WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 252

0:00:01.870 --> 0:00:02.890
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media.

0:00:02.910 --> 0:00:02.970
<v Speaker 2>Hi.

0:00:03.370 --> 0:00:03.450
<v Speaker 3>Hi.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.940
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to It Could Happen Here. My name's Carlos

0:00:31.980 --> 0:00:34.980
<v Speaker 4>Berrios Polanco. I'm a journalist and writer, and I'll be

0:00:35.020 --> 0:00:38.220
<v Speaker 4>your host for today's episode, which is about the ongoing

0:00:38.300 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 4>campaign of boat strikes by the U.S. military that have

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 4>turned the oceans around the Americas into killing fields. To

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.350
<v Speaker 4>give a high-level overview of what I'll be talking about today,

0:00:48.870 --> 0:00:51.450
<v Speaker 4>since September 2nd, 2025, up until the time of recording,

0:00:51.490 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 4>I've been doing a lot of research on the The U.S.

0:00:53.530 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 4>military has carried out at least 70 strikes on civilian

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 4>vessels in the Caribbean Basin and the Eastern Pacific Ocean.

0:01:02.380 --> 0:01:06.060
<v Speaker 4>At least 234 people have been killed by these strikes,

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 4>according to reporting from the New York Times. Per Air Wars,

0:01:10.459 --> 0:01:13.980
<v Speaker 4>there have been survivors almost every month of the campaign,

0:01:14.459 --> 0:01:17.420
<v Speaker 4>but only three out of the 28 total have ever

0:01:17.459 --> 0:01:22.259
<v Speaker 4>been rescued. These strikes originally started in the Caribbean following

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the mobilization of military assets into the region, which includes

0:01:26.500 --> 0:01:30.910
<v Speaker 4>the reactivation of the once-dormant Roosevelt Roads military base in

0:01:31.010 --> 0:01:34.030
<v Speaker 4>Puerto Rico, where I live and am currently recording from.

0:01:35.110 --> 0:01:37.490
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure that I've seen some of the aircraft used

0:01:37.530 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 4>in these strikes and other military operations in the region

0:01:40.780 --> 0:01:44.980
<v Speaker 4>from the hill that overlooks the base's airstrip. And I've

0:01:45.100 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 4>probably watched every single one of the videos the Trump

0:01:48.060 --> 0:01:51.700
<v Speaker 4>administration or the U.S. military has posted announcing that these

0:01:51.740 --> 0:01:56.020
<v Speaker 4>strikes took place. You've likely at least seen one yourself.

0:01:56.620 --> 0:02:00.700
<v Speaker 4>It's almost always a social media post, sometimes a press release,

0:02:00.970 --> 0:02:04.490
<v Speaker 4>typically showing a black and white video of a go-fast vessel,

0:02:04.990 --> 0:02:08.790
<v Speaker 4>colloquially known as a panga or a yola, depending on

0:02:08.810 --> 0:02:12.820
<v Speaker 4>where you're located. They're typically sipping across the waves only

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.940
<v Speaker 4>for a missile to rain down from the sky shortly

0:02:16.100 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 4>after the video starts, turning the boat and all the

0:02:19.180 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 4>people aboard it into a giant ball of fire. Per

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.780
<v Speaker 4>Air Wars, these posts almost always follow the same formula,

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.490
<v Speaker 4>naming who ordered the strike, the amount of people killed,

0:02:30.950 --> 0:02:35.550
<v Speaker 4>calling them drug traffickers or narco-terrorists, saying they're part of a, quote,

0:02:35.690 --> 0:02:40.769
<v Speaker 4>designated terrorist organization, end quote, in stating the location where

0:02:40.790 --> 0:02:44.090
<v Speaker 4>the strike took place. To be honest with you, even

0:02:44.130 --> 0:02:46.309
<v Speaker 4>if the victims are blurred out and you rarely get

0:02:46.350 --> 0:02:49.090
<v Speaker 4>an up-close look at how these people are torn to shreds,

0:02:49.590 --> 0:02:52.730
<v Speaker 4>these are essentially snuff films that the Trump administration has

0:02:52.910 --> 0:02:57.510
<v Speaker 4>used to hype up itself and its war on so-called narco-terrorism.

0:02:58.650 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 4>The Trump administration has been laying the fin legal justification

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.220
<v Speaker 4>as well as the moral and philosophical foundation for this

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 4>quote-unquote war since essentially their first day in office. More

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 4>than two months after the first strike, Defense Secretary Pete

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:20.510
<v Speaker 4>Hegseth officially announced Operation Southern Spear as the, quote, overarching D.O.W.

0:03:20.650 --> 0:03:23.550
<v Speaker 4>operation to disrupt the flow of narcotics in the Western

0:03:23.590 --> 0:03:27.290
<v Speaker 4>Hemisphere from drug cartels that the president has named as

0:03:27.350 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 4>a designated terrorist organization, parentheses, D.T.O.s, per a D.O.D. Inspector

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 4>General report. Southern Spear's mission statement, as well as several

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>documents that created the legal justification for these strikes and

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:47.220
<v Speaker 4>other related operations, are classified and secret from the public. However,

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 4>as this Inspector General report states, the aim of Southern

0:03:51.340 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Spear is to, quote, defend the homeland, protect regional partners,

0:03:55.700 --> 0:04:01.790
<v Speaker 4>and ensure stability and security across the Western Hemisphere. Operation

0:04:01.830 --> 0:04:06.110
<v Speaker 4>Southern Spear has since evolved into Joint Task Force Western Hemisphere.

0:04:06.820 --> 0:04:11.300
<v Speaker 4>which essentially means that several partner countries in the hemisphere

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 4>are working under Trump's banner of anti-narco-terrorism, whatever that means.

0:04:17.900 --> 0:04:21.100
<v Speaker 4>The Trump administration has repeatedly said that the people killed

0:04:21.140 --> 0:04:26.020
<v Speaker 4>in these strikes are quote-unquote narco-traffickers, and therefore enemy combatants,

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.260
<v Speaker 4>according to a January 20, 2025 executive order that labels

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 4>the group's that the dead allegedly belonged to either quote-unquote

0:04:34.700 --> 0:04:40.779
<v Speaker 4>foreign terrorist organizations or quote-unquote specially designated global terrorists, two

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.990
<v Speaker 4>terms that sound like they're the same thing but essentially

0:04:44.150 --> 0:04:47.310
<v Speaker 4>delineate groups marked by the State Department and the Treasury

0:04:47.390 --> 0:04:52.529
<v Speaker 4>Department respectively as terrorists. There is substantial doubt as to

0:04:52.570 --> 0:04:55.890
<v Speaker 4>whether the Trump administration is even able to identify these

0:04:55.980 --> 0:05:00.940
<v Speaker 4>people before massacring them. However, As has been evidently clear

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 4>to anyone with eyes, these people are not terrorists, and

0:05:04.380 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 4>there are serious doubts as to whether they're even actually

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 4>connected to drug trafficking organizations in a meaningful way. Because

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.620
<v Speaker 4>these strikes occur in the open ocean, sometimes in international waters,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 4>any evidence that could help in identifying the victims sinks

0:05:19.380 --> 0:05:25.020
<v Speaker 4>beneath the waves relatively quickly, making positive identification nearly impossible.

0:05:29.810 --> 0:05:32.610
<v Speaker 4>by their full names. A lot of these names come

0:05:32.670 --> 0:05:35.529
<v Speaker 4>from media outlets hitting the ground and interviewing people in

0:05:35.550 --> 0:05:37.870
<v Speaker 4>the communities where the men who've been killed by these

0:05:37.910 --> 0:05:41.010
<v Speaker 4>strikes used to live. Per the list, a lot of

0:05:41.050 --> 0:05:44.150
<v Speaker 4>these names come from the Los Angeles Times, the Trinidad

0:05:44.190 --> 0:05:47.940
<v Speaker 4>and Tobago Guardian, the Associated Press, and some were identified

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 4>by Costa Rican authorities as reported by La Nación, as

0:05:52.100 --> 0:05:57.180
<v Speaker 4>well as a collaborative investigation project titled Los Bombardeados Sin

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.700
<v Speaker 4>Derecho a la Defensa, or the bombed No Right to

0:06:00.740 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Defense between Air Wars, El Centro Latinoamericano de Investigación Periodística,

0:06:06.700 --> 0:06:10.350
<v Speaker 4>otherwise known as El Clip, and several other Latin American

0:06:10.450 --> 0:06:14.790
<v Speaker 4>or Caribbean media outlets. The Air Wars list includes names

0:06:14.850 --> 0:06:17.510
<v Speaker 4>from the first strike up until strikes in May earlier

0:06:17.570 --> 0:06:20.940
<v Speaker 4>this year. This doesn't mean that they've stopped working on it,

0:06:21.410 --> 0:06:24.190
<v Speaker 4>just that they haven't been able to identify anyone by

0:06:24.230 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>their full name after that. In other cases, these outlets

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.580
<v Speaker 4>and others across the Western Hemisphere have been able to

0:06:30.620 --> 0:06:34.770
<v Speaker 4>find nicknames and general descriptions of these men. Air Wars

0:06:34.850 --> 0:06:37.810
<v Speaker 4>keeps a list of these in their individual trackers per

0:06:37.830 --> 0:06:41.290
<v Speaker 4>strike as well. I have all these sources linked in

0:06:41.310 --> 0:06:44.170
<v Speaker 4>the episode description. I've tried to include English as well

0:06:44.230 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 4>as some Spanish-language news sources. The list by Air Wars,

0:06:47.940 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 4>the Los Bombardeados investigation, and the killing spree report by

0:06:51.339 --> 0:06:55.469
<v Speaker 4>the Washington Office on Latin America, or WOLA, were huge

0:06:55.510 --> 0:06:57.890
<v Speaker 4>sources for this piece, so if you're at all interested

0:06:57.970 --> 0:07:01.190
<v Speaker 4>in learning more about this topic, please go read those.

0:07:02.710 --> 0:07:05.380
<v Speaker 4>The evidence found by these outlets points to the killed

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.020
<v Speaker 4>victims being a mix of fishermen, motorcycle or bus drivers,

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.980
<v Speaker 4>and boat captains. The men are mostly from some of

0:07:13.020 --> 0:07:16.340
<v Speaker 4>the poorest areas of Latin America and the Caribbean, and

0:07:16.380 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 4>when they are connected to drug trafficking organizations, they appear

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.900
<v Speaker 4>to be, quote, among the lowest-ranked members, end quote, per

0:07:24.060 --> 0:07:28.770
<v Speaker 4>Air Wars. Among the identified, there's a quote-unquote local crime boss,

0:07:29.030 --> 0:07:31.770
<v Speaker 4>a fisherman pressured to get on drug trafficking boats because

0:07:31.790 --> 0:07:34.110
<v Speaker 4>they'd had no other options to make money to feed

0:07:34.150 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 4>their children, an indoor soccer player, people who'd left home

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.380
<v Speaker 4>in search of work, and fishermen who appear to have

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:45.300
<v Speaker 4>been stalled at sea fixing their ship's motor. The majority

0:07:45.340 --> 0:07:48.180
<v Speaker 4>of the men hail from Venezuela and Mexico, while a

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 4>few are from Colombia, Ecuador, Trinidad and Tobago, and St.

0:07:52.020 --> 0:07:52.340
<v Speaker 5>Lucia.

0:07:53.140 --> 0:07:57.220
<v Speaker 4>The Los Bombardeados investigation has been able to geolocate seven

0:07:57.380 --> 0:08:00.060
<v Speaker 4>of the boat strikes, three in the Pacific and four

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.260
<v Speaker 4>in the Caribbean. Of the two in the Pacific, two

0:08:03.300 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>took place broadly near the Mexico border and one strike

0:08:06.980 --> 0:08:11.510
<v Speaker 4>occurred about halfway between Mexico and Ecuador. Of the four

0:08:11.530 --> 0:08:14.190
<v Speaker 4>in the Caribbean, one took place in the open ocean

0:08:14.250 --> 0:08:18.290
<v Speaker 4>between Venezuela and the island of La Española. Another appears

0:08:18.310 --> 0:08:21.250
<v Speaker 4>to have taken place broadly near the Gulf of Venezuela.

0:08:21.490 --> 0:08:24.210
<v Speaker 4>One took place in the Gulf of Paria between Venezuela

0:08:24.290 --> 0:08:27.350
<v Speaker 4>and Trinidad and Tobago. And another took place along the

0:08:27.390 --> 0:08:30.190
<v Speaker 4>spine of the Lesser Antilles, close to Martinique and St.

0:08:30.230 --> 0:08:30.610
<v Speaker 6>Lucia.

0:08:30.630 --> 0:08:34.910
<v Speaker 4>El Clips reporting identifies other strikes, including one off the

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.620
<v Speaker 4>coast of Costa Rica, one off Ecuador's Santa Cruz Islands,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.500
<v Speaker 4>and another about halfway between Santa Cruz and Ecuador's coastline,

0:08:43.020 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 4>and one near Mexico's coasts. Although the strikes... originally started

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 4>in the Caribbean, only about a third of these strikes

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.740
<v Speaker 4>have taken place here. Meanwhile, the other two thirds have

0:08:53.780 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 4>taken place in the Pacific. I'm going to talk more

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.830
<v Speaker 4>about the identities of these men later on as I

0:08:59.870 --> 0:09:02.730
<v Speaker 4>talk about the individual strikes. But before I keep going,

0:09:03.270 --> 0:09:05.550
<v Speaker 4>I want to take this moment to say that it

0:09:05.610 --> 0:09:08.730
<v Speaker 4>does not and should not matter whether these men were

0:09:08.790 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 4>simply fishermen or if they actually were drug traffickers. Any

0:09:12.940 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 4>level of criminality, whether real or perceived, does not in

0:09:17.330 --> 0:09:21.450
<v Speaker 4>any sense of the word justify the murder of defenseless

0:09:21.510 --> 0:09:24.550
<v Speaker 4>people on a boat who had no way of fighting

0:09:24.590 --> 0:09:28.450
<v Speaker 4>back against the missile coming from the sky. As many

0:09:28.570 --> 0:09:33.250
<v Speaker 4>experts on U.S. maritime, international, and humanitarian law have noted,

0:09:33.270 --> 0:09:38.170
<v Speaker 4>these strikes on civilians, because they absolutely are not combatants

0:09:38.290 --> 0:09:41.210
<v Speaker 4>and the U.S. is not at war against the groups

0:09:41.309 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 4>that they pretend that these people are a part of,

0:09:44.270 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 4>are basically murder. As Ben Saul, United Nations Special Rapporteur

0:09:50.140 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 4>on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

0:09:53.580 --> 0:09:57.390
<v Speaker 4>Freedoms While Countering Terrorism, wrote in a briefing note, the

0:09:57.429 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 4>attacks are, quote, in violation. of the right to life,

0:10:01.380 --> 0:10:06.540
<v Speaker 4>being unjustified in national or personal self-defense or under international

0:10:06.580 --> 0:10:11.500
<v Speaker 4>humanitarian law, the international law of the sea, narcotic suppression conventions,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.819
<v Speaker 4>or international counterterrorism law. Later on in that same document,

0:10:16.900 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 4>he wrote that there is, quote, reasonable ground to believe,

0:10:20.980 --> 0:10:25.589
<v Speaker 4>end quote, that the United States strikes, quote, constituted crimes

0:10:25.670 --> 0:10:41.790
<v Speaker 4>against humanity of murder under customary international law. Before I

0:10:41.830 --> 0:10:45.050
<v Speaker 4>can talk about any boat strikes, I need to explain how,

0:10:45.250 --> 0:10:48.530
<v Speaker 4>according to the Washington Post, the Trump administration has been

0:10:48.610 --> 0:10:52.410
<v Speaker 4>pushing for these strikes on drug traffickers, on alleged drug traffickers,

0:10:52.490 --> 0:10:55.449
<v Speaker 4>I should say, since they took office and how they

0:10:55.530 --> 0:11:00.709
<v Speaker 4>repeatedly sidestepped, purged, fired, or steamrolled any lawyers who questioned

0:11:00.750 --> 0:11:04.870
<v Speaker 4>their plans. First, I want to broadly talk about why

0:11:04.910 --> 0:11:09.309
<v Speaker 4>the U.S. is doing this. The Trump administration essentially believes,

0:11:09.450 --> 0:11:13.450
<v Speaker 4>or purports to believe, At least, that since these alleged

0:11:13.510 --> 0:11:17.190
<v Speaker 4>drug traffickers, which they have not published any evidence that

0:11:17.210 --> 0:11:20.490
<v Speaker 4>these people are who they say they are, aka alleged

0:11:20.530 --> 0:11:24.370
<v Speaker 4>drug traffickers, are poisoning the U.S. with drugs, then it's

0:11:24.490 --> 0:11:26.390
<v Speaker 4>fair game for the U.S. to kill them.

0:11:27.090 --> 0:11:27.630
<v Speaker 6>To the U.S.

0:11:27.700 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 4>Government, this is quote-unquote self-defense. However, as UN Special Rapporteur

0:11:32.460 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 4>Saul highlights in his note, even if, and there's a

0:11:35.420 --> 0:11:40.330
<v Speaker 4>big if there, if they're actually drug traffickers. This is

0:11:40.370 --> 0:11:44.570
<v Speaker 4>in no way comparable to a direct military action. Drug

0:11:44.610 --> 0:11:48.430
<v Speaker 4>trafficking and military actions could never amount to be the

0:11:48.490 --> 0:11:54.170
<v Speaker 4>same thing. They are simply incompatible. To quote from Saul's note,

0:11:54.530 --> 0:11:58.860
<v Speaker 4>drug trafficking is not force at all. The Trump administration

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.300
<v Speaker 4>also alleges that these non-state actors are being sent by states,

0:12:02.620 --> 0:12:06.970
<v Speaker 4>namely Venezuela. After putting Tren Daragua on the FTO list,

0:12:07.190 --> 0:12:10.950
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration invoked the Alien Enemies Act to declare

0:12:11.410 --> 0:12:14.860
<v Speaker 4>that Tren Daragua was engaged in a quote-unquote invasion of

0:12:14.900 --> 0:12:18.459
<v Speaker 4>the U.S. on behalf of the Venezuelan government. It used

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.460
<v Speaker 4>this as pretext to send 147 Venezuelan men with seemingly

0:12:22.540 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 4>no connection at all to the gang to El Salvador's

0:12:25.660 --> 0:12:29.929
<v Speaker 4>Secat prison in March, where they suffered from torture. Along

0:12:29.990 --> 0:12:33.970
<v Speaker 4>similar lines, in November 2025, the U.S. listed the Cartel

0:12:34.010 --> 0:12:37.429
<v Speaker 4>de los Soles as an FTO. The Trump government had

0:12:37.530 --> 0:12:41.290
<v Speaker 4>for a long time contended that Nicolas Maduro, Venezuelan president,

0:12:41.770 --> 0:12:44.170
<v Speaker 4>was the leader of the Cartel de los Soles, even

0:12:44.230 --> 0:12:48.370
<v Speaker 4>though experts, like those of Inside Crime, claim it was

0:12:48.429 --> 0:12:51.410
<v Speaker 4>more like a loose network of cells inside the Venezuelan

0:12:51.490 --> 0:12:56.830
<v Speaker 4>armed forces. Also, going out of timeline here, But the U.S.

0:12:56.870 --> 0:13:00.350
<v Speaker 4>government dropped the accusation against Maduro that he led the

0:13:00.390 --> 0:13:04.330
<v Speaker 4>cartel earlier this year during his court case in New York.

0:13:05.309 --> 0:13:09.340
<v Speaker 4>Shortly after Trump declared several of these criminal groups FTOs,

0:13:09.860 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Hegseth began purging the DOD of any lawyers or commanders

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 4>who would serve as quote-unquote roadblocks to Trump's orders, according

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.339
<v Speaker 4>to The Hill. A similar thing was occurring at the

0:13:20.420 --> 0:13:24.810
<v Speaker 4>Justice Department, per the New York Times. And, This is

0:13:24.830 --> 0:13:27.170
<v Speaker 4>like absolutely the type of thing you do when you're

0:13:27.210 --> 0:13:30.230
<v Speaker 4>planning to break the law or do something evil. The

0:13:30.270 --> 0:13:32.970
<v Speaker 4>top echelon of the Trump admin has done stuff like

0:13:33.010 --> 0:13:37.620
<v Speaker 4>this across all avenues available to it. Imagine someone breaking

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.020
<v Speaker 4>a key in a door lock so that no matter

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 4>how much you want to lock the door, it's impossible

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 4>unless you change the whole mechanism. This is what they

0:13:45.860 --> 0:13:50.340
<v Speaker 4>were doing essentially. Staying on this door analogy, the Trump

0:13:50.380 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 4>administration essentially just made it so that the door to

0:13:53.540 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 4>doing something wildly illegal and immoral could never be fully

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 4>closed to them by the people who would actually stop

0:14:00.340 --> 0:14:04.140
<v Speaker 4>them from opening it. These strikes were originally supposed to

0:14:04.179 --> 0:14:06.810
<v Speaker 4>be carried out by the CIA, but lawyers at the

0:14:06.850 --> 0:14:11.290
<v Speaker 4>spy agency questioned whether killing civilian drug traffickers was legal

0:14:11.410 --> 0:14:15.130
<v Speaker 4>under domestic law. One person familiar with the debate told

0:14:15.170 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 4>the Washington Post that, quote, There is no actual threat

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:23.580
<v Speaker 4>justifying self-defense, end quote. This is perhaps the first time

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 4>the CIA has said it didn't want to get involved

0:14:25.940 --> 0:14:29.110
<v Speaker 4>in Latin America directly. That's a joke, of course. The

0:14:29.140 --> 0:14:32.110
<v Speaker 4>CIA is definitely here. Just look at the two agents

0:14:32.140 --> 0:14:35.490
<v Speaker 4>that died in Mexico earlier this year. The CIA is

0:14:35.610 --> 0:14:39.570
<v Speaker 4>also providing the targeting assistance and intelligence necessary to conduct

0:14:39.610 --> 0:14:43.850
<v Speaker 4>these strikes, according to The Guardian. Per WAPO, the Trump

0:14:43.950 --> 0:14:47.710
<v Speaker 4>admin quickly moved on with an alternative plan. to use

0:14:47.750 --> 0:14:51.780
<v Speaker 4>the U.S. military for these strikes. During the summer of 2025,

0:14:51.770 --> 0:14:56.270
<v Speaker 4>the Justice Department signed a secret opinion justifying the boat

0:14:56.290 --> 0:14:59.580
<v Speaker 4>strikes by saying that the U.S. was in armed conflict

0:14:59.630 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 4>with quote-unquote narco-terrorists and that using lethal force against them

0:15:04.100 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 4>was okay because it protected national interests and because they

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 4>were a quote, threat to the U.S. akin to a

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:17.180
<v Speaker 4>foreign nation attempting to invade, Senator Mark Kelly told WAPO. However,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.300
<v Speaker 4>this was in a capital W war, so they didn't

0:15:20.490 --> 0:15:26.970
<v Speaker 4>need congressional authorization. Instead, it's a, quote, non-international armed conflict,

0:15:27.210 --> 0:15:31.530
<v Speaker 4>end quote. Per a separate WAPO article, the Trump admin's

0:15:31.630 --> 0:15:35.140
<v Speaker 4>legal justification, quote, does not stand up to the facts,

0:15:35.860 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 4>end quote, to lawyers inside and outside the government. While

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 4>this memo was produced during the summer, it was not

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.650
<v Speaker 4>signed until September 5th of 2025. after the first boat

0:15:46.700 --> 0:15:50.580
<v Speaker 4>strike occurred. According to The Guardian, the memo states that

0:15:50.620 --> 0:15:53.780
<v Speaker 4>these groups are using the proceeds from drug trafficking to

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 4>wage war, which is something that the Taliban did, but

0:15:57.700 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 4>that experts have said these cartels designated as FTOs or

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 4>DTOs are simply not doing. Also, you have to remember

0:16:05.620 --> 0:16:09.980
<v Speaker 4>that these people, if they're connected to the cartels, are

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 4>at most low-level members, and their deaths, while extremely gruesome,

0:16:13.980 --> 0:16:19.070
<v Speaker 4>have little impact on drug trafficking in the region. Per WAPO,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.330
<v Speaker 4>the strikes have not reduced the amount of cocaine entering

0:16:22.390 --> 0:16:27.270
<v Speaker 4>the U.S., according to a Drug Enforcement Administration assessment. Also,

0:16:27.370 --> 0:16:31.100
<v Speaker 4>did I mention that Trump pardoned the former president of Honduras,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.990
<v Speaker 4>who'd been sentenced to 45 years in prison? in June

0:16:34.990 --> 0:16:38.970
<v Speaker 4>2024 after being convicted of importing more than 400 tons

0:16:39.030 --> 0:16:43.140
<v Speaker 4>of cocaine into the U.S. between 2004 and 2022. I'm

0:16:44.380 --> 0:16:47.780
<v Speaker 4>again stepping out of timeline here, but I wanted to

0:16:47.820 --> 0:16:52.260
<v Speaker 4>jump ahead to illustrate how this anti-drug policy is pure farce.

0:16:52.900 --> 0:16:56.810
<v Speaker 4>It's fake, and violence seems to be the point of

0:16:56.870 --> 0:17:02.170
<v Speaker 4>these boat strikes for the Trump administration. Sorry to digress. Anyway,

0:17:02.660 --> 0:17:07.060
<v Speaker 4>In mid-2025, Trump signed a classified directive that authorized the

0:17:07.100 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 4>military to use force against a secret list of 24 DTOs.

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.790
<v Speaker 4>Not to be left behind, Hegs have followed this up

0:17:14.810 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 4>with an execute order in August 2025 that contained targeting

0:17:18.770 --> 0:17:23.810
<v Speaker 4>instructions that didn't require positive identification of a target. Instead,

0:17:24.470 --> 0:17:27.869
<v Speaker 4>quote-unquote reasonable certainty that a person is a member of

0:17:28.109 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 4>or affiliated with a DTO, per the Washington Post. I

0:17:31.890 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 4>want to stop right here and say that under Obama,

0:17:34.460 --> 0:17:37.020
<v Speaker 4>the standard for drone strikes in the Middle East was

0:17:37.140 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote near certainty, and they still struck a marriage

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 4>possession in Yemen. There is serious reason to doubt the U.S.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 4>'s ability to know the certainty of any target they're

0:17:48.140 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 4>planning to hit. Earlier this year, a joint U.S. and

0:17:51.220 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Ecuadorian operation on an alleged narco-terrorist compound actually raided a

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.370
<v Speaker 4>dairy farm in with no arrests, but the Ecuadorian military

0:18:00.570 --> 0:18:05.110
<v Speaker 4>did allegedly torture some folks, per the New York Times. Meanwhile,

0:18:05.210 --> 0:18:09.629
<v Speaker 4>according to reporting in Bloomberg, serious issues with the AI-assisted

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 4>quote-unquote kill chain used by the U.S. military led to

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 4>the strike that killed at least 120 free children at

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:22.260
<v Speaker 4>a girls' school in Manab, Iran. United Nations investigators recently

0:18:22.340 --> 0:18:26.780
<v Speaker 4>concluded that this was likely a war crime. Funnily enough,

0:18:27.060 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 4>the boat strikes do not constitute a war crime because

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:34.180
<v Speaker 4>we're simply not at war with the cartels in a

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 4>strictly international legal sense. The criteria established by the execute

0:18:39.940 --> 0:18:44.350
<v Speaker 4>order to attack these ships is really unclear. Democratic Senator

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.429
<v Speaker 4>Tim Kaine from Virginia revealed that the boat strikes are

0:18:47.470 --> 0:18:50.510
<v Speaker 4>being carried out using free criteria that he was not

0:18:50.570 --> 0:18:54.930
<v Speaker 4>allowed to disclose. However, he was allowed to disclose that quote-unquote,

0:18:55.070 --> 0:18:59.189
<v Speaker 4>evidence of narcotics, was not one of them. Republican Senator

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.820
<v Speaker 4>Rand Paul from Kentucky said during the same hearing that

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 4>having weapons on the vessel is not one of the

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.100
<v Speaker 4>criteria either. This was during a full committee hearing of

0:19:09.140 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 4>the Foreign Relations Committee for the fiscal year 27 State

0:19:12.660 --> 0:19:17.770
<v Speaker 4>Department budget, by the way. Anyway, in August 2025, the U.S.

0:19:17.830 --> 0:19:22.910
<v Speaker 4>military mobilized to the Caribbean, and on September 2nd, 2025,

0:19:23.060 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 4>the first strike event occurred. And I say strike event

0:19:26.460 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 4>because there were at least four missiles fired on that day.

0:19:29.500 --> 0:19:35.390
<v Speaker 4>Per the Washington Post, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's order was to, quote,

0:19:35.530 --> 0:19:39.510
<v Speaker 4>kill everybody, end quote. Video published after the attack shows

0:19:39.570 --> 0:19:42.230
<v Speaker 4>a boat racing across the waves, lighting up with a

0:19:42.290 --> 0:19:46.030
<v Speaker 4>tower of fire after being hit. Nine people died because

0:19:46.070 --> 0:19:49.970
<v Speaker 4>of that first missile. However, after the smoke and fire cleared,

0:19:50.410 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 4>surveillance video being watched by U.S. military officials, but not

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.659
<v Speaker 4>released to the public, showed two people clinging to the

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.740
<v Speaker 4>remains of the vessel. They stayed in those freezing waters

0:20:01.780 --> 0:20:06.060
<v Speaker 4>for roughly 45 minutes until Admiral Frank Bradley, then head

0:20:06.100 --> 0:20:09.260
<v Speaker 4>of the Joint Special Operations Command, also known as JSOC,

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.939
<v Speaker 4>ordered SEAL Team 6 to hit it again, killing the

0:20:12.980 --> 0:20:17.659
<v Speaker 4>two remaining survivors. Per The Intercept, Admiral Bradley sought legal

0:20:17.740 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 4>counsel from JSOC's legal advisor in between the first and

0:20:21.460 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 4>second strike. Although the response isn't known, a lawmaker told

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.870
<v Speaker 4>The Intercept that the follow-up strike was deemed legal. Two

0:20:30.910 --> 0:20:34.710
<v Speaker 4>more missiles finally sank the vessel. Bradley, who's now Chief

0:20:34.750 --> 0:20:38.090
<v Speaker 4>of Special Operations Command, said that he ordered the extra

0:20:38.109 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 4>strikes because the shipwrecked men and the fragment of the

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 4>boat still posed a threat, sources told The Intercept. Per

0:20:45.140 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the New York Times, the survivors had managed to get

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.340
<v Speaker 4>back on the boat's remains and were waving to the

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:54.350
<v Speaker 4>planes before the second missile killed them. The aircraft used

0:20:54.380 --> 0:20:57.190
<v Speaker 4>to carry out this strike was reportedly painted to look

0:20:57.210 --> 0:21:01.369
<v Speaker 4>like a civilian plane. However, this practice has stopped since

0:21:01.410 --> 0:21:04.300
<v Speaker 4>that first strike, according to the New York Times. That

0:21:04.340 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>same article states that the men had spotted the plane

0:21:07.700 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 4>and turned the boat around back to Venezuela. Per sources

0:21:11.060 --> 0:21:14.379
<v Speaker 4>who spoke with The Intercept, JSOC did not know the

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 4>names or supposed affiliations of all the persons aboard this vessel.

0:21:19.220 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Of the victims who've been identified by Air Wars, eight

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.550
<v Speaker 4>were from San Juan Dunare in Venezuela, while three others

0:21:25.609 --> 0:21:29.210
<v Speaker 4>were from local towns close to San Juan Dunare called

0:21:29.250 --> 0:21:33.180
<v Speaker 4>Los Estigos and Guiria. The one victim there's the most

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:38.270
<v Speaker 4>information about online is Luis Chemaria Martinez, who was identified

0:21:38.310 --> 0:21:42.550
<v Speaker 4>by the Associated Press as a quote-unquote long-time local crime

0:21:42.590 --> 0:21:45.850
<v Speaker 4>boss that made his money mostly from smuggling people and

0:21:45.910 --> 0:21:50.070
<v Speaker 4>drugs across borders. He had previously been jailed after a

0:21:50.109 --> 0:21:54.490
<v Speaker 4>boat he was operating capsized in 2020, killing, quote, about

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 4>two dozen people, end quote, including several of his relatives.

0:21:59.060 --> 0:22:02.109
<v Speaker 4>He was jailed in Venezuela, to be clear. Some family

0:22:02.150 --> 0:22:04.850
<v Speaker 4>members believe that Che Maria was one of two bodies

0:22:05.210 --> 0:22:07.909
<v Speaker 4>that have washed up on the shores of Trinidad and Tobago,

0:22:08.530 --> 0:22:11.750
<v Speaker 4>per an anonymous source who spoke with N Plus Univision

0:22:11.850 --> 0:22:16.830
<v Speaker 4>from Martinez's native Guiria. The anonymous source compared Che Maria

0:22:16.869 --> 0:22:20.510
<v Speaker 4>to an errand boy for drug traffickers, not the owner.

0:22:21.310 --> 0:22:24.889
<v Speaker 4>Per the Killing Spree report by the Washington Office on

0:22:24.930 --> 0:22:28.889
<v Speaker 4>Latin America, there's a significant possibility that many of the

0:22:28.950 --> 0:22:32.380
<v Speaker 4>victims who died in that first strike were passengers traveling

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.500
<v Speaker 4>from Venezuela to Trinidad and Tobago. The report cites El Clip,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.619
<v Speaker 4>and I will here as well. Quote, some people who

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 4>are familiar with boat movements, end quote, along the Caribbean

0:22:43.020 --> 0:22:47.070
<v Speaker 4>coast of Colombia and Venezuela, told El Clip that, quote,

0:22:47.210 --> 0:22:49.730
<v Speaker 4>it is common for the same boats that carry drugs

0:22:49.830 --> 0:22:54.370
<v Speaker 4>on the outward journey to bring passengers back. The capitanes,

0:22:54.550 --> 0:22:57.550
<v Speaker 4>as the boat operators are known, take whatever work they

0:22:57.590 --> 0:23:01.170
<v Speaker 4>can get, end quote. The second boat strike we know

0:23:01.230 --> 0:23:06.350
<v Speaker 4>of occurred on September 15, 2025. Alejandro Carranza Medina, a

0:23:06.390 --> 0:23:09.270
<v Speaker 4>Colombian man, was one of three men killed by that

0:23:09.330 --> 0:23:14.230
<v Speaker 4>boat strike. Family members told RTVC, a Colombian news outlet,

0:23:14.390 --> 0:23:16.310
<v Speaker 4>that he had been on board the boat and that

0:23:16.330 --> 0:23:20.690
<v Speaker 4>it was an artisanal fishing vessel. Citing the video posted

0:23:20.750 --> 0:23:25.300
<v Speaker 4>by the Trump administration online, family members posited that the

0:23:25.340 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 4>ship had been having engine trouble at the time that

0:23:27.900 --> 0:23:31.230
<v Speaker 4>it was fired upon. When the New York Times spoke

0:23:31.550 --> 0:23:35.430
<v Speaker 4>with Carranza Medina's family, the mother of his free children

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.179
<v Speaker 4>said that he had never been involved in drug smuggling. Quote,

0:23:39.820 --> 0:23:42.859
<v Speaker 4>if he was some kind of narco-terrorist, then why are

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 4>we living in misery instead of a mansion? She asked

0:23:46.100 --> 0:23:50.100
<v Speaker 4>a reporter. Gustavo Petro, who was still president of Colombia

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 4>at the time he made these remarks, said that Carranza

0:23:52.780 --> 0:23:56.070
<v Speaker 4>Medina might have been involved with drugs intermittently as many

0:23:56.130 --> 0:23:59.770
<v Speaker 4>fishermen are forced to because poverty leaves him little else

0:23:59.910 --> 0:24:03.510
<v Speaker 4>in terms of work. Per reporting from El Heraldo and

0:24:03.530 --> 0:24:06.310
<v Speaker 4>the New York Times, he had previously pled guilty in

0:24:06.350 --> 0:24:10.629
<v Speaker 4>a scheme to steal weapons confiscated during legal proceedings, but

0:24:10.670 --> 0:24:13.100
<v Speaker 4>it appears that he never served jail time for this.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 4>I add this context because the truth of who these

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.780
<v Speaker 4>people were is extremely nuanced, and regardless of whether they

0:24:19.820 --> 0:24:22.460
<v Speaker 4>were quote-unquote criminals in the eyes of the state or not,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.869
<v Speaker 4>they did not deserve to be killed. In fact, as

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.390
<v Speaker 4>Petro said, For these poor communities, because of the economic

0:24:29.450 --> 0:24:33.129
<v Speaker 4>desperation these fishermen face, it's common for them to be

0:24:33.190 --> 0:24:38.910
<v Speaker 4>extremely vulnerable to being exploited by drug trafficking organizations. Per

0:24:38.930 --> 0:24:42.670
<v Speaker 4>the team behind Los Bombardeos, the four men killed during

0:24:42.710 --> 0:24:47.379
<v Speaker 4>the October 3rd, 2025 strike were also from Guiria. Luis

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.899
<v Speaker 4>Ramon Amundarang had traveled from his home to Trinidad and

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Tobago in search of work. He was a motorcycle taxi

0:24:55.020 --> 0:24:58.830
<v Speaker 4>driver and a boat captain. who accepted his first drug-running

0:24:58.869 --> 0:25:01.510
<v Speaker 4>job because he had no other way to pay for

0:25:01.570 --> 0:25:05.340
<v Speaker 4>his youngest daughter's dermatology treatment or to feed his four

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:10.780
<v Speaker 4>other children. According to El Clip, Ramon's cousin, Robert Sanchez,

0:25:10.940 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 4>was also on the boat and was killed. For the AP,

0:25:14.660 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Robert had been pushed by economic pressure to join a

0:25:17.510 --> 0:25:20.650
<v Speaker 4>drug-smuggling job in hopes of getting enough money to buy

0:25:20.670 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 4>an engine for his fishing boat. Ramon's wife told El

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Clip that, quote, if Ramon had really been a narco-terrorist,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 4>if he'd had money, if he'd been living large, believe me,

0:25:33.180 --> 0:25:35.619
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be living where I live now. And if

0:25:35.660 --> 0:25:37.700
<v Speaker 4>you go to the homes of the other free men

0:25:37.740 --> 0:25:40.790
<v Speaker 4>they killed, you'll see that they don't have much either

0:25:41.250 --> 0:25:44.810
<v Speaker 4>because none of it belonged to them, end quote. I

0:25:44.850 --> 0:25:47.790
<v Speaker 4>should say that El Clip notes that all signs point

0:25:47.830 --> 0:25:50.189
<v Speaker 4>to them about to go on a run for illicit cargo.

0:25:50.619 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 4>But a friend of Ramon's told El Clip that he

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 4>was sure no drugs were on board at the time

0:25:55.660 --> 0:25:59.070
<v Speaker 4>the boat was hit. Because a boat traveling from Trinidad

0:25:59.109 --> 0:26:02.290
<v Speaker 4>and Tobago to Venezuela is going to pick up merchandise,

0:26:02.530 --> 0:26:07.590
<v Speaker 4>not deliver it. Quote, boats carry drugs from South America northwards,

0:26:07.990 --> 0:26:12.430
<v Speaker 4>not the reverse. End quote. Said Maria Teresa Ronderos, director

0:26:12.490 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 4>and co-founder of El Clip to The Guardian. On October 14th, 2025,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.940
<v Speaker 4>a strike killed six people. Chad, Charpo Joseph, and Richie

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Samaru were among the victims. They were both from Trinidad

0:26:36.660 --> 0:26:40.380
<v Speaker 4>and Tobago, and they were fishermen, per CNC Free TV.

0:26:40.940 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Joseph's grandfather characterized the strike as a, quote, act of evil,

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 4>end quote. They seemingly had no connection with drug trafficking

0:26:50.380 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 4>other than Joseph's uncle being a, quote, unquote, drug lord

0:26:53.220 --> 0:26:57.109
<v Speaker 4>for the TNT Guardians. Per a lawsuit filed by the

0:26:57.170 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 4>families of Joseph and Samaru against the U.S. government in

0:27:00.540 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 4>the district of Massachusetts, Samaru was working on a farm

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 4>in Venezuela and had called his sister days before he

0:27:07.380 --> 0:27:09.980
<v Speaker 4>was killed to let her know that he had found

0:27:10.030 --> 0:27:14.629
<v Speaker 4>a ride to Trinidad. Similarly, Joseph had told his wife

0:27:14.930 --> 0:27:17.770
<v Speaker 4>he had found a boat ride from Venezuela back home

0:27:18.190 --> 0:27:20.429
<v Speaker 4>and would see her in a couple of days. They

0:27:20.470 --> 0:27:25.490
<v Speaker 4>never arrived. Per Air Wars, Dusak Milovic from Guiria was

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.100
<v Speaker 4>also one of the men killed during that strike. He

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 4>had once been a cadet at the Venezuelan National Guard Academy,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.699
<v Speaker 4>but dropped out to run drugs, per the AP. The

0:27:35.740 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 4>lawsuit against the U.S. by the families of Joseph and

0:27:39.260 --> 0:27:43.870
<v Speaker 4>Samaru is currently pending. stalled pending the completion of judicial

0:27:43.910 --> 0:27:46.950
<v Speaker 4>proceedings in Trinidad and Tobago that would declare the two

0:27:46.990 --> 0:27:50.300
<v Speaker 4>men legally deceased and allow their families to take control

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.940
<v Speaker 4>of their estates, per the Trinidad Daily Express. I'm sorry

0:27:54.980 --> 0:27:56.900
<v Speaker 4>to say that I don't have the time to name

0:27:56.940 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 4>all of the victims that we know of or the

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.139
<v Speaker 4>circumstances which led to them being killed in the ocean,

0:28:02.460 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 4>forced into an unmarked grave. However, you can see the

0:28:06.260 --> 0:28:10.460
<v Speaker 4>picture that's building through the strikes that I've mentioned. These people,

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.340
<v Speaker 4>appeared to be either common fishermen or forced into smuggling

0:28:15.380 --> 0:28:17.810
<v Speaker 4>drugs because that's the only type of work that they

0:28:17.850 --> 0:28:21.070
<v Speaker 4>could find in a poverty that they had lived through

0:28:21.170 --> 0:28:24.550
<v Speaker 4>most of their lives. Even the ones who were nominally

0:28:24.650 --> 0:28:28.169
<v Speaker 4>part of a drug trafficking organization, perhaps one of the

0:28:28.170 --> 0:28:31.530
<v Speaker 4>24 on the secret list, were low-level members at most

0:28:31.690 --> 0:28:35.990
<v Speaker 4>or only quote-unquote affiliated, perhaps because they were traveling on

0:28:36.010 --> 0:28:38.450
<v Speaker 4>the same boat as someone who was a member or

0:28:38.510 --> 0:28:41.900
<v Speaker 4>hitched a ride on a boat carrying drugs. The truth

0:28:42.260 --> 0:28:45.020
<v Speaker 4>is we will likely never know the full details of

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.580
<v Speaker 4>who all these people were and what made the U.S.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.300
<v Speaker 4>target them specifically. After the first strike, an official admitted

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 4>that only one victim was considered a member of a

0:28:56.570 --> 0:29:01.790
<v Speaker 4>designated terrorist organization per The Intercept. The rest were affiliates.

0:29:02.490 --> 0:29:05.750
<v Speaker 4>Pentagon officials have claimed that they knew the identities of

0:29:05.850 --> 0:29:09.050
<v Speaker 4>everyone on that first boat, but per Senator Mark Warner,

0:29:09.230 --> 0:29:12.610
<v Speaker 4>ranking Democrat of the Senate Intelligence Committee, in an interview

0:29:12.650 --> 0:29:16.410
<v Speaker 4>with ABC, quote, they don't know all of the individuals

0:29:16.650 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 4>on many of the other boats, end quote. I should

0:29:20.580 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 4>also mention here that maritime interdictions have not stopped while

0:29:24.740 --> 0:29:28.140
<v Speaker 4>these boat strikes have gone on. Per El Clip, on

0:29:28.180 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 4>the same day as that very first strike, the Colombian

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:36.210
<v Speaker 4>Aerospace Force, its Dominican counterpart, and the U.S. Joint Interagency

0:29:36.270 --> 0:29:40.390
<v Speaker 4>Task Force South, carried out Operation Seuss, which led to

0:29:40.410 --> 0:29:44.340
<v Speaker 4>the seizure of nearly 450 kilos of cocaine and the

0:29:44.420 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 4>arrest of two people. Seuss and other operations like it

0:29:48.660 --> 0:29:52.340
<v Speaker 4>have occurred in parallel to the violent extrajudicial killings of

0:29:52.380 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the boat strikes. This shows that contrary to what the

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration has said, blowing up random people on boats

0:30:00.220 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 4>isn't the only way to curb drug trafficking. There is

0:30:03.340 --> 0:30:07.140
<v Speaker 4>certainly another way to stop it that doesn't involve murder

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 4>and guarantees a person's day in court. This is in

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.940
<v Speaker 4>line with a new tactic utilized in the Eastern Pacific

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.410
<v Speaker 4>and the Caribbean, where SAFCOM forces have been interdicting alleged

0:30:19.530 --> 0:30:25.070
<v Speaker 4>floating refueling stations that support illicit drug trafficking. Many of

0:30:25.110 --> 0:30:29.170
<v Speaker 4>the publicly listed press releases related to these interdictions specify

0:30:29.230 --> 0:30:33.530
<v Speaker 4>that they operate for los choneros. These vessels are also

0:30:33.610 --> 0:30:37.220
<v Speaker 4>sunk via an explosion, and per the press releases I've read,

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.740
<v Speaker 4>the crew on these ships are disembarked and then handed

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:46.970
<v Speaker 4>over to their respective countries' authorities. However, speaking of a

0:30:46.990 --> 0:30:50.670
<v Speaker 4>day in court, three people have been rescued as survivors

0:30:50.830 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 4>in two incidents— On October 16th, 2025, two men were

0:30:55.580 --> 0:31:00.740
<v Speaker 4>pulled from a sinking semi-submersible vessel. Andres Fernando Tufino Chila

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 4>of Ecuador had previously been convicted of cocaine distribution, but

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.550
<v Speaker 4>his sister told El Pais that he'd been working as

0:31:07.590 --> 0:31:10.469
<v Speaker 4>a fisherman before the U.S. struck the vessel he was on.

0:31:11.070 --> 0:31:14.890
<v Speaker 4>Jonathan Obando, the second survivor who's from Colombia, had no

0:31:14.950 --> 0:31:18.270
<v Speaker 4>criminal history and no cartel links, according to El Pais.

0:31:19.270 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Even though Trump promised to prosecute them, they were eventually

0:31:22.980 --> 0:31:26.430
<v Speaker 4>let go without being formally charged by either the U.S.

0:31:26.590 --> 0:31:31.070
<v Speaker 4>or their home countries. Obviously, this begs the question, if

0:31:31.110 --> 0:31:36.110
<v Speaker 4>these people are really quote-unquote narco-terrorists, why have they been

0:31:36.230 --> 0:31:40.450
<v Speaker 4>able to go free? As El Pais notes, Trump's strategy

0:31:40.590 --> 0:31:45.410
<v Speaker 4>is paradoxical. The Trump admin has enough justification to kill

0:31:45.430 --> 0:31:48.650
<v Speaker 4>them extrajudicially, but not to charge these men in a

0:31:48.710 --> 0:31:52.350
<v Speaker 4>court of law, question mark? All possible evidence that could

0:31:52.390 --> 0:31:55.030
<v Speaker 4>link these men to alleged drug trafficking, if there ever

0:31:55.070 --> 0:31:57.390
<v Speaker 4>was any in the first place, goes up in literal

0:31:57.450 --> 0:32:01.050
<v Speaker 4>smoke the moment that these boats are hit, El Pais noted.

0:32:01.750 --> 0:32:04.450
<v Speaker 4>It's likely that a court case would expose much of

0:32:04.470 --> 0:32:09.180
<v Speaker 4>the legal scaffolding that upholds the fin legal justification that

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.140
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration is using for these strikes, as well

0:32:12.180 --> 0:32:15.390
<v Speaker 4>as put on display that many of these people might

0:32:15.430 --> 0:32:18.570
<v Speaker 4>really just be fishermen forced into participating in the drug

0:32:18.610 --> 0:32:20.830
<v Speaker 4>trade as a lookout or a guide or something like

0:32:20.870 --> 0:32:24.820
<v Speaker 4>that because they had no other opportunities. A note on survivors.

0:32:25.340 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 4>There haven't been more of them because the U.S. is

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 4>apparently intent on not looking for them. Per The Intercept,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.630
<v Speaker 4>after a December 30 strike sank three vessels, SAFCOM said

0:32:36.670 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>that it, quote-unquote, immediately notified the Coast Guard. but it

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:44.620
<v Speaker 4>took the Coast Guard almost 45 hours to begin searching

0:32:45.180 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 4>the attack zone for survivors. It is believed that the

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.469
<v Speaker 4>11 people on these vessels drowned at sea. To end

0:32:52.510 --> 0:32:56.350
<v Speaker 4>this section, on March 24, 2026, the Ecuadorian ship La

0:32:56.570 --> 0:33:00.350
<v Speaker 4>Negra Francisca Duarte II, which was coming back from weeks

0:33:00.470 --> 0:33:03.270
<v Speaker 4>of fishing at sea, was hit by an apparent U.S.

