WEBVTT - TNF Preview, Chargers @ Chiefs & Nick’s Picks | What's Wright?

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. Cibo index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cebo Life is better with options, your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be two.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with Cibo company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at cbo dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back in What's Right with Nick Wright Episode one

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven. Let's get right into it today because the

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>gambling portion of the show, we need some time, because

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>we need a gambling exorcism. I for six consecutive weeks

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>have either gone two and three or three and two demands,

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, has not hit a teaser since

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>before his sister went off to college. That's a true story.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So for all these reasons, we've got to get it together.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>We simply must get it together and salt in the

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>gambling wound. For the second time this year. I went

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>two and three on these picks on the podcast, and

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 2>then the three of the five picks from the podcast

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 2>that I used on television were the three losers. So

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>for the second time this year, I went zero and

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 2>three on television after going actually two and three on

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>my actual on my full five picks, because I picked

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the wrong three. It's a bad spot pack, It's a

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>bad spot man, and we'll get into it. Two of

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the losses this week were utterly painful. I was on

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 2>the right side of the bet, the process was correct,

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and I got just screwed one of them. I was

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 2>just outright wrong on two. But I really, the more

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I think about it, I got four out of five

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>right this week, which does make me feel like I'm

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>turning this thing around. The one, unfortunately, the one that

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I got dead ass wrong was the one that Demanse

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>then teased, and I got it so wrong it also

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 2>killed his teaser. It's just it just hasn't you know.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>What sometimes makes me feel better when we're in these

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, season mid season gambling swoons is

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at our preseason NFL futures and see how we're doing,

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>how we're looking. Let's do that right now, actually, before

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 2>we get into the actual show, Okay, let's look at

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 2>our season win total bets and how we're doing. First one,

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Bears under seven and a half, and I put we

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>love this bet and all caps at even money. That

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 2>one is essentially locked in already, right that one, you

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 2>can it's almost mathematically locked in. But they're not getting

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to eight wins Cowboys. If you remember, the total was

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half. We then said, instead of doing

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>nine and a half at minus one sixty, let's do

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>ten and a half at plus one point fifteen and

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 2>take the over. That one right now is obviously far

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>from locked, but is a favorite. The Jags similar situation,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 2>we had over nine and a half at minus one

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>forty Instead we did over ten and a half at

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>plus one forty five. That looks great. The Chiefs over

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>eleven and a half at minus one thirty four. That

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>one is also a huge favorite. The Patriots over seven

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and a half was a disaster. That one is an

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>outright disaster. The Eagles under eleven and a half is

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 2>an underdog but is not dead yet given what schedule

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>they have coming up. The forty nine Ers under ten

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 2>and a half is in real trouble, and the Seahawks

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>over eight and a half right now is a favorite.

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So right now we have we're looking like we're going

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to go either five and three or six and two

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>on our season win totals, so we feel good about

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that part of it. Our If you remember, we did

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 2>three long shot division winner bets at plus three hundred

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>to plus five hundred on the Dolphins now the favorite.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>The Steelers right now in first place, even though they're

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>not the favorite. Oh I'm sorry, a half game back

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of Baltimore and the falcon and the Packers they're screwed,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>so that one looks good. A Jags Chiefs two unit

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>bet for them both to win their division that could

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 2>that looks great. I'm feeling better already. I really am

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>already feeling better.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 3>What that bron party has performed way better than you

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>thought he was going to.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Why Because I had the Niners under.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 3>Ten then ten and a half, yeah, and the Seahawks

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 3>winning that division well, or that I thought they would.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 2>They would suffer multiple injuries because of the style of

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>football they play like they do every single year, and that,

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately might have started this past week. But all right,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel better. I feel like we've got the gambling

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 2>juju flowing in the right direction. Now, I I it

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>makes me feel like we had our finger on the

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 2>pulse of the season. We've just gotten unlucky, as we

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>will discuss. We've had a few bad picks, but a

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 2>lot of bad luck. We'll get into all that in

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the B block. If this sounds like what the kids

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>call cope, it might be. But we're going five to

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 2>oh this week. All right, here's what missed the cut

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 2>in today's show. Christian McCaffrey thankfully avoids major injury. Parsons

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and Hill are interested in flag football at the Olympics,

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>and shout out. Speaking of winning bets, shout out to

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas Aces and my season long futures bet on

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the Aces winning the title. They could have set that

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 2>thing at minus four hundred and I would have bet it.

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>The Ace has won the championship last night with two

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of their starters out here in New York City. The

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Ace is one of the best WNBA teams ever. I mean,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the Liberty is a damn good team and they were

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>not in the Aces League. Over the course of this series,

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the Ace is winning four. All right, let's get to

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>tonight's game, demanse.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, So The Jags are playing the Saints tonight,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 3>and Trevor's not looking clear if he's gonna play or not.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I've heard that there was speculation that he wasn't gonna play,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>but it seems like it.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's gonna be a game time decision. YEP, game

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>time decision. You've been for the game.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you've been super high on Trevor Lawrence for I

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know how long he's been. Not good, not terrible.

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 3>He's got three inchred passing yards, eight touchdowns, six turnovers

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>so far four His four and two record can't matter.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>If Brock parties, five and one record doesn't matter. So

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 3>are you still going to defend this guy off of

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 3>stuff that he's done in like middle school and pee

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 3>weee football in his high school career?

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you people see? Hold on? I gotta ask

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 2>you an honest question, Deman say, is this actually how

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>you feel? Or the producers just trying to set you

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>up to try to needle me and get under my

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>skin because they think the podcast is better when I'm angry?

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you are you? Are you a Trevor Lawrence skeptic?

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a Trevor Lawrence skeptic? But I do think that,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 3>like the whole pedigree thing that you're saying with the Bronx,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of this is just coming from the

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 3>brock Party argument. But Okay, well we'll get to don't

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>think stuff.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, no, we'll get to the We'll get to

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the brock Party stuff in a moment. So Trevor has

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 2>done one thing poorly this year. He fumbles too much.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>That is undeniable, and it was a problem for him

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Last year.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 2>He needs to do he needs to do better. When

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>it's so with the six turnovers, he has three interceptions,

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>but he has lost three fumbles. He has a couple

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 2>other fumbles he didn't lose that must be cleaned up.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 2>But the fact of the matter is that everything I've

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 2>said about Trevor is correct. They're four and two, with

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 2>one of those losses coming to the Chiefs. They beat

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>the Bills on a neutral site. Trevor has been, aside

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>from the Chiefs game, either good or very good in

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>every single game this year. And the the idea of well,

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 2>if you don't care about Brock Party's five and one record,

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>why would you care about Trevor Lawrence's four and two record?

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Is I care about. When I look at a team's record,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I ask myself do they have the talent commensurate with

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 2>that level of success. If they have a lot of

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>talent and they're underachieving, then I look to say, okay, well,

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 2>who are the reasons? Is it coaching? Is one of

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>their star players not producing? Is it just terrible quarterback play?

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>What is it? And if they have a better record

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 2>than their talent would suggest, then I say who is

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 2>carrying the load for the Jags? The answer is Trevor

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence and Travis Etsy and are carrying the load ATSI

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>end's been excellent. Trevor has been crushing on third and

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>longs all year. Now I wish he wasn't in so

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 2>many third and lungs, but to already have swept the

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>season series with the Colts, who seemingly are your biggest

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>competition for the division. All of a sudden, that Houston

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Texans loss, that everyone was killed him for now he

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>didn't play great, and that he played okay in that game,

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>but the team obviously played terribly and Trevor wasn't great.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>That loss doesn't look as awful as it once did

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 2>because the Texans are not an awful team. Now, I

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Texans are some great team, but the

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Texans are a legit team. Here are the facts, whether

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>people want to acknowledge it or not. Trevor Lawrence is

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>since last since last November first, so we are now

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about almost a full calendar year. Is what is

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>he thirteen? And I'm gonna get it exactly right. I apologize.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>He's twelve and four and three of those losses came

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to the Chiefs, so or twelve. I'm sorry, twelve and

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>five and three of those losses came to the Chiefs.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, the Jags they can't beat the Chiefs. Trevor's

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 2>been excellent, and I every the I want folks to

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 2>remember the actual because people like moving the goalposts on this,

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>so I want people to understand what it was. The

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville Jaguars in twenty twenty one, with Trevor and his

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>rookie year, went three and fourteen and had the first

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>pick of the draft. They were the worst team in

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. Last year they started two and six. Okay,

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>started two and six. I never lost faith. Since then,

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 2>since starting two and six, they have lost four to

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>is it four?

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>One? Two? Three five games, three to the Chiefs, one

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to Detroit and then the bad loss to the Texans.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>They have won. Let me make sure I've write seven

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>eight twelve games, so they're twelve and four. Twelve and

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>five is the record, like I said, And Trevor's been excellent,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and so yes, you know how you can believe real

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 2>quick that a guy who in the NFL up to

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 2>that point of his career had a five and twenty

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 2>record through his first twenty five games. You know why

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>you can believe in that guy and be proven correct pedigree, Yes,

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>it matters. The guy was five and twenty his first

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty five starts. But if you watch the games and

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're familiar with him as a player, then you're like, oh,

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>he's going to get it right. He did get it right.

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So there it is. Go ahead. Do you have follow up?

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 3>So with what you're saying, how Trevor, Trevor, Lawrence and

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Travis hits he and are carrying the load, they should

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>definitely lose night than without Trevor. If he's not playing correct.

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, if they listen, if they have started CJ. Bethard,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 2>they're in dire shape. What I will say is I

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>am very curious because the Saints are down both starting

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>tackles and one backup tackle. So in order for the

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Jags to win tonight if Trevor doesn't play, it honestly

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>has to be like a seventeen to thirteen win. It

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>has to happen because the Saints can't protect Derek Carr,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and the Saints often struggles even when they can protect Carr. But, yeah,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I believe in the Jags tonight because I believe Trevor

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 2>is gonna gut through it and play. It's an important

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>game and then you get ten days off. But the Yeah,

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 2>I do not think the offense is going to look

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 2>good without Trevor Lawrence if he doesn't play tonight against

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the New Orleans Saints next.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean that makes sense. All right, So your

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs had the chance to take a sizeable lead in

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the AFC West, but the Chargers are desperate and have

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 3>had success in Arrowhead before. What's more troubling the hungry

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 3>Chargers of the fact that your Chiefs have not beaten

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a decent team yet.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, you play who's on the schedule. I mean, they

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 2>lost the Lions in Week one. I don't know what

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>people want them to. Do you know what I mean

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>post that other than beat everyone, not trail for a

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>single second in the second half in the following five games,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, demnse.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 3>It does just look strange. It's a little fishy that,

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>like the best team that they've played, they lost to.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Well. Listen, if people want to have the take that

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs aren't any good, they should have that take.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's an interesting one. I wouldn't necessarily

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>go public with it, but you just said it on

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>a very popular podcast. Here's the thing that I'll tell

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 2>you about this game, for sure. This game scares the

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>hell out of me. The Chargers season is over with

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>a loss. And the Chargers never beat I shouldn't say

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>never rarely beat the Chiefs, but it's always close every

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>time they play. It's a three point game, and the Chargers.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>If the Chiefs win this game, they win the division.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>The division is just over midway through October, and the

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Chargers know that, and the Chargers coach is coaching for

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 2>his job potentially, and so I don't feel great about

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 2>this spot. I don't think the Chiefs are going to

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 2>blow them out because they never blow the Chargers out.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 2>And now Herbert has beaten the Chiefs twice, but it

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>should be noted one of those games was the final

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 2>week of the year when the Chiefs rested their starters.

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes didn't play, so I do kind of throw that

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>one out. But the first game of Trevor of sorry,

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>of Herbert's career, the game that he came in because

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the team doctor stabbed Tyrod Taylor and he didn't think.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 2>You don't know this story to Monseay. They were trying

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>to give Tyrod Taylor a painkilling injection in his ribs

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>and the doctor put the needle in too far and

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>punctured his lung. That's true story, not great, and so

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>all of us yeah, yeah, and so all of a sudden,

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 2>justin Herbert, week two of his rookie season, had to

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>play in a game he did not think he was

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to play, and he came in and played well.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Now they lost that game. But this is the final

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>score since Herbert's been with the Chargers of Chiefs Charger games,

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and I mean it really goes the Yeah, the final

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>score of Chiefs Chargers games since Herbert's been there. The

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs win twenty three to twenty The final week of

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the year. The game I was talking about, the Chargers

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>win by bunch of the Chiefs arresting their starters. The

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>next year, the Chargers win thirty to twenty four, and

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 2>then the Chiefs win thirty four to twenty eight. One

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 2>score game. Last year, the Chiefs win twenty seven to

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. Then the Chiefs win thirty to twenty seven.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 2>These are close games, and for Kansas City, this is

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>their only actual losable game of these opening eight weeks

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>post Jacksonville. Oh yeah, by the way, I can't believe.

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll let you get away with that. The Chiefs beat

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the Jags, who lead the division and right now have

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 2>are tied for the third best record in the AFC.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs also beat the Jets, who all of a

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 2>sudden people are arguing as a playoff contender. So they

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 2>have not played great teams yet, but they play all

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>those teams later in the year. So I think the

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs win on Sunday. But I'm very anxious about this game,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 2>very anxious about this, and because I would feel better

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 2>about the Chiefs in this spot if the Chargers had

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 2>one on Monday Night football. But because they lost, and

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>because there're seasons on the brink. I'm anxious about it,

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 2>all right, what's next?

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 3>All right? The Eagles have a shot at redemption after

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 3>losing to the Jets. They'll just mess it up. But

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>they face off against the red hot Miami Dolphins. So

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the winner of this game is the team to beat

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 3>until Kansas City's actual season starts after eight weeks, right.

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think that, And we're gonna talk more

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 2>about them in a moment. I think right now, the

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>team that should has the strongest argument that they should

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 2>be considered the team to beat is the Lions. The

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Lions have the best win of any team in the NFL.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 2>They also their only loss is in overtime to a

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 2>good team in Seattle. And like the every other team,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you can go up and down the list. It's yeah,

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the Niners only loss is a Clobe loss, but it

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 2>was to PJ. Walker. The Eagles blew a game, just

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>gave a game away to the Jets. The Dolphins only

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>losses to a really good team, the Bills, but they

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 2>got blown out in that game that go out.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that was fair to the Niners about how

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 3>you said they lost to PJ Walker. PJ Walker isn't

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 3>on defense like they got. So it's not like it's

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 3>not like the Browns lit them up on offense. The

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Niners just couldn't. I mean, the Browns are the best,

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the best defensive football party.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 2>He couldn't handle it, Okay, So I just want I

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>just want to make sure I understand this. When it

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 2>comes to discussing Niners' losses, it's a team endeavor. And

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to discussing Niners wins, brock Perty's five

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and one is that how we do it. I just

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 2>want to know. I just want to make sure I

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>understand when the Niners succeed, we must give Brock purty

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>as flowers. When they lose. It's a team sport. Amazing

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>how that works out because the Niners don't have.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>A good defense, right you were just like you lost

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 3>a PJ. As if he lit them up, but he didn't.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Like That's all that's the that's the point now making

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 3>is the defense.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, I'm saying a literal fact, you lost the game.

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 2>The opposing quarterback was PJ. Walker. That's all I'm saying.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying that's a bad loss. I'm saying losing to

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 2>a fringe playoff team with their backup quarterback is a

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 2>bad loss, just like the Eagles losing to a fringe

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Did the Eagles lose to Zach Wilson this week? Yes

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 2>or no? It's good. Yes they did. They lost to

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>a fringe playoff team, and it's a bad loss. I mean,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 2>it just is what it is. Like the here's what

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I know. I know that the and again I'm not

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 2>killing the Niners here. I'm trying to support the Detroit Lions,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 2>who have no bad losses. Defense is better than I

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 2>thought it would be. Golf has been better on the

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>road than I thought he would be. They have had

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>If you look demands at the Lions schedule, this is okay.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 2>So they play the Ravens obviously this weekend, and I

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 2>know we're going to talk about that game in a moment.

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of it. Yeah. So, so the Lions after

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>playing the Ravens, play one game the rest of the

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 2>way against a team that currently has a winning record.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>They have the the the Lions after the Ravens. Here's

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>their schedule Raiders, Chargers, Bears, Packers, Saints, Bears, Broncos, Vikings, Cowboys,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Vikings and by the time they're playing the Vikings. The

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Vikings are probably playing a young quarterback. They're you know

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, they're probably in the in full on

0:21:55.400 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 2>tank mode. Here's the The Lions could lose all of

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>their tough games. Yeah, they get the Broncos. They the

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Lions could lose all of their tough games left and

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 2>go fourteen and three. I mean they have one, two, three,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 2>four five. They have five games left against current one

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 2>win teams. Their most difficult their five most difficult games

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>are as follows at the Ravens, at the Cowboys, and

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 2>then the next most difficult games they have are at

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers, home for the Raiders, and at the Saints.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So the point I'm making is the Lions are very

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>very well positioned to be the one seed right now.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 2>You can get them. You know what, let's make that

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>bet right now. You can get the Lions to be

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the one seed at I believe it's plus four forty, Yeah,

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>plus four forty. I'm looking at it right now. I

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 2>think that's a hell of a bet. You you want

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a piece of that, Demanse.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's an awesome bet.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you think that's an awesome bet. Okay, all right,

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna do that. Just I'm gonna do that. During

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the commercial break, Oh my goodness, the the producers are

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 2>telling me that we just stepped all over the offer

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the show. But guess what, we're

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>accepting the offer. I try not to even read the

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 2>offer beforehand because I want to be surprised by it.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 2>But I guess that's gonna be the offer at the

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>end of the show. Now, Dolphin's Eagles, because we spent

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>that whole time talking about the Lions. By you know what,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 2>let's just finish up the Lions thing here. I apologize

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 2>I kind of screwed up the rundown, but it is

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 2>what it is, is good content. Who do you like

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>this week? In demonse? The Lions are the Ravens.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I like it, Like yeah, I said, I like the Ravens,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 3>But like you said, with the Chiefs, I am pretty

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 3>nervous about it. I don't think that it's it's not

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 3>gonna be sweet. I think it's gonna be a pretty

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 3>good game.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll be a great game. Here is the concern.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>The argument against us betting the Lions to be the

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 2>one seed right now is if you think they're gonna

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 2>lose to the Ravens. The number will be better on Monday.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>But if they beat the Ravens, the number is gonna

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 2>be so much worse. I think it's worth betting raz Yeah,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 2>because if they beat the Ravens, everyone is gonna take

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 2>note of the fact that they're gonna be favored in

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 2>almost all of their remaining games until they play Dallas.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, now, I was asked about Dolphins Eagles. This

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>is a wildly important game for Philly. Here's the thing

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 2>about the Eagles that folks I will start to discuss.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>If they lose this game to Miami, their next seven

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>are This is the opposite of the Lions situation at

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the Commanders who beat them last year, and then Dallas

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 2>at Kansas City, Buffalo, San Francisco, at Dallas at Seattle.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>If they lose to the Dolphins, this five and zero

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 2>can very very quickly turn into seven and five like

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 2>with a lot, and no one would be shocked by it.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Like the at Commanders, they should be able to just

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 2>power bomb Sam Howell into the center of the Earth

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 2>multiple times because they can't protect Sam Howel. They have

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a great pass rush. Home for the Cowboys is a

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>coin flip game at the Chiefs, they're a dog. Home

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>for the Bills is a coin flip game. Home for

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the Niners is a coin flip game at the Cowboys

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 2>as a coin flip game at the Seahawks. They're a

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 2>slight favorite. Slight favorite. But that's five coin flip games

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 2>in a row right after this coin flip game against Miami.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>The question here is going to be the determining factor

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>in Eagles Dolphins. The Eagles back end can not hold

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 2>up against Miami's passing attack. Can Miami's offensive line hold

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>up against the Eagles pass rush? Because the one time

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Miami hasn't looked like the best offense we've ever seen

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 2>was the Bills game when the Bills got after them

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and the Bills sacked to a That's the only time

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 2>all year where it's been like, Okay, this Miami team

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 2>is there's a way to defend them now? Yeah, I

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>don't think. And by the way, Tua has been sacked

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>six times all year. Four of them were in that

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Bills game. So that is the question of this football game.

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 2>If Miami can find a way to get to a

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 2>time they will shred this Eagle secondary. But if Jalen

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Carter and friends can get to Tua. This is a

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 2>scary game for Miami, A legit scary game for Miami.

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, since we did schedules, I want to ask

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you one other question. The in regards to the Niners,

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 2>you're all of a sudden newly beloved Niners because we

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 2>were discussing about how cmac's injury is not that significant

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 2>given the deep down you know brought Perdy will turn

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 2>into a pumpkin without Christian McCaffrey. Would you be uber

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 2>cautious with Christian McCaffrey and his return, not only like

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 2>to make sure he's one hundred percent healthy, but to

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 2>want him as fresh as possible for the end of

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the season, Like would you treat that? Because if I'm

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the Niners, I feel like more important, even than seeding,

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 2>is Christian McCaffrey being healthy at the end of the

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 2>year and the added bonus of getting Brock party. Some

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 2>reps under less than ideal circumstances, So if something does

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>happen at the end of the year, he's more used

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to it and doesn't look like how he looked, you know,

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 2>And I understand it was raining in a little chilly

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 2>in Cleveland, but in that game this past week, and

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>under less than ideal circumstances, I would be super conservative

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>with Christian McCaffery. Your thoughts on that.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that makes a lot of sense. Actually, get

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 3>party some extra practice before postseason comes. Christian McCaffrey's obviously

0:28:54.000 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 3>your best offensive weapon. One might argue, Yeah, yeah, No,

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that makes a lot of sense.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>The flip side is this, Christian McCaffery has like a

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 2>sneaky outside chance at winning league MVP, so he might

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>want to get back in there as soon as possible.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 2>But for a guy who's dealt with as many injuries

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 2>as he's dealt with, I think that that's the advice

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I would give Kyle Shanahan. All Right, we're gonna take

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a quick break, do our gambling show and bet the

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Lions to win to be the number one seed. Do

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>it all next, What's right?

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblast, who defined every expectation

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon, MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 4>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 4>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in what's right with Nick? Right, Demanse?

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I just text you the bet slip. You're in for

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of it, all right, so tell her and

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>you get the text. Yeah, well, it's not a free roll.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I assume you're gonna, you know, cash at

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 2>me or something if it doesn't hit. But for the

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 2>time it can be a free roll. No, I'm kidding.

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 2>You can just have ten percent, but uh, the go ahead.

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 3>No, I got you. I'll get I'll definitely make I'll

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 3>fill your pockets on that one. I appreciate you. I

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 3>know nothing.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 2>You're fine. But by the way, I can't see Demanse

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 2>anymore right now, So if we can get that, there

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 2>we go. Now I can see him. No, we can

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 2>just square up at the end of the year. Right now.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Consider it a loan, just a loan because it's gonna win.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>So rather than you have to send me ten percent,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>then I send you that back plus the you know,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 2>when it wins. That's a Lions plus four forty to

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>be the one seed with that schedule left. Again, I

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>don't think they are. I do not. I'm not yet

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 2>ready to say I think they're, you know, the cream

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of the crop of the NFC. But they do have

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the best resume and they do have the easiest path. Now,

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 2>is there a little bit of me that feels because

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the Lions are such a snake bit en franchise, this

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>does kind of feel like a team that goes fourteen

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and three is flying high, gets the bye, and then

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:32.239
<v Speaker 2>gets banked in their first playoff game. Right now, it

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 2>does kind of feel like that they get the no.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 2>For us, that wouldn't matter at all. For Lions fans,

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>it would matter a lot. All right, let's show last week,

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and I like the process of last week. I gotta

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 2>tell you last week. So let's go through the winners

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and then the losers. Okay, Cleveland, I told you all

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 2>week the hot team. I said that the Niners could

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>lose outright, and I was getting the seven points. I

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 2>said that every week this year, the hot team has

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 2>lost Week one, the defending champion Chiefs get picked off.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Week two, the Lions. Everyone's loving on them because they

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>beat the Chiefs. They lose in overtime. Week three, the

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys are going to the super Bowl. They've won seventy

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to ten their first two weeks of the year. They

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 2>lose to the Cardinals. Week four, the Dolphins had just

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>scored seventy points. It's the greatest offense ever. They lose

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 2>to the Bills. Week five, the Bills are back. They

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>had just beaten the Dolphins. They lose to the Jags.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Week six, Brock parties the MVP. The Niners are great.

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>They lose to Cleveland and PJ. Walker, here's a problem

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:50.479
<v Speaker 2>for this week. That team this week doesn't exist. It

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't exists.

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 3>The Lions.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the problem on that, and then I'll get

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 2>to these other picks in a moment. The Lions are

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 2>are underdogs this week, so that you know what I mean,

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Like they're playing at Baltimore. No one is saying like,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 2>oh and so, and Cleveland is in such a weird

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>spot because Deshaun didn't even practice yesterday, Like nobody knows

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with their quarterback situation. And I don't

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 2>think people are anointing the Lions. I think there are

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry the Browns. I think they're anointing the Browns defense.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>But right now there is that team. There isn't really

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 2>this week that team of the week go ahead.

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, no, I was just I was gonna say that.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I was just agreeing that there's uncertainty in the Browns

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and what.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>They there's uncertainty. Yeah. And then because the Niners lost,

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles loss, the Chiefs didn't play. They played on Thursday,

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>but they weren't overly impressive. The Bills won but didn't

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>look good. There isn't really a team that is right

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 2>now at the top of everyone's power rankings, if you will.

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>But I said I like Cleveland plus seven. I also

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 2>said I thought Deshaun was gonna play. He didn't play.

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 2>That line moved to ten. Cleveland wins outright. I also

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 2>got Dallas laying two and a half against the Chargers,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and I sat on Thursday at three and a half.

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't love it. At two and a half, I

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 2>love it. Dallas wins by a field goal. So the

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 2>process behind both of those was sound. Now let's talk

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 2>about the losing bets. Seattle plus three at Cincinnati, Seattle

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 2>nearly doubled them up in yardage, demanse and four times

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 2>in the second half, had the ball inside the ten

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and came away with three total points, threw a pick,

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 2>had two turnover on downs. I just needed one of

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 2>those to be a field goal or for Gino to

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 2>come through at the end for the win. But and

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 2>they cover the three. Instead, they lose by four. Go ahead.

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 3>You gotta stop bending against the Bengals.

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Many They're off this week, so I don't have the opportunity.

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 2>But Seattle plus three, the process was right. We were

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 2>on the right side. It took a lot of awful luck,

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and they still lose by They don't you know they

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 2>lose by four. We had them plus three New England

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>plus the Raiders. Pardon me here, but you gotta be

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 2>kidding me. They're down two with the ball and Mac

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Jones gets safety. He gets safety. I sent out a

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 2>tweet when they got the ball down two that if

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 2>this game ends with a Mac Jones pick six, I'm

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna lose my mind. Instead, it was more painful than that.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Instead of the pick six, it was just the predictable

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones, no pocket awareness. Standing in the end, Max

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>crossb becomes ripping around the right side. Safety, lose by

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 2>four at least on here's the thing that made that

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 2>so much, so much worse than a pick six. Even

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 2>let's just say Demonse, because the Patriots are down two,

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm catching three. Let's just say that on the first

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 2>play of that possession, with two minutes left, he throws

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 2>a pick six. Guess what then happens? Patriots down nine,

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 2>with the ball with two minutes and the Raiders backing off.

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm still alive there. I don't like it, but I'm

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 2>alive if they just if he anything other than a safety,

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm alive. But a safety is two points and the

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 2>other team gets the ball, so it's just over. It's

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 2>just so much worse than anything. And then I was

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 2>wrong on Tampa. There's no listen. I said Tampa plus

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 2>three and a half, they wouldn't have covered thirteen and

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a half. I was just wrong on Tampa. So but

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel good about the process last week. So that's

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 2>where we're at for last week. We've been two and

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 2>three or three and two every single week this year,

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 2>which puts our record at thirteen and seventeen, which is pathetic.

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just utterly pathetic. I don't feel good about it,

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 2>but I feel good about this week's picks. Let's get

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 2>right to them. What's the first pay for?

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 3>First off, you got Jacksonville plus one and a half

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 3>at New Orleans. I've given everything that we've talked about.

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 3>That's that's what I figured, right.

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if Trevor's not playing, then if Trevor's not playing,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>then at least I'm getting points against the Dennis Allen

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 2>coach team on short rest without without three of their

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 2>best offensive linemen. Dennis Allen teams, by the way, are

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:52.720
<v Speaker 2>one and seven straight up on short rest.

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, hold on, and yeah, I think you can get

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the Jags at plus two now or.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Plus and now two. Well, that means the market is

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 2>concerned Trevor's not playing, which actually like makes me like

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 2>this a little bit less. But you know what, We'll

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 2>stick with it. We'll stick with it. I think Trevor's

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 2>gonna gut through it. I think Trevor's gonna play. They're

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 2>gonna have a very conservative game plan. We're taking the

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Jags plus two and a half at New Orleans. Again.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 2>The Saints injury report is brutal on their offensive line.

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 2>So the Saints uh are without Ryan Ramcheck, they are

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 2>without land and Young they are let me see, there's

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 2>another offensive lineman who they're oh, James Hurst. They're without

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>three offensive linemen already ruled out for today's game. Trevor

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 2>is listed as questionable, not not even as doubtful. So

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna hold out hope that he's able to play.

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Now the and Brandon Shirf is also listed as questionable.

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna play. I do not think the

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Saints are good. The Saints have a good defense, they

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 2>don't have a good offense. And the Jags if Jade,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 2>if Josh Allen Can and former number one overall pick

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Trayvon Walker, who has not yet lived up to that

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.479
<v Speaker 2>draft status, they can harass Derek Carr knock him around.

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 2>We'll take the Jags plus two and a half. Now,

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 2>all right?

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Next, all right, you got Las Vegas minus three at Chicago.

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is very simple. I I understand the Raiders

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 2>are probably not gonna have Jimmy g and they it's

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 2>either Brian Hoyer who Brian Hoyer. So this is gonna

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 2>sound like I'm talking against my own bets. But demons,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>when do you think is the last time Brian Hoyer

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 2>won a game as a starter. Let's give it a

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 2>guess how long it's been.

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Wasn't there? Is that the same Hoyer that I'm thinking about?

0:39:59.120 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Is he the relevant? I don't know, it's probably been

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 3>a while because I haven't heard, like is he? Is

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 3>he older?

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 2>He's old? He's thirty eight, he's old, gentleman. So Brian

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Moyer hasn't won a game as a starter since twenty sixteen,

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 2>He's lost. If we're you know, since twenty sixteen, he's

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 2>zero to nine as a starter. And even if we

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 2>just throw in twenty sixteen, then he's just one in

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 2>thirteen and his last fourteen starts, which is why they

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 2>might not start him this week. They might start Aid

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 2>and O'Connell. Okay, so you might be saying, Nick, why

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 2>would you lay points in this setting? And the answer

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 2>is because the Bears are starting a dude from a

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 2>place called Shepherd College named Tyson Badgeant, and I'm just

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 2>going to fade him this way. I'm not gonna have

0:40:56.280 --> 0:41:00.399
<v Speaker 2>many opportunities to bet against Tyson Badgint. I'm I'm only

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 2>laying three points. It's as simple as that. I mean,

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 2>this guy again, you you know I care about pedigree

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 2>when your college career is at Shepherd College. I understand

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 2>he uh he set records there. I get all of it.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 2>But let me see, Tyson does he even have a

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>rivals page? Tyson badging is right now. If you go

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 2>to rivals, I mean he's he's unranked, zero star and

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 2>then he wait for a that's what he was Shepherd College.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Let me just go to Shepherd College for a moment.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was an inn ai A school for

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>a while, then it was D two. I just can't.

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Somebody is like the quarterbacks and their names. With their names,

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 3>you can kind of tell what they're gonna be. I mean,

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 3>I know it's really stupid, but Tyson badging is right

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:57.280
<v Speaker 3>in line.

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, Sheppard College has twenty seven hundred

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 2>students total. That's where he played football at. What are

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 2>you talking? Are you talking to me? What are you

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about?

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 3>No? No, no, I'm sorry.

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You're right, you're you're trying to talk to the producers.

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But it was into the microphone. I think the yeah, no,

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the bear. So it's it's it's Raiders at Bears. I'm

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna lay the three points the uh against Chicago, And yes,

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 2>I understand the Bears had PJ. Walker and they cut

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 2>him because they liked Tyson Badgint. Our buddy Mark Carmon

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 2>during training camp, who covers the Bears, said he thought

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Tyson Badgint might be better than justin fields, but he

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 2>was afraid to say that publicly. I'm telling you right now,

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm betting against Tyson Badgert. It's just that simple. It's

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.959
<v Speaker 2>a bat. It's a broken offense with not enough skill

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 2>position guys, I'm betting against him. I'm only laying three points.

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>The process there is this could be a Nate Peterman

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 2>situation where the if you don't remember Demonsey, people got

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 2>mad at the Bills of like six years ago before

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 2>they got Josh Allen because they were like a decent

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 2>team and Tyrod Taylor was playing decent and they had

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 2>just been to the playoffs, and they were like, you

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 2>know what, We're gonna turn the page to Nathan Peterman

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and people were like, you've got to be kidding me.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 2>They're like, no, we're gonna do it, and all the like. Basically,

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 2>universally in the football media, we were like, uh, Nathan

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Peterman's not an NFL player, and they're like, no, trust us,

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 2>And so they let him start against the Chargers. And

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 2>in that game, he completed the ball six times to

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 2>his team and completed the ball five times to the Chargers.

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 2>He threw five picks. It was six to fourteen, and

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 2>it was just it was kind of just noticing the

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Nathan Peterman game. By the way, Nathan Peterman, you might

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 2>be like, hey, how did that end up working out

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 2>for him? Because somehow he is still in the NFL.

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And the answer to that is in his NFL career,

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>he currently sits at four touchdowns thirteen interceptions. And again

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:15.959
<v Speaker 2>you might be saying, why is that a relevant piece

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of information? And the answer that that's irrelevant pieces of

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 2>information is guess who's backing up Tyson Badgitt this weekend?

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Nathan Peterman. So I am betting against the Chicago Bears,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 2>that's the answer. I am Bettingdownie, Yes he does. We

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 2>have a situation where the starting quarterback is a kid

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 2>from Shepherd and the backup is one of the worst

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>players in NFL history. I'm betting on the Raiders, even

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 2>though their backup is a guy who has not won

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>a game since Kaepernick was a starting quarterback. That's the citest.

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what this game is. This is how you break

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 2>bad gambling streaks. Is it's your you're It's a Aid

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and O'connell'brian Hoyer versus Tyson Badger and Nathan Peterman tag

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 2>team match. What is the total in this game? I

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 2>don't bet totals, but god, the total in this What

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 2>do you think the over under in that game is?

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Demanse thirty six.

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Thirty seven and a half, thirty seven and a half.

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:28.959
<v Speaker 2>All right? Next?

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.959
<v Speaker 3>All right? We got Buffalo minus eight and a half

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:32.760
<v Speaker 3>at New England.

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean Buffalo just blows out the Patriots.

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Is this is a crazy one?

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Why do you say that? Because you think it should.

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 3>Makes a lot of points and like the a lot

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 3>of Belichick. Obviously, I don't think Belichick is ever gonna

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 3>be willing to just throw games. He's not trying to tank.

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't He's not trying to tank, but he was

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to win. He got beat thirty four nothing by

0:45:56.080 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the Saints. Like that's the problem. The problem for the Patriots,

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 2>which is your correct They're not trying to tank, and

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 2>they're terrible. They got beat thirty four to nothing by

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the Saints, thirty eight to three by the Cowboys. The

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Raiders are are again not an overwhelming football team. The

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Patriots were totally desperate. They lost to the Patriots. And listen,

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots have the Bills and the Dolphins the next

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 2>two weeks. They've They've got no talent on offense. Their

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 2>best two defensive players are injured. I just and Josh Allen.

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:36.879
<v Speaker 2>What he's done against the Patriots is just dominate them

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 2>over the last few years. Let me let me give

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>it to you. Last year against New England, they won

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 2>by eight in the final game of the year, and

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 2>then earlier in the year they won by fourteen. That

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the previous year, he played them three times, once in

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, beat them by thirty once in the regular

0:46:56.920 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 2>season in that wind game. That one, I don't give it.

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 2>That was the one where the Patriots won fourteen to

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 2>ten and through three passes, because the wins were like

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 2>seventy miles an hour, and then beat them by twelve

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the other time the year before beat the Patriots by

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine and by three. I just think the Bill

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>If I know anything about Buffalo, it's after looking shaky,

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 2>they then look dominant. This is the week for them

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 2>to look dominant.

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Yeah, I mean just the same thing. They

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 3>They're coming off of the win, but they beat the

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 3>Giants by five. So like, I just.

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Feel like, what do we say about the Bills Dolphins

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:41.439
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half? Damn rollercoaster? Yeah, yes, but this

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 2>is who they are. They score sixteen against the Jets,

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 2>then thirty eight, thirty seven, forty two against Raiders, Commanders Dolphins,

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 2>then twenty against the Jags, fourteen against the Giants. They're

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna here's the thing. To cover eight and a half

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 2>against New England, you just need twenty four four. Like,

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 2>New England's not getting to seventeen points against the Bills defense,

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 2>They're not. No. I like Buffalo minus the eight and

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Next, Pittsburgh plus three and a half at the Rams.

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it's the Steelers after a bye. It's the

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Steelers as a dog. It's all of the Mike Tomlin stuff.

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 2>He's fifty six thirty one and four against the spread

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 2>as a dog. It's the best in the league over

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the last twenty years. The Steelers are fourteen and five

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:34.959
<v Speaker 2>straight up after a bye under Tomlin. That's not quite

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid, but it's damn close. And McVeigh is right

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 2>at five hundred against the spread when he's outside of

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 2>his own division. It's just I'm getting three and a

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 2>half points, and what could be? I don't know that

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the Rams. The Rams' biggest weakness is their offensive line.

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh's biggest strength is its pass rush. I think they'll

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 2>be able to get to Stafford. And even if the

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 2>Rams are up ten late, Kenny Pickett loves nothing more

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 2>than doing nothing the entire game and then finally throwing

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 2>one bomb down the field to Pickens. And so just

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh catching three and a half off the by there

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 2>are too many fundamentals that say you gotta bet that.

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to all right next?

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Minnesota plus seven versus San Francisco.

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I under the producers are saying, here's the

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 2>reason I shouldn't do it. Every Kirk Cousins national television

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>stat I understand that it's Kirk Cousins on night games.

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I understand that here's the thing. Ninety two percent of

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 2>the money is on a road favorite, laying a touchdown.

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Ninety two percent is on San Francisco. Also, I do

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 2>think Brian Flores, who is incredibly sharp, while he doesn't

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 2>have the personnel that Cleveland, has watched that Cleveland game

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:10.319
<v Speaker 2>plan against Purdy and said, I'm you know what, I'm

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 2>gonna take some of those keys. Furthermore, I do think

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the Niners are gonna be conservative with the guys coming

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 2>off injury. Also, Brock Perdy only six career road games,

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 2>two and four against the spread. Also, Minnesota is a

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 2>back door covering juggernaut, and I'm getting a full seven.

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 3>The whole world.

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Likes the Niners. Here. I'm gonna be four and oh

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>going into this this game Monday Night Football, the Vikings

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 2>plus seven, and it's gonna be something like the Niners

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:51.720
<v Speaker 2>have a thirteen point lead throughout. Kirk Cousins hits Jordan

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Addison midway through the fourth to put him down six.

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:56.839
<v Speaker 2>You're like, oh my god, are they gonna steal it?

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And then the Niners just run out the clock. I

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Likennesota plus seven. That's what I'm gad to say.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I like this one less than than the Buffalo one.

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, well I get that. I understand that you're

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.919
<v Speaker 2>part of the ninety two percent of the public that's

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:18.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna be all over San Francisco laying the seven. I'm

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:21.239
<v Speaker 2>fine with that. I'm gonna I'm gonna have. This is

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 2>how this week's gonna go. We're gonna have a nice

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Thursday win to set us up sweep Sunday, and then

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 2>a nice Monday nighter to go to win the weekend.

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville plus two and a half, Vegas minus three, Buffalo

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 2>minus eight and a half, Pittsburgh plus three and a half,

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota plus seven. All right, so, demons, what's the teaser

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>we're doing?

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Uh So, last week's teaser that we got wrong was

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 3>a three team seven point teaser. We got the Denver

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 3>plus seventeen and a half at Kansas City, which it

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 3>looked like it could have failed at one point. But yeah, yeah,

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Houston plus eight and a half versus New Orleans and

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:05.800
<v Speaker 3>then Tampa Bay plus ten versus Detroit.

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 2>That was painful. You and I were texting about it.

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 2>We just needed one Baker Mayfield drive. He didn't have it.

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Baker just flatley didn't have it.

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 3>So and Baker's awesome coming through this year, but yeah, he's.

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Been coming through. But all right, So you've lost four

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:21.760
<v Speaker 2>teasers in a row. So you just you've been doing

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:25.319
<v Speaker 2>these three team seven pointers this week. You're shaking the

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:26.919
<v Speaker 2>snow globe a bit. What are we doing.

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're doing a four team ten point teaser at

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 3>plus one hundred. It's just twenty less than the odds before.

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, So we got Detroit one extra team.

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 2>It's twenty it's just twenty cents less odds. But you

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 2>do have to add an extra team. That's the penalty.

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 2>That's the penalty for doing a ten point teaser. No,

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying to the audience. So it makes sense,

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 2>like the ten point teaser, that you have to add

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 2>an extra team to get even money. Go ahead, fair.

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh So we got Detroit from Detroit versus Baltimore, teasing

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore up to plus thirteen from plus three.

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 2>We got to Chargers hold on teasing not to plus thirteen.

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Teasing Detroit up. Sorry, but Baltimore's minus three, Detroit from

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 3>plus three to plus thirteen. And we got the Chargers

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 3>versus Kansas City teasing the Chargers from five and a

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:22.760
<v Speaker 3>half to fifteen and a half. You got Philly versus Miami.

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 3>We're teasing them up. I don't know what the original

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's minus two and a half, teasing them up,

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 3>teasing them up to plus seven and a half. And

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:33.760
<v Speaker 3>then we got Tampa Bay versus Atlanta. We're also teasing

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 3>up to seven and a half from minus two and

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, can I try to convince you of something here?

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 3>You can try?

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Detroit like it, they're not. I don't think they're

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 2>getting blown out the Chargers. I'm good with it. I

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Chiefs are blowing them out Tampa Bay Philly.

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:57.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Atlanta has the capability of blowing someone out.

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Philly can absolutely win this game outright, there's a reason

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:07.840
<v Speaker 2>they're the favorite. But if Miami can protect Tua, Miami

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:11.880
<v Speaker 2>has been a covering machine. So here is what I

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 2>would just encourage you. Let me just ask you this

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 2>before you lock this in. It's your teaser. You do

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:26.760
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want. What could you see more likely being

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:31.319
<v Speaker 2>a story on Monday? Holy crap, the Dolphins beat the

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Eagles by double digits? Is that more likely? Or this?

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Holy crap? The Patriots beat the Bills.

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Uh, the the first one, I mean, definitely the first one.

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 2>But you know, if that's the case, I'm just saying,

0:54:50.080 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, you.

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Can and a half or plus two and a half

0:54:56.120 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 3>plus one and a half exactly eight right now, tease.

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo down to where essentially just went just win or

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 2>lose by a point somehow. I'm just saying, Yeah.

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 3>You know what's funny, Buffalo was taken out like I

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 3>had them in. I had them, I had them in

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 3>when it was an eight and a half point teaser though,

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 3>and we teased them down to exactly.

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 2>This is eight and a half point teaser. I mean,

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 2>I understand fand will let you do anything you want,

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 2>but that's not right.

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Hey, So let's all right. So you know what that

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:32.840
<v Speaker 3>that makes a lot of sense. And I feel like

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Philly Miami is a that's a sweat. That's a sweat. Uh,

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:41.879
<v Speaker 3>I'll take yeah, I'll tell you. I just got publicly humiliated.

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 3>You just got me to take this leg out and

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 3>put this other leg in.

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:48.839
<v Speaker 2>No, No, that's a public humiliation. That's seam work. Yeah,

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 2>that's teamwork.

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 3>And that was with my inside scoop that I got

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:56.799
<v Speaker 3>for the teaser that I placed today. Uh. But no,

0:55:57.000 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 3>so look, I definitely I definitely want to do that.

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:01.359
<v Speaker 3>It makes a lot of sense, like sense.

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then by the way it says on the screen,

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 2>there we go, they fix it. It did say New England,

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 2>but now it says Buffalo. The Bills are not going

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 2>to lose to the Patriots. They're just not. Uh. I

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 2>would honestly be more worried about the Bills if they

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I know, people will say this is crazy if they

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 2>had just blown out the Giants, because they do. But

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 2>they seem angry as they should be about how they

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 2>played against the Giants. They seem you know what I mean,

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 2>they And so I just all right, good, I'm glad

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, I I'm you know, who knows.

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I screwed you there, but I just Philly Miami

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 2>to me is not an attractive teaser game because I

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 2>just could see I could see either team winning, but

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I also could see either team winning my double digits

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:01.800
<v Speaker 2>because it could just get away from them. The reason

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 2>that I like like I do like Tampa Bay in

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta as a teaser game because that's one of those

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 2>games I feel like you could tease either way and

0:57:12.840 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 2>be in good shape because I don't think either team's

0:57:15.640 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna blow out the other one that feels like a

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:21.040
<v Speaker 2>one score game. Detroit. I have too much respect for

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 2>it to think they're gonna get blown out by Baltimore.

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 3>And while charge is the beautiful leg to be honest, well,

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 3>because you're.

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Getting through all the key numbers. Yes, you're getting all

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 2>of the important numbers.

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean it is also the highest number. I didn't

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 3>notice that.

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, uh, okay, all right, that that one's not

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 2>bad at all. All right, what's the offer this week? Guys?

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:49.600
<v Speaker 3>The offer week seven? You know you like the Lions

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:52.439
<v Speaker 3>to be the number one seed in the NFC. We've

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 3>got a nice new offer for you. Detroit and Kansas

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 3>City parlay to be the number one season their division

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 3>at plus twelve hundred.

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 2>To be the number one seeds in the conference. So

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I so I love that it's twelve to one. Yeah,

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Chiefs are gonna be the one seed

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that now Miami could be if Miami beats him in Germany.

0:58:15.600 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Miami has a leg up on them. I understand that

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 2>part of it. Uh, but yeah, I'll take that offer.

0:58:21.680 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Detroit and Kansas City to be the one seeds.

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, sweeten the deal a little bit. What if we

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 3>parlayed San Francisco's total win under to twelve and a

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 3>half at plus twenty five sixty five.

0:58:34.720 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've got enough chips on the anti Niners

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 2>table right now. I'm not gonna add anymore, so I

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 2>don't need I don't need to add any more to that.

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I understand the logic there is, well, if the Niners

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 2>hit their over, they're gonna be the one seed in

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 2>the bets dead either way, but that's not necessarily true.

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Niners could hit their over, be thirteen and four and

0:58:55.960 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 2>not be the one seed, because the Lions could be

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and three and be the one seed given their schedule. Also,

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 2>while I don't think this is gonna happen, there would

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 2>be nothing sweet if just open your mind up to

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the possibility. I know I missed her twenty and zero

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 2>and that one's that's dead obviously. But if the Chiefs

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>were to run the table and then and then see

0:59:21.400 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 2>in the Super Bowl the Detroit Lions, the only team

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 2>that beat them this year, and then beat the Lions

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to go nineteen and one and have literally beaten everyone

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.800
<v Speaker 2>they played because they got a rematch. That's the greatest

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:42.040
<v Speaker 2>team of all time. That is the greatest season anyone's had,

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 2>greater than the seventy two Dolphins.

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 3>This is crazy story.

0:59:45.040 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 2>It would be a crazy thing that you lose by

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 2>one to open the season. And I did say the

0:59:53.480 --> 0:59:55.920
<v Speaker 2>thing that I tried to sell Wilds and brew on

0:59:56.800 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 2>after the Chiefs lost was that they're gonna be the

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:05.240
<v Speaker 2>O set Patriots in reverse. The seven Patriots went undefeated

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>until the Super Bowl and then lost. The twenty twenty

1:00:09.200 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>three Chiefs are gonna lose Week one and then go undefeated.

1:00:12.600 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Far way better, way more fun than the O seven Pats.

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>We answer your questions next from the chat. What's right?

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, DEMANSI let's roll through some of these questions

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:25.680
<v Speaker 2>real quick.

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Anastasio, Smart Coopolos or Markopolis?

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Ye?

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Nick, I am still. I am still alive in my

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>survival pool. Want to have picked the Eagles. I feel

1:00:35.920 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>like everyone is taking the Seahawks, and I think they

1:00:38.000 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 3>can lose. What are your thoughts, uh?

1:00:41.960 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I Usually the Seahawks are a popular pick because they're

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>playing Arizona. Obviously they could lose. My thoughts are using

1:00:48.640 --> 1:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles this week is insanity? Like using the Eagles,

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, the week they're playing the Dolphins is not

1:00:56.640 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>a good idea. So I, Oh, he's saying he's already

1:01:00.720 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 2>used the Eagles previously. Oh, I get what you're saying. Okay,

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>So if you're asking me obviously if they're available, if

1:01:10.120 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 2>they're available. I think Buffalo is a very smart bet

1:01:15.280 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 2>this week. And because Buffalo, I understand they have easy

1:01:18.800 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>games remaining, but they are such an unreliable team. They're

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>easy games are not the same as other teams easy games.

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think the Patriots can beat them. I

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>if you want to get really aggressive, you can ride

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>with me on the fading Tyson Badger Nate Peterman and

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>roll with the Raiders this week in a survivor pool.

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I understand using a Survivor pick on Aiden O'Connell Brian

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Hoyer sounds crazy, but I just don't see how the

1:01:49.760 --> 1:01:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Bears can win that football game, all right.

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Next a zsl Nick, Who do you think makes a

1:01:55.800 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>bigger impact? Frank Clark and Nicole Hardman.

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I think McCall is so assuming the Chiefs get both back.

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>They already got McColl back. I think McColl makes a

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:07.560
<v Speaker 2>bigger impact in the regular season. Frank makes a bigger

1:02:07.560 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>impact in the playoffs.

1:02:08.760 --> 1:02:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Next Caleb w Ass. If you had to predict a

1:02:12.240 --> 1:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>current division leader to miss the playoffs entirely, who would

1:02:15.760 --> 1:02:16.040
<v Speaker 3>it be?

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, right now, the division leader most likely to

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>miss the playoffs entirely, you'd have to say is Tampa.

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>The division leaders are as follows, Miami, Baltimore, Jacksonville, Kansas City, Billy, Detroit,

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, and Tampa. The one most likely to miss

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs is Tampa. The other one that I think

1:02:44.400 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>is on the board. I don't think Jags are on

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the board to miss the playoffs.

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think anyone else in that division is

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to get especially with Anthony Richardson

1:02:56.880 --> 1:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>now done for the year. The other one is that

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I would again, of those eight choices, other than Tampa,

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:10.080
<v Speaker 2>my biggest concern would be Baltimore, only because every team

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 2>in that division is legitimate and Baltimore has a history

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of some tough injuries. You could see Cincinnati getting hot,

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, if Cleveland gets the quarterback situation squared away,

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>if Pittsburgh just wins through defense and coaching. I but

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>right now, I mean, the Niners are not missing the playoffs.

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>The Eagles are not missing the playoffs. The Lions are

1:03:31.840 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>not missing the playoffs, the Chiefs, Jags, and Dolphins. I

1:03:35.400 --> 1:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>guess the Dolphins would be the next pick if something

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 2>were to happen to Tua, because the Bills are right there,

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>but Tampa would be the best bet. All right, let's uh,

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>let's go to uh. Let's just go ahead and read

1:03:51.000 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the fifth question. Yep, go ahead.

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Somebody said, asked, how are you handling your being in college?

1:03:56.800 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>And any advice for how I can break it? Break

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>it to my parents. I'm choosing a college in Arizona

1:04:01.360 --> 1:04:02.560
<v Speaker 3>instead of hearing Maryland.

1:04:05.280 --> 1:04:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh. I mean, your parents just want you to be happy,

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. Just I think they'll I

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>think they'll be supportive, assuming like that you're doing it

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:21.160
<v Speaker 2>for with good reason, and I think you'll be I

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>think you'll be fine. And as far as how am

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>I handling it?

1:04:24.680 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Well?

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:27.600
<v Speaker 2>She owes me a text. I'm actually I text her

1:04:27.680 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>yesterday and said and and said I had can we

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>talk today? And she hadn't responded to me. It was

1:04:33.640 --> 1:04:35.840
<v Speaker 2>one of the first days we haven't talked. I wrote

1:04:35.960 --> 1:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>her a very nice text. I said, I love and

1:04:37.520 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>miss you. Scoop, can we catch up tomorrow when you're free?

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>And she just left me on Red? Demase, she just

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:47.400
<v Speaker 2>left me on Red. That's tragic, all right? What's the

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>last question?

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Producers asked, what else do you know about the Clippers?

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Hard and rumors? That's a good one.

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, what I reported that the Clippers could have gotten

1:04:57.600 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>James Harden for a first round pick one swap in

1:04:59.840 --> 1:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>ten Aaron's man and they said no, And that kind

1:05:04.000 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of shows the world where James Harden's market is right now,

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's.

1:05:09.240 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Also double down and make it even worse.

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Harden is now lashing out at the Sixers. I'm

1:05:15.880 --> 1:05:18.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna try to get more info on that throughout the day,

1:05:18.520 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and I think we're gonna talk about that at three

1:05:20.120 --> 1:05:22.439
<v Speaker 2>o'clock today on First Things First, So people should tune

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>in there. Deman's great work today. We're going five and

1:05:25.720 --> 1:05:28.360
<v Speaker 2>zero your teasers winning. We'll see you guys on Tuesday.

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>What's right