WEBVTT - Trump's Primary Power and Midterm Test

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And we're back with a Sean Hannity Show on Greg

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Jarrett filling in for Sean Hannity. I'm a Fox News

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>legal analyst, former trial attorney. Sean's taking a few days off.

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be taking your phone calls very shortly,

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and we do have some callers here and I'll ask

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>them to stand by.

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for calling. Just hang in there. We'll get

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to you in just a moment.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>For those who would like to post some questions or

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>offer comments, please give us a call. The number is

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred nine four one seven three two six

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred nine four one seven three two six

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. On Tuesday, primary elections were held coast to coast,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and the endorsement power of President Trump was on full display.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>The candidates that he backed went, according to the President,

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven to zero. In other words, they all won.

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And that was no small accomplishment because you know, several

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of them were high profile ballot box showdowns. For example,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump was determined to get rid of GOP Representative Thomas

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Massey Kentucky's fourth congressional district, who had developed into a

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>very outspoken critic of the president. Massey denounced Trump's foreign policy,

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>including the Iran conflict, and he also blamed Trump for

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>slow walking the release of the Epstein files. Well, guess what.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It turned out that the voters in Kentucky got fed

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>up with Massey and his efforts to undermine the President's agenda.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>The congressman, who had held that seat for fourteen years,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>was soundly defeated by a newcomer for whom Trump had campaigned.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Massey lost by almost ten points, which is an astonished

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>rejection of an incumbent. In the Senate race in Kentucky,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Trump back candidate cruised the nomination to succeed retiring

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Senator Mitch McConnell, rejecting McConnell's handpicked candidate.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump's chosen candidate.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Also move forward in Alabama, in Georgia, in Louisiana. In

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that last state, Louisiana, Trump went out of his way

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of incumbent Senator Bill Cassidy, who has

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>long been a thorn in the President's side. Cassidy got

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely crushed. So what's the message, Well, it seems to

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be this oppose Trump at your own peril, because he

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>will flect his political muscles to exert payback on Republicans

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who defy him, and the question now is will any

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of that translate to the general elections in November. Well,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>joining me now to talk about it is my old

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>friend Doug Sean, who was a lawyer and a veteran

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>political analyst. And I always turned to Doug because he's

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat whom I trust to be candid and accurate

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in his assessments. He's not afraid to criticize his own

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>party when warranted. So Doug, thanks for taking the time

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to be here. I appreciate it, and I always learn

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot from you. And before we get to states

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>like Georgia and Texas, which are important and it could

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>spell trouble for Republicans in November, what's your reaction to

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the powerful influence that Trump had this week in various primaries.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, Greg, the conventional wisdom now is that the

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Republicans are going to get badly beaten in the midterms,

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>and that could well certainly happened. But my message and

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>my takeaway, Greg, and thank you for a very kind introduction,

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 3>is that the power of Trump to mobilize voters is

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 3>frankly as great as you state it to be. And

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the president represents it to be. And in a midterm

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>election where the issue is turnout, who's going to vote,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 3>it would seem to me that the greatest asset that

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the GOP has and GOP candidates have is one Donald J. Trump,

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>the President of the United States, in mobilizing voters who

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>might otherwise not be so inclined to vote when prices

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>are high. Were currently in a war that we'd all

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 3>like to successfully get out of, and midterms, as you

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 3>know and we have discussed previously, tend to break against

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the incumbent party. So I think the takeaway is much

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>more good news for the Republicans than we might have

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 3>anticipated a week or two ago.

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you're right. In fact, I talked to

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump about it. He's well aware of the risks involved

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in a midterm elections for the sitting president, you know,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it always goes against him historically, and he said, look,

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go out and I'm going to campaign

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>as if it's a general election for president, and I'm

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot on the midterm. So we'll wait and

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>see if that works. But I want to talk to

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you about Texas because Trump waited until the last minute

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to endorse the state attorney General Ken Paxton, or the

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>President describes as a true MAGA warrior. You know, there's

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one week to go into the runoff election against the

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>incumbent Senator John Cornyn, and some political pros thing Paxton

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is a gift to Democrats, making it easier for them

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to flip the Texas seat with their chosen candidate, James Talerico,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>who's built quite a war chest. It's felt that Cornyn

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was better equipped to successfully defend the seat in Texas.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, god.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess the conventional political wisdom would be exactly

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that Greg, that a more quote moderate mainstream Republican like

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Cornyan would do better than a more activist attorney general

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 3>such as Ken Paxton. I think the problem is, first,

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the polling today shows that the margin between Paxton and

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Cornyan in the primaries very close, and there wasn't a

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 3>clear advantage for Cornyan in the general election. Maybe a

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 3>point or two maybe, but I don't see it. But

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 3>to me, the key variable is Trump, and I believe

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 3>that the Trump endorsement Greg will as it did in

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Louisiana and as it did in Georgia and Alabama, as

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 3>you suggested, I think it'll probably be enough to pull

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Packson over the finish line and everything I've seen of Texas,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you're right. I'm a veteran, but going

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 3>back many many years, Texas is a reliably red state

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>that my party always believes it's going to win and

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 3>somehow never manages to do so, at least in recent memory.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'd make Paxt a narrow favorite, assuming he is

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the nominee, and that's a big assumption, goes. We haven't

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>had the run up, but I don't think he's going

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>to be appreciably weaker because the Republican brand and the

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump brand, I think are going to be what impels

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>people to vote less than perhaps some of the issues

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that Paxton has faced in the past.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're right about that, Doug.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, primaries are one thing, general elections or another, Especially,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.679
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, when the party in power faces

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>traditional headwins, it's always a challenging political climate. Historically, the

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>party that controls the White House tends to lose seats

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in Congress during the subsequent mid terms. It happened to

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump in twenty eighteen, certainly happened to most Democrats presidents

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. And look, Trump is getting battered in the polls.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw the it came out yesterday, the Fox News polls.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Opposition to the Iran conflict grows despite the belief that

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the US is winning, and economic anxiety seems to be

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>deepening among Americans. That could be troubling for people who

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>vote their wallets and they invariably do they step into

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the voting booth and say what affects me the most, well,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>my empty wallet. And so Democrats are making affordability the

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>issue that they're going to run on.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 3>So smart move, I think it is. Greg My party's

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 3>basic strategy is we don't have a message. We don't

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 3>have a messenger, and we have the polarization and division

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 3>between the far left in the more moderate wing of

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the party, which the progressive seemed to be winning, if

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I am any judge of it. So basically, my party

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 3>sort of says, we don't have anything to run on ourselves,

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 3>so we got to run against Trump. And the one

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>issue that we run on is the one, frankly that

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump ran on himself, which is it's too darn difficult

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>to make it in America. Prices are too darn high

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and Flacusnes is too high, and so vote against the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 3>incumbent because you have to hold somebody accountable. That's my

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 3>party's best argument. They really don't have much else going

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>for them other than that.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you say they don't have a messenger Kamala, Come on, man,

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Kamala is out there.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, she's got all kinds of ideas.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, Greg, I mean, I think the chance that he

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>see has to be the nominee is about zero. Even

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 3>though she's got more name recognition, she doesn't have appreciably

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>more votes. And my experience with her, both in the

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>presidential general election in twenty twenty four and when she

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 3>was a primary candidate in twenty twenty is that the

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 3>more people see her, the less they like her.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, Republicans should advocate the Kammaly get out

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 5>there more in talk because when she talks, it's an

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 5>auto turn off.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, Republicans seem to be winning the war.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>On redistricting lately. The Spreme Court finally put a halt

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to Democrats racial jerry mandarin in the Louisiana decision, so

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they could lose a number of seats in the South

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and Midwest. As maps are being withdrawn as a consequence

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of that ruling, and political jerry mandarine backfired spectacularly in Virginia,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas Republicans have actually successfully redrawn maps in their favor elsewhere.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>But you know, changing the maps may not be good enough, right,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you handicap that?

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, it really is a question of how much the

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>anti incumbent sentiment, the anti Republican sentiment, how strong that

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>is because we're going to have a lot of, as

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 3>you suggest, correctly, new districts, a lot of new candidates,

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and invariably these house races greg have become more a

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 3>test of incumbent versus out party than it is candidate

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 3>A versus candidate B. I would say at this point,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you're right on both your assertions. You're right to say

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 3>that the Republicans have clearly benefited from the redistricting wars

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>so far in the court decisions. But it's also the

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 3>case that we really don't have a sense as to

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>where the generic vote laws. I've seen everything from dead

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>even to plus in the most extreme left wing pole

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>New York Times poll plus eleven Democrats. I assume the

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Democrats are narrowly ahead, But if they're narrowly head three,

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>four or five points in the generic vote. That means

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of these races are going to be

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 3>very very close, and no trend is at this point discernible.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I tend to ignore the generic ballot because

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're really in the house talking about district races,

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and it really comes down to whether voters like that

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>particular representative. So isn't the generic ballot sort of misleading?

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>It is when it's very close, because it doesn't provide

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>a clear tip off. But if it's you know, in

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen, it was eight to ten points for the Democrats,

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 3>and when it gets that high, you have what you'd

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 3>call in that instance, a blue wave. In twenty twenty four,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 3>we had something of a red wave. Certainly twenty ten,

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>which we both remember when Obama said we got pasted,

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 3>there was a red wave against Obamacare. So I think, again,

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 3>it's still too early to say, but if the generic

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>vote is relatively close, I think you're almost certainly correct

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 3>that it'll come down to a candidate to candidate, district

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 3>to district fight. And it's not lost on me that

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Trump of the Republicans will bring you bringing over three

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million dollars to bear out from outside

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the system, plus whatever the candidates themselves and the party's race.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you one final question in thrown to

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the mixed fraud scandals. You know, these multi billion dollar

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>fraud scandals, they happen in blue cities and states. They

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>have created constant headlines. There's another one today in Minnesota,

0:13:54.920 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety billion in fraud. And it damage is Democrats who

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are in charge as either enabling the fraudsters or turning

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a blind eye to it, as Tim Waltz has done

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota. And of course voting taxpayers don't like it

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one bit when they're ripped off of their hard earned dollars.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>A factor in the socialist mayors in places like New

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>York City and Seattle have managed to drive away businesses

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and sap budget revenues as a consequence, and that hurts

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats as well. Doesn't that impact the midterms?

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 3>You know you are raising greg an issue that is

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I think emerging in people's consciousness because it is just

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>a fact that democratic blue cities, particularly those with far

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 3>left mayors, are badly administered. But badly administered is very

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>different than ninety billion dollars in fraud, and if the

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Republicans run against fraud and corruption, I think they have

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>a chance to neutralize an issue that arguably would be

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 3>one that the Democrats would prefer to deploy against them.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Doug Seawan, you're great. Thank you so much for

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>taking the time. We appreciate it. Will be right back

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.119
<v Speaker 1>more of the Sean Hannity Show. I'll be taking your phone.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 6>Calls, John Hennity.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Sean Hannity Show on Greg Jarrett.

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be getting to your phone calls in

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes. It's Keipen coming. The number is

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred nine four one seventy three twenty six

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred nine four one Sean. If you have

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a question or a comment to make, I'd love to

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We've got callers standing by.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Hang on.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>There will be right to you.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 6>You can't always believe what the other side claims.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 4>That's why there's the Sean Hannity.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 2>No truer words were spoken.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg Jared Filling and for Sean Hannity on the

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Sean Hannity Show.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Time now to get to your phone calls, and we

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 2>appreciate the callers on the line. Stand by. I'm going

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 2>to get right to you.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Our number is one eight hundred and nine four one seven,

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>three two six. If you haven't called yet, give us

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a call, one eight hundred and nine to four to one.

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Sean.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get right to it. Buffalo, New York.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Tom is standing by with a question or comment. Hey Tom,

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>how are you good?

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 7>It's not going to be on your show. My comment is,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 7>I'm wondering if President Trump would consider bombing Iran basically

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 7>every interval six hours, twelve hours, twenty four hours, one

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 7>item minute time, whether it be a power plant, a bridge,

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 7>or whatever, one item minute time on an interval of

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 7>whatever he sets and say keep doing that until they cry.

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Uncle, well a bad idea, presuming we have the armaments

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and you know I think we do.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know I find it so amazing, if not amusing,

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that when several weeks ago Trump threatened to bomb carg

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Island and the oil depots and the pumping stations and

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so forth.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, Democrats, how that's a war crime. You can't

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you can't bomb their infrastructure.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure you can't. And it's not a war crime. That's

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a silly argument. During World War Two, the Allies bombed

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of infrastructure, power plants, railroads, you know, depots,

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>fuel stations and so forth. And it was incredibly successful.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Nazi planes style flying because they

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any more fuel, the tanks stop running and

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>moving and say it.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Was very effective.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It was not a war crime then, and it's not

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a war crime now. It is a ludicrous argument for

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Democrats or anybody to make, Oh gee, it's a war crime.

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that utter nonsense.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 7>And doing an interval or intermittently gives them a chance

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 7>to cry uncle. And it's done slowly, monotonously and hit

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 7>them hard on one item at a time or two,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 7>and just do it on an interval and say as

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 7>soon as you cry uncle, will stop and you sign

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 7>the agreement.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like it's the only thing that's going

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to get the Iranians attention, you know, but they're following

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>their traditional playbook, you know, this sort of cat and

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>mouse game, delay, delay, delay, make promises.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>That will maybe do we'll sit.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Down and time stop, you know, firing bombs now, and

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we should have a c spe and then we'll talk

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>about it. Oh, yes, we'll stop enriching uranium. And then,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of course they lie and cheat, and they do it secretly,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they they take American presidents for suckers

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>until Donald Trump comes along and he actually does something

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, right.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 7>Exactly exactly. And I think if they I think that

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 7>would wake them up, and sooner or later, I don't

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 7>think it would take long. I think they'd say we'll sign.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You know the problem with the Mullas, who were in

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>charge in Iran is is that, you know, you can't

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>reason with unreasonable people. These people are maniacal. They are

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>pathologically you know, liars, and they're destined to cheat, and

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>so you can't trust them. So that you know, trust

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but verify, of course, was the famous uh Reagan slogan.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But unless there is a reliable ability to verify, and

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't trust the IA to be a reliable partner

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>in that, you know, continued military strikes may be the

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>only option. Tom, Thank you so much for calling us

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>from Buffalo, New York. Let's go to Tennessee, where Dan

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>has been patiently standing by. Hi Dan, how are you.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 8>Fine? Greg, I'll make this real quick, Greg. I'm not

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 8>sure if you're familiar with what they call the Presidential

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 8>National Security Emergency Declaration. It stems from a nineteen eighty

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 8>three case before the Supreme Court. The significance of it

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 8>is this, as under that particular declaration, the President can

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 8>set forth a judicial order mandating everything that is now

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 8>in the Save America Act, which is not going to pass,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 8>and that will mean, in effect, when the mid turns come,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 8>that the Save America Act and the provisions in it,

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 8>even though the Act has not been passed, will be

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 8>effective in the election. And I don't want to comment

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 8>any more on that. I don't know if it's with it,

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 8>I am not qualified.

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh you are, okay?

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 9>Oh sure.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 2>It's fifty USC.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen oh one, the National Emergency Act, and it essentially

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>grants the president access to, you know, over one hundred

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>distinct statutory powers. Once he formally proclaims the emergency, there

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are limits to it. He has to you know, declare

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the emergency in writing, specify you know which law he's activating,

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>transmitted to Congress. But you know, it's generally done. If

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>there is a as the title of it says, a

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>national security threat, that's either foreign or domestic. You know,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>he can do all kinds of things under it again,

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>block transactions, regulate trade, freeze assets. It's never been used

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that I'm aware of in an election, But you know,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I think, Dan, it's an interesting idea and it's you know,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>something that I might consider looking into as a possibility,

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, creative idea.

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Dan. Thanks.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Thune is the villain in all of this,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, he's the Senate Majority leader, John Tune.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 2>And you know he didn't want to.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Kill the fillibuster to do it, even though he's naive

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't think that's the first thing that Democrats

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Do when if, and when they regain.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Control, they'll kill a filibuster and you know, try to

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>do all kinds of things, including packing the Supreme Court

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with additional you know, Katanji Brown Jackson's you know, make

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico and DC states. Yeah, I mean they're gonna,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Kamal.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Harris it out recently.

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Here are the things we need to do, I mean,

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff, but that's where Democrats are. But you know,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Save of America Act should have been passed a long

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>time ago. It's a no brainer. Of course you should

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>have an ID to make sure when you vote you

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are who you say you are. I was just reading

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the other day, it was yesterday actually about you know

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>all the people are who at their homes are receiving

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple mail in ballots for people who don't live there.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Gavin Newsom has issued in order that

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't need to show ID, you don't

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>have verify who you are. Fill out the malee in

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>ballot as many time as you want, and center it

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on in and make sure that you market for Democrats.

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>And you know it's rigged out in California. I hate

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to say that.

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I spent thirty years in California, born and raised there.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I loved California until it went. You know, nuts, Dan,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much, appreciate a good idea. Let's go to Utah.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Sherry is standing by, Hi, Sherry, what's up?

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 8>Hello?

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, I had a question. It was a while ago

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 10>and I forgot the guy's name that was talking about

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 10>all these people that are this should be punished, they

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 10>should be in trouble.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 8>They should.

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was Mike Davis.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 10>Mike, Yeah, but how are we going to make it happen?

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 10>I hear it all the time. I mean for years

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 10>and years. Hillary Clinton can destroy her computers and oh yeah,

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 10>I guess she probably wasn't guilty. You know, Hunter Biden,

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 10>all those Gavin Newsommers is so awful, but they nobody

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 10>ever gets in trouble.

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no one.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 10>I mean we hear their name all the time, going, oh,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 10>those awful people. But that's not a punishment of any

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 10>sort to make other people do the same things. I

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 10>was just wondering, what can we do?

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, the most frequent question I get almost

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis for ten years, are.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 2>These people who waged.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This lawless, lawfair campaign against Donald Trump and others? Are

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they ever going to be punished? And you know, I

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have a crystal ball. You know, I gave up

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>reading Tea Leaves. I can't tell you the answer. I

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you this that in my first book called

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>The Russia Hoax, published way back in two thousand and eighteen,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know what is that eight years ago I

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>laid out all of the crimes that were committed by

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>all of the people who committed them, and I urged,

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in every chapter, these people should be prosecuted.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>The next year, twenty nineteen, I wrote the sequel witch Hunt,

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in which I had laid out even more crimes committed

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>by more people. And you know, unfortunately, after Jeff's sessions

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>was canned, terrible mistake by Trump to appoint him as

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General.

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Bill Barr took over.

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And I had high hopes for Bill Barr, a fine attorney,

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and he talked a big game about all of the

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>people who were abusing the law and weaponizing it for

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>political purposes and you know, partisan game, but he didn't

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>know anything about it. Bar became a huge disappointment in

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>my mind. And then of course it was shut down

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>by Merrick Garland and Joe Biden the moment that Biden

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was inaugurated, and it was shut down for four long years.

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump retook office in January of twenty twenty five, and

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes a while to get the DOJ

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and the US attorneys up to speed, and you know,

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to fight the deep state that are buried

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in these institutions all the way that are undermining any efforts.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people had to be fired appropriately. So

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and now you finally relatedly got a grandeury impaneled that

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is looking into it, and I think maybe poised issue indictments.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, justice comes.

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>A little too late, but it's never too late, and

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we have to counsel patients. But it's a

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>great point, Cherry, and thank you for bringing it up.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn out to South Carolina, beautiful state.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Mark joins us. Hi, Mark, how are you, hi? Greg?

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 4>How you doing fine?

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.239
<v Speaker 9>It's a great it's a great honor to talk to you. UH,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 9>and I feel like you were one. You're the perfect

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 9>man to answer my question, which I have two parts

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 9>and two part questions. And the reason I feel like

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 9>you're the perfect man to answer to answer this question

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 9>is I'm sorry, I'm nervous.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 8>UH.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 9>Is that you were always the one and most of

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 9>the time first, but that's not important. But it was

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 9>always truthful information and UH your book and and everything else,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 9>you've always presented the facts of the Russia hoax. And

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 9>my question comes down to this. Basically, I think the

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 9>Russia hoax was used as the main reason for impeachment,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 9>and UH, impeachment is actually a trial. It is actually

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 9>a trial by the Senate, and it is prosecuted. They

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 9>have the prosecutors, they have everything is just like a

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 9>crimin court. And my question is, since you're a trial attorney,

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 9>is my question is, just like there's false prosecution and

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 9>wrongful prosecution, there's got to be a way to look

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 9>at it. And I think President Trump My question was

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 9>this is, why doesn't President Trump pursue through the lens

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 9>of wrongful prosecution and that way through civilly and criminally

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 9>to That's the first part of the question, why can't

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 9>that be done? The second part of the question is

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 9>I believe that you know, we've all seen the movie

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 9>Absence of Malice with Sally Field as a purporter and

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 9>Paul Newman and Wilfred Bramley. He says basically, we can't

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 9>prosecute the journalists because they are absence of malice. You know,

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 9>they did not have any malice. I think it can

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 9>be proven now without a shadow of doubt. There's so

0:30:55.640 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 9>much malice against President Trump, whether every reporting, every thing

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 9>that's done. Why not go through the lens of wrong

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 9>of prosecution? Now start proving prosecution of speech a wrongful

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 9>speech and incorrect speech and factual speech and okay else

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 9>through the lens of uh I have malice to prove?

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, you.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot to unpack there. I'll be

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll begin with your remark about the impeachment. It looks

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like a trial, but it's a political device, and the

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rules of evidence don't really exist. Anything comes in, including

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a multiple hearsay, which is only slightly absurd. I wrote

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a column recently about how the first impeachment against Trump

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>was totally phony and contrived and reprehensible conduct by you know,

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of people in Congress, and the idea of

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>wrongful prosecutions. I think Trump brought one all, but I

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think that may be one of the useful methods for accountability.

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got to take a break, otherwise I'd give you

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a longer explanation.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Give us a call.

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 2>One eight hundred nine four, one seventy three, twenty six.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Back, Sean Hannity, more of.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Your phone calls coming up. One eight hundred nine four,

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one seventy three twenty six. One eight hundred nine four

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one Sean, and John Solomon, the great editor in chief

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of Just the News, will be Mike asked as well,

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>stick around