WEBVTT - Love at First Sight

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Douglas and we're coming off of Valentine's Day here, but

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>the war still sort of continuing. Um. We rolled through

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>five or six topics on Valentine, the issues from the

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>science of lingerie to uh to what happens in a

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>passionate kiss, to the color pink. The color pink and

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what it's hiding. Yeah, and it's hiding hiding quite a

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>bit as we explored. But today we're gonna we're gonna

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>really tackle the final piece of the puzzle and and

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the big tropes about romantic love, love at

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>first sight. Yes, I saw him from across the room.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>He looked at me. I looked at him. Sparks flew

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>were married just hours later. Is that your story? But

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a big Hollywood trope, you know, like

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the you're in a bar, you're somewhere across the room

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know you lock eyes. Time stands still, Yes, yes,

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you're outside of time all of a sudden. Um. And

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say that love at first sight couldn't exist.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I suppose there's a possibility, but in some ways, today's

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>episode is a bit of a trojan horse, like we're saying, hey,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>just love it, first sight exists. But really, what's inside

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that trojan horse is this idea that when you do

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>walk eyes, there's a kind of autobiography of things going

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>on to that leading up to that moment that are

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>influencing the way that you're even locking eyes with that

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>person and assessing them, and that there's probably a lot

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>more going on than just this instant, palpable chemistry. Indeed,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>now I think it's probably a good good point in

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast to just sort of establish our own take

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on this. Going into it, I definitely thought might take

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>changed a bit and exploring the information. But where where

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>were you on the idea of love at first sight

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>prior to this research? Well, I always feel like this

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is just a case of semantics like love, lust, intrigue, interest,

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are all sorts of things that come

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>up when you're in a room and there are strangers,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's always an excitement when you do lock eyes

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>with someone that you feel like you have a connection with.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I've never thought of it as like

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this sort of you know, you just got swept off

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>your feet and you locked eyes thing. Okay, Yeah, I

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like for my part, it's definitely a trope that

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I always kind of looked down on a bit. And

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe even if I was feeling a bit hot on

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the topic, I would say that the idea of love

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>at first sight cheapens love and and and yeah, just

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of cheapens that the real sustained love that one

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>has that you build over time. You know. It's kind

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of like saying, hey took me ten years to paint.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Look at this painting I did, and then someone said, hey,

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>yeah I just learned to paint and I made a masterpiece.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, No, you didn't make a masterpiece like the

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>thing that I've been building all this time. Like this

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is surely more substantial to than this, you know, brief

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>look at a bar and yeah, there there's some things

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to that. It is. Yeah, that's the thing about it.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Like now, having looked at the research which we're going

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to discuss in earnest here, Uh, you know, I I

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>have to give a little more credence to the idea

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>or at least the experience of love at first sight.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I'm at this point, I'm no longer

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going to say you were not feeling love at first sight.

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, you were feeling something. And if you want

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to classify his love at first sight, it could have

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>been something and it bloomed into love. Is that what

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting from you? Yeah? Yeah, okay, all right, Well,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>before we kind of go into the different aspects of this,

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to roll out some statistics. There's a

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand Gallop poll that found that while so many

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Americans believe that there is such a thing as the

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>one true love, overall, only of people think love could

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>occur at first glance. And here's the interesting thing about this. Um,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if you break this down by gendercent of men think

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's love at first sight compared to women. It's

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a slight uptick, but it's an uptick. Nonetheless, it seems significant.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean especially you know, if you're standing outside of

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the figures, one might one might be tempted to expect

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the female percentage to be higher. You know, well, I

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:38.559
<v Speaker 1>think that would be the stereotype. Women just can't help

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>love and love, right, But um, maybe it's a situation

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of the stereotype exists, and men are more likely to

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>buy into the stereotype, and women of course know that,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.119
<v Speaker 1>having the brain of women know that it's not quite

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so cut and dry. I don't know. I just don't

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>even know now, A Lea Malik Pines. A psychologist Ben

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Gearing on your university in Israel, found in a survey

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that a small fraction eleven percent of people in long

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>term relationships said that they began their courtships with love

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>at first sight. So that's that is pretty small, and

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just that area. And and particularly there's a sort

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>of cultural lens to you that we're looking at things

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about love at first sight. But still

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who say that's that's how my

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>relationship began and begun. Is key here because as we're

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss a lot of this falls into the

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>into an exploration of the timeline of romantic attachment, the

