WEBVTT - Nvidia Says It’s Getting Orders From China

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Though in San Francisco.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 3>In video says it's now getting orders from China and

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 3>ramping up sales of its.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>H two hundred chips plus. In video, CEO.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Jason Warms says that Openclaw is quote definitely the next

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 3>chat ChiPT. I'll comment, there's Chinese AI stocks higher, and

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 3>we bring you in exclusive interview with the CEO of Kalshi.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 3>That's after Arizona file criminal charges against the prediction market platform.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 3>But first we check in on these public markets roiled

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 3>by geopolitics, by macro events, and we keep an eye

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>on what's happening terms of the stock market now is

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>that one hundred is off by five ten percent, the

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 3>SMP is lower after two straight days of and this

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>is as we see oil spral higher more than five

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 3>point five percent. This is a question of conflict in

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East that seems to be accelerating, and we're

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>starting to see infrastructure continue to be targeted. That is

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>of course spiraling concerns about oil prices.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, all of this is an infratiory pressure.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>On the back of PPI numbers today that show that

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>inflatory pressure is already.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Here in the United States. What will the Fed do

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>later today?

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 3>All eyes on macro policy at this moment, but there's

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>also all eyes on what's happening in terms of individual stocks.

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 3>And there is a macrotail at play when it comes

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>to in video and the demand for compute, and also

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 3>what's happening with China demand signals actually a sign off

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>from the Chinese government at least, we're starting to see

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>a bit more of an appetite for buying into Invidia stocks.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>As GtC continues, let's just get more context on the

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 3>market moves. What's happening with Nvidia? Bloomberg Carmen, Ryanikey joins us.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Look in video is one of the few names that

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>pushes to the green today, alongside the likes of Micron

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and others. Carmen, How is Nvidia able to shake off

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>what for the rest of the market is angst about

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East and inflation.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, it really seems like investors are getting

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more confident with Invidia here. I think

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>that Jensen has said a lot during this conference that hopefully,

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, making people feel a little bit more confident.

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the orders from China is very positive, something

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>that investors have been looking for for a long time

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 4>from Nvidia, and he also said yesterday that they are

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 4>looking at a very large number to go into buybacks,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 4>and you know, the dividend for Invidia. So I think

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>these are all things that are positive and are maybe

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 4>helping the stack sort of shake off some of those

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 4>macro pressures that we're seeing really way down the rest

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 4>of the market.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>What have been extraordinary is that one trillion dollar figure

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 3>initially said didn't spur any absolute buying, but then he's

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to articulate that that one trillion can then be

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>added to other new products.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 2>That are coming to the market.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 3>Is well likely to inject upside to that number.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, and I think that upside is really important.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 4>He did clarify a very specific that doesn't include you know,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 4>the new products that are coming out, so you know,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the positivity I think is baked into

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 4>the stock, but that potential for future growth, which is

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>what everybody you know expects from in video, but he

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>wants to see even more of is really positive here,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 4>especially when we're seeing a backdrop that has so much

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 4>uncertainty for the rest of the market. And you know,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean in Video is still the biggest stock in

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 4>the s and P five hundred, So seeing you go

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 4>up when sort of the rest of the market goes

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 4>down is significant because if you're selling the SMP, you know,

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 4>you're also selling a lot of in video.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>A just of course speaks in big numbers talking about

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 3>how computing demand has increased by one million times in

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the last two years. But he's pushing forward on where

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 3>next for compute and that's going to be driven by

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 3>a gender ki. You saw his adoption of this chatchypd

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>moment for Openclore really helping Chinese names.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to have a read across to the US.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's something we're definitely looking for, and I mean,

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I guess it sort of means to be seen. You know,

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>we know that, you know, in Vidia does definitely moves

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, stocks of other companies that are related, and

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 4>we see that on a global scale. So you know,

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 4>we've seen through GtC, you know, companies that have partnerships

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 4>with Nvidia get some investor confidence through some buying into

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 4>their their stock. It's seen no reason why we wouldn't

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 4>see more buying into certain US companies sort of based

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>on this news. And you know, going forward there.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>I've already seen stain analysts trying to talk about the

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>companies that will be benefited by claw open claw the

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 3>CLAW six. We'll see if that catches on Bloomberg's common Ryanikey,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much. Indeed, now in Vidia CEO does,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and Wang was indeed articulating this projection for a trillion

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 3>dollars plus in AI chip sales and the fact that

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of course it doesn't include other product offerings. Now we've

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 3>already got the signal of the upside Bloomberg Intelligence noting

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>that this reinforces confidence in AI demand through twenty twenty seven.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And in Vidia's market leadership.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's get more on that with Kim Forest's CIO of

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Boka Capital Partners. Look, we're used to Jenson Wang being optimistic.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Are you buying into it, Kim?

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Kind of?

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Sort of?

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, he really is the poster child of AI

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 6>buildout right, And for the longest time until this GtC,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 6>we've all made the assumption that this is going to

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 6>happen at large data centers, and that is the who

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 6>the company was serving. Probably the hidden gem in his

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 6>comments were that only sixty percent of the chips that

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 6>they're selling right now are going towards those large data centers.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 6>But then corporations who are trying to figure out maybe

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 6>developing some in house you know, uses of this are

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 6>now buying their products. And I think that's really interesting

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 6>and kind of takes a little pressure off of the

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 6>company because it isn't solely dependent on you know what Core,

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 6>We even Microsoft and you know the rest of the

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 6>gang are buying.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>That is not just about GPUs, CPUs, even LPUS is

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 3>actually about the software side. How much did you pay

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 3>attention to Nemo claw, for example, the way in which

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>seems as though Jensen one's trying to get in on

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the enterprise desire to have safe agenda KI.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 6>Right, And I you know, I talked to a lot

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 6>of people in my job, and I have heard more

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 6>and more companies rolling out agentic services for their employees,

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 6>making them more productive. Now you know what the spending

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 6>on that is going to be. It's anyone's guess. I

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 6>am going to point back to the dot com Era,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 6>which it wasn't just about pets dot com and stamps

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 6>dot com and all that kind of goofy stuff. But

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 6>rolled into that was the Y two K conversion that

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 6>a lot of companies were undergoing. And one of the

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 6>flaws and thinking by investors during that time was that

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 6>spending was going to go on in perpetuity. What companies

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 6>were spending on it for that Y two K conversion

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 6>was thought to, you know, it will bloom and blossom

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 6>into other areas, and it didn't happen. And I think

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 6>this is a warning for this technology as well. I've

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 6>seen some really goofy estimates that you know, companies are

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 6>going to be spending on this, you know, in perpetuity

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 6>in the trillions, and that's really not how technology works.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 6>People want an end to it, and they just want

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 6>to use the build out and they just want to

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 6>use the technology for productivity. So investors beware, well how

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 6>of them?

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 3>For should the warnings to investors be about im perpetuity

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the pricing of memory going at a higher At the moment,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 3>we seem to be getting endless calls that this is

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be at least until maybe twenty thirty, but

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 3>there's got to be demand destruction and that's going to

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 3>be focused on in Micron's numbers after the bell exactly.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 6>And Micron is a really great example of this, right

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 6>because they had been participating and I'd love to say

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 6>this world oligopoly about six companies that were making land

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 6>and dram memory, right and what would happen was somebody

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 6>would bring on a new supply and that would just

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 6>kill nand prices because it was kind of a commodity. Well,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.239
<v Speaker 6>even though high bandwidth memory is you know, a gating

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 6>factor now for a lot of these build ai buildouts,

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 6>at some point, you know, we're going to go back

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 6>into that boom bust cycle even though it's exotic and

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 6>in demand. So I think that Micron just announced that

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 6>they're adding capacity to a Taiwan plant, and you know,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 6>look for the other players in this area to start

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 6>doing that as well. And again it's going it's not

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 6>going to go upwards to the right like it has

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 6>been the demand or the pricing, you know, because we're

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 6>going to have supply demand here entering into this. And

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 6>these are even a smaller oligopoly of about three players

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.359
<v Speaker 6>right now that are making this high bandwidth memory.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 3>How much these stopped price sing in Already the enthusiasm here, Kim,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>because we're seeing MI chron rally into its numbers. Are

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>people already expecting just killer results?

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 2>And can that? What more? Can the CEO already talk about?

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely? I mean they are expecting killer results, but the

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 6>physical world is going to impact their their you know

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 6>results too, because there's only you can only ship what

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 6>you make and they are running up everybody in this

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 6>industry is running up against you know, supply problems and

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 6>you can see that as the chip builders are complaining

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 6>about it. So I would be I am very enthusiastic

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 6>about my crime For the long haul, I think they're

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 6>a great company, but in the short term, I wonder

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 6>can they ship enough to satisfy investors demand? And I

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 6>guess tonight we'll see.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 3>We've also seen perhaps a slight quantening of the anxiety

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 3>around the AI trade, just from a can we afford it?

0:09:59.400 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Will it? Really?

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Do we need this level of data center build out perspective?

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Kim?

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Where is the anxiety right now for you? When it

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 3>comes to the still optimism we see baked into the

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 3>stock market.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 6>Sure well, I have some real questions about how much

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 6>capacity is needed. While I'm a huge bull on AI,

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 6>I understand what it can do, I am not still

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 6>convinced that large language models are the way forward forever

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 6>and ever.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 2>Amen.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 6>I think they've done wonderful things in solving natural language processing,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 6>but I don't know that that is what we're going

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 6>to do in let's say five years. So my fear

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 6>still is that we are building our investors are building

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 6>their expectations on what they know today, and I think

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 6>things can change very very quickly with innovations like I

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 6>don't know, open Claw or whatever it is. You know

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 6>where I'm sure where companies using worst profiting power and

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 6>getting more being from.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 2>The bark unpredictability in the stock market.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what Howard Marks is calling out today when

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 3>it comes to AI. Kim Forrest, CIO of Booker Capital Partners, Great.

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 2>To have some time with you. Now.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we're going to be speaking with Tarik Mansur

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Cal she CEO and co founder has after Arizona filed

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 3>criminal charges against the Prediction market platform one.

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Next this is bluembed Tech.

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Arizona has filed criminal charges against CALS, accusing the company

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 3>of operating an illegal gambling business.

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 2>So next, Tim Stenovich.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Joins us now and Kaoshi Kofanna and CEO Tim take

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>it away.

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 5>Hi, We're joined by Tarak Monsieur. He's the CEO and

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 5>co founder of Call She. Tarak, good to see you.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for joining us on this. Look, even though other

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>state regulators have taken steps to crack down on what

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 5>they say is unlicensed betting on call She's site, Arizona

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.599
<v Speaker 5>appears to be the first to escalate to criminal charges.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 5>What is your response to these charges?

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 7>Look, I mean, these charges have nothing to do with

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 7>gambling or the merits. If it was about gamling or

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 7>the merits, they would let the judicial process fright its

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 7>course in the federal courts. You know, five days ago

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 7>on Thursday, CALCI filed suit against Arizona and federal courts

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 7>on the mets on whether Calshi is subject to exclusive

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 7>jurisdiction of the CFTC. And you know, we're confident opposition

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 7>and wanted to let the court process play out. And

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 7>instead of letting that happen, the Arizona Attorney General decided

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 7>to subvert the judicial process and weaponize it and go

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 7>to state court and file these criminal charges, which you

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 7>know we view as merit lists and basis. We see

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 7>this as a total overstep and we look forward to

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 7>fighting it in court.

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 5>Well, experts are saying this could be the first of

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 5>many charges such as these from other states too. How

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 5>does it change your legal strategy.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is the whole point of federal preemption. So

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 7>this is not about camera. The charges that the Attorney

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 7>General filed are not about gambling. They're not even about

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 7>sports only. They're about prediction markets writ large. It's just,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, attacking the entire business model. And nothing prevents

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 7>from the same attorney general or others from fighting the

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 7>same criminal charges against derivatives' markets writ large. They could

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 7>file the same exact charges under the same analysis against

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 7>CME or ICE or NASDAC. And that's the whole point

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 7>of federal regulation of these financial exchanges is to prevent

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 7>this sort of chaos and these sort of attacks on

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 7>these businesses that could be political in nature or other.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 7>And that's a very important distinction.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, I read the charging document from the Attorney General

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 5>as twenty charges. They're mostly about betting and wagering. When

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 5>it comes to sports, there's some election stuff in there.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Would you ever consider limiting your business in Arizona or

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 5>other states, to things that these ags don't seem to

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 5>have problems with, like economic data, the price of bitcoin,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 5>what markets are going to do predictions around those things.

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 7>Look, I mean the AGE also claim that we have

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 7>war markets, which is incorrect. It's either flat out to

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 7>lie or it's misinformed take which is unfortunate for someone,

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, filing criminal charges against the company. What's more

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 7>important here, again is this is not about the merits.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 7>If it's about the merits, let's let the judicial process

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 7>run its course in federal courts. This is about something

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 7>other than the merits, which is what I'm focused on.

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't know what the AGE is focused on, but

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 7>you know she is off for reelection.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, it does.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 7>It did some press, It does seem to be making

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 7>some buzz. But what I'm really focused on is building

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 7>a great product from lens of customers, out of which

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 7>goes to four hundred thousand are in Arizona and fighting

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 7>any of these basis cases in courts, which was which

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 7>we're going to continue doing.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 5>So you're fighting the cases. As I mentioned, Arizona is

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 5>not the only state to take issue with your business.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 5>What happens. Ultimately, if courts do side with states, what

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 5>does it mean for the future of your company.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 7>We believe in the rule of law. Right, we will

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 7>always abide by court decisions. The law applies to us,

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 7>but it also applies to the government, including state governments,

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 7>and then it's a very important thing.

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 7>This is really not about our business model. Again, if

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 7>it was about our business model, we would be focused

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 7>on the federal courts and the lawsuit about the merits.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 7>This is a broader attack, and you know many states

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 7>have sided with us and have granted us a preliminary

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 7>in junction, agreeing with our legal analysis. We have spent

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 7>four years getting regulated by the federal government, and we

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 7>have a federal government in the CFTC that is coming

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 7>strongly in favor of our position. Following these charges is

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 7>a total total overstep and an overreach from an AG

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 7>that's up for re election, and we find that unfortunate.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 7>But we will stay focused on what we do best,

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 7>which is building a great product.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 5>So certainly the CFTC. We know where the CFTC stands,

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 5>and we know where Michael Mike Seelig stands on this.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 5>We don't know where courts stand on this, and I'm

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 5>wondering if we see a state like Nevada, for example,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 5>block access to your business, what will you do? Will

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 5>you continue to operate or will you will you say, Okay,

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to operate in Nevada.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 7>Well, first of all, let's get let's get to that point,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 7>and you know, we'll have to make a decision as

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 7>the company what we do. What I can reiterate is

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 7>we will one hundred percent abye by the law. That's

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 7>what we will do as a company. It's always been

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 7>our position. That's why we spend four years getting regulated upfront,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 7>regulatory first as a company and always abide by the law.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 7>But what I always say, the law applies to us

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 7>as much as it applies to the government, and when

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 7>government oversteps the law and goes out of bound, we're

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 7>going to fight that in court, which we look forward to.

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 5>How long does that process take, because it seems like

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 5>there's a regulatory limbo happening. You're you're it's almost like

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 5>your legal team is going to have to play whack

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 5>a mole with all these states that are that are

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 5>filing suit or bring in criminal charges. How long is

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 5>this going to take?

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 7>And gladly we have a legal team to handle these

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 7>types of things, and we're going to be focused on

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 7>and you know, maybe it's a question for them. I mean, look,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 7>whatever whatever long it takes, we're going to fight for

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 7>prediction markets. I spent eight years building this company, four

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 7>out of which have which are getting regulated upfront. I

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 7>really believe in this marketplace. I'm very excited about the

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 7>growth that we're seeing some of the fast growing company

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.479
<v Speaker 7>companies in America right now. And so what I'm going

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 7>to be focused on is keep building a great product,

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 7>and that's what's sort of most important for me. The

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 7>more important sort of question is, you know, when it

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 7>comes to this is not really about you know, whether

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 7>this is gambling or not. This is not really about

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 7>state versus federal which are both co existing and both growing,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 7>both models. This really is turning into sort of some

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 7>special interests that like the status quo. The status always

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 7>work very well for monopolies, but not for the consumers

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 7>that are flocking to prediction markets right now, which we're

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 7>going to keep fidding for Tark.

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 5>There is this perception though that people think this is gambling.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 5>An IPSOS survey from just a few weeks ago, for example,

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 5>show sixty one percent of adults safe prediction market trading

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 5>is closer to gambling. Eight percent say it's closer to investing.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 5>So there is this public perception that doesn't necessarily match

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 5>with what you say. The platform is how do you

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 5>respond to that and how do you at all that? Like,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 5>how is this not gambling?

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 7>I haven't really looked at these polls, you know. The

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 7>thing I will say is there's always been a battle

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 7>of whether financial derivatives are gambling. Great features were called

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 7>gambling and the eighteen hundreds, and there was a Supreme

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 7>Court decision that you know, said even though there is speculation,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 7>these you know, products have financial our structures the financial markets,

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 7>and thus are going to fall under financial market jurisdiction.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 7>So I always say this, you know, whether something feels

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 7>and looks like gambling doesn't necessarily make it gambling. Speculation

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 7>exists in all financial markets. If we're going to take

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 7>a line that speculation is gambling, then the stock market

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 7>with retail participation is gambling. Then buying options for retail

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 7>or zero data to expier options is gammling. Then retail

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 7>buying crypto is gambling. The more important line in the

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 7>historical line that we've been taking under the law, but

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 7>also you know, as you think about it societally. Is

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 7>is the business model a gambling business model, which is

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 7>a model where the revenue of the business and the

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 7>profits are equal to the customer's losses, in which case

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.719
<v Speaker 7>the incentive is to promote more losses and blog the winners.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 7>Or is it an open, free and fair marketplace where

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 7>people can enter in and out freely and transparently, which

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 7>is a financial exchange, which Calci falls under.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Tark monsieur Calci, co founder and CEO. Tark always good

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 5>to speak with you. Thanks so much for joining us, Caroline,

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 5>back to you.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Fantastic interview, Tim, thanks for bringing it. The Trump administration

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 3>is dialing up efforts to oust Anthropic from all federal agencies,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 3>saying the US government has reason to question whether the

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 3>AI firm is a trusted partner after the company asked

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 3>for limits on how its technology was used by the

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 3>Department of Defense. Let's get the latest on this saga

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 3>of Boomberg's AI reporter Rachel Metz. This is now not

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 3>just in the public court of the media. This is

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 3>going to the actual court for a fight out.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. So as part of this fight between the Anthropic

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 8>and the federal government, the Anthropic has filed to Las

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 8>suits and the one in California has a lot of

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 8>action happening. Yesterday, the federal government said we are going

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 8>to fight. We think that Inthropics technology became an unacceptable

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 8>risk essentially to the military because Anthropic would not agree

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 8>with a change to its contract that the military wanted

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 8>earlier this year.

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Emil Michael he's the US Undersecretary of Defense for Research

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 3>and Engineering, and it has really sort of been the

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 3>public voice of this, and he's talking about how there

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>was hostility thrown around by Anthropic during the negotiations he

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>feels and the fear it seems to be is that

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 3>in some way the technology can be manipulated if it

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 3>remains within federal use. Anthropic, if it feels as red

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 3>lines across, could just go in there and change the

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 3>way in which the technology works. It's going to be

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 3>grounds for this, Rachel as a legal argument.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think that that is really alarming sounding, right,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 8>Like the idea that if you could be using technology

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 8>in a war fighting situation and then the company that

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 8>has built the technology could do something about it. For

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 8>Nanthropics part, they said in a statement Dario Amida, Anthropics

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 8>CEOs and a statement in February, the company has never

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 8>done something like that, and really what the company wants

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 8>is just some specific limits on how its technology is deployed,

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 8>while the military is saying we want to be able

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 8>to use that technology for any lawful purpose, something that

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 8>Anthropic it alleges refused to accept due to its usage

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 8>policies for Claude.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Really they're talking about their long standing commitment to harnessing

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 3>AI to protect our national security. Is what Anthropics saying.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 3>How is this affecting or could affect the business?

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Briefly, Rachel, It's.

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 8>Sort of affect could affect it in two different ways.

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 8>On the one hand, this has seemed to be a

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 8>huge boost for Anthropic, especially as a consumer product, which

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 8>typically it is not thought of as a consumer product

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 8>miss chatbot Claude, but that app has gotten extremely popular,

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 8>big boost in popularity. And at the same time, the

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 8>company says this could be hundreds of millions or even

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 8>billions of dollars in damage, and it's cited in a

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 8>court filing last week some specific ways that it's already

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 8>starting to harm the company financially.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Racial mets on their latest with Anthropic and the Pentagon.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. We check in on these markets,

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 3>which in many ways are in the eye of a

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical storm, a macrostorm, with of by five ten percent

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 3>on the Nasdaq one hundred. More broadly, stocks have turned lower,

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 3>and the S and P five hundred because Brent crude

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 3>is on the higher side one.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Than five percent high.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>The conflict with the Middle East, within the Middle East

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>seems to be well worsening rather than coming to any

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 3>near conclusion. We're currently seeing there for inflationary pressure. Me

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the key concern for the market. PPI reading is coming

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 3>in today showing that there's inflation pressure even before the

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 3>conflict erupted in some.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Nineteen days ago.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 3>And we look towards what the Federal Reserve will do

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 3>in response that meeting today, we're not expecting any change

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 3>in rates per certainly a conversation to be had with

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 3>a Fed chair. Let's move on and have a look

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 3>at what tech stocks are doing, because in a monst

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 3>a's that one hundred, which is down. We're actually saying

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>in video trying to do its best in the green

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 3>We're up three tenths of a percent. Now, this is

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>as we have some extraordinary dictations coming from the CEO

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Wan, who's talking about this moment in open Claw,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 3>the fact that we've got a new chat ChiPT on

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>our hands in the world of agentic Ai.

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>It is driving those words.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 3>Driving Chinese stocks in particular Minimax up almost twenty percent

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 3>as they release you agentic Ai tools for its user base.

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Jupu is up almost twenty percent as well. Look, these

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 2>are record highs at the.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Moment due to open Claw frenzy that has beset the

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 3>entire Chinese world alike. Look, let's stick more broadly with

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Chinese stocks, because another giant that has been betting on

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 3>the use of open Claw style agents is ten Cent,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 3>which actually just released its earnings results showing that how

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 3>many plans to at least double its investments in ai

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Please just say here in New York.

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 3>For the time, banks, blux ages, stop reporter if you

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 3>can on Lee.

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you here for a couple of months.

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 3>You can talk to us a little bit about ten

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Cent and what they said on the numbers.

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think there are three key takeaways from their

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 9>earnings this morning. I think number one is this top

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 9>line crows. It said thirteen percent sales crows for the

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 9>December quarter, which is its fifth straight quarterly results those

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 9>posting double digit curls and that was in line with

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 9>expectation thanks to its advertisement and gaming department. So I

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 9>think that's the first key takeaway. And the secondly and

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 9>more importantly is AI investment. The company is that is

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 9>going to double is AI investment and that's going to

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 9>cause some share buy back. So company is going to

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 9>scale back the share buy back so we can bank

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 9>roll the AI investment that's going to at least double

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 9>this year. And I think thirdly a third takeaway is

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 9>actually the company is mentioned of the open cloud. The

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 9>company mentioned how it's going to use open cloud and

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 9>how it's going to help the company's as strategy using

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 9>the open class. So the company's CEO, Puny Mass set

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 9>open Claw is actually an inspiration, great inspiration for the

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 9>companies reach out related ecosystem and it also said is

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 9>helping ten Cent leverages cloud computing.

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 2>So the mention of the open.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 9>Claw topline growth is doubling of the AI investment. These

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 9>are the key takeaways from this tencent earning this morning.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 3>It's so fascinating because here open Cloor is sort of

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 3>a developer phenomenon, but in China and Asia it's a

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 3>consumer phenomenon. It's desire to see agent Kai autonomous agents

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>used in your personal life. How are other giants like

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Ali Baba thinking about this as we look towards their

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 3>earnings coming out?

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely so Ali Baba is reporting their earnings on

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 9>Thursday before before the market US time.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I think there are.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.239
<v Speaker 9>Several things that investors are looking forward to. I think

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 9>number one is investment plan on and the monetization flavor

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 9>is artificial intelligence. Overnight, we heard from Ali Baba that

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 9>is going to hide the prices of its own AI

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 9>storage and computing products by as much is thirty four percent,

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 9>and Investor cheered the news to say, sending the stocks

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 9>up as much as four percent in Hong Kong on Wednesday.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 9>So investors have been looking for answers on how the

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 9>company is going to monetize the AI investment and justify

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 9>the massive investment they are spending on the AI.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's more details.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 9>On this AI monetized instrument monetization plan. It's definitely going

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 9>to own the minds of investors on during the Alibaba's

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 9>earnest conference call, as well as plans on investment on

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 9>other areas such as quick commerce. The company has been

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 9>spending a lot to catch up with rivals and also

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 9>definitely a continued growth. The investor will be looking for

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 9>signs of continue growth in its top light and bottom line.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Yu Kiang, I'm so pleased you're going to be sticking

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 3>around for a few months. We appreciate you joining Kiang

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Lee over from Asia here in New York talking all

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 3>about Alibaba and Tencent. Look, now let's pivot a bit

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>to the private markets. Cybersecurity startup Expo has raised one

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty million dollars at evaluation more than a

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 3>billion now. The round was led by DFJA Growth and

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 3>North Zone and comes as more companies are focusing on

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the threats of aiured cyber attacks. Please to speak with

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Expo c more. I mean talk to us about first

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 3>and foremost the money, what you use it for, how

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 3>you can continue to power expot growth.

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 10>Thank you very much for having me. You cannot define

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 10>defend against machine speed attacks with human speed tools. And

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 10>that is what expert is all about. Last year, we

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 10>proved that completely autonomous attacks are possible by entering our

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 10>bot on the hacker one platform, and within a few

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 10>months it became the top hacker in the world. After that,

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 10>we were we here were quickly signed up over our

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 10>hundreds corporate customers, and we're now raising this money in

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 10>order to better serve those customers and to very quickly

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 10>further develop our products and go to market.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so what's so fascinating about your tool is that

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 3>basically a GENTICKI is a force in terms of our

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>defensive posture, but it's also a force in terms of

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 3>our aggressive posture. The fact that people can fight back

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 3>and you're using in many ways is the ability to

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 3>find vulnerabilities ahead of bad actors. How are we seeing

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 3>cyber attacks more broadly scale in this moment? How much

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 3>is there an aggression from those that are wanting to

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 3>do ill?

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely so, attacker holes will and are already using AI.

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 10>But the good news is the defenders can do it too.

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 10>By thinking the one can attack our agentic AI system

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 10>can find the flaws before it a bad guys, So

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 10>the danger is not really AI itself. But the danger

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 10>is defending modern systems with yesterday stores.

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about what we're seeing in terms of

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 3>you beefing up the ability to scale.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it about people?

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Because many in this moment I say, well, for the

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>rise of a gentki, you need less talent, you just

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 3>can empower the talent you already have.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 10>It's well, it's absolutely We already have some of the

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 10>very best human hackers in the world working for us,

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 10>as well as a fantastic go to market team. Really,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 10>we've got other combination of both AI talent and security engineers. However,

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 10>we also need to bring the product to market and

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 10>go to market. Appalt is still very much our human

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 10>human lad activity. A lot of the money you will

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 10>also go cannot lead towards inference in order to speed

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 10>up our development.

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Where are you looking for for that sort of compute?

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 3>How are you managing to ensure you've got the right

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>inference power and you need it?

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 10>So we actually work with all the frontier labs. All

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 10>of them give us special access to early models and

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 10>that allows us to always be in front of the

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 10>very latest, our very latest developments. We also across a

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 10>very pretty large consumers have special deals with the large

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 10>harvest galus.

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 3>You are so fascinating expos clearly fascinating, but your background

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 3>as a computer scientist professor at Oxford decades, the fact

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 3>that you help build GitHub, gethub co pilot as well.

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>When we see this fervor around a gender KI, when

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 3>you see the hype that's happening worldwide around an openclore

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 3>and an open source model that can revolutionize personal AI,

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 3>how does that make you feel?

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 2>How real do you feel this moment?

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 10>Is it's an unbelievable time to be building. We're seeing

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.959
<v Speaker 10>we're in the middle of a new revolution again to

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 10>the industrial revolution of our previous century, but it's going

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 10>to be much much bigger than that. So personally, I

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 10>actually feel lot, deeply privileged to be parts of this transformation.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>So briefly, you're optimistic at this moment rather than any

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>concerns wire is security issues.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, So the key about gender Gatorie systems is that

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 10>they will actually amplify what we can do as as humans,

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 10>and that's certainly too in cybersecurity. We've got one of

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 10>our customers, sess now sometimes called the Google of the

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 10>Czech Republic. They've been using our system for over a

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 10>year and one quote from one of their engineers stuck

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 10>with me. Every EXPO agent is like a new team

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 10>member in security. We're vastly constrained by the scarcity of

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 10>talent and so having the ability to suddenly scale and

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 10>do all the things that we know we should be

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 10>doing but we're not able to do before. That's one

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 10>and I believe not the same is true in many

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 10>in money, older fields or for human activity.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Gudomar, great to have some time with you. Expo CEO

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and the fundraise.

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Gradient Ventures, Well, it's raised two hundred and twenty million

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>dollars for its fifth fund, doubling down on its strategy

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and backing the next wave of AI founders at seed stage,

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>early stage. Now with his latest raise, the firm now

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 3>manages almost one point two billion dollars across its funds.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Please to say that we're joined by Darren Is Shirazi,

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 3>He's general partner. And so do we move away from

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 3>any of the learned performance already or do you double

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 3>down on the conviction that you already have. Is it's

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>still about generator AI and the tooling.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 11>Thanks for having me, Yeah, I mean, we have been

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 11>investing in AI since since the very beg beginning, and

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 11>then our focus has really been partnering with founders at

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 11>the earliest stages, when founders are really starting out with

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 11>a brand new idea, and we backed hundreds of companies,

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 11>and we've been fortunate enough to partner with these companies

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 11>from the very beginning, some of which are in an

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 11>apartment or our founders that have never even been in

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 11>business before, and our focus is on helping them scale

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 11>up and really find the next round of funding and

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 11>to really partner with these founders all the way through

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 11>IPO in some cases.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've been doing this since twenty seventeen, since

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 3>before chat ubt, since before AI got cooled. There we

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 3>say it, you've backed what five hundred AI founders already

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 3>talk us through the wins that you've already seen, because look,

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>the LPs need convincing at this moment. Where were you

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 3>able to show your prowess to those to come back

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 3>and reinvest with you.

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, you know, I think over the course

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 11>of the last ten years that we've been investing in AI,

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 11>we've seen the number of companies that come through our

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 11>doors really accelerate and increase. We used to see about

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 11>one hundred companies in AI per year, and we were

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 11>sort of the odd ball venture fund that was really

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 11>really niche and looking at really technical people that were

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 11>researchers or people that were not necessarily focused on building

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 11>big businesses in the eyes of a lot of other

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 11>venture capitalists. But we saw that the chat GPT moment

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 11>was going to come. We saw that the Transformer paper,

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.959
<v Speaker 11>which came out a month before Gradient launched, was really

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 11>going to be the epoch moment for AI. And my

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 11>partner Zach and I we saw that the ability for

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 11>people to use these models as sort of an intelligent

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 11>buddy and or an intelligent copilot was really going to

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 11>be the future of the Internet and the future of technology,

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 11>and we partnered with these founders. Now we see two

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 11>thousand companies a year come through our doors and pitch

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 11>us with some new AI technology or AI capability, and

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 11>we have to pick about ten to fifteen of those

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 11>that we decided to partner with. So the job has

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 11>gotten more difficult in terms of volume, but it's also

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 11>gotten a lot more interesting because of the number of

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 11>technologies and number of founders that we see and what

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 11>they are working on. Everything from wafer scale compute companies

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 11>to open claw renditions or individual models that are for

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 11>specific tasks.

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 3>What's also got more difficult is just the size of

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 3>the rounds that.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>We've just had.

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 3>The biggest sort of seed was it a billion that

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Yan Laccoon's just been raising over in Europe, I mean

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 3>coming out with three billion. In terms of valuation, you're

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 3>seeing Mira, Marati, rais and extraordinary fund people are calling

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 3>these like mango seeds, ravocado seeds.

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 2>As I'd love to say, how can you compete?

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 11>So that's a really interesting question, is that we actually

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 11>think that there is a bubble in certain parts of AI.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 11>There are bubbles. There is a bubble in foundational model companies,

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 11>contenders to open AI, contenders to Google, contenders to xai,

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 11>and anthropic and that's those are companies that we don't fund.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 11>What we really want to be focused on are AI

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 11>infrastructure companies and AI application companies, and those seed rounds

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 11>tend to be really well priced and tend to be

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 11>ones that we can invest in and lead with an

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 11>average three million dollar check and own ten to fifteen

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 11>percent of those companies. We actually don't see the valuation

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 11>issues in the areas that we want to focus in

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to AI. When it comes to a

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 11>lot of these other companies that are raising a billion

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 11>dollars here or there, it seems as though those are

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 11>a lot of venture capitalists or investors that want to

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 11>chase the next open AI. But realistically, the moat at

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 11>the model layer is just capital. How much money can

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 11>you raise? You know, because you buy data and compute

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 11>and so where we focus, the valuations are favorable and

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 11>the round sizes are favorable, and we believe that that

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 11>will continue.

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 3>What is it like in terms of diversifying your LP

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 3>base because it has a very interesting story gradient It

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 3>came out of Google, but then you brought on external money.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Does that change the way in which you have to

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 3>invest because lots of people have different strategies the why

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 3>they're coming to you with their money.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 11>It was extremely challenging to raise from LPs, especially in

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 11>this climate. I mean, we're very fortunate that we were

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 11>able to get it done in about nine months, but

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 11>you know before for our prior for funds, Google was

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 11>the single LP and they've been an incredible partner. I

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 11>don't think we could have launched an AI seed fund

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 11>in twenty seventeen when everyone was looking at crypto without

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 11>the help of Google, and so now I think we

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 11>decided we wanted to diversify our LP base because it

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 11>gives us a lot more capabilities. We have partners in

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 11>the LP base for our companies, and we also wanted

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 11>the ability to sort of scale up our capital base

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 11>and have that flexibility. But it was challenging because a

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 11>lot of people haven't seen liquidity, especially in the institutional

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 11>LP network. Fortunately, we found LPs that believed in our

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 11>vision and mission and wanted to partner with us over

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 11>the long term. And now we have a collection of

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 11>not just Google, but many other amazing institutions, including companies

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 11>like Marcado Libra, which we're very closely partnered with, as

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.919
<v Speaker 11>well as a number of other insurance companies, institutions and foundations.

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 11>And so I think that given the climate, it is

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 11>challenging to raise, especially for a seed fund when you

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 11>have inuresin in general catalyst raising ten twenty billion dollar funds.

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 11>But I think we've been able to articulate our strategy

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 11>in focusing on the areas where there isn't a bubble,

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 11>when valuations are favorable, and where we can partner with

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 11>these founders when it's just an idea and mature and

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 11>grow with them.

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Love that clarity and your Canada.

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much, Darren Shrausi of Gradient, Congratulations on the

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 3>new fund now coming up. Disney's new CEO takes over

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 3>as the media landscape shifts, government scrutiny increases.

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>We're on that next as Bloomberg Tech.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Disney's annual shareholder meeting is today and it marks.

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 2>A leadership handoff.

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Josh Tomorrow set to take over as CEO from Bob Byger,

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and he steps in at a challenging moment inheriting what

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 3>is a bit of an underperforming stock and a media

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 3>landscape still in flux for all Bloomers. Chris Palm Mary,

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 3>who leads our Media and Entertainment team, joins us look

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 3>for the second stint to Bob Iger.

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 2>He came on in what November.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty two, and the stock has only gone up

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 3>nine percent compared to seventy percent for the SMP and

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 3>huge moves for Netflix. What does Josh need to prove

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to an investor base today?

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 12>Well, Tomorrow is coming from the theme park business. That's

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 12>where his whole career has been, so we don't know

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 12>to what extent he really understands the TV a business

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 12>and a film business that is still so critical to Disney,

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 12>and there's just been a movement out of these stocks.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 12>You know, the streaming businesses haven't been as profitable as

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 12>people hope. The traditional TV channels are just losing viewers

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 12>and advertisers. So Tomorrow has to articulate a strategy for

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 12>that business that we really haven't heard from them.

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean he's got, of course, Dana Walden still

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>on board when it comes to Chief Creative Officer and

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 3>all things streaming movies that sort of ip, but it

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 3>has done deals He's got into Epic for example. How

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 3>are we likely to see him bring all of these

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 3>clustered sort of assets together.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, what we get a sense of his strategy is

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 12>that he sees, you know, coming from the parks business,

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 12>he's got that direct connection to the consumer, and so

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 12>he sees the Disney Plus service as a direct consumer

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 12>service and a way to tie in, say the games

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 12>like Fortnite, the Epic investment, and it's going to be

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 12>a sort of a Disney universe, and he's going to

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 12>put this all, you know, sort of better, more connections

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 12>directly with Disney fans who are you as we all

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 12>know who have been and money spending consumers.

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 3>We'll see what he does with tech aivrar and the

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 3>light bluembogs. Chris Palmry watching that shareholder meeting. Thanks so much.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Now let's talk about the FCC chair running car. He

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.760
<v Speaker 3>is waging what he calls a crackdown on fake news

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 3>as the Trump administration leans more heavily on regulators to

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 3>challenge media coverage, raising new questions about the SEC's role

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:25.239
<v Speaker 3>in reach the most. Kelsey Griffiths takes a closer look

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>at Carr himself his rise within the administration.

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 2>It's today's big take.

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 3>It's a fascinating read, and it all starts with how

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 3>basically a lot of Georgetown alumni were amazed to hear

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 3>that apparently they've gone to university with Brendan Carr, and

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 3>they didn't realize he was not a big guy on

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 3>campus or a big personality before the Trump administration.

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 13>That's exactly right, Caroline. I spoke with some of Brendan

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 13>Carr's former classmates who were shocked to realize in hindsight

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 13>that they had even gone to university with him, and

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 13>I think that is such a contrast to the man

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 13>we see today who has become this flamethrower for the

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 13>Trump administration. That's really in contrast to his kind of shy,

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 13>quiet personality that he's had over the years. So we've

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 13>really seen a change in his demeanor in the way

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 13>that he communicates publicly as he's really stepped into this

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 13>role as Trump's media enforcer.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Take us on that evolution then, of him, the personality,

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the man and the roles that he sort of almost

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 3>said gump like got him into this place with the FCC.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 13>So I've covered Brendan Carr since twenty seventeen when he

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 13>was a commissioner, and I think it's been really interesting

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:38.720
<v Speaker 13>to watch. He has always had a really congenial relationship

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 13>with the press. Even now, he always stops by the

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 13>press table at the FCC's public meetings speaks with US banters,

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 13>and I think that is sort of in contrast to

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 13>the big swings that he's been taking in the last

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 13>year or so against what he and Trump like to

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 13>labels the fake news.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 3>He must have had to grow a quiet fake skin

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 3>just thinking of the fallout online, the pushback he's got

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 3>from very famous comedians and the like, just how does

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 3>he serve the administration agenda.

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 13>At this moment, Brendan Carr has very much taken the

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 13>position that whatever happens in the media, whatever fallout happens

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 13>in the media, is not really his problem. I asked

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 13>him what it was like to publicly contribute to Jimmy

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 13>Kimmel's temporary cancelation and then to face a lot of

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 13>blowback for that, and he says he doesn't really care.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 13>He tries not to pay attention to the negative headlines,

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 13>and when he does see them, he kind of chuckles.

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 13>So I think he kind of adopts that some moilar

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 13>attitude that the president does that all news is kind

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 13>of good news.

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 3>See if he's reading your piece to Bloomg's Kelsey Griffiths,

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a great deep dive and a great big take.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Everyone to go online and take a look and on

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the terminal.

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 2>But that does it. With this addition of Bloomberg Tech, you.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Do not want to forget to check out our podcast

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 3>find Out on the Terminal as well as online on Apple.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Spotify and high r from New York. This is Breenberg

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Tack