WEBVTT - Feast or Famine

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>advice now leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Paul George.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Giargie and

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host today are Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. Hello, guys,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>back again, back again, doing a row for you. In

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a row that's that's what an honor for us really

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and the listeners. It's a Feast or Famine edition Thanksgiving.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you feast with guys like Dak Prescott, Dawson Knox,

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Cedric Wilson, Cedric Wilson or Bragger? Or did you get

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>famine on Thanksgiving? DeAndre Swift, Darren Waller? Did you fall

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Tony Jones hype right before gamesh I hope not.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope not. That's that was a trap, right, there

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>was that offense broken. I stopped crying about Waller like

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>two minutes ago, and you gotta bring that up. Yeah,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that. We were here to help in either case.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>If you are if you feasted on Thursday, We're here

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>to help you protect your lead. If you got famine

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday and Thanksgiving Day, we're here you to help,

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>here to help you make up ground on your opponents.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>We will do that over the course of the show

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with take a chance on me, three tough questions, premature speculation,

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and we will break down all the remaining games for

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Gentlemen, Let's start with the Falcons and the Jaguars. Scott,

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a Falcons offense that looked hopelessly broken last

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>time we saw them. They face a surprisingly stout Jaguars defense. Yeah,

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they do. The The Jack's defense has been really good lately.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they've helped three of their last four quarterbacks

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they faced under two hundred yards. Josh Allen was the

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>one that got over, but he didn't even throw a touchdown.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So I have Matt Ryan and basically most of the

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>passing game on the bench. Gauge Wrestler. Gauge has a

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>better forties and seventy yard guy three out of the

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>last five games, but the two he didn't get in

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that range, he got complete goose eggs, not even a catch.

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>How can you trust him here? And if you go

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>by the rule of every other like we were with

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>gasket last week. Then then we got a zero on

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>our hands. Uh Zakias. He did have that nice two

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdong game a while back, but he hasn't had over

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty two yards in any game this season. He's on

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Uh. Cordarrel Patterson is the question mark. He's questionable.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>He's put in some limited practices this week. I do too.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's gameplays. The last week I

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't think he was gonna play at all, and he did,

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and this week I'm I'm hesitant. I would give him

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a C grade if he plays, because I feel like

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the kind of guy like if they get ahead,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going to run the ball. If they are behind,

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna throw the ball to him. So like he

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>stays in the game no matter what. I'd give him

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a C grade if he goes. Uh. The other running backs, however,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Quadrea Allison and Mike Davis, I have them on the bench.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It was too much of a split. They said they

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get Allison more work, but they were really

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>ineffective with that amount of work last week. I have

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>them both on the bench. It's a lot of bench

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>grades so far. Now over to Kyle Pitts, Brian, It's

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a nice spot in that seven tight ends have had

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus and or a score the Jacks. Here's the

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>problem with Pitts. He's being treated like an elite receiver.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>The average PF grade of cornerbacks he's getting is facing

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is in the top twelve of receivers I, meaning he's

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>seen Deebo Samuel DeAndre Hopkins level seventy plus grades from

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the corners on on him a few weeks ago, stuff

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on Gilmore shadowed him a week or two weeks ago.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Lattimore covered him the majority of the time he sees

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>double coverage or help. On twenty of his routes against

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the Pats last week, thirty one percent of the time

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he saw double coverage or help. This is this is

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>why all the people that told you, oh, with Calvin

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Ridley out, Kyle pitch is gonna blow up. No, it doesn't.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, for the millionth time, it doesn't work that way.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you take the best receiver off a team,

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it only hurts everybody and by the waiver, but yeah,

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>still hurt. That kind of proves the point of Pelijack

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>taking away your best receiver if he threw doubles out

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of the time. That's right. Um. The Jags may take

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a similar role with Shaquille Griffin and throw him on pits.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 1>So I have merely a C grade despite an okay matchup.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just he's the top end talent and in some

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of those games he would go three for sixty, which

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is a decent game even against that top coverage. But

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>there's it's he's getting too much double coverage and top

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>top cornerbacks will break down Kyle Pitts in more detail

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>later in this show. On the other side, I have

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole passing game on the bench for the Jaguars.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence hasn't topped a hundred and sixty five yards

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>passing in three straight. That is nothing. That's nothing. That's

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's like half a deck press sky game. That's it's

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>basically nothing. Uh. He just lost Jamal Agnew for the year.

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons. I don't care that their bottom ten against

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>against quarterbacks. Uh. Lawrence is similar to like the Zach Willis, Wilson,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald types who all through for under two hundred

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>against them as well. Um, So I had the whole

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>passing game on the bench. I don't care that they

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>say they want to get Chanelt Moore in that agnew

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>role and get him touches at running back. I can't

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>trust it till I see it. James Robinson, No, I'm

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>giving a C grade too. He's been pretty ineffective with

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>his injured angle and knee despite lots of touches. Uh

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>in the two two weeks since returning from injury, those

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty touches on total yards and scoring two games. But

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he gets a seat here on the volume. I'm a

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>volume see guy. If you if you tell me you

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>guys getting fifteen plus touches and it's a bottom ten rundee,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you. I'm gonna give you the C

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>grade that that's that's about all I can give you

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're still hurt. Bucks take on the Colts, Bryan.

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>This Bucks passing offense hasn't looked quite right without antone

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yo Brown. And so does that mean we're gonna get

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more Leo four net in this game? I

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we'll get more of him, but uh,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't love the matchup for for Net. I don't

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have the matchup for running. We'll get to the most

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>elite running back in the NFL in a second on

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the cold side, but starting with four net just to

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>see for him, he's failed the top fifty rushing yards

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>over his last three games. He's had some tough matchups

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mixed in there. The Saints were one of them. Ronald

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Jones did steal a touchdown from four net last week.

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>That didn't help matters much, but the Colts are ranked

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>fifth against the run by Pro Football Focus. But receiving wise,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>India is allowing four catches for yards per game to

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>running back, so that should provide some opportunities for for

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>Net to produce through the air. Among running backs, he's

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth in targets, behind only DeAndre Swift, and that was

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>before Swift played on Thursday Night. Nag Harris and Austin

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Ekela then it's Leonard four NET. No one really would

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have predicted that going into the season, especially after Tampa

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay signed Geo Bernard. So for Net, very active in

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. He's startable, but just a C grade

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>for him, uh, not the opposite of the C but

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in a for Mike Evans. The Colts are allowing one

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half touchdowns per game to wide receivers the

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>highest clip in the league. They've surrendered six scores to

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the position over the last four games. Not much more

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to say here for Evans, he gets an A and

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so does Chris Godwin, especially now that Antonio Brown has

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out yet again. Uh just mentioned the monster

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers posted by opposing wide receivers against the Colts, who

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have also been smoked by slot guys like Tyler Lockett

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup. So love god when this week he gets

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an A. Really like Gronk as well, be for him.

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>In his four healthy full games this year, Gronk is

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>averaging seven targets and has finished inside the top eight

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at the tight end position, and three of them. The

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Colts are allowing the sixth most points Fantasy points per

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>game two tight ends. So be for Gronk, and then

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.679
<v Speaker 1>an A for Brady because all of the plus matchups

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for his past catchers. But just for fun now, all

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>these games I'm gonna mention with the Patriots, of course,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but the but Brady has thrown multiple touchdown passes in

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>nine of his last ten games, thank you, and he

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>had a hat trick and more in more than half

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of those games against the Colts, so he's been kind

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of slaying them over his career. So in A for Brady.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Now over to the coult side and we'll start with

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor or not a lot we need to even

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>say here, right Jonathan hey Lord like that. With Vida

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Veya not potentially playing in this game, probably not playing

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game that opens he's likely to come back

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And Quentin Nelson aggrevated an angle injury

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Bills. He was on the card

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>parted him off. He's looking unlikely to play. I'm still

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>going to give Taylord the A though has been going

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely preserved since Week fourteen, totally fifteen touchdowns in eight games,

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>scoring at least once in each of them. But Tampa

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Bay is an elite run defense, allowing just fifty five

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game, less than a hundred combo yards

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>per game the position. But you can't give Taylor anything

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>less than A at this point. He's gotta he's got

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to earn the B. I guess you can put it

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that way. So and A for Taylor. I will give

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pittman a B though I was posting big numbers

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>not long ago. But Taylor is totally stole in the

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>show in recent weeks, but this could be a bounce

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 1>back spot that the Colts are unlikely to get back

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>starting corner Carlton Davis and um. They haven't faced a

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>ton of tough wide receivers over the last month. Terry

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>McLaurin is really the only good wide receiver they faced.

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>He did have six catches for fifty nine yards. I'll

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>get Pittman that as a safe floor, but he does

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have touchdown upside. He is a monster in the red zones.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Would be for Pittman. I so I don't. I wasn't

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>where that t Y Hilton made his like third or

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>fourth return from injury last Yes, he's back, uh, but

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I still got him on the bench and every other

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Colts wide receiver. I also have Moale Cox Jack Doyle

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on the bench as well. It is a decent matchup

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that they kind of vulture each other, whether it's at

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the goal or you know, in the red zone or

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>just out side of the twenties. So they're on the bench,

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>but Carson Wentz is not. I'll give him a see.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Indie might be forced to throw more against Tampa Bay,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>who have still a run defense. Like I said, they

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>own the highest opponent passing play percentage at six. So

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give wins the sea. Alright, Steelers take on the Bengals.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Love this game for Nazi Harris. He destroyed the Bengals

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in the earlier matchup. He remember that was his fourteen

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>reception game earlier this year. That's they're not gonna let

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that happen again because he's not gonna get nin targets.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna watch the tape. They're gonna take that away

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to some extent anyway, But the Bengals are allowing the

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>most receptions and fourth most receiving yards per game. That well,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that that did pad some of those stats for sure.

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Um and just in general, they've struggled against running backs,

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>allowing one five total yards to runners, second most over

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the full over a full season here and and that's

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>just over the last three games. So Harris is an

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>obvious sight. Let's go to the passing game. I want

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to start with Deante Johnson. Get is since Week six,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a while ago now, says you know, over

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the past five weeks, only Tyree Hill and Cooper Cup

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>have more targets than Deonte Johnson. Now it's only scored

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>once over that span, and it's touchdowns have never really

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>been his game. But he gets you to a solid

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty two gay average of eighty two yards per game,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and we'll take that. Um. He missed the first earlier

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>matchup with the Bengals, he was out for that game,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but last year crushed him went over one hundred yards

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and both of the games. So this is a good

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Deontae Johnson, who comes in with a B grade,

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just a C grade on Chase Claypool. Here Bengals start

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Shadobe Awuzier and Eli Apple on the outside and they've

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>combined to allow two scores in the last three games,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>so there's a decent chance there. The best reason to

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>start Cha Pool Chase Claypool is just because he's so

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>much bigger than those guys, four inches and thirty pounds

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on both of them. And perfect problem recently, even before

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the injury, is he's not getting separations, so it's a

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of contested catches. With that size advantage, you can

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>get those catches. Absolutely. I had a big game against

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals the previous meeting, but again, Deante Johnson wasn't

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>on the field for that one. Pat Friar Muth I

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like him here a lot. Eric Ebron has been ruled

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>out and over the last five weeks Firemouth averaging over

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>seven targets per game, and over those last five weeks,

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>he's the third highest scoring fantasy tight end. And over

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that same span, averaging five receptions per game, he scored

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>four times. And the last time these teams met he scored.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So Friar Muth b grade in that one. Roll all

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of that together and I've got a C grade on

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger with some B upside, But we're calling it

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a straight seat. This is not a We're not changing

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>anything here. This is still just a seat. Very good.

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Over the last two games of multiple touchdowns for Ben Roethlisberger,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he rarely does that as one touchdown game guy. Prior

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to that, he had thrown for exactly one score and

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>six of the first seven games, including the earlier matchup here.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Bengals held Derek Carr in check last week, but in

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>their two prior games, they've given up combined five touched

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to Baker Mayfield and Mike White. So Roethlisberger has got

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>some a little better upside than the Sea. But on

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the law on the whole, I still can't get in

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>past that CE grade. Let's go to the Cincinnati side.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon is an obvious A. He's arguably the second

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>hottest running back behind only Jonathan Taylor, averaging a hundred

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>seven total yards and one and a half touchdowns per

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>game over the last five games. He's an obvious start here.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the passing game. Jamaar Chase gets a

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>B grade. He's matchup proof, but he'll face two capable

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>veterans in the form of Joe Hayden and Cameron Sutton.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Haydn missed the last game of the foot injury. Sutton

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>gives up a seventy percent catch rate, so Chase has

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>got the upper hand on in those scenarios. Over the

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, He's averaged just thirty seven yards, though,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a bit of a worry. I don't think

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting the rookie wall per se, but I think

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a little bit of concern there. Fortunately, still

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>getting lots of targets, and with enough volume he should

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>be able to overcome a capable but not great secondary

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Jamaar Chase. C grade on tee Higgins

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with the assive dud last week. Prior to that, he

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>had notched at least fifty eight yards and or a

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>score in five of the previous seven games. Uh He

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>was inactive for the earlier game against Pittsburgh, but his

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>career best game came against Pittsburgh last year. Higgins has

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>slightly positive matchups against the aforementioned Hayden and Sutton on

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the outside. He's got to see Gray Tyler Boyd startable

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in this game. He runs from the slot, and he's

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>scored in two of the last three full games against

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and fellow slot receivers Keenan Allen thumped him

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for a season high one hundred twelve yards last week.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>The main slot defender is usually Train Norwood, who gave

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>up one hundred yards, a score and a perfect passer

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>rating against the Chargers last week. Put all those receivers together,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and I've got a b ish grade for Joe Burrow.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>What's that mean? It means a B. He's the ice

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>cold with back to back duds, and the Steelers don't

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>really feel you know what I'm going see grade, see

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>grade on Joe Burrow. Steelers are not a get right

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>spot especially with makeup. Fitzpatrick coming back for this game,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and he will for this one. Burrow posted three touchdowns

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in the earlier meeting, but he was way hotter than that.

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Given how cold he's been and how luke warm I

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>am on his receivers, I'm just going with a C

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>grade on Joe. Speaking of sea grades, Scott Fish really

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>should have given one to Dan Arnold. Them a little

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>pod right now, but I guess I should have. I

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>should have given him a sea grade. All right, great,

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, there you go. Thanks, Okay, if you that's

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what you wanted. The bench dan Arnold have last week

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>zero targets wasn't his fault, but three the five tight

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ends to see at least five targets against the Falcons

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have finished top six, and Arnold's gonna see is at

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>least at least week. I'm fine with it. I had

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a bench grade. I'm fine with you. But Jaguars didn't

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>get the ball until like a minute left in the

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>first quarter. Then we come back, take a chance on me.

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not in really and you're starting lineup will

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you who they are when we return. Take a

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Nine players not normally in your starting lineup.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll give your quarterbacks running back to receivers you can

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>pick up off the waiver wire in many cases and

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>give a start. This week, we begin at the quarterback

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>position and Scott Fish. Yeah, I'm gonna start with Tyrod Taylor.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Trod Taylor. Excuse me? It gets a Jets matchup. The

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Jets of allowed two fifty plus yards and multiple scores

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to six straight quarterbacks. Taylor has multiple scores in all

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>four of his fall games this year. Actually, even the

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>game that it wasn't full game, he had multiple scores

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>uh six passing and three rushing. He's also averaging twenty

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to thirty rushing yards per game and a score per

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 1>game four touchdowns rushing. Give me to Taylor, all right,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I like it your quarterback, Brian. I got big mac

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Jones at home against the Titans. Now, I'm a little

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>worried about how this game script might turn out for

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the New England pass attack. We'll talk about this game later.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to need to pass much, but still,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones has looked great over his last two games,

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>has completed eighty four percent of his past attempts, and

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>he didn't get a chance to light up the box

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>score in last week's spanking of the Falcons. H Jones

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>did have a hat trick in Week ten against Cleveland.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Would have had four touchdown passes, but Brian Hoyer came

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in for in for relief. It wasn't really relief. He

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>threw a touchdown pass, so it should have been a

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>four touchdown game for mac Jones. Tennessee does own the

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>third highest opponent passing play percentage at sixty that this well, well,

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots jumped out ahead and they will. It could

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>be through the air from mac Jones. Uhlons have allowed

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at least two passing yards indoor, multiple passing touchdowns and

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>three of the last four games, So I'm going mac

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Jones where he could get paid off. They might run

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>up to the goal line, let mac Jones throw. You know,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he could get a three touchdown game on eight yard,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>five yard and four yard touchdowns. Jacks might let him

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have some fun in this one. They might know, they might.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got Jimmy Garoppolo going up against the Vikings. Vikings

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>will be missing all four of their starting defensive linemen

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Garoppolo is gonna have plenty of time

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and over the last three games with Garoppolo healthy, Samuel healthy,

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are you healthy? And George Kittle healthy. He's throwing multiple

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.719
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in every game, and he's top three hundred twenty

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>two yards in two of the three games. He's proving

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to be, begrudgingly too many, proving to be a serviceable

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy quarterback. There a lot of people who do not

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like to think of Jimmy Garoppolo that way. Uh, this

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is a very good opportunity. Minnesota just got eviscerated by

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers last week. I don't think we're gonna see

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like four hundred yards and four downs here, but a

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>solid game from Jimmy Garoppolo coming up. Scott, Let's go

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to the running back position. Who you got? I have

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson in that same game the Jets the Jets

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Texans game. Uh, Michael Carter is going to be out

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for a few weeks. Here. The Texans are allowing over

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>four point eight yards per carry, which is good for

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>most in the league. They've allowed the second most rushing yards.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Coleman might get some work, but even before Carter

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>went out, Ty Johnson was stealing not just receiving work,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but goal line work. He was sharing the goal line

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>carries with Michael Carter, so I think he takes that

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>on now. Mike White is the only quarterback that was

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>targeting running backs in that offense. Like their games were

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like two catches, two catches, three catches, two catches total

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for the running backs except for Mike White, who threw

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, four completions per game to the running back.

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But he he gets that work, he gets the goal

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>line work. I've c grade on him. So he's Johnson

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. All right, Brian, you take a chance of

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>me running back. I got Dontrelle Hilliard. Who a lot

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of people are you saying Tennis Clinton's running back at

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots the game I just mentioned, Jeremy Jeremy McNichols

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>has been ruled out. Uh McNichols was out last week.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Hilli had played more than six of the snaps in

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>his first game with Tennessee. In that game, he was

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>also very active in the passing game, catching eight of

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>eight targets uh we mentioned I mentioned earlier. The Titans

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>likely to fall behind in this one will be a

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>positive game script for Hilliard. The Patriots have allowed the

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>seventh most receptions and third most receiving arts of opposing

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs this year, So Dontrelle Hilliard and PPR. Of course,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in standard leagues maybe not so much, but most people

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>play some form with PPR these days. So I think

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we've put a different Titans running back into this spot

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks. We might not be done either. I

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have not. Lamar Miller is still out there waiting in

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the wind, and if anybody's gonna do it, it'll be you.

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got J. D. Mckissic going up against Seattle coming

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>off a season high and rushing yards, which is great,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>but where mckissic is always gonna be more reliable through

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the air. Um, if Seattle can just manage to like hold,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>serve or maybe even take a lead for a little while,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>which is not a given, but if they can, that

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>will keep Washington from grinding out the game. With Antonio Gibson.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Seattle gives up the sixth most receptions and the most

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards two running backs, and that's where mckissic comes

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in here, of course, and mckissic is gonna get most

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of what is there. They're averaging seven receptions and seventy

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>three yards. I'll take seven receptions in seventy three yards

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>out of j D mckiss. That would be fantastic or

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>something close to that. If he's got it, let's go

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to the receivers. You omitted one very important fact there

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's a revenge game for JD mkiss and

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>he had one last year with Washington against he had

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a great game. I think Gibson was ruled out entirely

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of that game. So let's still I love the call.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, good, let's go to the receiver position. I

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>am piggybacking off of charges prespect from last week to

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>go pick up Evan Ingraham and we're gonna start start

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>him here now. Not just start him. I actually have

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>an A grade on him in this matchup. It's death

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>taxes and tight ends scoring against the Eagles. Uh, we

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>got okay. Uh. The Eagles have allowed eight touchdowns on

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the season, two seven different tight ends. Uh. They just

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>give up a ton of yards. And also, Kyl Rudolph

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>might not be playing in this which opens up even more.

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost certain Rudolph he's doubtful. He's doubtful at that moment. Christmas,

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Christmas time. He can't be playing football. Sorry, Rudy,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>rudoh sorry nine touchdowns. My favorite UH Eagles tight end

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>stat was against the Chargers. They allowed to to finish

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>inside the top five and neither were Jared Cook. Jared

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Cook finished still top in that game too. All right, Brian,

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>your receiver not a tight end. I got um Carolina

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is Robbie Anderson at Miami. Opposing wide receivers are averaging

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>more than fifteen catches, one and ninety yards and a

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. Against the Dolphins, Anderson has seen twelve

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>targets over the last two games to the fourteen of

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>d J. Morris was right on on pace with him

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of targets. Both have nine is across those

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>two games. So I see major upside for Robbie, who

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>looks rebooted with Cam Newton at quarterback. He and Sam

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Donald did not click at all. And quick site note

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>on Robby Anderson. Since the start of he's tied for

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>seconds in touchdowns of forty plus yards. Tyreek kills in

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>first by a mile, but then it's Robbie Anderson. And

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>when you think about Robbie's quarterbacks during that span, like

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald, yadda YadA YadA, Sam Donald again. So p J.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Walker in that safe floor. Huge. So Robby Anderson, one

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of those guys if you're a deep hole after Thanksgiving,

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is upside and he's available. Brandon I who goes up

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings. And at this point we can safely

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>say Brandon Ayou has got four paws out of the doghouse.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He's actually get this as actually out snapped Deebo Samuel

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in four straight games. He's managed eighty five yards and

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in two of the past three games. And

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I passes the eye test. I mean, if you watch

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>him play, he looks, he looks fantastic. Um, he's working hard.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And here's the Vikings giving up the most yards to

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>opposing receivers two hundred four per game, and they've allowed

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>five one hundred yard receivers in their last four games.

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Ayuk nice play. In fact, you could couple him

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>with might take a chance, I mean quarterback, the garoppolo

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to Ayuk angle. And there's another one Brian was just

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You're down from Thursday's games. Here's your chance

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to make up a little bit of ground. Right there,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn our attentions to a to not a great

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>game Jets taking on the Texas Texas Scott on the

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Jet side, you already told us you like starting running

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>back Ti Johnson. What what do you think about the

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>passing game for the Jets with Zack Wilson back at

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the helmet. I've gotten so many questions about whether or

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not they can trust Elijah More. Yeah. I like Zach

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's arm talent. I don't know that I can trust

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>his fantasy production or the amount of interceptions get based

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on earlier than the season, So I'm I'm still gonna

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.239
<v Speaker 1>have him on the bench. Despite a plus match up

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Texans. But really that was Stafford and Murray

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and Alan Josh Allen, Kyler, Murray and Matt Staffew there

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that went for an average of three hundred yards and

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they had eight scores combined between them. The other seven

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks against the Texans two sixty seven yards, one touchdown

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in two picks was their average. The Texans defense has

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been shocked competent. They weren't good against the three really

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>elite quarterbacks, but others. So I have Wilson on the bench. However,

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Elijah Moore, He's your wide receiver. One week's eight through

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven wide receiver receiver three weeks, tons and tons of targets,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't played with Zach Wilson for since earlier

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in the season when they weren't on the same page

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't getting a lot of work. Uh. All three,

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with all three of these guys, More,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Davis and crowd are all all three have six plus

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>targets in five straight full games they played, which they're

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they're all getting spread out work. I'm giving More the

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>B grade as the guy who's done it a ton recently.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>They really trust him. He scored four touchdowns in the

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, getting the most of the targets. He's

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>also kind of the big play guy, so I have

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on him. I'm gonna give the this

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the C grade to Davis. If he goes, he might

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not go in this one. He's he's dinged up right

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>now with a couple of injuries. Uh, if he goes.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy that's got forty plus yards in six

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of eight games, and he's scored in you know, four

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of the in half his games, so I have a

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>B grade on him. Jamson Crowder I have on the bench, Uh,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He's really a spot play against bad we we called

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it last week against Miami. They're terrible against the slot

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we had. We had Crowder starting here. He gets slot

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>corner uh Tavier Thomas who switched to swap slot corner

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in week four and since then it has been PF

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth ranked corner since since jumping into the slot. The

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>outside corners are seventy five or below. That's why I

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>got grades on them. I got Crowder on the bench

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>over to the Texans side. I already told you I

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like to Taylor in this game, his receivers. I like

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>both of them a little bit, A little bit I

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>do have. I have C grades on both Cooks and

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>cons you can if if you were allowed, if we

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.719
<v Speaker 1>were allowed, I would give Cooks a B B minus.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, other than last week, Cooks has been mostly

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>dependable this year. Here's here's the problem over the last

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Over the last uh four weeks, he's only seen five

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>downfield looks past twenty yards and that's where he makes

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>his hey and he's not because the line is not

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>blocking for any of them long enough to get those

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>D balls. Alright, fine, I'll give it a be because

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I originally added to be as a being changed it. Um,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>let's hope, let's hope he gets one of those big plays,

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>but against this Jets team. The Jets. The Jets have

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed fifty plus yards from the top two receivers seven

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>consecutive weeks, So the top two receivers are getting work done.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm giving Collins a C grade two. He

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown last week even though the refs took

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it away for no good reason. Um Johnson, Burke read

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even Royce Freeman, you're on the bench. You're

0:27:57.880 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I I don't even want to get

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>into it. They were so in eighteen carries for for

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Burke last week made forty yards. Like they're so ineffective.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 1>That Jets around defense is terrible. Somebody I think somebody

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>probably gets a little something done. Oh but it could

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be anybody. And losing really doesn't really change anything. It's

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like forty six yards in a score. The

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>score will get it done and we don't know who's

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>getting it. Yeah, I'm I'm with you on that. When

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we come back Panthers take on the Dolphins, Brian will

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>tell you whether or not Cam Newton is going to

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>continue the hot start he has had for the Carolina Panthers.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.719
<v Speaker 1>When we return, you can get all my player rankings

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>available for free Guillotine leagues dot com. You've got questions

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on who to start to bench Guillotine leagues dot com.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll return to Fantasy Football Weekly in moments. Welcome back

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Last segment of our number one begins

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>with a dissection of the Panthers taking on the Dolphins.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Panthers offenses look rejuvenated with the return of Christian McCaffrey

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and Cam Newton at the quarterback position. Brian, let's break

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it down, beginning at the beginning with Cam Newton, who

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>has been fan who's we liked him last week and

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he paid off? You like him here? Yeah? I do.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a be He certainly has a upside,

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but I like the matchups for his three primary pass

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>catching weapons. None of them are tight ends, by the way,

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get into those guys in a minute. And

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>like I just said, Cam's legs are certainly still a weapon.

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Miami has faced three mobile quarterbacks over their last three games,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Trod Taylor, Lamar Jackson and Josh Josh Allen. None of

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>them really popped off, with still combine to average thirty

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>nine rushing yards, which equals a passing touchdown in most

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy format. So I think Newton's a safe be here

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with a upside. Uh, it's it's it feels like I

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>said that in three tough questions last week. There you

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>go right, and I didn't, so I'm proven wrong. So

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>far be grade for d J Moore as well. Opposing

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers are averaging more than fifteen catches a hundred

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety yards in a touchdown per game against the Dolphins.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>More caught a touchdown from Cam last week, so no

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns there. And for those reasons, Robby Anderson was might

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance of me wide receiver seeing about

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just as many targets as d J Moore. So I

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>love the both receivers, and you gotta love Christian McCaffrey,

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's not an easy a. It's not a Fonzie

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for Christian McCaffrey in the in this game. Even though

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey is scored five McCaffrey has scored twenty five and

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty six PPR points over the last two games. But

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that's with just one touch down, which is insane. Seven

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>team catches across the last two games for McCaffrey just

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just an absolute beast when healthy, and Quickside notes once

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the short sellers do cover a mc will be an

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>absolute beast as well, not financially Anyways, back to football, McCaffrey,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it is a tough matchup against Miami. The Dolphins run

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>defense has really stiffened over the last month. Over their

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>last five games, opposing running backs have averaged just forty

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>six rushing yards and no rushing touchdowns during that span.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And granted we're talking about the backfields of the Jets,

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, the Texans, UH and the Bills and the Falcons.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>H McCaffrey better than all those guys combined, like through

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the history of those franchises. Basically, it is worth mentioning

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>also that no opposing running back has topped fifty receiving

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>yards or scored through the air against Miami all season.

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So if anyone's gonna snap that streak, it's Christian McCaffrey.

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still give him an a, but it's not.

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a slam dunk for CMC. But went healthy,

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you're clearly going to start them over to the

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins side. We'll start with Miles Gaskin. Just to see here,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it's an even numbered week for Miles, which I'm very

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. Science has proven that he goes off an

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>odd numbered weeks. Struggles, struggles and even the number of weeks.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But uh, at least Caroline has run. Defense has softened

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>since Week three. They've allowed one d eighteen rushing yards

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>per game since then. But be wary of what Gascon

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>might do through the air. The Panthers are allowing the

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>fewest receptions and receiving yards per game to opposing running.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Anything to do with Myles gask this week, Yeah, it's

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a it's a softest. Just I'm not too worried about

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay. I mean probably, but you get you get

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>released by the Texans. You're not You're not very good,

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>um Gaskin. I'm gonna give him a C based on

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>expected volume, and just to see for Jalen Waddle, who

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>has pretty much been a safe B play at the

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>very least. But u G Team Leagues writer Jake Naggy

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of no relation to Matt Naggy, so Jake actually knows

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing. This is what he had to say

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about Jalen Wattle. Wattle has developed one of the safest

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>floors around, posting between sixty and eighty five yards and

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>five of his last six games and at least seven

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>receptions and four of his last six. He'll need that

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>safe floor against the Panthers defense, though that is fairly

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>stinge against opposing receivers, but that's largely a result of

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 1>playing just four top sixteen passing offenses all season. Uh.

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Carolina has been consistently cooked by quality wide receivers like

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks, Adam thieland Justin Jefferson, and most recently Terry McLaurin. A. J.

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Bouyer and Jeremy Chin had been splitting slot duties for Carolina.

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>As of late, both are allowing a passive rating of

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>at least ninety five on the season. Great work by

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Jake Naggy on that there's uh. This cornerback group for

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers suddenly uber d right. They added Stefan Gilmore,

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>they added they added in C. J. Henderson, A J.

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Blue Ya, Dante Jackson. This is and they already had

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a very good safety in Jeremy Chin. This is a

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>This is turned into a very good second. Yeah, so

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting hued at wide receiver too with Albert

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Wilson or President Williams. They're both on the bench. Mike

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Mikes he's really wide receiver to for the Dolphins, but

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of course he's tightened eligible in fantasy football. That's the

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>only thing he's eligible as only one opposing tight and

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>his top fifty eight yards against the Panthers all year.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Carolina also recently shut down the comparable Kyle Pitts, held

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>him to two catches for thirteen score of the Stards,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Like Pitski runs the vast majority of his routes from

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this slot or out wide. So just to see if

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you kisiki and two uh is on the bench for me,

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and this one when you're over under prop is set

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at two passing yards, you just stay away from that

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>guy entirely fantasy football. Okay. I've got the Vikings taking

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on the forty Niners Sdalvin Cook. Just a big rare

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Dalvin Cook and a tough matchup. Only

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>two runners have topped seventy two yards against the Niners.

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>That is not a particularly high threshold, and this could

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>be a trickier matchup than it sounds like. San Francisco's

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest weakness is at the goal line, where they are

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 1>allowing a touchdown on half of the rushing attempts inside

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the ten, and the Vikings run the ball constantly inside

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the tent, so there's a good chance for a touchdown.

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Though for Dalvin Cook, um I'll note that Cook's only

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>ranked twenty nine in attempts per broken tackle, and normally

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we think of him as somebody who breaks a lot

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of tackle hick Alexander Madison many times, right, So I'm

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not saying something's wrong with him, but it doesn't. It

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to have the same level of explosiveness and

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>big plays off of making somebody miss. Profo ball focus

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ranks is the fourth best tackling defense. So I don't

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>see the big game coming from Dalvin Cook here. Where

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I see it coming is through the air as the

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like this is gonna be a high scoring game. I

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 1>love so many players here, justin Jefferson obvious a coming

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>out back to back games with over one hundred forty yards.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson runs almost evenly from every spot on the field, left, right,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and slot and has got positive matchups at every single stop.

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>How about this stat as legendary as Randy Moss is.

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>In Randy Moss's first two years of football, he had

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven games with one hundred yards. Justin Jefferson's already there

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with whatever seven games left in the season to go

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on a better than Moss like clip for Justin Jefferson,

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he's an A grade. I've got to be grade in

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling. San Francisco has given a big games to

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>receivers with competent quarterbacking all year, allowing a ninety yard

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>receiver or multiple touchdowns to receivers when they've faced Aaron Rodgers,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, Kyler, Murray, Carson Wentz, Matthew Stafford. I think

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins in that mix. San Francisco's cornerback trio of

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman, Emmanuel Moseley, and Kwan Williams all rank they

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>rank respectively by Profo Ball Focus. So I like Theeland

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and many of these matchups. The only reason he doesn't

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have it and A grade here is he is somewhat

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent. When he does not score, you usually get

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a good not great box score from Adam Feland and

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Conklin on the bench. Nine US have been fantastic

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends since an opening week garbage time drubbing

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>by d J. Hockinson. San Francisco's only giving up per

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>game averages of three catches for twenty four yards and

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>zero point three touchdowns per game to the position. We're

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit Conklin in this one, and that leaves Kirk

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Cousins at a B grade. The beauty of starting Kirk

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Cousins is that he never torpedoes your team with a

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible game. He's throwing at least one touchdown in thirty

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>four of his last thirty five games. Then then he

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>periodically pops off for a monster game like the like

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the likes of which he had last week. He's found

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>his way to three or more touchdowns on five different

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>occasions this year, and as I mentioned, I like the

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver matchups. So I do like Kirk Cousins with

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a B grade in this one. All right, let's go

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>over to the Niners. I told you I thought this

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be high scoring game both ways, and it is.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are without all four of their starting defensive lineman

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>in this game. That's not good and That's why I

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>love many players here. Deebo, Samuel's and obvious a best

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver after the catch. And it's not even do You

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>can't even have a rational conversation with anybody about anybody

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>else in that conversation with the possible exception entire kill

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>for just speed. But nobody's more lethal at By the way,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I read a stat that the defensive line for the

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Vikings with all the backups and dropped about seventy pounds

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>per player. Oh no, kidding, Wow, that's amazing. Already told you.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolos may take a chance to the quarterback. Brandon

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I who was may take a chance to be wide receiver.

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>They have B grades in this game. George Kittle's gotta

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>be grade. He scored in all three of his games

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>since returning from injury, re cementing his elite status. Minnesota

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>has found a way to keep tight ends out of

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the end zone, at least until last week, when they

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>surrendered their first score to the position um. Much of

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this is because they've only yielded to red zone touches

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and four red zone targets two tight ends. Anthony Barr

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>comes back, he will be covering George Kittle extensively in

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this game. Still advantage Kittle, but the Vikings have been

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>very good against the position. All right, let's go to

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Alves Mitchell. I believe he will play in this game

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>off of the finger injury that kept him out last week.

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Wilson had all of the run last week and

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>did nothing with it, which is great for Elijah Mitchell owners.

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that Mitchell should get the vast majority of

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the work here. Wilson does have a history as a

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>goal line vulture, though, so I'll mention that, and I

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>could see Wilson coming in and sniping touchdowns. But that's

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>my only worry. When Mitchell is healthy, he gets all

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the work and he's established a safe floor, averaging seventeen

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>touches in ninety yards per game. The Vikings have not

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 1>allowed of running back to run for eighty yards since

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb did in Week four, but the Vikings missing

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all of those players on the defensive line, Mitchell could

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be sitting on a really nice game. Let's hope he's

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>able to go. If he can't go, you can put

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a C grade on Jeff Wilson. Although I didn't love

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what I saw last week Alright, final matchup of the

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>segment is the Eagles taking on the Giant Scott Eagles

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have suddenly reversed the early season all passing, no running.

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Now they're all no passing. Yeah, they gotta find some

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>balance sometime, right, although this is working way better for them? Yeah, yeah,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely is. Jalen Hurts obvious. If he doesn't get

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it done passing like he didn't last week, he gets

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>it done on the ground like he did last week

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:18.319
<v Speaker 1>with three rushing touchdowns, he gets it. He's He's been

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a top twelve quarterback ten weeks or not nine or

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>ten weeks of this season so far. Obviously there, you're

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>not benching him. Tavanta Smith, I also have an A

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.959
<v Speaker 1>grade on He's He's Hurts main guy has sixty plus

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>yards in six or eight games, and now he's scoring

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more as Hurts. His progressing as a passer

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>um last last week was a little fluky with Hurts

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>running three in but he is the guy that Hurts

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>looks too in the end zone. A grade on Smith

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Watkin Quest Watkins, I'm sorry, just when I start buying

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>into him, his targets are ticking up and schedule gets

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>easier then he goose eggs on us. So I'm throwing

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown two weeks. Yeah, I'm throwing him back on the bench.

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard B grade here the Giants been allowed a

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.959
<v Speaker 1>touchdown since week four. But Waller and Gronk just ripped

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>up the Giants the last two weeks for ninety two

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>yards and seventy two yards and a budget. The other

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends did work too. It seems like that's a

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the area there. They've been beaten recently in UM

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and you get a lot of targets out of Goddard. Yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of volume that that there was.

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Where my point is going is he those are the

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>two guys that compare with Goddard as far as volume goes.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders B grade. Howard is out. That should mean

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>a bigger look workload for Sanders. Scott does a lot

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that that Sanders does. The reason Jordan Howard

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>was coming coming in is because he does the bang

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>through the middle stuff buston. Scott really doesn't do that.

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So Sanders isn't gonna lose a lot of work to

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Scott on that angle. I think he might get up

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to his early season numbers of of snap counts in

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this one. Um, the Eagles have been going to the

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>running back to thirty five times per game, as we

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of alluded to. If he gets even half of

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that sixteen plus touches, Um, you're talking about a Giant's

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 1>team that all the backs of that sixteen plus touches. Uh,

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>they averaged a hundred and seven yards. So I like

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 1>miss Sanderson, he catches passes to my only concerned this

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>hurts stealing goal like Harries, it's legit. On the other side,

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones, I have a C grade. He's got his

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>weapons back. Yeah, sharps out or not sharp Sterling Shepherd.

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd's oh, yeah, that's right. I you know, I wrote

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this down before I saw Tony went doubtful. You know what,

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bench him now, just should be on the bed.

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Andy's Daniel Jones. The play has been so bad. Yeah,

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles have allowed seven seven quarterback touchdowns in just

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. But yeah, with with Tony out

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 1>now to Yeah, Shepherd's Shepherds. Don't trust Freddie Kitchens to

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>materially change, and you can't trust Holiday. You can't trust Slaton,

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So the only past catcher I trust is might take

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me receiver. I guess tight end Evan Ingram,

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>because he's gonna be the only one out there that

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can really make plays, can throw, they don't have to

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>run something. I don't know. I should look up his

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>passing stats. I have a B grade on s Kwon Barkley.

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Not the greatest return against the tougher Bucks run d

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>last week, but it lightens up here. Illegals are allowing

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most Comboy yards to running backs at over

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty yards per game. They're not gonna have

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Booker on the field. Barkley is gonna get He's another

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>week removed from that injury. He got some play in him.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>He had six catches in his first game back. He's

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a dual threat. B grade. There be grade there, hey.

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>From the Thursday games, Dallas has lost three of the

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>last four. Tony Pollard is simply a better running back

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>than Ezekiel Elliott. Do you know how many yards rushing EZEKIELA.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Elliott has in the last five weeks? No under five games,

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred and five games. I don't. I don't

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>know if he meant to do it. But you called

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>him Elliott there, and I like Ezekiel that would be

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that is a tough guy name right there. At

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>some point, at some point, they gotta flip the usage

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on these guys. Jerry Jones, do you think you want?

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He basically calls the plays right Our number two coming

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>up next Fantasy Football Weekly, including three tough questions for

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>a panel of experts. See if you can go three

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and oh when we return Fantasy Football Weekly. Our number

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>two Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Churchy and Scott Fish and

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson with you if you'd like to follow us

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, I am at Paul Charchy, and Scott is

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>at Scott Fish twenty four and Brian is beat t

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>x J. If you follow me, you're gonna have to

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>put up with video game, bourbon, board games, and a

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of fantasy football mixed in there as well.

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Those are all good things. Those are in my They

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>all go together in my world. It's it's all competitive gaming, baby,

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we love it. Uh. This is a segment we call

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. We encourage you to play a long question.

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Number one, better tight end prospect in future years Kyle Pitts.

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Our Pat friar Mouth will begin with our Kyle Pitts apologist,

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson. Um, I'm gonna have more counterpoints to this

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous question. Pat fire movie conclearingly gonna have a great year.

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>He's having a great rookie year as an actual tight end.

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna say he is the better tight end

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 1>prospect in future years because I truly believe that Kyle

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Pitts to wide receiver because that is what he plays,

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and yes, he's he is through among uh quote unquote

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and yards despite having his by and despite

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>being the only past catcher that's drawing double coverage Pits, Yes,

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and his his quarterback is dust In Matt Ryan. But

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I I honestly believe, and I don't like it, trust me,

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that Pitts is gonna be moved to wide receiver even

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football couple world. I disagree with you there

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because he for the contract. Falcons won't do it for

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the contract. His contract will be up in a couple

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of years, but they don't want to have to pay

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>him like a wide receiver they want to pay. If

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey hasn't moved age, then he won't, he won't

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>resign with Atlanta, and it will go somewhere else receiver,

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>because alright, okay, maybe we should have gone we should

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have gone to me first. Then I figured that better

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end prospect in future Kyle Pitts or Pat Friarmouth.

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, so I'm still sticking with See, I love

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>both these guys. I think this is talking to like,

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, who's better for the future, Hill or Adams,

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it's splitting hairs from me, because I

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:04.959
<v Speaker 1>really I have both these guys in a lot of leagues.

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I love both these guys. Kyle Pitts just runs so

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>many more routes. Uh, he he runs, He runs so

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>many more routes. He gets so much more air yards,

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets targeted on more routes um. His target share

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for the team is much higher. His catch percentage is

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>about the same. But where the difference is is really

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and and the red zone looks are even like

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>way in a way for Pat Okay, Pat fern With

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>gets all the red zone looks. He gets so much

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>touchdown targeting. That's kind of what you look for in

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends because but touchdowns aren't super sticky The problem

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is both we don't know who their cardobacks will be

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>next year. So I'm going to take the guy that

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I already know gets an elite level, elite level number

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of routes, you know, targets. Um, he's a bigger part

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the offense, and I think he's just a better

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>all around talent because I don't know what each offense is,

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what the touchdown offense is gonna look for,

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like for Pittsburgh next year. This was a hard question.

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a legitimately tough question. Touchdowns aren't

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:15.759
<v Speaker 1>as sick as loophole aside. Uh, first off, let's start here.

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm declaring victory and are heated preseason debates about Kyle Pitts.

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>That's already over. That's not it is not even up

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>for contest. It's third in yards among tight ends. What

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what Yeah, you're leaving out the one touchdown. Darren Waller

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>has two? Are you calling Waller? That is? That is?

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Waller has nothing to do with this conversation. He has

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>been over the past month. Over the past month, Kyle

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Pitts is tight end thirty two in Fantasy scoring three two.

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.839
<v Speaker 1>That is, he has if you started Kyle Pitts every

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 1>week of the season he has hurt your team. That

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is indisputable. That is, he has hurt your team over

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the past past five weeks, which is a sizeable sample size.

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Pat Friar Muth is tight end two in Fantasy Points

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end two over the previous five weeks. Kyle Pitts

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is tight end thirty two. So this is not to me.

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 1>This isn't close. That is a five weeks sample. But

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>they both have two top five weeks at tight end.

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>They both have four top twelve weeks at time end

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.319
<v Speaker 1>tight end, and Pitts has eight top twenty four weeks.

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Has played four games over the last five weeks start

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>he had his bidering that span. So talk about skewed numbers,

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he's got triple the did you start him in his

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:38.399
<v Speaker 1>bye week? Um? Okay, now here's here's the X factor here.

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And this I really struggled, I really, I honestly struggled

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>with with much of this. We know the Steelers have

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>got a huge problem at quarterback beginning next year, right,

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I mean they this is it, this

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is the end of the run there. But they also

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>know that and they will do They'll take some corrective measure.

0:49:57.080 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Now the prrective measure may not work, but they're going

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to do some thing about it next year. So then

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 1>we look at Kyle Pitts with Matt Ryan. Matt Ryan.

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a chance they move on from Matt Ryan next year,

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>but they will probably start him again next year. But

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we're at that stage where any year is where it

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>could totally fall off for Matt Ryan. So then do

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you ride out Kyle Pitts not knowing when the end

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is here for Matt Ryan, or you better off with

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Pat Friar Muth and whatever rebuilding measure that they end

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>up taking. And that's not obvious as to what the

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>right answer is on that. And Steelers have always had

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>consistent tight not not not necessarily elite, but even back

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Heath Miller days, they've had pretty consistent tight

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>end and they you know, they've targed there tight end

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the red zone for twenty years. And your case against

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Pitts in the summer was just he was a rookie

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>tight end. It wasn't that Matt Ryan was gonna be

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>absolute trash, that Calvin Ridley away from the team, that

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Cordell Cordell Patterson was gonna be this ridiculous X factor

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere. You can't take like that. That's just

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:06.600
<v Speaker 1>where we are today. And I won that, Dilton. I

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>won the preseason bet on whether or not he would

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>live up to your ranking of tight end four, your

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 1>preseason ranking of tight end four. It's just it's just two.

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>He's tight end eight right now. No, I bet he's

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not even that high, but that's it's still not four

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>either way. That is soundly seven. Okay, boy, after all

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of this, the correct answer is Kyle Pitts Top question

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>number two, sabotage drop, Russell Wilson, Scott Fish. What do

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you think I believe I said in the preseason just

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not to draft him, because that's that's a whole other

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation to take one of these This this is not

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like now. This is what we this is when we

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about the preseason is the second half of the

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>year is bad for him almost almost every year now,

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and now he's dealing with a finger injury. Um, there

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are enough qubs out there with the same that are

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna put up similar or better production without the name value.

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 1>So I I say, sure, I don't trust the run

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>game anymore. I don't trust pe Carroll anymore. Yeah. Yeah,

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop him, Brian sabotage drop Russell Wilson. Uh No,

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>next week, don't do it this week. You're gonna play

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:26.520
<v Speaker 1>him this week against Washington, who is given of the

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:31.879
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns two quarterbacks. Of course, So sabotage. Don't

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop at the end of the week anyway. Your

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>sabotrast draft window is next week after the big game

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>against Okay, yeah, I'll say yes if we're under that,

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:45.359
<v Speaker 1>yes notion, but yes after Sunday. Yes, sabotage rop Russell

0:52:45.400 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Wilson for sure, especially because I mean Russell Wilson and

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>his career is ten and two on Monday night with

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 1>absurd stats like and it's a great matchup. Again, for

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>those that are not familiar, the point of the sabotage

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>drop is to cost make other people spend some kind

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of capital their waivers spot or a bunch of fat

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and a guy who's not going to perform for that,

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you can't drop him at the end of

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the week because those pickups are free. You gotta drop

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>him at the beginning of next week. The second half

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the sabotage is that they start him and they

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:16.239
<v Speaker 1>don't and that's delicious as well. And by the ways,

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>tenth right now and points per game among tight ends

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and non PPR, he has had his by And despite

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that fact, he's third in yards and seventh in catches.

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Guess the one touchdown? Matt Ryan has missed him on

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple occasions in the end zone watching past I'm very

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>upset with this. What was what was the correct answer?

0:53:34.200 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, but still you're all over my boy. Listen.

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't that he never should have been ranked tight

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 1>end four. That was ludicrous. Darren Waller been ranked you

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>guys talked to me up to say, I'm preci I'm

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure I had him at six and moved him

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to five. Right, No, I moved him back to six

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with the entry to alight factor. Russell, We're still time

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>get this guy. Whatever over his last fifteen games is

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a healthy sample size. It goes back to Halloween's Russell

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Wilson's average output is two hundred fifteen yards and one

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:15.280
<v Speaker 1>point four touchdowns. Who else is two hundred fifteen yards

0:54:15.400 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and one point four touchdowns? Who is the statistical comparables

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam Darnald to a Tonguo Violoa and Jimmy Garoppolo. None

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of them may be starters next year. That is your

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:33.800
<v Speaker 1>comparable to what Russell Wilson has delivered over the last

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>year and change of games. I just have to throw

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this in because it's hilarious. Josh Norris, you know, Josh

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Norris formally wrote a word. He tweeted out a meme

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a picture of let Russ cook next to a bowl

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of cereal with two uncooked Hodd dogs and a piece

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of not melted cheese in it. And I'm like, that's

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:53.439
<v Speaker 1>that's about right now. Get this the schedule another reason

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to sabotage drop Russell Wilson. To schedule only one strongly

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:00.800
<v Speaker 1>positive game left at Houston. Every other game left is

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>neutral or negative for Russell Wilson. And ask yourself this,

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with playoff time approaching, you need to get your quarterback

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to help you win three straight games in the playoffs.

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You can't trusts. He can't put together three straight good games.

0:55:15.320 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>His offensive line ranks twenty four and pass blocking by

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus. He's only got one reliable target, TK Metcalf.

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:23.359
<v Speaker 1>So many things working against him. No running game, Yes,

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop Russell Wilson no matter what he does against

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the terrible Washington secondary this weekend. Tough question number three,

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what is the appropriate level of concern for Darryl Henderson? None?

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Some or a bowl loosening level of existential dread? Brian,

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going none. He scored zero points last week, but

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that's because he was on by UM. Apparently only Kyle

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Pitts docked for that, but anyway, third easiest remaining strength

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of skal for running backs according to Fantasy Pros and

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle, no threat to really steal touches from Henderson,

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and without Robert Woods, he could see the Rams have

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>deployed him as a wide receiver on multiple occasions, put

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>him out wide and completed long passes to him. He's

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of area yards for running back. So

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I have no concern with Darren Darryl Henderson. I see

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 1>where you're going with this, and it's because his touches

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and his production came down the last two weeks last

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty pretty precipitously. Um. But the even even three

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to even four weeks ago, he's still got like eighteen touches.

0:56:34.960 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 1>The week after that, he got sixteen touches like the

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:40.879
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks were the ones that really killed people. UM.

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:43.359
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that, the reason Michelle was getting

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>nine touches per game, is because they fell behind by

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>two scores. I don't see the Rams doing that a

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:51.440
<v Speaker 1>lot going forward. I don't think they're that broken. I

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:53.320
<v Speaker 1>think this is a question of do you think that

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are a little bit broken and they're gonna

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be falling behind in games where Darrell Henderson isn't good

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to get the usage he does. And I don't think

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen. I think they'll be ahead a lot.

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll get his usage back. He's been a

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>little dinged up. Um. Nobody else in that backfield gets

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the receiving work. I'm gonna say some, but only because

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe the offense is broken and Darrel Henderson gets injured.

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's something he does. He does. He's gotten hurt

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this year already a couple of times, played through it.

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He got hurt in previous seasons. Uh. The correct answers

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 1>some diminishing carries in five straight games. Hasn't top ninety

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards all year, but may or maybe more than

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:33.240
<v Speaker 1>anything else, I'm just worried that Sean mcveigh's got this

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>knee jerk willingness to bail on his running game the

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>moment his team is down. Will the Rams fall behind

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>at any point during this playoff schedule Seattle, probably not.

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>How About at Minnesota with a good Vikings offense. Maybe

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>at Baltimore maybe? And if they fall behind, does Darryl

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Henderson let you down in one of those games where

0:57:57.520 --> 0:57:59.920
<v Speaker 1>suddenly it turns into a seven touch game. That's a

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 1>good point, and that's what worries me. So I don't

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>know that you can get through a playoff gauntlet where

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't afford any loss in three straight games. And

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why three. The answer is the appropriate level of

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>concern for Darrell Henderson is some s working one final

0:58:18.160 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup in this this segment, it's not our final final matchup.

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 1>The Tennessee Titans take on the Patriots. Brian, there's nothing

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:26.640
<v Speaker 1>left with this, There's nothing left of this, This Titan's

0:58:26.680 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 1>offense missing. It's number one and number two wide receivers,

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's number one tight end And I don't know we're

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:36.960
<v Speaker 1>down to like running back seventeen here? Should I just say,

0:58:37.000 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going with the doctor was might take a

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>chance of Men's. Yeah, you can go to look at

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the other wide receivers, but suddenly they're like the top

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>option that it's gonna get shut down by cornerback J. C.

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's looked great. So yeah, you can't trust anyone in

0:58:52.440 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the passing except Hilliard. Out of the backfield me Marcus Johnson,

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 1>number one, two and three receivers are out. Johnson put

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>on I R by the way, you would have had

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a good game. You had the right call, but he

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got hurt. Last weeks Fitzpatrick and n W I had

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a great game. But anyway, basically you're benching all Titans

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>unless Hilliard. If you're desperate running back, he's a He's

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 1>take on Worthy over to the Patriots side the uh.

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Damien Harris and Mndre Stevenson both get a C for

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>me in a likely time share in this one. Teams

0:59:21.400 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have been having way too much fun throwing on the Titans,

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but Tennessee just yielded thirty five running back touches in

0:59:26.720 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a loss to the Texans and in this game should

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>offer the same type of script for the New England

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:34.200
<v Speaker 1>running back, So a C for both just because they're

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:36.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of vulter each other on this one. Stevenson

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe even gets the edge with the pass catching, but

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:40.680
<v Speaker 1>then again, they might never not even have to pass

0:59:40.720 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in this game, that's true. Uh. And with that said,

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just to see for Hunter Henry. For me, the Titans

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are allowing the fifth viewest Fantasy points per game to

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and John and Smith might get some extra

0:59:49.760 --> 0:59:51.720
<v Speaker 1>reps in this one. It is a revenge game after

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but he's still on the bench though, Jonas Smith that is.

0:59:55.720 --> 0:59:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll give the seed Hunter Henry, and now for Nelson Aguilar, Ja,

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Kobe Myers and Drick Borne. Kind of tricky situation here.

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give each one to see, but I don't

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>know which one is actually gonna have the the seaworthy game.

1:00:07.080 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>The Titans are allowing the most of everything to opposing

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers on the season, but again, the game script

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>could get flipped upside down. I'll go with Kendrick Bourne,

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>who has the most targets over the last two weeks

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>among the wide receivers in the most yards uh at

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty, and he scored a touchdown. Also

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>four rushes for fifty yards, so Kendrick Borne, if your

1:00:27.640 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ultra needy gets to see and I'm sort of saying,

1:00:30.760 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about how much the Patriots are gonna throw,

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but I still had Mac Jones. This might take a

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>chance to meet quarterback. I think they might let him

1:00:37.000 --> 1:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have some fun here aired out a little bit sounds good.

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, it's just gonna be as one side of

1:00:42.880 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a game as as we'll see. Things were looking so

1:00:45.120 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>promising for the Titans right before when they beat They

1:00:50.200 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hammered Patrick Mahomes and dominated that game, and it looked

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like they were as good as any team in the

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a f C. Fast forward, what three weeks and it's

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a complete disaster, clinging exact same team absolutely. When we

1:01:02.920 --> 1:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>come back, the Browns take on the Ravens. Brown's offense

1:01:06.680 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to rebound from a dug game, but they get

1:01:09.280 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>back Kareem Hunt. We'll tell you what to expect from

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>him and Nick Chubb in this matchup with the hated Ravens.

1:01:15.400 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>When we return to Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy

1:01:34.600 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. We've got a block of matchups for you,

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>letter grades and all the players who matter. Browns take

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Ravens now here's the schedule. Oddity with this

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is the Browns are gonna play the Ravens in consecutive games.

1:01:48.920 --> 1:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go Ravens Bye week Ravens, which is I

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can remember, and I'm not an

1:01:56.440 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>authority on this, I don't ever remember that happening before

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I playing the same team consecutively. That's it is. It

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is bizarre. This is the first of the two matchups.

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>UM A grade on Nick Chubb Um, although this is

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a tricky matchup as Baltimore allows

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the seventh fewest rushing yards and only Dalvin Cook has

1:02:16.640 --> 1:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed fifty as top fifty nine yards. Chubb has always

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>shown up though against Baltimore. Is his career average hundred

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>yards and one point three scores per game against his

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>division rivals. So we'll keep an A grade going there.

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Cream Hunt comes into a B grade. He's off fire,

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>he's activated, he's going to go. Hunt can help on

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground, but I really like him here as a receiver.

1:02:35.200 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens allowing the fifth most receiving yards, the tenth

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>most receiving touchdowns to running game to running back, so

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he finds a way to help out here.

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>He's um the hobble. You know, Baker Mayfield comes in

1:02:48.040 --> 1:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhat at least somewhat hobbled, and I believe that means

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to end up emphasizing the run a

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>little more than usual here and maybe some dump offs

1:02:57.040 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to Hunt as well. Also, because Baker is not good,

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not ready to go quite there yet. He's been

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>playing for all season long and I don't know, I

1:03:05.640 --> 1:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mean he has. He's been injured and inefficient, let's put

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it that way. And that's why he's on the bench here.

1:03:10.360 --> 1:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>He's had he's trying to play through knee, foot, and

1:03:12.840 --> 1:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injuries. There. There's a scenario where he may not

1:03:17.480 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>even finish this game. Who knows, but um, he was

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>unable to do anyth against the Lions last week. I

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can't trust him in Baltimore, so he's on the bench.

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got C grade on Jarvis Landry. Ravens have allowed

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the second most yards and eighth most touchdowns per game

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to opposing receivers over the last five weeks, and much

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of that production has come from outside receivers because Tavon

1:03:37.200 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Young is not allowed fifty yards or a score over

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:42.439
<v Speaker 1>those five games. And that's Jarvis Landry is a slot

1:03:42.480 --> 1:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>receiver and that's why he's only a C grade. If

1:03:45.880 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you are really in a dart throw need Donovan People's

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Jones if he plays through his groin injury, and we

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know that he will. But the outside cornerbacks to

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are just getting roasted. Over the past five weeks.

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed the second most yards two receivers, two fifteen

1:04:01.680 --> 1:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. And I just said, I'm not crazy

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about Landrying this lot. It's gonna go to outside guys,

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and Donovan People's Jones is the best they've got. Let's

1:04:08.800 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>go over to the Baltimore side. Lamar Jackson full practices

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>all week after the crippling injury of our illness of

1:04:15.000 --> 1:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>last week. A. He's kind of an amazing track record

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland and it probably doesn't stop in this game.

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland is understandably shut down the likes of Tim Boyle

1:04:24.120 --> 1:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Fields, but good quarterbacks like Patrick Mahomes, Mac

1:04:27.440 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones even counts here. Uh, Teddy Bridgewater just good

1:04:30.920 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>competent quarterbacking Teddy Bridgewater, Kyler Murray, Justin Herbert have combined

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen touchdowns against the Browns passing and rushing. So

1:04:38.360 --> 1:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I I like Lamar Jackson a lot in this one,

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and I like his receivers, especially Mark Andrews. Since Baltimore's

1:04:45.880 --> 1:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Week eight by He's gone from averaging seven targets per

1:04:48.880 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>game to nine targets per game. That nine targets per

1:04:51.640 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>game for a tight end is a ton. On top

1:04:53.600 --> 1:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, he's seen thirty one percent of the team's

1:04:56.080 --> 1:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets on the season, which is amazing. Andrew's

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>has a great matchup against the Browns, who have given

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>up the eleventh most red zone targets to tight ends,

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>which have resulted in the third most touchdowns to the position.

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>In Andrew's last three matchups was Cleveland, He's dominated them

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with five or more receptions for at least seventy five

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>yards in every game. A grade for Mark Andrews Mark's

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Brown is going to enter Sunday's game is questionable and

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really maybe even a game time decision. We're hoping he

1:05:23.800 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>goes here. Obviously, Cleveland hovers around league average and every

1:05:26.840 --> 1:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>meaningful stat against opposing receivers. Brown's most common individual matchup

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>will be Denzel Ward, and that is a challenging matchup.

1:05:34.200 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Ward is not allowed to score and coverage all year

1:05:36.440 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and is not giving up more than forty five yards

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>since Week two. In his coverage, Brown averages three catches,

1:05:42.560 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>forty five yards and just a quarter of a touchdown

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>against four in four career games against the Browns. I

1:05:48.600 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>would give him normally I would give him a seed,

1:05:51.400 --> 1:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm giving him a be just because he's been

1:05:53.040 --> 1:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so good all season and almost every game. But in reality,

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>if I just throw out the past and I look

1:06:00.440 --> 1:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at a injured player in a two very tough matchup,

1:06:03.360 --> 1:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>he deserves a see. But I'm giving him a beat

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>because of his past work. Quick just to pile on

1:06:09.440 --> 1:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the domination of the Browns by Mark Andrews five touchdowns

1:06:13.000 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>across his last four. He scored two touchdowns in two

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of those games. Geez, just just he's fantastic matchup for him,

1:06:20.440 --> 1:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and again a grade there, rosch out Bateman. We thought

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the breakout, we keep thinking the breakout games coming, and

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it might have come last week if Lamar Jackson had

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>actually played it got got thwarted by Tyler Huntley. Um.

1:06:32.720 --> 1:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>With Jackson back, this matchup is just fair. Um, I'm

1:06:37.400 --> 1:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>worried about his matchup with on the outside with impressive

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>rookie Greg Newsome. It's a rookie on rookie, first round

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>rookie Greg Newsom has been good. He hasn't given up

1:06:45.640 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a score since week two. He's allowing him modest forty

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>six yards per game in his coverage, and he will

1:06:50.200 --> 1:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>also see some of Denzil a Ward, who I just

1:06:51.800 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was talking about as a very good matchup. So I'm

1:06:54.280 --> 1:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>nervous about Bateman here just the C grade on him

1:06:57.080 --> 1:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And the only running back you'll consider

1:06:59.800 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>staring his DeVonta Freeman. So last week Lataviasmurray came back

1:07:03.560 --> 1:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and I thought Marie would go back to the depth

1:07:06.520 --> 1:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>chart top of the depth chart and get most of

1:07:08.200 --> 1:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the work, but that was not the case. It was

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>actually Freeman who got much more work and more it

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was more effective than Murray. So he's your lead running back.

1:07:15.960 --> 1:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>The Browns are pretty tough on paper as a run defense,

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing the eighth fewest rushing yards on the six lowest

1:07:21.400 --> 1:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, but lately they've been gashed by high

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>leverage starters over the last four games. Nazi Harris, Joe Mixon,

1:07:29.800 --> 1:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Romandri Stevenson and DeAndre Swift. We're all way better than Freeman. Granted,

1:07:33.920 --> 1:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but they've had a hundred twenty yards and one and

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdowns per game. So if we can get

1:07:38.120 --> 1:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>half that out of DeVonta Freeman, there's your C grade

1:07:41.520 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for Freeman right there. Next matchup and it's a doozy

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Rams taking on the Packers, Scott. The Rams offense has

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gotten itself in big holes in each of the last

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>two games and been out of sync. Do they get

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>healthy here against the Packers? Yeah? Just throw everyone in

1:07:59.680 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this game pretty much, no kidding um so on on

1:08:05.960 --> 1:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Rams side, I have a B grade on Matthew Stafford.

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Even though Cousins torched the pack last week, they'd only

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed three passing touchdowns in the previous five weeks combined

1:08:15.680 --> 1:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and an average of two hundred eight passing yards per

1:08:19.000 --> 1:08:23.639
<v Speaker 1>game during that stretch. Also, Stafford and the Rams offense

1:08:23.640 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't looked good in the last two weeks. It's looked off.

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Something's been off the bye week. No, Robert Wood is

1:08:28.439 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly a far part of that. Don't you think you

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>can't just go, hey, Odell Beckham, go be Robert Woods. No,

1:08:37.479 --> 1:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he's not that guy. So I have a B grade

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on Stafford because his worst game this year's two three

1:08:42.880 --> 1:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>yards in a score, which, like, if that's his floor,

1:08:44.960 --> 1:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>then I'm still going to give him a B and

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>hope that that offense turns around. Uh, Cooper Cup is

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>an obvious A. I don't think we need to talk

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to about him at all. Yeah, oh, b J and Jefferson.

1:08:55.479 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Here's where it gets interesting for me. But no, I agree.

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Normally when people are teams are you know, have wide

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>receivers that are gonna split them like you're gonna monopolize

1:09:06.160 --> 1:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>each other. I don't like you. This is the rare

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity where I'm going C grade on both, but I

1:09:11.720 --> 1:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know that one might fail. Yeah it's probably true. Yeah,

1:09:17.200 --> 1:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody will probably have some success. Yes, but I do

1:09:21.120 --> 1:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that all the time. You can give multiple sees. Two

1:09:23.040 --> 1:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>guys on the same team. They have that potential, but

1:09:24.880 --> 1:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean they're both gonna produce it. I I do that.

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I do that, but I I believe in this one

1:09:29.280 --> 1:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they actually have a pretty decent shot shot because a

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of times the number two receiver in this offense,

1:09:35.080 --> 1:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>who was usually Robert Woods, but sometimes it was Van Jefferson,

1:09:37.680 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and in past it was you know, Brandon Cooks, the

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>number two receiver performs in this offense, and it's gonna

1:09:42.920 --> 1:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be one of those two guys. So I think one

1:09:45.040 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of these guys that's going to perform on a B level,

1:09:47.760 --> 1:09:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think the others can perform on a C level.

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know which one is which because we

1:09:53.280 --> 1:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know's role at all. We just have no up.

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't top to eighty one yards in two years, right,

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't. I don't think O b J

1:10:03.680 --> 1:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is ready for it yet. Yeah, he's he's had like

1:10:07.160 --> 1:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Kitchen's level coordinators, not Sean McVeigh. That is a factor.

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But Stefanski's no slouch. Yeah, that's true. Yeah, and this

1:10:15.960 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 1>is the best quarterbacking he's had ever. Yeah. Uh, Henderson,

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a C grade to just we We've already

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>talked on this show exhaustively how he's been the last

1:10:28.080 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks and that's why he's I would normally

1:10:31.000 --> 1:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>give him a BE but the last couple of weeks

1:10:32.600 --> 1:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>have been that way, and I could see them falling

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>behind behind, and it could be it could be a

1:10:37.720 --> 1:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>replay of the last two weeks. Michelle still in nine

1:10:40.280 --> 1:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>touches per game over the last three. That's why he

1:10:42.560 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>gets to see you. For me, he's going to get

1:10:44.080 --> 1:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the volume. But maybe maybe it's another game like the

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. Rogers, on the other side, I

1:10:49.960 --> 1:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have a B grade for after that one week one

1:10:52.400 --> 1:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to bacle against the Saints. Rogers has thrown multiple touchdowns

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in all but one game. That game, he's still a

1:10:58.360 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 1>two or nine two yards. That's a good game game. Yeah,

1:11:00.880 --> 1:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in a tough spot against the Rams of just allowed

1:11:03.600 --> 1:11:06.519
<v Speaker 1>three multiple score games and just to three plus yard

1:11:06.600 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>days this season. I'm only giving Rogers the B instead

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of an A because his ceiling remains just through the

1:11:13.000 --> 1:11:15.519
<v Speaker 1>roof when he's on, he's on. Yeah, this is this

1:11:15.680 --> 1:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is so tricky with Rogers no no left, no left

1:11:18.479 --> 1:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in practice and von Miller coming at you from that

1:11:21.560 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>same spot. And finally von Miller has got some like

1:11:24.760 --> 1:11:27.559
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't greatest first game, right, but he's had two

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks to get healthy. As a big part of it,

1:11:31.800 --> 1:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous of. I think Rogers has Brady big downside

1:11:36.200 --> 1:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in this always has upside. The only two quarterbacks on

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Rogers level that played the Rams. Tom Brady and Kyler

1:11:42.479 --> 1:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Murray had seven hundred total yards and four scores against

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. So they performed to Davante Adams like Cooper

1:11:48.840 --> 1:11:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Cup is just an obviously you're not shadowing him virtually

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>all game. Yeah, they can double him and I'd still

1:11:56.320 --> 1:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>trust Davanta Adams to get red zone targets that might

1:11:58.760 --> 1:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>score touchdowns. I do have ENVS on the bench, though,

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I I it's just too tough of a matchup. Uh

1:12:06.560 --> 1:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And if Lazard comes, Lazard comes back, which it sounds

1:12:09.479 --> 1:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>like he will, MVS pops off when Lazard is out,

1:12:13.040 --> 1:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he quiets down when Lizard is in. They spread it

1:12:15.760 --> 1:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>around a little too much. So I have MVS on

1:12:18.840 --> 1:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the bench. A J. Dillon and Aaron Green. Aaron Green, Wow,

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, that's a flashbacker right there. Um, Aaron Jones,

1:12:28.360 --> 1:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a really tough one. Aaron Jones has practiced

1:12:32.960 --> 1:12:37.519
<v Speaker 1>the Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, but a lot of injury experts,

1:12:37.680 --> 1:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>including Stefani Bells, have said the Green Bay Packers are

1:12:41.160 --> 1:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>notorious for being very conservative, and they've got the bye week. Come,

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>They've got a bye week. The only way Aaron Jones

1:12:48.439 --> 1:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>plays is if he's at or near one. And that's

1:12:54.240 --> 1:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>exactly where my mind the looming bye week, there's no

1:12:57.560 --> 1:12:59.479
<v Speaker 1>way they play him unless he's almost full health. That

1:13:00.640 --> 1:13:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I think you we're of same mind here. That's exactly

1:13:03.840 --> 1:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>what I was gonna say. So my belief is he

1:13:06.439 --> 1:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>is out. So I am giving A J. Dylon the

1:13:09.760 --> 1:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>B grade here. Uh. Neither Wilson nor Mitchell were very

1:13:13.960 --> 1:13:17.519
<v Speaker 1>effective in von Miller's first game with the Rams, but

1:13:17.640 --> 1:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell had an okay day due to huge volume. This

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is where Dylan stands out from those guys. Where Dylan

1:13:23.920 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>stands out from those guys is he gets receiving work

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>those guys didn't at all. A J. Dylon had six

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>catches in his in his full game there, six forty

1:13:31.960 --> 1:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>four yards um. He's basically a lock for six team

1:13:34.920 --> 1:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>plus touches. Uh. Backs without receiving workload and touches have

1:13:39.720 --> 1:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>done fairly decently, So B grade on A J. Dylon. Yeah,

1:13:43.640 --> 1:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dylan looked okay last week, but as we

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>talked going into last week's game, it's the receiving work

1:13:50.000 --> 1:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna keep him safe. It's mostly the catches. I

1:13:52.280 --> 1:13:54.799
<v Speaker 1>feel like Aaron Jones is a much more effective receiver.

1:13:55.040 --> 1:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But for sure he's a very natural dy. Dylan can catch,

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but Owns is just it's so fluid with he's meant

1:14:05.080 --> 1:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to catch the ball. Well. When we come back, Premature

1:14:07.439 --> 1:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Speculation will give you three players to pick up this

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>week that everybody else is going to be trying to

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up next week. And Chargers taking on the Broncos

1:14:16.080 --> 1:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>will tell you what to expect from Justin Herbert and

1:14:18.880 --> 1:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that passing game. Can Mike Williams make it two in

1:14:21.160 --> 1:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a row? All that and more for the final segment

1:14:23.439 --> 1:14:43.639
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy Football Weekly Coming up next. Welcome in final

1:14:43.760 --> 1:14:46.599
<v Speaker 1>segment of Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul church In, Scott Fish,

1:14:46.680 --> 1:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson with you. You missed any part of

1:14:49.320 --> 1:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the show. You get all my player rankings available for

1:14:51.680 --> 1:14:55.679
<v Speaker 1>free at Guillotine leagues dot com. This is a segment

1:14:55.760 --> 1:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we like to call premature Speculation, where we give you

1:15:00.439 --> 1:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>three players you want to pick up now that your

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>opponents will be trying to pick up next week. Scott Fish,

1:15:06.200 --> 1:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>who you got? As always? I sometimes I really like

1:15:09.000 --> 1:15:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to go deeper on this segment because because I feel

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:13.679
<v Speaker 1>there are people in deep leagues. This guy is available

1:15:13.760 --> 1:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in nine percent of leagues of the snap snaps the

1:15:18.600 --> 1:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. Second in targets over the last three

1:15:21.680 --> 1:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks on his team, DeAndre Carter. He's got touchdowns in

1:15:25.760 --> 1:15:28.519
<v Speaker 1>three straight weeks. And get this, since week four, he

1:15:28.680 --> 1:15:31.719
<v Speaker 1>leads the Washington football team into in red zone targets.

1:15:32.400 --> 1:15:35.679
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the they have said, the Bears have said,

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Heineke and him have a great rapport. Curtis Samuel is

1:15:39.000 --> 1:15:41.719
<v Speaker 1>likely still out. He's only put in two limited practices

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>since the ree aggravation of his injury. It's and here's

1:15:45.200 --> 1:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing. They play Monday night. If he blows up

1:15:47.240 --> 1:15:49.439
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night, you already got him. Yeah, I like

1:15:49.600 --> 1:15:53.679
<v Speaker 1>it perfect. Uh, you know what I'm gonna go next,

1:15:53.800 --> 1:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>because I'm just gonna piggyback off another Washington player. Alright,

1:15:57.040 --> 1:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas Brian had mentioned him a couple of weeks,

1:16:00.160 --> 1:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's finally getting to the point where he's ready

1:16:02.000 --> 1:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to play at this stage. Although he may not go

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:06.439
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but I don't. This game has no

1:16:06.640 --> 1:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>no bearing on on this. I'm looking forward beyond this week.

1:16:10.000 --> 1:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We all need tight ends. Remember, in his three full

1:16:12.880 --> 1:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>games this year, he scored twice. He's according two of

1:16:15.080 --> 1:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the three games, and he was very good last year.

1:16:17.320 --> 1:16:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Washington desperately needs more receiving options, although you just mentioned

1:16:21.960 --> 1:16:26.479
<v Speaker 1>um that there there are well um in his stead

1:16:26.680 --> 1:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Ricky Seals Jones was freaking viable for fantasy and he's

1:16:30.040 --> 1:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a fract He's framctionally as good as Logan Thomas. So

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Logan Thomas is Mike would fifth. I think it's it's

1:16:38.880 --> 1:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seven sixteen, Brian, you're taking Sorry, you're premature speculation player.

1:16:47.280 --> 1:16:48.599
<v Speaker 1>I think you had people on the edge of their

1:16:48.640 --> 1:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seats when you're said you can use the Washington player

1:16:51.240 --> 1:16:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and they're like st Beard And then it wasn't I

1:16:54.560 --> 1:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thought he was coming back anytime soon. They keep pushing

1:16:57.080 --> 1:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>his timetable back. Well, speaking of a guy come back,

1:17:00.439 --> 1:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>probably not this week. And when he comes back, I

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can't promise you he's gonna stay healthy. And that's Miami

1:17:05.240 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>wide out Davante Parker uh most likely coming back next week.

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>You can grab him now. According to Fantasy Pros, the

1:17:12.040 --> 1:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins have the easiest remaining strength of schedule among wide receivers,

1:17:15.920 --> 1:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you're needy at the position, Davante Parker charges

1:17:19.040 --> 1:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>take on the Broncos. Brian Uh, we already know what

1:17:22.760 --> 1:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do with Austin Ekeler. There's a lot more

1:17:24.479 --> 1:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>intrigue in the passing game here. Talk to me about

1:17:26.960 --> 1:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Justin Herbert, and I'm especially interested in in whether or

1:17:29.760 --> 1:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>not we can get a good game out of Boom

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or Bust guy. Mike Williams. Yeah, this is the first

1:17:35.360 --> 1:17:37.519
<v Speaker 1>meeting of the year between these divisional rivals, so we

1:17:37.640 --> 1:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>can go back to recent history. But in Herbert's last

1:17:41.960 --> 1:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or bone trip to Denver last year, he threw for

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:47.599
<v Speaker 1>two state two eight yards and three touchdowns. So air

1:17:47.720 --> 1:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Bear can handle the thin air. The Broncos have rendered

1:17:50.560 --> 1:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple passing touchdowns and four of their last six games,

1:17:53.160 --> 1:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>only Taylor Heineke in case Keenum failed to hit the

1:17:56.560 --> 1:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdown mark, but they each had one, and the

1:17:59.479 --> 1:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are likely or they are the most high octane

1:18:03.000 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>offense UH Denver has seen during that same time Spanzo

1:18:06.120 --> 1:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and A for air Bear, uh A A for Keenan Allen.

1:18:09.720 --> 1:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Per next Agen stats, Alan is ranked among the top

1:18:12.200 --> 1:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen pass catchers and percentage of his team's air yards

1:18:15.000 --> 1:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last three weeks. That pairs nicely with the

1:18:17.640 --> 1:18:20.519
<v Speaker 1>fact that Denver gives up the third highest average depth

1:18:20.560 --> 1:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of target at nine point three yards. Alan has also

1:18:23.479 --> 1:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>scored in his last two games at Mile High or

1:18:26.120 --> 1:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>whatever they call it now like Corpo dot Com at

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Mile High Stadium. But E d A for Alan uh,

1:18:31.360 --> 1:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not an A for Mike Williams. I gonna give him

1:18:33.120 --> 1:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a b Denver has allowed six wide receiver touchdowns over

1:18:36.200 --> 1:18:39.519
<v Speaker 1>their last five games. Williams has averaged five catches and

1:18:39.600 --> 1:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty six yards over his last four games against the Broncos.

1:18:43.160 --> 1:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So I like Williams and this one you're don't you know,

1:18:45.840 --> 1:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a lot. You're You feel a lot more confident

1:18:48.080 --> 1:18:50.759
<v Speaker 1>about Williams than I do or anybody else who started

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>him for the last six weeks. I do. I like

1:18:52.960 --> 1:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>him this one. That's why I gave him to be

1:18:54.200 --> 1:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't like Jared Cook. He's on the bench.

1:18:56.320 --> 1:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Denver is not allowed tight in touchdown all year, so

1:18:58.439 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty easy bench. Great for him, in an easy

1:19:00.520 --> 1:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>A for Austin Ekeler over the last Over their last

1:19:02.800 --> 1:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>seven games, Denver is allowing hundred and sixty two combo

1:19:05.760 --> 1:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown per game to opposing running backs,

1:19:08.400 --> 1:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and that has been to the incomparable likes of Ernest Johnson,

1:19:11.640 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>J D. Mkissick, Kenyan Drake, and Boston Scott and by

1:19:15.200 --> 1:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>saying that you can't compare those guys to Austin Ekeler

1:19:18.320 --> 1:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, over to the Denver side. And this Denver

1:19:21.160 --> 1:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>side is fascinating because what felt like a massive opportunity

1:19:25.479 --> 1:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for the running backs gets blunted a little bit by

1:19:28.120 --> 1:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the loss of both of the starting tackles for the Broncos.

1:19:31.560 --> 1:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And so when I went into the week, I'm like,

1:19:33.400 --> 1:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon and Vante Williams are sitting on giant games.

1:19:37.080 --> 1:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm not so sure. What do you think? Yeah,

1:19:38.920 --> 1:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I had to. I had bees for both of them

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>based on both tackles being out. Like you just said,

1:19:42.439 --> 1:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna give each a sea. The Chargers are

1:19:45.040 --> 1:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>yielding thirty touches per game to opposing running backs who

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are averaging a hundred forty five compo yards and one

1:19:50.160 --> 1:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half total touchdowns per game. Uh So, just

1:19:53.439 --> 1:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to see if you're both it is revenge game from

1:19:55.479 --> 1:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon. Javante Williams on a per touch basis has

1:19:58.800 --> 1:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>been out of this world like the best running back

1:20:00.720 --> 1:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. But the problem is Gordon gets a

1:20:02.520 --> 1:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of the touches, but uh, and in fair as

1:20:04.439 --> 1:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>much as I want Davonte Willing to just earn and

1:20:07.160 --> 1:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>keep that job and just be the starter, Melvin Gordon's

1:20:09.960 --> 1:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>look good. Yeah, I mean if he was not bad,

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, he's He's looked good, but not as good

1:20:14.960 --> 1:20:17.519
<v Speaker 1>as Williams, who's looked awesome. But he's looked I don't

1:20:17.640 --> 1:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not so bad that there's any reason to bench Gordon.

1:20:19.840 --> 1:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Williams will have his day as a bell cow someday,

1:20:22.320 --> 1:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably not gonna be for the to the

1:20:27.160 --> 1:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers for the Broncos, Jerry Judy, just to see

1:20:30.479 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for him, he will draw a tough coverage from slot

1:20:32.439 --> 1:20:35.519
<v Speaker 1>corner Chris Harris. Judy is the top option at wide receiver,

1:20:35.600 --> 1:20:37.719
<v Speaker 1>but this is a better matchup for the Broncos boundary

1:20:37.760 --> 1:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>receivers actually, Courtland Sutton and Tim Patrick. Over the last

1:20:41.240 --> 1:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, DeVonta Smith, Justin Jefferson and Deonte Johnson, ever

1:20:44.200 --> 1:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>combined to average seven catches on nineteen yards and point

1:20:47.280 --> 1:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>seven touchdowns against the Chargers, who could also be without

1:20:50.439 --> 1:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Assante Samuel who's concussed last week. UM not a lot

1:20:54.240 --> 1:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of history to to base uh on for Sutton Patrick.

1:20:58.040 --> 1:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>These two combined for just one game into the Chargers

1:21:00.760 --> 1:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. Patrick had three catches for three nine yards.

1:21:03.720 --> 1:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>But just to see still for both of those guys,

1:21:05.479 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>I think they might vulture each other. B for Noah Fan. Though,

1:21:09.000 --> 1:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers have been bleeding points to the tight end position,

1:21:11.280 --> 1:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>allowing these second most fantasy points, the fifth most red

1:21:13.960 --> 1:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>zone targets, and the second most touchdowns at eight uh.

1:21:16.880 --> 1:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Four of those eight touchdowns have come over the last

1:21:19.000 --> 1:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from opposing tight ends against the Chargers. So

1:21:22.000 --> 1:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Fans who, in his two games against the

1:21:24.400 --> 1:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Chargers last year average six and a half catches and

1:21:26.960 --> 1:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty six yards. And now to Teddy b uh not

1:21:31.160 --> 1:21:33.479
<v Speaker 1>even Teddy c I've got him on the bench. Even

1:21:33.520 --> 1:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>though I gave all his past catchers a starting grade,

1:21:36.040 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean they're all gonna earn that starting grade. Uh.

1:21:38.400 --> 1:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>It's and with the with the beat up line as well,

1:21:41.040 --> 1:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I still think they lean on the run a little

1:21:42.680 --> 1:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>more on this one. So you can find better options

1:21:44.400 --> 1:21:48.719
<v Speaker 1>with quarterback than Teddy. I concur final segment. The final

1:21:48.800 --> 1:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup is the Seahawks taking on Washington. So let's let's

1:21:53.080 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>begin with Let's begin with Russ. We already hammered Russ

1:21:57.400 --> 1:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty good earlier in this show, but this matchups very,

1:22:00.680 --> 1:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>very tempting to call a slumpbuster. It's uh. It goes

1:22:04.640 --> 1:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>watching the ranks and passing yards allowed thirty first and

1:22:07.439 --> 1:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns allowed, and they just let legendarily inaccurate passer

1:22:13.120 --> 1:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton throw a six in incompletion game. That is

1:22:18.360 --> 1:22:21.799
<v Speaker 1>not cool. So I've gotta be grade on Russell Wilson.

1:22:21.880 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's obviously startable in this matchup, and this

1:22:24.400 --> 1:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>might be it for the year. Uh. Dk Metcalf, also

1:22:26.880 --> 1:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with a B grade, is has only fifty seven total

1:22:30.080 --> 1:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>yards in the two games since Russell Wilson came back

1:22:32.880 --> 1:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from that finger injury, really injury. Fortunately, Washington allowing one

1:22:36.880 --> 1:22:39.519
<v Speaker 1>ninety yards to opposing receivers that is fourth most, and

1:22:39.560 --> 1:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed a receiver to score in nine of ten games.

1:22:42.160 --> 1:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And if there's a touchdown to be had from a

1:22:43.720 --> 1:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver here, dk Metcalf is likely the guy title lock it,

1:22:47.320 --> 1:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just the C grade, you know, you know the story

1:22:49.160 --> 1:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>unlock it. It's all bloomber bust, And obviously he's got

1:22:51.360 --> 1:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>boom capability against a bad secondary um but they aren't

1:22:55.160 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>giving him necessarily explosive games like the kind lock it

1:22:59.120 --> 1:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>usually needs. So you know the drill, plenty of risk,

1:23:02.479 --> 1:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>plenty of reward. Um, I've just got the C grade

1:23:04.840 --> 1:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>unlock it, and I think there's more likely to bust

1:23:06.880 --> 1:23:09.559
<v Speaker 1>than boom and the whole running games on the bench,

1:23:09.640 --> 1:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>these guys have been a disaster. Alex Collins, despite double

1:23:13.160 --> 1:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>digit carries in seven straight games, has only topped the

1:23:17.520 --> 1:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>meager threshold of forty seven yards one time, and he's

1:23:22.400 --> 1:23:25.759
<v Speaker 1>scored just twice in those seven games. And Washington's actually

1:23:25.800 --> 1:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>turned into a very good run defense. For all the

1:23:27.680 --> 1:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>problems we've got against the past, nothing against the run.

1:23:29.800 --> 1:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Their fourth in rushing yards allowed over their last three

1:23:32.439 --> 1:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>games and only one rushing scoring that time. On Only

1:23:35.760 --> 1:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara has topped sixty two rushing yards against them.

1:23:40.160 --> 1:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>On the Washington side, let's credit Taylor Heineke for playing

1:23:45.360 --> 1:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>very well over the last two games. I thought three

1:23:47.479 --> 1:23:50.799
<v Speaker 1>games ago, I'm like they were talking about benching Taylor Heineke.

1:23:51.240 --> 1:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Now he's played well these last two games, seventy seven

1:23:54.160 --> 1:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>percent completion rate, four touchdowns and no picks over the

1:23:58.920 --> 1:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>last two games. Still he's still like makes some crazy

1:24:02.880 --> 1:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>bone headed overthrows and mistakes with the ball, but didn't

1:24:06.320 --> 1:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't cost him the last two games we know he

1:24:08.439 --> 1:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't both wins. Even more impressively, he's done so against

1:24:11.840 --> 1:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>two solid defenses, Tampa and Carolina, and he faces an

1:24:14.360 --> 1:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>improved Seattle secondary that's playing very well. Well until yielding

1:24:19.439 --> 1:24:22.559
<v Speaker 1>to Colt McCoy last week, they had been playing well.

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Even if you include McCoy's performance last week. The average

1:24:25.520 --> 1:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>passing game against Seattle over the past five weeks is

1:24:28.880 --> 1:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a modest two D sixty one yards and just one

1:24:31.080 --> 1:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown past per game. So I like Heinekee here with

1:24:34.360 --> 1:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Terry McLaurin gets a C grade as well.

1:24:38.000 --> 1:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's been a roller coaster ride all year, with over

1:24:41.080 --> 1:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yards and a touchdown in four games and

1:24:44.000 --> 1:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty two or fewer scoreless yards in the other six.

1:24:47.600 --> 1:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that's the that's the risk reward you get

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out of Terry McLaurin, which I don't I don't know

1:24:52.880 --> 1:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about you, Scott. I didn't necessarily expect that for him

1:24:55.240 --> 1:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>because previously he had always been a very safe play.

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think this week you go and boom

1:25:01.040 --> 1:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or bust. No, I'd be more on the boom side.

1:25:04.120 --> 1:25:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be more of a shootout

1:25:05.840 --> 1:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>than than people think. Um, what will you give? What

1:25:09.120 --> 1:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>will you give DeAndre Carter for this game? How about

1:25:11.720 --> 1:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>a see? I don't think i'd even give. I would

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have tough time even doing that. But my point on

1:25:17.200 --> 1:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that is like, if people watch him on Monday Night,

1:25:20.040 --> 1:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to realize he exists, and that would be

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>his fourth straight game with the touchdown. If he scores.

1:25:24.479 --> 1:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to trust him though. I don't have him starting,

1:25:26.760 --> 1:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But okay, they gave him on the I had a

1:25:28.880 --> 1:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>bench grade. But you know, but you kind of talked

1:25:30.760 --> 1:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>me into it during premature speculation. So I wanted to

1:25:33.000 --> 1:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>give you the chance. Um J D. McKissick, was manna

1:25:35.760 --> 1:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of me running back? Let's talk about

1:25:37.400 --> 1:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson. In two games since Washington's by both upset victories,

1:25:42.320 --> 1:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>how Gibson's handled at least nineteen touches and total at

1:25:45.920 --> 1:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>least seventy eight yards, and most encouragingly, He's handled both

1:25:49.360 --> 1:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of Washington's carries inside the tent seven of the eight

1:25:52.080 --> 1:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdown Seattle has allowed to come from inside the tent,

1:25:55.000 --> 1:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and if there's a touchdown to we had from inside

1:25:56.640 --> 1:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the tent, it probably goes to Gibson. So a B

1:25:59.080 --> 1:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>grade for Gibson in this game, Logan Thomas, we're gonna

1:26:02.280 --> 1:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>keep on the bench until we know for sure that

1:26:03.880 --> 1:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a go. And it's a Monday night game. You're

1:26:05.360 --> 1:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>not gonna know until Monday night, so we can't start him.

1:26:07.880 --> 1:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Um alright, final few moments of this show. Let me

1:26:11.240 --> 1:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>hit you guys with a couple of a couple of topics.

1:26:13.880 --> 1:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Can we just straight up drop Zack Moss? Yeah? I

1:26:17.400 --> 1:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>think so, Yeah, I don't. I don't love that situation

1:26:20.040 --> 1:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>at all. The coaches have indicated they want to get

1:26:22.960 --> 1:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bread of more work, and when they did, he still

1:26:24.960 --> 1:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>looks good. But it's enough of us split that you

1:26:26.760 --> 1:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>don't love starting either Moss or Singletary. But if he's

1:26:29.680 --> 1:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>back in this he's he's back to all four paws,

1:26:32.439 --> 1:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>back into the dog house. He's back. He's deep in

1:26:34.920 --> 1:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the doghouse after being inactive on third I'm holding him,

1:26:38.080 --> 1:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I'm not competing in a Dynasty League

1:26:40.360 --> 1:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and just praying for next year, but in redraft, absolutely,

1:26:43.080 --> 1:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>here's why. Here's why. I'm not even holding him in

1:26:45.320 --> 1:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a dynasty league with running backs within two years. For

1:26:50.160 --> 1:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>running backs, if you know in two years what you got,

1:26:52.920 --> 1:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>some guys the rookie or doesn't pan out, and then

1:26:55.120 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the second year it does. If you don't do it

1:26:58.040 --> 1:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in two years, you're not going to do it as

1:26:59.439 --> 1:27:01.479
<v Speaker 1>a running back in this league. I didn't say I wouldn't.

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd hold him through the draft next year, the draft,

1:27:04.200 --> 1:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm holding him until at least through the off season.

1:27:06.280 --> 1:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you start able at the end of

1:27:07.600 --> 1:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the year. And honestly, this feels like they keep just

1:27:10.000 --> 1:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>throwing stuff out there to try to figure out the

1:27:12.040 --> 1:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>run game within what's already a good offense. They just

1:27:14.439 --> 1:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>need the run game. I think they draft or go

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>out and get someone. I think they draft somebody too.

1:27:18.360 --> 1:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>If Devin Singletary can average five yards per carry and

1:27:21.680 --> 1:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss is three and a half, watch watch the

1:27:25.120 --> 1:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Burns contract up. But uh, Darren Waller is gonna

1:27:29.240 --> 1:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>miss some period of time. As as we're recording this,

1:27:32.400 --> 1:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't know exactly how long is Foster Moreau and

1:27:35.320 --> 1:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>automatic ad definitely, I mean he's proven when Waller has

1:27:39.320 --> 1:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>been out. Moreau has put up big numbers in a

1:27:41.760 --> 1:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. A big part of that offense that is

1:27:44.360 --> 1:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>missing pass catchers. I gotta throw out real quickly. Brian

1:27:48.040 --> 1:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Edwards just getting dunked on by Za Jones and Seawan Jackson.

1:27:51.680 --> 1:27:55.360
<v Speaker 1>How about that is killing me? Killing me? Yes? Add

1:27:55.439 --> 1:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Boston Moreau as Foster. Moreau is the best backup tight

1:27:59.320 --> 1:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>end in the league by talent, and he's a beast.

1:28:02.840 --> 1:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>He is huge, by the way, So yeah, I think

1:28:05.640 --> 1:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Foster Morowe becomes a priority tight end ad

1:28:08.479 --> 1:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for those people in a pinch people people probably forget

1:28:11.439 --> 1:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>even in Waller's big year, Morose still at five touchdowns.

1:28:14.360 --> 1:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Like no kidding. That says plenty, doesn't it. If you're

1:28:18.240 --> 1:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to the show over the air, know that the

1:28:20.040 --> 1:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast for Fantasy Football Weekly is available, and vice versa.

1:28:23.560 --> 1:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>If you're podcasting this show, know that it's broadcast on

1:28:26.800 --> 1:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>your favorite sports talk radio station. In many markets, you

1:28:29.439 --> 1:28:31.519
<v Speaker 1>may be able to hear it live there as well. Um,

1:28:31.840 --> 1:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening, everybody. Good luck in this the feast

1:28:34.160 --> 1:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>are famine week of Fantasy Football Weekly. We'll talk to

1:28:36.880 --> 1:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you next week. Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

1:28:53.120 --> 1:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>production of i heart Radio. For more podcast from my

1:28:55.880 --> 1:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:28:59.160 --> 1:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen into your favorite shows.