WEBVTT - The Macintosh Story Part 2

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Technology with tex Stuff from dot com. Hey there, and

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a senior writer for how Stuff Works dot com and

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to continue the story of the history

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Macintosh computer. Now in our last episode, have

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to do a little you know, roundup of what happened.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Previously on text Stuff, we covered how the mac was

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>born out of strife. It was not an easy birth,

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out. There was a lot of argument

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>going on arguing, i should say, going on behind the scenes.

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It started off as a low price computer. That was

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the intent that was supposed to make personal computers more

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>accessible to the average person. And then Steve Jobs effectively

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>took over the project and changed it significantly. Rather than

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>having a cheap machine, it became an expensive alternative to

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the IBM personal computer that had just debuted in the

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen eighties. So the IBM personal computer came out

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>and actually posed a serious threat to Apple. Uh, the

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh was supposed to be an answer to that. The

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple two and Apple three lines were distinct, and more

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>about them in a little bit, but the Macintosh was

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>really supposed to redefine computing and to put Apple back

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>on track to being ahead of the game, as it were.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But what actually happened next, Well, we ended right around

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five. Last time, nineteen eighty five. The Macintosh

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>computer debuted in nineteen eighty four, and Apple was trying

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to rebound from a couple of big blows. Now. That

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>first one came in nineteen eighty one. That's when IBM

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>got involved in the personal computer market with its own PC.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Before long, IBM PC sales were outpacing Apple to sales.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And the second blow came ine that's when Apple launched Lisa.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Lisa was a high end computer. It was a project

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>that was being pushed primarily by Steve Jobs, one of

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the co founders of Apple. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:21.559
<v Speaker 1>were the two Steve's who founded the company. But Lisa

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was not a huge success. It had a graphic user

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>interface or gooey g u i uh, and it had

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a mouse, which was very innovative for the time. The

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>only other company that really played with graphic user interfaces

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and a computer mouse was Xerox, and they had only

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>done it internally. They didn't make this a product that

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>other other companies and consumers could go out and purchase

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple decided to change that. However, Lisa had a really

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>hefty price tag. It was ten thousand dollars when it

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>went on sale, and it was meant for business applications.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>But at that price, very few businesses we're willing to

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>take the plunge. Remember, those are three dollars. That's significant,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>even more so than ten tho dollars is today. Ten

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars is already a huge amount of money. If you

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>had just for inflation, you're talking around almost twenty dollars.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot. So the g U I also ate

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of the computer's processing power. So not

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only did it cost a lot, but the operating system

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>alone took up so much of the computer's processing power

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that you couldn't run very many applications on top of it.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a great selling point, Like this is expensive,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but at least you can't run much software on it.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make a really good tagline if you're trying

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to sell a computer, just an f Y I in

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>case you ever want to make and sell computers in

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. Then you also had very few developers who

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are willing to put forth the effort to create programs

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>for a computer or that was so elite, so expensive

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that it had a very small market. If you are

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in the business of making software and you have a

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>limited amount of time and money on your hands, you

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>want to dedicate that time and money toward projects that

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are likely to give you the biggest profit. And if

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about you know, the types of organizations that

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>are willing to lay down ten grand per computer, that's

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>a very small market. So software developers were not eager

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to jump on the bandwagon there. So Lisa was effectively

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a flop. It was kind of doomed from the start. Now,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned right at the beginning of this episode,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs effectively took over the Macintosh project. Now, this

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was after the then CEO of Apple demanded that Steve

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Jobs stop interfering with Lisa. Macintosh was a totally different project,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Jobs, once he was pulled off the Lisa

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>project and said you can't bother them anymore, looked around,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>saw the Macintosh project, which was completely independent, and said

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make that my pet project. And so he

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>began to involve himself with or in the words of

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>some of his UH contemporaries at the time interfere with

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh project, and as a result, Macintosh transformed from

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a humble machine to an expensive consumer level device with

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a gooey and a mouse. It didn't have a graphic

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>user interface before Steve Jobs got involved. It was initially

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>priced at two thousand four dollars, which is expensive just

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>for a basic computer today before you adjust for inflation.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>If you do adjust for inflation, that's more like five thousand,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred bucks. That's a huge amount of money to

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ask to pay for a PC. So if you wanted

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a Macintosh when they first launched, you'd be plopping down

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of fifty seven hundred dollars in today's money.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind that the original plan was that

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this computer was supposed to cost five hundred dollars, which

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>would be closer to twelve bucks today, which is still expensive. Obviously,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to pay for a brand new computer,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>twar is closer to the top end of your of

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your basic machines. I mean, obviously, you can trick out

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a machine to be much more expensive than that if

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you want top of the line processors, UH graphics cards,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 1>cooling systems, all that sort of stuff. But if you're

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>just buying off the shelf, twelve hundred dollars is already

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty expensive. It's not it's not the top end, but

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it's healthy, right Anyway, that was the initial goal was

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a five price point in four dollars, which would be

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about twelve today, and it blew that out of the water.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I should point out, however, that this higher price tag

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is not entirely the fault of Steve Jobs. I don't

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>want to give you that impression. It's true that Jobs

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>added a lot of features that necessitated a price hike.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>No matter what, it was gonna cost more than five

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars because of the changes Steed Jobs made. But as

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for that price tag of two thousand four dollars, that

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>credit really needs to go to the then Apple CEO,

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>John's Scully. Scully reportedly decided that the initial price tag

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>for the mac which was originally going to be fift

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, was too low. He actually said, fifteen hundred bucks.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>That's that's not high enough for us to really see

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge profit off that. So he knocked it up

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to and that way the Macintosh would see a profit

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>margin of meaning you make over what you paid to

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>create the computer. He didn't want to have a slim

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>profit margin. However, of course, if you increase the price

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of a machine dramatically, then you're going to decrease the

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>number of sales you make. So it's a very delicate

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>balance figuring out how much to price a product so

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that you get the maximum amount of profit it from

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>your investment. And Scully decided to go pretty hard for

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that investment with that profit margin. And this also began

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple's long history of being a company associated with the

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that it's hardware is overpriced. You've probably heard that

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever taken any look into Apple products, that

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're paying a premium just for the Apple brand name

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because the products are priced more than what they would

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be priced by a competitor for an equivalent machine. That's

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not always the case, by the way, but it happened

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>frequently enough in Apple's past that it became associated with

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>the company's identity. People thought of Apple as being an

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>elite company, that you were paying that extra price, and

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that you could be saving money if you just went

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with a different computer manufacturer, which in some some eras

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely true, just not in all eras. Back in

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>those earliest days of Macintosh, It's certainly was the case

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that is undeniable now. Initial reviews of the Macintosh actually

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>heaped a lot of praise on the computer. Consumer Reports

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>wrote an absolutely glowing review of the original Macintosh, saying

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that the interface really transformed computing. The reviews stated that

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the interface, including the windows that it would use the

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>mouse that you would use to navigate the gooey, were

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>more than just gimmicks, which you know, you could have

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>easily seen them as just being gimmicks. Everyone else was

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>used to using text based interfaces and keyboards, so this

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a guaranteed success right all the gate. But Consumer

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Reports said, no, they got it right. This actually makes sense.

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>They said that it actually transformed computing from a system

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of Labyrinthian rules to something that the average person could

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>easily grasp. A Macintosh wasn't a cryptic machine that required

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the user to learn dozens of command line terms, like

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, various five old trees and ways to navigate

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>between different directories. You didn't have to do that because

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it was all graphically presented for you and you just

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>click on whatever it was you needed. It was a

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>device that a novice could learn to navigate within like

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>half an hour of using it. There were some drawbacks, however.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>That same consumer reports are You pointed out that the

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>operating system on the Macintosh took up an enormous amount

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of the computer's processing power. The computer had enough memory

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to store about eight and a half pages of text

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>after you factored in the operating system. That's text, not

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>images or video or audio. All of that stuff would

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>come later. Just eight and a half pages of text.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's all the memory it could have after you ended

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>up booting up the operating system. This was one of

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that I was a real snob about gooey

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>interfaces or gooey based computers. I hated the day that

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>my dad decided to install Windows on our IBM compatible machine,

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>which was similar in many ways to the mac operating system. Uh.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I was upset about it was because

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the Windows operating system required so much of our computers

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to process information that it limited the kind of

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>software we could run on it. If your software required

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more than what the computer could supply, you ran into problems.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And I attributed a lot of that to the operating system.

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I much preferred DOSS, which was so slimmed down by

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>comparison that you could run lots of different software on it. Well,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the same thing was true with the early mac operating system.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It just hogged up a lot of the initial Macintosh

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is uh abilities. And to be fair, the original Macintosh

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>only had a kilobytes of memory, so it wasn't exactly

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>packing an enormous amount of memory into that package. More

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and more software developers began to create programs that could

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>only run and E environments, which kind of forced the

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>issue to switch from the DOSS and other operating systems

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that involved command lines to shift over to graphic user

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>interfaces because a lot of software ended up only being

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>compatible with graphic user interface systems, and that helped force

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue. I still am bitter about that, even though

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>today I probably wouldn't be able to If you put

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>me in from an Apple to E or an early

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>IBM PC that was just running DOSS, I wouldn't remember

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>any of the commands besides d I R, which is

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>directory for DOSS, I I would be lost. But I

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>still a kind of bitter about all this. Now, I

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>also be fair, I'm an elitist computer nerd type. I'm

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just an elitist computer nerd type who lacks the information

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to be able to effectively be an elitist, which is

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the saddest kind of nerd. Apple obviously you had really

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>high hopes for that original Macintosh, but they had also

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>had really high hopes for Lisa, and that didn't pan

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>out back in nineteen eighty one, which was back when

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh was still in development. It didn't debut till

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty four. Keep in mind, in ninety nineteen eight one,

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple had a plan, and their plan was that they

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>would sell two point two million Macintosh computers by nineteen

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, by the end of nineteen eighty five, but

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>that plan was based upon a launch date that would

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>happen sometime in nineteen eighty two, because remember, back then

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they were still looking at creating a cheap alternative to

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the other computers like the Apple two and other competing

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>computers on the market, So they had high hopes that

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they would be able to sell two point two million

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>units by nineteen eighty five. The computer wasn't even available

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>for purchase until nineteen eighty four, so that's set them

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>back and even if they had launched in nineteen eighty two,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>they would have had to sell around fifty thousand computers

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>every month to hit that two point to a million

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>mark within the end of They did have an enormous start.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>The Macintosh marketing department was great for the launch of

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the computer, and they sold quite a bit when they

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>first went on the market because people were really excited

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. But after that initial excitement, they weren't able

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize on creating a momentum, and it died off

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly. The marketing kind of failed after that initial launch.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>The Apple blew too much money early on and didn't

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have enough to support it throughout its initial launch, so

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>after a successful couple of first months, sales dropped precipitously

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>down to like five thousand units a month, way below

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the number they would need, So by the end of

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>five they had not sold two point two million units

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>as they had originally planned. It was more like two

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>d fifty thousand units, a huge shortfall. The Macintosh was

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not quite a flop like Lisa, but it wasn't performing

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as well in the market as Apple had hoped. Now

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it was impressive, but it was suffering from a similar

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>issue as Lisa. It didn't have a lot of applications

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>available for it, and not as many as the competing

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>IBM PCs had. Apple's then CEO admitted as much later

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on John Scully. He said, Yeah, we didn't do enough

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to develop software to run this computer. So while the

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>computer was nice to look at, the graphic user interface

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was interesting, there just wasn't a whole lot to do

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>with it. You didn't have things like spreadsheet programs. There

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was a severe lack of utility with their computer. Really.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>They only had two applications that Mac Wright, which was

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a word processing program, and they had Mac Paint, which

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was a simple graphics program. But that was about it.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have the other stuff you would associate with

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>other uters. So while it was user friendly, it didn't

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of usability to it. Like there just

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough to do so that also hurt McIntosh sales.

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you might also remember from our last episode, like

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, the CEO of Apple at this time was

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>John Scully, whom Steve Jobs had lured away from PEPSI.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The story is that Scully was kind of in line

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to become the chairman of the board over at Pepsi,

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was on a much longer timeline than Scully wanted,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and that Steve Jobs was able to convince Scully to

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>come over by saying to him, do you want to

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>spend the rest of your life selling sugared water or

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>do you want a chance to change the world. Once

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>against Steve Jobs, master salesman, he could really have a

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>turn of phrase and get you to believe in him

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>even when the odds were stacked against him. Scully himself

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>would say that that phrase really convinced him to come

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>over to Apple, and he said so in a documentary,

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can actually check this out. It's a document

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are he titled Bloomberg Game Changers Steve Jobs. So it's

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>part of a series. It was a really effective sales pitch,

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, so Scullion Jobs initially worked really

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>well together leading up to the Macintosh launch. Scully's predecessor

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>was Mike Marcula, which in the last episode you might

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>remember was the guy who stepped in to remove Steve

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Jobs from the Lisa project. Marcula was an early investor

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in Apple and had transitioned from CEO to board members,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so he retired as CEO, he resigned um transitioning over

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to the board. He had told his wife that he

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to stay on with Apple for very long,

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>although he stayed on much longer than he initially meant to.

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>He just stayed on in the capacity of member of

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the board as opposed to the CEO, and then John

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Scully took over the job as CEO. Now, John Scully

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>would serve as the CEO from about to about nineteen nine.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>The three ish is really when we're looking at that

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>transition effectively ninety three. Scully initially got along well with jobs,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but when the Macintosh sales began to drop off, new

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>tensions developed between the CEO and Apple's co founder, and

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that's not great when you have kind of clashing personalities

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>at the top level of your company. Now, John Scully

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>also has the dubious distinction of being on the America

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>The Worst American CEOs list curated by Conde Nast. He's

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>actually number fourteen on that list back when they published

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it a few years ago. Now more on why John

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Scully made that list as this episode progresses. Apple at

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the time had not completely switched over to the Macintosh

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 1>line as its primary product. So you might think, oh,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it went Apple to to Apple three to Macintosh and

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they discontinued the other computers, but that's not true. They

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>were actually producing different lines of computers simultaneously, and Apple's

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>structure was designed around this, where each product had its

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>own division, so it wasn't like you had one big

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>division of all these different products grouped together. You had

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>an Apple two division and Apple three division, and a

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh division. You also had a Lisa division until they

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>discontinued that product, so the Apple two and Apple three

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>computers continued to be manufactured and sold by Apple, side

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>by side with Macintosh computers. The Apple three ended up

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>being a failure. It was a flop, very much like Lisa.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't do so well. It was meant to be, again,

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a business level machine, not a personal computer, and it

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was priced as such, and there just wasn't enough there

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>for businesses jump on board with it. There were cheaper

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>IBM com uters coming out, so that was more attractive

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>from an expense side of things, And like Lisa, there

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't a lot of developers creating software for the Apple three,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so it didn't make a whole lot of sense to

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>invest in the Apple three platform if the IBM computer

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>platform cost less and had more development, so companies weren't

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>adopting the Apple three. But the Apple two continued to

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>hold its own, so it was still a big product

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>even as the Macintosh came online. Uh. The Apple two

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>SEE computer debuted in nineteen eighty four. That was the

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>same year that the Macintosh came out, so Apple too

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>c uh stood for well, a more advanced Apple two computer. Actually,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the letter system for Apple two computers is really confusing

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because the Apple to E came out in nineteen eighty

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>three and then the Apple two C came out in

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty four, so they weren't going in alphabetical order

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and is a bit more than a bit confusing. But

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.959
<v Speaker 1>the Apple to C was Apple's first compact model, so

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the C kind of stood for compact. The computer's hardware

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>consisted of a case that had an incorporated keyboard and

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a five and a quarter inch disk drive, and the

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>computer itself, which was separate from a monitor. It was

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>just the computer. You could slide that into a base

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a stand essentially, and on top of the stand you

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>could put your monitor, So the computer were kind of

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>slot in underneath where the monitor was. The monitor would

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not sit directly on top of the computer case itself.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple would continue to make computers in the two C

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>line until n so the Apple two continued to go

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on sale to to hit store shelves while the Macintosh

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>continued to evolve, so these separate products remained side by

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>side for quite some time. Apple launched an enhanced version

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Apple to E in Night five, so the

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>two E continued as well. It just got a bit

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>of a beefier version than the one that had launched

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years earlier. It did not have a

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>graphic user interface like the Macintosh, and Apple would continue

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to make these Apple to computers available for quite some time.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that advanced to E would continue to be

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>on sale until n so, extending pretty far. Like you

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>would think that by nine three you would have just

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>graphic user interface based computers, but you still had the

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple to E Enhanced And maybe one day I'll do

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>an episode dedicated just to those Apple line computers to

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about the process of their evolution compared to Macintosh.

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's not really what this episode is about. I

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just went into touch base and explained that was going

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on at the same time as the development for the

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mac Now, in January, Apple tried to make the best

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of a bad situation and by launching the Macintosh XL.

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Only here's the thing, this was not the next Macintosh computer.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It was actually a rebranding of a different computer, namely

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the Lisa two. So remember the Lisa was a flop.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Then Apple decided to make a stripped down version of

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Lisa computer and sell it for a lower price

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>than that ten thousand dollar beast of a computer called Lisa.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Lisa too did not do well in sales either, so

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>then they rebranded it. They called it Macintosh XL because

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh was doing alright initially, but they weren't able

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to move the Lisa two computers, so they rebranded it.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>They called it the XCEL. But it still didn't do

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so well, and by April they discontinued it. They stopped

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 1>making the Macintosh XL. They still had a ton in inventory,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't making more of them. They were able

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to offload some of the Macintosh XL devices with some

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>big sales deals. So, for example, they sold five thousand

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the XL Macintosh is to a company called sun

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>remarketing back in nineteen eight seven. But ultimately a lot

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of those units never left Apple warehouses. They just sat there.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And so in nineteen eighty nine they decided to take

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a note from the video game crash of nineteen eighty three.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You might remember, Atari decided to get rid of a

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of excess inventory by dumping them in landfills out

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in the desert. Apple ended up doing the same thing,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>only they dumped there's in the landfill in Utah instead

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of in a different states. So they all of those

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh XL computers ended up in a landfill in Utah.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So somewhere in a Utah landfill, if you dig down,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you would be able to find old Macintosh XL Lisa

0:24:55.359 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>two computers. But don't do. That will be a colacily

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 1>bad idea and you could very easily injure yourself if

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you dug in the wrong landfield. Phil Plus you'd probably

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>be trespassing. So I'm officially telling you do not go

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>searching for the Macintosh x L because even if you

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>found one, it wouldn't work. At this point. It's been

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>exposed to elements since nine nine, So you don't want one.

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't do it. If I hear about you doing it,

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll be very put out. I've got a lot more

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to say about the history of the Macintosh from nineteen

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty four to nine, but before I get into the

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>next segment, let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, a few months after the initial Macintosh

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>hit store shelves, Apple released an update called the Mac

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>five twelve, also known as the Fat Mac. This Macintosh

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>had five twelve kilobytes of memory, That's why it was

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>called that, so significantly more memory than the initial Macintosh,

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>which remember, only had a hundred twenty eight kilobytes. That

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>additional memory made it easier to develop programs for the

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh because the operating system no longer hogged nearly all

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the system's memory. But that extra memory came at

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a cost. The fat max price tag was three thousand,

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars in nineteen five. That's equivalent to nearly

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand dollars today. It's uh incredibly expensive. Still, the

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Fat Mac had a big advantage. It could actually do

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff pretty big when you compare it to the original Mac,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and some software and one additional piece of hardware really

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>helped increase the value of the Macintosh line. So on

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the software side you had stuff like Aldus page Maker

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and eventually became Adobe page Maker. It helped usher in

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>a new era of computing. This was the era of

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>desktop publishing. That was not a thing really before the

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh and eldest PageMaker made it a thing. So PageMaker,

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>if you've never used it, it's sort of a layout

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>program and allows you to lay out a an attractive

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic design to stuff like newsletters, flyers, that kind of thing.

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>A program if you want to make a program for

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a play or some other event, you could use PageMaker

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to size everything and uh and position it properly so

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that you had an attractive layout. And that meant that

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you could suddenly do this at home, whether if you

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>had the right equipment or with a small business. You

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>could do it there. You didn't have to go to

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a larger publishing house and contract with them to make

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>your stuff. This was revolutionary. It was one of the

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>reasons why computers, personal computers and small computers that bus

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this is used. We're so popular and men that they

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>gave these entities, whether they were individuals or small businesses,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>greater opportunities. Uh, so that was very popular. But there

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>was also some other software that was helping out in

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft began to publish software for the Macintosh. So Microsoft

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and Apple haven't always had a contentious relationship. In fact,

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft has often in Apple's past helped the other company

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>out with loans or with investments. Uh, it hasn't always

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>been a I hate you, No, I hate you more

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of relationship. One of the earliest programs Microsoft made

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>available for the Macintosh was Word one point oh, which

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was the first real competitor to Apple's own Mac Write

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>software and eventually overtook Mac Write. People began to prefer

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Word one point oh, and it's later very visians to

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the mac right word processing program. Another program that came

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>over to mac was the Excel one point oh software,

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the spreadsheet program. In fact, it came to the Macintosh first.

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a Macintosh exclusive for a while. Uh in

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the early days. That was just the case because it

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even come to Windows until late nine. So Apple

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>had a headstart on Windows when it came to Excel.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's a whole story that I've talked about in

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a previous episode about why that is so I'm not

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>going to go into it. Here on the hardware side

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was a device called the laser writer. This was a printer,

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a monstrous lee heavy printer. It weighed seventy seven pounds

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's about thirty five ms, and it had a three

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred dots per inch resolution, pretty standard for printers of

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the day. And it cost a hefty amount seven thousand

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars and let's adjust for inflation because I like to

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>do that, that's about sixteen grand in today's dollars. Sixteen

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for a printer. But you could network multiple

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh computers to this one printer, so that increased its value.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You didn't have to buy a printer for every computer.

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>If you had several computer workstations at your office, you

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can network them together to this printer and they could

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>all print from the same printer. That was a pretty

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>big deal, very novel concept when it came to this

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>level of computer enterprise. Normally, you'd be paying a lot

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>more money for a networked system that was created pretty

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>much by contract for your company. So it meant that

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple could actually compete in that space. And uh they

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>could also print in different fonts. The earliest laser writer

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>only a few different fonts, but that was still a

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>huge advantage over older printers, remember like Daisy wheel printer.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Actually you may not remember Daisy will printers. I do

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because I grew up with them. Those had a physical

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>font on the device itself, so you couldn't really change it,

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>but the laser writer could reproduce a few different fonts,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>giving you some options. And later versions of the laser

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>writer and later versions of the operating system and the

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>accompanying software would allow even more fonts. So that made

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>desktop publishing even more attractive. So this, this combination of

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>software and hardware suddenly made the Macintosh a more attractive

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>device if you wanted to go into publishing. And this

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>really begins the relationship Apple has with creators, people who

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>are into graphics eventually into film and audio. Apple kind

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of established that relationship with people at this stage, this

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>early stage with the fat Mac. It meant that you

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were catering to people who didn't really feel comfortable with

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the IBM compatible approach to computing. They found it more

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>intuitive to go to the Mac system and that would

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>remain true for decades. In fact, for a long long time,

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple dominated when it came to production, particularly video and

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>audio production. Here at How Stuff Works, our video department

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>works almost exclusively on Macintosh computers. So, even though I

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>would argue PCs have caught up in a large part

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and software for the PCs have caught up in a

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>large part, two, Apple's dominant place in that market, there's

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:47.479
<v Speaker 1>still people who prefer the Apple approach, and to be honest,

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>depending upon what format you're working in, Apple still doesn't

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>better than PCs do. All of that began way back

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in with the Fat Mac and the launch of the

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Laser Writer and the launch of these software programs I've

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>been talking about on the corporate side. Five was when

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple said goodbye to the co founders, but under very

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>different circumstances. Steve Wozniak, who had mostly been away from

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple ever since he had suffered injuries in an airplane

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>crash and had been working hard to recover from them.

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>He left on his own accord in February night five,

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and he went back to college. Eventually he went into

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>teaching and then began to do other stuff as well.

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs, however, didn't really have a choice in the matter,

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not really when you get down to it. After numerous

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>teams reported being incredibly frustrated with Steve jobs managerial style.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The executives of the company, primarily CEO John Scully, decided

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to effectively strip Steve Jobs of all of his power.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 1>They removed him from all the projects. They put him

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in an office in a building that was mostly deserted. Uh.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs himself referred to it as Siberia. And of

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>course Steve Jobs is not one known for making melodramatic

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>statements like that, so you know it had to be awful.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But the point being the Steve Jobs had really very

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 1>little to do with the company that he had helped create.

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>He had been pulled away from it and removed more

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>or less from power. Not everyone was upset about that

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because so many people had had issues with his management style,

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but it still was a difficult story, right to say,

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we've decided this founder of our company shouldn't be involved

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in any of the company's projects, but was still effectively

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>an employee of the company. He was still drawing a

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>salary at that point, but Jobs decided he didn't want

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to just sit at a desk in an empty building

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and pull a salary from a company. He wanted to

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>see if he could perhaps regain control of Apple, and

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so he went to some of the executives at Apple

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to see if any of them would support him and

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>what would effectively be a coup to go to the

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>board of directors demand that John Scully be removed as

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO and perhaps Steve Jobs would take his place. But

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the executives he went to felt very strongly

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that this was the bad decision. That person was Jean

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Louise guess guess A. Now Jean Louise guess Ay was

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>someone who had risen up in the Apple ranks. He

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>was a manager in their in their various product division lines,

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and he did not like Jobs. Jobs and guess A

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>did not get along. So guess A ended up going

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 1>over to John Scully and tattletaled on Steve Jobs. Essentially

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>told John Scully, who was off on a business trip, Hey,

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you should know this. Steve is going around stirring up

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>trouble and he wants to try and go to the

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Board of directors and go over your head and replace you.

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 1>John Scully rushed back to Apple. He called a meeting

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of the board of directors. He was furious with Steve

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Jobs for what he saw as an act of disloyalty

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and dishonesty, and so they had it out in front

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Board of Directors. It was, by all accounts

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and ugly confrontation, and ultimately John Scully was asking the

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Board of Directors for essentially a vote of confidence and

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, who would they go with? Would

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they side with Jobs or would they side with Scully um?

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And then the board cided unanimously with John Scully. Every

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>member of the board, including the people I've already mentioned

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, we're on John Scully's side, and they

0:36:54.800 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>effectively pushed the Jobs out of his company. Uh. Obviously,

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the story was Steve Jobs and Apple doesn't end here.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>In will actually revisit Steve Jobs later on this episode,

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but we've also covered this story in other episodes of

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff. So if you want to hear a really

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>deep discussion about what Steve Jobs did in his years

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 1>away from Apple, there are a couple of different places

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you can check out, or a couple different episodes you

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>can check out. There's a two parter called How Bill

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Gates and Steve Jobs Work. They published in two thousand eight,

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>so they were very early episodes of Tech Stuff. We

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>launched tech Stuff in two thousand eight, So Chris Poulette

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, who

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of not just similarities, but a lot

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of They worked a lot together in those early days

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of Apple and Microsoft. So you can check out that

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>two parter. And there's also a very sad episode titled

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>One More Thing and that published in two thousand eleven,

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>shortly after Steve Jobs passed away. And in those episodes,

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I really he talked about what Steve Jobs did in

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>his ears away from Apple. So I'm not going to

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>cover it here, but we will revisit Steve Jobs because

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he does factor back into Apple's history a bit later on.

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more, check out those episodes

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned. Now, Jobs would end up publishing letters

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of resignation. He sent letters of resignation to the press

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>after he had effectively been forced out of his own company.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's more like you can't fire me, I quit

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Uh. Presumably he did this in order

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>to get the media on his side, but it did

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not have the effect that he was hoping for. In fact,

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple stocks rallied as a result of Steve Jobs being

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>pushed aside and sending out these resignation letters. Effectively, the

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>market was saying, who we're sure, are glad you got

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rid of that guy. Uh. Not a great message to receive.

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Not a that's big blow to the ego, I'm sure.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>But it gave Scully more confidence in his decisions, which

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>would emerge in physical form with the evolution of the

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh line. Now. One of the CEO's first acts once

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he had been confirmed as being the head of Apple,

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was to lead a massive reorganization at the company, and

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people say it was long overdue. So again,

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>up to that point, Apple's org charts were based based

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on products. If you worked in the Apple two line,

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you were in one division. If you worked on the

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple three line, you were in another division. If you

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>worked on the Macintosh you were in yet another division,

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. Each department was separate

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>from all the others. And John Scully said, this doesn't

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. What we should do is have a

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>big product development department, and everyone who works on various

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>products will be inside this structured department with a manager

0:39:54.719 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>overseeing that product, our product development overall, so everyone would

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have a single boss they would report to, who in

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>turn would report to John Scully as CEO. Then you

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>would also have a department just for sales, you would

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.479
<v Speaker 1>have a department just for marketing, and these departments would

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>work together, but they wouldn't be dependent upon individual products.

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It would largely be these big divisions within Apple. So essentially,

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he was saying, let's go to your traditional corporate structure.

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like he was inventing a new type of leadership.

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>This is something that's common across corporations all over the world.

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So he was just saying, let's go to that because

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it makes more sense. It's streamlines things, people know who

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they report to. There's not this this compartmentalized UH structure

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>between different products. People can actually communicate with each other.

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>We can make sure that people working on one product

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are not stepping on the toes of people who are

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 1>working on another product. Everyone can talk to each other,

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and that ended up being viewed as a positive move

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Again, people thought this guy knows what

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he's doing, and they felt confident in Apple's performance because

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of this restructuring. UH. Apple stocks would end up performing

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>really well over the next few years. Meanwhile, Jean Luis Gassay,

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that manager I was talking about who tattle tailed on

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs became the manager for the Products division. Effectively,

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he took over the position that Steve Jobs was inhabiting

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>before he was stripped of all of his responsibilities. So

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Gassa became the manager for Products Division and decided to

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>make a major change to the Macintosh line. So remember

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that last Mac was the Fat Mac or the Mac

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>five twelve. The next computer in that line was the

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Mac Plus. Now Apple introduced this in nineteen eighty six,

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and it looked identical to the Fat Mac. If you

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>were to put two side by side, you probably wouldn't

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>be able to immediately tell them apart unless you could

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>actually read the designation on the case. But inside it

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was actually quite different from the fat Fat Mac. So,

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, the Fat Mac was not meant to

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>be expandable. Steve Jobs hated the idea of users being

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>able to alter the computers that Apple designed. He wanted

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to have closed systems, meaning that you bought a computer,

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the computer you got to use. You didn't get

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to expand it in any way unless you were to

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>go to a third party, and that would violate your warranty.

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>The Mac Plus was different, and it was actually expandable. Um,

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>you could upgrade your machine if you wanted to. It

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>was the first Macintosh to feature a small computer system interface,

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>also known as a scuzzy drive s C s I.

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But people call it scuzzy, not that it was scuzzy,

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just how we pronounce it. It's actually a set

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of parallel interface standards that allow you to connect other

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>devices to a computer, so a scanner and external hard drive, printers,

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. It's just meant to be kind

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of a universal uh plug for certain types of computer peripherals.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked a little bit about it in a recent

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>episode about USBs when I was comparing USB s to

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>serial and parallel ports anyway, uh the scuzzy would remain

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>a feature in every Mac that would follow from that

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>point until n You could also upgrade the memory of

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Mac Plus. The Mac Plus would come with a

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>whole megabyte of memory, remember the previous fat Mac at

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>five twelve kilobytes. Megabyte was another big jump up, but

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you could expand that to up to four megabytes using

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a thirty pen memory module that was easily pluggable into

0:43:57.080 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh system. You didn't have to do any crazy

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>soldering or anything like that. It had an expansion slot

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you could plug these these chips into. Previous Apple devices

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't allow you to upgrade your memory, so what you

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>bought was what you got, unless you again went to

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a third party and had it professionally altered. So this

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was a huge departure from Steve Jobs's philosophy. Guess Say's

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>approach was almost a hundred eighty degrees different from Jobs,

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and would continue to be different from Jobs over the

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>next few years. The Mac Plus also included a keyboard

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with some features that we now considered to be pretty

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 1>much standard for keyboards, like arrow keys and a number pad. Obviously,

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>not all keyboards have those, especially for things like laptops.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>You might not have a number pad on all laptops,

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but for your standard PC keyboards the kinds for desktops,

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much find arrow keys and number pads on

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>most of those these days. But this was novel thinking

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>back in so it was something that differentiated the Mac

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Plus from other computers on the market, and it also

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ran the third generation of Max operating system, which was

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>then called System three. This was before Apple started calling

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the operating system mac OS. They just called it system

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and you could use double sided floppy discs with this device,

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>which allowed you to store a whopping eight bytes of

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>data per disc. I remember those days, but anyway, that

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was a big thing back then. Having a double sided disc,

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, effectively doubling the amount of information you could

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>save on a disc. That was a huge space saver.

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you had to have twice as many of those

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:44.399
<v Speaker 1>stupid discs, and that was a pain in the butt.

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Later in Apple discontinued the Fat Mac and replaced it

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with the five twelve K E, which was similar to

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mac Plus. So you had the Mac Plus, which

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the high end machine, and then they said, well,

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fat Mac doesn't really mess her up to the

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Mac Plus. Will make a new version of the Fat

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Mac called Mac five twelve K. It did not have

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the elements that the Mac Plus had. It

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the scuzzyport, and it didn't have the expandable

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>memory capability. It had those older traditional Apple style memory chips,

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and as you might imagine, that didn't measure up well

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 1>with the Mac Plus in the market. So you had

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>consumers or small businesses, mainly and larger looking at the

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Mac Plus versus the Mac five twelve k E, and

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they said, why would I go with the five twelve

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.320
<v Speaker 1>k E which has fewer features than the Mac Plus.

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately the five twelve K did not sell very well.

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The Mac Plus, however, was a very popular UH product

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>within the Apple line, in fact, so much so that

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it would become the longest lived computer in the Macintosh line,

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning it was the one that Apple produced the longest

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>amount of time UH from nineteen eighty six to nineteen

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so four years of producing the same computer. That's a

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>long time in computer terms, because parts become obsolete so quickly,

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>right processors get faster, we can put more memory into

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>these machines, but the Mac Plus would stay on store

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>shelves largely unchanged from nineteen eight six to nine. Now

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, I should mention that I'm not going

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to cover every single variation of the Macintosh in this episode.

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I know it sounds like it because I've started with

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the big ones so early on, but that would just

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 1>be ridiculous. If I were to do that, it would

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>eventually just lead to me reading off specs for different

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>computers and that would get incredibly boring incredibly fast. I

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>do want to cover some of the big changes that

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>happened throughout Apple's history and the history of the Macintosh,

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to cover every variation of every

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>entry into the Macintosh line. There are lots of them,

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so many that it actually became a problem for Apple,

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>But I'll go into that in a little bit. I'm

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just gonna try and get a deeper understanding of not

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>just the growth of the personal computer market, but the

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>evolution of Apple as a company. So that being said,

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven saw some milestones in Apple history. For

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing, Apple built the one millionth Macintosh in nineteen

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven. Now that was a bit behind schedule, because

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you remember, way back in nineteen eighty one, they were

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>hoping to sell two point two million Macintosh computers by

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of nineteen eighty five. Here it is nineteen

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven, and they've just built the one million Macintosh,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're well behind what they were hoping for back

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty one. However, that being said, this was

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a totally different world seven. You saw massive competition in

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the market. Not only did IBM have its own personal

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.840
<v Speaker 1>computers out there, but you had all the clones of

0:48:55.920 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>IBM computers, the IBM compatible computers, because IBM licensed that

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>technology to other companies, so there was a lot of

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:06.959
<v Speaker 1>competition in the space. So hitting that one million mark

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 1>was still impressive, even though it was much later than

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what they had hoped for, uh and it was significant.

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>So that year Apple introduced new computers in the Macintosh line.

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They launched the Mac S E and the Mac two

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as then the part two son of Mac. It was

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Roman numeral two as well, kind of similar to

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>how they did Apple one, Apple to Apple three. We

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:38.359
<v Speaker 1>start seeing the Macintosh regularly shortened to just Mac. At

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this point, very few people started referring to them as

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh computers. They just called a max really. After the

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>first Macintosh, that became pretty standard, and the Mac two

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>marked another big departure from the original Macintosh design jobs

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and wanted the Mac to be that closed system. Like

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, the Mac two had six expansion slots that

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>could port all sorts of stuff, including different types of

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>video cards, which was a huge departure for Apple, plus

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:10.280
<v Speaker 1>different types of network cards, scuzzy drives, that sort of stuff.

0:50:10.640 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It could also display color they video cards. If you

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>had the right video card in the right monitor, you

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>could have a color display, which was a first for

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh computers, and it pushed the Macintosh from the monochromatic

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>world to the world of glorious color with up to

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>sixteen million different colors that could be displayed, which is

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty impressive back in the mid eighties. Later on

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be dwarfed by what you could achieve with

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>high end video cards and monitors in n Apple's Macintosh

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>line continued to evolve, but there weren't really any major

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>developments like the ones I just mentioned. Instead, it was

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>mostly revisions and evolutions of the line, but not revolutions.

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 1>On the software side. The operating system grew, with systems

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>say coming out towards the end of nineteen, but apart

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>from the first Apple CD ROM drive launching, nothing huge

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:09.840
<v Speaker 1>really happened in the mac line, and the same is

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>true for eighty nine, with one major exception. That was

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the year the Apple introduced the mac Portable. So this

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really a laptop computer. I mean, you could call

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it a laptop computer, but really it was more of

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a portable Macintosh computer. In theory. You could call it laptop,

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but only in theory because the thing weighed nearly sixteen

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pounds or about seven point to six kilograms, which is

0:51:35.000 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a pretty weighty machine to call a laptop. It was

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:41.279
<v Speaker 1>also bulky, and it was about the size of a

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>standard briefcase. In other words, it was a giant compared

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Mac Air that you could find today. The

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Mac Portable had a lead acid battery, which is the

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.440
<v Speaker 1>same sort of battery you can find in your standard

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>gas powered automobile, like a car battery that's also lead acid.

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:03.439
<v Speaker 1>That's type of battery the first Mac Portable had. Now,

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it did allow you to have about ten hours of

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>battery life, so that's nice, but it added to that

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>significant weight, or it was rather i should say it

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>made up a significant portion of that weight. There were

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>two main keyboard layouts you could get. One had a

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>numeric keypad and the other one had a track ball

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>which would replace the need for a mouse. So trackball

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the old centipede arcade machines, And if

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what that is, ask your parents. There

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 1>were This was another one of the ideas of Jean

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Louis Gassy. So he decided that the portable computer was

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting approach. He had already made a decision to

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:47.720
<v Speaker 1>stick with Apple. He had received an order, an offer

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>rather from Commodore. Commodore was making the Amiga line of

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>computers and they wanted Gass to come over as the

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:58.760
<v Speaker 1>new head of Commodore. But he actually turned the company

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>down initially and said that he wanted to stick with Apple,

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and so he really pushed for the portable Mac. Uh.

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It had pretty impressive specs for the time. Apple said

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>they spared no expense, they made no accommodation for the

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that was portable. They didn't want to compromise on quality,

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the specs were pretty impressive even for

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just a regular desktop machine. However, it meant that the

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>device was incredibly expensive, again not a surprise with an Apple, right.

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's price tag was six thousand, five hundred dollars

0:53:35.560 --> 0:53:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for this portable machine. In so if we look at inflation,

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that's about thirteen thousand dollars. You would have to pay

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>thirteen grand to get this portable Mac. Now, there was

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a call for portable machines because more and more companies

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted people to be able to take a machine into

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the field You might work for a company like a

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>utility company, and having a computer that your employee could

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>take with him or her on a service call was

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:09.360
<v Speaker 1>incredibly valuable. So there was a need for portable machines.

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>People had a desire for them. There was a market there,

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but thirteen thousand dollars for a portable Mac was a

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>super steep price, and you might not be surprised to

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>hear that not very many of them were sold as

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a result. In fact, Apple sales in general were not

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>doing well that year. It marked the first time Apple

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>had an actual drop in sales figures, so they were

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>selling fewer computers than they had in the previous year.

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>The following year, Gasse announced his retirement from Apple and

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>vacated the head of product development, so he only lasted

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer than Steve Jobs himself did. Now,

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety also saw a big shift due to outside competition.

0:54:54.680 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>That's because in nineteen Microsoft launched Windows three point oh. Now,

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the previous incarnation of Windows had really not made a

0:55:04.160 --> 0:55:09.280
<v Speaker 1>huge impact on Macintosh sales. Consumers had not really adapted

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and adopted the Windows platform. But Windows three was a

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>different story. Windows three and IBM compatible machines were starting

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to become more popular, and from this point forward, I'm

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 1>just going to call those PCs. We'll talk about max

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>versus PCs. I don't like that because I think personal

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>computer is too broad a term to just refer to

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Windows based machines, but just for simplicity sake, we're gonna

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>do that for the rest of this episode. So PCs

0:55:39.560 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 1>were really selling well, and Windows three point oh was

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a dominant operating system, again a graphic user interface similar

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to what you would find on the Macintosh. There were

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>even people arguing that Microsoft was copying no Macintosh, but

0:55:56.600 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the development of Windows was happening at around the same

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>time him as the development of the Macintosh gooey, and

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, both companies really owed a huge debt

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to Xerox because it was Xerox is Park the R

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and d arm of Xerox that developed the graphic user interface. Anyway,

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the IBM PCs had a huge advantage over Macintosh and

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that they were less expensive. You could buy an IBM

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>PC for a fraction of what it cost to buy

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a Macintosh, and then you can get your graphic user

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 1>interface with Windows three point oh. Uh. In fact, within

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, you would have about five copies

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of Windows three point oh for every Macintosh that was

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>being sold. That's not great if you're Apple. Uh. I

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>should also point out that even at this point, as

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:51.640
<v Speaker 1>late as n I still hated Windows because I still

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 1>hated the idea of having to surrender so much of

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>my computers operating system or so much of my computers

0:56:57.960 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 1>processing power to the operating system them. So I was

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.280
<v Speaker 1>still being an elitist computer snob in those days. Although

0:57:04.320 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I had to give in because more and more games

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were only Windows compatible, and if I'm going to be honest,

0:57:09.320 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that was my main concern with PCs back in the day.

0:57:13.000 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't so much concerned about the productivity software, but

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>if I couldn't play my ultimate series of games got

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:25.080
<v Speaker 1>grouchy anyway. Remember it was also the year that the

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Mac Plus finally got discontinued from Apple. They decided to

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stop selling it, to stop making it. But it had

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a four year run, so that was really strong. Now

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got more to say about this period in Apple

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and Macintosh history, but before I get to that, let's

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break to thank our sponsor. Within two years,

0:57:52.840 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>so essentially By the time it gets to nine two

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Windows machines were outnumbering Macintosh machines by that factor of

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:01.880
<v Speaker 1>five to one, and that was super bad news for Apple.

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple stock price suffered dropping twenty percent, so the the

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 1>value of the company decreased by one five because of

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this issue and other issues going on in Apple, so

0:58:14.600 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the company was in a dangerous time in its history.

0:58:18.760 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It really led to an overall operational loss and it

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was pretty ugly. Stockholders were demanding that something change. So

0:58:27.520 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 1>John Scully was on the way out at this point

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>because the performance of the company was suffering. He was

0:58:34.840 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 1>being blamed for a lot of that, and so he

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>left in three. But just before he left, Apple was

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>still trying to right the ship right. The ship was

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:49.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to list. They were trying to get it back

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on track. I'm mixing metaphors, sue me. Apple introduced System seven,

0:58:56.520 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so this was the next generation of its operating system,

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and it introduced automatic support from multiple simultaneous applications, so

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you could run numerous programs at the same time. It

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>also introduced uh It's QuickTime software in n and Apple

0:59:15.040 --> 0:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Max began to run on the Motorola six eight zero

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 1>three zero processors. And I'm sure there's an easier way

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of saying that, and I'm sure the computer geeks out

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there in the audience who are familiar with these processors,

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:28.840
<v Speaker 1>these are the ones that you know, Max ran on

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the sixty eight thousand processors that Motorola made since the beginning.

0:59:34.080 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's an easier way of saying them, and

0:59:36.120 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for not knowing that, but I'm just gonna

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>say them the long way anyway. Uh. The Apple introduced

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh Quadra seven hundred and the Quadrum nine hundred

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>computers in nine, which were meant to be new product

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>lines within McIntosh, although they didn't last very long. Uh.

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>They ran on Motorola six eight zero four zero processors,

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>which are comparable to the four A the six processors

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that Intel was producing at the time. So you had

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Windows that were paired up with Intel, and

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you had Apple pairing up with Motorola, trying to make

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that its computers were of a comparable uh uh,

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>comparable level of quality to the to the top of

1:00:20.920 --> 1:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the line IBM compatible machines. Apple introduced a new type

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of computer called the power Book, which was a line

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of truly portable computers. These were more These were closer

1:00:32.520 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to being laptops than that portable Mac was. Remember the

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>portable Mac was really just a portable Mac, but the

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>power Book was meant to be more of a laptop.

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The first of the power Books, or rather the the

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>lowest in the whole line, the cheapest, was not actually

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>made by Apple. Apple contracted with Sony, and Sony made

1:00:53.400 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the power Book one. This is unusual because most Apple

1:00:57.000 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>products are manufactured by Apple itself, but that wasn't true

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for the power Book one. The battery on the power

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Book one hundred would last a whole two hours without

1:01:07.480 --> 1:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>being plugged in. It didn't sell as well as some

1:01:10.440 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the higher end models because it just didn't have

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the features. The power Book one forty and the one

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy were launched at around the same time, and they

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sold better than the power Book one hundred did. The

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>form factor of these ended up kind of defining the

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>look of laptops in the future. So if you unfolded

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the screen, uh, the keyboard sat back toward the screen.

1:01:31.280 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So typically the way you would open up a laptop,

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know how the keyboard is back in the

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>back section. In the front section, there was space for

1:01:39.040 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a first track ball, so again kind of like centipede

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ask your parents, and then later on a track pad,

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what you find standard on most laptops today. Well,

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it was the power Book that kind of defined that

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>form factor, and most laptops following followed along behind it.

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really change that up because it just made sense,

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but that was the power Book that really introduced that.

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Now beyond this, you also had in an alliance between Apple,

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>IBM and Motorola. They called it the AIM Alliance AIM,

1:02:18.920 --> 1:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>standing for Apple IBM, Motorola cute right. The aim of

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>AIM yeakeniche mcadee doo was building new hardware and software

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to act as a platform for the next generation of

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>computers and to stand as a direct competitor with Windows

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and Intel. So they wanted to make their own version

1:02:41.680 --> 1:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the partnership that Microsoft had with Intel and make

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it a competing standard. They called it PREP, which added

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>an upper case P and upper case are, a lower

1:02:51.960 --> 1:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>case E and an upper case P. It stood for

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>power PC Reference Platform. I was intended to serve as

1:02:59.320 --> 1:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that competitor, and the goal was to create a new

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>operating system that Apple would be in charge of so

1:03:04.920 --> 1:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple would provide the operating system and it would run

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on risk based processors as r I s C, and

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>those would come from IBM and Motorola. Apple's code named

1:03:16.480 --> 1:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>operating system was called Pink. And why well, that goes

1:03:20.680 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit earlier in Apple's history. So when

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple was planning out future projects several years before this happened,

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they would write down ideas on one of two different

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>colors of note cards. If the idea was considered to

1:03:36.560 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>be easy to implement, If engineers said yeah, we can

1:03:39.360 --> 1:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>knock that out and it won't cost too much and

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it won't take up too much time, those ideas went

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on blue note cards, meaning these are gonna be easy

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for us to do. If it was considered a challenging

1:03:50.560 --> 1:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>idea that was going to require more time, more effort,

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and therefore it was going to cost more internally, they

1:03:56.600 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>would write it down on a pink note card, saying, yeah,

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be harder to do. It might still

1:04:02.440 --> 1:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>be worth it, but it's gonna be hard. Well, the

1:04:06.360 --> 1:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>operating system was codenamed Pink because it was written down

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on a pink note card, creating the next generation operating system,

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>one that wasn't rooted in the system versions that had

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been on Macintosh up to that point, was gonna take

1:04:21.720 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of development time and effort, so it was

1:04:25.360 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>codenamed Pink. Now, sadly Prep never really meshed. You never

1:04:30.920 --> 1:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>got a point where you had the hardware and software

1:04:32.920 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>married together to make this rival to Windows Intel. So

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the project was a failure. But one thing that

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>did come out of it was a new type of

1:04:42.840 --> 1:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>processor called the power PC processor, and those would eventually

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>find their way into mac computers. Apple introduced a line

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of Macintosh computers called the perform Aline, and this was

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh's effort to actually say, hey, let's make something for

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the average consumer. Most Macintosh computers were so expensive and

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so specialized that they were just going to a narrow

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>niche market. We're talking about those creators I mentioned earlier

1:05:11.400 --> 1:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and small businesses, but that meant they were passing up

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to really target personal computer owners. They had

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>mostly targeted those through the Apple two line. But now

1:05:21.360 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the Apple two line was dead. It had discontinued, and

1:05:25.360 --> 1:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>uh really it ended in when Apple to E Enhanced

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>stopped being made. Although there were a couple of other

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>variations in the Apple two that lasted a bit longer,

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but they wanted to tackle that same market with the

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh line, so they launched the Performance Series. So what

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was it. The Performance Series was really just rebranded older

1:05:45.360 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>models of Macintosh computers. So the Macintosh computers that debuted

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years earlier but now had slower processors

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>compared to the most up to date models, they got

1:05:56.600 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rebranded as Performer models of Macintosh and put on the market. However,

1:06:03.040 --> 1:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple dumped a whole bunch of different models at the

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>same time, and that really confused consumers in the marketplace.

1:06:09.880 --> 1:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Imagine going to a store and seeing eight different variations

1:06:14.560 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the same basic computer and not really understanding what

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>differentiated one from another. That's kind of what happened with

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Performance Series. It just added more confusion in the marketplace,

1:06:26.240 --> 1:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately consumers just weren't sure about which computer they

1:06:30.200 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>should pie, and not a lot of them got sold.

1:06:33.920 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So Apple decided, hey, let's clear up the confusion, and

1:06:37.920 --> 1:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they produced a half hour infomercial explaining the different Performer models,

1:06:44.520 --> 1:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and you can find it online. So if you've got

1:06:47.840 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>half an hour to kill and you want to see

1:06:49.640 --> 1:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>how Apple tried to explain this performance series two consumers.

1:06:55.240 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Search for it online, you can find it. It's usually

1:06:57.440 --> 1:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>divided up into multiple parts, but you can find in

1:07:00.120 --> 1:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the performance series of videos that made up a half

1:07:03.920 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>hour infomercial. Now, the next person to stepa in as

1:07:07.800 --> 1:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>leader of the company, remember Scully had left in ninety three,

1:07:11.080 --> 1:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was Michael Spindler. He came from Apple's European operations division

1:07:15.960 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and he worked his way up the chain there. His

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>term was one of real controversy. It wasn't as a

1:07:24.760 --> 1:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>smooth transition, and it wasn't without issues. In fact, there

1:07:29.200 --> 1:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were rumors that he was discussing the possibilities of a

1:07:32.040 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>takeover with other companies like Sun Microsystems or IBM, and

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>he also oversaw projects at Apple that ultimately failed, like

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple's Newton project. I know I've mentioned Newton in previous

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Tech Stuff. I think we might have even

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>done a full episode about the Newton, which is kind

1:07:50.960 --> 1:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of a sad and comical story simultaneously. But that was

1:07:55.520 --> 1:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the little handheld device that was meant to be able

1:07:57.680 --> 1:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to recognize handwriting and other and have other features as well,

1:08:01.680 --> 1:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately had um Its ambitions were beyond its own grasp.

1:08:08.880 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's be kind and call it that. But that's another story. So, uh,

1:08:15.680 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the nickname for Michael Spindler was the Diesel. I don't

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>know what that says about his character, but I have

1:08:22.920 --> 1:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that I probably wouldn't be compatible with someone

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>whose nickname is the Diesel, unless it was Kevin Nash,

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because we have a mutual love of professional wrestling. Now,

1:08:38.680 --> 1:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Spindler would end up being replaced by the Board of

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>directors a few years later in and the board of

1:08:45.280 --> 1:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>directors chose Gil Emilio to step in as CEO. Gil

1:08:50.080 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Emilio had come from National Semiconductor before joining Apple, and

1:08:54.400 --> 1:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Emilio himself would also get replaced by the Board of

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Directors in But more on that in a little bit.

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the timeline of Macintosh. So we

1:09:05.320 --> 1:09:08.639
<v Speaker 1>left off in n just took a break to talk

1:09:08.680 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about the shuffle at the CEO level over the next

1:09:11.920 --> 1:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, which really tells you that Apple was

1:09:14.800 --> 1:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. When you see a company changing CEO so

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:22.479
<v Speaker 1>rapidly because the board keeps replacing it, that's not a

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>great sign. Doesn't show a lot of confidence at the

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>board of directors. Level, and it probably reflects a lack

1:09:28.600 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of confidence at the shareholder level. But the show had

1:09:31.960 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to go on. So what was happening at Macintosh. Well,

1:09:36.840 --> 1:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple made a big move that was a defining moment

1:09:41.560 --> 1:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Macintosh line. They decided to move away from

1:09:44.800 --> 1:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>those Motorola processors I talked about a minute ago, and

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>switched to the power PC processors, which remember we're still

1:09:52.479 --> 1:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>developed partially by Motorola in partnership with IBM, so it's

1:09:56.360 --> 1:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not like they were turning their back on Motorola. Rather

1:09:59.479 --> 1:10:02.519
<v Speaker 1>they said, from this point forward, our architecture is going

1:10:02.600 --> 1:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to depend upon this type of computer processor instead of

1:10:05.960 --> 1:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this other type of computer processor. But that meant big

1:10:10.200 --> 1:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>changes all down the line of the Macintosh. Now, they

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:17.639
<v Speaker 1>were hoping that the power PC processors would be able

1:10:17.680 --> 1:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to rival Intel's x eight six chips. Those are the

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>four eight six is the pen t M and so on.

1:10:25.080 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So that was the hope, and um they actually stuck

1:10:28.200 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>with power PC processors all the way from two thousand

1:10:33.160 --> 1:10:36.479
<v Speaker 1>six and then they changed again. That's a story for

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>later now. The first mac to feature a power PC

1:10:40.520 --> 1:10:46.639
<v Speaker 1>processor was the Macintosh, which also ran Mac OS nine.

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It was the latest version of Apple's operating system. Although

1:10:49.240 --> 1:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't called mac OS nine, it was really System nine.

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>It was the first computer to actually run System nine.

1:10:56.000 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Oddly enough, Apple also released a second ver version of

1:11:01.040 --> 1:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this specific computer with a completely different chip architecture. So

1:11:06.880 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you have the power Pc version of the sixty, but

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>you also had an Intel for eighty six version of

1:11:13.600 --> 1:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the sixty. For the first time, Apple decided to try

1:11:17.280 --> 1:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and go with an IBM compatible route, so this version

1:11:22.040 --> 1:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Mac six had an Intel forties for six microprocessor.

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It was DOS compatible. It could run both mac OS

1:11:30.600 --> 1:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and Windows simultaneously. Later on Macintosh users would have to

1:11:34.840 --> 1:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>do this by setting up a virtual machine that would

1:11:37.760 --> 1:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>run an instance of Windows over on top of the

1:11:41.280 --> 1:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Mac hardware. This was also a time when Apple began

1:11:44.960 --> 1:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to stray further away from the concept of making as

1:11:47.280 --> 1:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>much in house as it could, and it was a

1:11:50.640 --> 1:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>big departure from the white Steve Jobs had run things

1:11:53.400 --> 1:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>back when he was still part of the company. Now,

1:11:56.000 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the power Pc hardware was incompatible with software that was

1:11:59.320 --> 1:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>written for Scintosh computers running the older Motorola chips. You

1:12:03.200 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>often find this if you change processor types. That change

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in architecture requires software to behave a different way in

1:12:11.240 --> 1:12:14.479
<v Speaker 1>order for stuff to get done. So if you were

1:12:14.479 --> 1:12:18.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to run an older Macintosh program on a power

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>PC Macintosh, you had to have an emulator. This is

1:12:22.840 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a piece of software that simulates the way other hardware runs.

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>You might remember I did one an episode all about

1:12:31.040 --> 1:12:34.759
<v Speaker 1>video game emulators. The same thing is true for operating

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>system emulators or chip emulators. So you had this software

1:12:39.640 --> 1:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that was replicating the way old Motorola chips ran, but

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it would allow the software to run on a power

1:12:47.040 --> 1:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>PC processor computer. In other words, you just had to

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>have this other piece of software to kind of act

1:12:53.600 --> 1:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as an interpreter so that you could get stuff done

1:12:56.960 --> 1:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on your new machine. Now, the good news was the

1:12:59.760 --> 1:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>power PC's were so powerful, these power macs, as they

1:13:03.360 --> 1:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>came to be called, we're so powerful that it didn't

1:13:07.439 --> 1:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>slow down the processing of these older Mac programs. So

1:13:11.960 --> 1:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the emulator wasn't so processor heavy that it was impacting

1:13:17.320 --> 1:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the way the program ran. It would actually run more

1:13:19.600 --> 1:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>smoothly on these power PC programs or power Pc machines

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>than they would on the older Motorola machines. So that

1:13:26.240 --> 1:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was a good story. Right. You don't want your emulator

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to slow stuff down, because then people get the implication

1:13:32.760 --> 1:13:35.879
<v Speaker 1>that the brand new computer they just bought is slower

1:13:35.880 --> 1:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>than their old computer. That's a bad thing. So luckily

1:13:40.520 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the emulator ran really efficiently and it didn't slow things down.

1:13:46.680 --> 1:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That's when things kind of went bonkers over at Apple.

1:13:49.720 --> 1:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>For the first time ever, Apple licensed other companies to

1:13:53.240 --> 1:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>allow them to bring Macintosh compatible machines to market, so

1:13:58.800 --> 1:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this was the era of the mac Clone. They allowed

1:14:02.400 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>other companies to license the hardware and software and make

1:14:05.960 --> 1:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>their own versions of the Macintosh computer, although they would

1:14:09.320 --> 1:14:12.519
<v Speaker 1>be called different things. Uh. This, by the way, ignores

1:14:12.560 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that PowerBook one hundred was built by Sony,

1:14:14.920 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but that was built by Sony for Apple. In this case,

1:14:18.400 --> 1:14:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about companies that were building machines for Apple.

1:14:22.000 --> 1:14:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about companies that would license the technology to

1:14:24.640 --> 1:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>build their own version of the Macintosh and sell it

1:14:28.040 --> 1:14:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to consumers. The first was the Radius System one hundred

1:14:32.960 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 1>from a company called Radius, and it was similar to

1:14:35.800 --> 1:14:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple's own power mac The specs were very close, but

1:14:40.640 --> 1:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the computer itself was housed in a tower style case,

1:14:44.640 --> 1:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>so very different from Apple's approach where they would try

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and put the monitor and the computer case all in

1:14:50.160 --> 1:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>one unit. That was typical for most of Apple's computers,

1:14:53.360 --> 1:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not all of them, but a lot of them. This

1:14:56.240 --> 1:14:58.679
<v Speaker 1>was totally different. It was more like your standard IBM

1:14:58.800 --> 1:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>compatible where you had a tower desktop. So it was

1:15:03.000 --> 1:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a big departure from Apple's aesthetic. Uh, there were other

1:15:08.520 --> 1:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>computers that also launched at this time that were clones

1:15:11.240 --> 1:15:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of the Macintosh, because there were other companies that licensed

1:15:13.880 --> 1:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the technology from Apple, and perhaps Apple was hoping to

1:15:18.479 --> 1:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dominate the market again and make enough money off the

1:15:20.880 --> 1:15:26.599
<v Speaker 1>licenses to justify their use. Unfortunately, Apple ended up cutting

1:15:26.600 --> 1:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>off its nose despite its face. In this case, they

1:15:31.960 --> 1:15:35.439
<v Speaker 1>licensed the technology to other manufacturers, but that gave companies

1:15:35.479 --> 1:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to produce cheaper machines running Apple hardware and software.

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So you could run Macintosh programs on these computers because

1:15:43.880 --> 1:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they were clones of the mac not physically, but from

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:51.559
<v Speaker 1>a hardware and software standpoint, they were, and they were

1:15:51.560 --> 1:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>able to sell them for less expensive prices than what

1:15:54.160 --> 1:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple was demanding. So Apple ended up undercutting its own

1:15:58.080 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>sales because it authorized these other users, these other manufacturers,

1:16:03.040 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to make Macintosh compatible computers. So why would you go

1:16:09.040 --> 1:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and buy what appears to be an overpriced machine from

1:16:11.840 --> 1:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple if you can go to one of its competitors

1:16:14.920 --> 1:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and buy a comparable machine for much less money. If

1:16:18.800 --> 1:16:21.519
<v Speaker 1>you are a consumer or a business, it makes more

1:16:21.520 --> 1:16:24.439
<v Speaker 1>sense to go the other route, to go the cheaper route.

1:16:24.760 --> 1:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>As long as you're reasonably sure that the machine is

1:16:28.360 --> 1:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a good one, that's what you're gonna do. And in fact,

1:16:31.040 --> 1:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what Apple saw. They saw a lot of consumers

1:16:34.240 --> 1:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>going to these competitors rather than going to Apple. Now,

1:16:37.560 --> 1:16:40.479
<v Speaker 1>one benefit was that they had a lot more people

1:16:41.360 --> 1:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>buying into the Apple ecosystem, But because Apple wasn't controlling

1:16:46.560 --> 1:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that hardware, they weren't seeing any money off of it,

1:16:49.600 --> 1:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>besides that initial licensing fee that they charged companies in

1:16:53.360 --> 1:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>order to produce these clones. So in the long run,

1:16:58.840 --> 1:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it ended up hurting Apple. It was hurting their sales,

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>although it did mean that more people were getting familiar

1:17:06.080 --> 1:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Macintosh program and the Macintosh platform because suddenly

1:17:11.360 --> 1:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>they could afford a Macintosh, even though it wasn't an

1:17:14.400 --> 1:17:19.519
<v Speaker 1>official Apple Macintosh. This is one of those decisions that

1:17:20.280 --> 1:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple executives today probably look back on and shake their

1:17:23.760 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>heads and mumble about it, because it really affected profits

1:17:28.120 --> 1:17:31.559
<v Speaker 1>over at Apple by Apple was looking for the next

1:17:31.600 --> 1:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>generation of operating systems because Pink didn't work out. So

1:17:35.240 --> 1:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>they said, we need a next generation operating system. Our

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>system series is starting to show its age. We need

1:17:41.439 --> 1:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a new operating system. But to spend the money and

1:17:44.640 --> 1:17:47.559
<v Speaker 1>time to develop an in house is not really practical.

1:17:47.600 --> 1:17:50.519
<v Speaker 1>So they started looking outside the company and saying, well,

1:17:50.520 --> 1:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what else is out there that maybe we could acquire

1:17:53.880 --> 1:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and then use in future Macintosh computers. They looked at

1:17:58.720 --> 1:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>two different companies, and here's the funny thing. Each of

1:18:03.000 --> 1:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>those companies was founded by a former Apple executive. The

1:18:08.360 --> 1:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>first company was b Incorporated. That's b E Inc. And

1:18:14.000 --> 1:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>they created the bos or bios if you prefer. This

1:18:18.720 --> 1:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>company was founded by Jean Louis Gass, so remember the

1:18:23.240 --> 1:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>head of product development from a few years ago who

1:18:25.760 --> 1:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stepped down. The other big contender was next Step, the

1:18:31.240 --> 1:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>next Step operating system, which was from a company called

1:18:33.960 --> 1:18:40.599
<v Speaker 1>next and that company was founded by drumroll please Steve Jobs.

1:18:42.040 --> 1:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So once again you had guess a versus Jobs with

1:18:45.080 --> 1:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the two operating systems that could potentially power the next

1:18:48.800 --> 1:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>generation of Macintosh computers. Now ultimately, spoiler alert, Apple decided

1:18:55.120 --> 1:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that they would go Next. They decided against Bios and

1:18:58.760 --> 1:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>decided the next step was the operating system they wanted.

1:19:02.200 --> 1:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So instead of setting up a licensing deal, they did

1:19:05.840 --> 1:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>something a little different. They didn't just license the technology

1:19:09.680 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>from Next, they acquired Next. They spent a lot of

1:19:14.520 --> 1:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>money doing it too. They spent nearly four hundred thirty

1:19:18.760 --> 1:19:22.479
<v Speaker 1>million dollars on the purchase, and they threw in one

1:19:22.479 --> 1:19:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and a half million shares of Apple stock as well.

1:19:26.280 --> 1:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Now keep in mind Apple stock at this point was suffering,

1:19:30.120 --> 1:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was one and a half million shares. If

1:19:32.120 --> 1:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they could turn things around, and spoiler alert, they totally did,

1:19:35.800 --> 1:19:38.479
<v Speaker 1>that million and a half shares of Apple would be

1:19:38.520 --> 1:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>worth way more money. So Steve Jobs came along as

1:19:43.280 --> 1:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>part of this part of the deal. They essentially bought

1:19:45.479 --> 1:19:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs back to Apple because he was the founder

1:19:48.760 --> 1:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of Next and he was part of that company, so

1:19:51.320 --> 1:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they acquired the company. Steve Jobs comes on so he

1:19:55.200 --> 1:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would return to Apple after a very long hiatus or

1:20:00.040 --> 1:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as he might refer to it as banishment, and he

1:20:04.120 --> 1:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>returned initially as a consultant. But Apple was reeling. The

1:20:07.800 --> 1:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>stock price had hit a twelve year low and the

1:20:11.280 --> 1:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>board of directors had decided eventually that they needed to

1:20:14.880 --> 1:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>replace gil Emilio, and in fact, there was one person

1:20:18.439 --> 1:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>who was really arguing for this, and that person was

1:20:22.560 --> 1:20:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs. So Steve Jobs goes to the board directors

1:20:25.880 --> 1:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and says, hey, you are in real trouble. The decisions

1:20:29.120 --> 1:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that have have been made over the past few years have

1:20:30.720 --> 1:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>been disastrous for this company and they are leading it

1:20:33.240 --> 1:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to the brink of bankruptcy. You gotta get rid of

1:20:36.400 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>gil Emilio. And the board of directors agreed, and they

1:20:39.120 --> 1:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>put Steve Jobs in charge as interim CEO. But that

1:20:43.080 --> 1:20:47.519
<v Speaker 1>stas wentn't last. Steve Jobs would eventually become the actual CEO,

1:20:47.680 --> 1:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not just an interim CEO, and would end up taking

1:20:51.320 --> 1:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>control of the company he had co founded a couple

1:20:54.880 --> 1:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of decades earlier. And uh yeah, it was a total

1:20:59.160 --> 1:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>different story Apple from that point forward. But that's the

1:21:02.840 --> 1:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>tale for another episode for part three of the Mic

1:21:06.520 --> 1:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Microsoft. For Part three of the Macintosh Story

1:21:11.000 --> 1:21:14.559
<v Speaker 1>other m, my brain don't work, but yes, in part

1:21:14.600 --> 1:21:17.599
<v Speaker 1>three we will talk about Steve Jobs return, how he

1:21:17.880 --> 1:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>transformed the Macintosh line yet again and leading up to

1:21:22.520 --> 1:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the max that you would find in stores today. So

1:21:25.880 --> 1:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that will be part three. Uh, that'll that should bring

1:21:29.120 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us up to date. I imagine unless I come across

1:21:32.040 --> 1:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the story that's so incredible it takes yet another full

1:21:34.680 --> 1:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>part by itself. In the meantime, if you guys have

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for future episode topics or for guests I

1:21:42.040 --> 1:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>should have on the show, either as a guest host

1:21:46.520 --> 1:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>or an interview subject, let me know. Send me an email.

1:21:50.720 --> 1:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>My email address for the show is text stuff at

1:21:54.600 --> 1:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com. I keep getting emails sent

1:21:59.200 --> 1:22:01.759
<v Speaker 1>to the genera at how stuff works dot com address

1:22:01.840 --> 1:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>asking what's the email address for tech Stuff. I only

1:22:04.400 --> 1:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>say it at the end of every episode. It just

1:22:06.439 --> 1:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>tells me that you stop listening when I get to

1:22:08.760 --> 1:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this part. Don't do that. Listen to the end tech

1:22:11.840 --> 1:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff at how stuff works dot com, or you can

1:22:14.160 --> 1:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>drop me a line on the social media's like Twitters

1:22:17.960 --> 1:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and the facebooks at both of those. The show's handle

1:22:21.360 --> 1:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is tech Stuff H s W and I'll talk to

1:22:24.640 --> 1:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon for more on this and thousands

1:22:34.000 --> 1:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Because at staff works dot com,