WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: March 5, 2025

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and am Marie Hordern. Join us each

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>day for insight from the best in markets, economics, and

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>geopolitics from our global headquarters in New York City. We

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>are live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Joining us now

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 2>is the man behind the negotiations, the forty first United

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>States Secretary of Commace, Howard Lannik missed the Secretary before

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>we get go in a warm congratulations for the team

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>here at Bloomberg Surveillance on your confirmation.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh thanks so much.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't last night's speech amazing. I really I could

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 4>have been more proud of President Trump.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into the niceties on that in just a moment.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's kick it off, sir, with a question about your

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 2>comments yesterday when you suggested that maybe they could be

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a compromise on trade between the United States and Mexico

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and Canada and maybe we'ld hear more about that today.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Has the President confirmed that is that still the plan?

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think what happened is you have the trade

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 4>ministers and all the people from Canada really working hard

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:22.639
<v Speaker 4>with our homeland security people.

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Remember, this is not a trade war. This is a

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>drug war.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 4>We've got fentanyls still pouring into the country and it's

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 4>got to stop.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>So what's happened is they're showing us even more.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 4>Ways to try to stop the floor of fentanyl and

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 4>if they can stop the floor of fenyl.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 3>The President is open minded. There are going to be tariffs, let's.

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Be clear, But what he is thinking about is which

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>sections of the market that can maybe he'll consider giving

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>them relief until we get to of course, April second,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 4>but I don't want anybody to forget.

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>April second is the day that we announced our.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Reciprocal tarraffs around the world, and so April second is coming.

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>But this is about fetnel this month.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Got that. Just want additional clarity, just to be very

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 2>clear on this. Yesterday when you said I think the

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 2>President's going to figure out you do more and I

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>meet you in the middle we're probably going to announce

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>that tomorrow as in today. Can we no longer respect

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that announcement?

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, I didn't say that. I said the

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>President is.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Listening, uh to the offers from Mexico and Canada. He's

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 4>thinking about trying to do something in the middle. He's

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 4>thinking about it. We're talking about it. We're going to

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 4>what I leave here, I'm going to go talk about

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 4>it with him, and I think early this afternoon or

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>this afternoon we expect to make an announcement. And my

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 4>my thinking is it's going to be somewhere in the middle,

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 4>so not one hundred percent of all products and not none,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>somewhere in the middle, because I think Mexico and Canada

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 4>are trying the best and let's see where we end up.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 4>So I do think somewhere in the middle is a

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 4>likely outcome.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>When you say somewhere in the middle, do you mean

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 2>somewhere in the middle on tariffs, as in somewhere between

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>zero and twenty five or do you mean that certain groups,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>certain industries will just get a carve out, And would

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>that carve out be say the autos, Because the President

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>mentioned last night he'd spoken to the auto's CEOs, the

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 2>carve outs we should be thinking about.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 4>Here, Yeah, I think I think it's by product and

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 4>by regent. Remember the us MCA, right, the United States,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Mexico and Canada agreement set up some policies that said

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 4>you've got to have a certain amount of US content

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 4>in your products to be USMCA compliant.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 3>So I think he's thinking.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 4>About those categories, the us MCA compliant and does not

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 4>make sense to you, Right, if you complied with the agreement, then.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you avoid tariffs. And if you.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Didn't comply with the agreement, well you did sue at

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 4>your own risk. You knew you weren't complying, and therefore

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 4>it seems likely that's a place where the president will go.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Again, the president gets to make the decision.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm there talking with him about it, and so is

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 4>the team. But our expectation is that it'll be categories.

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>It will be twenty five percent, but it'll be there

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 4>will be some categories left out. It could well be autos,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>could be others as well. USMCA go look at that.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>That was the agreement we made with.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>US Mexico and Canada saying those products are exempt. Everyone

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 4>who didn't live under those terms and did so at

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>their own risk and knew they were doing it at

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 4>their own risk always.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Latna, good morning.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 5>Would you say right now that you think that US

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 5>autos like GM and Ford are compliant under USMCA.

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 4>That is my understanding is the Big Three say they

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 4>produce cars that are compliant under USMCA, which means they

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 4>have sufficient US content in them to be part of

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 4>the USMCA agreement. So I think that's part of our

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 4>discussion and the President's really thinking about that.

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 5>So it's fair to assume, then, especially given the constituencies

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 5>of autoworkers that the President was able to pick up

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 5>in this past election, that it is the auto industry

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 5>that can potentially get that exemption later this afternoon.

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 4>It's not really the decemption, remember, it's it's we're trying

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 4>to end fentanyl coming into the country. So we're trying

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>to send a message that fetanyl has got to end

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 4>coming in from Mexico and Canada.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 3>It just has to end.

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 4>And they've done a reasonable job on the border, and

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 4>they're going to do a better job on the border.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 4>But this is memory, it's a key about fentanyl for

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 4>this month April tewcond We could talk about the rest,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 4>but this month it's about fentanyl, and the President's trying

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to give Mexico and Canada some statement, some move forward

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 4>because they are doing they are trying their hardest, and

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 4>we believe they're trying their hardest. But the fact is

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 4>that we're going to put something on because depths in

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 4>America have not decreased in a way that is sufficient.

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Depths of ferialisms were in America.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Many families will sympathize with this, remarks me myself, I

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 5>know families who have been at the end of the

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 5>suffering when it comes to fentanyl. But yesterday though, the

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 5>President questioned the fairness of Canadian banks, So what is

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 5>it about. Is it about Canada's banking system or is

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 5>it really about fentanyl?

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 4>So this month, right now is about fentanyl. When we

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>talk about April second, we will talk about the bigger

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 4>trade picture between our trading partners Canada and our trading

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 4>partners of Mexico. So April second, I'll be happy to

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 4>come on and talk to you about our thinking and

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 4>our thoughts about a broad trading model. But right now

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 4>it's about fentanyl. This is a drug related issue. Drugs

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 4>coming into the United States of America have got to stop.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 3>The border. It's got to remain closed.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 4>That's the key of how you treat your great trading partner.

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 4>You treat your great trading partner with respect, and you

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 4>stop letting sentinel.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Into the country.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>So my view is the President is thinking about it,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>he's thinking about autos, he's thinking about USMCA. He's going

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 4>to come up with a plan. This afternoon. We're going

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to announce that plan. I think it's going to be

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>in the middle somewhere. There's going to be twenty five

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 4>percent tariffs. It's not the middle as in a number.

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's in middle in terms of USMCA, not USMCA.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 4>But the President will decide that this afternoon and then

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>we'll go on from there. But think about that, if

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 4>you were compliant with USMCA, you did what President Trump

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 4>asked in his last term.

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 3>And if you weren't compliant, you did that at your

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>own risk.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 6>Secretary Latnik, I just want to make sure that I

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 6>understand this correctly. You're talking about the idea that this

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 6>all has to do with the drug wars, and at

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 6>the same time, some people have speculated that this could

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 6>lead to a renegotiation of USMCA that.

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Would lead all around to even lower tariffs than before.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying that's off the table.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 6>The tariffs are still part of this at the twenty

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 6>five five percent level.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:07.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, remember April second, we begin our reciprocity model, which

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 4>is how you treat us as how we treat you,

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 4>and that is going to be part of his exemption,

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 4>part of his tier policy. And then he's got industries, autos, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals,

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 4>steel and aluminum.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 3>And copper lumber. These issues need to come home.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 4>We need to help our domestic industries grow and flourish,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 4>and so we called out those product sets for extra focus.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 3>But that's April second.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 4>So on April second, our reciprocal trade policy will come out.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 4>In twenty twenty six, we renegotiate USMCA with Canada and Mexico,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 4>and we're going to have really clear analysis and clear

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 4>focus on how that changes.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 3>But right today, let's be clear, today is about Fentanel.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>We heard from last night the President.

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 6>He said that he was fine with a little disturbance,

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 6>but going forward, there will be all of these gains realized.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Lutnik.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 6>Are you concerned about the level of uncertainty express not

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 6>just in markets, but just even from people who you

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 6>used to work with, where they're saying, we don't have

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 6>a clear sense of what the goal is. And I

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 6>understand you're saying it'll come on April second, But in

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 6>the meantime people are just putting all plans on hold.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm not seeing all plants at all. In fact,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm seeing the opposite.

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 4>We saw Apple commit to five hundred billion dollars. We

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 4>saw open Ai an Oracle commit to five hundred billion

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 4>dollars of investments.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 3>TSMC just the.

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Other day saying one hundred billion dollar investment in America.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Saw Bank two hundred billion dollar investment in America. So

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 4>a trillion, three hundred billion dollars. And you think people

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 4>are waiting on the sidelines. We feel it every day.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 4>All these companies are coming, they're building in America, they're

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 4>committing to America.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>We agree a April second is coming.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 4>We have to do our work before we announce our

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 4>plans on April second. Of course, we have to do

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 4>our work and do it properly and do it thoughtfully.

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 4>But in this period of time, America needs a president

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>to protect people from fentanyl that shouldn't be killing people

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 4>in our country. China still has fentanyl as a highest

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 4>list of subsidies.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Subsidies.

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 4>They subsidize the production of precursors, the ingredients to fentanyl.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 4>They send it to Mexico and Canada and into the

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 4>country it comes. So our president has said enough already,

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 4>enough already, and that's why he's come up with this

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 4>tariff plan today. April second will be a fairness plan.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 4>And fairness plan is not that hard to figure out.

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 3>If you have a vet look it.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 5>Can I jump in there on the on the fairness plan?

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Is that an initial, partial assessment and response or will

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 5>tariffs actually hit on April second?

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, there are a whole variety of laws in the

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 4>United States of America that we will follow with precision.

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Some tariffs will come on right away, and then some

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 4>tariffs will go be registered and they will take three

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 4>weeks or four weeks, and they will come on in

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 4>due course.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>So there's a process for tariffs in America.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 4>But we will announce them and we will be negotiating

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 4>with all these countries thereafter, and then they go into

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 4>effect over a period of months, so basically.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 3>April six, as you know, we will announce them and

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 3>then they come.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 5>In because there's months of studies, massive report, public opinion.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>This can take a very long time.

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 5>So legally there's no law that's short enough really to

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 5>put tariffs in place.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>On the second.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 5>So how long between April second till the tariffs actually

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 5>hit do you think we'll see?

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 4>As I said there, we launched our studies on January twentieth,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 4>so April second of.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Studies are done.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Some tariffs can come straight away, some can come weeks later,

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 4>some can come some can take over a month or

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 4>two to come online.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>But it will be very, very.

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Thoughtful, very organized, and we begin on April second. We've

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 4>announced it from January twentieth, that April second was the day.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>We're sticking with our day.

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 4>We're sticking with reciprocity at this time for America to

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 4>be treated fairly.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's what the President Trump is going to do.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 3>He's going to.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Make sure we are treated fairly. He's talked about it

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 4>last night. He's made this clear. So Mexico and Canada

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 4>is about fentanyl today for the month of March, but

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 4>on April second, it's about fairness. And yes, that is

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 4>a process that comes in that is strictly specific to

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the laws, but it'll take over a month or two

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 4>months to come in. But once it's in, they will

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 4>stick which is treat us fairly, treat us properly, or

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 4>don't trade with us.

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Missus Secretary, I was a man of my word. I

0:12:58.360 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 2>am a man of my word, and I promise would

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>come back the address last night, So let's finish there.

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>The President of the United States talked about a big,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>beautiful job in interest rates. A lot of people in

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>this market are curious whether the President is no longer

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>sensitive to the deadly gyrations of the equity market, that

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the focus, the emphasis now is on the bond market.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that the shift is that the way to understand things.

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>All.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 4>I think that is too specific. I mean, let's face it,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 4>if we balance the budget of the United States of America,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 4>interest rates are going to come smashing down. And I

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 4>don't mean ten basis points, I mean one hundred and

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 4>fifty basis points. You're going to have an explosion in

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 4>the housing market.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>You're going to have an explosion in the equity markets.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Because this is not a manufactured cut in the interest

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 4>rates like you saw last time with this huge money

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>supply which created the vast inflation.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 3>This is the right way to do it.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 4>You stop printing money, you stop running deficits, you balance

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 4>the budget of the United States of America. You smash

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 4>interest rates down, produce enormous amounts of energy, drive those

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 4>prices down, and you will see the greatest equity market

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 4>and the greatest.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Economy in the United States of America.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Now, remember this president is worried about the United States

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 4>of America. Sometimes I get asked questions about am I

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 4>worried about Canadam I worried about Mexican And am I

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 4>worried about Peu? My president is worried about the United

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 4>States of America. And you are going to see the

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 4>greatest equity market and bond markets under President Trump.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's want to be apparently American data right now,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 2>because equities have rolled over just a little bit, you

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>know the market. Well, I won't make a big deal

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>of it. We're just a bit software at the back

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>of this data from ADP, which is a downside surprise

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>at seventy seven K the estimate was one forty so

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>with sub one hundred we'll see what we get on

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the m later on this morning and on payrolls on Friday.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>But as you know, mister Secretary, the data over the

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 2>last few weeks hasn't been great. The survey data has

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 2>been softer, and a lot of these companies in these

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>surveys have pointed to tariff uncertainty. Do Youmick scept that

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the business community needs some clarity or whether it's twenty five, fifteen, ten, whatever,

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the number is going to be, that the volatility around

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the trade story, the cumulative effect of persistent uncertainty is

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to wink into this economy a little bit.

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 3>No way.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the President spoke about him last night. He

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 4>said Biden left him a pile of poop. Okay, he

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>left him a louse of the economy that he's trying

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 4>to fix.

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>You're looking at data that's Biden data.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Do not try to besmirch my President Trump with Biden's nonsense.

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the manufacturing number is Biden date? So

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I just want to be very clear, that's your opinion.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 2>You're entitled to it. You think that's his dates.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 3>My opinion, Okay, what possible could change? Seriously, we are

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 3>in early March. My president took over January twentieth.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 4>You think economic data coming out in early March is

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump related data monthly surveys.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm to be kidd mister Secretary, are you suggesting about it?

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 2>You suggesting so when Bonyard's drop in a market that's

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 2>worth trillions of dollars and investors place bets off the

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 2>back of that economic data, that that data doesn't count

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>front of thing, that that data somehow misleading.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that.

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Data is leading you to understand if Joe Biden was

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 4>still in charge, you'd be in trouble.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>But you have a new president. There's a new sheriff

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:28.119
<v Speaker 3>in town.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 4>And I would bet, I would bet on the economic

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 4>growth that is coming from Donald Trump.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>You see the investments. You see it already.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 4>There's trillions of dollars of manufacturing moving to America.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>It's moving to America. That means the cavalry is coming.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>For every trillion.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Dollars that invests in the United States of America that

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 4>produces one percent of GDP growth, imagine that you have

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 4>a president bringing GDP growth directly to his economy.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 2>It's the Secretary, We appreciate your time and your opinion

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>as always. The US Commerce Secretary Howard love Nick there

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>on the economic data, financial markets, and what's going to

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>happen with trade, joining us now to discuss JP Morgan

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Act managements. But Michael Bob, good morning, good morning. We've

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 2>got a lot to get through. We're getting Europe quickly,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>but I want to start with the United States. Does

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>it bring you comfort that the White House seems to

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 2>be more interested in your bond market than the equity market.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 8>It does to some extent. I think bond investors are

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 8>going to go through a period of discomfort, to borrow

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 8>a phrase from the President, where probably yields have gotten

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 8>a little ahead of themselves. So you know, any kind

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 8>of backup to the mid fours looks like a good

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 8>level for us to get in.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 2>So you're not a buyer here, not right now, you're

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a buyer of buns here. Can we bring up the curve.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to the German curve two year, ten year,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty year, double digit move we're seeing over in Germany

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>off the back of the prospect of a lot more supply.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 2>The ten Europe by twenty basis points. Where do you

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 2>stand on Europe?

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 8>Now I think you're looking at steeper curves in Europe.

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 8>I think you're going to see a lot of issuance.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 8>They've thrown fiscal austerity to the side. They've looked at

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 8>what's going on in China and the US and they

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 8>want to join the party and they're going to I

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 8>still see the ECB bringing rates down towards two percent,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 8>but I think with the amount of supply that's potentially

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 8>coming in Germany, you're going to drift up towards three percent.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 8>I think that's fantastic for bond investors. Again, discomfort ear term,

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 8>but the ability to have a bond market that has

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 8>yield to it and that's durable fantastic.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 6>There's a fantastic bond market for investors, and they're fantastic

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 6>bond markets for traders. A fantastic bond market for investors

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 6>is one where there's actual coupon, there's actual yield. A

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 6>fantastic bond for traders. Bond market for traders is when yield.

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Are going down. Is that move over?

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 6>Is it not any longer a fantastic market for traders.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 8>I think there's potential for a yield to go down

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 8>in the front end of curves. I think central banks,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 8>whether it's the ECBER, the FED, or looking for that

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 8>opportunity to bring yields down a little bit get closer

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 8>to what they perceive is neutral. But I think the

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 8>long end is going to stay about where it is.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 8>We're having conversations every day with plan sponsors who want

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 8>to get into this bond market. They're looking at it

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 8>as the anchor in the storm. They like the fact

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 8>they can buy the US aggregate bond market at a

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 8>yield of close to five percent. They're looking to bring

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 8>money out of cash and out of risk assets, whether

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 8>it's privates or equities, and go into the market. Fantastic.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You said this bond market.

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 6>Are you talking about the United States or develop markets

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 6>more broadly? At a time where we were just talking

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 6>with a number of guests, Peter Share among them saying

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 6>maybe Europe is going to draw capital away from the

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 6>United States, I think it's all bond markets.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 8>I think when you look at what equities have done,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 8>they've become lopsided in terms of portfolio allocations. The plans

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 8>that we're talking to are looking to do some rebalancing

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 8>and they're embracing yields where they are I met as

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 8>I said, I met with a plan yesterday. I met

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 8>with them. Five years ago, the aggregate bond market was

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 8>yielding two two and a quarter percent. They didn't invest.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 8>Now today they've won. Yields have doubled from where they are.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 8>They're coming in and we're hearing that everywhere from every

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 8>channel around the world.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 6>You said that you think that yields on the long

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 6>end are probably where they're going to stay, at least

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 6>in the United States. They're not going to go significantly lower.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Do you see them going significantly higher now?

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 8>I think you're stuck in the force. We're probably a

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 8>buyer in the mid forest because with another round of

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 8>tariffs coming and the blizzard of policies that come out

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 8>of Washington, there's going to be a lot of volatility,

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 8>and there may be a period where people run to

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 8>trades and you get down towards three ninety or four percent.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 8>But I think we're going to look back on twenty

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 8>twenty five and they're going to have spent almost all

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 8>of their time either side of four and a half percent.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 2>A period when we run to treasuries. Let's build on that.

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Could we be going to get to a period where

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>we run away from dollar denominated assets. Certainly not my view,

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 2>but of you that is out there, people who believe

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 2>that maybe the policy mix of the United States at

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the moment pushes capital away. We've had that a few

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>times already this morning. What do you stand on that call?

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 8>It should be your view, John. I think dollar exceptional

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 8>lensum has ended this week. We've done a lot of work.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 8>We've gone back and we've looked at Trump version one,

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 8>and we see a similar path where the dollar peaks

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 8>early a couple months into the term and then tends

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 8>to come off. We've talked about the dollar being overvalued

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 8>for a year or so now, and I think now

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 8>you're looking at fiscal spend in China, you're looking at

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 8>fiscal spend across Europe, and we're looking looking at we

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 8>didn't talk about Japan. We're looking at close to one

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 8>and a half percent ten year JGB yields. I don't

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 8>even remember when I last saw that.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 2>When you say a period of dollar exceptionalism is over,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 2>do you mean for the currency specifically, or do you

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 2>mean the dollar long that we've built up over the

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 2>last decade in dollar denominated assets across fixed income and

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 2>equities alike. Would you go that far?

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 8>I think yes, I would go that far. I think

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 8>everyone has talked about how expensive US markets have gotten

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 8>relative to non US markets, but nobody wanted to step

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 8>in front of the steam roller. And now the steam

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 8>rollers rolling the other way. And I think you're going

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 8>to see this flow out of dollar denominated assets, and

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 8>I think the dollar comes off from where it is.

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that process is underway substantially, if you're correct

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 2>at leasta, these are huge changes potentially for financial markets worldwide.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 6>I just wonder how much it reduces some of the

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 6>flows into US risk markets, and I wonder how much

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 6>that gives more fuel to what we've already seen, particularly

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 6>with some of the most consensus bests, which is the

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 6>technology firms.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>All these things we've been asking for for such a

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 2>long time. China needs to do more deficit spending headline overnight,

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>You're going to get it. Germany needs to invest more

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 2>in infrastructure, in defense headlines in the last twenty four hours,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 2>You're going to get it. Deutsche Banks George Soravellos talked

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 2>about it about twenty minutes ago. Put it perfectly. You

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 2>cannot overstate the changes we're seeing in the global economy.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of people sit here in the

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>media every single day and say, big wee, come guilty

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 2>of it, big wee coming up payrolls Friday. Forget payrolls,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.719
<v Speaker 2>forget the data. These are massive policy shifts.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 6>This is the time, and this is something Jim Reid

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 6>says every morning that years happen in the period of days.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 6>And we've seen that again and again, reshifting expectations. There's

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot to be determined. But my big question is

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 6>how much how far does this go in rearranging tradelines

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 6>kind of.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>What Donald Trump wanted. So this is the new world.

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Payroll still important. Friday, eight thirty Eastern time, right, don't

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>forget payroll. So take that back. But Michael a JP

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Organ Asset Management, Bob some big calls. I appreciate your time, sir.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. George Saravellas of Deutsche Bank writing it is

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 2>hard to overestimate the scale of change taking place in

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>global economic and geopolitical relations in just a matter of days.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 2>George joins us now for more. George, welcome to the program.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with the call of the euro talk to

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 2>me about the change.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 7>So there's really two key components, John.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 9>The first one is.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 7>Very much this shift coming out of Germany, which I

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 7>would call generational.

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 9>We have been.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 7>Expecting some sort of shift over the last two weeks.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 7>As soon as the election was over. It looked like

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 7>the ingredients were building.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 9>But even we and we've been on the.

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Optimistic end, were very surprised with the magnitude of the

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 7>fiscal shift that was announced. From my perspective, it's the

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 7>biggest shift in fiscal po I've seen in my career,

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 7>both in terms of magnitude and pace, and this has

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 7>huge consequences for both growth, the ECB and even Europe's strategic.

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 9>Autonomy versus the US.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 7>So that is one component, and I would say that

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 7>policy is increasing shifting to be cyclically relevant even in

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 7>coming quarters, rather than just structurally relevant. And then on

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 7>the flip side, you have a situation in the US

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 7>where tariff policy is taking place in such a haphazard

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 7>way it ends up creating self inflicted damage to the

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 7>US economy. I think that is one reason why FED

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 7>expectations and US heels are coming down and the broader

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 7>fiscal picture remains very murky.

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 9>So we have a situation which is the complete.

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 7>Opposite from what I personally would have expected at the

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 7>start of the year. But when the facts change, we

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 7>change our minds, and that's what's happened over the last

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 7>few weeks.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 2>So George, let's talk about a couple of things. Let's

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about this first on Wall Street. As you know,

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>there are certain phrases the scare people. One of them

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>is this time is different. George, why is this time

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 2>so different? Why should we really believe this is hamnik?

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 7>I think the first reason is it's now been announced,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 7>it has cross party support. What I found the most

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 7>interesting in Murcher's statements yesterday is he used.

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 9>The phrase whatever it takes.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 7>But take note it wasn't used in German, it was

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 7>in English, and it was also posted on x on

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 7>his feed. And this is a very conscious message by

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 7>the Chancellor in waiting of wanting to reflect on what

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 7>Dragie did and sending the same message for Germany. So

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 7>it does have to go through parliamentary approval. We have

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 7>a fairly high degree of confidence that it will, and

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 7>once it does, we are speaking of immense amounts in

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 7>terms of orders of magnitude. So you discussed earlier on

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 7>the show the shift around the big infrastructure fund, the

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 7>potential unlimited defense spending.

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 9>I would also add they're.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 7>Going to reform the debt break to allow a greater

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 7>degree of fiscal spend at the state level, which provides

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 7>cyclical steamulus as well.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 9>So if you add all of these.

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 7>Things up, they are going to have a very material

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 7>economic impact on Germany and by extension, I think the

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 7>whole of Europe.

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 6>George, if you had so much conviction, why is your

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 6>euro usd target one ten?

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it higher?

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 9>That's a great question. I would say, one step at

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 9>a time.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 7>Every day we're seeing newsflow that would usually take years

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 7>or even decades to potentially feed through.

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 9>So I would say what we need to.

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 7>Argue for an even weaker dollar is for persistent economic

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 7>weakness in the US. That's going to be a function

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 7>of what happens from the administration overcoming weeks. Do we

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 7>see a reversal in the tariff policy? So I think

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 7>there's still a tremendous degree of uncertainty on the US side,

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 7>and how much the recent weekends continues. It is a

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 7>function of fiscal in the US and tariff and then

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 7>there is some execution.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 9>Risk as we discussed around Europe.

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 7>But it is the first step one ten, and we're

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 7>very open minded in terms of how we think about

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 7>the outlook.

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they've got to be up and minded about

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>everything right now, George, including the United States. So let's

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 2>finish on the US. You mentioned the US side of things,

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 2>a question we've gone back to repeatedly on this program

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 2>ever since the election. Do you see a policy mix

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 2>that attracts capital to the United States or a policy

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>makes that pushes it away. I asked that question earlier

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>this morning. George. What's your call on that now and

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 2>has it changed?

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 7>I think it's becoming a bit more ambivalent over the

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 7>last couple of months, And I would say there's two

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 7>drivers around that.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 9>One just relates to the policy mix itself.

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 7>That is, it's less about the specifics and it's almost

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 7>about the lack of specifics and the uncertainty around the

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 7>reaction function. Now, if you're putting twenty twenty five percent

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 7>tariffs on half of your imports and you don't know

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 7>are they going to be there the next day, are

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 7>they going to be removed? That is naturally going to

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 7>be creating economic uncertainty and I think we're seeing that

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 7>materialize and that is why US risk markets are underperforming.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 9>So that's one aspect.

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 7>The second one is broader, and you could even call

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 7>it a positive but to the extent that President Trump

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 7>is encouraging other countries to build strategic autonomy and is

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 7>encouraging other countries to spend all of a sudden, you

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 7>have an investment thesis potentially for Europe.

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 9>Now that's the more positive angle. The more negative angle is.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 7>The policy uncertainty in the US itself, which I think

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 7>deshually needs a bit more clarity.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, George, appreciate your time. Joe Saravella staf toutsche Bank

0:29:54.800 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 2>looking for one ten on EU Rotllar. Monica Querra of

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Stanley writing the market could be undercounting the long

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>term impact of tariffs because of policy uncertainty. Monica joined

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>US now for more Monica and Mornic, good morning. I'm

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>so pleased you went there because I think this is

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 2>so important, whether the tariffs at twenty five, twenty fifteen,

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 2>or ten. I think the business community just wants to

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>know and have certainty and starts a plan for the

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 2>next year several years. That uncertainty that volatility of the

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>policy itself. How much damage could we see off the

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 2>bank of that.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 10>The policy itself, I think could you know, have significant

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 10>implications depending on the different industries that it's impacting.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>When we're thinking.

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 10>About the policy uncertainty piece not under essentially undercounting potential impacts.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It's what happens next, you know. Now with.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 10>Mexico and Canada, we spoke last week. We thought that

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 10>something like this might happen, right that the tariffs could

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 10>be implemented, they could be renegotiated. You have USMCA potentially

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 10>pulled forward into twenty twenty five. That situation, our relationship

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 10>with our neighbors is incredibly dynamic. It's what happens in April,

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 10>and I think that staying on top of potential tariff

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 10>risk is important.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 6>There's a question about who President Trump is speaking to,

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 6>because Marcus had just expected heading into this year that

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 6>he would be catering to them on some level, that

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 6>he'd be looking for market approval. Seems like that's not

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 6>the case. With a little bit of disturbance being just fine,

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 6>do we have a sense of where President Trump is

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 6>looking to sort of get that approval?

