WEBVTT - Do black holes destroy information?

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, I've got a black hole question for you.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you still hoping to catch and raise a black

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hole as a pet in your backyard? I can't confirm

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>or deny that, But my question is what happens to

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the stuff I put into the black hole? Is this

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>a question you already asked the folks at pet Smart. Yeah.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, like, say, if I drop a banana into

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a black hole, what what happens to it? Is it

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>gone forever? My advice is don't do it? Which part

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>raise a black hole or throw a banana into it?

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I may have done both already. What's the difference?

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you feed a black hole, it will grow,

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and a growing black hole will eat more, and eventually

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it will eat your house and then mine. Okay, so

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good idea to use a black hole

0:00:49.240 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>to make banana's booties. Officially, no, not a good idea. Hi,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm poor. Hey, I'm a cartoonist and the creator of

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I have never created a black hole to my knowledge.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you know, Daniel? Maybe you do it in

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>your sleep by accident. Hey, I can't be responsible for

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all incidental black holes I accidentally create, right, I mean,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be some legal principle there. Do you

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>ever take homes any work by accident, you know, like

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys suddenly bring home some particles or some black

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>holes that were created at the LHC. Yeah, sometimes I

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>go home with a few extra protons in my pocket.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody even notices that doesn't sound good. But welcome to

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio, in which we tell you all

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>about the mysteries of the university, incredible cosmic questions that

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>still make scientists puzzled, the things that we all wonder

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about this incredible, beautiful universe that we live in that

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we all desperately like to understand. Yeah. I take home

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>work all the time, Daniel, because I work from home

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>my cartoonist. So I think you take your home to

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>work then, don't you You know the tomato tomato, it's

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>all the same thing. But that's right. This is our

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast about the universe and all the amazing and mysterious

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>things that are out there for us to discover. That's right,

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>all those weird things floating in the cosmos doing strange, violent,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>incredible stuff and our attempts as lowly humans to understand them.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it really possible to unravel the mysteries of the

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>universe and lay them out inside a human mind. We

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>will find out today and tomorrow and the next hundred

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>episodes of our podcast. Yeah, because you know, it sometimes

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>feels like we're building this model of the universe kind

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of like we're building a whole universe kind of inside

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of our heads and our physics theories, almost like a hologramma.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It's incredible to imagine that the whole external universe,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>if it even exists, might be describable inside in mind, right,

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you could represent it somehow in terms of arrangements

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of neurons, right, and as I think the kind of

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>idea that makes people think, like maybe the entire universe

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually just a projection of some other kind of

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>physical arrangement. Right. Yeah, I've always wondered like maybe our

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>brains just aren't equipped to like understand the universe. Do

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you ever wonder about that? Oh, I'm almost certain that

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we are not capable of understanding the universe at its

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>deepest level. So are we doomed to always not know

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe. I think there's never going to be a

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>point where we're satisfied that we think we understand and

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, imagine the kind of super intelligence that would

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be necessary to like fully grasp with the universe. I

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think about your dog. Your dog is intelligent, but it

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't understand all the physics of the universe. And

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so compared to some super intelligent aliens out there, we

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>are as small as dogs, and there's no way that

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we could understand the universe at the level that they do.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And so you essentially have to be infinitely intelligent to

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>understand the whole university thing. And couldn't infinite intelligence exist

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in the universe that that would be so that would

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be a lot. It would create an intelligence black hole

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>inside its mind because you can't store that much information

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or that much smart in a small space. Man, we've

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>just covered dogs and black holes and like the first

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>three minutes and including brains. But yeah, so we talked

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>about all of the mysterious things, and one of the

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>favorite mysterious things that we like to talk about our

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>black holes because they're so mysterious and it seems like,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, that there were these black pockets in almost

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>their own universes, and it seems like anything you throw

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>into it can never ever come out. And they're especially

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>wonderful and fascinating because they came out of the human

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>mind initially. It's not something we saw in the universe.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It's an idea we had. We said, if the laws

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of physics are the way we think they are, then

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>these things should exist. So we like mapped something inside

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>our minds out into the universe and then went out

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and actually found them. I mean it's incredible, right that

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think that our understanding the universe could be so sophisticated

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and impressive that we can predict crazy new bonker stuff

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>out there which turns out to be real. I think

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's really impressive. Yeah, yeah, good jobs, physicists. Even though

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we are dogs compared to intelligently nothing against dogs. Of course,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>dogs very smart. That's why I chose them physics example,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and not cats. Right, I think cats are smarter. They're

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>not smarter than dogs. Man, you cannot train a cat.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>That's proof number one. That's cats are not smarter than dogs.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe like cats are mathematicians and dogs are physicists. Would

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you say that's a fair, fair comparison. Well, if you're

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>saying that dogs are smarter than cats, that I agree

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>with you. Masticians are just sneakier, that's right now. But

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>black holes are a fascinating mystery and one that began

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>inside the human brain, but one that we still don't

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really understand. I mean, we found them, we see them

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>out there, but it's a continuous source of mystery and

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>puzzlement for people everywhere and for scientists. Yeah, and it's

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>amazing that we've seen it, like we've found one, Like

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they took pictures of one sort of last year, and

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's real, it's there, you can see it,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like what we thought they looked like.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. The picture of the black hole shows you

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>all the incredible gas swirling around it that's trying desperately

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to avoid falling into the black hole and in the

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>process is bouncing around against all the other gas and

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>emitting lots of radiations. So we're not seeing the black

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>hole directly, you know, although we see a black spot there,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing mostly the swirling, chaotic, crazy gas that's surrounding. Yeah.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're right, because I mean, we see the

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>black center, but there's nothing to see there because nothing

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>can come out, or at least that's the idea of

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a black hole. And so the question then kind of

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>becomes what happens to the stuff that goes into it?

