WEBVTT - Witcher and the Three Rules for Making a Good Adaptation

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello. My name is Rosy Night and I'm a Buzafar.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 2>That's him.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm so happy you're here.

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Boo. Welcome back to X ray Vision, the podcast where

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>we dive deep into your favorite shows, movies, comics, at

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>pop culture. We are here at iHeart Podcast, where we'll

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>be bringing you three episodes a week and news on Saturdays.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And in today's episode, Rosie, you and I are going

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to be using the Witcher season four and the Netflix

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>adaptation at large sort of as a launch pad for

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a larger discussion about adaptations, because you and I have

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>been chatting about good adaptations, bad adaptations. What makes them good,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what makes them bad? How do you do them right?

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Quote unquote how do you do them wrong? And so

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into that today through the lens of

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the Witcher.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, ah boo. What is your preference?

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you want an adaptation to be a strictly adherent

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>to the source material?

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you like when an adaptation puts soon spin on it?

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I do feel personally that that is a subjective question

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>that's mostly on like a case by case basis.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>But what are your thoughts on it?

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean, subjectively speaking, I lean toward the purest

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>view on this, like, especially when it comes to stories

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>that I'm already deeply attached to and that I'm quite

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>passionate about. If I'm watching an adaptation, I want it

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to follow the story that I already know and love.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I want it to adhere as closely as it can

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to the source material. And in fact, that is the

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>reason I've been turned off for many adaptations, is when

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it begins to drift too far from the original characters

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>or the original plots and themes that resonated with me originally. Yeah,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if that begins to change in the adaptation, I begin

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to check out, and ultimately like, there's a high chance

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna not like the adaptation if it begins

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to be two different from the story that I already know.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm very interested to ask you then about Let's

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about uh Denny's June, because I do. I love June,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think, like you know, I like many I'm

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>not like you. I've not read all the books. I

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 2>have not like struggled through the density of the of

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the text, though I do. I do love what I've read,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 2>and I've enjoyed kind of dipping into them throughout my life.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>And I love those adaptations.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>But I do understand, even from my brief knowledge, like,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>there are some changes that are quite like a big deal.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, sure, yeah, a lot of

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>it sticks incredibly textually to the books.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, I think the dannie Ville Love films are

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>actually an example of handling an adaptation perfectly. Are there changes?

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Are changes inevitable? Yes, you're changing, You're changing to an

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>entirely different medium of storytelling, and you're retelling the story

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>decades after it was originally published. There inevitably have to

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 1>be changes. And of course it's being told through the

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>lens of a different artist, right Like that that worldview,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>their perspective is going to bleed into the adaptation of matter.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And also eight years after it is written or something

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>you know as well, that's the other thing. It's like

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>decades decades later, so things have changed, Yes, But yeah,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>what is it about the balance? How did Denny capture

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and balance those two things?

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Was it about? Like?

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>The tone feels so much like Dune. The themes are

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>still there, but those little changes work. Like what was

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>it about it for you that made it so special?

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think tone and theme are what Denny nailed. When

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Dune, It's clear that Dannyville Love deeply, deeply,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>deeply understands the Dune universe and doesn't just understand it like, oh,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I picked up this book and I read it once

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I liked it a lot. I'm going to make

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a movie. He clearly has read the entire series, has

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>read much of the extracurricular stuff that's out there, the

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>expanded lower stuff, and so that to me shows that

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there was respect and knowledge here from danny Ville Love.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he also captured tone, and the film itself

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is about the major themes that Frank Herbert was exploring

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in the books, about fanaticism and religion and despotic leaders

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and politics and you know, fate and predestination, like all

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>of these things are intact in the films.

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really good point because also it

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>reminds me of another adaptation that actually did change the

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 2>source material like a lot, which was Watchmen. It basically

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>acted as like a sequel HBO's Watchman. But I think

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>in the thing that it understood was it understood the

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>political themes. It understood the way that it was supposed

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to be satirizing, superho culture, fascistic policing, the way those

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 2>two things can come together.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>So that team was able to create something new.

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 2>With the characters that felt entirely thematically resonant and felt

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 2>modern and updated. And I think that there is a

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>possibility of doing that. But the kind of deft hand

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>that you need.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Is so so.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Just like gentle and intricate, and like you need to

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>be able to weave those together because also sometimes it

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 2>is a case of like Jurassic Park, that was something

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>we talked about, right, amazing adaptation. Arguably a lot of

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>people would say better than the book. The first book

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 2>is a lot more like the second book that there's

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 2>a movie. Ironically, there is a lot more density, there's

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot more of what you would expect from a

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Christim book.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And I love him. I love that book.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>But with Jurassic Park, I think it was kind of

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>ironically an incredible streamlining of a great idea and now

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the themes are there. It's not about science gone wrong, it's

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>about science gone right. But it's about greed, but it's

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>about should you. It's about all the same things. But

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 2>what they managed to do in Jurassic Park was streamline

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>it into like a blockbuster monster movie, and that's also

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>very interesting, like you can even change genre a little

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>bit if you end up in a space because the

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>original Jurassic Park is a sci fi thriller, as most

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 2>of Crichton's books are, but there are moments I think

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot about the Sam Jackson wrapped arm on his

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 2>shoulder that feel fully like horror, you know, And I

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 2>think that's because they understood what needed to be done

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>from a dinosaur movie, something we hadn't had a popular

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>one off since like the fifties, you know, obviously other

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>than like kind of sitcommy dinosaur X stuff, but not

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 2>like a thrill ride. So I think those are really interesting.

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I also think it's kind of funny how time changes

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>things because Lord of the Rings we all loved it, right,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>but as kids there were definitely, like when I was young,

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of nitpicking about like, oh, there's

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 2>not enough singing, why don't they have the singing, why

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>don't they have the long food sessions, why don't they

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 2>get into the stuff that is in the appendices? And

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 2>then ironically, you know, when Amazon decided, okay, well we'll

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>just do that, that didn't work, you know, for for

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>most people. I am a Rings of Power fan. I've

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about it. I like the show, I really enjoy it.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Why not make a big swing, Why not tell me

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>more about these characters? Sure, but it's funny what you

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>can sometimes I think adhering too much to those little

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 2>details that fans love, the songs, the hobbits, hairy feet,

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.559
<v Speaker 2>these things that you know, super fans are complaining about.

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes if you focus too much on that, you actually

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>lose what is at the core of it, which is

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of this adventure story or whatever.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Appeals to people.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's really interesting how these things change, because obviously

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 2>now a lot of the Rings is seen as like

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate, almost perfect adaptation, you know, even though there

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>are definitely big changes.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I know that. Let's talk about some some less good.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the one that really inspired this conversation,

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>which was.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, the Witcher, the Witch.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about it.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>So tell me more about your fandom of the Witcher

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and how you came to the Witcher before the show,

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>because you do have like a distinct knowledge of the

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>law and the novels and the games and stuff.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, absolutely, I love the games I was actually

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>introduced I'm sure, like many people to the Witcher through

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the video games, and actually not the Witcher three. I

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>played the Witcher one was just not a great video.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's pretty outdated and bad. Which Are two is great?

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Witch Are three is maybe one of the most legendary

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>video games of all time. That's how people are usually

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>introduced to the Witcher. They realize, wait, these are based

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>off of books. Let me read the books, and that's

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>when you realize the games are actually completely disconnected from

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the books. It just takes the characters in the setting.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The games are not canon in any way, to be clear,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but the books themselves are great, and the games adapt

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the books by doing hitting all of the things that

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you and I have been talking about, perfectly, nailing the characters,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the tone, the themes, many of the ideas, setting it

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in a world that feels so in line with the original.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's one big reason the games are so popular

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>as well, because of the great setting and great characters.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>The books are also great. I'm a big fan of

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the games, I'm a big fan of the books. I

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>ran a very popular Witcher podcast for many years that's

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>now sort of been on hiatus because I'm past that

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Witcher phase in my life. And you know, I thought,

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for the first season the Witcher TV show, while not perfect,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I had my qualms with it. I had my nitmix.

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>While not perfect, I think it was a good start,

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and I was hopeful that we would continue to see

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the show grow into itself, kind of find its voice,

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>really establish that its strengths as an adaptation of the material,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>because it was doing a pretty good job in season one.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I think by the time we got into season two,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we started to diverge greatly from the source material. Season

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>one certainly had its divergences, but that could be explained

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>away because we're a TV show.

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Now change some things, different format, different medium, you need

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 3>to change it.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Like sure, right, But I think seasons two, certainly, by three,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and now that we're into four that just came out

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, while we are still borrowing many things like

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>overarching plotlines and characters from the books, the way they

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>are interpreted and portrayed and the way the story is

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>told has diverged dramatically from the source material in ways

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that to me no longer honor the themes and ideas

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of the original stories. And so the show does not

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>resonate with me in the same way that the books did,

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't expand at the universe and let me

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>live in it like the games did. And so unfortunately,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of a a former Netflix which your show fans, you.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Know what, you gave it a try.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 2>You gave it a try, and I think that that's

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the thing. And I'm really excited to come back after

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>the break because i have a different Netflix show where

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the changes they made really worked for me, and it

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>got canceled.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 3>So I'm excited to talk about that after the bak

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>and we're back. Aboo, welcome back.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to those adverts that you definitely listen to, guys,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 2>me and a boo back, We're here, and yeah, Mark

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 2>for me, I totally feel you on the Witch. I've

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>played some of the games, not like finished. I think

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>they're great. I actually read the first book. I thought

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>it was really enjoyable. I watched a Netflix show. It

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 2>just never really caught me in the same way it

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>caught other people, but I thought it looked great. Around

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 2>the similar time Netflix launched, I think it was maybe

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen. The end of twenty eighteen, they launched a

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>shadow and Bone, which was an adaptation of the Lee

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Bardugo books that I love. But with that adaptation, Lee

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>essentially went, hey, guys, I wrote this ten years ago.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I was young. It was my first ever book. I

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 3>didn't really it was.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Inspired by her own you know, I think it's like

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Slavic folklore heritage. So she was like, I want to

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>reimagine this when we make it. I want to bring

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>on Asian American writers. I want to make sure that

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 2>this kind of fictionalized version of Asia that they had

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>in it. That she decided to make the character Elena

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the main character, ended up making her that she was

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>from that space, but also from the kind of generic, generic,

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, white Europe space, and there was this very

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting care put into that season. They also built in

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>characters from the spinoff books, which were, you know, really popular,

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>more popular arguably than Shadow and Bone. Six Crows and

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Crooked Kingdom still highly recommend. That was the kind of

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I did a lot of coverage on that shows too,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>so I had a lot of insight, but the kind

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 2>of conversations they were having creatively, I was just like, Oh,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>these are people who deeply care about the show, and

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 2>obviously Lee is the creator, so there is an authorship

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 2>thing there where she is involved, but she's involved in

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the way unlike some other YA authors where you're like,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad you're thinking about stuff like this. And

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 2>both seasons of the show are amazing, but Netflix is

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>notorious but not really advertising past the first season in

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 2>the same way second season. We never got the third

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and we never got the Sixercro's Ketadam spinoff.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>But that's one where for.

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Me, those Hollywood changes, those adaptation changes, those medium changes,

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that timeline that had passed. She reacted to it in

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a way that just made the work so much better

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>for me, and I was like, how I read it?

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And those are the versions of the characters I see.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think there is a version like Watchmen like

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 2>that where it can be expansive. But also I think

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the problem with Netflix in general that it's had is

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 2>like there is also a genericness to some of the

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff that they put out, and I do think The

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Witcher fell into looking like a Netflix original that didn't

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>necessarily give it the space as something like this to

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 2>show that we I think like season one foundation, I

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>thought it was good, right, it was fine, but it

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 2>was very different but season two off, where they really

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>broke out and just be able to go crazy, that

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>was such an incredible season of TV. And I think

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>often something like The Witcher it needs more space outside

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of that, you know, the Netflix format to really have

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>like a crazy wild second third season where you can

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>expand outside. And but yeah, it's such a complicated thing.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>But Aboo, you do have some quite good rules. You

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>have some quite strict rules. Let's talk about your rules.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 2>What are your top three Aboo rules for adaptations.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I'm curious how much you agree or disagree

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with that.

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited.

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I came up with three. I'm here to be I'm

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in hearing your takes. Rule number one, I think

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're making an adaptation, you do not change the characters.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any reason to make dramatic changes

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to characters, except where there are instances like in in

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the Shang Chi franchise, where there are obviously characters with

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely racist, problematic origins.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I infer.

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>There's all historically racist stuff that needs to be recontextualized.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And so recontextualizing that modernizing that I think in that instance, sure,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely aokay. But even then I would say that

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is a case by case consideration because sometimes the problematic

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>origins of a character is the entire point of that character.

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Because also I would say, like you make a great

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>point someone like Luke Cage, for example, right, a character

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 2>that came out of.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 3>The Black Exploitation explosion.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Definitely there are some elements of that story where you

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>could look back at it and be like, Okay, this

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 2>is kind of problematic, like I see where you're coming from.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Lots of white guys writing on this, but it found

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>its own audience, and because there was not a lot

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of representation at the time, it ended up becoming this

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>very powerful thing. And I think that the Netflix show

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 2>did a great job of playing.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>With both the power man history of it.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Or there's this great moment where he kind of runs

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 2>through a laundry kind of space while he's escaping and

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 2>he ends up with the yellow shirt and this kind

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 2>so they play into the corny past while still modernizing

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>it for the future and not leaving that character there.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>So I agree, I think case by case basis. I

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>am also like you know, for me, I think as well,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>like the notion of what changes of character is all

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to do with how good the writing is, how good

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the casting is. So for example, Doctor Manhattan Yah yah

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Abdolmaine the second like, that's one of the greatest castings

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of all time, greats reveals of all time.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 3>So well done.

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>And you could argue that it is a different character

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>because this is a Dr Manhattan who is more emotionally understanding,

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>emotionally available. He's been a live longer, he's found someone

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that he feels like is worth you know, being human

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>for so but again works because of the rest of

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the peace and everything around it. Okay rule number two.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, rule number two. I think it's extremely important for

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>any creator to understand the original author or original creator's intent,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you agree with it. You need to

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at least understand the author's intent originally, and then I

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>think you need to do your best to stick to

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the same overarching themes and ideas that were presented in

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the original story. I strongly believe that obviously, like it,

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>someone put words to paper because they had some worldview

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or some part of the human experience they wanted to

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>capture and share in their story. And I don't think

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like the person adapting adapting its job to completely

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>change that to decide this story is about something else.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Now, yeah, I agree.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>So what I really love about this all as well

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 2>is I think again it's all about you know, it's

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 2>so funny.

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I bring up Watchmen so many times of this conversation because.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.239
<v Speaker 2>The reality is guys like me too, but also like

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it's really funny because like when I have a lot

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of controversial feelings about it, because like you know, we've

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 2>talked about this a lot on the podcast, but the

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 2>IP was essentially stole them from Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, Yes,

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>but like it ended up being something that was worked

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 2>out via Alan Moore giving all of his rights and

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 2>royalties to Dave, and now Dave does these adaptations and

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I love that for him, but like thematically, I love

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>this because I do think that the thing reason Watchmen

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>works so well is it understands what Alan Moore was

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 2>doing even when some of the comic book readers maybe didn't.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think another great example of this of how

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 2>you can make this work even if you don't agree

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>is like something like poor Verehoven's Starship Troopers, which adapts

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>a very racist book, like the book is Hella racist

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>that's super paramilitary pro everything. And what Verehoven did is

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>he essentially adapted it so to the notes of the

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>book that.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 3>It became a satire of itself.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 2>She's the point, right, So you can even disagree and

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>show your disagreement by saying, hey, what does this look

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>like when you really put it up there? As this

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>person is saying, and I think this comes up with

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 2>another thing that I know is super important to us

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 2>both growing up, which is Harry Potter is like, actually,

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>you actually sometimes like you shouldn't change that, because guess what,

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>that's how we know she sucks.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Like you go back in the books.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 2>You read the names she gave people, You read the

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>fact that she's making the Irish kids power being blowing up.

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Guess what when you adapt that, stick to it, stick

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to your guns. If you want to adapt her, that's

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 2>what you're adapting. So I kind of love this. There

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>are times you can change the text, but at all

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>times like, why are you telling the story if it's

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 2>not about those themes or at least in reaction to

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>those themes.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, at least in reaction an understanding of the original

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>intention of themes is I think critical to.

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Him That's why I think something like this goes back

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>to our you know, we've had this conversation on our

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>anime adaptation episode. But I would say something like Ghost

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>in the Shelle, Dragon ball Z. Those remakes are bad

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>for many reasons in America, but mostly because they can

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>textually do not understand the theme.

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 3>That's the most interesting thing. It's like, yeah, the casting

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>is bad, the movie is badly made.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 2>They think they can just go action movie, but it's

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Dragon ball Z or action movie but it's Ghost in

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the Shell. But Ghost in the Shell is about the

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 2>demilitarization of Japan and how Yeah, then that forced them

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 2>into this technological space like there's so much there that

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 2>you can't just go okay, yeah, I'm just making it.

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not just a rapper and an IP to

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>make whatever movie you want to make, totally, and it's

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>about engaging with the original text.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 3>If that is the log line of this episode, that's

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the one.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not just a rapper and IP, Like, come on, guys,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 2>let's have an adapt Okay, final a boo adaptation rule.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Last thing to wrap up today, rule number three, And

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this is one as a purist where I'm actually advocating

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for change. I think rule number three is that a

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>creator should use their chosen medium to be additive to

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the original text, and they should play to their strengths.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>They should make changes that make that story fit better

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>into the shape that you're now putting it in. If

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a book, don't just translate that the text

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of the book into a script. That is going to

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be a bad script. It's never going to make sense

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>on film. Dannyville love understands this. There's so much dense

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>lore in the Dune universe, and yet the films don't

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>feel exposition heavy. There's no clunky voiceover that explains thing

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to you, thinks to you. Danny Ville Neve does a

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of showing because you understand the medium of film

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that I'm putting pictures up on screen and you can

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>see them and interpret them. I don't need to constantly

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>say things and explain things.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 2>Like the visual exposition of just like showing what's on

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the screen, rather than having someone go, hey, this is

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>this family and this is that family and blah blah blah.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, no. I did think that was really great.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Also loved that first movie because it just feels like

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 2>a like a BBC four part special that they would

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>have played like a very high budget one. But the

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 2>narrative like fictional, the the trail that it takes is

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 2>very much in that like not afraid to be slow,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 2>not afraid to just take its time. I also love

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 2>this because my last agreement on this, I think this

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>is a wonderful take and I think is maybe the

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>most important of your rules. I'm gonna go for one

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 2>that is pretty much like it is a very straight

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>adaptation in a way, which is David Fincher's Gone Girl

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 2>adapting to Jillian the book.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 3>But what he brought to it that the book, the

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Gillian's films book.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Always have like a dark tone, right, That's how she is.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 2>The movie adaptations are similar. But something that.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Was really able to be captured by Fincher was just.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 2>The the looming, dark, unsettling nature of like being settled

0:22:58.480 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>into a marriage.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 3>You don't want to like.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 2>This, this this domestic horror. He was able to bring

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>to it that in my opinion, like past it's domestic horror,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, And in my opinion like that is such

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic take on the book. And I think, like

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 2>when you I talk about additive those performances by Rosamond

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Pike and Ben Affleck and even Tyler Perry and you

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 2>know now believed and we forget about him scandalized. But like,

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 2>but but everything about that movie was additive to the

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 2>point where like, I usually will choose to if I'm

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about a story I like, and I will go

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>back and read the book with Gonga. Pretty much every time,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll just watch the movie because I think, like Tonally,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Fincher understood what his playbook was and how well it

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 2>would work with Flynn's and I think that's why it's

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 2>such a fantastic and the exactly so.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I love that one. Oh and boo, thank you so

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>much for joining me. This was the life.

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm really happy. And guys, you got it in

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>the discord. You gotta let us know what you think

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>of a boost rules. I think that are most sensible

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>rules that we've laid out so on edythe I help.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and if you're enjoying The Witcher season four,

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>please keep enjoying it. Yeah. Yeah, we don't have any

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is just for me. I'm the one losing sleep over it.

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Y'all enjoy it, you know what?

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>We We love everything here and we love that other

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 3>people don't love. And we like, you know, we like stuff.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.640
<v Speaker 3>We don't like stuff that other people do love. That's

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 3>the joy of being a fan. And yes, it's far.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Enjoying it. Keep enjoying it. Larry Fishburn, I love you,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Get a wig on a.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Living it, get that Netflix money. I love you. You've

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>been killing it since death. Wish knowing great, great, good job.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 2>I love you, Laurret's Fishburn.

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 3>That is the episode.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening, and guys, happy holidays.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 3>And stay safe. This season.

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 2>X ray Vision is hosted by Jason steps Young and

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Rosie Night and is a production of iHeart Podcast. Our

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>executive producers are Joel Monique and Aaron Korfman.

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Our supervising producer is Abusafar.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Our producers are Common, Laurent Dean Jonathan and Fay Wack.

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>A theme song is by Brian Vasquez, with alternate theme

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:06.959
<v Speaker 1>songs by Aaron Kaufman.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Special thanks to Soul Rubin, Chris Lord, Kenny Goodman and

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Heidi our discord moderator