WEBVTT - Ep 195 Salt Part 2: The Substance

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Intake of salt is a biological imperative inextricably woven into

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>physiological systems, human societies, and global culture. However, excessive salt

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>intake is associated with high blood pressure. The crucial question

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is whether salt exerts a causal influence on patient centered

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>health outcomes such as myocardial infection, stroke, and death. However,

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this issue is controversial and fiercely debated. Despite the controversy,

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>two broad points of consensus exist. The first is that

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty could be resolved by better quality data, that is, large,

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>randomized clinical trials with sufficient follow up to assess robust

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>cardiovascular outcomes. The second is that the barriers to performing

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>such trials are so substantial that they will be rarely,

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if ever surmounted.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so many questions.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>What was that? From?

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 2>When was that? From? Who wrote that?

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to tell you? Okay? So that was

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I pulled clips like little bits from the intro and

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.919
<v Speaker 1>from later in a paper, from a very very recent paper.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I have just scrolled. Why didn't I put this up?

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm scrolling all the way to the bottom of my

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>notes from Nature Reviews Nephrology from twenty twenty two by

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>hunter at All titled the Impact of Excessive Salt Intake

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on Human Health, and this paper that little intro, that's

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of my.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's what like, That's what kills me, is

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 2>that I feel like since that could The reason I

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>asked where when is it from? Is because that could

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>have been from so many different points in history over

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the salt debate. We need better data, we need randomized

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>control trials, we need long term data sets and follow up.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And it is from twenty twenty two. So that's what

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about today in this episode.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh.

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Aaron Allman updight.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>And this is this podcast will kill you. Welcome back

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 2>to Salt Salt. Here we go again, Yeah.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>We go again. I'm really excited about today's episode. I

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many answer any of your questions, but

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we'll come to some clarity. I

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>honestly really actually do at the end of this.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 2>I am hopeful. I know that if there is a

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>thread to be pulled, you will find it and yank

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>it out from the yank Yeah, yeah, I do. I'm

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>thrilled for this. Yeah, I already want to start asking questions,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and that is a first like that is early for me,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>so good.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. I can't wait for you to ask

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>me questions and then I'll be like that's the one

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an answer for, or like, oh my god,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>now I have to scroll one hundred years in my notes.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait. I have fifteen pages of notes here

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>erin so like, I've got to have answers to something.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But firstarantiny time it is?

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>It is we're again drinking the grains of salts, which

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>is based on a salty dog. I mean it is

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a salty dog, which is great fruit juice and vodka

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 2>or gin, whichever you prefer. Make sure your rim is

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>salted unless you're dealing with high blood pressure. No, just kidding,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but that is the technical recipe. Also,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 2>this reminds me that if you are just now tuning in,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.679
<v Speaker 2>then you didn't see at the top that it says

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Salt Part two. You really don't have to listen to

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the first episode, but you should. It's not like there's

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a narrative that you'll miss, but you'll miss a lot.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You'll miss some. It'll help you with trivia. It's got

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>some cool It's a great episode. Do you want to

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 2>learn where the term grain of salt comes from? Check

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 2>it out.

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got to listen to that episode. We're not going

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to tell you now.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, we'll post the recipe for the drink on our website.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>This podcast with you dot com and our social media

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is so make sure you're following us there. You find

0:04:57.960 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of other cool stuff on our website too, like

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>trans scripts and a bookshop dot orgiphiliated account, and a

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>good Reads list and merch and all the sources from

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these episodes. Boy do I have a long

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>list for this one bloodmobile? Who does our music? You know?

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Contact us form.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Lots of things.

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll check it out.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Is there any other business or can we like get

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>straight to things? Let's do this?

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, very short break life evolved in the oceans,

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>which are salty.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 2>I loved this. I'm like, wait a second, have I

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>said this before?

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>No, you haven't, but it is the most Aaron Welsh

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>way to start the thing. Ever that I was like

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>thrilled that you didn't start that way and that I

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>could do it.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 2>I did think about going into the evolutionary origins and

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>then I was like stop.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, no, I'm not going any further than that. Life

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>evolved in the oceans. Yeah, the oceans are salty, and

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>with the evolution from single celled organisms to multicellular organisms,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>salt became a major component of our extracellular fluid, that is,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the fluid that is on the outside rather than the

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>inside of our cells. Our bodies are basically just made

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>up of tiny little water balloons bathing in more water. Yeah, okay,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of the water inside and outside of our

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>cells is salty water. Yeah, but the salt on the

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>inside of our cells is mostly potassium. So the ions

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>that make up the salt mostly are potassium, and the

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>salts outside of our cells most are made up of sodium. So,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as we moved from our ocean homes to land, and

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>by we I mean like, you know, creatures and not

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like humans.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Global evolutionary we yeah.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, we were no longer bathing in sodium all the time, right,

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and thus we had to find ways to ingest it. Yeah.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So animals evolved taste receptors to be able to detect salt,

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and in general, like you kind of mentioned, Aaron, most

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>animals have actually a pretty consistent like upside down U

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>shaped preference curve for saltiness, right, but I think it's yeah,

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>upside down you so like it's delicious right in the middle.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>If it's not salty enough, it doesn't taste good. If

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there's too much salt also doesn't taste good. Right. So

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about salt in this episode, like you

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>said last week as well too, I'm talking about sodium

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>chloride NaCl uh huh. I mean when I set it

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in the bodies where there's other salts in your bodies,

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's other ions that are important, But from now

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>on out, I'm just talking about sodium chloride.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Can I already ask a question? Yeah, Garby, you

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>mentioned potassium is on the inside and sodium is on

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the outside.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 2>And what happens then?

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Like okay, yeah, let me let's sorry.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's not a question. It was more just

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 2>like tell me more.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, let me continue setting the scene and then I

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>will I will get into that, okay, very shortly. Well,

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking mostly about sodium chloride today. Lots of other

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>salts exist in chemistry, salt like table salt, Sodium chloride

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is about forty percent sodium. Yeah, like by weight, so

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>ten grams of salt. This is important for one work

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>because like all of the dietary guidelines and things talk

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about sodium, right, But then a lot of studies just

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>talk about salt. So we can use these interchange ten

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>grams of salt four grams of sodium. That's the equivalence there.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, guess what there are like online calculators that I

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 2>had to use to be like how much sodium are wet?

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I would be like how much salt does the average

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>American eat? Oh? You know, however thirty two hundred milligrams

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of salt or sodium, So like right, no, but how

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 2>much salt are we eating?

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>How much salt does that? Yeah? Exactly. Also, then some

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>studies like to use millimals just to make them sound

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>more smart, and you're just like, now I have to

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>take it from mills to milligrams, Like stop it, it's unnecessary.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But so the questions that I want to answer today

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in this episode are number one, why do we give

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a crap about sodium? And that's going to get it

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>your question of like sodium potassium, what does that mean?

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>What does it do in our bodies? Why do we

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>actually need it. What is the problem or is there

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem with excess sodium and how much? What does

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>excess actually mean? And why is there so much debate

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>about this? Yeah, that's going to be a big part

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of the episode. What I am not going to talk

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>about is hypo and hyper natremia. That is when your

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>blood sodium is too low or too high. I'm not

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about it in any great detail. If

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you are a medical student or a resident, you're welcome

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for not making you listen to that. If you don't

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>know what that means, you can watch some doctor Glalcum

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Flecken videos because they sum up both my knowledge and

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>also why I have no interest in talking about those things, because.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Are those acute stages.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>They can be acute or chronic. Okay, okay, yeah, and

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all just a mess. But you will understand why

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's important when I tell you why do we have

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to give a crap about sodium? Right at its core,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at its most important, sodium is what determines our total

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>body fluid balance. So because it is the most abundant

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>cat ion, positively charged ion in our extracellular fluid, it

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is what determines how much fluid volume we actually have

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in our bodies. Right, Because the salt on the inside

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of our cell bags is mostly potassium and the salt

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on the outside is mostly sodium, it doesn't matter which

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is which as long as their concentrations are the same.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Our bodies have to keep a balance of these fluids.

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So the concentration of particles on the inside of our

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>cell has to match the concentration on the outside if

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't, Like if you were to dump a bunch

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of sodium into your bloodstream into your extracellular fluid, then

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>your body would have to compensate by extracting fluid from

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>cells in order to make up for that.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay, And the identity of sodium versus potassium doesn't

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 2>necessarily matter, I imagine it does at a point.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It does, absolutely, but it doesn't for the purposes of

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>just understanding that, like at its core, you just have

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to have balance. It so happens that potassium is what

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>exists inside of our cells, and sodium primarily exists outside

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of our cells, And our cells do a lot of

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>transmitting sodium and potassium back and forth through these atp

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>ion channels, and that is all very important. But to

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>understand fluid balance. You need to know that potassiums on

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the inside and sodiums on the outside, and they got

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to be concentration wise balanced.

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Sodium is also an incredibly important cad on outside of

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>fluid balance. It's a neurotransmitter. It is essential for our

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>muscles to be able to contract, and so it's something

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that our cells also use in communication with other cells. So,

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>make no mistake, we cannot exist without sodium.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>It's necessary for life.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It is necessary for life, and the volume of our

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>fluid in our bodies is proportional to our total body

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>content of sodium. Right, So, in order to if you

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>lose a bunch of volume, for example, if you're bleeding,

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>or if you're even just peeing out way too much,

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or you're sweating or you're having diarrhea, in order to

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>replace the volume that you've lost of fluid, you have

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to also replace sodium. You cannot replace it with just water,

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it will not work. Right. We lose sodium predominantly through

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>our kidneys. In fact, shout out to our kidneys. They

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>are so stellar at this that they excrete about ninety

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to ninety five percent of what we ingest regardless of

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>how much we ingest. Isn't that interesting?

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Wait? So okay, but you said it's a proportion that

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>they excrete out or.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it ninety to ninety five percent of what you

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ingest you're going to pee out in your kidneys.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>So let's say we're talking about sodium sodium. Yeah, so

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 2>let's say that you, you know, going back to last

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>week's episode when the ridiculous estimate, shocking estimate of one

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred grams of salt a day a day, let's say, so,

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that's forty grams of sodium oday. Yeah, that ninety percent

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 2>that's excreted out. You've got a lot more salt remaining

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 2>in your body than if you're.

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Aaron, you're so right.

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for leading me perfectly to that.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>You did it all on your own. Oh my god, Yes, exactly,

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Proportionally percent of what we ingest, regardless of

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're ingesting. Right, we're gonna lose some through our

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gi tract, via your poop. You're gonna lose some via sweat,

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Okay, most of its kidneys, Most of it's kidneys,

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and our kidneys. They do a really good job of

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>deciding how much to kick out and how much to

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>keep depending on how much we eat, because it is

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be variable. Right, if you're not getting enough,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>if you are deficient in your sodium intake, or if

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got other reasons that your body decides, hey, we

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>need to hold onto this. Your kidneys can actually keep

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>almost all of it. They can They can keep almost

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of your sodium if they need to.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Two questions, Okay, what are some of the conditions that

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>your kidneys might keep more sodium than is necessary? And

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>how often does someone actually not consume enough sodium in

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 2>like the your like a normal day to.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Day you know, such great questions. How often in the

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>year twenty twenty five is someone not getting enough sodium?

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Very rare? Okay, it's very hard to not get enough

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>sodium for most people. You If you, for example, were

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to lose a lot of blood or lose a lot

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of volume for any reason, then your blood pressure would

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>probably drop. Then your kidneys would say, hey, we need

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto blood pressure. We're going to do that

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>by holding on all of our sodium. We're not going

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to let any sodium go, and that's going to help.

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You're going to need to ingest sodium, either via like

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ivy fluids or just eating salt in order to make

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>up for those losses. But your kidneys are also going

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to react very quickly to hold on to as much

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as possible. There's other like disease states. For example, if

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you have issues with your adrenals where you're not producing

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>certain hormones. Because it's a lot of very complicated it's

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your kidneys, it's your brain, it's your blood vessels and

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sensors that are in your blood vessels. It's hormones that

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are controlling all of this. So if you have deficiencies

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in certain hormones, then your kidneys might flip on and say, hey,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to hold on to all the sodium that's

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>possible because we are you know, at risk of losing

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it or whatever. Or maybe you have deficiencies and hormones

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can't do that and so you're losing a

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of sodiums. So then you might have what so

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>many animals have big bone lick stake park and that

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is what's called sodium appetite. Yes, and sodium appetite is

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea that we know exists in animals that in

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a state of sodium deficiency. Animals will exhibit these pretty

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>extreme sodium seeking behaviors and they will do extra work

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to seek out and consume salt. And we see this

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of different animals, mice, rats, rabbits, pigeons, goats,

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we learned, kangaroos, sheep, cattle, monkeys, horses. So the question

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is does this sodium appetite exist in humans, And we

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>think probably yes, though the data is based on a

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>few cases of like, for example, kids who had no

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>functional adrenals, so they were salt wasting. Their kidneys could

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 1>not hold on to salt, and so they had an

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>increased need for salt and exhibited these kinds of salt

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>seeking behaviors. In the literature, these are like really old

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>single case type studies. Yea, but then yeah, so those

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>individuals in those studies did exhibit that kind of sodium

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>seeking what we would call sodium appetite. That's not the

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing as what we experience now, which is sodium

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>preference where we like it so we eat it because

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 1>it tastes good. That does not mean that we are

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sodium deficient.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, even though it feels sometimes like the same thing.

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, hard to distinguish perhaps.

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have a question about you said like salt appetite,

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 2>this instinctual drive to find salt, and you said that

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 2>they tested out in kids that lacked adrenals. Tell me

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 2>why that would. What's happening there is their kidneys aren't

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 2>holding on like yeah.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly that. So your adrenals they do a lot,

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but one of the hormones that they make is called aldosterone,

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a very important part of mediating the resorption

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of sodium in your kidneys. And so without being able

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to make that particular hormone, then you can't have a

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>signal to tell your kidneys to hold on to sodium,

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and so you're basically sodium wasting. And there's other conditions

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as well too. There's like genetic conditions, or there's maybe

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>damage to the kidney. There's medications that can make you

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lose more sodium in your urine through your kidneys. Okay, yeah,

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of it is under that hormonal control.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's why it was in kids who had like

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not either they didn't have adrenals or they had non

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>functional adrenals. I can't remember which one. Okay, And your

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>drenals do a lot more than just teldosterone, but that's

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>important for salt.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>And your kidneys do a lot more than just sodium too, yes, Vato.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But so this all begs the question how much sodium

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>do we actually need?

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 2>How much?

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron? This is my favorite question that I've asked myself, yeah,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in a while, and it is very hard to come

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to an actual answer on this. So you mentioned, and

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad that you did in last episode, that

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>our early hominid ancestors, their estimated amount of salt intake

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was about one gram of salt per day or less.

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>That's four hundred milligrams of sodium. Now, there also was

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a study that came out in the late eighties called

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>inter Salt, and this was this one of these big,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>big observational studies that first showed a relationship. Not first

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because you said it was like you know, in the

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen hundreds.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Twenty six, if you're talking, you know, correct hard hard

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 2>pulse that hardens.

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But this was one of like a big important

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>observational study that looked at a bunch of different populations

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>with variation in their average salt intake and found a

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>very strong relationship between higher salt intake and blood pressure.

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>In this study, they also looked at several remote human

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>populations in Brazil, Kenya, and Papula, New Guinea, and in

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>those populations, people, yes, had very low blood pressure, but

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>they also had substantially lower sodium intakes compared to what

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we see today, one to three grams of salt on average,

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>which is four hundred milligrams to one point two grams

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of sodium per day.

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's to be hard, I feel like, in

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>our like in the US, to eat that, to select

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>that diet, right.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Listen, we'll get there. It's very hard, Okay, But this

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>all becomes really important because, as I'm going to talk

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about later, there is a lot of weird debate about

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>what our quote unquote physiologic need actually is. Okay, and

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into the people who are claiming things that

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>they're claiming, but it is very clear from these early

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, these estimates of early hominid we can't we

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can't have exact data on that, right, but these estimates

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>based on the sodium content of the types of foods

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that early hominids would be eating, plus the fact that

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there are, or at least in the eighties and seventies

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>were societies in which people were consuming very minimal amounts

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>of salt and they were living, surviving, maybe thriving, I

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but their bodies were functioning just fine. So physiologically,

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>most estimates say we need at a minimum about five

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred milligrams of sodium a day in order to continue

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>our bodily functionings, to keep up with losses from our kidneys,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>from our sweat, from our GI tract. And that's going

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>to vary based on how much you're sweating, how much

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you're pooping, and how great your kidneys are at retaining sodium.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 2>What about potassium, great question.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Potassium is incredibly important and actually plays a huge role

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in this sodium blood pressure, et cetera debate. And I

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't write down the exact like what the RDA the

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>recommended amount of potassium that you get is, so I

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know the exact numbers of that, but potassium is

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely essential to consume every day as well.

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>And we're but I'm asking about the intrasalt study. Were

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>those populations, the remote populations, were they consuming some other

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>types of salt, you know, potassium or whatever.

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>They were probably consuming more potassium than what we consume

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>or what a lot of other populations consume. Because foods

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that tend to be low in sodium are often high

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in potassium. That's very interesting, because whole foods are very

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>high like fruits, vegetables, these kinds of things tend to

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>be very high in potassium. Harm. Okay, we'll get there, Okay, okay,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's how much salt we need, like bare minimum

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to survive. We think, right, how much salt do we get?

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>On average? Global daily salt intake is estimated. Most estimates

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and by the World Health Organization are about ten grams

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of salt per day, which is about four grams of sodium.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot of variation, so the average ranges

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>from just over two grams to just over five grams

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>per day based on different populations, and of course there's

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of individual and day to day variation. Now,

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the World Health Organization recommends a limit of no more

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>than two grams of sodium a day two thousand milligrams,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's five grams of salt. The American Heart Association in

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the US recommends for all adults absolutely no more than

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>two point three grams of sodium, and for anyone with

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>high blood pressure or at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>They recommend a limit of one point five grams of sodium.

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Other countries have slightly different recommendations, but they're all in

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this ballpark of around two grams of sodium, around five

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>grams of salt, and yet globally, on average, we are

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>getting more than double the amount of what most major

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>medical societies recommend. Why is that? What impact is this having?

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And why is there so much controversy about this? Still?

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 2>This is so fascinating because I think question being how

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>much salt do we need? Versus how much salt is

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 2>too much? I feel like is really different. Those are

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 2>two entirely different questions.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They are, And I.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 2>Also want to understand how we arrived at this number,

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 2>these recommended numbers, which have been revised down over the

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 2>past fifty years.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they have been revised down. To me, most of

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the data that has led to the revising down of

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>these numbers is based on blood pressure, because there is

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>honestly very little at this point controversy left about the

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>data that pretty clearly shows that a reduction in salt

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>intake from that about four grams of sodium, which is

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>our average. Reduction from that reduces blood pressure, especially on

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a population level, and in most studies it reduces it

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to what would be considered a clinically relevant to so

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>like about the same amount that you would see if

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you were starting someone on an anti hypertensive medication at

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a low dose, right, so not quite as good as

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure medicine, but you know at a population level

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be reducing blood pressure by reducing sodium

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>intake from that current average of about four grams. The

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>exact amount that you're going to get is going to

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>very study to study. There's a lot of individual variation.

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Not every person gets the same degree of benefit, but

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>across the board, like studies don't argue that lower sodium diets,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Both interventional studies and observational studies agree that a reduction

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in sodium intake and lower sodium diets reduce blood pressure. Now,

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure is one of the major risk factors for

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>cardiovascular disease, including heart attack, heart failure, stroke, and death

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from cardiovascular disease. High blood pressure is one of the

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>major risk factors, so the biggest risk of diets that

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are high in sodium is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is where so much of this controversy lies.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Is now the time to ask what the mechanism is

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>between sodium intake and blood pressure?

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Great question? Yes, now is a great time to ask.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 1>So there's a complicated answer, which is a lot of

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>like we don't quite know and the mechanisms da da

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>da da. And then there's a simple answer, which is

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that when you consume more salt, because you're not excreting

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of it, some additional salt is going

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to stay in your body and that is going to

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>tell your kidneys to hold not even tell your kidneys,

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of force your kidneys to hold on to water

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>because water follows sodium yep. And so as your blood

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>volume spans and your extracellular fluid volume expands because it

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>will because you're holding on to water. By holding on

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>to sodium, that is going to cause an increase in

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>your blood pressure because you're increasing the volume in your

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>blood and.

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Just more is shooting through those vessels.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, you've got more sodium or holding onto more water,

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So now you have more fluids, so you have more pressure. Okay, Now,

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, if you're kidneys, which sense this

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>increase in volume and sense this increase in blood pressure.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>What they should do is excrete more sodium because they

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>can sense this and they can say, oh, we need

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of some sodium in order to get

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of some water because our pressure is too high.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So what exactly happens in these especially long term high

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>sodium diets, because this is not like a today tomorrow

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 1>type of situation. This is like a long term trend

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that we see, Okay, especially in places where there are

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>high sodium diets for a very long time. There's in

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like an increasing effect of high sodium diet with age

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and with time, And so what exactly is going on

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and what other miscommunications are happening between you know, our

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>reunnin and geotensin system and aldosterone and all of these

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>hormones and our kidneys and the receptors in our carotids

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that are also telling our kidneys in our brain how

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>much blood pressure we have. Like there's some miscommunication that's

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>going on that leads to over time and increase in

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And so our kidneys are just is it our kidneys

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 2>that aren't responding as well?

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is it that's part of what we think is

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's like, for some reason or another there's a

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>loss of some of this feedback where they're not able

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to sense this increase in blood pressure, or in some

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>cases they even maybe go, hey, let's activate this system

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and actually increase blood pressure more or something weird, like

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a like a paradoxical kind of response. So it's not

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like a super clear cut but and it's most basic.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You can think of it as you're increasing the amount

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of sodium, therefore you're increasing fluid, therefore you're increasing pressure.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Why does age play a role?

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, age plays such a huge role in our

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>cardiovascular health overall. We see like a decrease in elasticity

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of the vessels. So is it that they're not able

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to expand to that increasing volume. There's a chronic inflammation

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, Like there's so there's so much So

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a different question. But yeah, so that's how

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we think that blood pressure is like involved with sodium. Right,

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So then the question is if we know that blood

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure is such a huge risk for cardiovascular disease, and

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>diets that are high end sodium increase your blood pressure,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>do they increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and that

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>question has been fracked with so much controversy. Yeah, it has,

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>so let me try and break it down a little bit. Okay,

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly all of the large scale meta analyzes that have

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>been done to look at this question, does reducing sodium

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>intake decrease cardiovascular mortality? All of these large scale meta

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>analyzes do show a significant reduction in risk of stroke,

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>heart attack, cardiovascular disease, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. The quality, though,

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of this data is not as good as the strength

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the data that we have for this direct association

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>between sodium and blood pressure. We don't have long term

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>randomized clinical trial because that is very hard to do.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>As I said, at the first hand account, the estimates

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that I have seen are that to get really good

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>data on this, you would have to enroll between seventeen

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and thirty seven thousand people. You'd have to follow

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>them for a number of years because you need to

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have enough unfortunately bad cardiovascular outcomes to be able to

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>get that data, and it would cost between four hundred

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and nine hundred million dollars. So I know some people

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>who could fund that, you know what I'm saying. Not

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like personally.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>But but are they willing?

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Are they willing? No? But what it also seems to

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>me is that a lot of this controversy about the

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>strength of this data and whether it is real or

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not hinges on a couple of types of data and

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of studies that have come out. One of

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>them is not just one study but a few studies.

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Like one type of study has found that there might

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>be an increased risk of cardiovascular disease or death from

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>cardiovascular disease at very low sodium intakes, closer to that

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>one point two grams of sodium that a lot of

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>people actually recommend, right right right, So there are some

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>studies that suggest who have looked at like the lowest,

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the intermediate, and high sodium intake levels, some studies suggest

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that actually the risk of cardiovascar disease is very clear

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>above like four to five grams of sodium intake a day. Okay,

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>so like eight to ten grams of salt that is

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>too much, But the recommendation should be more like three

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to four grams of intake and not this super restrictive

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one point five to two point three grams of sodium intake.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what some of these studies say, okay, now the critics,

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I know you have questions like why what the critics,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the mechanism? Yeah, yeah, what's the mechanism? Great question.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Okay, I don't know. They have not

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>offered a mechanistic explanation. And some of the critics of

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>these studies that have looked at what they call this

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>J shaped curve right where like lowest intake is potentially

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>harmful and higher intake is potentially harmful, so there's a

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot in the middle. Some of the critics of

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>this say, look, in those studies that have looked at

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>low intake or that have shown low intake to be

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>potentially dangerous, that could actually be from what's called reverse causality,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>because in those studies they included a lot of people

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 1>who also already had known cardiovascular disease or high blood

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.919
<v Speaker 1>pressure or heart failure. Those people might be more likely

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to be on a low sodium diet because they've been

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>advised to cut out salt from their diet, and then

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they die from cardiovascular disease.

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 2>It's very interesting that that is not something that would

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>have been controlled for or right, you know, in those studies.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly, so mays like, actually need some better

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>studies on this stuff. It's bananas. They also criticize some

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of the like methodological issues with some of those studies

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>because they relied more on like spot urine rather than

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour urine, which is how we measure sodium

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>intake more reliably. But that's just like a lot of

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like it all just points to the fact that like

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these people say this data is not strong enough to

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>show a strong link, and these people say this data

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is not strong enough to show a strong link, and

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it's like, my goodness, Okay, oh.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting. I think, like also in the context

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 2>of evolutionary history, like our hominin ancestors. But at the

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 2>same time, though, like how cardio of I don't even

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 2>want to like this is like such a can of worms.

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, listen, Yeah, there's multiple kinds of worms that you're

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>about to talk about, and I want to get at

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>one that you're saying this evolutionary history thing, because listen,

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the other camp of people who seem super adamant that

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we should not be pushing for lower sodium, that we

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>should not be having our medical societies have a push

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>for sodium. It should not be a public health goal.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be in this group. Get ready for this?

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I get I'm too excited, they claim based on their data,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they have done all these studies. They've looked at like

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand people using these really great, high quality twenty

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>four hour year in studies across a number of different

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>countries with different cultures, et cetera. And over the last

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty years they say there's been no substantial change in

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>our salt intake over time, and it follows a normal

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>distribution between about two point six grams and four point

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>eight grams of sodium a day. And therefore they say

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that is our physiologic need of salt because for the

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>last fifty years it hasn't changed, and because it follows

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a normal distribution, that is what our physiological requirements are.

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a true argument that people are making in

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of studies. It seems to be mostly one

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>dude who makes this arm and then get cited over

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and over and over in all the studies that are saying, well,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this J shaped curve and don't you know our physiologic need?

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, you cannot tell a human's physiologic need

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>from fifty years of data. That's a post industrial revolutionary

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You're kidding me, m I was aghast.

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm not surprised the this is one of

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the most heated debates. I really is. It's like it

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 2>also doesn't feel like a debate too it or like

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it feels like the arguments for we are like that

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 2>is a ridiculous claim.

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>To me, and yet Aaron, it is so cited. Okay,

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this J shaped curve, it seems like we need to

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>investigate a little bit more. What is the ideal amount

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of assault consumption? That is, at its core the major question.

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>There is no doubt that diets very high in sodium,

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>especially over that four g of sodium, which is what's average,

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to increase your risk for blood pressure, and

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>almost all the data also agrees that that will increase

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>your risk for cardiovascular disease between this like one point

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>five to four grams. There's people who just want to

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 1>like fine tune this debate, which makes sense at a

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.959
<v Speaker 1>public health level, like we need to have recommendations, right, sure,

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but like I just the arguments that are trying to

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>be made, I just I'm like, I get.

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in the past fifty years, how many people

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 2>are smoking cigarettes? Like, does that mean that that's a

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>physiological need? Right?

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what? Also, the rates of hypertension have

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 1>also been stable over that exact same time period in

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>which our salt consumption has been stable. So like, that

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't tell us anything. It literally doesn't tell us anything.

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Our awareness and treatment have actually improved. So that's nice,

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but like, come on, it's not just blood pressure. Also,

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>there are more and more studies and more and more

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>data coming out that dietheset a high end sodium are

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>also linked to a number of other potential diseases or

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>whole body system changes that might result in disease. We

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>see increases in inflammation, we see a potential for increased

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>risk in autoimmune diseases. We see changes in the gut microbiome,

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and we see associations with certain cancers, especially stomach cancer.

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And we don't fully understand the mechanisms of these, but

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 1>we know that more and more data is coming out

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that these exist, and so people are looking into like

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>what could these mechanisms be. It seems to be that

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>there's like changes in our T cell response, there's this

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>like pro inflammatory state there's an increased in scret muscle contraction,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 2>That's I think that's that's interesting too, This argument about well,

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 2>this is our physiological need. If we have less than this,

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 2>then we'll die and this is what we whatever. Like

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 2>that also, I think, doesn't it dismisses these health these

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 2>potential health res as something that is not linked to salt.

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 2>But it because otherwise we would be eating less salt,

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>right because otherwise, or we would have adapted to consume

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 2>more salt somehow, the human species over the past five

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 2>thousand years. But the other thing too, is that these

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 2>all of these chronic conditions for the most part, like

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 2>you said, there's this age component to it, yes, and

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 2>so in which case, like it just is, yeah, it

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make sense.

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I know. It's there's also an argument that's like, well,

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we can't consume a lower sodium diet in our current

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>society and it would require such a societal shift that

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>therefore we shouldn't recommend it. Like what, it's too hard

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to do, so we shouldn't do it. High sodium intake

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is also associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kidney stones, and we think that it's by a similar mechanism,

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>because when you are consuming more sodium, then you will

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>have increased excretion of sodium, and calcium follows sodium the

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>same way that water does soday. Okay, and overall, the

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>World Health Organization estimates that there are nearly two million,

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the most reason data I saw said one point eight

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>nine million excess deaths every year that are due to

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:15.280
<v Speaker 1>excessive sodium consumption.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So I have some questions now, uh huh, give

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 2>it to me. So, like we talked about, there is

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 2>variation in individual sensitivity to sodium and the impact of sodium.

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the reasons for that, and how

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 2>does that sort of just come out in the wash

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 2>when we're talking about the levels of sodium that we're

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a really important question. So there's this phenomenon

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that is talked about in the literature of like salt sensitivity,

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so called salt sensitivity, right, And the thought is that

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's like fifty percent or or less, or some

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>studies say more of people whose blood pressure specifically actually

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>responds to an increase in dietary sodium. So they call

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>those people salt sensitive. That is not a term that

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can be easily measured. There is not an agreed upon

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>degree of salt sensitivity. How much of an increase in

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>your blood pressure do you need to have to be

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>considered salt sensitive. That's not a there's not a metric

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for that. But overall, yes, it is the case that

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>not everyone's blood pressure is going to increase necessarily as

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a result of an increase in salt intake. Some people

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>might have very low blood pressure on average, and in

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>fact need more salt in their diet in order to

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>maintain their blood pressure, and they could be at risk

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of hypotension having too low of blood pressure if they're

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>not getting enough dietary sodium.

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 2>What is clinical hypotension?

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it depends on your age, but and it depends

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on your if you're symptomatic or not.

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, okay, symptomatic meaning you're faint or like you could.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Faint, you could pass out. But it kind of depends.

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Usually if you're talking about like under an nineties over sixties,

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's pretty low, ok But someone who's you know,

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>always quite a lot higher than that and suddenly drops,

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>then you might consider that hypertensive. It kind of just

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>cost okay, Okay, but yeah, so it does depend. But

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there it is the case that not every person needs

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the exact amount of salt in their diet. Public health

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>recommendations don't apply exactly to every single individual. Equally, if

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you have certain conditions, you might need to follow slightly

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>different recommendations. Then what is like the World Health Organization,

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the CDC, the FDA, they are making recommendations for the

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>general public, and it's estimated that over seventy to eighty

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of adults are consuming significantly more than two point

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>three grams of sodium per day. So the advice to

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>reduce sodium applies to most people, not to everyone, which

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>is also why you shouldn't be taking medical advice from

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>podcasts or Instagram content creators because it doesn't apply to everyone.

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>There's also another huge confounder that we haven't even talked

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about yet, and that is that this is true of

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>all nutritional studies. But it's very true in all of

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>these studies that look at blood pressure and cardiovascular disease

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and sodium, and that is that you cannot change only

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>your sodium intake.

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how different? Like what, Yeah, the foods that you're eating.

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The foods that you eat will change there is a

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.879
<v Speaker 1>very solid amount of data that shows an inverse relationship

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>between potassium intake, for example, and blood pressure and cardiovascular disease,

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>meaning for most people. Not true for everyone, because if

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you have kidney disease, this might not apply. But for

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>most people, increasing your potassium intake can reduce your blood

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure and in some cases offset some of the effects

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of sodium. A lot of our nutrient dense whole foods,

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, these are high in potassium. Also,

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 1>many of our salt substitutes. If people are going to

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>swap out their salt that they're sprinkling or cooking with

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for a salt substitute, they're switching their sodium for potassium.

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:17.399
<v Speaker 2>What are some of these salt substitutes.

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I don't know. You just buy them at the grocery. Toot.

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It's called like substitutional substitute. It's a potassium salt. Sometimes

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just like pure what they're Yeah, sometimes they're pure potassium.

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they're like a mixture of sodium chloride and like

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a potassium chloride or a potassium another potassium salt. There's

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>been some really interesting data actually on using those, and

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>then some of the really strong data is from like

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a big study in China where they took entire villages

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, you guys are getting salt substitute

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and you guys are getting real salt. And they saw

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>significant decreases in cardiovascular mortality and strokes and all of

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>these things, and decreases in blood pressure in the salt

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>substitute group. But you can't quite disentangle the effects of

0:45:57.120 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>potassium and sodium in that right, because they're connected.

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 2>They're connected. And also, like you do a sub salt substitute,

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 2>but most people don't. Most of the dietary salt that

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 2>we consume is not from salt that we sprinkle on foods.

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 2>It's from the salt that's in the foods.

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 1>In the US, that's absolutely true. In this part of

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>China where they were doing it, most of their sodium

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>actually does come from discretionary sources. So that's why it's

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>an interesting study in that case. But yes, you're right,

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for us, for most people in the US, in Canada,

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, our sodium consumption is mostly coming from things

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that are not the salt shaker on our table. I

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's most estimates are like fifteen percent or something

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of our sodium intake comes from adding salt to our foods.

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Most of it comes from the fact that every single

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>food that comes in a package has sodium added to it.

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so there is something to be said for

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that all of the trials that have looked

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at long term sodium trends do not find that people

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>are able to reliably stick to low sodium diets. Usually

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>less than ten percent of people in these studies can

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>stick to these limits of less than two grams or so.

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I do not buy the argument that this is physiologically

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>driven at like an evolutionary level. This is a reflection

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of our food systems and the fact that it is

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>very difficult even when you're trying to avoid sodium. But

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean it's not an important conversation, right, because

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're recommending fifteen hundred milligrams of sodium and it's

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>impossible to do that in our grocery stores, you're setting

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>people up for failure. So that's a problem too.

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And it's also like more time consuming, more expensive.

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Often it's like you're yeah, it's hard.

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here, and like at the bottom line, to me, okay, Kenna,

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if I can conclude, please, the biggest problem, the unspoken

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>piece in all of these conversations about sodium and health

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and blood pressure is the same story as food dies.

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what about food?

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Does single piece of our food system arin?

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's some really interesting data that there's these long

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:12.439
<v Speaker 1>term studies that have been done on Japanese Americans living

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hawaii and Japanese people living in Japan, and they

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>look at cardiovascular disease and blood pressure and all of

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>these rates. We have and die from cardiovascular disease in

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the US at substantially higher rates than people in Japan.

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Like when you compare US to japan data, Japan has

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the best health metrics out there. They also

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>consume so much sodium, significantly more sodium on average than

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in America than in the US. And in these studies

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that have looked at Japanese men and women and Japanese

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>American men and women living in Hawaii, we see higher

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>blood pressure in Japanese populations living in Japan, and yet

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>higher cardiovascular disease in Japanese Americans living in Hawaii. Because

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>guess what, it's not just sodium that's different in their diets.

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>There's higher intakes of omega three fatty acids, there's higher

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>total cholesterol intakes. There's also interestingly higher rates of smoking

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 1>and alcohol use, but lower intakes of total calories and

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>protein and fat including saturated fatty acids. Nothing that we

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 1>eat is in isolation. Ye right, Yeah, so, yes, it

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is important to have these dietary guidelines, but these exist

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in the context of so many other foods, and it

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is one single part of your overall food system.

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 2>This is fascinating and I feel like there is a

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to me, there is like a clear answer in many ways.

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Your sodium, yeah, am I Yeah, Honestly, while I was reading,

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to use less. I use a lot

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 2>of salt. But I think I think you're right, Like

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 2>my Yes, I can reduce my discretionary salt, but am

0:49:56.480 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I still gonna want, you know, salty crackers and stuff. Yeah,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 2>so I'm going to try to less or at least

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:08.879
<v Speaker 2>try to eat more whole foods.

0:50:08.280 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, we all need to be doing that,

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that's true.

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but yeah, I think I think it's like because

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I have. The more salt I eat,

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the more I want, and then it becomes like a problem.

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So maybe I'll try you know what, you know what,

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I do kind of want to try it. To the

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 2>salt alternatives, Yeah yeah.

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>My husband Trek got really into those for a while.

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:32.879
<v Speaker 1>We had a lot of potassium salt in the house

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for a while.

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm intrigued.

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, Well, if you're also intrigued and want to

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 1>learn more about this debate or whether you should reduce

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:46.920
<v Speaker 1>your salt intake or not. My favorite paper, honestly was

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the one that I pulled that first hand account from,

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was by Hunter at All in Nature of

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Views and Nephrology twenty twenty two, The Impact of Excessive

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Salt Intake on Human Health. I thought that they did

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good job of explaining all of the controversy

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of providing the data. I know, not on quote unquote

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>both sides, but like providing all of the data. They

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely have a bent, they think that we're eating too

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:10.240
<v Speaker 1>much salt. But I really enjoyed that paper. I also

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>read it piecemeal, and I wish I had just read

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it all the way through at the beginning, because it

0:51:14.000 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 1>was most of my stuff ended up putting from there.

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But I was like reading it and then I found others. Anyways,

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a great paper. There's also some interesting ones about

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like our regulation of salt appetite and like the you know,

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the salt drive and everything. So I have a couple

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of papers on that. And then literally, I mean so

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>just so many papers. I think. Another great one was

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 1>from twenty eighteen by he at All the Role or

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>He and McGregor. It was the role of salt intake

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in prevention of cardiovascular disease Controversies and challenges. I enjoyed

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that one, but there's so many, including all of the

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>controversial ones. You can find them on our website this

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast wkay dot com under the episode's tab.

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 2>episode and all of our episodes.

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to Leon and Tom and Pete and Brent

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jessica and everyone else that is exactly right for

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:06.240
<v Speaker 1>making all of this possible.

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, thank you, and thank you to you listeners.

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I hope you liked these episodes. Let us know what

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you think.

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm very curious. Yeah, how much sodium do you eat?

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to tell me that you don't. There's

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 1>no judgment here. And a special shout out as always

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to our patrons, thank you so much for your support.

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It means the world to us.

0:52:31.760 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Until next time, wash your hands, you filthy animals.