WEBVTT - Weekend Bonus: Crypto IRL, Episode 7, with Tim and Katie

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heard podcast,

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy mrirae Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Yes, I know it's Saturday, but we're here

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer you our listeners a special audio only version

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of a new weekly video series called Crypto I r L.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That's I r L like in real Life, and it's

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hosted by friends of the show Katie Greifeld and Tim Stenovic.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>This is episode seven of the series. If you want

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the full video experience, head over to Bloomberg dot com,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>slash qt or check it out on YouTube. What cop

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>are you? I think I'd be the grizzled veteran with

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a heart of gold, grizzled veteran with the heart of

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>a Clint Eastwood type, you know. Yeah, Like at the

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I'm you know, hard on the outside,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but I just want the best for my colleagues, my rookies,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>such as yourself. I'm a rookie, I think in this situation. Yeah,

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I like to think of myself as the good cop. Alright,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty vanilla, but it's fine. Good cop, Okay, you

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>can be the bad cop. We should probably explain why

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about cops. The entire episode is about crypto

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and crime. Tim If I can't use my crypto to

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fund activities that other people might think are illegal, what

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>are we even doing here? That's the question. Bitcoin has

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>been closely associated with crime since pretty much the beginning.

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>In the early days, it was the currency of choice

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>on the dark wet, used in drug deals and even

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a murder for higher plot. In more recent years, it's

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>been what hackers have demanded when they've held pipelines, hospital systems,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and met packing plants hostage, And then there's been the hacks.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>October two is on track to see more crypto stolen

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and hacks than any other month this year is on

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>pace to be a record according to chain analysis. But

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as bitcoin actually good for crime, since all transactions are

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>public on the blockchain, everyone can see bitcoin move on

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain, and governments and other organizations are getting better

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>at recovering stolen bitcoin. Plus it's not actually that easy

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to launder bitcoin to turn lots of it into real,

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>usable money. This raises an important question. If bitcoin isn't

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>good at crime, then how can it live up to

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>its promise as a stateless currency that could allow people

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in impressed areas to transact with one another without a

0:02:52.880 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>regulator seeing what they're up to. Tell as at all

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast in February, you wrote that it's time for

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin to get better at laundering money, and I have

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about it since then. I pushed to get stuck.

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Did it really made an impression on me? Um? I

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>find it a very compelling argument, But lay out your case. Well,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the core arguments that like biitcoiners

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>make is that it's like separation of money and state, right,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that it's a sort of form of money that

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't rely on the government, it doesn't rely on traditional

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>banking system, etcetera. And when I wrote the piece, it

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was if you were calls like during the Canadian trucking

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>protests and there was that big convoy and sitting aside

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what one's view of the protest work, which I think

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is like kind of irrelevant to the question. The point is,

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>if there's going to be a moment where people needed

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a form of money that could like they could transact

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>without censorship, that was it. And it didn't really work

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for that. They were able to like very easily track

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the transactions that were able to like freeze wallets from

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>like interacting with banks. So it's like, if bitcoin is

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to live up to its promise of being a

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>means of transaction that is separate from the states, separate

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>from the financial institutions, I don't think it's there yet

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>in terms of whether it's privacy or obfuscation or things

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. So you're essentially saying that if bitcoin is

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to live up to its promise of being this stateless currency,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>yea something that could help and oppressed people, Yeah, then

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>it actually needs to be something that would also be

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>good for criminals. I think that, Yeah, that would be

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the implication because again, like what's what's a criminal in

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>one country one city could just be a protest or

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. So to some extent, like this distinction is

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be very like vagable, like yeah, some places

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like protest is crime, someplace free speeches crime. And so

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the point is that for it to like, yeah, fulfill

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>its mission, then on level, there has to be a

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>way to transact with it without the state being able

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, you got these coins, and now these coins

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>if they ever go to an exchange, if they ever

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>go to like a fiat off ramp, they'll be frozen.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the point then? I think part of the

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 1>reason I've been thinking about this column that you wrote

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know, eight nine months is that it

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of made me think that crime is really subjective.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Crime to one person, to one government, is not a

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>crime to another government. Yeah, right, Like there are all

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there are. There are certain categories of crimes that everyone

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>would find to be like absolutely, shouldn't people absolutely, But

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there are other yeah, in different situations, like you know,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sending someone or selling a copy of the Bible might

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be a crime in some countries, or a different religious

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>text or any other sort of like protest or whatever

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>it is. And so yeah, that's exactly right. Like, how

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>would you even begin to conceive of a currency that

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>would work for what we would call like legitimate crime

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or legitimate dissidents within a country if it didn't work

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for things that we would consider to be reprehensible. But

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it works to a certain extent, And that's what it

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like, at least because we are seeing still ransomware

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>attacks that are you know, essentially say pay us x

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin else. Yeah, although even even ransomware attacks, there's a

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty big loss of market share by bigcoin that we've

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seen to like some of the privacy coins, like I

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>think like if you look around like Manarrow, which is

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>much smaller, less liquid, less market kept point is still

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>popular among ransomware in tax and part because of this reason.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like has privacy built into it from like round up. Wait,

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so if you're a criminal and you want to do

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some crime, which is would never never suggest, but I

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>do think that it speaks to again like ransomware is

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>really bad. So this is not about that. The point

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>is like, well, then if if it doesn't work for these,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>then what I like to sort of like freedom, sort

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of like outside the state, outside the financial institutions, use

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>cases that it does work for because the point that

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I see is like, Okay, they say it's like no

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one can block a bitcoin transaction, no one can censor it.

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it a defective form of censorship if an

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>entity can say these wallets can no longer move to

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>an exchange, And I think that's an important sort of

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>set up there that you can do pack and get

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in exchange. It's just you can't really do anything

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with the bitcoin that you write, and you know there's

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all kind of like train analysis is getting better and better,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so it gets it becomes easier to like connect an

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>individual to a wallet and so forth, and like law

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>enforcements and private software companies are getting like really good

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at this. But if there's a point where it's like

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>really hard to disassociate a coin from a human name

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from someone that is known to officials, then you start to,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, lose some of the promise of the currency

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of anything. Really well, that's that's it. It's a whole

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>different episode the Philosophy Show to delight. Thank you for

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>having me. I'd love to be back. Beth Busbee from Analysis,

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Sugit Rahman from TRM Labs. It's good to have you

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>both here with us. How are you great? Thanks for

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>having us. What do you think of the crime scene?

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's great, very realistic. You know what it's like when

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you investigate a crypto in the digital world. This is

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it's like. All the coins, the yellow you know,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going for something that's really authentic. So that's some

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>good feesback. Um, hey, I want to start with you.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Just give us an idea of the most shocking crime

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen. Committed with crypto. So if I go

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>back to my days when I was with the Drug

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Enforcement Administration, um, it was with drug traffickers and anywhere

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from drug trafficking with money laundering using crypto for drug

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>cartels or your running the mill, individuals that were down

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on their g parents basement, um, selling drugs on the internet.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>So those are shocking and the of themselves and like

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>how the individuals actually like benefited from it and leveraging

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>crypto for that. When I think about drugs and I

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think about bit colin and I think about them both together,

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think about silk Road, Like is that the sort

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that we're talking about? Yeah, so kind of both. Right,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So the very first really play of drugs and crypto

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is silk road. Right, that was one of the most

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>innovative spaces for somebody to be like how do I

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>get this onto the black market without being detected by

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement? And then this was the generation of leveraging

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>tour and the digital realm of what payment system was,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>which was crypto, and that's what created silk road. So

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for the traditional sense of the digital aspect for drug trafficking, yes,

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be what it is. However, um. Any time

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a type of crime, you can leverage crypto

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for that. So drug trafficking and the traditional sense where

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you have the actual bulk move of large quos of

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>drugs UM individuals can still accept payment with that through

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>crypto suggets. Same question was shock and crime using Bicklins.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>They weren't necessarily shocking to me because criminals often go

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>where the sort of technology is. But the first time

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I was really struck by how interesting crypto really could

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be was when I read the indictments charging those Russian

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officers with interfering in the elections in because if

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you read those indictments, you'll see that intelligence officers were

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>using crypto to buy servers within the United States to

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>try to sort of you know, obscure their tracks and

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>use that to basically purchase the infrastructure that they then

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>used to launch the hacks into the DNC emails and

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all that. And they even hosted the website that you know,

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of hosted all that information through the payment of crypto.

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So when I was in a senior role the Justice Department,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what the first time I realized, Wow, I mean,

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 1>crime is very important, and all the stuff we're doing

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>on sort of dark webs really important. But there's a

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for an intelligence component to this, there's a defending democracy

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>component to this. But ultimately those individuals were indicted. They

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>were indicted, and the allegations are in the indictment right

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and in the in the indictment you see the evidence

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of them using what was it, bitcoin correct various types

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of crypto. So the question, well, we'll keep the question

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin for now and then take it out to

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>other types of crypto, but does it does that mean

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that it is or is not an effective means to

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially commit crime with? So it you know, it can

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be traced, right, And this is something that criminals often

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>don't realize, is that the bitcoin network itself is quite

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>traceable and folks like my team at r M labs

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>bets team of chain analysis have become very good at

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>tracing those payments. So it's just dumb criminals at this

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>point then, because I feel like at least I don't know,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe I spend too much time in my own bubble,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like it's pretty well known that you

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>can track things on the blockchain by now. Well, I

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people maybe don't realize that the

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>other thing is it still takes time. Right, You've got

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>technology like mixers and other types of technology that will

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>help you sort of you know, mix up the transactions

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Um even that capability is something law

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>enforcement can see through using the right and the effective tools.

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of crime out there and there's

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>limited resources for law enforcement. This special audio only episode

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of Crypto I r L will be right back with

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>more from Katie Greifeld and Tim Stanovic. If you want

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the full video experience, head to Bloomberg dot com slash qt. Okay,

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so we talked about shock, let's talk about scale because

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>when I think about Silk Road, uh, that was a

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. Where does the state of crime using

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto stand right now? So if you look past like

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Silk Road, that was one marketplace. One Silk Road was

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>taken down. It kind of like did this whackable type

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing where it dispersed and criminals were like, oh,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a really ingenious idea in order for me to

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>actually do my criminal activities. So you see this mold

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that then is being expanded within that. But if you

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>go past just like darkner markets and drug trafficking or

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>even UM the aspects of child expectation sites that are

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>also being leveraged on that UM. The other type of

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>crime is not necessarily financially driven. So we have seen

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>individuals that have taken advantage of the Bitcoin blockchain and

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>UM have been able to put messaging within the transactions

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>so that it's encrypted, and there's blotton nets that then

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>crawl the block blockchain in order to decrypt that to

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>then infortrate different aspects. So what we saw with US

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was a bunch of crypto dracking that was actually occurring.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So rather than just seeing the transaction that was occurring

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on a financial aspect, this is now being deployed for

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a cyber component as well. Makes something we noticed just

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the a few weeks ago is ices is trying to

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>raise funds through the use of n f t s,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>completely novel application of the technology. The technology is amazing,

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it's great, but illicit actors can also use it in

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>novel ways that are actually pretty concerning. How are they

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to do that? So basically, you know, you create

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of an n f T and use that as

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a means of collecting funds, and so our team at

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>TRM was able to identify that in advance and essentially

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>notify you know, law enforcement and has since been taken down.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like, uh, you know, they had actually

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>mobilized the n f T yet they were basically doing

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the preparatory work. I assume those n f T s weren't.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I wish you you bring up Actually my next question,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which is like I actually just don't get how isis

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would do this with an n f T, Like, explain

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>how this would work. Well, essentially, you would, you know,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>send funds to that n f T, right, you would

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>use that digital representation to store value and and I

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>mean so that n f T would be not associated

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>officially with a terrorist organization. Correct. You wouldn't realize that

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time that you were setting it, though people

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in the know would know to send and it would

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>evade detection. So you're essentially setting up a bank account

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that is unlinked to any entity in order to raise

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>funds for terrorists. Right. Essentially would be receiving funds in

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a digital manner that's not tied to any particular KYC

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>information right now your customer, no, your customer, and you

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>would then use that and sort of move it off,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, move it to other chains or other areas

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and then try to turn it into cash. So to

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that point, I feel like ISIS wouldn't have been using

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>n f t s. I don't know three four years ago.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you both have been involved in the space

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, Beth, I know that you've been

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at, you know, elicit activities using crypto since we've

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>touched on some of this, But tell me how the

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>use case has evolved since then? Has it gotten more creative?

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>How has it changed? Oh, it's definitely more creative. So

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I like to always think back, like back in the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>good old days with bitclin, because it's no longer the

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>good old days, where like the technology has advanced and

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these different aspects of cryptocurrency have popped up.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So you have n f t is, you now have

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>all of the defy tokens that are available and the

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>platforms that are operating in that manner that it's hard

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with all of that. So not only

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are you having individuals that are still in the bitcoin realm,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but they are now transitioning into the DeFi space. And um,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>there's so many advancements with that with blockchains on top

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of other blockchains and UM just being able to understand

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what that technology represents as well as how criminals are

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>using that technology for what it does not necessarily represent, right,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.479
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that's the evolution that will always continue.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>UM and being able to understand how it's being leveraged

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most um interesting things for the

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>evolution of what cryptocurrency is. Is it kind of easy

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to make money as a criminal using crypto? I would

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>say there are ways to take advantage of the systems,

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So you have platforms now where you can

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>stake funds, right, and you can stake that with criminal funds,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and so like you actually are earning money and interest

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on all of these different things that are actually illicitly earned.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if what you heard from Joe Wisenthal makes

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>sense that this stuff in order for it to actually

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>serve its promise as stateless currency and help people who

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are oppressed, it has to become better at crime. Because

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>what you guys do trm at at analysis, Like you

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>track this stuff something that we know can be tracked now,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but people have this idea that it was untrackable. Well, look,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I think privacy is very important, right, and so you know,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>at t RAN, for example, we don't touch personal sensitive data.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>It's all the blockchain information is publicly available. It's on

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a public blockchain and you can trace it over time,

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>which is what Joe was saying, is why it's not

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>good for crime. Right. But you know, just because something

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily good for crime doesn't mean that it's it's

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a it's a bad thing. Right, there's a lot of

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>positive use cases for for crypto generally, or for distributed

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>ledger technology, which is what all of the stuff is

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>based on. That. You know, often people are are overlooking, right,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean think about you know, the last time you

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>try to send funds. So if you've got relatives and

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world, you know, in the traditional

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>banking system, it takes days. There's fees everywhere, and it

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>takes forever, costs a lot of money, and it cost

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. And with crypto and you need

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a bank account on both sides, if you were a criminal,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>would you use crypto or would you put the cash

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>in a suitcase and sort of try to travel around

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that way? So can I give you my honest answers?

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I am not a criminal, This is a brain exercise,

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>though it requires us to suspend reality. I mean, look,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>cash is still king when it comes to illicit activity. Right.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Crypto is certainly a means of doing illegal things, but

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>there are aspects that are more traceable. But there are

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>aspects that make it more obfuscatable, like mixers and other

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of technology. So you know, I certainly wouldn't be

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the business of advice criminals and what to do

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>or what not to do. This special audio only episode

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>of Crypto I r L will be right back with

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more from Katie Greifeld and to Centevic. If you want

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the full video experience, head to Bloomberg dot com slash

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>qt That students talked a lot about state actors, and

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering in your work if you have any data

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that shows to what extent the crime is being committed

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>by state sponsored actors versus by rogue individuals with no

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>connection to a state. Yeah. So what we were able

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to identify is that UM for nation state actors there,

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's over four million dollars that we have been able

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to tie to UM North Korea, for instance. Right, However,

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at just individual Elica actors within that um,

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>although the hacks are very large, so six hundred million

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars at a time for a hack, right, it makes

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and grabs attention for headlines. However, what is not being um,

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>look at our individuals that are still soliciting um elicit me,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>but they're doing it in a larger, smaller scale, but

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a higher transaction, right, so that actually supersedes the amount

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>that's actually being moved on the list of scale for that.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting and I swear I'm just curious. So

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>if you were committing a crime, it sounds like just

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a series of smaller transactions makes a lot more sense

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in any type of movement for financial means that that

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is the best way, right so um being so in

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a traditional financial aspect, right, there's reporting requirements in order

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to transactions that hit a banking system, right and so

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>um and those are the suspicious activity reports that financial

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>institutions and money service businesses are actually supposed to report.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you're underneath that threshold, like you're not going

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to be able to be reported on as easily ten

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for funds that are going on a specifics

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, in all seriousness, um, all this talk of

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>state actors kind of has me thinking about whether or

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>not all of this is actually a good development or not.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, you know, North Korea recently launched a

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>missile over Japan and said, you know, shock ways throughout

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they do this every once in a while.

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, student, if you think North Korea would

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be as powerful as it is today and as much

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of a menace to the rest of the world if

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>there was no such thing as crypto. Yeah, I think

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you can strip the crypto conversation out of that, because

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>North Korea has been engaging in this kind of maligned

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>cyber activity for years. They tried to steal I think

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a billion dollars from the Bank of Bangladesh

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, but basically hacking into the Federal

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Reserve New York's account that the Bank of Bangladesh was

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>using and siphon that money out. Nothing to do with crypto, right,

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>it was just a cyber hack. So crypto certainly makes it,

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a more interesting conversation because there are certain

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>things that nation state actors can do that they couldn't

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>do more, you know, as easily in a in a

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>pure kind of analog world, do you guys like crypto?

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you see, you guys look at the

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>worst side of crypto when you zoom out from that?

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you see this is a net positive

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>or what are your feelings? All Right, It's definitely a

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>net positive. Like it's innovation at its finest, and it's

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating to be able to watch um being able

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to step back and see that individuals that maybe in

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>underprivileged areas that have access to financial means through crypto

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic. And just being able to leverage that in

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes it where almost everybody can be

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on the same playing field, to me, is one of

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the most rewarding things within this space. Would you agree

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with Stugent that we have to strip crypto out of

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the conversation there, because even if there were no crypto,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>these sanctioned countries would still be able to access funds

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to fund whatever they're doing. Yeah, And like, I would

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>actually say that the crypto aspect is actually a positive

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thing with it. And I say that because it is

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>trans parent for us to be able to actually track

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>those funds and actually see what is going on within

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>those different countries, which is, if you took the crypto

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>out of it, like completely, we would lose insight into

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>what's actually going on and we wouldn't be able to

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>tie that back to US. Does it stugent undermine American

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy at all? So look, that's a really interesting question. Obviously,

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>certain countries are trying to use crypto to kind of

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>evade the international, you know, global financial system, which is

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>very much US led, or at least led by kind

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of Western countries and Western values. But here's an interesting

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of other side to it. You talk about stable coins, right,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>which are basically tied to the US dollar. I could

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>see a world in which if there was more expansion

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of stable coins, that actually promotes the growth of the

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>US dollar into areas where it maybe doesn't exist now. So,

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, crypto again cuts both ways. You've got to

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>really understand it and then you can make good policy.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's your favorite TV cop? Like, who do you model

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself after? Well? I, uh, I was not a cop.

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I was a pro secuter. So if you watch Law

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and Order, yes I always identified with the lawyers, but

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I did like the guys in Law and Order. You

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta be honest it's for you. Yeah, it's a risk

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Harte Days character. I like a lot Olivia Benson there

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>is Yeah, Beth, what about you so mine? It's not

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a TV show, but it would be clarice from the

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>silence of the Lambs. Yeah, do you identify with their Yeah?

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So my whole dream job right was to actually be

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a profiler, and that's what I wanted to do, and

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>then I got sidetracked with Crypto. So here I am Raman,

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Beth Bisbee. Good to see you guys. Thanks for joining us.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>It's it kind of seems like you're ready for a

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>life of crime. I don't know. After listening to this episode,

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we mapped a pretty good blueprint, but not using bitcoin.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe ma Narrow definitely a mixer and I would keep

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it under ten grants. I thought you were a grizzled

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>old cop with the heart of gold. Things change. Yeah.

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to see these episodes of Crypto I r

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>L in video. Check them out on Bloomberg Quicktake at

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, slash qt, or find Katie and Tim

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Over on YouTube. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.719
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more shows from

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions,

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>or suggestions for the show to Crypto at Bloomberg dot

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>net or find us on Twitter. We're at Crypto. The

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Very Galina. Our

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed Faruk

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and Sharon Rio. Our associate producers are Ty Butler and

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Moses on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy, Marie Ishmael. Have a

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:11.959
<v Speaker 1>great weekend.