Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Oh it's International Climate
Speaker 1: Change Day. So the climate catatrophists are out in full force,
Speaker 1: including millions of children, it seems, who are being told
Speaker 1: to march in the streets to stop CO two from
Speaker 1: being in the air. Why is this movement relying on
Speaker 1: children to do its dirty work. We'll get into that.
Speaker 1: And also the whistleblower complaint. Oh, no, Trump is finally
Speaker 1: going down. Psych not gonna happen. We'll get into that
Speaker 1: more coming up on the buck Sexton Show. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake American Great, You're a great American Again the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins. Analysts, remember the d He's a it
Speaker 1: is s sected. No, I don't want you to be hopeful.
Speaker 1: I want you to panic. I want you to act
Speaker 1: as if the house was on fire, because it is.
Speaker 1: I'm sick of it, and so are all of you.
Speaker 1: And we are not here to talk about are sacrificing
Speaker 1: and are human blue? I'm not existency. We are here
Speaker 1: to create. We are created every day because every day
Speaker 1: in action. I'm nineteen years old, and like so many
Speaker 1: people my age, I feel really visceral anxiety about climate
Speaker 1: change every day, um and today as we speak, millions
Speaker 1: of young people all around the world are taking to
Speaker 1: the streets and going on strike to demand climate action
Speaker 1: because we feel this incredible urgency. If we're gonna have
Speaker 1: a livable future, we need a green new deal, and
Speaker 1: we need it as soon as possible. The Buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: where we are celebrating Day of Action on Climate Change,
Speaker 1: we are celebras a it's a party in here, my friends.
Speaker 1: Producer John is spraying aerosol cans all over the place,
Speaker 1: smoking cigars, just lighting, just lighting paper on fire, just
Speaker 1: to you know, one kill the trees and two put
Speaker 1: some smoke up in the air. Producer Mark, he might
Speaker 1: just be flying private this weekend. Who knows, He's not
Speaker 1: even going anywhere. He's just gonna get in a plane
Speaker 1: and get up in the air and just fly. He's
Speaker 1: gonna be in like a G six and just do circles. Man,
Speaker 1: he's gonna be doing. He's gonna be doing donuts in
Speaker 1: the sky in his G six to celebrate. They want
Speaker 1: action on climate change. We give you action on climate change.
Speaker 1: My friends. What we started out with there were a
Speaker 1: series of very widely distributed clips in the media right
Speaker 1: now of children because today was really kids Day, kids
Speaker 1: climate change Day. That was what the centerpiece of this,
Speaker 1: which is also why I can tell they're people coming
Speaker 1: after you know. Of course, now I'm kid bashing because
Speaker 1: I'm talking about millions of kids being out on the streets,
Speaker 1: elevated by the media, elevated by Congress, who have been
Speaker 1: made to be fearful in a way that they describe
Speaker 1: as visceral anxiety. You heard that. You've got a sixteen
Speaker 1: year old girl who who is telling you I want
Speaker 1: you to panic, I want you to think your house
Speaker 1: is on fire. And we are supposed to do what
Speaker 1: This is what is being offered up for public policy debate.
Speaker 1: This is what we're supposed to listen to. We have
Speaker 1: to listen, but not criticize. I'm sorry, not on my watch,
Speaker 1: not today. You have a situation where it's very clear
Speaker 1: what the tactic is here. The left brainwashes kids with
Speaker 1: this climate change lunacy, then throws them onto the front
Speaker 1: lines of the policy debate as human shields. Because you
Speaker 1: can't criticize kids, but you have to listen to them,
Speaker 1: my friends, the people who don't see this garbage tactic
Speaker 1: for what it is are dumb or dishonest. There is
Speaker 1: no third option. This is disgraceful. It's also disgraceful that
Speaker 1: the New York City public schools, as long as somebody
Speaker 1: has parental permission, are allowed to go march, go march
Speaker 1: on this issue as though. This is something that requires
Speaker 1: not just our urgent attention as adults, but it's more
Speaker 1: important than you know, learning to read and add and subtract, because,
Speaker 1: by the way, a lot of the kids who are marching,
Speaker 1: they're of that age where that's what they're learning to do.
Speaker 1: And I don't know about you, but on a highly politicized,
Speaker 1: highly partisan issue of not just US but global public policy,
Speaker 1: with trillions of dollars of wealth at stake, with endless
Speaker 1: regulations and implications for your day to day lives down
Speaker 1: to the most minute detail, I don't think I'm going
Speaker 1: to be lectured by people that still have to work
Speaker 1: on their multiplication tables. I'm sorry, does that make me
Speaker 1: a bad am? I am I kid bashing daily beast?
Speaker 1: Does that make me a bad guy? I mean, I'll
Speaker 1: just put this out there now, open challenge to any
Speaker 1: lib who wants to debate with me. You want to
Speaker 1: take this one on bro Cuomo, fake tapper, any of
Speaker 1: the above, anyone? Anyone? Oh no, I'm oh, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to waste my time with him. They don't waste
Speaker 1: their time debating anybody. By the way, who's really going
Speaker 1: to debate them? They only have people on their own
Speaker 1: shows where they can talk over them, shout them down,
Speaker 1: determine the subject matter, to determine what elements will be used,
Speaker 1: what quotes will appear on the screen, what sound bites
Speaker 1: will get thrown into the mix. They never leave a
Speaker 1: friendly form because they would get schooled. You know what
Speaker 1: should be happening to these kids, school stuff learning. I
Speaker 1: don't know how they're There's not a greater sense of
Speaker 1: embarrassment on the left. There's no sense of embarrassment. They
Speaker 1: act like this is normal. They're encouraging kids to walk
Speaker 1: out for a day of climate change action. Do you
Speaker 1: think one out of ten of these kids could even
Speaker 1: explain to you what photosynthesis is? I mean, this is
Speaker 1: a scientific issue, right, This is we're always told listen
Speaker 1: to the scientists, listen to the scientists. Do these kids
Speaker 1: understand the issue, and more to the point, even if
Speaker 1: they have a basic understanding of it. I you know,
Speaker 1: I had somebody yesterday during the whole Buck Bash's kids thing,
Speaker 1: which I just I'm sorry, I just think it's hilarious.
Speaker 1: And I was very disappointed in the outnumbered couch for
Speaker 1: saying that to me. And I'm glad that everybody who's
Speaker 1: watched the clip who's not an idiot has said, yeah,
Speaker 1: Buck's right, what are they talking about. I was disappointed
Speaker 1: in their reaction, all of them, well Harris wasn't sitting there,
Speaker 1: but the rest of them, because they were wrong. And
Speaker 1: I don't understand how they I guess they're just hyper
Speaker 1: sense that are about it. You know. Look, it's a
Speaker 1: very easy thing to be like, well, look I always
Speaker 1: defend kids, you know. It's like, yeah, okay, we all
Speaker 1: like kids. That's fine. You know. I like kids, I
Speaker 1: like puppies. I'm a nice person. I don't like being
Speaker 1: lectured on complicated public policy issues by people who are
Speaker 1: being used as pawns by adults who have been brainwashed.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it should be concerning to us that
Speaker 1: there are people out there who are saying they have
Speaker 1: a visceral anxiety, a visceral anxiety from climate change. That
Speaker 1: means that they're they're feeling the physical, the actual physical,
Speaker 1: physiological symptoms of clinical anxiety because they think the world
Speaker 1: is going to end, because manipulative, stupid adults have bought
Speaker 1: into this stuff. This is a moral panic. It's not
Speaker 1: that different from like tulip mania in the Netherlands. You know,
Speaker 1: it's just everybody gets caught up and something. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: did anyone really think that, you know, one one type
Speaker 1: of tulip, one species of tulip was worth more than
Speaker 1: all of the you know, all of the gold in
Speaker 1: Arabia or you know whatever. I mean. No, of course not,
Speaker 1: that's crazy. But people were acting like it, and that's
Speaker 1: where we are now. This is nuts. Trump's arrangement syndrome
Speaker 1: is real. Climate changed arrangement syndrome is real. Oh that
Speaker 1: would be the that would be the title of the
Speaker 1: good op ed. Maybe Buck should write that this weekend
Speaker 1: and then gold people writing me, you know a scientist, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm not a scientist. Are the twelve year olds that
Speaker 1: you're saying or are the voice of the movement? Are
Speaker 1: they scientists? I wear a little lap coat It's like,
Speaker 1: come on, come on. They're not scientists either. This is
Speaker 1: a public policy issue. You know. I'm also not a
Speaker 1: statistician or an accountant, but I think the twenty three
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in debt sounds like a lot. This is
Speaker 1: the single most absurd idea that has a well, no,
Speaker 1: this is more absurd even than the Trump Russia collusion insanity.
Speaker 1: This is this is the craziest thing the left believes.
Speaker 1: It really is. You know, I don't think, for example,
Speaker 1: that any leftists in their in their heart, really, if
Speaker 1: they thought about it, really thinks that a baby at
Speaker 1: you know, eight weeks, three months and four days isn't
Speaker 1: a baby until it comes out of the womb. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're not. I would think they're not that morally and
Speaker 1: intellectually corrupted. They just pretend to think that because they're
Speaker 1: they're terrified of the policy implications once they admit that.
Speaker 1: But I do think, unfortunately, there's a very substantial contingent
Speaker 1: out there of people who really believe that climate change
Speaker 1: is an existential threat to all humanity, to all life.
Speaker 1: And we'll leave it. Well, I'll play the quotes. I'll
Speaker 1: want the quotes for you I'll play it for you.
Speaker 1: You can hear it yourself. What is and it's global too? Oh?
Speaker 1: I know people, but Buck, what about the people in France?
Speaker 1: And what about look people want that. I don't you know,
Speaker 1: I don't do the spiritual thing here on the show
Speaker 1: very much. Most of you get that on Sunday. Some
Speaker 1: of you perhaps get it on Saturday. I hope maybe
Speaker 1: some of you on Friday or every day. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Whatever point is, I don't do that on the show.
Speaker 1: But from a from a more poly Si background, right,
Speaker 1: That's what I That's what I studied in school. I
Speaker 1: was a politically I have to speak English, what I
Speaker 1: have to do political philosophy guy at heart, But just
Speaker 1: a general philosophy is something I like to think about.
Speaker 1: I don't mean in the traditional Socratic method. I just
Speaker 1: like to try to understand why things are the way
Speaker 1: they are, like to sit around and think aloud. It's
Speaker 1: why I love this job, because I get to share
Speaker 1: those thoughts with you every day. And I really do
Speaker 1: believe a lot of this is driven by, especially in
Speaker 1: the European context, but increasingly the American one, the separation
Speaker 1: from God and from Christianity. Judeo Christian values from religious
Speaker 1: judaism and not just cultural and secular judaism. I think
Speaker 1: that that plays a very large role here because people
Speaker 1: are scared and lack purpose. When you lack purpose, you
Speaker 1: are scared because you know you're gonna die. So why
Speaker 1: are you here? What are you here to do? What
Speaker 1: are you here to accomplish? Well, if you don't believe
Speaker 1: in God, if you don't believe in the Almighty, I
Speaker 1: mean you can say that, well, you're here to be
Speaker 1: a moral person and to be productive. And for some
Speaker 1: people that's enough. For a lot of people that won't
Speaker 1: be a lot of people can't get beyond their own selfishness,
Speaker 1: their own needs, and so they want to believe that
Speaker 1: they're a part of some movement that is truly existential.
Speaker 1: And instead of it being existential for your soul, it's
Speaker 1: existential for humanity. This is where you get into the
Speaker 1: end of days mythology that you had in so many
Speaker 1: different civilizations and cultures, and yes religions too, But in
Speaker 1: the religious context, it is a function of the Almighty
Speaker 1: that has been wiped away. Now it's a function of
Speaker 1: human progress. Now it's a function of co two In
Speaker 1: the air, which is a byproduct of processes through industrialization
Speaker 1: and modern capitalism that have brought about more comfort and
Speaker 1: health and healing and prosperity and wealth and delicious food
Speaker 1: and comfortable homes and leisure time, more of that than
Speaker 1: in all of human history before it combined. The byproduct
Speaker 1: of this now we are made to feel guilty about.
Speaker 1: People are riddling themselves with guilt and yes, anxiety. You
Speaker 1: heard it from that that girl was I think, Oh no,
Speaker 1: there's one of those girls, the one who was screaming.
Speaker 1: You know, and you know I it's hard. But if
Speaker 1: you're they're under eighteen, I will not once they're eighteen.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. You're an adult. You're speaking about politics. You know,
Speaker 1: we get to this is what people say, David Hog,
Speaker 1: how dare you? He's just a child. Now the guy's
Speaker 1: in college and he's like a national media figure. He's
Speaker 1: an adult. He can vote, he's an adult. Oh, if
Speaker 1: these teenagers are so brilliant and we should listen to
Speaker 1: them all on climate change, shouldn't we get rid of
Speaker 1: the Oh that's right. They want the lives. Want to
Speaker 1: get rid of the voting age. Let's have sixteen year
Speaker 1: olds vote let's have twelve year olds vote. Why are
Speaker 1: we discriminating against five year olds. I've met some very
Speaker 1: spunky five year olds in my day. Lots of wisdom
Speaker 1: in the five and six year old group. But the
Speaker 1: same people that complain about institutions and how Trump is
Speaker 1: normalizing things that should never be normalized, then turn around
Speaker 1: and trash institutions that are central to Western civilization, that
Speaker 1: trash the very progress that we have made as a
Speaker 1: society to make ourselves richer and more comfortable and happier
Speaker 1: and healthier than at any time in human history. The
Speaker 1: left has embraced this climate change philosophy where we're supposed
Speaker 1: to feel bad for that, and the only way to
Speaker 1: atone for it is to hand over more control to
Speaker 1: the government, to the state, and then they will make
Speaker 1: the determinations about what penance we must make each and
Speaker 1: every one of us, because they know better. Climate change
Speaker 1: is at once a religion for people who are too
Speaker 1: smart for religion in their own minds, and also the
Speaker 1: invitation that the left has been waiting for for the superstate,
Speaker 1: and that's why they will use kids. They will shout
Speaker 1: down scientists who disagree, They will manufacture numbers they will lie,
Speaker 1: cheat and steal all to prop up this fantasy. Or
Speaker 1: really it's a nightmare. The world is going to end
Speaker 1: books boshing kids again. We'll get into more of that
Speaker 1: in a moment. Stay with me, Hi, Good morning, Senator.
