WEBVTT - MLB Season Long Prop Bets Update (Ep. 90)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's me Joey p

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe Pi Zapia, and today we got some more Major

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball for you. We're talking season long props with

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite people. You know him from in

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this league. You know him as one of the leaders,

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>if not the leader of the IT army, let's be honest.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And you also know him as the host of Prospect One,

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the greatest prospect show you'll ever find and the coolest

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>shirt here with the prospects assembled that is amazing copyright

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>infringement to the side. He's the one, the only, my

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>good friend, the Welsh Welsh. How are you, my friend?

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>What's going on, Joey, what's up, buddy?

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Don't mention copyright. It's totally okay. It's just totally fine,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>totally shirt that you can buy. Yes, what's up, buddy?

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you how much for having me. Glad to be

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>back on the Pros with the Joe.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that's right. Pros with the Joe. That's how

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we roll here. And you know it's funny because we

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about, you know, coming on for a show and

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 1>things like that. You said, well, I don't know betting

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. But to me, the person you

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to when it comes to props is

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy person, especially when you're going to talk about

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the rookie of the year stuff today too,

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>because you handle all the prospects and you can kind

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of tell us where to put our money. But also,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think fantasy people have the best opportunity to give

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you the best information when it comes to who's the

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hit leader this year, who's the k leader, who is

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>progressing in that fashion, because that is a little bit deeper.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>That's more about digging into the stats and digging into

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers and more than just the trends and the

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>recent bias and things like that. And I think it

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>takes a really good fantasy person that is you, my friend.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to chat for you about this. How

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are you enjoying the baseball season?

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>First off, Oh, that's a loaded question.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a loaded question. I know what it's full of.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And I want to ask you because there's been some

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>good and some bad so far this year. So I'm

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>curious what's your take on the year in twenty twenty one.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't ironically, maybe to some people like

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be like the negative guy, even

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 2>though I can be kind of a negative guy because

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 2>there's so much great stuff about it. But I think

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>it's been a loaded year across the board. There's so

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>many things that show how much baseball is working against itself,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>which really bothered me. From the littlest thing. John, I

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 2>was just talking about this on the Ende Fantasy Baseball podcast,

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Like you go and look at Key Brian Hayes losing

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 2>a home run because of the base thing. I know

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 2>it's like a technicality, but it's such a silly thing

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that hurts baseball. You think it's good for baseball for

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Kee Brian Hayes to literally hit a home run over

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>the wall, and then you have this little like foot issue.

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Witt had the exactly, it's the same day, the

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>same day Bobby Witt had it. That's not good for baseball.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>The spider, you know, the all of the sticky and

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that type of stuff, it's not good for baseball. The

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>COVID issues, there's been so much negativity in that front

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>that it's made it to enjoy baseball. Also, my team

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Arizona Diamondbacks are the biggest garbage pile in baseball, which

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>has made it tough. But at the end of the day,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I love it and I've expanded, you know, my fantasy

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff into I'm literally doing everything from points to dynasty,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to head to head to like weird Big sixteen twenty four.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I do all the different leagues to really kind of

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>expand how I'm playing. But you know, Joe, can I

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 2>ask you one question? Since the Bedding Show, I was

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 2>just talking to someone about this and we were talking

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>about the industry. As you're asking me how I'm enjoying

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the baseball season, Like, I'm enjoying it fine with all

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the negativities that come with it and all of the

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 2>adjustments that you have to do. But you know, the

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>DFS world, in the gambling world is very unique and

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me that the one thing I was saying,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>and I've always harped on and you agree with me,

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 2>is like baseball should be fun like you want, and

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>fantasy should be fun. By the way I play fantasy,

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>it should be fun. I feel like more than ever

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the fun has escaped fantasy when it has come to

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>gambling and DFS it's more serious, it's than ever been

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>it's ever been because it's big money and there's stuff

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like that. But how like, have you ever tackled how

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>do you bring the fun back into dfs? Not just

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>same question, you know what?

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>For me, honestly, I think the in game betting is

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>super fun where you're just watching a game and you

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>can kind of get involved in that and kind of

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>ride that wave. I think that's very different. That's really

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>evolved and kind of taking on. And for those of

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you who don't know what I mean, when you're watching

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a game, you can literally get in there and start

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>to make bets about the over unders changing or you

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>know whether or not another team's going to take the lead,

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>or I mean, it's crazy some of the things that

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are available to you in the game as things are

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>going on or really kind of changing that. I think

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it all depends on how you look at it. If

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you are somebody that does it as you know, a

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>very super serious thing, or if it's more of a

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>fun thing. And I think that's more for the individual

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep it fun. The TDFs to me, has been

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>more fun than season long baseball, to be honest with you,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>because the season long baseball injury train is brutal. I

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>just want to go out there some nights and just

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>put a lineup together, I like, and not have to

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>worry about drops and ads and trades and who's going

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>on the IL and replacing this player and all that

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff and all that work and all the investment going

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>down the drink because I got I got my three

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>best players in the IL. And I think that's where

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the dfs and really starts to, you know, come in

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and change things from a from a betting wagering perspective

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.239
<v Speaker 1>where you're playing the game differently. So I actually prefer

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the hyper focus of MLB dfs and some of the

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 1>wagering than to the other stuff. Necessarily, this season long baseball,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>especially the RODO is a bit of a grind by comparison.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really good conversation.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>It is, and I think it comes back and the

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>reason I asked it also not just because this is

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>like you know, we're talking gambling and betting and stuff

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>like that, but like you know, you asked me, like,

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 2>how am I enjoying the season more and more? For

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>people like us? And I think for more people in

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>general is I think when you ask that question, it's

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>not just about like, you know, the sentinity of the

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>game and blaha and baseball it's not helping itself, but

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 2>let the kids play. It's not even just necessarily about that.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>It's also it's intertwining because I think when you ask

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 2>someone like, hey, are you enjoying the season, they might

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>answer that from a gambling perspective. You know, Oh, I'm

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>arguing with people and I'm not making money and this

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>site didn't help me get this, or I'm just on

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>a bad streak. Like the exterior things that we do

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>to have fun, and yes, they can be businesses and

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 2>they can be lifestyles and likelihood, to be honest with you,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>but like the way people speak about their enjoyment of

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the game can be skewed by that that can be

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the impetus to all of those issues. And you know,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I just I always reiterate there can be be money

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>on the line, and I think how much money you

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 2>put on the line should also be dictated by the

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>level of enjoyment in these games that we play. And

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think when people put more money on

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 2>the line than they should, or they overextend themselves by

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>doing too much, you lose focus and you have less fun.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 2>And then that's sometimes where burnout comes in, because you

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 2>should want to have as much fun as possible no

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>matter what you're doing and what type of money is

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>on the line. You want to keep within your ability

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 2>to also enjoy the thing that you're doing.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think part of that joy is also

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>knowing when to make the wage. Like, for instance, you know,

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I loved Otani coming into this year for MVP, but

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't getting bed at twenty to one or thirty

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>or one before the season. I needed to see a

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And then the challenge to me is watching

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 1>things evolve and then getting in at the right time.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I love the Brewers, but I didn't wager on

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>them yet, and Yelich got hurt and I was happy

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, and then Yelich came back, and then Flowerty

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>got hurt, and the Milwaukee Brewers pictures look really good,

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and I started to change my tune a little bit.

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still waiting. So I got in on Otani,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't gotten in on the Brewers. There's some other

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>things that I'm looking at right now. We're gonna try

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to kind of look at them as well today and

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of these individuals, because I think a

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>third plus into the season, basically here we are in

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that sense, and now's the time where you have a

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>better picture of where things are. You have a better

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>picture two of injuries and how they've affected things. So

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>let's start with most hits now on the betting pros

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and the consensus line here, DJ Lemayhew was the best

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>odds at plus eight hundred, then wit Merrifield, wit Meryfield,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>big fan always at ten to one, Trey Turner at

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven to one, Mookie Bets twelve to one, and Mookie

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>has struggled quite a bit. Lindor Tim Anderson, these were

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>some other names that were kind of out there, but

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously going in, wit Marryfield was still my pick going in.

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>That was the guy that I thought people should be

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards if they wanted to make this wager. Is

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it still wit Maryfield for you or do you see

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody else kind of emerging? As you know, this guy

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>really has the inroads to be the hit leader of

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball because we've had some phenomenal performances so

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>far in the first two months of the season. Yeah.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think there's there's a couple in line

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>with here if you're talking about like where we stand

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>now and if I were, you know, trying to jump

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>in and whatever that could be. You know, someone I

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's making a crazy case right now and you

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 2>never would have bet them is actually Cedric Mullins, who

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 2>is a third in baseball in hits with seventy five,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 2>and he's just been next level. But you know, I

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>think preseason I might have gone DJ Lemayhew, you know,

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>mister you know, mister, no laun changle and just hit

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>hit hit, hit hit. That would have been guy. What

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a concept Welsh, Yeah, exactly, it could work. But trade

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Turner would be the guy for me that I would

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 2>look at in this because he's currently fourth in baseball

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>or at least tied for fourth with ikf Isa Isaiah

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of flavor what's up spot, and Turner is fourth

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>in that right now, and he's right on the heels

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>of the surprising leader in hits in baseball, Adam Fraser,

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 2>who's probably going to be one of the first people

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 2>traded by the trade deadlines. So I mean, I think

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 2>at this moment, if I'm you know, if I'm diving

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:31.599
<v Speaker 2>in it's trade. Turner is the guy for me that

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I wold feel best about. But I would I probably

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 2>would have gone in La Mayhew.

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you still have, i mean, with Fraser and

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>some of these eccentric mollins of guys you'd expect to

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>be there, if you could still go out there and

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>make that Trey Turner wager at reasonable let's say even

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a five to one in some spots, would that be

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a wager you'd be willing to go for? Yeah?

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>With Turner, I mean, the only thing holding him back,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>which I actually think plays really well into the bet

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 2>that you're talking about, like your bet here if it

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>was like plus one thousand, is Trey Turner's injury history.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Like that is the one thing that you would have

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to consider when you're doing it. But yeah, I mean,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I think he's been otherworldly and he's making everything happen.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>He's hitting over three hundred and the names above him,

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>by the way, are just not as trustworthy names Cedric Mullins,

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Adam Fraser and even Nick cass Casianos isn't necessarily a

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 2>He's not the pillar of hits. He's not the pillar

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of average and he's hitting three fifty seven. There's no

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>way that's gonna last. And the guys that are on

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>his heels, there's some interesting ones that are in there.

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Vladimir Guerrero Junior is in that. But based

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 2>on these guys that we're talking about, Yeah, I think

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Trey Turner would be my bet Wit would be number two. Obviously,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>LeMay Hugh's off of this and I mean sant Lendoor

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>on this list like what a what a bye?

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is what we're trying to do. We're trying

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to take where things were in the beginning of the

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>season and kind of take the temperature of them now.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>And the same thing goes for the home runs, because

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>going into the season, you'd get Vladdie for plus forty

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>four forty four to one. Oh yea forty four hundred

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable going into the season for Vla Guerrero Junior, right,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the favorites for Cody Bellinger, Jose Ramirez, Fernando

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Tatis was it minus one twenty four, Ronald Acunya one

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen so Akunya Tatist obviously still up there. Otani vlad

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>still in this conversation too, so in your mind right now,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing what you've seen so far, who do you think

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>at the end is going when the dust cell is

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going to lead the major leagues in home runs?

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I legit AM going to have a hard time coming

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 2>off of Vladimir Carrera Junior. I mean this has been

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 2>a big thing of Oh. I mean, you know we've

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 2>been doing shows for years. Oh yeah, Like I've watched

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Vladimir Guerrero, you know, just come up through the miners,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 2>and I got to spend a decent amount of time

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>seeing him in person when he was out here in

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Arizona during the Arizona Fall League. I I think in

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen it was and the one thing that would

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe seventeen, it doesn't matter. The one thing I would

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 2>stand out about him is he has some of the

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 2>best plate presents you've ever seen. He hits the ball

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 2>incredibly hard, but he was obviously looking for his spot.

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>But the negative on him for everybody was like, oh,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>he's just not getting the ball in the air launch angle.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 2>So he has this like mediocre year where people start going, Okay,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's a really good talent, but he's overrated.

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't hit homers, and this is me as a

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>prospect person. You know, prospects a symbol I say, I

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 2>tell you, I say, And this would be the same

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>thing I would I would bring up with if we

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>were going to talk about Jared kell Nick, I would say, listen,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 2>you've got to let the process happen and the people

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>that have focused on these minor leaguers and if you

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>believe and you kind of trust in what they say,

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 2>like follow their path and if if I happen to

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>be one of those people, I've like been steadfast to say,

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>like Blaim mcgerre Junior is going to be a star,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm not worried about having a seven degree launch

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 2>angle or anything like that. Like he's going to hit

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the ball hard, he's going to mash. He worked on

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>his body, and he looks like one of the best

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>players in baseball right now, and he's crushing homers. That's

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the only thing that people were taking away from him.

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>And he's got a three thirty five average, So all

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of that to be said. Vladimir Guerrero would be my

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>bet on this. The Otani one is super fun, though,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 2>but you know where the payout was for a lot

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>of people wouldn't have been like MVP or home run

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 2>leader was I want to say that the Otani home

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>run total was set at like twenty and a half

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and we might get that by like the extra week. Yeah,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna hit that by like next week, so that's okay.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And I would have taken I would love to tell

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>you I would have sat here and take taken Otani's MVP.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I probably wouldn't have. I won one hundred percent the

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>smash that Otani over twenty because this was one of

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 2>my big my big predictions, my bold predictions on the

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>year was Otani was gonna go twenty five plus on

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Homer's and that seems insanely silly now, but uh, you know,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 2>if you thought about the preseason with health and being

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>able to continue their billing.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>It sure you know. And the thing I keep coming

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>back and I got inven Otani. I put my trips

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>down at six to one, six and a half to one,

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>which I was very pleased because now that's a lot.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Forget it like he's gonna be minus at some point.

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna ask you this question and I want

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>your take on it, and then we'll move on to

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the next category here, because no matter what Vlad does.

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>If Otani is within you know, ten percent of it

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and pitching, how does Vlad compete for the MVP. Like

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing I can't wrap my mind around of

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Lad Guerrero MVP as long as Otani keeps some kind

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of pace with him.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Right because he doesn't. He doesn't, I mean he Otani

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 2>has been the leader of the MVP race.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>For especially with Trout going down to that really maximized

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it too, because you took that other guy who was

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on the same team, and then you start to write

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the narrative of well, you know, no, Trout, look at

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>what the guy's doing, and he's did in four hundred

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>said we put bombs last night's crazy.

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 2>It's at minimum four weeks. He's been the leader at

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the MVP, and he's so far along in this race

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 2>right now that you can't in my eyes, this is

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>just me. You can't talk about anybody keeping pace with Otani.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>You have to talk about a guy going so far

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>in above and beyond Otani to do this, because they'll

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 2>be got Akunya lad Tatis. They're gonna have more Homers,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna have a couple of them, will have some

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>more stolen bases, they'll have they'll have at least ten

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to twenty percent more offensive production at minimum. Okay, but

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>that's not enough because Atani is also doing it on

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the mound, and he is an elite hit right now,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>We're not even talking about a guy that's like he's

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 2>utility only and he's a top ten Fantasy player right

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>now in season long. And then you put him on

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the mound and he's putting up big strikeout games. There's

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 2>no one remotely close. It's a huge payoff if you

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>bet the MVP. And if I was doing it right now,

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting any plus odds. I'm still going Otani because

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, if you wanted to go on

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>another spot, I would look at like Tatis Junior. But

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Vlad is going to do it. Even

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 2>if he leads a league in home runs, that doesn't

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 2>really matter to me. I mean maybe triple crown. I

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 2>suppose triple crown is the thing that keeps it in it,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>But even then I don't think.

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Pitching just changes the whole nation.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Legit, I would love to know what people think about this,

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 2>because I legit think Vlad could have the triple crown,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>and I still think he doesn't win MVP over that.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. I'm gonna have to steal that for a

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation on tomorrow's leading off on Fantasy Pros, because that

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is a great question. If Lad wins a triple crown,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is that enough still? I don't know if it is.

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Assuming O Tawni like finishes like the season.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>A dozen wins or something like that, he strikes out

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy guys. I mean, it's just when

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you're playing two ways, I just don't know.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>He would be putting out the shares. You know, he

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>would be putting up two seasons worth of production at

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>two different positions of what people would have got. He

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>legit could have forty homers, twenty stolen bases, he could

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have eight to ten wins with a bunch of strikeouts.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>It's what you would think about him over two years.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, it's two different positions doing this,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>So triple Crown Vlad versus SUPERSTARO Tani, I just don't know.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's the closest I think you can get.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great conversation to have stolen bases obviously,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>going into the air at Alberto Mondesa was his favorite

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at minus one twenty five. But I don't know if

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have enough games to play really even to

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>get into this conversation, that's the problem. It's like, you know,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>people thought he might steal, you know, fifty sixty bases.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>We're lucky if he plays fifty sixty games. At this point,

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Trey Turner was at plus four point fifty, Ronald Acunia

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>plus six hundred, with Maryfield plus seven. Fernando tuttis junior

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in this conversation, as well as Boba Schett. But if

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you had to put the money down right now, who

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>do you think is going to lead the league the

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season here and cumulatively in stolen bases?

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Who would be that guy for you? And again taking

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Trey Turner's injury history even into.

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Account, Yeah, I mean I lean to wit Merrifield, and

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I hate being the guy that's like picking the guy

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 2>at the top. But I mean, he's got four more

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases than any other player. And even though if

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 2>I think an argument you could say is like if

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 2>I think Trey Turner is going to have the most hits,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>that gives more on base opportunities, but he's just stealing

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 2>at like a little bit less of a clip where

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Royals are manufacturing as much as possible,

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think Witt is in that discussion, has less

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 2>of an injury history, and you know, once the Royals

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 2>get going, they run almost more than anybody, and if

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Mondessy comes back healthy at some point, you know they're

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>going to want to continue to go. I think Witt

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>has a great chance. Tree Turner obviously has to be

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>put in that if you're going for like more wild card.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think I think a Tim Anderson

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 2>could be back in that race. He's not that far off.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>He's got ten stolen bases, and he's got a decent

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 2>amount at least thirty less at bats in wit Mayfield

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>that could account to a couple more. I think, so cumulative,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I would go with Wit, But if I were trying

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 2>to make some money, I don't hate the rest of

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 2>season on Tim Anderson.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, very good. Let's move and switch gears to

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the pitchers here, and let's start with major league winners

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of win total. Garrett Cole plus nine hundred,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Jacob de grond plus twelve. Trevor Bauer plus thirteen obviously

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a pretty usual suspects there, Beaver plus thirteen, Jack Flower,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you started off really great, was at plus fifteen walker

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Bueller's at plus fifteen hundred also, But you know, the

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble is with this one is you need the other factors,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen, need the run support, and you need to

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>pitch well. And God knows, Jacob de Grom's pitch as

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>well as any human being possibly could and win totals

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>always seem to be the thing that he is chasing.

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So in your opinion, even with all the new stuff,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>now you're throwing in this wrinkle where with Bauer and

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Cole and all the well, who's got the sticky stuff

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>from the hat and the glove and who's got all

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the special spinny the spinny goo that you put all

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>over the baseballs. I guess here's the question is does

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this start to kind of creep in and make you wonder,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, who really is completely legit and who is

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>going to possibly fall off? Or is it a little

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>bit of overrated nonsense when at the end of the.

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Day, let me do my best Garrett Cole impression.

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Uh good, Yeah, no, I think if he wasn't prepared

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 3>for the question, as if he didn't know that that question.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>That's the funny part, right, It's like he wasn't prepared,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like nobody said, hey, Garrett, they might ask you about this,

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you might want to have an answer kind of in

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the can.

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the most we just on I Tail

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Baseball podcast, We just watch it. I had not watch

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 2>the whole video. I watched like the first twenty seconds

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>because it was like, it's enough.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>You watch the.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 2>Whole thing, and it is like one of the most

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 2>insane lack of preparation to answer a question, and it's

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>one of those if you political candidate, someone would be like,

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>get off the stay. They would have cut his mic.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 2>They would have pulled off, they'd cut to a commercial.

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>There's no way. But like Garrett Cole already showed some

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>signs and you can see some of the relative concerns

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>that are out there. You know, I think you just

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>spend rate dropped a decent amount. You saw Bowers drop

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>a decent amount that I'm very actually, very very curious

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>to see where Garrett Cole is going to go the

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>rest of the year. If I were picking on this

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and this is this seems wild because he's like rampant

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>with it. I'd actually go with to Grom.

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 2>And actually someone had quote tweeted a video of de

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Groam kind of walking and like touching his side or whatever,

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 2>and they were like, oh, you want to say de

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Grom doesn't do this, blah blah blah. And Thomas Nido,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 2>who was with the team, he goes out and he

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 2>goes I can guarantee you this guy does nothing. He

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>is the most legit picture. De Grom needs nothing else.

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I think when you if you do actually truly bring

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 2>down the pool of guys and you bring down two levels,

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Jacob de Gram has an opportunity to kind of rise up,

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the crop rises up. And also I'd say that is.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Can the Mets rise up with the wins and all that?

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 2>That's the big thing. And I think Lindor has been

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>rock bottom for so long that I think signs are

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 2>starting to pick that. I think Lindor is going to

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 2>start to come around. And as Lindor comes around, you're

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 2>gonna have that second stretch, and I think Debram is

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>going to finally pick up more wins. If I was

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>picking another one, I probably go Bouer. Uh, you know

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Bower has been able to do this. It's the Dodgers.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>They're going to collect wins just left and right. So

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sitting at the top of the pool

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 2>here obviously of players like Flirty is going to be

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>out until the All Star break, so he's not even

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 2>an option.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And he's a lot of good pictures too. He's still

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>got you Darvish in this mix, you know, obviously, you

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>know he's pitched very well this year too. Nobody thought

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Carls or Down would be what he is. I think

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the guys in the White Sox always have a chance too,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>because I look at the combination of run support and

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>bolepen and things like that, and we go, well, you know,

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lance Lynn Gilito, if everyone just kind of flies through

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months of the season, maybe those

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>guys gonna start.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>You want a dark horse one. You want a dark

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 2>horse one is Juliarius with the Dodgers. You know, you

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>think of all the other pitchers with the.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers, because he's been terrific this year.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>He's tied for the most wins in baseball right now,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and think of the Division Rockies Diamonback's worst in baseball

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 2>right now. Obviously you've got the Padres and the Giants

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>perform decent fire expectations. Though, Yeah, Julio Urias has been

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 2>one of the best pitchers in one of the more

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>big breakout stars from this past year that I think.

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Arias where he's at, and the continuation, especially if you

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>look at the guys that are like, you know, Bieber's

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>in there, you can't discount Bieber, Aaron Savali's in there.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 2>A real dark horse wan would be Julio Arias.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to some of the save

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>leaders here. Liam Hendrix was leading the pack with plus

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>six point fifty, world As Chapman seven to fifty, Josh

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Hayter plus eight hundred. Then you have rycee Oglecias, Kenley Jansen,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Edwin Diaz. So I know saves can be such an

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary thing, a very difficult thing to wager on. But

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, looking at where guys are in terms of

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>totals and where you project them to be as the

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>season goes on, who do you think is going to

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>lead the league in saves when all of a said

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and done.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, Milanson's already got a three save lead and he's

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 2>on one of the best teams in baseball. I just

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know how you go against it. Now, I would

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>say the thing that is not I mean that's no,

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's not. But he's But it's not like it's

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 2>Milansen on the Royals or Milanson on you know, I'm

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to even look at the Angels or something like that.

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Mlanson on the Padres, who again, as I

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 2>point out, with the Dodgers, it's in a great division

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 2>to kind of keep collecting. The thing that holds against

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>him is that there are guys in the wings that

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they'd be afraid to go to. Like

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he has a shorter leash even though you

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 2>stay nineteen games, not even through mid June. I feel

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>like a team is going to give this guy more

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 2>of a leash than people want. So Milanson, I think

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>has got to be the guy that is still the

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 2>big front runner. But you know, don't look now, Kenlly

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Jansen is having insane year, but he's six saves behind.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's the Dodger. So I'm going on like win

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>teams like Hendrix is in there. I think Rays is

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>gonna tap down a little bit. I think there's competition

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>with Barnes. I don't know Chicago can win enough for

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Craig Kimberl. So I like, I like Mulanson or Jansen.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 2>If if if I were possibly insane enough to bet saves.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was just gonna say to me, this is

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>always the one I'd run away from because it is

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so arbitrary. Those opportunities can be so difficult, And certainly

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there's so many guys who are right there, and the

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>number is gonna be so close. You know, there's gonna

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>be like one save two save difference between these guys

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>at the end. Now, the thing you really want to

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about is pitcher strikeouts, and god knows we've got

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton of those. I mean, between Corbyn Burns and

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Jacob de Gram and Garret Cole and Bieber and everybody

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in between. Giolito Shurez are looking like Schrzer again going

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>into things. Jacob deGrom plus four twenty five, plus four

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to fifty for Garrett Cole, plus six fifty for Bieber,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer plus seven to fifty. Then you have Giolito

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>plus eight and Max Scherz are at ten to one

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>at plus one thousand. So as the board looks right

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>now taking health, taking the new cruelty in baseball, cracking

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>down potentially on the guys with the spitty balls and

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>then the special substances. Who do you think, at the

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the day is the guy at the top

0:24:58.400 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the hill when it comes to cas.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just can't go against Beiab. It's impossible to

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>go against Beiab right now with how he's with how

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 2>he's performed. There is I mean, I still love de Grom.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 2>That would be I mean, your easy bets pending where

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 2>the money is is that play? Because de Gram also,

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>by the way, has the best k per nine in

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 2>baseball at fourteen four because he's only pitched as.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>We're recording he starts right, Yeah, he's only pitched fifty

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe, fifty eight innings.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>He has ninety three strikeouts compared to the leader in Bieber,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 2>who is one hundred and twenty two strikeouts in eighty

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 2>five innings. But let me throw a secondary name at

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you again. If you're looking for just big payoffs for

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the season, how about Corbyn Burns. Because

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>if you move down.

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Saw Young coming into the season.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>And you moved down the qualifications.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>My big concern is what is Corbyn Burns after one

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty innings this year? That's what I worry

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit.

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's a great question. But if you are talking

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>rest of the season, you're willing to go with it.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Corbyn Burns is the second best k per nine behind

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Degram at fourteen to two. He's got a time. He

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>has more strikeouts currently just you know, just a not

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 2>She's got ninety four. He must take the grounds ninety

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 2>three and he missed some times. So I mean, if

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 2>you look at the top, what is this like the

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 2>top seven in strikeouts in baseball? They've all got seventy

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 2>five or more innings except for Corbyn Burns. He has

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 2>ninety four strikeouts or six guys that have one hundred

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts or more. The next guy is Corbyn Burns. So

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>you know where are my bets pending odds. Bieber is

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 2>clear and far away. You know, one hundred and twenty two,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 2>five more than Tyler Glass now and he's already you know,

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty more. They're twenty nine more than Jacob de Grom,

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>So you go Bieber to Grom. But if I want

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 2>some money play. It's Corbyn Burns. Corbin Burns is a

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>strikeout machine, and they got to press him. He looks

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 2>better than he's ever done before. He's missed some times,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 2>so he's not looking like he's gonna press over two

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 2>hundred innings. That would be my one.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's a here's something I want to throw up before

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we get to Rookie of the Year. I'm maybe a

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy and spirau theorist for a moment, if I may,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that they sent down casted hero again, because it's time

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to put him in a package to get some more

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>offense before he completely bottoms out in the major leagues

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>where somebody looks at him and says, Okay, we're gonna

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have you know, maybe we can get this kid right.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>He's still very young. Let's get him back. Maybe just

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a change of I don't know, scenery, a change of

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting coaches, whatever it might be. Do you think Milwaukee

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sees opportunity here in this central because I don't think

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>anybody really believes in the Cubs at the end of

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the day, and with Flaherty out and the rest of

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this pitching being what it is in Saint Louis that

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 1>pitching in Milwaukee is so good. They just need to

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>get some more offense in the worst way, and Hero

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't getting it done. Do you think that that's part

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why they sent him down again for

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the second time this year.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, and they did the Adamis trade. They're

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 2>looking for offense, you know.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm that's another patchwork trade. Like they need a Mancini,

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>they need a Peralta, they need a no No, you know,

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they need somebody.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree with you. I was gonna say, is like,

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:05.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm less conspiratorial about like those type of deals, at

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 2>least I used to be where it's like, oh, they're

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 2>sending him down and just kind of hype up the

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>value and stuff like that, because I always want to

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 2>give a benefit of the doubt that like, these people

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that are making millions of dollars, they're not gonna be

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 2>subdued by like fifty at bats in like a triple

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 2>A during half of the season to be like, whoa,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 2>this guy's really great, But you know what it kind

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 2>of is. It kind of is like fantasy. It is legit.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>The more that I have talked to inner workings of

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>people with baseball, the amount that teams will strategically push

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>prospects out there and try to influence and try to

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>create value and won't move prospects up specific levels because

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>they want to keep them hitting so they can keep

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 2>that value going. It actually makes a lot of sense,

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think here. Even though Craig Council came out

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and said that never before has there been a bigger

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 2>gap between Triple A and the majors, which is a

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>really interesting comment which I think I relate. I could

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 2>see and I could agree with that they're encouraged by it.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>It does feel like his team needs to make a

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 2>big trade, but I'm not so sure it can come

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 2>from Keston here. Regardless, he could be a part of it.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a prime candidate. Get him out of there,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 2>get him in a new spot. But I don't know. Man,

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 2>if they could get Devin Williams right, you want a

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 2>great bullpen, but I imagine the package you could get

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 2>for Devin Williams and Keston Hero. You can move them off.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think they I agree with everything you said totally.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they need new stuff and I think they

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 2>are priming Keston Hero to just destroy at Triple A

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>and have a team that is just willing to have more.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what he did already once. That's my concern. He

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he bret him up and it's like, yeah, it's not working,

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>let's send you back down. I think they're just protecting

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the asset because they realize it's just not gonna happen,

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and they think they have a window. All right, you

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>are the guy to talk to about this, So I

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>want your opinion on this. The consensus line of betting

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pros for the National and Rookie of the Year Caulbrian

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Hayes a plus three fifty, Ian Anderson plus six hundred,

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Carlson at plus seven hundred. The American League side,

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it still sit with Randy rose Arena at the top

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at plus three fifty, Wander Franco's at ten to one.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Jared Kellenick, who just got sent down, still attend to

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So I guess here's my question, National League, American League,

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>where do you want to put your chips here? Is

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it just as simple as Brian Hayes is back now,

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's his award to lose Anderson's pitch very well. We

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen Wander Franco yet. Is this the time to

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>bet it before comes up and this ten to one

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes a two to one at some point. But he

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is on the same team as a Rose Arraya, so

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. Take me through your thoughts here, National League

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>American League Work of the Year. Where's Welch putting the chips?

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 2>So from an NL perspective, I think you kind of

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 2>hit it. I think it's a two dog race right now.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I think I actually think Ian Anderson might be your guy.

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 2>He's got a three and a half era. He started

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 2>eleven games, he's been really good. If he had a

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>couple more wins under his table, like six, I don't

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 2>even think it'd be remotely close. But if he can

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>get to like twelve or thirteen wins and he's gonna

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>put it decently behind him, keep that three and a

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 2>half the ray. I gotta be honest with you. I'm

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 2>just not sure what key Brian Hayes can do at

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 2>that point. Like, I mean, he could obviously go off,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and he has shown some that I would say right now,

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Ian Anderson is the front runner, but kee Brian Hayes

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>is on his tail, and keep Brian Hayes has been

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>just such a pleasant surprise that you know, the power

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 2>numbers have gone up and he's going to have really

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 2>big totals.

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>There's nobody else national League wise, it's going to come

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>up and compete this year.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Right uh oh, that's going to like actually be called up.

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>For this award in your opinion, right, I mean these

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are these are the guys, right. Not a horse race here.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's the tough part.

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Walks is starting to play better. I don't know if

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a dark horse where you start.

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he qualifies though.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Has he has? He already passed the qualification.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he he had. Like there's a couple of guys,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 2>well they're not in all now that I'm thinking about it,

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 2>but there's a couple of guys that are like Fringy

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>in that range. But like to your point of guys

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that could come up and be impactful right now. Probably

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>not Like what I was gonna say is you always

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>have those players like look at like air Cities, a

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Kino and stuff. You come up, you play like fifty

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>games and you hit like twenty homers. Those guys can

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 2>happen and there's a there's a possibility like Helly Oramos

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 2>or Eli Oramos with the Giants. He could get called

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 2>up like any time, and he's the type of player

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that could hit twenty plus. And I think it could

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>change the discussion, except that Hayes and Anderson have been

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>there the entire time, so I just.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't think and Anderson has the you know, two months on.

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Hayes hasn't been there for two months.

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I like JJ, like JJ Blede could come

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>up in the discussion. If he comes up relatively soon

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 2>it starts hitting, he could be that. I think I

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 2>think the bet right now is one of those two.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I would put it on Ian Anderson like a little

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 2>subtext guy. If the team were a little bit better,

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 2>would be Pevid Smith, to be honest with you, a

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 2>dinoback to ninety two five homers. He's got thirty four runs.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>He legit could close in. If the Diamondbacks can score

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 2>runs on like one hundred runs on the year, maybe

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>eighty RBIs twenty homers with a two ninety average, he

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>would be in discussion. Like, I think he's a top

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 2>five Rookie of the Year candidate in the NL. But

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 2>that's you know, that's like low dollar stuff.

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>If you did that the al though America so al

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like the Wild West. Is it a

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>matter of a Roserina and everybody else? Or is wander Franco,

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, is this the window? Because it feels

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like it might be because I don't know, I'm a

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>big fan. I just feel like this guy's gonna light

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>everything on fire. I think the league gonna have a

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>hard time adjusting to him. Actually that's my opinion on

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Wander Franco. But I'm worried that none of that ten

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to one gets cut in half very soon. If he

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>does get that call.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I can throw a couple of things out

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>for you. There are two absolute wild cards in this.

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm assuming because based on how I have it, they're eligible.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 2>But here's what you're forgetting. You're forgetting you'remin Mercedes, and

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 2>you're forgetting a Doulas Garcia, even though they're twenty eight

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.479
<v Speaker 2>years old, but they qualifying right right now.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Adulus Garcia Garcia Barsides was a look. Mercedes came crashing

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>back down earth. He had a great April. It was

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a fun ride. But Garcia's home run totals I think

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>are definitely something to keep an eye on. If you

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>had a vote, would you vote for Garcia, or would

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you vote for a Rosorina.

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 2>So far, I would vote for Garcia. It's unreal. He

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 2>has sixteen homers, hitting two seventy six and forty three RBIs.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Those forty three RBIs, I gotta look here because I

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>want to say.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Also got a ton of strikeouts in there too, which

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I can, but they're not the day they look at

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>the totals. That's what you're looking for.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 2>He's inside the top ten in RBIs. He's only behind

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Shoheo Tani. I mean, maybe one of these surprising is

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Hasyus Agular, who's fourth in baseball.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what, because Hazy's Agular is driven on hundred runs,

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the Milwaukee Brewers. He was an RBI

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>machine in the minor leagues in Cleveland. That guy knew

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>how to drive in runs. And that was the one

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>thing I always liked about Agular, even though he didn't

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>have the same kind of power you would look for

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>from us a first baseman, prototypically, he always had a

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>knack for driving in runs and he hit well with

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>runners and scoring position, which is like a lost art

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>form in baseball nowadays. But you bring up a great

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>point in Garcia, So is he actually the dark horse

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that people should actually be starting to put some money

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on where everybody saw about the other guys.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I would be fascinated to see what does

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 2>the number look like right now for Al because I.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't have to pull that up. I don't even have

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that number for him, because you pick up a point

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>because he is twenty eight.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I think people you forget that he technically qualifies. He

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 2>did not exceed prospect eligibility. Age does not qualify prospect

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 2>eligibility in baseball, as much as people want to do it.

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Like a lot of people will be like, well, I'm

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 2>just not going to rank you know, a twenty eight

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 2>year old, which I totally understand, but baseball doesn't care.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And Randy Rosewine is twenty six, but Yurman is twenty

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 2>eight adults, Garcia is twenty eight.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And Erman Mercedes right now actually is funny because it's

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just actually moved recently. Your Mercedes at plus eight hundred,

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Kellenik is at plus ten, wonder Franco's ten, Andrew Vaughan's ten.

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for Mercedes on consensus right now?

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 2>You mean Garcia?

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean Garcia rather and I don't have him, So

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>does he indeed or were sure he actually qualifies? There? Correct,

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and you see Brujon in there, I see a lot

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of other guys, And I.

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Know eight he came into the year with prospect eligibility

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 2>as far as I know, because he had a short

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 2>stint in He had a short stint in two thousand

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and eighteen where he had seventeen plate appearances. Then he

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 2>had only a handful more this past year and he's

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 2>eclips He's only only has two hundred and eleven total

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 2>plate appearances in his career and for this season he

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 2>has one hundred and ninety nine at bats. So yeah,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 2>he technically qualifies. But maybe they took him off due

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 2>to age. I can't tell you who it is.

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, they can't take you off because of age, but

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know because of the you know, because of

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way the COVID seasons and other things and

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>how they they tabulate.

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Usually usually that's tied to games on roster. But I'm

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 2>telling you, we walked into this season. The qualification for

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 2>rookies as you walk into this season, and again somebody

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 2>that could go and correct and be like here's the

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 2>reason why, Okay, that's fine. If that's not the case,

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 2>let's just assume, like right now, I would go Adules

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 2>because his numbers are crazy. He's hitting underlining stuff you

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 2>on Baseball Savant, they keep going. He's just not going

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 2>to stop, and he's hitting for good average. Randy is

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 2>definitely in the disc I don't think it's out of

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 2>the realm of possibility. If Wander were to come up soon,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 2>that he could pass Randy Rosin and Rands only hit

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 2>in about two fifty counting stats look pretty good. But

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>what would be in consideration is if Wander were to

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 2>come up, let's say within the next couple of weeks,

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>he legit could finish out the year hitting three hundred

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 2>plus and he could have you know, a ton of runs,

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and he could maybe not a ton of RBIs ten

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 2>twelve stolen bases IV. I think if he were to

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 2>do that and come up, it would have to be

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 2>within the next couple of weeks. I would be willing

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 2>to slap a little bit of it on Wander. But

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Trek Scooble would be another dark horse in here. But

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Randy currently owns it. But you know, don't forget about uh,

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 2>don't forget about Adulus and pay attention to wander and

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Trek Scooble.

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>There you have it all right. You can follow him

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at is it the Welsh and of course

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>go check out the it l Army over on Patreon.

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>In this league with Scott Bogman and the Welsh. And

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you can also subscribe to Prospect one if you're somebody

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.439
<v Speaker 1>who plays in Diazi leagues or you just like great

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>baseball talk. In this league, by the way, does everything

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>all the sports Welsh. I miss talking to you on

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis. This was nice to get together talk

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a little baseball. Hopefully we'll do it again soon and

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the time today, my friend.

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me. I always loved doing it.

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I always missed doing podcasts with you. Hopefully everybody had

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 2>a good time. And remember have some fun, have a.

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Little bit of fun. It's supposed to be fun. Let's

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>make it fun. That's it. Go have fun, all right.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, but the story of the

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>game goes on for the Welsh. I'm Joey p. We'll

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids,