1 00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:08,000 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news joining us right now. 2 00:00:08,039 --> 00:00:12,240 Speaker 2: Turston slock a polyglobal management, hugely read on Wall Street. 3 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 2: Of course, off of is a kind of work at 4 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:19,360 Speaker 2: Deutsche Bank is well, Turston. Twelve months forward, where's real GDP? 5 00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:22,800 Speaker 1: I still think it's strong. 6 00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:25,240 Speaker 3: But I do think that the weather report you just 7 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:29,720 Speaker 3: had with still mildly hot economy, mildly hot weather, but 8 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 3: with a risk that we may have some slow down 9 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 3: coming maybe twelve months, but more eighteen months into the future. 10 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:37,639 Speaker 1: The fear you can have is that. 11 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:41,440 Speaker 3: Higher for longer ultimately begins to bite harder on LeVert 12 00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:44,479 Speaker 3: balance sheets for consumers, on LeVert balance sheets for firms, 13 00:00:44,720 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 3: and LeVert balance sheets in the banking sector, and that 14 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:49,880 Speaker 3: could potentially create that dreaded recession that we've. 15 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:51,000 Speaker 1: Been worrying about for so long. 16 00:00:51,040 --> 00:00:53,640 Speaker 3: But so far, for the next several quarters, we still 17 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 3: think that the tailwinds to growth are very strong from 18 00:00:56,200 --> 00:00:59,640 Speaker 3: fiscal policy and from easy financial conditions. 19 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 4: I'm pretty consistent here in your call that this Federal 20 00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 4: Reserve doesn't really have to cut rates in twenty twenty four. 21 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 4: Do you still believe that, and if so, why? 22 00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:11,240 Speaker 3: I still believe that because of what I think. I mean, 23 00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:13,720 Speaker 3: the first test is, well, if we literally just a 24 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 3: quote unquote look out of the window and see how 25 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 3: are things going in the incoming data. Non farm payrolls 26 00:01:18,520 --> 00:01:21,080 Speaker 3: at two hundred and seventy two thousand, that's a really 27 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:24,200 Speaker 3: strong number. There's some debate about whether some of that 28 00:01:24,319 --> 00:01:27,680 Speaker 3: maybe is driven higher because of immigration, when the Edelburgh 29 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:30,160 Speaker 3: and Tara Watson at the Brookings Institute wrote a very 30 00:01:30,160 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 3: important paper suggesting that maybe the equilibrium growth in non 31 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 3: farm payrolls is about one hundred thousand higher than normal 32 00:01:37,680 --> 00:01:41,640 Speaker 3: because of immigration. But I still think that strength in 33 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:43,600 Speaker 3: the numbers across the board, with a little bit of 34 00:01:43,600 --> 00:01:45,720 Speaker 3: weakness may be in retail sales earlier this week, but 35 00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 3: at the same day we also had industrial production was 36 00:01:48,160 --> 00:01:51,640 Speaker 3: very strong, so jobless claims also looking good. It's just 37 00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 3: hard to see where that slowdown is that so many 38 00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:55,960 Speaker 3: people are worried about. So because of that, we just 39 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:59,000 Speaker 3: don't see the urgency for the FED having some cut rates. 40 00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:02,640 Speaker 4: Are you surprised is that the higher rates haven't impacted 41 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 4: the consumer more. I mean, it's it's tough to get 42 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 4: a plane seat, it's tough to get a seat on 43 00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 4: a cruise ship. It's tough to get a seat at 44 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:11,800 Speaker 4: a restaurant. Talk to just about how the consumers reacting. 45 00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:14,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, this is very important Pole, So I think it's 46 00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:17,519 Speaker 3: very critical in that discussion is that the transmission mechanism 47 00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:21,639 Speaker 3: of mortary policy was actually working last year, exactly as 48 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:24,720 Speaker 3: the textbook would have predicted. The FED raise rates in 49 00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:27,639 Speaker 3: March of twenty twenty two, and the most highly leveled 50 00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:31,160 Speaker 3: consumers started responding because you saw the languagey rates go 51 00:02:31,240 --> 00:02:33,799 Speaker 3: up on credit cards, the languagey rate go about auto loans, 52 00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:37,080 Speaker 3: especially for consumers that have more debt, which generally are 53 00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:39,480 Speaker 3: consumers that are younger also and consumers that have lower 54 00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 3: five coats goes same thing for corporates. You began to 55 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:44,360 Speaker 3: see the full rates go up for high yield, the 56 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 3: full rates go up for loans. So, in other words, 57 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,520 Speaker 3: balance sheets that had a lot of debt were first 58 00:02:49,639 --> 00:02:52,600 Speaker 3: hit by the FED racing rates. But what really is 59 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,560 Speaker 3: unique at the moment, that is the answer to your question, Paul, 60 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:59,200 Speaker 3: is that for consumers, they have locked in during the pandemic, 61 00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:01,920 Speaker 3: mortgage rate, as we all know, ninety five percent are 62 00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 3: thirty five fixed at. 63 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:04,320 Speaker 1: Very low levels. 64 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:07,880 Speaker 3: Likewise, for corporates, the vast majority of credit markets is 65 00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:10,840 Speaker 3: I G and IT companies locked in and turned out 66 00:03:10,919 --> 00:03:13,400 Speaker 3: also very low interest rates. And as a result of that, 67 00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:16,080 Speaker 3: the transmission making has just been weaker than what it 68 00:03:16,160 --> 00:03:18,600 Speaker 3: normally is. And that changed with a FED pivoting to 69 00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:20,919 Speaker 3: dubbish because then on top of that, not only was 70 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:23,800 Speaker 3: the transmission making week, but we also got a tailwind 71 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:26,520 Speaker 3: from easy financial conditions with S and p up as 72 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:27,600 Speaker 3: much as we have seen. 73 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 2: Tursan, You've led on this and it's your best chart 74 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 2: of the many charts you put out ten years ago. Folks, 75 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:38,720 Speaker 2: the share of mortgages below four percent, Paul was thirty percent. 76 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:42,840 Speaker 2: Is it for the conversations doubled? I mean, I mean 77 00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:46,240 Speaker 2: the number of mortgages below four percent is doubled in 78 00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 2: ten eleven years. And touristen, that goes directly into the 79 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 2: transmission mechanism. You know, I'm very negative on the dots. 80 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:59,800 Speaker 2: Do the dots of the FED have they adjusted to 81 00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:04,760 Speaker 2: the slock slower transmission mechanism? 82 00:04:05,080 --> 00:04:07,040 Speaker 3: Well, I do think what is very important in the 83 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 3: last if I'm seeing meeting, and you have also talked 84 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:13,240 Speaker 3: about that on a surveillance radio, because what we saw 85 00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 3: was of course, that the FED went from instead saying 86 00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 3: three cuts in twenty twenty four to now saying one cut. 87 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:23,159 Speaker 3: That on its own is an admission that we were. 88 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 1: Wrong at the FED. We thought that we would have 89 00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:27,080 Speaker 1: three cuts. Now we think we'll to have one cut. 90 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:29,839 Speaker 3: So in some sense the FED is coming quote unquote 91 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 3: back to the view that maybe there is no strong 92 00:04:33,320 --> 00:04:37,279 Speaker 3: arguments for being in this urgent rag pace having two 93 00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:39,960 Speaker 3: cut rates as quickly as they thought just six months ago. 94 00:04:40,040 --> 00:04:42,040 Speaker 2: Were thrilled you with us for the entire half our 95 00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 2: tourist and slock. You know, we're gonna go to go 96 00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:46,640 Speaker 2: to Michael barn News, but I'm gonna really come up 97 00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 2: on beating this folks. I haven't mentioned this on area yet, 98 00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:53,200 Speaker 2: but it's a symptotic twenty twenty four. 99 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:54,640 Speaker 1: What is he talking about? 100 00:04:55,279 --> 00:05:00,120 Speaker 2: Come on, tourston all the assim Tote discussion. Ethan Harris 101 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:03,360 Speaker 2: retired from Bank of America leading the charge on as 102 00:05:03,400 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 2: a few others as well. They're lost and they're extending 103 00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:11,680 Speaker 2: out the axis as far as they can. It's that simple, right. 104 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 1: I agree. 105 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:16,080 Speaker 3: I think that what is very important here is that 106 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:20,640 Speaker 3: we have unleashed some fairly significant powers with inflation going up. 107 00:05:20,839 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 3: And one point that's also very critical in this discussion 108 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:25,880 Speaker 3: is that if you look at Michigan five to tenure 109 00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:28,479 Speaker 3: inflation long term inspectations. 110 00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:31,360 Speaker 1: The median is still very well behaved. So the median 111 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:32,480 Speaker 1: household still. 112 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:35,159 Speaker 3: Thinks inflation will be three point one, which is where 113 00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 3: it's been for the last several years. But if you 114 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,719 Speaker 3: look at the mean, you will see a significant increase 115 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 3: in one half of the population expecting that inflation is 116 00:05:44,360 --> 00:05:47,279 Speaker 3: going to be dramatically higher than the other half. And 117 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 3: if you look at the sub questions in the Unversity 118 00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:52,240 Speaker 3: of Michigan, who is it that's expecting inflation to be higher, 119 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 3: It is, generally speaking, the bottom thirty three percent of 120 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:58,760 Speaker 3: household incomes, meaning low income households expect much higher inflation 121 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:01,440 Speaker 3: than high income households. And it's general also people with 122 00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 3: high school or less education that expects inflation to be 123 00:06:04,920 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 3: a lot higher. So you're beginning to see some divergence 124 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:10,160 Speaker 3: in inflation expectations. And this is opening up a very 125 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 3: important debate in the Phillips curve that you and I, 126 00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:14,560 Speaker 3: Tom and I talked about for years, where if inflation 127 00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 3: expectations for half of the population are very very high. 128 00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:20,479 Speaker 3: What does that mean for when the fit say is 129 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:22,400 Speaker 3: that inflation expectations are under control. 130 00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:24,320 Speaker 1: Yes, the media may be under control, but. 131 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:26,600 Speaker 3: There's a significant part of the population they're still worry 132 00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:27,239 Speaker 3: about inflation. 133 00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:30,599 Speaker 4: To us and talk to us about what concern do 134 00:06:30,640 --> 00:06:33,400 Speaker 4: you have about this? Maybe the commercial real estate market 135 00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:36,160 Speaker 4: in this country it feels like it's there's still a 136 00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:40,120 Speaker 4: big shoe or two or three to drop, but maybe not. 137 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,040 Speaker 4: How do you think about that risk here as we 138 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:43,840 Speaker 4: look around to some of these big cities and see 139 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:45,040 Speaker 4: a lot of vacant office space. 140 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:48,359 Speaker 3: I think the important data point first to keep in 141 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:51,239 Speaker 3: mind is that the price per square foot for office 142 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:55,000 Speaker 3: nationwide is down more than forty percent from the peak. 143 00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:58,240 Speaker 3: So if we think about what that means, that of 144 00:06:58,279 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 3: course means that there's a lot of office that has 145 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:03,960 Speaker 3: been reset at a lower level. Now, there's some important 146 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:07,679 Speaker 3: differences across the country, of course, with the Sun Belt, 147 00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:10,560 Speaker 3: with the West Coast relative to East Coast, relative to 148 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:14,560 Speaker 3: metropolitan areas, but the bottom line is really that, well, 149 00:07:14,600 --> 00:07:17,400 Speaker 3: when an asset price goes down more than forty percent, 150 00:07:17,840 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 3: and in particularly when the financing of that asset price 151 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:23,960 Speaker 3: is something that normally is reset every five years. Then 152 00:07:24,440 --> 00:07:26,720 Speaker 3: we still have a maturity wall in commercial estate, in 153 00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:30,800 Speaker 3: particularly in office that is really really steep. For other 154 00:07:30,840 --> 00:07:33,280 Speaker 3: types of commercial real estate things look a lot better. 155 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 3: So of course you have warehouses, industrial, you have apartments, multifamily, 156 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:43,120 Speaker 3: shopping malls. Of course, also have data centers. There's some 157 00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 3: very idiosyncratic stories across the different types of commercial real estate. 158 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 3: But the main issue still that we should all be 159 00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 3: watching is office because that is just still where most 160 00:07:53,400 --> 00:07:54,520 Speaker 3: of the downward drift is. 161 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:58,480 Speaker 4: Towards another economic issue that's really been or I guess 162 00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 4: this discussion point over the last eighteen months as we 163 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 4: look around the world as this concept of American exceptionalism 164 00:08:05,200 --> 00:08:08,200 Speaker 4: from an economic perspective, you know, the commercial rule state 165 00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 4: issue notwithstanding, how real is that the US economy strength 166 00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 4: visa to be the rest of the world, or how 167 00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:15,720 Speaker 4: do you explain that? 168 00:08:16,680 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, this is really important. 169 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 3: So there is a structural discussion exactly about is the 170 00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:24,600 Speaker 3: US exceptional and the US it's closed. It is exceptional 171 00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:28,560 Speaker 3: because of large capital markets, much more spending and broadly 172 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 3: speaking across the board in occluding on defense, including also 173 00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:37,720 Speaker 3: on the role of the US consumer. So simply because 174 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 3: the US as the biggest economy in the world, playing 175 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:44,320 Speaker 3: this very sot it does, generally speaking, attract capital. 176 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 1: On top of that comes the most cygnical. 177 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 3: Arguments, namely that the US business cycle just happens to 178 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:52,640 Speaker 3: be a lot stronger than the business cycle in Europe, 179 00:08:52,679 --> 00:08:56,280 Speaker 3: the business cycle in Japan, Canada, Australia, emerging markets, and 180 00:08:56,360 --> 00:08:57,319 Speaker 3: of course also China. 181 00:08:57,640 --> 00:09:00,319 Speaker 1: And when the US is stronger, then that. 182 00:09:00,120 --> 00:09:02,480 Speaker 3: Means, of course, as we're seeing and as we're talking about, 183 00:09:02,640 --> 00:09:04,640 Speaker 3: then brakes will be higher for longer in the US 184 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:06,960 Speaker 3: than elsewhere. That's, of course what we saw with easy 185 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 3: b cutting rates they being ends today is staying at hold, 186 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:12,160 Speaker 3: but now signaling clearly the rake cuts are coming. All 187 00:09:12,200 --> 00:09:14,600 Speaker 3: that argues for still more upward pressure on the dollar 188 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:19,160 Speaker 3: because the US is exceptional not only from a structural perspective, 189 00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:22,360 Speaker 3: but also at the moment exceptional from a cyclical perspective. 190 00:09:22,600 --> 00:09:25,160 Speaker 3: So with that background, when will that exceptionalism from the 191 00:09:25,160 --> 00:09:26,600 Speaker 3: cyclical perspective change? 192 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 1: When the FED begins to cut rates, then. 193 00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:31,320 Speaker 3: We could begin to see the dollar begin to turn 194 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:33,720 Speaker 3: really south in a most more substantial way. But given 195 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 3: that's still now being pushed out repeatedly, then I still 196 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 3: think the dollar will be going up, and the exceptionalism 197 00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:41,320 Speaker 3: does play a very important role, both on the structural 198 00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 3: side and on the cyclical side. 199 00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:44,520 Speaker 2: Turst then one more question. We've got to go to 200 00:09:44,559 --> 00:09:47,119 Speaker 2: breaking news. But I think this is too too important. 201 00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:50,600 Speaker 2: Back to the idea of an xxis that goes out 202 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:55,440 Speaker 2: forever in the new idea percolating of an assm tote, 203 00:09:55,480 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 2: I guess down to two percent. Is the assump tote 204 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:01,520 Speaker 2: a smooth glide path down to two percent out there 205 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:04,280 Speaker 2: somewhere or is it two point x percent? 206 00:10:05,840 --> 00:10:08,480 Speaker 3: So if you mean inflation, of course, then the issue 207 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:10,599 Speaker 3: is that inflation at the moment, as you know, is 208 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:13,240 Speaker 3: three point three. The FEDS target is that it should 209 00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:16,120 Speaker 3: be two. Three point three is not two. So that's 210 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,720 Speaker 3: why if I'm seeing members repeatedly talk about, well, maybe 211 00:10:18,720 --> 00:10:20,720 Speaker 3: we do need to wait a little while longer before 212 00:10:20,720 --> 00:10:21,720 Speaker 3: we start cutting rates. 213 00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:23,160 Speaker 1: And to your question, will we. 214 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:25,640 Speaker 3: Have an asymptotic moved down from three point three to 215 00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 3: two point zero? I think that the answer to that 216 00:10:27,960 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 3: is absolutely not. We still have significant tailwinds from fiscal policy, 217 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:35,079 Speaker 3: the Chips Act, the Inflation Reduction Infrastructure and in all 218 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:40,000 Speaker 3: policies that designed to lift growth over the next several years. Likewise, 219 00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 3: we have a very strong tailwind from easy financial conditions. 220 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:44,160 Speaker 3: As long as the AI story and the stock market 221 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:46,160 Speaker 3: goes up, we still will have like we saw this 222 00:10:46,240 --> 00:10:51,480 Speaker 3: early season, strong demand for airlines, hotels, restaurants, concert sporting events. 223 00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:53,320 Speaker 3: So the short answer to your question is I worry 224 00:10:53,320 --> 00:10:54,959 Speaker 3: that inflation is not going to come down in a 225 00:10:55,000 --> 00:10:57,920 Speaker 3: straight line to two percent from the three point three 226 00:10:57,920 --> 00:10:58,800 Speaker 3: percent where we are today. 227 00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:00,960 Speaker 2: Tristin Sluk, thank you so much. It's with Apollo