WEBVTT - There’s Something About Mary -- But It’s Not Royal Blood

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Criminalia, a production of Shondaland Audio in partnership

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with iHeartRadio.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>There was something about Mary, but despite her claims, it

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>wasn't an inheritance, prestigious titles, peerage, or any aristocratic honors.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Mary Carlton was born in Canterbury, England, in sixteen forty two,

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>probably in January of that year, although some reports suggest

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>she may have been a virgo. She spent a lifetime

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>using false identities to conmen into marrying her and then

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 2>defrauding them as a way to not just boost her

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>bank account but also often social status as well. One

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>con that we'll talk about is her renowned German princess persona.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 2>But ultimately, though, it wasn't this fabulous's fraud, deception or

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>her way of putting one over on you that caught

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>up with her. It was the bigamy. It'll make sense,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>trust me. Welcome to Criminalia.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Marian Tremarky and I'm Holly Frye. Mary Carlton became

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>famous for being famous when the paparazzi and media of

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 3>her day caught wind of a bigamy scandal involving her.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Why would they care about a young woman from an

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>unknown family in southeastern England. Mary was self styling as

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>a mysterious German royal at the time, and while we

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 3>do know that she was not of royal blood, her

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>real identity has actually been debated over the decades. Modern

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>historians agree that she was born as Mary Motors. Her father,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 3>a Canterbury musician, was either a chorister or a fiddler.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 3>But we don't really meet up with Mary on the

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>historical record until she is legally accused of a crime

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 3>noe not fraud. Even though she did a lot of

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>that bigamy divorce we need to note in this time

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in England was not only scandalous, it was unheard of.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the beginning to Mary and her first husband,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Thomas Deadman. Mary and Thomas lived in Canterbury, where he

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 2>worked as a journeyman shoemaker, and being a journeyman really

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 2>just meant he was an apprentice working for a master cobbler.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Some sources report she and Thomas had two children, both

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 2>of whom died in infancy or perhaps maybe in childbirth.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Years into their marriage, Mary left Thomas and moved to Dover,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>which is about twenty miles outside of Canterbury. Mary was

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 2>included in the Newgate Calendar, which is a biographical book

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>of criminals that was published in the eighteenth century, and

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>in it detailed that she had grown unhappy in her

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>first marriage because her husband wasn't wealthy and couldn't quote

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 2>support her in the splendor she always aimed at. In Dover,

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 2>she married a second time to a man named Thomas Day,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 2>who was a surgeon. But when she left her first marriage,

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Mary she just laughed. It's not like she could have

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>filed for divorce, but legally she and Thomas Deadman were

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 2>still married when she married Thomas Day, according to seventeenth

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>century English law, one marriage at a time, Please and

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 2>arrest warrant was issued for her for bigamy. Mary was

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>tried in Maidstone, but because her first husband couldn't afford

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 2>to travel the thirty or so miles to the trial

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and testify against her, the case was dismissed.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>After her trial, Mary traveled to Cologne solo, and while

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 3>in Germany, she told a few lies about herself, her wealth,

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>and her personal history, so basically she established what would

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>become her usual fraudulent scripts. She had a brief affair

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>with a local nobleman who showered her with expensive gifts

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>and desperately wanted to marry her. It was when he

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 3>began preparations seriously for a wedding that Mary skipped town.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>She skipped country. Actually, she returned to England with all

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 3>of the lavish gifts she had received from him, as

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 3>well as it turned out as much of her landlady's savings.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>When Mary returned to London in sixteen sixty three, she

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>shook off her two marriages and took on the persona

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>of a German princess named Maria or Henrietta Maria de Wolwei,

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and her story was that she was a noble woman

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>forced to flee an unwanted arranged marriage. Specifically, in her

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>fictional backstory, she claimed to be the orphaned Princess von

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Wolway from Cologne and claimed her father was Henry von Bolweg,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 2>a lawyer and Lord of Holmestein, just like Maria. Though

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Henry was not real. She really took these personas she

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>created very seriously. Her Princess Khan was perhaps her most

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>sensational and best known work. To breathe some life into

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>her fictional characters, Mary used corroboration in her scams. She

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 2>would often arrange for someone to send her letters that

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 2>contained updates on friends and family and Cologne, or wherever

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 2>her fake identity had taken her fictional every word, but

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>her marks didn't know that. Most often, Mary used letters

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to fool men into thinking her fabricated identities were real identities.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>The German Princess Act was not her first royal ruse,

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>but probably her best.

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 3>When a new landlady found and read letters from Mary's

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 3>friends in Cologne, she was convinced that Mary really was

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 3>a princess. She wanted Mary to meet her nephew and

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't they make a lovely pair. Knowing her landlady was

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 3>reading her correspondence, Mary arranged for a new letter to

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>be sent, in which she was informed her brother had

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 3>died and he had left her with everything, including her

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 3>forthcoming inheritance from her also deceased father. But there was

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a snag. She could only have the inheritance if she

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 3>married the man from whom she'd fled back in Germany,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>and when her landlady's nephew stepped in to offer help,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 3>some reports suggest that he did offer marriage, Mary didn't

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 3>hesitate to take advantage of the situation. Now, she didn't

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 3>marry her landlady's nephew, at least not that we're aware of,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 3>but she took the opportunity to fleece him. Yes, so

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 3>we just said Mary often used this kind of method

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 3>to defraud men, but really she would defraud anyone if

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>she could, women and landlords, maybe even kids. Anybody she

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>came in contact with was likely to lose some money.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>She sometimes worked with the aid of an accomplice, her maid,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.119
<v Speaker 3>also known at the time as a lady's companion. Mary

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 3>was sometimes accused of the classic con charge obtaining money

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>and property under false pretenses. We know her details of

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>her German princess swindle because it was part of her

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.559
<v Speaker 3>court trial and court report, but it can be hard

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 3>to know the extent of her work. More than three

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred years have passed since her death, and as we've noticed,

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>history isn't always great with keeping paperwork safe. Many of

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 3>her husbands and other marks were likely too embarrassed to

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>reveal that they had been duped and left with empty pockets.

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>We're going to take a break for a word from

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>our sponsor now, and when we return we will talk

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 2>about how Mary's next marriage is the one that made

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 2>her famous.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Criminalia. Look, we all knew it was coming.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Marrying Mary got married.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Again in April of sixteen sixty three. Mary hit her

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>next mark. She employed her royal alias Swindle to captivate

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and marry John Carlton, who was either an eighteen year

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 2>old law clerk or perhaps a young surgeon. Records suggest

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 2>as way more likely, though, that he was a clerk

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and she, it was rumored, despite her alleged royal background

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and assumed wealth, was quite a spendthrift with his money.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Carlton became the surname by which she's remembered in history.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's because she was arrested using that name, and

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>she had a very public trial. She was arrested for

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 3>masquerading as a German princess, for marrying John Carlton under

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a fraudulent identity, and, as we've said, for bigamy. Some

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 3>sources suggest her fraud was exposed through an anonymous letter

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 3>that was sent to John shortly after the wedding, debunking

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 3>her princess story and exposing her other marriages. Mary had

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>gained notoriety as a princess, a real princess as far

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 3>as anyone knew the matter here though, wasn't that fraud?

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 3>To quote her court records, The trial of Mary Motor's

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 3>alias Stedman, styled the German Prince at the Old Bailey

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 3>for bigamy fifteen Charles the Second AD sixteen sixty three.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 3>So to be clear on this, bigamy is entering into

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 3>one marriage while the previous one is undissolved, and that

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>certainly fits Mary's situation. All right, now that we've got

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 3>that out of the way, let's go to court.

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>While she awaited trial, London's German Princess was the talk

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>of the town. You wouldn't be wrong to call Mary's

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 2>trial at the Old Bailey, which was the central criminal

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>court of England and Wales, a sensational one. Mary defended

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 2>herself against charges brought against her by her new husband

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>bigamy and possibly impoture. Depending on the report or transcript

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 2>we read. The whole event happened both in and out

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>of the courtroom. Back in this day, if you were literate,

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>you were likely getting your news and general information and

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>gossip from pamphlets. Pamphlets were kind of a forerunner to newspapers.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 2>News wasn't really printed within periodical publications in England. Yet

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 2>at this time. The London Gazette, for instance, claims to

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 2>be England's oldest newspaper. It published its first edition as

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the Oxford Gazette in November of sixteen sixty five, and

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>that's after Mary's trial.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Both Mary and John published pamphlets to tell their personal

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 3>narratives and gained support for their individual side of the story. Several,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 3>perhaps dozens of pamphlets were written by them both. Most

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 3>of these pamphlets, to be honest, were for mud slanging,

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>but as a whole they were ultimately heartbreakingly detailed accounts

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 3>of a marriage gone wrong, focused on he said, She

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 3>said volleys between the pair, the kind of gossip that

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 3>sells more pamphlets. Mary detailed the quote incivilities and miseries

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that she endured in marriage that are, according to her quote,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>irredeemable by the laws of the Kingdom may against femis covert.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 3>So a femis covert, if you haven't googled that yet,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 3>is a now obsolete legal term for a married woman.

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>John replied in his pamphlets by calling her quote this

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 3>two legged monster, and the Canterbury German specifically accusing Mary

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 3>of not being a real princess and of not even

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 3>being German either. Mary in response claimed that John himself

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 3>had exaggerated his own status and had when they met,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>claimed to be a lord, which he was absolutely not,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and she stated this bombshell in court that he was

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>only trying to end their marriage because he had discovered

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 3>she had no money or impending inheritance. There were also

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>pamphlets published that reported sensationalized details of what went on

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>inside the courtroom, on the scene and in the moment,

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 3>and these were distributed right there at the trial.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Throughout the trial, Mary, who as we mentioned, defendant herself,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 2>played the character of a victim, a distressed foreign aristocrat,

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>alienated from her home, her finances, and her possessions, and

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>on trial overseas. As for the prosecution, they bungled their case.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 2>They managed to produce a witness to her first marriage,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 2>but they failed to deliver the husband, Thomas Steadman. In addition,

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 2>any claims that Mary had already been tried for bigamy,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>remember Thomas didn't show in the courtroom in Maidstone, and

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 2>any accounts of her well known spurious and double dealing

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>adventures were dismissed as hearsay by the judge Ultimately, though,

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>this was not a trial about donning fictional personas, marrying

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 2>under false pretenses, or much of anything to do with

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 2>personal finance. As we keep saying, these were all about bigamy.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 2>And because neither of her first two husbands, Thomas Stedman

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>or Thomas Day, traveled to appear at this trial in London,

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Mary Carlton was acquitted without other husbands, there was no

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>bigamy case.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 3>By all accounts, Mary's acquittal only confirmed to the public

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>that she was a figure of scandalous celebrity. Perhaps in

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 3>an attempt to cash in on her freedom and her

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 3>new fifteen minutes of fame, or maybe just to set

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 3>her fictional story straight, Mary wrote an autobiographical work, which

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 3>was of course not a true story of her life

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 3>in any way at all. It was called The Case

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of Madam Mary Carlton, and in it she detailed an

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>account of her life and the events that she claimed

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 3>to have lived through. It was kind of an expanded

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 3>version of a previous writing she had published that was

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 3>a work called An Historical Narrative of the German Princess.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 3>She promised her audience the book would set the record

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>straight about her quote, birth, education and fortunes. What her

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.599
<v Speaker 3>audience got was part romance narrative of her lovers and husbands,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and part exposition of her husband, John Carlton and his family.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>That latter part about the Carlton family is interesting, and

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting because Mary accuses his family of tricking her

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.479
<v Speaker 2>into marriage in order to secure her wealth, or more accurately,

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the wealth they thought she had, and then prosecuting her

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 2>under false pretenses. In addition to personal details, Mary also

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>included details of her trial in this book in her

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>own words, as she had testified in court, quote, if

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 2>any be deceived, I am my lord. If that they

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>could have been ensured that I had been the person

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>as to a state that they imagined me to be,

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 2>your Lordship should not have been troubled. They would have

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>been contented to have practiced concealment in case I had

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>had more than one husband, instead of this defamation that

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I am loaded with my lord, my crime is that

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I have not an estate, or at least such a

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>one they imagined it to be. She also wrote of

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>her time growing up in a noble family in Germany.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>This telling of her pretend background is also interesting because she,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 2>like any good con artist, got her backstory out there

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>ahead of those who might try to discredit her, especially

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 2>that princess part and the many husband's part two. Probably.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 3>She also writes about the moments leading up to being

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 3>charged with bigamy and describes the moment of her acquittal.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>There's an interesting common theme in the story. She tells.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a question actually that emerges in her writing, and

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>that question is what's so bad about pretending you're a princess?

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>To quote her from the case of Madame Mary Carlton quote,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.359
<v Speaker 3>what harm have I done in pretending to great titles?

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 3>When it came to the taking money under false pretenses

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>part Mary actually had a few things to say about

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>that too. She stated that as a woman under English law,

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 3>she was deprived of her right to secure quote The

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Ways to a Better Fortune. Women were essentially second class

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 3>citizens in England in Mary's lifetime. At birth, they became

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>subject to their fathers and then later to their husbands.

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>They had limited opportunities and were mostly focused on their households. Basically,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>she argued that she wouldn't and couldn't be able to

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 3>live her best life until such unjust laws against women

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>were changed. Despite her arrests for bigamy. Mary continued to

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 3>improve her financial and social situations through marriage. Bigamy be damned.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to take a break forward from our

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>sponsor right now. When we return, we'll talk about Mary's

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>post trial fifteen Minutes of Fame.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Criminalia. The final years of Mary's life

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 3>are interesting, with her doing things that range from play

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>acting and engaging in additional marriages to imprisonment and execution.

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>But let's start with the happier times. Mary on stage.

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>As we know, during her fifteen Minutes of Fame, Mary

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>published The Case of Madam Mary Carlton, but she also

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 2>took to the stage after her trial concluded, starring as

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>herself in a play in London. Some reports suggest she

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 2>performed at what would become the legendary Duke's Theater, but

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>we're actually not so sure the dates match up on that.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 2>The German Princess was written by John Holden in sixteen

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 2>sixty four, but the original Dukes known as the Dorset

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Gardens Theater, didn't open its doors until sixteen seventy one.

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 2>But regardless of which playhouse it was staged in, Holden

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>wrote a dramatization of real life fraud based on Mary's

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 2>adventurous life, and she performed it. We have a little

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 2>taste from the epilogue she delivered as an example quote,

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the world's a cheat, and we that move in it

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>in our degrees, do exercise our wit and better 'tis

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to get a glorious name. However, got than live by

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 2>common fame.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It was a box office success. English diarist Samuel Peeps

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 3>was said to have been taken in by Mary and

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 3>claimed that he had seen the play several times. Of

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 3>the work, he wrote that he quote saw the German

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 3>princess acted by the woman herself. The whole play is

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 3>very simple, unless here and there a witty sprinkler or two.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 3>She grew a bit of a loyal local following, and

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 3>many reports suggest she married one of her admirers, which

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>would bring her to husband number four. Mary is Mary,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 3>though so she left him and took all his money.

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>To quote Mary's fake autobiographical character on stage, You think

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 3>me a bold cheat, but which of you are not?

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>When the plays run ended a newscam. This time she

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 2>brought in an accomplice who pretended to be her husband.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>She would bring a suitor home, only to be discovered

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 2>with him by her jealous spouse, remember thanks spouse. Fearing

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 2>blackmail or scandal, these would be suitors. Her marks basically

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 2>paid whatever she asked so they could get out of

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>there without any undue attention.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 3>As the years went by, Mary also began other non

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 3>aristocratic and non marital frauds, including mostly running small cons

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 3>on local merchants to keep cash flowing. Years after her

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>high profile bigamy trial, Mary also began stealing, specifically stealing

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 3>silver tankards from taverns and then reselling them. When she

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.239
<v Speaker 3>was caught taking one in the Covent Garden district, she

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>was arrested. Mary was charged, convicted of robbery, and transported

0:19:55.280 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 3>to Jamaica for her punishment. Jamaica, you may be wondering, Yes, Jamaica.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 3>England had recently gained claim of Jamaica from Spain in

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 3>sixteen seventy through the Treaty of Madrid, and had taken

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 3>to sending indentured servants and prisoners to the island to

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 3>serve out their punishments. And as far as Mary's story goes,

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 3>in sixteen seventy two, she either sneaked or swindled her

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 3>way aboard a ship and returned to London, where she

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>again began what seems to have been one of her

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 3>favorite cons pretending to be a rich heiress. Some reports

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 3>suggest she married again to an apothecary at Westminster. That

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 3>would have been her fifth marriage, at least as far

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 3>as we know. Do we have to say it all

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>righty we will? Mary took his money and she left.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 2>While living in a boarding house in London, Mary, through

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 2>simple bad luck, was recognized in the building by a

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 2>man who worked as a guard in one of the

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>prisons in which she had once spent a little time

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 2>for one of her various crimes. Technically escaped from a

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>penal colony, Mary was on the lamb. It wasn't long

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 2>after she was spotted that she was arrested, and at

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>this time things were much more serious. She was sentenced

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to death. Mary pled the belly, which is a turn

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 2>of phrase meaning she told the court she was pregnant.

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Pregnancy changed the picture because pregnant women's execution sentences weren't

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 2>carried out until their babies were born. But her lie

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 2>was exposed after midwives examined her. Mary was not pregnant.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>She was convicted on January sixteenth, sixteen seventy three and

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>sentenced to death. On January twenty second. Mary was hanged

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 2>at a now infamous execution spot, the Tyburn Tree, which

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 2>actually wasn't a tree at all, but rather than name

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for a three legged gallows at the Tower of Tyburn,

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a scaffold capable of publicly hanging twenty four people at once,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty four people at once. Mary, who had just turned

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty one years old when she died, is buried at

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Saint Martin's Churchyard in London, and there's no word if

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 2>any of her husband's plural traveled to her execution. I

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 2>hope that you called today's scam sauce sprinkle.

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 3>That's my favorite I did. I called it the witty

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 3>sprinkle because that's a great name for.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 2>A das ergic. And as soon as I saw that

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 2>we're pop up in Whenever Quits, I was like, Oh, no,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that was Samuel, wasn't it who we were quoting?

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, thanks Samuel. Peak that I was trying to think

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 3>for Mary about a drink that suited her story and

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 3>would be a little bit of a fun place to

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 3>land on since her story ends in tragedy, Even though

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 3>to her marks there was probably a lot of tragedy

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Before them, I kept thinking about her many marriages and

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 3>the kinds of drinks you would have at a wedding,

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 3>even though I think probably she wasn't having big weddings.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I wanted a toe staying celebration drink, but I also

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>wanted one that's strong enough that it will knock you

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 3>on your keyster and make you unable to travel twenty

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 3>miles to testify. So this is the Witty Sprinkle, and

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>this is a drink that you're making for two. It's

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 3>actually not as heavy hitting as it might sound initially

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>because you're splitting it. So it is two ounces of

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 3>reposato tequila, one ounce of a raspberry liqueur like shambour,

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>one ounce of lime juice, and then an optional splash

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of simple or vanilla syrup. You have the liqueur, which

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>is sweet, but because of how this plays out to me,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 3>it felt a little too tart and crisp without it.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 3>But if you like a crisp drink, you could skip

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 3>that syrup. You're gonna shake this, you're gonna strain it

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 3>into two chilled coups, and then you're gonna top it

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>with prosecco, so you get like a champagne cocktail, but

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>it's a prosecco cocktail and it has tequila in it,

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 3>so kaboo. It's very pretty because of the raspberry liquur.

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Its is beautiful pink color. It feels like a wedding

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>drink that you would have, except you would have it

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 3>many times over and maybe not feel great in the morning,

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 3>depending on how you handle tequila and champagne cocktails, which

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 3>you can also use champagne instead of prosecco. Prosecco also

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 3>helps sweeten it a little bit more, which is why

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I went with that. This is one of those drinks

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 3>I personally have to be careful with because it is

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 3>exactly the ingredients that make me way too drunk. Tequila

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and I have made friends, but we're not like besties.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 3>And champagne cocktails I love, but I find that they

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>will hit me harder than one would anticipate. As a combo,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 3>this is borderline deadly. If you want to do the

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 3>mocktail version of it, you are going to sub out

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>that reposado tequila for and agave juice. I would recommend

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 3>cutting it with a little bit of water because I

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 3>find it to be too sweet on its own. And

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 3>then you're also gonna add raspberry syrup. I prefer at

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 3>this point you already have a juice involved. Cut back

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the raspberry syrup to like three quarters of an ounce

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 3>instead of a full ounce. Keep your one ounce of

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 3>lime juice. You don't have to bother with any additional

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 3>syrup at that point, and then top it once you've

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 3>shaken it and strained it into pre chilled coups with

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a little light ginger ale and you're you're ready. And

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 3>that's actually a very yummy drink. That's one of those

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 3>mocktails that I would want to make the base of

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>it in batches and just have the ginger ale ready

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 3>to pour over to like have it a party, because

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>it's really easy and yummy. You can also make the

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>cocktail in batches at that point too, but tequila at

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>scale is always scary. That is the witty sprinkle, which

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 3>hopefully you find as delicious and giggle worthy as I do,

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 3>and it takes the Jeff Mary's sad end. We are

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 3>grateful that you hung out with us today and talked

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 3>about Mary and her many marriages. We will be right

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 3>back here again next week with another cocktail at Mocktail

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 3>and another story of scams.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Criminalia is a production of Shondaland Audio in partnership with iHeartRadio.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from Shondaland Audio, please visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.