WEBVTT - Behind the Scenes Minis: Murder and War

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you missed in History Class, a production

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio, Hello and Happy Friday. Am Holly Fry and

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy B.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Wilson.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So there was a thing this week. We talked about

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the Beecham Sharp Tragedy, sometimes also called the Kentucky Tragedy,

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and there was a thing I thought about including in it,

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but I did not, okay, And the reason why is

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that it's long. Okay, hold on, I'm counting one, two, three, four, five, six,

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>seven eight. I don't even know it's there. At the

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>end of their lives and wrote a poem about their

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>whole experience, with the intent that it would be engraved

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on their tombstone, which sounds lovely at least, you know,

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in ter of like from a sentimental point of view.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But this poem is long. It's not it's not like

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a short little thing. It's like thirty or forty lines long.

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really really long. And I just and it did

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>end up on their tombstone, and I just think of

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the poor person that had to engrave all of that,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>because it is not a brief piece of writing by

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>any means. It would be like going, you know, I

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>would like two of Shakespeare's sonnets engraved on my tombstone.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Like today, that would probably be quicker work. We have

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>machines to do it, mm hmm. Not in eighteen twenty six,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and it basically is a very romanticized version, of course

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of their story. I also didn't note that a lot

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of people, I mean, I think it's it's pretty commonly

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>believed that Anne really co authored that final document with

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>her husband, that she had a lot of say in it.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It was not written in his handwriting. Okay though that

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Initially when I read that, I was like, are they

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that this was a fake document? No, most people

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are actually indicating that Anne probably wrote it all down

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and was a collaborator on it. Whether that's just because

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he had poor penmanship or she was kind of driving

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the bus in terms of like how that document was

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>written and what it contained is a matter of some speculation,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But the two of them really wrote it together, right.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>This is such a mess of people lately, We've had

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of discussions of people accusing each other of

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>things that cannot be verified. Yeah, the whole thing about

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>her child is so messy, so messy, and the only

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>person who we can say knows for sure or knew

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>for sure who the father was was her, and she

0:02:53.919 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>never she never stated it was anyone other than but

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>there are even some questions about whether she ever actually

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>stated it was sharp. So it all stays a mystery.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a little unsatisfying. Yeah, It's also an interesting thing

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in that obviously this was written or this whole thing

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>took place in the eighteen twenties, so some decades before

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War, and reading some of the accounts, even

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>though I know this was the case, it's still a

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>little startling how casually people will just talk about the

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>enslaved people that they own and how that makes them important.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like, we know that that was going on, But

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>then when I read contemporary accounts, it always feels like

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a punch in the gut, like, oh, nobody was Like

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean people were, but nobody in this you know

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who was writing this down and being yes, he was

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy, he had X number of enslaved people, although

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they of course don't word it quite that way. Those

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>people never go own owning people. That seems that seems

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>weird and wrong, Like I just I don't know, I know,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that's my hippie dippy talking I just want everybody to

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.679
<v Speaker 1>have a moral compass. I don't know why that's so hard.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also an interesting thing in terms of how completely

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>gripped and entire community can be by the events and

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>behaviors in the lives of a very few people, right

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because there was all of this infighting among legislators while

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>farmers were seriously like are we going to survive? And

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>some of those legislators really did seem more interested in

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>just winning over one another than the actual constituents that

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they represented. We've never seen that before. But when you

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think about there are a bunch of people literally sitting there,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>going is my farm going to be foreclosed? Am I

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>going to lose everything? While all of these men bicker,

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very frustrating. And then it becomes really really easy

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>to see how there could have been political machinations involved

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the murder that played out Like Beecham obviously, you know,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>towards the end was like, yes, I did it, but uh,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to do it, but also I don't

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>know if I would have done it. I waited four years,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but then this guy kept telling me I should do it,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>kept pointing out that my wife's reputation had been ruined.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>He was right. I did want to kill him after that. Like,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a very interesting example of how levers can be

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>pulled by people with intents that are dishonorable to manipulate

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the passions of other people to do things that are

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily on their backs but that will benefit them directly. Yeah.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And like, one of the things that really struck

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>me was how much leading up to him, like authoring

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>or co authoring a confession, how much of it was

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>based on absolutely circumstantial.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>The closest thing to.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Like actual evidence being his wife's saying, like I recognize

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that voice, mm hmm, which I don't know maybe, but

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 2>everything else absolutely circumstantial.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, everybody that gave testimony just about someone else came

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>along and said, that's not true. He never had that conversation.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're talking about. That didn't happen.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not what really took place. It's such a mess,

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It also is a good, not a

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>good example, but a clear example of the way that

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>public opinion gets put in place, because again, right up

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>until the sentencing, Beecham was very adamant that he didn't

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>do it, and with no evidence. It took that jury

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>less than an hour to go yep, guilty. It's like,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>did you just go off vibes Like, That's not how

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to work. It's just a fascinator in a

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>sad way. I don't have a funny story to add

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to this one. This weekly it was really heavy. I

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>try to make sure there's some ding dong story I

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>could tell about my own ridiculousness. I'll at least take

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the edge off. And there I've certainly, I'm sure done

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>plenty of ding dong things in the last several days, even,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't have one ready to roll. I don't

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>think i'd ever heard of this before. Yeah, I mean

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I it's one that I stumbled across. It's another one

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of those great I was looking at a paper and

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw a headline on another part of the paper,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, what's that about? And it was like, oh,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this was one of the great things. Just kind of

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>makes it light. You surely saw the corpse bride, right, Yeah,

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know where there's that moment. It's in a song

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>where one of the characters is talking about all of

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that have been playing out again, revealing some

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some things that the characters in the movie have done,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and they go and a murder most Fowl. I found

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that exact line as a headline talking about this case

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>murder exclamation poem most foul, and I always thought that

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was very fun and cute and probably based on some

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is, I think, right, I think one

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Shakespeare tragedies. I'm pretty sure, yes, But I

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was surprised to find it as a headline in the

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky newspaper, Murder most Fowl, and it at least gave

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>me a moment of corpse bride fund in the midst

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of yucky he said, he said, she

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe said, but we don't know stuff. Yeah. I feel

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that Anne Cook moved out to the

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>country to be alone with her mother, out of society

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.599
<v Speaker 1>was probably a good indicator that she didn't want to

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about any of that right now. Whether or not

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 1>that was an issue of feeling ashamed or I don't know,

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe she just didn't want to get in the mess. Anyway,

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of sad and so much hangs on

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the testimony of the neighbor, some of which seems to

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be almost contradictory of itself. It's unclear anyway, a murder,

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>most foul. Let's go watch stop motion animation for fun

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>after such sad stories.

0:09:50.640 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we talked about Wilfred Owen this week.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We sure did.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>I have kept circling back to Wilfred Owen repeatedly. Deltiet

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>decoram Est is a poem that we've read, I think

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>in high school, maybe also in college, in like a

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 2>different context and a more humanity's context in college and

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 2>in literature class in high school. And I did not

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>know anything about his life or biography when reading the poem.

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 2>The poem was really about like World War One and

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 2>the horrors of trench warfare and the use of gas

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. It was not about Wilfrid Owen

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 2>as a person, and so I did not realize that

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 2>he had been a soldier and that he had been

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>killed at the age of only twenty five, so close

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>to the end of the war. And when I learned that,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I kept just circling back to I'm kind of wanting

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 2>to do an episode about it, And as I said

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>in the episode, I just kept kind of wanting to

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 2>hug him. I am sad that he had such a

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>short life because of war. I got the impression that

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>you had some similar responses as we were wrapping up

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the episode I did and his work, I never really

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>studied him, so looking at this after you had sent

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>it over to me, there's such a very obvious through

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 2>line from his work too. Another recent topic, who is

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>near to my heart Kurt Vonneguet in the way he

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 2>talks about war. Yeah, I'm like, I guarantee he read

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 2>his work. I guarantee it. I had not thought about that,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>but that makes absolute sense.

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very not romanticized when he talks about it

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in any kind of way, even in his off hand

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to sides, it's usually all about how stupid the whole

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>thing is and pointless, and that is the.

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Undertone of a number of Wilfrid Owen's poems as well.

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Regarding the height requirement to join the British Army, so

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>as we said, he was a little more than five

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to five, just like a smidge over five to five,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and the height requirement at the very beginning of the

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 2>war had been less than that, and then they had

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 2>such a surge of people trying to enlist that they

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 2>raised it to just have a way to quickly weed

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>people out, but then kept having to progressively lower it simultaneously.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 2>There were people underneath what had been the original the

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>original limit, which I think was five foot three, and

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 2>there were men under five foot three who wanted to enlist,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of them actually who wanted to enlist,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>And so special battalions were formed, called Bantam battalions, named

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 2>for they think rooster, right, bantam roosters. And a lot

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of the people who joined these bantom battalions were like

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>doc workers, mine workers, people who were shorter than average,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 2>but also like really stocky and really strong. And I

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of went on a slight detour learning about bantam

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 2>battalions and then was like, Tracy, you gotta get your

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 2>mind back on your work. So I don't know if

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>if that might be a topic for some kind of

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>future episode, or it might be incorporated in a future episode.

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>In some way, I got the impression that like, these

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>were generally men who were very used to doing very

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 2>hard work, and simultaneously the other battalions of men who

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 2>were taller than that could be kind kind of patronizing

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>toward them. Yeah, And so it seems like there was

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of a lot of social expectation and ideas

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 2>about masculinity kind of interwoven with all of this.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, this also makes sense because you know, bantams are

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a smaller fowl. Yeah, and they're not just roosters, like,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there are many fowl that could be characterized as bantam, Like,

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there are ducks that would be called bantam, as well

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as chickens.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I've most often heard it with rooster. Yeah,

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>but they are little and sturdy.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I also have some thoughts about Harold Owen, Yeah,

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>who I have not researched at all. I know zero

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>about his life. But he went to such links to

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>just black out parts of his brother's letters and in

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>some cases cut out parts of them with scissors, without

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 2>knowing that a person who is reading the elections of

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 2>his letters that his brother had edited and published might

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>think that, you know, these were letters sent from the front.

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they just got damaged in transit like that might

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>be what illegible meant. No, illegible meant that Harold went

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>through them and expurgated them.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>He made them illegible.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And logically, with it being you know, the early

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century, if what was being cut out was in

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>some way related to Wilfred Owen having feelings or relationships

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>with other men that likely would not have been something

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>he would have been writing openly about. So it seems

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>like this could have been things that his brother would

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>have been like able to see that people could like

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>read into, or like his brother not being particularly guarded

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>without how he was writing about things right but near

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that passage where Owen where Harold Owen and his biography

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>of his brother described him as having no relationship with

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>anybody because he thought it might interfere with his intellectual ability.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Harold Owen said this about himself, quote, I deliberately chose

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the Roman Catholic religion because of its insistence on celibacy,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and Wilfrid's thinking poetry supplanted religion. And I was just like,

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I have thoughts and questions, let me do if we

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>had a time machine, I would just kind of want

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to go meet both of these brothers and talk to

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>them more. This whole thing also illustrates why I can

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 2>find the meme about historians describing lovers as friends to

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>be frustrating, because this is the kind of things that

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>his story are dealing with when writing about queer history.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the time friends and family members who

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>are very protective of somebody's legacy, who in some cases

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>have gone through and cut parts of their letters out

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 2>with scissors and will not allow historians access to the

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 2>actual primary original documents to review them, only selectively give

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:28.239
<v Speaker 2>some stuff or some exp expurgated stuff or whatever. And

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>it's only later, often after either those family members have died,

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>or those family members have become more open about you know,

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>their past family member, or in some cases, you know,

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 2>something's been passed down through a family and they come

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 2>into the hands of somebody who has different you know,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 2>social and political ideal ideals and beliefs than the person

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 2>who was originally cutting stuff out of letters with scissors.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>That is when historians are actually able to get more

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>into the real depth of a person's whole life. So

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>as sure, there are you know, previous histories of or

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>previous biographies of Wilford Owen, including once written by his brother,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that don't touch on that at all, And one element

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of that is like just not having access to the

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 2>original documents and their entirety to go through. Yeah, I

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 2>always try to think about, like what that moment is

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 2>where someone decides essentially to rewrite history, and I honestly

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 2>am a little conflicted about it for a couple of reasons.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, like it sucks to not have original documents available

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell it an accurate story. I also do understand

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>as frustrating it as it has been for me. Not

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just in cases like this where it's queerness being raised,

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, with anyone where there's something about them

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that someone in their family thought it was best people

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>not know. But I can also see as incorrect as

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>this this move was, you know, someone like his brother,

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>who clearly had his own stuff going on, worrying that

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>his brother's legacy would be forgotten or tainted in some way,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and wanting to position it in a way that he

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would be recognized for his writing and not the other

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>things about him. Right, I mean, And it's hard because

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>it's easy for us to go that's shortsighted. But like

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time, it probably seemed like, well, his work

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>could be buried forever, or I can do this right

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and he can be seen in this other way. Not

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the same thing at all, but right, Like Queen Victoria's

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>daughter trashed a bunch of her writing yeah, and she

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>died rather than let people see it. And so I

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>do understand that there's also a tertiary part of it

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for me where I also wonder how much grief is

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>informing it, because if you've I mean, every one of

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>us will experience a grief if you have not already,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sorry, and it sucks. But there is a

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens. I have seen it happen to people

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>where when someone has passed, without even being cognizant that

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you are editing the story, people start telling their version

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of that person's story, focusing on things that are different

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 1>than other things and wanting to almost create this not

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>always idealized, but a version that is what they remember

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and what they were part of. Yeah. Yeah, and wanting

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to like pare down anything that doesn't fit that. Yeah. Again,

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>don't love it, but I do understand the motivation of it. Yeah.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, And socially, the culture that you and I have

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 2>grown up in and lived in in our whole lives,

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 2>we eulogize people after they die, when like that's just

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of a baseline of what's expected. Is like, yeah,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you don't go to somebody's funeral and say a bunch

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of things about them that could be taken as really

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 2>negative into a typical.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're a rabbel rouser, unless you're a rabbl rasler.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Like the word eulogy literally has the idea that it's

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 2>affirming there in the word yeah.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 2>The story of Wilfred Owen and all of his personal

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 2>papers reminds me a little bit of and Lister, who

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>we covered on the show before. Yeah wrote if you

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 2>haven't heard that episode, and Lister basically wanted to marry

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>a woman and figured out a way to make that

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>work for herself and wrote many, many, many diaries extensively

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 2>chronicling her life and also in chronicling all of her relationships.

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And when a family member later on, you know, this

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>is all in the nineteenth century, when all of this

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 2>would have been stigmatized and in some ways illegal. Family

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 2>member cracked the code that she had written in, realized

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 2>what they were about, and kind of went yikes, and

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 2>put them back in the vault. And I feel like

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 2>we're so fortunate that those things they went back in

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 2>the vault instead of being burned, because that is something

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 2>that could have happened and has happened with other figures

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 2>from history and honestly people, now, I'm sure so Yeah,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I still just want to hug Wilfrid now I love

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 2>so desperately that he and his mother worked out a

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 2>code together. Yeah, and a couple of different codes, a

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of different ways to stay in touch. I didn't

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>know anything about these postcards until learning about the code

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 2>that they had worked out together. And the postcards were

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>just basically a fast way to let your loved ones

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 2>know that you were alive.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 2>It took you know, two seconds to fill the thing

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 2>out and then it would just be mailed. And it

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>had instructions printed on it very clearly that if you

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 2>wrote anything on it other than your name, the date,

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 2>and the date of the last letter you received from

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 2>that person, it would just be discarded. And also, you know,

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the things in and of themselves a form of propaganda,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 2>because of all of the statements you could communicate with

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>somebody were none of them were like yeah, none of

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 2>them were like I am in the hospital and will

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 2>never recover. Like that was not an option.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder too, since these were posts cards, if part

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of this wasn't an effort at concealment from like enemies,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>reading Oh yeah, maybe and trying to triangulate where people were,

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what kind of actions were happening, et cetera. I mean it, yes,

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it is propaganda. Still, I'm not trying to claim it's not.

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>But like, if there is a secondary like intelligence and

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>concealment aspect to it, maybe so maybe so I want

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to I can so easily picture a film about the

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>leadership sitting around in a room going, well, we have

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it easy for them to communicate with their

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>people back home. Okay, but then that's going to make

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it easy for our enemies to read them, and them

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>figuring out this complex flow chart of what they could

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and could not include.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Having had a job before where I had to write

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>things that went through multiple levels of approval and revision,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I am imagining the approval process of exactly what went

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 2>on this postcard. I'm imagining that we can just write

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 2>a whole musical about the whole writing and editing.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you write the musical. I don't want the singing,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but I would be really.

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Bad at that. I was just thinking about about Operation

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Min's Meat is just what that made me think of

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>a show that I've only heard parts of. Anyway, Anyway,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever's happening on your weekend. I hope it as good

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>as possible. If there's somebody in your life that you

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>want to go hug, I hope they're cool with that

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>and that you're able to go give them a hug.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back tomorrow with a Saturday classic and something

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>brand new on Monday.

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Missed in History.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Class is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 2>to your favorite shows.