WEBVTT - Surveillance: Fed Downshift with Emanuel

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane, along

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa A. Brawmowitz jay Lee, we

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bring you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment,

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Jinn and Emmanuel with a surround a table from a

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>court Julian. Wonderful to have you with us. Proper introductions, sir,

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>which you deserve. What a runny we've just seen in

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>October spose over to November. This morning. We asked the

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>guest a little bit earlier, Eric Freedom, what he thought

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>of it, and he said he'd faith this. Do you

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with that? Now? Uh? From our point of view, Uh, Look,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the next week or two could be very choppy. Obviously,

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we've got the FED tomorrow, you've got the elections next Tuesday,

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's likely going to be back in fourth as

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the last couple of days. But from

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>our point of view, look, we know the FED is

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about the downshift. I don't want to call it plause

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get whatever. But we know the

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>trajectory is going to change and the market is getting

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with that. At the same time, just like the

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>July earning season, we know the numbers are coming down, okay,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't matter stocks in in July, and it

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter now because frankly, people have been for the

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>most part underinvested. And the last thing, the stock bond correlation.

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't get away from that. The UK set the

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>line in the sand when we resolve the political issues

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that at least stopped the parabolic move up and yields

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and that supportive for stock. We've got you for the

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>whole half hour, which is a real pleasure. I want

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to go into some of the machinery of what you're

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>doing day to day that everybody on wall streets treat.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that later. Right now, you have a single

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>statistic the morning it keeps coming up. Revenues keep taking

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>up on your earnings edge nine point five. What's the

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>glide path of revenues you see with your optimism and

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to say June of next year, well again, look, we

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>know the story is the story that none of us

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>as adults have a faced faced in our investing lifetime,

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and the revenues are being driven by the ability to

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>pass on prices in an inflationary Absolutely, absolutely, Look, the

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>glide path is going to moderate. The question is can

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>margins be maintained. They've slipped, there's likely going to be

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>some more slippage, but can we maintain And that's really

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the question uh confronting corporate America to politicians want to

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>see those profit margins maintained as the federal reserve. In

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>other words, the more that profit margins are maintained, the

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>higher rates will go at a time when there is

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the lack of sensitivity right now between monetary policy and

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the market response. Look, this again is part of the narrative.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of ways the policy titans and

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly and again this is part of the dialogue

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the last twenty four hours in pointing

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>out the energy industry and in particular that we do

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>want to see margins come in. But again that this

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is why the challenge of the soft Ish landing is

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so intense, because there's a lot of things that have

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to go right. Triple overage, all cash fun I have

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>no tax losses. Okay, other people have a lot of

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>tax losses. How do you play the shell game of

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>tax lost candidates into January three. So we are very

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>strongly convicted in the idea that you don't want to

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>take money out of the market here. Okay, look, could

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we go lower at some point next year, absolutely, but

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that is contingent on We've moved from contingent on a

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>recession to contingent on a deep recession. Boom Radio. You

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see this, But to put a manual over here

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>with me, because Lisa just didn't want to sit next

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to that much optimism to constructive to constructive, at least

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll said that the consensus view that has shifted so much, Judy,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and we've gone from the fence not going to hike

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>too much too. It's not gonna hike fifty, it's not

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna hike seventy five, or maybe it won't hike seventy

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>five again, they're set to do a fourth seventy five

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>basis point hike. When it came to the recession, it

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was no recession. That's recession but short and shallow. We're

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a long way from where we started the year, Julian,

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've been wrong, wrong, wrong, the whole way through.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>What gives you any confidence about three. Look, we do

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>have to understand the fact that when you have a

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>year like two, both the left tail and the right tail,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know we talked about options planning at every

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>car I s I are very large and frankly, when

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, and this is one of our

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite graphs, the bond stock return quadrant. It's been the

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>lower left in an unprecedented nature over the last sixty years. Two.

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But actually the upside of that is the year after

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the only other time it was lower left, you had

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a massive return here for both bonds and stocks. And

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>again we respect the concept of seasonality. It's not the

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>be all and end all in the markets, but we

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>all know the data that supports good years after mid time.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Can we give him in a shout out? Just quickly?

