WEBVTT - Boris Johnson Wouldn’t Last A Year As UK Leader

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul Swinge you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Theresa May is quitting as a

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister. She is out on June seven, although she

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>will be staying for a bit longer to manage the transition.

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this is being treated as a positive in markets,

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at least for the time being, with the pound gaining.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now Danny blanche Flower, Professor of Economics at Dartmouth.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>He is also a former Bank of America, Bank of England. Uh, policymaker,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, Professor blanche Flower. We love having you on.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Why are British assets rallying today? Well? I see you

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in some sense at least a release at the some

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of the and is over, but it's really unclear kind

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of where we're going. So the movement isn't that great.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And I've been thinking today I think perhaps for the

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>market is the most interesting thing is, in all probability

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a new chance of the Exchequer.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Who will be the person appointing the new Governor of

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England. And I think that's obviously an

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>issue we need to kind of care about. Who knows

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>where that's going to go. But the uncertainty going forward

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is basically not just who the leader will be. The

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>reality is that this is a leader of a party

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that the minority government. So the question really we should

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>ask ourselves is could this person actually govern? Could they

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>negotiate anything through the parliament? Is the Halloween deadline is

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be pushed back, which I suspect it is,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the markets have to deal with the

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>prospect of perhaps by Christmas there will be a labor

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>government headed by Corbin. All those things are on the table.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So in the short term, market saying Okay, this thing

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>at last has happened, But down the road, who the

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>heck knows? So, Professor, it appears that bars Johnson is

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the favorite to replace May. What would a Bars Johnson

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>leadership look like? Well, it's hard to tell. I mean,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>he was singularly unsuccessful as the Foreign Secretini and ended

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 1>up resigning UM with the reality that we should say

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>is that he was the top candidate to get the

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>job a loust time around, it didn't get it. I mean,

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the reality is he's not going to be able to

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>pull together any cross party kind of consensus. So he's

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a populist. Um he basically is says, I want to

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>go back and negotiate some deal or other and it's

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not then we'll use the threat of having um having

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>no deal at Halloween. So I think it's not going

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a government of consent. That the my suspicion

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is if and when he gets to be Prime Minister,

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>my bet would be he won't last the year. Okay,

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's perhaps why people aren't counting in the idea

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of a herd Brexit as much as you would think

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>based on Boris Johnson's rhetoric this morning. Is that how

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>we can interpret that? I think? So, I mean he's

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about we can go back to the European Union

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and reading ghost games. UM, Well that you know that's

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>cloud cuckoo land, because the European Unions said, well, the

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>deal is the deal and a no deal would have

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to resolve the Irish question. And Boris Johnson is very

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>good at headline, but not very good at the committy

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gritty of actually negotiating and trying to work out what

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you would do. So there's a lot of other people

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>who were in there, but the reality who are in

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this competition, the reality of many of them of brexiteers.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, we we will see whether that actually will

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>generate any kind of majority in the House of Commons.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen is that it has not been

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. So being Prime minister at once

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 1>being able to govern is a another and I think

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. Um, And we'll see. But I don't

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>think much of anything is resolved. It was absolutely clear

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the three times that Theresa May lost that she had

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>no consent as across the Parliament, and the fourth time

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was not a charm and so we've really not resolved

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>very much. Um, we will see. So, Professor, what is

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the status of a second referendum? Is that still on

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the table in anyway? I absolutely think it is. It

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>is on the table a possibility. Many of the people

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in the Tory Party who don't like it, Um, it's

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>still on the table. But I think the reason why

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gained kind of complicated is unclear what what the

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>question would be in that referendum, So would it be

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>here's Theresa May's deal against remaining. So so even though

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>we people talk about the second referend, if you have

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to resolve what's the question, you can't just say do

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you want brexit or not break it? Because that's the

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>devil now, as we know, is in the detail. So

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the answered yes, probably, but we have to

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>resolve what's in a referendum about so that so obviously

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a big problem. But all options are on the

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>table um and a general election might well end up

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>being where where we'll end up, and I won't resolve

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>anything either. So just a real quick here, Danny, I'm wondering,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>looking back at Theresa May's tenure, are we going to

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>say that she utterly failed and she could have done

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>something different, or that she just was dealt a terrible

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hand of cards. I disagree on the delta terrible hand

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of cards. She means she was delta hand. Perhaps that

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was unexpected, but she made us two fundamental errors. The

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>first error she made but she did not reach across

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the aisle to anybody outside the right essentially the right

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>wing of a Tory party, and that and that groups

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>walked down governments in the past. John Major was brought

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>down by by that group. So that so that was

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the first thing. And the second thing she did was

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>she triggered Articles fifty in March two thousand and seventeen

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with absolutely no plan whatsoever. So you trigger this thing

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and give yourself a two year dead line with absolutely

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>no clue what the plan was going to be and

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>no possibility of generating consensus. She to do that, she

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>could have triggered this mark of fifty later. Still, she

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just held her self a terrible hand, delt herself apple hand,

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately did not make it any better. Danny branch Flower,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Professor of economics for Dartmouth College, Thank you so much

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. What has been a very difficult environment

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for bricks and mortar retail. One area that has seen

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>growth is music and our next guest has been on

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the forefront of this growth. Ron Japan, Us CEO of

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Guitar Center based in Los Angeles, California. Ron, thanks so

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Just first, I wonder if you

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>could just tell us about Guitar Center how big you guys.

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the growth been looking like? Yeah, sure, Um, well,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we're about two point two billion dollars in revenue and

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we go into the market with four different segments. We

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have our arm knee channel segment, which is guitar center,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so those are our brick and mortar namesake stores that

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we also have the ability to buy online, ship to store,

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>buy online, ship to customer. We didn't have a pure

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>play brand, which we call Musicians Friend, which is just online.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we have a music and Arts segment which

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is the beginning stages of the musical journeys for children,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so think of band and orchestra and schools. And then

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>our fourth segment is our business solutions, which is our

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>business where we're going into other businesses help them do

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>conference centers, studios, bars and restaurants and businesses like that.

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So we talk a lot here on the show about

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar versus online. How have you seen sort

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of your two businesses when it comes to just how

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you're how you're selling the goods? Uh evolve? Yeah, Well,

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we've um, we have a pretty unique situation is that

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>our products are lend themselves to a environment where it

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can really be a lot of fun. So when you

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>go to our Guitar Center store, it's really a experience.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So what we do is we make sure that when

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you walk into the store, you're greeted by great salespeople

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and you have the opportunity to actually play the instruments.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's a unique experience to be able to walk

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in to one of our stores, take a guitar thousand

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 1>dollar guitar, ten thousand dollar guitar off the wall, be

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>able to sit down and play it without anybody um

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bothering you. And we see that as a very unique

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>experience because when you go to a mom and pop

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>or other stores, they actually have signs on the wall

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that say please do not touch, ask for salespeople. We

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>actually have an amp plugged in with a pick ready

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to go, and you can sit down and play the guitar.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So run. You know, one of the things that Lisa

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and I we hear from a lot of retail executives

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>when they come here talking about their business. It's about

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>shrinking the footprint of their stores to try to match

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, the demand out there, giving them

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>more and more sales are going online. You guys are

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>actually adding stores. Talk to us about that. Yeah, well,

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so again it's in this omni channel environment for guitest

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Guitar Center brand. So what you see is we're adding

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about six to ten stores a year for a guitar center,

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and we just opened up Hawaii recently and we're going

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to open up Alaska a little bit later on the year.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So this year we pulled back to six just because

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>they're a little bit more complicated. But again we see

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this omni channel experience because of the environment that we have.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Customers come into our stores and kind of like the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>candy land for our customer, they get to see spectacular guitars.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not unusual to have somebody come sit down, play

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a guitar, play start playing a song, have a drummer

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>start um playing the same song, and all of a sudden,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got a song being played in the store by

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>just customers. So that environment just keeps adding on. We're

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>also adding services into our business, so we have lessons, repairs,

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and rentals. So we're now being able to sell you

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the instrument, We're being able to teach you how to

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>use the instrument. We're able to support your gig at

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the bar. If we need to rent some additional products

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that go along with it and then repair the actual

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>item when it needs repair. Were just to even be

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>re strong. So I'm just wondering going forward, especially as

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you open all of these news stores, how are you

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>financing that? We're doing it all on our own. Um,

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we're financially sound and we have the ability to open

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>our stores. We've also acquired two companies recently in our

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>B two B segment and with as Music and Arts,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we've actually gone from a hundred and fifty stores and

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we're two hundred and fifteen stores currently and we looked

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>open between twenty and thirty stores a year in that

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>business segment. But right now I'm looking, Uh, I know

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that the company has a triple C rating and I'm

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, I mean, that's typically closer to default. How

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do you make sure that you generate enough revenue to

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>offset the costs of some of these expenditures. Yeah, we're

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>positive cash flow so UM. We manage our debt very

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>carefully and we have our A B L which we

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>use as our check book to be able to finance

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>our operations. And we're well within all the limits that

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we have within that and we just are very prudent

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about all of our expenditures. So, Ron, I know Bain

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Capital acquired you guys, I guess it was ten or

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve years ago. What's they're thinking about the investment. That's

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time to own portfolio company. Actually, Bain doesn't

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 1>own us anymore. Bain did take us UM private, and

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Aries is now the owner, and Aries has owned us

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and fourteen, and they're extremely supportive of

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the direction that we're going in right now. And as

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we continue to improve the business and the profitability of

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the business, then um, I think, you know, we'll have

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a transaction in the future. But we've

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just finished six positive quarters in a row, and the

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>business and all of our strategies continue to do well,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and so we expect to just continue to move forward

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the way that we're doing right now for the

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future. Ron Japinka, thank you so much for joining us.

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>At Ron Japana is chief executive officer of Guitar Center,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>based in Los Angeles. Well. One thing that rising trade

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tensions between the US and China have engendered in financial

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>markets is volatility. To get a better I you how

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to best navigate this. We turned to our next guest,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Doug's yuck Up, chief executive officer and partner for cover

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Our Capital Partners. They're based in Leewood, Kansas. They have

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>approximately seven million dollars under management. Doug, thanks so much

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. How are you guys kind of managing

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the day to day swings in the marketplace that can

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be you know, and you know, just created by a

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>tweet here or there. Yeah, you know, it's good actually

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to have volatility back, and we feel like it's presenting

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some opportunities for putting capital work that had not been

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>president in the first three or four months of the year.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I undeniably do not feel like the

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>market is be'm blown off course, but the winds have shifted, right,

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, things that were headwinds coming into the year

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and now tail winds and vice versa. And you know,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the trade war going into even the month of May,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>felt like there was gonna be a quick and very

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>prosperous resolution and that's been completely overturned. Yet at the

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>same time, we didn't feel like earnings were going to

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>be very strong, and they were considerably stronger than we

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>had anticipated. And you know the FED was going to

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be neutral and that was gonna be a headwind. But

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>out looks like the Fed And even despite some of

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the comments that we're pretty benign that came out on Wednesday,

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the FED is doubbish. And I think when capital,

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>which is plentiful, starts to be mobilized in the absence

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of fear that dictated the trade this

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this last couple of weeks, I think it's a good

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for the market to actually have kind of a

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty constructive summer, even if it only runs in place. So, Doug,

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>where are you finding opportunities? Where are you buying right down? Yeah? Thankfully? So.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I we like if you look at the sector performance

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, it's pretty amazing, right, But as it relates

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to a contrarian buying opportunity in a sector like healthcare, right,

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the smps of what twelve percent are almost year to

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>date and healthcare is up just a little bit better

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>than three right, And there's certainly there's regulatory knowing noise.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a tendant to this sector. There always is, particularly

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>when aspirations and in different campaign promises get to be

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>slung around. We're just beginning to see that, and we're

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see that intensify over the course of the

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>next year. Earnings were solid in Q one, Revenue was

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>solid in Q one. Biotech specifically, we think in terms

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe immune immunotherapy, genomics, these are revolutionary therapies and technologies

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that we think are underappreciated. And this is a market,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly given the pronounced level of actility we're undergoing right now.

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>There's valuing substantive and substantial organic growth and high margin businesses,

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and those are plentiful in the healthcare sector right now. Well, Doug,

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>how about in the you know, one of the things

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in these uh rising trade tensions between the

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>US and China and what the Huahwei news is the

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>tech sectors kind of gotten whipped around here, the semiconductor

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>stocks taking a beating. Are you taking this as an

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to maybe take another look at tech or does

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this just too big of a risk to kind of

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>bite off. No, we don't think it's to be a

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>risk at all. Paul. You know, it's amazing. You know,

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if you guys follow beast book on Twitter, they put

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal valuation compared and comparison chart out last night

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that the value H the P on tech and utilities

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are almost paired off right The U the P I

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>utilities right now are twenty point one in tech twenty

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>point five. We think there's some very interesting opportunities, particularly

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>if you consider where we are in the economic cycle,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which is undenidably late. We've seen enhancement of productivity and

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the aforementioned plentiful capital that's sitting on company balance sheets

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>gets deployed in the fashion that's going to elevate that

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>productivity to take the profitability into the future. We think

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>tech has some very interesting opportunities right now, and I

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think the Uahwei thing, as it gets thrown around, is

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a catalyst to really offer some of

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>those interesting and attractive entry points. Interesting I'm looking right now,

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, though it yields, and I do have to

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether they're sending a more bearished signal uh than equities,

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>especially with tenure yields hovering around the lowest since twenty seventeen.

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that that we can sort of

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>take some kind of bearished signal here or do you

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think that there's just a different story priced in having

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with Central Bank doublish policies. Yeah, there's always

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a message in the bond market, Riley. So we always

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>say the bond market is more cold, hard and calculating

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the stock markets, more that of the kind of

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the realm of the temperamental child. And it certainly is

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>telling us that inflation is not an issue. It's likely

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>telling us that growth rates may moderate. It is certainly

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>embedding some sort of an elongation of the trade tariffs

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and foreign and domestic politics. If you think about like

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the two axes upon which markets pivot. You have access

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to capital and you have confidence, and the bond market

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>is a proxy for both, and it's kind of splitting

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>its time right now. Capital is plentiful, but confidence is

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely waning. So people are kind of look for a signal,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and not likely that would be embedded in a backup

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and yields, because even though yields will come down over

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the course last three months, the curve has steepens. You've

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>had it's bull stepening trade that's been in place. That

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>does give us an indication that if things do tend normalize,

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that can make a very productive contribution to the markets

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>continuing forward. But the message of the bond market should

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>never be ignored. So, Doug, are you part of what

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I would call the kid census. Uh that

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the FED will cut rates at least

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>once before the end of the year. I don't know, Paul,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that is such a tough prediction to make. Means certainly

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>like the Bloomberg the w I r P screed is

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>giving what a my favorite Thank yeah, I love it

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. And in the market is in the market,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and w I r P has always been a little

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>bit detached from the Fed. I really don't know that

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Fed needs to cut rates clearly if they don't

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like the economy is running, you know, so weaker,

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and what do you want to look at the GDP

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>now from the Atlanta Fed or other um underlying sort

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>of data points. I don't feel like they need the

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>stimulus now if you could get something that kind of

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>runs and buttresses the monetary policy, like something for us

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to productive about a fiscal policy, and who knows, maybe

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we get some kind of a breakthrough announcement with capital

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>spending and infrastructure and that kind of thing. I don't

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>think the FED once to cut I hope the FED

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>does not cut. It is interesting to me that the

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>market is obviously a far more pessimistic than the set

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is communicating or the economic data is demonstrating. No, I

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>am not in a camp that they will doug. I'm

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>struck by sort of this dissonance here. There's some people

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who say that the trade concerns are really what's weighing

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>on equities and what's certainly creating a bid for bonds.

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Other people saying that that's actually the peripheral story and

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it really has to do with slowing growth globally. Where

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do you come in on this, I think the the former.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I've not seen any slowing growth globally. I think we

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have a fear of slowing growth globally. That goes back

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to the message of the bond market. Have not seen

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the data that would support that, other than in some

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>anticipatory impact of the trade tariffs and it's it's contractionary

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>capacity or it's play itself out. I've just not seen

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it yet least. I think it's more just consternation and fear,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's being pulled forward, not unlike the optimism and

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the greed had been pulled forward in the first three

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or four months of this year just real quickly ten seconds,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is or anything. You're just staying away from any equity

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>sector there really is not. I mean, I think when

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the valuations in the most

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive sectors like utilities in real estate and to think

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>that they're up and growing it two or three percent

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with a P, I think you have to be really

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>cautious there and selective. But as kind of wholesale basis, No,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of consider everything on kind of an individual

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>fundamental assessment basis. Doug Cioca, thank you so much for

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Doug Cioca, chief executive officer and partner

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>at uh Cover Capital Partners from Leewood, Kansas. Interesting to

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>see that he's seeing opportunities and he does think that

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this is more a story about trade concerns that it

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is slowing global growth. Talking about municipal bonds, we have

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the tremendous rally that we've seen in

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the debt, where we've seen prices on the debt rising

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to record highs relative to treasuries. Were very lucky to

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>have with us here. Amanda al Rite, municipal bond reporter

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. In our interactive broker studios in New York. So, Amanda,

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of analysts coming out from big

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>banks saying, Okay, this has gotten a little ahead of itself.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>There is going to be a pullback. What's the argument, right?

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>So I talked to some portfolio managers this week that

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of made the case that with Muni's UM, whenever

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>you see a sustained period of really big inflows like

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now, um, you're just kind of waiting

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for the other shoot to drop. UM. I think what's

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting about this moment is that investors don't really

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>know what that will be. So some people have even

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>talked about the election is being something that could trigger

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that or something even more soon if people start to

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>realize that they're kind of paying a lot to own

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>munis right now, and maybe they're not being compensated for

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the risks, or maybe they're better off buying treasuries or

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>corporate bonds instead. So, Amanda, we've seen really have the

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>less several months, if not more, just this tremendous inflows

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>into the municipal bond market. Um, are we seeing a

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of commensurate new issuance by municipality? Saying boy, this

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>market's great. I better just go out and raise the

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>money while I can. UM. Absolutely not UM. So the

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>last time i'd not so much. So when I checked

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning UM on NBM, which shows UM the scheduled

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bond sales versus the amount of bonds maturing and being

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>called away, I think it outweighs it by over twenty

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>billion right now. And so we're entering this period where

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>bond sales are really really light UM. You know, finance

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>officials are on vacation just like everyone else UM. And

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're having all this money pulled out of the

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>market and it's looking to get reinvested. So investors are

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>looking to that as another kind of UM supporter of

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>performance UM. But it's also kind of a frustration to

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>them because they have all this money to put to work,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>but they don't really have a place to put it.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They have a place to put it, they're just not

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it right. I mean, we're talking about infrastructure spending,

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and we've been talking about the two trillion dollar plan

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that won't or wasn't or has not been UM. Why

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't some of these localities just doing it themselves. So

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a really interesting conundrum. Dallas fort

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Worth said this week that they are doing a three

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollar expansion UM. So that's an example of,

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a place that's going at it alone. UM.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think that, you know, whether it's smart or not,

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think mayors and governors in some ways they're holding

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit of hope for the federal government.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>We have seen, you know, some gas tax proposals. Some

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of those have been UM successful, and some of those

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are kind of tied up in political stuff right now.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Michigan is still considering their's UM. But in terms of

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like the super local level, I feel like there's still

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of reluctance and a little bit of

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>fear about taking on debt. Still, let's look at the

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>other side of the equation a little bit, like when

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think about chronic fiscal woes at the state level

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and municipal level, I think Illinois, but the bonds are

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>doing really well. What's going on there? Yeah, So the

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>situation for Illinois UM investors have gotten more optimistic about

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it under UM JB. Pritzker, who's the new Democratic governor UM.

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So you have one party rule in Illinois now UM,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and the state is getting closer to enacting a progressive

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>income tax structure, which will help them you know, raise

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>more revenue from wealthier earners in the state. Um. So

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that's caused the bonds to rally, and you know investors

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>are really looking to as potentially you know, being a

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>further boon to the state's bonds. But again, that's kind

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of making a big bet on what residents will do

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>when that's up for a vote. And we've started to

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more money moved towards Puerto Rico again, right,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that's true. We've seen um, you know, high yield funds,

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>they keep attracting cash. We've seen some high yield deals

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>on the calendar this week, um that my colleague Joe

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Meisac has been writing about. Um, you know those are

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>getting um strong market access still and again this is

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a time when we're seeing you know, even Wall Street

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>analysts saying, hey, like maybe now isn't the best time

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to be buying these is. I don't know, how does

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a musicable market look at Puerto Rico now? Has it

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>been you know, permanently negatively impacted or is it a

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>temporary thing? And once it becomes clear that they've got

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>their duck scenario that the investors will come back. UM.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>It's really this is like the key Muni market debate

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. So you can talk to some folks that

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>are really optimistic on Puerto Rico, UM, you know, especially

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>after the hurricane and all the federal money um expected

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to come in. That's a positive. But if you talk

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to other folks, UM, you know, they've kind of been

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>burned before and they're seeing that the underlying issues in

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico with its economy, you know, still exist and

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe haven't been fully addressed. So it really depends on

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>who you ask. Is there any sign of any pullback

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>by investors or at least a softening in demand as

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a growing number of analysts say, you know what, guys,

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe just temper your enthusiasm. UM. I haven't seen any

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>signs of that yet, but it wouldn't surprise me there

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>there have been none. I think most people are kind

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of um, they're not hesitating to, you know, complain to

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>me about how how high prices are. UM. So it's

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of when portfolio managers decide, you know,

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to kind of step off completely. That was that was

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so diplomatic. They're not hesitating to complain. I just picture

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone calls that you get from people saying, oh

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, too, Darna, I'm not buying him. Amanda Albright,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Amanda's Umenissa Bond, reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us here on our interactive broker studio. Thanks for

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg pen L podcast. You can subscribe

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Lisa Abram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide.

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio