1 00:00:01,480 --> 00:00:05,439 Speaker 1: The Action Network Podcast podcast. 2 00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:08,920 Speaker 2: If you are even remotely a savage, you'll run these 3 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 2: people over for a second. Goodness, Hello and welcome to 4 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:31,600 Speaker 2: the Action Network Podcast presented by FanDuel. I'm Sean Zerula, 5 00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:33,400 Speaker 2: joined today by Billy Ward. We're going to help you 6 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:37,600 Speaker 2: break down the very early morning UFC card going down 7 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 2: at the Singapore Indoor Stadium in Singapore, starting at five 8 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:45,920 Speaker 2: a m. Eastern time. Seven prelim, six main card fights. 9 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:48,720 Speaker 2: This is an early one. Kegs, eggs and broken legs 10 00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:52,280 Speaker 2: always love the early Saturday morning fights. Billy told me 11 00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:55,639 Speaker 2: he's gonna wake up, smoke a brisket and enjoy his day, 12 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 2: and I think that's a great plan. See what I 13 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:00,680 Speaker 2: have planned for tomorrow morning. We're gonna be drinking at 14 00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:03,440 Speaker 2: seven am with breakfast or not. But in terms of 15 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:06,960 Speaker 2: the main event, Max Holloway a massive favorite over the 16 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:10,120 Speaker 2: Korean zombie TKZ Chan Sung Jung. 17 00:01:10,360 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 3: Could be a retirement fight for Jung. 18 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:16,480 Speaker 2: This is his tenth consecutive main event, probably a record 19 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:20,960 Speaker 2: for a non champion in the UFC, so certainly, you know, 20 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:24,360 Speaker 2: speaks to his level of star power. Max Holloway obviously 21 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:27,840 Speaker 2: one of the most popular fighters in the sport one 22 00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 2: of the biggest stars in the UFC in terms of 23 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 2: betting this matchup and betting Max Holloway as a significant favorite, 24 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:38,560 Speaker 2: a minus eight hundred favorite minus seven to fifty the 25 00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:42,720 Speaker 2: best available odds out there. That's basically where I projected 26 00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:45,600 Speaker 2: the line. It's hard to get beyond that kind of 27 00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 2: pricing because you're getting to slipping on a banana peel 28 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:52,000 Speaker 2: type of territory when you get to that level of 29 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:55,320 Speaker 2: pricing in a high level MMA fight, I think Max 30 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,760 Speaker 2: Holloway certainly deserves to be this big of a favorite. 31 00:01:57,800 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 2: I don't really see where Junk beats him aside from 32 00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 2: landing essentially a flash knockout, but Holloway the much faster hands, 33 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:08,799 Speaker 2: the much better athlete, especially at the stage of their 34 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 2: respective careers. I think Korean Zombie, who's basically fought one 35 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:14,919 Speaker 2: time a year for the past five or six years 36 00:02:14,960 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 2: and seemingly has regressed in his recent fights, I just 37 00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:21,919 Speaker 2: think another year off a bit slower, a bit more 38 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 2: cage russ where Halloway coming off of a win over 39 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:27,119 Speaker 2: Arnold Allen going to continue to look sharp and he's 40 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:29,639 Speaker 2: basically wiped out the rest of the division. Aside from 41 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:32,560 Speaker 2: his three losses to Alexander Volkanovsky. So on the feet, 42 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 2: I think Halloway wins clear minutes, clear volume advantage, and 43 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 2: I think his hand speed is going to prove too much. 44 00:02:38,120 --> 00:02:41,280 Speaker 2: And similar to that Volkanovski fight against the kay z 45 00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 2: could see Holloway winning via attritional finish, just an accumulation 46 00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:49,839 Speaker 2: of damage that he's being unreturned. On the other end, 47 00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:52,080 Speaker 2: if Zombie wants to win this fight, I think he 48 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:53,640 Speaker 2: needs to grapple, and I think he needs to do 49 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 2: so successfully like he did in his fight against Danny Gay. 50 00:02:56,520 --> 00:03:00,239 Speaker 2: Needs to hit takedowns, get top control, win minutes. It's 51 00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 2: with top position or as I said, land a flash knockout. 52 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 2: We've actually seen Holloway's chin starting to crack just a 53 00:03:06,880 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 2: little bit, knocked down for the first time in his 54 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 2: career and his loss to Volkanovski clipped wobbled multiple times 55 00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:16,080 Speaker 2: in his fights against Yari Rodriguez Arnold Allen, so maybe 56 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:19,960 Speaker 2: the chin for Halloway starting to go just to touch. 57 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:22,480 Speaker 2: He's absorbed an average of about one hundred and thirty 58 00:03:22,560 --> 00:03:25,919 Speaker 2: strikes in each of his past nine fights, so tons 59 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:28,120 Speaker 2: of damage worn throughout his career. One of the most 60 00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:30,320 Speaker 2: durable athletes in the sports, some of the best cardio 61 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:33,040 Speaker 2: in the sport too, and that's why I don't really 62 00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:35,640 Speaker 2: see many pass for TKZ to win this fight, and 63 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:38,720 Speaker 2: would justify Halloway as a substantial favorite. But in terms 64 00:03:38,720 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 2: of how I want to bet this matchup, Halloway inside 65 00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:44,400 Speaker 2: the distance at minus one twenty five, also his knockout 66 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:46,960 Speaker 2: prop at minus one fifteen I think are five bets. 67 00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 2: Fine Bets projected those closer to about minus one fifty 68 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:53,200 Speaker 2: and minus one thirty five, respectively. So Holland's fin or 69 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:56,560 Speaker 2: Halloway's finish props would expect the later finish around three 70 00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 2: or four five, like I said, with the cumulative damage, 71 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:02,000 Speaker 2: but just think the athleticism gap between these two is 72 00:04:02,040 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 2: pretty substantial at this stage of their respective careers. Billy, 73 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 2: are you playing this main event at all? And how 74 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 2: are you anticipating getting things started tomorrow morning? 75 00:04:11,680 --> 00:04:13,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, you know you've almost talked me into the main 76 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:15,760 Speaker 1: event with your point. But yeah, as you mentioned, definitely 77 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:18,480 Speaker 1: gonna wake up early, get the smoker going. It'll be nice, 78 00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:20,760 Speaker 1: get some fights out of the way, be done by noon, 79 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:22,800 Speaker 1: get to go spend some time doing anything else on 80 00:04:22,839 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 1: a Saturday but yeah, I mean you mentioned the star 81 00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:28,320 Speaker 1: power of Chansung Jung, and there's kind of two ways 82 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 1: to become a star. You can become a star because 83 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,160 Speaker 1: you are so good and so exciting, or you can 84 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:35,240 Speaker 1: be a star because you make your opponent look so 85 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 1: good and so exciting, and Changsung Jung kind of falls 86 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 1: in that second category, right, Like the zombie nickname is 87 00:04:40,760 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 1: just because he absorbs hillacious beatings and keeps moving forward, 88 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: which is a just horrible matchup for Max Holloway, the 89 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: UFC's all time significant strike leader. He's almost doubled up 90 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:55,039 Speaker 1: the next closest person in career significant strikes. He's at 91 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:57,960 Speaker 1: like thirty two hundred and number two is eighteen hundred. 92 00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 1: It wouldn't shock me to see him hit Zombie two 93 00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:04,520 Speaker 1: hundred plus times in this one significantly. So if there was, 94 00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 1: you know, outless you had where you can take some 95 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,160 Speaker 1: player prop style stuff and take the over on significant strikes, 96 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:11,000 Speaker 1: I don't know how a book could set this high 97 00:05:11,080 --> 00:05:13,600 Speaker 1: enough that I would be on the opposite side of that, 98 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 1: But I get your angle on the stoppage. I just 99 00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: worry that Holloway doesn't not only does he not have 100 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 1: a ton of power, but he doesn't really try to 101 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:21,839 Speaker 1: knock people out. He's just trying to touch you as 102 00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:24,360 Speaker 1: many times as he can. With it being likely the 103 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 1: last fight for Korean Zombie, you know, does he power 104 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:29,120 Speaker 1: through do the refs and the doctors give him a 105 00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: little bit more leeway than they probably should. That scares 106 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,800 Speaker 1: me just enough that I wouldn't take the knockout prop 107 00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 1: until we got to maybe plus money. And you mentioned 108 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:39,880 Speaker 1: the grappling. I think if that happens, it's probably gonna 109 00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 1: come early. It's just hard to grapple down the stretch 110 00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,600 Speaker 1: after getting hit one hundred times. So if we could 111 00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:48,400 Speaker 1: catch Holloway live at minus three hundred minus four hundred 112 00:05:48,400 --> 00:05:50,560 Speaker 1: after a round or two, I'd be interested. I don't 113 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,520 Speaker 1: see it getting much better than that unless he almost 114 00:05:52,520 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 1: gets knocked out, like right off the bat. So those 115 00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:56,640 Speaker 1: are a couple ways I'm looking to play it, but 116 00:05:57,160 --> 00:05:59,320 Speaker 1: this is one more just gonna enjoy it, love it. 117 00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:01,840 Speaker 1: For DFS. Max Holloway's going to score a million points 118 00:06:01,880 --> 00:06:04,760 Speaker 1: no matter what scoring system you're using, So that's more 119 00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:06,400 Speaker 1: my interest this week. 120 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:08,160 Speaker 3: Billy, I'm a little dispointy. 121 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:09,560 Speaker 2: You know, we've been doing these podcasts for a while 122 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 2: and I feel like I have a good feel for 123 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:13,599 Speaker 2: your betting style. I'm disappointed that you didn't have a 124 00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:15,720 Speaker 2: round four or five or decision prop. This seemed like 125 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,520 Speaker 2: a perfect queued up play where Holloway is going to 126 00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:20,080 Speaker 2: land a ton of volume, and I think the finish 127 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:22,479 Speaker 2: does come later if it comes at all, and the 128 00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 2: decision equity bakes into that. Bat too was the was 129 00:06:24,680 --> 00:06:26,800 Speaker 2: the precious to juice. You're just not a bet that 130 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:27,719 Speaker 2: interests to do for this one. 131 00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:29,640 Speaker 1: It's too juiced because he's I want to say, like 132 00:06:29,680 --> 00:06:31,760 Speaker 1: minus five hundred to win by a decision or something 133 00:06:31,800 --> 00:06:33,760 Speaker 1: crazy like that. So you have to then get a 134 00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:35,480 Speaker 1: worse line than that when you get rounds four and 135 00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:39,400 Speaker 1: five as well. So it's I haven't looked recently. It's 136 00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:41,719 Speaker 1: probably plus ev if I wanted to run the numbers 137 00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 1: on what I think was going to happen, I'm just 138 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:45,760 Speaker 1: not going to be in the business of laying three, 139 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:49,360 Speaker 1: four or five hundred odds on almost any MMA fight. 140 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 1: Make that a parlay piece. Sure, if you know you're 141 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:54,400 Speaker 1: interested in doing some parlays, that would be an excellent piece, 142 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 1: a little bit better juice than if you played him 143 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,799 Speaker 1: straight up. But as a solo bet. It's a lot. 144 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:01,680 Speaker 2: Let's move on to our fight of the night, the 145 00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:04,039 Speaker 2: co main event between Ryan Span and Anthony Smith, a 146 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 2: rematch from a couple of years ago. Span the minus 147 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,600 Speaker 2: one thirty favorite here when they ran this fight as 148 00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:14,160 Speaker 2: a main event on a UFC fight night back in 149 00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:18,440 Speaker 2: September of twenty twenty one. Smith closed as a minus 150 00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 2: one thirty favorite. That was a five round fight. The 151 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:24,600 Speaker 2: five round fight certainly favored Smith more so than a 152 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:28,320 Speaker 2: three round fight does. But Ryan Span, generally speaking, is 153 00:07:28,360 --> 00:07:32,320 Speaker 2: an early finisher, and when those early finishes don't materialize, 154 00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 2: his opponents tend to take over the fight with better cardio. 155 00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:37,920 Speaker 2: I think that's the biggest advantage that Anthony Smith has here, 156 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:41,280 Speaker 2: or maybe the two biggest advantages durability and cardio. But 157 00:07:41,320 --> 00:07:44,080 Speaker 2: I think in recent fights it's pretty evident, and since 158 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:48,000 Speaker 2: their last fight, it's very evident that Anthony smith athleticism 159 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 2: has dropped off to a fairly significant degree underwent surgery 160 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:55,520 Speaker 2: for his knees. So I actually think in this fight, 161 00:07:55,560 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 2: and this is a bit of an odd take, but 162 00:07:57,800 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 2: looking at Ryan SPAN's recent career history, the guys he's fought, 163 00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:04,240 Speaker 2: I think his decision equity is being a little bit 164 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 2: underrated here. And you know, people tend to think Ryan 165 00:08:07,880 --> 00:08:11,920 Speaker 2: Span early finish her bust. But against a potentially declining 166 00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:14,920 Speaker 2: athlete like Smith, who is durable, who can take a punch, 167 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:18,320 Speaker 2: who will stick around, I actually think Span has the 168 00:08:18,360 --> 00:08:20,760 Speaker 2: potential to just be the much bigger hitter to win 169 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 2: very clear minutes, at least for the first seven or 170 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:27,280 Speaker 2: eight minutes before Smith potentially takes over down the stretch 171 00:08:27,320 --> 00:08:29,680 Speaker 2: for the final or for the second half of the fight. 172 00:08:29,840 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 2: So looking at the guys that Ryan Span has fought recently, 173 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:38,520 Speaker 2: obviously Smith, but Nikita Krailove, Dom Reyes, Misha Serkanov, Johnny Walker, 174 00:08:38,640 --> 00:08:41,680 Speaker 2: these are all guys with a very similar arch type 175 00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:44,440 Speaker 2: as Ryan Span. Early finishers who tend to fade. But 176 00:08:44,520 --> 00:08:47,720 Speaker 2: the last time against went against somebody relatively durable other 177 00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:50,000 Speaker 2: than Smith was Sam Albi and that fight went to 178 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:52,040 Speaker 2: a decision, and he's won a couple of decisions in 179 00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:55,440 Speaker 2: his career. So Ryan Spanned by decision of plus thirteen 180 00:08:55,520 --> 00:08:59,360 Speaker 2: hundred absolutely bet my favorite prop squad pick for this week. 181 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,679 Speaker 2: I made this to plus nine hundred. You look at 182 00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:04,680 Speaker 2: the offshore markets, this prop is used much closer to 183 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:07,800 Speaker 2: plus nine hundred than the domestic markets a plus thirteen hundred. 184 00:09:07,840 --> 00:09:11,000 Speaker 2: So I think Ryan Span can absolutely win a decision here, 185 00:09:11,360 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 2: maybe even some decision only bets as well, so you 186 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:15,719 Speaker 2: don't lose your bet in the event that it does 187 00:09:15,760 --> 00:09:17,600 Speaker 2: go to fifteen minute or in the event that it 188 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:20,280 Speaker 2: ends inside the distance. But if it goes all fifteen minutes, 189 00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:23,439 Speaker 2: I think the pricing discrepancy for Smith by decision versus 190 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 2: Span by decision is actually a little bit overweight towards Smith, 191 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:29,800 Speaker 2: and I think SPAN's chances of winning a decision or 192 00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 2: a bit underrated here. 193 00:09:31,080 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 3: So, Billy, I know you like Ryan Span as well. 194 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:35,959 Speaker 2: I doubt that you expect him to win by decision, 195 00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:38,080 Speaker 2: but at plus thirteen hundred, you don't really need him 196 00:09:38,120 --> 00:09:39,920 Speaker 2: to win at a high clip in order to cover 197 00:09:39,960 --> 00:09:42,200 Speaker 2: that bar. Tell me why you like Ryan Span as 198 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:43,160 Speaker 2: they run this match back. 199 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:46,480 Speaker 1: No, I love the decision line. I messaged you earlier 200 00:09:46,520 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 1: in the week that his inside the distance was like 201 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:51,000 Speaker 1: five cents off his money line, which is just insane. Like, 202 00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:54,200 Speaker 1: I get why it is, but anyone can win a decision. 203 00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:57,120 Speaker 1: Stuff can happen, Guys can survive. But no, I think 204 00:09:57,120 --> 00:10:00,000 Speaker 1: Anthony Smith is just physically shot, especially since that broken 205 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:03,520 Speaker 1: leg in the Anklia fight looked horrible against Johnny Walker, 206 00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:05,840 Speaker 1: like just look like he was moving underwater, just never 207 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:07,959 Speaker 1: really got it going. And then you know, I know 208 00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:09,840 Speaker 1: a lot of people probably didn't watch this, but he 209 00:10:09,880 --> 00:10:12,720 Speaker 1: competed against Glover to Shera in a Fight Pass Invitational 210 00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:15,680 Speaker 1: grappling match, and if you didn't know who these people were, 211 00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:18,520 Speaker 1: you would have sworn Anthony Smith was the older, retired 212 00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:22,000 Speaker 1: fighter while Glover tech Era was the younger, more active guy. 213 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,160 Speaker 1: And that's scary against someone with the physicality of span, 214 00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:29,079 Speaker 1: you know, massive power, really fast, strong, all the physical tools. 215 00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: I love your angle and I'm actually gonna sprinkle on 216 00:10:31,440 --> 00:10:33,800 Speaker 1: that too, But the money line at minus one thirty, 217 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 1: I don't want to get cute. Could he catch him 218 00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:38,160 Speaker 1: in a guillotine because Anthony Smith takes a bad shot 219 00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 1: of course, knock out probably the most likely, just because 220 00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:43,800 Speaker 1: he blitzes him. But I get your decision angle as well, 221 00:10:43,880 --> 00:10:45,960 Speaker 1: So my main bet will just be the money line. 222 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:48,320 Speaker 1: But do love where you're going with that, because he's 223 00:10:48,360 --> 00:10:50,679 Speaker 1: tough enough to survive but might not have the physical 224 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:53,840 Speaker 1: Anthony Smith that is, it's tough enough to survive, but 225 00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:55,760 Speaker 1: probably doesn't have the physical tools to make it too 226 00:10:55,760 --> 00:10:56,680 Speaker 1: competitive anymore. 227 00:10:57,120 --> 00:10:59,079 Speaker 2: I believe all the Spans finishes have occurred in the 228 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:01,280 Speaker 2: first seven minutes his fights as well, as I said, 229 00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:04,640 Speaker 2: he does gas out. But if Smith can survive that 230 00:11:04,720 --> 00:11:06,840 Speaker 2: first seven minutes, I actually think this one has. 231 00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 3: A decent chance of going to a decision. 232 00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:10,720 Speaker 2: So if you're betting this fight to end inside the distance, 233 00:11:10,760 --> 00:11:12,760 Speaker 2: I'd go with the under one and a half as 234 00:11:12,800 --> 00:11:16,360 Speaker 2: opposed to betting the juice up fight nz ITD. Maybe 235 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:18,360 Speaker 2: Smith round two round three props would be how I'd 236 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 2: play Smith. Smith live after round one is probably the 237 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 2: only way I'd bet the underdog in this fight. But yeah, 238 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:27,679 Speaker 2: Ryan Span, I do think the price flipping base off 239 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:31,240 Speaker 2: of the athleticism gap that has clearly grown since the 240 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:33,000 Speaker 2: last fight, and also the fact that this is a 241 00:11:33,040 --> 00:11:35,559 Speaker 2: three round fight instead of a five round fight. I 242 00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:38,760 Speaker 2: think both of those factors certainly help Ryan Spance. A 243 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:40,640 Speaker 2: billy going with Ryan Span on the money line, I'm 244 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:43,880 Speaker 2: taking him by decision at plus thirteen hundred. That will 245 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:46,120 Speaker 2: be in my round robins and gonna sprinkle that for 246 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:49,959 Speaker 2: about a tenth of a unit as well. Let's move 247 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 2: along here to our favorite underdog beats, so we've got 248 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:55,240 Speaker 2: a consensus underdog. Billy, I'm gonna let you go ahead 249 00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,160 Speaker 2: and take this one away. Tell me why we both 250 00:11:58,240 --> 00:12:00,600 Speaker 2: like Lucas Abreshki for Saturday Night. 251 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:04,600 Speaker 1: So sometimes I'm betting on a fighter because I think 252 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 1: they're good or I think they bring something skill set wise, 253 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:11,040 Speaker 1: and other times I'm just betting against their opponent, and 254 00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:13,200 Speaker 1: this is one of the latter ones. I think Waldo 255 00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:15,719 Speaker 1: Cortez Acosta is kind of lucky to be in the 256 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 1: position he's in. Record wise, He's I want to say, 257 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:21,800 Speaker 1: two and one in the UFC, but he beat Chase 258 00:12:21,800 --> 00:12:25,479 Speaker 1: Sherman and Jared Vanderra, both fairly low level, boring decisions. 259 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:29,120 Speaker 1: He's a former baseball player, and like normally you say 260 00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:31,600 Speaker 1: baseball isn't his base, but he actually kind of punches 261 00:12:31,640 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 1: like he's pitching a baseball, which is interesting, but there's 262 00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:38,400 Speaker 1: a reason we don't see like anyone else doing that. 263 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:41,360 Speaker 1: And then he was really exposed against Marcos Virgerio Delima 264 00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:43,840 Speaker 1: in the last one. So it's not so much that 265 00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 1: I'm that big on Lucas Bresky, who I think is 266 00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:49,920 Speaker 1: it best to low to mid level UFC heavyweight, but 267 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 1: he fought some tougher guys. He's zero and two, lost 268 00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:55,960 Speaker 1: a split decision to Martine Boudai, unanimous decision to Carl Williams, 269 00:12:55,960 --> 00:12:58,360 Speaker 1: who took him down the whole time. Cortez Acosta isn't 270 00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:01,120 Speaker 1: going to grapple, and this fight is fairly likely to 271 00:13:01,120 --> 00:13:03,520 Speaker 1: go to a decision, which is rare for heavyweight fights. 272 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:05,959 Speaker 1: And you know, systemically we always talk about this. If 273 00:13:05,960 --> 00:13:07,679 Speaker 1: we think a decision is likely to happen, and one 274 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 1: guy's plus two hundred, that's the ticket I want in 275 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:12,000 Speaker 1: my hand when they're reading the scorecards. I don't want 276 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:15,559 Speaker 1: that heavily juiced line. So really nothing about Lucas Breski 277 00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:18,840 Speaker 1: that I'm super excited about. But there's a big fade 278 00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:21,840 Speaker 1: for me on cortezla Coosta as a minus two fifty 279 00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:24,679 Speaker 1: or so favorite against almost anyone at this point. 280 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:26,960 Speaker 2: Well, Billy, you know, you tick the boxes that we 281 00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:28,800 Speaker 2: talk about underdog in a fight that choots to go 282 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:32,400 Speaker 2: to decision, and frankly for heavyweight minus one twenty five 283 00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:34,200 Speaker 2: to go to a decision, I would say is heavily 284 00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:36,760 Speaker 2: favored to go to a decision. Heavyweight fights and inside 285 00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:39,560 Speaker 2: the distance close to seventy seventy five percent of the time, 286 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:41,760 Speaker 2: So getting minus money on a heavyweight fight to go 287 00:13:41,840 --> 00:13:44,440 Speaker 2: to a decision indicates that I think it's pretty heavily 288 00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:48,199 Speaker 2: favored to go to a decision relative to the divisional average. 289 00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:52,400 Speaker 2: BRESHKEI lost a split decision of Martin Budaye. I was 290 00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 2: on Budaye in that fight. He outlanded Budaye two to 291 00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:57,960 Speaker 2: one on strikes that probably should have gone Breshki's way. 292 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:00,600 Speaker 2: He was then taken down, as he said, by Carl 293 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:03,760 Speaker 2: Williams outr wrestled. He has the wrestling advantage in this 294 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 2: fight and all of the grappling upside. Cortez Acosta taken 295 00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:11,080 Speaker 2: down by Virgilia Daimau also taken down by Chase Sherman. 296 00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:15,160 Speaker 2: That is pretty telling for me. I think Breshke can 297 00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:18,560 Speaker 2: absolutely grapple him here. All of the grappling upside, and 298 00:14:18,600 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 2: if Breshky is not going to get grappled himself like 299 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:24,440 Speaker 2: he was against Williams, I think the striking as at 300 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:27,400 Speaker 2: a minimum fifty to fifty if not, would favor him 301 00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:29,640 Speaker 2: on the feet. So have no idea why Breshky is 302 00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:32,960 Speaker 2: the underdog in this spot. Absolutely my favorite underdog in 303 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:35,520 Speaker 2: the card, maybe even my favorite money line bet on 304 00:14:35,560 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 2: the card. As I said, all of the grappling upside 305 00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 2: and the striking at worst I think is fifty to fifty. 306 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:44,760 Speaker 2: So Lukash Breshki here a consensus underdog play for me 307 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 2: and Billy. I'm gonna give about one more Jarno Erins 308 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:50,080 Speaker 2: in the first fight on the card. Again, I think 309 00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:54,120 Speaker 2: another fight where the striking is essentially fifty to fifty 310 00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:57,960 Speaker 2: and Erins probably has the grappling upside. I don't expect 311 00:14:58,040 --> 00:15:00,640 Speaker 2: him to necessarily pursue it, but you do look his record. 312 00:15:00,920 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 2: He has a number of submission wins on there. Sungwu 313 00:15:03,120 --> 00:15:06,240 Speaker 2: Choi is a good boxer, but he's shown significant durability 314 00:15:06,280 --> 00:15:09,240 Speaker 2: concerns in his recent fights. He's getting clipped in fights 315 00:15:09,240 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 2: that he's winning. He's, like I said, he's a very 316 00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:13,480 Speaker 2: good boxer. He tends to win minutes, he puts up 317 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:17,240 Speaker 2: good volume. But he's getting clipped in every single one 318 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:20,560 Speaker 2: of these fights now and it's a big concern and 319 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:23,760 Speaker 2: he can definitely lose rounds that he's on the way 320 00:15:23,800 --> 00:15:26,000 Speaker 2: to winning just by getting clipped and knocked down. And 321 00:15:26,040 --> 00:15:29,280 Speaker 2: as I said, Aaron's retains all of the grappling upside 322 00:15:29,280 --> 00:15:31,480 Speaker 2: in this matchup too, So a couple underdogs for me, 323 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:34,400 Speaker 2: Aaron's and breshkeep who I think can keep the striking 324 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:37,480 Speaker 2: competitive at a minimum and retain all of the grappling 325 00:15:37,560 --> 00:15:39,400 Speaker 2: upside at plus money. 326 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:41,480 Speaker 1: You know, we talk frequently if we think it's going 327 00:15:41,520 --> 00:15:44,040 Speaker 1: to be a decision, we like to have underdogs. I 328 00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:45,840 Speaker 1: think there's a correlayer to that where if we think 329 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,720 Speaker 1: it's going to be a mostly striking fight, it's almost 330 00:15:48,760 --> 00:15:51,800 Speaker 1: always better to have underdogs because it's a lot easier 331 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:54,440 Speaker 1: for judges to tell who's winning in the grappling. And 332 00:15:54,480 --> 00:15:56,440 Speaker 1: when we think it's going to be a reasonably close 333 00:15:56,480 --> 00:15:59,200 Speaker 1: striking fight, even if you know one fighter looks a 334 00:15:59,200 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: little bit better, those get judged incorrectly all the time, 335 00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:05,360 Speaker 1: and unless someone's getting knocked down or cut up real badly, 336 00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 1: you could almost flip a coin on a lot of 337 00:16:07,320 --> 00:16:09,520 Speaker 1: these striking only abouts. And even if one fighter lambs 338 00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 1: ten or twenty more strikes, that doesn't mean the judges 339 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:14,200 Speaker 1: see that. They don't see the stats, they're not counting along. 340 00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:16,520 Speaker 1: So both of your picks kind of reference that to 341 00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:19,160 Speaker 1: an extent, and I think that's something that systemically we 342 00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:20,000 Speaker 1: should be looking. 343 00:16:19,760 --> 00:16:20,280 Speaker 3: At as well. 344 00:16:20,880 --> 00:16:22,480 Speaker 2: Absolutely, and that's why I'm going to take the guy 345 00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:24,680 Speaker 2: who you know, in theory is grappling upside. All I 346 00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:26,320 Speaker 2: need him to do is hold the fight up against 347 00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:28,880 Speaker 2: the cage for one minute out of the five minute round, 348 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:31,280 Speaker 2: or just laying a couple of clinch strikes, and if 349 00:16:31,280 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 2: the rest of the round is competitive, you know, the 350 00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:35,680 Speaker 2: judges might say, okay, well you had that one minute 351 00:16:35,720 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 2: of control time and some clinch strikes that might be 352 00:16:37,680 --> 00:16:40,600 Speaker 2: enough to separate it. So just mixing up the martial 353 00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 2: arts I think is important sometimes and just you know, 354 00:16:43,320 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 2: doing more being well around and giving your opponent more looks, 355 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:47,960 Speaker 2: but also giving the judges, you know, more optics that 356 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 2: you're actually trying to find different ways to win the fight. 357 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:52,360 Speaker 2: And instead of just you know, basically standing there and 358 00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:54,600 Speaker 2: sparring for fifteen minutes, you know, being the guy who's 359 00:16:54,640 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 2: trying to mix it up, pushing forward I think certainly helps. 360 00:16:57,600 --> 00:16:59,320 Speaker 2: And what could be a fifty to fifty round, so 361 00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:01,640 Speaker 2: you make some very get points there, Billy. Let's move 362 00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:03,760 Speaker 2: on to our favorite props and a fight that I 363 00:17:03,840 --> 00:17:05,880 Speaker 2: expect to be competitive too, another fight that we could 364 00:17:05,960 --> 00:17:09,479 Speaker 2: just stop and talk about here for a second, gigats 365 00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 2: Chickaise against Alice Cassaras. I think this is a good 366 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:15,800 Speaker 2: underdog spot. I think you would disagree with that. Very 367 00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:19,399 Speaker 2: interesting fight though here in this division. Billy, go ahead 368 00:17:19,440 --> 00:17:21,119 Speaker 2: and break down this fight for me and telling me 369 00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:22,919 Speaker 2: how you want to bet it. As I said, this 370 00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:24,480 Speaker 2: is our favorite props, so you might be able to 371 00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:25,320 Speaker 2: tell where Billy's going. 372 00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, so my favorite way about this fight is actually 373 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:32,720 Speaker 1: get to Chakadz live. For a couple of reasons. One, 374 00:17:32,760 --> 00:17:34,919 Speaker 1: we've got some cage rust issues. He's been out of 375 00:17:34,920 --> 00:17:36,440 Speaker 1: the cage for I think close to a year and 376 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:38,880 Speaker 1: a half at this point, and with guys like that, 377 00:17:39,240 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 1: it doesn't really shock me when they start kind of slow. 378 00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:43,679 Speaker 1: You know, you come out, you're just get getting your 379 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:45,359 Speaker 1: feet back on you. You're getting used to being hit, getting 380 00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:47,719 Speaker 1: used to the lights, all that stuff. So I expect 381 00:17:47,720 --> 00:17:50,440 Speaker 1: Cassarras to have his best moments early in the fight. 382 00:17:51,359 --> 00:17:55,000 Speaker 1: But the other reason is stylistically, Cassaras has a real long, 383 00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 1: wide like traditional martial arts stance that leaves him open 384 00:17:58,040 --> 00:18:02,520 Speaker 1: to getting leg kicked really frequently, and Giga might have 385 00:18:02,560 --> 00:18:05,040 Speaker 1: some of the best overall kicking game in the division, 386 00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:07,880 Speaker 1: that's always something that you're probably not gonna win any 387 00:18:07,920 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 1: fights in the first round with leg kicks, but you 388 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:11,600 Speaker 1: land five to six to seven in the first round, 389 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:13,720 Speaker 1: six to seven more in the second round, all of 390 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:15,920 Speaker 1: a sudden, you look like a minus one thousand favorite 391 00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:19,200 Speaker 1: down the stretch. So in terms of if I'm making 392 00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:22,080 Speaker 1: a pre fight, bet on that it's Chickatz in round 393 00:18:22,119 --> 00:18:24,840 Speaker 1: three or by decision at minus one fifteen, what I'm 394 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 1: really looking for is a competitive first round. Maybe Casarras 395 00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:30,399 Speaker 1: deals it with some grappling, and I'm guessing you're going 396 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:33,159 Speaker 1: to talk about the grappling upside for Casseras, which he 397 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:36,080 Speaker 1: has some, but he's not an offensive wrestler. He has 398 00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:39,800 Speaker 1: really good submissions. He developed his submission game because other 399 00:18:39,840 --> 00:18:42,600 Speaker 1: people kept taking him down and he needed a deterrent 400 00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:44,840 Speaker 1: or a way to win in those situations. I don't 401 00:18:44,840 --> 00:18:47,480 Speaker 1: see him having the wrestling ability to get Giga to 402 00:18:47,560 --> 00:18:50,520 Speaker 1: the ground unless Giga slips on a kick or some 403 00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:54,400 Speaker 1: other stuff, which isn't extremely unlikely but also feeds into 404 00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:56,280 Speaker 1: my pick where I think that's more likely to happen 405 00:18:56,320 --> 00:18:59,080 Speaker 1: early than it is late, as Giga tightens up and 406 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:00,840 Speaker 1: starts to pull down the stretch. 407 00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:04,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that, you know, that's a very solid breakdown. 408 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:08,960 Speaker 2: So my concern Mcgiga and the Giga Live entry would 409 00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:11,760 Speaker 2: be that I've never loved his cardio. Now, if Casaras 410 00:19:11,840 --> 00:19:13,880 Speaker 2: is trying to pursue takedowns and not able to get them, 411 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:16,159 Speaker 2: I think that certainly is going to even the cardio 412 00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:19,560 Speaker 2: out very quickly. Interesting points about the kajrash, You're right, 413 00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:22,440 Speaker 2: I mean, Giga coming back first fight since January twenty 414 00:19:22,480 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 2: twenty two, and he also took an absolute beat down 415 00:19:25,760 --> 00:19:28,440 Speaker 2: at the hands of Calvin Cator in that matchup. Chin 416 00:19:28,640 --> 00:19:31,160 Speaker 2: was probably very close to getting cracked, almost put out 417 00:19:31,320 --> 00:19:33,360 Speaker 2: near the end of that fight eight a million elbows. 418 00:19:33,359 --> 00:19:36,359 Speaker 3: His face was absolutely sliced to shred. 419 00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:38,280 Speaker 2: So curious to see what the scarring looks like on 420 00:19:38,320 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 2: his face after that one, because he might look like 421 00:19:40,840 --> 00:19:42,919 Speaker 2: the h you know, the old hockey goalies before they 422 00:19:42,960 --> 00:19:45,280 Speaker 2: used to wear masks after eating all of those elbows. 423 00:19:45,280 --> 00:19:48,119 Speaker 2: But yeah, so, as you mentioned, Alex Caceras does retain 424 00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:51,320 Speaker 2: all of the grappling upside in this fight, and when 425 00:19:51,359 --> 00:19:53,439 Speaker 2: Giga has faced guys who have had to grapple him 426 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:56,040 Speaker 2: or try to grapple him. That's when he's fought us 427 00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:59,520 Speaker 2: with decisions or lost fights. Is Dana White Contender Series 428 00:19:59,560 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 2: fight against Austin Springer choked out, runekund choke made it 429 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:05,640 Speaker 2: to the UFC, fought Brandon Davis taken out three times, 430 00:20:05,640 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 2: split decision win. Fought Jamal Emmers taken down twice, split 431 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 2: decision win. Then he faced a bunch of guys who 432 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:14,679 Speaker 2: were willing to strike with them, knocked him out, you know, 433 00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:17,040 Speaker 2: basically won on his title run, beat Eds and Barbosa 434 00:20:17,320 --> 00:20:19,960 Speaker 2: till he finally faced Calvin Cator, who took him down 435 00:20:19,960 --> 00:20:22,400 Speaker 2: in the first round, beat him up, tired him out, 436 00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:25,479 Speaker 2: and then the fight progress from there. But basically, as 437 00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:29,040 Speaker 2: I said, anybody who's taken down Giga, or at least 438 00:20:29,040 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 2: threatened to take him down, has either beat him or 439 00:20:31,600 --> 00:20:32,920 Speaker 2: gone a split decision with him at. 440 00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:33,600 Speaker 3: The UFC level. 441 00:20:33,680 --> 00:20:36,879 Speaker 2: So don't actually expect, as you said, Billy cassiraus to 442 00:20:36,920 --> 00:20:39,080 Speaker 2: land takedowns. I don't think he's a good offensive wrestler, 443 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:40,840 Speaker 2: but I do think he's going to get the back 444 00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:42,440 Speaker 2: at some point, and that's what you got to watch 445 00:20:42,480 --> 00:20:45,359 Speaker 2: out for. Giga does give his back both standing and 446 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:48,080 Speaker 2: when he's trying to stand if he gets taken down, 447 00:20:48,160 --> 00:20:51,680 Speaker 2: So if Casarus is able to land a takedown, maybe 448 00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:53,159 Speaker 2: he's not able to hold it. But I do think 449 00:20:53,200 --> 00:20:55,640 Speaker 2: he can switch to a back tack as Gigo looks 450 00:20:55,640 --> 00:20:57,200 Speaker 2: to get back up, or if they're in a clinch 451 00:20:57,320 --> 00:20:59,679 Speaker 2: position up against the fence, I think Casara's is going 452 00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:01,760 Speaker 2: to look to switch to a back take from there 453 00:21:01,880 --> 00:21:05,400 Speaker 2: as well. So yes, very much agree. Don't think Casaraus 454 00:21:05,400 --> 00:21:07,720 Speaker 2: has huge wrestling upside here, but he does have the 455 00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:10,399 Speaker 2: grappling upside, and I think the potential for back takes 456 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:12,560 Speaker 2: is very strong. So if he wins a fifty to 457 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:15,240 Speaker 2: fifty round one gets a back take in the second 458 00:21:15,320 --> 00:21:17,679 Speaker 2: or third round, this is definitely his fight. But in 459 00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:19,760 Speaker 2: terms of how I want to bet this, yes, I'm 460 00:21:19,800 --> 00:21:21,800 Speaker 2: sprinkling a little bit on Cassarra's money line of two 461 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:24,800 Speaker 2: to one, but I actually think his submission or decision 462 00:21:25,240 --> 00:21:28,240 Speaker 2: double chance prop at plus U ninety is a better 463 00:21:28,240 --> 00:21:29,840 Speaker 2: way to go about playing it. I think there's too 464 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:33,720 Speaker 2: much knockout equity TKO equity baked into his line. Has 465 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:35,879 Speaker 2: that recent head kick knockout, he is not a power 466 00:21:35,920 --> 00:21:38,719 Speaker 2: puncher whatsoever. Though, if he's going to get a knockout 467 00:21:38,720 --> 00:21:41,240 Speaker 2: here or an official TKO win. It's going to be 468 00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:44,840 Speaker 2: as a result of submission that Giga doesn't tap out 469 00:21:44,880 --> 00:21:48,919 Speaker 2: to that results in a TKO injury or a positional 470 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,040 Speaker 2: TKO via you know, stoppage on the ground where he's 471 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:54,560 Speaker 2: in mountain, basically pounding him out, and Giga doesn't roll 472 00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:57,040 Speaker 2: and give up his neck. So that's how I think 473 00:21:57,040 --> 00:22:00,399 Speaker 2: Casara's wins the fight by knockout. I think those possiblesities 474 00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:03,639 Speaker 2: are pretty low, and I think that discrepancy between his 475 00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:06,479 Speaker 2: plus two hundred money line and his plus two ninety 476 00:22:06,800 --> 00:22:10,240 Speaker 2: submission or decision double chance prop is a bit too wide. 477 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:12,359 Speaker 2: I think you would probably agree with that too, Billy. 478 00:22:13,000 --> 00:22:15,000 Speaker 1: I do, and I'm what I'm about to say is 479 00:22:15,040 --> 00:22:17,840 Speaker 1: actually not like trying to rebut your bet. I think 480 00:22:17,880 --> 00:22:20,119 Speaker 1: the likeliest way this gets to the ground is Giga 481 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:22,560 Speaker 1: slips on a kick like we see him do it sometimes. 482 00:22:22,280 --> 00:22:25,199 Speaker 1: He kicks very aggressively. Cassara's is tall, so he's got 483 00:22:25,240 --> 00:22:26,880 Speaker 1: to stretch a little bit higher on those head kicks. 484 00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:30,240 Speaker 1: That's not the craziest thing I think here, but I 485 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:32,320 Speaker 1: do agree, and also just if he tries to stand 486 00:22:32,359 --> 00:22:35,720 Speaker 1: in trade with Chikazi, he's just gonna die. So yeah, 487 00:22:35,920 --> 00:22:37,880 Speaker 1: you know, like we're not going to expect a knock 488 00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:39,880 Speaker 1: out in a situation like that where he's a huge 489 00:22:39,960 --> 00:22:40,879 Speaker 1: underdog in the striking. 490 00:22:41,600 --> 00:22:42,359 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm a bill. 491 00:22:42,240 --> 00:22:44,399 Speaker 2: Wonkey on like the Ghost the decision or ins inside 492 00:22:44,400 --> 00:22:46,680 Speaker 2: the distance here, I'd lean to the ghost of decision, 493 00:22:47,000 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 2: But I really do think one back take might be 494 00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:51,159 Speaker 2: enough for Cassarras to finish it with a choke. He 495 00:22:51,240 --> 00:22:53,399 Speaker 2: is a very good roar naked choke, and as you 496 00:22:53,440 --> 00:22:55,680 Speaker 2: said on the feet, I think there's a huge discrepancy 497 00:22:55,680 --> 00:22:57,959 Speaker 2: in terms of the impact of the striking. Giga has 498 00:22:57,960 --> 00:23:00,199 Speaker 2: that beautiful body kick that he seems to put out 499 00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:01,800 Speaker 2: a lot of people with, and that's just sort of 500 00:23:01,840 --> 00:23:04,080 Speaker 2: like a roll of the dice that you can't really 501 00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:07,560 Speaker 2: predict because Sarah's though tends to be very defensively, sounded 502 00:23:07,680 --> 00:23:09,880 Speaker 2: very careful in terms of how he approaches the striking, 503 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:12,120 Speaker 2: so could see a bit of a tepid striking pace, 504 00:23:12,160 --> 00:23:14,720 Speaker 2: But I also think there's going to be moments where 505 00:23:14,760 --> 00:23:16,600 Speaker 2: this gets very close to a finish and is going 506 00:23:16,640 --> 00:23:18,119 Speaker 2: to be harry. So that's that's why I kind of 507 00:23:18,160 --> 00:23:22,480 Speaker 2: stayed away from the total in this matchup, and then 508 00:23:22,760 --> 00:23:24,240 Speaker 2: you know, I just want to mention before we move 509 00:23:24,359 --> 00:23:27,080 Speaker 2: on that submission or decision double chance prop. I'm also 510 00:23:27,119 --> 00:23:29,960 Speaker 2: playing Parker Porter in his fight the exact same way. 511 00:23:30,280 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 2: I think Porter's knockout is too far baked into his 512 00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:35,880 Speaker 2: money line against Tafa. I think it's a very similar 513 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:38,879 Speaker 2: matchup to this one, where there's a clear striking advantage 514 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:41,399 Speaker 2: for the favorite, but I think the underdog has a 515 00:23:41,480 --> 00:23:44,480 Speaker 2: chance to either grapple or win minutes down the stretch. 516 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:48,840 Speaker 2: So Parker Porter submissioner decision, Alex Casara's submission er decision. 517 00:23:48,880 --> 00:23:52,920 Speaker 2: My favorite props for Saturday, Billy going with Giga Chakad's 518 00:23:53,080 --> 00:23:56,000 Speaker 2: round three or by decision, And Billy, you had one 519 00:23:56,000 --> 00:23:57,040 Speaker 2: more as well at Knockleboro. 520 00:23:57,119 --> 00:24:00,000 Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, go in with my props God Style pick 521 00:24:00,359 --> 00:24:04,280 Speaker 1: Rnya Nakamura plus six hundred by submission. He's, depending on 522 00:24:04,320 --> 00:24:06,760 Speaker 1: the book, roughly even money to win this fight and 523 00:24:07,080 --> 00:24:09,720 Speaker 1: by submission in round one. I should say he's roughly 524 00:24:09,760 --> 00:24:12,000 Speaker 1: even money to win this in round one, but he's 525 00:24:12,040 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 1: like much more heavily lined to win it by knockout 526 00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:17,760 Speaker 1: in round one than he is by submission, which doesn't 527 00:24:17,800 --> 00:24:19,480 Speaker 1: make a ton of sense to me because he's the 528 00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 1: Japanese bon Nickel. He was the under twenty three world 529 00:24:21,840 --> 00:24:25,040 Speaker 1: champion in wrestling. He was going to compete in the 530 00:24:25,080 --> 00:24:28,200 Speaker 1: Olympics before it got canceled switched over to MMA. Yes, 531 00:24:28,280 --> 00:24:31,040 Speaker 1: there's a significant chance he finishes with the TKO on 532 00:24:31,080 --> 00:24:33,919 Speaker 1: the ground, but his A plus plus plus skill is 533 00:24:33,920 --> 00:24:36,640 Speaker 1: his wrestling. You know, guy gives us back gets choked out. 534 00:24:36,880 --> 00:24:38,760 Speaker 1: That should be a lot closer to the knockout line 535 00:24:38,760 --> 00:24:40,600 Speaker 1: than the plus six hundred we're seeing right now. So 536 00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:42,960 Speaker 1: little bit sprinkle on that. It's gonna be my prop 537 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:43,960 Speaker 1: squad pick this week. 538 00:24:44,800 --> 00:24:46,560 Speaker 2: Billy, did you hear somebody else say that he's the 539 00:24:46,640 --> 00:24:48,439 Speaker 2: Japanese bon Nickel this week? Or is that just like 540 00:24:48,560 --> 00:24:49,959 Speaker 2: kind of the compument on him. 541 00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:52,080 Speaker 1: I have said that a few different times in a 542 00:24:52,080 --> 00:24:54,120 Speaker 1: couple different places this week. I don't know that I've 543 00:24:54,160 --> 00:24:55,879 Speaker 1: heard anyone else said it, but it's definitely been in 544 00:24:55,920 --> 00:24:58,680 Speaker 1: my brain. But he is, I mean, he's ridiculously athletic 545 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:00,440 Speaker 1: lefty with elite wrestling. 546 00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:04,520 Speaker 2: Like you know, I haven't tuned into any other concept 547 00:25:04,560 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 2: this week. I you know, frankly, I haven't read or 548 00:25:06,320 --> 00:25:08,080 Speaker 2: seen anything you've done. Is the first time we've talked 549 00:25:08,080 --> 00:25:09,160 Speaker 2: about the fights this week. 550 00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:10,840 Speaker 3: It's literally what I have in my notes. 551 00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:13,240 Speaker 2: This kid is the Japanese Bo Nicholas, so I'm glad 552 00:25:13,240 --> 00:25:15,560 Speaker 2: that we've arrived at the same comp on him. 553 00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:17,680 Speaker 3: He's a freak. I mean, he's a freak athlete. 554 00:25:17,680 --> 00:25:20,040 Speaker 2: We see a lot of these Japanese mixed martial artists 555 00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:25,239 Speaker 2: come over Tatsuro Taira, for example, Hora Gucci don't have 556 00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:29,159 Speaker 2: the most physically imposing physiques. They're more grapplers, but a 557 00:25:29,160 --> 00:25:33,960 Speaker 2: bit Newtaly. Nakamura is an insane athlete. This kid hits 558 00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:37,960 Speaker 2: like an absolute truck. I think he's an absolute potential 559 00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:42,200 Speaker 2: future champion and maybe the best Japanese miss martial artist ever. 560 00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 2: I think he legitimately has that ceiling. This kid isn't 561 00:25:44,800 --> 00:25:48,840 Speaker 2: an absolute freak athlete. So the way I'm betting that 562 00:25:48,880 --> 00:25:51,720 Speaker 2: fight Knacamora Garcia under one and a half rounds at 563 00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:54,680 Speaker 2: minus one sixty, it is juiced up. Knakamura is about 564 00:25:54,720 --> 00:25:57,359 Speaker 2: even money, as Billy said, to win in the first round. 565 00:25:57,480 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 2: I think he's minus three hundred to win inside the distance. 566 00:26:00,680 --> 00:26:03,639 Speaker 2: If you try the same game, parlay Knockamore in the 567 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:05,480 Speaker 2: under one and a half rounds. Where you're able to 568 00:26:05,520 --> 00:26:08,080 Speaker 2: do that, it actually gives you a return of minus 569 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:11,240 Speaker 2: one eighties. So you're better off betting the under one 570 00:26:11,240 --> 00:26:13,200 Speaker 2: and a half rounds straight up than you are playing 571 00:26:13,200 --> 00:26:15,440 Speaker 2: the same game. Parlay would knock them earn the under 572 00:26:15,480 --> 00:26:17,919 Speaker 2: one and a half rounds if he wins inside the distance. 573 00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:19,960 Speaker 2: I think it's going to be in the first seven 574 00:26:20,000 --> 00:26:21,840 Speaker 2: and a half minutes, So minus one sixty on that 575 00:26:21,920 --> 00:26:24,840 Speaker 2: under one and a half. Billy taking round one sub 576 00:26:24,920 --> 00:26:27,960 Speaker 2: at a much juicier plus six hundred. I'll probably put 577 00:26:27,960 --> 00:26:30,000 Speaker 2: that on my round robin tickets this week. Billy, I 578 00:26:30,080 --> 00:26:32,720 Speaker 2: like that angle. Let's move to our best bets, and 579 00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:35,159 Speaker 2: we're both gonna give out a best bet from the 580 00:26:35,200 --> 00:26:35,760 Speaker 2: same fight. 581 00:26:36,680 --> 00:26:38,840 Speaker 3: Probably my favorite fight this week. 582 00:26:38,600 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 2: In terms of, you know, projecting fighters for where they're 583 00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:44,240 Speaker 2: going to go in the future. In terms of a 584 00:26:44,320 --> 00:26:48,960 Speaker 2: matchup between top fifteen contenders, Aaron Blanchfield, the New Jersey 585 00:26:49,080 --> 00:26:54,479 Speaker 2: native against Talia Santos, who lost her split decision title 586 00:26:54,520 --> 00:26:58,639 Speaker 2: fight against Valentina Chipchenko the last time that she was 587 00:26:58,640 --> 00:27:00,800 Speaker 2: in Singapore, and I think that is act actually a 588 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:04,120 Speaker 2: bit of an underrated aspect for this matchup. The fact 589 00:27:04,119 --> 00:27:06,720 Speaker 2: that Santo's going right back to Singapore fighting on the 590 00:27:06,720 --> 00:27:10,399 Speaker 2: same body plock schedule that she did previously. This is 591 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:12,320 Speaker 2: her first fight since then, so she has had the 592 00:27:12,359 --> 00:27:16,240 Speaker 2: long layoff. Blanchfield has been more active in that time. Blanchfield, 593 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:19,200 Speaker 2: the younger fighter, showed really good striking and proved striking 594 00:27:19,240 --> 00:27:22,840 Speaker 2: in her win or just gone draj I think Blanchfield 595 00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:25,760 Speaker 2: is the future champion. I think Santos, though in her 596 00:27:25,800 --> 00:27:28,720 Speaker 2: own right, should already be the champion, if not, could 597 00:27:28,760 --> 00:27:31,480 Speaker 2: be a future champion as well. So curious to see 598 00:27:31,520 --> 00:27:34,920 Speaker 2: the trajectory of Santos's career coming off of that loss, 599 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:37,159 Speaker 2: whether her motivation to get back into the title picture 600 00:27:37,200 --> 00:27:41,200 Speaker 2: is still there. We know Aaron Blanchfield as motivated as 601 00:27:41,240 --> 00:27:44,919 Speaker 2: anybody in the vision to where UFC gold around her waist. Billy, 602 00:27:45,160 --> 00:27:47,720 Speaker 2: I'm gonna let you go ahead and give out your side. 603 00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:50,080 Speaker 2: But in terms of my favorite bet for this fight, 604 00:27:50,160 --> 00:27:51,879 Speaker 2: I'm playing it to go to a decision at minus 605 00:27:51,920 --> 00:27:54,480 Speaker 2: two twenty. I know what's heavily juiced up. I made 606 00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:57,639 Speaker 2: this line closer to minus two fifty, though, and I 607 00:27:57,640 --> 00:27:59,920 Speaker 2: think both have good enough defensive jiu jitsu to ASSENTI 608 00:28:00,280 --> 00:28:03,520 Speaker 2: deny one another, and they're both durable enough and have 609 00:28:03,600 --> 00:28:05,840 Speaker 2: good enough cardio for a three round fight to just 610 00:28:05,920 --> 00:28:08,960 Speaker 2: keep this a very competitive fifty to fifty scrap where 611 00:28:08,960 --> 00:28:11,320 Speaker 2: I don't really see the finish equity particularly high on 612 00:28:11,400 --> 00:28:14,000 Speaker 2: other side. But Billy, you're taking a firmer stance with 613 00:28:14,040 --> 00:28:15,640 Speaker 2: the side on this fight I am. 614 00:28:15,680 --> 00:28:17,160 Speaker 1: And you stole a little bit of thunder here when 615 00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:18,680 Speaker 1: you said she should be the champ. I was about 616 00:28:18,680 --> 00:28:22,280 Speaker 1: to refer to her as the lineal UFC Flyweight Women's Champ, 617 00:28:22,320 --> 00:28:25,000 Speaker 1: somewhat tongue in cheek. Yeah, it is Santos, but no, 618 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:27,159 Speaker 1: I think there's a bit of recency bias here with 619 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:31,120 Speaker 1: this line making Santos the underdog just because we haven't 620 00:28:31,119 --> 00:28:35,600 Speaker 1: seen her fight since she basically beat Valentino Chevchenko. I'm 621 00:28:35,600 --> 00:28:37,840 Speaker 1: going with Santos's money line at plus one twenty five. 622 00:28:38,200 --> 00:28:41,040 Speaker 1: It makes me sad my daughter who's doing jiu jitsu now, 623 00:28:41,040 --> 00:28:43,160 Speaker 1: and I watch all of Aaron Blanchfield's fight. She's like 624 00:28:43,240 --> 00:28:46,160 Speaker 1: the house favorite fighter right now, but I don't think 625 00:28:46,160 --> 00:28:48,480 Speaker 1: it's her time yet. I think Santos is just a 626 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:51,640 Speaker 1: little bit better. At this point. You mentioned Blanchfield being younger, 627 00:28:51,640 --> 00:28:54,560 Speaker 1: which normally we like, but she's only twenty four. Santos 628 00:28:54,640 --> 00:28:57,080 Speaker 1: is thirty or thirty one. I think Santos is closer 629 00:28:57,120 --> 00:28:59,720 Speaker 1: to her prime than blanche Field right now. Santos should 630 00:28:59,720 --> 00:29:02,200 Speaker 1: have a big striking edge. But what really stood out 631 00:29:02,200 --> 00:29:04,600 Speaker 1: to me is the way that Blanchfield gets her takedowns 632 00:29:04,720 --> 00:29:08,280 Speaker 1: is by generally she rushes in with punches, initiates a clinch, 633 00:29:08,360 --> 00:29:11,040 Speaker 1: then get trips and throws. Santos has a very good 634 00:29:11,120 --> 00:29:13,280 Speaker 1: Muay Thai style clinch where she can win some of 635 00:29:13,320 --> 00:29:16,760 Speaker 1: those clinch grappling exchanges and probably not get taken down 636 00:29:16,760 --> 00:29:19,920 Speaker 1: so easily against Blanchfield. And Santo's is also a very 637 00:29:19,920 --> 00:29:22,600 Speaker 1: adepth counter striker, so if Blanchefield is rushing in trying 638 00:29:22,600 --> 00:29:24,840 Speaker 1: to force the clinch, she can step back, kind of 639 00:29:24,880 --> 00:29:26,520 Speaker 1: slide out of range, do a little bit of Ian 640 00:29:26,520 --> 00:29:29,520 Speaker 1: Gary Sean O'Malley type stuff where she uses that length 641 00:29:29,560 --> 00:29:32,680 Speaker 1: and range to snipe from the outside if it does 642 00:29:32,760 --> 00:29:35,240 Speaker 1: get to the ground. Blanchfield is favored, but I think 643 00:29:35,280 --> 00:29:37,400 Speaker 1: Santos has a strong enough game to just not get 644 00:29:37,400 --> 00:29:40,240 Speaker 1: immediately tapped, and then if she's winning the striking, that's 645 00:29:40,240 --> 00:29:42,760 Speaker 1: all you need, right because the damage is so heavily 646 00:29:42,800 --> 00:29:45,520 Speaker 1: prioritized on the scoring. I do think it likely goes 647 00:29:45,520 --> 00:29:48,200 Speaker 1: to a decision. If it does, I kind of want 648 00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:50,760 Speaker 1: the woman who's landing more strikes rather than the one 649 00:29:50,760 --> 00:29:53,400 Speaker 1: who's desperately trying to get takedowns, getting a minute or 650 00:29:53,440 --> 00:29:56,240 Speaker 1: two a control time and then getting punched on the feet. 651 00:29:56,640 --> 00:29:59,680 Speaker 1: I am worried, though you mentioned. Blanchfield's striking progression looks 652 00:29:59,720 --> 00:30:01,720 Speaker 1: so much better against some drib than even the fight 653 00:30:01,760 --> 00:30:05,640 Speaker 1: before that. She's almost I shouldn't say almost certainly because 654 00:30:05,640 --> 00:30:08,280 Speaker 1: that's tempting fate. But she's a very likely future champion. 655 00:30:08,480 --> 00:30:10,280 Speaker 1: I'd love to see these two rematch for the belt 656 00:30:10,360 --> 00:30:11,760 Speaker 1: in two or three years because I think one of 657 00:30:11,760 --> 00:30:14,200 Speaker 1: them ends up having it. Probably whoever wins this one 658 00:30:14,320 --> 00:30:15,600 Speaker 1: is the next champion at Flyway. 659 00:30:16,280 --> 00:30:19,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, this is a great fight, you know, As you said, Billy, 660 00:30:19,960 --> 00:30:22,200 Speaker 2: I think Santo's being in her physical prime. She's just 661 00:30:22,200 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 2: going to be the stronger fighter here, and I think 662 00:30:24,120 --> 00:30:25,959 Speaker 2: that might be enough to deny the takedowns. It might 663 00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 2: be even be enough to get her offensive takedowns. I 664 00:30:28,480 --> 00:30:31,240 Speaker 2: think the fight that's most concerning for me was Aaron 665 00:30:31,280 --> 00:30:34,120 Speaker 2: Blanchfield's effort again to JJ Aldridge, where she ultimately won 666 00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:36,320 Speaker 2: I believe by second or third round finish. But she 667 00:30:36,440 --> 00:30:38,320 Speaker 2: was taken down twice in that fight and wasn't able 668 00:30:38,320 --> 00:30:40,440 Speaker 2: to land takedowns of her own, and she short of 669 00:30:40,480 --> 00:30:42,000 Speaker 2: struggled with Aldrich's size. 670 00:30:42,000 --> 00:30:43,840 Speaker 3: She's short, She's only five fours. 671 00:30:43,840 --> 00:30:47,000 Speaker 2: Santos is the bigger fighter, but also the upper body 672 00:30:47,040 --> 00:30:49,160 Speaker 2: takedowns that Aldrich hit in that fight are the similar 673 00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 2: types of throws that Santo's goes for, So I actually 674 00:30:52,080 --> 00:30:54,400 Speaker 2: think it's possible that Santos gets takedowns in top time 675 00:30:54,440 --> 00:30:58,160 Speaker 2: here too. So you know the fact that it's heavily 676 00:30:58,200 --> 00:31:00,160 Speaker 2: chused to go to a decision taking the plus more. 677 00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:01,520 Speaker 3: I agree. 678 00:31:01,640 --> 00:31:04,120 Speaker 2: I wanted to bet Aaron Blanchfield here. I'm with you, Billy. 679 00:31:04,160 --> 00:31:06,640 Speaker 2: I'm a big fan of Aaron Blanchfield. I'm from the Northeast. 680 00:31:06,920 --> 00:31:08,920 Speaker 2: I just like how she fights, though she's sort of 681 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:12,880 Speaker 2: a female Marabi Bosh Philly two degree, just in terms 682 00:31:12,920 --> 00:31:15,800 Speaker 2: of the pace, the forward pressure that she's going to provide. 683 00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:18,920 Speaker 3: I just love the stylum which she fights. I think 684 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:19,840 Speaker 3: she's getting much better. 685 00:31:20,320 --> 00:31:23,160 Speaker 2: I think we both recognize that the striking improved drastically 686 00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:26,360 Speaker 2: in the last fight against Andrage. I'm a bit skeptical 687 00:31:26,480 --> 00:31:30,720 Speaker 2: that you know, it improves so much, though technically more 688 00:31:30,760 --> 00:31:32,960 Speaker 2: so than it did, just because Onrage was so worried 689 00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:35,480 Speaker 2: about the takedowns coming, and she was just extremely open 690 00:31:35,520 --> 00:31:37,760 Speaker 2: to getting hit there because she was worried about the 691 00:31:37,800 --> 00:31:41,920 Speaker 2: level change. So yeah, Blanchefield, I agree. I don't really 692 00:31:41,920 --> 00:31:43,640 Speaker 2: think you can bet her here. I want to bet 693 00:31:43,680 --> 00:31:45,920 Speaker 2: her here. I want to root for her. I'm going 694 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:47,600 Speaker 2: to be rooting for her, but I'm going to be 695 00:31:47,680 --> 00:31:50,000 Speaker 2: rooting for her to win by decision right to end, 696 00:31:50,240 --> 00:31:52,840 Speaker 2: by decision, go to decision minus too twenty. My favorite bet, 697 00:31:52,920 --> 00:31:56,160 Speaker 2: Billy is going to be betting Talia Santos on the 698 00:31:56,160 --> 00:31:58,120 Speaker 2: money line at plus one twenty five. I would say 699 00:31:58,120 --> 00:32:02,200 Speaker 2: Santos probably more chaofide, Blanchfield more submission upside. But I 700 00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:06,160 Speaker 2: think Santos is defensive jiu jitsu I would trust more 701 00:32:06,200 --> 00:32:09,320 Speaker 2: than Blanchfield's chin I suppose, I think, especially if they 702 00:32:09,320 --> 00:32:11,760 Speaker 2: get in a firefight, I think I give Santos more 703 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:14,280 Speaker 2: finishing upside. So yeah, I definitely agree with Billy in 704 00:32:14,400 --> 00:32:17,080 Speaker 2: terms of leaning to the dog here. But that'll do 705 00:32:17,160 --> 00:32:19,479 Speaker 2: it for us for UFC Singapore. I hope you found 706 00:32:19,840 --> 00:32:22,000 Speaker 2: some value that you want to bet throughout this card. 707 00:32:22,000 --> 00:32:25,040 Speaker 2: For Billy Ward, I'm Sean Drul Moving back next week 708 00:32:25,120 --> 00:32:26,080 Speaker 2: for another UFC card. 709 00:32:31,120 --> 00:32:34,560 Speaker 1: Action Network reminds you please gamble responsibly. 710 00:32:34,960 --> 00:32:37,800 Speaker 3: If you or someone you care about has a gambling problem, 711 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:40,680 Speaker 3: help is available twenty four to seven at one eight 712 00:32:40,800 --> 00:32:41,600 Speaker 3: hundred Gambler