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Did you say the latest institutional investor survey at him

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and top economist, a title he has earned forty two

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>times in the history of the equity racess. I'm sorry,

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>forty two fifty one. Well, this is what you're going.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know he's smart enough to hire Michael Chew

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and Julian Emmanuel. You work for Chew, right, That's how

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it works. We'll talk. But the basic idea here John

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>has been doing it since C. J. Lawrence, And here's

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>how he does it. Granularity. No one is as granular

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is Edward Hyman. He's got a black pencil. He's ruined

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>three of his light Grace shoot suits. He's got the

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>sharpie thing going. He ruins like a three shoots using

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the sharp uses a black sharpie, and he's got a

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>he's looking at railroad crossings in Kansas City. Value. Add

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this is real value. You just take a sharpie and

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you talk about rabbit cross secrets. Yeah, exactly. I had

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.119
<v Speaker 1>a deal once and I had a paragraph on page

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>forty two that said, up, I didn't get ed Hyman's literature,

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't work there. I was literally give the proper

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>shout out, and you just went on around about pencils

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and sharp Pia's Jude Emmanuel the Weekend. Head over to

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>our good friend Manace Crowning morning Manus John, thank you

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>very much. Yeah, Joimy nive is amatox seeing the Special

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Presidential Coordinator, and what's good to see you in the daby.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We were just buying some of the presidents on there

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>talking about uh, you know, continuing buybacks and dividends would

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>perhaps bring the wrath of the wide House upon them

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of taxes. But to speech last night, let's

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about last night. The President warned, I'm paraphrasing that

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a risk of a windfall tax if you don't

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>be invest Is this just political kite find ahead of

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>mid terms? Is there any built possibility of windfall taxes? Well, Master,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's great to be here with you

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in uh In Abugabi and I'm Bloomberg. It's it's always great,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.679
<v Speaker 1>look the president is. This has been a consistent message

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from the President, from the administration asking companies to take

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>their profits and invest them back in America, back in

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>production and refining. We have been experiencing elevated prices as

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a result of geopolitical dynamics, not because of markets, but

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>because we have a war, devastating war in Europe where

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the perpetrator of the war is one of the largest

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>oil producers in the world, one of the largest gas

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>exporters in the world, and it's using energy as a weapon.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This has seen a massive increase in prices. Well, of course,

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we're still have a huge economic growth from post COVID

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that is also creating demands growth. So we're telling companies

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>make a profit. Hey, your shareholders, but there's a level

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and a limit to how much profit you can tell

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you without investing. You weren't saying not to oil companies

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when oil was at twenty bucks in the United States

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of America. I think I think the point that at

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars is when naturally companies don't invest. A hundred dollars,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety dollars is naturally historically when companies do invest. The

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>problem now is that they're not doing what they always

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>used to do. I'm not here to represent big oil

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and US. I'm here maybe put the problemsation, which is

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>people have said to me, you look at this administration's

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>guidance to big oil. Day one keystone was bins. We

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have neither discussion about a new taxation format, and we

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have a host of sort of no drilling on on

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>federal land. We have various messages which are respectfully schizophrenic.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>How can you plan for five years, ten years, copex

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>aim us with schizophrenic policy changes like this? This is

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>how it's been described to me. What's your response to that.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's been schizophrenic. I think we've been

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>very clear to craft. Look, we're in a we have

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the short term, medium term, and laun terms.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We're in a a time when we have to increase

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>production because we need to make sure to ensure global

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. Yes, we have to have reasonably brice affordable

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>energy resources oil and gas to meet our goals of

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>where we want the world to go. We have to

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>accelerate our investments in renewable energy. Those are consistent with

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>each other, they're not competing with each other. So investing

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, we here's a certainty we're giving oil companies.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>We've said we are going now that we have released

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighty million barrels. Yeah, I've oil onto

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the market from the spr for our national security, and

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>just we need to buy it back. We need to

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>buy another two hundred million barrels back over the next

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>several years, we have said. The President himself has told companies,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I will get I will tell you what price. I

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>will buy it back at seventy dollars or so I

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>will start buying back at large amounts. So I will

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>provide you with certainty of price to some degree, so

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to enable to answer the questions you've asked, Well, there's

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one way to push a market against you, and that's

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell them about what price you want to replenished

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the spr But I know it's a lengthy document and

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I know it has detailed We can we move on,

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>which is about the price cap from the United States

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of America. I think the language is an effective and

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a strong level of forty to sixty dollars is what

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand. The numbers that's in the Blomberg stories. Do

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you really believe sixty bucks is going to keep Russian

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>oil flowing onto the market, because the conversation I've had

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with everybody here, everybody's worried about the sanctions coming to

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bear here in our at home in Europe. To sixty

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>bucks keep Russia oil flowing in your mind? So, outside

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of a Bloomberg article, which I would never want to

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>argue with Bloomberg, I don't think so. I we are

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going to set the price. When we do that, and

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll announce it. I think all these numbers out there

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that are just rumors and leaks that I can tell

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you are not substantiated by reality. Uh, and people should

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>just ignore those. I really would hope people would ignore

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>those numbers. We are We've always said that our goal

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>was to keep the Russian barrels on the market while

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we restrict the revenues to Russia at a point when

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they're using those revenues to finance the war. There's a

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>balance here and we have to figure that out. There's

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a difference in the balance between when we were at

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred twenty dollars of arrow versus when we were

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>at seventy six dollars of arrow. So we are going

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to have to figure out we're doing that now of

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what the right price is going to be in order

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that Russia's still incentiviz is so on

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the market while we make sure that they're not overprofiting

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>beyond that level. Will it be materially higher than sixty

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you what the price is because if

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I say anything now, you're gonna they're gonna have rumors

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>again on that. But we look, we get it, We

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>understand how the market works, and we want to make

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that our goals are achieved to terrify ideal in fact,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>not rumor. And with that in mind, I want to

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>understand the potency of the price cap when it comes.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Because I call up the Indian Oil Ministry yesterday, it's

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>very unlikely. The speculation is it's very unlikely Indian China

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to If the biggest customers either for Russian oil will

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sign up, we don't know, but given the price cap,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a fairy impotent proposition if two of the biggest

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>customers of Russia won't sign up. I disagree because, um

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the country. What we're telling people, you don't have to

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>sign up. It's not you know, a membership. Uh. You

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as long as you are purchasing Russian oil at a

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>lower price, that's what we want to achieve. You have

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a market price of brant. Everybody negotiates. You know that

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody buys strictly brant. There's all kinds of negotiations. Do

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you really believe that India and China are not going

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to be negotiating and are not already? We know that

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian oil is not selling a brant right now. No,

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's at a discount, So it's just amount. How much

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>of a discount? Okay, Well, let's see what you produced

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>at your hair in Adipec. How would you describe Starry

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>US relations at the moment are they broken, Are they fractured?

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>What is the word that describes it at the moment? Well,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I think people attach too much to the drama of

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>things and the soap opera of things. Satura Abrabian the

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>United States have had an eight year relationship. We've had

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some ups, we've had some downs. We usually come back

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>from the up. We have a broad range of interest

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>from security to economic. We had a significant disagreement that

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, I don't try away from that. We

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>had a disagreement about the OPEC decision. We think it

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake to announce a cut of two million barrels,

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But we all we continue to talk to them, and

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to have a relationship that serves

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>our interests. We're just gonna have to evaluate how that is,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>how that best works. In all ways, the last time

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you were in the region, you left here? Did you

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>leave here? Did you leave Saudi Arabia with a conviction

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and a solid belief that you were going to get

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>more oil on the market. From the side, he's were

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you miss guy? You did? Did you walk away with

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that belief? Clarify for us today. So one of the

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>things that I never do was talking about what we

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about. What I my conversations with government officially understand

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. So I will say that we were very

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The good thing about my conversation and folks, I'm always

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward and I appreciate that they can be with me.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>They knew that we believe that a cut right now

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in this environment, under these conditions was not good for

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the global eco. What I mean, it was not good

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for their consumers. It's not good for our economy consumers.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We thought it was a mistake. I also, I think

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that we from trip to Saudi Arabia was about oil

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>all along. No, it was never about oil. Think about

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've done. We look, we are the

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>United States, Our interests are are varied and deep. And

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>look at what we achieved on that trip that I

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>think was really important. They were over flights from Israel,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>security arrangements, security integration, security, economic integration of Iraq, visa

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>vi Iran, extending the ceasefire with Yemen. I mean, these

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are really important things. We announced all kinds of other

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>achievements at the in the wall on that trip that

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm nothing to do with oil. At the same time,

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>when we announced the trip. We also so after the trip,

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a increase in production in July, an increase in production

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in August, an increase in production in September. Uh the

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>com sauity in August had its highest production levels continuity

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of them shock and it provoked immediate press releases. In

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the news conference I was in in Vienna that night,

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the question the market wants to know is how serious

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is the white hot abide a retaliation? You know, is

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>retaliation the right word? What are you gonna do? Is it?

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna be on sales? Is it gonna be

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>no peck? Is it gonna be let's say more additional

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>spr releases? What is this retaliation that's been so much

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>made off in the media. So again I have to

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>deal with the relationship less with what it's made of

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in the media. And we are looking at what the

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>interests in the United States are, how we see for

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>our own interests and for our interests here in the region.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>We have very strong interests here in the Gulf, across

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the board with you A, with Saudi, with the rest

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of the region. And we are going to continue to

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>look at what other actions that we need to take

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that best serve the American interests and what we think

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are the best security interests for this region and the

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>economic interests around the world. That's what will guide every

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>decision that we make. And I thank you very much

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to taking the time. I know you've got a busy

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>schedule and it's been good to catch up and on

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll make sure i'll go down fact check my forty

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to sixty dollar oiler price in terms of where the

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cop comes and team Special Presidential Coordinator in OUTA two.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>My final guest, it's a wrapper from the hallowed halls

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>where oil dealers are dumb. Jonathan Jane Folly will No,

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I would actually like it. Let's be about the company.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just fun to say the name Billy, Billy say it.

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>It's fun. Alright, let's be please, let's move on. Royal

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Dutch show is maybe just as fun to say, Jane Folly.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Strategy Jane, I did a fancy log study on the

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg on Chinese you won USDC N Y and if

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you extrapolated out on this moon shot of weakness, you

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>get to eight you want in the summer of next year.

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you go through that exercise? Can you extrapolate out

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these beleaguered EM currencies and particularly China. Well

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know again that the news that you were just

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>referring to, will they pull out of COVID zero or not,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Well that's going to have a big, big leaning really

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>on the markets expectations for growth in China and therefore

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>on the the value of the the remember, because we

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all know that Chinese growth this year is it's really

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>disappointing now. And we all know that of course that

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>we can economy means that we can exchange rate. So

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>those two things that are really really aligned. But you know,

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for many of the e M currencies or the economies,

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it really depends whether or not we're talking

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>about commodities exporters, commodities importers and certainly the ones that

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have been really struck by the energy yet at crisis

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>really in some dire straits or that or the food

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>price crisis for many em and you know, there is

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some degree of a doom look for for for many

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of these now and that's going to be really tough

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to break. And of course I think we've talked about

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>before if you can look at the doom loop for

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for emerging markets as their fundamentals keep on driving them lower,

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and then of course refers to to do that feedback

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>loop with respect to the dollar, to people keep on

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>holding the dollar and instead let's go to the first principles.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Off a FED meeting tomorrow and folks will have our

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>college very coverage, very dollar centric. Jane Fawley, Can central

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>banks manage a dollar turnaround? Well, you know, I think

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>central banks would like a dollar turnaround. I mean, you know,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there has been keeping up with the jones Is to

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some extent, and that's not just an e M. And

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw the emerging market central banks at start hiking

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rates really before detenant in many cases. And of course,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you know you look at the Bank of England, you

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the u c B. You know they next

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>time they go, I mean the Bank of England obviously

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this week, but next time they go, they could be

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>hiking into an interest rate hike into a recession. That's

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not something they want and they don't really want to

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>be doing seventy five basis points even fifty basis points

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>into a recession. But of course, as long as the

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>FED does large increments, then because of the the impact

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.959
<v Speaker 1>or the potential impact on their currencies, you know that

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>really keeps alive the possibility that they may have to

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>go by large incumments to which crushes demand. This isn't

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just about a doom look for em it's happening here too.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>It crushes demand even more, which is clearly not what

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>you want when you've got energy prices crushing demand as well. So, um,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>if the FED were to ease up, I think it

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>would be a relief to huge amount of economies around

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. Okay, so if there is a step down,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that we've seen peak dollar? Well, you know,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily. And and this is the interesting thing. Because

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is a safe haven, the dollar also reacts

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to to slower world growth. And so you know, I

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>still come back to the question until you can really answer,

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what else are you going to buy if

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not the dollar and you can really say, yeah,

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really want to go and buy risky assets,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back into em or you know,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm confident in the Euro. Until you can answer those questions,

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the dollar retains a fair amount of strength.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, with respect to the Euro, yes, you know,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the energy prices have come lower in October and that's

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>great news, but you know it won't stop. It hasn't stopped.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, big chemical companies, aluminium smelters help manufacturers moving

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out of Europe because they know that it's not just

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>about the cost of energy this winter. It's next winter

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and the one after that. Where is that energy going

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to come from? And I don't think that's something that

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the euro is is really priced for yet. So how

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>much can we see the dollar continued to rally based

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>on that backdrop, which is really a poign to think

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>about industries moving out wholesale of Europe because they know

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not a one winter problem. Well, you know,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we could still have euro dollar

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>going lower, maybe not right in the in the near term,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>because the market is is getting excited about that the

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>story that we've got this this warm period and energy

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>prices aren't as expensive as they could have been. But

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I think if we move into the proper winter over

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, after Christmas into January February, if it gets

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>cold then and I think the reality of this weak

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>set of data that we've had from Germany in terms

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of industrial production and manufacturing production, the prems, etcetera, that

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the warning is about recession if they come into fruition.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the sort of environment where we could see,

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you were a dollar moving back, maybe towards

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>or so. In final word on sterling, if you'd asked

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>me just a few weeks ago whether this Bank of

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>England will be selling assets, I would have said I

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. But they are. And it's that currency

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>positive or negative. Well, I suppose you know that the

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>fact that they managed to pull their credibility back from

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>the abyss, you know, is a positive thing. We have

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to see how this this auction is soaked up. But

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for now I think the Bank of England yet credibility.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a good thing. But you know, I think the

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>jury is out. I've still got a negative forecast for sterling,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's really because you know, all of this, So

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>our fundamentals that existed before that Many budget on September

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty three fundamentally still there. In fact the worse, because

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>confidences as worse, and business confidence, consumer confidence, that sort

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing. We are headed into the recession if we're

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>not already in it. So yes, you know, in terms

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of credibility, both the new Prime Minister and the Bank

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of England. Yeah, that's that's certainly a little more solid

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>than it was just a few weeks ago. But this

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is a this is a tough set of environments in

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the UK that that both are facing, and I think

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Sterling is still headed for a pretty bumpy ride. The

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>pan against the US stellar right now, one fifteen thirty five,

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that dollar week through all the get ten. Jane, thank

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you as always, Jane Pony, there's rather thank you speaking

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>from sixty thou feet Carracadanna's on a glide path landing

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>with the Fed. Tomorrow we'll have our coverage. He joins

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>US now chief US economist at BNP Perry Carl. I

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>want to drill right down to the press conference. Everyone's

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to look out to December. How does Powell

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:54.239
<v Speaker 1>frame December tomorrow in the vicinity of two pm? Well,

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>good morning, Tom. I think that the challenge for tomorrow's

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>press conference, obviously November is all about December, but the

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>focus is going to be on the Fed's credibility around

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this messaging, and they've previously highlighted that they need to

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>see some realized improvement in the inflation numbers, not just

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wishful thinking about a turn on the inflation data, and

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>if we look at, for example, the Core cp I,

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the six month annualized rate of change relative to the

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve month is not telling us things are moderating. So

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, what could happen? I mean, the Fed is

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously eager for a downshift at some point, but I

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe Pal will take a step away from

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that and rather than committing to December, he'll say, well,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the time is approaching for a downshift. We'll let the

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>data do the talking. And we have before the December

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting two jobs reports, two more inflation reports, and also

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>two more rounds of inflation expectations numbers which I think

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are exceptionally important at this moment. Is the rate regime

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>now or what we're going to see in December or

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>January the same as it felt the last time we

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>were at this level of nominal rate? Well, I think

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that debt levels have gone up in the economy, and

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>so interest rate sensitivity has only increased. And that's true

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>relative to the last time we are at these levels,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's true over the last fifty years as well.

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely monetary policy is biting into economic activity. We

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>see that very clearly in the housing sector. We'll see

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it through some other channels. You alluded to the manufacturing

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I s M out at ten o'clock this morning, the

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>strong dollar taking a very significant toll on the factory sector.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>We've seen new export orders slide into contraction, and I

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think that means that finally today the I s M

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>headline will also slide into contraction as well. So we're

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely experiencing multiple channels through which policy is tightening and

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>rating and activity, and I think that means we're heading

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>into recession next year. Maybe not so early as the

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, but I think by the time Q two

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>rolls around, we will have seen pay rolls slip below

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>zero on a monthly basis, and consumers will have exhausted

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>their excess savings from the pandemic, and the FED will

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be at level of about five and a quarter on

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the terminal FED funds rate. This will ultimately fix the

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>inflation problem, but through the process, it will steer us

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>into recession. To fix the inflation problem, how long does

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it FED, in your estimation have to hold rates at

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that five and a quarter percent level. In my estimation,

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>my team's estimation, we think that the FED will be

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>holding at that terminal rate of five and a quarter

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>THROUGHOUTE and then rate cuts could start in four. But

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>don't look for the Fed to be the white Knight

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at historically has been riding to the rescue quickly and

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>aggressively with rate cuts. Rather, they will be much stingier

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>with the lowering of the FED funds rate, keeping it

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>in restrictive territory. We're looking for maybe uh fifty basis

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>points of cut per quarter after at the start of four.