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it gone forever or cannedy recovered? Yeah? Is that

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff just like hanging out inside the black hole having

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a great time with all the other stuff? Does it

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>get squeezed into some new form of matter? Is it

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>all in a singularity in the middle. It's of the

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>deepest questions in physics what's going on inside a black

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hole and what happened to the stuff that fell in?

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So today on the podcast we'll be asking the question

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>those a black hole destroy information? I guess that's an

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting question because you know, it's kind of like asking

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>what happens to stuff that goes in, Like does it

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>get destroyed like obliterated? Does it become pure energy, unadultered,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>unfiltered energy that you can't make out what it is?

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Or does it you know, does a cork stay a

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>cork inside of the black hole? And does it still

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>fly around and doesn't even know it's in a black hole? Yeah?

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you wondering about what happened to that

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>banana you dropped into your black hole. I'm still wondering

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>about my banana, Daniel. I want it back. My dog

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>needs today. Do you like eating bananas when they're black,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>because that's probably what happened to your back. You mean

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it turned into a movie basically. Basically, But it's a

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating question, like when something goes into a black hole.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Is a black hole like a cosmic hard drive? Does

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it like just compress everything into some new arrangement but

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>effectively keeping track of all the particles that came in,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>or is it actually deleting stuff from the universe, turning

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>into some new configuration that doesn't have any information about

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened before it. That's a fascinating question. Yeah, and

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so we have a lot to impact here about black

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>holes and information. But at first we, as usually, we

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>were wondering how many people out there had heard of

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this question of whether black holes keep or destroy information?

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And so, as usual, Daniel went out there and ask

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>people on the internet what they thought of this question.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So thank you to everybody who have volunteered

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>to answer random questions. If you're willing to participate and

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like to hear your uninformed speculation on the podcast right

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to us two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube can answer these random questions. Think about it for

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a second, and what do you know about information and

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>black holes and what goes into them? Here's what people

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>had to say. I think the information diss inside a

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>black hole. My understanding of Hawking radiation is that when

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a particle interacts with the black hole, information is lost.

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Therefore the black hole behaves like a garbage disposal. Ah,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so I do know a little bit about this. So

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I read a book by Leonard Suskin which was talking

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>about the black hole wars. Stephen Hawkins believe that they

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>did disappear. Information did disappear, and the Suskin said it didn't.

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's started to do with holographic principle

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that basically all the data stays on the event arising. Yes,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>information disappears from black holes because they lose mass through

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Hawking radiation. They're more like garbage disposes than hard drives,

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>since you can't retrieve any information that's stored in them.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Um my guests would be that once an object is

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>sucked into a black hole. It is obliterated into its

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>most smallest particles that exist, and those things float around

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and mess around with other particles and probably no longer

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>resemble whatever it is that they used to make up planets, bananas,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bunnies or whatever it is. I think they like store

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>information and then eventually, in like trillions and trillions and

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>trillions of years, there's like hawking radiation that radiates, you know,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and out in black holes go away. As far as

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand, physics falls apart inside a black hole. I've

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>read that information doesn't disappear as such, and that all

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the information inside the black hole would be somehow readable

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Whatever goes in there just gets squished

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>into a really tiny small space. So I'd probably say

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they're more like a garbage disposal. What goes in doesn't

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>come out, I don't think so. I think it depends

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at the center of a black hole is which we

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know. If it's an infinite density single point, then

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's probably more like a garbage disposal. But if it's not,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>then I would assume information can enter it and just

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gets trapped. I'm gonna equivocate on this, and so I

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>shall leave it to my learned colleagues Daniel Watson and

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Hua Champ perhaps to answer that all so, I don't

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think that information disappears into the black hole. I think

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>information is recorded on the edge of black hole. Information

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>cannot disappear, like energy cannot disappear. All right, not a

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>good outlook for what happens to stuff that goes into

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the black hole. Nobody nobody thinks it's hanging out happily inside.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Nobody thinks that you're gonna eat that banana. I like that.

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>There's basically every answer here. Information disappears, information doesn't disappear,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>information is radiated out, and they're basically garbage compactors. That's

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful variety of answers here. Thank you to everybody

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>who participated, a wonderful variety of analogies here, Like is

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a garbage compactor? Is it a garbage disposal? Is it

0:11:54.920 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a recycling being? I don't think the universe recycles. I

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's like plastic in this black hole. Please,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, if black holes are just the

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>universe's compost, interesting they could be right. They break stuff

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>down and maybe they store it for later for a

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>universe garden, a star garden or story for never that's

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe the problem. Well, until the universe collapses and then

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>everything gets too cycled. Right, that's a very optimistic view

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to happen to your banana. Well, this

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting topic, and so let's jump right into it.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This might take a while because some of the things

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that we need to talk about include information and quantum mechanics.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>And so before we sort of get into the idea

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of what happens to information that goes into a black hole,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about kind of information in general and how

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that works in a quantum reality. That's right, because one

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>of the mysteries of black holes is what happens to

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the information that goes into them. And so first we

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have to understand, like what is information and what does

0:12:55.800 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics say about that information? Right? So, information is

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the arrangement of things, like the physicist.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Information is not like ones and zeros or it's not like, yeah,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you know a file or a number. It's more like

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the arrangement of things, right, Yeah, And it can be

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>represented as ones or zeros or you know, things you

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>print on a piece of paper. But fundamentally, it's the

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>arrangement of the particles. It's really it's the quantum wave

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>function that tells you where the particles are or where

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they are likely to be, and how they are interacting.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Remember that everything, me and you and bananas and all

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that stuff are made out of particles, and we're all

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>made out of the same particles. So the thing that's

