WEBVTT - Agecroft's Steinbrugge on Outlook for Hedge Fund Fees (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>dot Com the radio plus mobile lap and on your radio,

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a Bloomberg business flag from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Pellett. Just getting word from Applied Materials, the

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>biggest maker of machinery used to manufacture semiconductors. It is

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>predicting revenue and profit that may surpass estimates, banking on

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>increased business from chip makers upgrading their equipment and stronger

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>demand from companies that produced flat panel screens. Shares jumping

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>as much as six point four percent. Equities hired today

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with the now the SMP, NZDAC all advancing stocks fluctuated

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>from much of the session, but as of the close

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>it was an update. SMP up four to seven, a

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>gain of two tents of one percent, NASTACK up eleven,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>also a gain of two tenths of one percent down.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Industrials up twenty three, a gain of one tenth of

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one percent, Gold up eight sixty ounce the thirteen fifty

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>three a gain of six tenths of one percent. Crude

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>oil up three point two percent, advancing a dollar fifty two.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Talking about West Texas intermediate Brent was up today by

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>two percent. I'm Charlie Pellett. That's a Bloomberg Business flash.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to taking stock with Box and Kathleen Hayes

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio taking stock of hedge funds. Taking stock

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of hedge fund fees with Don Steinberger. He is managing

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>partner for Agecroft Partners. They're based in Richmond, Virginia, and

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he joins us. Now, Don, I'm sure you may read

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the article in Bloomberg Bloomberg Business Week Steve Eisman, who

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>made a bundle betting on the collapse of sub prime

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>mortgage securities, who now works at New Burger Berman. He

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>says that in the future, in ten years, that fees

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for hedge funds will be one point to five percent

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of assets per year instead of the standard two percent

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>annual charge plus a performance fee of twenty percent of profit.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree? You know, I think there is huge

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure on fees in the hedge fund industry, and I

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>think that pressure is going to continue, uh in the future.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>What I will say is, I do think that there

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are some managers that are specialized focused on mitch areas

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>UM can demonstrate that they can add value, and I

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's always going to be people that are willing

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay for people that can generate returns. But that

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>does not apply to a vast majority of the hedge funds.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It only replies applies to those maybe ten of the

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>industry that are truly talented. Well, Don Steinberg, I remember

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>several years ago speaking to the former president of Dallas

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Federalserve Bank, UM, Richard Fisher, who started at Brown Brother's

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Harriman and you know, bond fixed in some currencies that

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>worked in government. Starting a hedge fund though back in

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the eighties when there weren't very many of them around,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and sold it then, uh and and made good money

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on it. Not my he probably would have, you know,

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>done it ten years later. But he said back then

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he got sad this vision of things getting the industry

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>getting so big you just would not be able to

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have enough people to do that kind of high performance.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That the quality of the hedge fund and returns would

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>probably be diminished over time. And it seems like that's

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen. Too many people jumping into a very

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>tough industry. I think we are seeing too many. I mean,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>right now they're about fifteen thousand hedge funds and it's

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>way too money in the industry would be much better

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>if the number was significating less. I told you, you know,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think only are high quality. The other aren't. I

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>think because the other aren't. You're seeing really bad numbers

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>UM for various hedge fund industry hedge fund indusseries, and

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you know you're going to see a big shake up

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in the hedge fund industry over time. Down over the

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>past three quarters, investors have withdrawn about twenty five billion

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars from hedge funds globally. Not that is small compared

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to the roughly what three trillion dollars that they manage.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But why don't they just have some kind of hurdle

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>rate that in other words, if they can't make you

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>money above let's say a ten year treasury, they don't

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>make money. Doesn't that seem to make sense? Well, you know,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds are um. Each hedge fund is going to

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>make their own decision on what is in their own

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 1>best interests. And the the pressure on fees for talented

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>managers has not been that high outside of three areas.

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you look at the standard hetch funds

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>fee hedge fund charges in their operating docks. Very few

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>were going in and changing that to make it lower

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for their current investors or for new investors. Where you're

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing major pressure on fees is from large institutional investors.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, fifteen years ago, large and ugeal investors didn't

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>get a discount. Today, big pensions and Dowmond's foundations they

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>can get some cases fee discounts, and that pressure is

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not going away. I understand that, but I don't under

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But what I don't understand is that if you're managing

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>someone's money and you don't know how it's going to

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>turn out year from year, of course, but if you're

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>managing someone's money and they can get a relatively risk

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>free return of one and a half percent in a

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tenure treasury, if you can't do better than one and

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, why get paid, Well, you shouldn't get

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>paid if you can't do better than one and a

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>half percent. But there are certain managers, you know, like

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, UM, there's some direct lending managers out there

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that are getting you know, eight nine after fee returns

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on their portfolio, that do very good credit research. Uh,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there's reinsurance managers that are not correlated to the overall

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>marketplace that you know, they're historically they've been able to

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>generate you know, high single digit returns. Uh. You know

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>there's some market neutral managers have done well, so you

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>know there are some strategies or managers that are able

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to generate good returns even though a vast majority of

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds have not done well at the very least.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Does this make it a lot easier done for investors

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate with hedge funds on the fees. It's your

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>large you know, I mentioned the operating docks of hedge

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>funds to talk about what fees edge funds charge. Most

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are still charging one and a half and twenty or

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>two and twenty to someone who's going to allocate one

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. If you're going to allocate you know, fifty

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>million and your pension endowment are very large family office,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a big discount. Where you can get

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>discounts is um from smaller managers. You know, fifteen thousand

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds majority below hundred million, five of assets are

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>going to managers blow a hundred million a lot are

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>offering founders share discount. Great place to invest because you

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>know these managers are small, nimble, some of them can

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>generate I think much better returns and larger managers off

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>A forty act is growing, but you've got to be

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>very careful about forty because they tend not to be

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>run the same way as the hedge fund. Alright, well,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Don Stromberger, thank you so very much for joining us.

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So you'll have to come back soon and educate us

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on the next chapter of the hedge fund world. In particular,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna make up what does it take. I bet

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Pim Fox will be a really good hedge fund manager,

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>not at all. Well, you never know. I want to

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>thank Don Steinberger, managing partner at Agecroft Partners. I want

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to thank our technical director Reggie Basil and our producer

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Samara Lenga. I'm Kathleen Hayes, along with Pim Fox. We

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>want to thank you for joining us today. Keep it

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>right here. This is Bloomberg coming up. Bloomberg Law will

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>take a look at a lawsuit targeting sixteen banks. They're

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>being sued for allegedly manipulating a key Australian interest rate

0:07:55.480 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>benchmark in attempt to generate billions of dollars. That's next