WEBVTT - Marriott International CEO on Leading at a Difficult Time

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News, Jay and Jay's Vaccine. We

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>knew it was coming. It's another tool in the toolbox

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to fighting COVID nineteen. Yeah, it's those tools that we

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>need to get us on the other side of this pandemic.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And joining us now is Dr David Levy, Chief Executive

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Officer of Health. He joins us on the phone right

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>here from New York. Eh is a healthcare provider, uh In.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Dr Levy's a public health expert in veteran epidemiologist. Hey,

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Dr Leviy, thanks so much for joining us today. Um,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing. I'm doing great and thanks for

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>having me back. So what do you make of the

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Jane Jane us. It is great news. It's another vaccine,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>another tool, and it's going to be widely available in

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. And I think it's fantastic.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>What's highly effective and uh, we're all looking forward to us.

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So you still considered highly effective even though it's not

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as effective as the MR and A vaccines from moderna

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Advisor by on Tech, it is absolutely as effective as

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in preventing hospitalizations and deaths. And that's what this epidemic

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is about. Reducing That's what the treatment for the epidemics

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>should be, namely reducing lethality. And it's as good as

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>any of the other two. Well, and so Tim and

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I Dr Leev if I can interrupt for a second,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Like Tim and I were joking that we don't go

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to Dwyane red and I get the flu vaccine and

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what's the efficacy? I mean, what is considered

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the range of a really effective vaccine. Well, it all

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>depends what you're immunizing for and so you have to

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>start there. And one of the issues, uh, with this

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>particular virus is that it is highly or much more lethal,

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and people over sixty five and those people with comorbidities

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that relate to lifestyle like diabetes, hypertension and the like.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>And if you can, in fact have a vaccine that's

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>targeted specifically at reducing hospitalization and death in those people,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you've essentially dropped the lethality the epidemic potentially even lower

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>than the lethality of a flu epidemic. So this is

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a really good piece of news. Quite candidly, Hey, how's

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the messaging been in general about the vaccine, because I've

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>been having this debate with some friends recently because we've

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>heard so much If you get the vaccine, don't change

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>your behavior, keep wearing a mask, And I wonder what

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that does to the way that people think about how

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get through this pandemic, And just what

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is the point of getting the vaccine if you can't

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>change your behavior. Well, you know, that's a great question.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>The or is you want to continue your social distancing,

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>your mask wearing behavior as long as the virus is

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>endemic in the community. And that's what herd immunity is about.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not about eliminating the disease completely. It's about reducing

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the natural reducing of coming to a level of immunity

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>whereby there's no natural community spread. And as we get

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to a point where there's no natural community spread and

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we can now basically address and contain any focal outbreak,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>we can gradually loosen social distancing, mask wearing and the like.

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And so it really depends, frankly, at what level the

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>community is with respect to immunity and how soon they

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>get to a situation where you're just going to have

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the sporadic and fairly well contained, smaller outbreaks. By the way,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly the same thing with any other kind of

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>infectious disease outbreak like the flu or others. All Right,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's good to know. I'm curious what you

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are seeing within your employee base, in within the health

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>care system about health care employees. Um, is everybody increasingly

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>getting more comfortable though about taking the vaccine and getting

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine? Well, um, look, you hear the same reticence

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that you have that we've we've all heard about getting

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, in particular certain segments of the population that

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>have more mistrust for the vaccine. And I get it,

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and I understand it, But but I have kind of

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like a half cup full point of view on that,

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, this is a brand new technology,

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly two m RNA vaccines, completely new, completely new science,

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, at worst you have seventy of the

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>people who say that they're going to get it right

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate. I mean, that's an early adoption

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>factor of se which any CEO producing any product would

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>be thrilled to have. You know, Unfortunately, when we started

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>down this path, you know, we forgot about the marketing

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and distribution that we probably should have been do last

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>summer to get people up to a level of comfort.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, you know, as you probably are

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>education right, not even just marketing, but education. Well, I

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you it's not even going to be

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>education in my view in the future. You're you're now

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing around the world people talking about vaccine passes and

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the ability to travel from country to country. Uh, the

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>EU was talking about this tomorrow. I think Israel and

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Greece have already gone into a pact. We've seen airline

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the airline industry really talk about this. The truth is,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>as we learn to live with COVID, we won't eliminate

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>COVID will be living with COVID like we live with influenza.

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>People are going to need to have proof that they're immunized.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And I will tell you if those people want to

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>get who are reticent to be immunized, uh, stay that way.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They won't be able to get back to a normal life.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They won't be able to get into a large venue

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like a Madison Square gardener, maybe a Broadway show, or

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a restaurant. They won't be able to travel to

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a country where their parents may live unless they can

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>prove that they're immune. And that's what's going to be

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>driving people to almost full uh population. Immunization is really

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to get your life back to normal, you're gonna be

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be able to have to show proof that

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you have indeed been immunized by one of

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines that have been approved. You know, it's a point,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a practical reality, A point that that that our colleague

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Drew Armstrong, SENIORIT for Healthcare, made on Quick Take this morning,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>was that early on in the vaccination process, we saw

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people who were reticent about getting vaccines or hesitant to

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine once they saw people in their orbits

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>start to get them that went away, they started to

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get them. So this is happening in real time. One

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thing we want to ask you, Dr Levy, is something

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that came in to us from one of our our

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter followers and said, messenger, RNA changes your DNA. So

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in his book, the JJ and vaccine, a regular vaccine

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>is better than uh, either the Maderna or Fiser vaccine.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to that. I have never heard that.

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what he's talking about or to

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>what he's referencing. mRNA is basically just the code against

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>which the cells are, you know, producing the antibodies. That

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do fundamentally anything to a human being, to your

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>own DNA, I just I just don't know of any

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>evidence or anything to substantiate that comment. But I think

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it does speak to the reticence that people have when

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to you know, quote unquote new technology. Right,

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you were talking about this idea that having a

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>new product that has seventy percent adoption is really good,

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but there are still people who are like, hey, wait

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a second, I want to see something different. I completely

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I mean, this is the whole issue

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of a scary notion of brand new technology.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We're creating m RNA, we're putting in the body. It

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds like DNA. And that's why uh rod uh. You know,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>campaign ought to be introduced, you know, educates the public

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, fairly clear and easy to understand way

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>about what exactly it is that this new science has discovered.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think that this is just

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the begin thing. I think many new vaccines in the

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>future are going to be adopting this new technology. It's safe,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's effective, and it's and it's a great advance

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for humankind. And uh, it's a kudos to all those

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>people who and all those biologists who who have invented it.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just a wonderful thing. It's a wonderful

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>advance for science and for humanity. So I think it's

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>just a bad education quite translate and to be fair

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>new but also it's a it's not something that they've

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>just developed overnight. They've been working on it for years.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, for years for other reasons and for other reasons,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the funding and the acceleration that that

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>coincide together, you know, with the cod with the coronavirus

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic really has pushed this thing over the goal line.

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there are a lot of great benefits

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>from this. All right, So when you look forward, what

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>do you see as kind of our biggest obstacles still

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in getting us to a post COVID world. You know,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think first of all is continuing the immunization campaign

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and making sure this is a eye chain is great,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think that we're throwing the kitchen sink at that,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and people just have to keep on moving at that. Uh.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the idea of variance is always a wild

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>card out there, but the surest prevention for new variance

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is the reduction of replication and new human beings who

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have been infected. And the best way still at that

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is to maximize immunization. So you know, keep on moving

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>very very hard at that. In the meantime, all of

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the other things need to be really stringent to social distancing,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the masking and the like, And ultimately, I think as

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we get back to a more normal situation, we'll be

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>able to start relaxing some of those constraints. But really

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>right now is to move hard and fast at immunization

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in this country as much as possible. Hey, Dr Leady,

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can you talk a little bit about the alarming surge

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in mental health that we've seen anxiety, depression, burnout, and stress.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're seeing it everywhere. Yeah, so this is

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a big problem. We see it in our patients, we

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>see it in many of the employees of of of

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>all of our clients. And you know, this has been

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going on now for a year, and you know, we've

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>now been talking about how to bring people safely back

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>to work, and we find that it's people have gotten

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>into this grind of this is the way life is

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be and always going to be, and it's

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be difficult to get people into uh kind

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of a new way of thinking of getting them out

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of that rut and getting them back into a more

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>normal and socially engaged life. I think that's going to

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be one of the biggest challenges for over the next

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>six months. It's not that the people who want to

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to jump out and come back to work.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>They're sure there's lots of people like me who want

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 1>to do that, but there are a lot of people

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>who have been really stuck in this rut with an

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of depression. Uh, suicidal ideation, as you know,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very big problem. We're beefing up for all.

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Employers are beefing up support around mental health. We're looking

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>closely at reaching reaching out throughhealth and the like to

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>help support employees. But I think that that's going to

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be one of the biggest barriers. Yeah, but I have

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to say once we get through it, once we start

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to have to bring back to normal, I think normal

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>can't wait. Dr David Levy, thank you so much, CEO

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at e H E Health. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic from

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Bloomberg Business We had a great cover story

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>back in July. It was about the COVID vaccine front runner.

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>At the time, it was the work Astra Zeneca and

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the University of Oxford was doing, Tim, And since then

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we know that the path forward for Astra's vaccine it

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't been a straight one. Yeah. We've been hearing

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Johnson and Johnson, Moderna and of course

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Fiser in BioNTech, but Astra Zeneca not so much. Right,

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got an update on them in Bloomberg Business Week

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at some of the new data that

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>the company hopes can kind of get its vaccine back

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on track. Reporting for the magazine, Bloomberg News healthcare reporter

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>James Patton on the phone, Peyton on the phone in London,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>along with Bloomberg Business Week editor Jiell Webber on the

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>access line in Brooklyn. James Peyton story, feel like it's

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>such an important one to kind of understand what's been

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going on at Astra. Yeah, that's right. And you know,

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously here in America, Astra hasn't figured into the conversation

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>quite as much, but it is one that's really important

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and elsewhere in the world, and it we

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it still has potential and we're about to

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>see some results from a US trial that may clear

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>up some of the confusion. That it's a big may

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>because the confusion has led to a backlash in Europe.

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of where the story uh that James

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>and others uh rope for this issue of the magazine began. So, James,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>what did you guys learn what's been the continent's response

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to Astra's rollout. Yeah, we'll get to be with you.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean We're hearing reports out of Europe in places

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like Italy and Germany and elsewhere of health workers and others,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>UM pushing back on this vaccine basically perceiving it to

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be less effective in some way or you know, cause

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for concern when it comes to possible side effects. And

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>there are um, you know, local anecdotes I guess you

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>could call them circulating of health workers experiencing some bad

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>reactions to the vaccine. UM. Now you know, the company

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>says these are all consistent with what has been observed

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in uh some participants in clinical trials. UM. But that

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>clearly hasn't held matters UM for you know, Astroseneca and

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Oxford its partner, And there's been a lack of data

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>on the effectiveness in older adults. UM. You know, the

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>vaccine was given the green light for all adults by

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the European regulator, the equivalent to the FDA out here. UM,

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but at least ten EU countries haven't cleared it for

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>people over sixty five due to that insufficient evidence. So uh,

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know in some places, I think last we checked

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, UM, only something like of the roughly one

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>point five million astroid doses that have been delivered to

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>the country, has actually been injected, uh into arms. And

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's early days, but obviously that doesn't that doesn't bode well,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>so the company is trying to turn that around. Governments

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>also realized they'll need to rely on this vaccine to

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>immunize a large part of the population. So what do

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we know about how effective it is, James, Because as

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you and your colleagues right, since Astro and Oxford announced

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>their initial results last year, data on the vaccines effectiveness

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in preventing symptophatic symptomatic infection have ranged from sixty and

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that's because of dosing amounts and regiments in the trial,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>different ones exactly, And that is one of the key

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>issues that revolves around affectiveness. And you know you mentioned

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the other vaccines, Visor's, Maderna's. Um. You know, all the

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>companies say over and over again, this isn't a race.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not a race. But in this case, um,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it turned out to be a race in

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>many ways. Uh. You know, following Visor and Maderna was

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a difficult position to be in those you know, those

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>companies have attracted most attention. Um. You know you probably

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>recall when they reported their clinical trial results that the

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers were stunning, and you know, even if it wasn't

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that simple, they appeared to be totally clear and unambiguous.

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean both attained efficacy levels around so that was

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>one number to digest. It was hugely positive. And now AstraZeneca,

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, an Oxford, it's a different story. When they

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>released their results, as you say, there was a wide

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>range of numbers finally an average of it was very confusing,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not just for journalists but for scientists. You ever, was

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>scrambling to make sense of just how effective this vaccine is.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the takeaway to disease experts is that

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>all these front runners, including astra Zeneca, look like they

0:15:55.280 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>provide comparable and almost complete protection against severe illness and death.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are the most important factors to consider. Um

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So when it comes to those critical outcomes that will

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>end the pandemic, this vaccine is still expected to play

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a crucial role. But unfortunately there are all these questions

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>swirling around Astersenic and Oxford that have hurt the way

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine is perceived. That was the point that I

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to sort of underscore. There is like, just

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because the results have been confusing, There still is a

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could think of it. It's like a

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>portfolio of vaccine approach here, which is that as long

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as it keeps people from having severe illnesses overwhelming hospitals

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, hopefully dying like it, it may

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in the astrosenic a vaccine like still may prove a

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really important role, especially on a global stage. UM. So

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>when you think about that and then you know these

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>these forthcoming US results, what do what do we expect? Like,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is there any sense that you know there could be

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>just more confusion? More at a equals more confusion definitely.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the US you know you mentioned the you know,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the U S data. So this is going to be

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>from trials of tens of thousands of participants, UM, and

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be UM coming out in the coming weeks.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be closely scrutinized and pivotal

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>for the two UK partners. And I think about a

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter of the participants in that study are older than

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, so we should get a good indication of

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the protection it offers older adults. UM. So you know,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>astra Zeneca is keen to demonstrates its potency and older people.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think an FDA decision UM we've reported UH

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>is expected as early as April. So this is going

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a key stretch for UM, for ASTRA and Oxford.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And as you say, I think you alluded to it.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's overlooked sometimes how much the world is

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>counting on this back scene. I mean it's huge, assuming

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's rolled out and there aren't for the delays. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and listen all the doctors that we talked to say,

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to need multiple tools in that toolkit, that

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID toolkit in order to get controlled. Jil Weber, thank

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Editor Bloomberg Business Week. UH, and of

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>course James Peyton healthcare reporter. Check out his story in

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that's caught our attention. You were talking about this one

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of our planning calls today, Tim, about how the capital

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is being turned or being turned into a fortress, is

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>really kind of bringing on the push to make it

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a state. And look, DC statehood has been something that

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>liberals and Democrats have wanted for a very long time.

