WEBVTT - NBA Player Rankings #25-23: Chet Holmgren, Cooper Flagg & OG Anunoby

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The Volume. All right, welcome to Hoops tonight here at

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the Volume. Happy Friday, everybody, hopeful of you guys are

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>having a great end to your week. We are starting

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>our top twenty five player rankings finally today. Hopefully you

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>guys enjoyed our episode on Wednesday where we went over

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the rules and like how the list works, as well

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>as our seven honorable mention players that we went over

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in that video. Today we're hitting twenty five, twenty four,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three. You guys are the Joe Porgy started.

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to Hoops and Out YouTube channels you don't miss

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>any more of our videos. We need about sixty five

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred more subs to get to our one hundred and

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand goal, So you guys can help us a

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>lot by scrolling down and hit that subscribe button. If

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you already subscribed like this video, sign up for post notifications.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>That helps us a lot. And the last, but not least,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>before we get started, we are going to be doing

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>starting a week from today, Starting next Fridy, we're going

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to be doing mail bags on Fridays that cover the list.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you disagree with the ranking a player that

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you think is too high, too low, A specific two

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>players that you think should be swapped. Whatever it is,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>drop him in the mail bag, mail bag Colon in

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the comments underneath these videos. Mail Bag Colin, write your

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>comment about the player and we'll get to them in

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>our player rankings mail bags starting next Friday. All right,

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>without any further ado, let's talk some basketball. Number twenty

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>five Cooper Flag impressive Rookie of the Year campaign. Twenty

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>one points, seven rebounds, and five assists per game, fifty

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>five percent true shooting, two point one stocks per game.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Some huge games too, three forty five plus point games,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>six thirty five plus point games, eleven double doubles. He

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>had a thirteen game stretch late in the year where

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>averaged twenty six points, seven rebounds, and six assists with

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>two point seven stocks per game. Got to the foul

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and a ton in that stretch. Seven free throw attempts

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>per game is downhill attack earned him quite a few

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>trips to the free line. The shooting his jump shot

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not good, zero point eight three points per shot, broken

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>down by distance when he was inside of seventeen feet

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>forty three percent, twos outside of seventeen feet thirty three percent.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Threes just under thirty percent, like twenty nine and a

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>half break down by type twenty eight percent off. The

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>catch really struggled when he was unguarded, just under twenty

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seven percent on catch and shoot threes when he was

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>open and on film. One of the big things that

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>stood out to me when I was prepping for this,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he really slows down his.

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Release on catch and shoot threes.

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Like if you watch the difference between when Coop takes

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a pull up pull up threes or pull up twos,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he really takes off and gets a bunch of lift.

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking like you'll see you freeze frame in He's

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>got his legs extended in there, like two two and

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a half feet off the ground, Like he jumps on

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>his pull up jump shots, then on his catch and

0:02:55.320 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>shoot threes, he like really slows himself down. He barely jumps,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's almost like he's taking a set shot. And

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you'll notice is he leaves a

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of those catch and shoot threes short off the

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>front of the rim because of that kind of difference

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in his lift. Now, what ends up happening when you

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>do that when you jump really high on one and

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>then like set shot on the other. You know, between

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>catch and shoot and off the off the dribble jump shots,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you end up having problems with both because there's no

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>consistency between the two. Like I've talked about this before,

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>like when you're taking a catch and shoot three or

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you're taking a step back three. If I take the

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>step back three video, and let's say you know, you

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>do an in and out to a crossover hard step

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to your left, you plant that left foot way out

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to catch your momentum, and then you rise in fire.

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>If I pause right there on, when your feet gets

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>set and I play the video, it should look exactly

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like your catch and shoot jump shot, with exception of

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Like obviously, there are certain situations like post fades, you know,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>mid range fades where like you know you're snaking a

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll in your taken off at the elbow

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and landing damn near at the other elbow. Yeah, there

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are certain types of shots, especially in the mid range

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>where you're like drifting, but specifically threes. I don't care

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're taking it against the drop coverage just like

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>off a hesitation dribble, or you're taking it off of

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a side step step back, whatever it might be. If

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>you're taking it off of the catch, if you're taking

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it off the move off of the catch, if I

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>freeze frame off of you, like right when your feet

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>gets set and play the video, they should all look

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the same. That's your best chance to have consistency there.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And again, I'm not trying to be overly critical of

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Coop here, like this is actually a super common trend

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>among like young basketball players, aspiring shooters, players that are

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>still learning how to shoot. But I think that's gonna

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be what kind of helps turn around things for Cooper

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>with his jump shot is just getting some consistency in

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the amount of lift that he uses on both his

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>off the catch shots as well as his off the

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>dribble shots. He was thirty eight percent on pull up

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>twos broke down, like we talked about earlier, is better

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.679
<v Speaker 1>when he was inside of seventeen feet on pull up threes.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Now the jump shot is a real swing skill for Cooper.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk more about specific play types in

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes, but one of the consistent things that

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>really stood out to me when I was watching Cooper's

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>film is that his size, the downhill force that he

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>plays with, and then his vertical pop make it really

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>easy for him to get good looks at pull of

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>jump shots. Like there's a certain unguardability to being that big,

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that athletic, that aggressive towards the rim, but also having

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the ability to rise and fire from any spot on

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the floor. Cooper was getting good looks at jump shots,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he just wasn't making them. Once he becomes an elite

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>jump shooter, the sky's the limit, and he had some

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>really strong indicators from his rookie season, like he was

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>eighty three percent at the foul line, he was fifty

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>two percent on over one hundred and fifty floaters like

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that shows that he has really good touch. So it's

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just about tying together all those details, thousands of reps

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>to continue to refine the touch, some just slight changes

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to his form to get some more consistency between the

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>different types of shots that he takes. He's going to

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have to pay the price at the gym over the

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>next few summers, just thousands and thousands and thousands of reps.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 2>But if he does, he'll reap those rewards.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's going to reach a level of

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>unguardability with that pull up jump shot short range scoring.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Like we mentioned, fifty two percent one hundred and fifty

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>one attempts on floaters, had a little hook shot, didn't

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>take a ton of them. Who's sixteen for twenty seven,

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's fifty nine percent. Had some really impressive work in

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>low volume in the post, which we'll talk about in

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a minute, and then at the rim fifty eight percent,

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>which really is a respectable number for a rookie, a

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>high volume in poor spacing. He also got there a

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>ton six point seven attempts per game. That's really strong volume.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, he ranked twenty first. Cooper

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>flag ranked twenty first in the entire NBA in the

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>volume of attempts at the rim. He got to the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>rim more than Shako's Alexander. As a counter examples, really

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>really impressive aggressiveness from Cooper driving the basketball. We'll talk

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about all the different ways here in a minute. Let's

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>get into play times. Really effective in transition one point

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>two two points per possession on over three hundred possessions,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>so three hundred and sixty six total transition points last year,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>which ranked twenty fourth in the entire NBA. Twenty fourth

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in the entire NBA, and transition points spot up possessions Cooper.

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he didn't shoot well like twenty eight point

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>six percent on spot up threes, but he showed real

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>upside attacking closeouts last year and finishing in the short

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>range on wonderful pull ups in at the rim, which

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really boosted his his spot up efficiency despite poor jump shooting.

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>He's just really good at taking those closeouts, turning that like,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of like throwing that little pump fake

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and turning his shoulder, getting that leverage and just going

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>screaming downhill. This is what's so impressive about that to

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>shoot twenty eight point six percent on spot up threes,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but because he made fifty seven twos driving closeouts and

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>shot almost sixty percent on them, he actually converted spot

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>ups at zero point ninety nine points per possessions is

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>below average, but only barely like just barely below average,

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and better than you'd think considering he couldn't make catch

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and shoot threes like he was a legitimate threat in

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>spot up situations because of his drives. And another thing

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>where if he figures out that catch and shoot piece,

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he can become even more devastating attacking in off ball

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>situations when he gets to catch on the perimeter against