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>different between you and lava and hamsters and bananas is

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>not the stuff you're made out of. That's really the

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>same stuff that everything is made out of. It's how

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is put together. It's like if you had

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a book of recipes and they all had exactly the

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>same ingredients, just had different arrangements like where you put

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>the stuff. That's literally how things in the universe are built.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what we mean by information from a physics

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>point of view is just that is how the particles

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are put together to make this versus that, right, And

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it's also kind of the history of them a little bit, right,

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you can make a banana cake and I can

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>make a banana caig, but they're going to be different

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>bana caggs depending on you know, what the size of

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the pan I use, or whether I put in a

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of this, or a little bit more

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of that, or how I poured it. They're bothing that

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>tastes like banana aig, but they're gonna be different banana

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>caigs because they were arranged kind of with a different history.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's right. So our two banana cream pies both

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>have information about what happened to those bananas, how they

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>got there, how they originally were developed and grown and

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>blended up and and turned into the banana cream pies.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Because our two banana cream pies are not identical, they

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>contain information about how they got there. Their arrangements are

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>unique because only one way to create that particular banana

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>cream pie. And so you could run the clock backwards

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and figure out where everything came from in your pie. Yeah,

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that kind of what you're saying is

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's like, it's kind of like if you're playing

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>billiards or some thing, if you see all the balls

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of arranged in a particular way on the table,

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of backtrack how they all got to

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how billiard balls usually start. That's right, And that's what

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we mean when we say quantum mechanics does not destroy information.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It says that you can tell how you got to

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>where you are. So, just like you said in the

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>billiard balls example, if you see balls moving on the table,

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you can tell how you got there. You said, well,

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this must have happened in a certain way. You know,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Bob must have hit Alice's ball and it bounced off

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this wall, etcetera, etcetera. There's only one way to get

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to this exact particular arrangement. And so because information is

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not destroyed, it's all the information you need to figure

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>out how you got here is present in this configuration.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You could run the clock backwards, you can run a

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>physics simulation backwards and figure out exactly how you got

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear or run it forward. Right like that, I

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think you're saying that there's no ambiguity in the universe,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Like if you you come upon a crime scene, you

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>can tell exactly what happened, like a physicist could. If

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you sort of rewind the universe and play the laws

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of physics backwards, you can sort of reconstruct what happens

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>every time precisely. And it's really weird that this comes

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>up in quantum mechanics because you might think, yeah, quantum

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>mechanics is not something that's going to give you certainty

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that tells you you can know everything about the universe, right,

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>because quantum mechanics is something that feels like it has

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of built in uncertainty. And so what quantum

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mechanics tells you is you can always know the wave function.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that tells you where the particles are

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>likely to be, not that you could actually know where

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the particles are. In the same way, you can backtrack

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the wave function. You can say if the particles have

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain way function that says that they're more likely

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to be on the left side of the table. Now

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you can backtrack that and tell where they were likely

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in the past, not where they actually were.

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the wave function. It's all about this

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>evolving probabilities. The way so looking back into the past

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is also there's also probabilities or do you know for

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sure where the party like if like if I see

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>an electron and I measure, you know where it is

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and where it's going to the best degree that I

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can can, I tell you where it was before and

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>how fast it was going. No, you can only know

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities. You can't collapse the wave function into the

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>past because that would have changed where it is today.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you know the way function today right, then

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you can backtrack it into the past and you can

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>propagate it into the future. Any idea is that if

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at any configuration of matter, you should be

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>able to tell where it came from. That's the core

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>idea that you have to understand. I see. So when

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you talk about information, you don't mean like where things

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are and where they're going, but you also kind of

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>include these quantum probabilities as information, Like that's also information

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to physics, Yes, that's the actual quantum information, because they

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know where the particles are. We really just know

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>these probabilities. And so like when we talk about like

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum teleportation copying things, we're talking about copying not the

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where the particles actually are, but their probabilities, because that's

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>really what the quantum information is. It kind of feels

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a little unsatisfying on physicists because I feel I feel

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're telling me that information includes not knowing kind

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of in a way, you know what I mean, Like

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>information includes also non information. Yeah, what's the most information

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that you can have about the universe is information about

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities, and that information cannot be destroyed. Like we

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know where the electron is. It's not like there's

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a fact there that's not accessible to us. It just

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>isn't determined. But the way function is the thing that

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>tells you that it's more probable to find it on

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the left side or the right side. That is totally determined.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's the level of quantum information we can have.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the most information that the universe allows you to

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have almost right, Like you know you can know the

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>position and the velocity of a particle to a perfect

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>degree because of the uncertainty principle, because and that's just

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the rule of the universe. The universe is like, nope,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't know everything all of the time everywhere. That's right,

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's why quantum information cannot be destroyed, because the

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>probabilities cannot be destroyed. Like if an electron is somewhere

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in your box now, then it is somewhere in your

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>box in the future. You're like, out of all the

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>probabilities in the future, they still have to add up

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to one. And that's why if you run the clock backwards,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you should still get probabilities adding up to one in

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the past, and if you run it back even further,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you should still get probabilities added up to one because

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>information is not destroyed can't just disappear, because your particles

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't just disappear, you don't know where they are. But

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities can't disappear. The probabilities can slash around, but

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they can't just go away. And so that's why we're

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so fascinated about what happens inside a black hole, because

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we're wondering, like, does the information inside a black hole?

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Does it get deleted or is it still stored in there,

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a black hole that has a banana versus

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>an apple, have something different inside it that tells you

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that one has a banana, one has an apple, or

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the actually deleting stuff. Interesting? Interesting, Yeah, I get. The

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>question is if I throw a banana and one black hole,

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I throw the equivalent apple the copy of that

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>black hole, are the two black holes different at the

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>end or are they basically the same? That's kind of

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the question exactly, And quantum mechanics says they have to

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>be different because if they're not different, then you've destroyed

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the information about which one got the banana and which

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>one got the apple in a corner. Quantum mechanics, and

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a very deep, very bedrock principle. Information cannot

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>be destroyed. Like you go to a particle theorist and

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you say, what if I prove the quantum mechanics doesn't

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>preserve information, that you can delete information from the universe,

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>then basically they just throw all their books away and

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we have to start everything from scratch. It's that deeply

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>ingrained into physics. I guess it's like comparing apple black

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>holes to banana black holes. All Right, I'm starting to

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>feel a bit a little bit like a dog here, uh,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and not fully able to grasp all this stuff. But

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the nature of quantum mechanics. So let's

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>get into whether or not black holes can destroy this

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>quantum information, and if they can, then how do we

0:20:54.240 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>explain it? But first let's take a quick break. All right,

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about weather. Black holes can destroy quantum information.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And so Danny, you were telling me that quantum information

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>includes like the probability of all the particles in the universe,

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or at least a bunch of particles that you're looking at,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're telling me that quantum mechanics says that you

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>can't destroy this information, Like you can't just forget about it,

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Like it's always kind of encoded in how the particles

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are arranged or what they're doing. That's right. It's sort

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of like the central premise of that TV show Devs,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>where they try to reconstruct details about what happened two

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand years ago by getting really fine data about the

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>molecules in the air and the earth and just backtracking

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it two thousands of years. The ideas that the evidence

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>for the past is still with us here in the president,

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that if you had incredible computing power and enough data,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you could reconstruct any event. It's like the perfect crime novel. Wow,

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, Like can you look at a banana

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and tell what the plant the griod looked like? Kind of,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right, the ideas that no two bananas are identical,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but somewhere in that banana there's a clue about where

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it came from and what it was like and whether

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it got sun on a certain day, and all that

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>information is somehow encoded in the banana. They're making me

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>feel guilty about eating a banana. You're like you're destroying

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a perfect, unique gem in the univers just becomes part

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>of who you are. Right, if I took you apart,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I could figure out exactly how many bananas you had

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>last week and what happened to them, and the stars

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that burn the potassium that's in that banana, Like all

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that history is encoded in that banana and then in you. Well,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and also when I flushed down the toilet, technically you

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>would have to go down the toilet. That's a whole

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>different maybe podcast episode. That's a different kind of black hole.

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to dive into different um. So let's

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>get into now. Quantum mechanics says that you can destroy

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum information. And so what happens when you throw it

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into a black hole? Like does it get destroyed or

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>does it stay around inside of the black hole? That's

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the big question. Yeah, and so on the surface you imagine, well,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>black holes suck in information. Right, you put something into

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a black hole, it can never leave, So therefore it's

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>information is stuck inside the black hole. That doesn't mean

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>necessarily that it's destroyed. Right, Like you put a banana

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>inside a black hole, you could still be in there.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>The particles that made it up could be like squished

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and whatever, but they just got quantum mechanics aified into

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a new arrangement. And just like when you ate the

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>banana or when it grew, it's information could still be preserved,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>but be stuck inside the black hole, you know, like

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a like a neutron star kind of breaks everything down

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to the cork level, but all the courts are still

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kind they're bunched together precisely, and if the information is

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>still in there, it's stuck inside the black hole. Right,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing can ever leave the black hole. But also you

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>can't get any information from the outside about what's in

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the black hole. The only things you can know about

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a black hole are its mass, whether it's spinning, and

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>whether as electric charge. There's this crazy theorem in physics

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>called the no hair theorem that says that's all you

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>can know about a black hole. You mean, like the

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>overall charge of it, Like the black hole can have

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a charge to it. Yeah, if you have a black

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>hole with no charge, it's neutral, and you throw an

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>electron into it, then it has a charge and you

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>can measure that charge. You can know whether there are

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>charged particles inside a black hole. Oh, I guess you

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can measure how much it pulls proton through or something

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>like that, just like you can measure it's mass. You

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>throw a banana into a black hole, it got heavier.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You should be able to measure its mass by measuring

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the gravitational field around a black hole. Can also measure

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's spinning. But that's the extent of the information

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you can have, right. You can't tell what's inside. You

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>can't tell the detailed history of the banana from the outside,

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>so you can never get that information back out, right.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's step number one. Is the information, if it

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>still exists, is inside the black hole and can never leave, right.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the same as destroying it. It's just

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of storing it. It's like inside if somewhere I

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>can never that's right. And if black holes live forever,

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this wouldn't really be an issue. Would be a question of, like, well,

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>what happens inside the black hole? It's fascinating, but we

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that probably information is just in there, sort of

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>cut off from us forever, but still existing. Right, it's

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>still having its own little happy life inside of the

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>black hole. That's right. The banana party, that's where bananas

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>go so that you don't eat them. Right, it's the

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>only safe space in the universe. They don't have to

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about training black because everything is black inside of

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a black hole. That's right. But then Stephen Hawking came

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>along and he showed us that black holes actually they

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>can disappear, right, Yes, you can make it black hole disappear.

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It can evaporate. Yeah, black holes they evaporate. They give

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off very small amounts of radiation, little particles here there.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>For very big black holes, this happens extremely slowly. But

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>as black holes get smaller, they evaporate more quickly, and

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>then they can actually disappear. They can poof out of

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>existence as they give away their last little bit of energy.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Even like giant black holes will eventually disappear, like once

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>all black holes suck everything in the universe, Eventually they

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>will evaporate. Right, that's right. A black hole, if you

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>do not feed, it will give off Hawking radiation and

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>get smaller. Right. It gives off its energy, and that

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>energy comes from its mass, and so therefore it gets smaller,

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and the smaller it gets, the more radiates. So giant,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>massive black holes they might have lifetimes of trillions of years.

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But yes, eventually they will radiate away all of their

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>mass in terms of this hawking radiation and disappear, right,

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>And so then the question is what happened to the

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>information you put into it? That's right, what happened to

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the information inside the black hole? Like you put this

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>banana inside the black hole. You trust the black hole

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to keep your banana information safe. But then

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you come back a billion years later and the black

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>holes gone. You're like, what what happened to my You

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>deleted my banana from the universe. You know you can't

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. Quantum mechanics says that's impossible. So the question

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>is what happened to the information? And you might be

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>tempted to think, oh, well, maybe it's somehow stored in

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that hawking radiation, right, because the hawking radiation came out

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of the black hole. But hawking radiation is very special.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>It comes from the temperature of the black hole. It

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from treating a black hole, like everything else in

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe, is a thing that has a non zero

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>temperature which glows. And what's very important to understand is

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that the hawking radiation depends only on the mass of

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the black hole. Like how much hawking radiation you get

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and which particles you get are determined by the mass

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of the black hole and literally zero else, So none

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the information that's inside the black hole can possibly

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.239
<v Speaker 1>leak out in hawking radiation. Well, I guess it's kind

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of like if you have a glass of water, if

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you leave it out, it's gonna evaporate, but you can

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of trace what happened to the water. You can

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>trace the like the vapor of what molly kills as

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>it least the glass of water. Like that's okay, Like

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that's preserving the information. That's right. But a black hole

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't evaporate by having the stuff inside of it leak out.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It evaporates by almost like having the stuff at the

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>surface destroyed itself. Kind of that's right. And remember the

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>no hair theorem tells us that you can't get any

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>information out of a black hole. That none of the

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>configuration of particles inside a black hole, or the swirling

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or non swirling, or the singularity or non singularity can

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>affect what's produced on the outside of the black hole.

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So the Hawking relation cannot have any information about what's

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>going on inside the black hole. It's not like that

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>water vapor example. It's a good contrast because it doesn't

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you anything about what happened inside the black holes.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>This amazing sort of mysterious way to delete a black

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>hole without knowing anything about what's inside of it, right,

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>because the reason is not because of the theorem. The

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>theorem is sort of because of what's happening in the

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>physics of it, right, And it's yeah, the theorem describes

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the physics of it right, right, And and what's happening

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is that, like at the surface of a black hole,

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you get this pair of particle and antiparticles kind of appearing,

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and one of them goes into the black hole, the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>other one goes out of the black hole, and that's

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of how it evaporates. Happening at the surface of it.

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not happening because of anything that's inside of the

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>black hole exactly, and it comes just from the mass

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the black hole. As you say, virtual particles like positron

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>anti positron pairs are created near the black hole's edge

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>where there's a lot of gravitational energy, and then one

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of them is given a boost from that gravitational energy

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>while the other one maybe gets sucked in, and because

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's given a boost from that gravitational energy, that energy

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>comes from the mass of the black holes. The black

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hole itself is decreased a tiny little bit in mass,

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and so it's stealing some of the energy from the

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>black hole without apparently taking any information from it. And

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's the weird thing is that, like you put

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>information in a black hole, you can never get it out,

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but then the black hole can disappear. So where did

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the information go? Really, there's no information in that suckings radiation.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, wouldn't it like where it happens where

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's these particles and antiparticles form and where the one

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of them goes right and the other one goes left.

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that sort of depend on exactly what's going on

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>inside of the black hole. Well, the where the particles

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are created is just quantum randomness around the black hole,

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so that happens totally randomly, not depending on what's inside

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the black hole. And then they're boosted from the gravitational field,

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the mass of the black hole. So you

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>can know the mass of the black hole, and that's

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.959
<v Speaker 1>what determines how these particles get boosted and whether they

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>go in the right direction, etcetera. But that doesn't contain

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>all the information. Like if you threw an apple or

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>an equivalently masked banana into a black hole, that would

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>give you black holes of the same mass, so they

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>would affect talking radiation in exactly the same way. So

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that one used to be an apple and

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one used to be a banana is now irrelevant, which

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>means quantum information has been deleted all right, which is

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of bad news for quantum physics, because you're telling

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>me that this idea that you can't destroy information is

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fund mental to quantum mechanics. Maybe I really quickly, can

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you tell me why it's so fundamental. I mean, remember

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about earlier. The reason you can't destroy

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>information in quantum mechanics is because particles should always exist somewhere.

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have a particle now, as you

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>exist somewhere in the future, it's quantum information cannot be destroyed,

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like you don't know exactly where it is, but you

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>know what it's probability distribution looks like, and it should

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>have a probability distribution in the future also, and so

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that can change as the universe moves forward, but the

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>information about should not be deleted anywhere. Right, Well, I

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is, you know why not? Like why why?

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Why would we quantum mechanics breakdown if I just suddenly

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>took some particles and deleted their quantum information? Like why

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>would the universe complain or with the universe care if

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I had destroyed that information? All? Right? Well, mathematically we

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the equations that describe a wave functions. We

0:31:57.760 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>have a wave function that tells us where particles are

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to be you, and that moves forward in time.

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>There's an equation that describes how that happens. It's called

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the shrouding your equation, and the shrouding your equation says

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you can move information from here to there, but it's unitary,

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ever destroy information. And if information is destroyed, that

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>means that wave functions can disappear. And that just doesn't

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>happen in the shorten your equation, and so we would

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have to totally rethink the way quantum mechanics works if

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that was to happen. It's like a bedrock assumption that

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we've built into quantum mechanics. I see, it's like I

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>guess in quantum mechanics and wave functions, you know, these

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>functions don't don't just exist in the present and in

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the past. They're all sort of tied together mathematically to

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:42.959
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to be in the future. That's right,

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So like if you destroy it in the future, then

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you're really destroying it through all history. You don't have

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a term for that in the equation. Yeah, And the

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>equations work the same way forwards and backwards in time,

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and so if the wave function is ever destroyed, that

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>means that you couldn't go from a non existent wave

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>function backwards in time into the wave function you have now.

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So this sort of this time and variance built into

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics. You can run the clock forward, you can

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>run the clock backwards. You should be able to move

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>backwards and forwards at all points. But if the information

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is ever deleted, that means you can't move backwards and

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>forwards at all points. And the shrunning equation, the basic

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>assumptions on which it's built are totally wrong, and quantum

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mechanics doesn't work, and we'd have to come up with

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a new theory. It's not like the universe would puff

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>out of existence. Right, This is all human ideas about

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>how the universe might work. This is a basic assumption

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we've built into quantum mechanics that we're pretty sure is right.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.959
<v Speaker 1>But black holes are telling us that they're doing something

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that we thought was impossible. Man, there's such troublemakers, all right,

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So we have a big unknown here. How can both

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>things be true? How could information never be destroyed according

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to quantum mechanics and how can information be destroyed according

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to black holes and hawking radiation? So let's get into

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what could possibly explain this can prediction. But first let's

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, all right, Daniel, can information be

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>destroyed inside of a black hole? So quantum mechanics says no,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but kind of a black hole say yes. So what's

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going on? Is quantum mechanics wrong or do black holes

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>just kind of destroy our conception of how the universe works.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>This is a big puzzle in physics for a long time,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's such a big puzzle that like big folks

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>on both sides, like great brains on both sides of

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the argument, had like public debates about it and even

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>made bets about the resolution of this. Right. Yeah, there's

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a famous bed by between Hawking and Kip Thorne and

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>John Preskill. Right, that's right. John Prescille believed that somehow

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the information was sneaking out of the black hole back

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>into the universe, that it was leaking out essentially where

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking and Kip Thorn they thought, know, the information

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>can't ever leave the black hole, and therefore it must

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>be lost from the universe, and quantum mechanics is wrong.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So they made a very public sort of bet about this.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, So they made this bed and did they

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was one of im proven right? Well, they did come

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to what they think is a resolution to this, and

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so Hawking and Thorn actually capitulated on the bet in

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>public and said, all right, Prescott, we think you're right.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>We think that the information somehow leaks out of the

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>black hole. So wait, physicists think that black holes don't

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>destroy information. That's right. So the idea now is probably

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>black holes don't destroy information. I mean, the general categories

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of solutions are one, maybe quantum mechanics is just wrong

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and we have to toss it all out and rethink

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>everything about our idea of the universe at the smallest scales,

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>like that's an option and hey, that wouldn't be so bad.

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not like everything unravels and we all go living

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in caves or something. Just a bunch of physicist careers unraveled. No,

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>those are the best moments for physicist careers because like, wow,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that cracks open something deep that we thought was true.

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are the revolutions in physics we live for. That's

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 1>why we're here to figure out what in the firm

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and turns out to be wrong, because those are the

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>times when you can get a new glimpse onto a

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>new insight into the universe. I mean, wow, that would

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>be amazing. Right, So that's one possibility maybe quantum mechanics

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>is wrong um, And what are other possibilities black holes

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>are wrong? Another one is that like black holes, you

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>can think of them as storing this information, but that

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>they're also like connected to another universe. We've talked about

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>how maybe black holes are like doors to wormholes that

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>are connected on the other side to other places in

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe. They could also be connected to like separate

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>distinct universes that we don't otherwise have access to. It's

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a possibility. I mean, we're it's like a what if

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on top of a wood if. But the idea is

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that therefore the information could be in that universe, like

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe the banana got sucked into the black hole and

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>then slur belong to the wormhole and it's living off

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>it's banana like days in that other universe. Now, even

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>when our black hole disappears, I see like somehow there's

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a white hole on the other side that's spewing out bananas.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, a banana hole. I think it's what the

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>people in that universe we call it like that. I

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>think they call it the magic banana fountain. They're like

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>whole cult surrounding it about how generous this banana fountain is.

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You're like a god in that universe. You're like the

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 1>giver of bananas in that universe. I'm a legend. I'm

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a legend in another universe. They're like, but please stop

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing bananas in there with a bite taken out already,

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean please. So that's one idea, Yes, that it's

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>information is not disappearing, it's just going somewhere else. Yeah,

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's hard to really understand because then you can't

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>still really do quantum mechanics, like the information is effectively

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lost to us, and so then we can't do quantum

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of our universe, so it's not really Essentially, if

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's lost to us, it's a bummer. It's a bummer

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>because you know, is our wave function entangled with their

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wave function if they're in another universe? Then no, And

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so really quantum mechanics says, you can't lose any information

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>from your wave functions. So if you lose it to

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a totally incoherent wave function, it's effectively lost anyway. So

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics says no to that. Very clever, I think,

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>awesome idea, which would be a great basis for science fiction.

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Interesting like we're entangled with other universe. Yeah, but we

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't actually be entangled, right, That's the problem is that

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>our wave function isn't connected to theirs because it goes

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>through the wormhole. All right, So then what's the third

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>The third possibility is that maybe somehow that information is

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>actually imprinted on the Hawking radiation. So go back, that's

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>what I was saying, wasn't it that you were saying?

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He shot me down? But now it seems like Stephen

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Hawking agrees with me. That's right. This is known as

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the Hawking thorn cham theory of the universe should be. No,

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you're right, and you know, our understanding before this was

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's impossible for the information to be in the

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Hawking radiation for the very reasonable arguments that I gave

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you five minutes ago, which I will now undermine. It

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>made me feel bad, Daniel, No, nor yeah, alright, So

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>here's why your idea was a good one. And you know,

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>whenever you have an apparent contradiction, you have a string

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of logical arguments that leads you to something nonsensical, you

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have to go back and read examined, like well what

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>about this one? Is this one? Are we really sure

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about this? And try to find a hole in it.

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea is that maybe somehow the information

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about the banana you threw in is imprinted on the

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>hawking radiation. Well, how could that happen because once it

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>goes inside the black hole, the only information we can

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>get about it is how much mass it has, which

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>is essentially destroying the banana nous of the information. So

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the idea is maybe it never really goes inside the

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>black hole, like maybe a banana when you throw it

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>into a black hole, spends eternity sort of on the

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>surface of the black hole. One. And this is actually

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what what happens when you throw something into a black hole.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You never actually see it go in because remember, when

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>near a black hole, there's incredible gravity, and that slows

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>down time. Like you threw a clock into a black

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>hole and you watched it with a telescope, please from

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>very far away, you would see that clock ticks slow

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>down because the presence of mass slows downtime. Right. Yeah,

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So to the banana, you're seeing, the banana gets frozen

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>at the surface kind of. Yeah. As it gets closer

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>and closer to this event horizon, time slows down more

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and more, to the point where it slows down essentially infinitely.

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And you can watch this banana for the whole time,

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the lifetime of the universe. You will never see it

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>cross the event horizon. Oh uh. It's not like it

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>goes in and then the particles the photons can come out.

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 1>It's like it never goes in. Kind of from our

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>point of view, From our perspective, you never see anything

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>actually go into a black hole. Now it gets closer

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and closer, and it gets redder and redder because the

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>light from that banana, which can still get to you.

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Because the banana is not actually in the black hole,

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it gets stretched also by the gravity and gets redder

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and redd or longer and longer wavelengths. So what happens

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.959
<v Speaker 1>if you have trillions of years to hang out and watch,

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is that banana falls in more and more slowly, gets

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>darker and darker, and eventually goes out past the visible spectrum.

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't see it, and then you have to use

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>your infrared telescope to watch your very gently glowing banana. Right.

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I thought I thought time was became

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>a singularity, only only at the center of the black hole.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that time actually stops at the edge of it. Yeah,

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>at the edge of the black hole, time slows down

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially infinitely, like and that's for you. You're from the

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>outside point of view. You're watching the banana go in.

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not the same thing as the banana experiences. Banana

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>can fall into a black hole, and it can totally

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>experience going past the event horizon, right, because time always

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>goes at one second per second for the person experiencing it.

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We have a different story about what happens in banana

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>watching from the outside. So for us, the banana never

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>actually goes into the black hole for us. Interesting for us. Wait,

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so it gets frozen at the surface forever. Yes, but

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it gets stretched out right, It's not like just happy,

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't go back and pick up your banana. It

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>gets stretched out and reddened and smeared over the surface

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the black hole. And essentially it distorts the event horizon.

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It like changes the shape of the event horizon in

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>some way. And the ideas that maybe the banana changes

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the event horizon differently than an apple wood,

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>or differently than another banana in a way that we

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>can see, or in a way that we will never see,

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way that in principle preserves the quantum information

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of that banana and can influence the hawking radiation produced

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>at that point instead of the event rise and being

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a perfectly smooth sphere and now has little quantum wiggles

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in it, and those quantum wiggles tell you about what's

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>been thrown into the black hole, meaning that you could

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>measure the hawking radiation and reconstruct whether you threw a

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 1>banana or an apple in exactly that the black hole.

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You threw banana in would give you different hawking radiation

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>than the banana you threw an apple into, and that

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it's encoded somehow and now in the surface of this

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>black hole, which contains all the information but everything that's

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>been thrown into the black hole. So you're not breaking

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>general relativity because you're not getting information but what's inside

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the black hole, because in principle, all of this is

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>now encoded on the surface of the black hole. Right,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But the courts in the banana dude disappear or you

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>don't see them. You don't see them going into the

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>black hole. Like they're going to survive crazy experiences being

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>near a black hole and get torn apart and smash

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and other stuff. So who knows what's going to happen,

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But their quantum information should still be there. Everything that

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>happened to them is describable by quantum mechanics, and just

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like being eaten or being turned into banana smoothie, their

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>history is still carried with me. And that's okay with

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics, Like as long as the quantum history information

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and information is somehow carried on, even if it's like

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>passed between the banana cork it passes on that information

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>to the hawking radiation. That's still okay, that's right. Did

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you just create a new kind of cork, the banana cork.

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got up cork, charm cork, banana cork. I thought

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>they already existed. No, but you're exactly right. Somehow, the

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>information about that cork that was inside your banana is

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>encoded on the surface of the black hole and influences

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the hawking radiation that's produced. And therefore, if you like

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gathered all the hawking radiation that came out of a

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>black hole, you could tell exactly what had gone into

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the black hole in the whole lifetime of the black hole.

