Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Allegations of voter fraud
Speaker 1: fly at Michigan hearings, the Durham Probe is now a
Speaker 1: special counsel more lockdown hypocrisy in California, and Coomy gets
Speaker 1: a Columbia U gig. This is the buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with assionable intelligence. Make no mistake America great, Here
Speaker 1: a great America Again, The buck Sexton Show begins analyst,
Speaker 1: Remember he's a great guy. No welcome, friends to the
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show. The biggest question in politics right now
Speaker 1: in America, and therefore, I think you could argue the
Speaker 1: whole world is who really won this election. I know
Speaker 1: the media and the Democrats and a whole lot of
Speaker 1: folks are saying that this is not a real question.
Speaker 1: It's all over with. We all know that's what they
Speaker 1: tell us. It's all done, and any allegations of fraud
Speaker 1: should be dismissed out of hand. But I think you've
Speaker 1: also started to notice something, a narrative shift. You've seen
Speaker 1: things start to move a little bit, because for the
Speaker 1: last few weeks, what have we been told? There is
Speaker 1: no fraud, absolutely none, zero. That's interesting because now we're
Speaker 1: starting to see there are definitely irregularities, and there's certainly
Speaker 1: early stage proof that there was voter fraud. So I
Speaker 1: think that the change in tone that you can expect,
Speaker 1: and it's already just beginning to happen, is okay, fine,
Speaker 1: there was fraud, but not enough to change the results
Speaker 1: of the election. Even the Attorney General Bill Barr and
Speaker 1: his statement speaking on behalf of the DOJ which he runs,
Speaker 1: saying that we have not yet found enough fraud to
Speaker 1: date to overturn the results of the election. That's not
Speaker 1: the same thing as saying there was no fraud, which
Speaker 1: is what the left and the Democrats have been claiming
Speaker 1: all along. Now. I understand this is hyperpartisan at this point.
Speaker 1: I understand that there are people who view the fate
Speaker 1: of the country as enmeshed inextricably in this issue. But
Speaker 1: I also think it's very important, more than anything else,
Speaker 1: that we get it right, and we get the truth.
Speaker 1: And even if the truth isn't what a lot of
Speaker 1: us want to hear at this point, even if for
Speaker 1: many of us it's a disappointment, we need to arrive
Speaker 1: at that conclusion, and then we need to move on
Speaker 1: as a country. But we're not there yet. We still
Speaker 1: have quite a ways to go. And that's in evidence
Speaker 1: at these various hearings that have been had by state legislatures,
Speaker 1: including yesterday in Lansing, Michigan, where there were people who
Speaker 1: were coming forward publicly named individuals. These are not anonymous
Speaker 1: Internet rolls. These are not people that are hiding behind
Speaker 1: some veil of oh, I don't want anyone to know
Speaker 1: my name. No, they're coming forward and they're saying this
Speaker 1: is what I saw, and you had hours and hours
Speaker 1: of this. Now, yes, I understand. In Michigan the separation
Speaker 1: between Trump and Biden right now is over one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand votes. So that's a lot. Even if we find
Speaker 1: a thousand votes here or a thousand votes there, that
Speaker 1: may not be enough to change the result, but it's
Speaker 1: important for all of us. It's critical. It's essential that
Speaker 1: every vote is counted, that is legal, and that we
Speaker 1: know that that's what happened, and that we have put
Speaker 1: our system through this stress test and can come out
Speaker 1: the other side knowing that. However this shakes out the
Speaker 1: next election, which is going to be on January fifth,
Speaker 1: and Georgia, by the way, the next election is at
Speaker 1: least secure enough. It's never going to be perfect. Understand
Speaker 1: that there's no such thing as an election with paper
Speaker 1: ballots and mail in ballots at all, this with over
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty million votes cast, where everyone just
Speaker 1: does exactly what they're supposed to do. But it has
Speaker 1: to be good enough, good enough that we have faith
Speaker 1: in it, good enough that we don't walk around saying
Speaker 1: it looks like it was stolen, because right now, based
Speaker 1: on just a cursory overview of the facts and figures
Speaker 1: and the indications of what would have been enough to
Speaker 1: win in previous years, it certainly looks to a lot
Speaker 1: of folks like the election was stolen. So we're not
Speaker 1: just going to pretend that's not happening. We have to
Speaker 1: look at what's really going on. And when you start
Speaker 1: to dive into these different cases, you see that there
Speaker 1: are people who very much believe and are operating in
Speaker 1: good faith that they saw th things that were improper
Speaker 1: at a minimum, maybe a mistake, but also very possibly fraudulent.
Speaker 1: And let's also remember that there is a high degree
Speaker 1: of culpability. It is the cynicism of Democrats in this
Speaker 1: election year, in using COVID as an excuse to change
Speaker 1: in some cases, as we see in Pennsylvania, in likely
Speaker 1: unconstitutional fashion, to change the way people vote. And now
Speaker 1: there are problems and irregularities. Well, of course there are
Speaker 1: these last minute changes didn't go through the regular process.
Speaker 1: In fact, some of the changes to the actual process
Speaker 1: may themselves have been illegal. As I mentioned, Pennsylvania the
Speaker 1: most important case in point, and I think that it
Speaker 1: is going to be overturned by the Supreme Court in
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania if they take this up. I think that if
Speaker 1: the whole attention of the country is focused on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court on this issue, there's a very good chance
Speaker 1: at Pennsylvania's results will not be able to be certified
Speaker 1: as we currently would believe them to be because they
Speaker 1: changed election law and they were not supposed to do that.
Speaker 1: But now let's focus in on Michigan. You need to
Speaker 1: hear at least right the American people need to know
Speaker 1: what's going on. A lot of major networks, a lot
Speaker 1: of conservatives aren't even talking about this right now. They've
Speaker 1: already gone to the move on position. While I'm not there.
Speaker 1: I say we fight to the last day. I say
Speaker 1: we fight to the last man the last minute. So
Speaker 1: let's cheer out our fellow citizens are concerned fellow Americans
Speaker 1: who believe that they saw fraud, who believe that things
Speaker 1: in this election we're not on the up and up.
Speaker 1: And I will just tell you this, there's a surprising
Speaker 1: degree of likeness. There's a tremendous similarity in some of
Speaker 1: what you're hearing in these different states. Now, maybe that's
Speaker 1: because of the changes in the process with all the
Speaker 1: mail in balloting, so that alone caused there to be
Speaker 1: these irregularities. I mean, I find that hard to believe,
Speaker 1: but I'm trying to keep an open mind about all
Speaker 1: of it. But there are certainly similar things being said
Speaker 1: about last minute ballot dumps, about stops in the ballot counting.
Speaker 1: Did that really happen? Did they match signatures or do
Speaker 1: they just decide to wave it all in? Did Democrats,
Speaker 1: without even having to be told, who were involved in
Speaker 1: ballot counting, who were involved in this process, recognize that
Speaker 1: they just wanted to count every vote because they figured
Speaker 1: that the more they opened the floodgates, the better chances
Speaker 1: Biden had to win. Somehow, not winning these house races,
Speaker 1: somehow not winning these other state legislative battles in country,
Speaker 1: in states all across the country. But they are so
Speaker 1: certain that Biden substantially defeated Trump in these states. I
Speaker 1: find it hard to believe. Here is a Michigan pull watcher.
Speaker 1: I'm just giving you this. This hearing went on for
Speaker 1: a long time yesterday, so I want to give you
Speaker 1: some of I thought the most poignant moments of it.
Speaker 1: Here is this Michigan pole watcher talking about people being
Speaker 1: rejected from the room who were Republicans. Play one. I
Speaker 1: am an unaffiliated Michigan voter who was trained by the
Speaker 1: GOP to be a poll challenger on Wednesday, November fourth,
Speaker 1: beginning in the late morning until around eight pm, because
Speaker 1: I was told that they needed help they didn't have
Speaker 1: they were understaffed. I witnessed the room erupted thunderous applause
Speaker 1: and derogatory cheering as Republican poll workers were picked off
Speaker 1: one by one and ejected from the room repeatedly by
Speaker 1: police escort throughout the day. By the end of the day,
Speaker 1: they had picked off so many GOP poll workers that
Speaker 1: there were probably only a few dozen left to monitor
Speaker 1: all of the processing stations in the room, which I'm
Speaker 1: told was between one thirty and one sixty. Why would
Speaker 1: that happen? Is there any reason this guy would lie
Speaker 1: about this? If he was just doing it for attention,
Speaker 1: I think he could come up with a better story.
Speaker 1: But clearly something concerning here. Republican poll watchers pushed away
Speaker 1: so they can't see, and then there's cheering breaking out. Now,
Speaker 1: remember this is in political terms, enemy territory. Okay, when
Speaker 1: you're talking about Detroit, when you're talking about Philadelphia, these
Speaker 1: are eighty twenty Democrat districts. These are eighty twenty cities
Speaker 1: where the Democrat machine controls everything. You don't have people
Speaker 1: coming out and saying that this happened in Purple counties
Speaker 1: outside you know, the suburbs and the exurbs and all this.
Speaker 1: You're not having that, at least not the same way
Speaker 1: it's in these Democrats strongholds in key states that Biden
Speaker 1: was going to have to win. Now, I ask you,
Speaker 1: is that is the poll watcher? Is he making it
Speaker 1: up at a minimum? Isn't it suspicious? Isn't it concerning
Speaker 1: that this would happen? Okay, you say, well, Buck, that's
Speaker 1: one person. Well, no, there were others who said exactly
Speaker 1: the same thing. They were there to observe the count,
Speaker 1: and they were made to be so far away that
Speaker 1: it was impossible for them to observe the count. Here's
Speaker 1: another Michigan poll challenger yesterday, play three. I was under
Speaker 1: the impression that as a poll challenger, our primary responsibility
Speaker 1: is to make sure before a vote is cast that
Speaker 1: that ballot is either in the registered poll book, the
Speaker 1: computer book, or in the elect the paper poll book,
Speaker 1: of which anytime, as a challenger I tried to look
Speaker 1: at the ballot and then trying to verify it, I
Speaker 1: would get two or three of the poll workers literally
Speaker 1: screaming at me to get back six feet. However, we
Speaker 1: did not know that that had been overturned the night before,
Speaker 1: which would have been helpful. But at no time were
Speaker 1: we able actually to physically see the ballot and then
Speaker 1: see it in the pole electronic book. The person opening
Speaker 1: the ballot would probably be sitting where Senator faces, and
Speaker 1: the electronic screen that we were supposed to be watching
Speaker 1: is basically to where the committee clerk is now. I
Speaker 1: don't know if you guys got binocular vision, but I don't.
Speaker 1: What's the point of a poll watcher if you can't
Speaker 1: watch the polls. How many people have to come forward
Speaker 1: with sworn affidavits and firsthand eyewitness accounts of exactly this
Speaker 1: going on in major Democrat controlled districts. Now, this could
Speaker 1: all just be the kind of rough and tumble political
Speaker 1: melee of the moment. I guess right, I don't, And
Speaker 1: by the way, don't don't yell at me or send
Speaker 1: me emails like how could you believe that? I'm just
Speaker 1: working through this. I'm looking at all the possibilities. I
Speaker 1: obviously think something's funky here. I've been saying it's funky
Speaker 1: for weeks. But it's more than just you and me
Speaker 1: thinking that something is wrong here. We've got to establish
Speaker 1: how much wrong, and we've got to be able to
Speaker 1: prove it, prove it enough in court that a judge
Speaker 1: is going to say everything else all this. Oh, but
Speaker 1: I know there was fraud. I know there was fraud. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we all know there was fraud. How much fraud? That's
Speaker 1: the question that matters. This is not some purity test
Speaker 1: for whether you believe that Democrats are scummy and Trump
Speaker 1: should have won this thing. Of course we can agree
Speaker 1: on that one. But what do we know and what
Speaker 1: can we prove those are the questions of the moment.
Speaker 1: That's what we have to get real answers to. And
Speaker 1: some of what was said in Michigan was particularly concerning
Speaker 1: and certainly deserves more scrutiny. I spoke to Matt Brader,
Speaker 1: who's the guy running the voter Integrity Project, and he
Speaker 1: told me they're just crunching numbers and they're seeing people
Speaker 1: out of state voting. They're seeing people who are listed
Speaker 1: as dead voting. I spoke to Sean Parnell, who I mean,
Speaker 1: I would trust that guy with anything. I would trust
Speaker 1: Sean Parnell with my life. I'd follow that guy, actually
Speaker 1: follow him in the battle. Is a good buddy of mine.
Speaker 1: And he says that they did the random sampling of
Speaker 1: nursing homes and look like the signatures and the handwritting
Speaker 1: on a whole bunch of ballots was all the same. Now,
Speaker 1: I know Sean's not making that up. There are a
Speaker 1: lot of people here that are coming forward with things
Speaker 1: that are suspicious at a minimum, and the media is
Speaker 1: just suppressing it, just suppressing it. They don't care. They
Speaker 1: got the result they think they want and that's it.
Speaker 1: Now they're moving forward to Georgia and they're going to
Speaker 1: try to take Georgia two in whatever way they can.
Speaker 1: You and I both know it. Now. Here's another allegation
Speaker 1: from a Michigan hearing witness about military ballots. This was
Speaker 1: among the most stunning play four. One of the military
Speaker 1: ballots was not One of the military ballots was our
Speaker 1: registered voter, and the ballots suffect. They were all exactly
Speaker 1: the same xerox copies of the ballot. They were all
Speaker 1: providing across the board. There wasn't a single Trump vote,
Speaker 1: and none of the voters are registered. They had to
Speaker 1: manually enter the names and address us in a birthdate
Speaker 1: of one one, twenty twenty, which would override the system
Speaker 1: and allow them to enter non registered voters, of which
Speaker 1: I saw several that day throughout the day. That's how
Speaker 1: they would override voters that were neither in the electronic
Speaker 1: pull book or the supplemental update at pull book. Thank you?
Speaker 1: Is she lying? I don't think so. If she is wrong,
Speaker 1: if she's mistaken, then it's incumbent upon the people that
Speaker 1: are so sure that everything's fine here. Don't show us
Speaker 1: that is she telling the truth? Yes or no? We
Speaker 1: need an answer. There's still a lot that we have
Speaker 1: to find out about this. This is not over. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: It wasn't just Michigan where there were some pretty bold
Speaker 1: allegations made this week again in public named people people
Speaker 1: who have put out Swarnaffi David's. They're putting all their
Speaker 1: credibility behind it. They clearly believe what they're saying. They're
Speaker 1: operating in good faith. There's no reason for them to
Speaker 1: do this otherwise there's no benefit that no one's gonna
Speaker 1: make them rich or famous because of any of this.
Speaker 1: Here is a witness in the Arizona hearings, right. Arizona
Speaker 1: is another place, and you're gonna have Nevada in the
Speaker 1: crossairs this week for election challenges as well. And I
Speaker 1: think there's gonna be some really stunning stuff presented there
Speaker 1: based on my sources involved with the Trump the Trump
Speaker 1: election legal effort. But here's what was said in Arizona
Speaker 1: play clip two. I kept looking at the screen because
Speaker 1: it seems very odd, and in the bottom right hen
Speaker 1: corner was a yellow, yellow banner, and I got into
Speaker 1: a position where I could see the yellow banner which
Speaker 1: said low confidence. Then I started paying much closer attention
Speaker 1: to the signatures, thinking, this didn't even make sense to
Speaker 1: me because the signature on the ballot that was being
Speaker 1: compared to other signatures didn't even resemble in any way
Speaker 1: what they were comparing it to. They were completely illegible.
Speaker 1: They were just scribbles on the ballot. And there were
Speaker 1: five screeners screening low confidence ballots for an entire afternoon
Speaker 1: that I was in there, and I asked Celia what
Speaker 1: the low confidence said, and she said, just not to
Speaker 1: worry about that, that this was a new program that
Speaker 1: they were testing. Scribbles don't match the signatures, doesn't matter,
Speaker 1: just scribbles. That's all you need, is an Arizona. Does
Speaker 1: that woman sound at all like she's been coached or
Speaker 1: she's making something up? No telling the truth? More from
Speaker 1: the Arizona Hearing here play five the Wednesday before the
Speaker 1: Friday that we quit votus ten days before they quit tabulating.
Speaker 1: They thought they were done, and then more truckloads of
Speaker 1: ballots would come in. I'm like, how can you not
Speaker 1: know how many ballots are still out there? Should show
Speaker 1: what I'm sorry? Would you repeat that? Yeah, they thought
Speaker 1: they were done, And there was multiple times the people
Speaker 1: that were running the rooms, thought they were done, are
Speaker 1: almost done, or we're going to be done Wednesday morning,
Speaker 1: then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, then it went on
Speaker 1: the whole next week. And I'm like, I might ask
Speaker 1: the question, like, you don't know how many ballots are
Speaker 1: still left to come in, So I don't know, I
Speaker 1: don't know who does again, process, project management, a lot
Speaker 1: of sloppiness, a lot of ways that things could have
Speaker 1: slipped in that shouldn't. Now we're going to continue to
Speaker 1: chase all of this down. But I've been saying this
Speaker 1: all along as well, So we need to manage expectations
Speaker 1: here to stop the fraud. Would have been much easier
Speaker 1: before election day. Ballots can be challenged in advance for people,
Speaker 1: for places that have early voting and mail in balloting.
Speaker 1: There was a lot that could have been done that
Speaker 1: wasn't done. And once those votes make their way into
Speaker 1: the general, count them pile if you don't have exact
Speaker 1: chain of custody, very difficult to get rid of them.
Speaker 1: End the tie is going to go to counting the vote.
Speaker 1: You and I both know that, So we have to
Speaker 1: stay all this and we will. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show. Podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: You know how you can always tell that there's a
Speaker 1: problem with Democrats don't want you to find out about
Speaker 1: when they start lying about something, when they misrepresent things
Speaker 1: that you can prove they're lying about, but they don't care.
Speaker 1: They're just hoping that enough people hear what they say,
Speaker 1: don't check it, and then it has the required or
Speaker 1: the desired response, which is to just assume that it
Speaker 1: must be true. I mean, you should never assume that
Speaker 1: what Chuck Schumer says it's true, but some people do. Nonetheless.
Speaker 1: Here he is the senator from New York talking about
Speaker 1: how he claims Bill Barr said there's no evidence of
Speaker 1: voter fraud. Play Levin Well in response to Attorney General
Speaker 1: Bill Barr, I guess he's the next one to be fired,
Speaker 1: since he now too says there's no fraud. Trump seems
Speaker 1: to fire anyone in that regard. It's not what he said,
Speaker 1: very easy to check this. Attorney General Barr said there's
Speaker 1: not enough. There's not enough fraud that they have seen
Speaker 1: to date to overturn the election. That's a very different thing.
Speaker 1: Isn't it. But you know, they keep playing games with this.
Speaker 1: They keep pretending that people don't have access to the
Speaker 1: Internet and can't see what was actually said. And a
Speaker 1: lot of people won't. That's what's so for us. There
Speaker 1: are a lot of people that will just assume that
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer's a senator, he wouldn't lie about something so
Speaker 1: obvious like that. Oh No, he's Chuck Schumer. He lies
Speaker 1: if he's if his mouth is moving, he's probably lying.
Speaker 1: That's what happens there. And then there's there's Preet Barrara.
Speaker 1: This was a Obama's Obama's hitman going after Denish to Susan,
Speaker 1: remember that, try to try to send Denish, try to
Speaker 1: send Denish to prison for something that people usually get
Speaker 1: a fine for. Anyway, you know, he's a big lib Preet,
Speaker 1: with no surprise, started some podcasts with his podcasting brother.
Speaker 1: Now their producers suing them for millions of dollars. I'm
Speaker 1: sure he's a really good, ethical individual and not some
Speaker 1: power mad prosecutor lib headhunter. Sure, sure, yeah, But here
Speaker 1: he is telling you more of the same. Bill barr who,
Speaker 1: let's all be very clear, they tell you it can't
Speaker 1: be trusted. They said, how much do they spend the
Speaker 1: last last let's say, twelve months, how much time? When
Speaker 1: they were talking about Bill Barr was that he was Trump's,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump's little throne shining toady, that he would
Speaker 1: do anything for Trump, which a total lie, total smear
Speaker 1: of Bill Barr, who I know some of you are
Speaker 1: frustrated with him with the Durham probe. Are about to
Speaker 1: talk about the Durham Special Counsel. Huh, A little different.
Speaker 1: But I think the Attorney General has done a very
Speaker 1: good job. And I have not forgotten. You know, you
Speaker 1: got to give people credit where it's due. I have
Speaker 1: not forgotten that ag Barr got ahead of the hysterical
Speaker 1: effort to use the slimy smear job of the Muller
Speaker 1: report and the ten possible council of obstruction. He got ahead,
Speaker 1: and he's like, yeah, well it's our call, and there
Speaker 1: was no obstruction. He diffused that bomb that they threw
Speaker 1: at this administration. Don't forget that. Don't forget that. I
Speaker 1: know right now, and I'm seeing a lot of people
Speaker 1: even but what I like on the right being very
Speaker 1: hard on ag Barr. Guys, it's not a miracle worker.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, he's doing things in accordance with the law,
Speaker 1: and they hate him. They hate the attorney general on
Speaker 1: the left precisely because he's competent and doesn't fly off
Speaker 1: the handle and doesn't get drawn into the sometimes loose
Speaker 1: cannon vibe of the Trump team. I'm just it's true.
Speaker 1: You know, it's true. We operate in reality here. So
Speaker 1: that's why when Prete Berrara, who I think they're considering
Speaker 1: for attorney general, at least I've seen rumors to that effect.
Speaker 1: When Prete Berrara is out there talking about Bill Barr,
Speaker 1: you know that they're misrepresenting what's going on Play sixteen. Interestingly,
Speaker 1: it was a deliberate choice. He has to have known
Speaker 1: that the President was not going to like it. You see,
Speaker 1: the allies of the president are attacking Bill Barr all
Speaker 1: over the place because it's seen as a betrayal. This
Speaker 1: is the same man, Bill Barr, who on this network
Speaker 1: on CNN with our colleague Wolf Blitzer a few months
Speaker 1: ago basically said, I expect, because common sense tells me so,
Speaker 1: that thousands and thousands of ballots will be fraudulently filed
Speaker 1: and sent to the United States from abroad with no
Speaker 1: proof or evidence whatsoever, and for him to say in
Speaker 1: the face of what he knows the president wants and
Speaker 1: what the president's other lawyers are doing Rudy Giliani and
Speaker 1: at all. I think it's a deliberate thing for him
Speaker 1: to have done. And I think it tells you how
Speaker 1: weak the President's arguments are about fraud in all these states.
Speaker 1: Notice he doesn't give him any credit. And Bill Barr
Speaker 1: is ten times the legal mind that preparare is who
Speaker 1: Preparra really made his name by going after rich hedge
Speaker 1: fund guys and making a big show of it. And
Speaker 1: he didn't get the really big fish. Usually he just
Speaker 1: would get somebody down down the food chain and crush them.
Speaker 1: Say look at what a tough guy am for the
Speaker 1: Southern District of New York. I really really like to
Speaker 1: do the show trial thing. That's who pret is. And
Speaker 1: I told you he also he went after he went
Speaker 1: after Danish de Sus, a clear political hit job. I mean,
Speaker 1: Janessh broke the law and he admits that, but it
Speaker 1: was come on, it's a traffic violation. Give me a break.
Speaker 1: Gave a little extra money to a political campaign, Pay
Speaker 1: it back, pay a big fine, go about your business.
Speaker 1: Don't do it again. Should be a deferred prosecution even
Speaker 1: should anyway, it's outrageous, outrageous. Oh and you know who
Speaker 1: you know who Pret's mentor is to really understand what
Speaker 1: we're dealing with it, You know Preet Berara's mentors, James Komy.
Speaker 1: If that lanky, unself aware weirdo slimeball is your mentor,
Speaker 1: you got problems. You got big problems. And remember, Comey
Speaker 1: was given some really sweet gig, seven figure gig to
Speaker 1: be a an advisor to a major hedge fund when
Speaker 1: he little buddy Preet was running the US Attorney's office,
Speaker 1: was the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York,
Speaker 1: which does those kinds of Wall Street financial prosecutions. That's
Speaker 1: a great insurance policy to have in your back pocket.
Speaker 1: Isn't it pay weirdo Komy a million bucks? So it's
Speaker 1: really good? You think it's really good. Buddy is going
Speaker 1: to investigate, investigate the hedge fund that Comy's working for. No,
Speaker 1: I don't think so. I don't think so. No chart
Speaker 1: is brought against that fund. What a surprise. A lot
Speaker 1: of other ones had at least investigations. Friends, now you
Speaker 1: know how Now you know how the game is played.
Speaker 1: You're seeing it all around you. He's seeing it. And
Speaker 1: speaking of de Nih, I totally agree with He had
Speaker 1: to hit a tweet today where he said that you
Speaker 1: can't figure out what's going on in the world by
Speaker 1: looking at the news media. So understand that it's on
Speaker 1: you to figure it out, you know, And I would
Speaker 1: tell you listen to this show, read as many different
Speaker 1: sites and authors, and you know it's you're creating a
Speaker 1: mosaic every day in your own mind of what's going on.
Speaker 1: That's what you should be doing. Don't trust any one source,
Speaker 1: any one site. You know some people you should trust
Speaker 1: a lot more than others. But you should always be
Speaker 1: looking for various perspectives and opinions and even beyond that facts.
Speaker 1: There's an editorial process for what facts are presented to
Speaker 1: you more than others. How many of you could tell me,
Speaker 1: for example, off the top of your heads, And I
Speaker 1: don't say this is any sort of a criticism. I
Speaker 1: was doing a deep dive into this earlier than the week,
Speaker 1: so I was looking at it. You know that there
Speaker 1: are major cities in this country where they've already had
Speaker 1: thirty forty, Almost fifty percent of small businesses closed, perhaps
Speaker 1: never to open again. San Francisco, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Chicago, Boston,
Speaker 1: New York thirty forty, going up to fifty percent small
Speaker 1: businesses gone, they're coming back maybe some who knows right,
Speaker 1: But that's not a figure. You see a lot. What
Speaker 1: do you see every day? Oh my gosh, the COVID
Speaker 1: cases are higher and higher and higher. Yes, the panic,
Speaker 1: the panic porn and the media that you see all
Speaker 1: the time. The consequences of a lockdown that don't actually
Speaker 1: have the benefits that they promise, that don't protect us
Speaker 1: in the way that's advertised. You don't see that, do you.
Speaker 1: The editorializing of which facts to present and which facts
Speaker 1: to suppress. Now some good news about the Attorney General.
Speaker 1: I'll spend some time on with you. Now. I have
Speaker 1: been critical, or I should say, perhaps cynical about the
Speaker 1: prospects of the Durham Probe to find real justice. Remember,
Speaker 1: the Durham Probe was set up within the DOJ to
Speaker 1: look at the Russia collusion hoax, which that's what it was,
Speaker 1: to look at the Russia collusion hoax top to bottom
Speaker 1: and see if there was any criminality and produce a
Speaker 1: full report on just what happened there. Right, Okay, I
Speaker 1: had said that the bureaucracy will protect itself. But also
Speaker 1: in the back of my mind, I had always thought
Speaker 1: there's a very real chance that if you hit a
Speaker 1: Democrat administration, they're just gonna slow roll and then slowly
Speaker 1: kill that investigation. I mean, they're just draining of draining
Speaker 1: of resources. All the things they said Trump was going
Speaker 1: to do about the Mueller probe that he didn't do,
Speaker 1: including just shutting it down. A Democrat in this case,
Speaker 1: a Biden administration would do. So that was always a
Speaker 1: possibility that I had in the back of my mind,
Speaker 1: and that's why I felt like there was a clock
Speaker 1: on this one. But Attorney General Bill Barr, he's a
Speaker 1: savvy cat. This is not this is not his first
Speaker 1: rodeo in DC. Remember he was the Attorney general before
Speaker 1: under George H. W. Bush a long time ago. So
Speaker 1: he knows what's going on, and he has come up
Speaker 1: with something that's going to be very upsetting for the ah,
Speaker 1: very upsetting for the Democrats. A special counsel designation. He
Speaker 1: is the Attorney General and he can do this. Ah. Yes,
Speaker 1: a special Council designation of the Durham Probe. What this
Speaker 1: means is that they can't just make this thing easily
Speaker 1: disappear without showing everybody what a bunch of frauds and
Speaker 1: hypocrites and liars the Democrats are. Now that that does
Speaker 1: not mean they're unwilling to do that, but at least
Speaker 1: now it's like the trip wires, it's like the Claymours
Speaker 1: are put in place, so to speak. If they decide
Speaker 1: to shut down this investigation, it will cause a political
Speaker 1: explosion because what were we told for years by Democrats
Speaker 1: during the Mueller Special Council, Not only is it wrong
Speaker 1: if Trump were to shut down, but the very thought
Speaker 1: of shutting it down was impeachable, and had he shut
Speaker 1: it down, which he did not do, he should have
Speaker 1: been impeached and removed from office on that alone. On
Speaker 1: that alone, that's corruption, the kind of a kind of
Speaker 1: corruption that should get you, as a president removed from office.
Speaker 1: Very clearly established that standard. There's no question. They absolutely
Speaker 1: set that in stone. They can't walk away from it. Now.
Speaker 1: They might try, but they can't. And so with that,
Speaker 1: I say to you, now they are going to have
Speaker 1: to deal with what we did a dogged prosecutor. I
Speaker 1: do not believe that Durham is a partisan in all this,
Speaker 1: and so his findings may be somewhat disappointing. I also
Speaker 1: still stand behind my initial assessment, my initial prediction that
Speaker 1: it's unlikely you'll see James Combie or any of the
Speaker 1: rest of them frog marched out of their homes or
Speaker 1: offices in handcuffs. I don't think you'll see that happen,
Speaker 1: but you could. Now there's a special council. It could
Speaker 1: get ugly out there. And remember, there are people who
Speaker 1: are tied very much into the Obama orbit and the
Speaker 1: Obama administration who are at issue in Russia collusion, who
Speaker 1: if not back under a Biden administration if it happens.
Speaker 1: I'm just looking into the future here. If they're not
Speaker 1: back under a bid administration, would certainly be a let's
Speaker 1: just say, a pr blow for the Biden team if
Speaker 1: top Obama people ended up having at least the referral
Speaker 1: of criminal charges against them for the hoax they perpetrated
Speaker 1: with Russia collusion and the usage of the FBI and
Speaker 1: the intelligence community apparatus to go after and prosecute a
Speaker 1: political opponent, which is what they did to Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and his top advisors and his associates. That is what happened.
Speaker 1: Don't ever forget it. They will lie to you, they
Speaker 1: will gaslight you, they will pretend that you're crazy for
Speaker 1: saying it. They used the deep state apparatus of Hillary
Speaker 1: supporters within the government to try and stop the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: Shut it down, get him thrown out of office, prosecute him,
Speaker 1: ruin his life. That's what they did. They cheated and
Speaker 1: lied to get there. And now with the designation of
Speaker 1: Durham as a Special counsel, there's at least some chance
Speaker 1: I could be wrong and this may be worthwhile. After all,
Speaker 1: you're in the freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show Podcast. Now for the other side of this reality
Speaker 1: of the deep state and Komy and whether there'll be
Speaker 1: any justice. I often say this to you because it's
Speaker 1: true and it's important. There are some cultural differences between
Speaker 1: the right and the left, particular in how we treat
Speaker 1: those on our side who fight the good fight, at
Speaker 1: least from our perspective. Right on the right, if you're
Speaker 1: a conservative and you go out there and you make
Speaker 1: the case and you get chewed up, you know you're
Speaker 1: General Flynn. You're any number of people who have been
Speaker 1: attacked for being Trump supporters. You're Sarah Sanders having lunatic
Speaker 1: scream at you and restaurants and all this stuff. And
Speaker 1: then you leave the administration and you're looking for a job.
Speaker 1: There are only a few places you can go. Why
Speaker 1: is that? On the left? When you fight the good
Speaker 1: fight for their side, so that means the dirty, underhanded
Speaker 1: and evil fight. But when you do what they need
Speaker 1: you to do, when you're James Comy, what happens to you?
Speaker 1: Do you get arrested? Do you even get criminally investigated?
Speaker 1: Even though you leaked documents to the New York Times
Speaker 1: that you took in your capacity as an FBI director
Speaker 1: and a sit down with the press the United States
Speaker 1: and should have been mark classified, and you said, weren't
Speaker 1: Mark classified. So therefore you just get away with the
Speaker 1: whole thing. You know what happens to you? You get
Speaker 1: a seven figure book deal, You get six figure speaking
Speaker 1: gigs and a prestigious and I'm sure sure a well
Speaker 1: compensated teaching job at Columbia University Law School, one of
Speaker 1: the five best law schools in the country. What's James
Speaker 1: Comey gonna teach sanctimonious nonsense from a deep state superstar.
Speaker 1: I mean probably, But you see, there's a message sent here.
Speaker 1: If you do the Democrat's dirty work. Anybody working in
Speaker 1: the government right now, anyone who's supposed to be a
Speaker 1: nonpartisan civil servant, if you're willing to leak that stuff
Speaker 1: that takes down a Republican, if you're willing to follow
Speaker 1: in the footsteps of Comey, protect a Democrat from prosecution
Speaker 1: like Hillary Clinton, who should have faced criminal charges for
Speaker 1: what she did with her email server. If you do
Speaker 1: all those things, they'll take care of you. We need
Speaker 1: to come to grips with us. We need to understand it.
Speaker 1: This happens. The left takes care of its ideological soldiers.
Speaker 1: They do their assassins, their hate men, whatever you want
Speaker 1: to call them. They take care of them. They always
Speaker 1: land on their feet, good jobs, board seats, speaking gigs, books,
Speaker 1: or just you know, a consulting gig, whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: On the right, we have all these conservative businessmen. You
Speaker 1: know what they say when when I try to talk
Speaker 1: to them and say, why don't you hire some of
Speaker 1: these people, they say, ah, I know, I don't I
Speaker 1: like my business. I don't want to get boycott. I don't.
Speaker 1: This is one of the reasons the left gets away
Speaker 1: with what it does and why we have a tough
Speaker 1: time beating them. Thanks for listening to the bus seton
Speaker 1: show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Battlefield Georgia, it's just
Speaker 1: sweeks away, friends, and it's going to get more and
Speaker 1: more intense as it gets closer. The balance of the
Speaker 1: Senate here is what is at stake. Who is going
Speaker 1: to be in the majority? Huge implications. Honestly, for whatever
Speaker 1: happens with the presidential election, we still need control of
Speaker 1: the Senate. So to tell us what's going on there,
Speaker 1: and also just look more broadly at what's happening across
Speaker 1: the country with these voter issues. We've got our friend
Speaker 1: Ryan Gruduski with us now. He is the author, if
Speaker 1: they're not listening, how elites created the national populist Revolution.
Speaker 1: He's worked on many political campaigns and knows this game
Speaker 1: inside it out. Ryan, Great to have you back. Thanks
Speaker 1: for having me. So, what's happening right now in Georgia?
Speaker 1: You were down there for a few weeks. Tell me
Speaker 1: about this state of play, because there are a lot
Speaker 1: of people that are asking me questions like buck, hold on,
Speaker 1: if we have so little faith in what happened in
Speaker 1: the presidential election, and there clearly were problems. I mean
Speaker 1: there are votes, thousands of votes that weren't counted and
Speaker 1: issues like that. What's going on down there right now?
Speaker 1: Is the state GOP in command and control? Or should
Speaker 1: we all be worried? Well, let's say it's you a
Speaker 1: US incompetent. I mean, it's it's it's the problem with
Speaker 1: a lot of red states is that they're so used
Speaker 1: to winning and winning easily that they don't They oftentimes
Speaker 1: don't have the most efficient people running the show because
Speaker 1: it's considered they can just sleep through an election cycle.
Speaker 1: Their secretary of state isn't bumbling more on, there's no
Speaker 1: there's no doubt about that at all. I'll break some
Speaker 1: news to you. The deputy secretary of state, Uh, this
Speaker 1: woman who's been apparently making a lot of the calls
Speaker 1: back a few months ago, she wanted and this is
Speaker 1: a leaked to me by several people within the state party,
Speaker 1: she wanted to have one of a rapper do a
Speaker 1: public announcement to sit there and try to get um,
Speaker 1: try to get poll watchers, the rapper who sings a
Speaker 1: loop whose name I'm literally blanking out on. But anyway,
Speaker 1: she wanted to have rappers that they were and try
Speaker 1: to get pole watchers the biggest there's two fundamental party
Speaker 1: B I believe after Cardi B. Yes, Cardi B. That's
Speaker 1: the one she wanted Cardi B. If you know that
Speaker 1: is you want to Cardi B to get poll watchers
Speaker 1: in Georgia for the Republican Party. It's just a joke.
Speaker 1: The problem essentially comes down twofold one is that they
Speaker 1: have they have The Secretary of State did not mandate
Speaker 1: that counties report how many absentee battles they had in
Speaker 1: on election night. So to Cobb, Gwinnett, Fulton, all these
Speaker 1: counties did not sit there in report how many how
Speaker 1: many battles were outstanding, And the problem was they kept
Speaker 1: unfounding them. They found towns of thousands and poll watchers
Speaker 1: were forced to leave major pull sites and even though
Speaker 1: votes were still being tabulated. So there's opportunity for fraud
Speaker 1: even if there isn't election fraud. Even if there was
Speaker 1: an election fraud, the ID the opportunity for election fraud
Speaker 1: is boundless. Another big problem is they created the system,
Speaker 1: the local county board of Elections create a system called
Speaker 1: drop boxes where you can sit there and just drop
Speaker 1: your ballot in the box and they would be picked
Speaker 1: up and they were secure apparently and brought to the
Speaker 1: council later on. That is illegal under Georgia state law.
Speaker 1: Under Georgia state law, a ballot has to be delivered
Speaker 1: in person by two people watching the value being delivered.
Speaker 1: Because what also is illegal in Georgia is ballot harvesting.
Speaker 1: Now when you're dropping off tons of ballot or you
Speaker 1: have the potential to drop off tons of ballots in
Speaker 1: a drop box which apparently has a camera, but the
Speaker 1: cameras aren't being used to sit there and watching people
Speaker 1: delivering more than one ballot. They're being used is that
Speaker 1: they're making sure that nobody's destroying the drop boxes. So
Speaker 1: you have a problem with that as well. These drop boxes.
Speaker 1: No one is assuming as of right now to sit
Speaker 1: there and get these drop boxes removed, and every county's
Speaker 1: allowed to decide how many drop boxes they want in
Speaker 1: the county. All those things are really working against us
Speaker 1: in the state. Party really needs to ratify a lot
Speaker 1: of these problems, and I have a lot of confidence
Speaker 1: in the state Party. I think, listen, they need to
Speaker 1: pick up one of these sentence. David Purdue was just
Speaker 1: a few thousand bout shot of missing a runoff. He's
Speaker 1: well liked even in areas, but a Trump wasn't well
Speaker 1: liked in the outside suburbs of Atlanta. Stays Abrams has
Speaker 1: been taken has been running around screaming there's nine hundred
Speaker 1: thousand abs and tee ballots already in the mix. As
Speaker 1: usual with Stacey, Abrams have come to realize that oftentimes
Speaker 1: she takes credit for things that she doesn't necessarily deserve
Speaker 1: credit for. Most of these absentee ballots are for seniors
Speaker 1: that normally would get absentee ballots. There's not a huge
Speaker 1: surge and the number of appsonde ballots in the city
Speaker 1: of Atlanta, um it's pretty evenly dispersed statewide because it's
Speaker 1: just for seniors. Um So, so we're looking pretty good
Speaker 1: on the hound Perdue and shouldn't panic over this nine
Speaker 1: hund because I've seen that number thrown around a lot.
Speaker 1: Nine hundred thousand apsodes, So yeah, people, I reached out
Speaker 1: to people yesterday in the state Party and they said
Speaker 1: it's not that serious. And then I looked at the
Speaker 1: breakdown of every congressional district and it's almost exactly evenly
Speaker 1: dispersed through. I mean, there's a little bit more in Atlanta,
Speaker 1: but it's not sizeably more. It's not like eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine nine thousand toil one. The rest of the state.
Speaker 1: It's like seventy five eighty thousand, eighty nine thousand, and
Speaker 1: seventy eight thousand, so almost evenly run across the entire
Speaker 1: state of Georgia. There's been a Ryan Grudusky author if
Speaker 1: they're not listening, how the elites created the National Populist Revolution,
Speaker 1: and he was down in Georgia seeing for himself what's
Speaker 1: going on there with these upcoming races. Ryan, there's been
Speaker 1: all this, all this dust up over whether the GOP,
Speaker 1: and it is a GOP controlled state, would allow for
Speaker 1: signature matching in the recount in Georgia, it seems and
Speaker 1: anybody reading or paying attention to this, it seems like,
Speaker 1: why wouldn't they allow that? Can you tell us what's
Speaker 1: going on? So this is what I've heard, and I
Speaker 1: can't exactly confirm this from more than just like voice
Speaker 1: of mouth from people and the state Party. Is that
Speaker 1: when Brian camp became am the governor, he was originally
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State. When he vakee the position of
Speaker 1: Secretary of State immediately upon winning the governor's election, the
Speaker 1: former governor and Nathan Deal appointed somebody at a long
Speaker 1: standing government bureaucrat to sit there and to become the
Speaker 1: active Secretary of State. For several months she dealt with
Speaker 1: the law. This woman who was appointed the onslaught of
Speaker 1: lawsuits from Stacy Abrams. She conceded a lot of points
Speaker 1: to Stacy Abrams and allowed her up apparently to sit
Speaker 1: there and get away with a lot of things like
Speaker 1: having the NAACPP polewatchers, having a motor voter, which is
Speaker 1: allows everyone who is a driver's license in the state
Speaker 1: to be registered voter sat there in Okay. The idea
Speaker 1: of not matching signatures. The big problem is is because
Speaker 1: of COVID, someone in the state Party of the secretary
Speaker 1: of State's office thought that we didn't want to sit
Speaker 1: there and spread COVID. I guess people sharing a pen.
Speaker 1: So in some cases they did not have to sign
Speaker 1: at all to sit there and get to vote. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of it's a lot of ineffective people running
Speaker 1: different state parties. However, I will sit there remind people
Speaker 1: two important things that worked against President Trump that clearly
Speaker 1: were that there's no there's no evidence of being fraud
Speaker 1: or bad runing state parties. One, David Perdue did outperform
Speaker 1: in all the suburbs of Atlanta. And secondly, and most importantly,
Speaker 1: the ninth Congressional District, the second most Republican congressional district
Speaker 1: in Georgia. It's north west Georgia. That district pretty substantially
Speaker 1: underperformed as far as turnout goes. They had about seventy
Speaker 1: five thousand fewer votes come out of that district than
Speaker 1: in the neighboring districts. And that district, being one most Republican,
Speaker 1: would have delivered Trump. The state would have delivered David Purdue.
Speaker 1: The state. It's in the Schattanooga television market, and that
Speaker 1: television market did not have a single ad running for
Speaker 1: the entire duration of the campaign, and the social the
Speaker 1: last few months there was the Democrat and the Democrat
Speaker 1: congressional candidates dropped out, so there wasn't a grassroous movements
Speaker 1: that they're in trupt from the Congressional Kansas that they're
Speaker 1: trying to pull people out. A lot of the state
Speaker 1: legislaties were unh were I didn't have a Democrat opponent
Speaker 1: because it's such a Republican area. So grassroots efforts is
Speaker 1: that there, I'm kind of maybe pulled the striplers of
Speaker 1: the low hanging fruit or the or some of the
Speaker 1: low energetic voters. Is that they don't get them out,
Speaker 1: that would have probably made or broke the state. I
Speaker 1: think that they're kind of realizing that now, and also
Speaker 1: some of the Georgia Republican Party that's just involved in
Speaker 1: Georgia right now, and the RNC has also has over
Speaker 1: four hundred and fifty people on the ground right now
Speaker 1: in Georgia. So they're mobilized and they're energetic, and they
Speaker 1: run a pretty efficient operation. It's been a Ryan Grdrewski,
Speaker 1: author of They're Not Listening How the Elites created the
Speaker 1: National Populous Revolution. Ryan, I'm sure you've seen some of
Speaker 1: the testimony out of Arizona, out of Michigan. I've been
Speaker 1: speaking to people on the ground in Pennsylvania who I
Speaker 1: think Pennsylvania there's clearly issues. I mean there were Clearly.
Speaker 1: When I say issues, I don't just mean allegations of fraud.
Speaker 1: They change the election procedure in a state where you're
Speaker 1: not allowed to do that without the legislature actually making
Speaker 1: those changes. So I think Pennsylvania is going to be
Speaker 1: a place where the lawsuits could actually Georgiana. Those drop
Speaker 1: boxes are against state law and they still had them there.
Speaker 1: That is, I mean, it's literally in the statute and
Speaker 1: CINC then says how people should be allowed to vote absentee,
Speaker 1: and these drop boxes violate the state law. I don't
Speaker 1: why aren't they sewing? And we've got a GOP there.
Speaker 1: You're talking to these guys, Why why aren't they sewing?
Speaker 1: I bring it up till I'm bloom in the face.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm not speaking the right people. I don't know
Speaker 1: they are. And I will say one thing. The at
Speaker 1: Trained General's Office is investigating these groups that are trying
Speaker 1: to register new voters right before the runoff, because allegedly
Speaker 1: I saw this firsthand in New York City, several apartment
Speaker 1: buildings my friends live in they had dropped. They had
Speaker 1: they had literature being dropping from their house saying registered
Speaker 1: to vote in Georgia. So they are investigating those groups.
Speaker 1: I don't know why they're not doing for the drop boxes.
Speaker 1: I coming from the world of campaigns, I will say
Speaker 1: two things. One, after a vote is already cast, it
Speaker 1: is extremely unlikely that a judge is going to sit
Speaker 1: there and strike that ballot, simply for the fact that
Speaker 1: they do not want to deter people from voting and
Speaker 1: sit there and try to say and argue this is
Speaker 1: not a legitimate ballot. It's just the way judges usually work. Secondly,
Speaker 1: if the Georgia State Legislature right now try to convene
Speaker 1: to change all these laws some sixty days before election day,
Speaker 1: there would be a very very hard time from that
Speaker 1: to get past. Also, a judge a joke's will rule
Speaker 1: you can't change election law within sixty days of an election.
Speaker 1: I think that the more likely thing to do right
Speaker 1: now is to sue over clearly violations the law. And
Speaker 1: also for the secretary of State's office, and I wish
Speaker 1: there was a stronger secretary of state. I asked everyone said,
Speaker 1: what was his past job? He said he was just
Speaker 1: a rich guy who wanted to be a statewide elective official.
Speaker 1: I wish that the Secretary of State's office would have
Speaker 1: sat there, and I don't know had Marshalls had somebody
Speaker 1: there in I mean most of the boats in Atlanta
Speaker 1: are counting in one giant supercenter. Have someone said there
Speaker 1: and monerists that don't believe they would leave with them?
Speaker 1: That wasn't secure. They found sixty thousand absentee ballots days
Speaker 1: after the election, and they said, oh, we forgot to
Speaker 1: click the up little button on the computer for sixty
Speaker 1: thousand ballots to show those should have been stopped immediately
Speaker 1: and checked out and inspecting them when they were actually
Speaker 1: even put into the computer and process. All these things
Speaker 1: are extremely worrisome. I will say I do have more
Speaker 1: confidence in the Republican Senate Committee being involved on the
Speaker 1: ground in Georgia than I do the Georgia goop. But
Speaker 1: after this happens, Georgia needs to realize they are not
Speaker 1: South Carolina. They are looking closer and closer to being Virginia,
Speaker 1: and they need to really realize that they are in
Speaker 1: a changing state. They need extremely competent people. It can't
Speaker 1: be the good old boy system where someone's great uncle
Speaker 1: who has been loyal the party becomes chairman of one
Speaker 1: of the most important counties in the state, which I
Speaker 1: saw time and time and time again. We got to
Speaker 1: ask you this before let you go. Ryan, You've seen
Speaker 1: what's going on with these hearings in Arizona and Michigan,
Speaker 1: and there's one in Nevada. I believe it will happen tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Is the case? Is Trump's case in your mind? Is
Speaker 1: it getting stronger or is it just disappearing over time?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm not a lawyer, and I've never
Speaker 1: run absentee ballad challenges in any of these states before.
Speaker 1: If it was New York, I can tell you a
Speaker 1: much more substantial than I can do it in any
Speaker 1: of these states. I will say that Trump's tone and
Speaker 1: conversation has changed over time. You know, at the Christmas
Speaker 1: party yesterday, He's sat there said see you in four years.
Speaker 1: It's more likely that he's talking about running again in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four than he is that he will be
Speaker 1: the president in twenty twenty one. Ryan Grodusky, Everybody, they're
Speaker 1: not listening how the elites created the National populace Revolution.
Speaker 1: Check it out. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. You're ninety to ninety
Speaker 1: five percent immune after the second dose. But if there's
Speaker 1: still a lot of COVID circulating in your community, then
Speaker 1: you can still get infected, much less likely, but you
Speaker 1: can still get infected, and you can still get sick.
Speaker 1: So that's part of the reason why, at least for
Speaker 1: a short period of time, until there is widespread vaccination,
Speaker 1: we need to have everybody still wearing masks when they're
Speaker 1: out and about. But look, once we get to seventy
Speaker 1: eighty percent of Americans getting vaccinated, that will really bring
Speaker 1: the pandemic under control, at which point I think, certainly
Speaker 1: in low risk situations, we don't have to be wearing
Speaker 1: masks anymore. Life will really begin to get better. And
Speaker 1: I'm hoping that's by the way, like May June, not
Speaker 1: like in twenty twenty two or something. So I do
Speaker 1: think there will come a time when we don't have
Speaker 1: to wear masks as much. But that's not going to
Speaker 1: happen until a lot of Americans have gotten vaccinated. So
Speaker 1: let's be very clear about what this doctor on the
Speaker 1: view is saying, because I've been telling you that this
Speaker 1: is going to be what happens all along, because I
Speaker 1: understand their mentality. Even if you are vaccinated, you still
Speaker 1: have to wear a mask. Think about that. So, even
Speaker 1: if you get a vaccine that is ninety five percent effective,
Speaker 1: far higher than what they were even projecting six months ago,
Speaker 1: you're still gonna have to wear a mask. You wear
Speaker 1: a mask until they say so, wow, Yeah, these are
Speaker 1: the new rules, this is the new world we live in.
Speaker 1: Still have never heard anybody explain why we're not going
Speaker 1: to have to wear masks in flu season. Oh those
Speaker 1: the tens of thousands of people who die every year
Speaker 1: from flu, they don't count. Masking isn't a big deal, right,
Speaker 1: Why not enforced us all the time. I know I
Speaker 1: shouldn't give them ideas because I'm worried. I'm starting to
Speaker 1: think that they might bring this back even after this
Speaker 1: pandemic has gone. Yeah, why not? Right, they like this?
Speaker 1: Do this because I said so? Do it. Yeah, I've
Speaker 1: got a vaccine. I'm ninety five protected against this. That
Speaker 1: means ninety five one hundred people of the vaccine aren't
Speaker 1: going to be infected at all, or aren't going to
Speaker 1: show any symptoms and be able to transmit it to anybody.
Speaker 1: And and they're still saying everybody has to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: You see mask, mask, mask? Now, Remember At the beginning
Speaker 1: of this, they said, don't wear masks. But that's how
Speaker 1: obvious it is. I'm sorry, I'm not letting this go.
Speaker 1: That's how obvious it is that this protects you. That
Speaker 1: at the start of this, when they thought there was
Speaker 1: a three to five percent fatality rate, far higher than
Speaker 1: the actual fatality rate by a factor of hundreds, they said,
Speaker 1: don't wear a masks. But now it's it's essential that
Speaker 1: you do this. It's essential. They're not going to let
Speaker 1: this go. No, I get vaccinated. I'm not wearing a mask.
Speaker 1: They can arrest me not doing it. When I get
Speaker 1: that vaccine to my arm and I'm ninety five percent
Speaker 1: good to go. I'm not wearing a mask anymore. Not
Speaker 1: on the treadmill, not on the elevator, not out on
Speaker 1: the streets. We gotta draw a line here, folks, we
Speaker 1: gotta draw a red line on this. Enough is enough.
Speaker 1: These people are out of their minds. But notice this,
Speaker 1: This is what happens when you give people some power
Speaker 1: and put them in charge. Why can't they make every
Speaker 1: decision about your life. It's life and death. Why can't
Speaker 1: they tell you what you can eat, what will Because
Speaker 1: we know the lives like to do these things. Whatever
Speaker 1: they can get away with dictating to you, they will do.
Speaker 1: Oh you think that this is just for COVID. You
Speaker 1: don't think they're going to pull a climate emergency on
Speaker 1: you and tell you that it's sorry, the world is
Speaker 1: at risk. It's about saving the world. Gotta tell you
Speaker 1: everything that you can do about your life, your business,
Speaker 1: you name it climate emergency. I'm still a Paul that
Speaker 1: how much people have gone along with this idiocy all along.
Speaker 1: Just do whatever they say. They show you what frauds
Speaker 1: they are constantly, But we're supposed to do whatever they say. Okay. Sure,
Speaker 1: at least doctor Rand Paul is out there saying people
Speaker 1: need to say enough is enough. Okay, they need to
Speaker 1: start telling people to go blank themselves when they say, oh,
Speaker 1: you've been vaccinated, you still have to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: What is the chance that a person who has vaccinated, anyone,
Speaker 1: an individual? What is one in one hundred thousand they're
Speaker 1: gonna give it to somebody and that person's actually gonna die?
Speaker 1: And really, well crunch the numbers on this. What are
Speaker 1: the chances that any one person? Here's Rand Paul saying
Speaker 1: exactly what I'm saying. Is that. Don't don't let them
Speaker 1: get away with this nonsense blit twenty. Trying to take
Speaker 1: some precautions is reasonable, but they're now people saying. Doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci included that when we have a vaccine, you're still
Speaker 1: gonna have to wear a mask. So people do need
Speaker 1: to push back. I'm one of those who are immune,
Speaker 1: and I keep pushing back. Thirteen million Americans have had this.
Speaker 1: We don't need to tell them if to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Notice though, it's just it's become a cult now. Even
Speaker 1: if you've had COVID, they want you wearing a mask
Speaker 1: because you know it sends a symbol to other people.
Speaker 1: Oh but I thought this was about life and death
Speaker 1: and health. I didn't think it was about the symbolism
Speaker 1: that some people want to see. I'm telling you right now,
Speaker 1: hard line on this one. I get vaccinated, not masking up.
Speaker 1: Maybe for private businesses, but not in my own home
Speaker 1: and my own building, not on the streets. No, sir.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcast at the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: for war every you get your podcasts. Times are tough,
Speaker 1: but I want you to know that help is on
Speaker 1: the way. Last week I announced the nominations and staff
Speaker 1: for critical foreign policy and ask the security positions, a
Speaker 1: first rate team. It's going to keep us safe and secure.
Speaker 1: And today I have the pleasure I have the pleasure
Speaker 1: of announcing key nominations and appointments for the critical economic
Speaker 1: positions and the administration a first rate team that's going
Speaker 1: to get us through this ongoing economic crisis and help
Speaker 1: us build the economy back. Not just build it back,
Speaker 1: the build it back better than it was before. You
Speaker 1: Bonne Louis, remember that the stout fires, Louis. Yeah, here's
Speaker 1: Joe Biden telling you that the economic the economic genius,
Speaker 1: the people that he's bringing in, is going to really
Speaker 1: get things going for the economy. Their version of helping
Speaker 1: the economy is taking more from people who are productive
Speaker 1: and trying to find more ways to spread that money
Speaker 1: around at the government's whim and act like that somehow
Speaker 1: making us all better, richer, wealthier, more prosperous. That's what
Speaker 1: they do. That's the situation. But you're supposed to believe
Speaker 1: that this is going to make your life better. We
Speaker 1: had eight years of Barack Obama's economy. You remember that
Speaker 1: you didn't get that was good. No, they had to
Speaker 1: make excuses all the time. Oh, he inherited a depression. Oh,
Speaker 1: it was so terrible when he came in. That was
Speaker 1: what you heard for years. Yeah, it's not really so good. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know, but they made excuses for it. And then eventually,
Speaker 1: because this is America, got back on the economy got
Speaker 1: back on its feed, was doing pretty well, wasn't great,
Speaker 1: wasn't what it should have been. And then Trump came
Speaker 1: in the economy booms. You know, I we're gonna go
Speaker 1: We're gonna go back to Okay, maybe it's not as good,
Speaker 1: but everyone's gonna pay their fair share. There'll be more
Speaker 1: redistribution of wealth, more of the government in charge of
Speaker 1: your life. You're spending all of it. That's what we're
Speaker 1: heading back to you. That's where we're going here, and
Speaker 1: I think we should all remind ourselves of that, plus
Speaker 1: some heavy doses of social justice and left wing lunacy
Speaker 1: via economic policy monetary policy. Here's Janet Yellen telling you
Speaker 1: what she plans to do if she becomes Treasury secretary,
Speaker 1: which is Biden's plan. Play ten gender disparities to keep
Speaker 1: women out of the workforce and keep our economy from
Speaker 1: running at full force. It's a convergence of tragedies. So
Speaker 1: it's not only economically unsustainable, but one that betrays our
Speaker 1: commitment to giving every American and equal chance to get ahead.
Speaker 1: But I know this team will never give up that commitment.
Speaker 1: As you've said before, mister President elect. Out of our
Speaker 1: collective pain as a nation, we will find collective purpose
Speaker 1: to control the pandemic and build our economy back better
Speaker 1: than before, To rebuild our infrastructure and create bitter jobs,
Speaker 1: to invest in our workforce, to advance racial equity, and
Speaker 1: make sure the economic recovery includes everyone, racial equity, climate change,
Speaker 1: This is what the treasury, this is what would be
Speaker 1: Biden administration. Treasury secretary thinks is her mandate. Gosh almost
Speaker 1: like the Libs understand all along that the economy is
Speaker 1: just a giant opportunity for social engineering and social justice tinkering.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, they know. Get ready for a lot of that.
Speaker 1: Get ready for that to become more standard. Assuming that
Speaker 1: you know these legal challenges don't work, I think, can
Speaker 1: you all just give me, give me a give me.
Speaker 1: The expectation here is that I'm whenever I talk about
Speaker 1: Biden and his team administration. I'm not thrown in the towel,
Speaker 1: but I'm just dealing with what we're being presented here.
Speaker 1: As this transition is allegedly going forward, okay, or the
Speaker 1: transition is going forward, it's allegedly a done deal. So
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's a done deal. But this is
Speaker 1: what's happening in Democrat Land. This is what's happening with
Speaker 1: Biden and the folks around him. So I think that's
Speaker 1: it's worth at least dealing with here. It's worth at
Speaker 1: least looking at what's happening and understand that the Democrats
Speaker 1: are planning to do everything they can to mold the
Speaker 1: country more in their image, which is going to be
Speaker 1: a full throated embrace of the kinds of corporate diversity,
Speaker 1: rhetoric and all this stuff that we see. I think
Speaker 1: it's just in New York now they're talking about mandating
Speaker 1: diversity on corporate boards. You're going to see a lot
Speaker 1: more of this, some of these social justice issues that
Speaker 1: America hasn't been constantly bombarded with by the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: If anything, Trump has been holding back this tide. They're
Speaker 1: going to come back. There's going to be a whole
Speaker 1: lot more of this, and we need to be ready
Speaker 1: for it, because they haven't changed at all on any
Speaker 1: of this. In fact, here I remember just just a
Speaker 1: little bit of a review. Under the Obama administration, Barack
Speaker 1: Obama himself as president, was so devoted to the idea
Speaker 1: of making bathrooms I believe it was in South Carolina,
Speaker 1: could be North Carolina, though I gotta check, but in
Speaker 1: one of the Carolinas, but so devoted to a federal
Speaker 1: education policy that would mandate transgender student bathroom usage of
Speaker 1: their preferred gender. Right now, Notice, you can anyone can transition,
Speaker 1: and that's to be celebrated at any age. You can
Speaker 1: be five, eight, twelve, doesn't matter if you transition, it's affirmation.
Speaker 1: It's celebrated. You'll see, though, the Left has a problem
Speaker 1: with people who then want to transition back, because well,
Speaker 1: what does that mean? Does it mean that they didn't
Speaker 1: actually need to transition the first place? Does it mean
Speaker 1: that this is just a decision? If this is innate
Speaker 1: in who you are, how can you transition twice? How
Speaker 1: can how can you affirm two times? Right? There? They
Speaker 1: again they will always have this cognitive dissonance. What they're
Speaker 1: saying it is best summed up by the very very
Speaker 1: obvious question, but one that they don't have a good
Speaker 1: answer for. What is a woman? Ask a liberal this,
Speaker 1: you see this all over social media, what is a woman?
Speaker 1: And they will hesitate for a second. I would I
Speaker 1: would sit here and say, a woman is somebody who
Speaker 1: is a female, has female anatomy and has you know,
Speaker 1: XX chromosome, Right, that's a woman. They would say, well,
Speaker 1: a woman is someone who self identifies as a woman.
Speaker 1: M But then when you dig into that a little
Speaker 1: bit more, you say, well, does that mean that I
Speaker 1: can I can I self identify as a woman today
Speaker 1: and change my mind tomorrow? If not, why not? No
Speaker 1: really pushed them on these issues, right because there always
Speaker 1: there's a desperation on the left to create in their minds,
Speaker 1: and this goes very deep into the into the culture
Speaker 1: of left wing politics and the Democrat Party in America.
Speaker 1: They're desperate to create this notion that they are fighting
Speaker 1: in a new civil rights struggle, that they're the great
Speaker 1: heroes of periods past where there was real oppression in
Speaker 1: this country, where we do have a legacy of slavery,
Speaker 1: and you know, women were not allowed to vote in
Speaker 1: all these different areas where they're needed to be changes
Speaker 1: over time. There needed to be fights that we had
Speaker 1: to have right, fights that we had to have to
Speaker 1: be a more ethical, more moral country. Never perfect, but
Speaker 1: certainly needed to be better than we were on some
Speaker 1: of those issues as a country. You know, the great
Speaker 1: stain of our past slavery. Were monstantly reminded of this,
Speaker 1: not just by the Left but in any history class
Speaker 1: that's worthy of the name. Okay, So with all of that,
Speaker 1: now they're looking for another way to pose as the
Speaker 1: great heroes of the moment, and they've picked because we
Speaker 1: now have gay marriage is the law in all fifty states,
Speaker 1: We now have transgender rights. Is this the latest frontier?
Speaker 1: But this is running into some problems because it's not
Speaker 1: clear even by the left's own rules and dictates, well
Speaker 1: how does this all work? But one thing that you
Speaker 1: can be sure of is that whatever radical left disposition
Speaker 1: is fashionable, at any point in time, you'll have people
Speaker 1: like Chuck Schumer agreeing with it. And here he is
Speaker 1: talking about what he wants the Biden administration to do.
Speaker 1: Play clip twelve. Joe Bien said that on his first
Speaker 1: day of office, he will give trans gender students access
Speaker 1: to sports bathrooms and locker rooms in accordance with their
Speaker 1: gender identity in all federally funded schools. Do you think
Speaker 1: he has the ability to do this and do you
Speaker 1: agree with this decision? I agree with the decision, and
Speaker 1: I know he'll check things out thoroughly, legally, agrees with
Speaker 1: the decision. That's right, Chuck Schumer wants anatomical males twelve
Speaker 1: year old boys who are identifying as female. We should
Speaker 1: really dive in more to why there's this huge surge
Speaker 1: in people identifying as different genders all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: and why the left gets very angry and anyone actually
Speaker 1: does research into this. But a twelve year old boy
Speaker 1: who identifies as a girl is now going to be
Speaker 1: using the girl. You know, under a Biden administration would
Speaker 1: be federally mandated. This would become an issue of federal regulation,
Speaker 1: a federal education policy. They'll be using the bathrooms of
Speaker 1: your twelve year old daughter, and the same locker room
Speaker 1: in the changing areas and all that stuff. I remember
Speaker 1: when he even ten years ago, if you said this
Speaker 1: is where the left is heading, because I was a
Speaker 1: part of those debates, they would tell you never, we
Speaker 1: would never do that. I used to use examples like,
Speaker 1: what about a male inmate in a prison who's got
Speaker 1: a twenty year sentence. It says, you know what, I
Speaker 1: want to be in a female prison. I identify as female.
Speaker 1: If you're a biological male, you are a lot safer
Speaker 1: in a female prison than you are in a male prison,
Speaker 1: as well as other reasons why some people might choose
Speaker 1: to do that. And I said, well, isn't that can't
Speaker 1: we all agree that that's crazy as a policy, And
Speaker 1: they would say, oh, of course, we're not trying to
Speaker 1: do that, we're not making that our new stant. Well
Speaker 1: turns out that is now possible they have to go through,
Speaker 1: so there's some process they've put in place to prove
Speaker 1: that it's a real transition. But now they will put
Speaker 1: biological males in with females in a prison system. Now
Speaker 1: they will put biological males against women in sports. And
Speaker 1: I'm sorry to and this is sad. This should not
Speaker 1: be happening. It's wrong for the women who have their
Speaker 1: ability and their skill relative to their gender, because that's
Speaker 1: a real thing effectively nullified by someone who comes in
Speaker 1: who says I identify as female, and all of a
Speaker 1: sudden is winning, winning all the races, bigger and stronger
Speaker 1: than the women, Like this is a surprise to anybody.
Speaker 1: Oh but liberals are also Oh but we want to
Speaker 1: be the nice people and we want to feel inclusive
Speaker 1: of it. It's not inclusive for the girls that have been,
Speaker 1: you know, trying as hard as they can, working long
Speaker 1: hours at the track so they can get as fast
Speaker 1: as possible. To have some guy come in who's six
Speaker 1: feet tall and one hundred and eighty five pounds and
Speaker 1: has you know, much greater muscle, muscle mass and much
Speaker 1: less body fat relative to his peer group, which is
Speaker 1: now females, and is beating all of them. They clap
Speaker 1: for this, They think this is good. There's even a
Speaker 1: transgender female who was fighting an MM for a while,
Speaker 1: which is really dangerous for women to get into the
Speaker 1: ring with a guy. And I, hey, when I have
Speaker 1: all these people who confuse feminism girl power with what
Speaker 1: I'm talking about, Okay, let's not live in a delusional world.
Speaker 1: Let's live in the real world. Women are overwhelmingly going
Speaker 1: to be smaller, lighter, not as fast, not as strong
Speaker 1: as men of comparable age group and activity. That's just reality.
Speaker 1: We all this is true. We all know this, but
Speaker 1: they want us to forget this. They also want us
Speaker 1: to forget back to the transgender student issue. Oh and
Speaker 1: I brought up Obama. Obama during his administration was threatening
Speaker 1: federal funding for public schools, made it very explicit, federal
Speaker 1: funding for public schools unless people use the bathroom of
Speaker 1: their gender identity. So they'll and that's I mean when
Speaker 1: you talk funding with schools, the Department of Ed folks,
Speaker 1: that mean they'll you know, they'll do whatever. Now, I
Speaker 1: mean they'll Okay, hey, sure, you know whatever you want
Speaker 1: us to do. So get ready for more of this.
Speaker 1: And these fights are also going to coincide with a
Speaker 1: lot of efforts at cancel culture. These debates are going
Speaker 1: to be full of lies and smears meant to hurt
Speaker 1: people's careers, meant to hurt their livelihoods. If you won't
Speaker 1: call I think I think her name is Ellen Page
Speaker 1: just decided or just announced I should say yesterday that
Speaker 1: she is a man. If you use the wrong pronoun,
Speaker 1: people are going to come after you, and they might
Speaker 1: use the force of law against you. You know you'd say, well,
Speaker 1: how would they do that? I mean, if you're in
Speaker 1: an office setting. Now, and someone is a he and
Speaker 1: you call that person a she is that is that
Speaker 1: now discrimination according to unfortunately the Supreme Court and Neil Gorse,
Speaker 1: which seems like it is so now you have to
Speaker 1: lie about somebody's gender as a matter of law. That's
Speaker 1: the country we're living in now. Gender is a is
Speaker 1: a binary. It is a real thing. It is or
Speaker 1: is not. We can all observe it, we all see it.
Speaker 1: We all know there are cases where gender can be
Speaker 1: unclear as a physical, biochemical manifestation. But that's not what
Speaker 1: we're talking about. And if it is what we're talking about,
Speaker 1: all these other people who are just psychologically affirming some
Speaker 1: other gender don't. That's a different thing. So they won't
Speaker 1: they won't actually use that as the explanation for this.
Speaker 1: But this is coming your way, and this is this
Speaker 1: is happening. If there's a bid administration, there's gonna be
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff that you're told you better believe,
Speaker 1: you better sign on for, and they're gonna they're gonna
Speaker 1: try to force you to bend the knee. There's a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of rage and resentment stored up after even
Speaker 1: only four years of Trump. Here the left wants a
Speaker 1: purification of America through leftist pain. Get ready for it.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. We just don't have time to time. We
Speaker 1: have a couple of weeks left here. Obviously it is
Speaker 1: required by partisans support to get out of the Congress,
Speaker 1: but it requires a presidential signature, and this government is
Speaker 1: in place for sure for the next month. Yeah, they'll
Speaker 1: just wait it out. They don't care that people are suffering.
Speaker 1: Democrats will wait this thing out. Does not matter to them.
Speaker 1: That's the plan, That's what you see happening. And they're
Speaker 1: going to play this game too. I mean Senator King
Speaker 1: is an idiot. I mean this is he's a particularly
Speaker 1: dumb fellow, but he'll play dumb, even dumber than he is,
Speaker 1: in order to this whole What do you mean the
Speaker 1: Republicans won't just go along with our proposed bill. The
Speaker 1: Republicans have offered up money for COVID suffering, for COVID problems.
Speaker 1: Democrats are saying, yeah, we'll agree to pass that, but
Speaker 1: you also have to do all these other things that
Speaker 1: have nothing to do with COVID that we want. They're
Speaker 1: holding the funding hostage. That's what they are doing. But
Speaker 1: Senator King is going to say, oh, order to understand
Speaker 1: what's going on here, play eight, we really tried to
Speaker 1: come to a middle ground and we got to waiting. Frankly,
Speaker 1: and I don't understand what the Majority leader's problem is.
Speaker 1: But John, there's an important thing about the Majority leader
Speaker 1: that isn't in the civics books, and that is that
Speaker 1: he or she has absolute power over what comes to
Speaker 1: the floor of the US Senate. We can have a
Speaker 1: bill supported by ninety nine senators and if the Majority
Speaker 1: Leader said I'm not going to bring it up, it
Speaker 1: doesn't come up. And there's no mechanism, seriously to make
Speaker 1: that happen. So he's got to listen, and I'm hoping
Speaker 1: he's going to listen to the members of his caucus saying, look,
Speaker 1: we need to do something. It's urgent. People are going
Speaker 1: to be losing benefits, people are going to be losing
Speaker 1: their places to live, They're going to be evicted, schools
Speaker 1: are going to have really serious problems. We've got to
Speaker 1: do something, and we've put forward a good faith effort
Speaker 1: to make that happen. No they haven't. They could have
Speaker 1: just signed the bill gone forward with the bill. I mean,
Speaker 1: voted for the bill at Trumps signed months ago, but
Speaker 1: they won't For listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast,
Speaker 1: remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. I guess you can use
Speaker 1: a snappy slogan like defund the police, but you know
Speaker 1: you've lost a big audience the minute you say it,
Speaker 1: which makes it a lot less likely that you're actually
Speaker 1: going to get the changes you want done. But if
Speaker 1: you instead say, let's reform the police department so that
Speaker 1: everybody's being treated fairly, you know, divert young people from
Speaker 1: getting into crime. And if there's a homeless guy, can
Speaker 1: maybe we send a mental health worker there instead of
Speaker 1: an armed unit that could end up resulting in a tragedy.
Speaker 1: Suddenly a whole bunch of folks who might not otherwise
Speaker 1: listen to you are listening to you. So the key
Speaker 1: is deciding do you want to actually get something done
Speaker 1: or do you want to feel good among the people
Speaker 1: you already agree with. Oh Obama said stuff that god
Speaker 1: him in trouble here with the left, not allowed, not allowed,
Speaker 1: not allowed to do it. By the way, he didn't
Speaker 1: even say that he wants to or that he opposes
Speaker 1: defunding the police. He just said, it's not a smart slogan,
Speaker 1: and that's obviously true. Defund the police is crazy. It's
Speaker 1: a crazy it's a crazy thing to say. Right now.
Speaker 1: I understand that when you when you push and I've
Speaker 1: talked to activists about this, when you push people on defunding,
Speaker 1: what they'll say is, oh, but it's about a it's
Speaker 1: like a conceptualized future. When you ask a leftist what
Speaker 1: does it mean to defund the police, they mean all
Speaker 1: the things that Obama was saying, bo, We're gonna do
Speaker 1: more of this, We're gonna do more of that. We're
Speaker 1: gonna send you know, a healthcare worker or a social
Speaker 1: worker or a psychiatrist, not a cop, for all these
Speaker 1: different things. And we're gonna de escalate it. We're gonna
Speaker 1: do all this. That's all nice. It's a little bit
Speaker 1: like saying though, and it's a different context. Sent police
Speaker 1: are not soldiers. But imagine if you were, you know,
Speaker 1: imagine if you were taking an approach to a military
Speaker 1: conflict and you said, let's defund the military, and then
Speaker 1: you said, well, hold on, no, you can't do that.
Speaker 1: Said no, But by defund the military, we just mean
Speaker 1: not having air strikes on civilians by accident and not
Speaker 1: having you know, collateral damage and casualties and things like that.
Speaker 1: So we're just going to defund the military to get
Speaker 1: to that. People would say, well, that's completely insane, because
Speaker 1: you're already trying to do those things. They're already policies
Speaker 1: in place for problems. You know, you don't want to
Speaker 1: blow up the wrong house with an air strike, you
Speaker 1: don't want civilians to get killed. The answer, of course,
Speaker 1: is not to take money. It take all the money
Speaker 1: from the military and act like you don't need a military.
Speaker 1: So I mean defund the police in the same way
Speaker 1: as insane. They look at problems. Most police in the country,
Speaker 1: you know, ninety nine percent of cops ninety nine percent
Speaker 1: of the time, and that all the statistics bear this out,
Speaker 1: are acting, you know, reasonably, are acting in good faith,
Speaker 1: and are doing a good job of protecting people. That's
Speaker 1: the reality of law enforcement in America. That's what we
Speaker 1: actually see on a regular basis. But what the radicals,
Speaker 1: what the you know, what the left pretends we see
Speaker 1: is just an endless stream of evil cops murdering people
Speaker 1: for racist reasons, and so we have to have this
Speaker 1: sweeping overhaul of the police across the country. And that's just,
Speaker 1: it's just, it's it's I don't know what I'll say.
Speaker 1: It's crazy, it's crazy. But you see people you know,
Speaker 1: like Rashida Talib and Ilhan Omar and others, they have
Speaker 1: blasted Obama for this. They're they're upset with Obama for
Speaker 1: saying this. What would be more obvious than what Obama said.
Speaker 1: He wasn't even passing moral judgment or any judgment really
Speaker 1: on the stupidity and insanity of defund the police. What
Speaker 1: he was doing was saying, hey, guys, don't use that slogan.
Speaker 1: That's a bad that's a bad political move because people
Speaker 1: who are normal and not brainwash leftists are gonna say,
Speaker 1: you're gonna defund the cops. What happens, then you're you're
Speaker 1: gonna defund the police. And so then who's gonna come
Speaker 1: when someone gets shot in my neighborhood? Who do I
Speaker 1: call when there's a burglary? Oh? Well, then you hear
Speaker 1: all these different things too. Well, of course, it doesn't
Speaker 1: mean there's no police, doesn't mean there's no police, defund
Speaker 1: the police. There's no police, Okay, someone explained to me.
Speaker 1: Then what that does mean, right, if you keep going
Speaker 1: these circles, you say, so you want to get rid
Speaker 1: of the cops, except when there's a need for a cop,
Speaker 1: you're gonna say, well, there'll be cops there though. But
Speaker 1: they see, this is just that urch folks at the
Speaker 1: bottom of this, at the base of this, there's just
Speaker 1: this anti cop sentiment that the left has because ultimately
Speaker 1: the left is full of people that want to throw
Speaker 1: childish tantrums and do what they want to do and
Speaker 1: get away with it and not face consequences. And the
Speaker 1: left has created this vision of America in their heads
Speaker 1: where people are constantly being are being punished by police
Speaker 1: for reasons of race or reasons of class that have
Speaker 1: nothing to do with individual behavior. Right, It's not that
Speaker 1: people are committing crimes, it's that the cops are bad again,
Speaker 1: so divorced from reality, so separate from what is observable
Speaker 1: all around you that it's it's hard to fathom that
Speaker 1: anybody would say this out loud, never mind that they
Speaker 1: would try to base a national level policy shift on this.
Speaker 1: But that is what they do now. The Democrats can
Speaker 1: try to forget about this as much as they want.
Speaker 1: I mean, the left can do whatever they want here
Speaker 1: to try to make all this go away. But here's
Speaker 1: the truth of the matter. The Democrat Party lost pretty
Speaker 1: much across the board in this election in terms of
Speaker 1: the momentum and the trends, the waves. They lost in
Speaker 1: state houses, they lost seats in the House overall. They
Speaker 1: you know, they they look like they're not even they're
Speaker 1: not going to take back the Senator, though I know
Speaker 1: that's not a done deal. And a big reason for
Speaker 1: the reason, or a big reason rather why the Democrats
Speaker 1: didn't do better was because in suburbs actually of major cities,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who, even if they
Speaker 1: didn't like Trump, they did recognize that this defund the
Speaker 1: police stuff is crazy and that it endangers people and
Speaker 1: that the lawlessness. Remember there's a kind of psychosousness of
Speaker 1: mass lawlessness that happens when you see looters and rioters
Speaker 1: getting away with something in your hometown. People feel less safe,
Speaker 1: and those who are the criminal element see that and
Speaker 1: they see the lack of consequences and say, oh okay,
Speaker 1: so that's the political environment right now. Remember politics drives
Speaker 1: law enforcement. Unfortunately, right there has to be the political
Speaker 1: will to enforce laws and to hold criminals accountable, or
Speaker 1: else law enforcement does not have the support it needs
Speaker 1: to do these things. So when you have that kind
Speaker 1: of mass lawlessness on display, people turned around and they say,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, what else can I get away with?
Speaker 1: If I'm a criminal? And if you're a good person,
Speaker 1: if you're a law abiding person, you say, am I
Speaker 1: going to be safe? You're going forward with this Democrat
Speaker 1: point of view? And this wasn't just this isn't just
Speaker 1: a rhetorical question. This isn't just thinking aloud. This had
Speaker 1: an effect on the most recent election. This was a
Speaker 1: real thing that we saw a play out where people
Speaker 1: who could have gone for Democrats could have gotten more
Speaker 1: Democrats elected to the Congress. Now you'd say, oh, buck well,
Speaker 1: why wasn't enough for Trump to have some sweeping victory
Speaker 1: over Biden? Because the media has been four years saying
Speaker 1: that Trump was hitler And unfortunately the media is still
Speaker 1: powerful and unfortunately, you know, there are enough people that
Speaker 1: listen to them, and I don't think that the and
Speaker 1: there was COVID, right, I mean, so you add all
Speaker 1: these things together and you had a bizarre year where
Speaker 1: not Trump was a was a powerful enough political slogan
Speaker 1: unfortunately to at least get us to this point. You know,
Speaker 1: but Barack Obama saying this about defund the police just
Speaker 1: goes to show you that even even Obama recognizes that
Speaker 1: there's a cost to all this. Now, I'm also going
Speaker 1: to tell you this. I think that there's a degree
Speaker 1: of second tier or second level politics all around this
Speaker 1: where Obama doing this, saying this kind of helps push
Speaker 1: this narrative that the Biden team, right, because Trump, I mean,
Speaker 1: Obama and Biden are linked vice president president and we
Speaker 1: all know this, but kind of pushes this idea forward that,
Speaker 1: oh see Obama will call out defund the police because
Speaker 1: it's a way of saying that, you know, Biden and
Speaker 1: his incoming team, who are really a lot of them
Speaker 1: are Obama recycled recyclables or whatever people that came from
Speaker 1: the Obama administration, that they're not going to be radical.
Speaker 1: They'll even upset Rashida to leave, you know, they'll even
Speaker 1: upset il han Omar and say things like this. I
Speaker 1: think that that's for public consumption. I think at some
Speaker 1: level this is actually a pr exercise designed not so
Speaker 1: much to change then the police narrative as to allow
Speaker 1: the media, with this what they believe will be this
Speaker 1: new Biden administration, to continue to tell everybody, Oh Biden
Speaker 1: so moderate. Oh Biden's a guy, he's not radical, you
Speaker 1: can trust him. There is no big deal. And I
Speaker 1: think people recognizing increasingly that they'll see I believe they'll
Speaker 1: see in time that's not true. You know who won't
Speaker 1: see it though? That blow dried, imbecile Joe Scarborough play
Speaker 1: seven Democrats who think Joe Biden wants anything to do
Speaker 1: with any investigations regarding anybody whose last name is Trump,
Speaker 1: doesn't understand how Washington works. And Joe Biden is interested
Speaker 1: in moving legislation forward. Joe Biden is interested in getting
Speaker 1: things done his first one hundred days, just like Gerald Ford. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, he pardoned Richard Nixon because he wanted are
Speaker 1: long and national nightmare to be over. Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: interested in getting things done. I mean, Joe Scarborough is
Speaker 1: a Joe Scarborough's a Democrat and has been for years,
Speaker 1: or he's just whatever he has to be on TV.
Speaker 1: There's so much of that, isn't there in the media
Speaker 1: that people that will say whatever doesn't matter, it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter whoever will pay them the most. They're almost like
Speaker 1: ambulance chasing lawyers. It's just all about wherever they can
Speaker 1: get the most cash, and there's no ethics involved. There's
Speaker 1: a lot there's a lot of that in politics in general,
Speaker 1: but particularly in political media. You'll see people have no
Speaker 1: allegiance to principles or ideas, and what I think is
Speaker 1: so fascinating. They also will accuse people that support Trump
Speaker 1: of exactly that there's this projection that goes on when
Speaker 1: I mean, I can sit here and I have I've
Speaker 1: told you about things that Trump has done that I
Speaker 1: don't like, that I disagree with. Stylistically, there are areas
Speaker 1: where I would have taken it. I would have wanted
Speaker 1: the president, I should say, to take a different approach.
Speaker 1: But on the ideas, I think the ideas are really
Speaker 1: powerful and important and strong and on with the movement represents.
Speaker 1: I think that he's proven with things like the trade deals.
Speaker 1: I think he showed with results that those of us
Speaker 1: who had our qualms or had you know, questions about this, well,
Speaker 1: turns out he was right. He was right on China,
Speaker 1: he was right on trade, he was right on the border.
Speaker 1: These are things where Trump proved the model, so to speak.
Speaker 1: But the leftists and that the people that want to
Speaker 1: now be the former Republicans who have a there's a
Speaker 1: new found respect for them among Democrats. That's the term
Speaker 1: that will be used, a new found respect. People like that.
Speaker 1: They you know, you turn around, you say, what exactly
Speaker 1: were they doing all this time, for all these years
Speaker 1: when they were representing certain political interests and pushing forward
Speaker 1: certain ideas. Was that all part of a scam? Just
Speaker 1: because they were it was benefiting them them, I mean
Speaker 1: benefiting them at that time, Like Joe Scarborough. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what it's all about. Joe Biden wants to get
Speaker 1: stuff done in his first one hundred days. Yeah, like what,
Speaker 1: who even knows what Joe Biden represents other than the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party And he'll be essentially a you know, marionette
Speaker 1: for a left wing interests and big corporations and big tech.
Speaker 1: But well, what are Joe Biden's big ideas. I'm not Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna come in and I'm you know, no joke man,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna sign these bills and we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 1: build back better. Yeah, we're gonna shore your Babiscoba Scarby.
Speaker 1: Remember remember Joe Biden with some of those great moments
Speaker 1: of the CAMPAIGNE trow, we go, Scary, scar that's your
Speaker 1: next president, everybody. If the Democrats get their way in
Speaker 1: this whole recount fight, that's what's gonna be. And they're
Speaker 1: gonna tell you he's a genius, great leader. Yeah, and look,
Speaker 1: and you know, maybe he's right. I can't wait to
Speaker 1: hear him at the first Day of the Union address
Speaker 1: when he lays out the buying agenda and it's you know,
Speaker 1: we're gonna build back better and we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 1: do all these great things, and we're gonna do the discovery.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. On the same day that bar said that
Speaker 1: a judge forced his Department of Justice to tell us
Speaker 1: something else that it had been keeping quiet. They are
Speaker 1: investigating allegations of people seeking to bribe their way into pardons.
Speaker 1: That comes out just as we hear that Rudy Giuliani
Speaker 1: and others are asking for exactly that pardons question is
Speaker 1: for what talk about a guilty conscience has not even
Speaker 1: an investigation, Yet you want to pardon, and you're telling
Speaker 1: me everything you do is legit, but you want to pardon.
Speaker 1: The New York Times is reporting tonight that, along with
Speaker 1: the potential Giuliani pardon, Trump has discussed with advisors whether
Speaker 1: to grant preemptive pardons to his kids, Ivanka, Don Junior,
Speaker 1: and Eric, and also to his son in law Jared.
Speaker 1: What does that say that he wants to excuse them
Speaker 1: for things before anybody's even saying there's an investigation. Now,
Speaker 1: bad news for Trump translates into good news for the
Speaker 1: drama finally ending around this transition. Maybe, and let's just
Speaker 1: put aside for a second that I think we all
Speaker 1: know that there's essentially no chance, there's essentially no chance
Speaker 1: that Chris Cuomo will go back and apologize to these
Speaker 1: people that he's effectively claiming need a pardon here. Oh
Speaker 1: there's reporting. Yeah, Well, when the reporting doesn't actually bear
Speaker 1: out what's being said here, do you think he's gonna say, oh,
Speaker 1: maybe Rudy Giuliani didn't actually need a federal pardon. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying, if we get to that point, which is likely,
Speaker 1: I assure you they will not go back on Eric's
Speaker 1: Cuomo will not go back on Eric's and you know,
Speaker 1: put down the metrics weight gainer for a second or whatever,
Speaker 1: and you know, put down the weights and actually be
Speaker 1: smart for a second. Not going to do it. He's
Speaker 1: he's gonna just skip past this after he's done with
Speaker 1: the smear job. But also think about how they never
Speaker 1: give any thought whatsoever to why Trump would have to
Speaker 1: pardon himself and his family. It's not because they did
Speaker 1: anything wrong. It's because they'll try to manufacture. They lied
Speaker 1: about Russia collusion, They created a fake crime that did
Speaker 1: not happen, and then they investigated people and then they
Speaker 1: got them jammed up on process crimes from the hyper
Speaker 1: over zealous investigation as we know. And they even lied
Speaker 1: about what was done in the investigation in the case
Speaker 1: of General Flynn to ambush him and to take him down.
Speaker 1: So why would Trump and why would his family members
Speaker 1: need a pardon to protect them from these psychotic libs.
Speaker 1: That is why they would need a pardon. That is
Speaker 1: why they may have to do that. And I understand
Speaker 1: it's bad optics, but I'm just gonna say this. Do
Speaker 1: you trust Democrats when they claim that they would not
Speaker 1: bring an investigation against Donald Trump. Do you trust him?
Speaker 1: I don't trust them. Why wouldn't they They've been saying
Speaker 1: for years that he is a criminal, that he's gotten
Speaker 1: away with everything, and the process is the punishment. So
Speaker 1: even though there's no criminality, even though there's nothing they
Speaker 1: could find. Do you don't think that they would get
Speaker 1: joy out of putting Trump through numerous federal investigations and
Speaker 1: burning up millions and millions of dollars in legal fees
Speaker 1: and all the stress and the deposition. Of course they would.
Speaker 1: There's no good faith from these people, this whole all.
Speaker 1: We're the Democrats. We think we won, so we're all
Speaker 1: good faith and we care about the republic. It's all bull.
Speaker 1: It's all bull. We know it. So I understand that
Speaker 1: it wouldn't look good. But maybe Trump does need to
Speaker 1: pardon himself in his whole family. Because the Left or
Speaker 1: a bunch of barbarians, they get in charge, they run
Speaker 1: the DOJ, they'll bring investigations against Trump. They investigated him
Speaker 1: for three years over Russia collusion, which didn't even exist.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Seston Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. There ain't no party. Look
Speaker 1: at Team Buck party because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we got bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call rollco everybody, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: Team buck at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to
Speaker 1: send us an email. Also, I'm on TikTok, buck Sexton
Speaker 1: and Instagram buck Sexton. Yeah yeah, may get it happen.
Speaker 1: May get it happened, Producer Mark, Anything exciting going on
Speaker 1: your world this week? Man? It feels like every day
Speaker 1: is groundhog Day? You know. It's like that. Remember that
Speaker 1: Bill Murray movie. Do you ever see it? Yes? I
Speaker 1: have seen it. Great movie. It's a little bit like that.
Speaker 1: Wake up radio all day, go to sleep. Wake up radio,
Speaker 1: all day, go to sleep. I feel like you must
Speaker 1: do something exciting. No, I don't do anything exciting. I
Speaker 1: do the same thing you do with a little more
Speaker 1: free time radio radio radio. I wonder, you know, if
Speaker 1: if a vocal box could have a six pack, could
Speaker 1: have six pack apps. I'm sure my vocal box would
Speaker 1: because that's where all my energy goes these days, spending
Speaker 1: a lot of time on that. So yeah, I wish
Speaker 1: I could have cool stories for people, but I feel
Speaker 1: like New York you know, we're gonna we're gonna be
Speaker 1: shutting down more and more. It's not gonna stop. So
Speaker 1: you know, it's gonna time to hunker down. Man, get
Speaker 1: ready for some Netflix, nap time and radio. Of course,
Speaker 1: that's it. It was gonna be the worst vacations we've
Speaker 1: ever had when we take off at the end of
Speaker 1: the year. Yeah, I mean, we'll figure something out. Tell
Speaker 1: me this, Uh, what's the latest and greatest with with
Speaker 1: you and and your friends? The New York Mets. Any
Speaker 1: news there? They signed a relief pitcher. All right. Things
Speaker 1: are moving slow right now because of the economy and
Speaker 1: everything and all the uncertainty. You know, the hot stove
Speaker 1: is what they call the free agency in baseball. But
Speaker 1: it's been kind of a cool stove lately. I hear that. Alrighty, well,
Speaker 1: let's let's uh dive into the roll calls. We're checking
Speaker 1: with producer Marks. Yeah. By the way, you do anything
Speaker 1: fun for Hanukah in general? Yeah, we might see my
Speaker 1: in laws Lightermanora to exchange gifts. So yeah, that's the stuff.
Speaker 1: It's more fun when you're a kid. Is there like
Speaker 1: a special meal? Not really. I mean I think my
Speaker 1: in laws might make make lotcas. I was gonna say,
Speaker 1: when do you do the hollow bread? Hollow bread is
Speaker 1: technically every Friday night for sure. Okay, Yeah, learn something new, alrighty.
Speaker 1: I love lakis by the way, I will say that
Speaker 1: I have appropriated that from your people, and I love them.
Speaker 1: What's not to love about fried potato pancakes? Fried potato
Speaker 1: pancakes you throw a little bit of Oh and if
Speaker 1: you go, if you're really gonna go bougie and go
Speaker 1: with either homemade or fresh apple sauce, amazing. And I
Speaker 1: actually like them with sour cream. And I'll throw a
Speaker 1: little hot sauce on them too. Who telling you? Game changer?
Speaker 1: Game changer? All right, Robert, Team Buck As always, thanks
Speaker 1: to all your team does to bring us information and
Speaker 1: rational analysis of the news. I'm particularly fond of how
Speaker 1: you approach the COVID nineteen lockdowns, mask wearing and the
Speaker 1: fact that these little dictators will not relinquish their newfound
Speaker 1: power until we the people stand up and say no more.
Speaker 1: She'll die. Robert, you have excellent taste. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for your support. We do very much much appreciate it,
Speaker 1: and yeah, look I'm I'm not even somebody people keep
Speaker 1: saying my name pops up now along some fact checks
Speaker 1: with people like Barrenson and Atkisson for being you know,
Speaker 1: anti mask, and that's not even really. Yeah, I have
Speaker 1: questions about the effectiveness of Everyone has questions about No
Speaker 1: one knows how effective they are. I think the general
Speaker 1: public maybe thinks they're I shouldn't say the general public,
Speaker 1: but a lot of people, the experts probably think they
Speaker 1: reduce it by I don't know, you know, sixty percent,
Speaker 1: eighty percent, something like that. That's how they reduced this,
Speaker 1: That's what they would say. I think it's maybe like
Speaker 1: two percent. I mean, so I think that it's basically
Speaker 1: not really helping very much at all, and it's really annoying.
Speaker 1: But I don't know, But I do know. What I
Speaker 1: do know is that mandates as a policy do not work,
Speaker 1: all right. That is just looking at mask mandates, compliance
Speaker 1: and caseload for COVID. Mask mandates do not work, all right.
Speaker 1: This is a public policy debate, and it's one that
Speaker 1: we should have. And the data is not on the
Speaker 1: side of the people insisting on infringing upon your freedom,
Speaker 1: and people say, word is it say you don't have
Speaker 1: to wear a mask in the Constitution? I say, okay, Well,
Speaker 1: we can also take the position that you have to
Speaker 1: do one hundred pushups every morning for your health, because
Speaker 1: there's no prohibition against that every morning, one hundred pushups.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna arrest you if you don't do it. Police powers, right,
Speaker 1: at some level, the state's infringements upon individual autonomous autonomy
Speaker 1: aren't even a question of law. It's a question of
Speaker 1: don't be a bunch of jackasses. This is crazy and
Speaker 1: we're at that level, all right. In case that wasn't clear.
Speaker 1: Jeremiah buck Love the show. I listened here in Grand Junction,
Speaker 1: Colorado on k n z Z. Jeremiah, We love our
Speaker 1: Grand Junction Colorado audience. Colorado is it's big team buck Country.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you we do very well. Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: you know that we do very well in Colorado, can't.
Speaker 1: We love our Denver affiliate. We got well Denver, but
Speaker 1: we all where Colorado turns out we're big. We got
Speaker 1: a lot of podcast listeners in Colorado. So love you folks.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for your continued support. Who exactly
Speaker 1: certifies the election in each state. I thought it was
Speaker 1: state legislatures, which is why Rudy and co. Are working
Speaker 1: the geop lad legislatures in those states. But the secretaries
Speaker 1: of state in these states keep certifying results. Arizona just
Speaker 1: did today November thirtieth. Do the results then go to
Speaker 1: the legislatures after the secretary of state. So confused, Jeremiah,
Speaker 1: I cry, Uncle, I give, I'd have to check and see.
Speaker 1: I think, yes, I think the I think the legislator
Speaker 1: legislature certifies, and then the Secretary of State like certifies
Speaker 1: the certification. I honestly don't even really know. I mean,
Speaker 1: then now you're getting into state by state how this
Speaker 1: thing works, and you know the process is enormously complicated.
Speaker 1: So I will look into this because I want to
Speaker 1: have a good answer for you. I know that it's
Speaker 1: certified at the state level, goes to the electoral and
Speaker 1: then then the state chooses their elects to go to
Speaker 1: the electoral college. I mean, that process I understand, But
Speaker 1: as for how the secretary of state mixes in with
Speaker 1: the actual legislature. You know who man politics, Man, it's crazy.
Speaker 1: Burke Buck love your show, but listen while I work
Speaker 1: at night. Your impressions, especially a fouch Governor Cuobo crack
Speaker 1: me up regarding the Vanderbilt kicker Sarah Fuller. I'm a
Speaker 1: big college football an SEC fan the league in which
Speaker 1: Vanderbilt plays. While I agree with your overall point about
Speaker 1: women playing men's sports, your analysis of Fuller's kick is incorrect.
Speaker 1: It is what is referred to as a squib kick,
Speaker 1: which is a type of on side kick that's intentionally short.
Speaker 1: Producer markin back me up on that. Fuller is the
Speaker 1: goalkeeper for Vandy's women's soccer and is definitely more than
Speaker 1: cable of kicking the ball long. Just want to provide
Speaker 1: a tiny clarity, tiny clarity your analysis more accurate in
Speaker 1: the future. Shields high Well Burke, I love it, you
Speaker 1: love the show. I also think you're wrong here, so
Speaker 1: so I appreciate that you don't. You know, it was
Speaker 1: not an on side kick, and the fact that she
Speaker 1: would go for a kick that put the other team
Speaker 1: at their forty yard line. This was not strategy. This
Speaker 1: was the best that they could do, or the best
Speaker 1: that she could do, I should say under the circumstances.
Speaker 1: In my view, I've seen other people who are really
Speaker 1: into sports analyze this, and they say because that that
Speaker 1: became the thing of Oh it was a squib kick, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: wasn't a squib kick. I did not see any squib kick.
Speaker 1: I mean, again, I don't know much about these two teams,
Speaker 1: but a squib kick is something you do if the
Speaker 1: other team has a really great return man and you
Speaker 1: want to keep them all away from them. So that
Speaker 1: is a strategy, right. I can't say if it was
Speaker 1: being used in that, Burke. I think you're right about
Speaker 1: what a squib kick is and that it is a
Speaker 1: possible situation. But this was from what I saw it was.
Speaker 1: It was not a squib kick because as a squib
Speaker 1: kick also, you would kick it so that it would
Speaker 1: be um you'd wanted to try to bounce. I need
Speaker 1: to give you more time. I know it's not an
Speaker 1: onside kick, but you usually kick it up the middle
Speaker 1: and kind of have it hop around so that you
Speaker 1: don't get it to the right kick returner. This was
Speaker 1: just a really short kick, Ben. I mean, hey, team,
Speaker 1: if I'm wrong, let me know. But I think I'm
Speaker 1: right on this one. But Burke, we love you, cool
Speaker 1: name and you like the show. See your team Buck
Speaker 1: Forever Pablo Buck. I listen to your show daily, enjoyed
Speaker 1: your Dracula podcast. Well, Pablo, that's because you're a scholar
Speaker 1: and a gentleman. I was curious if you could possibly
Speaker 1: do something similar for Lincoln's first election. This election was
Speaker 1: very complicated. I believe it went to a vote on
Speaker 1: the House floor. I think this would do very well,
Speaker 1: be informative an interesting Shields High. Well, Pablo, I think
Speaker 1: that's a cool idea, but I can't tell you that
Speaker 1: I'm going to have the time really to do that
Speaker 1: and address that. So while thank you for bringing up
Speaker 1: to me, I cannot make false false promises here because
Speaker 1: we are still scheduled for six more Shields High episodes
Speaker 1: early in the new year. Going to be getting you
Speaker 1: all kinds of good stuff there. That is the plan.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get you Malta, siege of Vienna, Lepanto battles.
Speaker 1: I like big battles, and I cannot lie You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: More roll call come in your way. Remember gonna bucksexon
Speaker 1: dot com a check in on latest stories. Also Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck Sexton. If you haven't followed me
Speaker 1: on Facebook, please team, great way to keep in touch,
Speaker 1: see what we're doing, and uh check us out there
Speaker 1: and for all the fate of the Uh. I was
Speaker 1: gonna say, Facebook youngsters, that's not right. The TikTok youngsters
Speaker 1: out there. Buck Sexton's on TikTok, don't stop gonna groove
Speaker 1: it to you. Drop. What is it? What's the lyrics? Mark?
Speaker 1: Not what you just said. Ah, I was close. I
Speaker 1: was close, though I don't think so, but you know,
Speaker 1: so somebody want to think there was like a rhyme
Speaker 1: and you know a thing with a rhyme, you know,
Speaker 1: something like that. All right? Uh Graham, Oh wait, no, sorry,
Speaker 1: let's go to Brian here. Sounds like you had a
Speaker 1: well deserve relaxing holiday, Brian. I did, but it was
Speaker 1: a bit fattening better than that. Uh, you know, because
Speaker 1: the real damage that I did was I went in,
Speaker 1: I went in hard in the paint on Thanksgiving. But
Speaker 1: then the leftovers the days after I was like m
Speaker 1: pecan pie for breakfast. You know what I mean? You
Speaker 1: had some of that, Mark, didn't you. Of course I
Speaker 1: had an entire anniversary cake in my fridge. Oh yes, yes, sir,
Speaker 1: I mean because you could convince yourself. When you've got
Speaker 1: food like that in the fridge, you're like anything. I
Speaker 1: can eat anything for Thanksgiving, breakfast right the day after. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's it's lights, you know, anniversary cake or cereal. It's
Speaker 1: like the same thing, man, same thing. These are These
Speaker 1: are the conversations I have in my head after Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: which is also why now I've grown very fond of
Speaker 1: sweatpants and find belts to be evil. I don't like
Speaker 1: belts because they tell you when your belly is growing,
Speaker 1: because there's little notches that get tighter and tighter over time.
Speaker 1: So belts are bad. Sweatpants with their draw strings and
Speaker 1: their generally comfy nature, are your friend. That's what I've decided.
Speaker 1: That's what I almost exclusively wear now. Yeah, it's great too, Brian. Question,
Speaker 1: it's December second, Why has center Kamala Harris not resigned
Speaker 1: her Senate seat. Perhaps this lawyer knows what's coming and
Speaker 1: is not going to give up yet, Just in case, Brian,
Speaker 1: I don't have a good answer. I've seen people point
Speaker 1: this out. I wish I could say that I thought
Speaker 1: it was indicative of Kamala not having a whole lot
Speaker 1: of confidence that you know she's gonna be she's going
Speaker 1: to be the VP, but I think she thinks she is.
Speaker 1: I might just be either an oversight or maybe there's
Speaker 1: no reason to do it now and she likes staying
Speaker 1: in her senate role for the time being. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'd have to look into a little
Speaker 1: bit more. I've noticed this, and I've seen people pointing
Speaker 1: this out. But to me, I don't. I don't like
Speaker 1: to get excited about things we shouldn't get excited about, right,
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't like to look at indicators that
Speaker 1: I want to believe are true and then believe them
Speaker 1: for no good reason. Now that may not be the case.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe she is hedging her bets. I can't say.
Speaker 1: I just I don't have a read on this one.
Speaker 1: And I like to tell you all that too. Sometimes.
Speaker 1: I know, I talk to you guys for hours and
Speaker 1: hours a day, and I appreciate so much how many
Speaker 1: of you listen across the country, and I always really
Speaker 1: do put it one hundred percent into the show and
Speaker 1: give you the best I've got. But I also want
Speaker 1: to tell you when I just sometimes I just don't,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't really have a take. You know,
Speaker 1: that's why when when we're talking about the Mets pitching staff,
Speaker 1: we go to Producer Mark because Producer Mark will continue
Speaker 1: to have takes for us on that right, Yes, always, yeah,
Speaker 1: So that's you know, I know my wheelhouse and so on,
Speaker 1: or even if it's within my wheelhouse, but I happen
Speaker 1: to be asleep at the wheel or not not up
Speaker 1: on it. And so that's that's one that I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you. I think I think it's clear, all right
Speaker 1: that I thought it's clear that it's not clear to
Speaker 1: me Graham not to be confused with the Graham Cracker.
Speaker 1: I used to eat those back when I elude. They
Speaker 1: were quite delicious, actually, you know what, I really liked
Speaker 1: for a while too, mostly because the ads were super catchy.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, you might have been like in Amba or
Speaker 1: a tadpole at the time. I don't think you necessarily existed.
Speaker 1: But Teddy grams. Do you remember Teddy Grams? Of course
Speaker 1: they're just want to eat those ty grams. But I
Speaker 1: think you just confused a song from Full House or
Speaker 1: am I that young that I don't realize that that
Speaker 1: was I just did. I think my brain just used
Speaker 1: the Full House Teddy Graham's song a Teddy Graham's ad,
Speaker 1: But actually it wasn't the ad. Yeah, I think you
Speaker 1: did that. That was Uncle Jesse singing to Michelle. That's right,
Speaker 1: that's right. He was a very talented man, as was
Speaker 1: Aunt Becky, who I believe is walking around now in
Speaker 1: orange pajamas all the time as a prisoner. Am I
Speaker 1: or is she now? Or is she about to? I
Speaker 1: think she's in. She's not in for long though, so
Speaker 1: free Aunt Becky makes me so sad they locked up
Speaker 1: our Aunt Becky producer Mark over college admissions. Come on,
Speaker 1: crazy crazy all right? Um? Anyway back to sorry Graham,
Speaker 1: you just you triggered me with these uh Teddy Graham.
Speaker 1: Back in the day that Teddy Graham. I think they
Speaker 1: had a cereal they had the cookies. I like them.
Speaker 1: I might like them mostly because of the commercial. I
Speaker 1: also remember I used to buy and I would always
Speaker 1: want to get for Christmas for my mom, who's so
Speaker 1: so kind to her children. She would get us whatever
Speaker 1: the Christmas toys that we wanted, even when it was absurd,
Speaker 1: but but I remember, you know she would. We would
Speaker 1: always want to get these things. Do you remember these
Speaker 1: um cars that you would make this track four and
Speaker 1: they would do these commercials. It made it look so cool,
Speaker 1: and you'd make the cars go fast on the racetrack
Speaker 1: that you would build, you know, I'm talking about yeah,
Speaker 1: like a hot wheel, Yeah, kind of like kind of
Speaker 1: like hot wheels or whatever. But the commercial would always
Speaker 1: looked amazing, and then you'd get it and it would
Speaker 1: like right away the car would fly off and the
Speaker 1: whole thing would break and it was crap. I went
Speaker 1: through many iterations of those. Anyway, Graham says, buck. I
Speaker 1: love the show and pass the buck often. Well, Graham,
Speaker 1: you're a great man with a cool name. I'm curious
Speaker 1: how you feel about Bill Barr's pick as Trump's best cabinet. Personally,
Speaker 1: I think he says the right things, but no action.
Speaker 1: There hasn't been any constitutional protection provided by suing states
Speaker 1: about these draconian lockdowns, no results in the Durham probe,
Speaker 1: non existing on the general Flint issue other than dismissing charges.
Speaker 1: Unable to find anything to celebrate the ag Barr pick about.
Speaker 1: My pick is Mike Pompeio. He has been loyal, strong,
Speaker 1: calm in an excellent tecretary of state. Well, Graham, I
Speaker 1: told you at the earlier in the show, if you're listening,
Speaker 1: that the getting in front of the effort to impeach Trump,
Speaker 1: I mean, Barr may have saved the Trump presidency. It
Speaker 1: would be very clear about that. They were going to
Speaker 1: try to rally and impeachment and get instant based on
Speaker 1: the ten articles of obstruction possible obstruction or whatever and
Speaker 1: instances of obstruction, and Bar got ahead of that and
Speaker 1: they got the charges against Flynn dropped. So there's have
Speaker 1: been some pretty good stuff here. And they've got a
Speaker 1: special counsel now for the Durham probe, so let's keep
Speaker 1: an eye on that. Thanks for listening to everybody, Shields
Speaker 1: Hi