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a closeout pick and roll.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Now this I.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Actually thought this was one of the more impressive parts

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of Coop's game. Last year he ran seven hundred and

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen pick and roll. It's pretty high volume. Got zero

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>point nine to three points per possession including passes forty

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>fourth percentile, so just below average. But on film you

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can really see the vision of him eventually becoming a

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>very efficient, very talented pick and roll player. First of all,

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it gives him his best ability to get downhill as

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>an initiator in the half court. Like we'll talk more

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>about ISO in a minute, but Io was one of

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the uglier parts for me when I was watching Coop's

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>film because his first step quickness is not like a

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>strength of his right, Like, he's not dusting good defenders

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>off the dribble unless they're closing out at him, you know,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of advantage situation. But the ball screen

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty naturally gets the defender into trail position as he's

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>chasing you over the top of the screen, right, And

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>he's really talented when he gets into those circumstances. He

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>can start and stop his speed, you know, like you know,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is patient with his attacks, doesn't rush into the lane,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>puts the defender in jail. He's big and strong enough

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of pin the defender on his backside. He

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>has really good footwork, man Like.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>There were there were some plays.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>There was one I can't even remember which team he

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was playing against, where he kind of gets over the

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>top of the screen, has the defender and trail position,

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>stops and puts him in jail for a second, drives

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>down the left lane line, engages the big. The big

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>steps over and he just like pivots into a spin

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>move through the second defender who's trying to trap him

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>from behind, and then goes all the way to the

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>right side of the basket and finishes with the layup.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, man like the way that he could cause. Again, like,

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>athleticism is one thing, but footwork is the tool that

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>allows you to use your athleticism. Footwork is what gets

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you from point A to point B right Like, think

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of it more like natural talent versus technique. Athleticism is

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a natural talent. Footwork is a technique. You can have

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>great athleticism but not have a usefulness on the basketball

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>court if you don't know how to move from one

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>spot to the other. Cooper has excellent footwork on all

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of his counters, spin move step throughs, euro steps, all

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. He just has excellent footwork on

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>his drives. And then he has the short range scoring piece.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>This is huge, the huge upside for him in the

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>short term. Right, like I talk about his jump shot,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>his jump shot is gonna come around eventually, but like

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>right away, he can stop short of the rim and

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>make these floaters and make them at a pretty high clip,

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and so that makes him a very very good pick

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and role player already, with a lot of potential to

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>improve as the jump shot continues to come around.

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, he's not the most high level.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Playmaker you'll ever watch, Like he'll sometimes get into trouble

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on his drives and like leave his feet early to

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>throw a reckless pass or force something to the roller

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not there. But he's always been very good at

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>taking easy reads that show up in these actions. He

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>showed he'd like through some really impressive skip passes to

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposite court out of double teams and you know

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>ball screens where a low man comes over, not just

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in pick and roll but also in ISO's He had

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a couple ISO post ups where like he faced doubles

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and like dribbled away to get some space and then

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>like through a beautiful crosscourt pass to the opposite corner

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that some Mavericks player would miss because no one on

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that team could shoot last year. But uh, like the

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the it's the easy reads where he excels. Like when

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there's like a guy getting left open as part of

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the coverage, he'll take advantage of it. Nail help simple

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>swing pass, you know, like lob passes. If the big

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>steps up in ball screen, he'll hit the occasional lob

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>pass to like Musasise or you know Marvin Bagley before

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he left the team. But he'll he'll run inverted screens

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with guards too, and like he'll just throw a little

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pitch to you know Max Christy or Klay Thompson slipping

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the screen and like a guard guard screen.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Like he makes all the simple reads. It gets him

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>downhill where he's very good at changing pace and using

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>advanced footwork to get to his spots. Has the short

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>range scoring to kind of tie it off in the

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>short term. Once again, the jumper will be the swing skill.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>If he can get the pull up three into the

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>high thirties, the pull up two into the low fifties.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the rim pressure, the short range scoring, the playmaking,

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he could all come together and he could

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>become a really high level pick and.