Speaker 1: My name is Joan Miller. I am a doctoral candidate
Speaker 1: at USC. I study empathy as communication. My pronouns are she,
Speaker 1: her hers, And yesterday we talked a lot about individual
Speaker 1: responsibility to change behavior like veganism, water waste, and plastic
Speaker 1: straw bands, all of which initiatives disproportionately affect disabled people
Speaker 1: and poor people. Besides carbon tax and these individual responsibilities,
Speaker 1: how can we shift the responsibility to incentivize corporations and
Speaker 1: high waste industries to change their behavior around climate chain? Wow,
Speaker 1: I'm glad that she established what her pronouns were at
Speaker 1: the start of that, as if that has anything to
Speaker 1: do with anything. This is virtue signaling as actual signaling,
Speaker 1: right Like if I if I walk into a room
Speaker 1: and I'm about to order a pizza and I say, hello, sir,
Speaker 1: I would like your finest, obviously gluten free pepperoni pizza,
Speaker 1: my pronouns are he him? What else am I missing? He? Him?
Speaker 1: And what was the other I don't know what what
Speaker 1: she what did she say? She said her hers, so
Speaker 1: I would be he his? What am I missing? He? His? Him? Him?
Speaker 1: Thank you? Apparently I don't want my pronouns though, well,
Speaker 1: well maybe I'm a little kin. Just go buy it buck, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's gonna leave it out there. I still
Speaker 1: love the New York Times all the handwringing over. We know,
Speaker 1: we want to make sure that everyone feels included, but
Speaker 1: we kind of feel weird about using a plural pronoun
Speaker 1: for a singular individual because that's not accurate, because pearls,
Speaker 1: that'd be like to do they? Yeah, No, that's right, bucksax,
Speaker 1: and my pronouns are he him And according to producer
Speaker 1: producer Mark it Uh but yeah, I know she's saying
Speaker 1: that this will fall disproportionately on the poort. You know
Speaker 1: what's what's interesting is that she's correct. This is that
Speaker 1: is true that all this climate change stuff is going
Speaker 1: to hurt poor people more than anyone else. Because the
Speaker 1: cheapest and most effective way of transporting goods, of heating homes,
Speaker 1: of cooling homes, of giving you all the benefits of
Speaker 1: this modern world we live in, those involve not driving
Speaker 1: a Tesla and having solar panels on your roof. For
Speaker 1: the most part, I know someone's gonna send me the
Speaker 1: EMO book. I have solar panels and they're great, ari man,
Speaker 1: but you know it does it's not going to work
Speaker 1: for for all the rest of the the developing world.
Speaker 1: They hate to break it to you, We're not We're
Speaker 1: not about to have you know, endless solar panels installed
Speaker 1: in the roofs of every home in Bangladesh and you know,
Speaker 1: Botswana and Pieland and you know, you name it. It's
Speaker 1: just not going to happen. I don't know, I get
Speaker 1: I go back and forth. I also feel like maybe
Speaker 1: conservatives are just better at tuning this out because the
Speaker 1: left gets so enraged and so about this issue. They
Speaker 1: go Howard Dean on climate change. Yeah, I can I
Speaker 1: make fun of Howard Dean. Oh my gosh, buck is
Speaker 1: Howard Dean bashing? Why is he Howard Dean bashing? Because
Speaker 1: Howard Dean's not a kid. So there's that. I was
Speaker 1: one of the gun owning Americans that heard your speech
Speaker 1: and heard what you had to say regarding Hell. Yes,
Speaker 1: we're gonna take your aar fifteen and your AI. Let's
Speaker 1: let's be respectful. Let's be respectful. Well, I am here
Speaker 1: to say, hell, no, you're not so that. I would
Speaker 1: like to know how you intend to legislate evil, to
Speaker 1: legislate the hearts of men and leave American citizens like
Speaker 1: myself American mothers. I have four children and five foot
Speaker 1: zero one hundred pounds, cannot really defend myself with a fist.
Speaker 1: I just I just want to jump I just want
Speaker 1: to jump in on behalf of Betto for a moment, because, like,
Speaker 1: you know, this woman owns an air fifteen, so clearly
Speaker 1: she must be insane because she owns a gun. I
Speaker 1: believes in the Second Amendment, so we know she's crazy.
Speaker 1: But like I'm gonna be very I'm gonna be super
Speaker 1: like chill about this and just walk. Okay, now now
Speaker 1: you can hear from real Betto. It's okay. Let's please
Speaker 1: let's allow her to finish. I don't have my a
Speaker 1: R fifteen today, I have my glot. Look at that.
Speaker 1: He went on to say some stuff about how he's basically,
Speaker 1: you know, why can't This is where the libs take
Speaker 1: these things. You know, why can't you if you can
Speaker 1: have an air fifteen, why can't you have a er
Speaker 1: missile in a tank? And you know, this is where
Speaker 1: I just wish that people could have like a little,
Speaker 1: a little mini version of me on their shoulder when
Speaker 1: they need me or something. Maybe that sounds a little creepy.
Speaker 1: We're gonna manufacture tiny bucks. It would be a bobblehead doll,
Speaker 1: which would just look like a small version of the
Speaker 1: real buck giant head. But the yes, I'm self aware,
Speaker 1: I know the head is enormous. But the the truth
Speaker 1: there is that when when he poses that question to her,
Speaker 1: the answer is that because second Amendmentur's prudence deals with
Speaker 1: weapons in common usage. All right, that's the inderstanding. Even
Speaker 1: at the time of the American founding, and when there
Speaker 1: was the adoption of the first ten Amendments the Constitution,
Speaker 1: it would not have been not have been considered acceptable
Speaker 1: to have a you know, to be building. I don't know,
Speaker 1: if you walked around the streets, let's say, with a
Speaker 1: headsman's axe. I mean, this is what Scalia wrote in dcv. Heller.
Speaker 1: You know, you couldn't necessarily be a private citizen who
Speaker 1: was running his own you know, well, I know you're
Speaker 1: gonna say, Buck people did build their own cannon foundries,
Speaker 1: but there were some limitations on weapons you can have,
Speaker 1: and then that was understood, but weapons in common usage
Speaker 1: were understood to be because remember it's not and this
Speaker 1: is also then an extension of the debate. They say, well,
Speaker 1: the military has nukes, the military has you know, B
Speaker 1: one bombers and be two bombers, and you know, blah
Speaker 1: blah blah, all this stuff, and that we say, right,
Speaker 1: and we also have that, and we're trying to pacify
Speaker 1: Afghanistan and how's that going? Right? It's and I mean,
Speaker 1: can you imagine one thing? Think about this, and this
Speaker 1: is why the movie people often go to his Red Dawn.
Speaker 1: Here a foreign government trying to control America, let's say,
Speaker 1: against our will, it would just be unthinkable. I mean,
Speaker 1: the casualties that they would have merely from armed citizens.
Speaker 1: For let's just say, theoretically, our military, which I mean
Speaker 1: this obviously wouldn't happen, but just for the purposes of discussion,
Speaker 1: our military was like, you know what, we're just gonna
Speaker 1: We're not gonna fight because this foreign this foreign invasion,
Speaker 1: invasion is too powerful and it'll be mass casualties for
Speaker 1: us if we do it. So let's say that they
Speaker 1: knocked down our power grid and they say we're gonna
Speaker 1: hit you with nukes unless you stand down, So our
Speaker 1: military stands down. I know this is a crazy theory,
Speaker 1: but can you imagine, you know, the North Korean and
Speaker 1: let's just say North Korea, is that I won't get
Speaker 1: in trouble. That's like in a Red Dawn, right, the
Speaker 1: new Red Dawn. It's North Korea. They're gonna try to
Speaker 1: have their soldiers walk the streets, walk never mind the streets.
Speaker 1: A lot of people live in the redd or more
Speaker 1: rural parts of the country listening to show are like buck,
Speaker 1: let me tell you, in my in my area, my
Speaker 1: neck of the woods, these North Korean invaders would not
Speaker 1: get very far. And I'm sure that is true, and
Speaker 1: you all will probably start sending me now. The famous
Speaker 1: quote from was an Admiral Yamamoto, I believe saying that
Speaker 1: you could never This is World War two Japan, and
Speaker 1: I think the quote maybe apocryphal, but it is always
Speaker 1: attributed to the Japanese admiral that you could never invade
Speaker 1: the American mainland because there would be a rifle behind
Speaker 1: every blade of grass, even if it's apocryphal. It's a
Speaker 1: great quote because it's true. Because it's true, and that's
Speaker 1: why we have the Second Amendment that we do, and
Speaker 1: that's why it exists. But you know, Beato is still
Speaker 1: trying to oh wait, this was great though. Today I
Speaker 1: was like, why am I thinking about guns in Beto today? Well? Yeah,
Speaker 1: because also I just like, no letterr finish. I'm like,
Speaker 1: super chill about listening to opposing points of view. But
Speaker 1: guests who decided, after he had what was clearly the
Speaker 1: worst week, the worst week of his political career, what
Speaker 1: is the go to move for Libs? I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: for example, was it I don't know if it was
Speaker 1: Harvey Weinstein one of them one of the guys who
Speaker 1: got caught I can't remember the top I had one
Speaker 1: of the guys who got caught up in the me
Speaker 1: too and was guilty, right, not a Cavanall situation, an
Speaker 1: actual meet you guy who was a gross grabby assaulter,
Speaker 1: did something where he's like, I'm gonna I think it
Speaker 1: was Harvey Weinstein. I think it was Harvey Weinstein where
Speaker 1: he said, you know, now, I'm gonna just dedicate my
Speaker 1: time and effort to being a better person. And attacking
Speaker 1: the NRA. It was just like, yeah, if I go
Speaker 1: after the NRA, they'll forget about all the women that
Speaker 1: I sexually abused and took advantage of and you know,
Speaker 1: and perhaps even sexually assaulted. And I think that's still
Speaker 1: has he been found guilty at John or is he
Speaker 1: facing charges Harvey Weinstein? He's facing charges, right, He hasn't
Speaker 1: yet gone to troms charges, just charges right, right. But
Speaker 1: he did the whole like, oh, I'm gonna go after
Speaker 1: the NRA thing. That's like, oh well that will that
Speaker 1: will wipe the slate clean. You go after the NRA.
Speaker 1: You know, I am so sorry about being a serial
Speaker 1: killer the last twenty years, but I'm now a super
Speaker 1: woke lib and I'm gonna go after the NRA. So
Speaker 1: let's like, let bygones be bygones. Justin Trudeau, who is
Speaker 1: a very um I know, I want him to be
Speaker 1: more French than he is. I can't let this go.
Speaker 1: He just strikes me, like you look at him, you're
Speaker 1: like his name could be Pierre. And he promises that
Speaker 1: he is just friends with your wife and only wants
Speaker 1: to have chats with her about work purposes after working
Speaker 1: hours and he smokes the agut wise and I know
Speaker 1: he doesn't sell it. He sounds like me. He doesn't
Speaker 1: sound like that at all. I mean, my voice is
Speaker 1: obviously way better than Trudeau's. But anyway, he pulled the
Speaker 1: ultimate lib i'm quartered maneuver instead of just accepting that
Speaker 1: he's getting crushed rightly so for his multiple instances of
Speaker 1: black face coming up in photos, he's not even sure
Speaker 1: there could be another one justin. Trudeau today has announced
Speaker 1: that he wants to ban assault rifles. This is the
Speaker 1: ultimate aspiration move. It's like when you are just when
Speaker 1: you are caught, man. I mean you can just see
Speaker 1: this now if you if they've got you and you're
Speaker 1: in a room with a mound of cocaine, a dead
Speaker 1: hooker and a bag of cash that some union guy
Speaker 1: gave you to throw a contract their way, and you're
Speaker 1: a politician, you know what you do if you're a liberal.
Speaker 1: I just want to I just want to ban guns
Speaker 1: and assault rifles and stop and stop all the violence
Speaker 1: because I hate the NRA. Oh. I don't think this
Speaker 1: is gonna work the way he thinks it well, but
Speaker 1: I do, I do. I gotta appreciate the hustle here.
Speaker 1: I gotta appreciate the effort from Trudeau. What a shameless,
Speaker 1: lib hypocritical phony. But the buck, I am so smooth
Speaker 1: and suave. Perhaps I will put off, Perhaps he will.
Speaker 1: We've got more on the whistleblower thing. Stay with me.
Speaker 1: The urgency of this moment cannot be overstated. Um, I'm
Speaker 1: a change threatens every living thing on this planet, and
Speaker 1: we are literally running out of time for change. And
Speaker 1: yet I have to say, at this moment, I'm deeply hopeful,
Speaker 1: and I'm hopeful in part you may have heard I
Speaker 1: do selfie lines. I'm hopeful in part because of the
Speaker 1: number of people who come through and we shake hands
Speaker 1: and we do pictures and we do hugs, but who
Speaker 1: talk about how committed they are. I think I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be here and it's gonna be odd. Well, yeah, it
Speaker 1: means I will be, for one thing, held accountable. I
Speaker 1: think my generation will be held accountable because it will
Speaker 1: be on our watch that this thing played out. I
Speaker 1: actually think this is one of those moments that, like
Speaker 1: many moments in American history, really pivotal ones, like maybe
Speaker 1: the American Revolution itself, the goal for civil rights. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Think of a way that you could exaggerate
Speaker 1: the threat of climate change, and I will give you
Speaker 1: a prominent liberal in politics in media who vastly exceeds
Speaker 1: your exaggeration. It threatens every living thing, not even every
Speaker 1: every human being, my friends, every living thing on planet Earth.
Speaker 1: I mean, if we're going to get technical, you know,
Speaker 1: I think the bugs, I think the bacteria. I think
Speaker 1: they'll be just fine with a one with a one
Speaker 1: degree celsius raise in global temperature on average over the
Speaker 1: next fifty years, maybe one point five. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: It's hard to overstate the insanity here. These are people
Speaker 1: who think that they are they are well educated, they
Speaker 1: are wise, they are thoughtful, they're rational, they're reasonable, and
Speaker 1: their positions on this are none of those things, none
Speaker 1: of them, absolutely, none of them. So what do we do.
Speaker 1: We sit here and we're talking to people who are
Speaker 1: on a very important public policy issue essentially deranged, a
Speaker 1: threat to every living thing on Earth. And we have
Speaker 1: to also understand how concerning this is, because if they
Speaker 1: if they believe what they say, then there's nothing and
Speaker 1: I mean nothing that they cannot justify in their minds,
Speaker 1: right if they believe what they say, if they don't
Speaker 1: believe what they are saying, Elizabeth Warren Buddha judge. Then
Speaker 1: they will lie to any extent, They will engage in
Speaker 1: a mendacity that is just mind blowing, and not mine
Speaker 1: that they are brainwashing children, That they're taking public policy
Speaker 1: focus and dollars off of far more important issues, real
Speaker 1: issues where people are dying, where people are suffering, where
Speaker 1: there could be government assistance in one way or another.
Speaker 1: We're just all of us assisting in one way another.
Speaker 1: Instead we spend all our time talking about this non
Speaker 1: non issue. It is a non issue. Climate change is real, yes, Comma,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter, It's not important enough, it doesn't mean anything,
Speaker 1: and we can't do anything about it. Why do they
Speaker 1: think I'm so confident in this because big oil has
Speaker 1: paid me off? So they think that I'm brainwashed because
Speaker 1: I don't think the world's gonna end in ten years.
Speaker 1: They are saying this, They are saying things like the
Speaker 1: world's got en inteers. They you know that they don't
Speaker 1: want to Huh. It's just how can they expect me
Speaker 1: to take them seriously on a whole lot of other
Speaker 1: things too, that they've been so swindled on. This is
Speaker 1: deeply concerning to me. But as you know, I mean today,
Speaker 1: the main thing was they got kids running around. If
Speaker 1: they were if they had science on their side, they
Speaker 1: wouldn't be deploying these tactics of desperation and using children
Speaker 1: as policy human shields is a despicable tactic. It's gross,
Speaker 1: it's wrong, and they should know that. But liberals don't
Speaker 1: really have ethics. They just have a lust for power
Speaker 1: that can override any sense of decency. That's really the truth.
Speaker 1: He's when it comes to public policy discussions. Maybe in
Speaker 1: person they're really nice, But I mean, if you think
Speaker 1: that sending kids out there to lecture everybody else on
Speaker 1: climate change is an ethical and normal thing to do,
Speaker 1: I got a very different point of view on that.
Speaker 1: Books bashing kids again, stop bashing kids, Buck, not bashing kids.
Speaker 1: Kids don't know anything. I mean, that's that's not babby.
Speaker 1: I was a kid. I didn't know anything. I was
Speaker 1: running around. I was fifteen, and I was like, hey,
Speaker 1: girls are pretty, I want to play sports. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: drink some more chocolate milk. You know, Like that was
Speaker 1: sixteen year old bluck. I'm gonna read a Tom Clancy
Speaker 1: book maybe one day I'll be like a cool CIA ninja.
Speaker 1: You know I did get into the CIA, but definitely
Speaker 1: was not a ninja. H So you know that's I'm
Speaker 1: just saying. Giving kids don't know stuff all right now?
Speaker 1: You know who else doesn't no stuff? Democrats, Transition Boom
Speaker 1: made that one happen. Oh the whistle blower. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you a little secret, Producer Mark. I can't whistle,
Speaker 1: and I hate whistling. And it's not because I can't
Speaker 1: do it. I'm not bitter because I can't do it,
Speaker 1: but I do hate it. Yeah, I can whistle. Now
Speaker 1: you don't have to right now. They'll make me. Don't
Speaker 1: make me throw something at the glass. You know what'll happen.
Speaker 1: Stop it right now. People across the country or switching
Speaker 1: the channel to somebody who's like, I'm gonna tell you
Speaker 1: how to make more money. That guy sucks. Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: This is like somebody's like, I've got the secret for
Speaker 1: you being healthy, work out more eat less. It's like, wow,
Speaker 1: I should pay you. I should pay you a lot
Speaker 1: for that. That's really helpful. It's like I got an idea.
Speaker 1: Pay off your debts and don't spend too much money. Whoa,
Speaker 1: I should be a bazillionaire. Should you should teach his
Speaker 1: classes for free? I probably should? But I digress. So
Speaker 1: where were we? Oh? Yes, that's right too. I could
Speaker 1: see producer John was like, oh snap, he was whatever
Speaker 1: the true thirds, don't spend too much money, use cash,
Speaker 1: get out of debt. Whoa wow, I thought, It's like,
Speaker 1: what would I look like if I spend three hours
Speaker 1: at just buck Just spend three hours day in the
Speaker 1: jim stop whining about how you you know, I want
Speaker 1: to get healthier. Oh, there we go. That's the answer.
Speaker 1: Just do the just do the things that will all
Speaker 1: happen anyway, It's fine. Where was I? Oh? Yes, whistleblowers. Whistleblowers,
Speaker 1: so we have where were are we here? I got
Speaker 1: a couple of whistleblowers. Oh, Corey Booker's he's saying that
Speaker 1: this should take Trump downs. What do you make of
Speaker 1: what you're hearing about? Potential context with the Ukraine from
Speaker 1: Trump allies, or even this whistleblower call about a call
Speaker 1: with a feign leader. I don't like overly dramatic statements,
Speaker 1: but this is the most corrupt administration of my life.
Speaker 1: A whistleblower from the intelligence community. Can we just stop
Speaker 1: for a second to say, the guy who stood up
Speaker 1: in the US Senate and said I am Spartacus is
Speaker 1: telling you that he doesn't like overly dramatic statements. What
Speaker 1: he's accused the president of is stunning. This should be
Speaker 1: crippling Washington right now with the implications of what this whistle.
Speaker 1: Oh another, Oh, Trump's gone too far this time, this time,
Speaker 1: He's gone too far. No, it's all Oh. I mean, guys,
Speaker 1: you know how many times does Lucy get to pull
Speaker 1: the football away before it's on us? You know what
Speaker 1: I mean? It's ridiculous. No, No, I'm sorry, this is
Speaker 1: not This is not going to take down the administration.
Speaker 1: This isn't worse than Watergate. This isn't you know. You
Speaker 1: know the clock is ticking on Trump and this, I mean,
Speaker 1: all this stuff they've said it so many times, are
Speaker 1: always wrong. Always We'll get him more of this in
Speaker 1: a second. I don't know the identity of the whistleblower.
Speaker 1: I just hear it say partisan person, meaning it comes
Speaker 1: out from another party. And I don't have any idea,
Speaker 1: but I can say that it was a totally appropriate conversation.
Speaker 1: It was actually a beautiful conversation. And this is no
Speaker 1: different than you know, the precess had a very bad
Speaker 1: week with Justice Kavanaugh and all of those ridiculous charges
Speaker 1: and all of the mistakes made at the New York
Speaker 1: Times and other places. You've had a very bad week,
Speaker 1: and this will be better than all of them. This
Speaker 1: is another one. So keeping the whistle keeping, So keep
Speaker 1: playing it up because you're gonna look really bad when
Speaker 1: it falls. You know, I guess I'm about I guess
Speaker 1: I'm about twenty two. And oh and I keep it
Speaker 1: that way. President's right about this whistleblower nonsense. It's going nowhere.
Speaker 1: This is nothing. First of all, that when you have
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff as your spokesperson for anything, I mean I
Speaker 1: would listen to Adam Schiff if he was the spokesperson
Speaker 1: for the cure for cancer, because you know that it
Speaker 1: was not true, it was not real. It was you know,
Speaker 1: snake oil that he was selling. Yeah, trust Adams Shiff.
Speaker 1: Guys running around Yes, this House Committee and our democracy
Speaker 1: and the sanctity. Oh guys, the worst guy is the worst.
Speaker 1: This also raises some interesting questions. Whistle blower on a
Speaker 1: call with the president, do we think the president was
Speaker 1: in the room with somebody who happened over here this
Speaker 1: or do we think that this was, as President said,
Speaker 1: a heavily populated call, meaning that there were people who
Speaker 1: are picking up this call on our side and on
Speaker 1: their side. If it's an open phone line call, Folks,
Speaker 1: this is not hard to do. I mean, plenty of
Speaker 1: plenty of countries have the capability to do this. And
Speaker 1: the assumption whenever the president's if the president is on
Speaker 1: an open line call with a foreign head of state,
Speaker 1: or even if he's on a hard line call, because
Speaker 1: the other side could obviously record it and other third
Speaker 1: parties might try to record it, assumption is going to
Speaker 1: be that that people are going to hear this, and
Speaker 1: the president knows that it's it's very close to being
Speaker 1: a call out in the it might as well be
Speaker 1: a conversation in public, which is what the President is
Speaker 1: saying all along. He's like, this was a heavily populated call.
Speaker 1: But this whistleblower hunt would this be somebody, let's say,
Speaker 1: inside the intelligence community who had access to classified and
Speaker 1: decided that they were going to go forward with a
Speaker 1: whistle blower complaint? Is that what happened here. It's just
Speaker 1: interesting to me because we'll remember that we still haven't
Speaker 1: found out who was the deep state actor in the
Speaker 1: federal government who went forward with going after General Flynn
Speaker 1: by leaking a conversation between the incoming National Security Advisor
Speaker 1: and Russian Ambassador Saraga Kislia. I mean, that was a felony.
Speaker 1: We still don't know who did it. Still havn't figured
Speaker 1: out who was behind that one. And it looks like
Speaker 1: they're trying this once again. Now they're not leaking, they're
Speaker 1: going through somebody realized I don't want to be possibly
Speaker 1: in criminal jeopardy here. I don't believe it there's a
Speaker 1: conversation that happened with somebody in the room who heard
Speaker 1: President Trump, because that would only be a very senior
Speaker 1: person who Trump had appointed, and I doubt that that
Speaker 1: person would be willing to risk his or her job
Speaker 1: by being the whistleblower. This is somebody in the federal bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: some hashtag resistance hysterical lib who's like Trump is threatening
Speaker 1: or democracy, Oh my gosh, coming forward to make a complaint.
Speaker 1: And as I said last night, and I was on
Speaker 1: Shannon Bream Show with John Yu who was the I
Speaker 1: forget the deputy assistant attorney general or something like that,
Speaker 1: or who's an assistant attorney general I think under the
Speaker 1: Bush administration who wrote what are known as the torture Memos. Right,
Speaker 1: he was talking about enhanced interrogation at the time. We
Speaker 1: were on this, and we both came to the same
Speaker 1: conclusion without knowing too much about the details of the complaint.
Speaker 1: It's not even realistic that there's anything that could be
Speaker 1: considered illicit and worthy of a whistleblower complaint. Here. If
Speaker 1: the President tells the government of Ukraine, I would like
Speaker 1: you to do the following, unless he's saying I'm going to,
Speaker 1: you know, give me a bag of cash and I'm
Speaker 1: going to sell you a bunch of American nuclear missiles
Speaker 1: or something, which we all know he didn't do that.
Speaker 1: What is this complaint about. It's not hard for the
Speaker 1: president to come up with a way, with a justification
Speaker 1: to say that he you know, that he wants corruption
Speaker 1: in Ukraine to be rooted out. He's well within his
Speaker 1: rights to say that. I'll get into more of this
Speaker 1: in a second, but here's how the president has been
Speaker 1: handling the media, who are trying so hard to shift
Speaker 1: Remember they're shifting right now from the Kavanaugh reducts, which
Speaker 1: is what they wanted. They wanted to get back into Kavanaugh,
Speaker 1: restart the Kavanaugh to be Oh whoop. They got slapped
Speaker 1: down on that. Media's they lost this week. My friend,
Speaker 1: they took heavy narrative casualties this week in the media.
Speaker 1: I mean they got they got just crushed on Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: New York Times looks like a buffoon club. But now
Speaker 1: they got to switch to something else. And this whistle
Speaker 1: blower is a story they got to keep the pressure
Speaker 1: on Trump got us. The Libs want to stay on offense,
Speaker 1: and that's where this whistleblower story comes in. But this
Speaker 1: is how Trump is handling them. No, I have it.
Speaker 1: It's it's I just tell you it is. Everybody's rented.
Speaker 1: They left at it, and it's another It's another media disaster.
Speaker 1: The media has lost so much credibility in this country.
Speaker 1: Our media has become the laughing stock of the world.
Speaker 1: When you look at what they did to Justice Cavanaugh
Speaker 1: and so many other things last week. I think this
Speaker 1: is one of the worst weeks in the history of
Speaker 1: the fake news media. You have been wrong on so
Speaker 1: many things, and this one will be I wouldn't say
Speaker 1: it will top the list because I think you can't
Speaker 1: do worse than some of the stories you missed over
Speaker 1: the last week or two. But the media of our
Speaker 1: country is left at all over the world. Now you're
Speaker 1: a joke. Okay, what else? Look, I think he's he's
Speaker 1: well within his rights. You have the most famous newspaper
Speaker 1: in the country putting two of its reporters out there
Speaker 1: to try and defend the indefensible with their with their
Speaker 1: Kavanaugh book, where what they found out was that really
Speaker 1: they tried to take down Kavanaugh, but the truth is
Speaker 1: so in Kavanaugh's favor that guess what they helped Kavanaugh.
Speaker 1: They were trying to to hurt his case incredibility. But
Speaker 1: you know, ultimately this is all about their desperation to
Speaker 1: create the asterisk next to Kavanaugh's name and to delegitimize
Speaker 1: at some level the Supreme Court. And by delegitimizing the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, what they do in their minds, this is
Speaker 1: what the left, I'm telling you right now, what the
Speaker 1: plot is. They want to make the Supreme Court seem
Speaker 1: like it has been polluted by the elevation of Kavanaugh,
Speaker 1: by the elevation of Justice Thomas. You know these other
Speaker 1: conservative members. Oh, it's so terrible, so that if they
Speaker 1: win a presidency coming up here, they can restructure and
Speaker 1: perhaps reform the court. I do not think that the
Speaker 1: left is above court packing. I do not think the
Speaker 1: left is above I don't think they're above anything. Really,
Speaker 1: I don't think they're above impeaching Kavanaugh, even though the
Speaker 1: evidence proves his innocence. It's not that the evidence doesn't
Speaker 1: look great for him, but I still think he's probably
Speaker 1: not guilty based on everything we have seen. A rational
Speaker 1: person knows Kavanaugh is not guilty, but the media won't stop.
Speaker 1: And that's why Trump calling him out like this. It's
Speaker 1: a beautiful thing. Did you ask the Ukrea to investigate
Speaker 1: Joe Biden? No, actually I didn't. I asked the Ukraine
Speaker 1: to investigate the allegations that there was interference in the
Speaker 1: election of twenty sixteen by the Ukrainians for the benefit
Speaker 1: of Hillary Clinton, for wish they're already is. I never
Speaker 1: asking anything about Hunter Biden. You never asked anything about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Only thing I asked about Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: to get to the bottom of how it was that
Speaker 1: Lutsenko who was appointed right, dismissed the case against antill
Speaker 1: You did ask Ukraine did look into Joe Biden? Of
Speaker 1: course I did. You just said you didn't. No, I
Speaker 1: didn't ask him to look into Joe Biden. I asked
Speaker 1: him look in the allegations the relator to my client,
Speaker 1: which tangentially involved Joe Biden in a massive bribery. Skating
Speaker 1: bro Cuomo is like getting the answers that America deserves you.
Speaker 1: He's like, Yo, did you even work your traps today?
Speaker 1: And your lats swol club? WHOA what's up? Bro Cuomo
Speaker 1: doesn't seem understand the distinction that Giuliani is trying to
Speaker 1: make here, which is that he is saying. Giuliani is
Speaker 1: saying that he was telling the Ukrainian government to look
Speaker 1: into corruption that he believes occurred in the country of Ukraine,
Speaker 1: and that corruption may in fact involve, assuming that the
Speaker 1: allegations are true, a member of the Biden family. That
Speaker 1: is not the same thing as saying, go investigate Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden because he's Joe Biden's son and we're trying to
Speaker 1: get him. Julian is trying to make a distinction here
Speaker 1: between a legitimate a legitimate line of inquiry for certainly
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian government and as an ally of the Ukrainian government,
Speaker 1: we always want them to root out corruption, right, we
Speaker 1: want we want we have the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Speaker 1: We want less corruption all over the world. Well, guess
Speaker 1: what if one of the bidens was involved in lining
Speaker 1: his pockets and there's very real reason to believe that
Speaker 1: is the case, that is certainly the allegation that is
Speaker 1: out there right now, why can't we look into that?
Speaker 1: You know, we're really going to go through this now
Speaker 1: where libers are going to act like the Obama administration
Speaker 1: and Obama himself, by the way, he knew about some
Speaker 1: of this. We just don't know how much that Obama
Speaker 1: was able to use the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA,
Speaker 1: the who knows what to try and not just get
Speaker 1: dirt on President Trump, but to destroy his campaign, stop
Speaker 1: him from being president, and send him to prison. Let's
Speaker 1: be honest, that is what Obama did. That is what
Speaker 1: the Obama administration on behalf of Hillary Clinton's campaign. Now
Speaker 1: they could say, oh no, we thought this is where
Speaker 1: this is where the evidence was taking us. Really they
Speaker 1: thought that Papadopolis and Carter Page, we're part of an
Speaker 1: international conspiracy to work with the Russians to change the
Speaker 1: outcome of an election. So they're telling us that they're
Speaker 1: a bunch of hysterical morons. That's their excuse, because that's
Speaker 1: what that sounds like to me. But notice how narrative
Speaker 1: creation is so important to the left here that they
Speaker 1: control the narrative. Why is it illegitimate for Rudy Giuliani
Speaker 1: on behalf of the White House or in any capacity
Speaker 1: as a private citizen working for the United States government
Speaker 1: to tell the Ukrainian government we think you need to
Speaker 1: look into what happened here. Hillary Clinton's campaign paid a foreigner,
Speaker 1: Christopher Steele, to speak to a bunch of Russian subsources.
Speaker 1: I believe we're all mostly are all in Ukraine from
Speaker 1: what I recall, to get dirt on Donald Trump to
Speaker 1: beat him in the presidential election and maybe throw him
Speaker 1: in prison. So Hillary's Campaign's allowed to pay someone to
Speaker 1: go work with foreigners to destroy Trump while she's running
Speaker 1: against him, and the Obama administration gives her an assist
Speaker 1: by taking the information that Hillary's camp pain gathered together
Speaker 1: and then using that as the almost sole basis the
Speaker 1: dossier for the weaponization of the federal government's national security
Speaker 1: apparatus against Trump and now we're supposed to get the
Speaker 1: we're supposed to get the vapors. We're supposed to to
Speaker 1: shudder at the thought of President Trump's administration telling the Ukrainians, Hey,
Speaker 1: could you just could you look into what really happened here?
Speaker 1: Could you tell us if this was really what went down?
Speaker 1: Because that's a big problem. Just to review, the allegation
Speaker 1: is that Hunter Biden, who is a very troubled person.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody would dispute that that Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: was on the board of a Ukrainian company where there
Speaker 1: was a lot of corruption and Hunter Biden was getting
Speaker 1: getting a lot of money. The kind of money where
Speaker 1: you think, is he getting paid this money because he
Speaker 1: is so useful or because he's the president's son. I
Speaker 1: will let then the non idiots of the world decide
Speaker 1: this one. I think we all know no one thinks
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden is some great international dealmaker. Okay. Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's value is he is Joe Biden's son. He has
Speaker 1: no value in the international arbitrage game. He's not bringing
Speaker 1: huge deals together. If he's not Biden's son, he's the
Speaker 1: Vice President's son. He's doing deals in China, he's doing
Speaker 1: deals in Ukraine, places of maximum foreign policy interest for
Speaker 1: the United States. Remember Ukraine had the the insurgency in
Speaker 1: the East, and we were fighting with you know, arguing
Speaker 1: with Russia over this, and I mean there's Ukraine was
Speaker 1: very much at the center of a lot of major
Speaker 1: Obama administration foreign policy squabbles, which, by the way, the
Speaker 1: Obama administration did a terrible job of handling. But you know,
Speaker 1: NBD and now here we are. Now here, we are
Speaker 1: looking at the possibility of a complaint, a complaint being
Speaker 1: lodged by our administration saying, hey, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: was one of our guys doing something bad, leveraging his
Speaker 1: familial connection to the Vice president to change US foreign
Speaker 1: policy in some way for his own benefit. Because that's
Speaker 1: a big problem, right if if you notice how the
Speaker 1: Libs skip right past. What if the accusation against Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden is true? Ah, But you see, they don't want
Speaker 1: to ask that question because you know what, you'd find
Speaker 1: out very quickly. They don't care. It doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: it's true. He's Hunter Biden. And guess what Daddy is
Speaker 1: top of the demo crat pack in the presidential race.
Speaker 1: For the Democrats, it doesn't matter what Joe Biden, what
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's son did, They will protect him. They will
Speaker 1: circle the wagons. The only change you will see in
Speaker 1: this will be if Biden falls out of that front
Speaker 1: runner spot. Oh, then the New York Times will have
Speaker 1: some big oh you know, it turns out then maybe
Speaker 1: Joe Biden some was doing some you know, and they'll
Speaker 1: building look at us. We're We're so brave and honest.
Speaker 1: We're the good journos. We do the work that needs
Speaker 1: to be done. You know, all this patting themselves in
Speaker 1: the back crap they love to do. You know, they
Speaker 1: gave themselves awards. Yeah, I think the New York Times
Speaker 1: and the CNN they got awards for their Russia collusion coverage.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can't make this stuff up. She get
Speaker 1: an award for being crazy. But notice how the way
Speaker 1: this has been set up automnt if the entire whistleblower mess,
Speaker 1: the way they've been setting this up is oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: President and Trump is there's a complaint against him. Okay,
Speaker 1: well what if he said, I want you to open
Speaker 1: this case against or so I should say, open this
Speaker 1: investigation against Honey with our President Trump has no authority
Speaker 1: in Ukraine. All he can do is conduct foreign policy
Speaker 1: the way he wants to. But if President Trump decides
Speaker 1: that Ukrainian government needs to find out if there was
Speaker 1: corrupt corruption going on there, guess what, that's well within
Speaker 1: his right he can He can tell the Ukrainians that
Speaker 1: he thinks it would be a good idea for them
Speaker 1: to get at the bottom of this, and that would help,
Speaker 1: it would help the relationship with the United States. That
Speaker 1: there would be an ancillary, that there would be a
Speaker 1: secondary political benefit for Trump does not make it illegal.
Speaker 1: It's bare knuckle politics, don't get me wrong. It's not
Speaker 1: something that isn't clearly tied into politics. But just because
Speaker 1: there's a political connection, it doesn't mean that he's out
Speaker 1: out of line. And this is what the Libs. That's
Speaker 1: why the Libs are freaking out about this or trying
Speaker 1: to create this notion in people's minds. Yeah, no, we
Speaker 1: can't do this. You can't do this. Why even if
Speaker 1: what the whistleblower says is true, what's what exactly is
Speaker 1: the problem here? The people? The thought that using foreigners
Speaker 1: to dig up information about candidate Trump and then using
Speaker 1: Obama appointees in the federal government and deep state leave
Speaker 1: behind the federal government to try to take down Trump
Speaker 1: through not just the initial FBI investigation, but then a
Speaker 1: special counsel on top of that. Oh oh, they want
Speaker 1: to complain about about bare knuckle politics and fair play. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't think so, not on my watch, not this time.
Speaker 1: It's a good thing to listen to this show, though,
Speaker 1: because what we do here is annihilate the libs BS narratives.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. I've met Candice Owens a couple
Speaker 1: of times, interviewed her once or twice. She's a very
Speaker 1: sharp young woman, and I think that she's had a
Speaker 1: lot of very excellent moments on different shows, and including
Speaker 1: my show The Hill The Rising, where Crystal and Candace
Speaker 1: had a very If you have not seen it, you might.
Speaker 1: That's one that's in the archives that's worth pulling up
Speaker 1: on YouTube. You might they I was there with Charlie
Speaker 1: Kirk was there till there forget Charlie and I were
Speaker 1: looking at each other like, oh man, this is heating up.
Speaker 1: We're like, uh, We're not in this one. You know.
Speaker 1: It's like when you watch two people and they want
Speaker 1: to They're like, you want to step outside, and you're like, oh,
Speaker 1: I guess they're gonna step outside, Like this isn't anyway,
Speaker 1: it was quite a quite a scene back on the Rising.
Speaker 1: That was man, that was like eighteen months ago now.
Speaker 1: But Candice is, Yeah, she's fierce. And by the way,
Speaker 1: she invited me to do her show in DC last week,
Speaker 1: and I was very sad. Obviously I'm not in DC anymore.
Speaker 1: Otherwise I would have done it, but I couldn't do
Speaker 1: it because I'm not there. But hopefully we'll get I'm
Speaker 1: gonna try to coordinate to join her at some point
Speaker 1: when I'm out in in California. So anyway, Candice today
Speaker 1: was in a hearing before the House Oversight Joint Subcommittee
Speaker 1: and they were talking about white nationalism. That was part
Speaker 1: of the topic. Sorry, the House is having a hearing
Speaker 1: on white supremacy and the Republic. And this is from
Speaker 1: one of the most disgusting little turds and all of
Speaker 1: the Internet, who works for Media Matters. So I won't
Speaker 1: even get into it right now. I'm not sure which
Speaker 1: is worse these days, Media Matters the Daily Beast, but
Speaker 1: they're they're all terrible. But anyway, the House was having
Speaker 1: this subcommittee meeting, and and sure enough there was a
Speaker 1: moment where Candice Owens decided, you know, I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: let it rip. I'm sick of the nonsense. It's Friday.
Speaker 1: I want you to sit back and enjoy Candice Owens
Speaker 1: wrecking some libs in Congress hit it. I said, it's
Speaker 1: hilarious that we are sitting in this room today and
Speaker 1: I've got two doctors and a missus, and nobody can
Speaker 1: give us real numbers that we can respond to so
Speaker 1: we can assess how big of a threat this is,
Speaker 1: because you know that it is not as big of
Speaker 1: a threat as you are trying to make it out
Speaker 1: to be so that you can manipulate. And the audacity
Speaker 1: of you to bring up the christ Church shooting manifesto
Speaker 1: and make it seem as if I laughed at people
Speaker 1: that were slaughtered by a homicidal maniac maniac is, in
Speaker 1: my opinion, absolutely despicable, and I think that we should
Speaker 1: be above that. To try to assign reality or any
Speaker 1: meaning to a homicidal maniac writing a manifesto which, by
Speaker 1: the way, let the record show also stated spiral of
Speaker 1: the Dragon the Child's cartoon as a source of inspiration.
Speaker 1: He also cited Nelson Mandela as a source of information.
Speaker 1: I don't think I don't think that Nelson Mandela has
Speaker 1: inspired mosque shootings. You can correct me if you think
Speaker 1: I'm wrong. You would rather assign meaning to a homicidal
Speaker 1: maniac than to actually address that I said. To the
Speaker 1: things that I said today that are actually harming Black
Speaker 1: America Number one, father absence, number two, the education system
Speaker 1: and the literacy rate, illegal immigration ranks high, abortion ranks high,
Speaker 1: white supremacy, and white nationalism. If I had to make
Speaker 1: a list again of one hundred things would not be
Speaker 1: on it. This hearing, in my opinion, is a farce,
Speaker 1: and it is ironic that you're sitting here and you're
Speaker 1: having three Caucasian people testify and tell you what their
Speaker 1: expertise are. Do I know my experts are black in America.
Speaker 1: I've been Black in America my whole life, all thirty years,
Speaker 1: and I can tell you that you guys have done
Speaker 1: the exact same thing every four years ahead of an
Speaker 1: election cycle, and it needs to stop. Yes, sweet the link,
Speaker 1: no mercy, that's right. She swept the leg told Congress
Speaker 1: that the Democrats in Congress that she's just sick of
Speaker 1: the nonsense. I mean, I was. It's just you know,
Speaker 1: when you when you hear someone and obviously Candice is
Speaker 1: in a place, in a role speaking from a perspective
Speaker 1: as a young African American woman, that she can say
Speaker 1: this and not I mean, they're still gonna shout her
Speaker 1: down and do everything else. But you know, she can
Speaker 1: say this without them trying to destroy her career anything else.
Speaker 1: She can speak about what plagues the black community in
Speaker 1: America these days from a from a first person perspective.
Speaker 1: And when when you hear someone speaking the truth about
Speaker 1: about issues like this, uh, you just go finally, finally,
Speaker 1: you know, there are problems in this country, you know,
Speaker 1: you like, the opioid epidemic is not entirely but primarily
Speaker 1: a major problem of mortality and destruction of families. And
Speaker 1: and there's a whole lot of psychological analysis that should
Speaker 1: be done behind why at this point in time, as
Speaker 1: well as biochemical analysis about the very drugs themselves. But
Speaker 1: that that hurts the white community. You know, there are
Speaker 1: different there are different problems that are more common. I mean,
Speaker 1: all communities have problems that are common to each other
Speaker 1: at some level. Right, we all struggle with with problem
Speaker 1: with poverty, with crime, you know, lack of day to
Speaker 1: day purpose, with lack of spiritual connection to the almighty,
Speaker 1: you know whatever. Right, we all have problems. But when
Speaker 1: she's what she's addressing. Here is the fixation that liberals have,
Speaker 1: and they've created, and they've done it for the most
Speaker 1: obvious political purposes. They've done it to create a narrative
Speaker 1: that is damaging to Trump. Right, Trump is a white
Speaker 1: supremacist president. White nationalism is resurgent under Trump. All the
Speaker 1: white nationalism we always hear about Charlesville. But Charlesville was
Speaker 1: a couple of hundred losers in a country of three
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty million people. And by the way, after
Speaker 1: that Charlottesville rally, which Trump did say that they were losers,
Speaker 1: the media lied about what Trump said about them. And
Speaker 1: I will I just just like with the Greta Thunberg
Speaker 1: thing where people saying that I'm kid bashing, which is
Speaker 1: a stupid thing to say, and I did not kid bash,
Speaker 1: full stop. Bring it on. I've read the transcript dozens
Speaker 1: of times. It is obvious to anybody who cares to
Speaker 1: know the truth that Trump said that he was not
Speaker 1: referring to good people or to the white nationalists as
Speaker 1: good people in Charlotsville. But if this was a bigger problem, folks,
Speaker 1: wouldn't there be more than one rally two years ago
Speaker 1: that they'd be sighting. Oh, now we're gonna hear about that.
Speaker 1: They're they're gonna talk about the christ Church shooting in
Speaker 1: New Zealand. Okay, that's in New Zealand. Now, if we're
Speaker 1: gonna talk about white nationalism as a problem in a
Speaker 1: world of seven going on eight billion people, one homicidal
Speaker 1: mania in New Zealand should not dictate American political discourse
Speaker 1: or policy with his heinous actions. What Caanics is saying
Speaker 1: year is that this cynical politics on the left of
Speaker 1: pretending that the real problem, the greatest problem faced by
Speaker 1: the black community in this country is white nationalism and
Speaker 1: white supremacy, it avoids more useful public policy discussions and
Speaker 1: just discourse in general around problems that are still very sensitive,
Speaker 1: very hot button issue to talk about. But the fatherlessness rate,
Speaker 1: as she brings up in the black community, is that
Speaker 1: is not an issue that is to be discussed or not.
Speaker 1: And the statistics are that I believe seventy percent of
Speaker 1: African American children right now, seven out of ten are
Speaker 1: born out of wedlock. Now that's not the same as fatherlessness,
Speaker 1: but you can imagine the fatherlessness level is also stunningly high.
Speaker 1: Is that a conversation? But Candice can bring this up?
Speaker 1: Can anyone else talk about why this is happening in
Speaker 1: urban areas across the country and the or how about
Speaker 1: we just take race out of it entirely and discuss
Speaker 1: what does fatherlessness? Look at? These social research, the social
Speaker 1: science on this, stretching back for decades, what does fatherlessness
Speaker 1: mean for a child? What does buy the numbers by
Speaker 1: the statistics, and it will tell you more likely to
Speaker 1: drop out of high school, more likely to be a
Speaker 1: substance abuser, more likely to go to prison, more likely
Speaker 1: to be engaged in violent crime. Now more likely is
Speaker 1: not the same thing, by any stretch as determinative of like, oh,
Speaker 1: because you know I didn't have a father. We had
Speaker 1: the most recent president before this one grew up without
Speaker 1: a father, right, so it's not to say and that's
Speaker 1: you know, this is why liberals love to just try
Speaker 1: to find a way to twist words to avoid conversations
Speaker 1: that would be helpful to any community, but in particularly
Speaker 1: they do this with a black community, and it was
Speaker 1: just it was just a breath of fresh air to
Speaker 1: have Candice step up and just hit one out of
Speaker 1: the park in Congress today. That's exactly what she did.
Speaker 1: So props in a high five to her. I understand
Speaker 1: why people are Look, I understand why people are Candace fans.
Speaker 1: And I know some of you listen to this. You know,
Speaker 1: you have your your favorites here and there in the
Speaker 1: conservative movement, but I mean other than me obviously. But
Speaker 1: I thought Cannis did a very very good job today.
Speaker 1: And of course the Libs are now all trying to
Speaker 1: bash her for it. Oh look at it's downplaying white nationalism.
Speaker 1: Oh because you know, and they lied about what in
Speaker 1: the hearing. They lied about what she said in the hearing.
Speaker 1: One of the other witnesses said, you were laughing about this.
Speaker 1: If what conservatives say, whether it's me or you or
Speaker 1: Trump or Candice Owens, if what we say is so bad,
Speaker 1: why do they have to keep lying about what we say?
Speaker 1: Use Akham's razor like a chainsaw on that one. I
Speaker 1: thought there was a chance after not getting into September
Speaker 1: I still thought there was a chance to get in
Speaker 1: to October. We saw that with Steve Bullock didn't get
Speaker 1: into June, did get into July. You know, it's obviously possible.
Speaker 1: But as we went over the last few weeks, every
Speaker 1: day that passed it got tougher if there wasn't more progress.
Speaker 1: We were watching the Poland to see if anything was moving,
Speaker 1: and it just wasn't moving. So in the end, you know,
Speaker 1: you got to make decisions based on the facts, and
Speaker 1: sometimes it's just not your time and that's okay. Oh no,
Speaker 1: Bill Deblasio has dropped out of the presidential race, our own,
Speaker 1: our own New York City mayor. This is so sad
Speaker 1: for point zero zero zero zero zero zero one percent
Speaker 1: the electorate. It's just so sad. Are you Are you gonna?
Speaker 1: Are you gonna pour some out this weekend for for
Speaker 1: your main man de Blasio producer Mark, of course, I am.
Speaker 1: I'm so sad right now. Just just pour out like
Speaker 1: some kind of soy macha latte, drink, maybe some dirt
Speaker 1: that you only drink with one of those stupid paper straws.
Speaker 1: Have you used these paper straws? They disgusting. It's like,
Speaker 1: what what are we all of a sudden we're barbarians.
Speaker 1: We gotta drink with this like sludge, this uh, this
Speaker 1: mush straw. I'd rather just not use the straw. Ugh,
Speaker 1: I'd rather not use the straw too. But here we are. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, I saw something. The Washington Examiner put this out.
Speaker 1: I can't remember exactly what the numbers were, but effectively,
Speaker 1: the United States is responsible for less than one percent
Speaker 1: of the plastic that's in the oceans globally, and straws
Speaker 1: are responsive for of all global plastic. I think it
Speaker 1: was point zero zero zero four percent of all the
Speaker 1: plastic in the oceans, So we're responsible for less than
Speaker 1: one percent, and overall straws are point zero zero zero
Speaker 1: four percent. So you don't have to do the exact math,
Speaker 1: and not to know this is a stupid waste of
Speaker 1: everybody's time. And maybe people should stop being a bunch
Speaker 1: of nincompoops and let us use straws. What do you
Speaker 1: think that's right? I like the nincompoops thing. Yeah, thank
Speaker 1: that was good. Yeah, I got I got old timy
Speaker 1: words here. You see, I'm a gray I'm a gray
Speaker 1: beard millennial, unlike you whipper snappers from generation z over here.
Speaker 1: Oh like Zoro big Z. We're so cool. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: know what's up? Yeah, he's silent. Now, I'm not gen Z.
Speaker 1: I'm a millennial. Are you a millennial? Yeah? No, but
Speaker 1: you're When does gen Z start after me? I think
Speaker 1: like ninety eight or so? Are we gonna let him in? John?
Speaker 1: I don't know. We gotta help, we gotta hold the millennial.
Speaker 1: Hearing the graybeards at the millennial movement, I don't think
Speaker 1: John's the millennial. Damn it? What are you and I
Speaker 1: are the millennials? I'm Generation X. Ah, you're gen X.
Speaker 1: You're one of those. Yeah, I got the you're from
Speaker 1: Batou's generation. So you were like drinking Zima and listening
Speaker 1: to Nirvana and Stone Temple Pilots. Actually I kind of
Speaker 1: like STP. But what is Zima? Wow? What is Zema?
Speaker 1: This is? We also used to have his thing, producer
Speaker 1: Mark called a walkman. I used one, Yeah, right, used
Speaker 1: the CDP. Yeah exactly. You saw a walkman in a
Speaker 1: museum I did. Yeah, that's what I thought. You had
Speaker 1: to knock the dust off it to get it to work. Um.
Speaker 1: Oh mean I want to make fun of the Blasio
Speaker 1: a little bit more here it's clearly not his time.
Speaker 1: He dropped out of the race, and uh here he
Speaker 1: was on on Morning Joe with his does he say
Speaker 1: is that his line out? Clearly not my time. I've
Speaker 1: contributed all I can to this primary election, and it's
Speaker 1: clearly not my time. So I'm going to end my
Speaker 1: presidential campaign, continue my work as mayor of New York City,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to keep speaking up for working people
Speaker 1: and for a Democrat Party that stands for working people.
Speaker 1: And I'll just say this, I talked to a lot
Speaker 1: of folks, including a lot of labor union members, who
Speaker 1: really don't feel the Democrat Party has their back right now.
Speaker 1: And that's a lot of the story of twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: I think Democrats not being clear strong for working people.
Speaker 1: A lot of working people stay at home, some of
Speaker 1: them even drifted away. You know what doesn't help unions?
Speaker 1: Illegal immigration doesn't help union guys. And now what they'll do.
Speaker 1: And there's a professor Borjas at Harvard who has done
Speaker 1: the most thorough research on this. Because you always hear
Speaker 1: people say, oh, but it doesn't depress wages, Look at
Speaker 1: the look at the wages nationwide. This is a bit
Speaker 1: like saying, well, you know, the weather in the United
Speaker 1: States was fine yesterday. Well, actually, no, there was a
Speaker 1: tornado in Kansas. So it was fine in the United States,
Speaker 1: I guess, except for the tornado in Kansas. There if
Speaker 1: you look at it at a more localized level, illegal immigration,
Speaker 1: when there's a surge of illegal immigration into an area,
Speaker 1: it does depress wages in that area at a state
Speaker 1: and county level, for people in trades like carpentry and
Speaker 1: general contractor and people that are involved in some of
Speaker 1: the professions where illegal immigrants sometimes end up doing the jobs.
Speaker 1: All right, that's it does happen that there's a there's
Speaker 1: a depressing of the wages as a result. So you
Speaker 1: won't hear them really ever get into that. You won't
Speaker 1: hear them talk about it. But it is true. So
Speaker 1: the Democrats do have some contradictory positions, and so in
Speaker 1: a sense, I hate to say this, I I hate
Speaker 1: to say it, but de Blasio does have a point
Speaker 1: where the Democratic Party has still taken the white working
Speaker 1: class for granted and hasn't learned the lessons of twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: But you know what the bad news is. Producer John
Speaker 1: Now de Blasio's coming back to focus all of his
Speaker 1: laziness and ineptitude on destroying New York City, which is
Speaker 1: really sad, you know, which means everything will stay the same.
Speaker 1: You know what. De Blasio kind of reminds me of
Speaker 1: He's he kind of reminds me of evil Big Bird.
Speaker 1: Does that make sense? It's like, Hey, I'm big, I'm
Speaker 1: like tall and I'm big bird and I you know,
Speaker 1: but like, but if Big Bird were evil and he
Speaker 1: was like, I'm just gonna make sure there's people that
Speaker 1: I can't do a big Bird impression, is that kind
Speaker 1: of close? No? Not at all, right, damn it, but
Speaker 1: he does. He's evil Big Bird. I think that. I
Speaker 1: think that works for de Blasio because he's destroying the city.
Speaker 1: So it's like he walks around Sesame Street and he's like,
Speaker 1: how can I ruin this place? So now he's coming
Speaker 1: back to do just that. I think he's unfortunately going
Speaker 1: to be very successful in it. So we'll have to say,
Speaker 1: we got more coming up in a minute. Team stay
Speaker 1: with me, all right, everybody is Friday, which means it
Speaker 1: is time for the wit and wisdom of none other
Speaker 1: than mister Jesse Kelly, all eight foot three of him.
Speaker 1: He's calling us from Houston, Texas, where he is a
Speaker 1: host of the Jesse Kelly Show, the host of said show,
Speaker 1: and he's on KPRC Houston. And also we'll be joining
Speaker 1: me on Pluto TV on a soon to be announced
Speaker 1: brand new channel. We'll get to that at some other day. Jesse.
Speaker 1: Great to have you, sir. It's good to be here, Buck,
Speaker 1: it's good to be above water. We've been getting absolutely
Speaker 1: massacred with rain again here. Well, that's interesting because I've
Speaker 1: heard nothing about this because you may you may not
Speaker 1: know this, Jesse. But unless the weather is affecting specifically
Speaker 1: the northeastern corridor of America, journalists tend not to that much.
Speaker 1: No exactly. And that's the funniest thing about weather. It
Speaker 1: is so local and as soon as you did, like,
Speaker 1: somebody could be getting hit with a tornado and you'll
Speaker 1: see something about it on social media and you're like, oh,
Speaker 1: that's stay it's off there a prayer form, But thenk
Speaker 1: you forget. You know, unless it's affecting you, weather doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: And that's just kind of how we are. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: glad you're okay down there. So the good news is
Speaker 1: we don't have to worry about you drowning because you're
Speaker 1: always going to be above water. You're the guy who
Speaker 1: can stand and even the deepest end of the deep pool. Yes, yes, yes,
Speaker 1: no matter what, I could just put my feet down
Speaker 1: and I stand eye to eye with the skyscrapers. So
Speaker 1: as long as they're fine, I'm fine. I'm pretty sure
Speaker 1: I would have been fine when God flooded the earth.
Speaker 1: There you go, Jesse Kelly his own Noah's ark. He
Speaker 1: should make a T shirt. So Jesse, uh, we had
Speaker 1: like birds that nesting on his head and like you know,
Speaker 1: lions and hippos on his shoulders. Jesse, tell me a
Speaker 1: bit about the climate change strike as you see it today.
Speaker 1: First of all, I know there are a little Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly's running around. Are there schools letting them walk out
Speaker 1: in protest today? Or do they believe in things like education? Okay? One,
Speaker 1: I don't have my children in government schools. And even
Speaker 1: if my non government schools educated children had a climate
Speaker 1: change protest, one, that would be their last day at
Speaker 1: that school. Two, I would absolutely destroy both of my
Speaker 1: sons when they got home for attending set protests. In
Speaker 1: skipping in education, that is called parenting and it is
Speaker 1: something that used to happen in the United States of America,
Speaker 1: and so now we have insane leftists to think their
Speaker 1: kids are campaign props. And it's frankly disgusting. If I
Speaker 1: made a movie, you know, they've made some of these
Speaker 1: movies about a dystopian and bizarre future. There was or
Speaker 1: or even just it's all based on one premise that's
Speaker 1: really unsettling. There was that movie, uh, what was it,
Speaker 1: something about the birds or what ever, and then you
Speaker 1: can't look out the window or look at the sky
Speaker 1: or else you'll be overtaken by this. This is one Netflix.
Speaker 1: It was like bird Song or bird something or other,
Speaker 1: bird Box. I was gonna say Birdcage. That's a very
Speaker 1: different movie, also worthwhile, that's there's different issues than the
Speaker 1: bird Cage. But I would but there was, you know,
Speaker 1: a bird song. There's also quiet place. If I made
Speaker 1: a movie about how everybody that I walked around to
Speaker 1: on the street was like, oh my gosh, the world's
Speaker 1: gonna end in ten years unless we do everything that
Speaker 1: I say, people would think that that's absurd. The weird
Speaker 1: thing is Jesse. That's apparently when it comes to lives,
Speaker 1: the world that we live in. They really believe this crap.
Speaker 1: It is a religion. And and you know what's funny,
Speaker 1: bug is I've never been able to I mean, maybe
Speaker 1: you can come up with this, you're the XCI guy.
Speaker 1: I've never been able to come with the percentages of
Speaker 1: the climate change movement. And here's what I mean by that.
Speaker 1: I know for a fact, because there is a percentage
Speaker 1: of the climate change movement who believes it, believe it
Speaker 1: all the way. They truly believe they are trying to
Speaker 1: stave the earth. They believe we're destroying the earth and
Speaker 1: that we're all gonna die. Okay, as asinine as that
Speaker 1: believe is, I believe that a percentage of the movement
Speaker 1: believes that. But I also know for a fact that
Speaker 1: there is a percentage and I suspect it's a large
Speaker 1: one that doesn't believe it, doesn't even come close to
Speaker 1: believe in it. That's why none of these celebrities and
Speaker 1: politicians actually love the warning that they're putting on others,
Speaker 1: and that they just know it's a great way to
Speaker 1: achieve power and keep the masses clamoring for more government control.
Speaker 1: I mean, Barack Obama buying a fifteen million dollars beach
Speaker 1: front resort, right before he launches a big climate change
Speaker 1: thing with that Greta whatever foreign row who came over here.
Speaker 1: Come on now, Leonardo DiCaprio election everybody about their carbon
Speaker 1: footprint as he lives on a yacht for three months
Speaker 1: churning gas out. I mean, these people don't believe that. Jesse.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw this, but yesterday yours
Speaker 1: truly caught some heat sort of Jesse Kelly style, like
Speaker 1: people coming after me because they're saying I was being
Speaker 1: too edgy or something. All I said is that it
Speaker 1: is absurd for Congress to be taking testimony on climate
Speaker 1: change from a sixteen year old girl. They might as
Speaker 1: well ask her about the fed rate and then the
Speaker 1: Daily Beast, which is a dumpster fire of woke stupidity,
Speaker 1: among other places where you know, right wing pundit Bash's
Speaker 1: child like, like, I'm a child abuser because I said this,
Speaker 1: and I'm just look around. I was like, does anybody
Speaker 1: on planet Jake Tapper had Thunberg whatever her name is,
Speaker 1: you know, on his show, doing a whole segment on
Speaker 1: her about how brave this is and everything. Does anyone
Speaker 1: want to debate with me whether this is an intelligent
Speaker 1: idea or not having sixteen year olds testify about complicated
Speaker 1: policy matters in front of the United States Congress. I
Speaker 1: think the answer is no. But they all take these
Speaker 1: little little cheap shots, you know. They they hide, they
Speaker 1: hide behind the bleachers, but then they throw stuff at
Speaker 1: you when you're not looking. So yeah, because if you
Speaker 1: think about it in the very stable way, to diohan
Speaker 1: Omar and those people are this credit girl whatever her
Speaker 1: name is, is the perfect mouthpiece for the left. They
Speaker 1: love mauth. They think you should be too afraid to criticize. Oh,
Speaker 1: she's a child, pubs like, I understand she's she's going
Speaker 1: through this. She's going through that. Look, if you're going
Speaker 1: to stand in front of Congress and try to go
Speaker 1: after my liberty, I don't care whether you're five or
Speaker 1: eighty five, it's fair names now. I don't blame her.
Speaker 1: I blame her horrible parents who took a child who
Speaker 1: I believe as autistic they day, and you're you're propping
Speaker 1: her up and throwing her in the midst of a
Speaker 1: political arena. That's really nasty. This is all on her parents.
Speaker 1: But don't tell me who I can and can't criticize.
Speaker 1: You want to stand in front of confident try to
Speaker 1: take away my astule and my chief murders and everything else. Well, look,
Speaker 1: politics is a contact for it. If you're going to
Speaker 1: get contacted, and I have to get your your take
Speaker 1: on Justin Justin Trudeau, who I give a kind of
Speaker 1: a Montreal KiB quas accent too, even though he technically
Speaker 1: he doesn't have one. Uh Trudeau. My favorite part of
Speaker 1: the whole Trudeau debacle is it's not it's not that
Speaker 1: this guy corrects people when they say mankind. He's like, no, no, please,
Speaker 1: we prefer human kind. I'm like, oh, you probably also
Speaker 1: prefer soy milk in your latte. But you know, it's
Speaker 1: also that when they ask him, after three, not one,
Speaker 1: not two, three black faced photos come out of this
Speaker 1: guy and the press is like, Hey, just wondering, are
Speaker 1: there any more of these? He's like, oh, I honestly
Speaker 1: don't know, and I can't I can't say. It's like,
Speaker 1: how can you not know? Do you know? What's funny?
Speaker 1: But at the beginning of all this, you know, coures
Speaker 1: of this guy came out and that guy came out,
Speaker 1: and it dressed up like a black dude or a
Speaker 1: blast face or whatever you want to call it. I
Speaker 1: actually gave myself a minute, and did I ever do
Speaker 1: something like that? Like I remember at some point in
Speaker 1: time when I'm as a kid, like one of my
Speaker 1: biggest heroes was David Robins, and everybody remembers David Robinson
Speaker 1: the Center, and I'm almost positive at some point I
Speaker 1: dressed up like him for Halloween. But saying it, I
Speaker 1: don't think I thought to paint my face black and it.
Speaker 1: But if I had, let me just say this, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't apologize to a single person. And if I actually did,
Speaker 1: in that picture comes out, everybody can go through themselves
Speaker 1: because I don't apologize to the raging mall. And there's
Speaker 1: a big difference between black Space, which was done at
Speaker 1: minstrel shows for the sole purpose of mocking the intelligence
Speaker 1: of black people, and and somebody trying to dress up
Speaker 1: like a black person, and there just is I mean
Speaker 1: a lot of times this is somebody you admire, her
Speaker 1: or respect or something. That's why you're dressing up like them.
Speaker 1: But all that said, Justin Trudeau is a victim of
Speaker 1: his own politics. So I'm actually thoroughly enjoying watching him
Speaker 1: get just abused over this whole thing, because this is
Speaker 1: his politics, this is what he lives for. That cancel culture.
Speaker 1: Do you think do you think that he's gonna he's
Speaker 1: gonna escape biscus. You know today he's like, we're going
Speaker 1: to take a very important stap and uh, we're going
Speaker 1: to ban all assault rifles. It's like, oh, Trudeau, you're
Speaker 1: so cute. Oh yes, yes, of course you'll get away
Speaker 1: with it. Every leftist gets away with it. Ask Governor
Speaker 1: black Bee Store Virginia. He's gonna do what every leftist does.
Speaker 1: They'll be about half an hour media outrage, which we've
Speaker 1: already gotten through. Then he'll announce his stupid assault weaponsing
Speaker 1: or whatever other left wing cause, which he already did,
Speaker 1: and then he'll go on some quote listening tour so
Speaker 1: if he can quote better understand minorities out there, and
Speaker 1: that'd be enough for the press, But I hitter time
Speaker 1: to night the press of you're like, you know what,
Speaker 1: I think, he's okay, we're good here. If he was
Speaker 1: a conservative, of course, you'd be destroyed for the next
Speaker 1: three months. But all you get it a little pad
Speaker 1: on the rear end, and you know what, I feel
Speaker 1: like he's improved. What's on the docket for a Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly's weekend cooking of large salted steaks. What's going on? Yes,
Speaker 1: it's a big college NFL weekend. So I will be
Speaker 1: at a good old fashioned Texas meat shop first thing
Speaker 1: tomorrow morning, selecting various meats at my family and I
Speaker 1: will consume it tonight sadly. And I do mean this sadly.
Speaker 1: My wife has signed me up for the neighborhood party.
Speaker 1: You know how women love these neighborhood parties where you
Speaker 1: finally get with the work week and you don't have
Speaker 1: to talk to anybody anymore or do anything, and you
Speaker 1: get home and you immediately have to go hang out
Speaker 1: with other people. It is this is a woman thing.
Speaker 1: I don't know what this is. Is the worst thing
Speaker 1: in the world. Look, I'm with you in that. I
Speaker 1: like the Larry David episode where they talk about forget
Speaker 1: about cancel culture, canceling plans, and whenever someone cancels plans
Speaker 1: to them, he's like, no, no, it's okay, it's okay.
Speaker 1: You don't have to explain, Like I'm good. I feel
Speaker 1: that way whenever someone cancels of me these days. I'm like,
Speaker 1: oh wait, you mean I get to just wear pajama
Speaker 1: pants and a sweatshirt, watch Netflix, and eat whatever food
Speaker 1: I want and not be bothered. I'll be okay. That's
Speaker 1: universal for guys. When guys, that's been a long week,
Speaker 1: I mean something to be wrong. I have a great job,
Speaker 1: You're finally time with everything. I want to go home
Speaker 1: than just relax, you know what, hang out with my
Speaker 1: son with the words, watch something, go to that at
Speaker 1: the decent. I don't want to have to go mingo
Speaker 1: and pretend to care what other people saying. It's awful.
Speaker 1: It's absolutely you would fit in with the Curmudgeons here
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hut. Neither me, nor Mark nor John
Speaker 1: are about to throw the neighborhood block party anytime soon.
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly, everybody, you will be seeing him on Pluto
Speaker 1: TV soon, same channel as me. We're gonna give you
Speaker 1: more details on that the next week or so, and
Speaker 1: also please download the Jesse Kelly Show on iTunes. Mister
Speaker 1: Jesse Kelly, great to see you, sir, or talk to
Speaker 1: you at least, and we'll talk to you soon. You're good, brother.
Speaker 1: Thank care. If sanctions don't work and they continue their
Speaker 1: malign activity. Are there any other measures outside of a
Speaker 1: military option that can be taken. Well, I don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about that, but I will say I think
Speaker 1: the sanctions work and the military would work. But that's
Speaker 1: a very severe form of winning. But we win. Nobody
Speaker 1: can beat us militarily. Nobody can even come close. What
Speaker 1: we've done for our military in the last three years
Speaker 1: is incredible bull made in the USA, by the way,
Speaker 1: and it's it's really incredible. Our nuclear was getting very tired.
Speaker 1: They hadn't spent the money on it, and now we
Speaker 1: have it in as we would say, tippy top shape.
Speaker 1: Tippy top. It's we have new and we have renovated
Speaker 1: and it's it's incredible and we all should pray that
Speaker 1: we never have to use it. We should never have
Speaker 1: to use it. And our military itself is in phenomenal shape.
Speaker 1: I certainly hope that we don't use it on behalf
Speaker 1: of the Saudis. But I'm starting I'm starting to worry
Speaker 1: a little bit. I keep hearing about the options that
Speaker 1: are being discussed and thought about, and you know, the
Speaker 1: Iranians are threatening total war and as I as I
Speaker 1: discussed with you. We would look at the situation and say,
Speaker 1: the Iranians can't win. It would be massively damaging and chaotic.
Speaker 1: And you know, the Iranians know that the war would
Speaker 1: be there would be tremendous casualties. And yet that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that they wouldn't escalate into a full scale war.
Speaker 1: The Iranians fought of war and there was a million
Speaker 1: casualties in the nineteen nineties, I'm sorry, nineteen eighties. Rather,
Speaker 1: the Iranians fought of war with the rock back then.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that they would take a prudent
Speaker 1: course of action here. Their economy is at a standstill
Speaker 1: and actually going down down three percent, down six percent.
Speaker 1: I mean, once your economy starts shrinking six, seven, maybe
Speaker 1: ten percent a year, which is what could happen if
Speaker 1: this continues on, then people get desperate and the outrage
Speaker 1: on the streets becomes palpable. And the Iranians, more than
Speaker 1: anything else, want the right. When I see the Iranians,
Speaker 1: I'm referring to the regime and the government. They want control,
Speaker 1: they want power, and the external enemy phenomenon of the
Speaker 1: United States Saudi Arabia. I'm sure they'll find a way
Speaker 1: to blame Israel for this too. That's something that always
Speaker 1: looms in the background. That's always the possible path that
Speaker 1: they would choose, which is to say, as long as
Speaker 1: they're fighting that external enemy, they will maintain they'll maintain power. Also,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump had this long press crimers. I watched
Speaker 1: it when it was going on today when they aired it,
Speaker 1: and you know, I am a little concerned that the
Speaker 1: president's foreign policy right now feels stalled. Doesn't mean that's wrong,
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that he's made any major errors, but there
Speaker 1: does feel like and I don't mean because Bolton left,
Speaker 1: I don't think that really matters. People have this idea that, oh,
Speaker 1: this person doesn't have this big government job, how will
Speaker 1: anything function. There's so many people in government doing all
Speaker 1: this stuff. I can tell you every time there's any
Speaker 1: matter of any importance the United States government on the
Speaker 1: national security side, there are thousands of people, thousands of
Speaker 1: people who were you know, looking at it, thinking about it,
Speaker 1: Analysts who are drilling into it. I mean, it's just
Speaker 1: all over the place. But on China, we aren't getting
Speaker 1: anywhere in the negotiations yet. That doesn't mean we've lost.
Speaker 1: But yeah, but here's Trump's view of us. He was
Speaker 1: in a conversation today with the Prime Minister of Australia.
Speaker 1: I gotta love the Aussies. Man. Aussies just as a
Speaker 1: people have a great attitude, and I've I've really never
Speaker 1: met an Aussie that I wasn't like, Yeah, I like
Speaker 1: that guy, or I like that gal. I'm a big
Speaker 1: Aussi fan. We'll make it a lot of progress with China.
Speaker 1: They're having a very bad year, worse year in fifty
Speaker 1: seven years. The tariffs are coming in to us. We're
Speaker 1: taking in billions and billions of dollars of tariffs. They're
Speaker 1: devaluing their currency, which means the tariffs they're not costing
Speaker 1: us probably anything, but certainly not very much. They're also
Speaker 1: adding a lot of money into their economy. They're pouring
Speaker 1: money into their economy. But we're taking in many billions
Speaker 1: of dollars. At some point in the not too distant future,
Speaker 1: it'll be over one hundred billion dollars. We've never taken
Speaker 1: in one hundred cents from China. It was always the
Speaker 1: other way around. With that, they've lost over three million jobs.
Speaker 1: Their supply chain is crashing, and they have a lot
Speaker 1: of problems, and I can tell you they want to
Speaker 1: make a deal, so that I can tell you they
Speaker 1: want to make a deal, so we'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure they want to make a deal. I
Speaker 1: think the president I may depart on that bit of analysis.
Speaker 1: Of course, he's closer to it than I am. He's
Speaker 1: the president. He's got a lot more information. But he's
Speaker 1: also been wrong about other stuff like who should he
Speaker 1: put in seedure roles in his administration, which he will
Speaker 1: now admit. So let's not pretend the president, or any
Speaker 1: human being for that matter, is beyond criticism and is
Speaker 1: not going to be wrong on some things. But I
Speaker 1: think that the Chinese right now are just gonna they're
Speaker 1: and sit and wait mode. They want to see who
Speaker 1: the next president's going to be, because they can win
Speaker 1: the trade war just by waiting for a president war
Speaker 1: In or Biden or whomever the Democrats are going to
Speaker 1: put forward. They can wait for that to happen and
Speaker 1: just take the pain. In the meantime. Remember the Chinese economy,
Speaker 1: while it's not booming the way that it was before,
Speaker 1: China is still growing and the Chinese government, as much
Speaker 1: as it is an authoritarian regime. This is a really
Speaker 1: interesting area of conversation. Maybe we should get into another
Speaker 1: time if you're curious. But from my understanding of it,
Speaker 1: and having spoken to many Chinese business and business leaders
Speaker 1: and you know, economic thinkers over in China, they have
Speaker 1: a different view of how important an individual rights and
Speaker 1: freedom are. In places like Beijing. It's different than Hong Kong,
Speaker 1: where they've had a sense, they've had a taste of
Speaker 1: freedom because of the the British imposed system that has
Speaker 1: been maintained there. It's different in China. Um, So we'll
Speaker 1: see what ends up happening. But the president has a
Speaker 1: run in China top of the radar. Let's hope he
Speaker 1: makes the right call. Team Buck, it's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: I don't really know if I like the classic rock
Speaker 1: roll call. I think we might have to fade that
Speaker 1: one out. Prouster, Mark, You're you're opinionated in salty? What
Speaker 1: do you think I had never heard that before? Right now?
Speaker 1: John pulled it out of the John John, you know,
Speaker 1: we go way back? Whoa this two DJ's back, two
Speaker 1: DJ's enter, one DJ leaves. Yeah. I don't I just
Speaker 1: feel like it's a little too much of like a role,
Speaker 1: like someone went in the room. They're like, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: do a rolling Stone sound alike. It's a little bit.
Speaker 1: It reminds me of when you when they do those
Speaker 1: late night shows and they can't play the actual music
Speaker 1: of the of of a theme song for a show,
Speaker 1: so they do the like the close version of it.
Speaker 1: You know, it's like a bad cover band. Exactly what
Speaker 1: do we got listen to this? Yeah? Sure, you know
Speaker 1: where you are. You're in the freedom of day. You're
Speaker 1: not gonna I cannot believe somebody actually made Where did
Speaker 1: that come? John? Just pull these out? I don't know
Speaker 1: where John, you are? You are a spicy man today,
Speaker 1: DJ John, He's a spicy I meet the ball. We
Speaker 1: had those for about a year and I never got
Speaker 1: around to I'm playing, Oh come on man really so yeah,
Speaker 1: and then Mark took over night forgot to tell him
Speaker 1: about it. You got a show producer, Mark, We're all
Speaker 1: we're all the fun the fun audio toys are okay,
Speaker 1: so that you know in days when you're not here
Speaker 1: Forevard's listening. John. John is kind of helping us as
Speaker 1: we get ready for our transition at a different time
Speaker 1: and doing video and everything else. But it's really gonna
Speaker 1: be Bucking Mark making the magic happen every day. So
Speaker 1: it's it's gonna be it's gonna be quite quite a thing,
Speaker 1: and we can get it all going. And now I
Speaker 1: just realized, also, do we start here, John, you tell me,
Speaker 1: do we start with the emails today or do we
Speaker 1: start with you know what? Fine, We're gonna start with
Speaker 1: Facebook today just because it's easier because I have it,
Speaker 1: I have it open, I figure why not, all right,
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com slash buck sexon to send us in
Speaker 1: the roll call all quick note. Last night New York
Speaker 1: Young Republicans Club, we had over two hundred and twenty
Speaker 1: five people in attendance. Two fifty was the was my
Speaker 1: absolute like that would have been the perfect number. We
Speaker 1: were very very close. Two hundred was considered capacity, and
Speaker 1: we actually had to move to a different a different
Speaker 1: space to get everybody in. So I just want to
Speaker 1: say that to the members of team Bucking showed up
Speaker 1: and there were a whole bunch of you. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much. It was a lot of fun. I hope
Speaker 1: you enjoyed the speech, and we'll do more events like that,
Speaker 1: both in the New York area and then hopefully across
Speaker 1: across the country. As long as you know, missus producer
Speaker 1: Mark will let him travel sometimes. You know, she canna
Speaker 1: let you, she canna let you roam a little bit.
Speaker 1: Why not, as long as it's free, she won't care. Yeah, exactly, Yeah, totally,
Speaker 1: we'll take care of that all right. So no, it
Speaker 1: really was. It really was great last night, although we
Speaker 1: did have we had a moment where we thought maybe
Speaker 1: we were gonna have a someone. We were getting spam
Speaker 1: that was inappropriate spam on our phones from a Wi
Speaker 1: Fi and we didn't know if it was just like
Speaker 1: a prank from a nearby building or what, because it
Speaker 1: just didn't make any sense, right, like, we're getting No,
Speaker 1: it's actually air drops. So somebody was air dropping to
Speaker 1: anybody who had air drop open on their iPhone inappropriate
Speaker 1: photos during the event, which I had never heard of
Speaker 1: this tactic before. Do you know what this If you
Speaker 1: heard this, John, yeah, I heard that some people send
Speaker 1: inappropriate pictures on the subway. You know, there's a you
Speaker 1: see a girl on her iPhone and you send an
Speaker 1: inappropriate not me or you, but well, as I understood it. Actually,
Speaker 1: because we're right, you know, right near street level it
Speaker 1: could have even been At first, I thought, I mean
Speaker 1: I was telling the guys, I thought it might be
Speaker 1: a heckler, right, and that this was the way they
Speaker 1: were getting the heckling started. And then they're gonna stand
Speaker 1: up and interrupt the speech. And I just gotta say,
Speaker 1: I mean, I knew a lot of the people in
Speaker 1: the room, and I could look at them and be like,
Speaker 1: these people love America and freedom. Like I didn't see
Speaker 1: any filthy hippies in there, so you know, obviously filthy hippies,
Speaker 1: I could smell them a mile away. But when I
Speaker 1: was looking around the room, I just thought, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: if there's one person who thinks they're gonna stand up
Speaker 1: and make a mess here, I'm like, I got the
Speaker 1: Sexton brothers in the room, We had a whole but like,
Speaker 1: this would be a very, very unfortunate decision to make.
Speaker 1: But I think it might have even just been somebody
Speaker 1: walking by who does this. Like you can walk and
Speaker 1: just send out a blast on your phone over air
Speaker 1: to anybody. I think it's within thirty yards and you
Speaker 1: just you just offer to air drop people inappropriate photos. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's like a violation. If some people get off on
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff. You know. It's like, so I'd
Speaker 1: never seen that before. We all look at each other,
Speaker 1: We're like, why is this on our phone? That's why
Speaker 1: I turned off airdrop on my phone. At the good
Speaker 1: news that most of that audience, I think they're only
Speaker 1: about probably ten of us that actually got this thing,
Speaker 1: but we all got it. And because most people don't
Speaker 1: have air drop or they don't have an iPhone. So
Speaker 1: when you had those two things in, that was weird. Man.
Speaker 1: I was ready. I told the guys. I was like, look,
Speaker 1: we'll escort somebody out. And they're like, are you worried
Speaker 1: about physical security? I was like, please, don't let the
Speaker 1: poofy hair fool you. Okay, mister Buxter can handle himself.
Speaker 1: There's there are zero concerns about some like filthy Antifa
Speaker 1: Antifa media big like I'm gonna get you. I'd be like, dude,
Speaker 1: this is not your day. It's exactly. They did not
Speaker 1: want it. They don't they don't want none of this.
Speaker 1: They don't want none of the swoop haired killer. Um
Speaker 1: all right, here we go. Kristen do Shrek and Shrek two,
Speaker 1: not countless Eddie Murphy films. I think both are far
Speaker 1: above coming to America. Kristen. Interesting, Oh, I didn't think
Speaker 1: of that. I didn't think of that either. I don't
Speaker 1: you know. I don't know how we go with that,
Speaker 1: because look, the first I didn't I didn't see Shrek two.
Speaker 1: I do think that Puss in Boots was one of
Speaker 1: my favorite characters in any of it. And I heard
Speaker 1: the Puss in Boots movie wasn't so great, but I
Speaker 1: don't know he too old at that point to watch
Speaker 1: a Puss in Boots movie. Yeah, so Antonio Bendes playing
Speaker 1: a vidious, smooth, suave kats who knows the sword play.
Speaker 1: And also he's very good that. Yeah, so Shrek and
Speaker 1: Shrek two very good movies. I'm assuming Shrek two is
Speaker 1: Shrek Wam was great. But they're animated. I think, just
Speaker 1: like you know, I think you gotta put animated in
Speaker 1: a different category. And it's really not an Eddie Murphy film.
Speaker 1: He voices a character, So yeah, there you go. That's
Speaker 1: but but Christen a very fair point, and it got
Speaker 1: us all thinking about it. Let see, we got here
Speaker 1: Joan Shield Tie, Real News and Commy Bear fan. Oh,
Speaker 1: we are probably gonna have to ruin back Commy bear
Speaker 1: now that we're gonna be televising stuff. The new Rambo
Speaker 1: movie sounds a lot like the movie Commando, where the
Speaker 1: anti gun nut Alissa Milano was kidnapped and her father
Speaker 1: comes to her rescue by killing a small city of
Speaker 1: bad guys with every gun known demand. I wonder if
Speaker 1: she's still taking residuals for that, John, I can tell you,
Speaker 1: having seen the movie Commando far, far too many times,
Speaker 1: that movie is really like a guns and Ammo catalog advertisement.
Speaker 1: It's just he's just running around like now I have
Speaker 1: a shotgun, and now I'm firing the Smith and Wesson,
Speaker 1: and now I have the AK fuadi seven and now
Speaker 1: I have like he just have you ever seen it?
Speaker 1: I've never. I don't know how this guy was. He
Speaker 1: must have been carrying fifty different weapons on him. He's
Speaker 1: running around, he's got My favorite is when he won
Speaker 1: hand fires while lying down the M sixteen on full auto.
Speaker 1: That's next level right there, just like one handed, like
Speaker 1: like he's firing a twenty two pistol. But he also
Speaker 1: runs around with he definitely pulls out the AK forty seven.
Speaker 1: He's got um throwing knives. I mean, I feel like
Speaker 1: throwing knives are big in the eighties. It's not a
Speaker 1: I don't think he Usually if you're in a combat
Speaker 1: situation you have to go for the throwing knife. It's
Speaker 1: probably been a bad day, absolutely, yeah, exactly. You're not
Speaker 1: using a knife. Yeah, you're not using You're not you're
Speaker 1: gonna throw a knife at somebody. Chances are they'll be like,
Speaker 1: did you just throw a knife at me? Come on, Like,
Speaker 1: even if it's a chef's knife, even I mean, even
Speaker 1: if you hit them, it's gonna like stick in their
Speaker 1: shoulder about, you know, a quarter of an inch for
Speaker 1: a second, and then they're gonna pull it out and
Speaker 1: be like, really, you gotta throw a throw a knife
Speaker 1: at me? Anyway? Let's see Tom hi buck. Am I
Speaker 1: the only one who finds the ironic hypocrisy of the
Speaker 1: left getting outraged over the possibility that President Trump offered
Speaker 1: Ukraine aid in exchange for investigating the possibility that Biden
Speaker 1: as VP offered to withhold aid unless they fired the
Speaker 1: investigator looking into hunter Biden. But they couldn't care less
Speaker 1: about Biden's potential wrongdoing asking for a friend shields high. No,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is what I'm saying, man, You know
Speaker 1: that they can. They can weaponize the DOJ, they can
Speaker 1: set up fis US stuff. They can do whatever they
Speaker 1: want against a presidential candidate, using the full power of
Speaker 1: the federal government in secret against that candidate Trump. But
Speaker 1: now while Trump is president, he doesn't get to say, hey,
Speaker 1: can you root out corruption in your country? If that
Speaker 1: corruption happens to touch upon Hunter Biden, well too bad.
Speaker 1: That's what I think. Bob rights. Well, hold on, Bob,
Speaker 1: You're I keep getting this book an appointment thing. Whenever
Speaker 1: I look at Facebook messages, what is that? Are people
Speaker 1: trying to book appointments with me? I'm not a masseuse.
Speaker 1: I think that's so one of the default things that
Speaker 1: you can you can click when you're messaging your You're
Speaker 1: technically a business on Facebook. Oh I am a business,
Speaker 1: that's true, the business of Buck. They want to book
Speaker 1: an appointment with Buck. Yeah, but I'm not like a
Speaker 1: chiropractor guy. So if you need to need someone to
Speaker 1: adjust your neck, you gotta get somebody else. Bob rides, Oh,
Speaker 1: not for roll call, Well then that's not for roll call.
Speaker 1: We gotta go on, Tracy. See, we respect the not
Speaker 1: for roll call, just don't put it at the don't
Speaker 1: write ps. This very intense and personal note I've sent you,
Speaker 1: please don't read it aloud to hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: people across America. I'm like, okay, too late. Uh let's
Speaker 1: see Tracy writes regarding your episode last week about HUD
Speaker 1: and how they use it to central plan living. What
Speaker 1: you said rings true with I lived in the South
Speaker 1: suburbs of Chicago, and that is what Daily used to
Speaker 1: get the projects knocked down. All the crime and drugs
Speaker 1: and gangs were sent to the Section eight housing In
Speaker 1: my small town. It ruined our community. What was once
Speaker 1: a middle to lower middle class town of everyday people
Speaker 1: who struggled but kept things decent, turned into a hellhole.
Speaker 1: You would not believe the difference in just five years,
Speaker 1: stores closed, boarded up homes. My in laws had the
Speaker 1: most beautiful home on the block and they poured their blood,
Speaker 1: sweat and tears into it for over twenty years. Today
Speaker 1: it is boarded up and there's a tree growing out
Speaker 1: of the front porch my husband helped build as a child.
Speaker 1: It's heartbreaking. I know what those policies do. You're so right.
Speaker 1: Thank you for speaking up. I thought nobody understood Shields High.
Speaker 1: Tracy PS, you're my favorite talker on the radio, always
Speaker 1: have been well. Tracy, thank you so much that really
Speaker 1: I really do appreciate that. And as for your story,
Speaker 1: it doesn't I'm sorry to say, it doesn't surprise me.
Speaker 1: This is what's on planning is people that usurp authority
Speaker 1: for themselves in the government that they should not have
Speaker 1: making decisions that affect your life, that they are not
Speaker 1: accountable for, and that they're not in a position to
Speaker 1: make well, meaning that they're not going to make good decisions.
Speaker 1: And when they make bad decisions, no one's going to care.
Speaker 1: So I think that is important. That's important to keep
Speaker 1: in mind. But Tracy, thank you again for your kind words.
Speaker 1: And there were so many people last night at the
Speaker 1: New York Young Republicans Club who came out who just
Speaker 1: had very nice things to say about my show. And
Speaker 1: I will always tell you this, it really does mean
Speaker 1: a lot to me. So don't ever think that I
Speaker 1: if I just am saying thank you, that that's some
Speaker 1: mechanical response that actually I'm to this day still very
Speaker 1: very grateful. People will always say humbled, and that's true too,
Speaker 1: but that sounds a little self gratifying. I'm so humbled
Speaker 1: by everything, but I am very grateful that I get
Speaker 1: to do this job. Having done other jobs, I could
Speaker 1: do this job because you all listen. Let's get to
Speaker 1: a quick pause here. We'll come back. We'll finish out
Speaker 1: roll call strong as we do. Stay with me, alrighty,
Speaker 1: Josh writes, my favorite barbecue is chopped mutton. There's a
Speaker 1: spot in my hometown called Old Hickory that has awesome
Speaker 1: chopped mutton. Also, one of my favorite Eddie Murphy movies
Speaker 1: is Meteor Man. It's a really cheesy movie, but I
Speaker 1: loved it as a little kid. Keep up the awesome show,
Speaker 1: shields high. Well, hopefully I'm not gonna lose a listener here, Josh.
Speaker 1: But I think both of your choices are very poor.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say it, Josh. I respect you too
Speaker 1: much to lie to you. Josh, we go way back,
Speaker 1: all right. You are a rude, yeah, terrible person. That's
Speaker 1: that's fair. I deserve that. There's a whole episode of
Speaker 1: Seinfeld about how disgusting Mutton is. I mean, I believe
Speaker 1: it would you would you ever eat Mutton? No? I
Speaker 1: don't even know what it is, and I don't want it.
Speaker 1: It's like am I and I'm am I. In an
Speaker 1: episode of Downton Abbey. Oh tonight, it's on the menu.
Speaker 1: We have mutton with a mint jelly. I don't think
Speaker 1: so it's not happen, is it. It's a sheep yo? Really? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I had no idea. Man, Yeah that's not. Goat can
Speaker 1: be good, but goat can also be I've eaten some
Speaker 1: goat in my day. I've been some good. I've been
Speaker 1: in some countries. The problem with goat is when you
Speaker 1: see what the goats in third world countries are eating,
Speaker 1: and how they're essentially bathing themselves sometimes in trash and
Speaker 1: raw sewage. You're like, I hope they have a very
Speaker 1: strong immune system because I feel like I probably shouldn't
Speaker 1: be eating them after this. Yeah, yeah, I know, they
Speaker 1: don't seem like animals you want to eat. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: probably that's probably true. But you know, maybe we could
Speaker 1: put some goats along. Are you're a New Jersey guy, right,
Speaker 1: Long Island. You're Long Island man. We're learning things in
Speaker 1: real time here on the books. Actually, I just assumed
Speaker 1: your ae I'm originally from Queens Well we knew that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that goes that goes without saying rock I mean, what
Speaker 1: do you call it? Nassau County. Yes, Rockville Center close
Speaker 1: to that Long Beach. I was close. Yeah, not far
Speaker 1: from a bill O'Reilly Levitt Town. Yes, I know what's up.
Speaker 1: I know the longer, I know the Strong Island. All right,
Speaker 1: fair enough, Rockville Center, Long Islands very nice, very nice.
Speaker 1: Queen's Queens is But here's the question. Is Queens an
Speaker 1: appendage of Long Island? There was Long Island? Say, I'm
Speaker 1: from Long Island. No, I'm from Queens and from the city.
Speaker 1: I now live on Long Island, but I'm from Queens.
Speaker 1: You see that, John, he was ready for that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he knew that was coming. Everyone tries to say that.
Speaker 1: I'm like, no, yeah. My argument is that Long Island
Speaker 1: city is in Queens. So there you go. Mark, Wow,
Speaker 1: look at that. It's it's part of your bronx. Guy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, the bronx. That's how they get down. All right, David,
Speaker 1: let's see we get to this, David, Here we go,
Speaker 1: a whoa, here we go. Um. By the way, Northam
Speaker 1: has refused to appear on our monthly local w RVA
Speaker 1: Meet the Governor, where he takes calls from constituents. Double
Speaker 1: standard in the media is protected, predictable, but still astonishing.
Speaker 1: If the picture of George Allen or any other conservative
Speaker 1: politician ever surfaced and be on the front page of
Speaker 1: the Richmond Times Dispatch, don't think they have been. Don't
Speaker 1: think they haven't been looking for them. Take care of Dave.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Dave. Yeah, man, I hear you on that
Speaker 1: the double standard is real. Brent writes a little upset
Speaker 1: that Grenna Thunberg is far more intelligent than you. Well, Brent,
Speaker 1: seeing as you have a photo of Elizabeth Warren, who's
Speaker 1: a fake Indian as your Facebook avatar, I think we
Speaker 1: know all we need to about you and my friend.
Speaker 1: Good luck with that. Enjoy enjoy that one. Let's see, Jeff,
Speaker 1: can you tell me more about yourself. I'm a Christian, husband, father,
Speaker 1: and professional woodworker. My full time job is as a
Speaker 1: custodian in middle school. On today's show, you mentioned bacon
Speaker 1: scented candles. Yankee Candle makes one smells exactly like bacon,
Speaker 1: not some cheap imitation. Well, Jeff, I'm gonna have to
Speaker 1: get myself onto Amazon dot com or Yankee Candle dot
Speaker 1: com or whatever. And get a bacon scented candle, or
Speaker 1: just leave all the bacon grease that I constantly have
Speaker 1: out on the counter because I'm messy, which is more
Speaker 1: likely the option that I'm going to go for. But
Speaker 1: that's what I got for you today here in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut Squad. That's right, we're not letting them take
Speaker 1: that term away from us. Squad can mean all of
Speaker 1: us have a fantastic weekend. Talk to you Monday. Shield's
Speaker 1: High