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is weird because this is what they call

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>like the holographic principle, meaning like you know, you can describe,

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 1>like if the whole universe falls into a black hole,

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you could at some point technically everything would be described

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on the surface of the black hole, right, which is

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>like a two D surface. It's like a flat surface. Yeah,

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of mysterious to say you can describe everything

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that's happening in a three D space, like the inside

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of a black hole, just by knowing information on a

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>two D space the surface of the black hole. So like,

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>how can everything inside a three D space be described

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>by the surface of that space. Well, that's what we

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 1>call a hologram. A hologram is a two D image

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that's projected into a three D space, so it looks

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>three D. The entire hologram is determined actually by what's

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>happening on the surface. So the ideas maybe black holes,

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the interiors of them are just holograms of their surfaces

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can build a sort of a theory of

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 1>physics that works in three D. That's actually the theory

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of physics in two D on a surface, like you

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't need three dimensions. Maybe you can describe everything on

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on a surface exactly. And so the idea is like, well,

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's also true like for our universe, Like maybe

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>our three D universe is just a projection, is a

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.239
<v Speaker 1>two D hologram of what's happening at the edge of

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>our universe. We think we live in this three D

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>world and we're all moving around three dimensions. But if

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you can print all the information of a three D

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 1>world onto a two D surface, then it's possible that

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually live on the two D surface at the

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>edge of the universe somewhere and that what we experience

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is that three D world is really just a two

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>D surface. But okay, so I guess it's like if

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this can happen on a black hole, then maybe it's

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>happening everywhere. And maybe if we don't really need three dimensions,

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe like we have a redundant dimensions, right, And then

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there was this incredible result in string theory which backed

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this up. This guy at the Institute for Advanced Science,

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Jue Malda Sena, he came up with this theory that

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>showed that string theory in you know, three dimensions that

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we experience, it can actually be described by a quantum

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 1>theory in two dimensions. So he showed how you could

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>reconstruct a theory of our universe in three dimensions only

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on a two dimensional surface. So it sort of showed

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>mathematically that this might be possible. So what does that mean?

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that we're really living an illusion, like the

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>three dimensions that we think we're living in are actually

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just an illusion. Kind of It could be, right, Yeah,

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it certainly could be. It could be that we actually

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>live in a two D space Like I mean, it

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any difference like feeling like you live in

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>three D and actually living in three D, Like what's

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>the difference? Uh? Nothing, But mathematically it might be that

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>our three D universe can be described as just a

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 1>two D surface, which is sort of fascinating because you

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's too much information here, right that that

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 1>everything that's happening to us is somehow too much to

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>squeeze down to two dimensions. But mathematically it can be equivalent.

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It could be that it's just that we don't have

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the full freedom of the three dimensions, that we're just

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a projection of two D spit. But I guess maybe

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you explain it maybe is that you also

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:07.479
<v Speaker 1>have time and maybe like somehow time is also giving

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you that extra feeling of a three or third dimension. Right, Well,

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>here we're just talking about spatial dimensions, and so that

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>two D space would also have time in it, so

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's allowed to evolve that things can move on the

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>two D surface, and that changes what happens inside the

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>three D space, But we don't know right that. Yeah,

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what I mean. It's like, because you

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 1>have time, then you can maybe store more things into

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that to the information than then you might think. But

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a big leap, Like we say, maybe

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 1>information is stored on the surface of black holes, which

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>means that maybe you can determine their interior to maybe

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe is a holomeram. Like, there's a lot

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of big leaps there, But again they're also fascinating there, Like,

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe trying to solve this mystery about what's

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 1>happening inside of a black hole tells us about what's

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>possible for ideas we could have about the universe, and

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and reveals to us sort of shocking new mathematical connections

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that show us that the richness of our universe might

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 1>actually be representable in terms of a smaller set of dimensions. Right, Yeah,

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 1>like maybe we're all living in a video game. Kind

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:09.719
<v Speaker 1>of it just seems like we're in a three D world,

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but really we're we're just in this kind of reconstruction

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of a three D world, that's right. And if we

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>are living in a video game, I want to know

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>what are the cheat codes? How do I reset? How

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>do I get extra lives? Exactly? All right? Well, um,

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like maybe black holes are not destroying information.

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that that seems to be kind of the current

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>physics thinking is that maybe it is sort of recorded

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on the surfaces of black holes. Yeah, and you know,

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is pretty hand wavy. It's not like people

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have really worked out the mathematical details of it. It's

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an idea for idea we might have.

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like a crack a way to explore it that

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>might be able to reveal what's happening with black holes

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and information. It's not like a very totally solid worked

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out idea. I see, these are just kind of like

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 1>directions in which that might have playing these things exactly exactly,

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and we we we might be getting closer to knowing

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the answer, right, I mean, we just took a picture

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>of a black hole. Maybe in the future we might

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>get closer to it and figure these things out. Or

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is this closed off to us forever. That's a great question.

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we could send somebody into a black

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>hole and maybe they could learn something about it. The

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>problem is we'd never know the answer because they couldn't

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>tell us. We might as well send dogs in, right, Well,

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get a letter from the cat. Our

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.399
<v Speaker 1>cats depending it. You know, Well, if you're a dog lover,

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you can, we can send cats to we should just

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>send robots. And let's just send robots. No, there's no

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>society protecting the life of robots, right, that's right, the

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:43.839
<v Speaker 1>dog robots, dog robots. There, that's a perfect compromise, all right.

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, it just tells you that there's a lot

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about the universe, and that even like

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:50.840
<v Speaker 1>our experience of it, this three dimensional experience of it,

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 1>might be not real or not what we think it is. Yeah,

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and that deep insights into the very nature of the

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>universe can come from these little odds and ends, these

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>things that all we thought we understood, and then there's

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a little detail that doesn't quite make sense, and when

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you tug on that thread, it could unravel literally everything

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we think we understand about the universe. This is how

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of great discoveries were made relativity, quantum mechanics, and

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully future crazy bonkers discoveries that people will have a

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hard time accepting is the true nature of the anivers

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Until then, I guess I'll stay to a blender to

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>make my fans. I think that's a good idea. All right, Well,

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that Thanks for joining us. Let's

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:41.840
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I heart Radio. For more podcast for my heart Radio,

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:51:52.040 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. M