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 10>So the little bit of disturbance piece I think is

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.239
<v Speaker 10>key because the selloff we saw was you know, just

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 10>in the you know, the range of two five or

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 10>on the day on the second right when the tariffs

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 10>were implemented, you saw you know, the biggest hits right

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 10>to tech and energy given the types of tariffs that

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 10>were being you know, proposed. Now, what's important here is

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 10>that that's not this big market downturn. If you had

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 10>a greater correction on that that was prolonged, that I

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 10>think would get the president's attention. But a day point

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 10>in time, momentary response is expected and something that I think,

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, he's saying we can all live with that.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Markets are rebounding.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 10>They're looking to the potential of his negotiating tax tactics

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 10>long term.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 6>You aren't seeing the deals being announced, you actually saw

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 6>them and a volumes fall pretty significantly in February. We've

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 6>talked to a number of executives saying we just don't

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 6>have the certainty and to John's point, that uncertainty drags

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 6>on growth and you're starting to see that some of

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 6>the data in your conversations with people in Washington, DC.

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 6>Is President Trump and his cabinet concerned about that level

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 6>of uncertainty and some of the soft data rolling over now.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're concerned.

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 10>Now what we've seen as far as their strategy and

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 10>Trump one point zero it.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Was the growth policies for first and then teariff second.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the reverse.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 10>They're intentionally doing this. They're coming in at a point

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 10>of extreme geopolitical tension and conflicts, so they're looking to

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 10>address that, essentially reinforce the America First agenda, and then

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 10>hoping that off the back of that, the growth policies

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 10>pick up. So when you're thinking about this is where

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 10>budget and.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Tax come in.

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 10>That if you get the cuts, if you get additional

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 10>cuts to corporates, they're hoping that that's going to create

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 10>tailwinds through twenty twenty six succe that's when they go

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 10>into effect. So twenty twenty five is a restaging, resetting.

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Resizing year. It's going to be choppy.

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 10>This is something we talk to our clients about regularly,

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 10>that this is a bumpy year that.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:44.239
<v Speaker 1>You have to see through it.

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 10>And that's what I think the Trump administration is they're

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 10>looking at, too, is what happens in twenty twenty six

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 10>and then legacy going forward.

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>At LISTA mentioned this earlier. I think is an important

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 2>point regarding taxes twenty seventeen, we've been talking about text

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 2>cuts twenty twenty five into twenty six, we're talking about

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the extension of tax cuts. How different is that? What

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>we get additional cuts beyond just the extension of what

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 2>we did back in seventeen eighteen.

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So they are different.

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 10>If you're looking at it from a budgeting perspective, you

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 10>have to start from where we are now what would

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 10>be the impact long term? So if you extend the

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 10>tax cuts as is, that would add four.

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Trillion just off the bat to the deficit.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 10>Now, if you get additional cuts, it's likely to be

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, to social Security, to you know, no tax

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 10>on tips, those types of giveback to the individual. But

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 10>more importantly, on the corporate side, Trump has said he

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 10>wants corporate income tax top line as low as fifteen percent,

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 10>So that is, you know, significantly stimulative in the long

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 10>run when you're thinking about corporate America.

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Once fifteen with a US production element attached to it. Yes,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 2>so we really understand what that's going to look like

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 2>and how it works.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 10>I don't, especially because I think that There is a

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 10>component here that people are missing is that you have

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 10>to pay for those tax cuts somehow.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs is one way.

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 10>That they're looking to do that through that external revenue

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 10>service passing through funding right through an accounting adjustment. The

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 10>other thing that people aren't looking at is the potential

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 10>for increased corporate taxes on foreign revenues. So this is

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 10>something they did in twenty seventeen. It's i would say,

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 10>an easy, low hanging fruit if they're looking to raise

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 10>taxes because it speaks to and only trying to reincentivize

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 10>businesses to bring their production, manufacturing, sales home. But it

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 10>also helps offset any top line corporate income tax production.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 2>And you need the tax paych it to ready fully

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 2>understand the overall effort alongside the trade effort.

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 6>So if for example, some of the auto manufacturers had

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 6>to pay twenty five percent tax on parts from Mexico

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 6>and Canada, it would be offset with a fifteen percent

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 6>tax rate top line tax rate that would come later on.

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It's in theory.

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's how it comes.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 6>To right, but then sequencing doesn't matter.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Monitor matters. Yes, we've got to go. I appreciate your

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 2>time as always, Thank you, Monica Quera there of Morgan Stanley.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 9>This is the.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Sevems podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 2>and geopolitics. You can watch the show live on Bloomberg

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 2>TV weekday mornings from six am to nine am Eastern.

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 2>you listen, and, as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business app.