WEBVTT - China PMI Expectations, Cigna and Humana Seeking Merger

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. I'm Brian Curtis. Here are the stories we're

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>following today. The current Israel Hamas pause is nearing its

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>end as talks continue at Backsha with that story and

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>more from San Francisco ed.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I've gotten a lot of information out of it, either, Brian.

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Negotiators from Cutter in the US oppressing for the agreement

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 2>to extend Israel's demanding all the remaining hostages be released.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 2>In US Secretary of State Anthony Blincoln says continuing the

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>ceasefire may be the way to get that done.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 3>It's continuation, by definition, means that more hostages would be

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>coming home, more assistants would be getting in, So clearly

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 3>that's something we want and I believe it's also something

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 3>that Israel wants.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 2>Now more hostages were free today and the hope is

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>they're still for a second release before the deadline. But

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>it is bittersweet for some. Shanny Siegel was released earlier.

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Her cousin talks about her response.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 4>We were ecstatic, but the joy only laugh a few

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 4>minutes because many realize she was released without her husband.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Hamas is not released to any men as have yet,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>So we'll hope for words soon about that seasfire and

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>the US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has spent about

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>forty five minutes on the floor talking about the spike

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and anti Semitism in the United States.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Any of those marching here in the US do not

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 5>have any evil intent. But when Jewish people here chance,

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 5>like from the River to the sea a founding slogan

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 5>of hamas a terrorist group that is not shy about

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 5>their goal to eradicate the Jewish people in Israel and

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 5>around the globe, we are longed.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>He says. This goes waving on a legitimate debate about

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Israeli policy into a very dark place. Ukraine, NATO Ukraine

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Council in Brussels today renewed call for continued aid for

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine from Secretary of State Blank.

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>And some are questioning whether the United States and other

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>NATO allies should continue to stand with Ukraine. We enter

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the second winter at Putin's brutality, But the answer here

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>today at NATO is clear and it's some wavering. We

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 3>must and we will continue to support Ukraine.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>The scheduling of the vote for George Santo's expulsion needs

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>to be done by tomorrow under terms of the resolution,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>but House Speaker Mike Johnson, well, it doesn't sound a

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>whole lot like it.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 6>I think the good will be product. That's all I'm

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 6>going to say about the Friday.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>But the resolution says tomorrow now earlier in the day.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 7>I personally have real reservations about doing this. I'm concerned

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 7>about a president that may be set for that. So

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 7>where everybody's working through that, and we'll see how they

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 7>vote tomorrow.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we'll see where it goes. Santos's schedule a

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>news conference for early morning at the Capitol tomorrow. The

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan's president, Tyan Wing, says she believes China is too

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>consumed by domestic economic and political problems to invade Taiwan.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>This even as Beijing rams up military pressure, and as

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Google has struck it deal with a Canadian government over

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>contentious law that would force pay for news. It would

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>avert the news block schedule for next month. And I

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>was searching here a story just up on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk says advertisers that have stopped spending on the

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>platform due to his endorsement of antisemitic posts can f

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>word themselves. He says, what's going to do is kill

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the company Global news twenty four hours a day and

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>whenever you want it. With Bloomberg News now in San Francisco,

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ed Baxter.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, and we tackle now some of the

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>top business stories of the hour.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries rose on trader bets that the FED will

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>cut interest rates in the first half of twenty twenty four.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Two FED officials made the case for continuing to hold

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rates steady. Let's run through some of these now.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland FED President Loretta Mester said that policy is well

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>positioned for the FED to be nimble and respond appropriately

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>too incoming economic data, and Atlanta FED President Raphael Bostic

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>said he's growing increatingly confident that inflation is firmly on

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a downward path. However, Richmond FED chief Thomas Barkin told

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>CNBC he is not yet convinced.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 9>I think you want to have the option of doing

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 9>more on rates, and I guess the bigger point is

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 9>there's no precision that anyone can point to at exactly

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 9>what is the level of rates that exactly handles inflation

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 9>and exactly the way you want to handle it, And

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 9>so you're constantly trying to adjust on the fly as

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 9>you learn more about the economy, as you learn more

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 9>about the impact of demand on inflation. And that's what

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 9>we're learning as we go.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Barkin there on CNBC. FED officials meet next December

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>twelfth and thirteenth.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 10>We're hearing too, health insurance giants, emerger talks, Bloomberg's and

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 10>Kites reports.

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 11>Signa and hu Man are working on a potential cash

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 11>and stock combination that would create a giant in the

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 11>health insurance industry that you would become a powerful challenger

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 11>to United Health and CBS Health. The move would also

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 11>shrink the number of publicly traded national health insurance from

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 11>six to five and give the Signa Humanna editing more

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 11>leverage and negotiating with hospitals or Medicare. The tie up

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 11>would likely face antitrust hurdles in Washington, and Kate's Bloomberg Radio.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Interesting Paul that both stocks went down. You don't often

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>see that in one of these merger type stories. Signal

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was down eight percent for the session and Humano was

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.799
<v Speaker 1>down five and a half percent. Well Shares of General

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Motors jumped more than nine percent after the automaker announced

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it would boost its dividend by thirty three percent. GM

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>also said it would repurchase ten billion dollars of shares.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.679
<v Speaker 1>The carmaker is returning billions two investors despite a push

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>into electric vehicles. That push has yet to show significant results.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>The buyback also comes despite a new labor agreement with

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the United Auto Workers that adds more than nine billion

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars in expenses. GM CEO Mary Barra says the agreement

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was the right call.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 12>When you look at the suite of benefits that our

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 12>represented team members have, it's very very appropriate package and

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 12>frankly leading from an industry perspective broader than just the

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 12>auto industry. So I think we did the right thing

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 12>to recognize and reward the hard work of our manufacturing

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 12>team members across the board.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>GMCEO Mary Bearra. Separately, the United Autoworkers Union is launching

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>an aggressive campaign to unionize thirteen non union automakers. They

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>include Toyota, Volkswagen, and also Tesla. The union is hoping

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to capitalize in recent contract victories with the big three automakers.

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 8>In Detroit.

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 10>Salesforce gave a profit forecast for the current core of

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 10>the topped analyst estimates. I've got the story from Bloomberg's

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 10>Charlie Pellett.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 6>It shows strong momentum in the software giants cost cutting campaign.

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 6>The San Francisco based company said earnings excluding some items,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 6>will be about two dollars twenty six cents a share

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 6>in the period ending in January. Analysts, on average projected

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 6>two dollars seventeen cents. It said revenue will be from

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 6>nine point one one eight billion dollars to nine point

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 6>two to three billion dollars. That compares with analyst average

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 6>estimate of nine point two to two billion dollars in

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 6>New York. Charlie Pellett Bloomberg Radio.

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia is getting more involved in diplomatic efforts around

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Israel Hamas war. We hear the Kingdom is offering

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to invest more in Iran, its traditional adversary, if Iran

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>would keep its proxies out of the fight. We get

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>more from Bloomberg's Sam Dagger.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 8>I've been speaking to a number of experts and they

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 8>told me that for Iran, Hamas is less important than

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 8>the others, particularly has Bulah, which is the pillar so

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 8>to speak, of this whole forward defense strategy of Iran

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 8>in the region. So Iran is very careful not to

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 8>provoke a wider conflict in which has Bulah would be enmeshed.

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear yet how Iran might respond to the

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Saudi offer.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 10>Pmis fall November likely to show the manufacturing sector extending

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 10>its contraction. Bloomberg's von Mann has more from Hong Kong.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 13>The consensus at a Bloomberg survey of economists is for

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 13>a mile pickup in manufacturing. The economists pegged the index

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 13>at forty nine point eight, indicating the sector remains in

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 13>contraction early in leading indicators point to some softening in production.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 13>Meantime in a non manufacturing sector, economists adjusts the index.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 13>We'll pick up to fifty point nine for fifty point

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 13>six in October, but Bloomberg Economics expects the index to

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 13>decelerate further. That's likely to do with the extended slump

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 13>in the property sector and cooling tourism related businesses after

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 13>the October holiday in Hong Kong. I'm von Mann Bloomberg Radio.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Twelve minutes now past the hour. Joining us is Edward Harrison, Bloomberg,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>team leader for the America's FX and Rates team, and

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>he's with us here live on the show, Edward, thank

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us. I want to revisit a sort

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of non consensus call in the marketplace that the hard

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>part is over on inflation, that actually the last mile

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of disinflation won't actually be that hard. Goldman Sachs made

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that point a couple of weeks back. I'm not sure

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that many buy into it, do you.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 14>You know, I would say that I'm on the other

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 14>side of that. But there are some people, Bill Ackman

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 14>in particular, who are talking about this very much. In

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 14>particular Bill Ackman, who was very vocal about this in

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 14>the David Ruminstide interview that he just did here on Bloomberg,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 14>he said that the Fed concerned about the real rate

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 14>of interest, that is, you know, the nominal rate minus inflation,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 14>will eventually see very quickly, actually in the beginning of

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 14>twenty twenty four, that they're too tight because inflation has

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 14>fallen so much.

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 10>We're still well outside the target ban though, so you

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 10>know how I have for longer. Something we keep thinking

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 10>about is the market getting a bit ahead of itself

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 10>in terms of when it's anticipating easing.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 14>I would say it is getting ahead of itself in

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 14>terms of when it's anticipating easy and in part this

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 14>is due to the uncertainty involved in where we are,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 14>because if you think in the last three cycles, we've

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 14>had five hundred basis points or more of cuts, and

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 14>then there's the potential that we have a soft landing,

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 14>how do you hedge, you know, zero cuts versus five

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 14>hundred You come out somewhere in between. But to the

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 14>degree that you think that there is the possibility of

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 14>a recession, then it's likely to be coming in a

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 14>very short period of time, say twenty twenty four, and

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 14>that's why we're seeing this bidding up of cuts coming forward.

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if there's a little bit of goldilocks in

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the retail activity that we've seen here of

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>late with Black Friday or Monday, in that you have

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>discerning consumers. You have retailers that to make their numbers,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers were good, but to make those numbers they

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>did have to offer discounts and it wasn't like rampant,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>but they were definitely there. And to me, that indicates

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that companies find that they cannot continue raising prices, that

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers are becoming more discerning.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 14>They really are, and it is amazing what will happen

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 14>when you give a fifty percent discount. How many people

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 14>will come and buy your products?

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 8>The quest?

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it does.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It does have some implications for inflation coming down, doesn't it.

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 14>It definitely does. I think that it shows that at

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 14>a minimum, on the good side of things, that we've

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 14>seen the peak, and then the question now becomes the

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 14>sticky part, the services part. That's where the real tough

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 14>nut to crack is. The question is is how sticky

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 14>is inflation on the services side of the ledger and

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 14>how much of that will satisfy the FED before they

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 14>start cutting. I think that the market is a little

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 14>bit ahead of itself and if we don't have a

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 14>recession in terms of expecting any cuts in the near term.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 14>Even Bostic of the Atlanta FED, who's one of the

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 14>more dubbish members, isn't talking about this. But nonetheless I

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 14>think that's where the sticky wicket is.

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 10>We have seen pretty impressive decline and yields this week.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 10>The you are still a weakening as well. You're an

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 10>FX and rights guy. How much further that he's going

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 10>to fold?

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 14>I think that on the long end of the curve,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 14>it's very difficult to go much further from here. We're

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 14>at about four to twenty five.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 14>When you look at the FED funds, the top end

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 14>of the range is five point fifty, So that's one

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 14>hundred and twenty five basis points differential there that you're

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 14>giving up. Certainly, you're locking in for twenty five and

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 14>you rue the fact that you didn't lock in five percent,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 14>and that's a very nice coupon clip. But the reality

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 14>is is that you are giving up one hundred and

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 14>twenty five basis points by moving all the way out there.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 14>So the question then becomes how much more can these

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 14>yields go down given that were firmly anchored at five

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 14>point five percent on the upper end of the FED phones.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, quite interesting to note that the short end falling

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a little faster now than the long end, So that's.

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 8>Something to keep in mind.

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>One other issue that hasn't been talked about too much

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is China exporting deflation.

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 14>Now, Yeah, that is a good question. I would say

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 14>that a corollary of that question is whether or not

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 14>China has matters less in the sense that other Asian

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 14>countries are now picking up the baton from China, and

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 14>that what we're seeing in terms of China and their

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 14>exportation deflation is offset by, you know, a pickup in

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 14>demand in other countries within Asia, in particular Japan, which

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 14>has done relatively well for the first time in a

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 14>very long time.

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, your morning brief on the

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>stories making news from Hong Kong to Singapore and Wall Street.

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed every day, on Apple, Spotify,

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. You can also

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>listen live each day on Bloomberg eleven three to zero

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one in Washington,

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one oh six to one in Boston, and Bloomberg

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>nine sixty in San Francisco. Our flagship New York station

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is also available on your Amazon Alexa devices. Just say

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty plus. Listen coast to coast

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Business app, SiriusXM, the iHeartRadio app, and

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot Com. I'm Brian Curtis. Join us again

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow for all the news you need to start your

0:14:54.840 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>day right here on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia.