WEBVTT - It's a Numbers Game: AI Regulation Showdown: Privacy, Chatbots, Data Centers & Big Tech Power

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to a Numbers Game with Ryan Gerdosky. Thank

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys for being here. Happy Friday everyone, we made

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it through another week. This is going to be our

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>last episode on AI. It was AI Week. Next week

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to right back to politics, right back to

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>polling and the midterms and all that good stuff. I'm

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>hopefully going to announce some pretty big guests coming up

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in the future very soon, and some things have been

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>working on to really elevate this podcast to the next level.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very excited for that and we'll see where

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that goes. So on this episode, I want to talk

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about AI and what the numbers say about how Americans

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are feeling about the AI revolution and what is going

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on with our entire world when it comes to AI,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>because there's an obvious hostility that you can feel in

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the streets that you could just talk to people and

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's very palpable. This big backlash not even among just

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>people organizing against AI, like on the left and stuff

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and against data centers, but just regular people. You may

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the last few days at these college

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>graduation ceremonies, a number of commencement speakers have been booed

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for even mentioning AI during their speeches. In the case,

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say you missed it. If you missed it, here's

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a clip of exte Google CEO Eric Schmidt speaking at

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 1>the University of Arizona last December.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Time magazine selected its person view for twenty twenty five,

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and with this time it was the architects of Artificial Intelligence. Interesting.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>It will touch every profession, every classroom, every hospital, every laboratory,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>every person, and every relationship you have. I know what

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>many of you are feeling about that. I can hear you.

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 2>There is a fear.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>We do not know.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>We do not know the precise contours of what this

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 2>transformation will look like. Choose a diversity of perspectives including

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>let me add and if you if you'd let me

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>make this point please.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>If you don't care about science.

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 2>That's okay, because AI is going to touch everything else

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 2>as well. Whatever path you choose, AI will become part

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 2>of how work is done. If you have a pro

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>problem in the world you want to solve, you can

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 2>now assemble a team of AI agents to help you

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>with the parts that you could never accomplish on your own.

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you some advice.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>First, find a way to say yes and thank you

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>very much and good night.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I give him credit after, you know, being booed like

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that for the first I mean, he was like, no,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna I'm as dig to it. I'm gonna

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>keep getting booed. And he just kept getting booed. I mean,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>there's something to say about that. But he wasn't the

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>only one. Gloria Clawfield, a real estate executive, was met

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with similar responses over the University of Florida play clib too.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Now that said, we are living in a time of

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>profound change. That's an understatement, right, profound change. Change is exciting,

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 4>very exciting, and let's face it, change can be daunting.

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 4>The rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution?

0:03:47.560 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 4>WHOA what happened? Okay? I struck a chord? May I finish?

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Only a few years ago, AI was not a factor

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 4>in our lives, all right, Okay, we've got a bipolar

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 4>topic here, I see, okay, And now AI capabilities are

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 4>in the palm of our hands, and and oh I

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 4>love it, passion, let's go. Okay.

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>There were more speeches. I'm not going to get into

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>all of them, but you can obviously see where I'm

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>going with this, So let's talk about the numbers, right,

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>What does it say not only on the college campus,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean grade wuation ceremonies, but a broad level of

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>where the numbers are when it comes to AI and

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>how people are feeling about it. Americans are concerned about AI,

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>and that concern has grown over time. According to Pew Research,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of Americans who are more excited than concern

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was at eighteen percent in twenty twenty one. Now it's

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at ten percent, and those who are more concerned than

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>excited whereas at thirty seven percent in twenty twenty one,

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and now it's at fifty percent. So you see the

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>clear trajectory where it's going. They believe it will make

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it harder. The people believe that AI will make it

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>harder to think creatively, to form meaningful relationships and make

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>difficult decisions. The only field that people think AI will

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>be more of a positive than a negative according to

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this Pew Research study, is medical care. The area that

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they think that what the worst effect is on personal relationship, news,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and elections. They believe that it will only increase social

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:06.239
<v Speaker 1>distrust and continue to work down our fraying institutions. Of course,

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this isn't all people. AI experts, of course, think that

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>AI will be more of a positive than an egga

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty six percent to fifteen percent. That margin a yoga

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>pull on it. Seventy one percent Americans think that AI developed.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>This AI development is moving to quickly for that's sixty

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>four percent, including for young people eighteen to twenty nine

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>years old, so seventy one percent overall, sixty four percent

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>among young people. The presumption by a lot of people

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is that this is just it's just baby boomers and

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>old people who don't like it. It's not the truth.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It is very much young people who are increasingly hostile

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>towards you know, AI is in encourasion into every fragment

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of our life. When as they think that AI will

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 1>create economic games that will benefit everybody, sixty three percent

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Americans said no, while thirty six percent said yes. Young people,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>like those doing the commencement speechers, were more optimistic about

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the question of AI, but still a majority said no

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty five to forty five. And even though they're the

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>most optimistic but economic benefits, they're also the most worry

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that AI will take their jobs. By a sixty two

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>forty percent margin. A Quinnipiac poll from March split people

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>up between those who know AI a great deal, you

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know a lot about AI that use it a lot,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and those who know about it very very little and

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't use that often. Fifty six percent of those

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who knew a lot about AI and use it very

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>often were not excited about the developments, compared to sixty

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>percent who knew very little about it and use it

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>not that often. So the divide among people who use

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it very often and those who don't is not as

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>extreme as I think people would expect. I think people

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>would expect that if you use it a lot, you

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>love it, and if you don't use a lot, you're

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly fearful. The numbers are fairly similar. There is a

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>small there are more people who are accepting who use

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it often. However, it's not this double digit wide extreme

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on those who knew the most about AI were the

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>most concerned, seventy nine percent being very concerned to twenty

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>one percent say they were not concerned. And a Gallup

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>poll found that while the majority of gen zers use

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>AI on a weekly basis, probably to get them to

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>pass tests so that they could attend the graduation. Cermone

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that they bowed the executive talking about AI while they

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>were using AI the most, and while that usage has

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>gone up, the excitement for the product has gone down.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Gen zers were reporting to feeling excited about AI went

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from thirty six percent to twenty two percent in just

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a year, and those that the AI makes them angry

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>went from twenty two to thirty one percent once again

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in just one year. And it's easy to understand why

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's why they're anxious, why they're angry, why all

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>these bad feelings are coming when it comes to AI,

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Because all you have to do is just listen to

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what tech executives are saying. A twenty twenty three Yale

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>survey of one hundred and nineteen CEOs, including leaders from

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>companies like Walmart, Coca Cola, Xerox, Zoom, and others across

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the industry, gave AI a forty two percent chance of

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>destroying humanity in the next ten years. Another story out

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>of Berkeley University of twenty seven hundred AI researcher said

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a five percent chance of AI bringing the

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>extinction to humanity. Yeah, five percent is pretty low. It's

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a little too high for me. Though that's a high number.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk said it was about twenty percent, and Dario

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Amodi said that it was about ten to twenty five percent.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a big number. That's obviously not very comforting for

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>someone who's starting out their life, for someone who's starting

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>out their business, who just finished off school, all the

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. But the bigger problem, aside from the

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>extinction of humanity for a lot of people, the problem

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that is more in people's face is obviously jobs. And

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's understandable given what the AI business leaders are saying

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I will do to their jobs. Listen to a Daria

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Emodi of Anthropic has been saying.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 5>You've said AI could wipe out half of all entry

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 5>level white collar jobs and spike unemployment to ten to

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty percent in the next one to five years.

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that is shock.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 5>That is that is the future we could see if

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 5>we don't become aware of this problem now, half.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Of all entry level white collar jobs.

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, if we look at entry level consultants, lawyers, financial professionals,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, many of kind of the white collar service industries,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of what they do, you know, AI models

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 6>are already quite good at and without intervention it's hard

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 6>to imagine that there won't be some significant job impact there.

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 5>And my worry is that it'll be broad and it'll

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.599
<v Speaker 5>be faster than what we've seen with previous technology.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Just this week, leaked audio of Mark Zuckerberg came out

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>where he told Meta employees that before he fired ten

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of their workforce, a Meta's workforce AI have been

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>monitoring their what they did on their computers, on their

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>work computers to train to replace them. And then at

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>four am in an email, he sent it out to

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>thousands of Meta employees that they were fired and their

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>computers no longer work, their tags no longer work, Thank

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you and have a great day. When you look at

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>tech companies and big tech companies like Oracle, Amazon, Meta, Block, Cisco, Into, it,

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Wise Tech, Snap, Ocado, eBay, Coinbase, Pinterest, they have let

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>go of well over one hundred thousand jobs this year alone. Now,

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the employment rate among recent college graduates, if you're talking

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>about why college graduates is so fearful, is not that high.

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's five point three percent, which is lower than their

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>peers who did not go to college. The overall unemployment

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>rate for young people seven point two percent, So for

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>college graduates. It's fairly a decent labor market. What is

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>changing that is concerning is a trend that we've seen

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with employment numbers for the last thirty plus years is

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that recent college grads have lower levels of unemployment than

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the broader workforce. That's been the truth the last three decades.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>That reversed a couple of years ago around twenty nineteen

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty, and it's gotten worse over time. Recent

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>college graduates have the unemployment rate about a one point

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>higher than the overall workforce of all workers. Now, tech

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>executives have been saying that, you know, they've been changing

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>their tune when it comes to what AI will do

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to employment. James Manika, I believe I'm saying that last

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time correctly, but you guys know me, I'm probably butchering it.

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He is a senior Google Alphabet executive. On a recent

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast episode that he doesn't believe though the duomer predictions

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>over mass unemployment. Sam Altman of Open AI said he

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't believe that these predictions about fifty percent unemployment is possible,

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Bezos he gave actually one of the best

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>defenses up for why AI won't take people's jobs. This

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>is what he said on CMBC.

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 7>So there are so many smart people and they aren't smart,

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 7>and they are saying, oh my god. You know, there's

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 7>gonna be no more radiologists because you know, AI can

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 7>read X rays better than a radiologist can. And they're

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 7>going to be no more software engineers because a I

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 7>can program better than a software engineer can.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>These people are wrong.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 7>So what's really going to happen is that it's going

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 7>to elevate all of these people and they're gonna it's

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 7>like it's it's like you've been digging. Let's say you're

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 7>a software engineer, right, what it's the analogy and giving

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 7>you is you've been uh, digging out a basement for

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 7>your house with a shovel and somebody's about to hand

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 7>you a bulldozer.

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You're you're so you should be so.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 7>Happy if you're digging the basement to your house and

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 7>somebody says, hey, how about this, I have a tool here.

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna And what's really.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 7>Going to happen is we're going to have so much

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 7>productivity in our economy that, for example, this is this

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 7>is one effect a lot of people who have two

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 7>earner income households.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the people is going to drop out of

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the workforce.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 7>That's why we're gonna have a labor shortage. Because of

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 7>the productivity gains, you're gonna be able to afford things.

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have, I predictable actually.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 7>Have deflation of certain core Assuming we let this technology

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 7>play out and don't you hamstring it with regulation too early,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 7>we will actually have you know, everything will get food

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 7>will get cheaper.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So what does the future of employment look like with AI,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know. I don't believe anyone really knows.

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And I believe these guys more than I believe the

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fear porn armed Dario Modi that there is going to

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>be fifty percent unemployment rates among recent college graduates, don't.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that. But I'm not sure. None of

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>these people really are sure. But what I can tell

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you is that tech executives realize that they have created

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>their own bad PR and now they're desperately trying to

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>fix with good PR. And what they absolutely don't want

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in this point, in this moment, is more regulations on AI,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or any regulations on AI. When the Trump administration, who

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>has been extremely pro AI, more than the Biden administration

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but very pro AI. When they were considering

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a review board process to look at new AI developments,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that AI models before they were released, just for public safety,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for their own security, for national security, the tech world

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>swarmed the White House with lobbyists to stop them. What

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the framework the White House is going to release? And

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I have not read the official framework or what's expected

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to be. Is it ending up a voluntary framework for

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>developers for frontier models to inform the government about planned

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>new releases up to ninety days before the public really,

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so for three months beforehand. They would have to submit

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the release to the government voluntarily. There's no demandate for this,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and the government would give it the okay. This, of course,

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't good enough for the AI companies, even though it's voluntary.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>They only wanted fourteen day review, just two weeks to

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>understand the entire process and then get the green light

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>from the government. Of course, the White House fears aren't

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>just on job development, because President Trump and other people

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>administration believe that AI is going to create more jobs

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and it will take What they're worried about is national

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>security and AI being used to hack government programs and

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>government departments. Remember, nothing is all good and nothing is

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>all bad. Something that is something that is very positive,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like some AI developments will come with bad you know,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>bad results because that's just human nature. They will use

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>something to to harm people. That is how things have

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>always worked with technology. But this national security risk from

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>these new AI frontier models is very serious. That's and

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's changed a lot since since last sweep with Mythos

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and Open. AI's latest models have raised concerns that AI

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>is helping exploit software vulnerabilities. I talked about this on

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>my podcast on Wednesday. What happens if a terrorist is

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>able to use AI to hack the FAA and stop

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>communications between planes, people in the sky, and people on

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground directing them, it will be a catastrophe. It

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>will be a nine to eleven like episode nationwide. And

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>forget what could happen, let's talk about what has happened.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>AI has already been used to plan mass shootings in

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States and Canada. In April twenty twenty five,

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a man named nix Erker He exchanged more than thirteen

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand messages with chat ebt and lead up to an

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>attack that killed two people and injured others. Authorities in

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit claimed that he received advice on gun and

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ammunition types, optimal times and locations on campus from maximum victims,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>media attention strategies, that he even had to operate a

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>shotgun minutes before the shooting. This led to a criminal

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>investigation by the Flora Attorney General into Open AI and

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit from victims of families alleging that AI that

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT is a co conspirator. In February twenty twenty six,

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a shooter in Canada use chat GPT for planning guidance

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in a mass casualty event. Victims of victims families file

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits against Open AI, and in January twenty twenty five,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the cyber truck attack remember that happened in Vegas that

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>near the Trump Tower. Chat GBT was used to plan

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the device, on explosives and how to evade law enforcement.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Investigations and independent tests by the Center for Countering Digital

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Hate found that in eight out of every ten major

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>AI chat box including chat GPT, frequently assisted users in

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>helping to plan school shootings, bombings, and assassination attempts. This

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is a real question. I'm going to post everybody. How

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>long until we see chat GPT or some other AI

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>chatbox use. How long until we see it used to

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>plan an assassination of a tech ceo. And it's sometime

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wishing for or I'm hoping for, but I really

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>feel that is a possibility in our future, a Luigi

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Mangioni style assassination of a tech ceo who the planning

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and plotting will be used, will be worked with the

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>chatbox and they will plan the murder of somebody, somebody

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen on television, somebody talking about, you know,

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>job disruptions or or the fact that you know gen

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>zs are just too lazy, or or putting down or

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is going to make you lots of money.

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Part of the outcry. I think you have to understand,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's part of the outcry against a I is a

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>class struggle, right. It is gen xers and baby boomers

0:19:55.680 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>making enormous sums of money while gen Zers or struggling.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>As all young people struggle, there's something special about gen

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>z struggle. But as they're struggling to start their foothold

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in life and they feel the rug is cut from

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>under them, that their jobs won't exist while there's an

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>immense concentration of wealth among very very few, and there's

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be someone who cracks, and there's going to

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be somebody like a Luigi Manngioni who will be idolizing

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of style of behavior, that violence, and take

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it upon themselves somebody probably with mental health issues. And

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that's the case is for a lot of these kids,

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these kids who are angry and nowhere

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to feel their anger, They're going to look to take

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it out on somebody. And that is what I am

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>really afraid is going to happen in a very short

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Look at the amount of kids who

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>use CHATTP to harm themselves. It's not it's not a

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>small number. And yeah, I never I've never told this

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>story before, but this is something that I've experienced in

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>my own life. I have I have a I don't

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have a friend. Someone I've known for probably twenty years, married, kids,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>seemed fairly normal, like always a little bit of an

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>odd person, but on the periphery of odd, like normal,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like overall very normal, hell down, a job, had a family,

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>had a kids, had a house, who fell for better

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>or worse in love, with their chat box. So I mean,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know this person and I and I

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't understand, but they were. But they were spending fourteen

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>hours a day talking to their chat box. They came

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to certain opinions about knowing when the end of the

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>world was happening. Would send me messages saying, hey, this

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to have I've talked to chat gibt and

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the world's going to happen on this day. I was like,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you are losing it. And this person's wife said to everybody,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>please stay with my husband. He's he's entered into an

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>AI induced psychosis. And where that AI and DO psychosis

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>led to was he his AI bot told him that

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>his father killed his grandfather, murdered his grandfather, and he

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to seek justice out even though that wasn't true.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And now he's in prison for I presume an attempted

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>attack against his father that he was planning out. It is.

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It's shocking. And I know you're saying to yourself that

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>could never be me. And I said to myself, that

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>could ever be me. It wouldn't be me. I want

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>an unused chattipa too. I'm too rational, I'm too saying

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm too normal. There are people who were normal. We're

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>saying maybe they were a little lonely, maybe they were

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a little on the perfery, maybe they were on just

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the borderline. They were getting by and the introduce to

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>an AI and do psychosis because it was it confirmed

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>all of their places, which is what these AI chatbots do.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>They confirm all your pre existing beliefs. I don't believe

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of the conspiracies gonna AI, like a

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent unemployment rate. I don't. I don't. I don't

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>trust what most of the CEOs are saying tech on

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>AI in any direction, whether they're saying it's all way

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>great or they're saying it's going to be a big problem.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I do know, because we've had on this podcast that AI,

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that left wing politicians blue AI will will open the

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>doors towards socialism in America, and that I'm fearful of.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I do know that AI has been used to plan attacks.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that AI will be used to plan

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>attack against the tech CEO. And I do believe this

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>disruption in the market and the safety concerns around AI

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is enough for some kind of regulation at the federal

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>level that the belief that these AI companies will simply

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to monitor themselves and everyone will be playing

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone will be an angel I do all

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the right things and monitor themselves over profits. I don't believe.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't that. I don't believe. And I think that

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>when some kind of levels of AI production over data,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>over where data goes, especially medical uh, and that needs

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to happen sooner than later. And I don't really care

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>who has so kicking and dragging and screaming that we

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that this that we're gonna let China, you know, win

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the race. I don't believe that either. And that's where

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I stand in the whole thing. That's why I want

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to conclude this entire week's episodes around AI. So that's

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the data, that's where people are is will feel, that's

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wheople are going. And that's my big concerns over the issue.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>And I want you to be able to form your

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>own opinions based upon the data. One lady who has

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>formed her own opinions and is fighting for AI regulation

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>both from the state and federal level, as Amy Kramer.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>She's of the organization Human First. She's coming on next

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what AI regulation, Real AI regulation really

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like that's gonna be up next to Stay tuned.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Amy Kramer is the chairwman of Humans First. It is

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit organization working for AI regulation. Thank you for

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>being here, Amy, Thank.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 3>You Ryan so much for having me on.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>It's great to see Amy. What is Humans First?

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Humans First is a nonprofit that we started earlier this year,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 3>and we're focused on putting regulations and safety guards around

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 3>big AI to protect the American people, our children, our families,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 3>our resources, and jobs. Quite honestly.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So a lot of people would accuse you of being,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, anti innovation or anti AI as a whole.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that true?

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 3>No, Ryan, there's nothing further from the truth. I am

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>actually I use AI every day, probably more than a

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of people. I am not anti AI. I'm not

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 3>anti tech. But I feel like that this is the

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 3>most powerful I know it's not. I feel I know

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that this is the most powerful technology in human history,

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 3>and there are no regulations around this industry, and it

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 3>is impacting our lives in every aspect, in every way possible,

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's only growing and becoming more, you know, into

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 3>our life, that's growing more into our lives and there

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>has to be regulations and laws around this, and so

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 3>it's basically we just want that to happen, and we

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 3>do believe that there should be a federal law, federal regulations.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 3>But because AI, these big AI, big tech companies are

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 3>pushing the administration for no regulations and no laws, it's

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 3>being left up to the states. And so we're working

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>on a national level, and we want to influence policy

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>on a national level, but we're also working on a

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 3>state level until we get those federal regulations in place.

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's important to remember there are more

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>federal regulations on how much toilet bowl water is in

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>your toilet than there is about how much AI.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely there's more federal regulations on a ham sandwich, right,

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean than AI. And this is impacting. You can't

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>log into your email now without something coming up saying

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 3>you know, do you AI, saying do you want us

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to give you a summary of what this email thread is?

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's invasive, and the American people have not

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 3>really had a say in this, Ryan and and honestly,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 3>it's been built on American data, American land, American resources,

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 3>American energy, and American tax payer dollars and we have

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 3>no seat at the table and no voice in the

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 3>future of this technology. And that's just wrong. That's not

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 3>the American way.

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there was an interview not too long ago between

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Cara Swisher, who sometimes she's very smart, sometimes she's just

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>a lunatic, and and Sam Altman, and she asks, you know,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if you go to sea, some people are Some people

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>don't turn into AI to do functions like legal functions,

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>medical functions, asking you know, what disease do I have

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or what my legal thing is. But she said, unlike

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.479
<v Speaker 1>other on like on like going to see a doctor

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>who has a hippo law to work with, or a

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lawyer who has certain regulations. The laws are written to

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit AI companies, but not you benefit the consumer very much.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that how you feel?

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I would agree with that. There's not many protections for

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the American people. And one of the things that got

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 3>me into this because I'm not a tech person. I'm

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 3>just a mom. I've never been a techee. I never

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>will be. Even if you're editing, you know, like using

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Photoshop or something to two pictures. That's not my thing.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 3>But what got me into this was seeing the deaths

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of the especially these young kids, these teenagers taking their

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 3>own lives. And then you as you start to research more,

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not just that it's not just teenagers. There are

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 3>adults that's happening too also, And then you take that

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and it goes into this piece that I it's terrorism

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 3>where they're using chat GPT to plan shootings at FSU.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Chat GPT was used to plan the shooting in British Columbia.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Earlier this year, there was an incident in Florida. A man,

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty six year old Jonathan Gabalis out of Jupiter, Florida,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>whose Chat bought wife told him to go to Miami

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>International Airport and do terroristic to activity and create and

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I quote mass casualty. Thankfully he failed and then he

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>went and took his own life. But all of these

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 3>incidents is that I'm mentioning to you the only reason

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 3>we know about this stuff is because of lawsuits that

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 3>have been filed. There are no transparency, no reporting guidelines

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 3>around these companies whatsoever. And in the in the instance

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 3>of the one in British Columbia, those conversations were flagged

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 3>by I believe twelve people in Open AI. They took

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 3>him to their bosses and nothing was done about it.

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 3>So you have to wonder could that shooting have been stopped.

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 3>But if you're looking at I'm a former flight attendant

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the airlines, if there's an incident with an airliner, they

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 3>are required to report it. Hospitals, pharmaceutic quo companies, all

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 3>the things that you know that companies are required to

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>report to OSHA. But there's none of that here, and

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 3>so the American people are left in the dark. And

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 3>then you get into the technology aspect of it. And

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 3>we saw Secretary Descent just recently call a private meeting

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 3>of all these bank you know CEOs, and it was

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 3>over concerns of mythos, this new anthropic AI, the new

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 3>version of AI, their clawed AI, that the I mean,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 3>there's concern that it could shut down our financial system.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>That the abilities of this AI is nothing like we've

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 3>ever seen. So we need regulations to protect the American

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 3>people for no other reason ryan our national security. That

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>is the number one responsibility of the federal government as

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 3>our national security. And just because these companies you know,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 3>want to quote unquote race to the finish, I mean,

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>and they're saying they want no regulations no, No, I

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 3>mean regulations, laws. They're trying to bypass the American people.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 3>We have to stand up and say no, they're not

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 3>going to look out for us. They're not going to

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 3>look out for the American people. And if they're not,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 3>who was going to?

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the myth thos is interesting because it seemed to

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be the thing that really started changing the administration's mind.

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Right afterwards, there was a leak from The New York

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Times that Trump administration was considering a basically a rule

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that new aim als would have to be viewed the

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>way that pharmaceutical drugs are viewed, like you approved and

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>looked at to make sure that they were safe. They've

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>backed away from the earlier versions of that. I can

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>only imagine the intense lobbing that went on in the

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>media afterwards. Now it's a voluntary thing. It's ninety days.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want the ninety days. They wanted just fourteen

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>days of voluntary overlooking. What are some okay, so let's

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of these issues you brought up. So

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the whole chat bots, which is just

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>synthetic people. It's synthetic relationships. What would you like to

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be done? Would humans. First, like to be done to

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>reform the way the chat box interacting with people, especially

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are either on borderline mental health issues, people

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>who are children or young adults. What was you to

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>see done for that?

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, that is I believe a parental issue with parents

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 3>when it involves children. And I mean, I'm a parent.

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine having a child now just the harms

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 3>of social media. And then you get into these ais

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and these these kids are so smart they can find

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the way to work around us, right around their parents

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>on these computers. And that's what your phone is is

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>a little computer, and they can find a way. And

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 3>so the parents need to have the ability to manage

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and control what their children are accessing online. I mean,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I fully, one hundred percent believe that. And what's happening

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>is they're being given chromebooks in schools. They're giving they're

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 3>using AI schools and parents have a right to be

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 3>involved in those decisions. The schools should not be involved

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 3>in those decisions. I like what Governor Disantis did in

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Florida with his AI Bill of Rights. Unfortunately it passed

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>through the Senate, I believe unanimously this last time, but

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 3>it didn't get through the house, and that's a whole

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 3>nother story. But I mean he was giving the parents,

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, the controls and mechanisms to oversee what their

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 3>children are accessing. Look, we want we want transparency. We

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 3>want transparency when we want self reporting these companies. It's

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 3>not only you know what the children are seeing online,

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 3>that these companies are also giving this technology to foreign

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 3>governments and foreign foreign corporations entities. Who are they giving

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 3>it to and for what purposes? They say it's testing,

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 3>but there's no control there, and so we want some

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 3>regulations around that, so that in what you're talking about

0:33:54.960 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the executive order, the executive Order, there should be mandatory tests.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 3>There absolutely should be mandatory testing, and it should have

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 3>government approval before it's released to the public. That is

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 3>for I mean, not because we want to control these companies.

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I believe, and I believe most people believe in American innovation.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 3>And of course we want to beat China. We are

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 3>America first. We want to beat China. But you can't

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 3>have it both ways, saying we have to race to

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 3>the finish. We got to beat China and at the

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 3>same time be selling our chips semiconductors to China and

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 3>loosening our export controls. I mean, you can't be America

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 3>first in China, fund it right.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>There's also there is also no finish to the race

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to the finishing, right, That's what exactly. And I don't

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 1>understand why if AI is so dangerous? Why President Trump

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and Jinping Kenniping president president? It was like foreign presence

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to change the name. But if why they cannot have

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>a negotiation on limitations of a the same way that

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Soviets and the United State's over in nuclear war?

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>What I what I would like a regulation over and

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>what I would like a general conversation or is all

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the very all the the more coherent voices around AI

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>keep saying this is just a tool. This is just

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a tool. This is not going to replace every worker

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in America. And I believe them more than I believe

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the hysterical people. However, Let's say it's just a tool

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and your doctor is using it to make a scan

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of your body. Where does that data go? Does that

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>data stay with the doctor, does that data got question of?

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And then is that data then sold to companies. Let's

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>say you have a bone density problem. I'm going to

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>go on Instagram and all of a sudden see advertisements

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>about bone density bills. Right there is that there is

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a question, a general question of where does my privacy

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and my data go, especially with when these AI companies

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are working with the government over a lot of different

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>issues and we have a lot you know, there's there's

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a more intertwined relation now than ever before between governments

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and individuals in America, even from everything from Medicaid and

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Medicare to all this other spending. Is there a situation

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>will ever be in a place where they'll say, well,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we got your hold of your medical scan from a

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from an AI app that that a doctor was using,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and therefore you know you're going to be costing X,

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Y and Z rolling on to cover this much of

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it something like that, you know, talking about I know

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it sounds it's the.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Surveillance No, it's it's the surveillance state. I mean, it

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 3>is the surveillance state. And this is where it's connected

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 3>to the data centers. You're seeing this uprising across the

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 3>country with these data centers, and these data centers are

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the surveillance they are the heartbeat, They're the backbone and

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure of AI, and it is where all the data

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 3>is being collected and stored on all of us across

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 3>the country, around the world. And what is that data

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 3>being used for? Right, The data is being used and

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 3>collected there for these large language models to train these ais.

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 3>But also it's all the data that they could possibly

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 3>get on us, from I mean, from our medical records,

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 3>to what magazines we buy, to where we go, I mean,

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 3>everything on earth? And then who is getting access to that?

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Are they then turning around and selling the data? I

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 3>mean in politics, we know that you can go to

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 3>companies and you can tell them what kind of people

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.919
<v Speaker 3>that you know you want to get the data for,

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, conservatives that live in this area and make

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 3>this amount of money and all these things. We are

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 3>to use it in politics. But this is going to

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 3>step further and at what point does it stop? And Ryan,

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to be clear here. This is the thing.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 3>If this is what the American people want, then so

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>be it. Right, we are republic, a constitutional republic, and

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 3>if this is what the American people vote for and

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 3>this is what they want, then so be it. That

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 3>is the American way. Just like with the data centers,

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 3>if they want them in their communities, they have a

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 3>say in it, they vote for it, then so be it.

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:09.720
<v Speaker 3>But what is happening is this technology and the infrastructure

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 3>is being shoved down our throats and everything is being

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 3>done to circumvent the American people and we have no say.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 3>And if this technology is safe and it's just a tool,

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>why are you afraid of the American people? Why don't

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 3>you want us to have a say in this? I mean,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a legitimate question.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And there's a there. You know, there's a I

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of politicians you do as well. There

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is a genuine fear, especially on the right, to not

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>say anything. They know the backlash and they understand the anger,

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>but they fear the money from the AI company is,

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, more than anything. There's this election in New York,

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think your twelfth congressional district where this guy named

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Alex Boris who's running regulations on AI. It's a Democratic primary,

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and they've spent like twenty million dollars against them, and

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>they think that they can just you know, if they

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>spend the amount of money necessary, they will be able

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 1>to beat down anybody who has any concerns over regulations.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I keep saying, like Alex even if

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>even if he's horrended, if I disagree with him on

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.479
<v Speaker 1>so many issues, he has to win, like he has

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to win because people have to not be a scare

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of AI money. But that is true that Mark and

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Drewson is the number one spender of the twenty twenty

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 1>six elections so far, Mark and Drewson and his business partner.

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Then can we talk about can we talk about something

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 3>else too? You talked about that they're afraid of Republicans

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 3>but in the president, I mean, big Tech is in

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 3>his pocket and they're pushing this administration and whatnot. But

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 3>we're going to come up on a general election. We're

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we just had a primary here in Georgia

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 3>this week. We're going to come up on a general election.

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 3>What are Republicans going to say? Because two weeks ago

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday night, John Ausoff, who is our Democrat senator

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 3>who we hope will lose in November, but he was

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 3>out in San Francisco, Chris Lahane of Open AI seeing

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 3>a fundraiser for him. So you're they're talking out of

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 3>both sides of their mouth. What's going to happen when

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the general election comes? And you know, you have Mike Collins,

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 3>who I think is more of a populous more America first,

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 3>is going to be with the people. I hope he is.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I haven't talked to him about this issue. And then

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 3>you have John Ossoff. Are these big companies because three

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollars so far has been spent to influence

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 3>our elections because they want to elect people that are

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 3>sensitive or sympathetic to their cause. So what are Republicans

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 3>going to do when John Ossoff is running and they

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 3>get behind John Ossoff because he's sympathetic to their cause.

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 3>What are Republicans going to do then?

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean the thing is that a lot of

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the AI companies, a lot of the tech companies, they

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are still financing many, many, many progressive causes, many progressive causes.

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the people who censored Hunter Biden's laptop

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 1>did not wake up one day, have a Saint Paul

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on the roads to mask of conversion and all of

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden become right fierce right wingers. A few tech

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>people are right wing. Peter Teal was always right wing,

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>David Sachs has always been fairly right wing. But for

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the most part, these are the people who Elon Musk

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>was not right wing his entire life. That this is, like,

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a very very recent transformation, and how sincere

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not just Elon, but like all these those transformations are.

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an open question that no one really

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>has a firm opinion on because they keep finallyancing all

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>these left wing causes. And I except to this one

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>congressman and I said, you need He asked, he has

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to hire me. He's running in a very very difficult

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>house seat. And I just said, well, what's your We

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking about immigration and trade, always a big policy issues,

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and I said to what's your opinion on AI And

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, I'm hoping that this election cycle I

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>still won't have to talk about it until someone until

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think he was I don't think the

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>public has caught up. And the problem is is that

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be a limitation on how long

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>you could just be silent on it. So what politicians

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>have have been receptive to your message that you've that

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys have reached out to you.

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question. And I would say in the Senate,

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 3>the two real heroes and the Senate are Senator Marshall

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Blackburn and Senator Josh Holly. I do have to give

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Senator Ted Cruz credit. He is coming our way. I

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 3>met with him a couple of weeks ago with some

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 3>angel Ai angel families, some Texas parents that have lost

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 3>their children to these chatbots and so, and then he

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 3>spoke at a rally with Senator Marshall Blackburn last week.

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 3>And that is that. I mean, he is There's been

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 3>a clear shift there. But Ted's a dad. I mean,

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 3>he's got two teenage daughters, right, He's a dad, So

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure this pulls on his heartstrings. In the house.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 3>There's not been I hate to say it, but there's

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 3>not been a We don't have a lot of heroes there.

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 3>We do have some heroes out in the states. I mean, uh,

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Governor Ron De Santis has been a hero and rock

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 3>star on this, I mean absolute rock star. Governor Sarah

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Huckabee Sanders has been a rock star. And there

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 3>are a number of people in the state legislatures. Senator

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Angela Paxson out of Texas. She has led the effort

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 3>in Texas to get legislation passed there and Tennessee. But

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 3>this is the thing, as you know, what has happened

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 3>over this past this early winter and spring. The White

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Houses come in and put their boot on the neck

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 3>of the these states and interfering. These are This is

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 3>not the president, this is not you know. These are staffers.

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 3>These are not even bureaucrats. These are staffers that are

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 3>doing the bidding of big tech and calling and and

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 3>shutting down legislation in these states. And it's wrong, Ryan,

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:57.479
<v Speaker 3>It's absolutely wrong. And that's why I think you're gonna

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 3>see a very big pushback come next legislative cycle next January,

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:06.959
<v Speaker 3>where they are working together and you're going to see

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 3>these people push to get this legislation passed. Because as

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 3>a parent, you're a parent, you know, we all know

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 3>that if our children are in danger. I know no

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 3>one that is going to say I'm going to wait

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 3>on the federal government to come and help. It's just sassinied, right,

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.760
<v Speaker 3>No one ever said that. So, whether it's our and whatever,

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's just not realistic. And the states of

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the first line of defense. And that's why I have

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 3>to give a major shout out to Governor Ron de Santas.

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:37.479
<v Speaker 3>He is a best dam governor in this country right now,

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 3>and he is doing amazing work. And I think and

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 3>you've seen Senator or not Senator A. G. Ken Paston

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 3>really pushed back on these tech companies too and file

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.840
<v Speaker 3>lawsuits against them. I personally hope that Chip Roy is

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 3>elected as their AG because I think that fight will continue.

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 3>He's willing to go into the into the lions then

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 3>on that. But we need to states. We need leadership

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 3>and strong states that are going to stand up and

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 3>push back on these tech companies, because let me be clear,

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 3>these people are the same people that have banned in

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 3>censored conservatives for years now, right. I mean it was

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Mark Zuckerberg that ban permanently banned the President of the

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 3>United States from Facebook and Instagram after the twenty twenty election.

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I personally have been banned from starting Facebook groups for

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and nineteen million years. I can give you

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.359
<v Speaker 3>the screenshot of it. But then President Trump is reelected

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 3>and he's paying, you know, seven eight million dollars for

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 3>his inauguration, and he's right there at the inauguration. The

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 3>minute the Republicans are no longer in power, you're going

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 3>to see them flip and they're going to kick conservatives

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 3>to the curb. And so I would just say to

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the President and everybody in leadership, these people can't be trusted.

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they can't be trusted. It is your job,

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 3>your responsibility to protect the American people, and that's what

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 3>we want him to do. And look, President Trump has

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:03.439
<v Speaker 3>shown just this week when he endorsed Ken Patson, He's

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 3>shown he has shown he can be moved on issues.

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 3>So I hope that the President will come our way

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in his administration, will tighten the export controls. We'll stop

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 3>selling our chips to China, and we'll do this mandatory

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 3>testing where they have to have government approval for these

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 3>frontier AI systems before they're released for the for the

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 3>to the public. I think that is the only way

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 3>that you can protect the American people.

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Amy, Where do people go if they want to

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:30.880
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with the humans first? If we want

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to be part of what you guys are doing. What's

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the best resource for that?

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, thanks for having me on. You can go to

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 3>humans First dot com and I'm on Twitter and all

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the socials, although I'm shadow band and censored at Amy Kramer,

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, follow me there and thanks for having me on.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 3>You have a great podcast, and I'm really honored to

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 3>be here.

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Anne.

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Ryan, You've been great on this issue. You've been so

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 3>good on this issue. So thank you. You're one of

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:56.879
<v Speaker 3>the the real true voices out there speaking the truth,

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and so I appreciate that.

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you. Thank you, Amy, thank you. Now it's

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>time for they Ask Me Anything segment. If you more

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be part of the Ask Me Anything segment. You know

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan at Numbers Gamepodcast dot com. That's Ryan at numbers

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ploal Numbers Game Podcast dot com. First question comes from Bennett.

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>He says, right after the Virginia ballot measure passed, there

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>was outrage that the GP seemingly spent nothing or very

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>little on ads and ground game campaign. In hindsight, that

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was probably smart. I would like to think that the GOP

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was playing forty chess and knew there was going to

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>be a challenge to the measure in court, but I'm

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not too sure that was the case. Do you think

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there was incompetence or did the VA GOP knew all

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>along there was going to be a challenge with the

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 1>measure and that spent very little because of that. So

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>so yes, there was they always knew what there was

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be a challenge to the measure. In Virginia,

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the law is that the legislature needs to approve state

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justices every time they're up for confirmation. So yes,

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they knew that there was going to be a that

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the court was going to be there was going to

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>see a challenge, But many people did think that the

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>court would rule against the GOP because the Demo legislature

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>would have to approve the reconfirmation of all those judges.

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this was forty just I don't I

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 1>talked to a lot of Republicans who had no faith

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>in the Virginia Supreme Court, who did not think they

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>were going to rule on their side, and they thought

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to be a loss for Conservatives,

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were totally prepared for that. I think that

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it was some bad campaigning still. I mean, in the end,

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it all worked out, It all worked out fabulously for them,

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that anyone expected it too. I

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think that they got very, very lucky with that the

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justice's ruled correctly and had some kahones to them. Okay,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>next questioning comes up for Nate. Would you talk about

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the South Carolina election. I would love to vote out

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Grant, but I don't know anything about Mark Lynch.

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I also find really interesting for governor. So for those

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, Lindsay Graham is up for election this year,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Mark Lynch is the leading Republican alternative. He is a

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>repair executive, very successful guy, put millions of dollars into

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.800
<v Speaker 1>his own money against Lindsey Graham. He's the first serious

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge that Lindsay Graham's had in at least ten years.

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But right now, the based on the polling, it suggests

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:15.959
<v Speaker 1>that this is just basically a protest vote. He's about

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent in the polling right now, which is really

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:22.479
<v Speaker 1>no different than Casey Puca over against in Ohio against

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>vivek Raamaswami. Maybe he'll get more than the last Republican God,

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of doubt it right now. Grahama's Graham's

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:34.879
<v Speaker 1>got the endorsement of the Trump of President Trump. He's

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>got more money than God. And the last guy who

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>ran against the last people who ran against Lindsay Graham

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>got thirty three percent in twenty twenty. Maybe they'll get

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:46.359
<v Speaker 1>close to forty percent right now, but I kind of

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>doubt it. I think Lindsay Graham has really got this.

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't like Lindsay Grahm, vote your conscience,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>because it is it's likely to meet Lindsay Graham and

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>your vote. You should be able to vote. It's nothing

0:49:57.680 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>online for voting who you want to vote for, is

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. Okay. Last question comes from Scott enjoy

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. Thank you, Scott, I enjoy you. I'm a

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>supplier of data construction, specifically liquid cooling systems. I would

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.359
<v Speaker 1>have a real hard time believing anything being said about

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>high water usage. Yes there's a one time fill, but

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>all the systems being built now are closed loop is

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>quite impressive. How everyone all of a sudden hates citizenters.

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be that in many cases they

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hate the tax incentives. I hate those two. These do

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:29.760
<v Speaker 1>not create jobs, very few long term jobs after construction,

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so I see no reason to give any tax incentives.

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Like your interview with sheriff running from California Governor, why

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is it that ours want to eliminate all income tax?

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Ohio has driven itself into a tax cliff because property

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>taxes are ridiculous and can never be escaped. Unless you

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 1>get a deal well with a data center. I hope

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that these property taxes abolishments gets on the Ohio ballad

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:53.799
<v Speaker 1>this fall and we can shake things up. I don't

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>believe it is on the ballo of this fall. I

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>don't believe any kind of things are on the ballot

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of this one when it comes to tax in Ohio.

0:51:02.280 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What I'll say is this is that we're in basically

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a hot war between the states over who can cut

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>taxes fastest among all the right states, because it's to

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>draw people. Because Florida, Tennessee, Texas are drawing massive amounts

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of people because of zero income tax, and that's a big,

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:26.959
<v Speaker 1>big part of the incentive driving this this this cut

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is like who can make it faster. What where it

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>could be problematic is like in a case of Kansas,

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:37.359
<v Speaker 1>where Kansas cut so much taxes and so much well

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for spending so quickly back in like the mid os

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>or early twenty tens, and it ended up being that

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>no new tax revenue came in and people were furious,

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they got a Democratic governor right after

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Laura Kelly. So I think that I think, obviously, listen

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to cut taxes if you can and keep and make people,

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep their money. However, you never want to

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be in a situation where they've cut taxes is such

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a high extent that they all of a sudden to

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:11.320
<v Speaker 1>raise them quickly to pay just the basic things that

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay for a government, a local government,

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you end up with a democratic governor. So

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a big fear of that happening

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as retaliation. We'll see how We'll see how far that goes.

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people promising cutting all income tax, I

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think that they are there's going to be a little

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>bit of pushback. Or all property tax is another idea

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've had that they're gonna cut every time kind

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of property tax. They got to pay it for the

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>bills somehow, they gotta pay for the firefighters in the

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>roads somehow. So we'll see, we'll see where it goes.

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't be surprised of a few slash income

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 1>tax or cut down to zero. What really the opportunity

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is is not in these red states to cut taxes.

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Is a neighboring state next to a blue state. So

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like Arizona being a purple state, Pennsylvania being a Purple

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>State Connecticut. If they could ever get back to zero

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>income tax and live near these big high tax New Jersey,

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>New York states, that would revolutionize and change things in

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:08.800
<v Speaker 1>those areas. But I don't know if we're going to

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>see the because they love democratic governors. Anyway, Thank you

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>guys for listening to this episode. I hope you like

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it well. Back to politics next week. If you like

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, please like and subscribe to the iHeartRadio app,

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast work with this podcast and on YouTube. I

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>will see you guys on Monday