1 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Hello. My name is Rosy Night and I'm a Buzafar. 2 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 2: That's him. 3 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:09,840 Speaker 3: I'm so happy you're here. 4 00:00:09,920 --> 00:00:13,160 Speaker 2: Boo. Welcome back to X ray Vision, the podcast where 5 00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:15,960 Speaker 2: we dive deep into your favorite shows, movies, comics, at 6 00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:18,840 Speaker 2: pop culture. We are here at iHeart Podcast, where we'll 7 00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:24,320 Speaker 2: be bringing you three episodes a week and news on Saturdays. 8 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:27,240 Speaker 1: And in today's episode, Rosie, you and I are going 9 00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 1: to be using the Witcher season four and the Netflix 10 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 1: adaptation at large sort of as a launch pad for 11 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:39,680 Speaker 1: a larger discussion about adaptations, because you and I have 12 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: been chatting about good adaptations, bad adaptations. What makes them good, 13 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:45,640 Speaker 1: what makes them bad? How do you do them right? 14 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:48,559 Speaker 1: Quote unquote how do you do them wrong? And so 15 00:00:48,600 --> 00:00:51,040 Speaker 1: we're gonna get into that today through the lens of 16 00:00:51,040 --> 00:00:51,479 Speaker 1: the Witcher. 17 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 3: Okay, ah boo. What is your preference? 18 00:00:58,720 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 2: Do you want an adaptation to be a strictly adherent 19 00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:05,480 Speaker 2: to the source material? 20 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:08,160 Speaker 3: Do you like when an adaptation puts soon spin on it? 21 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:11,480 Speaker 2: I do feel personally that that is a subjective question 22 00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:14,240 Speaker 2: that's mostly on like a case by case basis. 23 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 3: But what are your thoughts on it? 24 00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 1: Yeah? I mean, subjectively speaking, I lean toward the purest 25 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,319 Speaker 1: view on this, like, especially when it comes to stories 26 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:27,479 Speaker 1: that I'm already deeply attached to and that I'm quite 27 00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:33,760 Speaker 1: passionate about. If I'm watching an adaptation, I want it 28 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:36,000 Speaker 1: to follow the story that I already know and love. 29 00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:39,520 Speaker 1: I want it to adhere as closely as it can 30 00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 1: to the source material. And in fact, that is the 31 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:46,200 Speaker 1: reason I've been turned off for many adaptations, is when 32 00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:49,640 Speaker 1: it begins to drift too far from the original characters 33 00:01:49,720 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 1: or the original plots and themes that resonated with me originally. Yeah, 34 00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:57,240 Speaker 1: if that begins to change in the adaptation, I begin 35 00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: to check out, and ultimately like, there's a high chance 36 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:02,880 Speaker 1: that I'm gonna not like the adaptation if it begins 37 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 1: to be two different from the story that I already know. 38 00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:10,720 Speaker 2: Okay, I'm very interested to ask you then about Let's 39 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 2: talk about uh Denny's June, because I do. I love June, 40 00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:19,440 Speaker 2: and I think, like you know, I like many I'm 41 00:02:19,480 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 2: not like you. I've not read all the books. I 42 00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:25,920 Speaker 2: have not like struggled through the density of the of 43 00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 2: the text, though I do. I do love what I've read, 44 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:31,400 Speaker 2: and I've enjoyed kind of dipping into them throughout my life. 45 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:32,720 Speaker 3: And I love those adaptations. 46 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 2: But I do understand, even from my brief knowledge, like, 47 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:39,400 Speaker 2: there are some changes that are quite like a big deal. 48 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 2: But at the same time, sure, yeah, a lot of 49 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:46,760 Speaker 2: it sticks incredibly textually to the books. 50 00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:50,519 Speaker 1: Right, Yes, I think the dannie Ville Love films are 51 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:55,800 Speaker 1: actually an example of handling an adaptation perfectly. Are there changes? 52 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:56,359 Speaker 2: Yes? 53 00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:00,720 Speaker 1: Are changes inevitable? Yes, you're changing, You're changing to an 54 00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:04,480 Speaker 1: entirely different medium of storytelling, and you're retelling the story 55 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:07,720 Speaker 1: decades after it was originally published. There inevitably have to 56 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:10,679 Speaker 1: be changes. And of course it's being told through the 57 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 1: lens of a different artist, right Like that that worldview, 58 00:03:14,919 --> 00:03:17,959 Speaker 1: their perspective is going to bleed into the adaptation of matter. 59 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 2: And also eight years after it is written or something 60 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 2: you know as well, that's the other thing. It's like 61 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 2: decades decades later, so things have changed, Yes, But yeah, 62 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:30,480 Speaker 2: what is it about the balance? How did Denny capture 63 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:32,520 Speaker 2: and balance those two things? 64 00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:33,200 Speaker 3: Was it about? Like? 65 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:36,520 Speaker 2: The tone feels so much like Dune. The themes are 66 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,520 Speaker 2: still there, but those little changes work. Like what was 67 00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:41,320 Speaker 2: it about it for you that made it so special? 68 00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:46,160 Speaker 1: I think tone and theme are what Denny nailed. When 69 00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:51,160 Speaker 1: it comes to Dune, It's clear that Dannyville Love deeply, deeply, 70 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 1: deeply understands the Dune universe and doesn't just understand it like, oh, 71 00:03:54,560 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: I picked up this book and I read it once 72 00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:58,320 Speaker 1: and I liked it a lot. I'm going to make 73 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:02,920 Speaker 1: a movie. He clearly has read the entire series, has 74 00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:06,160 Speaker 1: read much of the extracurricular stuff that's out there, the 75 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 1: expanded lower stuff, and so that to me shows that 76 00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 1: there was respect and knowledge here from danny Ville Love. 77 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 1: I think he also captured tone, and the film itself 78 00:04:18,080 --> 00:04:21,880 Speaker 1: is about the major themes that Frank Herbert was exploring 79 00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:28,160 Speaker 1: in the books, about fanaticism and religion and despotic leaders 80 00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:33,280 Speaker 1: and politics and you know, fate and predestination, like all 81 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:35,359 Speaker 1: of these things are intact in the films. 82 00:04:35,839 --> 00:04:38,640 Speaker 2: I think that's a really good point because also it 83 00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:43,039 Speaker 2: reminds me of another adaptation that actually did change the 84 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:45,720 Speaker 2: source material like a lot, which was Watchmen. It basically 85 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:49,000 Speaker 2: acted as like a sequel HBO's Watchman. But I think 86 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:51,680 Speaker 2: in the thing that it understood was it understood the 87 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 2: political themes. It understood the way that it was supposed 88 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:59,480 Speaker 2: to be satirizing, superho culture, fascistic policing, the way those 89 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 2: two things can come together. 90 00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:05,080 Speaker 3: So that team was able to create something new. 91 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 2: With the characters that felt entirely thematically resonant and felt 92 00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:13,039 Speaker 2: modern and updated. And I think that there is a 93 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 2: possibility of doing that. But the kind of deft hand 94 00:05:16,480 --> 00:05:17,640 Speaker 2: that you need. 95 00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:20,600 Speaker 3: Is so so. 96 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:25,480 Speaker 2: Just like gentle and intricate, and like you need to 97 00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 2: be able to weave those together because also sometimes it 98 00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:31,160 Speaker 2: is a case of like Jurassic Park, that was something 99 00:05:31,200 --> 00:05:34,400 Speaker 2: we talked about, right, amazing adaptation. Arguably a lot of 100 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:36,440 Speaker 2: people would say better than the book. The first book 101 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:38,640 Speaker 2: is a lot more like the second book that there's 102 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:41,839 Speaker 2: a movie. Ironically, there is a lot more density, there's 103 00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:43,480 Speaker 2: a lot more of what you would expect from a 104 00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:44,200 Speaker 2: Christim book. 105 00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 3: And I love him. I love that book. 106 00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,279 Speaker 2: But with Jurassic Park, I think it was kind of 107 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 2: ironically an incredible streamlining of a great idea and now 108 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 2: the themes are there. It's not about science gone wrong, it's 109 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:57,840 Speaker 2: about science gone right. But it's about greed, but it's 110 00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:01,640 Speaker 2: about should you. It's about all the same things. But 111 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:03,919 Speaker 2: what they managed to do in Jurassic Park was streamline 112 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:07,680 Speaker 2: it into like a blockbuster monster movie, and that's also 113 00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 2: very interesting, like you can even change genre a little 114 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:13,520 Speaker 2: bit if you end up in a space because the 115 00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:16,200 Speaker 2: original Jurassic Park is a sci fi thriller, as most 116 00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:18,360 Speaker 2: of Crichton's books are, but there are moments I think 117 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:21,479 Speaker 2: a lot about the Sam Jackson wrapped arm on his 118 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:24,599 Speaker 2: shoulder that feel fully like horror, you know, And I 119 00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:27,600 Speaker 2: think that's because they understood what needed to be done 120 00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 2: from a dinosaur movie, something we hadn't had a popular 121 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:34,280 Speaker 2: one off since like the fifties, you know, obviously other 122 00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 2: than like kind of sitcommy dinosaur X stuff, but not 123 00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:40,560 Speaker 2: like a thrill ride. So I think those are really interesting. 124 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:43,120 Speaker 2: I also think it's kind of funny how time changes 125 00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 2: things because Lord of the Rings we all loved it, right, 126 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:49,960 Speaker 2: but as kids there were definitely, like when I was young, 127 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:54,240 Speaker 2: there was a lot of nitpicking about like, oh, there's 128 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:56,839 Speaker 2: not enough singing, why don't they have the singing, why 129 00:06:56,880 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 2: don't they have the long food sessions, why don't they 130 00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:02,279 Speaker 2: get into the stuff that is in the appendices? And 131 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:05,840 Speaker 2: then ironically, you know, when Amazon decided, okay, well we'll 132 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:08,640 Speaker 2: just do that, that didn't work, you know, for for 133 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:10,560 Speaker 2: most people. I am a Rings of Power fan. I've 134 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:12,640 Speaker 2: talked about it. I like the show, I really enjoy it. 135 00:07:12,680 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 2: Why not make a big swing, Why not tell me 136 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:18,200 Speaker 2: more about these characters? Sure, but it's funny what you 137 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 2: can sometimes I think adhering too much to those little 138 00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:25,840 Speaker 2: details that fans love, the songs, the hobbits, hairy feet, 139 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:28,559 Speaker 2: these things that you know, super fans are complaining about. 140 00:07:28,640 --> 00:07:31,160 Speaker 2: Sometimes if you focus too much on that, you actually 141 00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:33,880 Speaker 2: lose what is at the core of it, which is 142 00:07:33,920 --> 00:07:35,920 Speaker 2: kind of this adventure story or whatever. 143 00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 3: Appeals to people. 144 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 2: So it's really interesting how these things change, because obviously 145 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:41,840 Speaker 2: now a lot of the Rings is seen as like 146 00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:45,880 Speaker 2: the ultimate, almost perfect adaptation, you know, even though there 147 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 2: are definitely big changes. 148 00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:51,040 Speaker 3: Well, I know that. Let's talk about some some less good. 149 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,160 Speaker 2: Let's talk about the one that really inspired this conversation, 150 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:55,080 Speaker 2: which was. 151 00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 1: Sure, yeah, the Witcher, the Witch. 152 00:07:58,320 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 3: Let's talk about it. 153 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:03,560 Speaker 2: So tell me more about your fandom of the Witcher 154 00:08:03,600 --> 00:08:05,760 Speaker 2: and how you came to the Witcher before the show, 155 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 2: because you do have like a distinct knowledge of the 156 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:10,360 Speaker 2: law and the novels and the games and stuff. 157 00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 1: Right, Yes, absolutely, I love the games I was actually 158 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:18,960 Speaker 1: introduced I'm sure, like many people to the Witcher through 159 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:23,600 Speaker 1: the video games, and actually not the Witcher three. I 160 00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:25,880 Speaker 1: played the Witcher one was just not a great video. 161 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:29,280 Speaker 1: Actually it's pretty outdated and bad. Which Are two is great? 162 00:08:29,360 --> 00:08:31,200 Speaker 1: Witch Are three is maybe one of the most legendary 163 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:34,680 Speaker 1: video games of all time. That's how people are usually 164 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:37,199 Speaker 1: introduced to the Witcher. They realize, wait, these are based 165 00:08:37,200 --> 00:08:39,440 Speaker 1: off of books. Let me read the books, and that's 166 00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 1: when you realize the games are actually completely disconnected from 167 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:45,200 Speaker 1: the books. It just takes the characters in the setting. 168 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,840 Speaker 1: The games are not canon in any way, to be clear, 169 00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:53,920 Speaker 1: but the books themselves are great, and the games adapt 170 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 1: the books by doing hitting all of the things that 171 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:59,000 Speaker 1: you and I have been talking about, perfectly, nailing the characters, 172 00:08:59,040 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: the tone, the themes, many of the ideas, setting it 173 00:09:02,760 --> 00:09:05,880 Speaker 1: in a world that feels so in line with the original. 174 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:09,000 Speaker 1: And that's one big reason the games are so popular 175 00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:11,880 Speaker 1: as well, because of the great setting and great characters. 176 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:15,120 Speaker 1: The books are also great. I'm a big fan of 177 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:17,560 Speaker 1: the games, I'm a big fan of the books. I 178 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 1: ran a very popular Witcher podcast for many years that's 179 00:09:21,040 --> 00:09:23,680 Speaker 1: now sort of been on hiatus because I'm past that 180 00:09:23,720 --> 00:09:27,240 Speaker 1: Witcher phase in my life. And you know, I thought, 181 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:31,520 Speaker 1: for the first season the Witcher TV show, while not perfect, 182 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:35,000 Speaker 1: I had my qualms with it. I had my nitmix. 183 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 1: While not perfect, I think it was a good start, 184 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:42,560 Speaker 1: and I was hopeful that we would continue to see 185 00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:45,680 Speaker 1: the show grow into itself, kind of find its voice, 186 00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:49,160 Speaker 1: really establish that its strengths as an adaptation of the material, 187 00:09:49,240 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 1: because it was doing a pretty good job in season one. 188 00:09:52,559 --> 00:09:54,680 Speaker 1: I think by the time we got into season two, 189 00:09:55,480 --> 00:09:59,760 Speaker 1: we started to diverge greatly from the source material. Season 190 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:02,679 Speaker 1: one certainly had its divergences, but that could be explained 191 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:04,000 Speaker 1: away because we're a TV show. 192 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:06,959 Speaker 3: Now change some things, different format, different medium, you need 193 00:10:06,960 --> 00:10:07,559 Speaker 3: to change it. 194 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:11,400 Speaker 1: Like sure, right, But I think seasons two, certainly, by three, 195 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:14,120 Speaker 1: and now that we're into four that just came out 196 00:10:14,120 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 1: this year, while we are still borrowing many things like 197 00:10:18,520 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 1: overarching plotlines and characters from the books, the way they 198 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:28,240 Speaker 1: are interpreted and portrayed and the way the story is 199 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:32,960 Speaker 1: told has diverged dramatically from the source material in ways 200 00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 1: that to me no longer honor the themes and ideas 201 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:40,840 Speaker 1: of the original stories. And so the show does not 202 00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:43,360 Speaker 1: resonate with me in the same way that the books did, 203 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:46,360 Speaker 1: and it doesn't expand at the universe and let me 204 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 1: live in it like the games did. And so unfortunately, 205 00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:55,240 Speaker 1: I'm sort of a a former Netflix which your show fans, you. 206 00:10:55,160 --> 00:10:57,000 Speaker 3: Know what, you gave it a try. 207 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:00,439 Speaker 2: You gave it a try, and I think that that's 208 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 2: the thing. And I'm really excited to come back after 209 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:05,320 Speaker 2: the break because i have a different Netflix show where 210 00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:07,280 Speaker 2: the changes they made really worked for me, and it 211 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:08,000 Speaker 2: got canceled. 212 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:10,120 Speaker 3: So I'm excited to talk about that after the bak 213 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:28,240 Speaker 3: and we're back. Aboo, welcome back. 214 00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:31,000 Speaker 2: Thanks to those adverts that you definitely listen to, guys, 215 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,920 Speaker 2: me and a boo back, We're here, and yeah, Mark 216 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:38,160 Speaker 2: for me, I totally feel you on the Witch. I've 217 00:11:38,200 --> 00:11:39,920 Speaker 2: played some of the games, not like finished. I think 218 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 2: they're great. I actually read the first book. I thought 219 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:44,480 Speaker 2: it was really enjoyable. I watched a Netflix show. It 220 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:46,640 Speaker 2: just never really caught me in the same way it 221 00:11:46,679 --> 00:11:49,000 Speaker 2: caught other people, but I thought it looked great. Around 222 00:11:49,040 --> 00:11:52,199 Speaker 2: the similar time Netflix launched, I think it was maybe 223 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:55,439 Speaker 2: twenty eighteen. The end of twenty eighteen, they launched a 224 00:11:55,559 --> 00:11:58,000 Speaker 2: shadow and Bone, which was an adaptation of the Lee 225 00:11:58,400 --> 00:12:03,240 Speaker 2: Bardugo books that I love. But with that adaptation, Lee 226 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:05,600 Speaker 2: essentially went, hey, guys, I wrote this ten years ago. 227 00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 3: I was young. It was my first ever book. I 228 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 3: didn't really it was. 229 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:11,080 Speaker 2: Inspired by her own you know, I think it's like 230 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:16,480 Speaker 2: Slavic folklore heritage. So she was like, I want to 231 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 2: reimagine this when we make it. I want to bring 232 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:21,600 Speaker 2: on Asian American writers. I want to make sure that 233 00:12:22,080 --> 00:12:26,199 Speaker 2: this kind of fictionalized version of Asia that they had 234 00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:29,240 Speaker 2: in it. That she decided to make the character Elena 235 00:12:29,320 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 2: the main character, ended up making her that she was 236 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 2: from that space, but also from the kind of generic, generic, 237 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 2: you know, white Europe space, and there was this very 238 00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:42,640 Speaker 2: interesting care put into that season. They also built in 239 00:12:42,960 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 2: characters from the spinoff books, which were, you know, really popular, 240 00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:50,080 Speaker 2: more popular arguably than Shadow and Bone. Six Crows and 241 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 2: Crooked Kingdom still highly recommend. That was the kind of 242 00:12:55,440 --> 00:12:57,240 Speaker 2: I did a lot of coverage on that shows too, 243 00:12:57,280 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 2: so I had a lot of insight, but the kind 244 00:12:58,800 --> 00:13:01,679 Speaker 2: of conversations they were having creatively, I was just like, Oh, 245 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 2: these are people who deeply care about the show, and 246 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,400 Speaker 2: obviously Lee is the creator, so there is an authorship 247 00:13:07,440 --> 00:13:09,960 Speaker 2: thing there where she is involved, but she's involved in 248 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:13,000 Speaker 2: the way unlike some other YA authors where you're like, 249 00:13:13,080 --> 00:13:15,640 Speaker 2: I'm so glad you're thinking about stuff like this. And 250 00:13:15,679 --> 00:13:17,959 Speaker 2: both seasons of the show are amazing, but Netflix is 251 00:13:18,040 --> 00:13:21,160 Speaker 2: notorious but not really advertising past the first season in 252 00:13:21,200 --> 00:13:24,199 Speaker 2: the same way second season. We never got the third 253 00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:27,240 Speaker 2: and we never got the Sixercro's Ketadam spinoff. 254 00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 3: But that's one where for. 255 00:13:28,800 --> 00:13:34,640 Speaker 2: Me, those Hollywood changes, those adaptation changes, those medium changes, 256 00:13:34,800 --> 00:13:38,080 Speaker 2: that timeline that had passed. She reacted to it in 257 00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:41,040 Speaker 2: a way that just made the work so much better 258 00:13:41,080 --> 00:13:42,800 Speaker 2: for me, and I was like, how I read it? 259 00:13:42,880 --> 00:13:44,880 Speaker 2: And those are the versions of the characters I see. 260 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:47,040 Speaker 2: So I think there is a version like Watchmen like 261 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:50,720 Speaker 2: that where it can be expansive. But also I think 262 00:13:50,720 --> 00:13:53,320 Speaker 2: the problem with Netflix in general that it's had is 263 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:56,000 Speaker 2: like there is also a genericness to some of the 264 00:13:56,040 --> 00:13:57,760 Speaker 2: stuff that they put out, and I do think The 265 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:03,600 Speaker 2: Witcher fell into looking like a Netflix original that didn't 266 00:14:03,640 --> 00:14:06,160 Speaker 2: necessarily give it the space as something like this to 267 00:14:06,280 --> 00:14:09,079 Speaker 2: show that we I think like season one foundation, I 268 00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:10,760 Speaker 2: thought it was good, right, it was fine, but it 269 00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:15,400 Speaker 2: was very different but season two off, where they really 270 00:14:15,440 --> 00:14:17,720 Speaker 2: broke out and just be able to go crazy, that 271 00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:20,000 Speaker 2: was such an incredible season of TV. And I think 272 00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 2: often something like The Witcher it needs more space outside 273 00:14:24,400 --> 00:14:27,520 Speaker 2: of that, you know, the Netflix format to really have 274 00:14:27,640 --> 00:14:30,720 Speaker 2: like a crazy wild second third season where you can 275 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 2: expand outside. And but yeah, it's such a complicated thing. 276 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,400 Speaker 2: But Aboo, you do have some quite good rules. You 277 00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:40,320 Speaker 2: have some quite strict rules. Let's talk about your rules. 278 00:14:40,480 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 2: What are your top three Aboo rules for adaptations. 279 00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,480 Speaker 1: Okay, so I'm curious how much you agree or disagree 280 00:14:46,520 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 1: with that. 281 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 3: I'm excited. 282 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:50,480 Speaker 1: I came up with three. I'm here to be I'm 283 00:14:50,520 --> 00:14:53,640 Speaker 1: interested in hearing your takes. Rule number one, I think 284 00:14:53,640 --> 00:14:57,520 Speaker 1: when you're making an adaptation, you do not change the characters. 285 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:02,440 Speaker 1: I don't think there's any reason to make dramatic changes 286 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 1: to characters, except where there are instances like in in 287 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:13,440 Speaker 1: the Shang Chi franchise, where there are obviously characters with 288 00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:15,920 Speaker 1: extremely racist, problematic origins. 289 00:15:15,960 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 3: I infer. 290 00:15:17,960 --> 00:15:23,280 Speaker 2: There's all historically racist stuff that needs to be recontextualized. 291 00:15:22,440 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 1: And so recontextualizing that modernizing that I think in that instance, sure, 292 00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:31,800 Speaker 1: that's absolutely aokay. But even then I would say that 293 00:15:31,920 --> 00:15:37,240 Speaker 1: is a case by case consideration because sometimes the problematic 294 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:41,720 Speaker 1: origins of a character is the entire point of that character. 295 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:44,040 Speaker 2: Because also I would say, like you make a great 296 00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 2: point someone like Luke Cage, for example, right, a character 297 00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:47,800 Speaker 2: that came out of. 298 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:49,520 Speaker 3: The Black Exploitation explosion. 299 00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:54,360 Speaker 2: Definitely there are some elements of that story where you 300 00:15:54,400 --> 00:15:56,160 Speaker 2: could look back at it and be like, Okay, this 301 00:15:56,200 --> 00:15:58,280 Speaker 2: is kind of problematic, like I see where you're coming from. 302 00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:01,200 Speaker 2: Lots of white guys writing on this, but it found 303 00:16:01,280 --> 00:16:03,320 Speaker 2: its own audience, and because there was not a lot 304 00:16:03,360 --> 00:16:06,120 Speaker 2: of representation at the time, it ended up becoming this 305 00:16:06,240 --> 00:16:09,120 Speaker 2: very powerful thing. And I think that the Netflix show 306 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 2: did a great job of playing. 307 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:14,880 Speaker 3: With both the power man history of it. 308 00:16:14,960 --> 00:16:16,920 Speaker 2: Or there's this great moment where he kind of runs 309 00:16:16,960 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 2: through a laundry kind of space while he's escaping and 310 00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:22,360 Speaker 2: he ends up with the yellow shirt and this kind 311 00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:28,040 Speaker 2: so they play into the corny past while still modernizing 312 00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:30,720 Speaker 2: it for the future and not leaving that character there. 313 00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:33,120 Speaker 2: So I agree, I think case by case basis. I 314 00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:36,520 Speaker 2: am also like you know, for me, I think as well, 315 00:16:36,600 --> 00:16:39,400 Speaker 2: like the notion of what changes of character is all 316 00:16:39,440 --> 00:16:41,720 Speaker 2: to do with how good the writing is, how good 317 00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:44,800 Speaker 2: the casting is. So for example, Doctor Manhattan Yah yah 318 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:48,560 Speaker 2: Abdolmaine the second like, that's one of the greatest castings 319 00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:50,640 Speaker 2: of all time, greats reveals of all time. 320 00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:51,880 Speaker 3: So well done. 321 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:54,840 Speaker 2: And you could argue that it is a different character 322 00:16:54,880 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 2: because this is a Dr Manhattan who is more emotionally understanding, 323 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 2: emotionally available. He's been a live longer, he's found someone 324 00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:04,560 Speaker 2: that he feels like is worth you know, being human 325 00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:08,840 Speaker 2: for so but again works because of the rest of 326 00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:13,080 Speaker 2: the peace and everything around it. Okay rule number two. 327 00:17:13,560 --> 00:17:17,359 Speaker 1: Okay, rule number two. I think it's extremely important for 328 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:22,880 Speaker 1: any creator to understand the original author or original creator's intent, 329 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:25,520 Speaker 1: whether or not you agree with it. You need to 330 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:29,720 Speaker 1: at least understand the author's intent originally, and then I 331 00:17:29,720 --> 00:17:31,919 Speaker 1: think you need to do your best to stick to 332 00:17:31,960 --> 00:17:34,560 Speaker 1: the same overarching themes and ideas that were presented in 333 00:17:34,600 --> 00:17:39,199 Speaker 1: the original story. I strongly believe that obviously, like it, 334 00:17:39,720 --> 00:17:43,400 Speaker 1: someone put words to paper because they had some worldview 335 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 1: or some part of the human experience they wanted to 336 00:17:46,040 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 1: capture and share in their story. And I don't think 337 00:17:48,840 --> 00:17:53,800 Speaker 1: it's like the person adapting adapting its job to completely 338 00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:56,400 Speaker 1: change that to decide this story is about something else. 339 00:17:56,440 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 3: Now, yeah, I agree. 340 00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:00,680 Speaker 2: So what I really love about this all as well 341 00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 2: is I think again it's all about you know, it's 342 00:18:03,600 --> 00:18:04,000 Speaker 2: so funny. 343 00:18:04,040 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 3: I bring up Watchmen so many times of this conversation because. 344 00:18:06,280 --> 00:18:09,239 Speaker 2: The reality is guys like me too, but also like 345 00:18:09,280 --> 00:18:11,840 Speaker 2: it's really funny because like when I have a lot 346 00:18:11,840 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 2: of controversial feelings about it, because like you know, we've 347 00:18:15,600 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 2: talked about this a lot on the podcast, but the 348 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:21,880 Speaker 2: IP was essentially stole them from Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, Yes, 349 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:25,200 Speaker 2: but like it ended up being something that was worked 350 00:18:25,240 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 2: out via Alan Moore giving all of his rights and 351 00:18:28,040 --> 00:18:30,720 Speaker 2: royalties to Dave, and now Dave does these adaptations and 352 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:34,400 Speaker 2: I love that for him, but like thematically, I love 353 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:36,800 Speaker 2: this because I do think that the thing reason Watchmen 354 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:38,760 Speaker 2: works so well is it understands what Alan Moore was 355 00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:41,879 Speaker 2: doing even when some of the comic book readers maybe didn't. 356 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:44,600 Speaker 2: And I think another great example of this of how 357 00:18:44,640 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 2: you can make this work even if you don't agree 358 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:50,920 Speaker 2: is like something like poor Verehoven's Starship Troopers, which adapts 359 00:18:50,920 --> 00:18:53,720 Speaker 2: a very racist book, like the book is Hella racist 360 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:58,439 Speaker 2: that's super paramilitary pro everything. And what Verehoven did is 361 00:18:58,440 --> 00:19:02,480 Speaker 2: he essentially adapted it so to the notes of the 362 00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 2: book that. 363 00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:05,240 Speaker 3: It became a satire of itself. 364 00:19:05,560 --> 00:19:09,720 Speaker 2: She's the point, right, So you can even disagree and 365 00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:12,760 Speaker 2: show your disagreement by saying, hey, what does this look 366 00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:15,440 Speaker 2: like when you really put it up there? As this 367 00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:18,760 Speaker 2: person is saying, and I think this comes up with 368 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:20,879 Speaker 2: another thing that I know is super important to us 369 00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:23,680 Speaker 2: both growing up, which is Harry Potter is like, actually, 370 00:19:24,040 --> 00:19:27,679 Speaker 2: you actually sometimes like you shouldn't change that, because guess what, 371 00:19:27,720 --> 00:19:28,960 Speaker 2: that's how we know she sucks. 372 00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:30,320 Speaker 3: Like you go back in the books. 373 00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:32,159 Speaker 2: You read the names she gave people, You read the 374 00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 2: fact that she's making the Irish kids power being blowing up. 375 00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:38,240 Speaker 2: Guess what when you adapt that, stick to it, stick 376 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 2: to your guns. If you want to adapt her, that's 377 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:43,200 Speaker 2: what you're adapting. So I kind of love this. There 378 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:45,480 Speaker 2: are times you can change the text, but at all 379 00:19:45,600 --> 00:19:48,400 Speaker 2: times like, why are you telling the story if it's 380 00:19:48,440 --> 00:19:51,919 Speaker 2: not about those themes or at least in reaction to 381 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:52,480 Speaker 2: those themes. 382 00:19:52,520 --> 00:19:56,160 Speaker 1: Yes, at least in reaction an understanding of the original 383 00:19:56,160 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: intention of themes is I think critical to. 384 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:00,560 Speaker 2: Him That's why I think something like this goes back 385 00:20:00,560 --> 00:20:02,600 Speaker 2: to our you know, we've had this conversation on our 386 00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 2: anime adaptation episode. But I would say something like Ghost 387 00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:10,000 Speaker 2: in the Shelle, Dragon ball Z. Those remakes are bad 388 00:20:10,040 --> 00:20:12,440 Speaker 2: for many reasons in America, but mostly because they can 389 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:14,240 Speaker 2: textually do not understand the theme. 390 00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:17,639 Speaker 3: That's the most interesting thing. It's like, yeah, the casting 391 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:19,000 Speaker 3: is bad, the movie is badly made. 392 00:20:19,040 --> 00:20:21,160 Speaker 2: They think they can just go action movie, but it's 393 00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:23,320 Speaker 2: Dragon ball Z or action movie but it's Ghost in 394 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:25,080 Speaker 2: the Shell. But Ghost in the Shell is about the 395 00:20:25,119 --> 00:20:29,680 Speaker 2: demilitarization of Japan and how Yeah, then that forced them 396 00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:32,639 Speaker 2: into this technological space like there's so much there that 397 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:34,640 Speaker 2: you can't just go okay, yeah, I'm just making it. 398 00:20:34,920 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not just a rapper and an IP to 399 00:20:37,920 --> 00:20:41,480 Speaker 1: make whatever movie you want to make, totally, and it's 400 00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:43,200 Speaker 1: about engaging with the original text. 401 00:20:43,600 --> 00:20:45,720 Speaker 3: If that is the log line of this episode, that's 402 00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:46,040 Speaker 3: the one. 403 00:20:46,119 --> 00:20:48,440 Speaker 2: It's not just a rapper and IP, Like, come on, guys, 404 00:20:48,520 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 2: let's have an adapt Okay, final a boo adaptation rule. 405 00:20:52,359 --> 00:20:54,840 Speaker 1: Last thing to wrap up today, rule number three, And 406 00:20:54,920 --> 00:20:57,880 Speaker 1: this is one as a purist where I'm actually advocating 407 00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:00,600 Speaker 1: for change. I think rule number three is that a 408 00:21:00,640 --> 00:21:05,119 Speaker 1: creator should use their chosen medium to be additive to 409 00:21:05,160 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 1: the original text, and they should play to their strengths. 410 00:21:08,280 --> 00:21:12,119 Speaker 1: They should make changes that make that story fit better 411 00:21:12,240 --> 00:21:15,560 Speaker 1: into the shape that you're now putting it in. If 412 00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:18,960 Speaker 1: it is a book, don't just translate that the text 413 00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:20,960 Speaker 1: of the book into a script. That is going to 414 00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:22,920 Speaker 1: be a bad script. It's never going to make sense 415 00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:27,159 Speaker 1: on film. Dannyville love understands this. There's so much dense 416 00:21:27,359 --> 00:21:32,760 Speaker 1: lore in the Dune universe, and yet the films don't 417 00:21:32,800 --> 00:21:36,360 Speaker 1: feel exposition heavy. There's no clunky voiceover that explains thing 418 00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 1: to you, thinks to you. Danny Ville Neve does a 419 00:21:39,280 --> 00:21:42,520 Speaker 1: lot of showing because you understand the medium of film 420 00:21:42,760 --> 00:21:45,280 Speaker 1: that I'm putting pictures up on screen and you can 421 00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:47,639 Speaker 1: see them and interpret them. I don't need to constantly 422 00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:49,200 Speaker 1: say things and explain things. 423 00:21:49,080 --> 00:21:52,159 Speaker 2: Like the visual exposition of just like showing what's on 424 00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:54,760 Speaker 2: the screen, rather than having someone go, hey, this is 425 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:57,760 Speaker 2: this family and this is that family and blah blah blah. 426 00:21:57,880 --> 00:21:59,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, no. I did think that was really great. 427 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:02,040 Speaker 2: Also loved that first movie because it just feels like 428 00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:05,760 Speaker 2: a like a BBC four part special that they would 429 00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:08,000 Speaker 2: have played like a very high budget one. But the 430 00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:12,919 Speaker 2: narrative like fictional, the the trail that it takes is 431 00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:15,439 Speaker 2: very much in that like not afraid to be slow, 432 00:22:15,600 --> 00:22:17,959 Speaker 2: not afraid to just take its time. I also love 433 00:22:18,040 --> 00:22:21,959 Speaker 2: this because my last agreement on this, I think this 434 00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:24,240 Speaker 2: is a wonderful take and I think is maybe the 435 00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,160 Speaker 2: most important of your rules. I'm gonna go for one 436 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:29,720 Speaker 2: that is pretty much like it is a very straight 437 00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:33,880 Speaker 2: adaptation in a way, which is David Fincher's Gone Girl 438 00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:35,720 Speaker 2: adapting to Jillian the book. 439 00:22:35,960 --> 00:22:38,640 Speaker 3: But what he brought to it that the book, the 440 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:39,920 Speaker 3: Gillian's films book. 441 00:22:39,680 --> 00:22:42,840 Speaker 2: Always have like a dark tone, right, That's how she is. 442 00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:47,880 Speaker 2: The movie adaptations are similar. But something that. 443 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:52,160 Speaker 3: Was really able to be captured by Fincher was just. 444 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:58,480 Speaker 2: The the looming, dark, unsettling nature of like being settled 445 00:22:58,480 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 2: into a marriage. 446 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:00,520 Speaker 3: You don't want to like. 447 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:03,440 Speaker 2: This, this this domestic horror. He was able to bring 448 00:23:03,480 --> 00:23:07,480 Speaker 2: to it that in my opinion, like past it's domestic horror, 449 00:23:07,520 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 2: you know, And in my opinion like that is such 450 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:14,359 Speaker 2: a fantastic take on the book. And I think, like 451 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:18,920 Speaker 2: when you I talk about additive those performances by Rosamond 452 00:23:18,960 --> 00:23:22,399 Speaker 2: Pike and Ben Affleck and even Tyler Perry and you 453 00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:25,399 Speaker 2: know now believed and we forget about him scandalized. But like, 454 00:23:25,800 --> 00:23:28,679 Speaker 2: but but everything about that movie was additive to the 455 00:23:28,680 --> 00:23:31,480 Speaker 2: point where like, I usually will choose to if I'm 456 00:23:31,480 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 2: thinking about a story I like, and I will go 457 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:36,320 Speaker 2: back and read the book with Gonga. Pretty much every time, 458 00:23:36,359 --> 00:23:39,080 Speaker 2: I'll just watch the movie because I think, like Tonally, 459 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:43,000 Speaker 2: Fincher understood what his playbook was and how well it 460 00:23:43,040 --> 00:23:45,480 Speaker 2: would work with Flynn's and I think that's why it's 461 00:23:45,480 --> 00:23:48,480 Speaker 2: such a fantastic and the exactly so. 462 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:50,000 Speaker 3: I love that one. Oh and boo, thank you so 463 00:23:50,080 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 3: much for joining me. This was the life. 464 00:23:53,320 --> 00:23:55,439 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm really happy. And guys, you got it in 465 00:23:55,440 --> 00:23:56,800 Speaker 2: the discord. You gotta let us know what you think 466 00:23:56,800 --> 00:23:59,000 Speaker 2: of a boost rules. I think that are most sensible 467 00:23:59,400 --> 00:24:02,200 Speaker 2: rules that we've laid out so on edythe I help. 468 00:24:02,320 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 1: So yeah, and if you're enjoying The Witcher season four, 469 00:24:04,640 --> 00:24:06,880 Speaker 1: please keep enjoying it. Yeah. Yeah, we don't have any 470 00:24:07,720 --> 00:24:10,280 Speaker 1: is just for me. I'm the one losing sleep over it. 471 00:24:10,480 --> 00:24:12,040 Speaker 1: Y'all enjoy it, you know what? 472 00:24:12,080 --> 00:24:14,840 Speaker 3: We We love everything here and we love that other 473 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:17,960 Speaker 3: people don't love. And we like, you know, we like stuff. 474 00:24:17,960 --> 00:24:19,640 Speaker 3: We don't like stuff that other people do love. That's 475 00:24:19,640 --> 00:24:21,639 Speaker 3: the joy of being a fan. And yes, it's far. 476 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:25,280 Speaker 3: Enjoying it. Keep enjoying it. Larry Fishburn, I love you, 477 00:24:25,400 --> 00:24:26,840 Speaker 3: Get a wig on a. 478 00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:30,280 Speaker 2: Living it, get that Netflix money. I love you. You've 479 00:24:30,280 --> 00:24:33,560 Speaker 2: been killing it since death. Wish knowing great, great, good job. 480 00:24:33,760 --> 00:24:34,879 Speaker 2: I love you, Laurret's Fishburn. 481 00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:36,280 Speaker 3: That is the episode. 482 00:24:36,320 --> 00:24:40,480 Speaker 2: Thank you for listening, and guys, happy holidays. 483 00:24:40,040 --> 00:24:42,159 Speaker 3: And stay safe. This season. 484 00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:49,680 Speaker 2: X ray Vision is hosted by Jason steps Young and 485 00:24:49,800 --> 00:24:52,720 Speaker 2: Rosie Night and is a production of iHeart Podcast. Our 486 00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:56,119 Speaker 2: executive producers are Joel Monique and Aaron Korfman. 487 00:24:56,400 --> 00:24:58,440 Speaker 1: Our supervising producer is Abusafar. 488 00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:02,760 Speaker 2: Our producers are Common, Laurent Dean Jonathan and Fay Wack. 489 00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:05,640 Speaker 1: A theme song is by Brian Vasquez, with alternate theme 490 00:25:05,720 --> 00:25:06,959 Speaker 1: songs by Aaron Kaufman. 491 00:25:07,160 --> 00:25:10,520 Speaker 2: Special thanks to Soul Rubin, Chris Lord, Kenny Goodman and 492 00:25:10,600 --> 00:25:12,400 Speaker 2: Heidi our discord moderator