WEBVTT - End Of The Road

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now,

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>along with the guys from dat leagues dot com, here's

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Jargian.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul Charchi and co

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>hosts today are Scott Fish and Thorneystrom.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, what's going on, Paul? Twice? I've seen you twice

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>in the last couple of days here.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I know it's weird twice the last couple of hours.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Forget to say a guess, see you down at the

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Feast or the football feast there hanging out with

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 3>my new friends Rich and Josh.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it wasn't that nice. You make friends easily.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 3>It was they're good guys.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well you bought their beer the exact off it.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back, Thank you, going to be back. You can't

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 2>really be any hotter than you have been so far.

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>In the show, you have.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Paul, big down charge.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Geez, some of your early preseason picks. H and we're

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 2>excited to see what you've got on taps. Over the

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>course of the show, we'll have three tough questions like

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>we always do. We'll give you nine players upon whom

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>you can take a chance. We'll give you premature speculation

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>players to pick up, including at least I'm very excited

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>about my player. I think I know who you guys

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>are going to go with two. These are some great opportunities.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Hope to work in the Jamison Williams News if you

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>want to pick him up a week early, if you can.

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 2>If you can, yeah, we'll find out if We'll talk

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>about that a little bit as well. So plenty to

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>get to over the course of the show. Of course,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 2>we give you letter grades on every meaningful players. We

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>break down every matchup. We begin with the London game. Yes,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Falcons taking on the Jaguars. This is the Drake London

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>in London game.

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>There we go, Drake London in London and yes, yes, god,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>yes we can start on that side of the ball

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 3>where I'm leaving Desmond Ritter on the bench. I'm sorry.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I know the Jags have a bottom ten pass thee

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and have a lot of multiple scores to all three

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks they but they haven't played Desmond Ridder. This should

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>help improve their rank. This week, Ritter averaging like one

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eighty four passing yards a game. He's not

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 3>doing too well. You weren't even considering.

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Sneaky landing spot for Kirk Cousins, just.

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Saying yeah, yeah, yeah, that's that's the rumor out there

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.839
<v Speaker 3>that you're pushing. No, no, it's actually there are lots

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>of other people saying that kind of stuff too. Drake London.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I am given the C grade too though, because I

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>want Drake London to score a touchdown in London. That's

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 3>most of most of my data there. No but top

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver get target getters against the Jags have all

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>gone for seventy plus yards, all three of them scored.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>It's it's an okay spot for him. Giving him a

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 3>C grade though, just because it's a decent pesty it

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>has been so far anyway, the against wide receivers. I

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>should say Kyle Pitts also getting a C grade here.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I know you're looking at me like you should just

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>betch him.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>It's only because you had a good game in London

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 2>two years years ago.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he did, he did. He had nine FO one

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred and nineteen yards and one touchdown two years ago

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 3>to London. Yeah, exactly, it was two years ago. Actually,

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 3>has nothing to do with that it has everything to

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>do with just the Titan landscape is absolutely garbage this year,

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>and he's he's probably the best tight end you have

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 3>on your roster. Every bit about it, about his metrics,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 3>his talent, his usage, everything screams good. He got nine

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 3>targets last week. But guess what, he only fifty three

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 3>percent of his passes. The passes to him are catchable.

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Like if that, if Desmond improves just the slightest tick,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>he should be able to notch down a C grade.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you're wrong, Donald parum At least you

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 3>know he's tied for the league lead in red or

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>targets inside the five yard line. You have a decent

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>chance of a touchdown with Donald Parhum. Over on the

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 3>other side of the ball, we got Trevor Lawrence. I'm

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>giving him a D grade. Is that okay? Charge?

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not okay? You have a here allow me to

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>read it, because yeah, he's a bad example. You have

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a choice of a B, C and bench. That's the

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>more opportunities to place your guy in the right spot.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, are we put in Trevor Lawrence?

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 3>So Trevor Lawrence, he's playing a Falcons D That held

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Love, Bryce Young and Jared Jared Goff each to

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 3>their worst passing days of the year. So it's not

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>actually a great matchup. It's one of the lowest over

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 3>unders of the week. He's looked off, and he's looked

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>off so far, Trevor Lawrence has because it's such a

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>tough grade. I'm giving it the dart throw grade.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>That would be a seed timately, because you're saying, start

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 2>a ball.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 3>But he's startable, he's got he's got the weapons. I

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>think he can overcome. Unlike those. I consider him a

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 3>better quarterback than those. Maybe not golf, but you know,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>better than Love and Bryce Young. I'll give him the grade. Fine,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll bump in them. Travis Etn a grade. The Falcons

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 3>allowed ninety eight yards to Miles Sanders, eighty two to

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Jamior Gibbs, and even aj Dillon, Yes, twenty twenty three

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>A J. Dillon somehow had sixty three yards on them.

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 3>The only buggle boo is Falcons have only allowed an

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>RB to score once and just eight receptions. It's not

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot of passing passing work, but Travis Etn gets

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 3>seventy two percent of the opportunity share about four pass

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 3>catches per game. That's gonna boost you up. I got

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>him with a B. I could move him up to

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>an A though, just because that volume is high and

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a low scoring close game where

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 3>he should get a decent amount of work. Tank Bigsby

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 3>on the bench. I know he's converted two of his

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 3>three carries inside the five yard line, but his snaps

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>keep going down, his touches keep going down. It's he's

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>just on the bench for now. Over to the passing

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 3>game or over to the wide receivers. Calvin Ridley and

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Christian Kirk. I love that you got multiple tank.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have to put the bad tanks the bad

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>right and on. Unfortunately, the bad tank sounders winning right now.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So with Zay Jones missing last week, he's also

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 3>going to miss this week. Christian Kirk really bumped up

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 3>his napshare. It was only sixty percent week one. It's

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>been it's been over eighty percent, eighty six percent the

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 3>last two weeks, and he's really delivered with an eleven

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>catch one hundred and ten yard performance and a four

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 3>catch fifty four yard and a touchdown performance. I expect

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>much of the same here. I have Covin Ridley also

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 3>with a C grade. Two straight duds for Ridley, but

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>he dropped four passes last week. Dropped two passes. Drops

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 3>are not a sticky stat. He dropped what what should

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>have been a touchdown. Without those, he would have had much, much,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 3>much better days. It's he doesn't look like the guy

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>that he did in Week one and in the preseason.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I expect him to at least bounce back a little bit,

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 3>so I'm at least giving him the season ricky.

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Matchup with AJ Terrell's turning into one of the best

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 2>cornerbacks in the league.

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when the Falcons drafted him that first year, they

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 3>avoided passing his way, and yeah, he's pretty decent. Evan

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Ingram C grade. I think we gotta kind of watch

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 3>him now. Five plus catches in all three games, forty

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 3>nine to fifty seven and sixty seven yards. He's going

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>into the week. Before last night or before Thursday night,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 3>excuse me, he was right there with Laporta had eighteen

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>catches one hundred and eighty six yards, Ingram eighteen for

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>one seventy three. They were right in the same zone.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 3>The only problem is Evan Ingram zero red zone targets

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>this year. That's not helpful at all.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Dallas Goddard, by the way, zero red zone.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I know it's weird, isn't It's just downright weird. So

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Sea grade on.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Him, all right. Dolphins take on the Bills Store. Dolphins

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>scored ten touchdowns last week and are underdogs in Buffalo.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>So this is a quot. Now you're new to the show,

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't chase last week's box score. You gotta just

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>we gotta look at this Dolphins Bills game as its

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>own entity. Let's start on the Dolphins side. What do

0:07:59.280 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>you got?

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're scoring seventy again, but this is

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 4>a really good fantasy match hold, So we'll start with

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 4>two fantasy QB four so far this season. Number one

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 4>passing grade in the NFL. Number one big time throw

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 4>rate in the NFL. Solid matchup here. Bills have allowed

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 4>the tenth highest adjusted completion rate in the NFL. Last year,

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 4>the Bills allowed the second highest adjusted completion rate on

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>throws twenty plus yards downfield. Obviously, the Dolphins offense is explosive.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Tua is an a Tyreek kill. Obviously, a weekly must

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 4>start Tyreek kill. On pace for two thy three hundred

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 4>and thirty five receiver yards.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty good this year, pretty pretty good.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 4>So he's obviously an A, as is Jalen Waddle Sterling

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 4>eighteen point one percent air yard share so far this

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 4>season three point zero four yards per route run.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 2>That's excellent for Waddle. And last year, if.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>You guys recall both games the Dolphins played the Bills,

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Jalen Waddle went over one hundred receiving yards both times, so.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 2>He's an A as well.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Julian Hill, the tight end the Dolphins have been using

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the most, can't start him. The running back situation, of course,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 4>very interesting in Miami right now. I'm gonna give both

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 4>mostart and eight Chan as we've learned as the pronunciation,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>who apparently.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Has decided after every four touchdown game he's going to

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>change the pronunciation of his name.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>This is it then?

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, this will probably be after the game he

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>just had. That's that's cool with me.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 4>But you know, as for Most, obviously he's in the

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 4>time share with a Chan. Moster played fifty one percent

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 4>of the snaps last week. He is the team's clear

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.239
<v Speaker 4>pass down running back. Most are top five in explosive

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 4>run rate, top ten in miss tackles, force per attempt excellent.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm giving him a beat, especially in this matchup where

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 4>and you guys know how topical this is going to be.

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 4>The Bills are coughing up the second worst explosive run

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 4>rate in the NFL so far, so that's topical to

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 4>both Mostert and a chany as for a chance, you

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 4>guys remember twenty two touches two hundred and thirty three

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 4>total yards on forty one percent of the snaps last

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 4>week eight. Chan number one in the NA in miss tackles,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.719
<v Speaker 4>force per attempt, yards after contact per attempt, and PFF

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 4>grade for qualifying running backs. I mentioned that the Bills

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 4>run defense gives up home runs regularly. I have to

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>give him a be just because you know the time share.

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 4>But both those guys, it's a good matchup for moving

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 4>to the Bills. Josh Allen obviously a weekly must start.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 4>He's an A here number five and Fantasy points per

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 4>dropback since Week two.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 2>You guys recall the Week one.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Dodd Jets clearly an admiration there for Alan Miami has

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 4>an average pass defense. They rank number fifteen in both

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 4>yards per attempt allowed and pass A rating allowed Stefan

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Diggs weekly must start. He's an a here, top five

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL, and first read share.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Gabe Davis. I'm gonna give him a ce.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 4>He's been about what we expected so far. I think

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>you guys would agree wide receiver forty.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Well for Scott and I, yes, he has been what

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>we expected. But we both thought he was gonna have

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a much better year than last year. So we're both

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 2>buying Gabe Davis in the preseason. He's been better than

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>he was last year by a margin for sure.

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and this one, most of his routes are going

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>to come against the dalphin cornerback Xavian Howard and Kadeer Cahu.

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Howard seventy two point seven catch rate against COOHU eighty

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 4>two point four catch rate allowed on targets got good.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Gave Davis could have a big, solid game here, but

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm giving them a seed just because those targets are

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be going to Digs. I also have to

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 4>give a sea to both Dalton Kincaid and Dawson Knox.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 4>We have a bit of a quag Meyer situation here.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 4>I was hoping the Bills were going to go to

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 4>twelve personnel and every single play that has not happened yet.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 4>They love running out the different formation every single time,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 4>so one of those guys can end up on the

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 4>bench on any given step. When they're out there and

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 4>they're used on routes, the Bills aren't really using them.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Dalton Kincaid was a guy in college who the utility

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 4>was downfield catching. Yeah, he only has a three point

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 4>six a dot right now. That's nice, so he's just

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 4>be using as a dump up. As for knocks, zero

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>points six to one yards per route run.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Not great.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 4>You can't trust either of those guys right now, but

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 4>in a deeper league they would potentially be startable if

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 4>he didn't have another option. And lastly, James Cook given

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 4>him a grade of A here one hundred and eleven

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 4>point three total yards per game on average on sixty

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 4>percent snapshare, but he only has won a Buffalo seven

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 4>carries so far this season inside the five yard line.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 4>But on the other hand, the Dolphins cough up the

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 4>fourth highest yards per reception to running backs. James Cook

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 4>obviously a very skilled receiver, so a decent matchup for him.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 4>We just hope we can get a little more carries

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 4>inside the five.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 2>This was exactly the worry about James Cook going into

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the season that we articulated repeatedly is what's the touchdown

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 2>total going to end up being? As he gets sitting

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 2>in like a six touchdown year, and I think it's

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>going to play out about that way. Yeah, he won.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>A crazy to us stat I heard this week, and

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I double checked to make sure it was accurate. Through

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the first three weeks. Last year, he was seventy two

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 3>for one hundred and one with eight touchdowns seventy two

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>what seventy two completions, Oh, seventy two percent completion, No,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>seventy two completions out of one hundred and one attempts, yeah, okay,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and eight touchdowns and two interceptions. This year, seventy two completions,

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and one attempts, eight touchdowns, two interceptions. The

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 3>yardage is about one hundred off.

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I forgotten you started that hot last year.

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Too, almost the exact same starts last.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Year, and then right around now is when he had

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>his first concussion. Yeah, I've got to pray for health

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>this year, Vikings take on the Panthers. Viking side's getting

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty easy. Kirk Cousins TJ. Hockinson and Justin

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Jefferson are just now obvious. A's all of them producing

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>at top three levels at their position. Nothing about the

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 2>Panthers suggests a different outcome here. Let's go to the

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>murkier guys, including Jordan Addison. Now, I love that his

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>snapcount has risen in three straight games thirty six snaps

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>to forty snaps to fifty six snaps last week. Still

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>trailing kJ Osbourne and snapcount, but heading in the right

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 2>direction here. And of course, the Panthers are without star

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>cornerback J. C. Horn who's still on IR and the

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>outside starters CJ. Henderson and Dante Jackson both allowing a

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>passer rating of at least one hundred and sixteen. So

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 2>there's optimism for Jordan Adison, who I'm putting a B

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>in this game. Alexander Madison comes in with a B grade.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Even if cam Akers is active, Madison should get most

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 2>of the work, and he will be acted by the

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>way they've they've announced as much. Should get most of

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the work in a very plus matchup. Carolina has allowed

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>multiple running back scores in every game this season, allowing

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the second most on the entire year. They're inside linebacker.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Frankie Louvu left last week's game with a hip injury,

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and Shaq Thompson is on injured reserve. Carolina ranks twenty

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>third run stopping by Pro Football Focus. I like Alexander

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Madison in this game.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>I also heard they weren't playing on playing Cam on

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 3>passing downs.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>At least that, which would make sense as well. Actually,

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>that's a more sophisticated sort of route pickups and things

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that he'd have to do with that pass protection and

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 2>other things for Carolina. I originally had an A grade

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>on Adam Field, but now with the news that it's

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be Bryce Young as the probable starter here,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>everybody in the passing game goes down and notch because honestly,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Calton was better, right, I mean, the Panthers offense play

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>their best game last week under Dalton, but still Bryce

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Young startable here. I've got a C grade on Bryce

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Young just because the Vikings secondary is so soft right now. Miami, sorry, Minnesota,

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 2>allowing a staggering seventy six percent completion rate. They ranked

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>dead last in pass rush by Pro Football Focus. They've

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>only generated fourteen quarterback pressures per game. It's not nearly

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>good enough, especially for a team blitzing as much as

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings are. Bryce Young will have time to scan

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the field find his receivers in a pinch. You could

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 2>go to Bryce Young this week. Back to Adam Thielen

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>B grade revenge game, obviously as he plays Minnesota. He's

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>coming off back to back solid games. Really blossomed with

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Dalton last week. Again, wish Dalton was playing here. Fourteen

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 2>targets last week. Feland remains an elite goal to go

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 2>receiving threat, just like he was in Minnesota. Primarily playing

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the slot for Carolina. The Vikings just got nuked out

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of the slot by Keenan Allen last week, who exploited

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a half dozen different Vikings dB. He's trying to guard

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>him from the slot. See B grade for Adam Thieln

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>C grade for DJ Chark. As an outside option here,

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>he runs from the outside. He's going to see cornerbacks

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>at Caleb Evans the most, and a little bit of

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Makai Blackman. Evans has allowed touchdowns in consecutive games. Blackman

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 2>has allowed an eighty six percent completion percentage, both positive

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>for DJ Hark. You could give a try on Miles Sanders.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna want to follow this. He's got a groin injury.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>He was a Friday, he was a Friday missed practice.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 2>We don't like guys to get downgraded on Friday. You're

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>heading the wrong direction into the weekend. This groind injury

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 2>is a very real threat to re injure for running

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 2>back because you have to do all the cutting. Sanders

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>has experienced a decline in carries and yards per game

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>in every game this year. Panthers run blocking has been bad.

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>That hasn't helped him either. He is a capable receiver,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>but this is one thing the Vikings defense has been

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>great at. They've allowed the second fewest receptions to running backs,

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the fewest receiving yards to running backs, giving up a

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 2>touchdown to running backs. So if Sanders, even if if

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Sanders starts the game, he still gets a bench grade.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Now if he's out, Juba Hubbard presumably gets like all

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 2>the work and he would turn into a C grade

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 2>in that event. When we come back, nine players upon

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 2>whom you can take a chance. Find out who these

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 2>guys are. Maybe you have injuries, maybe you have illness,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 2>maybe you've got underperformers. We're gonna dig up some deep

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>dives for you to inject into your lineup when we

0:17:29.600 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 2>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, Take a chance on me.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Nine players not normally in your starting lineup. These are

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 2>all guys well in many cases you can pick up

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>off the waiver wire injected into your lineup for possible

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 2>success this weekend, we begin with the quarterback position at

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Scott Fish.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I like that you say nine players, and I'm going

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 3>to give you two quarterbacks wo, because I have to

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 3>hatch here. I have to hetche all right. Derek Carr

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 3>is expected to play. Yes, if he starts, he gets

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.239
<v Speaker 3>the ninth easiest matchup against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, who

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 3>allow two hundred and seventy seven yards and almost too

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 3>actually two fall if you count the rushing two touchdowns

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 3>per game to the quarterback position. Derek Carr at three

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred and four yards and two hundred and twenty eight

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 3>yards in his two full games. His weapons will be

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 3>healthier getting Kamara back as well. The other option here

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>is Jimmy Garoppolo, who also might not play, so hopefully

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to go Jameis Winston. No, no no, no,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 3>no no no. I'm going with two guys that you

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 3>hope play one of them. They both have great matchups.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Garolo versus the Chargers. They ranked fourth worst in

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 3>the defensive DVOA. Jimmy g is second in fifteen plus

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>yard throws. He's really getting the ball deep down.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 2>There, Jaybe. It was Kyle Shanahan that was holding him.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Back to all his betting concussion protocol, but he practiced

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the last two days of the week. Chargers allowing an

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>average of three hundred and sixty yards and two point

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 3>seven scores per game on their way to being the

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 3>worst against fantasy quarterbacks. Hopefully one of them goes and

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 3>go pick them up, because I'm sure those two guys

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 3>are available.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, they probably are, actually, Derek car Jimmy all right,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>you're taking chance at me quarterbacks, So nice.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Last segment we talked about the Bells and the Dolphins,

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 4>which is the obvious fantasy game of the week. I

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 4>think the Colts in the Rams is this is non.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Obvious sneaky game of the sneaky.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 4>So with that being said, Matthew Staffords might take a

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 4>chance on me. Quarterback number six in passing grade this

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 4>year for Matthew Stafford, number nine yards per attempt for

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Matthew Stafford this year.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And this is a really good matchup.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 4>As we're sort of alluding to, the Colts are allowing

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 4>the fourth most fantasy points to opposing core this year.

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a nice start for him. I'm gonna go.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson taking on Chicago. This is for all the

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 2>problems the Broncos have, like, none of it is on

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson. He's thrown multiple touchdowns and or three hundred

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>passing yards in every game. The Bear secondary in ruins

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>with injury and ineptitude. They've allowed seven passing touchdowns already.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Two of Wilson's three receivers have got strongly positive matchups

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in this game. Chicago's pass rush ranks thirtieth by Pro

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Football Focus, and they've generated one sack and seven quarterback

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 2>hits in three games. Think about how bad that is. Unbelievable.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the running back position, Scott Fish.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I have Elijah Mitchell here, the San Francisco

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 3>forty nine ers against the Arizona Cardinals. They're more than

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 3>two touchdown favorites. Now, I will say Dallas didn't do

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 3>so well against last week.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Rico, Dowolves probably sounded pretty good last.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Week, and Donald actually didn't do too bad last week.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Mitchell more than two touchdown favorite CMC likely to

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>get some rest here where Mitchell can come in. He

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 3>did see fourteen touches last week in a similar game

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 3>script where they won by what sixteen points or whatever?

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 3>It was nineteen points? I believe it was. I saw

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 3>fourteen touchdowns in a similar game script last week, and

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals sixth worst against fantasy quarterback running backs.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, Surry, you're taking chance on me running back

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>speaking of Rea, Sorry mode, you're a lot a bit there, Yeah.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 4>And going along the same thought process the Fish had

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 4>for his Obviously, Dowdell is Tony Pollard's handcuff, but I

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 4>think he could have standalone value in this game against

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 4>the Patriots. Dowdell is playing really well in his limited looks,

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 4>number sixteen in PFF grade for running backs this year.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 4>You guys mentioned his game last week, forty six total

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 4>yards on seven touches. En Rico scored his first career touchdown.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 4>If the Cowboys throttle the Patriots in this game, which

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 4>is definitely in play, Dowdell could threaten fifteen touches.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Also, just to help his point, New England and Dallas

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>are number one and number two in pace of play,

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 3>so there's gonna be a lot of plays, a lot

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 3>of opportunity.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I would never guess the Patriots are that high in Pamela.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 2>They picked up this year. They really have. You're gonna

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 2>love this one for Roe Sean Johnson. Baby love it.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Broncos ranked thirty first against the run by Pro Football Focus.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 2>They ranked dead last in tackling.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Shockingly, have twelve tackles of the year.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>It feels that way, doesn't it. Shockingly, Chicago's offensive line

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>holds the league's second best run block win rate. I

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>never would have guessed that, a seventy six percent win

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>rate behind Philadelphia. Come on, how is the Bears offensive

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>line doing that? Broncos have been gashed by opposing running

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 2>backs through the air, allowing the fifth most running back receptions,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the most running back receiving yards, and the most running

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>back receiving touchdowns. And Johnson's been shockingly active in the

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Bears passing attack, averaging eighteen routes per game. Roe Sean Johnson, Now,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>when this one hits thor that'll complete some kind of

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 2>trifecta that you have a preseason predictions for you. I

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>love it. Let's go to the receivers, Scott so.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 3>I originally had Josh Palmer in this spot because I

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>think he's got a good spot. And then I noticed

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 3>that Jacoby Myers is forty percent started this week. What

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 3>is going on with that? Yeah, he doesn't.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Realize how good Jacoby Meyers.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I think he's boring to people or something. He I

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know what it is. But ten plus targets and

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 3>seven plus catches and eight plus yards in both games.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 3>He's got that McDaniel Jimmy G. Myers connection. For New

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 3>England Chargers have allowed six wide receiver touchdowns on their

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 3>way to being second worst against wide receivers. And he's

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 3>got good matchups. He's he's either going against the Sante

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Samuel Junior or Michael Davis, both allowing well allowing one

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirteen point four passer rating the other one

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty nine point two passer rating against. It

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 3>just a good spot for him.

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I like it. Hey Myers. By the way, not only

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>fantasy owners missing the Jacoby Myers thing, how about general

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 2>manager Bill Belichick? Who basically traded in on. He even

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 2>contracts Joe Kobe Myers let him leave him breaking Juju

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Smith schusteron not good? Oh come on yeah, anyway, Thornier

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>your final take a chance with me player. We're going

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 2>back to the Well in that Rams Colts game.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm going with two to two at Well, which people

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 4>out there might be surprised. He is wide receiver twelve

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>and half point PPR scoring so far this season. Two

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 4>to has drawn at least eight targets in every single

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 4>game so far this season.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>His role is not changing.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he's becoming a weekly must start type of player.

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 4>He certainly is this week against a terrible Colts pass

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 4>defense that's already allowed thirteen plus PPR fantasy points to

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 4>multiple opposing receivers twice this season, so usually two receivers

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 4>are going to eat when they play the Colts. I

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 4>think that's happening again this week.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Totally with you on that. You know, when Cooper Cup

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>comes back and now it sounds like he's going to

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 2>start practicing next week, things will get a little bit trickier.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 2>But at Well's not running from the slot at all, basically,

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>so he'll stay on the field.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 4>And he's the burner. They don't have another guy to

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:04.360
<v Speaker 4>fill his stretch once he does.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right point. Nico Collins is a long time favorite

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of this show, and we're going to go right back

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to him here against Pittsburgh. Currently tenth in receiving yards

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 2>through three games, the average yards of separation Collins creates

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 2>on his receptions four and a half yards. That is

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>over a yard and a half more than league average,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>so he's getting open. Pittsburgh's defense has allowed the second

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 2>most rushing yards to this point, so there is somewhere

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>he used to could do the damage on the ground,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 2>but the Houston running game has not been able to

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 2>generate much to this point. Collins is a great matchup

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 2>on the outside against Levi Wallace and Patrick Peterson. Wallace

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 2>just got thumped for one hundred and four yards and

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>two touchdowns last week. Meanwhile, Patrick Peterson is giving up

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 2>a passer rating of one hundred and forty four and

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>has given up three touchdowns already. So Nico Collins, I'm

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>very very intrigued. Let's go back to the matchup Steelers.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Tail Let's stick in the taks.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, same game. Let's go to the Steelers side to

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>start on this one and what has been an absolutely

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>brutal start for basically every Steeler you could have, possibly Drac.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 3>I had so much high hopes for this Steeler offense.

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>The way they looked in preseason against basic vanilla defenses

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 3>at backups, we just thought they'd be so that would translate.

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 3>But at least Kenny Pickett hit through his first multi

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 3>score game last week, so I guess I jinxed that streak,

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 3>but I talked about it last week. Probably got fifteen

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 3>straight weeks with one score. He basically needs it because

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 3>he throws two hundred and twenty to two hundred and

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 3>thirty five yards every single game. So if he doesn't

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>get that second score, he's not worth a start. And

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna say he's not worth a start here.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I know the Texans are twenty fifth in defensive DVOA,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 3>but despite that low rank, they bring the heat, having

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>a seventh best pressure rate in the NFL. I don't

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 3>know that that offensive line and Kenny Pickett can handle

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 3>that heat.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>Probably not.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 3>So I have I basically have only have a couple

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 3>of grades here. I have George Pickens with a C grade.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna need a big skill. He's either gonna need

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>that one touchdown from Pickett or he'll need a big play.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 3>But he just gets tons of targets. He's the target

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>yardage leaders since Deontay Johnson went out only one wide

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 3>receiver his top sixty yards against the Texans. But if

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 3>he's seen near double digit touchdowns, that volume alone should

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 3>four or five six catches. He's gonna get in that

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 3>C grade. Yeah. In the run game, man, Jalen Warren,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I had more hope, but he just didn't get it

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 3>done last week.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, and he didn't give that many carries. It's like

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 2>they doubled down on Naji Harris.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the other like, let's let's keep going to that

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 3>that Naji Harris. Well, so I can't trust in Jalen

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Warren and I'm still gonna give naj the sea, but

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>you could tell me to bench him and I would

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>do it. Here's yeah, exactly why seventh worst against Backs

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 3>seven Zach Moss and Travis etn just dropped one hundred

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and plus in each of the last two weeks. Just

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that thirteen touches for forty seven scoreless yards being his

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 3>average is just gross though, But he should get the

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 3>volume C and it's a better matchup over on the

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 3>other side. C. J. Stroud, I do have. I could

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 3>tell you I have Friar with on the bench. I

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and he scored two touchdowns. But he's got he's got

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>five catches on the year, like he's just not getting all.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 2>They're not using him better.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and more.

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>C J.

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Stroud, I have a C grade on Steelers. Rank eighth

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>in defensive DVOA, fifth highest pressure rate. All both good spots.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 3>But I think C. J. Stroud has looked really, really good.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 3>And Jimmy G just went for three forty two and

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 3>two on them, and I think J. Stroud is at

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 3>least Jimmy G level, So he looks good. So I'm

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna give him a C grade. Here, Damian Pierce, I

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 3>have the D grade dart throw that's you said, that's

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>okay right, No now, now, I'll get okay, okay grade

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 3>if you want, I'll give him an he's not a

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 3>dart row guy. I'll give him a C grade. His

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 3>negative yards over expectation is one of the five worst

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 3>in the league, five worst, and time spent behind the

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 3>line of scrimmage. But McCaffrey, Jerome Ford Nick Chubb, Josh

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Jacobs Dale did really great work against the Steelers. They're

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>eighth worst against running backs. It's a good spot. I'll

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 3>give him a CEA.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully he'd finally giving up five point five yards per perry.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>If this Houston offensive line can't give Damian Peterson with here,

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that's I don't know what I'm gonna do.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 3>It's exactly what I was gonna say, Like, this is

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 3>the spot for Damien Harrison. If it isn't, I'd be

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 3>really really worried. Nico Collins, you'll take a chance on

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 3>me player. I also like tanked ol I got the

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 3>C grade on him too. I both him. Both of

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>them looking good. They both get plus matchups because they'll

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 3>switch on Levey Wallace and Patrick Peterson, and you've already

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 3>talked about the salient points about them. Robert Woods is

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 3>going to get Chandon Sullivan there on the slot. It's

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the fifth easiest matchup for wide receivers, uh Davante Adams,

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Brandon ayuk Amari Cooper. I'll torch them. The smaller speedy guys,

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the Debo and Myers drop fifty five yards and eighty

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.719
<v Speaker 3>five yards everybody. They're both very wildly viable here in

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>this matchup.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Agreed. Yeah, So our final matchup of this segment taking

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>on the Colts, as you alluded to earlier. Well, you

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 2>didn't allude, You set it out right, and you're right.

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 2>There's sneaky points to be had here. You've already touched

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 2>on two to two at well, tell me about the

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 2>rest of the passing game here for the Rams and

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Stafford you already hit that too. Yeah, my two

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 2>take a chance on me, guys.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Moving to Puka Nakua, great of a weekly must start,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 4>already wide receiver seven in fantasy this thus far number

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.479
<v Speaker 4>four in first read share in the NFL.

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Love it.

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Another big games coming for Puka this week Indianapolis is

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 4>his zone heavy coverage defense, and they're not a good one.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Puka's the Rams zone beater. We've already seen that this year.

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 4>He has a forty three point nine first read share

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 4>against zone and also three point four to four yards

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 4>per route run.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Against zone coverage.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 4>And as I mentioned before, the Colts have already allowed

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 4>six different wide receivers to score at least thirteen PPR

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy points this year, and multiple ones in two games

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 4>so Pukah is a good obviously a must start to

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 4>two is a good matchup as well. Keep Van Jefferson

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 4>on your bench or preferably cut him at this point. Yeh,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Higbee, I'm going to give him a grade of B.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 4>He does have a solid fifteen point four first read

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 4>share this year, and this is also a good matchup

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 4>for him. Indianapolis allows the eighth most receiving yards to

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 4>opposing tight ends. Moving to Brian's boy, Kyron Williams. If

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 4>there's such thing as a volume B grade, here's a

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 4>B grade. Okay, I mean that's available. You can just

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 4>use B.

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Fish is a bad influence on me.

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he is well the secret the volume C is

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 3>a C grade. I'm just clarifying that it's because he's

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna get volume. I don't actually love him.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Kyen's a sort of a better version of that.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Ninety five percent plus snaps each of the last two weeks.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 4>There's okay, here's a crazy stat. There's only been five

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 4>games in the NFL this year where a running back

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 4>has taken every rushing attempt to carry from their team

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 4>in that game. Does he have two of the five

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 4>of them where Kyron's last two weeks, so that's kind

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 4>of crazy. And he still play got Nuber's special teams UITs.

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know how that kid's but you know,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 4>doing it, or how long he can stay healthy.

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Now let's assume he does go down. Do I want

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Evan Hall? Not Evan Hall, sorry, Zach Evans.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that would be the next one up at

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 4>this point. Yeah, at this point. The player though for Kyroen,

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 4>has been a little bit mediocre, you know, and this

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 4>goes back to his athletic limitations and stuff like that.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 4>He's averaged eighty two point five total yards in those

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 4>two games, even though he's getting all the snaps, getting

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>the opportunities, he's outside the top forty in miss tackles,

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 4>force per attempt and yards after contact per attempt. There's

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 4>only fifty some qualifiers for that, so he's down near

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the bottom. He is an absolute cell high candidate. I agreed,

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 4>if you can get anything for him in trade, like

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 4>you can get a lot, you can get a lot

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 4>for Kyen Williams right now, I would move.

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>It's because people are so desperate at running back.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree, the usage for sure is going to

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 4>be there, but yeah, I have questions about the other

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 4>stuff moving to the colt side. Anthony Richardson coming back

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.479
<v Speaker 4>from the concussion. I give him a grade A in

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 4>this matchup, only twenty eighth in the NFL in passing

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 4>grade to this point, but number one in the NFL

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 4>in fantasy points per drop back. The Rams have a

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 4>good pass defense, but as you guys know, Richardson's legs

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 4>set an extremely high floor in every game from a

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 4>fantasy perspective, and a top three ceiling weekly.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 3>In terms of that, you'd mentioned the fantasy points per dropback,

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points per snap. He's at zero point four to

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 3>six per fantasy points per snap, which means lot. He

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 3>snaps the ball, he gets you half a fantasy point.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, no matter if he could be handing it off, Yeah,

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 2>and he got.

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 3>You half of It's unreal.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It's it's ridiculous.

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna get Michael Pittman an A grade as well

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 4>in this one wide receiver twelve in fantasy. He's proven

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 4>the past couple of years he has quarterback proof. It

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 4>does not matter, he is going to produce. Pittman has

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 4>scored at least thirteen point six PPR Fantasy points in

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 4>every game this season. This is a great matchup for

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 4>him as well. The Rams predominantly run zone coverage. Pittman

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 4>versus zone coverage has a crazy forty one point two

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 4>percent target share.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's huge, huge, Josh Downs.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna give him a c. He has a solid

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent first read share as Indyanapolis is starting slot

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 4>slot this season, and he has a good matchup here

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 4>against Kolbe Durant the opposing nickel. Durant has allowed a

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 4>seventy one point four percent catch rate and one hundred

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 4>and one point five passer rating against. You're gonna keep

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 4>Alec Pearson Kylon grantson on your bench. I'm gonna give

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Zach Moss though an a rounding this thing out. Last

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 4>two games, Zach Moss seventy six percent plus snaps both

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 4>times for an average of one hundred and twenty six

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 4>total yards per game. The Rams run defense is not good.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 4>They're allowing the tenth most yards after contact per attempt.

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 4>As we all know, Moss is a tackle breaker.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well that's what I was telling everybody when he

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 2>was in Buffalo, and I was like, he's gonna get

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 2>used in Buffalo. W it's never panned out. People are

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 2>stillting it now with me. Now he's getting his opportunities.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's only for like one more game, but we'll

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 2>we'll find out. Would we come back more matchups for you,

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 2>including the Broncos taking on the Bears. These are two

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of the arguably the worst and the second worst defense

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 2>playing against each other, so opportunities abound. Will tell you

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 2>about that matchup when we come back too, Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly Paul Jorgi and Scott Fish

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 2>and throw an eistrom with you. Broncos take on the Bears,

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 2>two of the worst defenses in the league playing each other.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson was already might take a chance on me quarterback.

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's go too his receivers. I got an eight grade

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>on Jerry Judy with a phenomenal matchup running largely out

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of the slot against cornerback Josh Blackwell, who gives up

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 2>a one nineteen passer rating and has yet to force

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>an incomplete pass. So there's a really nice opportunity for

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Jerry Judy. A graade for him. B great for Courtland

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Sutton against the secondary. Sutton likely gets shadow coverage from

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the only good Bears cornerback Jalen Johnson. He's giving up

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 2>just twenty four scoreless yards in his coverage per game.

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 2>So I can only get the B grade on Courtland Sutton,

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 2>but Marvin Mims B grade and this could be a

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 2>biggie here. He's your Hail Mary home on to plan more.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Say no, that's the catches like he's on the field

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 2>like fifteen snaps a game, but a dream matchup against

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 2>rookie cornerback Tyreek Stevenson. He's allowing an almost perfect passer

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 2>rating in his coverage of one hundred and forty eight

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 2>including touchdowns and back to back games. Let's try a

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>little Marvin Mims here. Let's get staying with the passing game.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Adam Troutman zero catches in back to back weeks, so

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 2>he's nothing more than a desperation dark brow. But he's

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 2>running a ton of routes and Chicago's allowed the third

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 2>most tight end receptions and three different tight ends of

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 2>top forty yards, so in the tight end wasteland. Yeah,

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go see grade on Adam Trautman. Lastly, Javonte Williams.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I like him here, Bears allowing the tenth most rushing

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 2>yards and the second most receiving yards to opposing backs.

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>It's one hundred and fifty seven total yards per game.

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Javonte Williams is going to get most of that. The

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Bears have also given up almost two and a half

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns per game to posting running back second most. Javonte

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Williams seeing forty four percent of the snaps, will take

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>him here. This should be a good opportunity for him.

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the Chicago side. Rochan Johnson was might

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 2>take a chance on me. Running Back Khalil Herbert clocks

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in with a C grade, averaging five more snaps than

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Roshan Johnson along with a couple more carries. But of note,

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Johnson out carried Herbert last week by one carry. And

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 2>I already discussed the broncos many row woes against the

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>run when I was talking about Roshan Johnson. So you know,

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 2>if you've got little Herbert on on your roster, you

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 2>may as well start him here. It's the easiest matchup

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of the year, all right. What to do about justin Field?

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 2>So it's been a disaster for fantasy owners who went

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to bat for justin fields to the first set of games,

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 2>and you know if you finally bench him, he's gonna

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 2>blow up. Right here, He's gon to run for hundred

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 2>and forty yards and two touchdowns. The best reason to

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 2>keep him in your lineup is this. After getting two

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and then three designed runs through the first couple of weeks,

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 2>he got seven last week. We're here for the running

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 2>for Justin Fields.

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 2>The Broncos held mobile quarterback Sam Howell to thirteen rushing yards,

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 2>but he had zero design runs in that game. Denver

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Rank's twenty seventh in pass rush by Pro Football Focus

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and dead last in pass block win rate. So Justin

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Fields should have time. Doesn't mean he's doing anything with it,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 2>but I'm giving him a C grade here on just

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 2>the totality of his opportunity. DJ Moore gets a C

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 2>grade Denver Rank's thirty first and pass coverage by Pro

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Football Focus, but more will draw. The only competent cornerback

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 2>on the team, Patrick Certain, who's more than competent. He's

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 2>borderline awesome in shadow coverage. Now. Certain got worked last week,

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 2>but he's proven over the course of his career to

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 2>be very good. And he held the Washington and Las

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Vegas receivers to sixteen yards and seventeen yards in his coverage.

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 2>It's potentially a tricky game for DJ Moore only a

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 2>C grade, and Cole Comet is on the bench diminishing

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 2>targets receptions in yards. In three games so far, for

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 2>all at Denver's defensive woes, they've held down opposing tight ends,

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 2>allowing just modest forty one yards per game to the position.

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Cole Comet, nothing special on the bench. Let's go to

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Bucks taking on to these Saints. Scott.

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, this is actually kind of one of my favorite

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 3>matchups because because we have Mike Evans versus Marshaw Lattimore

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and all their drama. Yea. And on the other side

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>you got Carlton Davis who held Michael Thomlas to zero

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 3>receptions and then called him slant boy. I love it.

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 3>So we got some drava. The wide receiver, the cornerback matchups.

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield I do have on the bench, though. I

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 3>love what Dave Canalis has done the oc higher from Seattle,

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 3>who made Gino Smith be awesome last year. He's really

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>done it with Baker this year too. But New Orleans

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 3>is holding opposing quarterbacks to two hundred and three in

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 3>yards and one score stat lines. They ranked sixth in

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>defensive DVOA and honestly Baker's stats, I mean he's averaging

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.399
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and twelve yards and one point. Like it's

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 3>not even that that spectacular, but it's it's better.

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Than we expected.

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Ben, It's just not the match This is not the

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 3>matchup for it. I do have Mike Evans with a

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 3>C grade in that Marshaan let like, he's been a

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 3>level all year, So a C grade is really low.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 3>It's just because it's Marshawn Lattimore and we've seen a

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 3>ton of benchworthy games and even injections and fights from

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 3>these two since twenty seventeen. He's scored four times in

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 3>those ten matchups against Latimore, averaging about sixty five yards

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 3>each or was under sorry, I was under sixty five

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 3>yards in eight of the ten. That's that's where the

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 3>stab was. So C grade there. I hope you can

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 3>hope you can get some in this better year for him.

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 3>B grade on Chris Godwin. If Paulson Dable goes, it

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 3>may be tougher sledding, but he is dealing with a

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 3>hamstring injury, so maybe not you never know, but he's

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 3>allowing six catches for seventy one scoreless yards. If not,

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 3>it's Isaac ye Yeaedamy item im think it's m I

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 3>might be Yaem who allowed four for thirty in a

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 3>score last week in replacements. So it's an okay spot

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 3>for Chris Godwin's he usually has the better he scores.

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 3>He's scored more Fantasy points than Evans in four straight

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 3>of those Saints Lattimore matchups, So B grade there Over

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 3>to the other side, New Orleans Saints side. Derek Carr

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 3>was kind of a take chance on me, Hedge.

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 2>He really was.

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that what it is? Because it's a decent matchup

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 3>for quarterbacks there. I love his I love Chris lave

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna get an A grade for me. Justin Jefferson

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty yards. DJ Moore one hundred and

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 3>four yards. AJ Brown one hundred and thirty one yards.

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 3>The number ones are doing what they do against the

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Bucks defense and Chris LaVey in general. Seven plus catches,

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 3>one hundred plus yards. He just hasn't every game. He

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 3>just hasn't scored. Well, he kind of scored but stepped

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 3>out of bounds. At the leg. That cost me a

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 3>game in our home league. Charge that step out did out,

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I'd be three and oh, I hate that, hate that.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I was high fiving my son and then nope, nope.

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 3>His worst game is eight for eight or six for

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 3>eighty six. That's his worst game. So a grade there,

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Michael Thomas C grade in that Carlton Davis matchup, He's

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 3>got at least five for fifty yards in every game

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Number two is against the Bucks. Sixty one yards, thirty

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 3>six yards, fifty eight yards, all four to five catches.

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 3>That's good. All three scored. They're letting the number two

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>score and they're not letting the number None of the

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 3>number one scored, all the number two scored. So it's

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of a weird situation.

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about the number three Rashid No, Now,

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 2>he scored on a punt return, he scored in every

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 2>game punt return last week, but no catches to go

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 2>with it.

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 3>Heart, Yeah, I'm keep him on the bench, but if

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 3>you want to dart throw him in a decent matchup,

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 3>you can dart throw him. But I have a bench

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 3>grade on him.

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we have time to work in one

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 2>more matchup.

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask you one question then if we're like

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 3>we got a minute here, right? Yeah? I told you

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I play in the league with Darren Waller, and I

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 3>was gonna offer Darren wall to himself so I could

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 3>get some fined that information. I picked him two picks

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 3>before he picked yeah, and he picked TJ. Hockinson. Can

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I trade him Darren Waller for TJ.

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Hocketts because he has to take himself?

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. J. Hockinson is better than that.

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 2>He's got. I want you to do it on this break,

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 2>and then I want you to report back whether or

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 2>not he actually takes the trade because he kind of

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 2>has to take himself, doesn't he.

0:43:22.680 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 3>TJ.

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Hawkins is the highest scoring tight ended fantasyball. That would

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 2>be great. Jamison Williams gets a is coming back a

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 2>week early now. He's probably locked in your system because

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 2>he played on Thursday night. The lanes happened to have

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 2>played Thursday night. He probably can't pick him up. But

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 2>note that he's coming back. I think it could be

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a slow It might be slow to get him working

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 2>back into the system because Josh Reynolds is good. Cliff

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Raymond's making big plays. I don't know that he walks

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 2>into a big starting role very quickly.

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I don't know either, but we do have to

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 3>remember he averages forty one yards per catch.

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Against the Biking.

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Against all teams. That's a touchdown at every every catch.

0:44:01.120 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Guarantee leagues are super fun and we're still

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 2>forming new Guillotine leagues. You get to play for fifteen

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 2>more weeks. You know it works. The low screwing team

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 2>gets chopped every week and all the players go to

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the waiver wire where the rest of us build superstar rosters.

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>It's Guillotine Leagues dot Com. Tons of fun, and you

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 2>can still join a new league. Back for our number

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 2>two in Moments, our number two Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Charchi and Scott Fish and Thor Nystrom with you. This

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 2>is a game we like to call three tough questions.

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Tough question Number one is Derrick Henry cooked? Scott Fish?

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Sure? Sure, Normally I don'ly I like to, you know,

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 3>delve onto the positive. But Spears got more snaps last week.

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 3>The eyebe doesn't. He doesn't look as dominant, his metrics

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 3>are down. He's always like been buoyed by these late

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 3>in game wearing down of the defenses or you know,

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 3>a big, huge play. He had that one big catch

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 3>in week one, but that's it. Otherwise, mostly short runs

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 3>and even when he was wearing down in week two,

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty five carries here we got like seventy yards. He's

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 3>not getting what he used to get to be dominant, all.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, So you're yes, sure works as a yes on

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 2>this sure thor is Derek Henry cooked?

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 4>I would say he's medium rare cooked, not fully cooked.

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Well that's not that's that's evehen that's on the that's

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 2>medium rare is that's barely barely cooked. He's barely he's

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:41.320
<v Speaker 2>partially cooked.

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean he's seventeenth in PFF run grade right now,

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 4>he's thirteenth in yards after contact. They're obviously spelling him

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 4>more as Fish was alluding to before, and attempting to

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 4>protect him more, and he's already starting to pick up

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 4>some of these nagging injuries.

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Partially cooked, not all the way cooked answers, Yes he is.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:02.760
<v Speaker 2>He's carried the ball fifty one times. How many broken

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 2>tackles He's got five, Dereck Henry five broken tackles on

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 2>fifty one carries in PFF's elusiveness rating. Only four starting

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 2>running backs are rated lower than Derrick Henry in yards

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 2>over expectation. Dereck Henry is a flat zero. Guess who's

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 2>third running in the same offense. Taj Spears is sitting

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 2>behind Christian McCaffrey and Bijon Robinson. Last week in a

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 2>one sided loss, granted was a one sided loss, and

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 2>they were behind early. Henry was on the field eleven snaps,

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 2>Spears thirty three snaps. Holy cow, this is a very

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, do you think Tennessee's going to

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 2>fall behind frequently?

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:49.959
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah they are. This is Look, I'm not saying

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Derek Henry will never have another good fantasy game, But

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.919
<v Speaker 2>what I am telling you is the end is effectively here.

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Right Derrick Henry, You've enjoyed the last four years. That's over.

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 2>This is this He's not the best running back on

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 2>roster right now. Tough question Number two. Alvin Kamara makes

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 2>his return on Sunday. On balance for the rest of

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 2>the season, will Alvin Kamara be an RB one RB

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 2>two flex or will he be a bench player? We

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 2>begin with Thorne Eistro.

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a low end RB one. The rest

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 4>this season. He has a skill set that they really

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.760
<v Speaker 4>really need. You've seen especially with the injuries when Williams

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 4>didn't play, But even when Williams is playing, he's just

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 4>trying to carve stuff out with the lack of explosion

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 4>last week, you know, trying Kendrick Miller, trying some of

0:47:40.040 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 4>these other guys. They really need him. They used to

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 4>just going to dictate that low end RB one designation.

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Scott Alvin Kamara on balance for the rest

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of the season. Will he be an RB one, an

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 2>RB two, yeah, flex or bench.

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 3>I was right with Tho. I was like, low end

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 3>RB one, high end RB two. I'm gonna sit at

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 3>RB two, just a hedge a little. I guess he's

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 3>got five bottom seven matchups that are going to be

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 3>great for him, only two against top ten defenses. Granted,

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 3>we're working on a three game sample size, so a

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of that can change by the time it gets

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.919
<v Speaker 3>to him. But he's a guy who's likely to see

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 3>fifteen plus touches. That's what he did almost every week

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 3>that he suited up last year. Averaged nineteen touches per

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 3>game last year, and he had mark Ingram and David

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Johnson there, so even when Jamal Williams gets back, he

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 3>should see the same type of touchload he got last year.

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Three out of his four final weeks were RB one

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 3>weeks last year. I think he's going to be an

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 3>RB two quite often, and RB one a decent amount

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 3>as well, but RB two I'll go with just high

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 3>end RB two.

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Assuming Jamal Williams returns in three weeks, which is a

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 2>huge factor in this.

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the most key's better than old mark ingram

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 3>from last year.

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 2>He is a lot better the most common grade Alvin

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Kamara is going to get the rest of the year

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 2>is going to be beat and that makes him an

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 2>RB two. Of course, Jamal Williams stealing goal line work,

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 2>but he also have Taysom Hill stealing goal line worker.

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 2>And remember last year. Do you guys remember how many

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 2>games in which Alvin Kamara scored a touchdown last year?

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 2>He scored in two games last year. That's it. Kendry

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 2>Miller's now playing that dilutes the backfield further. Tony Jones

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 2>might still be a factor. Kamara is gonna help Vie

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 2>of the pass because he's really gifted that way. But

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 2>get this second half of last year this was all

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Alvin Kamara was giving you through the air. Two catches

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 2>for twenty two yards second half of last season. That's

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 2>our most recent sample size. There's still a lot of

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.759
<v Speaker 2>reason for concern here at the touchdowns. Maybe not as

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 2>much help in the air game as we think, but

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 2>still starting running back for an NFL team RB two.

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Tough question number three. Miami running back Devon A Chan

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 2>stunned everybody with four touchdowns last week. On balance for

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the season, is he gonna be an

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 2>RB one, an RB two, A flex or a bench player?

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Devon a Chan, Scott Fish.

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Devon A Chan. It's gonna take me a while to

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 3>get it, really is I put flex? Given the injury

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 3>history of moster at Wilson and Auchmed, I think there's

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 3>a decent chance he gets, you know, some okay workloads.

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 3>It's on a you know, a good offense. It's gonna

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of scoring opportunities to his talent and

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 3>skill set, especially for the scheme they scheme. That offensive

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 3>scheme all great, but there's gonna be a lot of

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 3>splitting in and Mike McDaniel himself even this week was like,

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we got a five running back rotation

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 3>that he wants to utilize their skill sets differently for

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 3>different teams so that teams can't you know, plan for them,

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and that scares the crap out of us fantasy owners

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 3>if that's his plan once Jeff Wilson gets back to

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 3>just be using all five of them like that. So

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 3>I went with flex. He's gonna have his moments all right.

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Thor for Miami running back Devon a Chan on balance

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the season, will he be in

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 2>RB one, an RB two, a flex or evene.

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to say RB two on balance where I

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 4>think it's gonna come as like half the weeks you're

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 4>going to get the RB one production that half the

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 4>weeks it's going to be less than that, I think,

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:03.399
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's going to balance out to RB

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 4>two value. The whole thing with the platoon and the

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 4>time share there. It's pragmatic with regards to A Chan.

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean at Texas A and m Jimbo Fisher phone

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 4>he kept wanting to give eight Chan all the touches

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 4>because it was the only way the Aggies could generate

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 4>offense well. Han and the last season he missed two

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 4>games with an injury he'll get He's one hundred and

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 4>eighty five pounder. He's going to get hurt. I'm soaking wet.

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna get hurt if they use him too much.

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 4>So the time share thing works out for him. Some games,

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 4>what he does is hit dingers. So when he does,

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 4>like the last game, hits a couple of them, he's

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 4>gonna have the good value. There's other games where I

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:39.759
<v Speaker 4>don't think the ball is going to go over the

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 4>fence as it were.

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:44.800
<v Speaker 2>So last week he had the gigantic game, the Dolphins

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 2>rolling up seventy on the hapless Broncos was an empty

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:52.719
<v Speaker 2>calorie box score for Miami's backups. Robbie chosen one of

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 2>my guillotine leagues, went for ninety bucks. Yeah, come on,

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be that game. You know, we

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:02.719
<v Speaker 2>all what is it? What we were influenced by what

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 2>happened recent The recency bias, Right, we all have some

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:08.760
<v Speaker 2>recency bias. Here are you going to know when Devon

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Achan's big games are coming.

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Not less his injuries?

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 2>And that's the problem, right, you know when this, when

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:18.280
<v Speaker 2>they've got a healthy rotation of backs, you almost need

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>guys like Achman to be out like he was last week.

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Wilson to be out like he was last week. That

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:26.280
<v Speaker 2>clarifies it. But that's not always going to be the case.

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 2>He's still the backup to a running back who looks

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 2>frankly amazing and Raheem Mostert, And you know, you got

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:33.839
<v Speaker 2>a factor in Mostar. It's likely to get injured too,

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 2>but so you know, he might as well love the burst.

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I love that he can catch. I also got a

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:40.479
<v Speaker 2>factor in Jeff Wilson returning from ir in one week

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 2>from now. Basically we're just going to the flex level

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:46.799
<v Speaker 2>and you might want to sell high by the way,

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Devon a Chan. Let's go back to the matchups. Bengals

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 2>taking on the Titans. Joe Burrow completely off the injury report.

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Does that give Thorne Neistrom some renewed interest in that

0:52:59.080 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 2>passing game?

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, so with Burrow, he's an interesting case this week.

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 4>This is definitely an a matchup by you know, any

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:10.240
<v Speaker 4>paper quantifiable, Yeah, exactly because of the awful Titans pass defense.

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.319
<v Speaker 4>But of course the Bengals have been getting the ball

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:15.200
<v Speaker 4>out super duper quick to protect Burrow in the pocket.

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 4>So I'm because of that, I'm going to downgrade him

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 4>to a B in this matchup. Jamar Chase, though, of course,

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 4>is an A and a weekly must start. T Higgins,

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to give him a grade of B. He's

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 4>their downfield guy. He is not a yet guy. And

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 4>the way that Burrow has been playing so far, getting

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the ball out so quick, it's it doesn't really facilitate

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 4>those downfield looks for T.

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Higgins.

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he's just not not throwing well downfield, maybe

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 3>because of the injury, because he can't plant and drive it.

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 3>But he's out two for seventeen on the season with

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 3>an interception throwing more than fifteen yards.

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen yards isn't even that deep it is. I mean,

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 2>you know what we generally call you know, we use

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the term deep when we're talking analytically, it's usually twenty

0:53:55.360 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 2>yards or more. Fifteen is not even that deep. And

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you've completed two passes through three games.

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Teams for five for five to two for seven a pick.

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 4>And that bites him too, Higgins' game more than anybody else,

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 4>because he's your downfield, jump jump all kind of guy.

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna keep Tyler Boyd and then the banged of

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Cincinnati tight end room on the bench, Joe Mixon.

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna give him the volume C grade here.

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Seventy five percent plus of snaps in each of the

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 4>last two games, average eighteen and a half touches and

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 4>eighty two point five total yards those games. But the

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Titans run defense is awesome, number two stuff rate in

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 4>the NFL this year, and of course last year, as

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 4>we've talked about a couple of times, they were the

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 4>number one run defense DVOA in the NFL. Moving to

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 4>the Titan side of things, Ryan Tannehill, you're keeping on

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 4>the bench. I think DeAndre Hopkins is the only potential

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 4>startable guy in you know, amongst the receiving core. I'm

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.240
<v Speaker 4>gonna give him a volume seed. Keep in mind, DeAndre

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Hopkins was limited in practice Thursday. He did practice in

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 4>full on Wednesday, likely to play in this game, but

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:56.359
<v Speaker 4>only nine point eight PPR Fantasy points per game. That's

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 4>the second lowest of his career. But he already has

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 4>twenty five targets to easily lead the team this year.

0:55:01.960 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Second place trail On Burks has thirteen. Burks is out

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 4>for this game, so is Kyle Phillips. So that so

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Hopkins at least gonna get the targets. Chicka Konquo been

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:14.719
<v Speaker 4>disappointing so far. Yes, this is the breakout game is

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:17.879
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, I'm gonna give him a be. He only

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 4>has zero point six rams at zero point six to

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 4>eight yards per route run this year and zero red

0:55:23.040 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 4>zone targets. But again, I think this is where it

0:55:25.680 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 4>changes against Cincinnati defensive coordinator Ana Rumos defense. If I

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 4>can say that what you do is you attack the

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 4>tight ends and the slot receivers, they're really good against

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:38.800
<v Speaker 4>the boundary guys. This year, the Bengals have allowed the

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 4>six most fantasy points to opposing tight ends. I think

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Chick gets back on track in this one. We talked

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 4>a bit about Derreck Henry so far on this show.

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to give him a great be assuming that

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:50.760
<v Speaker 4>he plays. Of course, he has that turf toe injury

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 4>miss Thursday's practice was limited earlier in the week. Last

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 4>week did not look good, look very sluggish. Twenty total

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 4>yards on eleven rushing attempts, zero touchdowns against the Browns.

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:03.280
<v Speaker 4>But this is a good matchup assuming he plays against

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:06.399
<v Speaker 4>an average Bengals defensive line. But again, on the other

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:08.720
<v Speaker 4>hand of it, there's always a chance he gets game scripted.

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 4>If the Bengals jump out to a lead, Tajy Spears

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 4>has been the receiving back. And speaking of Taj, I'm

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 4>gonna give him a C whereas I gave Henry a B.

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Taj was Vish's prespec. Last week I mentioned that Henry

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 4>was limited in practice. Spears, of course, is his handcuff.

0:56:23.640 --> 0:56:26.880
<v Speaker 4>He is also the Titans undisputed receiving back. If Henry

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 4>needs his workload cut down because of that toll, or

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 4>the game script goes past heavy like we've seen a

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:33.560
<v Speaker 4>couple of these other ones where all of a sudden,

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Spears starts getting all the snaps, then Spears could be

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 4>worth starting in flex and deeper leaks.

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. See, my prespects are long play. They're gonna pan

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 3>out eventually. Four over here is like I'll give you

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 3>immediate points. But no, we don't want that over here.

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, Ravens take on the Browns. Get this.

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 2>The Browns are the number one defense in fantasy points

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 2>allowed to the quarterback position, the running back position, the

0:56:56.960 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver position, and the tight end.

0:56:58.800 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like good defense.

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 2>That's an amazing They're also.

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Number one in defensive DVOA yeah.

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not surprised. Shocking for Lamar Jackson. I was tempted

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 2>to put him on the bench and I couldn't quite

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 2>do it. I've got the C grade on him, and

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:13.440
<v Speaker 2>part of it is because I love is whopping seventy

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:16.160
<v Speaker 2>three percent completion rate, but some of that has come

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 2>at the expensive downfield passing. His A dots just seven

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 2>yards and really everything else is bad news. Get a

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:23.960
<v Speaker 2>load of this. It's just it's staggering. In three games,

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the Browns have allowed one passing touchdown, one hundred and

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 2>one passing yards per game, and minus eight quarterback rushing yards.

0:57:35.680 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 2>What's I mean? Unbelievable? He faced Cleveland once last year.

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 2>He threw for one hundred and twenty scoreless yards ran

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 2>for fifty nine. That would be That's That's all I

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 2>can do to get you to the C grade on

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson's If something like that, he'll have to do

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it without. Rashod Bateman and OBJ have both been ruled

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 2>out for this game. Zay Flowers comes in with a

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:56.240
<v Speaker 2>C grade. Now he runs from all parts of the field,

0:57:57.080 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 2>watches it. The injury status though of excellent corner Greg

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Newsom for the Browns if he can't go, it helps

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Flowers a lot because then he'll go to backup Cameron Mitchell,

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 2>normally just a special teams guy, and Mitchell allowed all

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 2>three passes in his coverage to be completed last week.

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 2>So Jay Flowers if again were not normally attuned to

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:19.439
<v Speaker 2>cornerback health. But if Greg Newsom goes, I really i'd

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 2>consider benching Zay Flowers. If Newsom does not go, then

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I would start him with a C grade. Mark Andrews

0:58:25.840 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 2>production is way down. He has failed to top forty

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 2>five yards in either of his two games, and Cleveland

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 2>has allowed the least fantasy points to tight ends this year.

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:39.040
<v Speaker 2>They've only allowed twenty six yards to tight ends, not

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 2>per game wow on the season, twenty six yards to

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the tight end positions in two games last year. Andrews

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 2>posted zero yards against Cleveland and thirty one yards against

0:58:52.120 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland and did not score only a C grade because

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 2>of the wasteland of the position. Gus Edwards is on

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 2>the bench just eleven carries last week, with the undead

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:06.360
<v Speaker 2>corpse of Melvin Gordon getting ten and averaging a full

0:59:06.520 --> 0:59:09.320
<v Speaker 2>yard per carry less than Edwards, and yet they still

0:59:09.480 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 2>kept trotting out Melvin Gordon. The Browns run defense looks amazing.

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 2>They're giving up two point eight yards per carry, just

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:19.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty five yards per game. No runners scored against Cleveland.

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Edwards would need a goal line carry to get much

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of anything done here. Justice Hill might come back. Don't care.

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Melvin Gordon might play in this game. Don't care they're

0:59:27.240 --> 0:59:30.680
<v Speaker 2>out as well. Let's go to the Cleveland side. Jerome

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Ford immediately stepped into Nick Chubb's usage with six percent

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of the snaps. That was good. Kareem Hunt saw twenty

0:59:37.840 --> 0:59:40.360
<v Speaker 2>percent by the way. Ravens shut down Damian Pierce in

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the opener, but they've struggled against Joe Mixon and Zack

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Moss since then, and that gives you some glimmer of

0:59:45.480 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 2>hope for Jerome Ford in this one. The Ravens have

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 2>allowed only a single touchdown to opposing running backs, but

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 2>they otherwise are middle of the pack, and most running

0:59:52.880 --> 0:59:55.600
<v Speaker 2>back defensive metrics will go B grade on Jerome Ford.

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 2>DeShawn Watson. We were optimistic about Watson and last week's

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 2>easy matchup against Tennessee, much less so this week against

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a good but not great Baltimore secondary. You'll want to

1:00:06.080 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 2>watch the health status of safety Marcus Williams and cornerback

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Marlin Humphrey. They're both healthy enough to return. I think

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>you just move Watson down to a bench grade. Otherwise

1:00:14.040 --> 1:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>we'll go C grade here if they both miss another matchup.

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>And I know you drafted Deshaun Watson for his rushing, No,

1:00:20.520 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 2>but that's largely you miss conception. He's averaging two and

1:00:23.240 --> 1:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>a half designed runs a game. That's it. That's not

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>enough to get it done on the ground. Chat No, honestly,

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>he's not. Right now, how about a Mari Cooper who

1:00:34.480 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>is good. He's reached the seven reception mark in each

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of his last two games, and he's averaging one hundred

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>three yards per game over that span, and it's a

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>home game. Well yeah, way better O the trade to Cleveland.

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 2>The Ravens have allowed the most receptions to wideouts in

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the eighth most yards to wideouts, and Cooper's boasting a

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>healthy forty target share on the season, So we'll take

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>a B grade.

1:00:56.840 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Should have had another touchdown, He should have.

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Had another one. Everybody else is on the bench, including

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>David and Joku, averaging just three catches for thirty yards.

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>He has not a good matchup, and the league's shortest

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>average throw to any player is David and Joku at

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>one yard. You know it is to be Fantasy relevant

1:01:17.240 --> 1:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>on one yard passes virtually impossible. We're gonna try to

1:01:21.680 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 2>squeeze in a shorty here Thor can.

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>You do Pills? No?

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>No, oh no, Raiders, Chargers, can you do d Chargers

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>in three minutes or less? And if you can't, then

1:01:30.520 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna push it to the next time. No sure.

1:01:33.080 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 3>On the Raiders side, Jimmy Garoppolo is one of my

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 3>two quarterback hedges for take a chance on me players,

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>and so was Jacoby Myers, my wide receiver. Because this

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>is a terrible defense against the pass. The Chargers and

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Derwin James unlikely to play. Joey Bosa is questionable and

1:01:47.760 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>might not play, so lose the pass rush too. DeVante

1:01:51.680 --> 1:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Adams Auto maca, we don't need to talk about him.

1:01:54.080 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's let's go to the run game for the charge

1:01:56.240 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 3>for the Las Vegas Raiders. I almost said Oakland, Oakland

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:04.280
<v Speaker 3>versus San Diego. Here, Josh Jacobs has been really inefficient.

1:02:04.280 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He's at four carries inside the five converted none. He's

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 3>averaging eighteen touches per game playing that bell cow role

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of snap so I am gonna give him

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the B grade even though his like rates and yards

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>per carry, miss tackles, yards after contact, all that is

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>really low. When you're getting eighteen to twenty touches, you

1:02:22.040 --> 1:02:24.640
<v Speaker 3>can almost you can almost pencil in a C if

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>not a B. High volume, inefficient, mediocre backs have destroyed

1:02:30.320 --> 1:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers, as Derrick Henry and Alexander Madison have shown

1:02:35.520 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>in the last two weeks. So B grade for josh

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Jacobs over to the charger side justin Herbert is an

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 3>automatic A I believe as well, same as Keenan Allen,

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:46.760
<v Speaker 3>but I can I can go into how they're You know,

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.560
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders are fifth worst in defensive DVOA. They don't

1:02:49.560 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 3>even pressure third worst pressure rate. So Herbert's gonna have

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>time to throw unlike the Blitz is that the Vikings senter,

1:02:55.720 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna have more time to adjust over Also with

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the wide receivers Joshua Palmer, he's going to immediately fill

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>in there. He did. At the end of last week,

1:03:06.160 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>he was sixty percent snapshare to Johnston's twenty two percent.

1:03:10.040 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 3>After Mike Williams went out, he was the guy that

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 3>came in. He's the replacement. Had some good games in

1:03:15.240 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 3>that replacement role for each of Alan and Williams last

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:21.840
<v Speaker 3>week last year. Raiders, I ready mentioned bad pass defense

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>DVOA wise, they're also top five in pace of play,

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 3>which means there's gonna be a lot of opportunity. Also,

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Josh Palmer historically very good against man coverage, seen a

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 3>one percent target share. Raiders play a lot of man,

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>so it's a good spot for him. They've allowed five

1:03:39.720 --> 1:03:42.920
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver touchdowns in the last this season. Four went

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>to the number two wide receiver with Josh Palmer. Will be.

1:03:46.000 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 3>The last thing I'll touch on quickly is Donald Parum.

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>I have a bench grade on him, but he leads

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the NFL in like tied for the lead in targets

1:03:54.800 --> 1:03:58.800
<v Speaker 3>inside the five. This is a top top five matchup

1:03:58.840 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>against tight ends. He might see another red zone target

1:04:01.600 --> 1:04:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and touchdown. If you really really desperate, he might see

1:04:03.920 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown.

1:04:04.560 --> 1:04:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I could see it, all right. Let's take a break.

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, Patriots take on the Cowboys Ramandre Stevenson.

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been an inconsistent season so far. Maybe that might

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 2>even be a nice word for what we've gotten out

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of Ramandre Stevenson. Find Out if thorn Eistram thinks that

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>a bounce back is coming against a normally tough Cowboys defense,

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll get our intel on that. And for the Cowboys,

1:04:28.680 --> 1:04:30.800
<v Speaker 2>tricky matchup in a variety of ways for them too.

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>What do you want to do with Dak Prescott coming

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 2>off a dead game? Find out when we come back

1:04:37.040 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>for another segment a Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Football Weekly. Another block oh matchups for you, beginning with

1:04:57.440 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots taking on the Cowboys. Thor Are with the

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:03.600
<v Speaker 2>running game for the Patriots and Ramandre Stevenson.

1:05:03.760 --> 1:05:05.720
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna give him a great b in this game

1:05:05.760 --> 1:05:08.400
<v Speaker 4>because even though he's only averaging two point nine yards

1:05:08.400 --> 1:05:11.800
<v Speaker 4>per carry to this point, he obviously averaged five yards

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:14.640
<v Speaker 4>per carry last year and this year he ranks RB

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 4>sixteen in PPR scoring despite his struggles, and I'm bullish

1:05:18.080 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 4>on a turnaround for him the Patriots passing game, however,

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not bullish out a tear out for that. Everyone

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:25.920
<v Speaker 4>is on the bench for me in there, except for

1:05:26.000 --> 1:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Hunter Henry. I'm willing to give him a volume C

1:05:28.800 --> 1:05:32.080
<v Speaker 4>in this The good news is number seventeen in target

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.840
<v Speaker 4>share amongst tight ends. The bad news is the Cowboys

1:05:34.880 --> 1:05:38.560
<v Speaker 4>allow the ninth lowest yards per reception to opposing tight ends.

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:40.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm also going to keep Ezekiel Elliott on the bench

1:05:40.680 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 4>in his revenge game. Six point one PPR points per

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:46.919
<v Speaker 4>game for Ezekiel Elliott the Cowboys Dak Prescott. I'm giving

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 4>him a CEE under seventeen fantasy points in two of

1:05:50.160 --> 1:05:52.720
<v Speaker 4>his three games so far. Obviously, he was bad against

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the Cardinals last week. Obviously, the Cowboys offensive line is

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 4>banged up. The Patriots have not allowed a quarterback to

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 4>throw for two hundred and fifty plus yards this season,

1:06:01.800 --> 1:06:05.160
<v Speaker 4>but we'll give Daca see Ceedee Lamb and Tony Pollard

1:06:05.200 --> 1:06:08.400
<v Speaker 4>are both obviously must starts. I'm keeping Brandon Cooks at,

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Michael Gallup and Jake Ferguson on the bench. Rico Duto, though,

1:06:12.080 --> 1:06:13.480
<v Speaker 4>is a guy I'm willing to take a chance on.

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:14.960
<v Speaker 4>That's why it was might take a chance on me

1:06:15.040 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 4>running back.

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, Commander's taking on the Eagles. It's time to

1:06:19.840 --> 1:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>break down a little. Sam Howell, the league's most sacked quarterback,

1:06:26.160 --> 1:06:29.280
<v Speaker 2>faces the Eagles pass rush That does not sound good,

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>yet through sheer volume, Howell could be a desperation fantasy start.

1:06:34.400 --> 1:06:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Nobody can run on the Eagles, so teams are passing

1:06:36.640 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>copiously forty one times per game, fourth most and a

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>staggering seventy three percent pass rate, second most in the league.

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Against Philly, they're actually giving up the eighth most fantasy

1:06:47.080 --> 1:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>points to quarterbacks. They're not running Sam Howell, which is

1:06:50.040 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a real killer for part of the reason I was

1:06:51.760 --> 1:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>so optimistic about him in the preseason. C grade for

1:06:55.200 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Sam Howell, segrade for Terry mcclaurin, who crushed the Eagles

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:00.760
<v Speaker 2>last year with one hundred yard games a bit both matchups.

1:07:00.960 --> 1:07:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Most impressively, half those catches and over half of those

1:07:03.200 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 2>yards came against Darius Slay, So even if he goes

1:07:05.560 --> 1:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>on the sleigh ride this year, you can still beat it.

1:07:07.520 --> 1:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>C grade for Terry McLaurin and everybody else is on

1:07:10.360 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the bench, including both running backs Bijon Robinson sorry, Brian

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Robinson and Antonio Gibson. Eagles rank number one against the

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>run by Pro Football Focus. They've allowed the fewest fantasy

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>points to opposing running backs, including zero touchdowns, and they're

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 2>giving up two point eight yards per carry best in

1:07:26.600 --> 1:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the league. So Robinson Gibson on the bench for Philadelphia.

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts obvious A. I don't think we need to

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>expend a lot more time on that, but I will

1:07:37.640 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>mention that opponents are running through the Commanders. Opposing quarterbacks

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>are running through the Commanders and Jalen Hurts his next up,

1:07:44.440 --> 1:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>DeVante Smith and A. J. Brown get B grades here.

1:07:47.240 --> 1:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Smith scored in both games last year. Washington favors zone coverage,

1:07:50.720 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and Smith fares much better against zone. Twelve catches versus

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>zone this year already three just three against man covers

1:07:57.240 --> 1:08:00.520
<v Speaker 2>so far for Smith, I like him. A. Brown comes

1:08:00.520 --> 1:08:03.840
<v Speaker 2>in with the B grade as well. Rookie Emmanuel Forbes

1:08:03.920 --> 1:08:06.040
<v Speaker 2>is the better matchup that He's gonna get a lot,

1:08:06.040 --> 1:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>but his bigger size makes him one of the few

1:08:08.120 --> 1:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>corners who could potentially match up with Brown. But he's

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:13.439
<v Speaker 2>just a rookie making his fourth NFL start, and Brown

1:08:13.480 --> 1:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>gets the advantage here for sure. Forbes allowing a seventy

1:08:16.240 --> 1:08:20.439
<v Speaker 2>five percent catch rate and Dallas Goddard staying with the

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>passing game for a minute. Yeah, that's a safe sigh

1:08:23.920 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>right there. Here's his yardage totals in three games, zero

1:08:27.560 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty two and forty one yards. Not great.

1:08:30.920 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 3>Oh so he's so this is this going to be

1:08:34.520 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>sixty or eighty? Is it doubleing or adding twenty proughly that.

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:40.719
<v Speaker 2>The good news is he's running a lot of routes.

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>He's getting targets, but they're all short targets. He's averaging

1:08:43.439 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>less than six yards per catch. Commanders have only allowed

1:08:46.240 --> 1:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>forty one receiving yards to tight ends total this year.

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>That includes the eighth least Fantasy points to tight ends.

1:08:52.960 --> 1:08:55.040
<v Speaker 2>He's only gotten one red zone target. Earlier the show,

1:08:55.040 --> 1:08:57.479
<v Speaker 2>I said zero. He's gotten one red zone target on

1:08:57.520 --> 1:08:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the year. That's it for Dallas Goddard and I can

1:08:59.200 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 2>only get him to a sea grade here.

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1:09:01.080 --> 1:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And then lastly, DeAndre Swift averaging seven yards per carry

1:09:06.080 --> 1:09:09.639
<v Speaker 2>running behind Pro Football Focus is top ranked run block unit,

1:09:09.920 --> 1:09:13.879
<v Speaker 2>featuring the league's highest run block win rate of seventy

1:09:13.920 --> 1:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>eight percent. It's all positive there. Swift leads the Eagles

1:09:17.720 --> 1:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>in back at the Eagles backfield in targets, and he

1:09:19.840 --> 1:09:22.680
<v Speaker 2>leads all Philly runners in red zone carries and that

1:09:22.720 --> 1:09:26.120
<v Speaker 2>includes Jalen Hurts as well. Washington just gave up almost

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:29.200
<v Speaker 2>seven yards per carry to James Cook. The only reason

1:09:29.200 --> 1:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't give you an eight grade on on DeAndre

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Swift is because his quarterback steals is up close rushing touchdown.

1:09:34.240 --> 1:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>DeAndre Swift went down at the one yard line three

1:09:37.240 --> 1:09:39.840
<v Speaker 3>times this season and Hurts got the touchdown after it.

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, jeez, all right, Scott, let's see what's next is.

1:09:44.680 --> 1:09:47.519
<v Speaker 3>The Arizona taking on the Stanford score. We get to that.

1:09:48.200 --> 1:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>We missed out on Josh Kelly from the previous segment.

1:09:51.720 --> 1:09:53.799
<v Speaker 2>You want to give us a quick thirty to twenty

1:09:53.840 --> 1:09:55.439
<v Speaker 2>seconds on Josh Kelly, Yeah.

1:09:55.280 --> 1:09:56.840
<v Speaker 3>We can. I do have a C grade on him

1:09:56.880 --> 1:09:59.679
<v Speaker 3>because it's the fifth easiest or the fourth easiest matchup

1:09:59.760 --> 1:10:04.960
<v Speaker 3>for running backs facing those facing those Raiders. But it's

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>mostly due to volume. He you know, the last two

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:10.519
<v Speaker 3>games though eleven carries twelve yards, thirteen carries thirty nine yards.

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Even with the volume, he didn't do well. Right and

1:10:12.960 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 3>even the matchup two hundred and thirty three yards and

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>two scores were the Bills against the Raiders. They are

1:10:19.120 --> 1:10:22.479
<v Speaker 3>most of what makes up that that bad ranking, right,

1:10:22.560 --> 1:10:24.200
<v Speaker 3>So the best I could give him is a C

1:10:24.360 --> 1:10:26.960
<v Speaker 3>grade on ten to fifteen touches because he's gonna get

1:10:26.960 --> 1:10:28.599
<v Speaker 3>eighty two percent of the carries.

1:10:28.760 --> 1:10:30.799
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Yeah, all right, let's go to the Cardinals

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:33.759
<v Speaker 2>taking on the forty nine ers. Cardinals offense not as

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>dreadflows to be expected. Now all the forty nine ers

1:10:36.800 --> 1:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>matchup is just brutal.

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The four nine is ranked fourth in defensive DVOA,

1:10:40.960 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 3>behind the Browns, Bills, and Cowboys. They're right up there.

1:10:43.360 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 3>And we saw what the Cowboys did with the Cardinals

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:48.759
<v Speaker 3>last week. But I got Joshua Dobbs on the bench.

1:10:48.840 --> 1:10:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I got all the pass catchers on the bench. Marquise

1:10:51.280 --> 1:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Brown may not play, but if he does, go like

1:10:54.280 --> 1:10:59.880
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna get match up with Lenoir Lenoir or Tarvarius

1:11:00.080 --> 1:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Ward and both of those guys seventy six, seventy six

1:11:04.200 --> 1:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>passer rating against, fifty nine passer rating against. It's not

1:11:07.680 --> 1:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a good matchup for Marquise Brown. Michael Wilson, no Rondo Moore,

1:11:12.040 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 3>no zach Ertz, no tight end his top twenty yards

1:11:15.640 --> 1:11:18.599
<v Speaker 3>against the forty nine ers, and he has declined in snaps,

1:11:18.600 --> 1:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>targets and catch. It's three weeks in a row, so

1:11:21.320 --> 1:11:24.719
<v Speaker 3>he's on the bench. James Carter, James Connor is getting

1:11:24.760 --> 1:11:27.679
<v Speaker 3>a C grade here. He's one of those rare true

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:34.759
<v Speaker 3>bellcow horse whatever workhorse backs. He's averaging over twenty touches

1:11:34.800 --> 1:11:37.800
<v Speaker 3>per game, but San Francisco is allowing the fewest rushing

1:11:37.880 --> 1:11:41.680
<v Speaker 3>yards to back. James Connor is fourth in explosive run rate, though,

1:11:41.720 --> 1:11:43.360
<v Speaker 3>so if he can peel off a couple and he

1:11:43.400 --> 1:11:47.759
<v Speaker 3>gets enough volume. He's converted two of his three carries

1:11:47.800 --> 1:11:51.479
<v Speaker 3>inside the five for touchdowns, He's got some positive stuff there.

1:11:51.520 --> 1:11:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll give him the C grade. Over on the other side,

1:11:54.600 --> 1:11:57.760
<v Speaker 3>brock Perty gets the C grade. Forty nine ers may

1:11:57.800 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>win big, but how do they get there? You know,

1:12:00.520 --> 1:12:03.920
<v Speaker 3>brock Party gets two touchdowns all but one game that

1:12:04.040 --> 1:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, like every single he started eight games. He's

1:12:06.200 --> 1:12:09.719
<v Speaker 3>gotten two touchdowns or more in seven of those eight games.

1:12:09.920 --> 1:12:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm giving him the C grade. I think he gets

1:12:12.160 --> 1:12:15.080
<v Speaker 3>his stats on the way to getting there. Christian McCaffrey

1:12:15.160 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 3>is an automatic A at this point. Elijah Mitchell was

1:12:18.920 --> 1:12:20.519
<v Speaker 3>gonna take a chance on me player. I think there's

1:12:20.520 --> 1:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a room for him at the end of this game

1:12:21.960 --> 1:12:27.320
<v Speaker 3>to make them hey over into the passing game, Deebo Samuel.

1:12:27.479 --> 1:12:30.519
<v Speaker 3>If he goes, I'm gonna give a B grade too.

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:33.920
<v Speaker 3>He missed practice both the last couple of days of

1:12:33.960 --> 1:12:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the week, but they still think he might go. Arizona

1:12:36.560 --> 1:12:40.679
<v Speaker 3>plays zone and that's not only where Deebo Samuel shines.

1:12:40.960 --> 1:12:44.759
<v Speaker 3>He has a forty percent first read share. That's awesome

1:12:44.800 --> 1:12:48.519
<v Speaker 3>when they face up against zone coverages and debos and

1:12:48.560 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the meaning for those listening, meaning when they drop back

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>to back and they see a zone and Deebo Samuel's

1:12:54.000 --> 1:12:56.439
<v Speaker 3>out there. Deebo is the first read they looked at him,

1:12:56.479 --> 1:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>first B grade there. Brandon I limited on Thursday, but

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Friday looks like he's good to go. Now. Yeah, love,

1:13:04.800 --> 1:13:09.040
<v Speaker 3>it's good. He's gonna get either Katrell Clark or Marco

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Wilson for most of his uh most of his plays

1:13:11.960 --> 1:13:14.679
<v Speaker 3>there one hundred passer rating allowed for Clark, one hundred

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>and thirty point four passer rating allowed for Wilson. I

1:13:18.280 --> 1:13:20.800
<v Speaker 3>have a B grade on Ayuk. If Samuel doesn't go,

1:13:20.880 --> 1:13:22.559
<v Speaker 3>you could bump me up to an A on Ayuk.

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:23.720
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't blame you.

1:13:23.920 --> 1:13:26.960
<v Speaker 3>George Kittle A grade Listen to this. He has five

1:13:27.040 --> 1:13:29.640
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns in his last three games against the Cardinals. That

1:13:29.720 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 3>includes back to back two touchdown games. He has eight

1:13:33.160 --> 1:13:38.360
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns in his last five games without Deebo Samuel Oh.

1:13:38.520 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>That includes Rangle three of those with two scores. So

1:13:42.160 --> 1:13:43.960
<v Speaker 3>if Devo doesn't go, I got an a grade on

1:13:44.040 --> 1:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Kittle either way. Okay, but if Devo doesn't go, like

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:49.800
<v Speaker 3>launch him in, it's just wheels up, wheels up.

1:13:50.400 --> 1:13:53.559
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, Premature Speculation will jump in the

1:13:53.600 --> 1:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Football Weekly time machine to tell you players you'll

1:13:57.080 --> 1:13:59.880
<v Speaker 2>want to pick up now that everybody else be trying

1:14:00.120 --> 1:14:03.479
<v Speaker 2>pick up next week when we come back Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:14:21.120 --> 1:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. If you haven't joined the

1:14:23.400 --> 1:14:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Guillotine League yet, we highly encourage you to do exactly that.

1:14:27.040 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 2>It's super fun and you can start a new season

1:14:29.520 --> 1:14:32.599
<v Speaker 2>long league right now at Guyotine leagues dot com. You'll

1:14:32.600 --> 1:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>still get to play for fifteen more weeks. You're a

1:14:36.040 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 2>regular listener to this show, so you know how it works.

1:14:38.280 --> 1:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Every week, the bottom scoring team gets chopped, all the

1:14:41.840 --> 1:14:43.560
<v Speaker 2>players go to the waiver wire, and the rest of

1:14:43.640 --> 1:14:46.679
<v Speaker 2>us build superstar rosters for the rest of the season.

1:14:46.800 --> 1:14:49.559
<v Speaker 2>All you have to do is not finish last. No,

1:14:49.560 --> 1:14:51.600
<v Speaker 2>none of that pesky head to head matchup stuff. Just

1:14:51.600 --> 1:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>don't finish last. That's it.

1:14:52.960 --> 1:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>We're still alive in ours.

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, well I'm alive. I had to spend a

1:14:57.280 --> 1:14:57.840
<v Speaker 2>little this week.

1:14:57.840 --> 1:14:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I have not spent yet.

1:14:58.960 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I had decided a little spending. I didn't want to,

1:15:01.320 --> 1:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes you gotta do it.

1:15:02.760 --> 1:15:06.240
<v Speaker 3>My starting lamp's fine. My bench is terrible. That's zero

1:15:06.280 --> 1:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>points on my bench.

1:15:07.720 --> 1:15:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, probably better that than to lose with pent points

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>on your bench, which happened a lot with people with

1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:15.919
<v Speaker 2>divon Achan.

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right, we should. We should do some kind of

1:15:18.040 --> 1:15:20.280
<v Speaker 3>bet who lasts longer between the two of us.

1:15:20.360 --> 1:15:22.200
<v Speaker 2>We'll think it if I like my roster well enough

1:15:22.240 --> 1:15:25.479
<v Speaker 2>for that I am right now. We'll see that league.

1:15:25.520 --> 1:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I've never done well in that particular one for whatever.

1:15:27.960 --> 1:15:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Think even second two years ago in that one.

1:15:30.280 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Premature speculation is where we give you players that you

1:15:33.000 --> 1:15:34.960
<v Speaker 2>want to pick up now that other people be trying

1:15:34.960 --> 1:15:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to pick up later. We begin with Scott Fish who

1:15:37.439 --> 1:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>you got?

1:15:38.320 --> 1:15:41.599
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah, So I'm gonna go with Josh Downs

1:15:42.080 --> 1:15:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And I actually thought he was a waiver wire pickup

1:15:45.160 --> 1:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>this but his this last week, but his roster ship

1:15:47.880 --> 1:15:52.639
<v Speaker 3>jumped like up to eight percent or something. It's barely anything.

1:15:53.640 --> 1:15:56.840
<v Speaker 3>He had twelve he had you know, twenty four targets

1:15:57.080 --> 1:16:02.200
<v Speaker 3>in three weeks, increasing catches, snaps, target share, everything, increasing

1:16:02.280 --> 1:16:05.599
<v Speaker 3>eighty eight percent route participation. He's the main slot guy

1:16:05.640 --> 1:16:08.200
<v Speaker 3>on a team that plays one of the highest percentages

1:16:08.280 --> 1:16:11.439
<v Speaker 3>of three wide receiver sets. He should he should be roster.

1:16:11.479 --> 1:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying stard him every week, but there's gonna

1:16:13.240 --> 1:16:15.559
<v Speaker 3>be matchups for him going forward. I'm gonna add one

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>extra one in there, just just throwing there. Keaton Mitchell,

1:16:19.640 --> 1:16:22.559
<v Speaker 3>speedy guy out of East Carolina. I know that Thor

1:16:22.680 --> 1:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>calls him like discount Devon h Chan that that Baltimore backfield.

1:16:27.920 --> 1:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>You know he can he can make some work. There's

1:16:30.439 --> 1:16:32.599
<v Speaker 3>there's there's a lot of questions there. There's there's room

1:16:32.640 --> 1:16:33.559
<v Speaker 3>for him to jump up.

1:16:34.360 --> 1:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, your premature speculation, player, Thor, it's not going

1:16:38.400 --> 1:16:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to be as good as my last two Pooka Naku

1:16:40.280 --> 1:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and Jayden Reid. This week. Oh you can't really top that.

1:16:42.880 --> 1:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I can't top that, So lower your expectation to give

1:16:45.280 --> 1:16:48.400
<v Speaker 2>you a little that. But you've earned the peacock, baby.

1:16:49.000 --> 1:16:52.040
<v Speaker 4>This one is more of a long term one that

1:16:52.280 --> 1:16:56.040
<v Speaker 4>could hit. I'm going with Raiders. Running back Zamir White

1:16:57.040 --> 1:16:59.240
<v Speaker 4>obviously will not be a stud this coming week like

1:16:59.280 --> 1:17:02.320
<v Speaker 4>those other guys, but he is absolutely worth a stash.

1:17:02.479 --> 1:17:05.920
<v Speaker 4>The Raiders' upcoming schedule is absolutely amazing. What you should

1:17:05.960 --> 1:17:11.920
<v Speaker 4>keep in mind for all their players Chargers, Packers, Patriots, Bears, Lions, Giants, Jets,

1:17:12.040 --> 1:17:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Dolphins sets up really well. Josh Jacobs is not playing

1:17:16.000 --> 1:17:19.360
<v Speaker 4>well right now. Josh Jacobs number thirty seven PFF grade

1:17:19.479 --> 1:17:23.320
<v Speaker 4>out of fifty six qualifiers. Jacobs is also and you

1:17:23.360 --> 1:17:24.960
<v Speaker 4>hate putting this out in the universe, it's just a

1:17:25.000 --> 1:17:28.320
<v Speaker 4>fact though, elevated injury risk following a league leading three

1:17:28.479 --> 1:17:31.840
<v Speaker 4>hundred and ninety three touches last season. If Jacobs were

1:17:31.880 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 4>to go down, Zamir White would become the undisputed workhorse

1:17:35.360 --> 1:17:37.479
<v Speaker 4>of this offense and would be worth a lot in

1:17:37.520 --> 1:17:38.240
<v Speaker 4>fantasy world.

1:17:38.439 --> 1:17:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Would it be any good Zamir White? Yeah, you could say,

1:17:41.880 --> 1:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>if he's a lead back, can he be a workhorse back?

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:46.519
<v Speaker 2>He can handle the load for sure. Yeah.

1:17:46.520 --> 1:17:49.000
<v Speaker 4>The receiving stuff is the one thing I would question,

1:17:49.120 --> 1:17:51.719
<v Speaker 4>but grinding out the yards the goal line guy, for sure.

1:17:52.320 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>He can do your meat and potato stuff. Absolutely fantastic.

1:17:55.080 --> 1:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>My premature speculation players Miami running back Jeff Wilson, who

1:17:59.320 --> 1:18:01.599
<v Speaker 2>at this time week will be off the IR.

1:18:01.760 --> 1:18:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

1:18:02.240 --> 1:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And that Muddy's the backfield. But here's the deal. Those

1:18:06.800 --> 1:18:09.200
<v Speaker 2>are guys who all get hurt constantly. Raheem Mosart hurt

1:18:09.280 --> 1:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Jeff Wilson, you'll remember goes h has

1:18:12.920 --> 1:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the San Francisco Roots, got traded to Miami middle of

1:18:16.479 --> 1:18:19.559
<v Speaker 2>last season, and promptly from that trade forward, he averaged

1:18:19.600 --> 1:18:22.559
<v Speaker 2>ten carries per game and almost five yards per carry.

1:18:22.680 --> 1:18:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Is more effective than he was, more.

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Effective than moster was. Yeah, he can catch a little.

1:18:27.240 --> 1:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Not a gifted receiver, but he can catch a little

1:18:29.160 --> 1:18:32.160
<v Speaker 2>as well. You know, Jeff Wilson, if you believe all

1:18:32.200 --> 1:18:35.120
<v Speaker 2>the injury stuffs can happen, you might just have a

1:18:35.160 --> 1:18:37.360
<v Speaker 2>guy that you could plug in for some big volume

1:18:38.000 --> 1:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>here and there.

1:18:38.840 --> 1:18:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep. Pick him up, throw him on IRY. By the way,

1:18:41.080 --> 1:18:43.479
<v Speaker 3>Keith Mitchell also on IR. That's why, that's why he

1:18:43.520 --> 1:18:46.400
<v Speaker 3>hasn't factored in since the injury to JK. Dobbins. Right,

1:18:46.479 --> 1:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you can pick him up and put him on IR

1:18:48.040 --> 1:18:50.000
<v Speaker 3>for a week and some time, taking him some will.

1:18:49.880 --> 1:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Let you do that, will YEAHO does I think? I

1:18:53.080 --> 1:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>think ESPN does not let go directly from IR or

1:18:56.040 --> 1:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>in free agency right to ir. But we've got two

1:18:59.240 --> 1:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>more matchups left get to including the Monday nighter that's

1:19:02.040 --> 1:19:05.479
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks taking on the Giants. Store to this point,

1:19:05.600 --> 1:19:10.799
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks running game behind Kenneth Walker has been really nice.

1:19:10.960 --> 1:19:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Sure has yeah, and Kenneth Walker becoming a week we

1:19:13.479 --> 1:19:15.479
<v Speaker 4>must start here. Oh yeah, yeah, I mean great a

1:19:15.720 --> 1:19:18.639
<v Speaker 4>for sure for Kenneth Walker. He's averaging eighteen point four

1:19:18.720 --> 1:19:21.320
<v Speaker 4>touches per game, ninety two point three total yards per

1:19:21.320 --> 1:19:24.400
<v Speaker 4>game on fifty one between fifty one and sixty three

1:19:24.439 --> 1:19:27.120
<v Speaker 4>percent of the snaps depending on the game number eleven

1:19:27.200 --> 1:19:31.320
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL in miss tackles force per attempt. The Giants,

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:33.920
<v Speaker 4>on the other hand, this week's opponent, they ranked number

1:19:33.920 --> 1:19:36.920
<v Speaker 4>eighteen in yards after contact per attempt allowed to the

1:19:36.960 --> 1:19:41.120
<v Speaker 4>opposing running backs. So I'm giving Kenneth Walker an a Charboney,

1:19:41.160 --> 1:19:44.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna advise people to keep him on your bench,

1:19:44.439 --> 1:19:47.519
<v Speaker 4>but he's absolutely someone to keep an eye on. Last week,

1:19:47.560 --> 1:19:50.080
<v Speaker 4>his jumps, I'm sorry, his snaps jumped all the way

1:19:50.160 --> 1:19:53.439
<v Speaker 4>up to forty three percent, and Sharboney has five red

1:19:53.520 --> 1:19:55.720
<v Speaker 4>zone carries, So someone to keep an eye on. But

1:19:55.840 --> 1:19:57.800
<v Speaker 4>in this game, I would advise the bench for him

1:19:57.840 --> 1:20:00.759
<v Speaker 4>unless you're in a super duper deep league. DK Metcalf

1:20:00.840 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 4>must start grade of A here. Giants run a lot

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:07.519
<v Speaker 4>of man coverage concepts. DK eats that alive sixty one

1:20:07.600 --> 1:20:11.120
<v Speaker 4>percent air yard share versus man coverage for the Seahawks.

1:20:11.720 --> 1:20:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Lockett, on the other hand, I'm gonna give him

1:20:13.680 --> 1:20:16.040
<v Speaker 4>a B. Not quite as good of a matchup for

1:20:16.120 --> 1:20:18.240
<v Speaker 4>him as we've talked about in the past. Lockett is

1:20:18.280 --> 1:20:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Seattle zone beater. Obviously, the Giants are man heavy here,

1:20:21.600 --> 1:20:24.439
<v Speaker 4>but Lockett will run a majority of his routes against

1:20:24.520 --> 1:20:28.519
<v Speaker 4>Giants cornerbacks Trey Hawkins and Deontay Banks, the rookie. Both

1:20:28.520 --> 1:20:31.920
<v Speaker 4>those guys have allowed quarterback ratings on targets over ninety

1:20:31.960 --> 1:20:34.960
<v Speaker 4>five flat. Jackson Smith and Jigbuck got to give him

1:20:34.960 --> 1:20:37.639
<v Speaker 4>a bench grade middle and thirteen point six target share

1:20:38.000 --> 1:20:40.120
<v Speaker 4>and two point two a dot. Not the best yet,

1:20:40.200 --> 1:20:42.120
<v Speaker 4>they're still waiting for his wrist to heal on different

1:20:42.120 --> 1:20:45.600
<v Speaker 4>stuff like that bench all the Seahawks tight ends, and

1:20:45.640 --> 1:20:48.519
<v Speaker 4>then as far as the Giants, Daniel Jones, I'm gonna

1:20:48.520 --> 1:20:50.200
<v Speaker 4>give him an eight grade for this game.

1:20:50.680 --> 1:20:53.200
<v Speaker 2>He hasn't been great this year, I.

1:20:53.160 --> 1:20:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Will say, but the Lakes set a very high floor,

1:20:56.720 --> 1:20:59.559
<v Speaker 4>and they certainly will in this game. Daniel Jones top

1:20:59.560 --> 1:21:03.320
<v Speaker 4>five quarterbacks and carries per game, red zone carries per game,

1:21:03.520 --> 1:21:06.559
<v Speaker 4>and rushing yards per game. The Seahawks allow the eighth

1:21:06.680 --> 1:21:09.560
<v Speaker 4>most Fantasy points per game to opposing quarterbacks. All the

1:21:09.640 --> 1:21:11.599
<v Speaker 4>usage is going to get funnel through Daniel Jones and then,

1:21:11.640 --> 1:21:15.280
<v Speaker 4>by extension, Darren Waller. Because of that, I have to

1:21:15.320 --> 1:21:17.519
<v Speaker 4>advise you have to bench all the Giants wide receivers

1:21:17.520 --> 1:21:17.960
<v Speaker 4>in this game.

1:21:18.040 --> 1:21:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, wait, but you just gave Daniel Jones an A

1:21:20.080 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 2>grade and a bench all on the ground.

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:26.559
<v Speaker 4>I think Daniel Jones' utility in this game, Yeah, it

1:21:26.600 --> 1:21:29.120
<v Speaker 4>comes through the rushing and a rushing touchdown at least

1:21:29.160 --> 1:21:31.880
<v Speaker 4>one of them. Darren Waller, he is the dude that

1:21:31.920 --> 1:21:34.120
<v Speaker 4>you want to start as far as the pass catchers.

1:21:34.320 --> 1:21:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Giving him a grade of A in this tight end

1:21:36.840 --> 1:21:40.080
<v Speaker 4>ten in Fantasy so far, but number six target share

1:21:40.120 --> 1:21:43.320
<v Speaker 4>amongst NFL tight ends. And this is a fabulous matchup

1:21:43.360 --> 1:21:45.400
<v Speaker 4>for Darren Waller, which is one of the reasons. It's

1:21:45.439 --> 1:21:47.599
<v Speaker 4>just going to be all the usage funnel to him

1:21:47.800 --> 1:21:50.320
<v Speaker 4>and then the Giants receivers are a Hodgepodge is always.

1:21:50.479 --> 1:21:54.080
<v Speaker 4>The Seahawks allow the highest yards per reception to opposing

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:55.759
<v Speaker 4>tight ends in the entire NFL.

1:21:56.200 --> 1:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Man do we need this, Darren Waller, Managers host, they

1:21:59.800 --> 1:22:01.760
<v Speaker 2>need a big game. This is why you need to

1:22:01.800 --> 1:22:02.719
<v Speaker 2>do that offer for TJ.

1:22:02.800 --> 1:22:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Hawkinson to Darren Waller, he accepts that. You know that

1:22:05.200 --> 1:22:07.960
<v Speaker 4>he loves his matchup this. Yeah, Saquon Barkley, I'm giving

1:22:08.040 --> 1:22:10.320
<v Speaker 4>him a grade of B. Return to practice in a

1:22:10.320 --> 1:22:13.120
<v Speaker 4>limited capacity on Thursday. Of course, he missed last week

1:22:13.160 --> 1:22:15.840
<v Speaker 4>with a great two high ankle sprain. But if he plays,

1:22:15.840 --> 1:22:17.960
<v Speaker 4>and I'm assuming that he will, I'm giving him a

1:22:18.000 --> 1:22:21.559
<v Speaker 4>bee here. The Seahawks run defense allowing two point nine

1:22:21.840 --> 1:22:25.120
<v Speaker 4>yards per carry after allowing four point nine last year.

1:22:25.479 --> 1:22:28.200
<v Speaker 4>It has gotten a lot better early on. So maybe

1:22:28.240 --> 1:22:29.880
<v Speaker 4>not quite as good of a match up here for

1:22:29.920 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 4>Saquon as you otherwise would think. But the Seahawks, we

1:22:33.400 --> 1:22:35.360
<v Speaker 4>talked about this in the past two their pass defense

1:22:35.560 --> 1:22:38.640
<v Speaker 4>stinks against receiving running backs, So I think Saquon is

1:22:38.640 --> 1:22:41.080
<v Speaker 4>gonna get a lot of receiving production in this game.

1:22:41.240 --> 1:22:44.160
<v Speaker 4>If Barkley somehow didn't play, Matt Brita would become a

1:22:44.200 --> 1:22:47.559
<v Speaker 4>desperation play. But last week, when Barkley did, and Brito

1:22:47.640 --> 1:22:50.400
<v Speaker 4>only had seven touches for eighteen yards as the Giants

1:22:50.479 --> 1:22:53.120
<v Speaker 4>is RB one. He did score a touchdown to start

1:22:53.120 --> 1:22:55.000
<v Speaker 4>a salvage like flex.

1:22:54.880 --> 1:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's all he had got. That's it. Who was

1:22:57.720 --> 1:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the other the big running back that they were They

1:23:00.040 --> 1:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>used a couple of times in that game, Bright Well

1:23:02.080 --> 1:23:05.360
<v Speaker 2>or something. Yeah, Arizona. Yeah, guy's got that. Guy's a

1:23:05.479 --> 1:23:08.200
<v Speaker 2>freaking beast. At least he's built. You will fight.

1:23:08.320 --> 1:23:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have a Giants wide receiver question since he

1:23:10.600 --> 1:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>threw them all on the bench, And that's fine.

1:23:13.240 --> 1:23:14.080
<v Speaker 2>You start slating.

1:23:14.200 --> 1:23:17.559
<v Speaker 3>No, no, Wandelle Robinson got his first play of the year,

1:23:17.800 --> 1:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>first playtime of the year, last play last week. Eleven snaps,

1:23:22.600 --> 1:23:27.280
<v Speaker 3>five targets, four catches on eleven snaps now eleven percent.

1:23:27.640 --> 1:23:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah h yeah, whatever it is. But if you extrapolate

1:23:30.479 --> 1:23:33.439
<v Speaker 3>that he that's like forty catches if he plays the

1:23:33.479 --> 1:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>whole game.

1:23:35.439 --> 1:23:37.559
<v Speaker 2>But it tells you, I mean, they were clearly trying

1:23:37.600 --> 1:23:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to scheme him.

1:23:38.240 --> 1:23:41.080
<v Speaker 3>The ball and yeah, that's that's actually that's actually more

1:23:41.160 --> 1:23:43.839
<v Speaker 3>my actually could be snaps eleven snaps.

1:23:43.880 --> 1:23:45.839
<v Speaker 4>I think at the end of one of the Giants

1:23:45.880 --> 1:23:48.639
<v Speaker 4>receivers will be startable. It's just impossible to see which

1:23:48.960 --> 1:23:51.120
<v Speaker 4>they just have a bunch of slot receivers and you

1:23:51.120 --> 1:23:51.959
<v Speaker 4>know it's situation.

1:23:52.400 --> 1:23:54.400
<v Speaker 3>My question is just do you think that's do you

1:23:54.439 --> 1:23:57.680
<v Speaker 3>think that's something or just the one game? I think

1:23:57.800 --> 1:23:58.640
<v Speaker 3>is there's something.

1:23:58.400 --> 1:24:01.400
<v Speaker 4>There, too much something among too many guys in the

1:24:01.439 --> 1:24:03.040
<v Speaker 4>slot for But yeah, I don't know that it has

1:24:03.080 --> 1:24:04.719
<v Speaker 4>predictive value week to week here.

1:24:04.640 --> 1:24:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Too, Jets take on the Chief Sunday night. Mahomes and

1:24:07.760 --> 1:24:09.519
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey are obvious says that we do not need to

1:24:10.040 --> 1:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>spend time on. And here's the painful part is there's

1:24:12.720 --> 1:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>no other receiver to start, you know, last week against

1:24:15.160 --> 1:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>it's the Bears. So I'm like, go ahead and start MVS.

1:24:18.200 --> 1:24:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a flyer. If not now when he's the

1:24:21.080 --> 1:24:25.439
<v Speaker 2>leading receiver by snaps, by targets, go get him. Didn't

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:28.040
<v Speaker 2>do much of anything, None of them do. No chief

1:24:28.040 --> 1:24:30.960
<v Speaker 2>receiver was able to stand out against the Bears corners,

1:24:31.000 --> 1:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>So we're not going to roll the dice in them

1:24:32.479 --> 1:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>succeeding against Sauce Gardner and DJ Reid. So they're out.

1:24:36.360 --> 1:24:38.679
<v Speaker 2>So that only leaves me to talk about Isaiah Pacheco.

1:24:39.240 --> 1:24:41.840
<v Speaker 2>His touches have increased in each game. He's putting some

1:24:41.880 --> 1:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>distance between himself and Ceh, who was pesky early on.

1:24:45.760 --> 1:24:49.040
<v Speaker 2>The Jets are allowing the seventh most rushing yards and

1:24:49.080 --> 1:24:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the fifth most receiving yards to opposing running backs, good

1:24:51.920 --> 1:24:54.360
<v Speaker 2>for one hundred and forty four total yards per game,

1:24:54.520 --> 1:24:56.160
<v Speaker 2>but Checko should get most of that one hundred and

1:24:56.200 --> 1:24:59.280
<v Speaker 2>forty four. Kansas City's offensive line is a top ten

1:24:59.479 --> 1:25:02.559
<v Speaker 2>run block win rate and the Jets have a bottom

1:25:02.600 --> 1:25:05.920
<v Speaker 2>ten run stuff win rate, so it should be a

1:25:05.960 --> 1:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>dominating run performance here. The Jets are seeing a lot

1:25:08.800 --> 1:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>of runs as opponents get ahead early, Zach Wilson cannot

1:25:12.960 --> 1:25:15.639
<v Speaker 2>mount to come back, and then the Jets just get

1:25:15.720 --> 1:25:17.160
<v Speaker 2>run on for the rest of the game. And that

1:25:17.160 --> 1:25:21.599
<v Speaker 2>should be the formula here. Isaiah Pacheco a grade boom

1:25:21.720 --> 1:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>this game boom, I like his champions. Let's go to

1:25:24.920 --> 1:25:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the Jets.

1:25:26.120 --> 1:25:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:25:26.760 --> 1:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>At three and a half weeks ago, when you were

1:25:28.800 --> 1:25:31.680
<v Speaker 2>looking at the Jets, you thought there were probably like

1:25:32.080 --> 1:25:34.880
<v Speaker 2>five rosterable guys, and you're like, you know, we could go,

1:25:35.200 --> 1:25:38.120
<v Speaker 2>we could thrown a little I don't know, Tyler Conklin,

1:25:38.160 --> 1:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>even if we needed to. That's all dried up. There's

1:25:40.840 --> 1:25:43.479
<v Speaker 2>only two guys that you care about now, and that's

1:25:43.560 --> 1:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Breshall and Garret Wilson. Let's start with Breshall gets a

1:25:46.960 --> 1:25:49.719
<v Speaker 2>C grade. He's got one hundred and fifty three rushing

1:25:49.760 --> 1:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>yards on the season, one hundred and fifty seven after contact.

1:25:55.240 --> 1:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>He's so good though. He leads the league in yards

1:25:57.400 --> 1:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>after contact and he's over four yards per carry after contact.

1:26:01.280 --> 1:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>But if you take away that eighty three yard run

1:26:04.320 --> 1:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that he had in Week one against Buffalo, Briest Hall

1:26:07.120 --> 1:26:09.160
<v Speaker 2>has only been able to average two point eight yards

1:26:09.200 --> 1:26:12.439
<v Speaker 2>per carry. That's it because defense is stacked to stop

1:26:12.479 --> 1:26:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Breese Hall because literally like the only thread on the team.

1:26:15.560 --> 1:26:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

1:26:15.960 --> 1:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>As long as Jack Zach Wilson is at the helm,

1:26:18.560 --> 1:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs are allowing the eighth fewest total yards to opposing

1:26:21.120 --> 1:26:24.120
<v Speaker 2>running backs, including shutting down Travis Etn and Khalil Herbert.

1:26:24.160 --> 1:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>For the past two weeks, he's only getting two targets

1:26:26.640 --> 1:26:28.920
<v Speaker 2>per game, which is unfortunate because he was five targets

1:26:28.920 --> 1:26:30.760
<v Speaker 2>per game last year and they're just not throwing to

1:26:30.760 --> 1:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Breese Hall, which is sad because that would have been

1:26:33.080 --> 1:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>another avenue for him, but it's not one here unfortunately.

1:26:36.040 --> 1:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>So just the see grade on him, and of course

1:26:38.120 --> 1:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Wilson's awesome, but his situation couldn't be worse now.

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:44.519
<v Speaker 2>To his credit, he's managed touchdowns in two of three games,

1:26:44.560 --> 1:26:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and he's been targeted eight and nine times the past

1:26:47.880 --> 1:26:51.360
<v Speaker 2>two weeks. Like that nine times. So the judge are

1:26:51.400 --> 1:26:56.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to manufacture touches for Wilson, which we gratefully appreciate. Unfortunately,

1:26:56.880 --> 1:26:59.439
<v Speaker 2>this is a tough matchup. Kansas City's two outside corners,

1:26:59.479 --> 1:27:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Lagarious Need and Joshua Williams, have allowed forty scoreless yards

1:27:03.840 --> 1:27:07.479
<v Speaker 2>per game combined. In the first three games. They have

1:27:07.560 --> 1:27:10.080
<v Speaker 2>been lights out. I can only get you to a

1:27:10.120 --> 1:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>C grade on Garrett Wilson, and that is a sad

1:27:14.280 --> 1:27:16.679
<v Speaker 2>story of woe for what should have been a great

1:27:16.760 --> 1:27:18.400
<v Speaker 2>season for Garrett Wilson.

1:27:18.040 --> 1:27:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Wide receiver, twenty seven on the year.

1:27:19.800 --> 1:27:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I think we thought it'd be seven yep, yeah, or

1:27:22.760 --> 1:27:26.559
<v Speaker 2>two twenty seven exactly. All right, let me get we

1:27:26.600 --> 1:27:27.960
<v Speaker 2>got a couple of minutes here. Let me hit you

1:27:28.000 --> 1:27:30.760
<v Speaker 2>with a couple of quick hitters. Jamiir Gibbs. Owners are

1:27:30.800 --> 1:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>apoplectic about what went down on Thursday. What do you

1:27:34.760 --> 1:27:37.799
<v Speaker 2>believe that is indicative of what you can expect going

1:27:37.840 --> 1:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>forward from the Jamiir Gibbs David Montgomery time share.

1:27:42.960 --> 1:27:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I can go first, probably for a bed like you

1:27:46.439 --> 1:27:49.960
<v Speaker 3>look at the Lions schedule and I have them, as

1:27:50.439 --> 1:27:52.559
<v Speaker 3>you know, possible favorites, and a lot of them which

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:55.960
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be game script for Montgomery. They're going to use Gibbs,

1:27:56.000 --> 1:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>but they don't need to bring them along. They don't

1:27:58.040 --> 1:28:00.160
<v Speaker 3>need him what he brings to the past game right now,

1:28:00.200 --> 1:28:02.720
<v Speaker 3>they can just use Montgomery in that positive game script.

1:28:02.600 --> 1:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, thor are you feeling it differently?

1:28:04.680 --> 1:28:07.160
<v Speaker 4>The usage has been really dumb so far. I'm still

1:28:07.200 --> 1:28:08.200
<v Speaker 4>bullish on Gibbs.

1:28:08.320 --> 1:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I am too. I just don't think they need

1:28:10.360 --> 1:28:10.920
<v Speaker 3>to know.

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:14.640
<v Speaker 2>You can't be upset when David Montgomery scoring the touchdowns.

1:28:14.680 --> 1:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>When you know David Montgomery was going to score the touchdowns.

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I know you want more total touches from Gibbs. I

1:28:21.200 --> 1:28:23.880
<v Speaker 2>probably will come along. Remember the Lions staked out a

1:28:23.880 --> 1:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>big early lead and then just went into grind mode

1:28:27.000 --> 1:28:29.120
<v Speaker 2>at the right round. That's not gonna happen every game.

1:28:29.120 --> 1:28:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Although their schedule is cake the rest basically the rest

1:28:33.120 --> 1:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of the season, the lines might be favored in all

1:28:35.680 --> 1:28:37.679
<v Speaker 2>but one of the rest of their games for this year.

1:28:38.880 --> 1:28:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Fantasy Football Weekly is always

1:28:41.040 --> 1:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>we encourage you to get all my player rankings available

1:28:43.320 --> 1:28:45.479
<v Speaker 2>for free at Guillotine leagues dot com and go ahead

1:28:45.479 --> 1:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>and join another fantasy league. Why not? New season starting

1:28:48.360 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>now at Guillotine leagues dot com. Talk to you to

1:28:50.080 --> 1:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>week everybody, Bye bye