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be a gradual moderation of that

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>restrictive stance of policy because it is going to take

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>time to choke the inflation pressures out of the economy.

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing inflation at the moment in very sticky categories

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>places like rents UH and services excluding rents, and historically

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's taken more forceful policy action to bend the trend

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in those types of categories. A lot of people listening

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to this might say five and a quarter percent rates

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for a full year at a time when we haven't

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>seen as much sensitivity this year because of some of

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the immunization of balance sheets that we've seen. Next year

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>starts to get a little bit different. What are the

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>contours of a recession with a full year or more

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of five and a quarter percent fed funds rates. Well, again, Lisa,

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I think the recession probably starts in Q two of

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>next year. We have to be careful not to succumb

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to recency bias, as psychologists call it, and draw parallels

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to the last few sessions which were exceptionally deep recessions,

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the COVID recession UH and the global financial crisis before that.

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the contours of this recession look more like

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a run of the mill recession, if you will. And

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so why if I had to draw a historical period

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>with the closest step parallels, maybe it's the nine recession.

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would look for again between three and five

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>quarters of recession, probably four quarters of economic contraction, and

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>look for the unemployment rate to back up from three

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half as it currently stands to something in

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the vicinity of six percent at the peak. But the

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>critical thing here, Carl, and you've been a great student

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of history, you know, for years, rolling back to your

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>time at Deuts, your bank, and and to me, the

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>critical thing here is life goes on. If we get

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a Rick and Dona view, life goes on doesn't it.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a whole gloom crew out there. We

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>roll over and die. I just don't buy it. Well,

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't roll over and die. Uh. There's a you know,

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>still a decent demographic tray and in the US, especially

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>compared to a lot of our developed economy, appears in

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in in Asia and Europe for that matter. So there's

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>population growth, maybe we see some improvement on the immigration front. Uh,

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And all of these demographic factors mean that life goes

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on as the population grows, then the economy gets dragged

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>along with it, so you get you get hiccups along

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, and those hiccups are recessions, but structurally there

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is still a growth paradigm in place. Meanwhile, Senator Warren

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and Bernie Sanders putting out a note basically talking about

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>how they want to talk better with FED Chair J.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Powell about the path of rate hikes and some of

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the pain that it's going to inflict on the economy.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>If the Fed lacks the political will for whatever reason

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to that five and a quarter percent level,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>how high could inflation be? I mean, what's necessarily going

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the length of time that inflation could remain

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>high and the ramifications for the economy, well, if they

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>lack the political will to really force full react against inflation,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's a case by any stretch.

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, UH, A slew of FED officials have

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>made it very clear that inflation is Job one priority

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>number one, and they will do whatever it takes to

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>accomplish those goals. So as long as J. Powell is

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at the HELM, I think they will have the political

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>will to make sure this plays out in an appropriate fashion.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But if they don't act forcefully, then not only do

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you have a higher inflation over a medium term horizon,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but possibly some dis anchoring of inflation expectations. And and

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that for me was really the last straw. John had mentioned.

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Crude oil prices at the start of the segment. Crude

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>oil prices in the eight to ninety dollar range mean

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that the relief we've seen in gasoline prices UH over

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the last one days or so may prove short lived

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and we could start to drift higher in the coming months.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And nothing antagonizes inflation expectations in the United States, including

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>longer run inflation expectations UH than rising prices at the

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>pump We've seen this in the latest University of Michigan

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>details for longer run. We've also seen it in the

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>New York FEDS survey of consumer expectations on three and

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>five year horizons. So I think in the back of

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>their minds uh FED officials are looking at that notch

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>up in inflation expectations. It's still in territory consistent with

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>them moving back to their goal, but it's moving in

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction, and I think this is part of

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason they may have some pause about really convincingly

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>signaling a down shift for the December meeting, and instead

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, well, let's let the data do the talking,

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and if we do see some relief, maybe they can

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>down shift to fifty and December. But I don't think

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll get kind of convincing, table pounding confidence on that

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>point in tomorrow's press conference. Count thank you go to

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Nave that down that. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern. I'm Bloomberg Radio and I'm bloom Television

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international Relations and

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom Keene,

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg