1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jailey, we bring you 3 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:30,560 Speaker 1: and of course, on the Bloomberg Terminal. The perfect guest 6 00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 1: to start this week's confer which with Jim Karen of 7 00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Fixed income portfolio Manager. Jim first question, sir, 8 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:42,319 Speaker 1: what are we doing back up near one fifty? Well, 9 00:00:42,360 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 1: good morning, thank you for having me on your show. Look, 10 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,159 Speaker 1: I think there's a couple of things that are going on. 11 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:49,400 Speaker 1: One of them is very technical. One of the reasons 12 00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:52,600 Speaker 1: why yields were so low was because the Treasury General 13 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:55,200 Speaker 1: account had been drawn down so much. Now that's really 14 00:00:55,240 --> 00:00:58,040 Speaker 1: technical speak for saying that there wasn't a lot of 15 00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:01,560 Speaker 1: net issuance of US treasure reads over the last couple 16 00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:05,000 Speaker 1: of months. In fact, nearly zero net issuance. Today, all 17 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:06,880 Speaker 1: of that is starting to change a lot of things 18 00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:09,399 Speaker 1: are changing right now that are leading to higher yields. 19 00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:12,200 Speaker 1: Number One, now we're start going to start to get 20 00:01:12,319 --> 00:01:16,520 Speaker 1: net positive supply, so more positive net supply is coming 21 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:19,040 Speaker 1: to the markets. That and the fact that we're getting 22 00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:22,839 Speaker 1: closer to a deal on the deficit, then the question 23 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,559 Speaker 1: becomes is it going to be I'm sorry, a deal 24 00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:28,120 Speaker 1: on the infrastructure bill? And the question then becomes is 25 00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:31,960 Speaker 1: it going to be deficit financed? So that's another argument 26 00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:36,160 Speaker 1: for higher debt into the future. The third point is tapering. 27 00:01:36,440 --> 00:01:39,800 Speaker 1: The FED is announced pretty aggressively. It seems like at 28 00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:43,399 Speaker 1: the September FOMC last week that probably by December they're 29 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 1: gonna start tapering. So all of the factors that we're 30 00:01:46,680 --> 00:01:49,920 Speaker 1: keeping yields lower in the second quarter and for part 31 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 1: of the third quarter are now starting to run in reverse, 32 00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:55,800 Speaker 1: and you're seeing yields start to move higher. Not to 33 00:01:55,840 --> 00:01:58,480 Speaker 1: mention that energy prices are moving up and even some 34 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:01,800 Speaker 1: of the COVID cases are are on the decline. We 35 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:05,440 Speaker 1: could be setting ourselves up for a much stronger, much 36 00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: awaited for fourth quarter, and all of this is pushing 37 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:13,079 Speaker 1: treasury yields higher. And it makes sense. Yeah, Jim Carren. 38 00:02:13,120 --> 00:02:15,359 Speaker 1: When you're on the Gorman Gulf Stream, you're flying at 39 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:17,640 Speaker 1: thirty two thou feet and you're looking down in the 40 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:20,920 Speaker 1: yield market, What is the ten uere yield where you 41 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:24,840 Speaker 1: signal shift or you signal trip point. We're in a 42 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:28,320 Speaker 1: one seven, maybe one fifty, But what's the level where 43 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:32,520 Speaker 1: you go things have changed. I think we're past that. 44 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:35,280 Speaker 1: I think it's around one forty. The fact that we've 45 00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:38,760 Speaker 1: gotten a back above one forty is telling us that 46 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:43,000 Speaker 1: the correction lower in yields is over with. We have 47 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:45,960 Speaker 1: to start thinking about yields progressing up back towards the 48 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:49,800 Speaker 1: March thirty one highs around one seventy five, even up 49 00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:53,280 Speaker 1: to one eight percent, and it's even possible that you 50 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 1: could start to even test two percent by end of 51 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 1: this year beginning of next year. I think it would 52 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:00,800 Speaker 1: be hard to get above two percent and stay there, 53 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:03,840 Speaker 1: but I think that's the trajectory that we're on, and 54 00:03:03,880 --> 00:03:06,160 Speaker 1: the fact that many people have squared up most of 55 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 1: their positions. I would say the market's not overly short, 56 00:03:08,840 --> 00:03:12,720 Speaker 1: so the technicals are are suggesting that you could actually 57 00:03:12,760 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 1: get a push higher. So Tom, I think that we've 58 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 1: already tripped that switch, and that we're already in the 59 00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:21,200 Speaker 1: mode to get towards higher yields. Plus all the supply 60 00:03:21,320 --> 00:03:24,160 Speaker 1: that's coming. Jim you talked about higher oil prices. We 61 00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 1: also talk about supply chain disruptions. Are these events Are 62 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:34,239 Speaker 1: these appearances inflationary or disinflationary? Lisa, Absolutely, It's is a 63 00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:36,200 Speaker 1: great it is a great point, and I'm glad we're 64 00:03:36,240 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 1: talking about this. This is inflationary. Um, what we're going 65 00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:45,119 Speaker 1: to see our rolling supply shortages and so so yes, 66 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 1: you know, one day it might be one thing, another 67 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: day it could be natural gas, another day it could 68 00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:51,720 Speaker 1: be oil, and and you're gonna start to see this 69 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:55,120 Speaker 1: just on a rolling basis going forward as the supply 70 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,400 Speaker 1: chains are getting readjusted, and then when price gets too high, 71 00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:01,080 Speaker 1: demand will fall that ass price will come down and 72 00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:03,960 Speaker 1: it will be another asset, commodity assets turned to start 73 00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:06,680 Speaker 1: to move higher. So I think this is getting embedded 74 00:04:07,040 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 1: importantly into the psychology of consumers, that prices are going 75 00:04:12,280 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 1: to stay perpetually high. That doesn't mean that we have 76 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:19,239 Speaker 1: runaway inflation. It just means it's going to be harder 77 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 1: to get below two percent inflation. So now think about this. 78 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:26,400 Speaker 1: Even the people say the Fed was hawkish, the median 79 00:04:26,480 --> 00:04:29,919 Speaker 1: dot in was at one point seven five for the 80 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:33,440 Speaker 1: FED funds rate. But inflation is supposed to is supposed 81 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:35,679 Speaker 1: to be between two and two and a half percent, 82 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:38,080 Speaker 1: or at least it's being expected to be between two 83 00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:40,560 Speaker 1: and two and a percent, which means that the real 84 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,120 Speaker 1: Fed funds rate is still going to be minus twenty 85 00:04:43,120 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: five to minus fifty basis points. This is still very 86 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:51,680 Speaker 1: accommodative uh FED policy at the current moment. There's nothing 87 00:04:51,720 --> 00:04:54,119 Speaker 1: hawkish about this. So, Jim, let's put all this together. 88 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:56,039 Speaker 1: When you say it's hand to get below two percent 89 00:04:56,080 --> 00:04:58,720 Speaker 1: on inflation, just explain to us and accountli of lines 90 00:04:58,760 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 1: why it's difficult to get up one night s eight 91 00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:04,919 Speaker 1: on a tenure yield. Well, well, for right now, we 92 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 1: are still doing quantitative easing, so there is still some 93 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:11,280 Speaker 1: asset purchases that are going through. Bond yields around the world. 94 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:13,760 Speaker 1: Although they are starting to rise, we're seeing that in 95 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:16,840 Speaker 1: Europe are still very very low. So I think that 96 00:05:16,880 --> 00:05:19,120 Speaker 1: there is an interest rate differential and then it will 97 00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:22,320 Speaker 1: come back down to the dollar. Dollar appreciation um At 98 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:24,440 Speaker 1: least in the near term. You could see some dollar 99 00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:29,640 Speaker 1: appreciation that would keep foreign investors interested in the U. S. 100 00:05:29,680 --> 00:05:32,120 Speaker 1: Treasury market, but that I think is a cycle. Tom. 101 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:35,400 Speaker 1: I'm a long term dollar bear. Eventually, these deficits and 102 00:05:35,440 --> 00:05:37,240 Speaker 1: everything else that's going to catch up to the dollar, 103 00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 1: and that's gonna push it lower. And foreign investors, which 104 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,400 Speaker 1: the US demand you know, relies on heavily for demand, 105 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:48,560 Speaker 1: is is going to require higher yields to indice entice 106 00:05:48,880 --> 00:05:51,960 Speaker 1: foreign investors to come in and buy US treasuries. Jim, 107 00:05:52,120 --> 00:05:54,159 Speaker 1: thank you, sir as all wise and have a good week. 108 00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:56,640 Speaker 1: Jim Cannon, that of more can standing investment management of 109 00:05:56,680 --> 00:06:05,600 Speaker 1: fixed income pull folio manager. We've got to start with 110 00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:08,240 Speaker 1: a fantastic guest this morning, Jean Parvan, head of the 111 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 1: black Rock Investment Institute. John, you've got this framework, the 112 00:06:11,400 --> 00:06:13,680 Speaker 1: new nominal, and allow you to explain that in just 113 00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:17,239 Speaker 1: a moment, the conversation we're having once we start raising 114 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:20,200 Speaker 1: interest rates in America maybe the back end of next year. 115 00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:22,839 Speaker 1: Who knows, Sean, I can't predict next year. How steep 116 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:25,000 Speaker 1: will that policy path be, How shallow will it be, 117 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:28,600 Speaker 1: How loose will any potential tiening be? The answer to that, John, 118 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 1: I think it's gonna be the shallow as we've seen 119 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:34,520 Speaker 1: in decades. Um. You know, we have to go back 120 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 1: to maybe the fifties and the sixties to see the 121 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 1: same kind of shadow pad as I think we're going 122 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:41,560 Speaker 1: to see so nothing of the you know, recent cycle. 123 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,359 Speaker 1: I think is is a guide much shadower, and I 124 00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 1: think we've seen more, much more, you know, ongoing evidence 125 00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:50,560 Speaker 1: that they are, you know, on the slow path. I 126 00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:53,159 Speaker 1: think they've been very deliberate to try to separate the 127 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:56,680 Speaker 1: taper discussion last week from from the liftoff and from 128 00:06:56,800 --> 00:06:59,160 Speaker 1: from what it's work. We cannot predict wate, we need two. 129 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:01,200 Speaker 1: But I think it's a eight twenty three story. The 130 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:05,200 Speaker 1: first rate hike jump a black rock in your team 131 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:08,400 Speaker 1: unabashedly say your pro risk I mean, you mean snow 132 00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:11,920 Speaker 1: words about it. How do these changes, the worry worry, 133 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 1: worry out there affect corporate thinking with a higher yield regime, 134 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 1: with steepening of the curb and on and on, how 135 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:23,920 Speaker 1: does pro risk come over the corporate action? Yeah, so 136 00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 1: the pet had for for you know, equities and risk 137 00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:30,880 Speaker 1: assess break higher is getting narrower. So I mean, I 138 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 1: just want I want to college that. And after a streak, 139 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:35,840 Speaker 1: I mean, you look at the chart of the smps 140 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: you start in general, and you look at it and 141 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 1: there's no way you can tell them in the pandemic. So, 142 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 1: I mean this does race question. I think we're gonna 143 00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:46,120 Speaker 1: be an environment where markets will be more primed to 144 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:49,960 Speaker 1: look at risk and maybe more natility. But in that environment, 145 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:53,120 Speaker 1: we still think that the fundamentals are constructive for for 146 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 1: the time being, and as a result, we would you know, 147 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:57,920 Speaker 1: look through that. That's where the pro risk on a 148 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:02,240 Speaker 1: bashing version is coming from. How concerned are you about 149 00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 1: what's going on in China with respect to not only 150 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 1: the scrutiny of the tech companies, but also what some 151 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: people are calling an increasing energy crisis, especially as the 152 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:15,440 Speaker 1: regulators try to clamp down on fossil fuel usage ahead 153 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:19,120 Speaker 1: of the Olympics. Yeah, so I think, I mean broader 154 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:21,960 Speaker 1: story and in China is that you know, the direction 155 00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:25,880 Speaker 1: of travel towards UH, a greater role of social objective 156 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 1: politics over economics is is unmistakable. Um, it's playing out 157 00:08:31,120 --> 00:08:33,600 Speaker 1: and I think we should we should all acknowledge that 158 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:37,959 Speaker 1: it changes the lens eens of investment. However, Um, you know, 159 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 1: we've seen a very steep decline activity throughout the course 160 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:45,800 Speaker 1: of one I mean, you know from earlier this year 161 00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:48,679 Speaker 1: to queue Ford is going to look so for as 162 00:08:48,679 --> 00:08:51,200 Speaker 1: far as we're concerned. So that's a pretty seem decline, 163 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 1: and even a country that is, you know, on the 164 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 1: path to put other objectives in front um, I think 165 00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 1: they cannot ignore this weakening growth. So that makes us 166 00:09:00,720 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 1: you know, we've been neutral on Chinese equities for for 167 00:09:04,880 --> 00:09:08,559 Speaker 1: for the last few months, but we start to think 168 00:09:08,600 --> 00:09:12,000 Speaker 1: now that it's time to dip our toe back or 169 00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: start to dip our though in the Chinese equities, given 170 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:18,720 Speaker 1: that you know, we see some easing of the various 171 00:09:18,760 --> 00:09:22,080 Speaker 1: palty tools over the next few months. Can you elaborate 172 00:09:22,120 --> 00:09:25,960 Speaker 1: on dipping your toe back into Chinese equities? Where do 173 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,360 Speaker 1: you see a sort of a safe place to park 174 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:32,920 Speaker 1: amid still a lot of ongoing on certainty. I should 175 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:35,680 Speaker 1: I should qualify the back because we've just broken out 176 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 1: the Chinese equities as a as a stem alone asset 177 00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:41,439 Speaker 1: class for the first time in June or Minion outlooks, 178 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 1: so I mean, there's no bad aspects. So but we're 179 00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:46,720 Speaker 1: dipping our toes in the sense that you know, you've 180 00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:50,720 Speaker 1: seen on the performance of the Chinese equities over US 181 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 1: equities for good reasons. That's where we were neutral. But 182 00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:57,079 Speaker 1: at the same time, that's a pretty the gap as 183 00:09:57,480 --> 00:10:00,240 Speaker 1: has been pretty material in terms of the two regions. 184 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 1: And while there's a lot of uncertainty, I mean that 185 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:05,120 Speaker 1: means the recipium has increased quite considerably. And now I 186 00:10:05,120 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 1: think it's the time to think about opportunities reappearing. I'm 187 00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:10,880 Speaker 1: thinking about the broad market exposures here as opposed to 188 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:14,320 Speaker 1: specific and um But that broad market explosure, that broad 189 00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:16,480 Speaker 1: market story, I think is a repriced quite a bit. 190 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:19,040 Speaker 1: John just quickly find a question, how do you reconcile 191 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 1: your bond market call, your federal reserve call with where 192 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 1: you want to own in the equity market domestically here 193 00:10:25,040 --> 00:10:29,840 Speaker 1: in America. So we think the bad market call. Just 194 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,199 Speaker 1: to clarify, as we think rates on the way way 195 00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 1: up on the ten uere We've been like increasing our 196 00:10:34,679 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 1: underweight US treasuries over the course of the last few months. 197 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:40,839 Speaker 1: Our conviction has not waned, despite the fact that it 198 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: has been stubbornly low over the course of the last 199 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:46,560 Speaker 1: few months. But we think that the direction is up. 200 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:48,880 Speaker 1: That said, it's in the context to go back where 201 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 1: we started, where we're going to see a very shallow 202 00:10:51,400 --> 00:10:54,959 Speaker 1: normalization of policy rate in the US and as a result, 203 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,160 Speaker 1: and some more inflation coming. But this combination of an 204 00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:01,880 Speaker 1: inflation coming through with very oh rate um, it's it's um. 205 00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:04,440 Speaker 1: It's a real rate environment that's very negative and contin 206 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:06,840 Speaker 1: used to be and that will be um you know, 207 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:10,840 Speaker 1: supportive of of equity or risk ascid even the U S. 208 00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:13,200 Speaker 1: We're neutral on US equity though, just to be clear, 209 00:11:13,600 --> 00:11:16,720 Speaker 1: uh and I think that's more coming from this the juncture, 210 00:11:16,760 --> 00:11:19,640 Speaker 1: the fiscal policy landscape on the tax front, that ceiling. 211 00:11:20,280 --> 00:11:22,640 Speaker 1: Uh and and we're gonna we're gonna hear more this week. 212 00:11:23,280 --> 00:11:26,080 Speaker 1: We want to just right there, just I want to 213 00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 1: make that clear. You care about the dead ceiling. We 214 00:11:30,240 --> 00:11:32,760 Speaker 1: think there's headline restaurant the dead ceiling. Ultimately, we put 215 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:35,160 Speaker 1: out a note last week where we say, uh, you know, 216 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:37,480 Speaker 1: there's gonna be noise. The market is prone to be 217 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:40,520 Speaker 1: reacting to noise and this juncture, like we said, but 218 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:43,320 Speaker 1: we will advise looking through. But the headline risk is there. 219 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: But again we haven't certainly around the how big this 220 00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:48,320 Speaker 1: package will be. As a result, we haven't certainly around 221 00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:51,360 Speaker 1: corporate taxes and the like. And that's a neutral the 222 00:11:51,400 --> 00:11:54,280 Speaker 1: neutral sense on US equity. Joan, thank you, Jean Bavan. 223 00:11:54,520 --> 00:12:01,760 Speaker 1: There of blank Rock the Investment Institute had right now 224 00:12:01,840 --> 00:12:04,079 Speaker 1: joining us on a political moment and what it means 225 00:12:04,080 --> 00:12:07,760 Speaker 1: for economics financial investment. Gregory Vellier joins us with a 226 00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 1: g F Investments always a stude on the moment a hand, Greg, 227 00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:15,240 Speaker 1: I am dumbfounded by Democrats taking a victory now like 228 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:18,960 Speaker 1: it was sixty four sixty five and the resounding win 229 00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:21,960 Speaker 1: of L. B. J Lyndon Baines Johnson off of the 230 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:27,040 Speaker 1: assassination of JFK took sixtent of the vote. Biden took 231 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:29,800 Speaker 1: fifty one point three percent of the vote. How much 232 00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:33,000 Speaker 1: of a majority does the president have to ram through 233 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 1: this set of legislative pieces. He doesn't have much, Tom. 234 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:40,359 Speaker 1: I think that that is one of the big realizations 235 00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:44,440 Speaker 1: over the last weekend. Nancy Pelosi, of all people, said 236 00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:46,560 Speaker 1: that we're not going to be at three point five trillion. 237 00:12:46,679 --> 00:12:49,680 Speaker 1: That was a big concession in my opinion. And then 238 00:12:49,720 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 1: she threw out another concession, Tom, and that is that 239 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:54,880 Speaker 1: we're not going to have a government shutdown. At the 240 00:12:54,960 --> 00:12:58,160 Speaker 1: end of this week. They'll do an extension. So those 241 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,280 Speaker 1: two thinks make me a little more up to stick. 242 00:13:00,520 --> 00:13:03,560 Speaker 1: And I'm not euphoric, but I think the chances of 243 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: a major crisis are still remote. And then one final point, 244 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:10,679 Speaker 1: I urge everyone to read the Wall Street Journal piece 245 00:13:11,040 --> 00:13:14,000 Speaker 1: on the Fed's tools. If we were to have a 246 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:17,680 Speaker 1: debt real debt crisis and a default crisis, the FED 247 00:13:17,760 --> 00:13:20,520 Speaker 1: has options. They can sell some of their treasuries, they 248 00:13:20,559 --> 00:13:24,360 Speaker 1: can buy defaulting treasuries. So this this is a serious story, 249 00:13:24,640 --> 00:13:29,360 Speaker 1: but it's not an apocalyptic story. Greg, very importantly, do 250 00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:33,760 Speaker 1: you sense negotiations that are normal, that they have a 251 00:13:33,800 --> 00:13:37,000 Speaker 1: give and take and a back and forth among well 252 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:42,960 Speaker 1: meaning politicians. No, I don't see it yet. I think 253 00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:45,400 Speaker 1: that there's a lot of anger at Mitch McConnell because 254 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,600 Speaker 1: the Republicans spent like drunken sailors for four years with 255 00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 1: tax cuts and a lot of spending. I think there's 256 00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:54,040 Speaker 1: a lot of resentment toward him right now. Frankly, I 257 00:13:54,080 --> 00:13:58,800 Speaker 1: think the negotiations that really matter are among Democrats. You 258 00:13:58,880 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 1: still got to get a full of very important moderates 259 00:14:01,640 --> 00:14:04,560 Speaker 1: on board. That's coming, But I think a deal with 260 00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:08,760 Speaker 1: Republicans comes later in the fall. Greg, you mentioned this 261 00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 1: Nick Timorrow story in the Walster Tournal. Let's go there. 262 00:14:11,160 --> 00:14:13,200 Speaker 1: This idea that the FED could be thrust once again, 263 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: it's the political spotlight actually taking a role in trying 264 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:20,120 Speaker 1: to stave off a political default. How much is this 265 00:14:20,200 --> 00:14:23,000 Speaker 1: a risk for the Federal Reserve that when Congress stalls 266 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:26,000 Speaker 1: out and can't get stuff done, the Federal Reserve has 267 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:28,480 Speaker 1: to sort of be left holding the bag and takes 268 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:32,480 Speaker 1: a lot of heat as a result on all sides. Yeah, Lisa, 269 00:14:32,520 --> 00:14:35,480 Speaker 1: it's a good point. They dread this. They don't want 270 00:14:35,480 --> 00:14:37,520 Speaker 1: to get an image of being the you know, the 271 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:41,320 Speaker 1: lender of last resort. Uh And I think they would 272 00:14:41,400 --> 00:14:44,120 Speaker 1: make it clear this is an exception. But you read 273 00:14:44,200 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 1: the piece that they've been there before, they've considered these options. 274 00:14:47,640 --> 00:14:49,960 Speaker 1: There's a lot of controversy with them, including some of 275 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 1: the active traders at the FED, and now there's going 276 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:55,240 Speaker 1: to be controversy over this. Well, you know, that's just 277 00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:57,840 Speaker 1: the way things are right now. It's a very controversial, 278 00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:01,840 Speaker 1: dysfunctional period and w it's the way things are, especially 279 00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:03,760 Speaker 1: at a time when FED Chair J. Powell is up 280 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 1: for the potential renomination by Jerome by President Biden. There's 281 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 1: a question though here how much inflation is starting to 282 00:15:11,800 --> 00:15:15,200 Speaker 1: concern Democrats more than it had previously, and perhaps this 283 00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:17,120 Speaker 1: is one of the reasons for some of the concessions 284 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:19,880 Speaker 1: the Nancy Pelosi made. Do you really feel like that's 285 00:15:19,920 --> 00:15:23,600 Speaker 1: the case? Yeah, I think that more and more voters 286 00:15:23,640 --> 00:15:28,120 Speaker 1: around the country are linking together higher prices and big spending. 287 00:15:28,160 --> 00:15:31,160 Speaker 1: I'm not sure the correlation is there, but the voters 288 00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:33,880 Speaker 1: believe that, and as long as they do, I think 289 00:15:33,880 --> 00:15:36,800 Speaker 1: at price tag like three point five trillion is just 290 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:41,400 Speaker 1: too rich. Greg I was looking at ed case of Hawaii. 291 00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:45,400 Speaker 1: It's a hugely democratic state, and he is clearly a 292 00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:49,920 Speaker 1: moderate Democrat as well. What does Speaker Pelosi have to 293 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 1: offer moderates blue dogs like Ed case of Hawaii, Well, 294 00:15:55,840 --> 00:15:57,720 Speaker 1: not a lot to on That's that's one of the 295 00:15:57,800 --> 00:16:01,040 Speaker 1: problems here. Maybe she's gonna for him a better chance 296 00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:05,400 Speaker 1: of getting reelected. An awful lot of Democrats I talked to, 297 00:16:05,520 --> 00:16:09,840 Speaker 1: or their staffs anyway, are saying they're scared about. The 298 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 1: issue is not will the Republicans win the House? The 299 00:16:13,040 --> 00:16:15,760 Speaker 1: issue is by how much? Will they win the House 300 00:16:15,800 --> 00:16:18,840 Speaker 1: by ten, twelve, fifteen, twenty seats. When you start talking 301 00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 1: about numbers like that, a lot of people, like the 302 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:25,760 Speaker 1: gentleman from Hawaii run for cover. So just before we 303 00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 1: let you go, you said that three and a half 304 00:16:27,240 --> 00:16:29,560 Speaker 1: trillion dollar plan is a pipe geam. Even Nancy Pelosi 305 00:16:29,600 --> 00:16:32,080 Speaker 1: said that what are you seeing in terms of what 306 00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:34,520 Speaker 1: the likely bill will look like in terms of size 307 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:38,640 Speaker 1: and in terms of taxes, well under two. But there's 308 00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 1: so many gimmicks. Some of these programs are five years, 309 00:16:41,280 --> 00:16:44,360 Speaker 1: some or seven, some of ten. Some will expire and 310 00:16:44,360 --> 00:16:47,080 Speaker 1: then get shoved shoved off to the States. There's a 311 00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:50,280 Speaker 1: lot of gimmickry. But I think that let's say something 312 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 1: more around two is far more likely, and it's not 313 00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:58,520 Speaker 1: him if investments. Gregg, thank you on the week ahead 314 00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 1: and beyond. We have a rare treat right now. We'll 315 00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:09,800 Speaker 1: get right to a Lloyd Miner is one of the 316 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:12,520 Speaker 1: most different physicians I know out there. He has someone 317 00:17:12,600 --> 00:17:16,199 Speaker 1: with world class first order research on the balance of 318 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:19,440 Speaker 1: the ear. He has taken that over to medicine and 319 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:22,200 Speaker 1: the management of hospitals and all among other things that 320 00:17:22,280 --> 00:17:25,600 Speaker 1: Johns Hopkins a residency at Duke a few years ago 321 00:17:25,920 --> 00:17:28,320 Speaker 1: in olds Court and Palo Alto. Right now, what's your 322 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:31,480 Speaker 1: biggest headache right now? Dean? I think our biggest concern 323 00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:33,200 Speaker 1: right now is to make sure that we continue to 324 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:36,640 Speaker 1: provide outstanding healthcare, that we take care of our students 325 00:17:36,680 --> 00:17:39,600 Speaker 1: eighteen thousand students back on our campus, and that we 326 00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:43,760 Speaker 1: comply with the federal mandate that the Biden administration is 327 00:17:43,760 --> 00:17:47,960 Speaker 1: issued with regard to the vaccine mandate. What is your 328 00:17:48,080 --> 00:17:53,600 Speaker 1: strategy with your unvaccinated staff. Well, first time we have 329 00:17:53,640 --> 00:18:01,200 Speaker 1: a highly vaccinated it's between within your hospitals, within our hospitals, yes, 330 00:18:02,080 --> 00:18:04,480 Speaker 1: and and around the university. It's similar. I mean, we're 331 00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:07,880 Speaker 1: still gathering that information. We want to make sure that 332 00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:10,320 Speaker 1: that we're providing those who wish to apply for a 333 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:13,399 Speaker 1: religious or medical exemption, that we provide the avenue to 334 00:18:14,040 --> 00:18:18,119 Speaker 1: you know, issue that application and have it reviewed. But 335 00:18:18,520 --> 00:18:21,199 Speaker 1: we know that these vaccinations are among the safest and 336 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:24,600 Speaker 1: most effective vaccinations ever developed. We want to make sure 337 00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:27,920 Speaker 1: that we answer any questions people have and ultimately get 338 00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:31,399 Speaker 1: a fully vaccinated workforce. Meanwhile, Dr Minor over in New 339 00:18:31,480 --> 00:18:35,280 Speaker 1: York State, there is a mandate that healthcare workers get 340 00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:38,960 Speaker 1: vaccinated and actually the governor and Kathy Hokel has said 341 00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:41,560 Speaker 1: that she may bring in the National Guard to fill 342 00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:45,359 Speaker 1: empty healthcare rules once this mandate goes into effect, which 343 00:18:45,480 --> 00:18:47,600 Speaker 1: is this week. What do you make of all this? 344 00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:52,560 Speaker 1: It's really important that our healthcare organizations, hospitals, clinics be 345 00:18:52,640 --> 00:18:56,040 Speaker 1: able to continue to provide outstanding care. You know, the 346 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,919 Speaker 1: real tragedy early on in the pandemic was in places 347 00:19:00,080 --> 00:19:03,600 Speaker 1: like New York where the healthcare workforce became overwhelmed. We 348 00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:08,200 Speaker 1: had too many patients overwhelming our facilities and our workforce. 349 00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:11,920 Speaker 1: So I think having skilled, trained healthcare personnel, and if 350 00:19:11,920 --> 00:19:16,000 Speaker 1: that's the National Guard, uh, then then perhaps that's appropriately 351 00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 1: making sure we continue to provide care to patients when 352 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:21,080 Speaker 1: they need it by skilled personnel is going to be 353 00:19:21,119 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 1: really important. Dr Dr Miner. If there are people who 354 00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:29,200 Speaker 1: doubt the efficacy or doubt the potential risks of the vaccine, 355 00:19:29,720 --> 00:19:32,119 Speaker 1: what does it send them in terms of messaging that 356 00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 1: a lot of healthcare workers are not getting vaccinated themselves. 357 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:39,360 Speaker 1: I think it's a difficult message and uh and one 358 00:19:39,400 --> 00:19:42,159 Speaker 1: that concerns me a lot. We we have a highly 359 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:44,920 Speaker 1: vaccinated healthcare workforce where we are, and I think that's 360 00:19:44,920 --> 00:19:50,080 Speaker 1: true across most areas of the country. It's the pandemic 361 00:19:50,119 --> 00:19:53,040 Speaker 1: has been overwhelming and overwhelming experience for all of us. 362 00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 1: But I think the steps at the FDA, the c 363 00:19:55,960 --> 00:19:59,080 Speaker 1: d C have taken to ensure the safety and efficacy 364 00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 1: of these vaccines are remarkable, and we need to do 365 00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:05,600 Speaker 1: the best job we can in healthcare to communicate that 366 00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:09,720 Speaker 1: message so that more people feel reassured and get vaccinated. 367 00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:14,320 Speaker 1: Our listeners are viewers have to be confused by the 368 00:20:14,320 --> 00:20:20,440 Speaker 1: cacophony of politics. F D a federal this maybe world 369 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:25,399 Speaker 1: health organization, but certainly c DC. What's your desire for 370 00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:31,040 Speaker 1: c DC and Washington officials to get on the same page, Tom, 371 00:20:31,080 --> 00:20:35,320 Speaker 1: I think it's really important that that federal agencies UH 372 00:20:35,359 --> 00:20:38,080 Speaker 1: and the FDA and CDC in particular are aligned, and 373 00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:43,520 Speaker 1: I think Dr Willinsky. Director Willinsky of course ultimately issued 374 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:46,800 Speaker 1: a ruling aligning the CDC recommendations pretty much with the 375 00:20:46,880 --> 00:20:50,159 Speaker 1: FDA recommendations. But there was, as you described, there was 376 00:20:50,240 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 1: a lot of back and forth with the advisory committee. 377 00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:55,560 Speaker 1: It's important to have advisory committees. They represent a diversity 378 00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:58,520 Speaker 1: of opinions and areas of expertise. But at the end 379 00:20:58,560 --> 00:21:00,720 Speaker 1: of the day, it's up to the leaders to make 380 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:03,480 Speaker 1: sure the alignments. There is this one off like is 381 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:05,880 Speaker 1: this something new for you with all of your decades 382 00:21:05,920 --> 00:21:07,679 Speaker 1: of experience, or is this sort of the way the 383 00:21:07,680 --> 00:21:12,760 Speaker 1: sausage is made within the vaccine bacteria community. Well, COVID 384 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:15,520 Speaker 1: is certainly one off for all of us. But and 385 00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:19,840 Speaker 1: I think ordinarily Tom these disagreements do exist in a 386 00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:24,359 Speaker 1: healthy way between regulatory agencies. But we're in the midst 387 00:21:24,359 --> 00:21:27,200 Speaker 1: of a huge crisis, and so alignment and coordination is 388 00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:30,760 Speaker 1: particularly important getting us through this crisis. Dr Monner, there 389 00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:32,800 Speaker 1: was a study that came out of Oxford University that 390 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,720 Speaker 1: came out this morning that said that American men lost 391 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:38,639 Speaker 1: more than two years of lifespan as a result of 392 00:21:38,640 --> 00:21:41,679 Speaker 1: the COVID pandemic. When we look back on this period, 393 00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:47,040 Speaker 1: what will be the healthcare legacy of the COVID pandemic. Well, 394 00:21:47,080 --> 00:21:49,760 Speaker 1: I hope the legacy will be how we responded as 395 00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:51,879 Speaker 1: a as a nation and how we responded as a 396 00:21:51,920 --> 00:21:55,320 Speaker 1: healthcare community. Certainly, there are many aspects of that response 397 00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:58,240 Speaker 1: that we wish were different, but I think we've all 398 00:21:58,320 --> 00:22:00,560 Speaker 1: learned a lot and are learning a lot. I am 399 00:22:00,600 --> 00:22:03,879 Speaker 1: just so proud every day to work with an amazing 400 00:22:04,080 --> 00:22:08,160 Speaker 1: group of dedicated healthcare professionals where I am at Stanford, 401 00:22:08,160 --> 00:22:10,840 Speaker 1: and I would say that about really healthcare workers around 402 00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:16,280 Speaker 1: the country and supporting our healthcare workforce during these trying 403 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:18,760 Speaker 1: times is going to be particularly important as we all 404 00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 1: get through this together. Just a Miner, thank you so 405 00:22:21,119 --> 00:22:23,960 Speaker 1: much for joining Bloomberg today, and you're greatly greatly appreciate 406 00:22:23,960 --> 00:22:26,040 Speaker 1: that Lloyd Miner has been with us many many times 407 00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 1: year across the arc of this pandemic. And we look 408 00:22:29,040 --> 00:22:33,440 Speaker 1: for further conversations of course Stanford University School of Medicine, 409 00:22:33,680 --> 00:22:37,960 Speaker 1: Diana as well. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks 410 00:22:38,000 --> 00:22:41,280 Speaker 1: for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to ten 411 00:22:41,359 --> 00:22:45,840 Speaker 1: am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each 412 00:22:45,920 --> 00:22:49,679 Speaker 1: day from six to nine am for insight from the 413 00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:54,920 Speaker 1: best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And subscribe 414 00:22:54,960 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 1: to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, 415 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:03,240 Speaker 1: and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. 416 00:23:03,320 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 1: This is Bloomer