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>timeline of say, any successful or doomed relationship, however you

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>want to look at it and how it transpires and

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>then how we look back at it. Yeah, and timeline

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is important. I'm glad that you brought that up to you, because, um,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about love at first sight. Again, it's

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a case of semantics, because if you look at someone's work,

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>like biological anthropologist Helen Fisher, she might say, Okay, that

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>could be of at first sight a couple of seconds

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>up to maybe three minutes, depending on what's going on

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in the brain and how primed the brain is. And this,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this is where we really need to turn to you know,

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>some good old m r Eyes and take a look

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>into the brain to figure out what's going on. Indeed,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>so let's go back to that sort of the bar trope, right,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Like what's happening when person a in person be suddenly

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>locked glances and there's that magical moment and the music

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>starts up. It could be it could be some music,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but essentially what's happening is your your your eyes are

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>locking on, but your brain is locking on to a target.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like a scene in Top Gun right

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>where the you're you're trying to lock the missiles before

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you fire the heat seeking missile at the enemy. MiG right, um,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Except when our brains do this, we're sucking away from

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>other faculties. Were sucking away Environmental stimuli are processing of time.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>We're using some of the same parts of the brain

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that are also involved in time and perception. So it

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>begins to it feels like time is standing still. It

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>feels like everything else is sort of fading, uh into

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the periphery, because it sort of is from from just

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a computational side of things. Yeah, especially if you consider

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with the chemistry in the brain.

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Because as I had mentioned before, you're in the room

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>full of people who are strangers, there's already an element

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of intrigue. You lock those eyes, and maybe when you

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, that triggers the release of dopamine in the

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>brain's reward system, which in turn may motivate you to

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>approach that person. Because if we've learned anything about dopamine

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the reward system, we know that, um, there's kind

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of bread crumb trail being made here, and the more

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you can revisit it and get more things of that dopamine, well,

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the happier your reward system is. So hey, why not

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>go and then talk to that person and see if

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you can increase the dopamine in your brain. Yeah, all

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>under the dress of elation, passion and this and this

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>cultural idea of romantic love, right, Yeah, and that's kind

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of what is setting the stage for your brain for

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea of love. Because if you look at this

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>meta analysis study, it's called the Neuroimaging of Love and

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it was conducted by Syracuse University's professor Stephanie Ortiga. It

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>found that when people are engaged in this sense of love, um,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that there are twelve areas of the brain that work

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>together to release euphoria inducing chemicals like dopamine, oxytocin, adrenaline,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's oppressing and then that's what is culminating to

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>express that feeling of love. And according to this meta analysis,

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this can happen as early as point two seconds of

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>visual contact. All right, so you're locking in on target

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can can even think of the dopamine kicking

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the various other alk hormones were mentioning. It's kind

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of the the ignition behind the heat seeking missile, like

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>go out there, go to the next stage, right. Um.

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's also interesting in this study they pointed out

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that these euphoria inducing drugs that are suggesting love, Um,

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's akin to using cocaine. Yeah, And uh, that's what's

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting about this. There's, uh, this idea that newly found

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>love sparks in areas of the brain that are associated

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>with euphoria inducing drugs. So that's that's that feeling of cocaine.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And also, just as a side note, this is why

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>when new love crashes like you know and and burns,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>um and you are with drawing from that person, withdrawing

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>from you, you feel that sense like you're withdrawing from

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a drug because no longer is that source available to you.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>You're coming off of your fix and you're gonna need

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>another fix. It also draws back to our previous episode

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that we did I Believe on the Dark Side of

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sarahtonin um. So, any of these chemicals, you know, even

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>though we talk about like the love hormone and the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>fuel good neurotransmitter, etcetera, like these are that the brain

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is a complex system. In various parts of the brain,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>various neuro transmitters are are pulling at least a double duty.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And so there even though there's there is a positive

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>spin on any of these interactions, there's also a potential

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>negative one. Indeed, um No, again, you just have to

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of look at it as this again, this idea

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>of you know, split second love or love at first

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>sight is perhaps more like there's some chemistry going on

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the brain that is setting this stage for love.

