Speaker 1: From UFOs two, Ghosts and government cover ups. History is
Speaker 1: writtled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or
Speaker 1: learn the stuff that don't want you to now. Hello,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the show. My name is Matt and
Speaker 1: I'm then we're here with our super producer Noel Castro Brown.
Speaker 1: Oh man, is that that's an upgrade? I'm like full
Speaker 1: dictator right there. Well, you know who's already heading in
Speaker 1: that direction. I think we can all see the trajectory.
Speaker 1: Ritt large, isn't that right? Nold? That's smirk evil personified. So,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen, today we are talking about um, I
Speaker 1: don't know, let's start with this story. How about that,
Speaker 1: all right? Son? Or just a hypothetical situations? So like those? Okay,
Speaker 1: So let's say super producer Noel Brown is a word
Speaker 1: world leader, right, and she's a world leader in I
Speaker 1: don't know, pick kind of government. Let's say let's say
Speaker 1: it's democratic. Okay, he's a world leader in a democracy.
Speaker 1: But things are not going too well in this democracy.
Speaker 1: The economy's tanking, the population is impoverished, unhappy, crime is high,
Speaker 1: they're threatening riots. Political opponents are increasingly averse to spending
Speaker 1: especially in foreign interventions. And since you're a Western leader,
Speaker 1: if you're Noel Brown in this situation, you can't just
Speaker 1: make people do what you want. No, you you have
Speaker 1: to seek guidance from your people. Right, you can't just
Speaker 1: go out there and put an iron fist down. Right.
Speaker 1: They are in charge of you, right, you are. You
Speaker 1: are the person with three hundreds something million bosses exactly.
Speaker 1: You know, theoretically, these people vote, and that is how
Speaker 1: decisions have made. They if least if it's in the US,
Speaker 1: the Republic of the U S. So this is not
Speaker 1: the best comparison. Uh, then they have the right to
Speaker 1: kick them out, if kick out their elected officials and
Speaker 1: get some new ones. So you have to get these
Speaker 1: people on your side. But what if circumstances change, Matt,
Speaker 1: What if Noel Brown is the president when an attack occurs? Oh,
Speaker 1: but all this bad stuff is happening already, it's still there.
Speaker 1: But then an attack occur. I guess it depends on
Speaker 1: who attacked you, right, Yeah, what if a common threat
Speaker 1: brings a divided nation together supporting you, Noel Castro Brown. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, and and at the risk of being a
Speaker 1: very cold person, this is Markavellian and and effective. You know,
Speaker 1: it's it's a gift if this occurs. Sure, it's a
Speaker 1: terrible thing to happen in the short term, but in
Speaker 1: the long term for your goals. If you're that lead,
Speaker 1: Noel Brown, then yeah, blessing in disguise, right, And you
Speaker 1: can sit around and wait for something like this to happen,
Speaker 1: although that would not be very wise. No, why not
Speaker 1: just do it yourself? Hang on there, Matt, Are we
Speaker 1: talking about false flag attacks? We're talking about false flag attacks.
Speaker 1: That is the nature of a false flag attack. And uh,
Speaker 1: we've got a quotation here that we'd like to open
Speaker 1: up the show with. Why. Of course, the people don't
Speaker 1: want war, but after all, it's the leaders of the
Speaker 1: country who determine the policy. And it's always a simple
Speaker 1: matter to drag the people along. Whether it's a democracy
Speaker 1: or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or a communist dictatorship,
Speaker 1: voice or no voice, the people can always be brought
Speaker 1: to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All
Speaker 1: you have to do is tell them they're being attacked
Speaker 1: and denounced the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing
Speaker 1: the country to danger. It works the same in any country.
Speaker 1: Who said that that was Herman Goring. Herman Goring leader
Speaker 1: in the National Socialist Party known by most people today
Speaker 1: as the Nazis. This is not an unusual stance. It's
Speaker 1: just it's just put very plainly in that quotation. But
Speaker 1: a false flag ultimately, it's just a covert operation designed
Speaker 1: to look as though somebody else carried it out. And
Speaker 1: the term goes back a long time. The actual phrase,
Speaker 1: at least the story goes is that this goes all
Speaker 1: the way back to the days of sailing and and
Speaker 1: uh seaborn empires. And if you're on the if you're
Speaker 1: sailing the high season and you're flying a flag. Let's
Speaker 1: say you're in territory that's not yours or the country
Speaker 1: you're in, you fly flag of that country. Let's say
Speaker 1: you're a pirate. Instead of throwing up the old black flag,
Speaker 1: just throw up, I don't know, let's say a British
Speaker 1: Empire flag. Right. Nobody's gonna mess with you unless they
Speaker 1: get close enough to really like inspect your stuff, yes,
Speaker 1: or they will let you get much closer than they should.
Speaker 1: Uh So, this this concept can still be seen today
Speaker 1: because ships often are required to fly flag even even
Speaker 1: in this time, in this day and age. But uh,
Speaker 1: it was much easier during that time to you know,
Speaker 1: raise the Spanish flag, conductor raid leave change your flag
Speaker 1: to you know, the Dutch flag or something. You could
Speaker 1: be almost anonymous. Just have a whole stack of different
Speaker 1: flags down there. And the word for studying the study
Speaker 1: of flags is vexillology. Now that's a fun words, and
Speaker 1: it's a weird one, isn't it. They're a real life vexillologists,
Speaker 1: which is which is how I learned about the various
Speaker 1: different pirate flags. It's not all skull and crossbones. It's
Speaker 1: it's very strange. There are some elaborate ones, and there
Speaker 1: are also a lot of poorly drawn skulls. I guess
Speaker 1: the guys were in a hurry. But but you know,
Speaker 1: when we're getting sidetracked. The thing is that ladies and
Speaker 1: gentlemen listeners there at home, in your car, running whatever
Speaker 1: you're doing, be aware that this is a real thing.
Speaker 1: This is not some there's not some fluke that happens once.
Speaker 1: This is not something that one guy did in you know,
Speaker 1: ancient Rome. In fact, we have multiple examples of false
Speaker 1: flag attacks. Yeah, just just to reiterate what you said, Ben,
Speaker 1: It's not something that just the fringes are allowed to
Speaker 1: talk about, right and to understand this is something a
Speaker 1: lot of times you'll hear on the fringes of news
Speaker 1: or media organizations. But it's something that I think we
Speaker 1: can and probably should talk about more. Sure. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: we're going to present some historic proven false flag attacks,
Speaker 1: and then we're going to look at some of the
Speaker 1: alleged false flag attacks, which that is more of the
Speaker 1: the murky water for a lot of people. So the
Speaker 1: first one we'd like to talk about is something we
Speaker 1: we discussed in the video that we put out on
Speaker 1: Wednesday of this week called the Muktin incident. And this
Speaker 1: is when Japanese troops created an explosion on a train
Speaker 1: track and they blamed it on China and the whole
Speaker 1: idea of this was to justify an invasion of Manchuria
Speaker 1: and um it's also known by the way, as the
Speaker 1: Manurian incident. That makes sense, not to be confused with
Speaker 1: the candidate no Um. And after a while this went
Speaker 1: to a trial in the Tokyo International Military Tribunal UH
Speaker 1: and essentially a lot several of the people the perpetrators
Speaker 1: who carried out this attack admitted to what they had
Speaker 1: done and it became public record at that point. We
Speaker 1: also know that this kind of practice existed on both
Speaker 1: sides of World War two Axis and allies alike. UH.
Speaker 1: During the Nuremberg trials UH former SS major who was
Speaker 1: under orders from the chief of the Gestapo, he said
Speaker 1: that he and some others faked attacks on UH Germans
Speaker 1: and on resource centers so that they could blame it
Speaker 1: on Poland and justify an invasion. And then also during
Speaker 1: the Nuremberg trials, it was found out that this guy
Speaker 1: friends Halder, who was a general UH. He stated that
Speaker 1: he UH they set fire to the German parliament building
Speaker 1: and then also blame that on somebody else, this time
Speaker 1: on the Communists. And speaking of the Communists, did you
Speaker 1: know that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police
Speaker 1: to execute over twenty thousand UH Polish army officers and
Speaker 1: civilians in ninety and then blame it on the Nazis.
Speaker 1: Jeez I remember this isn't just one side or the other.
Speaker 1: The British government has admitted that between UM it actually
Speaker 1: bombed ships that were attempting to take Jewish people, families
Speaker 1: and people to who are trying to escape the Holocaust
Speaker 1: or what was occurring at the time, civilians, refugees, yeah,
Speaker 1: trying to take them to Palestine. And so again the
Speaker 1: British government admitted that they bombed five ships carrying people
Speaker 1: to safety, and they even set up a group called
Speaker 1: Defenders of Arab Palestine, which was a pseudo group didn't
Speaker 1: actually exist. Once they set that up, they had that
Speaker 1: group claim responsibility for these attacks. And let's go to
Speaker 1: Uncle Sam. The CIA openly admits it hired Iranians in
Speaker 1: the fifties to pretend to be communists and stage bombings
Speaker 1: in Iran in an attempt to turn the country against
Speaker 1: its democratically elected prime minister. And of course we know
Speaker 1: that did not work. We also know that in nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty seven Dwight D. Eisenhower was working with the British
Speaker 1: government to uh or at least they approved a plan.
Speaker 1: Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan to carry out an attack
Speaker 1: in Syria then blame it on the Syrian government as
Speaker 1: a way to you know, like they do, try and
Speaker 1: make regime change, which you know, that's nineteen fifty seven,
Speaker 1: that's uh. I don't know, man. We've been learning a
Speaker 1: lot about the U. S. Government's interactions with regime change
Speaker 1: in the Middle East lately. Right, Yeah, not just the US.
Speaker 1: The US is the one that is most commonly associated
Speaker 1: with that because they've admitted to it a couple of times.
Speaker 1: They got caught a couple of times. Maybe that's all right,
Speaker 1: But the United States did not what the United States
Speaker 1: was not the original regime changing power in Collies. Okay,
Speaker 1: So we already talked about Operation Gladiol, which we did
Speaker 1: a video about, and in Operation Gladiol, NATO, the North
Speaker 1: Atlantic Treaty Organization had secret armies that would stay behind
Speaker 1: and bomb stuff. Yeah, bomb stuff for various reasons, but
Speaker 1: usually to hold back some kind of invasion from communist
Speaker 1: or uprising. And we've seen a lot of other declassified
Speaker 1: plans or proposals to carry out some kind of false
Speaker 1: flag attack, Operation Northwoods being the biggest, the most famous,
Speaker 1: the plan to attack Miami and then blame it on Cuba. Uh,
Speaker 1: to justify war with Cuba. Right, and Uh, this this
Speaker 1: is not the the first nor the last time these
Speaker 1: sorts of things will be suggested. In nineteen sixty one,
Speaker 1: the Joint chiefs of staff started talking about blowing up
Speaker 1: a diplomatic building, an embus consulate excuse me, in the
Speaker 1: Dominican Republic to justify an invasion. But these plans, fortunately,
Speaker 1: we're not carried out, and we you know, we see
Speaker 1: that that's not the only plan that was proposed. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the idea of blaming an attack on Cuba was kind
Speaker 1: of pervasive around that time because we really wanted to
Speaker 1: get in there and take back over. So in sixty
Speaker 1: three there was another plan to uh stage attacks on
Speaker 1: police like Trinidad and Tobago or Jamaica and then again
Speaker 1: blame it on Cuba. Right, And this wasn't just really
Speaker 1: restricted to the US and Cuba. There's the famous Gulf
Speaker 1: of Tonkin incident, and you can go to UM government
Speaker 1: run websites who will provide a fairly thorough narrative of
Speaker 1: what happened. But this reason and UM this this event
Speaker 1: in the Gulf of Tonkin was the reason that the
Speaker 1: United States became involved fully in the Vietnam War. But
Speaker 1: the problem is, we didn't happen. It didn't really happen,
Speaker 1: not the way that it was stated at the time,
Speaker 1: as in something that happened. Yeah, and then it didn't. Right.
Speaker 1: But honestly, like there were the ideas that they were
Speaker 1: being um, the ideas that uf U S ship was
Speaker 1: being fired upon right by North Vietnamese boats. But again
Speaker 1: that didn't happen. And there's a question about whether this
Speaker 1: was just something misread in the fog of war or
Speaker 1: whether the National Security Agency purposefully mis old the American public. Yes,
Speaker 1: here's just one that I find really interesting, especially with
Speaker 1: some of the videos we've done on co intel pro
Speaker 1: in general, and on the assassination of Martin Luther King
Speaker 1: and a couple of other things. In the ninth through
Speaker 1: the nineteen fifties and nineteen seventies, a US Congressional committee
Speaker 1: admitted that as part of this Coentel program that we've
Speaker 1: talked about, they actually used provocateurs during that time nineteen
Speaker 1: fifties to nineteen seventies to carry out violent attacks, could
Speaker 1: be anything really small to something maybe a little larger,
Speaker 1: and then blame those attacks on political activists to undermine
Speaker 1: those movements. Right. Yes, and this we you know, we
Speaker 1: see this also occurring in South Africa during apartheid, when
Speaker 1: a group called the Civil Cooperation Bureau, which is part
Speaker 1: of the Defense Force at the time, it's asked a
Speaker 1: couple of experts to help them discredit the African National
Speaker 1: Congress by bombing a cop car and trying to frame
Speaker 1: the a n C for it. And we see that, Um,
Speaker 1: we see that this happens much more frequently than you
Speaker 1: might suspect. Right. But one big thing here that we
Speaker 1: also need to point out is that often when these occur, uh,
Speaker 1: they're created by factions within a government, not the entire government.
Speaker 1: It's quite possible, for instance, that the um president or
Speaker 1: prime minister of a country might not know what's going on,
Speaker 1: and they may believe it's a legitimate attack. To absolutely
Speaker 1: because you you'll have someone who's in a high place,
Speaker 1: maybe in the military, that just said, look, we need
Speaker 1: to get this done. This is hypothetical on my part,
Speaker 1: but if you, if you believe strongly, like we said before,
Speaker 1: enough in anything, you will do sometimes actions that are
Speaker 1: unconscionable to most of us. Right. Yeah, And this brings
Speaker 1: us to something that's that's a pretty sticky subject for
Speaker 1: a lot of people, which is, um, the US going
Speaker 1: to Iraq after the attacks on nine eleven. Right. Uh,
Speaker 1: This this justification that the w m D or the
Speaker 1: the relationship alleged relationship right between UM, the Saddam regime, right,
Speaker 1: Saddam Ussein's regime and UH terrorists didn't really pan out.
Speaker 1: It was something that UM, either the US was wrong
Speaker 1: about or factions in the US were purposefully misleading people.
Speaker 1: And the question here is often a question of intent.
Speaker 1: That's what makes a false flag operation different in comparison
Speaker 1: to just a typical operation, because people can make enormous mistakes, right,
Speaker 1: But people can also do enormously immoral things if they
Speaker 1: feel like they're working for a higher purpose. So we've
Speaker 1: we've got many many more list of possible a list
Speaker 1: of proven false flag right. And the question again being
Speaker 1: you know, were these on purpose? Where these accidents? Were
Speaker 1: these mistakes? Uh? But let's talk about the alleged examples. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: the first one that everyone would yell at us that
Speaker 1: we didn't say it is just the September eleventh attacks
Speaker 1: on the World Trade Center of the Pentagon and uh,
Speaker 1: where did the plane fall down in Pennsylvania? Um? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so we've heard this a lot. We get some flaks
Speaker 1: sometimes for not covering the subject as much as some
Speaker 1: people would like to. UM, it's a very sensitive subject
Speaker 1: and it's tough for me to even go there, but
Speaker 1: there are some fishy things that that are still there.
Speaker 1: We've made a whole video called Thirteen Unanswered Questions about
Speaker 1: nine eleven, and we'd love for you to check it
Speaker 1: out if you have a chance. Uh, you know, I, Well,
Speaker 1: here's the thing. Then, I am very skeptical when I
Speaker 1: hear people say like, you can't talk about this thing
Speaker 1: because of an issue of emotions, right in respect, but
Speaker 1: I I'm very suspicious when people are treated like there
Speaker 1: are certain questions a person is not allowed to ask.
Speaker 1: They might be stupid questions, they might be UM easily
Speaker 1: easily disproved or debunked, But you can't attack somebody for
Speaker 1: asking a question. That's just that's foolish, that's a UM
Speaker 1: it's a bullying technique of sorts. So with that, with
Speaker 1: that in mind, UM, we would love to hear your
Speaker 1: thoughts on whether I don't know, tell us what you
Speaker 1: think about not just nine eleven, but the following. We
Speaker 1: also have a vlog that came out this week about
Speaker 1: the Oklahoma City bombing, which UM, you wanted to cover
Speaker 1: because this is also the twenty year anniversary of that event. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was That's one of those events that I remember
Speaker 1: as a kid, not very well, but I remember it
Speaker 1: happening and seeing news stories and when my father and
Speaker 1: mother watching a lot of that stuff. But I knew
Speaker 1: nothing about it at the time, about what was going on,
Speaker 1: the circumstances. Over the over the years, I've learned a
Speaker 1: little more about it, especially then in two thousand one,
Speaker 1: right around the time when I was graduating high school.
Speaker 1: That's when McVeigh, Timothy McVeigh was lethally injected who killed
Speaker 1: And that's kind of when I started thinking about it.
Speaker 1: I wonder how much you've you've thought about it around
Speaker 1: that time or since then. H Uh, this this was
Speaker 1: if you if you can put yourself back there, ladies
Speaker 1: and gentlemen, if you were alive when this occurred, then
Speaker 1: you'll know that this was until uh nine eleven, this
Speaker 1: was a tremendous one of the biggest acts of domestics
Speaker 1: terrorism in US history, or at least on US soil.
Speaker 1: And we also know that later as in you know,
Speaker 1: like what ten years later, two thousand five, two thousand six,
Speaker 1: maybe evidence emerged that UM federal agents were aggressively trying
Speaker 1: to you know, break up possible terrorist attacks, and in
Speaker 1: several cases cross the line from stopping his terrorist attack
Speaker 1: to maybe manufacturing a terrorist yeah, to essentially entrap somebody basically, yeah, hey,
Speaker 1: you have these views that are pretty extreme. Well, what
Speaker 1: if you had a bomb. What if I could get
Speaker 1: you a bomb, you know, as an undercover agent. Let's
Speaker 1: teach you how to make it, put in your hands,
Speaker 1: drive you to the place. And so the question that
Speaker 1: people have about Oklahoma City is it often revolves around
Speaker 1: something like that, was this a case where someone manufactured
Speaker 1: to make they you know, right? Uh? And there are
Speaker 1: interesting theories here. There isn't any conclusive proof at this point.
Speaker 1: There there are things that Um, there are definitely some
Speaker 1: strange things that are had and let's say questions that
Speaker 1: have yet to be answered. Who made a video about it? Uh?
Speaker 1: One of them that I found really interesting was the
Speaker 1: one of the first responders to the bombing. I cannot
Speaker 1: remember his name, Tarenceiki yek Yeki. Tarenceiki. Yeah, he he
Speaker 1: was one of the first responders along with another officer,
Speaker 1: and he saved I think four people, then ended up
Speaker 1: falling and injuring himself. Um. Then I forget how many
Speaker 1: years later, but a while down the road he ended
Speaker 1: up killing himself and when they found his body, he
Speaker 1: had tried to cut his wrists allegedly and then had
Speaker 1: ultimately shot himself, but at an angle that didn't seem
Speaker 1: to make sense for one to kill themselves. Um. People
Speaker 1: alleged that he had information about the attack that he
Speaker 1: wasn't telling, and that and perhaps he's threatening to tell, right,
Speaker 1: And people on the other side of the argument that
Speaker 1: I believe that he just commits suicide say that he
Speaker 1: was having very difficult marital problems, and he was. And
Speaker 1: again this is you know, as as you said, a
Speaker 1: lot of this is allegation and speculation, but this this
Speaker 1: exploration that we're talking about Oklahoma City. You can you
Speaker 1: can watch our videos. You can hear much more about it, um,
Speaker 1: with a little digging, because there are more facts that
Speaker 1: come to light. The one person you will not hear
Speaker 1: from is Terry Nichols because Terry Nichols is apparently not
Speaker 1: allowed to communicate with anyone. He is currently serving a
Speaker 1: life sentence. I think I don't know if he got
Speaker 1: the death penalty, but he's serving a life sentence. And
Speaker 1: his idea was that or his story side of the
Speaker 1: stories that he was helping McVeigh make a bomb and
Speaker 1: take it to a truck, but he didn't know what
Speaker 1: was going to happen. And he he wants to give testimony,
Speaker 1: but he's unable to do so currently, right And and
Speaker 1: there's not really a question about whether McVeigh did it.
Speaker 1: He did it. He it's conclusive that he did it.
Speaker 1: The questions people are asking, or the questions that you
Speaker 1: were asking, were um, the extent if any of other
Speaker 1: parties involvement. We we also know that in a rock
Speaker 1: there was when we talked about that a little bit,
Speaker 1: the idea of weapons of mass destruction, which is not
Speaker 1: not really a false flag so much as it is
Speaker 1: either a mistake or misdirection. Sure, but we do know
Speaker 1: that these things exist. We know that, Uh, this is
Speaker 1: a way to learn more about what's called the deep state,
Speaker 1: which is the unelected. The unelected officials like I think
Speaker 1: high level military, think, high level agency people who don't
Speaker 1: have to you know, run for a district to get
Speaker 1: voted back in every four years or so. Instead, they
Speaker 1: have a much longer potential ability to plan right, powerful
Speaker 1: offices and a let's say longer further vision for what
Speaker 1: they can achieve while they're in their office right right,
Speaker 1: which is not which is not necessarily a bad thing,
Speaker 1: because let's let's remember that there are unelected officials at
Speaker 1: the Army Corps of Engineers, you know, and they are
Speaker 1: able to leverage this this ability to plan for things
Speaker 1: that are ten or twenty years down the road. It's
Speaker 1: just that this, this power that an unelected position can
Speaker 1: transfer is uh is dangerous and it goes both ways.
Speaker 1: That's an excellent point. Then, hey, thank you, Matt. Uh.
Speaker 1: We would like to hear from you what you think. Uh.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that there are uh some false flag
Speaker 1: attacks that we should have mentioned, and if so, what
Speaker 1: are they? Do you think that people are exaggerating actual
Speaker 1: events by claiming that there's a conspiracy of foot where
Speaker 1: none exists. You can find us on Facebook and Twitter
Speaker 1: to tell us about it, and you can also email us.
Speaker 1: But just so you know, uh that how important listener
Speaker 1: mail is to us, Why don't we read a couple today?
Speaker 1: Sounds great? This is a message that comes from Katie.
Speaker 1: She says, Hello, gents, just finished listening to your podcast
Speaker 1: on big data, and I'm here to tell you that
Speaker 1: there is hope. Well, yes, the big data you see
Speaker 1: every day does generate the targeted advertising that is all
Speaker 1: around us. One of the biggest, yet least discussed uses
Speaker 1: is in healthcare. I work in predicative and analytics in
Speaker 1: the healthcare field, where we use big data to help
Speaker 1: predict and prevent catastrophic health events. Most of this is
Speaker 1: driven by clinical data used during taken during every doctor's appointment.
Speaker 1: And yes, your doctor is definitely selling your data, but
Speaker 1: we're moving into the future where you're buying. Eating and
Speaker 1: movement habits may help us even more accurately predict things
Speaker 1: like heart attacks and stroke. We also can predict how
Speaker 1: effective treatment is, especially in behavioral diseases such as type
Speaker 1: two diabetes, based on the information your cell phone knows
Speaker 1: about you. That's crazy, are accurate, It's hard to say
Speaker 1: when the results are an event not occurring negative observation.
Speaker 1: But if people get to live better lives, then does
Speaker 1: it really matter. Don't get me wrong, it's creepy as beep,
Speaker 1: but I I'd like to think that we're really helping people.
Speaker 1: That's a cool perspective. That's a really cool perspective. Kay,
Speaker 1: That's not something that we had thought about before. At
Speaker 1: least that I had thought about before. I've heard of
Speaker 1: it using uh, this information to see into your health future.
Speaker 1: It's still is creepy, like she says, but I don't
Speaker 1: know what do you think, Ben? I mean, if it
Speaker 1: could save somebody's life, It could save somebody's life. And
Speaker 1: I was really glad to read this to see more
Speaker 1: of a positive look at big data, and we'd like
Speaker 1: to we'd like to hear more of that too. We
Speaker 1: have another letter and thank you for writing to a Katie.
Speaker 1: We really did enjoy that perspective. We have another letter
Speaker 1: from Adam at Tonbridge Wells. Adam says, first, great work
Speaker 1: you do. Have been listening to you for under a
Speaker 1: year now. Always look forward to your next topic. Thanks Adam.
Speaker 1: One thing I was expecting you to discuss and forgive
Speaker 1: me if you did on the Big Data podcast was
Speaker 1: the police in the US who can predict where crime
Speaker 1: is likely to be due to masses of data that
Speaker 1: was put it that was put into this system to
Speaker 1: set the thing up. The police on patrol are told
Speaker 1: which areas to go at any one time. Uh, this
Speaker 1: is a specific police department he's talking out. And I
Speaker 1: had not I had not heard of this, But what's
Speaker 1: exciting is that it is possible. You know, there is
Speaker 1: enough there is enough data depending on the city, to
Speaker 1: predict where things are most likely going to go down.
Speaker 1: You know, it's interesting the time of day, what type
Speaker 1: of crime right the neighborhood, like, where do break INDs occur?
Speaker 1: When do they occur? Uh So we're gonna dig in
Speaker 1: a little bit deeper and look at that as well
Speaker 1: at them. Thanks so much for writing, Katie, Thanks so
Speaker 1: much for writing. Adam. We hope that you, as well
Speaker 1: as the rest of the listeners enjoyed our episode here
Speaker 1: on False Flags, and we would like to hear from
Speaker 1: you if you are into this whole podcast thing. And
Speaker 1: then buddy, do we have news for you. You You can
Speaker 1: visit stuff they don't want you to know dot com
Speaker 1: where you can see here uh so much stuff that
Speaker 1: we've done. Yeah, it's all there, and you can go
Speaker 1: check out our videos there. If we do a blog,
Speaker 1: you can check that out too. And oh man, you
Speaker 1: there are all these other sites that we have all
Speaker 1: our friends who work here with us. Yeah, you can
Speaker 1: go to cars though I we never do this, I'm
Speaker 1: saying it. You can go to car stuff if you're
Speaker 1: into cars, car stuff show dot com, Yeah, we have
Speaker 1: a we have a car show as well. If you
Speaker 1: like our podcast, you'll probably also enjoy h stuff to
Speaker 1: blow your mind. Yes, definitely. They get weird with it,
Speaker 1: just like we like to write. So if you're into
Speaker 1: any of that stuff, go to Twitter. We are conspiracy
Speaker 1: Stuff there. You can also find us on Facebook, same thing.
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, if you don't like doing any
Speaker 1: of that stuff and you're like, man, leave me alone,
Speaker 1: but you're still interested in and want to talk to us, uh,
Speaker 1: you can always write us an email. We are conspiracy
Speaker 1: at how stuff works dot com. From one on this
Speaker 1: topic another unexplained phenomenon, visit YouTube dot com slash conspiracy stuff.
Speaker 1: You can also get in touch on Twitter at the
Speaker 1: handle at conspiracy Stuff to me