WEBVTT - Minds of Musical Emptiness

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stop

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Work dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and my name is Christian Seger.

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey Robert, he ever met a person who doesn't like music?

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I do not think I've ever met anyone who just

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>across the board doesn't like music. I've certainly met plenty

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of people who seem to dislike music in certain scenarios

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>because I'm the kind of type of types of music, well,

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>types of music, but also music in certain situations, like

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I've certainly known people who don't like music while driving.

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm of the mindset I want music on all the time,

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just about music of my own choosing, but music. I

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of our colleagues have difficulty writing while

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>there's music on. I don't have that problem, although I

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>do like sort of cultivate playlists of stuff that helps

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>me to write, you know, mostly instrumental stuff. But there's

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>certain music that I can listen to that has vocals

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that I can listen to all writing. But yeah, so

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I know, like you like, I've known like

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>various sort of iterations of people who can't listen to

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>music during certain times. I've only meant like one or

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>two people in my life who just don't. They literally

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>say I don't like music, And that's so alien, so

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>difficult for us to comprehend, because it's like hearing someone say, oh,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't like food, like I don't like

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>drinking liquids. It almost seems inhuman in a way. And

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think like when you hear that, at least in

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>my experience, people will kind of think like, oh, that's

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the trade of a psychopath, right, But it's not. It's

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>actually not. We've talked about psychopaths on the show and

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't come up as one of the symptoms. But also,

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>as we're going to talk about today, this is a

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>real brain condition. Yeah, at least a couple of different

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>conditions we're going to discuss, and I think they both

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>serve to remind us just how tenuous our sensory experience

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the world really is. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean, like,

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>think about you and me, right, Like the audience probably knows,

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>if they don't already, that you are really into electronic

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>music and you cover it for stuff to blow your mind,

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd say weekly, right, Yeah, and um, and I as

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>many people have heard on other episodes, grew up in

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the punkin metal scene and still listen to a lot

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff, which a lot of people find unlistenable

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>and dissonant, including you know, my wife and um, I'm

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>okay with that. But it's interesting because dissonance plays into

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>these diseases as well. Well, here's a quick question for you,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think this helps to sort of this helps

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us, uh, try and comprehend what some

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of these conditions are. Like, Yeah, like what what's the

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>type of music that you just really don't get that

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you just you can't really listen to, you don't understand,

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and and you're just willing to say, yeah, I that

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is not for me usually like np R style jazz.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say jazz in general, because there's

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of stuff that's being done in that area that's

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting and I like, but like that kind of like

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>background elevator music jazz, you know what I mean? Like

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that that drives me crazy. It's like fingers on a

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>chalkboard for me. It's I have to say jazz as well.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>And part of this could be I mean the view

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the jazz takes some getting used to.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to be you have to immerse yourself in it.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>And I like some jazz, and I like jazzy elements

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and some of the music I listened to from time

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to time. But it's that jazzy jazz that's spacey jazz,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that that completely unhinged jazz that just kind of gives

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>me to shape, making me think of this joke on

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Parks and Rack. I don't know if you remember this,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but the their local MPR station, they had a show

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and they would say jazz plus jazz equals jazz. Whenever

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I hear something like that, I'm like, nope. There. In

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the general, I often think about it that it's maybe

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>like a like a strong alcoholic property, you know, some

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>strong liqueur that you would never drink on your on

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>its own, but you would use in a recipe or

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>would you would certainly use in them using a mixed drink.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So I often think, well, that is that is the strong,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>undeluded stuff that is not for me. Yeah, but you

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>can put a like a shot of it, or like

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I will. I don't drink clearly, so shots a lot,

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know a little bit, it's like adding grenadine

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to your to your soda or something like, yeah, you

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>could drink and given a little flavor. Well, like punk

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is is one of those things. I think about this

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's like pure punk. I just it's not my scene,

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not what I dig. But I've certainly loved groups

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that have elements of punk in their sound. They either

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>come out of punk or find some of their musical

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>genre to combine it with, Like um oh the Pokes

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>come to mind. Yeah, share a little bit of Irish music,

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of punk music. It's really I would

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be hard pressed to want to listen to Irish or

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>punk mu look on their own, but when these two

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>come together, then I you know, I've always enjoyed it. Yeah, No,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I can definitely see that, even like having spent many

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a year in basements watching just like crusty punk bands

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>just hammering out four chord songs. Uh, I can understand

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from and that that sort of has

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>led to like what a lot of our I guess,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like popular alternative music is nowadays. Right, it's like a

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fusion of punk and jazz or punkin metal, or where

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe and I were just talking the other night about

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Scott like nineties and how that was sort of something

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, well, okay, enough about our musical interests.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>But so clearly we're human beings who love music. We've

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>got opinions about music. We like to talk about it,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we like to listen to it, we got to shows. Um.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But there's people out there who don't. And it's not

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just because you know they don't, they don't go to

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>things like that, or they're just not. It's because there's

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>literally something going on in their brain that makes it

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so that they're capable of enjoying music. Something's wired differently.

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Some systems are online in a slightly different array, and

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we will get into into these in a moment, but

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>before we do, without it be helpful to just go

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead and give a nice overview of the cognitive experience

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of music, just basically what's going on when we process it.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So music is of course a deep part of our

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>cognitive architecture. It changes our mood, it heightens our emotions,

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it summons and banishes memories, It affects the manner in

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>which we preceive perceived time. Even we can actually use

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it to treat illnesses of the mind and body. So

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's powerful stuff. It's potent stuff that's not even just

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with human beings. There's been research done on plants that

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>music affects plants, so we're talking about some serious magic here.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>There are parts of the brain that respond to music

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that that don't respond to language. There are separate parts

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of the brain that respond to melody, to the melody

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of language, different than these different for the parts of

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the brain the respond to the melody of music. They

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are parts of the brain that deal with movement, attention, planning,

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and memory, and these all respond to music even though

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't have anything to do with the actual auditory process.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot going on behind the scenes, and

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and we don't fully understand it yet. I mean, I

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>would say this research well, you know, we'll talk about

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it later, but really, only in the last century have

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we even been aware of this as a medical condition.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But only in maybe the last twenty or thirty years

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>has there have been like real deep research into what

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this means. Yeah, and certainly there's a lot of wonderful

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>research out there about our relationship with music, and we

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can't cover it all here, but just a couple of

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>i think illuminating studies to to touch on here um in.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>In recent years, we found that you can look to

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the brain via f m R I, and specifically you

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>can look at brain activity in the nucleus incumbence. This

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is involved in the formation of expectations, and we can

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>actually tell if a person is enjoying the music they're

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to by looking at at brain activity in this region.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>If it's meeting their musical expectations and matching up with

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the stored templates of what you've heard before, then you

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>see stuff light up. Um, yeah, I could absolutely believe

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that given my experience with music. Yeah, Like if you're

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just like I don't know, Like here's an example, Like

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I walk around sometimes and I'll just have like my

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>entire music library on shuffle on my phone or something

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, Like one like really great song from my

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>high school days will pop up, and it's like I

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>can feel like, whatever those lights are that are going

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on in my brain just activate, you know. Yeah. Yeah.

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>The expectation plays such an interesting role in our experiencing music,

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>because on one hand, there's there's something that happens when

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a when a melody or a tune or the lyrics

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>take you to that place you're expecting it to go

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but then also when it goes to a slightly different

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>place where it kind of you think it's going to

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>turn left and it turns right. But that animates you

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's it's it's almost like narrative without words. Really.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Ah yeah, that's a really interesting way to put it.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I um, I'll just do a little bit of subjective

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>experience here to throw in here. I'm not like, personally

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of The Cure, but a friend of

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mine is, uh and if he's listening her, this is

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your story. So The Cure just played in Atlanta recently,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like I think like two weeks ago. Did you know

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>about this? Oh? Yeah, I have. I have some friends

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>who are really they went to this show. So the

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>way that he told me was that, like, apparently this

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>tour was like you know, they're going to be playing

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>all their greatest hits or whatever, but that was sort

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of like a different arrangement of the musical instruments. So

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he was really excited because he's like, well, I'm gonna

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>hear the songs that I love and it's gonna be

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>played by the guys who wrote them, but they're going

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to be playing them in very different ways than I'm

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>used to and that's a wholly new experience. Oh yeah,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I've had an experience with I guess uh, tool has

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.599
<v Speaker 1>been been worth seems like the kind of band that

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>would do something like that. They'll play with the intro

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>on something and so the live version at first you're

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure what it's going to be, but then then

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you realize, oh, it's it's this track, it's that track, whatever,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the particular track maybe, and there's this, you know, a

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>physical experience of excitement totally. When I was, you know,

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>still involved in the music scene and just go into

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shows, the thing that was always the

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>most impressive to me, and that just showed like a

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>real classic professional touring band, was when they could play

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>an entire set without stopping, Like they would just start

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and their songs. They had figured out ways to weave

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>their songs in and out of one another, so they

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>would just play like a really tight thirty forty minutes

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>set and then boom, they were done, got off on stage.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>And that is the kind of thing that just floors you.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>It's just like you don't have time to stop and

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>breathe and kind of judge them. Uh, for other factors

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like whatever they're wearing, or what they say in between

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>songs or something. You're just like bombarded. Well, that's one

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that I've been so into DJ mixes

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Uh, it's not quite the same as

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a as a band performing their entire set without stop,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but the the idea that you can take various musical

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>elements and and a talented DJ it can create a

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>seamless tapestry of sound. I love that, and certainly you

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>get those six surprises, those expectations met or skewed throughout

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that sonic narrative as well. So all right, we're clearly

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>establishing that we're music nerds. We love music, and whatever

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>parts of the brain that don't work for for some

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of these people, they're they're lighting up like fireworks for us. Now.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Another key point though, is certainly you've been to a

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>concert or performance and you've been experiencing the music, and

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe you've seen somebody like clearly their significant other drug

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>them here and they're not enjoying it, or they got

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a free ticket and you said drug them. I thought

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>drug early gave them drugs so that they would just

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>sit put. But yeah, that's that's that's possible, depending on

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>these both. Yeah, so you've seen people that are not

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>into it, or they're they don't they're clearly they're the

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>first time or maybe they you don't feel like they

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be enjoying the music on the same level

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as you are. Yeah, possibly and and certainly like and

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to applaud my wife again, like she's indulged

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>me by you know, sometimes I can't get a friend

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to go with me to a particular kind of thing,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, all right, you know, let's I'll go

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with you. You know, we'll go see Converge and High

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on Fire. And she's just sitting there like shaking her

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>head while I'm like really into it, you know. Um,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I get that. Well. It's interesting because despite

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all of our very musical taste, in our varying levels

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of engagement with particular types of music, particular performances, the

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>brain experiences that we have are actually pretty consistent among

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>most people. There was a two thousand thirteen study publishing

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the European Journal of Euroscience, and they found that if

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>two people listened to the same track, one inexperienced fan

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of the music and another not the other one. Just

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like a newcomer you know, there's been dragged in there

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>by their spouse. You're still going to see the same

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>synchronization in several key brain areas and similar brain activity.

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So as much as you you know, might like to

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're experiencing your favorite band and an entirely different

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>cognitive level than the you know, the dumb guy next

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>to you with the glories on his fingers, Um, that

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be quite the case. We're still engaging

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like the same networks. I wonder if this is similar

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to like research that's been done on depression and anxiety

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in that like, Um, the more you listen to the

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>songs over and over again, right like, it's maybe it's

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like a like writing over the same pathway of the

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>brain over and over and over again, so it makes

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it easier for that experience to happen. It's happening in

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the same way for everybody, but it's just kind of

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>going through the brain. I don't know how to describe

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this other than with like road metaphors, right Like, it's

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like going down the same road, but it's just like

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going down faster for for us, or something that plays

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in expectation right where the road is gonna turn, where

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna split. Yeah. Interesting, huh. I wonder if anybody's

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>done research on that, like the the the experience of

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>having music encoded to the brain as being similar to

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of expectations that encode anxiety into people. Yeah.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I will have to follow up on that, because I

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>know there have been a number of studies that have

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>looked into, you know, the potential therapeutic aspects of music,

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as the role of music and in various

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>emotional states. Yeah. Right, and you think about it, like

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the emotional states that are created by listening

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to music have very similar symptoms to anxiety. Huh. All right,

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's a future episode. We'll have to dig deep

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for that one. But let's take a quick break and

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>then when we come back, we're going to talk about

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the condition of a musia or tone deafness. All right,

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So this first one, tone deaf deafness, a musia.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is gonna be the one where

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see far more listeners who can share experiences

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>with this. Certainly we've probably all encounter people with varying

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>levels of tone deafness over the years. Yeah, and it

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like tone deafness has variations on it, like extremes

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or you know, some people have it to to less

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>an extent than others. The term congenital amusia is what

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we use to denote tone deafness that you're born with.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>It's been described in medical literature for more than a century,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and it manifests basically as a severe deficiency in processing

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>pitch variations. Now this extends to impairments in musical memory

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and recognition, as well as what we traditionally think of

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>his tone deafness as like bad singing or the inability

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to tap in time with music. Right um, everybody's right

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>now is probably thinking of like the person who I

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know was inquired or something that they just couldn't

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>hit the notes. Yeah um. Some literature also refers to

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a musia as dismelodia or dismusia, but the term amusia

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is generally agreed to be preferable because it acknowledges the

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>possibility that there exists as many forms of congenital amusias

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>as there are forms of acquired amusias. And what I

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is accidental brain damage. So you can

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>hurt yourself a variety of ways that will also produce

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this effect. Now, to clarify, congenital means present from birth,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but it is possible to acquire a musia through brain

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>damage in life. The very first study that looked at

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this was done in eighteen seventy eight by a guy

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>named Grant Allen, and he was investigating a thirty year

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>old man with a neurological lesion that gave him this,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>as he referred to it, then severe musical handicap um.

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe some of you out there wondering right now,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like I can relate to this, is this me well,

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it could be a recent study found that out of

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred people who self declared them selves as having

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a handicap for music, only twenty two so actually exhibited

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the traits of a musea after they were tested with

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a formal questionnaire. And the way that this questionnaire worked.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It tested your aptitude for scale, interval and contour information,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as melodic organization dimension, rhythm and meter, and

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>temporal organization dimension. They also tested memory recognition ability connected

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to music. Now, those who are tone deaf are generally

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>unable to hear the differences in pitch and tone that

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us here, we joke about this, right,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that there's always like uh and I imagine

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>with like movies like Pitch Perfect or TV shows like Glee, like,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there must be tons of joke about jokes about tone Deafnessily,

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems like every long running show ever has had

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>at least an episode where oh, it's the person who

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>can't sing, but they don't realize they can't sing us.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's a common enough of a thing that it

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>shows up in some pop culture narrative and we all

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>recognize it. Uh. We use the phrase really to describe

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>people who don't understand simple communication strategies to write, like

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like even outside of it, we've turned into this metaphor

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for like, ah, well, he's tone deaf, so that's why

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't understand what we're talking about here. It's not

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>even we're using it on a on a level beyond

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like its actual medical application. Right. And it's most extreme though,

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>People who are tone deaf are unable to even perceive

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>music the same way that the rest of us do,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and it comes down to an actual difference in their

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>brain structure. Uh. And it's different from those like you know,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Robert and myself for whom music comes naturally. Okay, it's

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>actually defined as a learning disability. There's a team from

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the University of Montreal who have first published an empirical

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>study on it, and that's their delineation. So, for instance,

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>most children, and I didn't realize this, but this is

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>probably a common experience for you. Most children learned to

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>sing at the same time that they're learning to speak, right,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so they're like kind of like singing words. Like I

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was a babysitting a friend of ours four year old

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the other night, and he was singing constantly, but then

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he would just kind of talk to himself too. Oh yeah,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that's my experience with my son Bastion is um, there's

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of talking at this point

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he's four, but there's also a lot of singing. He

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>will just burst into song about the silliest things, to

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>the point we're just like, all right, you just you

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can't sing about butter anymore. Just just eat, don't play

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>with the butter, and don't sing about the butter for

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>just consumed butter. Well, that sounds like he is not

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>tone deaf, because tone deaf children don't do this singing

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're younger. Uh. And this is where this this

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>woman seems to be like the expert on this, Like

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>every study I was looking at, she was somehow involved

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in Her name's Isabelle Perette's and that's when she gave

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it the official disorder, congenital amusia. Uh. It's innate in

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>these people's brain, the lack of musical perception. And it's

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>also hereditary. Uh. They found that congenital amusia is genetically transmitted.

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Thirty of the people who have first degree relatives with

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this cognitive disorder also have it. However, if you look

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at control groups, only three percent habit and control and

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 1>control group families. However, congenital amusia doesn't seem to result

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from any particular family environment. It's not like I don't know, Uh,

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you can somehow connect it to like alcoholics or something

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. Right, Like, there doesn't seem to be an

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>environmental source that's causing this. It seems to be genetic. Remember,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>though genes don't specify cognitive function, they actually influence brain development.

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>So the next step that these researchers are looking at is,

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>let's identify the genes that relate to these neuroanatomical anomalies

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that are found in the brains of people who have amusia. Now, interestingly,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that three percent control group almost lines up exactly with

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>what they've found to be the percentage of people in

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the population who have it. Four percent seems to be

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the number of people in general population who are a

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>music They grow up with normal exposure to music and

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are otherwise capable of doing everything else everybody else does.

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>They're intelligent, they're educated. This only affects their ability to

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>recognize pitch and music, and it doesn't apply to language.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the really fascinating part. Right. The musics can

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>process speech as well as environmental sounds like I don't know,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>like an animal's cry or something right, or voices. They

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>can understand all of that. They can even understand the

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>pitch changes in different languages like you know a little Chinese.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I spent some time in China. You know how important

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>pitch is the difference in words. They're fine with that,

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's only with the music that they have this

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>pitch problem. Well, it reminds me of some of the

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bits we we discussed earlier about how our brains process

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>music and the idea that your brain is processing it

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>separately from the music itself. They based on all of

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>these other factors, So I guess it stands a reason

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>someone would even you know, fairly significant musa here could

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>still listen to, say a track with some really engaging lyrics,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, and they're gonna get some sort of lyrical

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>experience out of it. Yeah, and maybe maybe even something

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that is thinking of some of the more some of

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the least musical music that I like, some of the

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>more noise branded stuff like, maybe they could listen to

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that and appreciate that on some level that is not

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>as tied to the music, but still somehow tied to

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a sonic experience of the thing. We are going to

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>get back to that. Yeah, there's a there's uh a

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>way that dissonance in particular plays into both regular music

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>listening experience and a music listening experience. But there's actually

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>some music acts that are recorded that are fluent in

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>several languages, so this is it doesn't at all affect

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>their other communicative abilities. Uh. And the way that they

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>figured this out was they use these tests that were

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>originally designed to a sess the presence and specificity of

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>musical disorders and patients with brand damage. The big one

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the difficulty in detecting pit related changes, right,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>especially when that extends into dissonance, which a musical subjects

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have little sensitivity too. So that's interesting, right. So, uh,

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>people who love music, when you create music that has

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>dissonance in it, when tones are playing over one another

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that don't match up the right way, and it just

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds like kind of white noise, some people hate that, right.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I dated a girl once who I remember putting

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on a record in a car and she just said,

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>turn this off. It just sounds like insects. Uh, And

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>she was wrong, but she probably wasn't in music because

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they have very little sensitivity to dissonance. Okay, So I

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>so one with this condition could very well be an

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>exclusive fan of say like Nurse with Wound or early

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>into New Boton, very like throw a xylophone down a

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hallway sort of music. That's what I'm kind of wondering

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is if like these experimental noise fans that are just

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>super into it and that's all they listened to. I

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could have a musia and not even

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>know it, because that's sort of your genre of choice. Um,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't appear, unfortunately, to be something that can be

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote fixed either. Peretza's team has tried teaching kids

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>with the musica to like music. Actually, they basically they

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>gave them MP three players and they said listen to

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this for thirty minutes a day. Not only did the

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>kids fail to improve on their tests, but they how

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>poorly they scored on the test correlated to how much

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they reported listening to the music. UM. So the next

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>steps to to see if there's any kind of way

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to reverse this. Seemed to be some kind of remediation

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 1>training programs that might improve hitch perception and memory. At

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the very least, this will us understand the neurological basis

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for this so that we can use it to diagnose

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>other learning disorders too. So, what what's going on in

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the brain here? Right? Like, let's zoom in take a

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the brain and figure out what exactly the

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>deal is. Well, there's a study by a team in

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>France and they used MTG scanners to figure this out.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>A music people's brains stem from delayed or impaired functioning

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in their frontal and auditory cortex. They also had physical

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>abnormalities in those areas of the brain with more gray

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>matter and less white matter than usual. Now, this is

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>something that's come up on the show a couple of

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>times when we're talking about everything from brain disorders to

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>drug usage. Right, like that white gray matter balance seems

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty important. Again, people with music, they don't

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoy music, but they're capable of enjoying all the other

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>pleasures the rest of us are. Right, It's not like

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>they're dead inside, right, it's just this one area, and

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>arguably an area that that certainly has nothing to do

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with their survival or ability to to move and enjoy

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>life and and and partake of our culture. They're just

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 1>not into the musical aspect of it. Yeah, I mean

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they like food, they like money, they like sex. This

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>has all been tracked in Uh. There was a March

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>six article in the Journal of Current Biology. They looked

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>at this UM. So, Okay, we know it's innate or

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>it's acquired. We know it prevents people from processing music

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the way they do. There's also another way to look

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at this, another terminology called specific musical and hedonia. UH.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is what another studies authors called the inability

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to explain experience pleasure from music in general. So if

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a musia is the like disease, the extreme version where

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't appreciate music at all, is this specific musical

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and hedonia. And in their study, they divided thirty people

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>into three even groups and they were asked to do

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what they called a music task where they listened to

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>class sical pieces of music and then they rated them.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Then they were asked to do a monetary incentive delay task.

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Basically this is gambling um and usually both would induce

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 1>an emotional reaction in the brain. The researchers analyze the

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>heart rate of their subjects and how much they perspired. Now,

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some were quote emotionally oblivious to music that they could

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>tell what they were supposed to be feeling. So they

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>heard the stuff they knew they were supposed to be

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>having some kind of feeling, but their brain wasn't registering it.

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Their brain registered okay, there's some reward system in place.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>When I'm when they were playing around with the money

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and gambling, that was lighting up, but not when they're

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to music. So I'm wondering, this is just me

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>here and maybe I'm way off, But do you think

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a music can also affect a person's timing and tapping

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like fine motor control, because I'm thinking, like,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.719
<v Speaker 1>if you can't tap out a beat along to a song,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>would that affect your fine motor control in terms of

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>like trying to find I don't know. I'm thinking about

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like platform video games where you're trying to like jump

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>from one thing to another at just the exact right time,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of like it was like the old school platformers

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>where they were just insanely difficult and you essentially had

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to know like the exact beats to hit the exact key.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a name to that, right, And I'm wondering if

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that affects them as well, or like for Simon game

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. Oh yeah, that would be a perfect example.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, like they'd just be unable to do Simon.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about that. Again, it comes down to like

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a small loss like Simon wouldn't be a big deal.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But I would imagine if the fine motor control extended

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>into other aspects of your life that might be difficult.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly there was a time when like the

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>predominant game video game was those insane platformers, and if

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you were not able to partake of those. I mean

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you felt like you were missing out a little bit,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like I was just always kind of horrible at them.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And I remember feeling a little left out like I

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I had never beat like I don't think I backed

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>any of those old Nintendo games, and and I did

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like this or something something wrong with me that

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I haven't beat Super Mario Brothers too. I can sort

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of remember that yet, because especially like our generation, the

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>way we played like we all would just huddle around

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the TV and the console right for hours at a time.

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember playing like Mega Man for like ten hours

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>straight into the middle of the night with my buddies,

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and we would like switch off right. But yeah, you

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>would sort of get laughed at if you weren't as like,

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>oh you can't make that one little jump? Come on,

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. Thank god they got easier. Okay, So Robert

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit more about agnosia and how

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's related to a musea. Well, Agnosia in Greek means

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not knowing and um and if from a broad standpoint,

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>agnoja refers to a number of different neural disorders that

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and basically in which the subject experience is an inability

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to inability to process different sensory information. Now what sort

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of information? This varies a lot. Some experience and inability

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to recognize and identify objects or persons or aspects of

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>objects or persons. Uh. The sense itself is not defective, however,

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just how you're processing it. So it's not that

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't hear, it's not that you can't see, it's

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>just there's no memory loss. And it might be limited

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to a single sense, it might be more than one.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So what I immediately thought of here was all of

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>our sacks famous study of the men who mistook his

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>wife for a hat, which was about a guy who

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>had a brain disorder and literally like couldn't perceive the

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>difference between his wife when he saw her in his hat. Uh.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And all of your Sacks was famous for doing all

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of studies like this. But this, that seems like

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe a more extreme version of agnosiat Well, there are

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of different versions of it that have been

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>either officially or unofficially identified, So just a few. Here.

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>There's finger agnosia. This is an inability to recognize the

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>fingers of the hand. There's a more famous one, and

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly Oliver Sacks don't study this one a good bet.

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is a prosopagnosa. This is face blindness. So

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at a face. It's not that you can't

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>see it's not even that you can't see a face.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not like on that that wonderful episode of Hannibal

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>where it's like a blank thing. Right, It's it's not

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that as wonderful as that was visually in that show.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not really what facial face blindness is like. But

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>still you you can't you look in at the face,

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the face, but you can't really identify what's

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>going on. You can't like put the markers together to

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>identify it as being different from one face or another. Right,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>There's also a phone agnosia, which is voice blindness. There's

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>time agnosia, which is an inability to interpret the passaging

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of time, and there's also semantic agnosia. And this is

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>object blindness. And without being fresh on the details of

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the hat situation, that seems like that that would be

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the related clas probably yeah, And I have to say um,

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:04.959
<v Speaker 1>and I have to bring this up in a big

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>geeki about it since I'm currently reading the latest book

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in our Scott Baker's Prince of Nothing. You have told

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>me about this numerous times, and so has a friend

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of the show, Ec Steiner. Yeah. Yeah, I look forward

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to chatting about this latest book with Steiner because it's uh,

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the title is a Great Ordeal. But throughout the entire

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>series there's this tragic, undying elder race known as the

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>non Men. Okay, so they're like humans, but they're very

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>alien in many respects. They've been around forever, they've they've

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>had all these traumatic experiences, and there are a few

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>different differences that, like, very notable differences between them and humans, Like,

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they're you know, they're ghastly and pale, kind

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of google ish. They their teeth are all fused together.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But the one that I've always found really fascinating was

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the revelation that they can't see paintings. Interesting, they deal

0:32:54.480 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>almost exclusively with three dimensional representations. That would that would

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely work for Steiner since he's working. For those of

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you who don't know who we're talking about. This is

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a friend of ours who has actually done work for

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the show before, especially for our video series. Um. He's

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>worked with me on comic books before in two dimensional formats.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But he actually sculpted like these huge set pieces that

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we used for the Monster Science series. Here. He did

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this wonderful Cathulu piece that we have here in the office,

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, just a giant cyclops skull that you can

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>see in the background and a couple of those. So

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>he's worked with us on the show before. Yeah, and

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he's he himself is one of the non

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>men um He might be. But I've seen people interpret

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this like painting blindness, if you will, and maybe it

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's something to do with oh well they can't

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>see colors and color blindness. But I can't help but

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this is, uh, if this would be some

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like painting agnosia. And certainly our baker worked

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so many neuroscientific and philosophical ideas and it was work.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised at all of that was

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a partial inspiration for it. Okay, Yeah, I like that.

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I like that, but all displating it outward. Yeah, but

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>all of these conditions, the real ones that we've discussed here,

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>there are examples where again, you're the stimuli is entering

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>through your senses, but then something is messed up, the

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>wiring is crossed. There's there's something in many cases physically

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>damaged in the brain that is permitting the proper processing

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of that stimula. Yeah, and where this enters the musical

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>realm is auditory agnosia. And they're essentially two different versions here.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>There's classical auditory agnosia, which entails environmental sounds, so this

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>would be like you hear a bird or a car,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but you're unable to process exactly what that sound is.

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>And then there is interpretive or acceptive agnosia, and this

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>entails music and gets more into this this idea of

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>musical agnosia. I guess like here's a good point for

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>me to probably clarify too, because I have this. I

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know about you, but um, I have a good

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of tenitis um from all my years going to shows,

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and even though I want ear plugs, Uh yeah, I

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>still hear that whistling at night and if everything's quiet,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I just hear a high pitched wine all the time. Um.

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't that though, right, Like that's that's an

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>actual like we actually have an episode of brain stuff

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 1>about that. Um, But that's part of your ear drum.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Being affected and then connecting to your brain. This is

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 1>totally different. This is just brain right now. In some

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of the case and we'll look at a couple of

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>case studies here, uh in a minute. In some of

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>those you do see like actual deafness occurring as well.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, for the most part, we're talking about

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the about not a physical hearing loss. So examples of

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this go back at least as far as nineteen o five.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at some articles about this, and the

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>reference a physician only referred to is uh Bond Vincini

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and another one by the name of lamby L. A. M. Y.

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And both of those uh encountered individuals who who had

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>UH difficulty with music so they could In the first one,

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen o five case, the patient could still process

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 1>musical information, but could no longer recognize well known tunes.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Um he could pick out a wrong note in a

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>famous tune, but he couldn't name that tune. And in

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen o seven case from lamby L. A. M.

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Y described a patient who could transcribe his national anthem

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but didn't know what it was. That's interesting, huh, And

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that had given their names, they probably weren't

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>transcribing the American national anthem, right. I think these were both,

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>uh at least said the first one was Italian. I'm

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not certain about Lamby. Again, I look to try and

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>find some more information about these individuals from motor Head

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>did some certainly may be lots of time alright. So

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing to keep in mind is there's a lot

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of variety. UM. Here's an example to that. In eleven

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>case that was reported by zang Kaga and Hai. She

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of a twenty seven year old woman with long term

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>severe hydrocephalius. This is abnormal accumulation of cerebro spinal fluid

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in the brain, and this was due to congenital spina bifida.

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>She gradually lost her hearing, but she experienced quote severe

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>difficulty in distinguishing verbal, environmental and musical instruments sounds. As

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>her hearing left her. She continued to enjoy music, however,

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and could she could because she could sense the rhythms

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>by simply turning up the music allowed enough to feel

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the vibrations, and this allowed her to actually summon the

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>memories of emotional associations that she had made with the

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>music prior to her hearing loss. Okay, that's nice. Yeah,

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of beautiful. I mean it gets

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>into this idea that we discussed earlier that the brain

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:52.919
<v Speaker 1>is processing music in a few different ways, and if

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those bridges happens to break down, it doesn't mean,

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the information can't get across, and the vibration

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.240
<v Speaker 1>alone are enough to sort of trigger those emotional associations.

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Is interesting. Yeah, And you can also of course get

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>into I don't think they got into it as much

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>in the paper, but you know, you have you have

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>instances where you can you can use hearing a devices

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that that that depend upon like vibrations in the skull

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to uh, you know straight up you know,

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your drumalizations. Yeah. Now, compare all of this to an

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier case. This was present in nine six in the

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, that of a and this was

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the case itself was first studied in the seventies,

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was a forty year old nurse referred to

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>as c N who, following a series of surgeries at

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>age thirty five to repair cerebral aneurysms in each of

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>her temporal lobes, complained that she was no longer able

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to pick out the simplest overlearned tune, you know, things,

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the tunes you should have known just by heart. So

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>she no longer recognized tunes from her own record collection

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:01.760
<v Speaker 1>unless they had audible lyrics, which is which is interesting.

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You can only identify them of the lyrics kicked in.

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is making me think of people. I listened

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of music that has unrecognizable lyrics, and

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that, but I know a lot of

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are like, how could you listen to that?

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what they're saying. I wonder if that's connected.

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because maybe it's just an aesthetic preference.

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 1>But I often think of in cases like that where

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't quite understand what the the the vocalist is saying.

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like Tom York comes to mind. Certainly, some of

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the music of a tool even or or Um Sugares

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>another act that comes to mind, where if I'm not

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>even understanding exactly what's saying, or I'm only picking up

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on certain words, like the voice itself as a musical instrument. Yeah, exactly. Yeah.

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I was just mentioning this the other day to a

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine about Radiohead, that that's how I think

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>of Tom York is less as a lyricist and more

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>as like a vocal musical contributor, sort of like how

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Patton does stuff with his voice and some of

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>his side projects like um like Phantom Moss, where he's

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not even really saying things, but he's just like using

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>his voice as an instrument. Yeah, or like certainly we

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can all listen to music in different languages. We can

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to say, Mongolian throat singing and still experience enjoy it. Yeah.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>So the the the individual in question here, she had

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>no problem understanding or communicating verbally, but music simply didn't

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.760
<v Speaker 1>register like it used to. Musical patterns found no purchase

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in her mind. And this made her a near perfect

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>case of music agnosia. While and it sounds like there's

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>an overlap there with a musa. So I wonder if,

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>like um, the neurobiologists that are really looking into this deeply,

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>if there's just a terminology overlap here, or if there's

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>some symptoms of agnosia and some symptoms of as a

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>musea that separate them out as being totally different. I

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think that there is definite overlap here, because I have

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>seen and some of the papers we were looking at

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>they even you said you even you used them interchangeably

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>or said, this is also known as a musea. Though,

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and though there are plenty of cases, especially in the

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>stuff we covered earlier, where a musa is not describing

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>agnosia and vice versa. So it sounds like that we

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>need to do a lot more research on this and

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of better identify these categories. Yeah, I believe, I

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>believe the experts in these areas are still trying to

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>get firm ideas of what's going on, because certainly agnosia

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is a is a rarity compared to the more simpler

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>versions of the music, right, Yeah, you can have a

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>musea and okay, so maybe this is the difference. Amusia

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is the four percent of the population who are just

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>toned deaf, whereas agnosia or the term that I was

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 1>using earlier, me scroll back into the notes to find

0:41:53.760 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it specific musical and hedonia those sound like the the

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>extreme version of it where you just don't process music

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>at all, right, And I think that's I think that's

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>where we see the overlap. Yeah, and those conditions where

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>we're talking, especially when we're talking about brain injuries um,

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>physical trauma to the brain, physical changes to the brain,

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the result in these symptoms. Now, in the treatment of

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>agnosia um, the analogy I made earlier about the two bridges,

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that's ultimately where we see the main treatment or coping mechanisms,

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is that if one bridge is out, there

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are other bridges. There are other ways that we consume

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>music that we that we take music in, and so

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we we see in various cases where it basically information

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is just presented in other modalities with that connect to

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the patients. So it's just a different way of connecting

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with the music. It's interesting that you use the term

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>bridges because from what I can tell, the causes that

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>lead to and these are the physical causes that lead

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to agnosia um usually are around the occipito temporal border

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in the brain of the ventral stream right connecting parts

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the brain together, the bridges between that that gets damaged,

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and this could be lesions on the parietal or temporal lobes.

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It can be produced from head injury or a stroke,

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>or infection or carbon monoxide poisonings, all kinds of things, right,

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 1>UM but these lead to all the kinds of agnolgia,

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and not just the auditory ones we're talking about, also

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>visual and tactile that you know, we're focusing on auditory today,

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but that bridge, if that's severed, that's where that sense

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of goes Hey whire Alright, So this is what

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, and this is what I'd like to see

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>more research of, you know, leading us out for the future.

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>What effects do a musia or agnosia have on other

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>behaviors like we've we've seen Okay, yes, these people understand

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>uh language still right, and they're they're capable of being

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>functional in society and working and being intelligent and educated.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But what kind of personalities develop from a person who

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't have music in their life. It's a good

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>question I'd love to hear from from any listeners on this. Certainly,

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the the data we were looking at in the papers

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we were reading, they seem if anything, it seems like

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>most of the time the researchers are surprised at how

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>how well the individual does you know? So it's it

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a lot. It's maybe in the more

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>severe cases where it's affecting you know, greater sound agnosia

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in general, or or other types of of a stimulus

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>coming into the brain. But for the most part, it

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to handicap them significantly. I mean, they're still

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>able in many cases to enjoy music. The thing the

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one area that is that is specifically affected. Yeah, I'm

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>also wondering too, and please listeners chime in on this

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.800
<v Speaker 1>one as well. With the rise and popularity of podcasts,

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder that is an outlet for a music acts

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like there, Well, I don't like music, but these podcasts

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are great, So I'll just load up a bunch of

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>these and listen to these all the time. I've certainly

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>met people like that, the people who don't want to

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>drive with music on, and then inevitably that they want

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to something, right, and they'll they'll go for

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, We'll go for a radio show, or like

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a book. Yeah, yeah, interesting, okay, huh. Well, I like

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to balance back and forth between the two. Sometimes I'm

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mood for music, sometimes in the mood for

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a podcast or a book. But that's an interesting, interesting

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>difference in experiences. Well, it seems like there's a lot

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of information that we can learn from you the listeners

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>out here about this. I mean, we're scratching the surface

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>of this pretty much brand new discipline of research. So

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 1>let us know what you think about it. I want

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 1>to hear your your experiences. Maybe you've met people who

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like music at all. Maybe you're one of those people,

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's why you listen to the show. Um,

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 1>so let us know. Uh. You can contact us in

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>all the usual ways. We are on social media all

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>over the place, Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram. And then

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there's also our landing page, Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's where you're gonna find all the podcasts,

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all the videos we've made, and all of the articles,

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>none of which are musical based. If you have a musea,

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you can consume them and be just fine. That's right.

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>And hey, if you want to get in touch with

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>us directly, as always, email us at blow the Mind

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff Works dot com. Well more on this

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and basands of other topics. Is that how stuff works

0:46:41.600 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I pol have a fa back by a

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>part