WEBVTT - The Road to Damascus

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:21.236
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. I have a theory that the most interesting autobiographies

0:00:21.716 --> 0:00:24.836
<v Speaker 1>are the ones written by second tier people. I'm not

0:00:24.956 --> 0:00:28.276
<v Speaker 1>using second tier in a derogatory sense like second rate.

0:00:28.996 --> 0:00:34.636
<v Speaker 1>I mean it in a sense of hierarchy. When the

0:00:34.676 --> 0:00:38.276
<v Speaker 1>people on the top tier tell their story, it's invariably boring.

0:00:39.196 --> 0:00:41.836
<v Speaker 1>They have too much to lose by being honest. Their

0:00:41.836 --> 0:00:45.316
<v Speaker 1>public stature works against them on the page because they know.

0:00:45.436 --> 0:00:49.476
<v Speaker 1>Anything they write that's even vaguely controversial or opinionated, in

0:00:49.516 --> 0:00:53.196
<v Speaker 1>other words, anything interesting, it's going to get dissected and

0:00:53.276 --> 0:00:57.036
<v Speaker 1>distorted by the media. But the memoir of the person

0:00:57.236 --> 0:01:00.396
<v Speaker 1>under the general or the president or the CEO, the

0:01:00.436 --> 0:01:03.236
<v Speaker 1>person you've never heard of, that person has a lot

0:01:03.356 --> 0:01:06.996
<v Speaker 1>less to lose, and their memoirs are where the gold lies.

0:01:11.556 --> 0:01:14.676
<v Speaker 1>Not long ago, I picked up a book called Company Man,

0:01:15.196 --> 0:01:18.916
<v Speaker 1>Thirty Years of Controversy and Crisis in the CIA. It

0:01:18.996 --> 0:01:21.636
<v Speaker 1>was by a man named John Rizzo. I checked the

0:01:21.636 --> 0:01:25.316
<v Speaker 1>book flap for Rizzo's bio. He wasn't the director of

0:01:25.316 --> 0:01:29.196
<v Speaker 1>the CIA, or the deputy director, or even the Head

0:01:29.236 --> 0:01:32.476
<v Speaker 1>of Operations, which is the person who runs all the spies. No.

0:01:32.996 --> 0:01:37.116
<v Speaker 1>Rizzo was an attorney in the agency's legal Department, eventually

0:01:37.236 --> 0:01:41.516
<v Speaker 1>rising to acting General counsel. When I saw Rizzo's book,

0:01:41.756 --> 0:01:46.516
<v Speaker 1>I thought, BINGO, I have to read this. I was

0:01:46.556 --> 0:01:54.476
<v Speaker 1>not disappointed. My name is Malcolm Gladwell. You're listening to

0:01:54.556 --> 0:02:00.556
<v Speaker 1>Revisionist History, my podcast about Things Overlooked and Misunderstood. This

0:02:00.716 --> 0:02:03.316
<v Speaker 1>episode is about a story John Rizzou tells on page

0:02:03.356 --> 0:02:06.396
<v Speaker 1>one forty eight of his autobiography. It's a story about

0:02:06.396 --> 0:02:08.956
<v Speaker 1>a spy, a very good one, and what happened to

0:02:08.996 --> 0:02:14.996
<v Speaker 1>him him. Right after I read it, I got in

0:02:15.076 --> 0:02:17.596
<v Speaker 1>touch with Rizzo. I asked him if I could interview

0:02:17.636 --> 0:02:20.516
<v Speaker 1>him about the story of the spy. He said, of course.

0:02:21.116 --> 0:02:26.276
<v Speaker 1>Then in his email he added a PostScript, PS, interesting

0:02:26.316 --> 0:02:30.716
<v Speaker 1>that you focused on that episode. When I finished the manuscript,

0:02:30.956 --> 0:02:33.516
<v Speaker 1>I figured that if any single anecdote in the book

0:02:33.596 --> 0:02:37.196
<v Speaker 1>would garner public attention, that would be the one. As

0:02:37.236 --> 0:02:40.436
<v Speaker 1>it turned out, I don't remember anyone ever asking me

0:02:40.636 --> 0:02:48.116
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise talking about it, which I found puzzling. Yes,

0:02:48.876 --> 0:02:49.596
<v Speaker 1>it's puzzling.

0:02:51.396 --> 0:02:54.836
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was probably forty maybe. As I say,

0:02:54.876 --> 0:02:57.436
<v Speaker 2>I saw pictures of him, photos of them. At the time.

0:02:57.796 --> 0:03:01.236
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting at Rizzo's kitchen table at his house in Washington,

0:03:01.316 --> 0:03:04.556
<v Speaker 1>d c. He's telling me about the spy he mentioned

0:03:04.636 --> 0:03:05.676
<v Speaker 1>in his autobiography.

0:03:06.076 --> 0:03:10.116
<v Speaker 2>And he looked like al Pacino, no circa godfather too.

0:03:10.236 --> 0:03:12.756
<v Speaker 2>He was at Europe, I mean, he was European looking.

0:03:12.756 --> 0:03:16.516
<v Speaker 2>He's to a young man, and I think he reached

0:03:16.596 --> 0:03:19.036
<v Speaker 2>sort of, you know, a stage in his life that

0:03:19.596 --> 0:03:24.956
<v Speaker 2>he felt remorse skills about what he had done in

0:03:24.996 --> 0:03:27.876
<v Speaker 2>his youth and in his formative years. You know, as

0:03:27.916 --> 0:03:32.196
<v Speaker 2>simple and confounding as that. I mean, I don't, honestly,

0:03:32.236 --> 0:03:36.156
<v Speaker 2>I don't recall another instance of an asset coming to

0:03:36.276 --> 0:03:38.996
<v Speaker 2>us under those kinds of circumstances.

0:03:39.356 --> 0:03:43.556
<v Speaker 1>An asset is CIA speak for a source, someone on

0:03:43.596 --> 0:03:46.756
<v Speaker 1>the inside. This asset, the man who looked like al

0:03:46.796 --> 0:03:50.676
<v Speaker 1>Pacino was a terrorist. Do you know the details of

0:03:50.756 --> 0:03:55.916
<v Speaker 1>his how he approached the CIA to say I've had

0:03:55.916 --> 0:03:56.596
<v Speaker 1>a change of heart.

0:03:57.436 --> 0:04:01.676
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I believed he just volunteered his services,

0:04:01.716 --> 0:04:05.516
<v Speaker 2>and I think he just walked into an embassy.

0:04:05.316 --> 0:04:08.196
<v Speaker 1>And what was what do we know about the quality

0:04:08.236 --> 0:04:09.956
<v Speaker 1>of the information he was providing.

0:04:10.476 --> 0:04:13.036
<v Speaker 2>It was very good. You know. He was considered the

0:04:13.436 --> 0:04:17.916
<v Speaker 2>highly reliable and he he didn't want much money. That

0:04:17.996 --> 0:04:21.396
<v Speaker 2>was the other interesting thing. He didn't want money. I

0:04:21.436 --> 0:04:23.956
<v Speaker 2>mean it wasn't you know most assets didn't want money.

0:04:25.476 --> 0:04:26.636
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't he want money?

0:04:27.156 --> 0:04:31.676
<v Speaker 2>Because he said that he was doing this for his conscience,

0:04:32.596 --> 0:04:35.476
<v Speaker 2>to make up and it was an act of expiation.

0:04:36.116 --> 0:04:40.356
<v Speaker 1>An act of expiation. You will want to take sides

0:04:40.396 --> 0:04:44.676
<v Speaker 1>when you finish this story. My advice to you is don't.

0:04:50.356 --> 0:04:53.436
<v Speaker 1>If you make a list of the greatest investigative reporters

0:04:53.516 --> 0:04:57.076
<v Speaker 1>of a last generation, there's Bob Woodward at the top.

0:04:57.716 --> 0:05:01.916
<v Speaker 1>There's Mark Bowden, who wrote Blackhawk Down, Seymour Hirsch who

0:05:01.996 --> 0:05:03.756
<v Speaker 1>wrote for the New York Times for many years, and

0:05:03.756 --> 0:05:08.276
<v Speaker 1>then The New Yorker, Steve Cale, Jane Mayer. There's a

0:05:08.276 --> 0:05:10.716
<v Speaker 1>guy who I sett when I first started my career

0:05:10.716 --> 0:05:14.156
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington Post many years ago, Mike Isikoff, who

0:05:14.196 --> 0:05:17.956
<v Speaker 1>was a bulldog. And somewhere in that top cluster of

0:05:17.996 --> 0:05:22.156
<v Speaker 1>investigative reporters is Tim Weiner. He's one of the few

0:05:22.236 --> 0:05:25.436
<v Speaker 1>journalists ever to have won both a Pulitzer Prize and

0:05:25.556 --> 0:05:29.196
<v Speaker 1>a National Book Award. In the nineteen eighties, Weiner worked

0:05:29.196 --> 0:05:32.876
<v Speaker 1>at the Philadelphia Inquirer, and his first foreign assignment was

0:05:32.916 --> 0:05:37.796
<v Speaker 1>covering the overthrow of the Filipino dictator Ferdinand Marcos. When

0:05:37.836 --> 0:05:40.556
<v Speaker 1>Weiner came back, he convinced his editor to send him

0:05:40.596 --> 0:05:44.236
<v Speaker 1>to Afghanistan, where the CIA was then secretly funding the

0:05:44.316 --> 0:05:47.036
<v Speaker 1>mujah Hadeen in their battle against the Soviet occupation.

0:05:47.556 --> 0:05:51.356
<v Speaker 3>I called up the CIA, which had and always has

0:05:51.436 --> 0:05:56.076
<v Speaker 3>had a public information office, and I said, hey, I'm

0:05:56.076 --> 0:05:59.116
<v Speaker 3>going to Afghanistan. I understand you people do country briefings

0:05:59.796 --> 0:06:03.796
<v Speaker 3>from time to time for foreign correspondence. How about it?

0:06:04.316 --> 0:06:09.276
<v Speaker 3>And he said absolutely not hung up the phone. If

0:06:09.316 --> 0:06:11.556
<v Speaker 3>I went to Afghanistan. I had a jolly old time.

0:06:11.676 --> 0:06:13.756
<v Speaker 3>Came back and I hadn't been back in Washington for

0:06:13.796 --> 0:06:15.276
<v Speaker 3>more than a day when my phone rang.

0:06:16.116 --> 0:06:19.676
<v Speaker 1>It was a public information officer from the CIA. This

0:06:19.796 --> 0:06:23.356
<v Speaker 1>time he was friendly. He said, why don't you come

0:06:23.356 --> 0:06:24.316
<v Speaker 1>by for that briefing.

0:06:25.316 --> 0:06:27.596
<v Speaker 3>So off I went through the CIA, which is in

0:06:27.636 --> 0:06:30.396
<v Speaker 3>the woods, about eight miles outside of the White House,

0:06:31.996 --> 0:06:36.036
<v Speaker 3>checkpoint one, checkpoint two, checkpoint three, into the lobby of

0:06:36.036 --> 0:06:38.236
<v Speaker 3>the CIA, and up on the left hand wall, in

0:06:38.316 --> 0:06:41.316
<v Speaker 3>great gold letters, it says from the Gospel of John,

0:06:41.916 --> 0:06:44.316
<v Speaker 3>and ye shall know the truth, and the truth will

0:06:44.316 --> 0:06:48.716
<v Speaker 3>make you free. So I'm hooked already. I go up

0:06:48.756 --> 0:06:51.156
<v Speaker 3>to the seventh floor, which is where the executive suites

0:06:51.356 --> 0:06:55.076
<v Speaker 3>were and there are four CIA officers sitting around a

0:06:55.116 --> 0:06:59.636
<v Speaker 3>table for my quote briefing unquote, But they really only

0:06:59.676 --> 0:07:03.836
<v Speaker 3>wanted to know one thing from me, which was what's

0:07:03.876 --> 0:07:09.076
<v Speaker 3>it like. These were supposed to be the four top ciaxps.

0:07:09.196 --> 0:07:16.076
<v Speaker 3>It's on Afghanistan. They'd never been to Afghanistan. So I

0:07:16.116 --> 0:07:18.316
<v Speaker 3>walked out of there thinking, I'm going to devote the

0:07:18.356 --> 0:07:22.476
<v Speaker 3>rest of my life to making a study of this agency.

0:07:23.836 --> 0:07:27.756
<v Speaker 3>I was completely fascinated.

0:07:28.396 --> 0:07:30.116
<v Speaker 1>Why I went to The New York Times in nineteen

0:07:30.196 --> 0:07:34.636
<v Speaker 1>ninety three continued covering the agency all throughout the nineteen nineties.

0:07:35.236 --> 0:07:38.636
<v Speaker 1>He was very, very good at it. When I was

0:07:38.676 --> 0:07:41.676
<v Speaker 1>covering the CIA during the Aldrich Ames affair, you may

0:07:41.716 --> 0:07:45.196
<v Speaker 1>remember that Ames was a senior CIA officer who worked

0:07:45.196 --> 0:07:47.676
<v Speaker 1>there for more than thirty years, and he ended up

0:07:47.676 --> 0:07:51.476
<v Speaker 1>telling the KGB everything he knew, including the names of

0:07:51.476 --> 0:07:55.276
<v Speaker 1>the agency's assets inside the Soviet Union. It was one

0:07:55.276 --> 0:07:58.836
<v Speaker 1>of the most damaging cases of espionage in American history.

0:07:59.436 --> 0:08:02.996
<v Speaker 3>Ames is under arrest, and I'm thinking I should go

0:08:03.036 --> 0:08:06.676
<v Speaker 3>interview Ames. I wonder where Ames is right now, and

0:08:06.716 --> 0:08:08.516
<v Speaker 3>as it turned out, he was in a county jail.

0:08:10.076 --> 0:08:13.316
<v Speaker 3>So I go to the county jail and I say,

0:08:13.396 --> 0:08:16.676
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to talk to prisoner Alder James. And I've

0:08:16.796 --> 0:08:19.596
<v Speaker 3>walked into the interview room and there was Alda James.

0:08:20.716 --> 0:08:21.276
<v Speaker 3>We talked.

0:08:23.396 --> 0:08:24.436
<v Speaker 1>How long did you talk to him?

0:08:24.436 --> 0:08:24.516
<v Speaker 4>For?

0:08:24.716 --> 0:08:25.516
<v Speaker 3>Well about an hour?

0:08:26.276 --> 0:08:26.516
<v Speaker 2>Wait?

0:08:26.556 --> 0:08:28.836
<v Speaker 1>You stopped after an hour? Did they stop?

0:08:29.116 --> 0:08:29.276
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:08:30.316 --> 0:08:32.796
<v Speaker 3>It's a visiting hour, Tim, this.

0:08:32.796 --> 0:08:35.596
<v Speaker 1>Is the greatest scoop of your It's a school.

0:08:36.636 --> 0:08:42.156
<v Speaker 3>And I gave my phone number and he called me collect,

0:08:42.916 --> 0:08:46.836
<v Speaker 3>you know, on a regular basis. And I did a

0:08:46.916 --> 0:08:50.476
<v Speaker 3>number of stories based on first hand interviews where he

0:08:50.596 --> 0:08:54.316
<v Speaker 3>essentially confessed to everything he'd done and gave me some

0:08:54.436 --> 0:08:57.476
<v Speaker 3>rather vivid descriptions of life inside the CIA, most of

0:08:57.516 --> 0:08:59.316
<v Speaker 3>which were true and demonstrably true.

0:09:00.436 --> 0:09:02.756
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you have to have been a reporter to understand

0:09:02.796 --> 0:09:06.276
<v Speaker 1>how fantastic that story is. I was a reporter at

0:09:06.276 --> 0:09:09.076
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post for ten years. I would have assumed

0:09:09.236 --> 0:09:11.756
<v Speaker 1>that the worst spy in American history was under triple

0:09:11.796 --> 0:09:15.396
<v Speaker 1>lockdown somewhere, whisked away by helicopter to a black side.

0:09:15.956 --> 0:09:19.156
<v Speaker 1>I would have waited for the press release. But Weiner

0:09:19.316 --> 0:09:21.276
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of person who would assume that if

0:09:21.316 --> 0:09:25.356
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence establishment was naive and disorganized enough to have

0:09:25.396 --> 0:09:28.556
<v Speaker 1>its clock cleaned, by a KGB mole. Then it was

0:09:28.596 --> 0:09:32.156
<v Speaker 1>probably naive and disorganized enough to park that same mole

0:09:32.276 --> 0:09:33.716
<v Speaker 1>unattended in the county jail.

0:09:34.276 --> 0:09:36.716
<v Speaker 3>And I covered them like you would cover a courthouse

0:09:37.156 --> 0:09:40.476
<v Speaker 3>or the cops, or Congress or the White House. They're

0:09:40.516 --> 0:09:44.076
<v Speaker 3>an arm of the government, like the Internal Revenue Service

0:09:44.356 --> 0:09:47.276
<v Speaker 3>or the Post Office. They happened to be a secret

0:09:47.356 --> 0:09:48.116
<v Speaker 3>arm of government.

0:09:53.196 --> 0:09:55.756
<v Speaker 1>Weiner would later write a book called Legacy of Ashes.

0:09:56.396 --> 0:09:59.316
<v Speaker 1>That's how he won his National Book Award. It's an

0:09:59.396 --> 0:10:03.516
<v Speaker 1>amazing book, easily the best history of the CIA ever written.

0:10:07.116 --> 0:10:09.956
<v Speaker 1>Some people within the agency thought that one was biased

0:10:09.996 --> 0:10:13.716
<v Speaker 1>against them, that in his reporting, and particularly in Legacy

0:10:13.756 --> 0:10:16.156
<v Speaker 1>of Ashes, he went on too long about what the

0:10:16.236 --> 0:10:19.436
<v Speaker 1>agency had done wrong, and that he said too little

0:10:19.636 --> 0:10:23.476
<v Speaker 1>about what the agency did right. I understand why they

0:10:23.516 --> 0:10:26.636
<v Speaker 1>think that way, but I'm not sure that assessment is fair.

0:10:27.396 --> 0:10:31.796
<v Speaker 1>Weiner is not biased. He's aggressive. You only have to

0:10:31.796 --> 0:10:34.956
<v Speaker 1>meet him to understand that he has one of those big, square,

0:10:35.036 --> 0:10:39.316
<v Speaker 1>impressive heads, barrel chest, the kind of self confidence that

0:10:39.396 --> 0:10:41.516
<v Speaker 1>you have to have if you're in his line of work.

0:10:42.116 --> 0:10:46.876
<v Speaker 1>He's a kind of relentlessness about him. I can't remember

0:10:46.916 --> 0:10:49.316
<v Speaker 1>how many times we talked on the phone and went

0:10:49.396 --> 0:10:51.716
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in emails before he agreed to sit

0:10:51.796 --> 0:10:55.996
<v Speaker 1>down with me. He kept it up for weeks, clarifying, probing,

0:10:56.716 --> 0:10:58.916
<v Speaker 1>why do you want to do this story? What are

0:10:58.956 --> 0:11:03.476
<v Speaker 1>your intentions? Weiner is aggressive because over the course of

0:11:03.516 --> 0:11:06.716
<v Speaker 1>his career, he needed to be aggressive. It's not like

0:11:06.796 --> 0:11:10.676
<v Speaker 1>the CIA puts out colorful brochures highlighting its latest initiatives.

0:11:11.116 --> 0:11:18.036
<v Speaker 1>It's a secret agency. There's a man named Jeffrey Smith

0:11:18.276 --> 0:11:21.156
<v Speaker 1>who will figure in this story as well. Smith used

0:11:21.196 --> 0:11:23.836
<v Speaker 1>to be the general counsel for the CIA. He's very

0:11:23.916 --> 0:11:28.916
<v Speaker 1>much a member of the intelligence establishment, genteel, bookish. He's

0:11:28.916 --> 0:11:31.196
<v Speaker 1>now in private practice at one of the most prestigious

0:11:31.236 --> 0:11:34.476
<v Speaker 1>of DC law firms, Arnold and Porter. And one of

0:11:34.516 --> 0:11:37.156
<v Speaker 1>the things that Smith says is it's a good thing

0:11:37.236 --> 0:11:40.396
<v Speaker 1>for the agency that reporters like Tim Winer are aggressive.

0:11:40.916 --> 0:11:42.916
<v Speaker 1>The agency needs a free press.

0:11:43.756 --> 0:11:49.196
<v Speaker 5>It keeps you honest. It's not unlike congressional oversight. If

0:11:49.196 --> 0:11:53.596
<v Speaker 5>any government agency is asked to do something or is

0:11:53.596 --> 0:11:58.396
<v Speaker 5>considering something, the CIA, you have to think, this is

0:11:58.636 --> 0:12:00.796
<v Speaker 5>probably something that is going to have to be reported

0:12:00.796 --> 0:12:03.596
<v Speaker 5>to our two oversight committees. How are they going to

0:12:03.596 --> 0:12:07.916
<v Speaker 5>react and what happens if it leaks, how do we

0:12:08.396 --> 0:12:13.316
<v Speaker 5>explain what doing? And that question comes up all the time,

0:12:14.356 --> 0:12:16.036
<v Speaker 5>and without a press it wouldn't come.

0:12:15.996 --> 0:12:25.076
<v Speaker 1>Up, So you need needs yes, Does the CIA always

0:12:25.116 --> 0:12:25.596
<v Speaker 1>remember that?

0:12:27.076 --> 0:12:32.396
<v Speaker 5>In the ranks, some people don't see it that way.

0:12:33.196 --> 0:12:35.796
<v Speaker 5>As you get more senior, you do see it that way.

0:12:36.796 --> 0:12:40.036
<v Speaker 5>And the senior people have to explain to the younger

0:12:40.036 --> 0:12:43.156
<v Speaker 5>people as are coming up through the ranks why that's necessary.

0:12:47.036 --> 0:12:49.716
<v Speaker 1>Why do we put up with a hugely powerful agency

0:12:49.756 --> 0:12:53.116
<v Speaker 1>like the CIA, with a budget in the tens of billions,

0:12:53.676 --> 0:12:57.836
<v Speaker 1>doing things we know very little about, because we're confident

0:12:57.916 --> 0:13:01.476
<v Speaker 1>that if the CIA does something truly evil or stupid,

0:13:02.036 --> 0:13:05.476
<v Speaker 1>the press will find out and let us know. Weiner

0:13:05.836 --> 0:13:09.316
<v Speaker 1>lives by this idea. He devoted his career to it.

0:13:09.796 --> 0:13:12.876
<v Speaker 3>What does the CIA look like in the absence of

0:13:13.036 --> 0:13:17.996
<v Speaker 3>free press? It looks like the KGB. We have a

0:13:18.156 --> 0:13:21.956
<v Speaker 3>uniquely American problem here, Malcolm. We're trying to run a

0:13:22.036 --> 0:13:26.196
<v Speaker 3>secret intelligence service in an open, democratic society. The Russians

0:13:26.236 --> 0:13:29.876
<v Speaker 3>don't do that, the Chinese don't do that, not even

0:13:29.916 --> 0:13:34.796
<v Speaker 3>the British do that. We need to have a constant

0:13:34.916 --> 0:13:39.836
<v Speaker 3>tug of war between a free press, a cantankerous press,

0:13:41.036 --> 0:13:46.796
<v Speaker 3>a skeptical press, and the powerful institutions of our government.

0:13:47.676 --> 0:13:49.676
<v Speaker 3>But there are going to be arguments.

0:13:50.316 --> 0:13:52.716
<v Speaker 1>Believe me, they were arguments.

0:13:54.356 --> 0:13:56.556
<v Speaker 5>He's the world's most wanted man, the son of a

0:13:56.556 --> 0:13:57.956
<v Speaker 5>wealthy Venezuelan lawyer.

0:13:57.996 --> 0:14:00.516
<v Speaker 1>His profession is spreading terror worldwide.

0:14:00.676 --> 0:14:01.916
<v Speaker 5>He has links with groups like that.

0:14:02.036 --> 0:14:04.996
<v Speaker 1>The most notorious terrorist of the nineteen seventies and nineteen

0:14:04.996 --> 0:14:09.556
<v Speaker 1>eighties was a man named Ilitch Ramirez Sanchez, so known

0:14:09.556 --> 0:14:13.196
<v Speaker 1>as Carlos the Jackal. He was born in Venezuela, but

0:14:13.276 --> 0:14:16.076
<v Speaker 1>worked closely with a radical group called the Popular Front

0:14:16.116 --> 0:14:21.156
<v Speaker 1>for the Liberation of Palestine, setting bombs assassinating people. He

0:14:21.236 --> 0:14:23.276
<v Speaker 1>was thought to be responsible for the deaths of more

0:14:23.316 --> 0:14:26.316
<v Speaker 1>than eighty people. He played a role in the massacre

0:14:26.316 --> 0:14:28.996
<v Speaker 1>of Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympic Games in nineteen

0:14:29.036 --> 0:14:33.236
<v Speaker 1>seventy two. Carlos the Jackal was almost as notorious in

0:14:33.316 --> 0:14:35.956
<v Speaker 1>his day as a Soma Ben Lauden was in ours.

0:14:36.756 --> 0:14:39.916
<v Speaker 1>He was the subject of a massive international manhunt that

0:14:39.996 --> 0:14:43.796
<v Speaker 1>went on for years. Finally, in nineteen ninety four, he

0:14:43.876 --> 0:14:47.356
<v Speaker 1>was captured in Sudan by French intelligence. How did they

0:14:47.356 --> 0:14:51.116
<v Speaker 1>find him because of a tip from the CIA. Where

0:14:51.116 --> 0:14:54.156
<v Speaker 1>did the CIA get its information from a man who

0:14:54.236 --> 0:14:56.476
<v Speaker 1>was once high up in the same world as the Jackal?

0:14:57.156 --> 0:15:00.396
<v Speaker 1>The guy John Rizzo wrote about the asset who looked

0:15:00.436 --> 0:15:02.876
<v Speaker 1>like Alpuccino. Here's Rizzo again.

0:15:03.396 --> 0:15:07.956
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, usually you work case officers, work potential sources and

0:15:08.036 --> 0:15:11.956
<v Speaker 2>assets for months to years before even pitching them to help.

0:15:12.396 --> 0:15:16.036
<v Speaker 2>This guy just walked, I mean just just walked in.

0:15:16.716 --> 0:15:18.676
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean, at the time is recruitment. There

0:15:18.756 --> 0:15:21.356
<v Speaker 2>was a great excitement, eagerness that this is one of

0:15:21.436 --> 0:15:23.716
<v Speaker 2>the few guys, the best guy we have inside a

0:15:23.796 --> 0:15:25.316
<v Speaker 2>terrorist organization.

0:15:25.756 --> 0:15:28.516
<v Speaker 1>So you never met him, but you saw a picture

0:15:28.556 --> 0:15:32.276
<v Speaker 1>of him, and you say, you describe him as looking

0:15:32.316 --> 0:15:34.796
<v Speaker 1>like al Pacino. There was something kind of glamorous about him.

0:15:34.836 --> 0:15:35.156
<v Speaker 2>Is that what?

0:15:35.356 --> 0:15:35.556
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:15:35.796 --> 0:15:41.516
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, sleek, dark hair, is European looking. I mean he

0:15:41.596 --> 0:15:44.156
<v Speaker 2>was not you know, he was not your jihadi. I

0:15:44.156 --> 0:15:47.676
<v Speaker 2>mean he was he was Westernized.

0:15:50.996 --> 0:15:55.036
<v Speaker 1>Al Pacino helped the CIA find Carlos the Jackal, but

0:15:55.156 --> 0:15:57.876
<v Speaker 1>by the following year, the summer of nineteen ninety five,

0:15:58.436 --> 0:16:02.756
<v Speaker 1>the CIA found itself in crisis. The Aldrich Aims scandal

0:16:02.956 --> 0:16:07.276
<v Speaker 1>had devastated the agency's reputation. What's more, the Cold War

0:16:07.516 --> 0:16:11.076
<v Speaker 1>was over, and since the CIA was essentially created to

0:16:11.076 --> 0:16:14.836
<v Speaker 1>fight the Cold War, lots of people in Washington, serious

0:16:14.876 --> 0:16:18.716
<v Speaker 1>people wondered if the United States even needed the agency anymore.

0:16:19.636 --> 0:16:22.276
<v Speaker 1>Then all kinds of stories broke about shady characters the

0:16:22.316 --> 0:16:26.796
<v Speaker 1>agency was mixed up with in Central America, murderers, drug dealers.

0:16:27.516 --> 0:16:30.876
<v Speaker 1>It was the last straw. President Clinton brought in a

0:16:30.916 --> 0:16:34.636
<v Speaker 1>new director, John Deutsch, with the mandate to clean house.

0:16:35.636 --> 0:16:39.076
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche ordered what's called an asset scrub, a review of

0:16:39.076 --> 0:16:42.836
<v Speaker 1>every spy, informant, an asset on a CIA payroll, with

0:16:42.916 --> 0:16:49.956
<v Speaker 1>a specific emphasis on ethical considerations. As the CIA's General Counsel,

0:16:50.236 --> 0:16:51.676
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Smith was in the middle.

0:16:51.396 --> 0:16:57.876
<v Speaker 5>Of it, were there assets who had committed major felonase

0:16:57.956 --> 0:17:02.156
<v Speaker 5>human rights violations or had attacked Americans? And so we

0:17:02.236 --> 0:17:06.196
<v Speaker 5>added that dimension to the assets scrub that was currently underway.

0:17:06.996 --> 0:17:09.796
<v Speaker 1>And one of the files the agency reviewed was that

0:17:09.836 --> 0:17:13.596
<v Speaker 1>of al Pacino. John Rizzo was Jeff Smith's deputy. He

0:17:13.676 --> 0:17:14.796
<v Speaker 1>was in the middle of it as well.

0:17:15.316 --> 0:17:19.276
<v Speaker 2>It was discovered that he had actually committed terrorist acts

0:17:19.316 --> 0:17:25.796
<v Speaker 2>against Americans, bombings in Europe, and that he had wounded

0:17:26.036 --> 0:17:28.996
<v Speaker 2>some with his bombs. I mean, obviously the intent was

0:17:29.036 --> 0:17:34.836
<v Speaker 2>to kill them. Now that was somehow missed. Now I

0:17:34.876 --> 0:17:37.756
<v Speaker 2>don't know how it was, mister, whether frankly it was

0:17:37.876 --> 0:17:42.116
<v Speaker 2>just overlooked, but it should have been a red flag.

0:17:43.076 --> 0:17:46.236
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine what some people inside the CIA thought

0:17:46.236 --> 0:17:49.516
<v Speaker 1>of the asset scrub. The function of a spy's service

0:17:49.916 --> 0:17:51.956
<v Speaker 1>is to find out what the bad guys are doing,

0:17:52.636 --> 0:17:54.236
<v Speaker 1>and the best way you find out what the bad

0:17:54.276 --> 0:17:57.396
<v Speaker 1>guys are doing is to have another bad guy tell you. Right,

0:17:57.956 --> 0:18:00.196
<v Speaker 1>So why would you have a rule saying the CIA

0:18:00.556 --> 0:18:04.436
<v Speaker 1>needs to be extra careful about hiring bad guys, but

0:18:04.476 --> 0:18:06.676
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as a group that says, look,

0:18:07.276 --> 0:18:09.796
<v Speaker 1>the agency is a mess. We might not have a

0:18:09.836 --> 0:18:12.556
<v Speaker 1>future unless we clean up our act. We have to

0:18:12.556 --> 0:18:13.556
<v Speaker 1>play by the rules.

0:18:14.156 --> 0:18:16.996
<v Speaker 2>So what that meant was, we've belatedly discovered that we

0:18:17.036 --> 0:18:22.836
<v Speaker 2>should have reviewed his record before entering into a relationship

0:18:22.876 --> 0:18:27.836
<v Speaker 2>with them, and we should have actually gone to the

0:18:27.916 --> 0:18:31.836
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement, the FBI, Department of Justice at the outset

0:18:32.356 --> 0:18:35.596
<v Speaker 2>before we even began a relationship. And I would have

0:18:35.596 --> 0:18:37.236
<v Speaker 2>been the guy to do it, was to go to justice.

0:18:37.236 --> 0:18:38.516
<v Speaker 2>The out that we did not do that.

0:18:39.476 --> 0:18:42.876
<v Speaker 1>In the middle of all that handbringing, someone calls Tim Winer.

0:18:43.956 --> 0:18:47.916
<v Speaker 1>So when do you first get wind of the retired terrorist?

0:18:48.916 --> 0:18:52.556
<v Speaker 3>As I recall in the late spring or early summer

0:18:53.796 --> 0:18:58.756
<v Speaker 3>of nineteen ninety five, I get word from inside the

0:18:58.756 --> 0:19:04.356
<v Speaker 3>CI that we have a problem here, and I begin

0:19:04.436 --> 0:19:05.276
<v Speaker 3>to make inquiries.

0:19:07.076 --> 0:19:11.236
<v Speaker 1>So somebody from is the CIA? What is their motivation

0:19:12.156 --> 0:19:14.076
<v Speaker 1>for telling you this?

0:19:14.596 --> 0:19:18.956
<v Speaker 3>The CIA has screwed up. It has failed to inform

0:19:18.996 --> 0:19:23.356
<v Speaker 3>the Justice Department that they have an asset on their books,

0:19:24.396 --> 0:19:29.596
<v Speaker 3>a foreign agent who has again euphemistically American blood on

0:19:29.636 --> 0:19:30.156
<v Speaker 3>his hands.

0:19:30.836 --> 0:19:34.876
<v Speaker 1>So why do they want to call the New York Times.

0:19:36.556 --> 0:19:45.516
<v Speaker 3>To write or wrong? Because sometimes public disclosure is the

0:19:45.556 --> 0:19:46.556
<v Speaker 3>only way to write a wrong.

0:19:47.716 --> 0:19:50.116
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's ea? Did they think it would

0:19:50.156 --> 0:19:56.356
<v Speaker 1>be easier for them to fulfill their obligation to inform

0:19:56.996 --> 0:20:00.396
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department if there was a kind of leak

0:20:00.476 --> 0:20:01.036
<v Speaker 1>of this fact.

0:20:01.116 --> 0:20:05.316
<v Speaker 3>First, there was a battle royal going on inside the

0:20:05.316 --> 0:20:07.756
<v Speaker 3>CIA over the scrub.

0:20:09.396 --> 0:20:13.036
<v Speaker 1>So Deutsche's pushing that and within the agency there's a

0:20:13.076 --> 0:20:16.396
<v Speaker 1>considerable amount of pushback, so they're anticipating this is going

0:20:16.436 --> 0:20:17.116
<v Speaker 1>to be a struggle.

0:20:17.236 --> 0:20:21.156
<v Speaker 3>A considerable amount of pushback is an understatement. There was

0:20:21.356 --> 0:20:23.156
<v Speaker 3>fierce opposition.

0:20:24.556 --> 0:20:27.156
<v Speaker 1>So I'm guessing the people who call you are the

0:20:27.196 --> 0:20:28.636
<v Speaker 1>ones who are in favor of the scrub.

0:20:31.516 --> 0:20:38.356
<v Speaker 3>The people who call me are patriots who love their

0:20:38.436 --> 0:20:43.396
<v Speaker 3>country and who were sworn to uphold Let me rephrase that.

0:20:45.036 --> 0:20:50.036
<v Speaker 3>The people who called me, I believe, are patriots who

0:20:50.076 --> 0:20:55.396
<v Speaker 3>love their country and are motivated to live by their

0:20:55.436 --> 0:20:58.396
<v Speaker 3>oath to uphold the Constitution and obey the laws of

0:20:58.436 --> 0:21:01.236
<v Speaker 3>the United States.

0:21:01.956 --> 0:21:06.116
<v Speaker 1>Why or Waits continues to ask around. Then, late in

0:21:06.156 --> 0:21:09.516
<v Speaker 1>the summer of nineteen ninety five, the CIA decides to

0:21:09.556 --> 0:21:13.196
<v Speaker 1>take its medicine. Rizzo goes to the Department of Justice

0:21:13.636 --> 0:21:17.756
<v Speaker 1>and tells them good, bad and ugly about their al pacino.

0:21:18.316 --> 0:21:20.836
<v Speaker 2>They were upset, you know, basically, why are you just

0:21:20.876 --> 0:21:23.916
<v Speaker 2>telling us this now? You know, why didn't you tell

0:21:23.996 --> 0:21:27.796
<v Speaker 2>us before you got in bed with this guy? So, yeah,

0:21:27.836 --> 0:21:30.836
<v Speaker 2>they were upsets. I knew they would be. You have

0:21:30.916 --> 0:21:35.876
<v Speaker 2>to weigh this guy is, you know, gold, against the

0:21:35.916 --> 0:21:39.916
<v Speaker 2>fact that, well, you know, he's got attempted murder of

0:21:39.956 --> 0:21:41.596
<v Speaker 2>Americans on his resume.

0:21:42.676 --> 0:21:45.956
<v Speaker 1>At the same time Rizzo's having that conversation, the head

0:21:45.956 --> 0:21:49.396
<v Speaker 1>of the CIA's counter Terrorism Center went to Capitol Hill

0:21:49.596 --> 0:21:53.276
<v Speaker 1>and briefed members of Congress about the acid scrub. They

0:21:53.316 --> 0:21:58.316
<v Speaker 1>weren't happy either. People all over Washington. Now knew about

0:21:58.356 --> 0:22:02.316
<v Speaker 1>al Pacino, people in the Department of Justice, people in

0:22:02.356 --> 0:22:07.756
<v Speaker 1>the White House, people on the Hill, representatives, senators, staffers,

0:22:07.796 --> 0:22:09.396
<v Speaker 1>and Winer's phone rings.

0:22:09.436 --> 0:22:15.596
<v Speaker 3>Again, my rule of thumb on a story like this

0:22:15.636 --> 0:22:18.676
<v Speaker 3>is and I want to have three sources, and I

0:22:18.716 --> 0:22:20.996
<v Speaker 3>want to make sure that the second source is not

0:22:21.116 --> 0:22:25.316
<v Speaker 3>the first source, in which case I have one source. Right,

0:22:25.636 --> 0:22:31.196
<v Speaker 3>So I had two sources. I did get a call.

0:22:35.396 --> 0:22:43.636
<v Speaker 3>The call was a call to have a conversation outside

0:22:43.676 --> 0:22:50.316
<v Speaker 3>of the normal circuits of the telephone lines. The conversation

0:22:50.636 --> 0:22:55.036
<v Speaker 3>was with a member of Congress. At this point, I

0:22:55.036 --> 0:23:00.956
<v Speaker 3>have three sources. Subsequently, there was a fourth who is

0:23:01.316 --> 0:23:04.516
<v Speaker 3>an American diplomat, was an American diplomat at the time.

0:23:05.356 --> 0:23:09.076
<v Speaker 1>Winnercalls the CIA Press office and talks to the agency's

0:23:09.156 --> 0:23:12.956
<v Speaker 1>Oaksmith at the time, Dennis Box. I met Box in

0:23:13.036 --> 0:23:16.396
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant in northern Virginia.

0:23:15.596 --> 0:23:18.676
<v Speaker 4>And it was at that point where they said this

0:23:18.796 --> 0:23:23.356
<v Speaker 4>is not good, this is this is really gonna put

0:23:23.356 --> 0:23:27.676
<v Speaker 4>somebody at risk. And I said, said, well, let's invite

0:23:27.716 --> 0:23:32.676
<v Speaker 4>him in and try to lay out for him. You

0:23:32.716 --> 0:23:35.996
<v Speaker 4>know what's gonna what the risk is. He said, he

0:23:36.036 --> 0:23:39.356
<v Speaker 4>sat in my office with the head of counter Terrorism Center.

0:23:39.636 --> 0:23:42.516
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what was do you remember much? What was

0:23:42.556 --> 0:23:44.116
<v Speaker 1>the what was the nature of the conversation.

0:23:45.036 --> 0:23:47.756
<v Speaker 4>Well, it was pretty straightforward. It was he's got a

0:23:47.796 --> 0:23:51.036
<v Speaker 4>fairly mild demeanor. He's not at least with us. He

0:23:51.156 --> 0:23:54.276
<v Speaker 4>you know, he wasn't aggressive or abrasive. I mean, he

0:23:54.396 --> 0:23:58.876
<v Speaker 4>was just kind of laying out, here's here's what I have,

0:23:59.036 --> 0:24:02.036
<v Speaker 4>here's what I've been told. But it was the detail.

0:24:02.116 --> 0:24:05.796
<v Speaker 4>It was the details of this particular asset that got

0:24:06.276 --> 0:24:07.356
<v Speaker 4>our folks worked up.

0:24:08.876 --> 0:24:13.796
<v Speaker 1>This particular asset meaning Alpucino, Bach says, the head of

0:24:13.796 --> 0:24:17.436
<v Speaker 1>the counter Terrorism Center explained all the specific things that

0:24:17.516 --> 0:24:21.196
<v Speaker 1>if published, would put al Pacino in danger. He tried

0:24:21.236 --> 0:24:23.956
<v Speaker 1>to interest Winer instead in a broader story about the

0:24:23.956 --> 0:24:26.876
<v Speaker 1>asset scrub, which wasn't really a secret at that point.

0:24:29.516 --> 0:24:33.956
<v Speaker 1>These kinds of conversations between reporters and government officials are

0:24:33.956 --> 0:24:39.156
<v Speaker 1>not unusual. This is how Washington works. In the United Kingdom,

0:24:39.316 --> 0:24:42.516
<v Speaker 1>there is something commonly known as a d notice, which

0:24:42.556 --> 0:24:45.796
<v Speaker 1>is a government order issued to a media organization saying

0:24:45.996 --> 0:24:49.036
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't publish what you want to publish because it

0:24:49.156 --> 0:24:54.316
<v Speaker 1>endangers national security. If this story were taking place in

0:24:54.316 --> 0:24:57.476
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom. The minute winer called to say, I

0:24:57.636 --> 0:25:00.676
<v Speaker 1>know about al Pucino. The British government would have slapped

0:25:00.716 --> 0:25:03.516
<v Speaker 1>a D notice on him, end of story. But the

0:25:03.596 --> 0:25:07.796
<v Speaker 1>United States doesn't have dnotices. It has a constitutional right

0:25:07.876 --> 0:25:11.276
<v Speaker 1>to freedom of the press. So what happens instead is

0:25:11.276 --> 0:25:15.796
<v Speaker 1>a negotiation. The reporter comes in, he or she gets briefed.

0:25:16.716 --> 0:25:18.716
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the head of the CIA calls the editor of

0:25:18.716 --> 0:25:22.116
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post or the New York Times and says, look,

0:25:22.516 --> 0:25:28.436
<v Speaker 1>we're really uncomfortable with this. Here's why. Just as I

0:25:28.516 --> 0:25:32.076
<v Speaker 1>was writing this episode, the Washington Post reported that in

0:25:32.116 --> 0:25:35.596
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with Russian officials, President Trump lets slip some

0:25:35.836 --> 0:25:39.836
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive intelligence from an ally. It was about the

0:25:39.876 --> 0:25:43.436
<v Speaker 1>intention of Middle East terrorists to use laptops as bombs.

0:25:43.756 --> 0:25:47.996
<v Speaker 1>Huge story, but if you read the initial news accounts closely,

0:25:48.436 --> 0:25:52.916
<v Speaker 1>it's obvious that the reporters held some information back. They

0:25:52.916 --> 0:25:56.516
<v Speaker 1>didn't tell us which American ally gave us that information.

0:25:57.476 --> 0:25:59.556
<v Speaker 1>It seems like they knew the location of the spy,

0:26:00.236 --> 0:26:03.796
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't tell us that either. This is what

0:26:03.836 --> 0:26:07.196
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. Somewhere along the line, there was clearly

0:26:07.276 --> 0:26:10.836
<v Speaker 1>a conversation between those reports and the CIA and the

0:26:10.876 --> 0:26:14.316
<v Speaker 1>reporters listened and then said, we're going to disclose what

0:26:14.356 --> 0:26:16.876
<v Speaker 1>we think is necessary to make the point about the

0:26:16.916 --> 0:26:20.676
<v Speaker 1>recklessness of the president, but we're willing to withhold details

0:26:20.796 --> 0:26:25.396
<v Speaker 1>that you tell us might damage national security. Jeff Smith

0:26:25.396 --> 0:26:28.956
<v Speaker 1>says he's been involved in lots of these conversations, both

0:26:28.996 --> 0:26:31.396
<v Speaker 1>on the government end and now on the media end,

0:26:31.596 --> 0:26:34.036
<v Speaker 1>because he has media organizations among his clients.

0:26:34.996 --> 0:26:37.556
<v Speaker 5>One of the things I fault the government is too

0:26:37.596 --> 0:26:41.436
<v Speaker 5>frequently the government just says, well, harm could result. That

0:26:41.436 --> 0:26:44.636
<v Speaker 5>then leaves my clients when I'm on the client side

0:26:44.996 --> 0:26:46.996
<v Speaker 5>in the terrible at the lemo of saying, well, what's

0:26:46.996 --> 0:26:48.716
<v Speaker 5>the harm? We can't tell you.

0:26:49.716 --> 0:26:52.596
<v Speaker 1>But Smith, as you can imagine, can see the government's

0:26:52.596 --> 0:26:56.196
<v Speaker 1>side as well. If you're the CIA trying to convince

0:26:56.236 --> 0:26:58.796
<v Speaker 1>a reporter or an editor not to spill a secret,

0:26:59.276 --> 0:27:01.516
<v Speaker 1>you have to tell them enough about the secret so

0:27:01.556 --> 0:27:04.196
<v Speaker 1>that they understand what's at stake. What you don't want

0:27:04.236 --> 0:27:06.556
<v Speaker 1>to do is reveal even more the secret than what

0:27:06.596 --> 0:27:09.916
<v Speaker 1>has already been revealed. And all of this respecting the

0:27:09.956 --> 0:27:13.756
<v Speaker 1>fact that the press in America can, at least in principle,

0:27:13.916 --> 0:27:15.836
<v Speaker 1>do pretty much whatever it wants.

0:27:16.356 --> 0:27:21.236
<v Speaker 5>What the government tries to do is indicate gradations of harm.

0:27:21.956 --> 0:27:27.036
<v Speaker 5>This is really bad, this is less bad, and leaving

0:27:27.316 --> 0:27:32.636
<v Speaker 5>the editorial judgments to the press. But the government should

0:27:32.676 --> 0:27:35.756
<v Speaker 5>not be in the business of saying, we agree, you

0:27:35.796 --> 0:27:36.316
<v Speaker 5>can print this.

0:27:37.276 --> 0:27:39.116
<v Speaker 1>It's tricky from the.

0:27:39.116 --> 0:27:43.556
<v Speaker 5>National security side. You have to trust the editors of

0:27:44.516 --> 0:27:49.036
<v Speaker 5>the publishers or whomever you're talking to and tell them

0:27:49.156 --> 0:27:52.156
<v Speaker 5>why and as specific as you can what the harm

0:27:52.196 --> 0:27:55.796
<v Speaker 5>would be, so that they can make a judgment. It's

0:27:55.836 --> 0:28:00.396
<v Speaker 5>then incumbent upon the editors to take that seriously.

0:28:01.556 --> 0:28:05.156
<v Speaker 1>This is exactly the kind of elaborate dance Winer and

0:28:05.236 --> 0:28:07.596
<v Speaker 1>the head of the counter Terrorism Center are having in

0:28:07.596 --> 0:28:11.196
<v Speaker 1>the summer of nineteen ninety five. In Rizzo's book, he

0:28:11.276 --> 0:28:13.836
<v Speaker 1>says that some of the things the counter terrorism chief

0:28:13.876 --> 0:28:17.996
<v Speaker 1>told Weiner left him bug eyed with shock. Weiner says,

0:28:18.036 --> 0:28:21.676
<v Speaker 1>that's nonsense. But the point is this. The conversation. Wasn't

0:28:21.716 --> 0:28:25.356
<v Speaker 1>the CIA giving instructions to the New York Times. That's

0:28:25.396 --> 0:28:27.756
<v Speaker 1>not how the balance between a free press and a

0:28:27.756 --> 0:28:34.676
<v Speaker 1>clandestine service works. Did the counter terrorism chief say to you,

0:28:34.756 --> 0:28:36.076
<v Speaker 1>don't mention his guidele.

0:28:39.556 --> 0:28:45.316
<v Speaker 3>It was a strong preference of the counter terrorism chief

0:28:45.756 --> 0:28:53.116
<v Speaker 3>that certain identifying details that were known to me stay

0:28:53.116 --> 0:28:58.676
<v Speaker 3>out of the public realm, and I agreed with that.

0:29:01.436 --> 0:29:04.796
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what is the point of publishing the guy's

0:29:04.876 --> 0:29:08.076
<v Speaker 3>country of origin, the intelligence service he worked for, the

0:29:08.156 --> 0:29:12.636
<v Speaker 3>specific time and date in place of the attacks. Does

0:29:12.676 --> 0:29:15.876
<v Speaker 3>the reader need to know that? No, the story's about

0:29:15.916 --> 0:29:20.436
<v Speaker 3>the balancing test. I knew who we worked for, I

0:29:20.516 --> 0:29:23.756
<v Speaker 3>knew the specific time and place of the attacks, and

0:29:23.796 --> 0:29:29.276
<v Speaker 3>I knew how grievous the attacks had been. Every detail

0:29:29.276 --> 0:29:32.556
<v Speaker 3>of that was scrubbed of my own free will and

0:29:32.636 --> 0:29:37.076
<v Speaker 3>volition from that story, based on my principle that I

0:29:37.116 --> 0:29:40.356
<v Speaker 3>do not want to publish anything they can get anybody hurt.

0:29:45.476 --> 0:29:48.276
<v Speaker 1>But Winer made it clear to the CIA that he

0:29:48.356 --> 0:29:51.276
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to leave al Pacino out of the story entirely.

0:29:52.196 --> 0:29:54.756
<v Speaker 1>He was going to reveal that al Pacino was the

0:29:54.796 --> 0:29:58.396
<v Speaker 1>source who helped find Carlos the jackal that Paccino had

0:29:58.476 --> 0:30:01.316
<v Speaker 1>and I'm quoting from the story. Winer eventually wrote a

0:30:01.356 --> 0:30:05.116
<v Speaker 1>brutal resume. He had been involved in two bombings in

0:30:05.156 --> 0:30:08.516
<v Speaker 1>Western Europe in the mid nineteen eighties that had injured Americans,

0:30:09.156 --> 0:30:11.476
<v Speaker 1>and he had only broken with his terrorist group in

0:30:11.556 --> 0:30:17.116
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven. Four separate people someone inside the CIA,

0:30:17.556 --> 0:30:20.836
<v Speaker 1>a congressman, a diplomat, and someone else in the know

0:30:21.236 --> 0:30:25.356
<v Speaker 1>had told Weiner about Alpucino. Al Pacino was the person

0:30:25.436 --> 0:30:28.116
<v Speaker 1>about whom the agency had failed to tell Congress and

0:30:28.116 --> 0:30:33.476
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department. From Winer's perspective, al Pucino was the story.

0:30:36.476 --> 0:30:40.036
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Smith says that when he realized what Winer intended

0:30:40.076 --> 0:30:44.756
<v Speaker 1>to publish, his heart sank. What was the in general,

0:30:44.836 --> 0:30:48.796
<v Speaker 1>the feeling within the agency about the possibility of this

0:30:49.876 --> 0:30:51.556
<v Speaker 1>story being written.

0:30:52.556 --> 0:30:59.196
<v Speaker 5>Anger, anger that it had leaked so quickly, and then

0:30:59.956 --> 0:31:02.996
<v Speaker 5>a real desire it that we do all we could

0:31:03.036 --> 0:31:06.436
<v Speaker 5>to not have the details of what this individual had

0:31:06.516 --> 0:31:09.916
<v Speaker 5>told us and what happened come out.

0:31:10.236 --> 0:31:12.036
<v Speaker 1>When you say what happened, do you mean are you

0:31:12.116 --> 0:31:16.316
<v Speaker 1>talking specifically about this individual's involvement with fingering or help

0:31:16.476 --> 0:31:20.596
<v Speaker 1>define to your mind that was the identifying Yes. Yes,

0:31:21.876 --> 0:31:24.516
<v Speaker 1>the agency scrambled to get in touch with al Pacino.

0:31:25.196 --> 0:31:27.836
<v Speaker 1>They had to warn him. Here's Rizzo again.

0:31:28.556 --> 0:31:30.356
<v Speaker 2>You can't just call up an assentence that made me,

0:31:30.596 --> 0:31:32.516
<v Speaker 2>you know, made me in the cafe around the corner

0:31:32.516 --> 0:31:38.836
<v Speaker 2>of the hour. I mean that located signal emergency meeting

0:31:38.916 --> 0:31:44.316
<v Speaker 2>was necessary. I think the meeting actually took place, either

0:31:44.756 --> 0:31:47.196
<v Speaker 2>just immediately before the story came out or on the

0:31:47.276 --> 0:31:48.436
<v Speaker 2>day the story came out.

0:31:49.556 --> 0:31:51.876
<v Speaker 1>And what did the assets say during the meeting when.

0:31:51.716 --> 0:31:57.956
<v Speaker 2>Told this, Well, I was told that he was flabbergast,

0:31:58.796 --> 0:32:02.596
<v Speaker 2>felt absolutely betrayed. How could this happen? How could you

0:32:02.876 --> 0:32:06.676
<v Speaker 2>do this to me? I'm a dead man, you know.

0:32:06.756 --> 0:32:11.796
<v Speaker 2>And our case officer broken news to him, offered immediate evacuation,

0:32:12.156 --> 0:32:16.596
<v Speaker 2>safe haven, get the hell out of there, and he refused.

0:32:18.076 --> 0:32:23.436
<v Speaker 2>He just walked away. You betrayed me, and that was it,

0:32:23.556 --> 0:32:27.116
<v Speaker 2>he just walked.

0:32:31.196 --> 0:32:33.876
<v Speaker 1>The story ran on August twenty first, nineteen ninety five,

0:32:33.916 --> 0:32:36.876
<v Speaker 1>on the front page of the New York Times CIA

0:32:37.116 --> 0:32:40.956
<v Speaker 1>re examines hiring of ex terrorist as agent. It was

0:32:40.996 --> 0:32:45.476
<v Speaker 1>also translated and ran in newspapers around the world. Al

0:32:45.516 --> 0:32:48.516
<v Speaker 1>Pacino's case officer put a copy of the Greek version

0:32:48.556 --> 0:32:51.676
<v Speaker 1>on his wall, and when the case officer was asked why,

0:32:51.996 --> 0:32:55.196
<v Speaker 1>I'm told, he said, I do this because it is

0:32:55.236 --> 0:32:58.196
<v Speaker 1>a reminder to all of us in this division about

0:32:58.236 --> 0:33:05.556
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of breaking faith with your asset. One of

0:33:05.556 --> 0:33:08.476
<v Speaker 1>the most famous of all New Testament stories is what

0:33:08.556 --> 0:33:14.276
<v Speaker 1>happened to Tarsus on the Road to Damascus Saul was

0:33:14.276 --> 0:33:18.116
<v Speaker 1>a strong opponent of the early Christian Church. He persecuted

0:33:18.116 --> 0:33:22.876
<v Speaker 1>the early Christians, the Bible says beyond measure. He stood

0:33:22.876 --> 0:33:26.676
<v Speaker 1>by and watched as one of the earliest of Jesus' followers, Stephen,

0:33:27.156 --> 0:33:30.796
<v Speaker 1>was stoned to death. And then one day on the

0:33:30.876 --> 0:33:34.356
<v Speaker 1>road to Damascus, Saul had a vision of the resurrected

0:33:34.436 --> 0:33:41.116
<v Speaker 1>Jesus and converted to Christianity. Saul became Paul, cornerstone of

0:33:41.156 --> 0:33:45.196
<v Speaker 1>the early Christian Church. Saul was allowed to become Paul.

0:33:45.756 --> 0:33:48.876
<v Speaker 1>That's the point of the story of Paul's epiphany. He

0:33:48.916 --> 0:33:51.516
<v Speaker 1>had been the sworn enemy of the early Church, and

0:33:51.556 --> 0:33:54.236
<v Speaker 1>then he said that he had changed his mind, that

0:33:54.356 --> 0:33:58.956
<v Speaker 1>he regretted his previous acts, and he was forgiven. That

0:33:59.076 --> 0:34:03.156
<v Speaker 1>idea that we are allowed to transform ourselves has been

0:34:03.236 --> 0:34:07.356
<v Speaker 1>central to our culture ever since. The man we've been

0:34:07.396 --> 0:34:10.996
<v Speaker 1>calling al Pucino was a sworn enemy of the West.

0:34:11.756 --> 0:34:14.916
<v Speaker 1>He helped plant bombs in Western Europe that killed and

0:34:15.076 --> 0:34:19.836
<v Speaker 1>injured innocent people. And then he had an epiphany. He

0:34:19.876 --> 0:34:23.476
<v Speaker 1>walked into an American embassy. He said, I don't want money,

0:34:24.076 --> 0:34:26.356
<v Speaker 1>I just want to atone for the evil that I

0:34:26.436 --> 0:34:30.956
<v Speaker 1>have done. But in al Pucino's case. We did not

0:34:31.076 --> 0:34:35.356
<v Speaker 1>allow him to transform himself. The CIA went to Congress

0:34:35.516 --> 0:34:38.436
<v Speaker 1>and the Department of Justice to confess they had hired

0:34:38.436 --> 0:34:42.236
<v Speaker 1>an ex terrorist with a terrible past, even though he

0:34:42.316 --> 0:34:45.476
<v Speaker 1>was an ex terrorist who only came to us because

0:34:45.476 --> 0:34:50.276
<v Speaker 1>he had repudiated his terrible past. The Justice Department says,

0:34:51.036 --> 0:34:53.116
<v Speaker 1>why didn't you tell us before you got in bed

0:34:53.156 --> 0:34:55.916
<v Speaker 1>with this guy? As if he were still the guy

0:34:56.156 --> 0:34:58.836
<v Speaker 1>you would never want to get in bed with. The

0:34:58.876 --> 0:35:03.516
<v Speaker 1>headline to Winer's story says, CIA re examines hiring of

0:35:03.636 --> 0:35:07.356
<v Speaker 1>ex terrorist as agent as if the central fact about

0:35:07.356 --> 0:35:12.156
<v Speaker 1>al Pacino was his past associations, his brutal resume. As

0:35:12.156 --> 0:35:16.036
<v Speaker 1>Winer put it, a resume is a list of accomplishments.

0:35:16.556 --> 0:35:20.196
<v Speaker 1>But al Pacino did not consider his past record and accomplishment.

0:35:20.636 --> 0:35:23.916
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to repudiate it. That was the whole point

0:35:23.916 --> 0:35:26.836
<v Speaker 1>of him walking into an embassy and offering us everything

0:35:26.876 --> 0:35:30.716
<v Speaker 1>he knew. Remember what Rizzo said about why al Pacino

0:35:30.836 --> 0:35:33.876
<v Speaker 1>did not want money. He said he was doing this

0:35:34.036 --> 0:35:39.356
<v Speaker 1>for his conscience. It was an act of expiation. Expiation

0:35:39.636 --> 0:35:43.516
<v Speaker 1>is the act of making amends or reparation for guilt

0:35:43.636 --> 0:35:50.156
<v Speaker 1>or wrongdoing. Atonement. He asked for atonement. We pretended to

0:35:50.196 --> 0:35:53.916
<v Speaker 1>give it to him, then we took it away. What's

0:35:53.996 --> 0:36:00.996
<v Speaker 1>wrong with us? So what happened to al Pacino? I

0:36:01.036 --> 0:36:04.076
<v Speaker 1>think you can guess. Very soon after the New York

0:36:04.076 --> 0:36:08.636
<v Speaker 1>Times story ran, he was killed by his former terrorist colleagues.

0:36:09.316 --> 0:36:16.476
<v Speaker 1>They identified him, they tracked him down. When I said

0:36:16.516 --> 0:36:19.076
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning that you would feel the urge to

0:36:19.156 --> 0:36:23.076
<v Speaker 1>take sides, and that you shouldn't, I was talking about

0:36:23.116 --> 0:36:28.116
<v Speaker 1>this moment. We can argue all day about what is

0:36:28.516 --> 0:36:31.676
<v Speaker 1>and is not an appropriate leak, or about who's to

0:36:31.716 --> 0:36:34.756
<v Speaker 1>blame when negotiations break down between the government and the

0:36:34.836 --> 0:36:39.436
<v Speaker 1>press over a sensitive story. But if you get too

0:36:39.476 --> 0:36:42.356
<v Speaker 1>lost in picking a side in that argument, you lose

0:36:42.396 --> 0:36:46.876
<v Speaker 1>track of Alpucino, whoever he was, this man who risked

0:36:46.876 --> 0:36:50.036
<v Speaker 1>his life for a country other than his own, asking

0:36:50.076 --> 0:36:58.316
<v Speaker 1>only in return that he be granted absolution. I never

0:36:58.396 --> 0:37:02.196
<v Speaker 1>found out anything more about al Pucino. There is apparently

0:37:02.276 --> 0:37:04.996
<v Speaker 1>a long story about what happened to him and how

0:37:04.996 --> 0:37:10.116
<v Speaker 1>he was killed, but it's still classified. The CIA people

0:37:10.316 --> 0:37:13.316
<v Speaker 1>were only free to talk about Tim Weiner. Tim Weiner

0:37:13.516 --> 0:37:15.196
<v Speaker 1>only wanted to talk about the CIA.

0:37:16.036 --> 0:37:20.356
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a problem with that. Story as Rizzo

0:37:20.476 --> 0:37:23.636
<v Speaker 3>tells it, just as he thinks there's a problem with

0:37:23.796 --> 0:37:28.636
<v Speaker 3>my story is published. I respect his right to his opinion.

0:37:29.436 --> 0:37:32.836
<v Speaker 1>To winer Rizzo was just blaming him for a problem

0:37:32.836 --> 0:37:36.036
<v Speaker 1>of the CIA's own creation. They were the ones who

0:37:36.076 --> 0:37:37.476
<v Speaker 1>opened up al Pacino's file.

0:37:38.196 --> 0:37:41.396
<v Speaker 3>If they hadn't screwed up their own procedures and arguably

0:37:41.516 --> 0:37:45.196
<v Speaker 3>violated a presidential directive on how you handle a problem

0:37:45.276 --> 0:37:48.196
<v Speaker 3>like this, then they wouldn't have had to go to

0:37:48.236 --> 0:37:51.116
<v Speaker 3>the FBI and Capitol Hill, and I wouldn't have gotten

0:37:51.156 --> 0:37:53.996
<v Speaker 3>my third and eventually my fourth source on this story.

0:37:54.756 --> 0:37:58.796
<v Speaker 3>Where's the leak? Here? The leak is because the CIA

0:37:59.556 --> 0:38:05.716
<v Speaker 3>violated its own guidelines and practices, and mister Rizzo, who

0:38:05.796 --> 0:38:10.916
<v Speaker 3>is a good lawyer and a capable lawyer, you know,

0:38:11.036 --> 0:38:14.956
<v Speaker 3>has made a false and arguably defamatory argument here, which

0:38:15.036 --> 0:38:18.716
<v Speaker 3>is the New York Times got an asset killed.

0:38:22.516 --> 0:38:26.276
<v Speaker 1>False and defamatory. One side puts the front page of

0:38:26.276 --> 0:38:28.476
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times up on the wall. The other

0:38:28.556 --> 0:38:33.356
<v Speaker 1>side says, don't blame me, I'm just the messenger. Can

0:38:33.396 --> 0:38:35.476
<v Speaker 1>we at least agree that we should have forgiven al

0:38:35.556 --> 0:38:40.276
<v Speaker 1>Pacino his sins and that, however it happened, he was wronged.

0:38:41.116 --> 0:38:43.396
<v Speaker 1>And maybe if you run a front page story about

0:38:43.396 --> 0:38:46.196
<v Speaker 1>a man one day and right after he gets killed,

0:38:46.396 --> 0:38:48.676
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't think it was your fault exactly,

0:38:48.916 --> 0:38:51.396
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should run a little explanation of what happened,

0:38:52.116 --> 0:38:55.076
<v Speaker 1>or even just have a moment of silence, a little

0:38:55.076 --> 0:38:58.956
<v Speaker 1>bit of remorse. What was the reaction in house the

0:38:58.956 --> 0:38:59.956
<v Speaker 1>New York Times the story?

0:38:59.996 --> 0:39:03.036
<v Speaker 3>Do you remember the reaction in house at the New

0:39:03.116 --> 0:39:06.956
<v Speaker 3>York Times. There were a lot of page one stories

0:39:06.956 --> 0:39:15.356
<v Speaker 3>about the CIA in that era, and I don't think

0:39:15.356 --> 0:39:17.316
<v Speaker 3>that there was a major reaction at all.

0:39:20.876 --> 0:39:41.156
<v Speaker 1>What happens after the story runs, Life goes on? Revision's

0:39:41.236 --> 0:39:44.516
<v Speaker 1>History is produced by me LaBelle and Jacob Smith, with

0:39:44.636 --> 0:39:49.636
<v Speaker 1>Camille Baptista, Stephanie Daniel, and Sillomarra Martinez White. Our editor

0:39:49.716 --> 0:39:54.116
<v Speaker 1>is Julia Barton. Flaonon Williams is our engineer. Original music

0:39:54.156 --> 0:39:57.836
<v Speaker 1>by Luis Sciarra. Special thanks to Andy Bauers and Jacob

0:39:57.836 --> 0:40:00.476
<v Speaker 1>Weisberger Panople. I'm Malcolm Gladwell,