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Roll player ISO.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>These were probably the ugliest reps I watched from him

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in my film study, out of any of the play types.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The numbers are actually okay, zero point nine points per possession,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>which is like, you know, just a little bit below average,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like pick and roll for him. But it's

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>more about the film here, Like when he's going against Smalls,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he can just relatively easily overpower his way close to

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the basket for one of his floaters that he shoots

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. It did pretty well against Smalls, But anytime

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he runs into a player, he can't overpower like a

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger forward, He can kind of struggle to turn the

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>corner in ISOs with his first step, and then it

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>turns into a lot of contested mid range jump shots.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Now once again, the upside there is if he can

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>become a better jump shooter because he does have the

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>ability to get the pull up off because of his

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>height in the threat of his drive. So really again

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just the thing is is like he does have

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a foundational trait which is a size strength and athleticism

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.239
<v Speaker 1>when he's downhill. So pick and roll has a foundational

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>trait for him because it kind of has a baked

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in angle for him by virtue of the screen. Right

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>ISOs are tougher for him because he doesn't have access

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to his foundational trait as much, but he still has

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the ability to shoot over the top. So that's why

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the jump shot such a such a swing skill for him.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Post ups, though, are another angle that don't are another

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like situation that take the emphasis off of

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>his first step quickness and put the emphasis on his size,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a strength for him. The post ups look

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>flat out awesome and are a really exciting part of

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>his development and something that I think MAVs fans should

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>be really excited about and that the MAVs coaching staff

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>should be looking to explore more. One point one seven

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>points per attempts on points per possession on fifty four

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 1>reps including passes, that's in the seventy ninth percentile inefficiency.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>He personally shot sixty one percent on his own shot

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>attempts out of the post.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>This year.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Again, the post up unlocks three of Cooper's best traits.

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>His size is excellent footwork like we talked about, and

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's short range scoring a lot of times, Like he'll

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just get into those spots and he will literally just

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>rather than backing a dude down, he'll catch on the

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>left block with the ball in his right hand and

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>he'll just dribble into the lane and take a floater.

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But again, like he's already close to the basket, he

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to turn the corner. He's just trying to

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like get a little bit of an angle to take

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a little floater right. But like he can pivot over

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>either shoulder. He's got like a little short turnaround jump

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>shots where he's more efficient there than he is when

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>he's further away from the basket. There's a lot of

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>upside for Cooper there out of the post that I

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>want to see him continue to explore. And again he's

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>got a nice little hook shot too that I think

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>he could use even more. On defense, I thought it

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>was a really solid first campaign showcase high level off

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>ball defense as a secondary rim protector as well as

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>jumping passing lanes. Had some really impressive blocks on rotations

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>at the rim. He can, like even on some of

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>these ISOs where he's defending, he can like get beat

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, but just recover and block that shit,

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>just simply because of the athletic tools that he has. Statistically,

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he was a great on ball defender. He defended sixty

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>two ISOs according to Synergy and allowed just sixteen made

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>shots and just four additional shooting fouls. So, in other words,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they scored on him just twenty times in sixty two

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>tries in ISO this season. It's really impressive. The main

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>guys he struggled with, if you look at the times

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he did give up baskets, mostly power players like Pallo

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>went through his chest, you know, Jaylen Brown went through

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>his chest, Kawhi Leonard went through his chest. Like those

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of guys can power through him. As he's still

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a smaller version of himself. He'll put on muscle, but

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>those are the only guys he's really struggling with there.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>But even then, like he can cause problems with his

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>length there, Like he had one where Nazried was trying

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to bully him and he like pulled the chair and

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then met him on the other side of the basket

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and just blocked him off the glass or brandon Ingram

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tried to like bury him on a post up towards

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the short corner, and he just like overplayed the strong

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>hand and used his length to like knock the ball

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>away from him and get his steel. This is ultimately

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what put Cooper into the top twenty five for me.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I just think he has an extremely high floor. He's

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a weapon in transition. He's a useful off ball player

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because he can slash closeouts. He's a really good post

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>up player already. He's average and pick and roll right now,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's showing a lot of upside there that I

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>think he'll continue to figure out and their flaws that

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think are fixable for him. And he's a good

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive player both on and off the ball. That's the

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>floor and the upside is crazy. Like I think he's

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>going to improve as a jump shooter. I think he's

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a really good year as a pick and

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>roll player. His tools are outrageous. I think his post

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>up volume is going to get increased. I think we

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>can book Cooper for twenty three, seven and six this

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>year with high level defense, and I wouldn't be the

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>least bit shocked if he got up to twenty five

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>points per game. A lot of that just depends on

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>how healthy Kyrie Irving is and whether or not he

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>gets traded and how much.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Usage he gets.

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>But like, if he gets the ball anywhere near as

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>much as he got it last year, he's gonna get

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five points a game. I'm a huge believer

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in Cooper Flag. I think he's going to be several

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>spots higher than twenty five when we redo these rankings

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a year from now. Today's show is brought to you

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>by a presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bets Sports Book. Some

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>sports fans call this slow period until football season, but

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on hard Rock Bet, we call it baseball season. In

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this summer, hard Rock Bet has the hottest betting odds

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, introducing ten cents summer sale, big juice fee,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>whatever you call it. We're cutting our cut on winners,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>spreads and over under pregame baseball bets, same bets, better odds.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're ready to step into the batter's box, sign

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>up with hard Rock Bet today and place a five

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet. If it wins, you get one hundred and

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus bets on top of your winnings.

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right, an extra one hundred and fifty dollars in

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your account and sure. Hard Rock Bet is Florida's only

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>legal sports book. But if you don't, you don't have

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to be in Florida to join the party. Hard Rock

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Bet is also live in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan, with more states on the way. So grab

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>your bat and swing for the fences all August long

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>during hard Rock Bets ten cent Summer Sale. Download the

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet app today and roll with us. Payable

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and bonus bets not a cash offer offered by the

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Seminal Tribe of Florida in Florida, offered by Seminal hard

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Rock Digital LLC. In all other states. Valid for money

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>lines spread and over under pregame markets with odds between

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>minus two fifty and plus two to fifty only. Must

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be twenty one plus and physically president in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling. In Florida, call one eight

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>three to three play wise.

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 2>In Indiana.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>If you or someone you know has a gambling problem

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and wants help, call one eight hundred and nine with it.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>In Arizona, Ohio, and Virginia, call one eight hundred my

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>reset gambling problem, called one hundred gambler in Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Jersey, or Tennessee Number twenty four. Chet HomeGrid.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>An award filled third campaign for Chet, second Defensive Player

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Year voting. We should probably just call this

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the non Wemby Defensive Player of the Year because no

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>one's taking that from Wemby for a while. But second

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>in Defensive Player of the Year, his first All Star selection,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>third team All NBA, First Team All Defense. Hell of

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a season for Chet seventeen nine and two were his

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>averages with two point five stocks per game, career high

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty five percent true shooting, and this was fueled by

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a nine percent increase in his efficiency at the rim.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>There was no increase in his free throw volume or

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>three point efficiency volume, anything like that. It was all

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>at the rim. Nine percent better at the rim this

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>year than he was last year. It was mainly fueled

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>by the offense, Like he was just fed so many

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>more opportunities to finish cuts and rolls this year. As

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, Chet in the twenty twenty five

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign got just one point one to six makes per

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>game on cuts and rolls. In this twenty twenty six campaign,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>he got one point eight four per game, So almost

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>double the opportunity to finish cuts and rolls this season

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>than he did last year. A product of the continuity

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and like all the reps that him and these guys

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have together, but also just the wonderful basketball fit between

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>him and Isaiah and Stein. And again, like I just

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the play that eliminated the Lakers in the

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>second round series with that, you know, at the end

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of this week, Blitz's shay on the ball screen, short

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>roll past Isaiah Hartenstein, easy little drop off past to

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>chat who gets the dunk. Like the tic tac toe

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sequences that Okasee got to take advantage of Chet as

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a vertical spacer were really dialed in this year. And

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he's just a really gifted vertical spacer. Super high standing reach,

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>very quick off the ground, great hands, just made him

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>really difficult to handle there shooting. He's kind of like

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>plateaued a little bit as a pro. As a jump shooter,

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>he's stayed right around four attempts per game every season

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of his career thirty seven percent as a rookie, thirty

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>eight percent as a sophomore, thirty six percent last year.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>So no real trajectory there either direction. Uh shot just

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven percent from three in the Spurs series.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 2>There's some struggles there. I want to talk about. We'll

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>get to.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the Spurs series really at

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of this of this segment, breakdown of the

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>jump shooting by distance forty nine percent inside seventeen feet,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight percent on long tows, thirty six percent from three.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Huge difference between when he was guarded and unguarded forty

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>four percent when he was opened thirty four percent when

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't. Kind of a slow release, which we'll talk

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more about when we talk about the Spurs series. In

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs thirty eight percent when he was opened, thirty

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>two percent when he was guarded.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Hooks and floaters.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't really take many twenty seven all season, just five

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, but he shot well sixteen for twenty

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>seven in the regular season, four for five in the playoffs,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>probably something he should explore more again twenty for thirty two,

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>let's bump that volume up. That's something he's very good at, right,

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>just those little short you know, hooks, floaters, short turnaround

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>jump shots, things like that. Very modest self creation leap

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>last year. If you look at twenty twenty five campaign

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>pick and rolls, ISOs post up so like anything. He

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>would create about twice per game twenty twenty five, about

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>four times per game in twenty twenty six, so still

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>low volume, but trending in the right direction. He doubled

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>his volume year over year, below a point per possession

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five, just about a point per possession,

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>just over a point for possession in twenty twenty six,

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>So significantly more efficient and double the volume, but he

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>does have a long way to go there to be

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like a legitimate scoring option or shot creation option. The

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>main reason that Chet is on this list at twenty four,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>despite being a pretty flawed offensive player and coming off

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of an extremely disappointing playoff run, is that I view

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>him as one of the best defensive anchors in the league.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Chet was the best non and wemb defender in the

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>entire league last year, like we talked about earlier, very

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>gifted rim protector, good at doing it without fouling as well,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like uses verticality extremely well. We'll talk about it in minute.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Probably could stand it fut a little bit more. We'll

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about that a little bit. But great timing, great

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>mobility on his rotations to the rim. But he's also

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>an excellent switch defender, and that's really the key with

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>him is the versatility, right, Like if you have him

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in a drop coverage, he can protect the rim. If

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you have him in helpside, like if Isaih Hartenstein's defending

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>pick and rolls and he's the low man, devastating rim protector,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but he also can switch, which is a really useful

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>weapon against pick and rolls, right, especially when Isaiah Hartenstein's

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on the floor too and they don't have to worry

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about size on the back line. Chet defended eighty six

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>ISOs last year and allowed just zero point eighty five

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>points per possession. That was seventeenth out of the fifty

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>players who defended at least seventy five ISOs last year.

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot of reps, really solid defense from him on

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>an island, just really good at like navigating that like

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>special balance as a tall player between like giving space

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of bait players into jump shots, but knowing

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the length to recover, but also giving space

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way that allows you to beat them to

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>spots when they try to drive. That's really the combination

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>of fluidity like athletic fluidity like mobility and length with

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Chet that makes them so devastating in switch situations. But

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that versatility is what makes them so valuable. You can

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>run from the five spot any pick and roll coverage

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you need, deep drop, high drop, you know, switching things

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>along those lines. And then also from the four spot,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>he's like a devastating lowman, you know when he's on

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the floor with Isaiah hartenstein Er, with Jalen Williams right,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and again, aside from a fluky hip injury which was

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>again a crazy rim confrontation from Andrew Wiggins, just kind

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of a bizarre play, he's been overwhelmingly available to his

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>team and he hasn't missed a single playoff game, which

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is a huge boost on a list like this, Right,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just having Chet on the floor gives your defense a

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>great chance to get stops. Combine that with elite play

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>finishing as a vertical spacer. On offense, he's a knockdown,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 1>wide open three point shooter. He shoots him well when

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he gets lots of space, and he has some ability

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to put the ball on the floor and score. Put

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>all that together, he just has an extremely high floor

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>as a basketball player, and that's what keeps him on

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this list despite the rough end of the season. Now,

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about this San Antonio series. There are three

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>things from that series that I think are worth talking

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about that if Chet can fix, he can flip the script.

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And the first part is just mental. It's confidence. The

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>most disappointing thing about what Wenby did to Chet is

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>how he responded mentally, like there just wasn't really much

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of a fight from him. It looked like Wemby kind

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of sapped him of his confidence. They will play the

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Spurs in the playoffs again at some point and Wemby

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>will try to do it to him again. And step

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>one is stay in the fight mentally, stay locked into

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>who you are as a basketball player. Hang onto the rope,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>don't stop throwing punches. The numbers from this are crazy.

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Chet took ten shots forty nine times in the regular season,

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and six times in the first two rounds of the

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>playoffs six times in eight games. Just once in seven

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>games against the Spurs did he attempt ten field goals.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>That can't happen.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>That's you losing who you are as a basketball player

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>as a product of what's taking place in the mental

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dynamic of the game. So that's the first part. He

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just has to stick with it mentally, stay in the fight.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Second piece has to speed up his catch and shoot release.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the most disappointing statistical thing about Chet's performance in

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the final or in the Western Conference finals was his

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lack of three point volume. The Spurs closed out hard

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>on his catches, mainly with guards, and he was constantly

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>spooked out of his release into like pump fakes or

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>drives when he was supposed to be spacing the floor.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And a big part of that is his release is

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just slow and he has like a big wind up.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>So as a result, his volume drops against elite defenses,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and his efficiency when he's contested drops off. Like we

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier, massive drop offs for Chet in his

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>three point percentage when there's a contest versus when there's

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>not a contest.

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 2>At his size, He's got.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>To get quicker and more fluid with his release at

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the very least, if all of the other parts of

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>his game fail him, he needs to be a thread

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>outside the three point line, especially considering Isaiah Hartenstein is

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>such an important part of how the Spurs of how

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the thunder Half to compete against that particular Spurs team.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I actually think in general he could benefit from playing faster,

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>like even in his one on ones, like, he's never

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna win a leverage battle is too upright, too skinny, right,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>So he's got to win on the floor with his

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>speed and with his length, and so just in general,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like catch and rip, catch and go quick, catch and

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>shoot quick. I just want everything with Chet to be

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like sped up a little bit. I think

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that will help him a lot. The third piece of

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it is actually the defensive end of the flour. I

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>also thought that Chet allowed the dynamic with Wenby to

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>negatively affect his aggressiveness around the rim. Defensively, we talked

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>about this during the series. He was nowhere near physical enough,

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Spurs guards consistently finished through his chest and

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>around him at the rim. And this is where I

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think Check could actually stand to pick up more fouls,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be more physically aggressive in his contests, meet players further out,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>hold his ground more. Rim battles can be one on

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground every bit as much as they can be

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one in the air, And I thought last year there's

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a little too much of this. Just go vertical and

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 1>don't bring any aggressiveness to those rim confrontations. Spurs players

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>went right through him. Overall, I think the series would

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be very good for Chet's career. Obviously, you never want

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to lose, and you certainly never want to be embarrassed,

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>but embarrassment can be a great motivator. And I think

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Chet's gonna have a great offseason, and I think he's

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>going to come into next season as a very different

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball player. Last player for Today number twenty three og

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>An Andobi, fresh off of an incredible championship winning postseason,

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Ognob cracks our top twenty five list for the first

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>time in his career. We very rarely get like role

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>players on a list like this. Usually our list is

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>dominated by ball handlers and like defensive centers that are

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in that like eighteen to twenty two points per game list.

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Chet Holmgrin bam Adebayo like that, kind

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of guy. But the reason why og is on this

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>list actually has a lot to do with this ball

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>handling ability, But that's a postseason question. Let's quickly go

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>through his regular season stuff. Modest regular season seventeen to

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>five and two two point three stocks per game, sixty

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>two percent true shooting, was second team All defense, so

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>like good but nothing like spectacular, right, okay shooting. He

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was very good off the catch for two percent catch

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and shoot threes, forty eight percent unguarded catch and shoot threes.

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Brutal pull up shooting season, though, He's just twenty eight

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for one oh four on pull up jump shots, one

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for nine on hooks and floaters, So some dark spots

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in his you know, some uh inefficient spots in his

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>shooting numbers. Sixty five percent at the rim, though, which

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is very good play type stuff. Like really a bad

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>year for him as a shot creator. He's well below

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>point for possession in pick and rolls, ISOs and post

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>ups this year. But Ojananobi is one of the best

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>playoff risers in the NBA, and last year was his

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest rise yet. He's built for playoff basketball right, combination

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of size and strength as well as speed that allows

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>him to basically just win physical battles all over the floor,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>leverage battles, speed battles, vertical battles like you know, on offense,

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>when he's trying to turn the corner on somebody, he

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>blows through that shoulder because he's so strong on defense,

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>when a guy's trying to turn the corner on him,

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he regains control with his physical leverage, right fighting for

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>rebound positioning, you know, getting through screw all that kind

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Speed battles like just having to get up

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and down the floor and transition, keeping up with small guards.

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He's garden deeron fox in the finals for stretches right.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And then vertical battles like to tip in in the

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>NBA Finals, like the block shots. E's seven blocks in

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Finals, Like just he wins all sorts of

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>battles because of his physical tools, and that's what makes

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>him a playoff riser. He's also just in general, always

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>been very good at making shots when he can get separations.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So like when you piece those two things together, it's

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's generally the what makes a playoff riser is like

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy who can physically handle all of the confrontations

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and get to his spots. But that's also capable of

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>finishing plays when he gets there. Og Nnob averaged twenty

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>points per game in that playoff run on seventy two

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>percent true shooting. But it wasn't just knocking down threes,

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>although he was a preposterous sixty percent on open threes

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in that playoff run. Just ridiculous, but og I thought

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was New York's second most reliable shot creator in the

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>half court. If it felt like when you were watching

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks this year, if it felt like like ogn

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Andobi just would like get the ball with five on

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the shot clock and just go get a big bucket

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>over and over again every time the Knicks needed him,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what happened. He took forty one shots out

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of picking rolls in his one on ones, and he

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>scored fifty three points on them, one point two to

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>nine points per possession. Ognnobi is the only role player

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>on this list because he's very simply the best role

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>player in the NBA. He's a great perimeter defense option

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>both against quick guards but also power wings. His rim

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>protection is a huge part of that title run for

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks in transition and in help side. He saved

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>them a game in the NBA Finals with the transition

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>block again, block seven shots in those five games, average

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>six point three rebounds per game in the playoffs, great

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>rebounder play Finisher scored one hundred ninety one points in

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>transition and spot up situations, all on absurd efficiency, almost

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a point and a half per possession. But you can

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>also give him the ball and ask him to create

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a shot and he'll do it at a level of

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>surgical efficiency. He was simply amazing in that title run

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Knicks. Deserves a boatload of credit. And again,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean we didn't even he won an NBA Finals

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>game with an offensive rebound tampin. He's the best role

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>player in the NBA. I feel like it's under selling

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>him to even call him a role player with the

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>work he can do off the bounce. Just an incredible

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>basketball player. I'm just really happy for him to have

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the moment that he did, and he very much belongs

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in our top twenty five this year at number twenty three.

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, guys, it's all I have for today is

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>always a sincerely appreciate you guys for supporting us in

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>supporting The show will be back on Monday with twenty

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>two to twenty one and twenty I will see you

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>guys then