WEBVTT - Surveillance: Get Used To Low U.S. Yields, Caron Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Should

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we talk to somebody who actually manages real money? I mean,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the charm of Bob Michael and others here.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>There's people that are strategists only, and then there's people

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that actually enjoy losing money when things go wrong. This

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>dog log normal, I mean, Jim Karen join us in

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>New York. Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Fixed Income Portfolio Manage

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to Jim, Great to see you. Let's talk about some

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges out there at the moment. Are you

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>happy with some of the toad has been deployed? Um?

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Not not from the fat not so far. I mean

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rate cutting, interest rates, it's like you know, bringing

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a knife to a gunfight, you know at this point,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's really about the credit markets. And you know,

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>what we apply whenever these crisis events happen is what

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we call a triple A framework. And the triple A

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>framework is affordability of credit, accessibility of credit, and then

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>risk appetite. All three of these have to have to

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>work together. Affordability, the FED can lower interest rates, and

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>as as you're bringing up earlier, interest rates are actually

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>lower for investment grade credit to day, so the borrowing

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>costs is low and that's good. Um, the accessibility. Are

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the capital markets open? Are they able to issue their

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>debt that needs to get going again? And then will

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>people actually buy those bonds? Is the other question, Jim,

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>How worries should I be about the small to medium

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sized enterprises? Otherwise viable business has gone through a really,

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>really tough time right now. Can they make it to

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the year. Isn't that actually a big question? So, Jonathan,

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you're talking about that. Not a lot of

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>people are. That is the most important thing that we

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>should talk about at this point. The large corporations and

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>investment grade and all these indices, they can access to

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, plenty of liquidity. They have no problems. Small

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and midsized business. This is a life blood of the U.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>S economy. They employ six the people. This is jobs.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Jobs feeds into consumption. Consumption feeds into g D p.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>What we need to see is more support mechanisms for

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>these for these businesses to get bridge loans, because these

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are these are as. I like to say, these are

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand companies that borrow from ten thousand banks that

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you've never heard of, that really are the lifeblood. But

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim Karen, how do you do the X axis if

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a medical event. I mean, to be fair,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this virus could be good news, clear itself medically from

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a realological standpoint in weeks and we move on. I

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>doubt that, but hey, that's one theory. How do you

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>do the X axis of assistance to small business? Well,

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you overdo it to to make sure that

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a big problem. Right. So, so so

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the way that you do these things is you have

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to start to come up with these lending problems, Like

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the ECB has a nice toolkit to lend directly to

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>these small and midsized enterprise. The way that it works,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the FED is they may have to

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>open up certain programs where they tell the big banks,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>like remember remember September two thousand, A team we had

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a big spike and repo rates. That's the big banks,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>not lending to the small banks, who then lent to

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the who then lent to small business. What we need

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to do is have some regulatory changes to make sure

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>liquidity is flowing so that these small businesses can roll

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>over their loans and these midsize and small banks can

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>also continue to make these bridge loans and make sure

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that their backstop so that the credit can continue to flow.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And if that, if that works over the next couple

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of months, we get through the virus, then we have

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a viable business to bounce back. If not, we don't

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have a viable business. This is critical. It's called building

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the bridge to get to the middle of the year.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We've got a health shock, a health crisis. It will pass,

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and it probably will pass by the middle of this year.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It all depends on what state these small and medium

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sized enterprises are actually in once we get there, and

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that will define the shape of the recovery. Absolutely that

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>will define the upslope. I want to get my hands

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>around the risk we face between now and then. If

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see these tools deployed, are we talking about

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcys and sames? Are we talking about airlines going under?

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to lay on thick. This show has

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>been really, really careful over the last couple of weeks,

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just to be very, very delicate about the position we're in.

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that questions we need to ask you. Yeah,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So so it goes back to risk, appetite and willingness

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to land. Right. So what we see here is that

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>demand is not being destroyed, but it's being delayed. I mean,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we we came into this event, you know, with relatively

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>strong footing, and I think that most people would see

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this as a viable opportunity to make these loans to

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>get people to the middle of the year, because it's

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good it's gonna be a good investment,

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a good opportunity. So it's not like

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this is ah, this is an event that took place

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know what the end looks like. We

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>believe that we do know what the end looks like.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a question of the time and the passing the virus.

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Really important observation, John. This came after my six hour

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>day yesterday. My last interview was with Alan Blinder of Princeton,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the former vice chair and LISA vice chairman. Blinder was

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>adamant Okay, it's a supply shock, it's a virus, but

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>guess what, it's still a demand discussion, is Mr Karen mentioned? Well, absolutely,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>because whether people are going to travel matters with these

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>companies and whether they're going to survive. I'm wondering there

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was so much discussion about lending moving away from banks

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to private equity, to private credit to smaller firms, and

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't this sort of stress testing them. Aren't they supposed

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to be swooping in here and actually fulfilling their function.

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So at least this is this is a good point here, right,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So the regulatory environment has pushed these the banks out

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of that business and it's gone more to the private side,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>more to private equity and things like that to create financing. Well,

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>these these guys are not the JP Morgan's, They're not

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of American's right there. Not the big banks

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that have to make these loans or that you can

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>regulate to force them to make these loans. These are

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>private entities. So the liquidity may not be asked forthcoming.

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>But in some senses, some of these private equity firms

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have so much capital that's willing to deploy that they

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>may do it on an opportunistic basis, but not on

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory, you know basis. So in other words, the

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>FED loses control as the overall regulator of the banks

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually enact this policy. So it's really now up

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the animal spirits to, you know, to actually take

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this on. There's also a question of how much time

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>some of these businesses have until they run out of

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>cash or face material debt maturities. Do we have a

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of that because in China there were statistics that

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies, millions even could run out of

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>cash in six days, right, So we don't We don't

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have good data on the small and midsized businesses, right

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>because Wall Street typically you know, looks at large cap

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>companies and that's and that's typically the way it goes.

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But what I do know is that more small in

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>mid sized businesses. You know a lot of these a

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of these businesses put you know that they're working

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>capitals their credit card, right, they put things on their

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>credit card, they pay off their bills at the end

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of the month. So really what we have to start

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to look for is stresses maybe in some of the

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>asset BacT markets that you know, the credit card markets

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and loan markets. In those ways, we have to start

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit more creative to see how

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>these small and midsized businesses access the credit markets and

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>access liquidity. And that's what we need to be supportive of.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>So far, what I can tell you is I'm not

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>seeing any stresses in the repo market, which is good,

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>really really good news. So this is not looking like

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight. This is not a systemic event

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point. All I'm bringing up are the sign

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>posts of risk that we should start to look at. Um.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So far, so good, but we also have to start

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at some of the credit card data and

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the loan defaults and things like that in

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the smaller sized in the smaller size banks. Jim, let's

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about these markets and get a co from you. Ny.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Basis points is the yield on the US tenure treasury?

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Should I get used to these kind of numbers now?

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The treasury market, I got used to it pretty quickly

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out from Germany and Europe and Japan. Do I need

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to get used to that hit in the United States?

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, sadly the answer is yes, especially if the

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>FED by most economists now we're calling for another fifty

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>basis point rate cut, you know, relatively soon. So if

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed funds rates at you know, fifty basis points

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in you know, a couple of months time, or say

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe even weeks time. Um, Yeah, you're gonna be looking

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at the tenure note around one percent. Could the yield

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>curve steep? And yes, Um, is inflation going to come

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>back in any big way to to push longer term

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>yield higher anytime soon? Probably not so. And if we're

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at higher yields, we have to look towards the

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year hard to see what the

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>path of the virus actually takes. But the answer is

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely these are just numbers, right, one percent not imagine

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just the number ninety bass point nine bays, But

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just a number. It could go lower, um, But

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think there are limitations before it starts to

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>actually hurt the markets much. It's the fetes that imply, oh, absolutely,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you think another twenty five. Well, I, you know, I

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>can't make a call on whether they go twenty five

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or not. It's gonna depend on what's happening in all

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the other markets. But I I don't I don't rule

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that out. Jim Cannon to catch up near this morning

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>moldering Stanley Investment Management Fixed Incomepan folio manager. The idea

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>tell them that the fetty still implay after the fifty

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary absolute extrema weeks away. I love what Mr Karen said.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>They're about forget full faith and credit and look at

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets. Is the point over the next number

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>of weeks headline across the Bloomberg. And this really shows

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not the specificity of cancelations, but there are two or

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>three different pilgrimages in Saudi Arabia and the amra Is.

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's considered like a secondary pilgrimage because it's not compulsory,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's where anybody goes to Mecca. And they've canceled

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire omber pilgrimage moment in Saudi Arabia. That's a

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>big deal. It's a broader statement than just canceling one

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>specific thing like the I M Fringe series put together

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>tho it's a series of gatherings that ultimately of being canceled.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is playing into the economic impact, not just

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle Eas, not just in Asia, but all

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>little perspective. This morning, as we bring in our good

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>guest Howard Dean of Courses, Dr Dean of Albert Einstein

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Medical School, the former governor of Vermont, and he and

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I are of a vintage where we remember the extraordinary

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>events of ninety two, which was George McGovern and I

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>would point out Dr Dean that it was the six

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Amendment where it was guaranteed that the ut of America

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would show up and vote. They didn't show up yesterday,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>did they, Dr Dean? No, they didn't. And I'm stretching

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in my head and figuring out why. I've been reading

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter as I often do, and there's a lot of

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>young people on Twitter expressing disappointment because many of them

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are for Bernie, but they didn't vote. And I don't

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>understand why. I don't get this. They have a candidate

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's very exciting for them. It doesn't happen all the time.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Young people elected Barack Obama in two thousand and eight,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the only time in my lifetime where more people under

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty five voter than over sixty five. So I do

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>not understand what's going on. I would suggest Vice President

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Biden is not doesn't have the former president's electricity of

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking and events and all that does Vice President by

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>need the youth vote to defeat Donald Trump? I think

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he does. Um, we weren't party really is young, dark,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and female. I mean, if you look at the Three

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Paths election in two thousand eighteen, two thousand seventeen in Virginia.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand nineteen in Virginia, the legislators were transformed. Uh,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and the average age I think of the Democratic Caucus

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>went down about ten years in the single election in

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the House. So, but our core group is young, of color,

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and female, and so we need those groups to turn out.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>If those groups turn out, we went. If they don't

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>turn out, we lose. It's just as simple as that. Well,

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how would let's talk about what was actually happening out

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the former Vice president Joe Biden. It was the African

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>American vote overwhelmingly in his faith and now two months

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>ago it fount like that would be the story. But

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>eight days ago it felt like that maybe some of

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that was slipping. What has happened in the last seven days,

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not entirely clear, but it's more than the African

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>American But the African American votes started all this in

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina, but donal throughout the South. He just got

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>enormous numbers. And I can't conclude anything but this is

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>this association with the only African American president we've ever

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>had in this country. Um. But there's more to it

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>than that. Uh to win in places like Texas. Uh

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and in Massachusetts, which is just shocking. In Minnesota that

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was not the African American vote that carried him. There

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was others. UM. I think some of this is just

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>voters saying, look, we've had enough of the drama and

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the corruption and the every day Let's just get somebody

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>who's we know. And even if it's Joe, who may

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not be that exciting when he showed he could win

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in South Carolina currently struck a struck a match. I.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen anything like this in eleven decades, I

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>mean eleven cycles. Here. Do you expect in the next

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>four hours that this race goes down to two? No,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth is probably going to stay in. She thinks it's

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a broker convention and she can be the peacemaker. UM.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Mike Bloomberg is going to do,

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, Uh. I think he's considering his options. He

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>has enough money to stay in as long as he

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to, and his goals are really broader than just

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>becoming president. His ads have been absolutely fantastic in terms

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of ripping up Trump, and you know, he gets a

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>great he gets it's a big discount on those ads

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as he's a candidate. So I have no

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>idea what either one of them are going to do.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And so far as I've assumed, it's going to be

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a four person race into the next big weekend, because

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been asked about this before and I've said repeatedly,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to know until two weeks and the

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the next week is important to Michigan and big states

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. So this is not over by any speci

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of imagination. Yeah, and Dr Dean Michael Bloomberg has said

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>he's come out and said, uh that the only way

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that he could win is in a contest, contested convention

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>where the super delegates come together and meet Michael Bloomberg,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>founder and Geordie owner of Bloomberg LP. I'm wondering, from

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, what is the likelihood that we will get

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a candidate determined by a brokered convention which has not

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>been used for decades, Not since nineteen fifty two. I

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's very unlikely. Um. Frankly, the optics is that

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are awful. Whoever the losing candidate would be in a

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>broken convention with their supporters would have a very hard

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>time getting behind the winner. Um. I just am not

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for brokered conventions. The super delegates has never elected a president.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Has always been done without this help of the super delegates.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Super delegates really are only there elect will attend the convention,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>which they didn't used to do until they were super delegates.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Howard Dean, what kind of vice president does a seventies

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>something year old gentleman from Delaware need? I mean, what's

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean? I know it's way too premature to talk

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>vice president. What What's And Bernie has already said this.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Bernie has said we cannot have two old white guys

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the ticket. He's absolutely right. I'm

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>hoping we're gonna have a young woman of color on

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the ticket. I can think of a number in the

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>governor of New Mexico is a Hispanic. As a Senator

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>from Nevada, Stacy Abrams, of course, is highly well thought of.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are plenty of well qualified women. I think

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's important that we have a woman and I think

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's probably what's your okay, great, but you know some

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>people listening this would say you're gonna hand President Trump

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a second term. I mean, maybe that's President Trump's greatest hope.

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>What is the evidence America will actually elect a woman

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>as president or vice president? This is not just about winning,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's also about change in the country and if we

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have to be run fear of voters who won't vote

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for women, and this country is in deep trouble. All

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>those people are already voting for Trump and we're not

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get their votes back. I've never thought that

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the way of winning this election is to take to

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a few Trump votes back. There will be some. The

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>way of winning this election is to gin up our

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>base like crazy and give young people, people of color,

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and women are reason to vote. Now, that's what's so

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>disturbing about yesterday. That's really remarkable with Joe Biden did,

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's incredibly disturbing the young people didn't vote, and

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it didn't just hurt Bernie Sanders, that hurt everybody. It's

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>sat or even having this conversation. I'm used to female

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>leaders in the UK. We've had female prime ministers, we've

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>had leading Dr Dean has got decades. It's a simple observation.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's satur revenues conversation. Howard, let's talk about

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>drumming up the base. I thought the base was fired up.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought it has been for the last three or

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>four years. Have we got to get the guys in

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the middle. The guys in the middle are going to

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>probably vote with us, especially with the candidate like buying

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because they're sick of Trump. But I don't again, I don't.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you win races by firing up your base.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how Obama one um, you know so, I I

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's the key. Now, the guys in the middle,

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll they'll they make up their own decisions. Look,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we can't stand for nothing as a party. I don't

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>want to be like Jeremy Corban because that was obviously

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, but we do have to stand for something.

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Dr Dean. I have to wonder. One big question has

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been turnout and how much can we read into the

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>levels of turnout that we've gotten within these uh these

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>early votes A lot. I am stunned and thrilled with

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the turnout among African Americans were stunned and thrilled by

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Bernie's turnout in Nevada among Latinos. So this is clearly

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really important part. I'm not worried about turnout among people

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of color. I am worried about people young people. Uh.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is that yesterday's result made me, makes me

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>very nervous, and I think we have some work to do.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>How do we greatly value your Thank you so much?

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a former chairman of the d n C. The

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>consensus for the private sector Friday is a hundred and

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty thousand. I love this. We can just about throw

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that out the window too. So there you go from

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter book far to get an excellence on which part

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of this we should throw out the window, we go

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to Julia Cornado, of course, how to give us perspective? Julie,

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I thought of you yesterday, I mean the historic moment

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of an emergency FED rate cut, with your work at

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the FED and with your wonderful academics at Texas, how

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>did you frame the historical moment of that fifty basis

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>point cut? Well? Come, it was, you know, we had

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>anticipated and given the signal of the G seven call,

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought they wouldn't want to not deliver um. It's

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>it's I think we saw the market reaction was not Uh,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a panasy monetary policy in this situation is not

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to fix the problem. The laryngitis at your fighting fighting, Julia,

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>is it kinesiean or monitorist laryngitis? Well, but I'm hoping

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not coronavirus. Well, we'll get a test it. We'll

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get official surveillance test kit for your Thank you for

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>being a trooper and being out with us. Let's go

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>here a bit more dr Coronado and then we'll cut

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>it short so you can go have a drama scotch

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to get through the morning. Julia. When we when we

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>look at the economics of the moment, how do you

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate forward? I mean, your timeline becomes so changed. How

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>do you look forward one week or to the Friday

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>jobs report or even at one quarter. Well, as you mentioned,

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the job report is going to be a little bit stale.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Um and you know, the sectors that we're gonna look

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for in the coming months will be say, leisure and hospitality, travel.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>These sectors are going to be tremendously hit in the

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>next few months, both in spending probably bleeding into hiring.

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So we are going to see us slowdown in activity

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in Q two. We're going to say this in claims

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of weeks that claims are going

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to start to lift a little bit high. Here, we

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>could probably see a little lifting claims. Yes, Um, you know,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we think about the sectors that are going to be hit.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of these people aren't going to be eligible for

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>an unemployment insurance. You're going to see probably the hourly

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>workers get laid off first. So um, it may not

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>show up in entirely in claims, but you you know,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 1>you you probably would expect a little bit of a

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>lifting claims. Yes, Junia, it's been such a big focus

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>of this program over the last couple of weeks. How

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>do we support the small and medium sized enterprises to

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure they don't have to lay off people for

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what could be just a temporary economic shock. How do

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>we do that? That's really a fiscal question. I mean,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we really need a coordinated fiscal response here. We need

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>some liquidity, maybe through the Small Business Administration, through SEMA.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's all kinds of ways that the federal

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>government could get money in a targeted fashion to affected areas.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any evidence that the administration has plans

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for that. Um I think we need to start talking

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>about that, because why let this economic hit sort of

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>spread and deep and in the way you're describing if

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to ensure this this shock Julia as a

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>former FED researcher at the Central Bank in Washington. I'm

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>just trying to understand how they're modeling out the potential

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>effects of the coronavirus, what data they're looking at, what

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they're responding to. Clearly they were responding to a material

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>shift and expectations going forward stocks trying to take that

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and figure out whether that means recession? How likely do

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that is the outcome here? So I think

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>modeling the direct effects is easier, say, you know, you

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can think about the interruption and activity in certain sectors,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, how it's likely to spread. The knock

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on effects through confidence are the things that the FED

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>is trying to ensure again, right, the hit to consumer confidence,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a broader sense of you know, pull back in business

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>investment in consumers ending. So I think that's what the

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>FET is trying to keep on the tracks, which has

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good in recent years, very resilient to a

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of bad news. So I think that's the aim um.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>If that gets hit and we see consumers just sort

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of hunker down, then you're in trouble. Dr. Cornado and

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>micro economics. One of the great great moments is when

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to try to figure out income and substitution

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>effects and at least to all sorts of ambiguities. What's

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the arch ambiguity for chairman power right now? Is it

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>ambiguity about the dollar? About no inflation? Yes, inflation? I mean,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>what's the unknown out there for the chairman? Well, and

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Thomas's you know, you're you're putting your finger on it.

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>The income and substitution effects in an older society, lower

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates can be you know, more painful to the

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>older generation replying on that income, and they can you know,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes have to save more as a result, so you

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>get less bang for your buck. Mine, Julia, you're you're

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>being come on, get the piece of chalk in your

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>hand to get some vixed vapor rub to get you

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>through the day. Dr Coronado, you're in a classroom right

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>now and you're looking at an actuarial assumption that's going

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to four percent or even three point eight percent. That's

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn on its head our American financial society, isn't it?

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It will? Yes, and we are I mean, Tom yesterday

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>was a dramatic day. The drop in yields at the

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>ten year point below one per cent um. It's astonishing

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>where we are. And of course for the FED, you know,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>forget the income and substitution effects. They're out of AMMO.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're running out of tools. Uh and uh.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's I think there may be that kind

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of existential worry in the markets, this realization that, oh

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, here we are now even the FED is

0:22:55.080 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out of AMMO. Are we questioning the Fed? Put Um?

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little bit more underlying concern about

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that now. I mean, obviously the Fed can do KWIE

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and they will if they have to. Um. You know,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the impact of that is less powerful when yields are

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>already as low as they are, so, you know, I

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the clients I talked to, Yeah, there's

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more discussion about what comes next, what's the

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>FED gonna do and what is the impact going to be?

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have a real shock here, this coronavirus.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>It's transitory, but it's real. We know it's going to

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hit the economy, so you know, the the ability of

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the FED to ensure us against this. You know, I

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was hoping with the G seven announcement that we were

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing more evidence of the kind of fiscal monetary coordination

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna need when we get a real shock

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the deeral lower bound. But we really didn't seem

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>much follow through on the fiscal side, certainly not in

0:23:56.280 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the US. So you know, I think that's the realities

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that fiscal policy makers are going to have to pick

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up the ball here. Julia, you're a trooper to be

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>with today. Nurse Amy emails in Dr Coronado and suggests

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you go to the Joe Koi School and Hospital uh

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there for your your laryngitis, and she recommends you put

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>vix on your eyelids, and that's usually a good way

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on your eyelid. That's from the Joe. She she's a

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>nurse staph nurse of the front. That's from you know,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that's from Dr. Thank you. Coming out of the macro

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>policy prospectives, President I found out our guests come on

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with us when they're sick, and you know, it's really

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>because they de tended to be on a program, and

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a beautiful thing. Did we pair We

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:50.239
<v Speaker 1>probably dated. Jared Burstein with us right now. And if

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you're curious about Vice President Biden's path forward on economics

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and policy, there's no one better to speak to you,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>senior fellow Center and Budget and Policy Administration, UM Policy Priorities,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>former chief economists of course, with the Vice President, Jared.

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Did you speak to the Vice President last night or

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in the recent days and how's he doing. I haven't, Uh,

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>he's been a little busy. I've talked to folks on

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the campaign, and I thought what was interesting to me

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is that these folks were feeling strong even before South Carolina.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>They believe that South Carolina was going to turn the

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>tithes and events have proven them correct. Define establishment Democratic

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Party economics and how it can defeat the president of

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States. There has to be a strategy. My

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>guess is after four years ago it will be more overt.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 1>What will that strategy be to defeat Donald Trump? So

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that's a two part question. Let me start with the

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>first part, which is easier, about the economic I think

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the way to think about the economics in this case

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is building on what exists versus introducing a lot of

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>new things. So if you listen to Biden's agenda, he's

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about building on the Affordable Care Act, planning a

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>path towards universal coverage, but not trying to leap frog

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>there quickly. If you look at his progressive tax ideas,

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they're building on the code as it exists. How did

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that beat Donald Trump? Well, it's a return to a

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>more established, normal set of procedures, and it's a belief

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that what the country craves is a lot less chaos

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more order from someone who's had a

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience in government. One thing that marked the

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>primaries was the lack of younger voters turning out. And

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>this is the reason perhaps that some people are pointing

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to Sanders not performing as well as he was expected to.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just wondering, if you take this forward, and

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you take this idea that we're probably going to see

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders still very much in the race, how significant

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is it to you that we've got a two party,

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>two candidate race at this point where one of them

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ignites the younger voters, which is the key democraphic and

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not Joe Biden. What does it say about Joe

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden's chances? I think what it says is all of

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the function of something nobody knows the answer to which

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is that if Joe Biden ends up being the nominee,

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and you make a great point, this is ain't done yet,

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>will those voters switch over or will they sit on

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>their hands. It's kind of a protest vote. I think

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the anxiety about Trump having four more years is enough

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep people from sitting on their hands in that context.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>But that is the big question. There's another question to

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>which is that Bernie Sanders also still has quite a

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of support and quite a few votes. How likely

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>is it that we're heading toward a brokered convention, a

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of worst case scenario for Democrats trying to give

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>voters conviction that they actually had a choice in who

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up being the candidate. You know, it's a fair question.

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I'm an economist that I don't know

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that I have a great answer for you. I will

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>say this, one thing that really struck me about last

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>night's vote is that late deciders broke towards Biby. That

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>happened even in Massachusetts state, eating campaign a lot where

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>he beat uh Center Warren. So that leads me to

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>believe that there is an electability case to be made.

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Their people are people are just thinking that he's the

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one who can most reliably be Trump, and I think

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that probably does put some wind in the final Gared,

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing market economics where you're gaming tense of

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>a percent and real GDP, etcetera. But how do you

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>envision the economy going into it? It's you know the

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>folks that GDP statistics come out. I don't have it

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>in front of me job, but Jared, but I'm going

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to suggest we're gonna get a g d V reports

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>three days before the election, whatever, but we're gonna have

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a two percent economy or could it be gloomier to

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of a Democratic candidate. Certainly, the coronavirus is

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge concern. I saw and I said pole this

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>morning that I must admit surprise me, which is that

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus impact was high on the minds of lots

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of voters, and by the way, that tended to break

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>towards Biden. Uh So, it is Uh, definitely likely. I

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would say that the economy will be growing considerably slower,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>well below trend by the time when people are making

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>up their votes. And by the way, if, if, even

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>if we we don't have to have a recession for

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>unemployment to start to rise. This grossery is cut by half,

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the Goldman Sachs forecastpoy R could be closer

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to and that's still low, but it's half point about

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>where we are, and we'll be watching claims tomorrow on that.

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Jared Bernstein, thank you so much, greatly, appreciate your time.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Looking forward to seeing you in Washington again. Of course,

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bernstein with the Vice President a number of years

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>ago with the Obama administration right now comments in a

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>well timed discussion with David Rubinstein. You know him, of

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>course from Carlisle. Some of you will know him from

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>some of his public service, particularly with the administration of

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 1>UH President Carter. This was a few years ago, and

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>now he has become a TV star with piercing interviews

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with an eclectic group of world thought leaders and decision makers.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And I always bring up, of course, is I thought

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>definitive interview with Mr Bezos. Um it will be tonight

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>nine o'clock on Bloomberg Television. I want to begin first

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with Mr Rubinstein talking to his good guest, the governor

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi Arabia's sovereign Well It's fund. Let's listen in.

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Now you have said, I think publicly you would like

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it to be the largest sovereign wealth fund in the

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>world at some point, and you like it to get

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to a trillion dollars to trillion trillion dollars. So when

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think you'll be able to get to two

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars? The number looks really big because you know

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the largest Southern well fund today is about one trillion. Uh.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>We think that it's very much achievable by twenty thirty.

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>All those different things require a big staff to manage.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>How big is the p i F staff today? When

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we started this was forty people today of more than

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred by year, and alatargetists to have more than

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>one thousand full time employees. M P if this deserves

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>at least a one hour conversation, it could be one

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of those panels where I would discuss this in Mr Rubinstein. Instead,

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got too few minutes to talk about this, David,

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>there's any number of ways to go here with this

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>effort by Saudi Arabia, what makes this effort of a

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sovereign wealth fund different from so many others were aware of? Well,

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this sovereign wealth fund came out of the blue in

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>many respects. Some of the well known sovereign wealth funds

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.959
<v Speaker 1>like the Kuwait Investment Authority, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority,

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the Government of Singapore Investment Company, they have been around

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>for decades, generations in some cases. The Sovereign Wealth Fund

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and Saudi Arabia is relatively new, while Um the head

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of it, Mr Al Romanon has um been the head

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just for a couple of years. It actually was started

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>p i F Fund in seventy one, but it was

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>relatively under his leadership. It's now becoming, as he hopes,

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest in the world. He was an

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>investment a commercial banker in Saudi Arabia. He's a native

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi Arabia and he was picked by MBS to

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>leave the p i F Fund and he's built it

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>up into a very very considerable force. Obviously, the I

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>p O of Saudi Aramco given it more resources, and

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I should say he was also appointed to be the

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Saudi ARAMCO in addition to the job he

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>now has as being the head of p IF, So

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he's got two big jobs in Saudi Arabia. Now. Is

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sovereign Wealth Fund a bolt on to the House

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of Flizara, bolt onto the royal family or can it

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be discreet and also separate from the social debates of

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the kingdom. Well, they've hired a lot of investment professionals

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>from the West, so they have a lot of people

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as well from Saudi Arabia. It's designed to get the

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>highest rate of return that you can legally do without

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>taking undue risk. But it also has a different mission.

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>They also want to uh uh have people come into

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabian invest there, so they might invest with people

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who will invest in the kingdom as well as people

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>who will invest and get good rates returning outside. So

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's got a dual mission in that sense. Just because

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of time, David Rue was saying, give us one vignette

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of this important conversation. What was something that surprised you

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>from the governor. I think it's surprising that he doesn't

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>seem to be under undue stress. I mean, if him

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on my case. So I was running as the chairman

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Saudi Aramco and also running the p IF

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and MBS is deeply involved in both of them.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You think he would have been under more stress, but

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be relatively relaxed about what he's doing

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think a very engaging person. He's come to

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>be well known in the investment world in recent years.

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we did this interview at a large private

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>equity conference, and um, you know he tends private equity conferences.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>He's involved in a lot of investments directly. He's on

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the board of Uber, where the fund made a direct

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>investment before they went into division fund, and he is

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the person who, with MBS, made the decision to I

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>went to the Vision Division Fund, the first one that

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they committed forty five billion dollars to it. David Rubinstein

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>one final question. You were brought up in a regime

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of six, seven and eight percent rates. I don't want to,

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, give away Mr Rubenstein's young age, but this

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was a few years ago. How does your world spin

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>with a ten year yield of point nine five to two.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to believe because you're referring to days when

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I was in the cart administration, when interest rates were

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>much much higher. It's hard to believe that the Treasury

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is now below one one point oh, but that's the

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>world we live in, and I suspect it could go

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>lower because I'm not sure we've seen the last of

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates declines from the from the Federal Reserve. David,

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, David Rubinstein. Peer to peer conversations

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with a gentleman from the Carlisle Group. This is an

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely important interview, particularly for our global audience, Saudi Arabia's

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>public investment funds, Yassir al Ramaya and their governor. Thanks

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio