WEBVTT - Ep. 075: Cloning Mammoths

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>This is me eat your podcast coming at you shirtless, severely,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>bug bitten and in my case, underwear listening podcast. You

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can't predict anything. Okay, we're recording in the you see

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Santa Cruz, which is which I found I've been. I've

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>been in a lot of campuses in my life. I

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>guess I was gonna say I haven't been on many,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>but I've been on a ton of them. This is

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the most gorgeous campus I've ever been to. It's pretty amazing.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Did you happen to see any e walks on your

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>way out? No, but I was. It was like, It's

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>funny because driving in here, I was thinking I was

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>about to form the sentence to Janice that this is

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like a Star Wars set, and then yeah, like interrupted

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>my thought to comment about a Star Wars set quality.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>My youngest child calls it the e walk for us.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>We come up and he goes, it's the book forest. Yeah,

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's got to be good for your brain

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>to be around these trees. I feel like I could

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be hopeful about that. Yeah, all right, No, I think

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. Next time students come up here saying if

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a good place for them to come to school,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'll try to give him that line. These trees

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>are good for your brain. And you're hearing the voice

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of Dr Beth Shapiro. Who is who deal? Okay, I

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>don't let her tell you what she is who. I

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>know her from the fact that she deals with what's

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>called ancient d n A. And if you follow wildlife

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>conservation and wildlife politics, I think that you will in

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>your lifetime here a lot you'll hear that term ancient

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>d n A, And in surrounding conversations around it, you'll

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>hear that progressively more and more, to the point where

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>when you grow old and die, it might just be

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like a fact of life that it may be transformed

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of That's really great. I'm really intrigued to

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>hear you say that you know ancient DNA isn't isn't

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>something that most people have heard of. And while my

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>motivation for doing this is to be able to learn

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>something that's useful for conservation by a diversity conservation, I

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of times people think of it as

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to learn about history, particularly human history. I'm

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>most interested in animals, but I'm pleased to hear you

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>say that you think there's a place for this, and yeah,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>well maybe let me let me let me all to that.

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Because let's say that that you have a technology, and

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a technology like the internal combustion engine. Now

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>no one talks about the internal combustion engine, but they

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>most definitely talk about the creations built around that, right, Okay,

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So um, instead of building it all up and talking

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about how important it's going to wind up being, we

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>should talk about what it is and can you you're

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>probably good at this by now, can you like sketch

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>out what ancient DNA is the fields where it's being applied, okay,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>particular to wildlife, and what are some things that's taught us,

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>What are some things, what are some areas where the

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>work done around ancient DNA has has challenged or added

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to our assumptions about our world? All right, there's a

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot there, and even me a lot of room.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think what I'll start with is probably something

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that we can come back to later on. So I'm

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>going to start with a teaser about what I hope

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>ancient DNA can do for wildlife conservations, and then we

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>can turn back around and go to the beginning and

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>talk more about ancient DNA and the origins of the

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>field and how it came about and what else has

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>been applied to. So imagine that you are trying to

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>protect the last of a particular species um and this

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>species is not doing well because the habitat that it

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>lives in is disappearing. The climate is changing. Maybe it's

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit too warm for it, or maybe it's getting

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit cold. Maybe there's just something different about today's

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>climate that is affecting this animal and the animals in

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>particular trouble because its population has been small for a

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>long time, and because it's been small for a long time,

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.239
<v Speaker 1>it's lost a lot of genetic diversity. A good example

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of this right now is the black footed ferret. So,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the black footed ferret is a species that we thought

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>was extinct, but then a population, the surviving population was discovered.

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It turned up on a rancher's doorstep and Matit Wyoming, Wyoming. Good.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>You know more about this than I do I know

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about the DNA. A guy, Yeah, guy in in Martz.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>A guy in Matitz, Wyoming. Um, As I understand it.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>One day, his dog is standing there with a black

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>footed ferret that's amazing, and he went out to try

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to find what the animal was and it turned out

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that um, they were not in fact gone, They were

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not gone, so but they are in trouble. And this

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is a problem with black footed farets. So they were

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>very small population for quite a long time, and they

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have almost no genetic diversity, and they're threatened in the

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>wild today because while they can breathe them, there are

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>nice captive breeding facilities that can produce lots of black

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>footed farets. As soon as they've released them into the wild,

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they get sick and they die. Can can you just

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a whole because when you hear I think people often say,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like no genetic diversity, But is there a way to

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 1>put it? Is there a way to put it in

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>human terms where you imagine is it as bad as

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if you only had one family? Yes, like you had

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a mother, father, two daughters, two sons, and they needed

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to recolonize and that was it. And then the daughters

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>had to breed with their brothers or with their fathers

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>literally like literally literally siblings breeding with siblings or extreme inbreeding,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>extreme inbreeding, and it's bad for the population. And and

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know this population is doing okay, and that it

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>can survive in captive environments where it's not exposed to

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.559
<v Speaker 1>any sort of allunges. But as soon as they're released

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>into the wild, this inbreeding shows up as something that

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>causes them to not be able to survive. It shows

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>up behaviorally, it shows up behaviorally probably, but in the

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>case of the blackfooted ferrets, it shows up because they

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have no resistance to the diseases that are actually circulating

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in a wild, so they're they're not able to survive

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.679
<v Speaker 1>as they get infected. So one of the most diverse

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>parts of our genome of any species genome, is what's

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>called the major histamine complex NHC. It creates the proteins

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and enzymes in our body that allow us to fight diseases.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And we're very different. Everybody is very different. We have

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of different circulating alleles or variants in our population,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is so that you know, the more diversity

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we have, the more um diversity of diseases that we

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 1>are potentially able to fight off. And so it's good

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>for a population and for an individual to have lots

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of diversity at these alleles, and these black footed ferrets

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>and other species that go through these what's called population

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>bottle X, where you have a very small population size

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and you lose a lot of

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>your diversity, become um completely lacking in diversity at this

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>really important part of the genome. So here's where I'm

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>going with ancient DNA. Imagine that you could find a

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>bone or some tissue from blackfooted ferrets that lived before

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>they went through this population bottleneck. So these would have

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>been individuals that are no longer alive. Maybe they lived

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years ago, maybe they lived thousands of years ago,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but they have diversity in their genome that used to

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be there, that used to be able to help this

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>population to fight disease. If we could get that information

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sequence their DNA, grind up a bit of that bone

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and extract the DNA sequences that are preserved in that bone,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>or in the case of blackfooted ferrets, that are actually

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>preserved tissue specimens from individuals that lived a couple of

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>decades ago that are in what's called the frozen Zoo

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego. So we can a couple of decades.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>A couple of decades ago in this case is enough.

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>In other species, it depend some when your bottleneck was

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So for blackfooted ferrets, the bottleneck was relatively recently. For

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>American buffalo the bottleneck was thirteen thousand years ago. So

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you would need older individuals to be able to see

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what the diversity in the past look like, because that's

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that's surprising to hear. But I know you're interested in bison.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But so we can go back and we can sequence

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the DNA from these older individuals that have this diversity,

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>learn what that diversity used to look like, and then

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>use genome engineering technologies to cut and paste the no

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>diversity region of individuals genomes today living individuals and paste

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in its place, uh synthetic version of the sequences that

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>used to exist in that population. And in doing so,

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you have modified the genomes of a living organism in

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a way that gives them a fighting chance to survive. Today.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You haven't brought back the extinct thing. You have used

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>gene sequences that are extinct from the same species to

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>bolster the immunity or potentially help this species to survive.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And this this is one example, but this is where

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I really see the power and the potential of this

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of technology. The idea that we can look at

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>DNA sequences in the past. Let's say we want to

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>create an animal that's more able to survive somewhere cold

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or somewhere hot if we can identify an extinct species

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or a close relative that used to be alive, that

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>has a gene sequence that might be able to cause,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, the idea of bringing mammoths back to life.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And you and you, I'll point out, you have a

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>book how to Clone a Mammoth. Yes, so this is

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>something that I've been thinking about a lot, and a

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sub doesn't A subtitle could be how to clone a mammoth?

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Um all the reasons why you might want to and

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>might might not want to. I think the subtitle is

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>actually this science of de extinction or something. But I

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have been suggested several several better subtitles. I think my

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite was, um, why cloning a mammoth? Or why how

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>cloning a mammoth? Might be? No, I'm trying to think

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of what the best one was that was suggested with

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>my friend of mine. It was like, if you have

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>limited ethics, a billion dollars and a mammoth, that that

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>opens it up. That always what I was trying to

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>what I was trying to suggest about it. But but anyway,

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>they I mean, we can talk about this later, but

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to use it as an example because I mean,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy to think through. So if you have

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>an elephant, this is something that's adapted to living in

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the tropics. Um. The tropics is not a place that's

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>really conducive to elephants living right now. Let's say we

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to create an elephant that is able to survive

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere colder, not conducive for human reasons, for human reasons,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because of because of rampant poaching development, yeah, influx of

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a like pastoral agriculturalists. Right. And and I should say

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>right up front that I am not advocating creating mammoths

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that can live in the cold as an alternative to

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to fix the terrible situation that Asian elephants and

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>African elephants are in right now. I think that this

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is just an alternate pathway that potentially should be followed

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as existing conservation efforts. UM, But

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it is something that I think we should consider. It's

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>not possible to do it yet, but there's no reason

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to turn to say no to a technology before we

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>know what's actually feasible because we're a little bit scared

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>about the ecological and ethical consequences of of doing it.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>These are things that we need to think through very clearly. However,

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>stepping away from the ethics and of and morality of

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this right now, and we will come back to this,

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just trying to explain the technology here. Let's

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say we can go and sequence the genome of a mammoth.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Mammoths and Asian elephants are very closely related to each other.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>They shared a common ancestors sometime in the last five

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>million years, so that really closely related to each other.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>You pointed out that there's, uh, there's a the difference

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>between an Asian elephant in a wooly man ammoth is

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about are similar to the difference between humans and chimps.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right, About one percent of the genome sequence is different.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I told that to your friend and he said, uh, yeah,

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>but that's the that's the percent that gave us Mozart.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>It's probably true, and that's the one percent that we're

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the difference between mammoths and elephants. If what

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to do is figure out what it is

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that made mammoths which is an elephant able to survive

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the cold, and we want to be able to

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>create an elephant that that is able to survive in

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a colder environment. If we could identify those important parts

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of mammoth that are different and then cut and paste

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>those into an elephant genome, could we create not a mammoth,

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but an elephant that can live somewhere that's colder, that

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>can eat this same diet, that can somehow protect itself

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>from these cold winters, so that we can potentially find

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a place to put elephants while we are trying to

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>solve the problems that are that are ongoing in there

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>exists environment. Can I pause you there to have you

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>explained a couple of things real quick. Um, you're saying, though,

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like just based on even with some future projecting, you're saying,

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we will not no matter how journalist frame news that

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>comes from your world, we will not make a mammoth.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We will not bring back a living, breathing mammoth. Is

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just a continuation of the mammoths that we're there. I

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think that this is something that is really important for

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>people to understand, is that once a species is extinct,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it is gone. This is not a solution to the

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>extinction crisis. De extinction this is the term that people

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are using too to refer to bringing something that's extinct

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>back to life. Is it's an idea that is shaped

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>more by imagination than by reality. It's very romantic to

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think of the I think that you might be able

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring something back that's been gone for a long time.

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But there are people who the scientific reality is there

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>are ones that try to do it, who kick around

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas it's gone, the ideas. If you dig into these

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas though, it's it's not. It's not that. It's not

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to bring something back that is identical

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to something that's gone. It's that you're going to be

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>able to recreate components of those organisms. You could bring

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>back traits. You could move genes from a mammoth into

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>an elephant. Potentially, we don't know how to do that yet.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We can move genes from mammoth sequences that we generate

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>from bones into cells of elephants that are growing in

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>petrie dishes and labs, but we can't then turn those

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>cells into some hybrid between a mammoth and an elephant.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So what would you need if you were going to

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>create an exact replica of a species that's extinct, you

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would need it's a DNA sequence. We can do that.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>For for a mammoth, there are incredibly well preserved bones.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You mean that map its entire genome. Yeah. So the

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>way we do that in angel DNA kind of getting

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>back to this, is we collect these bones. The best

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>preserved bones are frozen in the Arctic soil called parmafrost,

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and mostly they've been de fleshed, probably by something like

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a lion or a big bear, and so the bone

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any tissue on it. It It gets buried in

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the soil and rapidly frozen. And you spend time including

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this that you spend some you spend field seasons up

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>actually like physically look at like actually looking for bones

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>sticking out of the ground. Yep, I do. It's good

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fun too. I recommend it. Yeah. Um. But you can

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>take these bones and you can take a chunk out

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of them with a drum will drill or something like that,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and you grind it up into a fine powder and

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>then you can dissolve away all the components that aren't

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the DNA, so the tissue and the actual bone. You

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>dissolve it away, and then you can chemically and somatically

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>pull out the DNA. So the DNA that we get

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>out of those bones is not in good shape. This

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is one of the important things to remember. If I

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>were to take a swab Q tip in the inside

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of my cheek or spit in the tube like you

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>do when you send something off to one of these

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>companies that sends you your DNA sequence, you can get

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really long fragments of DNA. Our genomes have about three

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>billion nucleotides bases, these A, C, S, G S, and

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>T s that make up the the sequence that has

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the genes that make the proteins that make us look

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and act the way we do. And we can get

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>millions of them, strings of millions in a row from

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a living person, of living piece of tissue. But the

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bones that we get out of the Arctic, the DNA

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in them is chopped up into tiny fragments. And this

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>happens first because once an organism dies, there are enzymes

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in their own body that chop up DNA. These exist

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because if you eat a piece of meat, where you

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>eat a leaf of a plant, you don't want that

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>DNA to stay really big and long and powerful. In

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>your body, you've get enzymes that chew that up and

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>make it go away, and that happens to your own

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>tissue when cells burst, When cells die, and life chops

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up your DNA so that you can get rid of it.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>That happens post mortem as well. And then there are

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>things like bacteria and fung gui that will get into

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>these bones and the tissue remains when they're decaying, and

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they will also chop up that DNA. They consume all

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of carbon material for food. And then the sun.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, you go outside and you're supposed to wear

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sun block, and that's because the ultra violet radiation will

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hit your cells and break your DNA. Now, when you're alive,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you have proof reading enzymes that will go along and

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>fix those those bits of damage that the UVY radiation

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>causes so that you don't get skin cancer every time

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you walk outside. But once you're dead, those proofitting enzymes

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are not doing their job anymore, and the UV radiation

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and other sorts of radiation will continue to hit the

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>cells and break down the DNA, so that the end

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>result there is that pretty soon after death, the DNA

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is no longer in long strands. It's in really short,

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>chopped up strands, and after time they just getting get

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller and smaller and smaller and small. And you say

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon after death, the first pretty soon means like

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>within years. First pretty soon means within minutes, and the

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>second pretty soon we're talking tens of thousands of years there.

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It depends on environment. So if something were to die

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and sit in the sun in Arizona today it's supposed

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to be hunter twenty degrees in Arizona, probably we would

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>get no good recoverable DNA tomorrow, right, Um, but I

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>don't all that because stuff decase. Also, you'll have really

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>rapid microbial activity when it's things are rotting in the

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sun like that. So maybe you could get DNA tomorrow

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is probably an exaggeration, but certainly within a couple of days.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be very hard to get recover good quality

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>DNA from these things. If something dies, it's that volatile. Yeah, Well,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it depends on microbial activity, so and also the sun

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and temperature. So things decay faster when it's hot, and

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>when the temperature fluctuates, a lot of things decay. If

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you think about ideal temperatures for stuff to break stuff down.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you want to when you're cooking something,

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to get it above a particular temperature, and

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not the temperature of like your normal ambient temperature

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and Phoenix, Arizona today, right, it's so you don't the

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 1>all the microbes will just multiply at some point, can

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cause a lot of microbial life forms, and you get

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sick when you eat stuff. So you eat I wanted

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to stay cold and frozen, or you wanted to be

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>really hot, like cooked. And if it's really hot and cooked,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you're destroying all the DNA, all the living material. But

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>if it's cold and frozen, then you're slowing down the decay,

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just like sticking your steak in the freezer so that

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it lasts for an extra couple of In those cases,

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like when you when you find a well preserved mammoth

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the permafrost, it probably so that thing

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>probably died in sub freezing conditions. Yes, yes, uh maybe,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean when when these animals died during the summer.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>In the summer in the Arctic, it can be you know,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>sixty seventy degrees during the day, but those ones and

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>those ones could still potentially be preserved. Could be because

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the the sediment, the dirt in the ground is very cold,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and if it gets buried right away in volcanic dust

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, then these the remains of these animals will

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>will preserve for a long time. The oldest DNA that

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>we've ever recovered was from a bone that we found

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in permafrost in the Yukon territory, and it was associated

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with a volcanic ash layer that we think is around

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred thousand years old. So we're estimating that that

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>is the age of this horse bone. It's also the

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>oldest frozen dirt that anyone has ever known. So that

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>horse bone, that horse lived around seven hundred thousand years ago.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>It died, its bones were immediately buried and frozen, and

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we're kept in that freezer, that dirt freezer, for the

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>last seven hundred thousand years, and that's the only reason

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we were able to recover DNA from that bone. And

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the DNA was in terrible condition. The longest fragments were

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty letters long. Remember I said, so that's

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>where you're going saying, we have them that are a million, millions,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>millions or millions or million long millions. Yes, we can

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>do millions, but because you said three billion total. Yeah,

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>so it depends you can get very large fragments of DNA.

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>How large this depends on how good you are at

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>extracting what's called high molecular weight DNA, and there are

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>hits that you can purchase in different approaches you can

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>use to get larger and larger fragments. Were limited by

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>technology in living things rather than by the actual size

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the DNA, whereas an ancient DNA you're limited by

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the actual size of the surviving fragments of DNA. Our

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>technology would allow us to get larger fragments if they existed,

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>they just don't. And why is this important? Why are

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we having such a long conversation about this. It's important

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because an elephant genome, a mammoth genome is about four

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>billion letters long, and if we have thirty letter fragments,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we it's kind of like having a trillion zillion piece

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>puzzle and we don't know what a mammoth genome actually

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like. So we're taking these tiny little puzzle pieces

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to figure out where in the elephant

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>genome they go. So you've got your massive trillion piece puzzle,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and the box top is actually not the picture of

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle that you're trying to put together. Some close

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but not exactly the right picture. And there's another problem,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is that, remember I said that there were

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all these bacteria and fungui and things that were eating

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>up the DNA. Their DNA is also in that bone.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>So when you extract DNA from these mammoth bones, you

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>get loads of tiny pieces of mammoth DNA. Maybe about

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one to four percent of what you get is tiny

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>pieces of mammoth DNA. The rest of it is tiny

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>pieces of other types of DNA, and you don't know

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>which is which. So you've got chillion piece puzzle that

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>actually includes the pieces for about a hundred different puzzles,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and you've got the wrong box top, right. Can you

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>can you? Can you? When you talk about contaminants, can

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you include the anecdote about sheep contaminants in MOA bones?

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so this wasn't MOA bones I think that

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. This was from we were trying to

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>get DNA directly from dirt in New Zealand. And so

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it is true that DNA is preserved in sentiment columns.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>This is really cool and it's something that people are

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just starting to focus on. I think that it's going

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to be really neat way of trying to figure out

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>where stuff lives. You know, we there are species that

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>are rare or whose ranges we don't know. It turns

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>out you can just go out and you can get

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of soil and you can extract DNA from

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that soil and you can ask, is this incredibly rare

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>small mammal ever found in this location? And if their

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA is there? The answer is yes. So we wanted

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to know how far back in time we could do this,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So we went to different caves in New Zealand where

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there are sandy environments and DNA will actually percolate through

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sands depending on what the sources of DNA is. And

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we knew that there should not be moa and sheep together,

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>right because the moa went extinct before sheep were introduced,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And means it like four pound birds that used to

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>live in New Zealand and we're extrapated by humans, right

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or not not extra but driven to extinction by human Yes,

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like big enormous kisy. Yes, they were impressive birds, and

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they were preyed upon by an even more impressive bird.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I digress here, but because this is an opportunity to

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about one of my favorite extinct species, Harper gourns

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the hosts eagle, the giant eagle that would swoop down

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and pick up these massive moa. So how big was

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the eagle? I can't say. I was top of my head.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But somebody who has a computer in front of them

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>can look this up on and figure it out right now,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's you have to give me the here. I'll

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>turn my phone here, I'll turn my phone A A

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>st you need a connection, I can do it. H

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A s T alright, so continue, we'll get out of that.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll find it. Yeah, anyway, so this is an amazing,

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>amazing animal. Anyway, both of these things went extinct because

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a giant eagle and you thrive

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on eating these giant birds, and the the giant birds go extinct,

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably going to go extinct too. They went

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>extinct several hundred years past, and sheep were introduced into

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand. So our idea was, if DNA is not

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>moving up and down in these caves, we should find

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>MOA DNA and then a layer where there's nothing, and

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>then a layer where there's sheep dna. But in act,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>what we found was that there was sheep DNA intermingled

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with the MOA DNA. And this is probably because there

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>were so many sheep that were wandering around and urinating,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and of course the urine is a nice source of

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.959
<v Speaker 1>DNA and this was percolating through this sandy soil that

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the sheep DNA was getting down into the MOA DNA.

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And all this tells us is that in some soil

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>environments you don't have this nice layering effect, and you

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have to really archaeologists always talk about and it exists

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>in some places, for example in and the Arctic, where

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, we found this horse bone and

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it associated with this volcanic eruption. You can see these

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>volcanic ash layers, they call them tephra, and they go

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>cleanly across this permafrost dirt. And you might not know

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>anything about whether the layering is good below it or

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the layering is good above it, but if you can

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>see this nice clean layer of thick ash, you know

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>that there's not stuff moving above and below that ash

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and if we find a bone below it, we know

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>it must be older. The bone must be older than

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that eruption. And if we find a bone above it,

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we know that it must be younger. So the bone

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't migrate through the line. The bone won't move. You're

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>saying that that's all stuff that ash was coming in from,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like eruptions in the illusions. Uh, there are a couple

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of different volcanic um mountain chains that are up there

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that cause like the logo, there are a couple of

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>different mountain chains up there that will erupt at different

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>time points. And you can actually tell by the chemical

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>composition of the ash which mountain it came from, and

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you can link eruptions together that you see the ash

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>from in different places, and you can kind of learn

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>something about the geologic history by studying these ash. So

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that's other cool thing that you can do when you're

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>out there working in the tundra. Yeah, it's fascinating, like

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>like little time stamps. Right, So where were we? We

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>were talking about piecing together the mammoth genome real quick though,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>just everybody knows that how do you pronounce it? Host?

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Twenty six pounds. That's an average between the male and

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the female and uh ten ft to twelve foot wingspan.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a big eagle. Yeah, twelve fan and its closest

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>living relative, I believe, at least it was a while

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>ago when we studied this UM when I was a

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>grad student. Is something called the booted eagle from Australia,

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>which is a tiny little thing. I think whenever we

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out that there these these enormous phenotypic differences between

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>things that are really closely related to each other, it

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just astounds me. The power of evolution and genetic variation,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and it has a lot to do right with um.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Certain groups get to islands and they seem to get

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>huge islands, they seem to get teeny And there's another

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I like to talk about bison. So do you

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>know about bison ladder frons um. This is an enormous bison,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>much bigger than the other bison that lived in North

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>America at the time. We just were able to get

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>DNA from a bison ladder frons that was found in

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>snowmass Colorado, at this site that was found recently and

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's about a hundred and twenty thousand years old. This

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>particular remain based on the geological setting, and we were

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>also able to get DNA from a step bison. This

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>is the bison that lived at the same time in

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Alaska that was much smaller, about half the size, if

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>not smaller, from bison ladder fronds, and they are the

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>same yoetically are you familiar with Do you ever read

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the work of Valarious Geistes? Are you with his idea

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>about it? Was that him that came up with the

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>founding effect. The founder effect, we're like one of species

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>colonized as a new era area, okay, and they have

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like unfettered like like they're in a non competitive environment

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that they will invest for a while. They invest a

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy into elaborate sexual display and have an

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>experience like periods of very high fecundity and kind of

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have a good old days, and then things kind of

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>catch up with themselves and they shrink. I think that

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he wrote about ladder Franz as being that it was

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>colonizing areas in the wake of glaciers. Yeah, and got huge.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That idea. Is that idea sound? You know? With bison,

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so many competing ideas about the history of these guys.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, at one point there were more than fifty

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>different name species of bison that supposedly lived in North

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>America during the late licens scene, and I think probably

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there there was actually only one. It was just changing

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time depending on where it was, and there

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was a competition between paleontologists to name new species. This

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is a time where people would find these partial horn

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>cores and they would turn them in different directions and

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they would measure the width and the length of the

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>horn cores, which is a terrible marker because these things

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>are they're manipulated by depending on what fights you get into,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>or how much you eat when you're growing up, et cetera.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>This is not a paleontologically equivocal trade. This is not

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>something that you can say, ah, that definitely means this

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>species or that species. And so people were naming new

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>species right and left based on not very much information,

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but the genetic data that we've started to get from

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>these bison bones. Um. We think the oldest bison in

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>North America are around hundred and sixty years old. And

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that's when they showed up. That's when they showed up,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>came across the bearing strait um. And this is a

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>paper that was published really recently that I worked on

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with a colleague collaborative of mine from University of Alberda,

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was kicked up in the New York Times. Yeah,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote you an email, so I want to like,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>see we got We're actually having two discussions right now both.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to these animals. Okay, I

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>want to come back to bison because just remember this

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because you hear people talk about and this, because we're

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about extinction. You hear people say, like, an

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>extinct form, Okay, the bison ladd of France, which had

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a six ft horn tips tip, huge horns, so six

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>ft from tip to tip. People be like, it's an

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>extinct one, but it's not. Nope, there's still bison around.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just like it just as different than what we

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have now. But people used to dig this stuff up.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's a there's one on display in in North

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Dakota that came out of the Missouri River that wants

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to look at a really nice skull and um, people

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>would dig it up and they'd be like, well that's

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all kind that's not here anymore. Yeah, you know it's

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a this is a tough thing. Right,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and this is a I think it's an

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>important question to people who care about wildlife. It's an

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>important questions people who care about conservation is how do

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we define the thing that is worth protecting, the thing

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that we don't want to go extinct? Do we define

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it as a species, do we define it as a population?

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Do we find it as something that looks different from

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>other things? Because a lot of fronts looked decidedly different

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>from the step bison that lived in Alaska, which also

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>looked different than the bison bison. The forms that exist today, Um,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they're a continuum. They certainly are closely related to each other,

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>but they aren't. They don't exist anymore. But the same

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>thing could be said for you know, you look at

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>wolf populations that are alive to day, and they are

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes phenotypically or behaviorally different from each other, but they're

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>all wolves. So where do you draw the line? Where

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>do you decide what is the thing that you want

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to protect? And and traditionally people think about species, but

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the name species is something that is kind of arbitrary.

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Is something that we decided on and who is well,

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it depends on who's thinking about it and who's asking

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the question, and what the point of asking the question is. Um.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a concept called the biological species concept, which says

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that species are defined as reproductively isolated units. So two

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>things that can't make or if they do, they don't

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>produce offspring, or if they do produce offspring, those offspring

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are not viable or also can't produce offering themselves. So

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>donkeys and mules are distinct species. They can produce. Sorry, sorry,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>donkeys and horses are distinct species. They can produce offspring,

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but that offspring can't reproduce, So the biological species concept

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>says they're different. But meanwhile, that definition would mean that

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all of are like mountain cariboo, woodland caribou, bar and

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ground caribou reindeer from Eurasia are just one species, and

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it would get rid of our discussions about the Mexican

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>gray wolf and the gray wolf proper. But something I

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think a little bit closer to heart, right, it would

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>say that humans and Neanderthals are the same species, because

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we were clearly different, behaviorally, physically different from each other.

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But after our ancestors moved out of Africa, they met

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>with Neanderthals and they hybridized with them. And because of that,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>most of us have some component of Neanderthal DNA in

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>our genomes. So the biological species concept would call humans

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and Neanderthals the same species. They would also call brown

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>bears and polar bears the same species, despite that these

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>two animals are behaviorally and physically and ecologically quite different

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>from each other. Yeah, because you can see people would

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be like very resistant to the idea because of like,

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>hold on right, and it only eats seals, and it swims,

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and it has different dentition and it doesn't hibernate, whereas

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the other one is incredibly different. But they mate and

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they produce offspring, and they do so in zoos, and

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>they do so in nature viable viable offspring. All the

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>bears on Alaska's Abc Islands are hybrids, all of them.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>They have up to eight percent polar bear ancestry. And

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that's because after the last ice Age, we believe that

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the ABC Islands were actually colonized, were actually just a

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>home for polar bears, and then as the climate warmed up,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.959
<v Speaker 1>brown bear boys because boys leave, and brown bears moved

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>from the Alaska mainland onto the Abc Islands, where they

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>met this population of polar bears and hybridized with them,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and gradually this population was converted back to being brown

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>bear like, more brown bear like, because brown bears kept

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>coming over and mating with these these bears that lived there,

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but mitochondrially, which is only inherited from your mom. This

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is part of DNA and everyone of yourselves that only

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>comes from your mom. They are polar bears. They are

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all polar bears with their mitochondrial DNA really and their

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>X chromosomes, which come more from mom because Dad only

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>has one copy of the X. The X chromosome has

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>more polar bear DNA on it than the rest of

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>their genome, which again is evidence that their mom's mom's

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mom's mom's mom, at some point in the past, probably

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fifteen thousand years ago, was a polar bear.

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And and that then jives what you said earlier that

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>it was like colonizing males, which kind of fits in

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>with just general brown bear behavior like well, like a

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of those, like a lot of big predators where

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>when they turn up in weird places, not always, but

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>so often it's a male turning up in a weird place. Yeah, well,

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>many in many animals, like I mean mountain lions which

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we have out here, do this to The males are

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the ones that disperse. They're the ones that go out

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to find new territory. And so that that's

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in brown bears, is that juvenile, juvenile

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>males move outside, whereas the females tend to stay with

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>their mom. Is called maternal philopatrie. But you know that.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But uh um, that's common in a lot of especially

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I think large predatory species. But okay, now I'm gonna

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>back you way up to where you are. I don't

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>even remember that you're finding little instead of the millions

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>long DNA strands, you're finding little thirties and forties. And

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem with those little thirties and forties is that

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>there in shitty condition, and their and finding them, figuring

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>out where they go, how to line them, and they're

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>corrupted because of part of the trickery of finding them

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>is that they're corrupted with so much other stuff, right,

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 1>And also they're corrupted themselves because all of these things

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.959
<v Speaker 1>like UVY radiation beating down on the DNA will actually

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>cause the molecules to change, to become damaged in their

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>own way. So ancient DNA has its own kind of damage.

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>It's broken into tiny fragments, and it's mixed up with

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other contaminants. And your job as an

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>ancient DNA scientist is to take that little thirty and

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out where on that big four bill in genome

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that isn't actually the same genome it goes, and then

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>to gradually piece this puzzle together. And we do that

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>using computers. Um, you know, lots of DNA sequencing and

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>lots of computers. Gradually pieces together and come up with

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what we believe the mammoth genome looked like. And you

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>can only move it relative to other pieces you found. Yeah,

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so if you find one isolated piece, if you picture

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on a number line like one to a hundred, you

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have no idea where to place it until you find

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>some other thing. Right, Well, what you have is a

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>number line. Let's say you have a number line that's

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one to one, and you have a little thirty piece,

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and your thirty piece says so you can kind of

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>scan along that one to one hundred to figure out

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>where it goes, and you'll find the matching sequence. So

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>let's say that number line is your elephant genome, and

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>then you've got your little thirty to four, your little

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty base pair piece. You can figure out where it goes. Now,

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>mammoths and elephants are kind of different from each other,

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so there'll be some places where it doesn't match up exactly.

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But if it's long enough, you can figure out the

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>best ice in that number line where your tiny little

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>thing goes, because there'll be some common ground. So there

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are lots of computer algorithms that people used to do that,

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and heuristic searching approaches that people used to do that,

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and and this is this is possible? And how apparent

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>is it? What that piece? What function that things served

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for the organism function? Now this is something you're getting

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>into another whole realm of issue here. We hadn't quite

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten there yet, but we can totally get there. So

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a great question. Um, we have

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>very little idea what parts of genomes do. We have

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>algorithms that help us to find genes. Genes are not

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that are in our genomes. There's also

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>lots of noncoding stuff. There's positional stuff. There's lots of

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 1>viruses that have gotten in there and made copies of

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves and moved around. There are repeat elements. There are

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>all these kind of things called like allue elements and

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. There's just our genomes are chock full

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of other stuff that's not genes, and that other stuff

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>might be portant and it might not. Write. This is

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>true for every animal, every organism that's out there. So

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>today we have people are saying we have complete genome sequences,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.919
<v Speaker 1>we have genome sequences available for lots of different species. Um,

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>it's true, we have genome sequences available for lots of

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>different species, but there are very few species that we

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>know very much about, and those that we do know

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot about tend to be the ones that we

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>study a lot. So things like humans because we care

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot about humans, and lab organisms like mice and

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>rats and Drosophila fruit flies, things that people use to

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>manipulate experimentally in the lab, other things. Any wildlife. You

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>pick a wildlife that isn't a domestic, agriculturally important species

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>we know very little about, and we guess, we guess

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the function. So we find a gene that we believe

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 1>is the same gene as something that we know that

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>if you turn off in a mouse changes the color

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of their eyes. I'm just making that up right, And

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>then we can say, ah ha, that gene in the

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>mammoth was probably associated with something like that. We have

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>no idea, right really, but we have some idea. That's

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of unfair. We have some we've educated guesses about

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the functions of genes based on learning something about functions

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of genes in a very different animal that was living

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in a lab. That makes sense, okay. So for example,

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>if we want to know what genes are associated with

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>cold tolerance in an elephant, we might look at what

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>people have written published about um cold tolerance or subcutaneous

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>fat or hair development or things like that in mice

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 1>or in humans, and then say, hmm, what's the same

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>gene that we found in this mammoth genomesequence. That's probably

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the function of that gene. So we have an educated guess,

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know for sure. Did when when did elephants?

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Were they like they were in equatorial areas like pre

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>mammoth and the mammoth was like a north word. Yes,

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the other way around, right, So another the

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that we can do to figure out so he

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>was like, they were figuring, like Asian elephants existed, No, No,

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>as mammoths for figuring out how to deal with the cold. Yes,

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 1>so they had a common ancestor that's probably tropically adapted, right,

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and then they dive. That common ancestor diverged into elephants

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and mammoths Asian elephants in mammos. Yeah, it's kind of

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 1>like you know, um, we didn't evolve from chimpanzees, and

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzees didn't evolve from us. The two species evolved from

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a common ancestor that was neither a chimpanzee nor a human. Right.

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true for Asian elephants in mammoth

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>when people say we had come from monkeys, and I

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't know if anybody is saying you

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>came from a monkey, well, great ape, some sort of

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>great ape. Yes, and prior to that monkeys or maybe

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 1>they diverged. Anyway, I digress into parts of human evolutionary

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>history that I'm not confident. Yeah, well, yeah, don't do that.

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>There's enough you are confident with. We don't need to

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 1>do what you're not confident with. I'm not saying I'm

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not confident that we came from great apes. We certainly

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>evolved from great apes. Anyway, Um, where was I function mammoths? Yeah,

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about finding things that would um allow

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>cold tolerance and understanding where those things are, and I

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>interrupt you to make sure that that, uh, mammoths moved northwards.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So another way that we can try to

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>identify things that are potentially important to making a mammoth

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:27.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at like a mammoth instead of like the common

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ancestor of the Asian elephant is to use evolution to

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>know what to learn to to use what we know

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about evolution. So we have um African elephant genome sequence,

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>which we know diverged prior to the divergence between Asian

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>elephants and mammoths, and so we kind of know what

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that ancestor of Asian elephants and mammoths looked like. And

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>then we can use the genome sequences and what we

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 1>know about how evolution works to identify the mutations that

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>happened just along the mammoth lineage, and we can think,

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe those are some of the things that are really

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>important to making a mammoth looking act like a mammoth.

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You'ring to the finding the cold tolerance stuff, right, Well,

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>how we how we find it? Yeah? I mean you

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:12.759
<v Speaker 1>just think about the way you can look along these lineages,

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>these evolutionary lineages, and ask what things are fixed, what

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>things are all the same in mammoth. So we know

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of places in our genomes

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>where you and I will differ, and those are probably

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>not fundamentally important to making us human. If they were,

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't differ. We would be the same as each other,

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 1>but different from our closest living relative, chimpanzee. So that's

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we're doing with mammoths. If we sequence

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of mammoths, we can look and see

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>where there's variation in mammoths and say that's probably not

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that important to making a mammoth look and act like

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a mammoth. But we can also find places where mammoths

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>are all the same as each other, but also all

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>different from all elephants, and we can say, ah ha,

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>there is likely to be some evolutionary difference, some change

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that happened along that lineage to making mammoths look and

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>act like mammoths rather than like the ancestral elephant that

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they were, and we can then target those as something

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that we might need to change if we were going

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to turn an elephant into a mammoth. That section of

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the that one one letter. Oh, that's a one letter part,

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one letter, one letter. Yeah, so that's the thing you know,

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or you're talking about. You know, you have four billion

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>bases that are different between asian elephant and a wooly

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>mammoth and they're four it, no, sorry, four billion basis

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>total in a wooly mammoth genome and about one and

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a half million differences, right, and they're going to be

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>spread randomly throughout the genome because mutations happen randomly, and

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>only some of them are going to be really important

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to making a mammoth mammoth and an elephant an elephant. Right,

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So the goal is to use what we know about

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:50.439
<v Speaker 1>where genes are and the way evolution works to try

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to figure out which of those million and a half

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>differences really are fundamentally important. And if we're only interested

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in in creating specific traits or moving specific mammoth like

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>traits into elephants, we got to figure out somehow which

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of those differences that we've decided are important differences making

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>mammoths different are actually important differences in making them different

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in that very specific way that we're interested in them

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>being different, you know, in the case of cold tolerance,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>which would further limit the number of changes that you

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>would have to make if you were going to make

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>an elephant that had that particular trait. But this is hard.

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>This is something that you know, we we we kind

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of have some idea about how to do, but we

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know enough about the way genomes function, or the

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 1>way mammoth genome in particular functions, to to know exactly

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>what the right what the right decision would be. So

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>what what year was it when there was the announcement

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that they had mapped the human genome? That was two

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one, And the person who led that the

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>public effort for the Human Genome Consortium is in that

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 1>building right there behind you through the treats. What what

0:45:55.440 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of the mamoth genome is complete? Uh? Well, can

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I answer the question about the human genome? First? Two

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one we said we had mapped the human genome?

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>About the human genome is known? Now? Oh yeah, Now

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years later, we still don't have the whole thing.

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, why was it? Well, you know, to be fair, well, no, there,

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are The genome is a big and

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>complicated place, right and there are parts of our genome

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>towards the centromeres the middle of the genome, and toward

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the end of the telomeres that are just made up

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of these really um tightly wrapped repeat sequences that there

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is no existing sequencing technology that we can get through. Um.

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to sequence through these things right now.

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to do it. And in fact, a

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>big challenge that genome scientists are often thinking about it's

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who is going to actually finish the complete human genome?

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>This would be a really cool thing to be able

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. To be fair, we know most of the

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>genome that actually has genes in it that's doing stuff,

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and the parts that we don't know are is very

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>small compared to that. But we don't know all of

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it yet, and we certainly don't know the entire genome

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sequence for something that is not human, where we haven't

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>spent billions and billions and billions to tell me that

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you're almost there on the mammoth. No, and a harder

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:20.919
<v Speaker 1>thing about something like a mammoth. There's something that's something

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that's extinct. Is that, Remember I said, we don't we

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have long sequences. So the only way to get

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>through these repeat fragments for these regions of the genome

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that are just the same thing, repeated over and over

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again is to be able to

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sequence these long strands of DNA. We're never going to

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have that for something that's extinct, and so we're always

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 1>going to have to take these broken fragments and map

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 1>them to an existing genome sequence. We can't do what's

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 1>called a DiNovo genome assembly, where you don't have anything,

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>which is what impressively these teams managed to do for

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the human genome. We had no map, we had no puzzle,

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>top right. They just did it. They took these long

0:47:56.320 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>fragments and used sophisticated computer algorithms to piece these these

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>long fragments together. And the more data they get, so

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the more they have to realize they got some parts wrong.

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>They can rearrange it and and and try to figure

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>out what the real sequence is. It's very hard to

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>put together these denovo genomes where all you have is

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>just good quality tissue and you don't want to use

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 1>any map. The reason you don't want to use any

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>map is that the map might be wrong, and this

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is particularly important when something is extinct and doesn't have

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 1>any close relatives. Um think, for example, of the moa,

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>where the closest living relative is the tinamou, and they diverged.

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember exactly how many, but more than thirty

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>million years of between these two lineages, so there's a

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity for parts of the genome to move around,

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.479
<v Speaker 1>for chromosomes to break and move around. Probably doesn't happen

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so much in birds, but in in mammals we know

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that chromosomes rearrange all the time. And if your map

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 1>your living thing, the tinamou is really different from the

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>ancient sequence ancient genome you're trying to map, where you

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>only have your thirties and forties, there might be big

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>chunks the genome that you just never get. They'll never recover,

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>no matter how many bones are because you don't have

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>those long fragments, which is what you would need to

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to extend off the ends of these sequences.

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is a hard thing for ancient genomics and

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for many species. We might be forever restricted to just

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>being able to use this stuff that doesn't change so quickly,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this is a bad thing, right right, And

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to um whether you can bring back

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a species that's extinct If the most important parts are

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the most divergent parts, and therefore the parts that you

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 1>actually can't sequence or put together, how are you ever

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>going to know what they are? So if if a

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>fellow wanted to go make a mammoth, right, okay, all right,

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:57.479
<v Speaker 1>like and there are some of those fellas, right, Well,

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing you talked about is there was someone

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>who was hopeful. I don't want to dwell on things

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that just aren't going to happen, But just as an example,

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>there was someone who is hopeful, um that you talked about,

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who would find semen. Right, So, there are two teams

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that are out there that are looking either for semen

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 1>or for cells, just frozen cells that are in good condition,

0:50:19.640 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and they want to clone a mammoth. This is most

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>common word that you hear when you think about Jurassic

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Park type clone of mammoth. Yeah. Clone. Well, you see,

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>even bringing up Jurassic Park kind of calls all this

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>into questions because then you got to talk about how

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>many journalists have asked you to explain why amber it's

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>not actually good for DNA. How many journalists are there.

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:46.959
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question, though, I mean to be fair.

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>This is this is what people think about ancient DNA

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.479
<v Speaker 1>is is, Oh, look we can find things preserved and amber.

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna able to bring dinosaurs back to life. Medium

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:57.839
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense. It does. It does. When you see

0:50:57.840 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>a piece of amber, you see a fly in it,

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well of And it was inspired by reality.

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So Michael Crichton, when he wrote his book actually wrote

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in the acknowledgments UM that he was grateful to the

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Extinct Species Working Group at you see Berkeley Allen Will

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>because they were talking about ancient DNA and that was

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what inspired him. And then his movie book inspired people

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to see if they could actually recover DNA from insights

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in amber, and people published papers saying that they had

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>um Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on who you are and

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how you feel about these things. There is this ubiquitous,

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>uh source of DNA that's everywhere, that gets into everything,

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and I could extract DNA from anything and get some DNA.

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that it's DNA from that thing. Amber

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.799
<v Speaker 1>is very porous, it's formed a very hot environment. It

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>turns out that it is a terrible, terrible preserver for DNA,

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>which is very sad that there's these beautiful skeletons or

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:57.880
<v Speaker 1>exo skeletons of things that you see in amber, but

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 1>there isn't any DNA that is from those animals that's

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in there. There was a a group of scientists in

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in London at the Natural Museum in London in the

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>late nineties who tried to replicate some of these experiments

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 1>by going into their collection, and they were They recovered

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 1>pieces of amber and copal. Copal is the recent precursor

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to amble. Amber. First it's copeal and then it hardens

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and becomes amber. And these were only decades old. We

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>know we can recover decade old DNA. And some of

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 1>these things had bugs in them and some of them didn't.

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:28.439
<v Speaker 1>They extracted DNA from all of these different pieces of amber, saying,

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:30.359
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't have an insect, we shouldn't be able

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to get DNA. If it does, we should be able

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to get DNA. And therefore this is some sort of

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>test of the hypothesis of whether amber preserves DNA, and

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they were able to recover DNA from their pieces of

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>copal and amber, but there was no correlation between their

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>ability to recover DNA and whether there were insects there.

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out they were just recovering insect DNA

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>because there's insect DNA everywhere. I mean, I could take

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a swab off this tabletop here and get insect DNA

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>off of it, and probably your DNA as well, because

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you've been sitting here and breathing on the table for

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a while. That doesn't mean it's already there. Yes, yes,

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So I could go to the toy store and get

0:53:09.480 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a dinosaur and extract DNA and show that I have

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>recovered dinosaur DNA, but really it's just going to be

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.880
<v Speaker 1>chopped up pieces of human and cockroach DNA, right, you know.

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So the early days of ancient DNA were filled with

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>some of these spectacular claims, none of which have been

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>able to be shown to be true. The oldest DNA

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that we've recovered as reliable is that seven hundred thousand

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>year old horse bone from the Arctic because it was frozen, right,

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it was recovered. Um Dinosaurs went extinct

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty five million years ago. There is no frozen dirt

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that's sixty five million years old. There is no DNA

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and dinosaurs and talk about the um. You don't need

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to dwell on it. But the sperm path to a

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>mammoth cloning. Uh, let's do cells and then sperm. Right,

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So the idea with sperm, I guess I'll start with sperm,

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>would be that you could find frozen sperm and then

0:53:56.640 --> 0:53:59.799
<v Speaker 1>you could you could get an elephant egg cell and

0:53:59.840 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you could use it to fertilize the elephant egg cell,

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so you would have something that's half mammoth half elephant.

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Um like you surrogate, surrogate, you'd like impregnate a female

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Asian elephant with this frozen sperm and get a half mammoth,

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:15.879
<v Speaker 1>and then do it again and get a three quarter

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 1>mammoth's And they're fired up about that because I think

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you should explained that. And you get in your book

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that they found that old frozen sperm is still viable.

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:29.879
<v Speaker 1>That gives him whole We're not old old right, right,

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but just the term you guys use old old, it's

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like alternative old. Yeah. Uh no, So when an animal

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>dies and I think I've already said this. The DNA

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and IT cell starts to degrade immediately, and the cells

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>started to grade immediately. So this requires that you were

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>able to be fine, you would able you would be

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>able to find frozen viable cells or frozen viables. Oh,

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I got you, So the same problem. I hadn't really

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.400
<v Speaker 1>put that together, right, Yeah, the sperm has Yeah, I

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>got you. It's destroyed everywhere, and so it had to

0:55:04.560 --> 0:55:07.760
<v Speaker 1>be that sperm was It's like sperms that some special holders,

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so that makes it a special holder. Actually probably would

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.919
<v Speaker 1>be the testicles, right, And this is what I read

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing my research for this, is that

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:17.839
<v Speaker 1>because the testicles were outside of the body, they would

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>get frozen faster and that would protect the sperm. It

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>turns out they're not outside of the body in a mammoth,

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>which is probably you know, for good reason, right if

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about the environment where they lived, So yeah,

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not then no, it's not a viable pathway. That

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 1>was the interesting thing I heard about mammoth um. You

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about the cold tolerance for but a thing that

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Asian and African elephants have big ears, and mammoths had

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:48.439
<v Speaker 1>small ears because imagine that thin flat Yeah, what would

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>happen to it in cold temperatures? Right? And the elephants

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have big ears for heat this patient, right, so um, yeah,

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to dissipate your heat if you're living

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at forty below. Okay, So now that I understand the

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sperm thing that it is, it's it's just like the

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>cell thing. Yeah. And and so when when people say

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:08.319
<v Speaker 1>cloning cloning, what what you really mean? And we say

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this cloning dinosaurs and dinosaur bar you say cloning mammoths,

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>What you really mean when you say cloning is an

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>actual scientific process where you take a cell and that's

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 1>already a particular type of cell, like a skin cell

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or Okay, so here we go. Who's the most famous clone? Dolly,

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Dolly the sheep. That's so, Dolly was a clone and

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>she was a clone of a mammary cell from another

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>female sheep. Right, So what you do in cloning is

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you take an egg cell that is viable, ripe egg cell,

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and you suck out the nucleus, the stuff that has

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear DNA, the all the stuff that is going

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to code for the genes that make the animal look

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>and act like it does that normally, in an egg

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cell would be fertilized by sperm that would make everything

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 1>diploid ut of Mom's DNA and Dad's DNA, and then

0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that would um cause this process of differentiation. Because that

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:04.759
<v Speaker 1>fertilized cell is is a stem cell. It has the

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's called tote potent. It has the capacity to become

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:11.400
<v Speaker 1>every type of cell that's necessary to create an organism.

0:57:11.800 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Um it doesn't yet have any instructions that say, be

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>heart cell, be a memory cell, be a lung cell,

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but it will begin to divide and differentiate, and as

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it does, those cells will gradually get the instructions that

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:23.520
<v Speaker 1>are necessary to be different types of cells. You don't

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>need the same genes turned on to be a heart

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 1>cell as you do to be a liver cell, for example.

0:57:28.000 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So this process of differentiation just turns genes on and

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>off as necessary to create different functions. So the idea

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of cloning is that you have a cell that's already

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 1>way down that path. It already has exactly the genes

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:43.240
<v Speaker 1>turned on and off to be that particular type of cell.

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 1>In Golly's case, it was a mamory cell. And you

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have to somehow trick it into forgetting those instructions and

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>resetting itself into one of those types of cells that

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:57.680
<v Speaker 1>can begin this process of dividing and differentiation. This reprogramming

0:57:57.800 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is really important in cloning. So you take that egg

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:03.960
<v Speaker 1>cell and there's some magic in that egg cell, and

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that is that the proteins that are in that egg

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:10.480
<v Speaker 1>cell can cause that reprogramming to happen. So you take

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the excel, suck out of the nucleus, and then you

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you take this tissue cell that you want to clone,

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and you stress it out. You starve it if nutrients

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and put it in a state where super stressed, right,

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you can suck the nucleus out of that cell,

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>injected into the egg cell, zap it with a bit

0:58:24.680 --> 0:58:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of electricity. Some magic happens that causes the proteins in

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that egg cell to reset that cell, causing it to

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>forget all the instructions to be a memory cell and

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>start that process of dividing and differentiating. That, it turns out,

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is really hard and still is really inefficient. This if

0:58:40.840 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the cell is not entirely reprogrammed, reset it completely to scratch,

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>then it won't work. It won't divide correctly. It'll go

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong at some point, and that's why cloning of animals

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:55.240
<v Speaker 1>remains um really inefficient. It's gotten better than than it

0:58:55.320 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>was in Dolly's time, but it still isn't you know.

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not like every time you do it it works.

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You need, though, is for that cell, that tissue cell

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to be alive. There can't be anything wrong with it.

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>If there's anything wrong with it, miracle of life alive,

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like is able to divide in a in a dish,

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it has to be, you know. It can't be broken,

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It can't be turned off. The DNA can't be chopped up.

0:59:18.200 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It has to be capable of resetting itself. And as

0:59:21.400 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we've already established, once an animal dies, all of its

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>cells start to break up and die, the enzymes chop

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up the DNA, it can't replicate itself anymore. And because

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that is true, one will never find a living mammoth cell.

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The most recently live mammoths were live years ago. They

0:59:40.840 --> 0:59:45.919
<v Speaker 1>have no living cells remaining, and end of story, one

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 1>will never be able to clone a mammoth, really sorry,

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:57.800
<v Speaker 1>or dinosaur. And that's that's a particular particularly bold statement

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:01.000
<v Speaker 1>comes from someone in your position. It it's a statement

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been making for very but just but okay, I've

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>seen the deal, the operating You live and operate in

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the world of the impossible, do I? Yes? Because things

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that things that would have been regarded things that a

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>decade ago or two decades ago would have been regarded

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as No, that won't happen, right, Okay, how do you

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>know that you're not? But I don't. I don't doubt

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that you are. But you're not worried about becoming the

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>laughing stock. You know what, if somebody finds a living

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>mammoth cell, it will be so freaking exciting that I

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>won't mind being a laughing stock. The chances that'll outweigh

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>your embarrassment. Exactly is that the likelihood of this happening

1:00:44.840 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is very, very very close to zero, so close to

1:00:48.160 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>zero that I'm willing to say it's never going to happen.

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And is that is that? Um? I don't want dwell,

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But is that like sort of like the consensus among

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>your peers. Yes, So if that's the case, let's move

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>on to what might work. Well, this is why we

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>get to moving genes, so we know that we can

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>come up with these DNA sequences if we can identify

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>using a computer which parts of those genomes are important

1:01:11.600 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to making something look an act like mammoth. Then we

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>can take an elephant cell that is alive, right, that's

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>living in a dish, that's able to replicate itself and

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>turn into two cells whatever from an Asian elephant, and

1:01:25.280 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we can then cut and paste using geno mediting technologies,

1:01:29.040 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the elephant DNA sequences can be cut out and paste

1:01:32.600 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>into their place the parts of the mammoth genome sequence

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that are there. So then you have a living cell

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>as an elephant cell that has some mammoth DNA sequences

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in it, right, Yeah, but that is not the same

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thing as having a mammoth cell. No, yeah, I'm with you, right,

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And what are the things that you would be Let's

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just make let's assume for a menthy that this is

1:01:57.640 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>already and you could do it. Can we can we

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>finish why that cell is not ever going to be

1:02:02.880 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing as a mamothy, because this was

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the question you asked me at the very beginning, and

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we kind of gone down a lot of different rabbit

1:02:10.120 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>holes here. But let's see. So let's say you somehow

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>managed to identify all the places where mamoths and elephants

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are different. And you managed to make all of those changes,

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>cut and paste one and a half million different letters

1:02:24.720 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in that cell that's growing in additional lab So now

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a genome sequence that looks, as far as

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you can tell, like a mammoth genome sequence. Right, Why

1:02:33.000 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't that turn into a mammoth? Well, the main reason

1:02:37.720 --> 1:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we are more. Every organism is more than

1:02:42.040 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the sequence of the A, C, S, G S, and

1:02:44.280 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>T s that make up our d N A. That um.

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>There are things that happened during development that change the

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:54.479
<v Speaker 1>way our genes expressed. Our mom's diet, whether she gets sick,

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what she's exposed to, how stressed she is, et cetera.

1:02:57.200 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>All those things will change the way our genes are expressing.

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Some of the developmental things that happen in utero are

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>caused by hormonal changes in mom, which are coded for

1:03:08.200 --> 1:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>by her genome, which is an elephant at this point, right.

1:03:11.800 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the animal is born and it consumes an

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>elephants diet, and it's taught how to behave like an elephant,

1:03:17.880 --> 1:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and it has a gut microbes that are like an elephant,

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're just beginning to learn how important the things

1:03:25.440 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that live in our gut are to a lot of

1:03:28.360 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>animals I know do this, but they'll eat like fegal

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>matter of the mother to colonize their guts what it needs.

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And so those organisms living in its gut

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be expressing different chemicals and etcetera, and

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>those are going to affect the way the genes are expressed.

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>And so this thing that is born might have mammoth DNA,

1:03:47.480 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's not going to be a identical to a

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>mammoth that used to be alive, and that's because mammoths

1:03:52.240 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't here anymore. You would need a family of mammoths

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and a mammoth habitat and and mammoth gut microbes and

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>etcetera if you were going to make something that's identical

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to a mammoth, which is why it can't happen. But

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the people who are proponents of using this

1:04:07.520 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of technology as a way of preserving by a

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>diversity or or replacing parts of ecosystems that are missing

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>because of an extinction don't really care that you're not

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>creating something that's identical to something that's there What they

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really want is to create an ecological proxy, to create

1:04:25.240 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>something that can fill the components of that niche that

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are missing and therefore somehow threatening either the stability of

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem in the given in the existing climate or

1:04:36.400 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or phenomena or threatening other species from going extinct. Now,

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that this is necessarily true for mammoths.

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are people who are interested in

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing mammoths back because it's phenomenal, Like, how cool would

1:04:49.720 --> 1:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it be to have a mammoth that's back? Can you

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can you hold that thought like touch on why why mammoth?

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it because the person they're crazy enough, but RecA

1:05:01.920 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they're crazy enough to have attention, but recent enough to

1:05:04.840 --> 1:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be in the realm of supposed possibility. I think kind

1:05:09.080 --> 1:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of boils down to that. My personal opinion about why

1:05:12.120 --> 1:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>people have focused on mammoth's and my book is about

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>mammoth's as well, even though I don't personally work on

1:05:18.640 --> 1:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>mammoths in my lab, but it is the thing that

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>people talk about. I think people think of mammoths as

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>soon as they realize that they can bring back dinosaurs.

1:05:28.120 --> 1:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's like the second most spectacular things

1:05:32.720 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>t rex is out but right right, it's also but

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it is because it's like saber tooth cats, let's bring

1:05:41.480 --> 1:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>them back. Or arc Todus giant short faced bear that

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we made extinct because it would stand up and would

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>be fourteen feet tall and we didn't like that when

1:05:50.040 --> 1:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to let our kids run around outside.

1:05:51.880 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, that was um. So mammoth they seem well,

1:05:54.760 --> 1:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they're huge, they're spectacular, they're definitely gone. Um, but they

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't kill us. You know, there's some like kind

1:06:01.120 --> 1:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of snuggly about them. But it's nothing else in that.

1:06:03.880 --> 1:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing, it's it's nothing other than just those like

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of issues of charisma. And maybe it's in the

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>realm of possibility because they're coming up out of the ice.

1:06:16.120 --> 1:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is the reason that we see

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of popular attention to it. Now. There are

1:06:19.840 --> 1:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>people who make ecological arguments for bringing mammoths back to life. Um.

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a father son team that live in northeastern Siberia,

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Zimov Sergey Zimov and his son Nikita. They have

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this this place called Pleistocene park Um where they're trying

1:06:36.320 --> 1:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to bring enough big herbivores back that they can re

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>establish this rich grassland that used to be in the

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Siberian tundra during the ice age. And they have um

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>imported bison from Canada, and they have a couple different

1:06:49.840 --> 1:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>species of deer, and they have horses, etcetera. And they

1:06:52.680 --> 1:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have been able to show that having these animals on

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the landscape sort of increases the production of this grassland.

1:06:58.680 --> 1:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So they move things around, the recycling nutrients, they're chewing

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. And they've even made the argument um that

1:07:06.400 --> 1:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>because these animals are there and they're feeding during the winter,

1:07:10.040 --> 1:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they're pulling away the snow and creating these exposed bits

1:07:14.680 --> 1:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of soil. And this would have happened during the ice age,

1:07:17.680 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>where the snow would have been removed and the soil

1:07:20.360 --> 1:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was exposed. And in doing so, they're actually causing the

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>sediment that is in the area to warm up less

1:07:28.440 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly than it does when the snow is on top

1:07:30.680 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of this is a little bit counterintuitive. So if you

1:07:32.440 --> 1:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it, if the average temperature of the soil,

1:07:36.840 --> 1:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>if the sorry, if the soil temperature is really the

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>average annual ambient temperature, right then um, during the summer,

1:07:43.640 --> 1:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, up there during the winter it's forty

1:07:46.440 --> 1:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>below So the soil temperature can be very cold as

1:07:49.200 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>long as there's not snow sitting on top of it,

1:07:51.760 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because snow is a really efficient insulator. And what the

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>snow sitting on top of this the soil does is

1:07:57.520 --> 1:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it keeps that summer heat in the soil and actually

1:08:00.800 --> 1:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>causes the soil to warm up faster. Whereas if you

1:08:03.560 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>can pull that snow away, the bare earth is exposed

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to the really cold Siberian winter and cools down that

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that sediment. And so they have made the argument that

1:08:13.560 --> 1:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>if we could get rid of a lot of the snow,

1:08:15.560 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>which we could do by having really big herbivores like

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mammoth's wandering around, we could slow the rate of permafrost

1:08:21.840 --> 1:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>warming and slow the relate rate of release of carbon

1:08:25.040 --> 1:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>into the atmosphere that's coming from parmafrost warming. So they

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are making an ecological argument for why we should have

1:08:31.160 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>these animals back on the landscape. That's something I hadn't

1:08:34.240 --> 1:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>heard of, because I know that um the the area

1:08:38.920 --> 1:08:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like the Arctic and what was the Bearing land Bridge

1:08:42.360 --> 1:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>at the time when people talk about with their horses

1:08:44.520 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>up there, there was like an American lion. Everything lots

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of cool things. There was a grassland, there was like

1:08:50.560 --> 1:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>step grasslands, and now it's tassi, it's tundra. I'd never

1:08:56.600 --> 1:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>heard the idea that that train. I had always heard

1:08:59.640 --> 1:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that transition explained as a climate issue. I never heard

1:09:03.840 --> 1:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>it explained as perhaps related to grazing habits. Yeah, um,

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I do you know. Things don't have been in isolation. Obviously,

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems change. Ecosystems are dynamic. But if you remove grazing

1:09:16.560 --> 1:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>herbivores from a landscape, the landscape changes. You can see

1:09:19.200 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that in the desert southwest. There's this little thing called

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the kangaroo rat and it's kind of makes these little tons.

1:09:25.479 --> 1:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty cool, huh. And but once they disappear, and

1:09:28.400 --> 1:09:31.639
<v Speaker 1>they are disappearing, it takes you half a year, and

1:09:31.800 --> 1:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the entire landscape has changed because that animal was doing

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot to maintain this different type of habitat. It changes,

1:09:39.800 --> 1:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>other species move in, some other species will disappear. But

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>having that little guy there really maintained that habitat. And

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there's little doubt to my mind that having these herbivores

1:09:50.000 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on the landscape in the High Arctic will have had

1:09:53.000 --> 1:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>an impact on the the grasslands. I mean they were

1:09:56.720 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>consuming things. They were favoring some plants over others. They

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>were moving nutrients around all over the place. They were

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>churning the soil by walking over things. Um, they were

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We know that when mammoths and other large mammals disappeared

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>from the southern part of North America and California, for example,

1:10:14.200 --> 1:10:16.799
<v Speaker 1>they would have actually kept the trees at bay, these mammoths,

1:10:17.000 --> 1:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and so there would have been an enormous change to

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem that happened with the extinction of mammoths. And

1:10:21.479 --> 1:10:25.639
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the change that caused Native Americans who lived

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>there to start using fire instead of these large animals

1:10:28.400 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to try to keep the trees at bay so that

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they other things would grow there. So yeah, I mean,

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the animals that live in a habitat definitely have some

1:10:36.640 --> 1:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>feedback into the what habitat is there? Now you know

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that you have the chicken and egg problem. What happened first?

1:10:42.800 --> 1:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Did the landscape change so much that it couldn't support

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the animals, or did the animals disappears that the landscape disappeared.

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Probably these things happened together. So the a biotic changes,

1:10:51.080 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the climate changes associated with warming probably fed into the

1:10:55.479 --> 1:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>disappearances some of these animals that then fed into more

1:10:59.120 --> 1:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>changes that were being to the landscape. So remember that,

1:11:02.240 --> 1:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you think about the ecology of a system,

1:11:05.120 --> 1:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not thinking about one animal or just the vegetation.

1:11:08.400 --> 1:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>You really have to think about how everything interacts with

1:11:10.640 --> 1:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>each other, which is one of the arguments for UM

1:11:14.600 --> 1:11:18.639
<v Speaker 1>potentially thinking about using this genome engineering technology to try

1:11:18.680 --> 1:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to preserve some components of ecosystems, because as components disappear,

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems change. However, proximate, however proximate. Are you ready now?

1:11:30.920 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I now prompt you along to what the uh

1:11:35.400 --> 1:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what might the mammoth? In quotes, I'm making quotes what

1:11:39.960 --> 1:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>might the mammoth be? And look like I have no idea.

1:11:43.640 --> 1:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It would depend on what genes were changed, you know,

1:11:46.360 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it would really depend on what what sciencests were interested

1:11:49.200 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in doing this. We're trying to select. Probably if it

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>was something that wanted to live in the high Arctic,

1:11:53.120 --> 1:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be something that was harriier than an elephant,

1:11:55.280 --> 1:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>because it needs to be able to protect itself from

1:11:57.080 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the cold. Um, so our ears probably smaller ears, but

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know it's a these are it's fluid. You know,

1:12:07.320 --> 1:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>there has to be so that you thought about a

1:12:08.720 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>great deal. I haven't. I you know, I if I

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>had to pick species that I think we should use

1:12:16.600 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this technology on, I don't think the mammoth would be

1:12:19.320 --> 1:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>high up on my list. Yeah, is it your Your

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:25.759
<v Speaker 1>lab has the greatest connection of collection of passenger pigeon

1:12:26.240 --> 1:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>also not high up on my list for a species

1:12:28.960 --> 1:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we should bring back to life, but a species that

1:12:31.360 --> 1:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I think is fascinating, which is why we have this collection.

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I am so you're you're not gonning for to bring

1:12:38.280 --> 1:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>back a billion passenger pigeons. I don't think that's a

1:12:40.880 --> 1:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>good idea. I think that. You know, when you think

1:12:42.880 --> 1:12:45.479
<v Speaker 1>about bringing a species back to life, there are there

1:12:45.479 --> 1:12:48.599
<v Speaker 1>are technical hurdles, there are ethical hurdles, and there are

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:52.519
<v Speaker 1>ecological hurdles to doing this. In this case for passenger pigeon,

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there are technical hurdles. One can't clone birds. So the

1:12:55.840 --> 1:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>point where you have a living cell that you edited

1:12:58.600 --> 1:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that you then clone using regular cloning technologies. We can

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>do that with birds because we can't get to the

1:13:03.280 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>egg cells at the time in their reproductive cycle where

1:13:06.120 --> 1:13:09.599
<v Speaker 1>they're actually um ripe. They're ready to ready to have

1:13:09.640 --> 1:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that little magical thing that happens that reprograms the cells.

1:13:12.280 --> 1:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>We can't do that. So in order to clone or

1:13:14.880 --> 1:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>genetically modify birds, we need entirely new technology. And there

1:13:18.400 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>are some technologies that are under development, but they're really

1:13:20.600 --> 1:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not as far advanced as I think. So there's technical hurdle. Um. Ethically, uh,

1:13:24.960 --> 1:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>now with mammoths, there are many ethical hurdles. I mean,

1:13:28.280 --> 1:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I elephants in captivity don't do well. We need to

1:13:31.520 --> 1:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>know a lot more about how to you know, keep

1:13:34.920 --> 1:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>them psychologically and physically healthy if they're going to be

1:13:37.320 --> 1:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in captivity. Obviously this would be a captive breading experiment. Um.

1:13:40.360 --> 1:13:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I think elephants should be allowed to make more elephants

1:13:42.840 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than to be used in experiments to do this.

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of sort of moral

1:13:46.960 --> 1:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>ethical questions involved with and also they're very highly social creatures.

1:13:50.560 --> 1:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Why would you bring one back? You'd need to do

1:13:52.960 --> 1:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this over the course of you know, many many generations.

1:13:56.040 --> 1:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Elephants have fourteen to eighteen year um eighteen years generate

1:14:00.200 --> 1:14:02.479
<v Speaker 1>times in the wild. Generation times that's how old they

1:14:02.479 --> 1:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>are when they first have their first babies. This is

1:14:04.640 --> 1:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a long and I have a two year gestation, And

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>to your gestation, yeah, so there there are technical and

1:14:09.840 --> 1:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to my mind a lot of ethical problems with mammoths.

1:14:12.720 --> 1:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So has your feeling about this matured over time? I

1:14:17.160 --> 1:14:20.479
<v Speaker 1>think as I've learned more about the technical hurdles, I

1:14:20.479 --> 1:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>think I've thought more about Um. I don't know. I

1:14:25.960 --> 1:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>guess obviously your feelings about anything that you're learning a

1:14:28.400 --> 1:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lot about mature as you learn more about them. But

1:14:31.120 --> 1:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've ever really been in favor of

1:14:33.840 --> 1:14:37.679
<v Speaker 1>mammoths for for these ethical reasons. UM. What I try

1:14:37.720 --> 1:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to do when I think about what species might be

1:14:40.280 --> 1:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>good for this is I try to think through these questions. First,

1:14:43.920 --> 1:14:46.479
<v Speaker 1>what are the technical hurdles, what are the ethical hurdles,

1:14:46.479 --> 1:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>what are the ecological implications? And if we get to

1:14:49.080 --> 1:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>passenger pigeons, I mean, where would they live? But this

1:14:53.240 --> 1:14:57.479
<v Speaker 1>is a species that flocked in the billions, one big

1:14:57.520 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>flock of billions of individuals that would move through forests,

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just destroying forests in their way. We don't even have

1:15:04.520 --> 1:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>those forests anymore, so where would they go? Maybe they

1:15:07.400 --> 1:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to live in such big flocks. We have

1:15:09.360 --> 1:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>some genomic evidence now that suggests that they might have

1:15:12.080 --> 1:15:14.559
<v Speaker 1>been genetically adapted to living in large flock, So maybe

1:15:14.560 --> 1:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they did that. Yeah, that's that's been explained to me

1:15:17.320 --> 1:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that with some things like passenger pigeons, it would be

1:15:20.240 --> 1:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that you might have to have many to have any

1:15:26.640 --> 1:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because those mass groupings of birds trigger Yeah. Well, this

1:15:31.200 --> 1:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually fascination with passenger pigeons and why we've been

1:15:34.720 --> 1:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in studying their their d n A. It is

1:15:36.880 --> 1:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing to me that a bird could be that abundant,

1:15:40.000 --> 1:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and even with the amount of hunting and you know,

1:15:42.840 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>human use of these birds that went on, how did

1:15:45.360 --> 1:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they actually disappear? How is it that no tiny little

1:15:48.360 --> 1:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>pockets of these birds survived. There's no long autumn, right.

1:15:52.080 --> 1:15:54.679
<v Speaker 1>There must have been something about them that made them

1:15:54.720 --> 1:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>adapted to living in these large flocks, and that's why

1:15:57.360 --> 1:16:00.519
<v Speaker 1>we've been studying them. I'm I'm fascinated to one standard,

1:16:00.520 --> 1:16:03.519
<v Speaker 1>why how something could evolve to be adapted to living

1:16:03.520 --> 1:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in such big populations, and why that extinction would have happened.

1:16:06.360 --> 1:16:09.439
<v Speaker 1>And you say you have not found small pockets. No,

1:16:09.439 --> 1:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>no one ever found small pockets of passenger pigeons surviving.

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:16.479
<v Speaker 1>They in forty years, they went from millions to billions

1:16:16.479 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of individuals to extinct, So what are what are if

1:16:21.080 --> 1:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>those two are out? Like, what is a good candidate? Spees?

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that you like you professionally, like

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I I you don't separate plausibility with the ethics, right

1:16:32.880 --> 1:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>like you have the conversations at the same time, and

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:37.439
<v Speaker 1>there's no sense in doing this big ethical exploration of

1:16:37.560 --> 1:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>something that just isn't going to happen. So you're doing

1:16:40.080 --> 1:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>these in tandem. As you do them in tandem, considering

1:16:44.280 --> 1:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the technology and the ethics, where would be a place

1:16:48.080 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>that maybe not even in your generation, but in the

1:16:50.600 --> 1:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>next generation of people in your field, where would be

1:16:53.400 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a place where you might picture if you were able

1:16:56.160 --> 1:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to make an edict? Now, I think this is going

1:16:57.840 --> 1:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to disappoint you, but I think that this technology has

1:17:00.760 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>its most I'm already disappointed because you're not You're not

1:17:03.280 --> 1:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>shooting for You're not shooting for the stars here. I

1:17:06.760 --> 1:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think this technology has the most potential as a tool

1:17:09.960 --> 1:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for conserving species, preserving species that are still alive today.

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that we should think about this technology, and

1:17:17.160 --> 1:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously people like this sort of spectacular nature of thinking

1:17:20.080 --> 1:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>about bringing things that are extinct back to life. But

1:17:22.280 --> 1:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we should think about how we might use DNA sequences

1:17:25.760 --> 1:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>from individuals from the same or related species that used

1:17:28.920 --> 1:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to be alive to increase the diversity decrease vulnerability of

1:17:33.840 --> 1:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>species that are in danger of going extinct today. And

1:17:35.960 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>whether that means wooly rhinos or kangaroo rats or blackfooted ferrets,

1:17:40.520 --> 1:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, right but I I what I worry

1:17:43.320 --> 1:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>about is that the kind of spectacular nature of thinking

1:17:47.680 --> 1:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about bringing extinct species back might make people less likely

1:17:53.920 --> 1:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to think about some of the real benefits of this technology.

1:17:56.560 --> 1:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Could have two species that are still alive. There's you

1:17:58.960 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>know this, this thoughts among conservation groups that um, this

1:18:04.120 --> 1:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>excitement about the extinction is taking away resources that would

1:18:07.880 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>otherwise go to protecting species that are alive. And and

1:18:10.479 --> 1:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's true. Um. I don't think that

1:18:14.000 --> 1:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>people who care about preserving polar bears or care about

1:18:18.080 --> 1:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>preserving woodpeckers are all of a sudden going to stop

1:18:21.439 --> 1:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>caring about that because some far off possibility of bringing

1:18:24.160 --> 1:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>mammoths back to life might be there. The money thing

1:18:26.520 --> 1:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>seems real unless you feel that no money would really

1:18:29.160 --> 1:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was headed in one direction and goes off in a

1:18:31.840 --> 1:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>different direction. I think that where the extinction is right now,

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which is in this let's see how the mammoth genome looks,

1:18:39.320 --> 1:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or let's see that Any money that goes into that

1:18:41.840 --> 1:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is going to be new money. It's gonna be it.

1:18:44.240 --> 1:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't going to the Eastern Bluebird Society now, but

1:18:47.439 --> 1:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you know later if if you actually have an animal,

1:18:51.240 --> 1:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you would need to figure out how to regulate it,

1:18:54.479 --> 1:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>how to rear it, where it goes, and that I

1:18:56.720 --> 1:18:59.519
<v Speaker 1>think would come into conflict with some of the money

1:18:59.560 --> 1:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>that's going into conservation UM, which is why I think

1:19:02.479 --> 1:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that we need to have more realistic conversations about where

1:19:07.320 --> 1:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this technology can go and bring people together to think

1:19:09.960 --> 1:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>about how we might develop this technology as a new

1:19:14.479 --> 1:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>weapon in what I really feel should be a growing

1:19:17.240 --> 1:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>arsenal in ways that we are thinking about combating UM

1:19:21.400 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the extinctions that are happening today, the crises that of

1:19:25.080 --> 1:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>biodiversity loss that are real UM where wildlife is disappearing,

1:19:29.760 --> 1:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and what can we do what what? How can we

1:19:32.920 --> 1:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>think about modern technologies in a way that is conducive

1:19:35.960 --> 1:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to collaboration with people who are interested in conservation rather

1:19:38.840 --> 1:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>than conflict. I think some of the more spectacle also

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this this fear that there's a lot of money

1:19:44.360 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>going to the extinction, which is not true. I know

1:19:49.000 --> 1:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not true. I know that there are some people

1:19:52.680 --> 1:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who care very much about particular species who have been

1:19:55.720 --> 1:19:57.559
<v Speaker 1>who have been generous in thinking about so there are

1:19:57.560 --> 1:20:00.479
<v Speaker 1>people who care about prairie chickens, for example, and are

1:20:00.560 --> 1:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>very interested in helping to UM to think about ways

1:20:03.960 --> 1:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that we can use this technology to increase diversity and

1:20:06.200 --> 1:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the robustness of prairie chickens. UM including maybe thinking about

1:20:10.120 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the heathen, which is a prairie chicken that

1:20:14.120 --> 1:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>used to live on Martha's vineyard, and can we find

1:20:16.439 --> 1:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>out the differences between heath hens and other species and

1:20:19.160 --> 1:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe think about using this as a technology to bring

1:20:21.280 --> 1:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>heathens back. And there have been some people who have

1:20:22.760 --> 1:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>been generous and donating small amounts of money to do

1:20:25.120 --> 1:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>sequencing of heathen remains and then some analyzes to figure

1:20:28.320 --> 1:20:32.839
<v Speaker 1>out what we might do there UM the mammoth funding stuff. UM.

1:20:32.880 --> 1:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, George Church is doing a lot of that

1:20:34.920 --> 1:20:37.599
<v Speaker 1>work at his lab and Harvard. He might have some

1:20:38.080 --> 1:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>UM specific donors who have been given him money to

1:20:40.360 --> 1:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>do that. I'm not sure there's zero public funding going

1:20:43.479 --> 1:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to this zero. So that's a checkable big number. Yes. Um.

1:20:51.479 --> 1:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think when I assume my book, I

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>actually looked at places like World Wildlife Fund and conservation

1:20:56.400 --> 1:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>organizations and to figure out exactly how much money had

1:20:58.720 --> 1:21:01.599
<v Speaker 1>gone into de extinction projects, and the number when I

1:21:01.600 --> 1:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>was writing this book was it was zero. So so

1:21:05.520 --> 1:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>let me throw two hypotheticals that you if you don't,

1:21:07.720 --> 1:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can pick which one you like, but I'm

1:21:10.000 --> 1:21:12.599
<v Speaker 1>talk in what you're talking about with that you would

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>prevent the technology would be applicable in preventing extinctions, what

1:21:18.080 --> 1:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>might be imminent extinctions. And I'll throw two cases at you,

1:21:21.479 --> 1:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>so one you have. We spent a long time having

1:21:24.800 --> 1:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with someone about Mexican the Mexican gray wolf.

1:21:28.080 --> 1:21:31.599
<v Speaker 1>Now they were down to seven all in captivity. They've

1:21:31.600 --> 1:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>got them up to around a hundred living in the wild.

1:21:36.080 --> 1:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>They're the barrier to recovery is that they're inconvenient to

1:21:42.120 --> 1:21:45.519
<v Speaker 1>have around. Okay, that's it's like, it's not a habitat issue,

1:21:46.080 --> 1:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not an animal issue. It's just people don't like

1:21:49.160 --> 1:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>predators that they're inconvenient. Right, I don't know how to

1:21:53.680 --> 1:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>quite break it. Out, But fifty of that fifty of

1:21:57.240 --> 1:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the inconvenience argument comes from hunters who want more dear

1:22:01.840 --> 1:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and out, particularly out on the ground that they can

1:22:04.880 --> 1:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>hunt and eat and enjoy. And again I'm not sure

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on the percentage is livestock producers who don't these wolves

1:22:12.960 --> 1:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>are affecting their ability to make a living. Let's say, like,

1:22:18.200 --> 1:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>would it be the kind of thing you're talking about,

1:22:20.479 --> 1:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>could you ever imagine that you would make a gray

1:22:24.400 --> 1:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>wolf that doesn't eat? No, no, let's rule that out

1:22:29.280 --> 1:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>manipulated gray wolf that you would find in them? Like

1:22:32.880 --> 1:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what is it about lives cattle? That's you can pick

1:22:37.920 --> 1:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>from that one or you can pick from this one.

1:22:40.360 --> 1:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Why are why is the greater sage grouse? So per

1:22:46.080 --> 1:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>snickitty about where it lives? Which of those is better?

1:22:50.720 --> 1:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna look at some way to explore like

1:22:53.080 --> 1:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about with helping species, because we have

1:22:55.400 --> 1:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>two species sage grouse and the reason, well, just because behavior.

1:23:01.160 --> 1:23:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Trying to to understand the behavior of a predator that's

1:23:04.479 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to be one gene or ten genes or

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>hunter genes. This is going to be a gene environment,

1:23:09.880 --> 1:23:13.599
<v Speaker 1>heredity interaction thing that's going to be extremely difficult to understand,

1:23:13.960 --> 1:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so you're never going to suss out like why do

1:23:15.720 --> 1:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>these things? But you might be able to do experiments

1:23:19.439 --> 1:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with sage grouse that we're able to identify individuals that

1:23:23.320 --> 1:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>were capable of living in different habitats um, and and

1:23:26.520 --> 1:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>then you could hone in on whatever genes are associated

1:23:29.320 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>with the why is this? Why is this one? Okay?

1:23:31.640 --> 1:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>With being with breeding, with nesting next to an oil rig, Yeah,

1:23:36.240 --> 1:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and just as happy and productive. So that would be

1:23:39.600 --> 1:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not easy, right because you're still talking about behavior

1:23:42.439 --> 1:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're still talking, but there are other things about

1:23:44.800 --> 1:23:47.559
<v Speaker 1>stage grouse. They have shorter generation times, it's an easier

1:23:47.560 --> 1:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>thing to think about. Um, you're talking about nesting habitat preference,

1:23:51.160 --> 1:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>which is something that you could select for. You could

1:23:53.000 --> 1:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>do artificial selection for individuals that want to nest in

1:23:55.880 --> 1:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>particular places. Whereas trying to teach a wolf not to

1:23:59.760 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>be a wolf. That's a tough one, right. So is

1:24:03.479 --> 1:24:05.599
<v Speaker 1>there a one like I gave you two? Is there

1:24:05.640 --> 1:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>one that you really love, like a scenario that you

1:24:08.160 --> 1:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>think is like right for exploration? I you know, I

1:24:11.720 --> 1:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>would like a low hanging fruit um, like the black

1:24:16.400 --> 1:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>footed ferret, so is there Yeah, so something where there's

1:24:20.840 --> 1:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a particular trait that you can hone in on that's

1:24:23.080 --> 1:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not caused by too many different genes that is missing

1:24:26.120 --> 1:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in a population, or that one population has but another

1:24:28.880 --> 1:24:30.479
<v Speaker 1>one doesn't, and that would be like that would be

1:24:30.520 --> 1:24:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the disease resistance. Yeah. So, well this isn't a wildlife question,

1:24:33.520 --> 1:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of easier to get your get your

1:24:36.000 --> 1:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>wrap your head around. Um, there are we know that

1:24:39.479 --> 1:24:43.519
<v Speaker 1>oceans are becoming more cidic, and if you could identify

1:24:43.560 --> 1:24:45.759
<v Speaker 1>populations of fish and there there was a paper recently

1:24:45.760 --> 1:24:48.559
<v Speaker 1>where they identified a picular population of particular species of

1:24:48.600 --> 1:24:51.559
<v Speaker 1>fish that was capable of surviving and producing more offspring

1:24:51.640 --> 1:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in an environment of higher acidity than other populations. If

1:24:55.000 --> 1:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you could figure out what genes cause that, you could

1:24:57.040 --> 1:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>move those genes into other fish, then maybe we would

1:25:00.240 --> 1:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have a way of of safeguarding fish against some of

1:25:02.960 --> 1:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the acidity increases happening in the oceans while we try

1:25:05.479 --> 1:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to figure out a way to stop that as well.

1:25:07.360 --> 1:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying we should do this instead. This is important,

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:12.599
<v Speaker 1>but you know these changes, some of these anthrogenic changes

1:25:12.640 --> 1:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to our our climate are happening too quickly for evolution

1:25:15.479 --> 1:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to sort it out on its own, and if there

1:25:17.840 --> 1:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>are these scenarios where we could find genes and move

1:25:20.160 --> 1:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>them around. Another thing is heat tolerance and corals. So

1:25:23.120 --> 1:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>if you could find corals that are able to survive

1:25:25.240 --> 1:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and higher temperature environments, and you could figure out what

1:25:27.760 --> 1:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>genes are associated with that, could you then move those

1:25:30.000 --> 1:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>genes into different species of corals so we could stop

1:25:32.280 --> 1:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all the corals from dying. These are hard, like probably

1:25:36.960 --> 1:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>really hard, maybe impossible questions to answer, but there are

1:25:40.120 --> 1:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>things where you can imagine targeting coming up with a

1:25:43.640 --> 1:25:46.519
<v Speaker 1>way of figuring it out. Now, you know, there's, as

1:25:46.600 --> 1:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, there's little, very little money going into this

1:25:49.360 --> 1:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, public funding these days, we only like

1:25:52.080 --> 1:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to fund things that we know are going to work,

1:25:53.680 --> 1:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>which mostly means you have to already have done the

1:25:55.720 --> 1:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>experiments using your own money in order to do it,

1:25:59.280 --> 1:26:01.599
<v Speaker 1>or it has to have immediate impact on human health.

1:26:01.880 --> 1:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And there has as yet to be a recognition enough

1:26:05.000 --> 1:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of a recognition of how important healthy, diverse habitats are

1:26:09.439 --> 1:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to maintaining healthy humans. Um but this is something that

1:26:13.000 --> 1:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to become more and more apparent. Hopefully,

1:26:15.960 --> 1:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hold on, you're saying that we're like connected to the

1:26:17.920 --> 1:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>natural world. Um. Yeah, don't don't tell Congress, but tell them.

1:26:24.479 --> 1:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Actually A questions. Two questions. Question number one, Um, you're

1:26:32.400 --> 1:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sensitive about Uh, you're sensitive about the idea that people

1:26:38.920 --> 1:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>would accuse people in your field of promoting this idea

1:26:42.880 --> 1:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that we could just say screw it, will fix it later. Yeah,

1:26:46.800 --> 1:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because we can't. We cannot fix it. Once something is gone,

1:26:52.280 --> 1:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it is gone. Even if we create proxies of that

1:26:55.200 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>thing so that we can try to have other things

1:26:57.840 --> 1:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>not disappear, it's not the same thing as say, eavning

1:27:00.240 --> 1:27:04.519
<v Speaker 1>it in the first place. And you know that I

1:27:04.560 --> 1:27:08.599
<v Speaker 1>don't think that you know, people have made that argument

1:27:08.600 --> 1:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to me before. I tend to be more of an

1:27:10.160 --> 1:27:13.839
<v Speaker 1>optimist than that. I think that it thinks that assumes

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two things about people that are both kind of awful. Um.

1:27:18.400 --> 1:27:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Actually one of them maybe I'm not being too optimistic

1:27:21.600 --> 1:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>about I think the first thing is it assumes is

1:27:23.360 --> 1:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that people in general care about extinction. Um. And I

1:27:29.240 --> 1:27:32.400
<v Speaker 1>think maybe they don't. I think maybe most people, inasmuch

1:27:32.439 --> 1:27:35.719
<v Speaker 1>as it doesn't actually affect them personally, don't care. And

1:27:36.400 --> 1:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe by talking about things that are extinct and what

1:27:40.000 --> 1:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're missing we can get more people to actually care

1:27:42.040 --> 1:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about things going extinct in the first place. Will it

1:27:45.680 --> 1:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>make these people feel more comfortable about stuff going extinct? Maybe,

1:27:49.280 --> 1:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is something we have to work against by

1:27:51.720 --> 1:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>not letting this report that mommoths are going to be

1:27:55.000 --> 1:27:57.559
<v Speaker 1>cloned in two years continue to go through the news

1:27:57.560 --> 1:28:00.599
<v Speaker 1>cycle because they're not. We can never bring a mammoth back,

1:28:00.640 --> 1:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's really important that we don't falsely say that

1:28:04.840 --> 1:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we can, because this or what I could see happening,

1:28:08.439 --> 1:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>is that someone creates a hairy elephant and he's in

1:28:12.479 --> 1:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a part and then all of a sudden there's a

1:28:14.320 --> 1:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>story about how you know, however they want to pitch

1:28:16.800 --> 1:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at that time, and we'll go, oh, yes, that might

1:28:19.920 --> 1:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be the thing that happens. First, we're a very far

1:28:22.040 --> 1:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>away away from from creating any sort of manipulated elephants.

1:28:25.640 --> 1:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We can't we can't actually do any of that reproductive

1:28:27.800 --> 1:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>technology for elephants yet. So there's you know, there's a

1:28:30.360 --> 1:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of technical stuff that we didn't talk about that's

1:28:32.720 --> 1:28:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in the in between you know, today and having edited

1:28:35.760 --> 1:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Mammoth's Mammoth's Back. But the other thing that it assumes

1:28:39.439 --> 1:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is that people who do care about extinction, people like

1:28:42.000 --> 1:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>me and hopefully people like you and people listening to

1:28:44.840 --> 1:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, are all of a sudden not going to

1:28:47.840 --> 1:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do so because some far off crazy thing happens and

1:28:51.439 --> 1:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a mammoth like thing comes back. I think people are

1:28:54.040 --> 1:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>still going to care about losing the animals that are

1:28:56.280 --> 1:28:59.559
<v Speaker 1>in their backyard that they care about having there, and

1:28:59.600 --> 1:29:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that like some idea that maybe someday in the future

1:29:02.479 --> 1:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>someone might be able to bring them back, won't stop

1:29:04.240 --> 1:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>them from worrying that they're not going to be there

1:29:06.000 --> 1:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>next week or in ten years or when their kids

1:29:09.200 --> 1:29:11.519
<v Speaker 1>want to go out and and hunt or play with

1:29:11.520 --> 1:29:13.599
<v Speaker 1>these animals that are in the backyard. I think people

1:29:13.600 --> 1:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>who care will continue to care. I hope that people

1:29:17.120 --> 1:29:20.439
<v Speaker 1>who don't care will care even less. And that's that's

1:29:20.439 --> 1:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the fear well sort of the argument. Like someone with

1:29:22.600 --> 1:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a big trust fund right doesn't develop a sort of

1:29:26.040 --> 1:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>aggressiveness in an opportunistic sense because they always know that

1:29:30.320 --> 1:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>no matter what they do, they're going to be okay

1:29:32.960 --> 1:29:35.759
<v Speaker 1>down the road. But here's my here's my second last question.

1:29:36.200 --> 1:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like the that the people in I

1:29:40.400 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to put it, like your peers, what

1:29:42.120 --> 1:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>do you call your community. That's like, it's not your community.

1:29:44.120 --> 1:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Who are the you know, my peers, my colleague, Yeah,

1:29:47.280 --> 1:29:50.519
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues who who deal in this world? How much

1:29:50.560 --> 1:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are you guys? Sort of um, like a jockey looking

1:29:54.080 --> 1:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for a horse. Okay. So obviously it was like a

1:29:59.479 --> 1:30:03.439
<v Speaker 1>love of the technology that drew many of many of

1:30:03.479 --> 1:30:06.439
<v Speaker 1>your peers into this field. Have you had to try

1:30:06.479 --> 1:30:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to become a little bit elastic in how you apply

1:30:10.600 --> 1:30:13.559
<v Speaker 1>it or talk about applying it in order to make

1:30:13.600 --> 1:30:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it palatable like this to sort of steer the conversation about,

1:30:18.320 --> 1:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing god. As you pointed out a criticism

1:30:21.439 --> 1:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in your book that that you found that it's advantageous

1:30:24.920 --> 1:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to like turn the technology towards a discussion about de

1:30:30.320 --> 1:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>extinction or saving nearly extinct species, because it just is

1:30:34.640 --> 1:30:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a good way to sell it. I think that, um,

1:30:37.479 --> 1:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a big group of people and were

1:30:39.120 --> 1:30:42.479
<v Speaker 1>actually a UM, we have a big community and a

1:30:42.520 --> 1:30:44.639
<v Speaker 1>list serve and it's very active and people are talking

1:30:44.640 --> 1:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about people have different motivations for being interested in this,

1:30:47.280 --> 1:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and there are some people who really want to bring

1:30:49.280 --> 1:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a particular species back, Like there's the group in the

1:30:51.800 --> 1:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Netherlands that want the ROCs, which is the ancestor of

1:30:54.560 --> 1:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic cattle. They want to bring this back and are

1:30:56.880 --> 1:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to do this by breeding together different breeds of

1:31:00.040 --> 1:31:03.439
<v Speaker 1>all that have different characteristics of the ancestor to eventually

1:31:03.439 --> 1:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>come up with some new breed that has, you know,

1:31:05.920 --> 1:31:10.479
<v Speaker 1>a cluster of characteristics. Their work was initiated by the

1:31:10.600 --> 1:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>desire to see like by the desire to make the orcs,

1:31:15.439 --> 1:31:17.879
<v Speaker 1>because they want to be able to have this ORACX

1:31:18.040 --> 1:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in these habitats that they're trying to rewild. And so

1:31:22.160 --> 1:31:25.519
<v Speaker 1>they think that in order to bring um wildlife back

1:31:25.560 --> 1:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to these parts of Europe that where all all the

1:31:27.680 --> 1:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>trees were cut down and went to pasture, it said,

1:31:29.520 --> 1:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they need to have some of these animals back because

1:31:31.120 --> 1:31:33.599
<v Speaker 1>they want to re establish it. And so their desire

1:31:33.720 --> 1:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is to see wildlife in its natural state and they

1:31:36.960 --> 1:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think in order to do that, they need to bring

1:31:39.000 --> 1:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>back something that is like an orox. And so that's

1:31:42.160 --> 1:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what's motivating that there's a group in Australia that there's

1:31:45.240 --> 1:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there's like the wildlife to biochem path Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:31:49.040 --> 1:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, there are people who are interested in

1:31:50.520 --> 1:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>gastric brooding frogs that people who are interested in MOA's

1:31:53.000 --> 1:31:55.439
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of MOA's there are you know, George

1:31:55.479 --> 1:31:57.479
<v Speaker 1>is interested in using this technology to come up with

1:31:57.479 --> 1:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ways to cure um. I think it's her peace in

1:32:00.760 --> 1:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>elephants and and you know other things. And also then

1:32:04.200 --> 1:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>there's the Zimovs who really want to to re establish

1:32:07.120 --> 1:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>tundra in Siberia. So I would say that the motivations

1:32:10.520 --> 1:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for this range from conservation to ecological to just really

1:32:15.040 --> 1:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>being astounded and impressed by the technology, to really wanting

1:32:18.040 --> 1:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring a particular species back. And obviously people are

1:32:21.840 --> 1:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>flexible in the way that they talk about this, and

1:32:23.880 --> 1:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as people learn more about different motivations and different opportunities

1:32:27.479 --> 1:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and different technical and ethical ecological challenges, we change the

1:32:31.800 --> 1:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>way we are thinking about these things. We grow, we

1:32:33.960 --> 1:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>learn and adapt, and that's that's not a bad thing. No,

1:32:37.880 --> 1:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like you're and as you pointed out,

1:32:39.880 --> 1:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you're like chasing the money because right

1:32:41.840 --> 1:32:44.639
<v Speaker 1>now there isn't any money change. It's not like you're

1:32:44.640 --> 1:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to like like human longevity. I imagine there's a

1:32:47.640 --> 1:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>budget there. In fact, if anyone would like to donate, Yeah, no,

1:32:54.120 --> 1:32:58.799
<v Speaker 1>if we were studying aging or you know, human diseases.

1:32:58.840 --> 1:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Then there's there's pockets and money out there for that.

1:33:00.800 --> 1:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But as people who are involved with conservation, no, there's

1:33:03.600 --> 1:33:06.559
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough money going around in conservation. I don't

1:33:06.680 --> 1:33:09.799
<v Speaker 1>want to compete with people who are trying to conserve

1:33:09.840 --> 1:33:12.519
<v Speaker 1>species um that are alive today. What I'd like to

1:33:12.560 --> 1:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>do is collaborate with them. I'd like to create opportunities

1:33:16.600 --> 1:33:20.519
<v Speaker 1>for us to work together so that our motivations, my

1:33:20.600 --> 1:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>desire to see this technology developed so that it can

1:33:23.240 --> 1:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be a useful tool for conservation, happens along with someone

1:33:27.000 --> 1:33:29.519
<v Speaker 1>who's really trying to conserve a particular species. And in

1:33:29.520 --> 1:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that way, I guess I am kind of a jockey

1:33:32.040 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for a horse. I want to find people who

1:33:35.400 --> 1:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have a question, a problem that they're trying to solve

1:33:38.560 --> 1:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that this technology might help to solve, and I want

1:33:42.080 --> 1:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to work with them, not against them, because I do

1:33:45.479 --> 1:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>see that there's tremendous potential in this technology as long

1:33:48.800 --> 1:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as we're not too scared of it to try it

1:33:52.560 --> 1:33:56.559
<v Speaker 1>real quick. Um. So your own book, uh, Beth Shapiro,

1:33:56.960 --> 1:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>How to Clone a Mammoth The Science of de Extinction. Um?

1:34:00.760 --> 1:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Where else might people go if they want to if

1:34:03.080 --> 1:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they're curious about this, are there's some good There's lots

1:34:06.040 --> 1:34:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of videos on YouTube. There is UM. There was an

1:34:08.240 --> 1:34:11.479
<v Speaker 1>event that's our Community de Extinction community held at National

1:34:11.560 --> 1:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Geographic several years ago that you can find a ted

1:34:14.160 --> 1:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>x D extinction. So there's lots of different talks from

1:34:16.920 --> 1:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ethicists and conservation biologists, both for and against UM some

1:34:20.640 --> 1:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of the technology, and there is a bit out at

1:34:22.320 --> 1:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a date now, but it's a nice place to start,

1:34:24.120 --> 1:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a good resource for finding out about the way that

1:34:26.439 --> 1:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking about this. Now is your book current? Yeah, yep.

1:34:31.439 --> 1:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The technology moves slowly. All right, Well, thanks so much

1:34:35.439 --> 1:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for talking to this man. This is great stuff. And yeah,

1:34:39.080 --> 1:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I want I want to schedule another talk for one

1:34:41.880 --> 1:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>decade from now. Okay, I'll put it on my calendar. Yeah,

1:34:46.160 --> 1:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and then and we'll we'll send up come up with

1:34:48.120 --> 1:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the funding to have you for a whole day. I

1:34:50.080 --> 1:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like we could have talked a lot longer. Thank you,

1:34:53.680 --> 1:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Thank you asssssssssssssssssssssss