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And Helen Fisher again, she is that biological anthropologist, and

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>her ted talk called the brain and love. She says,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>there are now three academic articles in which they've looked

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>at this attraction which may only last for a second,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's a definite attraction in either the same brain region,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this reward system or the chemicals of that reward system

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are involved. In fact, she says, I think animal attraction

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can be instant. You can see an elephant instantly go

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>for another elephant. And I think that this is really

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the origin of what you and I call love at

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>first sight. Yeah, we're talking about animal favoritism here. Um

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>mate choice, female choice, sexual choice instantly. What comes to

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>my mind is just like two beatles dancing around each

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>other on a tree limb. And then ultimately you can

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>say that any human interaction, with its levels of human complexity,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is essentially the same thing. It's that little dance to

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>see if these two pieces are gonna lock up. Yeah,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>in some ways it's kind of thin slicing, right, assessing

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the situation. All Right, we're gonna take a quick break,

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and when we get back, we're gonna talk about imprinting.

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>But we're not going to talk about Twilight, the movie

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and imprinting. We promise. Alright, we're back. I know you

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just promised we weren't going to talk about Twilight. But

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of course you're referring to the the imprinting that occurs

0:11:54.960 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>when a werewolf sees a half vampire baby also love

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with it. Just to clarify for anyone out there, it

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't know what they're talking about Twilight,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but and the same thing happens in humans. Well, no,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit more complicated. Um in Printing refers

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to a really critical period of early time in an

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>animal life when it forms an attachment and develops a

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>concept of its own identity. So birds and mammals are

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>born with the pre programmed drive to imprint on their mother.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>And this sort of imprinting provides animals with information about, hey,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this is my mom, or this person or thing or

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>animal is really important to me, And later on this

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>can determine who they will find attractive when they reach

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>adulthood or who they pair up with. And there are

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of studies that actually support this in humans

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and in other animals. Yeah. I mean we're ultimately talking

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>about a predisposition to fixate on particular types of people.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the exact parameters are obviously going to vary

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It might relate to race, like you said,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>hair color, um, But ultimately it's kind of aiding a

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>rough template of what you're supposed to look for. Yeah,

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And just so you have an idea of how easy

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it is to imprint in the animal world. Um. I

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring up the example of Austrian naturalists Conrad Lawrenz,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>who became the first to sort of um codify this

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>right and established the science behind imprinting. And he found

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that when baby birds emerged from their eggs, they'd imprint

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on whatever animated thing was in front of them. And

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so he tested this out. He himself became the thing

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that they imprinted upon, and they followed him around and um,

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he became the object of their affection. And then he

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>also would put in other mother's substitutes. And he found

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that those birds would just as easily attached to inanimate

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>objects and oddities such as a pair of gum boots.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, this is the guy you would you see

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the images even treking around in the boots, Yes, a

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>white ball and even an electric train. I Again, this

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is if it was presented at the right time when

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they were emerging and trying to figure out something to

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on into again, harness their energy into figuring out

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what was important, who was important, and who they were. Yeah,

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean from a biological standpoint, like life is essentially

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a matter of scaling this mountainous survival to fulfill your

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>genetic mission, you have to reach the top of it,

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and imprinting is sort of a way of finding those

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>first hand and footholds as you make the ascent. Yeah.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Now in humans, it's, uh, it's perhaps not as clear cut,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but there are a couple of studies. There's a two

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand three study called sexual imprinting and Human mate choice.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>In this uh that the abstract actually says, quote, we

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>report that homogammy in humans is attained partly bi sexual

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>imprinting on the opposite sex part parent during childhood. We

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>hypothesize that children's fashion a mental model of their opposite

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sex parents phenotype that is used as a template for

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>acquiring mates to phenotype meaning like the physical characteristics, and

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that it goes on in this abstract to say, to

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>disentangle the effects of phenotypic matching and sexual imprinting, adopted

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>daughters in their rearing families were examined. Judges found significant

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>resemblance on facial traits between daughters husbands and their adopted fathers. Furthermore,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this effect may be modified by the quality of the

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>father daughter relationship during childhood. Daughters who received more emotional

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>support from their adoptive father were more likely to choose

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mates similar to the father than those whose father provided

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a less positive emotional atmosphere. And this, to me feels

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like one of those adoy moments because you see this

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>alive classic Oh I married my mother, I married my father,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and also just the myth of the of Oedipus marrying

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>your mother murdering your father. It's it's kind of funny

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>because as we'll look at the next section here on

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>gene um compatibility or genetic compatibility, it's a fine line here.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>You want someone who's similar enough and the traits that

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you admire and a parent, because hey, your parent was

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>attracted to that parent and had successful offspring, the same

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>thing could happen for you, right, But you want enough

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>genetic diversity to strengthen any offspring that you might have. Yes,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And if I can just return to the Top Gun analogy,

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's identifying the any plane, there's a certain type

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of plane you need to shoot down. Yeah, poor Goose.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I have theories about Goose. I really wanted to see

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a sequel to Top Gun where Goose lived and was

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>reprogrammed by the Soviets the Battle matter that that would

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have been a movie that I really could have wanted

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to have seen. Uh oh, well, you never know. Maybe

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>there'll be some sort of reboot, maybe maybe by Robert

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>liam Alright, But in terms of genetic compatibility, again, we

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>can look at the animal world. There's a study from

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>April two thou and nine, the issue of the journal Genetic,

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>in which researchers from Cornell University found that female fruit

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>flies are biologically primed to sense which males are more

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>genetically compatible with them and to make more eggs after

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mating with good matches than they do with less compatible matches.

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And so these findings suggest that the females can somehow

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>judge a potential mate upon their first meeting and then

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>biologically react to boost the chances of producing against successful offsprings. So,

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and we bring this up because we want to kind

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of say that whole love at first sight thing isn't

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just okay, you locked eyes and um, this person kind

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of has these traits that you admire. There's other stuff

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>going on to Yeah, there's a lot of stuff going

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>on underneath the surface. Um. And with the fruit fly situation,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of that is also related to avoiding

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>hooking up with a close relative, which obviously is genetically speaking,

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>not a wise move for for any organism. Uh. But

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>then the human crossover for this is is pretty spectacular.

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Now with the fruit flies, I mean a lot of

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this is as simple as programming to keep one fruit

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.239
<v Speaker 1>fly from mating with a close relative and you know,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and stirring up the genetic ramifications of that. But then

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>when we when we look at how this plays out

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>in the human sphere, we see, uh, we see a

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more complexity. Um, depending how complex you want to

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to to make sniffing one another person's sweat or you know,

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>engaging in a makeout session with them. Yeah, again, that's

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>just it's complex biochemistry and the fruit flies are exhibiting

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the us and humans we have seen in studies exhibit

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>this when they sniff the sweaty armpits of T shirts

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>worn by the opposite sex. Again, this is like sort

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of gender normed studies that we're talking about here. But

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that women were more uh more likely

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to select a mate with someone who had a far

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 1>different genetic expression than their own, because again, you need

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>genetic diversity that's going to uh, that's going to result

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in stronger offspring, and that again as part of the

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>whole genetic mission of of any organism. Um. So, so

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we begin to have this picture emerging of it's it's

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like multiple scans are going on, you know, kind of

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>rowbody computer re star trek scans almost if you want

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to use that analogy, and and then you almost have

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>different departments that are reporting back on how things are

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>matching up, like all right, does she look like our mother? Yep,

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it looks like our mother. Right, we're gonna go on that.

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you have the other the other department, and

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>they're like, all right, well, we're making some sense of

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the genetic combatibility here. Um, we're taking in the smells,

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we may have to take in some of the saliva

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>as well. And we're gonna see what the test results

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there are. So so they're they're they're kind of these

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>different it's almost like trying to get legislation passed or something. Yeah,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're right in if you think about it that way,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that locking eyes across the room. Alright, dopamine all right, now,

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>go inch forward and meet the person to get more dopamine. Now,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>further assess and then yes, at the end of the night,

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there might be the swapping of the spit to further

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>assess whether or not you're compatible. And in our mind

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>it's all playing out like like like like a French

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>romance movie, but but under the surface, it's it's a

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lot more complex, weating outgoing. Yeah, and there's another element

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>here that is pushing the needle a bit when we

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about this love at first sight, and it's called

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a sort of mating. And we already know that people

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>tend to gravitate towards each other based on their shared

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>socio economic and education backgrounds. Right, So if you ever

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>heard the phrase, uh, birds of a feather fly together, Yes, Yeah,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like this, like you're seeking out someone

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>who is like you, and we know that we're doing

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>this even when we're not trying to go after some

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of relationship, we just tend to do, you know,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with each other. When when we're connecting with one another. Yeah,

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean people you can have conversations with about the

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>things that matter to you. Do you end up engaging

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>with people that are kind of from the same background

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or have similar interests. Well, it turns out that there

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>may even be a body fat component to a sort

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of mating. There's a two thousand and seven study in

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>which the researchers, who are based at Rout Research Institute

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>in the University of Aberdeen, measured the body composition of

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>forty two couples using a sophisticated technique called dual energy

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>X ray absorbed geometry, and the results show that the

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of body fat in one person was proportionately very

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>similar to that of their partners. And so there's this

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>idea that not only do we try to find similarities

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and our you know, socio economic backgrounds and what our

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>taste and music are, but maybe even the shapes of

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>our bodies. Yeah. Now that the study point out that

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unclear though, exactly how these associations come about.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do the social activities of of overweight and

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>obese people just merely conside to the you know that

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the social activities of active runners, they just happened to concide.

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>You met this person while you were engaging in similar

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>activities that have an impact on your physical fitness or

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, or vice versa. So we're just more likely

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to meet people that have a similar body index. Yeah,

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of feel like across the board, obviously

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't see this. I mean, you see plenty of

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>examples of couples who don't match up in terms of

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>body type or body fat. Yeah, I mean I think

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.479
<v Speaker 1>it was Paula Abduel that that pointed out that opposites attract, right,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that was the big track. Yes, it was Paula Abduel.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But as we've discussed before, opposite they do attract. But

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>can you still have to have enough there in common

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>in order to make that whole dynamic work. So again,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it kind of comes back to this idea of multiple

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>m committees weighing in. And so one committee might say

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they're a lot shorter than we are, I'm not sure

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna match up, And they'll say, well, but

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the stats on the genetic compatibility, look at

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the stats on whether she looks like our mother. All

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>these things are looking good. So we're gonna we're gonna

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe pass on worrying about high her body mass index

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in this case. Yeah. A lot of this dates back

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to nine seventy study from social psychotist K. Reuben where

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to a college student couples gave him me to each

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of them a survey asking questions about the relationship, and

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>then put them in a room measured their gaze uh

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And what he found was you saw stronger

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>connections of love or at least reported love on the questionnaires,

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>matching up with more prolonged eye contact. So the more

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and again this is another one of those that sounds

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious. It seems like an overstatement of the obvious

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>when we we spell it out like this, But the

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>idea that if you're making more eye contact between these couples,

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>there's more love present, stronger connection. I also wanted to

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>mention that just the bear gaze, when you're you're looking

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>out across the room at someone, um, if you're giving

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a really direct gaze, um, and that person is perceiving

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>that already. The fact that you're like, you're trying to

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>get that person's attention, is going to ratchet up your

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>attractiveness one notch. It's kind of like this mutual admiration society, right,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you both are kind of like baseline attracted

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to each other and you notice that you're looking at

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>each other, there's that oh you're looking at me, I

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>must be attractive to you, and so on and so forth. Now,

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this is again one of those adoin moments. But if

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you smile, that's going to give even more, you know,

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the confirmation that, yes, you should pursue this. If you

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do not smile, of course, this is going to tell

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the person that you're not interested unless you look away

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and don't smile. There's something to this, like you maybe

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>catch eyes, you look away and you're not smiling, you're

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit mysterious about loose and this was

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>This was actually proven out in a two thousand six

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>study from the Institute of Neuroscience Psychology at the University

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>of Glasgow in case anyone just really wanted some some

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hard science to back up back that up. You know.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It also reminds me of a story that a friend

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of mine told me, and that maybe some people can

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>relate to. So, my wife a couple of friends. They

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>were traveling on a subway in New York and one

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of the friends in this group has this, uh like

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>when she feels nervous, she smiles. And so they were

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>leaving like a restaurant or something, and like some guy

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>was interested and she wasn't interested, but she was kind

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of like nervous, so she made eye contact and smiled,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and like the dude ended up following them on the

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>train for like a long portion of their leg back

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to where they were staying, to the point where they

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>had to like stop him and say, look, we just

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>need to go on because she's just just a nervous

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>tick with her. Well, also there is um, I'm sure

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that simint arts stuff Mom never told you has probably

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>covered this before too. There's a cultural expectation that women

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>should smile back. Yeah. I was thinking about that, um,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's the whole the word one of the one

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the worst, well, one of the many bad things

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you can say to a female say hey, honey, why

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>don't you smile more? Right? Right? Coming from maybe like

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>older gentlemen at a fruit stand or something, right, yeah,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or you get stuff like you'd look a lot prettier

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're smiling, and then you just want to punch

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the person. Yeah, because its matching up with the state.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like they're saying, I would want to

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>mate with you more if you would smile for me.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that's horrible, right, do my bidding right now. I

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know you, but right now I want you to smile. Uh.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, So that again as part of those those

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>unconscious um communications that were throwing at each other all

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the time. Now, Cheryl Murphy, writing for Scientific American, looks

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.719
<v Speaker 1>at the gaze and smiling in a little bit more

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>deaf and she reports that in one study, Kellerman at

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>All took seventy two unacquainted undergraduate students and they split

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>them into male female pairs and then studied the effects

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that two minutes of uninterrupted mutual eye contact had on

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>their feelings towards one another. And in their study they

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>found that if the two strangers gazed into each other's

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>eyes for those two minutes, they later reported that they

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>had increased feelings a passionate love and affection towards the

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>other person. And then another phase of the experiment had

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the pairs of students interact in other ways, like looking

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.479
<v Speaker 1>at the partner's hands or counting blinks of their partner,

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>but it was mutual eye contact that best fanned the

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>flames of attraction. I feel like we've discussed this in

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of working and collaborating in our modern age as well,

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like just at a very basic level, and I think

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>most people can relate to this, like having that eye

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>contact with the people you work with or even you know, family, etcetera.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Like that makes all the difference in your in your

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>ability to sort of rain in how you're supposed to

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>be feeling about any given situation. Well, it's very powerful.

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think we talked about this before. We were

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about performance artists and Maria Abramovich. Yes, maybe that's

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>where this came out. Yeah, she she had um the

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>uh performance. I think it was at MoMA in New York.

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So the artist is president, the artist is present. There's

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a great documentary on it, and people would just sit

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>across from her, I think for about eight minutes uninterrupted,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just gazing at each other. And people were going bananas

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>over this. They were crying, I mean they were it

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>was almost like they were having these mystical or even

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>ecstatic experiences just by being looked at by someone. Indeed,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>because you wonder, like you know, I mean if you

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>just self the valuate like how much time in our

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>day goes by without any significant eye contact going on.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of an artificial environment for us

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to be discussing this because we have to make a

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of eye contact during the recording of the podcast,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, we look away. I mean, like you and

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like just pull on like staring each other

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire times. That would just be so weird if

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I was doing that, you know, that would be very intense.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's a timer in my head. So

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like I make eye contact with with anybody, not

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just shoot, um, we'll basically anybody except like you know,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>my wife or my child, um or maybe a cat.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Uh, there's like a tim or going off.

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, all right, that's enough eye contact. You have

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to look away because if you don't, too much sustained

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>eye contact is maybe sending too much of a crazy

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>vibe or something. I actually have an egg timer icon

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that I said, Yeah, well that's a good that's a

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>good method. I need. I need a more solid method

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>than sort of trying to figure out how much time

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>has passed in my head. You can borrow mine. All right,

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break. When we get back,

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the gaze a bit more

0:29:55.040 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and the difference between the love and lust gaze. Continuing

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to explore the question does love at first sight exist

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>or more to the point, what is the thing that

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>exists that we tend to classify as love at first sight? Yeah,

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And Helen Fisher gives I think an interesting um answer

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to why this might exist in the first place. And

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of course she's coming at it from an evolutionary angle,

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and she's co author of the study reward, motivation and

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>emotion systems associated with early stage intense romantic love. And

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then she again again looks at these, uh, this sort

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of constellation of neural systems involved with the feeling of love,

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and her idea is that we're marshaling these resources really

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly and efficiently because it could be a mating shortcut.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>She says, quote, even love at first sight is a

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>basic mammalian response that developed and other animals and our

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>ancestors inherited this in order to speed up the mating process.

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about it, our ancestors did not

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have much dot com at their disposal, and they only

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>had you know, maybe thirty or forty years of a

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>lifespan in the first place, So there wasn't a lot

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of like this is gonna be my my first marriage

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of talk. Yeah. So, as as as Fisher and

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh and her co researchers pointed out in that study, Um,

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about early stage, intense romantic love, and we're

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>associating that with sub quartal reward regions, all this rich

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with dopamine, as we discussed, and we see that romantic

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>love engaged his brain systems associated with the motivation to

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>acquire a reward. Yeah. She says about romantic love, it

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>enables you to focus your mating energy on just one

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>at a time, conserve your mating energy, and start the

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>mating process with this single individual. And she said, I

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think of all the poetry that I've read about romantic love.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>What sums it up us is something that is said

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>by Plato over two thousand years ago. He said, the

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>god of Love lives in a state of need. It

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is a need, it is an urge, It is a

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>homeo state static imbalance, like hunger and thirst, it's almost

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>impossible to stamp out. Yeah, I mean we call it

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>love sickness for a reason. You feel love sick it's

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean you begin to almost really bodily suffer out

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of this longing. Yeah. And if anyone who's ever been

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a teenager and had any sort of love interest knows

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>what that feels like, right, you can kind of feel

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that in the pit of your stomach right now. Um. Now,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there are some who, may you know, say, look, this

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is all very well, and perhaps we are neurally put

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>together to quickly identify feelings of love. However, maybe this

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>framing of it has more to do with the fallacy

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of memory. Yes, as we've discussed in a few different

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast episodes, our memories are not these solid, fixed items.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not little stone sculpture stored away in a drawer.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>If anything, they are clay sculptures stored away in a drawer.

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And every time we get a memory out of that drawer,

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's susceptible to change. We we put our we we

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>project our present onto these little fragments of our past,

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and then reform our past and reform our present. In

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>doing so yeah, and when you do that, you're strengthening

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>those neural connections, right. So that's why, Um, sometimes people

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>feel very like, yes, I know this happened exactly the

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>way I think it happened, because they've taken that memory

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>out over and over again and revisited it, and so

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they can quickly get to it and there's this certainty

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that they feel because of these neural connections, when in fact,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of fallacy and memory. And we've

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before. Uh. Donna Joe Bridge, a postdoctoral

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fellow and Medical Social Sciences and a co author of

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the study on how the brain refrains the past to

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>fit the present, says quote, when you think back to

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>when you met your current partner, you may recall this

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>feeling of love and euphoria, but you may be projecting

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>your current feelings back to the original encounter with this person. Yeah.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, our lives are experienced in a in a

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of storytelling way. We we create a story, we

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>are the center of our story, and uh, and and

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we are constantly tweaking the narrative even though we don't

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>realize it. Yeah, And that's what I think is interesting

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.360
<v Speaker 1>about that moment that across the room you lock eyes,

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's this idea that all these disparate elements of

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>your autobio biographical past may coalesce in this person. In

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>other words, this sort of spreadsheet of what you find

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting in another person, this person might check off some

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of those boxes and it might feel like, ah, this

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is the one. And if that is successful, if you

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>see that relationship through then through the power of narrative

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and the way that we reef framar experiences, then all

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden that becomes yes, it was love at

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>first sight, even though maybe it was just intrigue. Yeah.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for the most part, you're you're probably going

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to be more likely to to skew positive on your

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>reframing of your personal story. I mean, for the most part,

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to live a happy narrative life. So you're

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna you're gonna tweak at your I mean, we all

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>experienced this every every day. I feel like I do.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like I'll think back on something in the past,

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>past experience, past something I did, maybe something I miss

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but don't get to do anymore, and then I have

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to questions like, well that I really was it really

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>all positive? Or were there some negatives in there that

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of omitting in my in my current narrative.

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was, um recently a study that came out,

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and my apologies because I don't have the name of

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the study in front of me, but basically it was

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a study of ten different languages from twenty four different

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>types of media like literature and Twitter and so on

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and they had hundreds of billions of

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>war words and they went through this painstaking process of

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out this sort of qualitative narrative here

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>is there a sort of more positive words or less

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>positive words that we use? And there does seem to

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be this positive skew to language. No matter what language

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at, people were using more positive terms.

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea there is that you're you're trying

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to survive, and storytelling a narrative is like a very

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>basic way in which we do survive. And so overwhelmingly

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the message becomes it's going to be okay, you know,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna survive, You're gonna get through this. And

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's no wonder that when we revisit our past

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>histories we do the same thing unconsciously we're shaping them

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in a more positive light. Yeah, and indeed, I don't

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>think there's any anything wrong with that. I mean, I

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>guess sometimes I maybe if I'm going to engage with

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea of something like love at first, not on

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a scientific level, but onlike I just sort of a

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>loftier level. Yeah, I can think of it maybe in

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the present reaching back through the past, you know,

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because because ultimately our experience of time is more or

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>less an illusion. If you look at everything as a constant,

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you can say, well, there's not really a timeline of

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>my relationship with the person I love. It's a constant.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And so there's ultimately nothing wrong with applying the emotions

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and the and the importance that builds up over time,

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>applying that back to the beginning, because ultimately it's you know,

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about a timeline, We're talking about a

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a constant, singular thing. Hey, this is this is personal history, right,

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>So we already know that rescuing stuff in terms of

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what's realistic and what's sort of made up, fairland fun

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we like to throw in our personal narratives. Now,

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>when we get back to though, that that idea of

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the gays and how this all first coalesced and happen

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to all these things unconsciously bubbling beneath um. There is

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a way that we can kind of do some eye

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>tracking to figure out whether or not that first moment

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>has more to do with love or lust. Yes, and

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and again this is another one of those studies that

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>might seem like an outrageous overstatement of the obvious fact

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>up by by science. But uh, but yeah, there's there's

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 1>the lustful gaze, and there is a more or less

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>loving gaze, and we probably have some pretty firm ideas

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in our mind about what those gazes look like like.

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>The lustful gaze is a cartoon coyote with bulging out

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and its tongue lolling, and maybe it's it's going like

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the one. Yeah, So there's that, And then there's

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the more loving lost in your your your potential lover's

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.959
<v Speaker 1>eye just kind of look, I'm lost in love and

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know that one. I don't

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>know either. That's in my head, but I do not

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>know the artist, all right, So of course there's a

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>report All the Loves and the Gaze published in psychological

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>science male and female students from the University of Geneva.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>They viewed a series of black and white photographs of

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>people they had never met. And in the first experiment,

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>participants looked at photos of young heterosexual couples interacting with

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>each other. Now and the second experiment, participants looked at

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>photos of the opposite sex. Then they were asked too

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly identify the photos as either eliciting a feeling of

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>romantic love or sexual desire. Now the whole time, of course,

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>there was eye tracking software looking at what was happening,

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and for both men and women. The software reveal that

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>when participants reported feelings of a romantic love, they tended

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to dwell upon the face, which makes sense right then

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>eyes and but when they felt lusty, well their their

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>their gaze went south, and that makes sense, right. But

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I also can't help but pick it this, especially with

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>all the information we've just gone through, and say, is

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>there really that much difference between the two if you

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really start looking under the hood of of all that's

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>going on. When when these two when individual a and

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>individual be lock eyes for the first time, or you know,

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or one looks at the other ones. But what however

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>it ends up going down. I mean, ultimately, is there

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is there that much difference between the two, Like there's

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>just an exchange of stimuli, there's a there's an initial

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>gazing and uh and scanning of the other organism to

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>see if there's compatibility. I agree, I think there's a

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>whole like tail wagging the dog element. Yeah, I mean,

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 1>because you can just boil it down to this person

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is feeling lovey and giving the love gaze because they're

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.240
<v Speaker 1>genetically inclined to mate and produce offspring and then die

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And meanwhile, the lusty individual is is, you know,

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasizing about getting this person back to their apartment because

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>their genetic programming says that they need to mate with somebody,

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>produce offspring and then die, right, And then you know,

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>eventually that works out or it doesn't, you know, it

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>turns into love or I mean, you know it does

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It sort of doesn't matter, right. But to me this

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because it once again unpacks this idea that

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>are unconscious and our experiences, our autobiography, every moment is

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>influencing the decisions that we make and our perceptions. So

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it's lovely to say that you know. Ah, yes, I

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>saw him and it was love at first sight, but

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more going on underneath that. Also, I

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to mention in terms of really obvious studies and

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>information that I think all of us probably know on

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>some level. There was recently one about the best way

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to caress someone's cheek, like there their face. Apparently it's

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>moderate pressure moving at one per second up or down.

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall with knuckles or fingers, I know, I

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>think fingers, knuckles, I don't know, I don't know. Kind

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of like that, I don't know. Yeah, yeah, well that's

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of nice too. I was just striking my face

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with my knuckles in case you guys are wondering what

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the heck is going on? All right, So there you

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>have it now. If you want to check out more

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>about this topic, be sure to check out stuff to

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com. I'll make sure that the

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>landing page for this episode includes links to related contents

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and just some of that other Valentine's Day Lovey Debbie

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff about Laingderie, wearing rats and uh and the microbiology

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of a kiss um. All of that will be on there,

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so as well as some links out to some of

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>these outside sources we've talked about, such as that that

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Ted Talk and you can also check out our videos

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are blog post and uh you know links out to

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>our very social media accounts so you can follow us

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.879
<v Speaker 1>wherever you tend to hang out, and we would love

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. Guys. Does this information change your

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas of your experiences of love and perhaps even love

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it first sight? Let us know. You can email us

0:42:55.719 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>below the mind at how stuff works dot com. For

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics, visit howstuff

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>works dot com