WEBVTT - Kodak Craziness Is Captured in One Word. Really?: Max Nisen

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. It is time for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>This morning. We're joined by Bloomberg Opinion columust Max Neson.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>He covers all things biotech, farmer and healthcare. Max, You've

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 1>got a column now which I just read talking about Kodak.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the shares of Kodak here up twelve

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>percent today, um up seven year to date, up over

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the trailing twelve months, and now has a market cap

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of one point six three billion. I didn't even know

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>this company was still in existence as a public equity.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>What's going on with Kodak? Uh? So, what's going on

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>driving this this incredible stuff? Brice Increase is a deal

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>alan from from the government which is intended to help

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>them kind of make a transition into into a new business,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>uh which is the making of of drug product of

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of active pharmaceutical ingredients part of kind of an ongoing

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>policy effort to bring more of that production back into

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the United States. UM, which you know that that business

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is really currently very dependent on China and India. I'm

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the sort of political leanings of the

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>current administration. You know, there are potential national security concerns

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about disruption, there have been quality control issues, so you know,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not a not an insane policy move. But but

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's a little bit more difficult to understand

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is why Kodak and secondly, um, why why this loan

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>well significant would lead to such an enormous increase in

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the stock Because this is a company that that, while

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it has chemical experience, is new to this business, which

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is a very difficult, very low margin commodity business. It

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>moved out the United States for a reason because it's

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>much cheaper to do it elsewhere. It's hard to be

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>cost competitive here. So the imagined future where you know,

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>code Act does this sustainably and profitably seems very unlikely

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to mean, I just want to bring it to our

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>listeners attention that several outlets and now reporting that Hermann Kine,

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the former presidential candidate has died from COVID nineteen once again,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Herman Caine has died from COVID nineteen. Will bring you

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>more details when we get them. But another death among

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the one d and fifty thousand plus deaths that we

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>were counting every day, Max. How concerning is that that

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing numbers rise again in the places like

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, which had tried to sort of Tampa down

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and had managed to do so. It's it's very concerning,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, unfortunately maybe inevitable accent uh you know,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>really really strict policy or or you know, profound adherent

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to social distancing guidelines going forward. I think the country

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is in a pretty concerning place where well, you do

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>have some some plateauing or or decline of case growth

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in you know, put the initial hotspots Texas, initial new offspots, Texas, Florida, Arizona.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>You still have many cases there also deaths as as

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, people have consistently warned catching up to that

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>case you know, that past case growth, and then many

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>other examples besides New Jersey around the country that you know,

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>well not as acute as those hot spots, yet still

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing very significant levels of case growth. All of which um,

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, makes any further opening, makes school in the

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>fall harder and will lead to both you know, more

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>debts and the sort of unknown long term consequences of infection. Um,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>which you know, more more research props up every day

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>indicating the possibility of heart lung damage that may be durable.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, it's a it's a scary time, all right.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So that brings us to the continuing ongoing view of

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>potential for vaccines Johnson and Johnson. I saw a headline

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccine protects monkeys from COVID with single shot. How important

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>is the J and j H news there? Um, you know,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of both. Do you always have

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to be particularly cautious about um, you know, non human data.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a saying among people who do in vectious disease research, Um,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, mice lie, monkeys exaggerate, So you know, there,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>there's that's a thing you really kind of do have

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to view it in the context that, well, well, this

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>can tell you something valuable, give you an indication of

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood that a vaccine is promising, and in this case,

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the particularly promising potential of of a single dose. After

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you really do need to see it at humans before

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you make any conclusions. And that's something where um, you know,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the change of vaccine is running a little bit behind.

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>It just began it its first in human studies, so

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll I personally wait for that before making to two

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>firm of a verdict on the promise of the vaccine. Though, um,

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely you know what you want to see from a

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>primary challenge study. You know it wasn't It went well

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>within the limitations of the study. And we have confirmation

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>now on the Boomberg website that Herman Came, the piece

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>of Jane executive of course, has died seventy four years old.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>He released a statement via Twitter on July twod that

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he was hospitalized in the Atlanta area after contracting coronavirus,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was less than two weeks after attending President

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald Thomp's indoor rally and Tulsa, Arizona. He didn't know

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>when or how he contracted the disease. But again, Herman Kine,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the former prominent Republican who actually was running for White

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>House position, if you'd like to put it that way,

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has died from COVID nineteen Max. Thank you, This isn't

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the last death, unfortunately from this awful pandemic. And again

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we're more than a hundred and fifty thousand people down

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States now and much more than

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that globally, so Paul and another prominent figure dying from

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen. You have to wonder if this will change

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the conversation in any way across the country, but unfortunately

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to see that happening. It is time to

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>take a closer look at that economic data as well

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>as what the Federal Reserved chair said yesterday. No better

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>man than to bring in David Kotok Now of Cumberland Advisors. David,

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>good morning, and welcome. Good morning, Vanney. It's nice to

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>talk with well, it is, except that we got a

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>second quarter annualized figure of down thirty two point nine

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>percent for GDP growth. What does that mean for the

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>economy going forward? What should we read into this well

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>remarkable number. We've already had a lot of conversation about it.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Um it was expected to be huge, and it validated

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the expectation, and it says nothing about where we're going

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in the fourth quarter and next year. And

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what's key markets are I think are reacting not

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to the GDP number with this red tape today. I

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think they're reacting to the impasse from the US Congress,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which invites risk and the blame game between the two

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>largest economies in the world, China and the United States.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what's driving this market to a

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>red tape, not GDP. All right, Dave, let's let's go there. Um.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>We had Kevin Sirelli, Bloomberg's Washington correspondent on earlier with

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene and myself on surveillance. He believes that from

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>his contacts in Washington that something will in fact get

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>done this week. What's your outlook for the fiscal stimulus?

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the market is really looking for

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to come out of Washington. Yeah, well, I I saw

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the piece with Kevin. Um. As you said, you know,

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a regular surveillance watcher every morning, and I think

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the cutting edges where they're going to meet in the middle.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The issue of the liabilities is not resolved, or maybe

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it will become. So how do you deal with a

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>retroactive liability deletion on the part of local governments, on

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the part of business. Is what to do with the

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>liability for COVID and how do you establish proof in

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. These are also complicated my expectation as the

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>markets would like to see you meet in the middle compromise.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>They don't expect three plus trillion, and they don't expect

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>one trillion, and they do expect some amount of sustenance

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep thirty or forty million Americans bridged at least

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in part across the gap for the rest of the year.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Markets would like that, businesses would like that, the citizens

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>would like that, and we would get beyond the same

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>pass which you indicated this morning is possibly going to happen.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it realistate, David to think though, that, you know,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the administration of all of this can get done in

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that Republicans are expecting, in the sense of,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, okay, down to two extra from the federal

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>governments per week for a couple of months, and then

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, by then everybody will be able to get

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some of what they had been making. Is that even possible?

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>There is no extra money for states to do this? Um, well,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the profound question, Ronnie. It's a fair one,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. I I reflect on history as you know it.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm a student of history for a very long time.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And I remember Winston Churchill rising in the House of Commons.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't there at the time when I'm very young,

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but I remember reading his words in in the House

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of Commons after World War two and all the chaos

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a allowed, and he stood up in the House of

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Commons and he says, it has been said that democracy

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is the worst system of government. And he paused, and

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, except for all the others. And we are

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>testing Churchill's wisdom right now today in the United States,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as we have been all year. There's truth that that's

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>our system. As crazy as it is, it's still better

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>than a place where you live under a dictator and

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>an autocrat and you have no rights. And so I

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a long term believer in this enduring, marvelous experiment

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that started over two hundred years ago. So I think

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll work this out the hard way, but we'll get there. So, David,

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 1>what's an investor to do here? As we look at

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>these dire economic data. Yes, it's backward looking, but it's

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>really sobering. What should investors do here as they think

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>about the next of all eighteen months? One investor should do.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It depends on their point of view. In Cumberland's case,

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market, we have some cash reserve, but

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>we are invested. In the U S stock market, we

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are overweight the sectors which we think benefit healthcare. It's

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a great example, of course, and we are underweight or

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>avoiding the troubled places. Trying to pick the right cruise

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.719
<v Speaker 1>ship company that will survive is trying to avoid a

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>falling knife. Why why do that? In the rest of

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the world, we are deploying moneys because we think pandemics

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>run their course. And in Asian countries specifically, we see

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the ability of governments to respond better than we have done,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and they are doing that. Why they learned with two

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three with stars, They prepared, they have

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>tracing testing, they have all the facilities in place, they

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>apply technology, they have apps on their phones, whether it's

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in a country like China or it's in South Korea,

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>tai one. So we favor looking at Asian recovery leading

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the way coming out of this, and some are already

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>doing it. And in the United States, we have to

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>get through this forest fire in the country. Now we

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have three ways. We don't have flattening the curve.

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a forest fire. It's burning. It doesn't burn forever,

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>but it will burn for a while. David, thanks so

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>much for that. We really appreciate it. David Kotok, Chairman

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and Chief investment Officer of Cumberland Advisors. They have over

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars in assets under mention. We always appreciate

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Dave's perspective as broad perspective on the and uh, you know,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>putting things in context. I think for investors, I think

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's investor's value that David has seen a few of these.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>He's seen pandemics, he has seen crises, he's seen crisis

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>calls by all different sorts of things. He's seen market

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bubbles burst, and he's in the game more than ever.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>So obviously there is another side to the end of

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>all of this. Very excited to welcome our next guest.

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Dr David S. Gorton is cardiologist and President and CEO

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Association of American Medical Colleges or the a

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a m C. He joins US now from Washington, d C.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Following an op ed in the Washington Post which was

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>entitled we need a COVID nineteen reset. So we developed

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive plan to do just that. Drs Gorton, thanks

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>for joining. What does a reset look like? Is it

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a countrywide lockdown? No, Bunny, First of all, thanks for

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>having me on UM. It's more complicated than that. We

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>laid out nine immediate steps that we believe the country

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to take in two longer term actions. And among

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>those nine steps, the big three are will not surprise you.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Number one is to do a better job at making

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that we have the supplies we need from personal

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>protective equipment to the lab supplies that will allow us

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to boost up testing. Number two is testing itself and

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>really nothing else that we can do in the country

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that we want to do, like reopen the economy, go

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>back to school, go back to college, all of those

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>things will depend on a better ability to do testing

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and turn it around more quickly than we're doing it

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>right now. And then, thirdly, we believe there should be

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>national standards on face coverings and that masks should be

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mandatory in areas of growing community spread. And then there's

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>many other aspects, but those are those are the ones

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that I believe are the most urgent we need to

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>work on now. Doctor, I guess For me, the biggest

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>frustration is that petas I look at the US relative

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to other countries around the world, there has not been

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a national response policy to what is clearly a national problem.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It is left to state by states. Some states like

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>New York have done it better than some other states

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like Florida for example. Will there ever be a national response?

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And if there is, where does it need to come from?

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't need to come from the White House? Well, when

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you ask whether ever be a national response, if I

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had that crystal ball and it was as effective as that,

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably be um sitting in your seat and telling

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>people which way to go. But um, what I would

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>say is the first two words of my outbed and

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's post. We're we're failing, and I mean we very sincerely.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>All of us need to pull together individual decisions like

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>whether to wear a mask, whether to be socially distant,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>whether to pay attention to the evidence based advice we're

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>getting from the top health professionals in the country. And yes,

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we believe that there is a role for government to

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>develop more national policies, not only the administration, Congress, but

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there's also a role for the private sector. We think

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that the manufacturing sector, for example, could help us. But

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we're playing catch up on these supply issues. So there's

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>something here from everybody. But yes, there does need to

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be a national view of how to go forward, and

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we try to present that view in our roadmap. Is

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there a time limit for this? I mean, will there

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>be a point beyond which of all is lost? I

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to be, you know, totally apocalyptic about this,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know at a certain point it's too late

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to implement proactive measures. Well, I'm a physician as scientist,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very very strong believer in biomedical research. Right

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this minute, Bunny and Paul, there are people all over

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the world working on robust vaccines right this minute. There's

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>people at universities and in pharmaceutical industry working on anti

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>viral treatments and so on. And as we've learned more

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about the coronavirus on the front lines of hospitals across

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the world, we've learned more and more how to provide

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>supportive care. So I remain an optimist about this. Nonetheless,

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>if we don't make some changes and soon in supplies, testing,

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>face coverings, and some other areas, um we're going to

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more deaths, and I'd like to just

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>insert one issue relate to finance, if I might. One

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of the difficulties of national system of health insurance that's

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or fifty percent of people insured through their employer. Is

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it a time where employment dips than healthcare coverage dips

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. And one of our immediate action recommendations is

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to immediately expand health insurance through COBRA. That's a mechanism

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>already in place, but many workers cannot afford to pay

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>both the employer and employee premiums for COBRA when they're

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>out of work. So we're asking for Congress to consider

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at least partly subsidizing COBRA for a while while we're

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in such a pickle in terms of employment and a

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>reduction in health insurance coverage. Doctor, One of the big

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>topics right now as it relates to our response to

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is the reopening of schools or weeks away

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in many parts of the country. Many parts of country

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>are actually reopening now. How do you think this should

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 1>play out? One of our recommendations is to establish Tavanni's

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>point earlier national criteria and your point national criteria for

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>CAPE through twelve school reopenings and to immediately convene a

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:10.959
<v Speaker 1>working group to study different approaches, so to bring together

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the expertise to do this right. We need to bring

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the educators, the teachers, We need to bring some voice

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>from parents and families, and of course we need to

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>bring the voice of public health, epidemiology and infectious diseases.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a recent of consensus report that I commend

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to you and your listeners from the National Academy of Science, Engineering,

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and Medicine just a few weeks ago, which laid out

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a very important step by step process for reopening and

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so we have a bit of a roadmap from the

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>National Academy is one of the most prestigious groups in

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the country or in the world, and I think we

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>need to do is make up a national commitment to

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to some of these recommendations, and then it has

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to be interpreted like everything else locally, depending on the

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>amount of community spread, the re sources available, and the

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>different neighborhoods of school districts we're talking about. There's a great,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>great difference, as you know, in the resources available to

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>school districts based on local property tax revenue and so on.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So yes, we need to pay attention to this, and

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the National Academy's report is a terrific place to start. Dr.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You're a cardiologist as well as everything else, and I'm

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>curious as to what's been the most surprising thing for

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you as a result of this COVID pandemic. What does

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the disease do in terms of what you're a specialist

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in that terrifies you. Well, um, from the cardiology point

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of view, that has not been as prominent as issues

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>as you know, with the lungs, with the neurological system

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and other things. But I'll say as just a physician

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in general, I used to run a division of general

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>internal medicine. We call this a novel coronavirus because it's

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the first time that we've known about this coronavirus affecting humans,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that there can be such robust spread

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of a disease from asymptomatic people is quite unusual. And

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of course this makes it much much harder to manage

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the communities because you don't really know who's got it.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>A medical commentator a couple of three months ago said

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we should all act as if we have coronavirus. Put

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a mask on, stay away from other people, and so

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth, except those in our immediate family

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with whom we're living. And I think that's a very

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting way to look at it. But that's been a big,

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>big surprise. And then the other big, big surprise has

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>been the chameleon like effects of this virus on various

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>different bodily systems. And I'm sure you all have followed

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the lingering effects, the neurological effects, as well as those

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>effects from the immune system on the lungs. He does.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Dr David Scorton, thank you so much for joining us.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your thoughts, uh and opinions, David. Dr

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>David Scorton, cardiologists and President CEO of the Association of

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>American Medical Colleges, giving us his thoughts on what a

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>national policy could look like. Well, tech analysts and tech

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>investors are going to be more than busy after the

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>close today. We have the big four tech companies, Apple, Amazon, Facebook,

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and Alphabet reporting numbers. I don't think that's ever happened,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Vonnie one time at the same time on the same

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>day reporting. It's gonna go. So there's gonna be a

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>lot to pass through from big tech. It's got a

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a preview there. We can do that

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>with Barry Ridholtz. He's a Bloomberg opinion columnist and host

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. And of course

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a founder, chairman and chief investment off Server it

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>holds wealth Management. So, Barry, if you needed some color

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on in the tech space, I think

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get it. After the close today, You're gonna

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>get a lot more than color. You're gonna have a

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>full painting as to how four of the six companies

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that have been driving two thirds of the SMP five hundred,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how well they're doing. And uh, it's gonna be interesting.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Remember back in February, Apple was the first company that

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>came out and said, given this nascent coronavirus pandemic, we

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have no visibility for the rest of the year. They

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>were way ahead of the curve on that. I'm really

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>curious to see what they're going to come out and say, Yeah,

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be fascinating. I mean, will they all show

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>stellar results? You think Pario it feels like they are

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the only winners out of all of this. Well,

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they clearly have been UM part of the stocks that

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have been been driving games. Take take the ten biggest

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>names in the SMP five hundred on an equal weight basis,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they're up thirty four percent for the year. Take the

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>next four hundred nine UM stocks in the SNP five

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred on an equal weight basis, they're down eight percent

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>for the year. So the the earnings health of the

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the fang so called fang stocks are really important,

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if investors are going to give

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>them a pass. If anybody says, well, this sector did

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>well and this division did well, but we really saw

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>soft sales in this sector. Maybe it's iPhones, maybe it's UM.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Some form of advertising on Facebook or Google that's they

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>expect will return once things get back to normal. It's interesting.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking, you know, just at the the advertising driven

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>names that we're gonna hear from tonight, in terms of

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and and Google parent is alphabet UM those stocks,

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're you know, and also looking for a

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>significantly slower rubbnue growth because let's face it, advertisers aren't

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>advertising that much. I don't care if it's on a

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>radio or TV ed or a newspaper or on the Internet.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Yet those stocks are still up their team percent. So

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess tech investors barrier, you know, willing to look

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>towards the other side of this. Yeah, I mean everybody

0:23:55.760 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>knows your your movies aren't advertising, restaurants aren't advertising anything.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a face to face experience where people have a

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>tendency to um put that on hold until we get

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>past the pandemic. Obviously that's down. I have to think

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>investors understand that, and they're looking at one maybe even

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>past that too. It's it's hard to It's really hard

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to say. And one of the bigger concerns was regulatory

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>overreach in d C. Based on what we saw yesterday,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think these four companies have a whole lot

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to worry about in terms of the government figuring out

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>what they even do more or less regulating them or

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking them up. Sorry, I mean, is this the line

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of the sound after this? If there are no consequences

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in any way regulatory or anti trust or otherwise, do

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>they get Carton Lush and do we see somebody like

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos and start increasing prices on Amazon, which was

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>always the original goal anyway, you know, the only historical

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>frame of reference that that I can compare this to

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was Microsoft in the late nineties, and if you remember,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft owned the desktop, and any time a new idea

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or feature or a little software program was developed, it

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>managed to be copied and built into Windows. And once

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department started talking about antitrust enforcement, it really

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>led to that Cambrian explosion of websites and soft web

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>based software apps. And I'm wondering if something similar might

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>not happen. Maybe we're at peak Google and peak Facebook.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Given the mere fact that we're having this hearing, Microsoft

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>might have, you know, pulled in some of their claws

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit when the Justice Department started poking around.

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Facebook and Google and Amazon for that matter, um

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>throttle back a little bit. Apple's got a ton of

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>criticism for their thirty tax on the app store. Let's

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>see if anybody wants to change, uh their current business

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>models to sort of keep the wolves away from you know,

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the crown jewels, verry. When when we do come out

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of I'll put the glass half empty on on the

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>table here. When we do come out of this pandemic

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and the economy starts to really right itself, do you

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>expect investors will rotate out of these tech winners and

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>try to find some more value and possible performance from

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>some of the more UH names that were beaten down

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>the cyclicals and so on. You know, we've done a

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of studies on this internally. We've We've crunched a

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of numbers, and I've read other studies from people

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>like Bill Miller and Research Affiliates and a q R

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and go down the list. The key determiner as to

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's value or growth that dominates seems to be

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some combination of interest rates and inflation. When we are

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in a low yield environment and a very low inflationary environment,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it does not work to the advantage of value, and

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in many ways the cheap cost of capital works to

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of the bigger, more ambitious tech companies. But

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>if people like j Professor Jeremy Siegel at Wharton are correct,

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and when we begin to recover and all this pent

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>up demands plus all the FED and congressional stimulus works

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>its way into the economy, you might see a little

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>bump up in inflation. And if it gets to three

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>or four percent or more for just a year a

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, that should be advantageous to value stocks.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Very briefly, you know, at Redults well as management, are

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you buying or selling anything these days? No, We're pretty

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>happy with the way our portfolios are configured. The most

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>recent change we made was last quarter when we added

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>gold to our tactical portfolio, and that that was a

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy call to make when you look at the

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>possibility of inflation, and you look at the just the

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>overall trend and then the breakout in gold. But the

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that's been driving gold recently has been the inability

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for the US Congress to agree on any sort of

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a second act to the Cares Act. Compared to Europe.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Look at how successfully Europe put through a new stimulus plan,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and just look at the relationship between the euro and

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. The euro was having one of its best

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>runs in a long time. The dollar did take until

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>five in the morning that last day, though, So Barry,

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens on Friday. Maybe we'll get something

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>out of Congress. Barry Riddles with Golden seventy ounce right now.

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. Barry Riddles, CEO of Riddle's

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Management, Bloomberg Opinion contributor and Masters in business host.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio