WEBVTT - This Is How the Terra Stablecoin Actually Imploded

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wasn't and I'm Tracy Allaway, Tracy Luna, Tera

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>stable coins, crypto crashing stuff. I'm gonna throw something else

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>out there, Roman history. Let's talk about classic history. What's

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the Roman history part? It's Rome sacking Carthage. Have you

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>not heard about that? Yeah? Is that what's going on?

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Is a Carthage big sacked right now? Well, that's actually yeah,

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's kind of what we're going to talk about.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to be speaking with someone who has

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>framed himself as Rome in the historic parallel going after Carthage,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which would be Tara and Luna. The algorithmic stable coin,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>slash cryptos This is such a wild story. I mean,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like I think you know, look, crashes, hacks, pond zis,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>rug polls, they happened all the time in crypto, right

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's almost it almost just like boring, And most

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the time they're not even worth reporting on or

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about because they're like a daily occurrent. But the

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Terra ecosystem, the us T stable coin, the Luna token

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>had gotten so big, so valuable, and so many major

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>backers of crypto um were invested in it or had

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>invested in it in some way that this is not

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just like another coin to crash. I think that's absolutely right.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So two things here. One top ten coin, right, like,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not every day that you see something

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like this happened to a top ten coin. Secondly, the marketing,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so everyone knew it was an unusual experiment, an algorithmic

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>stable coin, and we'll get into exactly how it's supposed

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to work. But even with that said, it was pitched

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>as a stable coin, as something that is supposed to

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>maintain a peg one to one with the dollar, and

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people are supposed to be able to use it to

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>get in and out of more volatile cryptocurrencies. And clearly

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's been happening because we've seen the peg

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>has crashed. I think it got too as low as

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like point three is right, No, I mean that's exactly right.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's a stable coin. The interesting thing is, like

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>stable coins, there are many different flavors of stable coins,

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and people have been skeptical about them for a while.

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Most of the discussion about vulnerable stable coins was focused

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>on tether, which but this was a so called algorithmic

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>stable coin. They had some collateral backing. It's sort of complicated,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into it, but the point is that, yes,

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it is sort of this classic example of the thing

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that blows up is the thing that has to maintain

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a peg, which is a lesson that in the trad

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fi world is understood for a long time, which is

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>often the sorts of big sources of big risk are

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>the things that, on the surface appear to have the

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>least volatility. Here's the other thing that makes the story

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so in staying it's the people involved. You know, you

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned some of the big funds like Galaxy Slash Novograts

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>who were invested in Tara slash Luna. Yeah, which I

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>thought was fake when I first saw that photo, but

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it is in fact real. But the other thing is

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>there are strong personalities attached on both the pro Luna

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Tara side and the sort of against or warning about

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Tara slash Luna side. And that's where that Rome versus

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Carthage analogy comes in. You had the founder Do Kuan,

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if anyone follows him on Twitter,

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>but he is incredibly I guess outspoken would be Yeah,

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is putting it all very very politely. But people

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>would come out with criticisms of the entire algorithmic stable

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>coin idea, and people would highlight vulnerabilities in the system

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and he would just bat them away, or he would

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just say, you're poor. I don't Yeah, you're poor. I

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>don't need to talk to you. So what is going on?

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be speaking with a perfect guest.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>When everyone was like odd Lots has to do an

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>episode on Luna obviously, and everyone my d MS flooded

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with this is the guest you have to have on

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's been warning about it for a while. We're

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be speaking with Kevin So. He's the co founder

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of Gail Walk Capital, which is a crypto hedge fund

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that was launched in so that's old by crypto hedge

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>fund uh longevity. But actually he's been in the space

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for about a decade, which is truly extraordinary. He knows

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it well. He's been warning. He had been warning about

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Tara and Luna for a while. So, Kevin, thank you

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on odd Lots. Yeah, absolutely, thanks

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Kevin, you started a crypto hedge fund,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.239
<v Speaker 1>like you know, now everyone has a crypto hedge fund obviously,

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but you that's legit, legit, legit veteran in the space.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>What what's your background? Why did you how did you

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get into it so much earlier than most people? Um, yeah,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I think my background, Um, you know,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been in crypto for a while now, really got

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>started in I hadn't joined industry at the time. I

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was just mostly trading my own p a uh. And

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>then I joined the industry, joined a small um bitcoin startup.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>It was an exchange. It was called butter Coin. It

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was the second y C company that was dealing with crypto,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the first being coin base. Um, things didn't go so

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>well over there and in the in the winter of

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen, we shut down. Afterwards, I joined Kraken,

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ran their trading desk for two years, and then afterwards

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>in uh, you know, in I guess early seen, decided

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>to leave and start Galwa Capital and we launched in January. So,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned in the intro, there's been a lot

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of criticism of Terra and Luna and you're I think

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest voice in that space. What piqued your

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>interest in this particular pin or you know, system, when

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>did you first start getting interested and start looking into it?

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And why? You know, when I first started looking into it,

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it was around mid or late last year.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, at the time, I didn't think

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>too much of it. I thought, oh, you know, this

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is just one of those i'll go stable coins. It

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>probably won't work out, you know, it'll just implode pretty soon.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Turned out not to be the case. It just kept going, uh,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, Luna kept going up, us T kept maintaining stability.

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It grew bigger and bigger. And then I revisited it

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in January of this year, and I at this point,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was kind of surprised at just how

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>big it got, you know, it all of a sudden,

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's now like a top ten coin or

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So now I was starting to get

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>worried because I've never seen one of these, you know,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>i'll go stable coins get so big. Usually they just

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>collapsed before that. So you know that I thought, well,

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe this is first one, maybe a great

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>shorting opportunity, and to maybe this poses some systemic risks

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to the entire space, and and maybe it's time intosan

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sound the alarm, you know not. I mean, obviously for

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>my own benefit, I would definitely like to make money

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>on the short but also I think just as a

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>public service to also let everybody else know to So

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>can you actually back up for listeners? And we hear

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>stable coins and we sort of mentioned it in the intro,

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>which is that there are various flavors of stable coins.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Tethers one model, U S d C is a similar model.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>There's also um maker and die. But what is uh

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an Elgo stable coin, this project that keep trying and

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they do have a long history of continuing to blow up.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>How is an Elgo stable coin different than other stable coiners? Um? Yeah,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think we should first separate out these so

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>called um these centralized stable coins with the centralized ones.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, first on the centralized side, you have

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>folks like UH USDT which is tether, and USDC which

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is uh you know, circles dollar and you know, basically

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here is that there's a dollar in some

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>bank account and for every dollar there they issue out

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>one coin. Anytime you return a coin to them, you

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>can demount of physical dollar, you know, by wire transfer

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatnot. It's very much kind of tethered together between

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the real world and the virtual world. Um. You know,

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on the on the sort of decentralized side, you really

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>have variations of two models, right, So you have sort

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of like the collateralized model, which is like make or

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>die um. What that is is basically you can post

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>uh some amount of um some other type of asset,

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and in return you're going to get some stable coin,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>which is maybe you know, like if you if you

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>over collateralize it by then you're gonna get a percent.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you put in a dollar worth of value,

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you get back a dollar uh. And then at some

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>point the price of the underlying collateral will fluctuate to

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the point at which you reach like a point where

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a margin call and then you know, either your

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>collateral get seized or you top it up or you

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>return the borrow. Right, So it's basically collateralized leading right.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of you know, that that sort of model.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, and this is where you know we

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we we start talking about Luna and Ust. You know,

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>finally there is this pure class of algo stable coins

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>which do not have collateral or or severely undercollateralized and

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>they have some kind of stabilization mechanism. Long story short,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's basically like a perpetual motion machine. And it's not

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the first time that exact phrase has been used on

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:28.119
<v Speaker 1>this podcast in reference to a Tero slash Luna. Yeah, definitely,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I would say either perpetual motion machine or giant Rue

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Goldberg machine. Right, So some of these are just really

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>elaborate contraptions and you know, you don't know where the

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>hand crank is, but someone's turning a hand crank to

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>keep the system going. And it's not actually a perpetual

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>motion machine, which we know is impossible, but um so,

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's the analogy. But basically the idea is that

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you have some kind of mechanism which in some way,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, indirectly or directly expands the supply of that

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>stable point when the price is too high in order

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to push it back down, and on the other side,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>contracts the supply of that stable point through some mechanism

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>when the price is too low, hence pushing the price

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>back up. Right. So these are kind of like these.

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are these feedback mechanisms regardless of how

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you design it. Within this class of stable coin. They're

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>all these feedback mechanisms which eventually caused something like this

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen, which is why in the end, I think

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they're all pretty much the same, but you know, just

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>through different methods. I mean, they all look different, but

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>when you really, like when you start to really break

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it down, it's all just about supply contraction and expansion.

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So two things here. One, could you give us a

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more detail on that arbitrage mechanism between Terra

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and Luna, like walk us through exactly how it works

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>if the price of Luna goes up or the price

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of Luna goes down, and you know, vice versa with Tera.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, you mentioned a hand kind of turning

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the rank. And my understanding here is that yields on

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>offer from Tera slash Luna were exceptionally high, I think

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>something like nineteen or And this is another question that

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we ask a lot in the crypto or DeFi space

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, but where do those yields actually come from?

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Like how does this entire incentivization mechanism work? M Yeah, definitely,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And and I completely agree with you that I think

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this component of it, which is the anchor yields on

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>deposits for US T this nineteen and a half percent,

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>which then eventually dropped down eight. That's exactly the hand

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>crank in this perpetual motion machine that that makes it

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>not perpetual. That's it's a great question always I think

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask where do the yields come from? I think

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times, you know, it just seems like

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's free money, but it turns out you're you're just

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>subsuming all of this kind of indirect or hidden risk

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're not aware of, right, A lot of this

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like tail risk, which only manifests once in

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a blue moon, but when it does, it completely wipes

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you out, right. So it's just it's just really kind

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of like very dangerous kind of invisible risk. What I

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>always like to say is that most of the time,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you can't find where the yield is

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>coming from, then effectively it's coming from future bag holders. Right.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's like this idea that the sort of true

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>belief and sort of the cultish behavior of true believers

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>will eventually produce some value which gets extracted from them,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and it is given to you now in the present.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's extracted in the future and given to you

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in the present right now, right, And I think that's

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>basically exactly what's going on with this with this lunar model.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a little bit abstract, but um, you

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>know that's kind of how I how I see it.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And then maybe just returning to your first question, we

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>could do remind me again with the first question, can

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you explain exactly how the arbitrage mechanism between Luna and

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Terra or Ust actually works, Like, walk us through what

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is happening as the prices of either of these things move,

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>like how they balance out. Yeah, so, um, how they're

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>supposed to balance out, I should say, yeah. So I'll first, um,

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of just describe the simple model and then I'll

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>add some caveats on some of the intricacies there. So

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the simple model is that at any point you can

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>always redeem one UST for one dollars worth of Luna, right, So,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like if Luna was at a hundred dollars, then one

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>us t would get you, uh, one luna penny right

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>point zero one Luna, which is equivalent to one dollar.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And if Luna is one dollar, then you know one

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>UST is going to give you one Luna. Right. But

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 1>in any case, you're always able to redeem us T

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>UH for the equivalent amount of dollars worth of Luna. Uh.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And the amount of Luna you get is based on

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>where the current market value for Luna is and the

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>vice and you know the opposite is true too. You

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>can all is destroy or burn one dollar's worth of

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Luna to create one U s T. Right. So the

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>idea behind this feedback mechanism is that if us T

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>is trading below one dollar, what you can do is

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you can buy that on the open market, right, and

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>then convert that to one dollar's worth of Luna and

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>then sell that one dollar of luna. Right. So that's

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of how that arbitrage mechanism works in order to

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>maintain this peck. So that's that's basically the simple model.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Now it gets a little bit more complicated because there's

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dials um and and knobs that you

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>can adjust uh and you know, bells and whistles around this.

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing is that it's not technically true

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that you get exactly one dollar's worth of Luna for

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>burning one U s T. There is basically something called

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a automated market maker. This is something that has been

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>popularized by you know, uh, you know, unit swap, sushi swap,

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>curve balancer, a lot of these you know, m M protocols,

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>these uh, these sort of decentralized liquidity pools, and it's

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>really this automated market maker bonding curve which governs sort

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of the slippage or the costs of converting between Luna

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and UST. So the first component of this mechanism is

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that the greater the size that you do, the worse

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of a price you're going to get. Right, So this

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is like equivalent to like market slippage. You know, if

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy, you know, a million dollars worth

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of something, you know you're gonna pay a little above

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>market price. If you want to buy a billion dollars

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>worth worth of something, you're gonna pay well above market price. Right.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's just you know, it kind of depends on

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>liquid in the market, but really it's governed by this

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>bonding curve, and you know, the greater the size that

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you do, the more slippage you in curve. The second

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>part of it that's a little bit nuanced, is that

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>there is some fee that's collected in the middle just

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like all these other bonding curves, all these other A

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>M M s. There is a fee for converting. It's

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>not very high, but you know, there is still some

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>fee which adds on to basically the transactional costs, which

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>are the slippage you know, plus the fee itself. And

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>then the last part that's really interesting about this mechanism

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, before the full collapse, you know,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in the past couple of days, there was basically a

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>gating mechanism on which governed exactly how much ust could

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be created or destroyed per day, So being destroyed being

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, moving back into Luna, and I think that

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that number was around like two fifty mil uh dollars

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>worth per day. Um, So anything beyond that you just

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna have to wait until the next day.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, there's also all sorts of like um,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, much finer details like pool recovery periods and

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, but you know, none of that is

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really that important, I think, to what we're gonna be

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about next. So I think just based on that explanation,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be able to describe the phenomenon

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that we've we've seen in the past few days. So

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to get before we get into sort of

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like what happened over the last few days, because I

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>think you've said some important things. The fact that there's

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a limit on how much can be converted in a

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>given day is really important to understanding the action. The

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's a fee obviously for the more you trade,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>which if everyone's trading, fees go up. The one other

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>UM element I'm curious about an understanding its role actually too.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I want to understand a little bit further them. The

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Luna Foundation bought a ton of bitcoin I think earlier

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the year, and their basic idea was like, Okay,

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, just in case I guess this the the

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>perpetual motion machine starts to wobble a little bit, we

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can defend the PEG with this big bitcoin reserves, sort

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of like classic e M style. So I found this

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>move really weird because either you're sort of a fully

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>backed stable coin or its traditional reserves, or you're an

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>algorithmic stable coin. Because the whole the whole problem they

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>were trying to solve was that they wanted to get

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>away from the traditional financial system UM without having to

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>build the reserves. It's sort of like being like a

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit pregnant or something like we're sort of a

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit a little bit uh, a little bit unbacked. Yeah,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>like we're sort of reserved back but not so what

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>is what was the role? Well, I I want to

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>know what is the role of the Bitcoin Stabilization Fund?

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And then also I know you touched on it, but

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>could you just explain a little bit and Tracy as

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's crucial that percent yield that was

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>being given to induce people to hold us t this

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of big reason to hold a stable coin and

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>actually make money holding a stable Like where was that

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>coming from? Like what was the source of funds specifically

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>other than just sort of theoretical future bag holders, Like

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>how was that paid out? So basically, you know, when

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Luna or the terror Eco system first got started, Uh,

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>there was some funds that were set aside for the

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>company itself, right, And the main company is Terraform Labs TfL,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and they have this huge stash of Luna which unlocks

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>over a certain investing schedule. Right, so even for them,

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, slowly unlocks over time. So what they would

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do in order to finance their operations and to also

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>finance the anchor yield reserve. Is they would sell large

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>clips of this too, you know, willing investors at some

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of discount that also has a one year clip

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for some kind of vesting schedule, uh something like that,

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and then they would use that for operations, and they

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>would also use that to keep basically topping up the

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>anchor protocol on their year reserve because they were paying

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>more interests to depositors than they were collecting from borrowers.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think in the end stages of Luna,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in its final days, um, you could see that the

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, the the deposit amount was way way

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>higher than the borrowed amount. So you know, they're they

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>were bleeding. I mean, I think at some point so

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone so everyone buys UFT in order to collect that.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>But that basically has the effect, if you think it through,

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>of sapping those reserves fund faster. They're sort of like

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>set aside to sort of bootstrap the whole thing and

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>incentivize the whole thing. But essentially, if everyone is chasing

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>for it at once, that starts to get depleted or

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you start to like strain your ability to pay that up. Uh. Yeah,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. I think at the at the peak,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>they were burning maybe about seven million a day, uh

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth a day of their their their yield reserve,

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, originally I think it was something

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like fifty mil or eighty mil or something like that.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>And then they had to do a top up of

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>four fifty mill and then, you know, very quickly soon

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>after that, soon was almost depleted, and they were thinking

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about how much to do another top above. Whether you know,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking about whether to do it or not.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Everybody was you know, you know, lobbying Dough Dough quant

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to to do it. You know, he was, you know,

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>running some rumors that oh maybe it's going to be

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>over a billion this time, this, this and that. So

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the whole the whole thing was very expensive. Now,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I think what they were thinking, because I don't want

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to strawman them, you or, I think what they were

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking is that, you know, they just want to uh

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they think about this as a marketing expense, right,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so they just want to get to get everybody talking

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about Luna, everybody using us t um. You know, they're

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just bleeding seven million in a day, but they're getting

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people you know, talking about anchor using anchor,

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, using their ecosystem, putting their money into it, uh,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>into this bar lending protocol. So you know, I personally

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think it was worth it. I think they you know,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>probably even even if they were right, which I don't think.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're absolutely wrong. But even if they were right,

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they probably could have gone away with a little bit

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lower than yields. I mean probably like even like eighteen

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>seventeen probably would have been fine. Now, it's not going

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>to save them that much more money, but I do

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think they overpaid for that. Uh, if you know, it's

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>just the random thought there. And what about what do

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you think was the rationale for the bitcoin reserves, because

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I think before this week happened, I think they ended

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>up with something like three billion worth of bitcoin that

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they'd accumulated. I think that's right. Yeah, um, yeah, that's

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>about right. So you know, um, I think this, uh,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>this whole purchasing of the bitcoin was, in my opinion,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a great move, uh in some ways and in some

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>ways a really bad move. Right. So it was a

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>really good move I think in terms of trying to

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>make the system solvent eventually they probably needed about actually

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>about ten billion dollars worth of collateral. They got to

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe about only only seven billion more, you know, And

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, I mean easier said than done, definitely, but

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least it was I think a step

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction in terms of creating solvency for

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the system. I think the system was way in the past.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>It was already insolvent. You know. It's just that nobody

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>realized because they had created such a strong supply sink

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>an anchor for this us T. You know, if that

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>disappeared overnight or even gradually, the entire system was insolvent.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean even at a price I would say, of

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred dollars a luna. Uh, this whole thing

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was already insolvent, just nobody realized it. But anyway, returning

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 1>back to the bitcoin, um so, I think in that

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sense it was really good that they bought the bitcoin,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But in some ways it was ald bit bad because

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it kind of destroyed the narrative a little bit, right. Yeah,

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Now it's just like a kind of half backed, a

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit half aspect, you know, kind of Uh. I

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I could say that something, but uh,

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know, but it's you know, now it's sort

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of like it's destroying their own narrative because like they

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>basically said that, oh, we we finally constructed this perpetual

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>motion machine. You know, behold everybody, We finally did it,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's working and it's amazing. But actually,

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, just in case it doesn't work, let's get

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>some insurance. You know. So like before they were the

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>narrative was very strong. It was just like there was

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>just saying, oh, yeah, for sure the state works now,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and obviously it doesn't. But you know, they were saying

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people were believing them. But you know,

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like they were capitulating a little bit on

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the narrative and making certain concessions by even buying the

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in the first place, because now it begets the question.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Now people were thinking, well, wait a second, this thing

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 1>is just always it was going to work all along.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Why do we even need that, Like you're telling me that,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's not really a vote of confidence there,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that you even feel the need to get

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>some insurance there. But you know, all that being said,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>still happy that they did, I mean, it would have

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>been even worse if they did. So walk us through

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what you think just happened, Because I've seen some wild

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>theories out there. I mean a lot of the lunar bowls,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess they sometimes call themselves lunatics, but a lot

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of them are talking about this idea of a concerted

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>attack from people like Citadel and yeah, I mean it

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just sounds crazy to me. But also, but also here's

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the thing, Like, even if it was some sort of

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>concerted attack a bunch of people shorting all at once,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that still seems like a fundamental vulnerability in this machine

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that you've designed to be stable. So I guess, walk

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>us through what you think happened and what the exact

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>trigger was for the chaos that we've seen this week. Yeah,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the deep pegging. Yeah, you know, I think we're really

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>entering this phase in the market cycle, which I've been

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>calling on Twitter the finger pointing phase. You know, now

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that this thing is clearly you know, it's clearly failed,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>who should take the blame for this? Right? Is it

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a some external party in a foreign world, the trad

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fi world? Right? The boomers in the suits that nobody

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>likes crypto? Yeah, easy scapegoat? Right? Probably was Citadel or

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>black Rock right, turned out to be just a post

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of four chance, you know, like I mean, like they're not.

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe we're in historic times. The Black Rocket Citadel.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Now I have to issue rebuttals to a four champ post.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>But that's absolutely ridiculous. I mean, it just goes to

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>show how quickly means spread and how quickly narrative spreads,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's right or wrong. Where we're in the age

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of social media and words spread so fast that literally

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a four chand post can trigger a response from set

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>it on black Rock And it's absolutely ridiculous. I mean,

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>where people coming up with these conspiracies. Uh so is

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it a them, right, these outsiders, these boomer trade tread

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>rad fight guys. Is it be somebody internal to Crypto?

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, some big shorters like uh you know, like

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>galwah Capital or like some of the other noted uh

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know six Factors of Luna. Was it Sam, you know,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 1>was it Winter Mew? Who knows? Maybe it was one

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of our own people, right or is it c Um?

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it do Kuans fault? You know, because he built

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this project, the mechanism was clearly unsound. Maybe he's a grifter.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he was a scammer all along. Maybe it's his

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>fault or is it cut d like? Is it? Is

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it like people's own fault in a way? Right? Is

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it that they themselves got a bit greedy? Um? They

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted so badly to believe that there was free money

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>raining from this sky that they turned off all their

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>reason and logic because they you know, they had some

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hope of changing the circumstances of their life. You know,

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit sad to say, but I think you

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>know there is some bit of that too, you know,

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So what I would say is really hard to say

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>what you know exactly triggered it, but I think it

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>would you know, if this is any lesson for us,

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, the crypto space, we've we've

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>always been um kind of like we want to be

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a self regulatory, regulating industry. We do. We don't really

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>need regulators to step in, you know, protect the little guy,

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>protect the retail from themselves. Right, we can handle things

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on our own. And if that is the case, then

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>every time something like this happens, we have to take

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>some very good lessons about them. We have to, you know,

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>take a hard look at ourselves and why this happened?

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, why how did people get so greedy and

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not just not just retail themselves to write I think

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it is good for them to reflect on themselves too.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know, how did the vcs? How did

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the investors get so greedy about this stuff? How did

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the founders get so greedy about this stuff? You know,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges, I mean to some extent. I mean, they

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>definitely benefit from all the trading volume, right, so you know,

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not that you know, they're particularly greedy, but

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they look the other way because they don't really care.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>As long as you could trade a coin back and forth, uh,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, collect the fees, maybe it was still

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>good for them, right. So you know, I think I

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>think it is important for us to reflect on ourselves

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>before we just start pointing fingers. Now that being said,

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>if we want to talk about how how you know,

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it actually went down, there's been you know, a lot

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of speculation and you know, some people have woven these

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>very intricate narratives about Okay, on this time, this thing happened,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.239
<v Speaker 1>this time, that thing happened. Um, what I would say

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is that most mostly its speculation. There are some things

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that are I think factual. So maybe we can just

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.479
<v Speaker 1>start with that, which is that when Luna first um

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>started to unwind. This was during a period, you know,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>when the first deep pegging happened. There's a couple of

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>days ago. Just before you keep moving. We're recording this Thursday,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>May twelve, and so it was really I feel like

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>last Saturday morning. I guess that was maybe the seventh

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or something. I just wanted to sort of like set

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that when people like people have been talking about for

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a while, but that was sort of when it suddenly

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>started to deviate. I think it was about roughly five

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or six days ago. But anyway, sorry, keep going. I

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>just want to make sure listeners start to understand the

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>time frame here. Yeah, exactly. So, so it was around

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that time, and it was during a time when there

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>was a migration of assets from the three pool on

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Curve to the new four pool, right, So maybe I

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>just I'll explain that a So I guess starting with curve.

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Curve is basically it's a little bit like unit swap.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a bonding curve. M M. It's a

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>bit flatter in terms of the bonding curve meaning that

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you can trade greater size near quote unquote the peg,

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and this is like this is mostly for

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>stable points, right see. You know, for three pool, it's like,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have USDC USDT Die, and those are

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>three three coins in three pool, and they're all stable coins.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>They should all be pegged roughly to a dollar. Uh

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so you know, around a dollar you can trade huge

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>amounts of size, which is not quite doable in you know,

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rounder bonding curve like you know, most things on NITA,

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>at least un swab. So it's an a MM, it's

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a it's a it's a defy MM. But it's particularly

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>well optimized for trading stables between each other. Yes, I

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>mean there's some caveats there, but you know, I think

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the details don't don't matter too much. So, um, it

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is particularly optimized for trading stables for the most part.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's three pool. Three pool is you know, circles Dollar, Tether,

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and Die which is makers coin, and then four pool

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>would have been would have been two of the coins

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>from three pool being tether and Circle dollar. But instead

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of having Die, they we're gonna have ust and they

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>were gonna have fracts as dollar. So you know, the

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>whole idea there is that they kind of it to

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 1>kill die, and they wanted to have more of their

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>own native liquidity. They didn't want to just have a

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>meta pool, which is you know, for example, ust against

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>three curve, right, so it's it's a pool between two assets,

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but one of the assets is a pool itself, right.

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So they don't want to just be attached as like

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a sidecar, you know, to three pool. They wanted to

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be you know, have their own native pool. So these

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>great plans for you know, four pool and whatnot. So

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, during this time in the DP pegging, returning

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to that point of the story, um, you know, they

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>were basically the lunar guys TfL they were doing a

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>migration from three pool of the four pool. So they're

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>pulling all the liquity from three pool putting into four pool.

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.479
<v Speaker 1>And this is basically when somebody just took up all

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity left on us T by basically just in

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the U S T pools, just by dumping all their

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 1>us T and taking out all the other assets. And

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this basically was what caused the first panic. Now was

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that one person was that multiple people I think really

0:31:58.160 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to say. I think you'd have to take a

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the chain. Right now, the narrative is that

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it was just one attacker, But I mean, I think

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of like a like a boogeyman. I

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>think we should we should actually take a look at

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the actual transactions that had happened on Curve at that

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>time and see if it came from multiple addresses or

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>came from a single address. I mean, to be fair,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if it comes from ultiple addresses, it

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>could still be you know, the same party. Maybe they

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just split up their wallets, you know, But at least

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't We should verify right before making these kinds

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of speculations. But in any case, basically all the us

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>T was dumped, all the other assets were drained from

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>these pools, and then that that basically caused a little

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a panic. Other people pulled money out of anchor,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 1>people try to find ways of getting rid of their

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>us T. Luna started tanking. The entire markets were already tanking.

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, it's kind of like an alignment of

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the stars. The equity markets were tanking, and cryptos really

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>correlated with the equity markets these days, so everything was dropping,

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and on top of that, the migration was happening. So

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, a cacophony of the perfect sequence

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of events and um, you know, coincidences there. So this

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>system was already very unstable, and this was something that

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you recognized and other people, but you recognized

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going back to last year, it was inherently flawed. But

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>then we get this sort of perfect storm because we

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have this big risk asset sell off. You know, stock

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>market has obviously been tanking Bitcoin, which on some level

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>had of course been a contributor to ust stability. Bitcoin

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>has obviously been tanking, so did the extent that that's

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a backstop that's dissolved or diminishing by the day. And

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then you have this migration and it was about to

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be a switch and someone dumps a lot and drains

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity from the existing pool you mentioned and I

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>saw I've seen a lot of people talk about this

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>move from the three pool to the four pool. Was

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there something inherent about that migration that made it vulnerable?

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Was that inherently going to be a less liquid moment

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for us? T Yeah, I mean it would definitely be

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a less liquid moment, But I don't want to just

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>say that definitively someone was trying to attack the probo

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>at that time, you know, because what it really could

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be is that somebody was just looking at the liquidity

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and didn't even know that the migration was happening that day, right,

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and then just saw all the liquidity evaporate, panicked themselves, right,

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and then just dumped all their us t training the

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of liquidity, right. Or or it might not have

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>been one person, it could have been multiple people who

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>all you know, we're sitting at their computers one day

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and not having read that they were doing the migration,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody feeling the same panic, everybody dumping, right. So, speaking

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of opportunistic moments, I guess or triggers for these type

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of types of moves. You mentioned that you were short,

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and I know you probably can't necessarily go into detail

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of exactly what that position looked like. But I imagine,

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>given the degree of criticism against Terra slash Luna, that

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there were a number of people who would have liked

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to or maybe have better against this over time. And

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, you know what, what, how did those trades

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>theoretically work? And then is it possible that there were

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>frictions within the Luna Terra ecosystem that made shorting it

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of difficult, because this is a classic thing in markets, right,

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can identify the bubble or you can

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 1>identify the ponzi and then get killed. So I guess

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how painful it would have been to short

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this for a substantial amount of time. Yeah, I definitely

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>would be very painful. And this is why we didn't

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>start shorting this thing until actually pretty recently. I want

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, I don't want to say exactly when, but

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it was sometime this month, and it wasn't actually earlier

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>than that that we were shut um. And you know,

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that with something like this, being early is

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 1>almost as bad as being wrong, right uh. And you know,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>partly one of the reasons that this thing was so

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult to short was because the funding on putting on

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>shorts uh was extremely high. And that's because the opportunity

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>cost was getting yield on anchor. Right, So basically you're

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>paying maybe about but it's about that, it'll be about that, right,

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Like that yield was higher, maybe even harder to shore

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that yield was lower. It would be easier to shore, right.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But basically that's the opportunity cost of not shorting, right.

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's why, you know, that's why this this trade

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think was particularly difficult to put on just from mechanically,

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>from that standpoint, but also I think on top of that,

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this whole system and this whole design is so reflexive

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>on both the up and the downstading, right, So like

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>we saw this thing go negative down right, right, just

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days, right. But you know, on

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the up side, it's also very violent, right, So you know,

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you could be right, but you know, the market could

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>still liquidate, you you know, for some reason. You know,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets rally, everything rally, Bitcoin rallies, the you know,

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Luna having beta to bitcoin it also rallies. Uh. And

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that they make some kind of

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy announcement whether it's true or not, you know, and

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>then and then you know, you could completely get blown out.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think that that's why, you know,

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing was just particularly difficult to short. You know,

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>just structurally, it's just very difficult. But we did get

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it in. Uh, And I think it was just roughly

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about the right timing, so very happy about that. Yeah,

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I bet um. I mean it feels to me like

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the difficulties or one of the reasons this

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>week has been so extreme, is because there's no natural

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>circuit breaker on while either on the upside and this

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is why you saw you know, some phenomenal valuations, but

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>also on the downside. Yeah, you know, I think my

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>opinion there is a little bit you know, different than yours, Tracy,

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I think that the circuit breakers could

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have slowed things down, but couldn't have stopped them. And

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>in some ways by doing the circuit breakers, uh you know,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>like let's say the exchange is just you know, limit

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>up or down. They just hit the circuit breakers. Well,

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>there's still the defied markets, right, and then there's still

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 1>like all these other sources of true price discovery, and

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as there's some kind of outlet for it,

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you're basically just building up pressure on the Sea FI

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>exchange once the circuit breaker is released, right, So now

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>like instead of it just like you know, exponentially crashing down,

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>now it might just be straight up vertical line. You

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>hit the limit and then the moment the market reopens,

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>another straight vertical line down to the next limit and

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then just like staggered lines down right instead of like

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>more more a curve line, almost vertical down. So you know,

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of the day, Um, you

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>can't really go against the market. If it wants to

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>go down, it's just gonna go down. I mean, you know,

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>any kind and especially for something so reflexive. Um, most

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>people are not trading, you know, people are trading emotionally.

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But there's like there's what I'm saying is that there's

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>there's more that's coming, right, It's not that oh you know,

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>after a while, people just want to go buy the dip. Right,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 1>This asset is the complete opposite of a dip buying asset. Right,

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>some assets they're more mean reverting when it goes down

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and you buy something looks cheap when it's when it

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>pops up, you know, when you sell down a little

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>bit because it looks expensive. This is the complete opposite.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 1>The further it goes down, the easier it is to shore, right,

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>because then first of all, like everybody else is unwinding,

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you know that's happening. And then uh, second of all,

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire value of everything back in us T which

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is circularly, Luna It's itself and Bitcoin are both losing value. Right,

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So then at some point, you know, if you if

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you think collateralization ratio was bad yesterday, then today it's

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>even worse, and the next day it's going to be

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>even worse, and you can see that trend deterministically playing out,

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>than at that point you might as well just dump

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it today, right. So this thing is a purely reflective asset.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>It's the purest of momentum assets. So what you say

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>makes total sense. But you know, I'm trying to understand

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>actually how different fundamentally Luna Terra is from a lot

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of other crypto defy assets. And of course, we recently

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>did an episode with Sam Bankman for and he was

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>asked to describe yield farming and he's like, oh, it's

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a box and you put money in and then you know,

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you get some governance tokens to incentivize more money in

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the box, and then more money goes into the box,

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and then you make a lot of money if you're

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the box. You talk about the reflexivity of

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Luna Tarot box and when it's going down, there's

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>literally no reason there's no cash flow, there's no book

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>value or anything that inherently stabilizes the price. There's this

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is what I meant by a natural by the way,

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So then how different is it from a lot of

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>other crypto things in terms of this reflexivity? And is

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this and I mean, is it really different from the

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>rest of the space, because I don't see, like it

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>feels like a lot of crypto assets have the same reflexivity. Yeah,

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so I want to separate out the reflexivity from the

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>garbageness of it. Right, So, like I think on the

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 1>reflexivity part, this is uniquely bad, like or Luna is

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>uniquely bad in its reflexivity. It's extremely extremely high reflectivity.

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's not the case for a lot of

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>these other yield farming boxes. Um. Now that being said, uh,

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, there are some similarities in the

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sense that there was a box also for Luna, and

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it was called Anchor, and you put money in that

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>box and seemingly you've got money out of it. Now

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what it turned out to be is that, uh, you know,

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And I want to maybe just go off of Sam's

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>metaphor here, which I found hilarious, which is that you know,

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these cases, right, you put money

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>in the box and then money comes out of it,

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>especially you know, if you're early, I would say that

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in this case, you put money in the box, seemingly

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>money comes out of it, but really, really the true

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>transfer value here is that you put your money in

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the box, that money, somehow, through many different pipes, goes

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>to investors and founders of the project, and then your

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>money disappears and you have nothing. So it's it's more

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, I would say, so instead of how is

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that different? Sorry, yeah, because I would say that certain

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>boxes are a little bit more honest in the sense

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's kind of like a like a

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>chicken game, right, So it's like users competing with users,

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and the earlier you are, the better that you do. Right.

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it sounds really bad. It is really bad,

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm saying is that this is even worse

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>than that, because it's not even it's not really just

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>users competing against users. It's more like users thinking they're

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>competing against other users, but really getting all their funds

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>siphoned out by you know, investors and the inside team.

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>So one of the other things that's been happening this

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>week is now Tether has depegged. And initially at the

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>start of this week, when Tara was going down, when

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ust hit point three or whatever it was, everyone was

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Oh, it's it's a problem with the algorithmic

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>stable coins, only this thing is worse than a lot

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of other stuff. But now we've seen strains on Tether,

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to be reserved backed, but of course

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there have always been questions swirling around what those reserves

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>actually are, what they look like. We've also seen some

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>stable coins um I can't remember exactly what it was,

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:37.919
<v Speaker 1>but like stuff like USDC and b USD and things

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like that, UM that seemed to have done relatively better.

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>So those are holding up. So I guess my question is,

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is this now a shakeout in the stable coin space

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or what happens now? Do people go to stuff that

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they perceived to be safe or does the safe stuff

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.240
<v Speaker 1>get liquidated because a bunch of hedge funds have Luna

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Tera exposure and need to raise money. Like what exactly happens? Yeah,

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think a lot of those things. So

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>let's first talk about the general sort of financial contagion, right, So,

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of these guys who are just like

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>these funds uh and and other types of investors who

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are just really long but let's say Luna or Ustu

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes even doubling down on the position. Uh. You know,

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>they basically, you know, as as the price moves against them,

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>they're facing margin calls. So I think what a lot

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of them did is that they sold their other hard assets, right,

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 1>so other coins, bitcoin, ethereum, whatever, they had to meet

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>these margin calls, uh, and then eventually, like some of

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>them even got wiped out on on the entire fund.

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's probably why you're seeing all of

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this contagion. I mean, some some of it is just

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>correlated to equities, but I think for the most part,

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>there's also some psychological contagion. And you know, people just

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, you know, they see this huge

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, top ten coin implode, they start to feel

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less safe about all their other investments

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in general. And then some of it is this like

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to meet margin calls and to find ants themselves. You know,

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>some people have just sold off actually much better assets

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 1>than than Luna and ust to defend their position, and

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Lunar and U s t so I think that that

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that definitely happened. So I forget what the first part

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of that. I guess, how does the stable coin market

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>shake out now? Does more money flow into things that

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.919
<v Speaker 1>are perceived to be higher quality, or how do people

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>start to differentiate? Yeah, definitely. Uh, you know, I think,

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, these days, you're starting to see like some

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of these coins trade above parody that are not, you know,

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the non tether stable coins. At least for a little bit,

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of stuff was trading like a

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>dollar and two cents dollar in three cents, that sort

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing. I think generally the consensus right now in

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the market is that us d C is the safest

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's a little bit of worry about Tether. I

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's fair. But I do think the worries about

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Tether or a little bit overblown. And I want to

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 1>qualify that statement by saying that although Tether as a

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>company has done some really shady stuff in the past,

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>actually happened to believe that they're actually more than just

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>fully collateralized. I think they're actually overcollateralized. Um. So you know,

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>if you think, if you think about some of the

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>weird and wacky stuff they did that they shouldn't have done. Um,

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they actually backed some of the tether with crypto righte

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with with bitcoin itself, and this is like during a

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 1>bull run. So first of all, they really shouldn't do

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that because that's not the point of what their business.

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I mean they really should just be keeping

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like really dollar like instruments or actual dollars that would

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>be the absolute safist in the bank account and they

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be speculating with client funds like that. But given

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that they actually did do that something that they shouldn't,

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they actually worked out for them. So they kind of

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>got lucky and with you know, I don't know if

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they kept a lot of the profits themselves are whatnot,

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>But if at least some of that profits still was

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 1>held on the vaults, then they should actually be overcollateralized.

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And then you know the other you know, crazy stuff

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that they did, you know, where they loaned money to

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves because you know, Tether is also owned by X,

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just the parent company at bit foin X. They basically

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 1>loan money to bitfoin X because of you know, some

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>some bad debt that bitfoin X had because they they

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>were like short like eight million or something because of

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like crypto capital something I don't I don't remember exactly,

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was something like that. Um so they were

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>basically like doing all these crazy loans between their own companies.

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's you know, I think, definitely something

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that they shouldn't have done. But technically they you know,

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>they made it out of that too. They issued the

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>LEO token, they sold it to investors, raised a billion,

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>put that money back in, gave that money back to Tether.

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So you know, technically it should still be a whole.

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they keep doing things that they shouldn't do,

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 1>but yet they always get lucky and they come out

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. So I actually tend to believe that Tether

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is pretty safe. But you know, they really should stop

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>doing crazy ship I want to ask about the more

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the terror fall out in a different direction. So clearly

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>there's this sort of pure financial contagion. You see the

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>top ten coin crash and cetera, or you start to

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder about the safety of some of these other yield

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>boxes and so forth. But the other thing good striking,

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned this in the intro, which is that

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we're used to hacks and crashes in crypto. They happened

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and most of the time they're too

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>boring to even mention. But this one was like backed

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>by like legit or people who are respected leaders in

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry, people who go on TV and obviously like

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Nova grads who has the dog tattoo mean nothing seriously,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, but there's others two And if you

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, I saw the press release of

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time, like you know, when Tara got funded,

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's all of the like some of the biggest

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>names in crypto, and so I'm curious, like how that

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>affects the industry that this is not like some like

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 1>big connect weird thing where everyone sort of new was

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>really terrible, like a bunch of people really stood by this. Yeah, definitely,

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think historically we've seen stuff like

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that happened before. You know, look at like the Dow

0:48:57.560 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know when that came out and it

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>got act I mean that was also backed by a

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of heavy hitters in the industry. And then you know,

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>there was at some point there was like the whole

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin cash fork. Uh, And I wouldn't I want, I

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say it was backed by like everybody.

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It was in the majority. It was still a minority

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 1>within the industry, but it was a very healthy minority, right,

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So we've definitely had situations like that in the past.

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>What I would say, and I don't want to cast

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.399
<v Speaker 1>any expersions on most of the investors in Luna and Terra,

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that I think it's a

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>combination of three things. I think the first is that

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>people got used to too much easy money in the

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>bull cycles. And you know, before the FED started hiking

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:38.839
<v Speaker 1>up rates, you know, they were used to this kind

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of access arbitrage right as vcs, they're very well connected. Um,

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they can get into these very early seed round deals

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and massive discounts mark that stuff up, you know, crazy amounts,

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten X in a week, you know ten

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>X in a couple of months, hundreds X in a year,

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, even thousands possible. So I think they just

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:02.000
<v Speaker 1>saw that as a continuation of business as usual, right.

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know that also like to get some questions

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like why why should the returns be so high in

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the first place, But you know that's I think another

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>philosophical discussion. I mean, but I think you know, they

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>got kind of used to that, and for them, they

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really switched their mindsets yet to more of a bearish,

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>more of a hawkish kind of fed environment. So I

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's one part. I think the second part is

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that generally some of them tended to be true believers.

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>And what I mean by that is that they thought that, yeah,

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe most likely this thing fails, like nine chance this

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>thing fails, but maybe ten percent chance the same thing

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>succeeds and it goes up a million x, right, So

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:45.240
<v Speaker 1>then that still makes the investment positive ev right, positive

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.919
<v Speaker 1>expected value. So I think from that standpoint, they thought

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that this was still maybe a good bet to make,

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>and it was an honest bet. Um, you know, they

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>thought it was good at the time. Maybe they don't

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think so anymore, but maybe some of them even still

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 1>now made money because they got out in time, right,

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think the I think the third thing is

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that probably some of these investors realize that this thing

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>would never work, but they figured that they can make

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>some money in the short term, and being a bit

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on the more cynical side within that demographic of investors, uh,

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they figured that they could exit out of this thing

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 1>before it blew right so I think it's a combination

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of those things, you know, just you know, true belief

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and plus c v um cynicism and quick flip and

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>hopium not being adjusted to a new bear market. So

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>before we go, I want to like talk a little

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more about sort of what's happened or where we

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.919
<v Speaker 1>are now. And again, one of the things that we've

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>seen with Tara and Luna specifically is Tera continues the

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>stable cling continues to have these periods where it drives

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 1>up back towards the peg of a dollar. Meanwhile, Luna

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is just absolutely blown out and every day it's going

0:51:56.640 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>down by like in a a and the total issuance

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of I think there is like a hundred million, I

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and now there's like billions and billions. Can

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you walk us through like this sort of like weird,

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like I guess like put rigor mortis or something, or

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like afterlife of the court right now.

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:16.959
<v Speaker 1>The death was like, what is actually this like weird

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.720
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that we're seeing right now? You know, I totally

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, it's actually pretty bizarre. But there's a

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of theories here. So the first theory

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is that lf G Lunafination Guards still has some reserves left, right,

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and they know the timing of it. They decide, Okay,

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:34.399
<v Speaker 1>at this point, you know us T is too low,

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to exhaust the rest of it, and

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to support the price either for a

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>for people on the inside to get out, or for

0:52:41.880 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 1>be uh you know, altruistically to just get whoever wants

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to get out. Whatever remaining back holders want to get

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>out of USC they can with with the remainder of

0:52:50.280 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>these reserves. So that could be the case. Another possibility

0:52:53.920 --> 0:52:56.839
<v Speaker 1>is that uh, it's the arbors that are closing up

0:52:56.880 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this that that are pushing the us T price up

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>because the Luna protocol itself the underlying virtually and M

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 1>will always consider us T is worth one dollar of Luna, right,

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So as long as Luna has any bit in the

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>market and any market price in the market, you can

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:16.960
<v Speaker 1>always generate some kind of hyper inflating value to create

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>these dollars. So the issue is if you're guaranteed to

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>get a dollar for us T, all that happens and

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>let's say Luna or sorry, a dollar's worth of Luna

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for us T, and then Luna plunges by then whatever.

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Then to continue to redeem those, you just have to

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>create billions and billions of fresh lunas to meet that obligation.

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:42.400
<v Speaker 1>That pushes it down. Then the next wave of redeemers

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that makes even more billions, and so you have this

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:48.359
<v Speaker 1>like true hyperinflation to defend the peg. But that's what

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the AMM is supposed to do. I mean, this is

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the bot basically working as the code instructed it too. Yes, exactly.

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is actually a really great point

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that you bring up, Joe, And I think there's a

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting nuance here, which is that first of all,

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this is hyper inflation, but this is actually worse than hyperinflation.

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:11.759
<v Speaker 1>This is hyper hyperinflation because it's hyper inflation, which itself

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>is accelerating, right, So it's like it's hyper inflation of

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 1>hyper inflation. Basically, it's like exponentially bad, right because basically,

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as more and more luna get created, pushing the price

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>further down, exponentially more lunar needs get created. Right, So

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like maybe you like you burn a clip of ust

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and you have to mint a million luna, and then

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>next time you you do it, you have to mint

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a billion Luna and next time you have to do

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 1>do it, you have to mint a trillion lunar. Next

0:54:37.840 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>time you do, you have to minto quadrillion luna. Right,

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So it just like exponentially gets worse. Right. So, on

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 1>one hand, yes, this still does allow the UST holders

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to get out, But now there's kind of a political consideration, right,

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because the holders of Luna and the holders of UST

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:57.279
<v Speaker 1>are not aligned. Right. The us T holders don't really

0:54:57.320 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>care about the lunar price. You want to give the

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 1>thing down to, Yeah, points one, that's fine for them,

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as they have they meant enough

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that they can get out a dollar's worth or you know,

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 1>close to a dollar's worth of us T. Well, the

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Luna holders, you know, they're not happy that the us

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.359
<v Speaker 1>T guys just continuously crushing this price when no one

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in sight, I mean, we got yards to go, you know,

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:20.919
<v Speaker 1>there's no end and insight, right, Um, so I think

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there is some political disconnect between the interests of either

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the holders. And then I would say, finally, you know,

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>how does this actually end? Well, what I think is

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that in the end, you don't actually fully redeem out

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>all of this us T at a dollar you know,

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:39.399
<v Speaker 1>even if it takes forever, and even if you hyper

0:55:39.440 --> 0:55:42.840
<v Speaker 1>inflate Luna to like a Googleplex or whatever. Right, Like,

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you actually get out this us T

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:48.360
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, there is still

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a tick size constraint on exchanges. Right. So, like let's

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:59.279
<v Speaker 1>say the tick size on the exchange is one penny. Right, Eventually,

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:02.919
<v Speaker 1>if Luna it's actual fair value price is below half

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a penny, which rounds down to zero, and it's technically

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:08.880
<v Speaker 1>below one tick, then there will just be no bids

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in the order book. It will just be a one

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sided order book with only offers and no bid. Right.

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So at that point you can't actually complete this arm.

0:56:17.239 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't actually you know, sell that no matter how

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:24.359
<v Speaker 1>much Trillon's or Google's of of you know Luna you have,

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 1>there's just no market to sell it because it's worth

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>less than a tick, right, So like it, once that happens,

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 1>then basically everything remaining in us T is just bad debt. Right.

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:40.279
<v Speaker 1>So what is the market saying right now? I think

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's being, first of all, a little bit optimistic. I

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's saying that, you know, thirty eight cents on

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar basically they're saying that if everybody takes a

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 1>haircut of sixty cents, everybody can have thirty eight cents.

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:53.520
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I think this is wrong, but let's

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>say that this was right. Right, So if this was right,

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 1>then maybe that would be the fair thing to do.

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Everybody just takes a haircut, everybody gets thirty eight cents.

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But what's actually gonna happen is not not quite that.

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 1>What's going to happen is that thirty eight percent of

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:13.839
<v Speaker 1>people are going to get a dollar and people are

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 1>going to hold that debt word zero. Wow, that's really depressing.

0:57:17.000 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of depressing, so one of the things Joe and

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I were doing was we were looking at the subredit,

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the terror Luna subreddit, and there are some really sad

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:28.720
<v Speaker 1>stories out there, you know, people claiming to have lost

0:57:28.760 --> 0:57:32.840
<v Speaker 1>their life savings, um threatening to commit suicide, things like that.

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of the stories that struck me it was

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>someone who said that they had done all their research,

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they really believed in the project, and this happened to

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>them and they've lost a lot of money. And one

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things about crypto, at least to me,

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is it is such a polarizing space on the one hand,

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there are people saying this is going to be the

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:59.200
<v Speaker 1>next big thing Web three point oh, a new financial system.

0:57:59.240 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And on the other side, there are people who are

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is an outright ponzi. So I guess

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:06.959
<v Speaker 1>my question is, you know, someone comes and they see

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the same they read the same things about Terra and

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Luna that you do, presumably, and they come to a

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>completely different conclusion. How does crypto, as like a wider

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>space try to solve some of that tension? And what

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:24.920
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give to people who are trying to

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>evaluate these different projects or boxes. Yeah, you know, I

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think I think you're breaking bring up a lot of

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>very interesting topics there. Maybe just starting with that what

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say, And this is a bit more on

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the brutal side, but I think in crypto, you know,

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's literally the wild West. Everybody needs to be personally

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible for their own decisions and accountable to themselves, do

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>their own research, and that's kind of how a market works.

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>To people can look at the same mechanics, do the

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:55.920
<v Speaker 1>same research and come to different conclusions, and then based

0:58:55.920 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on the market mechanism, eventually one side is right and

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the other side is wrong. But that is basically the

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.920
<v Speaker 1>function of the market. The bet making here is exactly

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what creates the price discovery. So I don't think that

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there's anything particularly wrong about that. But I do think

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that people should think very clearly for themselves whether or

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 1>not they want to put up their mortgage on a

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>bet that they think is good. But maybe you know,

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have some doubt, maybe have have have some skepticism, to

0:59:22.920 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more skepticism, maybe don't put in

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 1>more than you can lose. And you know, my sympathies,

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think go out to all of these folks who

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, lost their home, lost their life savings, that

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:35.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. But what I would say is that

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 1>better that this happened now than later. You know, if

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if if us T was hunter billion and eventually there

0:59:42.360 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>was of bad debt or ninety billion of bad debt,

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would be way more devastating, right, I mean,

0:59:49.000 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 1>even more people would have lost their lost their shurts.

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I wish it would have unwound earlier. You know, I think,

0:59:54.680 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we've been great to have this unlinding last year,

0:59:57.360 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, at the end of the day, you know,

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>better now then later, at least well, so I want

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to just go back to your history with it, because

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you did. You've the reason people said you gotta have

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin on the show is because you have been allowed

1:00:11.640 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>critic slash skeptic publicly on Twitter about the model and

1:00:15.840 --> 1:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>about its unsustainability. But also, as we discussed, being wrong

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>can or being early can be devastatingly wrong when it

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>comes time to place a trade, and with us T

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular, because you have this big like tact are

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you you know you have to pay that if you're

1:00:31.880 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>going to short a stable coin or whatever. And the

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Luna just kept going up, even amid the sort of

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like broader crypto malaise of the last year. So what

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>did you see that? What you went from being like, Okay,

1:00:43.720 --> 1:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this is unstable too, Yep, Okay it's falling apart. Now.

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I always thought it was going to fall apart. I

1:00:50.040 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just didn't know when I actually thought the timing was

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not bad at all because I I thought this thing

1:00:54.040 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>would have lasted a little bit longer, to be honest.

1:00:56.440 --> 1:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is one of the more optimistic outcomes. Um.

1:01:00.120 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know what what I would say is

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, with all these kinds of mechanisms most

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of the time. You know, you look at all these

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of I call them money games, right, these i'll

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>go stable coins, these rebasing games. They've never gotten this

1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>big before, right. You know. You look at Home for example,

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>barely you know, Billy, I forget how much it was,

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was like it was, it was much much smaller,

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>right order magnitude smaller. Right, you look at like mem

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>You look at all you know, all this stuff. Mim

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>was a collateralized staple coin though, but I mean there

1:01:28.000 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was still some contagion from the time Wonderland fallout over there,

1:01:32.200 --> 1:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and you like e S D DSD based VAMS Basis Cash,

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>who some people think that do Quan was also the

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>founder of I've also heard that remark reported it um yesterday,

1:01:45.320 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact May eleven, that do Quan, the creator of Luna,

1:01:50.360 --> 1:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>was involved in the other stable, Elgo stable that crash

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>called Basis Cash. So at least they they it has

1:01:56.160 --> 1:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>been reported that that is the case. Yeah, I've been

1:01:59.840 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>here in that rumor for a while too. Um you know,

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's true or not, but you know,

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I tend to believe that that is true. Um So,

1:02:06.120 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But Anyway, these experiments have all been tried before, but

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>never to this scale, right, And that's what I thought

1:02:11.480 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>was particularly alarming, because even with the collapse of Wonderland time,

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>with the whole seafood drama, I mean, there was already

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>some contagion, but it was it was still well contained, right,

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but you could see that like any bigger and there

1:02:23.040 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>would just be massive whiteouts. You know. It's like at

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>some point the cancer really is it's terminal, right. And

1:02:29.920 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and for that one, we did some chemo, we came

1:02:32.200 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>out of Wonderland time. For this one, you know, it

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is stage four, you know what I mean. So this

1:02:36.480 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>one's a lot worse, right, So you know, So that's

1:02:39.280 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what really really got me thinking about this one

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:44.439
<v Speaker 1>in particular. And this is also why I've never really

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>called down any projects in the past. You know, if

1:02:46.520 --> 1:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you if you look at my Twitter. Um, first of all,

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I rarely tweet, and most of the times when I

1:02:52.000 --> 1:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do tweet, it's about some new obscure play that I found.

1:02:55.120 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I generally share Alpha and you know, you know, we

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>found FTT, we found WiFi in the very early days. Um,

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, you know, I think you'll find

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>some you know, interesting eleph and mostly on the positive side.

1:03:06.920 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think this one and I maybe just to

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>take a step back. One of the reasons that I

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>don't like calling out projects is because in some ways

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe you can stop human nature. Right, if

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>people want to gamble, if people want to play these

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>money games. Um, I think if you if, even if

1:03:21.440 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>if you can't really suppress it, and even if you did,

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it would come out in other ways, right. But I

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>think for this one in particularly, it was just so

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bad that I felt I had to say something because

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is just gonna be devastating for the space.

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, regulators are going to use this as an

1:03:34.960 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>excuse to basically put on more regulation, and this is

1:03:38.080 --> 1:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going to stifle innovation. You know, it's gonna be It's

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be a rough ride. What are the chances

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that someone comes to the rescue here and pours more

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>money into it and gets the machine going again. Well,

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that there probably is going

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to be some residual value in Luna and Ust, but

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>not until all of the bad debt on wines. Right,

1:03:59.680 --> 1:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's better to wait for the dust

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to clear out, and then you know, if you want to,

1:04:06.160 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you can just have you know, you can bid up Luna. Uh,

1:04:08.800 --> 1:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can have some price discovery. But what

1:04:11.240 --> 1:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that until that bad debt winds down,

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna have hyperinflation. You're just gonna have massive

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>selling pressure, crushing the price to a tick and then

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to note ticks. Right, So until that happens, you know,

1:04:24.480 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and and who who knows what the actual intrinsic value

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of an l one without the stable coin really is.

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it could be actually well higher than like

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>three cents or wherever it's training two cents right now.

1:04:35.320 --> 1:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It could be well well higher than that, but we

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>won't know that. We can't really have that price discovery

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>until all the bad debt winds out. So you know,

1:04:42.480 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for now, you know, I'm really no bid on Luna.

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think UST itself is going to go down. I

1:04:48.240 --> 1:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think three or eight cents on dollars. It's still too

1:04:50.040 --> 1:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>expensive to be honest, And then at some point bad

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>debt clears out and then people bid up Luna and

1:04:55.520 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>then it'll settle at its true fair value. But I

1:04:57.880 --> 1:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do think that they're doing the right things. I do

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think that survive as a chain. Will it ever be

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>top ten again? Very unlikely. I think something like this

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is so damaging to the reputation that I don't think

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it will ever happen again. Kevin So of Gila Capital,

1:05:11.960 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>fascinating conversation. We could talk with you over three hours.

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You're so clear, you're such a such a so good

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at explaining things. So glad we had you on odd

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Lash And yeah, likewise, really glad to be on. Thanks

1:05:25.240 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for inviting me. Absolutely, Thanks Kevin. That was so good. Yeah,

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that was great. Thank you, Kevin Tracy. Just in terms

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of how crypto defy these markets work, I think Kevin

1:05:49.360 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is the best guest we've had on that. I think

1:05:52.040 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>he was really good and really clear. He obviously has

1:05:55.400 --> 1:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credibility on this one as well, because

1:05:58.160 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he was such a big vocal critic of Luna Terra.

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you know, you can't just say, oh,

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>he's an anti crypto guy. He doesn't get it. It's

1:06:06.920 --> 1:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>all fun like he's actually invested in the space and

1:06:09.880 --> 1:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>called this one out as a bad actor, and he's

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly into the space because you know he you know,

1:06:16.360 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>he's on he's clearly of the view that you know,

1:06:18.440 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't want like massive regulatory response to this, and

1:06:23.400 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>also that if crypto is going to avoid big regulatory

1:06:27.400 --> 1:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>responses in the future, whichever one in the industry wanted

1:06:30.520 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to avoid, presumably there has to be like a greater

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>willingness to call out projects that are unsustainable. I also

1:06:38.320 --> 1:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>really like the description of the self reflexivity of the

1:06:42.680 --> 1:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>way Luna terror works. And you know, this is something

1:06:45.160 --> 1:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that I know we've spoken about before, but this idea

1:06:47.960 --> 1:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the ultimate sort of momentum play, but

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole system is predicated that at some point people

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>will want exposure that starts falling away because people start

1:06:59.680 --> 1:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>doubting the way the entire thing is working. Then it

1:07:02.560 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>just feels like there's almost a limited downside. And you

1:07:05.280 --> 1:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>asked the key question, and I still think that, like

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it seems like shades of great to me, the

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>difference between Tara Luna or some of these other DeFi things,

1:07:15.320 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>because with the stock, when the stock goes down, where're like, yeah,

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but the company is still selling a bunch of paint

1:07:20.720 --> 1:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're getting a lot of right, and so there's

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this cash flow that people want. But with a lot

1:07:25.400 --> 1:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of DeFi stuff where it's like token trading all the

1:07:27.800 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>way down. There is not like some natural other source

1:07:31.120 --> 1:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of cash other than you know is he put it great,

1:07:34.120 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>He said, if you get if you're getting a yield,

1:07:36.000 --> 1:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you're often just getting money from future bag holders. But

1:07:38.880 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's no more future bag holders. And I think

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that still is the case with many coins, even if

1:07:44.040 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not quite as convoluted or not quite as blatant

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>about how the box were. Yeah, and I mean the

1:07:49.560 --> 1:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>other thing I would say is this kind of arbitrage mechanism.

1:07:52.400 --> 1:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It is not unknown in the world of traditional finance,

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think a few people have drawn analogies with

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that Exchange traded his work and market making

1:08:01.520 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for those. But the difference is, you know, you're trading

1:08:04.680 --> 1:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a basket of stocks, and the stocks kind of have

1:08:08.560 --> 1:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>some sort of value, they're tied to some sort of

1:08:10.720 --> 1:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. For this one, the arbitrage is all about

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the crypto, and if you don't think the crypto has

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:19.639
<v Speaker 1>any value anymore, then it kind of collapses very quickly. Well,

1:08:19.640 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about this a long time, and I'm

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sure we will. Yeah, our producer is kicking us out

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the studio. All right, shall we leave it there?

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

1:08:31.200 --> 1:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Isn't though. You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart.

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Follow our guest Kevin So on Twitter. He's at Gail

1:08:39.840 --> 1:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>law Capital. Follow our producer Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Arman.

1:08:44.080 --> 1:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast Francesco Leavi at Francesco Today.

1:08:48.040 --> 1:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>And check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under

1:08:50.720 --> 1:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening to