WEBVTT - Tech News: Tech and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, February twenty four, twenty twenty two,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and probably the biggest story in the world right now

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.639
<v Speaker 1>is Russia's invasion of Ukraine, something that has heightened tensions

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>around the globe, and of course that also spills over

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>into tech news. In the hours before open hostilities, Reuters

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>reported that the US will likely begin with holding tech

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>from Russia, ranging from products like computer systems to individual

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>components like semiconductors and aircraft parts. Interestingly, though not surprisingly,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the language is directed more at Vladimir Putin than at

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Russia as a whole, and Putant's tendency toward authoritarianism arguably

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>justifies that wording. The US Deputy Treasury Secretary said that, quote,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to cut him off from Western technology that's

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>critical to a dancing his military, cut him off from

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Western financial resources that will be critical for feeding his

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>economy and also to enriching himself. Uh. The he in

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this case being Putent and again this all came out

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>before Russia's actual invasion. But yes, we should see various

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>sanctions around the world. I know the UK has also

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>started to announce some and likely a lot of that

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to focus not just on finances but on

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>tech as well. In addition to the explosions and gunfire

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>happening in Ukraine. By the way, any listeners out in Ukraine,

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I really hope you and your loved ones are safe.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But the country has also been under a pier attack.

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It appears that distributed denial of service attacks, also known

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as the DOS attacks, have hampered Ukraine's internet infrastructure. In addition,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it seems as though there's been a deployment of a

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>type of malware designed to infect and then wipe out

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>data on machines, and that this has been targeting some

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>computer systems in Ukrainian organizations. Now, just in case you're

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with the term di DOS attack, the basic

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>ideas that you have a distributed network of machines, so

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole collection of computers that are distributed in an

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>area could be all around the world actually, and you

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>use these to target specific web servers and you overwhelm

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>those servers with traffic such as a pin request or

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe even a pin request that goes back to an

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>address that doesn't exist, and the web server attempts to

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>respond to all those requests because that's how you know,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet functions, is that if it didn't respond to

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these request USTs, then the Internet wouldn't work. It has

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to respond to these things. So this

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>is kind of equivalent to bringing a doorbell and then

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>running away. I've used this analogy before. Imagine that you

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are required to answer your door every time the doorbell rings.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And someone rings your doorbell, so you get up, you

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>walk to your front door, You open the door, no

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one's there. You close the door. Someone rings the doorbell.

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>You have to turn back around and go back to

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the door, open it. And this just happens over and

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>over to the point where you can't do anything else.

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That's essentially the basic version of a distributed denial of

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>service attacks. If you just imagine that all the neighborhood

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>kids in all the neighborhoods around you are all in

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on this, and they're all taking turns doing it. That's

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's going on on a the you know,

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an analogy level well. There are companies like cloud Flare

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that specialize in mitigating the dose attacks, and some of

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine's most critical services, such as those connected to financial

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>military operations, appeared to have weathered the storm a little

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>bit better than you know, just about everybody else. The

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>malware is a different matter, the Wiper malware. This is

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>software that appears to have been created in late twenty one,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>which could indicate that this was a planned part of

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the invasion, and that the invasion itself has been something

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's been the work for at least a few months,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>which honestly, I would be shocked to hear otherwise it

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>The narrative coming out of Russia is that this was

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of happened suddenly, but all evidence seems

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to contradict that. Moscow so far has denied any involvement

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in the DIDOS attacks or the malware. But as we

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>covered in a recent tech News episode, much of the

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>hacking activity reported around the world, including nearly three quarters

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of all ransomware attacks, appears to originate out of Russia

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or Russia aligned countries. On a relay to note, researchers

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine have been sharing information, photos, and videos on Twitter.

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So this includes journalists and security experts, and a lot

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of them have noticed that their accounts have been hit

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>with suspensions. For example, Oliver Alexander, who has been fighting

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>misinformation during the invasion by trying to cover things on

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground, has had his accounts suspended at least two

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>times in the last twenty four hours. Now, in most cases,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>the researchers are told that they received a suspension for

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>violating a Twitter policy, but at least in a few

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of those, no specific policy was cited. As of the

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>time of this recording. The working hypothesis is that there

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>was and potentially still is, an active campaign, likely originating

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in Russia, that is identifying and reporting any social media

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>accounts attempting to cover the Ukraine invasion, and that these

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>reports are all made in bad face in an effort

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to suppress information from being published. So in other words,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's people saying, hey, they're spreading misinformation

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in an attempt to silence people. Now, a Twitter spokesperson

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>has said that quote, We've been proactively monitoring for emerging

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>narratives that are violative of our policies, and in this instance,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we took enforcement action on a number of accounts in error.

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>We're expeditiously reviewing these actions and have already proactively reinstated

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>access to a number of affected accounts. The claims that

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the errors were a coordinated body campaign or the result

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>of mass reporting is inaccurate end quote. So in other words,

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they're refuting that hypothesis, and hopefully that is true, because

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>presumably it will mean that from this point forward we'll

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>see fewer mistaken suspensions and that will just be a

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>little blip in the early days. Uh, if this actually

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>is part of a supper Ashan campaign, maybe that will

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>mean Twitter will develop better tools to detect and prevent

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>those from happening, which again can be a larger benefit

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Switching over to North Korea, Wired has

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>an article titled North Korea hacked him, so he took

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>down its Internet and the pieces about a hacker who

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>goes by the handle Packs that's p the numeral four

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and X, and North Korea targeted Packs because Packs does

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity work and had been involved in cybersecurity work related

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to North Korea, and Packs did not like getting targeted

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and after a year of waiting to see what the

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>US would do about this, and Seeing that apparently the

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>answer was nothing, Packs decided to take it upon himself

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to do a effectively a denial of service attack on

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>North Korea's Internet system. Now, you could argue that this

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.239
<v Speaker 1>is not really an effective strategy because very few people

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in North Korea actually have access to the Internet. A

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks, or at least not a lot some

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>folks can access and intronet, but that has no connectivity

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to the outside. Internet's fully controlled by the North Korean government.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>The Internet sites in North Korea really are mostly for

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>propaganda purposes and are outward facing, So in other words,

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's for the rest of the world, not for the

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>people in North Korea. So disrupting those just means that

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>North Korea's propaganda campaign was somewhat hindered. In fact, a

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, like, the best this does is

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of irritate the government and it could potentially force

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>them to start beefing up their Internet security, which could

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in theory disrupt say more clandestine efforts that could be

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>going on at the same time. In other words, don't

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>bring attention to these vulnerabilities because someone else might be

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>using them to do some important work. Uh. Then again,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, considering the limited use of the Internet and

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, you could argue that maybe there's not really

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>any real opportunity through that route, unless, of course, you know,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>they are really bad at doing things like having air

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>gaps in their system. And air gap, by the way,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in case you're not familiar with that term, that's where

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you make certain that a system has no connectivity to

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>outside networks. It is a standalone network. It's like an island.

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't touch any other network. And uh, that's that's

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a security measure, right if you If it doesn't interoperate

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>with any other networks, there's no way to get at

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 1>it from outside. You have to get access to the

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>actual system itself, which really cuts down on the possibility

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of it being um compromised. It doesn't eliminate that possibility,

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it just cuts way back on it. And um it

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>would be shocking to me. I guess not shocking, but

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, if North Korea is not doing that, it's

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>stupid because if it's not using the Internet the way

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>other countries are, then there's no real reason to have

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>any of its you know, crucial systems hooked up to it.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, that's what's going on right now, and I

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>recommend the article again. It's titled North Korea hacked him

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so he took down its internet. Check out that article.

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got a few more stories to cover, but before

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we get to those, let's take a quick break. We're back.

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>You might remember from a couple of weeks back when

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I talked about how the Dutch Competition Authority was levying

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fines against Apple for violating anti competitive regulations. Specifically, we're

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple's payment system in app payment system, and

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>how the company previously required all apps to use Apple's

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>own operated in payment system, and that also meant that

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple could take a chunk out of every in app

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>transaction like up to well, Apple has since change things

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up uh. It has announced that developers will be able

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to use third party payment systems, but Apple will collect

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>a twenty seven percent commission on all in app purchases

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that use a third party payment method. Now that that's rough,

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because chances are app developers will have to pay a

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>cut to whatever third party payment system they're using. So

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you might start to suspect that while Apple is saying

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it is going to offer an alternative, the alternatives will

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>likely end up being more expensive to use than the

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple provided option, and Apple still gets a cut. As such,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The Netherlands Authority for Consumers says that Apple has quote

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>refused to put forward any serious proposals end quote, and

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that furthermore, the company appears to be fine with paying

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fines even if those fines get up to fifty million

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>euros a week for non compliance, which tells you just

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>how important in app revenue is for Apple if the

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>company is not responding to this stuation with more speed

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and seriousness. The a c M says that Apple is

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>purposefully putting in barriers that discouraged the use of third

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>party payment systems and has to come up with a

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>fair alternative. The BBC News investigated how the metaverse is

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>shaping up when a researcher posed as a thirteen year

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>old girl and used a meta quest a k a.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>The old Oculus quest headset to visit the vr chat

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>virtual space. The researcher witnessed numerous things that were wildly

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate for a child, including simulated sex acts. The researcher

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was also approached by several adult men. Remember the researcher

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was posing as a thirteen year old girl, and that

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is beyond disturbing, and reportedly the researcher even received a

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>rape threat. On top of all that, the researcher said

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>she used a fake identity to create an account, and

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>there was no point where Meta actually verified her age,

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>which meant she was free to wander into virtual space.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Is very much inappropriate for children. The National Society for

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Prevention of Cruelty to Children in the UK responded

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to the report by saying that there is an urgent

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>need to address online safety issues for children, particularly as

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they're such a hard push to create the metaverse. As

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it stands, the virtual environments that are sort of a

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>proto metaverse are very much not a safe space. Um.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>They actually remind me a lot of very early Internet

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>chat rooms, which could range from just being silly and

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>harmless to outright disturbing and pornographic, depending on the chat

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>room and who was there at the time. The NSPCC

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>said that as it stands, these virtual chat rooms are

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>dangerous by design because of oversight and neglect. Meta's approach

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>so far has been kind of a weird and gross

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>scientific observation. Essentially, watch how people are interacting in virtual

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>spaces and then address problems that crop up. But that

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>does mean anyone who's adopting the Virtual Space protest, an

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>early adopter, is effectively a guinea pig, and that person's

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>mental health isn't really afforded very much protection. Anyway, don't

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>let your kids use VR chat rooms just yet. The

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>world can be a cruel and dangerous place, and the

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>online world sometimes it's a billion times more so. Earlier

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, we talked about how Peloton, the exercise company,

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is going through a really rough patch. After an initial

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>surge in demand at the top of the pandemic, things

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>quieted down and Peloton found itself with warehouses full of

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>product that they couldn't move. In addition, a terrible tragedy

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>involving a treadmill made by the company necessitated an expensive recall.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Shareholders began to lose confidence in Peloton, and apparently a

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>batch of Peloton bikes coming out of a Taiwanese manufacturing

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>facility had rust on them in mostly in non visible

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>parts of the bikes, and the company's response reportedly was

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to use a chemical to conceal the corrosion. And I've

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>seen this referred to as Project ten Man. I'm not

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>actually sure if that originated from inside the company or not.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Warehouse workers were told to use the concealer, which covered

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the rust with a black layer, so it wasn't removing

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the corrosion, it was just covering it up. It's like

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>putting a rug over a dirty spot on the floor. Allegedly,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>inspectors were encouraged to downplay how badly rusted a bike

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>actually was. Uh. And the company had adopted a policy

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that would allow lightly rusted vehicles or bikes, I should say,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>not really vehicles. They don't take you anywhere their stationary bikes,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but they would allow lightly rusted ones to go on

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to be sold to customers and if it was deemed

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>unsalable then it wouldn't be And the reports suggest that

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>people at least felt pressured to air on the side

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of selling them to customers rather than to say no,

0:15:55.760 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this is unacceptable. Uh. So Platon has actually said that

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>if anyone pushed something that should not be sold out

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to a customer, that was against corporate policy, and it

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually falls on the person in charge of that inspection,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not on Peloton. They said, no, listen, we would never

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. Uh. You know, we don't know

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where this came from these people are in charge of that,

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they have the authority to make those decisions, and if

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they chose to sell heavily rusted bikes to customers, that's

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that's on them now. Apparently at least six thousand bikes

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>were affected by what Peloton creatively referred to as cosmetic oxidation,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>which I guess is glamour rust. The company has issued

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>statements saying no customers have reported problems with the bikes

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and that the company would be certain to make available

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>replacement parts should any problems pop up down the line

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>due to this issue. That's good, though, I think you

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>can make a strong argument that covering up the corrosion

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and calling it cosmetic oxidation points to its Peloton really

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>knowing this wasn't a cool move from the get go.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Online shopping has seen a bit of a decline as

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>more people emerge from isolation and start to populate brick

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and mortar stores once again. Amazon has adjusted its forecast

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for first quarter sales, and it says that those estimates

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are now slightly lower than they originally were. eBay has

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>had similar news. In fact, eBay's news was enough to

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>concern shareholders and send the stock price down nearly nine

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and extended trading. Stephen Priest, the chief of finance at eBay,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>told investors, quote, the second quarter should mark the low

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>point for margins during the year as we lap difficult

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>comps and ramp up our pace of investment end quote.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So it does sound like things are going to get

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>worse for eBay before they get better. Andy Maxwell of

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>torrent Freak wrote an article titled Reddit Banned two thousand,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>six hundred twenty five subreddits for excessive copyright infringement into

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in D twent d one, which details how Reddit is

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>taking d m c A takedown notices. Seriously, that's the

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Digital Millennial Copyright Act. Maxwell points out that Reddit reviews

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>these takedown notices and only takes further steps if the

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>notification follows redd It's rules. So if someone sends in

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a copyright notice but they don't completely or correctly fill

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>out Reddit's forms, then that notice doesn't count. Reddit will

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>take no action on it because the person did not

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>bother to actually properly fill out the notice in the

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>first place. Then if the notice is filled up properly,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Reddit examines the case to see if perhaps it's an

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>example of fair use. So as a reminder, fair use

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>covers exceptions to copyright exclusivity. Now, fair use is usually

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a matter that gets decided within a court of law.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Arguing fair use on the outset isn't really a force

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>field against d m C A action, But in limited cases,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>someone can use part of a copyrighted work without getting

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>permission to do so. Anyway, Maxwell mentions that in one

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>read it received copyright notices regarding more than nine twenty

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand pieces of content. Read It subsequently removed around six

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty five thousand of those pieces, So again, it's not

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a guarantee that once read It gets a copyright notice

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that it will strike content. It did so more frequently

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>than it didn't, but like a third of almost a

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>third of the complaints were dismissed. But Maxwell points out

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that folks really do need to take copyright more seriously

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>on the platform because repeated violations can result not just

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in user bands, but even bands of entire sub credits.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>And imagine being part of a community that gets shut

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>down because too many other folks in that community we're

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.919
<v Speaker 1>posting copyrighted material without permission. That would stink. Anyway, The

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>article is a good read. I recommend checking it out again.

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It is titled Reddit banned two thousand, six d twenty

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>five subreddits for excessive copyright infringement in one and it's

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>on torrent Freak. Okay, we've got a few more stories

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>before we close out today, but first let's take another

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Meta, the company that was formerly known as Facebook,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>has announced that it is developing AI tools dedicated to

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>translating languages in real time any language to any other language.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And right now, we do have tools that can cater

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to some of the major languages in the world, like Mandarin, English,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and Spanish, but a lot of other languages have little

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to no support in those tools, and Meta says that

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the company wishes to build out a universal translator like programs,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>something that could let any two people from any two

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>places in the world have a conversation in real time

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with each other, no matter what languages each person was speaking.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you had one person speaking Portuguese and another

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>speaking Hindi, they could communicate easily with one another through

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this AI application. And you can immediately understand how this

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>would be a really important component in Meta's vision of

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>its own future, primarily the metaverse. If there is to

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be a persistent global virtual world. It would be beneficial

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if there were no communication barriers between people visiting that world.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I should add, however, that while Meta's goal is pretty

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>easy to understand, like we we see what they're aiming for,

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Meta has not yet shared any information on how it

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>plans to get to that goal, like how long is

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it going to take, what are the milestones to achieving

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>that goal? None of that has been shared publicly. At

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>least if I replacing a BET, I would aima oult

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>several years, maybe as many as ten to get a

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>really good handle on this. The tools we have today

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are pretty amazing, um, at least for the limited contexts

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in which they work. But they still have a lot

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of flaws and shortcomings. They're far from perfect. There's a

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of bias in there. There's still a lot of

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>error in there um And a lot of this is

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because translation is hard. Interpretation is part of translation, and

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that is hard. So it's gonna take some time to

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>develop something that can work with low latency and high

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>reliability across all languages. The Center for Countering Digital Hate

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>released research saying that Facebook is falling well short of

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>its responsibility to flag climate misinformation. UH, it's supposed to

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to tag UH posts that contain our links

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to articles that are are deemed to be misinformation. But

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the research states that ten publishers nicknamed the Toxic Ten,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>are responsible for nearly sevent of all climate change denial

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>posts on Facebook, and that Facebook had only tagged about

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>half of those as containing misinformation. The research sites examples

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of posts that clearly contained misinformation in the headlines alone,

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>let alone inside the articles themselves, and yet did not

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>get that climate denial misinformation tag on them. But a

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook rep addressed the findings and said that part of

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the problem was that the company was actually in the

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>process of rolling out its labeling platform when this research

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>came out and when it was conducted, suggesting that it

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was just a matter of timing that the company was

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>failing to tag of misinformation incidents. The c C d

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>H report included several examples of posts that were made

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>after September of last year, which is when Meta announced

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it was labeling climate change misinformation posts. So I guess

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it all just depends on which party you believe. Hopefully

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it will mean that we will see more accurate tagging

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future and potentially less bultification of misinformation across

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's platform. I know a guy can dream. U S

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Senator Tammy Baldwin sent a message to Activision Blizzards CEO

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at least for now, Bobby Codeck, and in that message,

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin told Codeck he should quote negotiate in good faith

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>with the workers and suspend any efforts to undermine your

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>employees legal rights to form a union and collectively bargain

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>end quote. Among the many issues plaguing the company, one

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is that quality assurance testers working at Raven Software, which

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is owned by Activision Blizzard, have been attempting to unionize.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've seen several tech companies face unionization

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>efforts in what I think we can generously refer to

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as an adversarial response. Of course, Microsoft is on track

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to acquire Activision Blizzard and a deal that will not

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>finalize until the by the end of fiscal year three,

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't start until this July UM, so that is

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>probably going to complicate matters. However, it does mean that

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin decided to copy Microsoft's CEO Satya Nadela on this

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>letter as well, so you know she saw to it

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that that Nadela also got this notification to say, hey,

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we're directing this at CODEC, but we really mean that

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you should allow your employees to unionize if they want to.

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Activision Blizzard refused to voluntarily recognize the union, which means

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that now there are necessary further steps that must be taken,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>including a formal vote. UH side note I Heart Media,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>our our parent company, voluntarily recognize the Heart podcast union,

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>so there are cases where companies will voluntarily recognize unions,

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but Activision Blizzard did not go that route. So assuming

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that the QA testers hold such a vote and the

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>vote passes, then the National Labor Relations Board or in

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>l r B would step in an Activision Blizzard would

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>really have no choice but to recognize the union. Microsoft,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>i should add, is another company that is not particularly

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>known to be super gung ho on unions. In fact,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the acquisition agreement includes a clause that prevents Activision Blizzard

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>from voluntarily recognizing unions without first consulting with Microsoft executives, so,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in other words, they have to ask their parents for

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>permission first. There are also reports that Activision Blizzard was

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>looking to redistribute the QA testers throughout the rest of

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>activision Blizzard perhaps in an effort to head off this

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>unionization effort, if they were incorporate into other teams, than

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you can make the argument, well, you don't have a

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>high enough concentration of people who are trying to unionize

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because you have to read a reach a certain threshold

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to start this process. And if you dilute

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that by spreading out the employees into other divisions, that

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>could be a way to try and avoid, uh, the

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>whole issue. It's not common for U S. Senators to

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>wait into matters like these, and they don't actually hold

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>any legal authority to change the course of matters, but

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it could certainly help shape public opinion on the subject.

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And finally, on a related activision Blizzard note, Bloomberg reports

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that the company will delay what was to be the

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three release in the Call of Duty franchise

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>see activision. Blizzard has put out a new main title

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in that franchise every year since two thousand five, but

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>now it sounds like the twenty twenty three release will

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit longer before players get a chance

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to play it. It will not come out in and

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it seems like part of this reason is that the

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>most recent release, Call of Duty Vanguard, didn't meet company expectations,

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and that executives were blaming the fact that players were

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>still playing earlier Call of Duty releases and that perhaps

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they were coming out a little too close together and

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>not offering enough to players to necessitate them moving to

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the latest title, and so they want to take a

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>little more time both to develop stronger games as well

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as to give the market a little time to create demand. So,

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you can have too much of a

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>good thing. Of course, some players would argue that good

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is not the word they would use for certain Call

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of Duty releases, not all of them have received universal acclaim. Also,

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there will still be plenty of cod content out there

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to play before the next major release, because they'll be

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>various expansions. There's the free to play war Zone game mode.

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>There's war Zone two that's supposed to be coming out

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the future. So there just won't be another major

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>release in the franchise in three but that doesn't mean

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>there won't be any Call of Duty content out there.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>All right. That wraps up this Tech News episode. If

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you have suggestions for topics I should cover in future

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, Please reach out to me. The

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>best way to do that is on Twitter. The handle

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for the show is tech Stuff hs W and I'll

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again, really Sion. Tech Stuff is an

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.