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>The big question is it ever going to happen? Yeah,

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's put that question to Amanda Colson Hurley. She's

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>politics editor Bloomberg Business Week. She's with us from the

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>nation's capital. Amanda, good to have you here with Tim

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and myself. So tell us a little bit about your well.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, give us a visual. And I know

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we're on radio, we're on YouTube for those who are

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>also watching there. But give us the visual of what

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>DC is like right now? Sure? Um. So I actually

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>went down to the area around the Capitol on Sunday

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and walked all around. Um, the capital as well as

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a number of the well known landmarks nearby, like the U. S.

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Courts, the Library of Congress, Um, are all behind

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a big sense seven fts hall fence tops in most

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>parts with these coils of razor wire. Um. There are

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>troops patrolling, um, you know, stationed every I would say,

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>every d two hundred feet or so, little clump clumps

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of of troops. Um. And so really there's this kind

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of compound now on Capitol Old it's about three miles

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in circumference. So, um, it's a very uh dramatic difference

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>from that area if anyone has you know, been there

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>before as a tourist or as a local. Uh, you know,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>with used to be quite open obviously a great attraction

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for for visitors. Uh you know, very very famous views

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the capital dome. Um. So, uh it's all looking

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>looking pretty different right now. If you're watching us on

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube right now, you see some of these images that

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that Amanda took, that with that she took and she

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sent to us. Um, Amanda, I gotta ask what the

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>connection is here with with DC statehood? Right, the relationship

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>between the federal government and the district and and law enforcement.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Well right as as you said, Uh, now, the push

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for statehood in DC is not something that's frown up overnight.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's been years decade that uh you know,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>some activists have been pushing for DC to become a state. Um.

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think, uh, a couple of things happened. First

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of all, the Democrats won the White House and both

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>houses of Congress, although they controlled the Senate very narrowly,

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and this gave statehood advocates really the best kind of

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>window that they've had in a long time, uh, probably ever. Um, more.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, a prominent Democrats have said they support statehood

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. President Biden has said in the past

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that d C should be a state. Uh so there

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is some kind of momentum. And I think meanwhile, the

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>events of January six, uh, you know, left a lot

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of people in DC, both the kind of elected local

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>leaders there and just regular residents, uh, you know, feeling

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>more ad ODT with the federal government. And this sense

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of symbolizes that, right. Um, you know, it was imposed. Uh,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>this temporary senses there now was imposed uh immediately, Uh,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and people kind of understand that it needs to be there.

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it reassured people, especially in the initial days

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>after the riot. But now there's this proposal to put

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>up a permanent sense and uh, you know, as as

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>one person I interviewed said to me, we already don't

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have any representation in Congress, and now they're kind of

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>walling it off for us from from us. In addition

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to that, what's the political will to make a change.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just curious Republicans versus Democrats on this. Yeah. Well,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a pretty clear split there in that uh,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>DC statehood is much more favored you know, by Democrats,

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>by liberals. Uh. And part of the reason for that

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh, you know, the district, which has seven

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand people now, um, is you know, one of one

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the most solidly democratic voting places in the country. Um.

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>People don't vote for you know, they don't have a

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>voting representative in the House or or senators who can vote.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>But but they do vote for president. And I think

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they voted for Joe Biden more strongly than anywhere else

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in the country. I mean, there are there are other

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons too, and that uh you know, there are objections

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>on the grounds that it's it would not be constitutional,

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, or um, you know, the DC was

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really intended to be a federal district, so the the

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the objections are not entirely partisan, but that is definitely

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it. So Amanda, very briefly, Um, look, it

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that Democrats want d C to be a

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>state for politically, it makes sense. But is there a

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>chance that it happens in the near future, any chance

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>at all? And we only have about twenty seconds. Oh

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't we Actually we can have more time with you.

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, we get more time with you, Amanda. We say,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Amanda is On, we were just going to go well,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the answer is still pretty six thinct,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>which is they have their best window they've ever had

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, but it's still pretty slim. Um. I think, uh,

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to get sixty votes in the Senate.

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh to pass in the Senate the past statehood, they

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>would have to sort of either eliminate or kind of

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>work around the filibuster. I think there are you know,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>ways they could make a rule change where they would

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>say statehood votes don't need you know, sixty votes. But

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>even that seems like it would be it would require

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>an expenditure of political capital that that perhaps you know,

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>not everyone would be enthusiastic about, even you know, among

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. So it makes me wonder what our forefathers

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>would think. Um, but I do wonder, Amanda Hurley, what

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a state would it be if it was

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on its own? Is there a state across the US

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that it kind of is similar to? Uh? Well, let's

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>see in population terms, it's the most similar, I believe

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to Vermont and Wyoming with seven thousand people, but it

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>would be it would have the highest share of of

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>of black residents. Of of any states. Uh, as I

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>said before, it would be very solidly democratic voting at

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>least you know, for the time being, and it would

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>still it would still have this kind of federal uh

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>district at the very heart of it, where you know,

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the government buildings and the National Mall and

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>monuments would be. So it's not like that's going to

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>go away. That would just shrink and d C would

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise kind of have the powers of the state. But

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that that means that whatever happens,

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that tension between the district and the federal government is

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>never going to go away entirely because of that. What

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about people in Washington, d C. I mean, do do

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>they want this to happen? How do they feel about this? Yeah?

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the last time there was a polar survey

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>den uh support at least for statehood referendum was at

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>six percent. So um, you know, and a lot of

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the local political leaders are pretty strong statehood proponents proponents

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, um. The non voting congresswoman for the district,

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Eleanor Holmes Norton, has introduced a statehood bill into the House. Uh.

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, year after year after year. Uh. So and

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly a number, if not all, of the members of

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the district the DC Council as well support statehood. Um,

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty common sentiment. Even the DC license plate

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen it, the standard motto and the

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>license plate is end taxation without representation. So people do

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty strongly about Yeah, that's pretty clear. What about

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>people like beyond DC, like the rest of the country

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>are people did they do they have any strong feelings

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about it? Yeah? I think in the rest of the country,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people sort of aren't don't

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>think a lot you know, as understandably about the issue

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and what it means to district residents. I think the

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>last time there was a Gallop poll a couple of

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and support for d C statehood was not

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>very high. It was I think around thirty percent or

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>even lower. And Um, a lot of people feel that maybe,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it shouldn't be a state, that maybe because

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they think it's you know, very small, or or that

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's uh you know, maybe they think it's for partisan

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.719
<v Speaker 1>reasons only, that that people would would want it to

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>become a state. Uh So, Yeah, it's not an issue

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that I would say has attracted really broad support outside

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of the DC area. Are there are there certain members

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of Congress right now, um, who are sort of surprising

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>on the issue, like is this Are there any Republicans

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>who support this or do they know this is just

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so dangerous politically? That's a good question. I'm actually not

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>aware if any Republicans have come out and said, you

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>know what, DC residents should be able to, you know,

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 1>have representation in Congress to um and look there there there.

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It is dangerous politically for them because it would the

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>margins right now are razor tight. And if DC were

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to become a state, think about who that enfranchises, right,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a group of voters who largely voted as you mentioned

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Amanda for vice for President Biden now uh. And and

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>also it would give them senators who would likely be

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and really change the balance of power. That's right,

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean the DC senators if it had them, would

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly be Democrats. You know, two Democrats, which would

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the current situation easily you know, tip

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>control of the Senate, you know from from split right,

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, easily tip it over to the Democrats and

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>giving them a kind of margin. So so yeah, I

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>do think that it's kind of a paradox of the

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>current situation for statehod advocates. But while having this democratic

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>trifecta in Washington gives them this opportunity that they're excited about.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. Having the fifty split also probably illustrates for

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for Republicans and for other opponents, just just how much

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of a difference it would make, uh if if the

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>district were to become the state, and you know how

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that would change the political calculus and does it open

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the door then for Puerto Rico or something. I don't know,

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like who knows, um, but it's very provocative. Uh, and

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>those visuals. I highly recommend everybody to go to Bloomberg

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com and see a little bit of that more. Amanda,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Amanda Coolson Hurley Politics that are at Bloomberg

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Week from the nation's capital. This is Bloomberg Business

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. We had a big story, a big

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>business story over the past week, and this is about

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>married International naming uh Tony Capuano as chief executive officer,

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>tapping someone who is well known to the company to

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>really lead this hotel giant's recovery after the COVID nineteen pandemic.

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So we are delighted to welcome Tony to Bloomberg Business

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>WEEKI Jones is on the phone in Pathesda, Maryland. Tony,

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>great to have you here with Tim and myself. How

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>are you? And I have to say, Um, many of

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>us here at Bloomberg we've been thinking about you and

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Marriott family after the loss of Arnie Sarns and

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he was always always so generous with his time to

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>so many of us here at Bloomberg, and especially over

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the last year when we know personally professionally he was

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>dealing with so much. Well, thank you, Carol, and thanks

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for having me back. It's obviously been a tough week

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for all of us. I talked to our team around

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the world over the last few days, and the two

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>words that I really thought about were reflection and resolve.

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>All of us are reflecting on the this this terrible loss,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the loss for Arnie's family, the loss for the extended

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Marriott family, and the loss for the business community more broadly,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as as you suggested, but I think there is a

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>real resolve here. Um. This is a company that is

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>approaching its anniversary, and we've been through recessions and nine

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven and the Great Financial Crisis and the pandemic, and

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a company that has the resolve to continue to

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>build and grow and create opportunities for our folks and

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>really help the company realize it's promise. But it's been

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a difficult week, no, and you've really all been on

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>our minds, UM. And you talk about family, and you

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think about the Marriott family, your franchise owners. You treat

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>them like they are family members. Tell me how they

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>are doing in this environment and what it looks like, uh,

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward this year and then beyond. Well, the pandemic

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a historic and terrible crisis from a whole

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>host of perspectives. The travel industry has been hit particularly hard,

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the weight of that that impact

0:31:55.400 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>has fallen on the shoulders of our owners and franchises. UM.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They are under tremendous financial pressure. UH. Some of the hotels.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>At the outset of the pandemic, we had hundreds of

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>hotels clothes on a global basis, we were running twelve

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>percent occupancy, and that created great distress for our owner community.

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>As we've seen through the last number of months, we

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are seeing slow and steady recovery, particularly domestically in drive

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to destinations, interestingly China, which seems to have its arms

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively around the virus. We're seeing occupancy levels approaching pre pandemic,

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>which is quite encouraging and maybe represents a bit of

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a roadmap for the rest of the world. But at

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we continue to see instances where there's

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a spike in infection rates and a given market, and

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it has a pretty stark chilling impact on the pace

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of demand growth. Tony, you ran the hotel, the you

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ran the company's hygiene initiative. What should customers expect if

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they haven't traveled to a Marriott property in a few

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>years or since the pandemic started. How will that experience

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be different post pandemic? I think in a few ways.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think really starting during the booking process, when they

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>go to Marriott dot com to to make their reservations.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>There are pretty thorough and transparent disclosures about any modifications

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we've made to the operations of a given hotel, whether

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there are outlets that are closed, that have limitations on

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>capacity or modified hours. When they arrive, they will see

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>every one of their fellow guests and every Marritt associated masks.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>They will see electrostatic cleaners disinfecting the public areas. They

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>will have optionality around whether they want daily housekeeping, but

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they know that when they arrive in their room for

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time, that there is a hospital grade level

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of cleaning that's been done to that room before their arrival,

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and they will experience a lot of advances that we've

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>made from a technology perspective to make it as touchless

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an environment as possible. We've made some pretty significant upgrades

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bonvoy app and the ability to check in remotely,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to order room service remotely. Uh, there's a chat function

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to talk to the hotel staff if there are service requests,

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and so I think those are the most significant changes.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>How much of it stays with us? Tony, Listen, you're

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who I know used to travel. I'm assuming a lot,

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and we can talk about how much traveling you've been doing.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I used to travel a lot, haven't done much in

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve months. How much of what changes in the hotel industry,

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the hospitality industry really stays with us longer term? Like

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like some of the digitization in the apps

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 1>like that to me, sounds like a great thing. Um,

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping there's a day when I can walk into

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a hotel lobby and I don't have a mask on,

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have to be so worried, and I

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like housekeeping. I'm just gonna say so, I'm just curious

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how how much stays with us M Yeah, you know,

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>all of these decisions are often informed by what we

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>hear from our guests. But I think your intuition is right.

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>When I look across all the changes we've had to

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>make in response to the pandemic, I think the technological advances,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the optionality of touchless experiences, I think those will continue

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic. Uh. The nice thing will be to your point,

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we all aspire to get to a place where no

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>one has a mask, there are no plexiglass barriers, and

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>then it will really be based upon guest preference. There

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>are some guests that love to go to the front desk,

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>engage with our associates, get local restaurant recommendations. And there

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>are others that want to check in, get a mobile key,

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and go straight to their room. And I think we

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>all look forward to the day where we can offer

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 1>both of those options to our guests. Hey, Tony, we

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>saw something really interesting happen at the beginning of the pandemic.

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>When lockdown started back in March, Airbnb really struggled, and

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>they struggled very quickly and laid off employees. And then

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a few months later the company really started to recover

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as as people wanted to spend a long time in

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>homes away from their primary residences. I'm wondering how you

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think about Airbnb and how you're thinking about competition from

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb over the next few years. Well, Tim, we um,

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know, in two thousand nineteen, we launched Marryott

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Homes and Villas, uh not with an eye towards going

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>head to head with Airbnb. I don't think we'll find

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in the business of traditional home sharing or couch

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>surfing or any of those areas, um, but we've really

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on the upper end of the market and whole

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>home rentals, and we think the value proposition that that

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we offer is really predicated on consumer confidence around safety,

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a service level that our customers expect, and a linkage

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Bonvoy loyalty program. And since that two thousand

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen launch, where we had about two thousand homes. We've

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>grown to over homes. We think, in for a few

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>short months, will be on every continent. And the thing

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we like about that business we hear from our customers

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that for very specific trip types, they like the notion

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of whole home rentals, and by launching this platform, it

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>allows us to keep them within the Marriott ecosphere. Yeah,

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Hey, you know, Tony, one thing I

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you. You guys have so many different

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>brands under your umbrella. There's the Rich Carlton, there's St. Regis,

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>there's the w There's Sheridan, there's Home and Village. I mean,

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there's just so many. Does everything stay with you going forward?

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Or do you kind of take this time to look

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>at the business and say, maybe we do some consolidation

0:37:57.320 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of brands. I knew each brand kind of has its

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>its market, but I do wonder how you look and

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe change the business tweak it going forward. Carol, We

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>actually love the breadth of our brand portfolio, and I

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think we like it because of the choice that it offers,

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>certainly the choice to our consumers, but also to our

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>owners and franchisees. We find from a consumer perspective. Depending

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>on trip type, they may choose one of the hotels

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 1>in our portfolio in the economy tire. Then they may

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 1>plan of family vacation and go to a luxury resort.

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And similarly, the vast majority of our owner community are

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>multi unit owners and they would like to continue to

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 1>grow their portfolios within the Marriott family. Having that breadth

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of choice gives them lots of options as they look

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to continue to invest in the Marriott flags. So Tim

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and I Tony cannot wait to get back on a

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 1>plane for fun for work, I cannot wait. I've missed it.

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Have you been traveling much for traveling for our work?

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Are traveling at all? I have, although I think the

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>last time I was in studio with you, you were

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>shaking your head at a number I shared with you

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that I had been traveled two hundred and twenty five

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 1>nights the prior year. I'm obviously at a small fraction

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of that today. And unfortunately, because of some of the

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>borders that are closed, I'm not traveling internationally nearly as

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 1>much as I would like. But I've been in New York,

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been in Los Angeles, I've been in Miami visiting

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>our teams and our associates across the country, and Uh,

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I have my passport and my my back pocket, and

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I am ready as soon as some of the borders

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>start to open. I'm jealous business travel. How long do

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>you think before it really comes back to what we've seen,

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what we saw pre pandemic. Well, there are, as you know, Carol,

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of opinions out there about whether we've

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>seen some sort of permanent change in the demand for

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>business travel, and and time will tell which those opinions

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is accurate. As we talk to our customers around the world,

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we certainly think leisure will lead the recovery, but we

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>are already seeing green shoots for business transient demand, and

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we think fundamentally that is a business that will come

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>back strong. What we hear from our customers not dissimilar

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to you and Tim's comments. They miss being on the road,

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they miss visiting their their business partners, and maybe most importantly,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they miss visiting their customers. And so we're we're quite

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about the long term UH demand for business travel.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Very briefly, the only other thing I would say to

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you is sorry, go ahead. Oh, I was just gonna

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>say the one thing that may shift a bit carol

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 1>about business travel. As folks have gotten more and more

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>comfortable conducting business over Zoom or Microsoft teams, they have

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>started to learn that perhaps they can do a better

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>job blending leisure in business travel. And so there will

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly be certain business purposes where they need to be

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in person, but they may also say to their family,

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go for three or four days of vacation and

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll carve out a day in the middle and conduct

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>business via technology. All right, great stuff, listen, thank you

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>so much. Are you two so gracious with your time?

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate it. And again we're thinking about all

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of you guys over at Marriott. Tony be well, stay safe.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Tony Capuano he is chief executive officer at Married International.

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>On the phone from Bethesda, Maryland. I'm ROC journal. Yeah,

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. No, no, no, no, honey, please,

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the right rivel. I want to drive, Just drive.

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the questions. Keep trying. This is the drive to

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the globe. That's Bloomberg Radio. All right, Just about eleven

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading session. Another day where we

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>setting selling and then buyers coming back. Into the trade. Tim,

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to Dan Morgan, VP and senior portfolio

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.879
<v Speaker 1>manager over at the Nova's trust company. They've got roughly

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty point six billion in assets under management. He's with

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>us once again on the phone in Atlanta. Dan, Good

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with us. How you doing, Hi, Carol? Hi? Tim?

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>How are you happy New year? Happy New Year? And

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>have we not talked to you since? I guess not yet.

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>We did a bunch of stories kind of in the

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kalen the last year, but then things got

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy with the election and so but we're back today

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>talking chips. Yeah, talking to Well listen, this is a

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 1>big story and video is going to be out after

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the closing bow. But we are all focused here at Bloomberg,

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>watching the administration, watching the industry because these chips shortages.

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>What do we need to know about this and what

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done? Well, you're right, you know what,

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Carol's really interesting because last time we talked, we talked

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>about how a large percentage of chips are actually built

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>outside the US, right over in the Pacific RIM. We

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>have all the engineering, marketing and design skills here, but

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>we're actually most of our plants are fabulous, which means

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't produce the chips here, And there was actually

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you and I talked about it. Then all of a sudden,

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I noticed a couple of weeks ago, in the last

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 1>ten days, all the chip companies got together and signed

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a letter and sent it to President Biden saying, you know,

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to start building chips here in the US,

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and how better way to get rid of some of

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>these shortages than to have control of your supply and

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, unfortunately we don't have that, and that's what's

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>causing these shortages and these problems. But of course, Carol,

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I were already ahead of the head of

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the ball here in terms of identifying that issue before

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it became a major story. Hey, dan Um, just in

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the last few minutes the NBC reporting that GM says

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the worst of the global chip shortage may be behind it.

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that that you're seeing at all? Well?

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I mean, if we think about what's

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>happening in the semiconductor business right now in terms of

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the overall cyclical recovery, and you think about let's say,

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>autos and industrials which have been coming back very strongly,

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and I know At one point we had some shutdowns

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>right with some of the auto manufacturers where they couldn't

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>even deliver certain models because they couldn't get the chips.

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So slowly, that's starting done fall a little bit. And

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we look at just a week ago,

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Analog Devices reported numbers and their auto division was up

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>nineteen in terms of revenues. So I think that's getting

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>behind us and things are getting better. But it'd be

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:30.279
<v Speaker 1>great if we could move those facilities here to the

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>US and we wouldn't have any problems. Yes, everything would

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>be some entirely. Oh that it were so okay, But Dan,

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, Listen, you're much smarter than I when

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>it comes to chips. There's lots of different kinds of chips.

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Are you talking about that we need to bring all

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of chip manufacturing back to the United States? Well,

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I mean we talked about the autos industrials.

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.319
<v Speaker 1>One thing we always say, Carol, is that not every

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>chip company is exactly the same. So I mean, when

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I say every it would just be good to have

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a larger percentage of the chips produced here domestically to

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of meet some of these areas that are really

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be kind of secular growth stories.

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And we talked about this before, Carol and Tim. The cloud,

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>which we all know is a great space gaming and

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then this huge five G rollout, especially in not only

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with smartphones with let's say an Apple, but also from

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the communications infrastructure, you know, perspective in terms of rolling

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>out the base stations in terms of five G. So

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we can get all of these

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 1>areas here in the US domestic, but if we could

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>get a larger percentage because I think at this point

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this before, Carl, I think it was

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:46.959
<v Speaker 1>only it was being produced outside it was a huge Yeah. Okay,

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk more in video company reporting earnings after

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the bell today. Speaking of chips, what would you ask

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>management if you had the opportunity to do so well?

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Tim, you know, obviously we're gonna be following

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 1>expectations in terms of data center revenue, which is about

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:03.120
<v Speaker 1>one point eight eight billion, gaming at two point three

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>nine billion. I think something that's been kind of hot

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>topic has been how is this acquisitioning is coming along?

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>In return in regards to the arm deal, that was

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>something that's somewhat controversial. Um, it really gives them a

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>leg up in artificial intelligence what they have about a

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine percent market share, and they're kind of head

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of some of these other you know players in that space.

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Sy Links is in space Lattice, So it's kind of

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see if we can get a little bit

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>more color from management, if that deal will in fact

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>go through. There's been some pushback from some of the

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>other chip makers that's saying, hey, we don't want ARM

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to be owned by videos. So I think that's could

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be on the center stage beyond just hitting those targets

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of revenues. Is that deal going to go through? Well,

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where I wanted to go. I mean, there's some

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>big companies are questioning this acquisition, Google, Microsoft, qual Calm.

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of the world largest technology companies. They're

0:46:55.560 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>complaining to US antitrust regulators. When you look at that

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>deal from an antitrust perspective, as an analyst, as an investor,

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think there's a problem. Well, Carol, you know,

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for listeners out there that aren't familiar with the model, right,

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a qualcom right, they are an

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property model which is they collect fees in regards

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to their you know, what they're providing in terms of

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the designs and so forth. They're not like a company

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that produces chips, like let's say Intel and you know,

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>turns out microprocessors and sells them to PC manufacturers. So

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they're a little bit of a different animal. And the

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that they work with so many other chip companies

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of providing these this tech, you know, this

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property that that could be somewhat of you know,

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly right that in video would have over this

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>company that's so different. It's not just you know, like

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a company that produces more gaming chips. So I think

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that that is kind of interesting, Carol, Like you said

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're getting this pushback and could this be an

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>anti trust issue that then derails the deal? Um, because

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's saying, wow, us to be a sweet deal for

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 1>end Video, but not so good for everybody else. So

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think it happens? Well, I'm hopeful. I mean,

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's why I'm you mentioned Tim in the

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:12.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning about what we want to hear from management. I

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's got to be on center stage, right. How's

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that deal coming along? What what's the issues with the

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>d o J or you know, antitrust issues and if

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>that you know, will consummate. So I'm I'm hopeful and

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>optimistic they can execute the deal. I think it'd be

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>great for them, as I mentioned an ai um and

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>hopefully they can set up some firewalls where they're not

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>interfering with other companies that are using um ARM in

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of some of these designs, you know, and then

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:39.920
<v Speaker 1>creating some sort of competitive advantage. I think that's what

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's really worried about. Hey, just twenty seconds here the

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Tech pullback rally. Any thoughts on it? Well, it's actually, Carroll,

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>because Tech made such a huge run. It did so well.

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was just looking at the charts because

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about chips for such a long time.

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you realize that the socks is up two percent

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 1>from the low that it hit in March? I mean, unbelievable, right,

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I think it's only naturally we're going

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a bit of a pullback. But you know

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to the wrong guy, Carol and Jim, because

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm always bullish on technology. Right Listen, As

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Kathy would said, to us yesterday from Mark Right. Things

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>don't go up in a straight line. Dan Morgan, thank

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much, senior portfolio manager over at s Nova's Trust,

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:22.879
<v Speaker 1>joining us once again on the phone from Atlanta. Thanks

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News.