0:33:03.330 --> 0:33:06.270
<v Speaker 4>military drone strike, according to NPLOS Univision.

0:33:06.990 --> 0:33:07.430
<v Speaker 7>The crew.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.020
<v Speaker 4>had been forced off of the boat by apparent U.S.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 4>military personnel, although it's unclear from which agency they could

0:33:14.980 --> 0:33:18.020
<v Speaker 4>have been. Photos from another ship that was detained in

0:33:18.060 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 4>the region show that it might have been Coast Guard personnel,

0:33:21.660 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 4>per NPLOS's reporting. Crew of La Negra Francisca Duarte II,

0:33:26.620 --> 0:33:29.540
<v Speaker 4>as well as the Don Maca, which was intercepted on

0:33:29.660 --> 0:33:33.750
<v Speaker 4>April 30th, alleged to drop site news in Mongabay, Latam,

0:33:34.310 --> 0:33:38.090
<v Speaker 4>that they were arbitrarily detained and tortured. The crew of

0:33:38.110 --> 0:33:42.790
<v Speaker 4>the Negra Francisca Duarte was moved roughly 900 miles north

0:33:42.830 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 4>from their position and turned over to the Salvadoran Coast Guard. Meanwhile,

0:33:47.130 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the crew of the Don Maca told Dropsite they had been, quote,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 4>held hostage and hooded for eight days. La Fiorella, another

0:33:55.660 --> 0:33:58.820
<v Speaker 4>Ecuadorian ship, and its crew went missing in January, per

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.940
<v Speaker 4>the New Yorker. The wife of the captain who commanded

0:34:01.980 --> 0:34:04.790
<v Speaker 4>the ship told Dropsite that her husband had called her

0:34:05.270 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 4>on an emergency line saying that, quote, American aircraft, two drones,

0:34:09.780 --> 0:34:12.820
<v Speaker 4>and a blue patrol ship, end quote, had been circling

0:34:12.860 --> 0:34:17.380
<v Speaker 4>the boat. The next day, the Fiorella and its crew disappeared.

0:34:18.140 --> 0:34:21.700
<v Speaker 4>The prosecutor who had led the investigation into the Fiorella's

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:26.310
<v Speaker 4>disappearance was shot dead alongside her sister in Manta, per

0:34:26.330 --> 0:34:29.350
<v Speaker 4>the New Yorker. There do not appear to be any

0:34:29.430 --> 0:34:32.450
<v Speaker 4>links between these three boats and drug trafficking, per the

0:34:32.469 --> 0:34:36.460
<v Speaker 4>report cited earlier. Unlike the boat strikes, the U.S. has

0:34:36.540 --> 0:34:40.009
<v Speaker 4>not taken boastful credit for the disappearance and detention of

0:34:40.070 --> 0:34:44.190
<v Speaker 4>these ships and actively denies having done anything to harm them.

0:34:45.190 --> 0:34:48.150
<v Speaker 4>For their part, the Salvadoran military says that the men

0:34:48.190 --> 0:34:51.890
<v Speaker 4>of the Francisca Duarte had been shipwrecked and then rescued

0:34:51.969 --> 0:34:56.540
<v Speaker 4>as part of a quote-unquote humanitarian operation. It's unclear if

0:34:56.580 --> 0:34:59.740
<v Speaker 4>these are related to Operation Southern Spear or Joint Task

0:34:59.780 --> 0:35:03.820
<v Speaker 4>Force Western Hemisphere, its evolution. There was a brief two-month

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:08.219
<v Speaker 4>pause on these boat strikes from July 21st to August 23rd.

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 4>But at time of recording, the strikes have continued unabated.

0:35:12.300 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 4>There appears to be no end in sight for this terror.

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.820
<v Speaker 4>These strikes are part of the Trump administration's focus on

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:25.810
<v Speaker 4>exerting control over the Western Hemisphere, the so-called Trump corollary

0:35:25.910 --> 0:35:29.410
<v Speaker 4>to the Monroe Doctrine. As part of this renewed focus

0:35:29.489 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 4>on the region, Trump attacked Venezuela and kidnapped its president,

0:35:33.340 --> 0:35:37.780
<v Speaker 4>Nicolas Maduro. He is currently sitting in jail in New York. Meanwhile,

0:35:38.380 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 4>the U.S. has started partnering with other countries in the

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:46.850
<v Speaker 4>region to attack so-called narco-terrorists. These countries, such as Ecuador, Colombia,

0:35:47.210 --> 0:35:50.870
<v Speaker 4>and Honduras, have agreed to join operations on their soil

0:35:50.969 --> 0:35:54.990
<v Speaker 4>with U.S. personnel. These include airstrikes, which I previously mentioned,

0:35:55.250 --> 0:35:58.210
<v Speaker 4>as the attack on that dairy farm. It's clear that

0:35:58.530 --> 0:36:02.770
<v Speaker 4>that this rising tide of anti-narco-terrorism actions will become more

0:36:02.850 --> 0:36:09.009
<v Speaker 4>prominent across Latin America. I should also say, quote-unquote, anti-narco-terrorism actions.

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:18.140
<v Speaker 4>Alleged narco-terrorism. On September 22nd, the United States, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia,

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:24.090
<v Speaker 4>Costa Rica, República Dominicana, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guyana, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Peru,

0:36:24.810 --> 0:36:29.310
<v Speaker 4>and Trinidad and Tobago published a joint statement declaring that

0:36:29.330 --> 0:36:33.509
<v Speaker 4>they were announcing the, quote, first joint action under our

0:36:33.610 --> 0:36:37.819
<v Speaker 4>newly announced pillars, individual and collective action to confront the

0:36:37.860 --> 0:36:42.940
<v Speaker 4>scourge of narco-terrorism. As such, we declare our intention to impose,

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.580
<v Speaker 4>as applicable and in accordance with our respective international and

0:36:46.620 --> 0:36:51.779
<v Speaker 4>domestic legal obligations, as it freezes immigration and visa restrictions

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 4>for members, associates, and supporters of the organizations and criminal liability,

0:36:56.930 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 4>for individuals knowingly providing material support, including logistical support, to

0:37:01.780 --> 0:37:06.379
<v Speaker 4>the organizations, among other measures. This announcement has seemingly been

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:09.380
<v Speaker 4>a long time coming. At a conference of the America's

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Counter-Cartel Coalition in March 2026, Stephen Miller told Latin American

0:37:14.420 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 4>military leaders that, quote, these organizations can only be defeated

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.430
<v Speaker 4>with military power. And I see some heads nodding up

0:37:22.489 --> 0:37:25.130
<v Speaker 4>front because they understand you're dealing with a lot of

0:37:25.210 --> 0:37:28.810
<v Speaker 4>lawyers in your country, I'm sure. You have my permission

0:37:29.030 --> 0:37:33.390
<v Speaker 4>not to listen to them. End quote. This is frightful,

0:37:33.610 --> 0:37:35.930
<v Speaker 4>to be honest with you. There's not enough space in

0:37:35.969 --> 0:37:38.230
<v Speaker 4>this episode today, but I assure you I will talk

0:37:38.270 --> 0:37:42.530
<v Speaker 4>about this more later at some point. If you want

0:37:42.710 --> 0:37:46.090
<v Speaker 4>a brief intro into what the U.S. has done in

0:37:46.130 --> 0:37:49.049
<v Speaker 4>Latin America before you can listen to my episodes on

0:37:49.090 --> 0:37:53.450
<v Speaker 4>the Dominican Republic and my episode on the U.S. 's colonies.

0:37:55.180 --> 0:37:57.580
<v Speaker 4>To be honest with you, things are not looking good

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:02.020
<v Speaker 4>in terms of democratic rights in the Americas. I want

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to end this episode by highlighting this quote from the

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:11.529
<v Speaker 4>Washington Office on Latin America Killing Spree Report. Quote, If

0:38:11.570 --> 0:38:15.110
<v Speaker 4>normalization of the boat strikes... takes hold and the U.S.

0:38:15.190 --> 0:38:19.690
<v Speaker 4>president can assert an unlimited license to kill, the protections

0:38:19.810 --> 0:38:22.089
<v Speaker 4>of the rule of law will be gravely weakened for

0:38:22.170 --> 0:38:24.419
<v Speaker 4>all of us, not just those who are the most

0:38:24.540 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 4>immediate targets of state violence. Thank you for listening. You

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 4>can find me on all social media as at Vaquero2XL

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.060
<v Speaker 4>and you can follow Cool Zone Media at Cool Zone

0:38:37.100 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Media pretty much everywhere.

0:38:48.300 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Hello, everyone, and welcome to It Could Happen Here. My

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:52.980
<v Speaker 2>name is Dana Al-Kurd. I'm a researcher and analyst of

0:38:53.020 --> 0:38:56.740
<v Speaker 2>Arab and Palestinian politics. Today on the podcast, I'm speaking

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.550
<v Speaker 2>with Harsha Walia, who is an activist and writer based

0:38:59.590 --> 0:39:03.450
<v Speaker 2>in Canada. Her book, Border and Rule, Global Migration, Capitalism,

0:39:03.489 --> 0:39:05.750
<v Speaker 2>and the Rise of Racist Nationalism, I think is essential

0:39:05.790 --> 0:39:07.609
<v Speaker 2>reading for all of us who are concerned with the

0:39:08.250 --> 0:39:11.890
<v Speaker 2>rise of fascism and its connection to anti-immigrant sentiment and

0:39:11.910 --> 0:39:14.290
<v Speaker 2>narratives that are taking root in a lot of our societies.

0:39:14.989 --> 0:39:17.910
<v Speaker 2>I spoke with Harsha about the for lack of a

0:39:17.910 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 2>better term, incident that happened in the Spanish enclave of

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.919
<v Speaker 2>Ceuta on the tip of Morocco exactly a month ago.

0:39:25.180 --> 0:39:28.350
<v Speaker 2>So we recorded this podcast on September 10th, a month

0:39:28.390 --> 0:39:32.380
<v Speaker 2>ago exactly. I think something like 70,000 migrants attempted to

0:39:32.420 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 2>cross over into the Spanish enclave to seek refuge in

0:39:35.180 --> 0:39:38.020
<v Speaker 2>the European continent. Some of these migrants were from Morocco,

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.340
<v Speaker 2>but many were not. And there was a huge outrage

0:39:41.380 --> 0:39:45.140
<v Speaker 2>and backlash against migrants and against what happened there. From

0:39:45.180 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the left and the right, as we'll discuss in the interview.

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.660
<v Speaker 2>So I spoke with Harsha about what the implications of

0:39:51.739 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 2>these arguments have been and how do we understand this

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 2>anti-immigrant sentiment that, again, sometimes comes both from the right

0:39:59.980 --> 0:40:00.419
<v Speaker 2>and the left.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.020
<v Speaker 8>So I hope that this is a.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.500
<v Speaker 2>Useful interview and useful for some of us who are

0:40:06.580 --> 0:40:11.589
<v Speaker 2>trying to center migration and freedom of movement in our

0:40:11.950 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 2>struggle against fascism. Without further ado, here's Harsha Walia. So

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.380
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to start with maybe just a brief summary

0:40:22.500 --> 0:40:26.020
<v Speaker 2>for our listeners, since the world is on fire and

0:40:26.060 --> 0:40:30.489
<v Speaker 2>things move quickly, about what happened last month in Ceuta.

0:40:30.660 --> 0:40:32.030
<v Speaker 8>I think I'm pronouncing that correctly.

0:40:32.469 --> 0:40:35.230
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and it's almost exactly to the day. It's been

0:40:35.230 --> 0:40:38.890
<v Speaker 9>30 days. And so what happened a month ago is

0:40:38.930 --> 0:40:40.990
<v Speaker 9>approximately 70,000 migrants were.

0:40:43.030 --> 0:40:43.930
<v Speaker 5>From Morocco.

0:40:44.130 --> 0:40:46.170
<v Speaker 9>And here it's important to say, you know, migrants came

0:40:46.250 --> 0:40:49.230
<v Speaker 9>from Morocco, but not all the migrants were Moroccan because

0:40:49.270 --> 0:40:54.410
<v Speaker 9>of course, Morocco is one of many transit routes for

0:40:54.450 --> 0:40:58.770
<v Speaker 9>migrants looking to come through the Mediterranean into Europe. And

0:40:58.830 --> 0:41:02.650
<v Speaker 9>so the 70,000 migrants who came from Morocco were not

0:41:02.710 --> 0:41:08.570
<v Speaker 9>only Moroccan migrants, but included migrants from Sudan, Mali, Yemen, Gaza, Palestine,

0:41:08.570 --> 0:41:13.620
<v Speaker 9>48 and others. And so what happened is 70,000 migrants

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:19.590
<v Speaker 9>transited into Ceuta. And Ceuta is also a transit point

0:41:19.710 --> 0:41:24.970
<v Speaker 9>into the EU. Ceuta is one of the Spanish-held enclaves

0:41:25.150 --> 0:41:30.380
<v Speaker 9>in Moroccan territory and has long been held by Spain

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 9>and is claimed by Spain despite being on the continent

0:41:33.620 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 9>of Africa. And because it is under formal Spanish jurisdiction,

0:41:37.980 --> 0:41:40.940
<v Speaker 9>a lot of migrants looking to come into the EU

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:44.700
<v Speaker 9>have transited through the enclaves, as they're called. So Ceuta

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:48.129
<v Speaker 9>and Melilla. Another one is the Canary Islands. You know,

0:41:48.150 --> 0:41:51.690
<v Speaker 9>since the 1990s, this has been one of the major

0:41:51.750 --> 0:41:56.510
<v Speaker 9>routes of migration. And so while it may seem incredibly

0:41:56.670 --> 0:42:00.130
<v Speaker 9>significant and spectacular, which it was because of the scale,

0:42:01.090 --> 0:42:04.609
<v Speaker 9>the fact that Ceuta and Melilla are transit points into

0:42:04.650 --> 0:42:07.060
<v Speaker 9>the EU for migrants is part of a very long

0:42:07.140 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 9>and ongoing trajectory. And so what we saw, particularly because

0:42:10.660 --> 0:42:15.290
<v Speaker 9>of the scale of 70,000 people crossing into Ceuta was,

0:42:15.350 --> 0:42:20.190
<v Speaker 9>you know, this global kind of uproar that frankly came

0:42:20.410 --> 0:42:23.550
<v Speaker 9>from many parts, you know, came, of course, from the right,

0:42:23.630 --> 0:42:27.170
<v Speaker 9>where the right and, you know, nationalists across the spectrum.

0:42:27.790 --> 0:42:31.170
<v Speaker 9>So the far right, but also conservatives and at a

0:42:31.210 --> 0:42:34.410
<v Speaker 9>global scale, right? So not just in Europe, but also

0:42:34.570 --> 0:42:37.930
<v Speaker 9>in the United States and elsewhere. This fed into, of course,

0:42:37.950 --> 0:42:42.370
<v Speaker 9>the perfect anti-migrant storm that far-right and fascist and conservative

0:42:42.410 --> 0:42:46.890
<v Speaker 9>forces are always fueling. But also we saw a lot of,

0:42:46.890 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 9>I would argue, misinformation from many leftist commentators who arguably

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 9>actually used a lot of right-wing rhetoric to claim that

0:42:55.960 --> 0:43:00.360
<v Speaker 9>this was an attack on Spain because of Spain's very

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:05.050
<v Speaker 9>vocal position in support of Palestine. And so this created

0:43:05.090 --> 0:43:09.250
<v Speaker 9>really a perfect storm for a lot of misinformation across

0:43:09.290 --> 0:43:12.230
<v Speaker 9>the spectrum, particularly for people who had frankly never even

0:43:12.310 --> 0:43:15.090
<v Speaker 9>heard of Ceuta before. And so this is kind of

0:43:15.150 --> 0:43:18.810
<v Speaker 9>what happened both in terms of the really significant scale

0:43:18.850 --> 0:43:22.069
<v Speaker 9>of migration that took place, but also what we saw

0:43:22.170 --> 0:43:24.410
<v Speaker 9>after in terms of how people responded to this moment.

0:43:25.230 --> 0:43:27.009
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for setting it up that way. What does

0:43:27.030 --> 0:43:29.930
<v Speaker 2>that get into for me of interest is the leftist

0:43:30.130 --> 0:43:34.189
<v Speaker 2>misinformation that we saw all over the Internet. But before

0:43:34.230 --> 0:43:35.730
<v Speaker 2>I get into kind of some of the details of

0:43:35.770 --> 0:43:38.629
<v Speaker 2>the aftermath, I also just want to kind of break down.

0:43:38.710 --> 0:43:41.170
<v Speaker 2>Why did migrants think this was a good time to

0:43:41.190 --> 0:43:43.130
<v Speaker 2>try to make it to Europe? Like why in this scale?

0:43:43.730 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's a it's a good question. And, you know,

0:43:45.820 --> 0:43:48.220
<v Speaker 9>I think a lot of what's happening is frankly still

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.859
<v Speaker 9>being pieced together. Because, you know, one of the things

0:43:50.890 --> 0:43:53.890
<v Speaker 9>that we did see in the aftermath was a lot of, you.

0:43:53.670 --> 0:43:56.030
<v Speaker 10>Know, clipping and hypotheses.

0:43:56.510 --> 0:43:58.469
<v Speaker 9>And there are still people on the ground who are

0:43:58.510 --> 0:44:01.350
<v Speaker 9>talking to migrants to find out, you know, why did

0:44:01.390 --> 0:44:04.089
<v Speaker 9>you make this journey at this moment? What is the

0:44:04.130 --> 0:44:07.670
<v Speaker 9>circulation of information that was happening? So a lot of

0:44:07.690 --> 0:44:10.029
<v Speaker 9>that is still coming out, which I think I want

0:44:10.050 --> 0:44:12.620
<v Speaker 9>to emphasize because I think in like a hot take economy,

0:44:12.700 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 9>we don't we aren't sitting with accurate information always. And

0:44:17.380 --> 0:44:20.140
<v Speaker 9>there isn't a simple answer because again, I would emphasize

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.900
<v Speaker 9>that migrants who migrated in that moment, again, were coming

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:26.770
<v Speaker 9>from very different backgrounds. And by backgrounds, I don't just

0:44:26.850 --> 0:44:30.190
<v Speaker 9>mean the kind of national origins that I pointed out,

0:44:30.610 --> 0:44:32.830
<v Speaker 9>but many of the migrants have left, but many of

0:44:32.870 --> 0:44:35.130
<v Speaker 9>the migrants are still there. And so people were in

0:44:35.250 --> 0:44:38.969
<v Speaker 9>very different situations as to why they chose to make

0:44:39.030 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 9>the move in that moment. There isn't a single answer.

0:44:42.010 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 9>Some of the factors that we can point to and

0:44:44.260 --> 0:44:47.460
<v Speaker 9>we can see is there was a Supreme Court decision

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 9>in Spain just a few weeks prior to this mass

0:44:52.140 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 9>migration in July.

0:44:53.860 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 10>And so that decision was in June.

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 9>And that decision was a very specific Supreme Court decision

0:44:59.820 --> 0:45:04.780
<v Speaker 9>in Spain about regularization because Spain has been regularizing migrants,

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:07.540
<v Speaker 9>which has been really significant, actually, in the context of

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 9>this rightward drift in the EU that has been escalating.

0:45:11.180 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 9>Spain's regularization program was significant. And there was a Supreme

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 9>Court decision associated with that about travel and travel routes.

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.350
<v Speaker 9>To kind of put it simply, what we saw is

0:45:21.730 --> 0:45:28.730
<v Speaker 9>several misinterpretations of that Supreme Court decision that started to circulate. And,

0:45:28.750 --> 0:45:31.450
<v Speaker 9>you know, for anyone who is familiar or who has

0:45:31.550 --> 0:45:35.549
<v Speaker 9>family who has been looking to migrate, you know, from

0:45:35.710 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 9>all of the many situations and horrors around.

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 10>The world, we know that you know, information travels fast.

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.650
<v Speaker 9>So one of the kind of conspiracy theories is like,

0:45:43.670 --> 0:45:47.570
<v Speaker 9>there's no way 70,000 people would have all gotten access

0:45:47.590 --> 0:45:50.940
<v Speaker 9>to the same information. And frankly, that is a complete

0:45:50.980 --> 0:45:57.430
<v Speaker 9>misunderstanding of how diasporic communities and communities who are immobilized,

0:45:57.450 --> 0:46:00.590
<v Speaker 9>who are looking to migrate, how information travels.

0:46:00.610 --> 0:46:03.110
<v Speaker 10>Travels much wider. Travels much wider.

0:46:03.250 --> 0:46:06.310
<v Speaker 9>Many of the WhatsApp groups, for example, that in this

0:46:06.370 --> 0:46:09.510
<v Speaker 9>situation people were referencing, there was at least two groups

0:46:09.950 --> 0:46:13.009
<v Speaker 9>that had almost 200,000 people on the WhatsApp groups.

0:46:13.050 --> 0:46:13.609
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah.

0:46:13.950 --> 0:46:17.190
<v Speaker 9>And this is not a conspiracy theory because actually coincidentally yesterday,

0:46:17.250 --> 0:46:21.270
<v Speaker 9>a number of declassified documents were released by Spain. And

0:46:21.290 --> 0:46:23.509
<v Speaker 9>so these Spanish documents revealed that there were some of

0:46:23.530 --> 0:46:27.030
<v Speaker 9>these WhatsApp groups had almost 200,000 people on each of them.

0:46:27.910 --> 0:46:29.300
<v Speaker 9>And so if you think about it, that's just a

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:31.980
<v Speaker 9>fraction of the people, you know? So the issue is

0:46:32.020 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 9>not how information travels. It's just whether people choose to

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 9>act on that information, how verified they think that information is.

0:46:39.180 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 9>And so that was significant. The misinterpretation of the Supreme

0:46:42.620 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 9>Court decision bolstered a lot of these WhatsApp groups to

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:47.220
<v Speaker 9>think like actually now is the moment.

0:46:47.460 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:46:47.980 --> 0:46:50.700
<v Speaker 9>Actually, just yesterday, the information that I was referencing actually

0:46:50.739 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 9>suggested that the Spanish government was told by Spanish intelligence

0:46:55.540 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 9>that there was going to be some significant movement in July,

0:46:59.239 --> 0:46:59.900
<v Speaker 9>in mid-July.

0:46:59.920 --> 0:47:00.820
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:02.950
<v Speaker 9>Because of access to these WhatsApp groups.

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:03.339
<v Speaker 5>Mm-hmm.

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.460
<v Speaker 9>And we know that many of the migrants, particularly non-Moroccan

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.500
<v Speaker 9>migrants in Morocco, were waiting to move in the summer

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 9>because that is actually typically when people move. Not at

0:47:12.700 --> 0:47:15.380
<v Speaker 9>the scale of 70,000, but it is not unheard of

0:47:15.420 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 9>for thousands and thousands of people to be on the

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 9>move through the summer trying to get into Europe, particularly

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 9>crossing through the Mediterranean. So that is actually just, frankly,

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:26.410
<v Speaker 9>a baseline when it comes to a lot of migration.

0:47:26.489 --> 0:47:28.770
<v Speaker 9>And then, of course, we did have the element of

0:47:29.250 --> 0:47:31.569
<v Speaker 9>You know, to what degree did the Moroccan government and

0:47:31.610 --> 0:47:36.009
<v Speaker 9>Moroccan authorities not necessarily, you know, foster this in an

0:47:36.170 --> 0:47:40.830
<v Speaker 9>active way, but definitely suggestions that, you know, Moroccan authorities

0:47:40.930 --> 0:47:42.790
<v Speaker 9>were not as heavy handed as they have been in

0:47:42.830 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 9>the past when collaborating on border securitization and perhaps using

0:47:47.580 --> 0:47:51.940
<v Speaker 9>this moment to leverage with Spain with respect to Western Sahara. So,

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.610
<v Speaker 9>you know, multiple factors were at play. But it is

0:47:55.830 --> 0:47:58.430
<v Speaker 9>the main things that stand out, particularly from migrants who

0:47:58.469 --> 0:48:02.990
<v Speaker 9>both returned or are still in Soweto, is really the

0:48:03.250 --> 0:48:06.859
<v Speaker 9>Supreme Court decision. And then just this kind of surge

0:48:06.910 --> 0:48:09.060
<v Speaker 9>that happened in the moment where more and more people

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:12.580
<v Speaker 9>felt in the moment that they could make the crossing

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 9>because of the seemingly lax border securitization in that moment.

0:48:28.739 --> 0:48:30.930
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to Morocco and Western Sahara in

0:48:30.969 --> 0:48:34.130
<v Speaker 2>just a moment. Listeners will remember or hopefully will remember

0:48:34.350 --> 0:48:39.180
<v Speaker 2>a episode I recently did with Western Sahara activist Mohammed Saddam.

0:48:39.219 --> 0:48:41.399
<v Speaker 2>So I'll link that in the show notes. But before

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.299
<v Speaker 2>we get to that, just to kind of break down

0:48:43.410 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the aftermath, the kind of immediate aftermath we saw in Morocco. Spain,

0:48:47.820 --> 0:48:50.230
<v Speaker 2>and as you said, like, not just Spain, not just Europe,

0:48:50.250 --> 0:48:53.210
<v Speaker 2>but also the United States. But let's maybe start with Spain. Like,

0:48:53.250 --> 0:48:56.390
<v Speaker 2>has there been kind of an anti-immigrant backlash as a

0:48:56.410 --> 0:48:57.109
<v Speaker 2>result of this?

0:48:57.270 --> 0:48:58.710
<v Speaker 8>And what has that looked like?

0:48:59.090 --> 0:49:01.879
<v Speaker 2>And then how has that kind of fed into these narratives, like,

0:49:01.980 --> 0:49:05.240
<v Speaker 2>especially in the United States, like the Great Replacement Theory,

0:49:05.300 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 2>like people really hooked on to these things.

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 8>So maybe you could break that down for us.

0:49:09.530 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, the things that have been happening on

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:14.899
<v Speaker 9>the ground, you know, I'm also obviously not there, but

0:49:15.340 --> 0:49:18.670
<v Speaker 9>being in touch with comrades there and following what's happening

0:49:19.150 --> 0:49:19.969
<v Speaker 9>has been incredible.

0:49:20.700 --> 0:49:21.219
<v Speaker 11>Alarming.

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.460
<v Speaker 9>You know, so it is undeniable, of course, that we

0:49:24.540 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 9>are overall in a crisis of neoliberalism and austerity. And

0:49:27.900 --> 0:49:29.980
<v Speaker 9>we know all of the ways in which that means

0:49:30.020 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 9>people feel intense economic pressures in their lives. Ceuta is

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:38.649
<v Speaker 9>not a huge place in terms of geography and population.

0:49:39.340 --> 0:49:43.240
<v Speaker 9>And so just the ability for the infrastructure, the local

0:49:43.300 --> 0:49:47.339
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure to actually support people in a good way has

0:49:47.380 --> 0:49:51.420
<v Speaker 9>been significantly strained. However, you know, while that is true,

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 9>that is often layered, as we see in many places

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 9>with anti-migrant xenophobia, right, where migrants become the scapegoat for

0:49:59.140 --> 0:50:04.489
<v Speaker 9>capitalist austerity, become the scapegoat around scarce resources. And almost

0:50:04.700 --> 0:50:08.750
<v Speaker 9>every day in Ceuta, there has been anti-migrant protests since.

0:50:09.070 --> 0:50:13.670
<v Speaker 9>the last 30 days, almost every single day. It initially

0:50:14.250 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 9>started by far-right forces coming into Ceuta from other cities,

0:50:20.100 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 9>particularly from Spain and elsewhere, really to foster this phenomenon.

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:29.340
<v Speaker 9>And unfortunately now it has extended into Ceuta locals as well.

0:50:29.430 --> 0:50:32.700
<v Speaker 9>And so Ceuta has historically been known for being a

0:50:32.780 --> 0:50:34.380
<v Speaker 9>very multicultural space.

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 10>You know, it is a borderland.

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.859
<v Speaker 9>And so I use multiculturalism, not in the liberal way,

0:50:38.900 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 9>but in a very sincere way of what it means

0:50:41.580 --> 0:50:43.980
<v Speaker 9>for people to have lived together for a very long time.

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:47.219
<v Speaker 9>And I don't say that to romanticize all the anti-migrant

0:50:47.260 --> 0:50:50.850
<v Speaker 9>violence that has been ongoing and the securitization of the

0:50:50.950 --> 0:50:55.950
<v Speaker 9>enclaves since the 1990s, but I mean within the local communities.

0:50:56.620 --> 0:50:58.980
<v Speaker 9>And that has been fracturing, you know, many of the

0:50:59.060 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 9>organizations that have been operating in Ceuta to support migrants

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:06.430
<v Speaker 9>are now facing attacks. You know, they are being called traitors.

0:51:06.550 --> 0:51:10.430
<v Speaker 9>They are facing a lot of hatred just for supporting migrants,

0:51:10.489 --> 0:51:14.189
<v Speaker 9>just for doing accompaniment, just for doing documentation. And they've

0:51:14.210 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 9>been doing incredibly important documentation work, documenting how migrants have

0:51:18.540 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 9>been stranded alone on the beach. Many migrants have been

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.740
<v Speaker 9>corralled and told that they cannot leave certain areas because

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:28.969
<v Speaker 9>So they are basically enclosed into certain areas of Ceuta.

0:51:29.489 --> 0:51:32.989
<v Speaker 9>Many of them have been denied registration. So registration is

0:51:33.030 --> 0:51:36.320
<v Speaker 9>the process through which you become registered into the state

0:51:36.380 --> 0:51:39.569
<v Speaker 9>registry in order to access supports. Hmm. So they have

0:51:39.610 --> 0:51:42.359
<v Speaker 9>documented that then when they accompany people, they are being

0:51:42.420 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 9>arbitrarily denied. And when they're denied, that means they can't

0:51:45.180 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 9>access any of the supports. There have been beatings by

0:51:48.420 --> 0:51:51.700
<v Speaker 9>local police authorities. There have also been local attacks on

0:51:51.760 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 9>migrants by right forces. So it has been incredibly hard

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 9>and horrific to witness this. And what I find particularly

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:04.460
<v Speaker 9>hard about this moment, just to return to this earlier moment,

0:52:04.540 --> 0:52:09.720
<v Speaker 9>you know, when migrants were first landing on Ceuta in July,

0:52:09.750 --> 0:52:13.370
<v Speaker 9>the way that so many left-wing comrades were quick to

0:52:13.430 --> 0:52:16.609
<v Speaker 9>dismiss it. I'm not saying the left is responsible for

0:52:16.630 --> 0:52:19.089
<v Speaker 9>the violence, but it has meant a very quick turn

0:52:19.130 --> 0:52:22.620
<v Speaker 9>away and abandonment of migrants because people were quick to

0:52:22.660 --> 0:52:24.739
<v Speaker 9>just call it an invasion and say, well, so many

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 9>of the migrants have come back. It was not an issue.

0:52:28.040 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 9>But that ignores the fact that there are, in fact,

0:52:30.219 --> 0:52:33.980
<v Speaker 9>many migrants who are still there And again, particularly migrants

0:52:34.060 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 9>from Palestine, from Yemen, from Mali, from Sudan, who have been, again,

0:52:38.580 --> 0:52:41.700
<v Speaker 9>you know, just kind of stranded on the beaches. And

0:52:41.890 --> 0:52:45.210
<v Speaker 9>for organizations in Ceuta who are supporting migrants and migrant

0:52:45.230 --> 0:52:48.069
<v Speaker 9>justice organizations, you know, they've said that they haven't seen

0:52:48.190 --> 0:52:50.890
<v Speaker 9>anything like this in decades in terms of the work

0:52:50.950 --> 0:52:51.970
<v Speaker 9>and the impact on the ground.

0:52:52.469 --> 0:52:55.690
<v Speaker 2>And just desperate conditions for these people that I think,

0:52:55.750 --> 0:52:59.029
<v Speaker 2>like you said, the left likes, not all the left.

0:52:59.450 --> 0:53:02.230
<v Speaker 8>Let's just be, you know, everybody get upset with me.

0:53:03.210 --> 0:53:06.489
<v Speaker 2>But some large parts of the left and the global

0:53:06.530 --> 0:53:09.450
<v Speaker 2>north that like really loves a neat narrative.

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:10.859
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:53:10.910 --> 0:53:13.980
<v Speaker 8>So let's maybe get into that. Like, why did we see,

0:53:14.739 --> 0:53:15.020
<v Speaker 8>for me.

0:53:15.060 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Especially English speaking influencers and pundits who speak on the left,

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:21.320
<v Speaker 2>like why did they connect this to an Israeli plot?

0:53:22.060 --> 0:53:22.299
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:53:22.380 --> 0:53:25.100
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think what we've seen in the past

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 9>few years since the ongoing genocide is various kinds of

0:53:29.340 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 9>lefts have emerged. One of those lefts has been very

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:38.589
<v Speaker 9>quick on the takes, on the upticks. We see content farming.

0:53:38.989 --> 0:53:41.850
<v Speaker 9>And in particular, we see very simplistic narratives where people

0:53:41.890 --> 0:53:45.969
<v Speaker 9>may not actually know the extent of place-based geographies and

0:53:46.030 --> 0:53:50.150
<v Speaker 9>movements and have only seen clickbait about what countries have

0:53:50.190 --> 0:53:53.109
<v Speaker 9>done to stand up to the Zionist enemy. And that

0:53:53.150 --> 0:53:55.590
<v Speaker 9>is important. Spain, for example, is one of those countries

0:53:55.630 --> 0:53:58.810
<v Speaker 9>that has stood up to the Zionist entity. We saw

0:53:58.850 --> 0:54:01.819
<v Speaker 9>this with, you know, tremendous support, for example, for South

0:54:01.900 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 9>Africa during the ICJ hearing. And at the same time,

0:54:05.219 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 9>we had organizers from Sudan saying, hey, can we talk

0:54:08.420 --> 0:54:12.260
<v Speaker 9>about what's happening between the South African state and the

0:54:12.390 --> 0:54:14.890
<v Speaker 9>UAE and the closer relationships? You know, none of which

0:54:14.950 --> 0:54:17.810
<v Speaker 9>is to simplify in the opposite direction, but it is

0:54:17.850 --> 0:54:21.170
<v Speaker 9>to actually sit with internationalism in a meaningful way and

0:54:21.190 --> 0:54:23.130
<v Speaker 9>to look at all the contours of what is happening.

0:54:23.630 --> 0:54:26.410
<v Speaker 9>And so what we saw in the aftermath of July,

0:54:26.430 --> 0:54:29.630
<v Speaker 9>and really from commentators who, frankly, in my humble opinion,

0:54:29.710 --> 0:54:32.870
<v Speaker 9>have any connection to migrant movements, right? So did not

0:54:32.890 --> 0:54:36.569
<v Speaker 9>know the history of Ceuta, do not understand Ceuta as

0:54:36.630 --> 0:54:41.649
<v Speaker 9>a transit point for many decades, really harping on this

0:54:41.790 --> 0:54:46.989
<v Speaker 9>idea that because it was migrants entering into Ceuta, it

0:54:47.030 --> 0:54:50.090
<v Speaker 9>was an attack on Spanish sovereignty. you know, there was

0:54:50.110 --> 0:54:53.150
<v Speaker 9>all these clips of these migrants are military aged men.

0:54:53.210 --> 0:54:55.270
<v Speaker 9>Just look at them. They're like 18 to 45. And

0:54:55.510 --> 0:54:58.830
<v Speaker 9>it's like, who do you think most migrants are in general?

0:54:58.850 --> 0:55:02.950
<v Speaker 9>Like that is actually the demographic of many migrants, not exclusively,

0:55:03.030 --> 0:55:06.210
<v Speaker 9>of course, but that is the reality of migration, particularly

0:55:06.270 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 9>on dangerous routes, right? That has been one of the

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:11.660
<v Speaker 9>impacts of securitizing the borders is that it does make

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:15.719
<v Speaker 9>it harder for elderly or kids to migrate because those

0:55:15.780 --> 0:55:20.220
<v Speaker 9>routes are becoming more dangerous. The narrative became, look, this

0:55:20.390 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 9>is a U.S.-Israeli-Moroccan-backed plot to destabilize Spain and Spanish sovereignty

0:55:27.700 --> 0:55:30.540
<v Speaker 9>at a time when Spain is standing up to Palestine.

0:55:30.600 --> 0:55:33.910
<v Speaker 9>That was the through line. And all of the evidence

0:55:33.950 --> 0:55:37.870
<v Speaker 9>was clipped and farmed to justify that. And so, you know,

0:55:37.910 --> 0:55:40.930
<v Speaker 9>that was why we saw what we did. I think

0:55:41.070 --> 0:55:45.020
<v Speaker 9>in this moment, we're seeing many other similar narratives in

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:48.299
<v Speaker 9>that trajectory that are not about Ceuta, but that are

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:52.799
<v Speaker 9>in that same vein, where people want to suggest that

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.700
<v Speaker 9>everything is a U.S.-Israeli-backed conspiracy.

0:55:56.140 --> 0:55:58.230
<v Speaker 10>Frankly, you know, people straight up saying, like.

0:55:58.900 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, if anyone is against Spain, they must be

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:05.890
<v Speaker 9>backed by Zionists. Like, you know, and it is clear

0:56:05.950 --> 0:56:10.730
<v Speaker 9>cut and nuance is terrible and nuancing is two-sided, you know?

0:56:10.890 --> 0:56:13.989
<v Speaker 9>And so I think there was an uptick because that

0:56:14.030 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 9>has become part of some segments of leftist discourse.

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:21.780
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, people in the Palestine space, I'll speak for myself

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:27.359
<v Speaker 2>in particular, like this struggle to have a truly internationalist perspective.

0:56:28.280 --> 0:56:33.730
<v Speaker 2>has been a growing struggle in the movement to kind

0:56:33.750 --> 0:56:38.330
<v Speaker 2>of push against the easy narratives that people want to

0:56:38.350 --> 0:56:41.009
<v Speaker 2>latch on to. And your argument is that treating it

0:56:41.050 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 2>as a foreign military maneuver, you're just conceding the far-right's

0:56:45.500 --> 0:57:01.540
<v Speaker 2>premise entirely. So let's maybe also talk about the Moroccan

0:57:01.580 --> 0:57:06.220
<v Speaker 2>role here. You mentioned already that there is an interest

0:57:06.260 --> 0:57:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Moroccan state to use migration as a leverage,

0:57:08.460 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 2>and Western Sahara plays a role in this.

0:57:10.940 --> 0:57:13.910
<v Speaker 8>So could you maybe break that down for us?

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think, as I mentioned, some of this is

0:57:17.180 --> 0:57:21.030
<v Speaker 9>still being parsed out. And so we don't know for sure.

0:57:21.070 --> 0:57:23.590
<v Speaker 9>But what we do know is that Moroccan state authorities

0:57:23.610 --> 0:57:27.770
<v Speaker 9>are likely relaxed their kind of border controls in that moment.

0:57:28.350 --> 0:57:30.390
<v Speaker 9>And I think it is important here again to emphasize that,

0:57:30.430 --> 0:57:33.250
<v Speaker 9>you know, both Morocco and Spain have for a long

0:57:33.290 --> 0:57:35.580
<v Speaker 9>time collaborated on border controls.

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:37.950
<v Speaker 9>And so. You know, one of the arguments that I

0:57:38.030 --> 0:57:41.010
<v Speaker 9>generally make is that we have to understand borders as

0:57:41.030 --> 0:57:44.230
<v Speaker 9>a linchpin in state violence. That, you know, while there

0:57:44.310 --> 0:57:47.850
<v Speaker 9>are many things often at play in terms of global geopolitics,

0:57:47.910 --> 0:57:52.790
<v Speaker 9>whether it's imperialism, of course, or bilateral kind of relationships

0:57:52.850 --> 0:57:55.950
<v Speaker 9>between various states, one of the things they have always

0:57:56.030 --> 0:58:00.040
<v Speaker 9>collaborated on and continue to collaborate on is borders. It's

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:05.460
<v Speaker 9>completely global. And Spain and Morocco have long collaborated. Spain

0:58:05.500 --> 0:58:10.050
<v Speaker 9>has often funded Moroccan border securitization. And so while there

0:58:10.170 --> 0:58:14.110
<v Speaker 9>are many significant differences between Spain and Morocco, for example,

0:58:14.190 --> 0:58:17.630
<v Speaker 9>on their positions and alignments on Palestine and You know,

0:58:17.750 --> 0:58:25.330
<v Speaker 9>Morocco's normalization, Spain's significant stance against Zionism and Israel, although imperfect,

0:58:25.350 --> 0:58:27.590
<v Speaker 9>is significantly more than Morocco.

0:58:27.610 --> 0:58:28.550
<v Speaker 10>That is undeniable.

0:58:29.180 --> 0:58:32.820
<v Speaker 9>Despite Spain and Morocco's significant differences on Western Sahara, they

0:58:32.860 --> 0:58:35.060
<v Speaker 9>have collaborated on border securitization.

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 10>So that is important to hold as the overall context.

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:40.100
<v Speaker 10>And then in this moment.

0:58:40.460 --> 0:58:42.900
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's hard to say precisely because, again, we

0:58:42.940 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 9>don't have all of that kind of information. But what

0:58:46.060 --> 0:58:49.080
<v Speaker 9>we do know is that at different times, Spain has

0:58:49.300 --> 0:58:52.580
<v Speaker 9>leveraged the border and Morocco has leveraged the border for

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:55.970
<v Speaker 9>their own personal interests, particularly around Western Sahara. And with

0:58:56.010 --> 0:59:00.080
<v Speaker 9>respect to Spain, Spain has actually fluctuated on its position

0:59:00.340 --> 0:59:04.930
<v Speaker 9>on Western Sahara over the past several years. In 2021,

0:59:04.930 --> 0:59:08.330
<v Speaker 9>as we know, Spain reversed its position on supporting an

0:59:08.350 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 9>independent referendum on Western Sahara. This moment in 2026 has

0:59:13.020 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 9>been really important because Algeria and Spain have reestablished relationships.

0:59:19.200 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 9>While we don't know the extent of that relationship, we

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:28.090
<v Speaker 9>know that those relationships being reestablished did cause some discontent

0:59:28.690 --> 0:59:31.690
<v Speaker 9>for the Moroccan state. And so, you know, we can

0:59:31.770 --> 0:59:34.730
<v Speaker 9>speculate that that is one of the reasons, particularly in

0:59:34.770 --> 0:59:39.650
<v Speaker 9>this moment, that Morocco may have decided to really leverage

0:59:39.930 --> 0:59:43.350
<v Speaker 9>the border in a particular way to have Spain rethink

0:59:43.470 --> 0:59:47.370
<v Speaker 9>any possibility of rethinking its position on Western Sahara. And

0:59:47.390 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 9>to emphasize, Spain has not yet reversed its decision from 2021.

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:55.580
<v Speaker 9>But people understood that maybe this gesture towards Algeria might

0:59:55.660 --> 0:59:58.860
<v Speaker 9>suggest that Spain was going to change its position on

0:59:58.880 --> 0:59:59.540
<v Speaker 9>Western Sahara.

0:59:59.820 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 8>Interesting.

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:00.580
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

1:00:00.940 --> 1:00:03.880
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's a very important point to underscore

1:00:03.940 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>that there is, as you've mentioned in your previous work,

1:00:06.300 --> 1:00:10.330
<v Speaker 2>this kind of externalization. of enforcement, and that there are

1:00:10.430 --> 1:00:12.990
<v Speaker 2>all these states around the world that play that role.

1:00:13.470 --> 1:00:16.220
<v Speaker 2>You know, Fortress Europe, I don't know, catchphrase is the

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>right term here. But like, we talked a lot about

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Fortress Europe, like, I don't know, 10 years ago, and

1:00:21.300 --> 1:00:23.700
<v Speaker 2>the role that a lot of these Middle Eastern states,

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.500
<v Speaker 2>despite a lot of differences, like you said, like.

1:00:26.500 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 8>Play in the maintenance of border imperialism.

1:00:30.780 --> 1:00:33.300
<v Speaker 2>I kind of want to maybe end on this idea

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>from some of your commentary on this on this particular

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:38.540
<v Speaker 2>incident a month ago about how, you know, we need

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:41.430
<v Speaker 2>to understand like people will keep crossing. That's going to

1:00:41.470 --> 1:00:45.270
<v Speaker 2>be the significance. So for those of us who aren't

1:00:45.390 --> 1:00:49.090
<v Speaker 2>taking an anti-immigrant position, either from the left or the right,

1:00:49.110 --> 1:00:52.530
<v Speaker 2>like what should someone who takes that seriously actually be

1:00:52.660 --> 1:00:53.700
<v Speaker 2>organizing towards right now?

1:00:54.260 --> 1:00:55.460
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I love that question.

1:00:55.740 --> 1:00:59.410
<v Speaker 9>Because for me, when I think about the externalization of borders,

1:00:59.510 --> 1:01:02.290
<v Speaker 9>as you just were talking about, to me, it means

1:01:02.330 --> 1:01:05.890
<v Speaker 9>that if we see bordering as happening, not just as,

1:01:06.030 --> 1:01:07.930
<v Speaker 9>you know, a line on a map that's, you know,

1:01:07.970 --> 1:01:11.410
<v Speaker 9>about people crossing in particular moments, or, you know, especially

1:01:11.450 --> 1:01:14.010
<v Speaker 9>right now, what's happening, for example, in the US, or

1:01:14.050 --> 1:01:18.100
<v Speaker 9>what we see with AFD's victory in a region of Germany,

1:01:18.580 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 9>all of this to me really points to like, it

1:01:20.820 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 9>is impossible to separate out the rise of fascism from

1:01:24.700 --> 1:01:28.450
<v Speaker 9>anti-migrant racism. And so when I think about, you know,

1:01:28.610 --> 1:01:33.150
<v Speaker 9>what can we do to support migrants, it really is

1:01:33.330 --> 1:01:37.990
<v Speaker 9>a much broader struggle to dismantle fascism because despite all

1:01:38.030 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 9>their differences and all polls for the past decade have

1:01:40.910 --> 1:01:44.620
<v Speaker 9>shown this, that in different parts of the world, people

1:01:44.780 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 9>vote for fascist parties for different reasons, right? Because obviously

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:51.780
<v Speaker 9>not every geography is the same. But the two most

1:01:51.860 --> 1:01:57.630
<v Speaker 9>significant similarities is anti-Muslim racism and anti-migrant racism. That is

1:01:57.670 --> 1:02:02.390
<v Speaker 9>the most consistent similarity in very disparate parts of the world. Because,

1:02:02.430 --> 1:02:05.890
<v Speaker 9>you know, for example, white supremacy is not necessarily at

1:02:05.970 --> 1:02:09.210
<v Speaker 9>play in India, right? Like that is not the governing

1:02:09.430 --> 1:02:13.390
<v Speaker 9>framework for fascism, but it is Hindutva, which is motivated

1:02:13.630 --> 1:02:18.330
<v Speaker 9>by anti-Muslim racism, caste supremacy, and also anti-migrant racism, right?

1:02:18.410 --> 1:02:21.340
<v Speaker 9>All of the changes that we're seeing under Hindutva that

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:25.440
<v Speaker 9>are denationalizing and stripping people of citizenship, particularly from Muslim

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 9>regions of India. So those are very connected in many

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:29.890
<v Speaker 9>different parts of the world. And so I think it

1:02:29.950 --> 1:02:33.870
<v Speaker 9>is so important to understand the ways in which anti-migrant

1:02:33.910 --> 1:02:37.250
<v Speaker 9>racism is not only about migrants on the move, but

1:02:37.270 --> 1:02:39.790
<v Speaker 9>it is part of a much bigger project of fascism.

1:02:40.090 --> 1:02:45.390
<v Speaker 9>And so dismantling fascism is actually so central to thinking

1:02:45.430 --> 1:02:49.270
<v Speaker 9>about no borders and the freedom to move. And also,

1:02:49.570 --> 1:02:52.110
<v Speaker 9>for me, it really is about the freedom to stay, right?

1:02:52.130 --> 1:02:56.140
<v Speaker 9>So all of our struggles against imperialism, but an anti-imperialism

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:59.940
<v Speaker 9>that's inflected with internationalism, that centers, you know, the way

1:02:59.960 --> 1:03:04.060
<v Speaker 9>in which borders are a structuring of imperialism, that we

1:03:04.100 --> 1:03:08.320
<v Speaker 9>cannot continue to see the nation state as an anti-imperialist formation.

1:03:09.030 --> 1:03:10.290
<v Speaker 10>The nation state as a form.

1:03:10.330 --> 1:03:13.170
<v Speaker 9>I'm not talking about particular governments, you know, whether they're

1:03:13.190 --> 1:03:16.100
<v Speaker 9>anti-imperialist or not, but as a form. And so thinking

1:03:16.140 --> 1:03:21.080
<v Speaker 9>about anti-imperialism from an internationalist perspective is so central.

1:03:20.780 --> 1:03:21.780
<v Speaker 10>To migrant struggles.

1:03:21.820 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, like what is, how do we make sure

1:03:23.340 --> 1:03:27.020
<v Speaker 9>that people are not being displaced and immobilized by bordering

1:03:27.080 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 9>regimes and the dismantling of capitalism? So for me, really

1:03:30.490 --> 1:03:34.190
<v Speaker 9>thinking about bordering as a through line through our struggles

1:03:34.230 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 9>for abolition, through our struggles against imperialism, through our struggles

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:41.680
<v Speaker 9>against displacement and genocide and gentrification, all of these are

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:45.120
<v Speaker 9>very similar forces, right? Very different, of course, in how

1:03:45.200 --> 1:03:48.500
<v Speaker 9>people are impacted, but similar in their logics. So to me,

1:03:48.540 --> 1:03:51.820
<v Speaker 9>thinking about bordering as central is how we actually fight

1:03:51.840 --> 1:03:53.660
<v Speaker 9>for people on the move. It is to refuse to

1:03:53.720 --> 1:03:58.110
<v Speaker 9>silo migrants into this other struggle because that is actually

1:03:58.150 --> 1:04:00.669
<v Speaker 9>what the right relies on, right? Like if we actually

1:04:00.690 --> 1:04:03.050
<v Speaker 9>think about it, migrant is one of the most state

1:04:03.090 --> 1:04:07.260
<v Speaker 9>constructed categories. Like we know everything is constructed. Race is constructed.

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:12.460
<v Speaker 9>Gender is constructed. But migrant truly is so constructed. You know,

1:04:12.500 --> 1:04:15.980
<v Speaker 9>it's literally just about a paper. And so, you know,

1:04:16.020 --> 1:04:19.070
<v Speaker 9>to refuse to feed into the idea of that construction

1:04:19.090 --> 1:04:22.350
<v Speaker 9>is to understand migration as inherently connected to all of

1:04:22.410 --> 1:04:22.990
<v Speaker 9>these struggles.

1:04:23.050 --> 1:04:23.250
<v Speaker 7>Right.

1:04:23.270 --> 1:04:27.050
<v Speaker 9>It is actually a symptom. and cannot be siloed as

1:04:27.090 --> 1:04:30.140
<v Speaker 9>a kind of separate side issue that people who stand

1:04:30.160 --> 1:04:33.160
<v Speaker 9>for migrant justice are just, you know, this little pro-immigrant

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:36.340
<v Speaker 9>silo alongside all these struggles. It is to see bordering

1:04:36.720 --> 1:04:40.360
<v Speaker 9>as the linchpin that sustains so many other forms of violence.

1:04:40.820 --> 1:04:42.830
<v Speaker 8>No, that's so well put.

1:04:42.890 --> 1:04:46.010
<v Speaker 2>I think we all could do in all of our

1:04:46.670 --> 1:04:49.790
<v Speaker 2>respective communities to do a little bit more work understanding

1:04:49.830 --> 1:04:53.300
<v Speaker 2>what fascism actually is. Like, What are the building blocks?

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:57.140
<v Speaker 2>What are the mechanisms of fascism? And if there's consistency

1:04:57.380 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>in being anti-fascist, then you see this very clearly that

1:05:01.580 --> 1:05:05.060
<v Speaker 2>the immigration issue is essential. But unfortunately, there is not

1:05:05.100 --> 1:05:07.770
<v Speaker 2>always consistency. But yeah, thank you so much, Harsha. This

1:05:07.790 --> 1:05:10.750
<v Speaker 2>has been such a wonderful conversation. And I know that

1:05:10.770 --> 1:05:12.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people will get a lot out of it.

1:05:12.090 --> 1:05:13.050
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for your time.

1:05:13.310 --> 1:05:15.189
<v Speaker 10>Thank you so much. And thank you for your work.

1:05:15.630 --> 1:05:17.730
<v Speaker 10>Your work is just so deeply appreciated.

1:05:17.810 --> 1:05:18.770
<v Speaker 14>Please know that.

1:05:18.790 --> 1:05:19.490
<v Speaker 2>Oh, thank you so much.

1:05:19.510 --> 1:05:20.710
<v Speaker 8>I appreciate it. All right.

1:05:20.870 --> 1:05:21.410
<v Speaker 6>Take care, everybody.

1:05:33.510 --> 1:05:36.070
<v Speaker 15>Welcome to It Could Happen Here, I'm Kevin Foster, and

1:05:36.110 --> 1:05:39.890
<v Speaker 15>today we're separating the art from the artist, specifically taking

1:05:39.970 --> 1:05:44.290
<v Speaker 15>Macklemore's solid political takes and isolating them from his, let's

1:05:44.350 --> 1:05:47.410
<v Speaker 15>just say, iconic bars like What Up, I Got a

1:05:47.430 --> 1:05:50.810
<v Speaker 15>Big Cock. For those who aren't caught up, Macklemore was

1:05:50.890 --> 1:05:53.880
<v Speaker 15>touring with Ed Sheeran not long ago before he was

1:05:53.950 --> 1:05:58.460
<v Speaker 15>removed from the tour for espousing pro-Palestine statements on stage

1:05:58.580 --> 1:06:03.020
<v Speaker 15>at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. Specifically, he said Free

1:06:03.100 --> 1:06:06.900
<v Speaker 15>Palestine a few times and thanked students at Columbia University

1:06:07.060 --> 1:06:11.320
<v Speaker 15>for kicking off the encampments movement in spring of 2024.

1:06:11.320 --> 1:06:14.840
<v Speaker 15>Those students inspired his song Hins Hall, the title student

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:19.190
<v Speaker 15>protesters gave Columbia's Hamilton Hall, named after Hind Rajab, a

1:06:19.250 --> 1:06:22.530
<v Speaker 15>five-year-old who was brutally murdered by the Israeli Defense Forces

1:06:22.650 --> 1:06:27.340
<v Speaker 15>in Gaza in January of 2024. In a beautiful case

1:06:27.440 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 15>of leopards eating faces, Ed Sheeran's entire lineup of opening

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:34.460
<v Speaker 15>acts and his backing band withdrew from the tour in

1:06:34.520 --> 1:06:38.820
<v Speaker 15>solidarity with Macklemore. In his next performance, Sheeran gave a

1:06:38.900 --> 1:06:41.750
<v Speaker 15>sort of apology speech to the crowd, reading off a

1:06:41.810 --> 1:06:45.230
<v Speaker 15>teleprompter in which he did not use the words genocide

1:06:45.350 --> 1:06:49.150
<v Speaker 15>or Palestinian. Rather than focusing on that, due to the

1:06:49.290 --> 1:06:54.110
<v Speaker 15>outstanding negative response to McLemore's statements from Zionist billionaires, I

1:06:54.130 --> 1:06:56.550
<v Speaker 15>think it's worth listening to some of what he actually

1:06:56.630 --> 1:06:59.890
<v Speaker 15>said on stage. Here's a clip from his Instagram.

1:07:00.250 --> 1:07:06.250
<v Speaker 13>To all of my Jewish brothers and sisters, criticism of Israel,

1:07:07.130 --> 1:07:12.390
<v Speaker 13>criticism of apartheid, being against genocide in no way is

1:07:12.430 --> 1:07:19.030
<v Speaker 13>a criticism of you. My message is for peace, love,

1:07:19.090 --> 1:07:23.070
<v Speaker 13>for all human beings to be treated with dignity, respect,

1:07:23.490 --> 1:07:24.290
<v Speaker 13>and equality.

1:07:25.150 --> 1:07:28.820
<v Speaker 11>So I say free Palestine. I say free Lebanon.

1:07:29.030 --> 1:07:30.260
<v Speaker 5>I say free Cuba.

1:07:30.460 --> 1:07:34.500
<v Speaker 15>I say free Congo, free Sudan, free all.

1:07:34.440 --> 1:07:39.550
<v Speaker 13>People in America living in fear over this terrorist organization ICE.

1:07:44.850 --> 1:07:48.370
<v Speaker 13>None of us will be free until we are all free.

1:07:48.650 --> 1:07:50.260
<v Speaker 11>This song is called Hen's Hall.

1:07:51.410 --> 1:07:54.560
<v Speaker 15>Some deeply frightening stuff in there, at least for Robert Kraft,

1:07:54.640 --> 1:07:58.820
<v Speaker 15>the pro-Israel billionaire owner of the New England Patriots football team,

1:07:59.080 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 15>and Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts near Boston, where McLemore

1:08:03.800 --> 1:08:07.290
<v Speaker 15>was set to appear on tour with Sheeran. Kraft was

1:08:07.370 --> 1:08:11.390
<v Speaker 15>not happy with McLemore's support of Palestinian equal rights on stage,

1:08:11.510 --> 1:08:14.410
<v Speaker 15>and he confirmed to Rolling Stone that he barred McLemore

1:08:14.450 --> 1:08:18.450
<v Speaker 15>from appearing at the Boston shows over, quote, recent actions,

1:08:18.670 --> 1:08:21.979
<v Speaker 15>material shared from the stage during Ed Sheeran's shows in

1:08:22.070 --> 1:08:26.300
<v Speaker 15>New Jersey, and a broader history of anti-Semitic rhetoric and

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:29.620
<v Speaker 15>imagery that we believe has been deeply offensive and hurtful

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:34.240
<v Speaker 15>to the Jewish community, unquote. Despite McLemore's clear calls for

1:08:34.300 --> 1:08:38.070
<v Speaker 15>equality and peace, Kraft felt his presence at Gillette Stadium

1:08:38.110 --> 1:08:41.629
<v Speaker 15>would stymie the supposed goal of providing a, quote, welcoming

1:08:41.689 --> 1:08:44.900
<v Speaker 15>environment for all guests and ensuring that all events held

1:08:44.979 --> 1:08:48.939
<v Speaker 15>at our venue do not provide a platform for hate speech, unquote.

1:08:49.620 --> 1:08:53.200
<v Speaker 15>Funnily enough, those shows ended up getting cancelled anyway due

1:08:53.260 --> 1:08:57.570
<v Speaker 15>to severe weather warnings. But Kraft allegedly did not stop there.

1:08:58.050 --> 1:09:01.099
<v Speaker 15>According to a post by Macklemore Followers, his removal from

1:09:01.140 --> 1:09:04.559
<v Speaker 15>the tour, Sheeran apparently said that Kraft had rallied other

1:09:04.600 --> 1:09:08.520
<v Speaker 15>stadium owners with an ultimatum, quoting from that post, if

1:09:08.620 --> 1:09:11.560
<v Speaker 15>McLemore stays on the tour, you will not be allowed

1:09:11.620 --> 1:09:15.820
<v Speaker 15>to play in our venues, unquote. Messina Touring Group, the

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:19.050
<v Speaker 15>promoter of the US portion of Sheeran's tour, said, said

1:09:19.090 --> 1:09:21.490
<v Speaker 15>in a statement that they were notified by venues from

1:09:21.510 --> 1:09:24.180
<v Speaker 15>the upcoming U.S. tour dates that they would not allow

1:09:24.220 --> 1:09:28.179
<v Speaker 15>a concert to take place with Macklemore in the lineup. Obviously,

1:09:28.260 --> 1:09:31.960
<v Speaker 15>this represents a serious affront to freedom of speech, something

1:09:31.979 --> 1:09:34.480
<v Speaker 15>that is far from new on the matter of Palestine.

1:09:34.979 --> 1:09:37.760
<v Speaker 15>As of yet, Kraft has not discussed or denied the

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:42.010
<v Speaker 15>allegations of mounting this pressure campaign against the rapper. In

1:09:42.050 --> 1:09:45.889
<v Speaker 15>response to the controversy, basically everyone and their mother chimed in,

1:09:46.150 --> 1:09:51.150
<v Speaker 15>including Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who pretty well lays out the

1:09:51.189 --> 1:09:53.000
<v Speaker 15>real focus of this episode.

1:09:53.420 --> 1:09:58.660
<v Speaker 16>This is about how just a handful of stadium owners

1:09:58.939 --> 1:10:03.360
<v Speaker 16>and the elite can prevent an entire massive issue, in

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:07.050
<v Speaker 16>this case the genocide in Gaza, but it doesn't stop there.

1:10:07.590 --> 1:10:10.230
<v Speaker 16>It could be speaking out about AI. It could be

1:10:10.270 --> 1:10:12.330
<v Speaker 16>speaking out about any issue.

1:10:13.770 --> 1:10:17.509
<v Speaker 15>Here's where things get interesting. Rolling Stone lists seven stadium

1:10:17.570 --> 1:10:21.330
<v Speaker 15>venues that allegedly objected to McLemore's inclusion in the tour.

1:10:21.650 --> 1:10:24.690
<v Speaker 15>And of those seven, five are publicly owned by either

1:10:24.750 --> 1:10:28.250
<v Speaker 15>the city, county, or state in which they reside. I

1:10:28.290 --> 1:10:30.470
<v Speaker 15>could spend quite a lot of time talking about how

1:10:30.490 --> 1:10:33.070
<v Speaker 15>I think Ed Sheeran is a coward, how it is

1:10:33.150 --> 1:10:36.530
<v Speaker 15>a political statement to fold in favor of genocide deniers.

1:10:37.060 --> 1:10:39.340
<v Speaker 15>But what I'm far more interested in is the First

1:10:39.400 --> 1:10:43.120
<v Speaker 15>Amendment implications of Kraft's alleged actions and the ways in

1:10:43.160 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 15>which billionaires are able to wield authority over our rights,

1:10:46.820 --> 1:10:50.939
<v Speaker 15>even through public institutions and capital. To discuss this in depth,

1:10:51.140 --> 1:10:54.220
<v Speaker 15>I've interviewed friend of the pod, Mo Meltzer Cohen, a

1:10:54.260 --> 1:10:57.839
<v Speaker 15>law professor at CUNY School of Law, experienced in defense

1:10:57.880 --> 1:11:02.080
<v Speaker 15>of people targeted on the basis of First Amendment protected beliefs, identities,

1:11:02.220 --> 1:11:07.970
<v Speaker 15>and association. Let's dive right into that. I'm kind of

1:11:08.050 --> 1:11:11.090
<v Speaker 15>wondering if you can just tell me from what you

1:11:11.150 --> 1:11:14.200
<v Speaker 15>know about this case, what do you make of a

1:11:14.979 --> 1:11:19.800
<v Speaker 15>billionaire kind of organizing a censorship campaign like this? Have

1:11:19.820 --> 1:11:24.540
<v Speaker 15>you seen similar things in different contexts around free speech?

1:11:25.060 --> 1:11:25.860
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly.

1:11:25.939 --> 1:11:29.380
<v Speaker 6>And there are all manner of ways in which coercive

1:11:29.500 --> 1:11:34.330
<v Speaker 6>social or economic pressure is brought to bear on different

1:11:34.430 --> 1:11:40.100
<v Speaker 6>people or different events or forums. in order to constrain

1:11:40.120 --> 1:11:46.420
<v Speaker 6>the expressive conduct of different people or different groups. There's

1:11:46.460 --> 1:11:50.440
<v Speaker 6>certainly nothing at all that is unique or unusual about that.

1:11:51.280 --> 1:11:55.080
<v Speaker 6>I think what's important to recognize before we really get

1:11:55.120 --> 1:11:58.439
<v Speaker 6>too deep into this is when we're talking about free

1:11:58.479 --> 1:12:03.050
<v Speaker 6>speech principles, We can talk about free speech or free

1:12:03.090 --> 1:12:09.240
<v Speaker 6>expression as a shared cultural value, but the First Amendment

1:12:10.000 --> 1:12:14.560
<v Speaker 6>only applies to the government, right? So when we're talking

1:12:14.600 --> 1:12:18.360
<v Speaker 6>about censorship, we need to be clear about whether we're

1:12:18.400 --> 1:12:26.710
<v Speaker 6>talking about a private individual or company refusing to platform

1:12:26.870 --> 1:12:33.849
<v Speaker 6>particular speech. Which is certainly censorship, but it isn't government

1:12:33.950 --> 1:12:38.910
<v Speaker 6>censorship of the kind that the First Amendment is concerned.

1:12:38.430 --> 1:12:39.910
<v Speaker 1>With, right?

1:12:40.110 --> 1:12:40.330
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

1:12:40.910 --> 1:12:44.850
<v Speaker 6>The First Amendment, as a legal principle, a set of

1:12:44.900 --> 1:12:49.440
<v Speaker 6>legal principles, is a constraint on the power of the

1:12:49.860 --> 1:12:56.870
<v Speaker 6>government to censor political speech or to censor free expression, right?

1:12:56.970 --> 1:13:00.650
<v Speaker 6>It's a constraint on the power of the state to

1:13:01.729 --> 1:13:08.099
<v Speaker 6>restrict people's ability to speak, to associate with each other,

1:13:08.640 --> 1:13:13.759
<v Speaker 6>to believe freely. And so I think what's interesting about

1:13:13.979 --> 1:13:19.880
<v Speaker 6>this particular situation that you've raised is that, you know,

1:13:19.900 --> 1:13:24.650
<v Speaker 6>an event planning company or a private theater or Robert

1:13:24.729 --> 1:13:30.860
<v Speaker 6>Kraft himself as an individual, are certainly at liberty to

1:13:31.900 --> 1:13:36.880
<v Speaker 6>decline to give a platform to any speech that they

1:13:37.040 --> 1:13:43.890
<v Speaker 6>find offensive. Robert Kraft takes umbrage at somebody's music. He

1:13:44.050 --> 1:13:47.570
<v Speaker 6>is under no obligation to subsidize it, to support it,

1:13:47.630 --> 1:13:51.750
<v Speaker 6>to give it a platform. But you've pointed out that

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:57.620
<v Speaker 6>some of these stadiums at which these performances were scheduled

1:13:57.660 --> 1:14:02.210
<v Speaker 6>to occur are owned by cities, are municipally owned or

1:14:02.250 --> 1:14:04.690
<v Speaker 6>are owned by the state. I think one of them

1:14:04.729 --> 1:14:07.790
<v Speaker 6>you said is owned by the state of Florida. Yeah.

1:14:07.850 --> 1:14:10.050
<v Speaker 15>So I can like dive into a little bit of

1:14:10.070 --> 1:14:14.320
<v Speaker 15>the details on that. There's specifically this, the stadiums that

1:14:14.360 --> 1:14:19.220
<v Speaker 15>are in Philadelphia, Atlanta, Tampa, Indianapolis, and Arlington, Texas are

1:14:19.650 --> 1:14:23.019
<v Speaker 15>They're not all operated by public entities, but they are

1:14:23.060 --> 1:14:26.139
<v Speaker 15>all owned by public entities that between, you know, city,

1:14:26.220 --> 1:14:29.600
<v Speaker 15>county and state. But in the examples where they are

1:14:29.660 --> 1:14:33.980
<v Speaker 15>privately operated, it's like the Atlanta Falcons or the Philadelphia Eagles,

1:14:34.560 --> 1:14:37.690
<v Speaker 15>but I reached out to these different groups, and in

1:14:37.750 --> 1:14:40.830
<v Speaker 15>some cases, they tried to push it on to the operators.

1:14:40.950 --> 1:14:43.210
<v Speaker 15>Like in Philadelphia, they told me to reach out to

1:14:43.250 --> 1:14:46.880
<v Speaker 15>the Eagles for Lincoln Financial Stadium. They did not respond

1:14:46.900 --> 1:14:49.900
<v Speaker 15>to my emails. And then I had this, I think

1:14:49.920 --> 1:14:53.420
<v Speaker 15>it was Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. They did actually respond,

1:14:53.820 --> 1:14:57.510
<v Speaker 15>but that was from the Capital Improvement Board for Marion County, Indiana.

1:14:57.530 --> 1:15:02.180
<v Speaker 15>And they said, quote, we can confirm Messina Touring's announcement

1:15:02.240 --> 1:15:05.160
<v Speaker 15>that Macklemore will not be performing at the upcoming show.

1:15:05.560 --> 1:15:07.710
<v Speaker 15>And then they said Lucas Oil Stadium is a public

1:15:07.729 --> 1:15:11.229
<v Speaker 15>facility and as such is content neutral, which, you know,

1:15:11.270 --> 1:15:13.710
<v Speaker 15>I had to follow up and ask about that. And

1:15:13.830 --> 1:15:16.309
<v Speaker 15>they didn't respond to that. But it's a bit silly

1:15:16.350 --> 1:15:19.480
<v Speaker 15>when they're sort of barring a performer. But like you said,

1:15:19.520 --> 1:15:22.679
<v Speaker 15>where I feel like this was especially sort of troubling

1:15:22.740 --> 1:15:28.020
<v Speaker 15>was in Tampa. They're both owned publicly and it's operated

1:15:28.060 --> 1:15:30.820
<v Speaker 15>by the Tampa Sports Authority, who did not respond to

1:15:30.860 --> 1:15:34.830
<v Speaker 15>my request for comment. And that seems to create this

1:15:34.850 --> 1:15:38.170
<v Speaker 15>sort of complex situation. I don't know exactly what all

1:15:38.189 --> 1:15:42.170
<v Speaker 15>the contracts are behind the scenes and who gets to

1:15:42.229 --> 1:15:44.269
<v Speaker 15>control these things. But if it's a publicly owned and

1:15:44.330 --> 1:15:47.610
<v Speaker 15>operated facility, I mean, does that raise some concerns?

1:15:48.120 --> 1:15:52.390
<v Speaker 6>It sure does. And so It's interesting that they reached

1:15:52.450 --> 1:15:55.090
<v Speaker 6>back out to you that Lucas Oil Stadium said, we

1:15:55.170 --> 1:15:59.010
<v Speaker 6>are content neutral. So that's a legal term of art.

1:15:59.110 --> 1:16:01.030
<v Speaker 6>So let's keep them out a little bit.

1:16:01.520 --> 1:16:01.690
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

1:16:02.350 --> 1:16:05.820
<v Speaker 6>So as I said, the First Amendment is a constraint

1:16:05.920 --> 1:16:11.900
<v Speaker 6>on the power of the government to dictate speech, right?

1:16:12.360 --> 1:16:17.000
<v Speaker 6>It says the government cannot be the arbiter of expression.

1:16:17.760 --> 1:16:22.229
<v Speaker 6>And so- if you have a stadium that is owned

1:16:22.930 --> 1:16:29.870
<v Speaker 6>by the government, presumably that forum is a public forum

1:16:30.030 --> 1:16:34.490
<v Speaker 6>in the same way that a public park would be

1:16:34.590 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 6>considered a public forum. And that's legally significant. Why is

1:16:40.479 --> 1:16:47.339
<v Speaker 6>that legally significant? Because in what's called a traditional public forum, land,

1:16:47.700 --> 1:16:52.520
<v Speaker 6>an area that is owned by the government. Well, the

1:16:52.720 --> 1:16:59.980
<v Speaker 6>government is permitted to impose constraints on the time, place,

1:17:00.280 --> 1:17:04.920
<v Speaker 6>and manner of expression. Those constraints, first of all, they

1:17:04.939 --> 1:17:09.519
<v Speaker 6>have to be reasonable constraints. And those constraints may not

1:17:09.600 --> 1:17:14.849
<v Speaker 6>be imposed on the basis of content or viewpoint discrimination.

1:17:15.630 --> 1:17:15.810
<v Speaker 3>Right?

1:17:15.910 --> 1:17:18.890
<v Speaker 6>So that's what they're saying when Lucas Oil Stadium says,

1:17:19.790 --> 1:17:23.130
<v Speaker 6>Lucas Oil Stadium is content neutral. It's a very inelegant

1:17:23.189 --> 1:17:27.679
<v Speaker 6>way of saying we aren't discriminating on the basis of viewpoint.

1:17:28.479 --> 1:17:31.979
<v Speaker 6>So constraints may be imposed, but they have to be

1:17:32.040 --> 1:17:37.680
<v Speaker 6>content neutral. They can't be based on viewpoint discrimination. They

1:17:37.780 --> 1:17:42.720
<v Speaker 6>have to be narrowly tailored to to serve a significant

1:17:42.880 --> 1:17:47.640
<v Speaker 6>government purpose or a significant government interest. And there are

1:17:47.660 --> 1:17:51.780
<v Speaker 6>a range of things that are understood to be legitimate

1:17:51.900 --> 1:17:57.220
<v Speaker 6>or valid significant government interests, right? They are things like

1:17:57.960 --> 1:18:03.970
<v Speaker 6>public safety, making sure that school children's educational activities are

1:18:04.050 --> 1:18:09.870
<v Speaker 6>not disrupted, right? Making sure that people have access to

1:18:10.150 --> 1:18:15.810
<v Speaker 6>and from public buildings, right? These would be considered valid

1:18:16.410 --> 1:18:22.059
<v Speaker 6>government interests. Now that issue sort of points up the

1:18:22.140 --> 1:18:27.660
<v Speaker 6>fact that with respect to stadiums in particular, there are

1:18:27.939 --> 1:18:33.620
<v Speaker 6>frequently events held at stadiums where in the wake of

1:18:33.720 --> 1:18:39.600
<v Speaker 6>those events, typically sporting events, There are threats to public safety.

1:18:40.320 --> 1:18:46.610
<v Speaker 6>There are very often extremely foreseeable incidences of boisterousness.

1:18:46.630 --> 1:18:46.710
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

1:18:50.060 --> 1:18:55.740
<v Speaker 6>We say, after, you know, the Super Bowl or the

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Stanley Cup. You know, publicly owned stadiums are not exercising

1:18:59.800 --> 1:19:03.640
<v Speaker 6>their right to impose reasonable constraints on the time, place

1:19:03.680 --> 1:19:08.760
<v Speaker 6>and manner of expression by shutting down the Super Bowl.

1:19:09.610 --> 1:19:09.929
<v Speaker 12>Right?

1:19:10.050 --> 1:19:16.410
<v Speaker 6>In anticipation of what they could reasonably expect to be rowdiness.

1:19:17.150 --> 1:19:19.800
<v Speaker 15>I think Mom Donnie would be recalled if he tried

1:19:19.840 --> 1:19:23.660
<v Speaker 15>to stop the Knicks games over public safety concerns.

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:26.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't think Mom Donnie would ever do such a thing.

1:19:27.840 --> 1:19:28.400
<v Speaker 12>No, I know.

1:19:28.479 --> 1:19:43.630
<v Speaker 6>They won. Yeah. In any event, it is really important

1:19:43.650 --> 1:19:46.570
<v Speaker 6>to understand that it is permissible for the government to

1:19:46.650 --> 1:19:51.660
<v Speaker 6>impose constraints on expression. They have to be reasonable constraints.

1:19:51.760 --> 1:19:55.559
<v Speaker 6>They have to be content neutral, right? Not discriminating on

1:19:55.580 --> 1:19:59.480
<v Speaker 6>the basis of viewpoint. They have to be narrowly tailored,

1:19:59.780 --> 1:20:02.939
<v Speaker 6>meaning they can't just be, okay, we're going to shut

1:20:03.000 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 6>down everything because we have some concern, some speculative concern

1:20:08.120 --> 1:20:12.059
<v Speaker 6>that like maybe there's going to be some rowdy behavior.

1:20:12.880 --> 1:20:17.960
<v Speaker 6>And finally, and critically, those constraints have to leave open

1:20:17.979 --> 1:20:22.760
<v Speaker 6>what are called ample alternative channels of communication, right? So

1:20:23.120 --> 1:20:29.400
<v Speaker 6>absolutely canceling a performance would not leave open ample alternative

1:20:29.439 --> 1:20:31.540
<v Speaker 6>channels of communication, right?

1:20:31.740 --> 1:20:32.420
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

1:20:32.439 --> 1:20:35.260
<v Speaker 6>And it's not clear what the public interest is in

1:20:35.300 --> 1:20:40.030
<v Speaker 6>this case because... you know, there are exceptions. There are

1:20:40.130 --> 1:20:44.890
<v Speaker 6>things that fall outside the zone of First Amendment protections.

1:20:44.950 --> 1:20:48.800
<v Speaker 6>And there are things like fighting words, you know, hate speech,

1:20:49.310 --> 1:20:55.200
<v Speaker 6>true threats. But it's very clear that criticism of Israel,

1:20:55.720 --> 1:21:00.720
<v Speaker 6>support for Palestine, solidarity with Palestine, those things are not

1:21:00.920 --> 1:21:04.929
<v Speaker 6>hate speech, right? Criticism of the political ideology of Zionism.

1:21:05.650 --> 1:21:10.870
<v Speaker 6>These are not instances of anti-Semitic hate speech, right? Yeah.

1:21:11.170 --> 1:21:16.070
<v Speaker 6>And so it's, you know, however offensive Robert Kraft or

1:21:16.130 --> 1:21:20.740
<v Speaker 6>anyone else might find solidarity with Palestine to be, it

1:21:21.600 --> 1:21:27.200
<v Speaker 6>is not speech of a kind that is exempted from

1:21:27.260 --> 1:21:32.200
<v Speaker 6>the protections of the First Amendment. So, you know, if Again,

1:21:32.280 --> 1:21:36.430
<v Speaker 6>if there's a private event company or a privately owned

1:21:36.790 --> 1:21:41.470
<v Speaker 6>stadium that says, we don't want to have Macklemore play,

1:21:41.590 --> 1:21:43.650
<v Speaker 6>they're at liberty to do that, right? They can make

1:21:43.670 --> 1:21:44.330
<v Speaker 6>that decision.

1:21:44.790 --> 1:21:45.010
<v Speaker 16>Yeah.

1:21:45.189 --> 1:21:49.479
<v Speaker 6>What we can't have, or at least what deserves interrogation,

1:21:49.520 --> 1:21:55.300
<v Speaker 6>what deserves a serious inquiry, is a publicly owned, government-run

1:21:55.880 --> 1:22:01.200
<v Speaker 6>entity shutting down speech at the behest of a wealthy

1:22:01.220 --> 1:22:07.900
<v Speaker 6>individual powerful individual, not on the basis of needing to

1:22:07.960 --> 1:22:12.420
<v Speaker 6>impose a reasonable constraint or a reasonable restriction on the time, place,

1:22:12.520 --> 1:22:19.860
<v Speaker 6>or manner of expression based on a content-neutral analysis that

1:22:19.939 --> 1:22:24.430
<v Speaker 6>is narrowly tailored to serve some significant government interest while

1:22:24.590 --> 1:22:30.430
<v Speaker 6>also leaving open ample alternative channels of communication, right? I

1:22:30.490 --> 1:22:36.930
<v Speaker 6>am concerned about a public stadium bowing to that kind

1:22:36.970 --> 1:22:41.560
<v Speaker 6>of pressure, particularly in light of the fact that Kanye

1:22:41.640 --> 1:22:50.000
<v Speaker 6>West can perform freely. And Kanye West is pretty openly anti-Semitic.

1:22:50.439 --> 1:22:52.700
<v Speaker 15>This is a sort of a, not even really a

1:22:52.740 --> 1:22:56.479
<v Speaker 15>side note, but Kanye West performed multiple times at Raymond

1:22:56.500 --> 1:22:59.840
<v Speaker 15>James Stadium in Tampa at the end of June. And,

1:23:00.120 --> 1:23:03.880
<v Speaker 15>you know, while the setlist FM doesn't say that he

1:23:03.960 --> 1:23:07.360
<v Speaker 15>performed his song, Heil Hitler, that I guess came out

1:23:07.479 --> 1:23:09.970
<v Speaker 15>in 2025. It's hard to believe where we're at sometimes,

1:23:10.050 --> 1:23:13.470
<v Speaker 15>but it's the the the open hypocrisy of that is

1:23:13.530 --> 1:23:14.990
<v Speaker 15>just astounding.

1:23:15.250 --> 1:23:19.890
<v Speaker 6>But well, it's never been about anti-Semitism. Right. I mean,

1:23:19.910 --> 1:23:23.519
<v Speaker 6>just as a as a side side note. There are

1:23:23.640 --> 1:23:27.120
<v Speaker 6>more Christian Zionists in the United States than there are

1:23:27.220 --> 1:23:30.460
<v Speaker 6>Jews in the entire world, and they are explicitly motivated

1:23:31.000 --> 1:23:36.060
<v Speaker 6>by explicitly anti-Semitic goals, right? One of which is to

1:23:36.439 --> 1:23:41.259
<v Speaker 6>create a mass exodus of Jewish people from the so-called

1:23:41.280 --> 1:23:42.620
<v Speaker 6>global north.

1:23:42.740 --> 1:23:43.280
<v Speaker 11>Oh, God.

1:23:43.680 --> 1:23:48.220
<v Speaker 6>And the other of which is to hasten the apocalypse,

1:23:48.960 --> 1:23:55.080
<v Speaker 6>at which point, according to the Christian Zionist eschatology, some

1:23:55.160 --> 1:24:01.439
<v Speaker 6>Jews will become Christian and remaining Jews will go to hell.

1:24:01.800 --> 1:24:06.090
<v Speaker 6>So this is not and has never been about anti-Semitism.

1:24:06.590 --> 1:24:09.550
<v Speaker 6>It is about criticism of Israel. It is about solidarity

1:24:09.570 --> 1:24:14.469
<v Speaker 6>with Palestine. Now, you know, we're looking at this very

1:24:14.810 --> 1:24:19.720
<v Speaker 6>sort of niche and narrow issue of what are the

1:24:19.840 --> 1:24:23.680
<v Speaker 6>implications for the First Amendment in when we have a

1:24:24.220 --> 1:24:29.880
<v Speaker 6>municipally owned or a government owned event space and a

1:24:30.800 --> 1:24:38.220
<v Speaker 6>performer is prevented from or forbidden from performing in that space,

1:24:38.600 --> 1:24:43.540
<v Speaker 6>clearly on the basis of what would typically be understood

1:24:43.600 --> 1:24:47.300
<v Speaker 6>to be protected speech. Why does it matter? I mean,

1:24:47.880 --> 1:24:51.890
<v Speaker 6>just to clarify, I am not an expert certainly in

1:24:51.930 --> 1:24:57.300
<v Speaker 6>whatever kinds of leases or contract arrangements there are between

1:24:57.310 --> 1:25:03.139
<v Speaker 6>these cities or states and, you know, third-party event planning.

1:25:03.160 --> 1:25:04.519
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

1:25:04.820 --> 1:25:09.380
<v Speaker 6>Which, you know, if there's enough space in between, you know,

1:25:09.400 --> 1:25:15.640
<v Speaker 6>the stadium and the decision being made potentially by a

1:25:15.700 --> 1:25:19.880
<v Speaker 6>private third party, That might vitiate some of those First

1:25:19.939 --> 1:25:21.100
<v Speaker 6>Amendment protections.

1:25:21.439 --> 1:25:21.620
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:25:21.760 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:25:22.500 --> 1:25:24.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't know because I don't know enough of the

1:25:24.900 --> 1:25:29.000
<v Speaker 6>facts on the ground there. And nevertheless, I think it

1:25:29.080 --> 1:25:33.720
<v Speaker 6>is really important for us to address ourselves to this question.

1:25:33.740 --> 1:25:39.340
<v Speaker 6>Am I a Macklemore fan? I, you know, not particularly.

1:25:39.360 --> 1:25:43.540
<v Speaker 6>I mean, he's fine. But my concern is not with

1:25:44.320 --> 1:25:50.230
<v Speaker 6>a wealthy and powerful man. recording artist. My concern is

1:25:50.910 --> 1:25:55.630
<v Speaker 6>that we look at this situation with Macklemore, and I

1:25:55.970 --> 1:26:02.860
<v Speaker 6>think it is obscuring a whole range of threats to

1:26:03.420 --> 1:26:06.880
<v Speaker 6>free expression for the rest of us, right? Because, you know,

1:26:07.180 --> 1:26:11.469
<v Speaker 6>is anyone going to be real worried about Macklemore's welfare? No,

1:26:11.479 --> 1:26:16.439
<v Speaker 6>he's fine. to his credit, by his own admission, he's

1:26:16.490 --> 1:26:22.660
<v Speaker 6>not suffering. My concern is not with Macklemore not being

1:26:22.700 --> 1:26:26.160
<v Speaker 6>allowed to play a show. My concern is with the

1:26:26.360 --> 1:26:31.439
<v Speaker 6>implications for the rest of us when we're allowing these

1:26:31.510 --> 1:26:37.250
<v Speaker 6>kinds of incursions into First Amendment protections. And I think

1:26:37.310 --> 1:26:42.740
<v Speaker 6>this is such an interesting case because The fact that

1:26:42.780 --> 1:26:47.360
<v Speaker 6>it's Macklemore is actually functioning, I think, to camouflage what

1:26:47.420 --> 1:26:51.160
<v Speaker 6>those threats are, right? Because we're also focused on the

1:26:51.200 --> 1:26:56.320
<v Speaker 6>fact that it's this wealthy, powerful guy that we're missing

1:26:56.560 --> 1:27:01.120
<v Speaker 6>the fact that the First Amendment can't be mobilized to

1:27:01.180 --> 1:27:07.540
<v Speaker 6>protect his free expression. How else might we see these

1:27:07.800 --> 1:27:12.360
<v Speaker 6>end runs around constitutional protections? for the rest of us.

1:27:13.080 --> 1:27:15.680
<v Speaker 6>I think there are a lot of things that are

1:27:15.760 --> 1:27:20.890
<v Speaker 6>protected by the First Amendment that aren't necessarily legible to

1:27:21.120 --> 1:27:28.030
<v Speaker 6>us as First Amendment protected beliefs, associations, or activities, right?

1:27:28.070 --> 1:27:30.530
<v Speaker 6>Because we often will think about things that are First

1:27:30.590 --> 1:27:33.930
<v Speaker 6>Amendment protected as being like the right to go to

1:27:33.950 --> 1:27:39.090
<v Speaker 6>a particular kind of religious institution or the right to

1:27:39.150 --> 1:27:40.550
<v Speaker 6>go to a protest.

1:27:41.410 --> 1:27:41.710
<v Speaker 11>Right.

1:27:43.170 --> 1:27:46.290
<v Speaker 6>But a lot of the most important First Amendment case

1:27:46.450 --> 1:27:53.950
<v Speaker 6>law deals with things like are multiple adolescents allowed to

1:27:54.050 --> 1:27:58.800
<v Speaker 6>hang out on the public sidewalk together without getting arrested?

1:27:58.900 --> 1:27:59.120
<v Speaker 13>Right.

1:27:59.760 --> 1:28:05.439
<v Speaker 6>Does it constitute probable cause of unlawful conduct for there

1:28:05.479 --> 1:28:09.000
<v Speaker 6>to be more than two black children hanging out together

1:28:09.120 --> 1:28:09.820
<v Speaker 6>on the stoop?

1:28:10.520 --> 1:28:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:28:11.220 --> 1:28:11.460
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:28:11.780 --> 1:28:15.320
<v Speaker 6>That's not the kind of First Amendment protected activity that

1:28:15.380 --> 1:28:18.420
<v Speaker 6>most people think about. It's not the top of mind

1:28:18.479 --> 1:28:19.939
<v Speaker 6>when you say First Amendment.

1:28:21.090 --> 1:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Right.

1:28:21.320 --> 1:28:24.510
<v Speaker 6>I think people are thinking about, you know, people like

1:28:24.570 --> 1:28:26.490
<v Speaker 6>marching against the war in Vietnam.

1:28:26.650 --> 1:28:26.849
<v Speaker 17>Yeah.

1:28:27.410 --> 1:28:31.630
<v Speaker 6>But we do many things every day that are protected

1:28:31.670 --> 1:28:34.450
<v Speaker 6>by the First Amendment, not just, you know, posting on

1:28:34.750 --> 1:28:40.240
<v Speaker 6>the Internet. Not just, you know, having privacy protected. with

1:28:40.300 --> 1:28:43.389
<v Speaker 6>respect to who we're calling, right? Being permitted to make

1:28:43.810 --> 1:28:48.850
<v Speaker 6>phone calls to anyone we want. Like a birthday party

1:28:49.290 --> 1:28:54.390
<v Speaker 6>is a First Amendment protected gathering, right? Our right to assemble,

1:28:54.970 --> 1:29:00.780
<v Speaker 6>our right to free association, right? And so having an

1:29:01.020 --> 1:29:10.400
<v Speaker 6>incursion into those protections, any incursion into those protections has

1:29:10.820 --> 1:29:15.730
<v Speaker 6>implications for all of those other things. And if we

1:29:15.860 --> 1:29:18.450
<v Speaker 6>stop paying attention and we say, oh, this is sort

1:29:18.470 --> 1:29:22.969
<v Speaker 6>of a punchline, right? Oh, Macklemore's being canceled by the

1:29:23.030 --> 1:29:27.930
<v Speaker 6>rich right-wing stadium owners. And we don't look at the

1:29:27.970 --> 1:29:31.240
<v Speaker 6>fact that There is a public performance that is being

1:29:31.320 --> 1:29:38.820
<v Speaker 6>canceled by potentially the government. We're missing a whole range

1:29:39.600 --> 1:29:45.689
<v Speaker 6>of risks because what's at stake is not Macklemore's career.

1:29:46.470 --> 1:29:53.269
<v Speaker 6>What's at stake is the ability of all of the

1:29:53.330 --> 1:30:01.900
<v Speaker 6>rest of us to freely associate to petition the government,

1:30:01.920 --> 1:30:08.280
<v Speaker 6>to believe the things that we believe without being censored,

1:30:09.240 --> 1:30:24.290
<v Speaker 6>without being punished for doing so. One of the other

1:30:24.370 --> 1:30:28.780
<v Speaker 6>things that deserves to be said here is One of

1:30:28.840 --> 1:30:31.620
<v Speaker 6>the reasons that this is a little bit confusing and

1:30:31.660 --> 1:30:35.450
<v Speaker 6>that the waters are so muddied is this issue that

1:30:35.490 --> 1:30:39.090
<v Speaker 6>I referred to a minute ago with respect to these

1:30:39.290 --> 1:30:46.520
<v Speaker 6>publicly owned stadiums leasing out digital authority to these third

1:30:46.600 --> 1:30:47.559
<v Speaker 6>party companies.

1:30:47.720 --> 1:30:47.980
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:30:48.000 --> 1:30:48.600
<v Speaker 17>Yeah.

1:30:49.160 --> 1:30:53.620
<v Speaker 6>Are private and which are as non-government entities are not

1:30:53.720 --> 1:30:58.460
<v Speaker 6>subject to the constraints of the First Amendment. That's not

1:30:58.500 --> 1:31:03.060
<v Speaker 6>a problem with the First Amendment. That's a problem with

1:31:03.080 --> 1:31:08.519
<v Speaker 6>the privatization of public life. And I think we're seeing

1:31:08.590 --> 1:31:11.769
<v Speaker 6>that in a lot of other realms as well. So,

1:31:11.830 --> 1:31:16.809
<v Speaker 6>for example, as we see traditional government functions being more

1:31:16.890 --> 1:31:23.610
<v Speaker 6>and more assumed by private utilities, we have a situation

1:31:23.670 --> 1:31:27.050
<v Speaker 6>where what, you know, 40 years ago might have been

1:31:27.800 --> 1:31:33.280
<v Speaker 6>people petitioning the government not to build a pipeline, right?

1:31:33.680 --> 1:31:37.720
<v Speaker 6>That would have been a First Amendment protected gathering, right?

1:31:37.760 --> 1:31:41.640
<v Speaker 6>We might have a protest at a government building. That

1:31:41.680 --> 1:31:45.080
<v Speaker 6>would be protected by the First Amendment. Now, if you

1:31:45.120 --> 1:31:48.650
<v Speaker 6>have a group of people who want to protest, for example,

1:31:49.350 --> 1:31:54.530
<v Speaker 6>a pipeline, that whole process beginning to end may be

1:31:54.550 --> 1:32:01.100
<v Speaker 6>so problematic controlled by a private corporation that there's no

1:32:01.240 --> 1:32:04.070
<v Speaker 6>government building to protest at.

1:32:04.010 --> 1:32:04.790
<v Speaker 2>Anymore, right?

1:32:04.930 --> 1:32:08.210
<v Speaker 6>And so what would have otherwise been a First Amendment

1:32:08.250 --> 1:32:12.809
<v Speaker 6>protected protest is now a bunch of trespassing charges, right?

1:32:12.870 --> 1:32:16.410
<v Speaker 6>Because the place that people are going to do that protest,

1:32:16.490 --> 1:32:21.179
<v Speaker 6>to carry out that protest, may be private property, right? Yeah.

1:32:21.650 --> 1:32:24.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, we're no longer petitioning the government. Now we're

1:32:24.200 --> 1:32:27.610
<v Speaker 6>petitioning you know, energy transfer partners.

1:32:28.330 --> 1:32:30.650
<v Speaker 15>This sort of, you know, raises this question. On the

1:32:30.750 --> 1:32:33.059
<v Speaker 15>one hand, I'm like, oh, I'm not as worried about,

1:32:33.150 --> 1:32:36.340
<v Speaker 15>you know, Robert Kraft getting to say, oh, Macklemore's not

1:32:36.500 --> 1:32:40.360
<v Speaker 15>welcome at Gillette Stadium. I'm thinking about the ways in

1:32:40.420 --> 1:32:44.320
<v Speaker 15>which he's able to use his wealth and capital to

1:32:44.800 --> 1:32:48.420
<v Speaker 15>sort of manipulate the situation with government entities or call

1:32:48.500 --> 1:32:51.920
<v Speaker 15>on his NFL buddies to kick them out in other places.

1:32:52.710 --> 1:32:56.280
<v Speaker 15>But there is also a consideration around the concentration of

1:32:56.360 --> 1:33:01.660
<v Speaker 15>wealth and the ways in which privatization is rapidly happening

1:33:01.800 --> 1:33:05.900
<v Speaker 15>in various different instances across the country. And at what

1:33:05.939 --> 1:33:08.660
<v Speaker 15>point do you see the shrinking of the public square

1:33:08.850 --> 1:33:11.930
<v Speaker 15>just generally across the board and the ways in which

1:33:11.990 --> 1:33:16.350
<v Speaker 15>billionaires are then able to control the narrative through that ownership?

1:33:17.090 --> 1:33:20.470
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I think one of the other things that is

1:33:20.550 --> 1:33:23.799
<v Speaker 6>worth pointing out is A lot of times when we're

1:33:23.810 --> 1:33:30.040
<v Speaker 6>talking about First Amendment retaliation or, you know, what we're

1:33:30.100 --> 1:33:35.959
<v Speaker 6>seeing here, right, where you see an organization, public or private,

1:33:36.600 --> 1:33:40.840
<v Speaker 6>engage in this kind of really obvious censorship on the

1:33:40.880 --> 1:33:47.010
<v Speaker 6>basis of viewpoint. We usually do not see the kind

1:33:47.050 --> 1:33:50.060
<v Speaker 6>of smoking gun violence But, you know, the putting it

1:33:50.120 --> 1:33:53.620
<v Speaker 6>in an email and saying, I don't want to see

1:33:53.720 --> 1:33:58.550
<v Speaker 6>this individual being allowed to perform for the following reason,

1:33:58.590 --> 1:34:01.070
<v Speaker 6>which is that he expressed solidarity with Palestine.

1:34:01.410 --> 1:34:01.650
<v Speaker 18>Right.

1:34:01.950 --> 1:34:05.950
<v Speaker 6>We usually see at least a little bit more. Well,

1:34:06.110 --> 1:34:07.990
<v Speaker 6>usually we don't have a smoking gun email.

1:34:08.310 --> 1:34:11.050
<v Speaker 15>Yeah. Or talking to the press about it.

1:34:12.370 --> 1:34:14.729
<v Speaker 6>And I think that one of the things that's actually

1:34:14.810 --> 1:34:19.560
<v Speaker 6>unusual about this situation is that that maybe just due

1:34:19.650 --> 1:34:23.229
<v Speaker 6>to wealth and power, Robert Kraft didn't have any compunction

1:34:23.890 --> 1:34:27.729
<v Speaker 6>or concern about very publicly saying, I don't want this

1:34:27.830 --> 1:34:32.769
<v Speaker 6>to happen because I am offended personally by the political

1:34:32.830 --> 1:34:34.450
<v Speaker 6>content of his speech.

1:34:35.100 --> 1:34:35.360
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

1:34:35.640 --> 1:34:39.439
<v Speaker 6>And I would say, you know, typically people who are

1:34:39.640 --> 1:34:42.040
<v Speaker 6>at least in government who have the kind of power

1:34:42.060 --> 1:34:45.979
<v Speaker 6>know better than to say it. The quiet part out loud.

1:34:46.260 --> 1:34:46.520
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

1:34:46.580 --> 1:34:49.360
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's sort of interesting, I guess, just

1:34:49.400 --> 1:34:55.939
<v Speaker 6>that the billionaire class has become so comfortable with their

1:34:55.979 --> 1:35:01.660
<v Speaker 6>own strength, I guess, that they're not concerned about being

1:35:02.420 --> 1:35:08.700
<v Speaker 6>publicly very honest about their desire to censor certain people.

1:35:09.680 --> 1:35:14.490
<v Speaker 6>And so, you know, In this instance, it may actually

1:35:14.550 --> 1:35:19.320
<v Speaker 6>be an interesting opportunity just because some of these stadiums

1:35:19.780 --> 1:35:22.740
<v Speaker 6>are publicly owned. And so to the extent that those

1:35:22.800 --> 1:35:27.260
<v Speaker 6>stadiums can be shown to have canceled the show under

1:35:27.320 --> 1:35:31.720
<v Speaker 6>pressure from this private actor and on the basis of

1:35:31.740 --> 1:35:39.370
<v Speaker 6>that private actor's sort of personal convictions, it does create

1:35:39.410 --> 1:35:45.100
<v Speaker 6>an interesting opportunity. You had said something about not being

1:35:45.360 --> 1:35:49.940
<v Speaker 6>clear on what the leases were and the arrangements and contracts.

1:35:49.979 --> 1:35:54.150
<v Speaker 6>And I am also not clear on what those contracts are,

1:35:54.200 --> 1:35:59.580
<v Speaker 6>how they might implicate First Amendment concerns or undermine First

1:35:59.640 --> 1:36:04.559
<v Speaker 6>Amendment rights. But if there were to be, for example,

1:36:05.560 --> 1:36:09.500
<v Speaker 6>a lawsuit filed about it, some of that stuff would

1:36:09.540 --> 1:36:13.520
<v Speaker 6>come out in discovery in the process of turning over evidence.

1:36:13.600 --> 1:36:17.439
<v Speaker 6>And so if nothing else, I kind of hope that

1:36:17.540 --> 1:36:21.660
<v Speaker 6>one of the impact litigation outfits does file a suit,

1:36:22.020 --> 1:36:26.480
<v Speaker 6>not because I am concerned about vindicating Macklemore's First Amendment rights,

1:36:27.020 --> 1:36:31.490
<v Speaker 6>but because I think we need to really be vigilant

1:36:32.310 --> 1:36:38.610
<v Speaker 6>and alert to the actual legal mechanisms by which the

1:36:39.189 --> 1:36:45.320
<v Speaker 6>government is performing an end run around constraints on state power.

1:36:46.740 --> 1:36:49.599
<v Speaker 15>To wrap this episode up, I just wanted to highlight again,

1:36:49.800 --> 1:36:51.920
<v Speaker 15>although it may feel a bit silly to talk about

1:36:51.979 --> 1:36:55.380
<v Speaker 15>all this in the context of McLemore, a multimillionaire, I

1:36:55.800 --> 1:36:59.160
<v Speaker 15>think the point is that this sets a bad precedent. Notably,

1:36:59.240 --> 1:37:03.979
<v Speaker 15>we've witnessed crackdowns on university students over Palestine solidarity protests.

1:37:04.470 --> 1:37:06.530
<v Speaker 15>There was a new ruling against a student from the

1:37:06.610 --> 1:37:10.130
<v Speaker 15>University of Texas Austin just last week. There may still

1:37:10.170 --> 1:37:14.229
<v Speaker 15>be open questions about these stadiums and their complicated contract arrangements,

1:37:14.590 --> 1:37:17.630
<v Speaker 15>but either way, the wealthy are wielding influence over the

1:37:17.670 --> 1:37:20.750
<v Speaker 15>public square. With all that said, here is Mo with

1:37:20.870 --> 1:37:21.630
<v Speaker 15>one final note.

1:37:23.010 --> 1:37:26.950
<v Speaker 6>I would just like your listeners to be alert to

1:37:27.110 --> 1:37:31.889
<v Speaker 6>all of the ways in which our daily lives are

1:37:32.570 --> 1:37:37.200
<v Speaker 6>frankly made possible. by First Amendment protections that we don't

1:37:37.320 --> 1:37:41.570
<v Speaker 6>think about very often. And I would like to plug

1:37:41.610 --> 1:37:47.450
<v Speaker 6>the concept and the practice of not talking to law

1:37:47.689 --> 1:37:52.090
<v Speaker 6>enforcement until you have had an opportunity to consult with counsel.

1:37:52.650 --> 1:37:53.940
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, always good.

1:38:05.660 --> 1:38:09.140
<v Speaker 14>Hello and welcome to It Could Happen Here. My name's

1:38:09.200 --> 1:38:11.700
<v Speaker 14>Kim Kelly and I'll be your host for today's episode.

1:38:12.620 --> 1:38:16.620
<v Speaker 14>To introduce myself, I'm a labor journalist, I'm the author

1:38:16.650 --> 1:38:18.830
<v Speaker 14>of a book called Fight Like Hell, The Untold History

1:38:18.850 --> 1:38:21.950
<v Speaker 14>of American Labor, and I'm a third generation union member

1:38:22.050 --> 1:38:27.130
<v Speaker 14>based in Philly. Obviously, go birds. And I'm just over

1:38:27.170 --> 1:38:28.890
<v Speaker 14>the moon to be back here in the cool zone.

1:38:28.910 --> 1:38:32.680
<v Speaker 14>Shout out to Sophie, Robert, James, and everyone else for

1:38:32.700 --> 1:38:35.200
<v Speaker 14>letting me Kool-Aid man my way onto their network now

1:38:35.260 --> 1:38:37.380
<v Speaker 14>and again to catch you up on what's been happening

1:38:37.420 --> 1:38:39.820
<v Speaker 14>in the labor movement in the U.S. and otherwise. If

1:38:40.840 --> 1:38:43.460
<v Speaker 14>you've been paying attention, you'll already know September was a

1:38:43.620 --> 1:38:47.300
<v Speaker 14>very busy month. But if you haven't, well, that's what

1:38:47.320 --> 1:38:50.979
<v Speaker 14>I'm here for. So let's start off with some good news.

1:38:52.120 --> 1:38:54.470
<v Speaker 14>And look, I'll throw you a bone. Here's a quick

1:38:54.570 --> 1:38:58.350
<v Speaker 14>one for the gamers. In a big dub for tech organizing,

1:38:58.350 --> 1:39:02.969
<v Speaker 14>1,900 video game workers at Activision Blizzard have just won

1:39:03.010 --> 1:39:07.669
<v Speaker 14>their first union contract. Hell yeah. Workers at the company

1:39:07.729 --> 1:39:10.510
<v Speaker 14>have been organizing in various ways since 2021, but they

1:39:11.630 --> 1:39:15.089
<v Speaker 14>formally unionized with the Communication Workers of America in 2024.

1:39:15.090 --> 1:39:18.740
<v Speaker 14>So it's been a long time coming. This shiny new

1:39:18.780 --> 1:39:22.700
<v Speaker 14>contract includes a lot of good stuff. They got protections

1:39:22.740 --> 1:39:26.849
<v Speaker 14>for remote workers, huge for the tech world, and against outsourcing.

1:39:27.470 --> 1:39:31.320
<v Speaker 14>They got some language around AI development. They got a

1:39:31.400 --> 1:39:36.030
<v Speaker 14>three-day in-office hybrid work week, which, damn, I feel like

1:39:36.490 --> 1:39:38.889
<v Speaker 14>the four-day work week is still a huge pipe dream.

1:39:38.910 --> 1:39:42.310
<v Speaker 14>These guys are out here doing three. Unions are good,

1:39:42.729 --> 1:39:45.430
<v Speaker 14>you know? And they even got May Day off as

1:39:45.470 --> 1:39:46.330
<v Speaker 14>a paid holiday.

1:39:47.070 --> 1:39:48.450
<v Speaker 6>It's really great work all around.

1:39:48.470 --> 1:39:51.320
<v Speaker 14>You love to see it. May a thousand more tech

1:39:51.360 --> 1:39:57.860
<v Speaker 14>worker unions bloom. Speaking of contracts, this is a big one.

1:39:57.860 --> 1:40:03.269
<v Speaker 14>800 Walmart workers at a distribution center in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada,

1:40:03.770 --> 1:40:07.750
<v Speaker 14>have just won that company's first ever union contract in

1:40:07.790 --> 1:40:12.190
<v Speaker 14>North America. Now, Walmart has long been the labor movement's

1:40:12.250 --> 1:40:15.950
<v Speaker 14>white whale. It's one of the largest employers in the world.

1:40:16.030 --> 1:40:19.650
<v Speaker 14>It's run by evil Arkansas billionaires who hate unions. Its

1:40:19.689 --> 1:40:23.250
<v Speaker 14>workers regularly make the news for the despicably low wages

1:40:23.290 --> 1:40:26.950
<v Speaker 14>that those rich people pay them. But organizers in the U.S.

1:40:27.110 --> 1:40:30.450
<v Speaker 14>have yet to crack the retail giant. And look, it's

1:40:30.490 --> 1:40:33.570
<v Speaker 14>not for lack of trying. In the past, Walmart has

1:40:33.610 --> 1:40:37.900
<v Speaker 14>simply shut down stores who have tried to unionize. For example,

1:40:37.979 --> 1:40:42.490
<v Speaker 14>back in the year 2000, which is so much further

1:40:42.600 --> 1:40:46.240
<v Speaker 14>away than it really feels like it should be. Back

1:40:46.280 --> 1:40:49.440
<v Speaker 14>in the year 2000, after meat cutters at a Texas

1:40:49.479 --> 1:40:54.440
<v Speaker 14>location voted to unionize, the company eliminated its entire meat

1:40:54.479 --> 1:40:58.620
<v Speaker 14>department in Texas and in five other states for good measure.

1:40:59.400 --> 1:41:00.820
<v Speaker 14>I'm thinking about it. I don't think we have a

1:41:00.860 --> 1:41:05.140
<v Speaker 14>meat department in South Philly. Like imagine cutting out an

1:41:05.220 --> 1:41:09.889
<v Speaker 14>entire section of your store, of your enormous store, nationwide

1:41:09.990 --> 1:41:13.349
<v Speaker 14>retail chain because a handful of workers in one place

1:41:13.390 --> 1:41:16.130
<v Speaker 14>were like, hey, what if you treated us a little better?

1:41:16.150 --> 1:41:20.189
<v Speaker 14>It's petty and it's cruel and it's very on brand

1:41:20.210 --> 1:41:24.520
<v Speaker 14>for Walmart. So folks are understandably very excited to see

1:41:25.320 --> 1:41:29.020
<v Speaker 14>workers in Canada sticking it to them. And when the

1:41:29.140 --> 1:41:33.000
<v Speaker 14>Ontario Union Drive went public two years ago, of course

1:41:33.100 --> 1:41:36.260
<v Speaker 14>Walmart rushed to punish those workers and did its damnedest

1:41:36.280 --> 1:41:41.840
<v Speaker 14>to bust their union drive. But Importantly, this time, those

1:41:41.920 --> 1:41:46.479
<v Speaker 14>union busting efforts failed. So we can only assume that

1:41:46.500 --> 1:41:51.120
<v Speaker 14>the Walton clan is hopping mad about the whole situation. Again,

1:41:51.350 --> 1:41:55.250
<v Speaker 14>love to see it. And honestly, now that our Canadian

1:41:55.310 --> 1:41:59.110
<v Speaker 14>counterparts have notched this major win, I'm really curious to

1:41:59.150 --> 1:42:01.510
<v Speaker 14>see what kind of organizing efforts we might see here

1:42:01.550 --> 1:42:06.030
<v Speaker 14>in the US. I mean, when Amazon workers in Staten

1:42:06.140 --> 1:42:10.490
<v Speaker 14>Island unionized, they set off a little chain reaction. When

1:42:10.729 --> 1:42:14.830
<v Speaker 14>Starbucks workers in Buffalo unionized, they sent off a big

1:42:14.910 --> 1:42:18.220
<v Speaker 14>chain reaction. You know, these guys are over the border,

1:42:18.300 --> 1:42:20.340
<v Speaker 14>but it's only a few hundred miles from New York.

1:42:20.420 --> 1:42:24.540
<v Speaker 14>It's not that far. Could this contract in Ontario be

1:42:24.580 --> 1:42:28.360
<v Speaker 14>the beginning of a domino effect? Are we finally going

1:42:28.380 --> 1:42:32.719
<v Speaker 14>to unionize Walmart? Look, it would take a lot of doing,

1:42:32.820 --> 1:42:36.330
<v Speaker 14>but you know, Someone's got to be the first, and

1:42:36.490 --> 1:42:40.070
<v Speaker 14>now that someone's proved it can be done, look, I'm

1:42:40.090 --> 1:42:43.710
<v Speaker 14>just saying, a girl can dream. Speaking of New York,

1:42:44.350 --> 1:42:48.380
<v Speaker 14>a couple hundred miles south in New York State, caregivers

1:42:48.450 --> 1:42:52.840
<v Speaker 14>with the state's Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program have filed

1:42:52.900 --> 1:42:59.420
<v Speaker 14>for a union election with 1199-SCIU. CDPAP is a Medicaid

1:42:59.479 --> 1:43:02.820
<v Speaker 14>program that allows folks who are eligible for home care

1:43:02.860 --> 1:43:07.230
<v Speaker 14>services to to train and choose and hire their own

1:43:07.320 --> 1:43:12.670
<v Speaker 14>in-home caregivers, which can include family members and friends. So

1:43:12.689 --> 1:43:17.090
<v Speaker 14>it's always exciting when we see overworked, underpaid workers organizing

1:43:17.130 --> 1:43:20.610
<v Speaker 14>and fighting for better. But the sheer scale of this

1:43:20.710 --> 1:43:25.370
<v Speaker 14>particular union drive is honestly incredible. And it's legit historic.

1:43:26.189 --> 1:43:31.060
<v Speaker 14>Nearly 70,000 caregivers have already signed union cards signifying that

1:43:31.080 --> 1:43:34.190
<v Speaker 14>they're down to join the union. And if they're successful,

1:43:34.330 --> 1:43:37.490
<v Speaker 14>if the union drive is successful, the union would include

1:43:37.570 --> 1:43:43.010
<v Speaker 14>almost 190,000 workers across the state. This would be the

1:43:43.070 --> 1:43:48.349
<v Speaker 14>largest union election in U.S. history, like all of U.S.

1:43:48.400 --> 1:43:48.839
<v Speaker 6>History.

1:43:49.640 --> 1:43:53.840
<v Speaker 14>And it's being led by workers whose labor is deeply

1:43:53.900 --> 1:43:58.019
<v Speaker 14>undervalued and rendered almost invisible to those outside the walls

1:43:58.100 --> 1:44:01.520
<v Speaker 14>of their unique workplaces, which is They're not working in

1:44:01.560 --> 1:44:03.760
<v Speaker 14>a factory. They're not working in a store. They're not

1:44:03.780 --> 1:44:08.120
<v Speaker 14>in a retail setting. These are workers who are completely atomized, isolated,

1:44:08.260 --> 1:44:11.090
<v Speaker 14>working in people's homes. The fact that they've been able

1:44:11.130 --> 1:44:16.710
<v Speaker 14>to organize an effort this scale is just, it's so impressive.

1:44:17.650 --> 1:44:22.600
<v Speaker 14>And it's long overdue. You know, prior to this, the

1:44:22.660 --> 1:44:25.879
<v Speaker 14>record for the largest election in modern U.S. history happened

1:44:25.900 --> 1:44:32.049
<v Speaker 14>in 1999. when about 74,000 LA County home care workers

1:44:32.189 --> 1:44:38.810
<v Speaker 14>voted to form a union with SEIU. Sound familiar? Nearly

1:44:38.810 --> 1:44:42.240
<v Speaker 14>30 years later, these caregivers in New York are following

1:44:42.280 --> 1:44:45.780
<v Speaker 14>in those footsteps. As the union noted, the filing comes

1:44:45.840 --> 1:44:49.940
<v Speaker 14>at a fraught moment for care in America. Medicaid-funded services

1:44:50.479 --> 1:44:54.809
<v Speaker 14>face devastating federal cuts enacted under the Trump administration. which

1:44:54.850 --> 1:44:59.110
<v Speaker 14>has villainized this workforce with its waste fraud abuse campaign.

1:44:59.950 --> 1:45:03.689
<v Speaker 14>At the same time, the nation's rapidly aging population is

1:45:03.750 --> 1:45:06.490
<v Speaker 14>driving growing demand for care, as they wrote in a

1:45:06.530 --> 1:45:11.130
<v Speaker 14>press release. For many people, this specific program can be

1:45:11.150 --> 1:45:15.150
<v Speaker 14>a lifeline. The difference between seeing your loved one left

1:45:15.600 --> 1:45:19.020
<v Speaker 14>to loneliness and neglect or to having them be cared

1:45:19.080 --> 1:45:22.139
<v Speaker 14>for in their own homes by people they trust who

1:45:22.180 --> 1:45:26.050
<v Speaker 14>love and advocate for them. The difference is really stark,

1:45:26.650 --> 1:45:29.670
<v Speaker 14>but don't take it from me. The union shared a

1:45:29.710 --> 1:45:32.030
<v Speaker 14>few worker and client testimonies with me, and I want

1:45:32.050 --> 1:45:35.950
<v Speaker 14>to share them with you now. So the first quote

1:45:36.520 --> 1:45:40.320
<v Speaker 14>comes from a worker, Angela Jimenez, who was a full-time

1:45:40.360 --> 1:45:44.660
<v Speaker 14>healthcare worker and 1199 SEIU member before she left to

1:45:44.700 --> 1:45:48.560
<v Speaker 14>join the CDPAP program to care for her mom. So

1:45:48.780 --> 1:45:52.630
<v Speaker 14>Angela says, I love taking care of my mother, but

1:45:52.670 --> 1:45:56.679
<v Speaker 14>love doesn't pay the bills. Rent, groceries, and healthcare keep

1:45:56.720 --> 1:46:00.260
<v Speaker 14>going up while our wages aren't keeping pace. Care is

1:46:00.300 --> 1:46:03.280
<v Speaker 14>essential work, but the way we're paid doesn't treat it

1:46:03.340 --> 1:46:07.089
<v Speaker 14>that way. Caregivers like me shouldn't have to struggle to survive.

1:46:08.070 --> 1:46:11.269
<v Speaker 14>I'm joining with caregivers across New York because together, we

1:46:12.030 --> 1:46:14.090
<v Speaker 14>have the power to demand what this work is worth

1:46:14.350 --> 1:46:16.120
<v Speaker 14>and make sure we can afford to keep doing it.

1:46:16.910 --> 1:46:20.490
<v Speaker 14>Soleil Byung, who works as a caregiver for her 79-year-old mother,

1:46:20.520 --> 1:46:25.490
<v Speaker 14>an Alzheimer's patient, says... I need a community. I need

1:46:25.530 --> 1:46:29.670
<v Speaker 14>a pay rise. A labor of love is still labor.

1:46:30.630 --> 1:46:35.150
<v Speaker 14>And 68-year-old Dominique LaRouche is a former caregiver herself who

1:46:35.189 --> 1:46:38.299
<v Speaker 14>was a proud union delegate for 1199 when she was younger.

1:46:39.140 --> 1:46:42.660
<v Speaker 14>Now her daughters care for her through the CDPAP program.

1:46:43.180 --> 1:46:45.600
<v Speaker 14>She says, My daughters help me get out of bed

1:46:45.640 --> 1:46:48.380
<v Speaker 14>in the morning, help me get dressed and brush my hair,

1:46:48.400 --> 1:46:51.000
<v Speaker 14>and help me cook meals from our culture that I

1:46:51.060 --> 1:46:54.200
<v Speaker 14>enjoy eating. but what they really give me is the

1:46:54.240 --> 1:46:57.840
<v Speaker 14>chance to live my life. Because of my daughters, I

1:46:57.860 --> 1:47:00.880
<v Speaker 14>can see the people I love, be part of my community,

1:47:01.320 --> 1:47:05.140
<v Speaker 14>and experience the world around me. CDPAP has given our

1:47:05.180 --> 1:47:09.740
<v Speaker 14>family safety, dignity, and peace of mind. That's why I'm

1:47:09.780 --> 1:47:12.439
<v Speaker 14>proud to stand with my daughters and thousands of other

1:47:12.479 --> 1:47:18.809
<v Speaker 14>CDPAP caregivers as they come together to join 1199 SEIU. So,

1:47:19.290 --> 1:47:22.450
<v Speaker 14>an election date has not yet been set, Under Trump,

1:47:22.470 --> 1:47:25.980
<v Speaker 14>the NLRB remains a clusterfuck. But here's hoping we get

1:47:26.020 --> 1:47:28.600
<v Speaker 14>some more good news on this soon. Because, I don't

1:47:28.640 --> 1:47:30.639
<v Speaker 14>know about you, but I feel like the working class

1:47:30.700 --> 1:47:33.840
<v Speaker 14>could really use a win. And an historic union win.

1:47:33.860 --> 1:47:38.160
<v Speaker 14>That would feel pretty good right about now. And speaking

1:47:38.200 --> 1:47:42.250
<v Speaker 14>of caregiving, once again, I've got to shout out National

1:47:42.290 --> 1:47:46.210
<v Speaker 14>Nurses United, the largest union of registered nurses in the U.S.,

1:47:46.670 --> 1:47:50.960
<v Speaker 14>for continuing to just be incredibly based. This time, they're

1:47:50.979 --> 1:47:54.860
<v Speaker 14>leading a week of action against Peter Thiel's data-gobbling surveillance

1:47:54.900 --> 1:47:59.910
<v Speaker 14>demons at Palantir. The tech company has happily and profitably

1:48:00.410 --> 1:48:03.610
<v Speaker 14>provided technology to ICE to surveil and target immigrants in

1:48:03.630 --> 1:48:06.690
<v Speaker 14>the U.S. and to Israel's Ministry of Defense to use

1:48:06.710 --> 1:48:11.479
<v Speaker 14>in its ongoing genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. As Truthout reported,

1:48:11.490 --> 1:48:16.000
<v Speaker 14>the unit is pushing public institutions, including hospitals and other

1:48:16.030 --> 1:48:20.679
<v Speaker 14>healthcare providers, to end contracts and partnerships with Palantir and

1:48:20.689 --> 1:48:24.099
<v Speaker 14>to divest from the company. Unlike many people in power

1:48:24.380 --> 1:48:28.280
<v Speaker 14>in and outside the labor movement, NNU has not been

1:48:28.340 --> 1:48:32.520
<v Speaker 14>shy about speaking out against these atrocities. In August, they

1:48:32.540 --> 1:48:36.160
<v Speaker 14>called out Israel's bombing of hospitals, schools, and public infrastructure.

1:48:36.939 --> 1:48:41.750
<v Speaker 14>And their executive director, Kunit Maharaj, said plainly that, quote,

1:48:42.170 --> 1:48:46.660
<v Speaker 14>the intentional bombing of hospitals, schools, and public infrastructure necessary

1:48:46.700 --> 1:48:51.100
<v Speaker 14>for basic living are war crimes against humanity. The Israeli

1:48:51.140 --> 1:48:54.550
<v Speaker 14>government must be held accountable for these atrocities and the

1:48:54.600 --> 1:48:58.650
<v Speaker 14>genocide must stop. Nurses and caregivers truly are the best

1:48:58.710 --> 1:49:01.870
<v Speaker 14>of us, man. Now, hold that thought while we take

1:49:01.890 --> 1:49:16.750
<v Speaker 14>a quick little ad break. Hello again. You're still listening

1:49:16.810 --> 1:49:19.299
<v Speaker 14>to It Could Happen Here, and I'm still Kim Kelly.

1:49:20.220 --> 1:49:22.740
<v Speaker 14>Now that we've started off with a little treat, let's

1:49:22.780 --> 1:49:24.920
<v Speaker 14>get into some of the bad news that came crawling

1:49:24.979 --> 1:49:27.560
<v Speaker 14>out of the labor world this past month. So you

1:49:27.600 --> 1:49:30.220
<v Speaker 14>know how oil has gotten really expensive because of the

1:49:30.939 --> 1:49:35.089
<v Speaker 14>US-Israel's fun new forever war in Iran? Well, when oil

1:49:35.100 --> 1:49:37.870
<v Speaker 14>is available, someone's got to get it from point A

1:49:37.890 --> 1:49:40.680
<v Speaker 14>to point B. And I don't know about you, but

1:49:40.740 --> 1:49:43.559
<v Speaker 14>I think it's probably for the best that those someones'

1:49:43.810 --> 1:49:48.170
<v Speaker 14>working conditions are safe and stable and decently paid, so

1:49:48.189 --> 1:49:50.130
<v Speaker 14>they don't have to go drive for DoorDash when they're

1:49:50.170 --> 1:49:54.290
<v Speaker 14>not navigating huge tankers full of toxic and economically invaluable

1:49:54.390 --> 1:49:59.250
<v Speaker 14>fossil fuels. You know, seems like common sense. Given all that,

1:49:59.490 --> 1:50:02.650
<v Speaker 14>and the inherent volatility of the job, we also probably

1:50:02.689 --> 1:50:05.309
<v Speaker 14>want them to be protected by a good union contract, right?

1:50:06.479 --> 1:50:10.089
<v Speaker 14>That's what deck officers at Alaska Tanker Company and Overseas

1:50:10.130 --> 1:50:14.170
<v Speaker 14>Shipholding Group thought too, which is why an overwhelming percentage

1:50:14.189 --> 1:50:18.670
<v Speaker 14>of them chose to unionize with the International Organization of Masters, Mates,

1:50:18.729 --> 1:50:22.790
<v Speaker 14>and Pilots back in 2024. As a quick aside, I've

1:50:22.810 --> 1:50:25.520
<v Speaker 14>been to a lot of union halls, but the MMP

1:50:25.610 --> 1:50:28.700
<v Speaker 14>union hall is definitely one of the coolest. They have

1:50:28.840 --> 1:50:32.560
<v Speaker 14>so many model ships, like more than you can ever imagine.

1:50:33.160 --> 1:50:37.290
<v Speaker 14>But anyway, so the Mates voted to unionize. The NLRB

1:50:37.350 --> 1:50:39.970
<v Speaker 14>ordered their employees to recognize the union and start bargaining.

1:50:40.710 --> 1:50:45.370
<v Speaker 14>And then, radio silence. It's been two years, and these

1:50:45.430 --> 1:50:49.760
<v Speaker 14>workers are still without a first contract. As the union noted,

1:50:50.310 --> 1:50:53.800
<v Speaker 14>their fight now reflects the same first contract crisis seen

1:50:53.860 --> 1:50:58.380
<v Speaker 14>at Amazon, Starbucks, and other major employers. Corporations drag in

1:50:58.400 --> 1:51:01.599
<v Speaker 14>their feet, knowing they're supposed to be bargaining, knowing that

1:51:01.620 --> 1:51:04.220
<v Speaker 14>they should be treating their workers with respect. It's like

1:51:04.600 --> 1:51:08.000
<v Speaker 14>the same old story, it just keeps repeating and repeating,

1:51:08.060 --> 1:51:11.520
<v Speaker 14>repeating in different industries and in different areas. And it's like,

1:51:11.580 --> 1:51:14.979
<v Speaker 14>we can see you. We can see you doing this.

1:51:15.780 --> 1:51:18.990
<v Speaker 14>Being a bad boss, being a union buster, dragging out

1:51:19.030 --> 1:51:21.910
<v Speaker 14>these union contracts is not a good look. And the

1:51:21.930 --> 1:51:24.130
<v Speaker 14>employees are not going to just sit there and take it.

1:51:24.750 --> 1:51:26.850
<v Speaker 14>In the case of these deck officers in the Masters

1:51:26.890 --> 1:51:32.030
<v Speaker 14>Mason Pilots Union, they pointed out that the company's subsidiaries...

1:51:31.950 --> 1:51:36.139
<v Speaker 14>also received millions of dollars in federal subsidies and said

1:51:36.189 --> 1:51:41.080
<v Speaker 14>pretty plainly that, quote, companies benefiting from taxpayer support should

1:51:41.200 --> 1:51:44.960
<v Speaker 14>not be permitted to violate federal labor laws while denying

1:51:45.060 --> 1:51:48.420
<v Speaker 14>basic bargaining rights to the American mariners risking their lives

1:51:48.479 --> 1:51:53.820
<v Speaker 14>at sea. Now, that latter point is important because, like, again,

1:51:53.850 --> 1:51:59.670
<v Speaker 14>this bizarre war that we've become trapped within, that impacts

1:51:59.710 --> 1:52:04.849
<v Speaker 14>them pretty significantly. Word recently broke that an Iranian military

1:52:04.900 --> 1:52:09.790
<v Speaker 14>official identified one of these companies, Overseas Shipholding Group, as

1:52:09.850 --> 1:52:14.390
<v Speaker 14>a candidate for potential retaliatory measures. Which is not what

1:52:14.430 --> 1:52:17.689
<v Speaker 14>you want to hear when you're a person who works

1:52:17.770 --> 1:52:21.389
<v Speaker 14>on an oil tanker. That's not, like, good.

1:52:22.070 --> 1:52:23.470
<v Speaker 6>It's, frankly, terrifying.

1:52:23.490 --> 1:52:26.760
<v Speaker 14>Especially given how hard the U.S. military is fucking up

1:52:26.810 --> 1:52:31.730
<v Speaker 14>this entire thing. So, look, while we're still... a little

1:52:31.770 --> 1:52:35.090
<v Speaker 14>ways away from transitioning to renewable energy while we're still

1:52:35.130 --> 1:52:38.310
<v Speaker 14>dependent on oil. We have the world we have right now.

1:52:38.330 --> 1:52:41.610
<v Speaker 14>The folks who are working on these oil tankers and

1:52:41.689 --> 1:52:44.689
<v Speaker 14>risking their lives so people can drive five minutes down

1:52:44.710 --> 1:52:48.430
<v Speaker 14>the street to go to fucking Target. Like, let's take

1:52:48.450 --> 1:52:51.100
<v Speaker 14>care of them. Let's help them out. The mates are

1:52:51.150 --> 1:52:54.360
<v Speaker 14>asking folks to sign their petition that they have calling

1:52:54.400 --> 1:52:57.960
<v Speaker 14>on the companies to stop stalling and start bargaining. So

1:52:58.380 --> 1:53:01.090
<v Speaker 14>please sign their petition. We'll drop it in the show

1:53:01.130 --> 1:53:05.549
<v Speaker 14>notes for you. So unfortunately, there really is never any

1:53:05.670 --> 1:53:08.629
<v Speaker 14>shortage of stories about rich people being evil to workers.

1:53:09.410 --> 1:53:12.410
<v Speaker 14>But the big bad villain of this past week or

1:53:12.470 --> 1:53:16.900
<v Speaker 14>so comes from a rather unlikely source. On September 23rd,

1:53:17.580 --> 1:53:21.939
<v Speaker 14>journalist Amir Kafagi published a blockbuster story for Documented New

1:53:21.979 --> 1:53:27.500
<v Speaker 14>York titled Cesar Alarzon Dismantles Unions. Why is he now

1:53:27.580 --> 1:53:30.729
<v Speaker 14>creating them? that you truly need to go read because

1:53:30.770 --> 1:53:34.300
<v Speaker 14>it is just wild. And before we get into it,

1:53:34.570 --> 1:53:36.070
<v Speaker 14>I want to make sure we're all on the same page.

1:53:36.420 --> 1:53:39.200
<v Speaker 14>So we're going to take a minute to talk about

1:53:39.640 --> 1:53:44.280
<v Speaker 14>union raids. So generally speaking, unions are supposed to play

1:53:44.340 --> 1:53:48.360
<v Speaker 14>nice together, what with their shared history and stated goals

1:53:48.420 --> 1:53:51.439
<v Speaker 14>and the whole solidarity thing. And a part of that

1:53:51.700 --> 1:53:55.680
<v Speaker 14>is agreeing not to try and steal another union's members.

1:53:56.680 --> 1:54:00.080
<v Speaker 14>Doing so is called raiding, and it's a very unchill move.

1:54:00.900 --> 1:54:03.890
<v Speaker 14>Back in the battle days, unions went to war over

1:54:03.950 --> 1:54:07.849
<v Speaker 14>stuff like that, and things got real bloody. Now it's

1:54:08.130 --> 1:54:12.479
<v Speaker 14>tactically legal, but it's still very much frowned upon. There's

1:54:12.500 --> 1:54:15.479
<v Speaker 14>a little less dynamite involved, but still not a good look.

1:54:16.000 --> 1:54:19.060
<v Speaker 14>So given all the risks... Why would a union bother

1:54:19.180 --> 1:54:22.680
<v Speaker 14>trying to go raiding? Why would they try and go

1:54:22.760 --> 1:54:26.320
<v Speaker 14>to a unionized workplace and try to displace the union

1:54:26.439 --> 1:54:28.620
<v Speaker 14>that was there before them and swoop in and take

1:54:28.660 --> 1:54:32.370
<v Speaker 14>their members? Seems like a weird thing to do, no? Well,

1:54:32.550 --> 1:54:36.350
<v Speaker 14>it usually comes down to math. More members means more

1:54:36.430 --> 1:54:41.350
<v Speaker 14>dues money, and more money plus bigger membership means more power,

1:54:41.650 --> 1:54:46.880
<v Speaker 14>politically and otherwise. Sometimes, though, the math falls apart And

1:54:46.960 --> 1:54:50.180
<v Speaker 14>things seem to turn upside down. In the case of

1:54:50.240 --> 1:54:53.860
<v Speaker 14>César Alarçon, it seems like he's purely in it for

1:54:53.880 --> 1:54:56.970
<v Speaker 14>the love of the game. And that game, for him,

1:54:57.400 --> 1:55:01.480
<v Speaker 14>is union busting. As Kefagi uncovered, Alarçon has had a

1:55:01.560 --> 1:55:06.620
<v Speaker 14>long career in quote-unquote union avoidance, a sanitized term that

1:55:06.660 --> 1:55:09.040
<v Speaker 14>consultants and their clients like to trot out to make

1:55:09.080 --> 1:55:12.860
<v Speaker 14>their slimy actions seem a little less contemptible. It's a

1:55:13.040 --> 1:55:17.020
<v Speaker 14>union avoidance consultant's job to persuade workers not to unionize.

1:55:17.440 --> 1:55:20.520
<v Speaker 14>When you hear about captive audience meetings and things like that,

1:55:21.010 --> 1:55:23.830
<v Speaker 14>these are the people that are parachuting into workplaces to

1:55:23.850 --> 1:55:26.710
<v Speaker 14>try and convince workers that unions are actually a bad thing.

1:55:26.930 --> 1:55:31.130
<v Speaker 14>That's their whole job. It's a very lucrative business that

1:55:31.190 --> 1:55:36.040
<v Speaker 14>rakes in about $ 1. 5 billion a year from anxious anti-union

1:55:36.080 --> 1:55:40.100
<v Speaker 14>employers who somehow have not realized that they could simply

1:55:40.780 --> 1:55:43.480
<v Speaker 14>pay the workers the wage increases that they're probably going

1:55:43.520 --> 1:55:46.260
<v Speaker 14>to be looking for in their first union contract and

1:55:46.360 --> 1:55:49.770
<v Speaker 14>save a bunch of dough. But, you know, captives of

1:55:49.830 --> 1:55:54.150
<v Speaker 14>industry are not necessarily renowned for their adherence to logic

1:55:55.010 --> 1:55:59.790
<v Speaker 14>and empathy. So that's where the union avoidance consultant comes in.

1:56:00.990 --> 1:56:04.550
<v Speaker 14>With that kind of background, why then did Alisson walk

1:56:04.610 --> 1:56:07.690
<v Speaker 14>into a Golden Crust manufacturing plant in the Bronx and

1:56:08.530 --> 1:56:12.460
<v Speaker 14>identify himself as a representative for Progressive Workers of the

1:56:12.520 --> 1:56:16.900
<v Speaker 14>World Local 311, and start trying to convince the workers there,

1:56:17.160 --> 1:56:21.760
<v Speaker 14>who are already unionized with IBEW Local Union 1430, to

1:56:22.600 --> 1:56:26.310
<v Speaker 14>join his group instead. And how many times has he

1:56:26.350 --> 1:56:30.430
<v Speaker 14>apparently done this before? Like, you'll need to read the

1:56:30.470 --> 1:56:33.230
<v Speaker 14>whole article to find out, but it includes a whole

1:56:33.270 --> 1:56:37.310
<v Speaker 14>lot of twists and turns. There's corruption, there's family drama,

1:56:37.800 --> 1:56:41.940
<v Speaker 14>There's union buster on union buster infighting. There are mafia ties.

1:56:42.500 --> 1:56:45.300
<v Speaker 14>Donald Trump's hatred of unions and workers comes into play.

1:56:45.320 --> 1:56:48.400
<v Speaker 14>The phrase, that's just paperwork, that has nothing to do

1:56:48.420 --> 1:56:51.970
<v Speaker 14>with me, does a lot of heavy lifting. The whole

1:56:52.090 --> 1:56:56.190
<v Speaker 14>sordid tale shows just how low employers and their anti-union

1:56:56.210 --> 1:57:00.190
<v Speaker 14>goons will stoop to assure that workers are kept underpaid, overworked,

1:57:00.450 --> 1:57:04.370
<v Speaker 14>and unrepresented. I'm telling you, you gotta read this thing.

1:57:04.430 --> 1:57:07.280
<v Speaker 14>Shout out to Amir, he rules. Now let's take a

1:57:07.300 --> 1:57:10.000
<v Speaker 14>minute to collect ourselves before we head into our next

1:57:10.040 --> 1:57:25.090
<v Speaker 14>tale of work, wins, and woe. All right, so we

1:57:25.110 --> 1:57:28.570
<v Speaker 14>got some good news. We got some bad news. And

1:57:28.590 --> 1:57:30.550
<v Speaker 14>now I'm going to leave you with some news that's

1:57:30.590 --> 1:57:34.770
<v Speaker 14>neither wholly good nor wholly bad, but definitely something to

1:57:34.790 --> 1:57:40.330
<v Speaker 14>keep an eye on. But first, a rumor. I love gossip,

1:57:40.570 --> 1:57:44.120
<v Speaker 14>and I'm always down to investigate a nice, juicy transportation

1:57:44.160 --> 1:57:47.300
<v Speaker 14>strike rumor. This one's been flying around for the past

1:57:47.340 --> 1:57:50.240
<v Speaker 14>little while, but I'm pretty sure it's a non-starter. In

1:57:51.280 --> 1:57:54.760
<v Speaker 14>a classic case of social media not actually being real life,

1:57:54.780 --> 1:57:58.080
<v Speaker 14>I know, I'm shocked too, news began to spread a

1:57:58.120 --> 1:58:02.540
<v Speaker 14>few weeks ago on Instagram, TikTok, and Reddit that truckers...

1:58:02.580 --> 1:58:06.090
<v Speaker 14>were planning a strike for October 1st to protest skyrocketing

1:58:06.130 --> 1:58:09.890
<v Speaker 14>diesel prices. There's even a goofy AI flyer out there.

1:58:10.380 --> 1:58:14.000
<v Speaker 14>calling on drivers to quote park it stand together make

1:58:14.060 --> 1:58:17.580
<v Speaker 14>our voices heard if a large-scale trucking strike or even

1:58:17.620 --> 1:58:20.820
<v Speaker 14>a partial disruption were to actually happen it could have

1:58:20.840 --> 1:58:23.720
<v Speaker 14>a massive impact and grind the entire economy to a

1:58:23.780 --> 1:58:28.230
<v Speaker 14>standstill transportation logistics workers hold an incredible amount of power

1:58:28.980 --> 1:58:30.640
<v Speaker 14>which is of course why so many of them are

1:58:30.700 --> 1:58:35.040
<v Speaker 14>forbidden from striking under the Railway Labor Act. Truckers, many

1:58:35.060 --> 1:58:38.100
<v Speaker 14>of whom are independent contractors or members of established unions

1:58:38.120 --> 1:58:41.880
<v Speaker 14>like the Teamsters, don't fall under the act and theoretically

1:58:42.060 --> 1:58:45.740
<v Speaker 14>could engage in labor action if they wanted to. They

1:58:45.760 --> 1:58:48.630
<v Speaker 14>just haven't done it yet. I've got to say though,

1:58:49.090 --> 1:58:53.850
<v Speaker 14>if a potentially paradigm-shifting nationwide strike was actually in the works,

1:58:54.770 --> 1:58:57.750
<v Speaker 14>chances are that Facebook wouldn't be the first place you'd

1:58:57.790 --> 1:59:00.730
<v Speaker 14>hear about it. Remember when Joe Biden killed off the

1:59:00.770 --> 1:59:03.510
<v Speaker 14>railroad worker strike before it even had a chance to start?

1:59:04.390 --> 1:59:08.070
<v Speaker 14>The corporate media was flooded for weeks with stories and

1:59:08.130 --> 1:59:13.030
<v Speaker 14>statements justifying that debacle and inadvertently showed how powerful that

1:59:13.070 --> 1:59:17.669
<v Speaker 14>kind of action could be. This might not be legit.

1:59:18.130 --> 1:59:21.770
<v Speaker 14>I would be really surprised if we saw any kind

1:59:21.830 --> 1:59:26.050
<v Speaker 14>of strike activity or stoppage activity on October 1st, but

1:59:26.870 --> 1:59:29.910
<v Speaker 14>you know, That's not to say we'll never see it.

1:59:30.650 --> 1:59:36.080
<v Speaker 14>Much to consider. And speaking of transportation and union busting,

1:59:36.760 --> 1:59:39.360
<v Speaker 14>for our last story of the episode, it's time to

1:59:39.400 --> 1:59:40.780
<v Speaker 14>get into the zone.

1:59:41.580 --> 1:59:42.420
<v Speaker 5>AutoZone.

1:59:43.080 --> 1:59:46.020
<v Speaker 14>Where workers at a location in White Plains, New York,

1:59:46.520 --> 1:59:48.020
<v Speaker 14>just won their union.

1:59:48.460 --> 1:59:48.840
<v Speaker 5>Hell yeah.

1:59:49.420 --> 1:59:52.580
<v Speaker 14>Eleven workers at this small but mighty shop will join

1:59:52.680 --> 1:59:57.280
<v Speaker 14>UAW Local 259, making them the first stores at the

1:59:57.320 --> 2:00:02.580
<v Speaker 14>country's largest auto parts retailer to successfully organize. Now, AutoZone

2:00:02.620 --> 2:00:06.240
<v Speaker 14>execs are not thrilled about the development, and they actually

2:00:06.280 --> 2:00:11.670
<v Speaker 14>wasted over $ 200, 000 trying to keep it from happening. That's right,

2:00:12.090 --> 2:00:14.630
<v Speaker 14>tried to bust the union. They hauled out all the

2:00:14.670 --> 2:00:19.030
<v Speaker 14>classic tactics, captive audience meetings, remember the whole union avoidance

2:00:19.050 --> 2:00:19.990
<v Speaker 14>thing we just talked about?

2:00:20.290 --> 2:00:20.730
<v Speaker 11>That's them.

2:00:21.810 --> 2:00:25.450
<v Speaker 14>In addition to surveillance, threats of discipline and retaliation for

2:00:25.470 --> 2:00:28.400
<v Speaker 14>supporting the union, And they also got a little funky

2:00:28.440 --> 2:00:33.010
<v Speaker 14>with it by flying in 17 different managers from Memphis,

2:00:33.150 --> 2:00:37.970
<v Speaker 14>from Indiana, California, and Florida to lurk around the stores,

2:00:38.790 --> 2:00:41.850
<v Speaker 14>push anti-union propaganda on the workers, and keep an eye

2:00:41.870 --> 2:00:46.870
<v Speaker 14>on their conversations. Honestly, this brings to mind the scenes

2:00:47.150 --> 2:00:51.360
<v Speaker 14>at the first union drive back in Buffalo at Starbucks

2:00:52.080 --> 2:00:55.820
<v Speaker 14>when there was just a flood of managers and execs.

2:00:56.320 --> 2:00:59.160
<v Speaker 14>wandering around the stores, like trying to mop and getting

2:00:59.180 --> 2:01:02.540
<v Speaker 14>underfoot because they were terrified of the thought of having

2:01:02.580 --> 2:01:06.340
<v Speaker 14>to bargain with their workers. A side note, it's still

2:01:06.400 --> 2:01:11.010
<v Speaker 14>fuck Starbucks. We are boycotting Starbucks until Starbucks Workers United

2:01:11.240 --> 2:01:14.930
<v Speaker 14>gets their first contract. Make your coffee at home or

2:01:14.990 --> 2:01:18.490
<v Speaker 14>buy it from a union shop, just not Starbucks. But

2:01:18.830 --> 2:01:22.090
<v Speaker 14>back to the zone. This isn't the first time AutoZone

2:01:22.130 --> 2:01:24.630
<v Speaker 14>execs have locked in to crush a union drive either.

2:01:25.640 --> 2:01:28.520
<v Speaker 14>Back in the early 90s, the Teamsters tried to organize

2:01:28.580 --> 2:01:32.650
<v Speaker 14>one of their distribution centers, but were unsuccessful. Even though

2:01:32.660 --> 2:01:36.290
<v Speaker 14>the union drive failed, the NLRB still dinged the company

2:01:36.350 --> 2:01:40.650
<v Speaker 14>for its unlawful conduct during their union busting spree. I

2:01:40.670 --> 2:01:44.410
<v Speaker 14>guess old habits die hard, because this time around, according

2:01:44.450 --> 2:01:48.640
<v Speaker 14>to Nathan DeKong, a parts equipment manager, AutoZone was trying

2:01:48.680 --> 2:01:52.480
<v Speaker 14>to do everything possible to destroy us, to destroy our union.

2:01:53.310 --> 2:01:55.770
<v Speaker 14>It was a show of force to intimidate us to

2:01:55.810 --> 2:01:58.410
<v Speaker 14>make sure we don't even think about talking about the union.

2:01:58.430 --> 2:02:01.850
<v Speaker 14>That's what you told the chief, a really great labor

2:02:01.900 --> 2:02:04.640
<v Speaker 14>publication that you should also read, who did a great

2:02:04.680 --> 2:02:08.200
<v Speaker 14>story on the whole situation. The workers voted to unionize anyway,

2:02:08.220 --> 2:02:13.040
<v Speaker 14>a historic win that AutoZone celebrated by promptly firing Ducon,

2:02:13.700 --> 2:02:16.820
<v Speaker 14>who was the primary leader of the union drive. The

2:02:16.860 --> 2:02:20.590
<v Speaker 14>company insisted that he was a supervisor and therefore ineligible

2:02:20.650 --> 2:02:24.350
<v Speaker 14>for the unit. which Dukong disputes. He says that he

2:02:24.370 --> 2:02:27.770
<v Speaker 14>did not have firing, hiring, or disciplining power, but did

2:02:27.810 --> 2:02:31.800
<v Speaker 14>try to remedy before the vote by refiling the union petition.

2:02:32.660 --> 2:02:33.140
<v Speaker 6>Didn't work.

2:02:33.960 --> 2:02:37.620
<v Speaker 14>The day that it went public, the manager who fired

2:02:37.660 --> 2:02:40.420
<v Speaker 14>Dukong told him very bluntly that his support for the

2:02:40.540 --> 2:02:44.520
<v Speaker 14>union was why he was being axed. Quote, despite repeated

2:02:44.580 --> 2:02:48.020
<v Speaker 14>instruction not to advocate for the union, you continue to

2:02:48.060 --> 2:02:51.630
<v Speaker 14>participate and or facilitate union activity at the store.

2:02:52.630 --> 2:02:53.130
<v Speaker 2>The horror.

2:02:53.770 --> 2:02:57.330
<v Speaker 14>The chief also reports that days after AutoZone fired DeKong,

2:02:57.850 --> 2:03:01.300
<v Speaker 14>management fired a supervisor at the store for, quote, failing

2:03:01.340 --> 2:03:06.620
<v Speaker 14>to stop the union. It's just ridiculous, you know? Like,

2:03:07.600 --> 2:03:08.580
<v Speaker 14>the whole situation.

2:03:09.100 --> 2:03:10.100
<v Speaker 11>Like, fuck it, relax.

2:03:11.120 --> 2:03:13.510
<v Speaker 14>Like, God forbid you gotta give some workers a raise.

2:03:13.600 --> 2:03:15.290
<v Speaker 14>Eleven workers you gotta deal with.

2:03:15.450 --> 2:03:16.730
<v Speaker 5>Like, grow up.

2:03:17.530 --> 2:03:21.880
<v Speaker 14>But since then, labor has rallied around DeKong. I'm so

2:03:21.940 --> 2:03:24.020
<v Speaker 14>sorry if I'm saying your name incorrectly to you, Nathan.

2:03:24.700 --> 2:03:26.360
<v Speaker 14>Let me know if I fucked it up and I

2:03:26.860 --> 2:03:30.240
<v Speaker 14>owe you a drink. But a GoFundMe has been created

2:03:30.280 --> 2:03:34.230
<v Speaker 14>to support him and other fired workers. It's raised about

2:03:34.230 --> 2:03:38.350
<v Speaker 14>13 grand so far. Phenomenal. Gonna need more because this

2:03:38.590 --> 2:03:41.130
<v Speaker 14>is gonna be a long fight. So we'll pop that

2:03:41.150 --> 2:03:43.090
<v Speaker 14>in the show notes so you can add to that number.

2:03:43.290 --> 2:03:46.680
<v Speaker 14>Let's get it up as high as we can. This

2:03:46.740 --> 2:03:49.520
<v Speaker 14>is a developing story, but it's really been heartening to

2:03:49.560 --> 2:03:52.190
<v Speaker 14>see how much love Dukong and his co-workers have been getting.

2:03:52.200 --> 2:03:56.770
<v Speaker 14>And it makes sense. His union organizing story is very

2:03:56.870 --> 2:04:01.450
<v Speaker 14>modern and very relatable and very New York. He's gotten

2:04:01.470 --> 2:04:04.730
<v Speaker 14>support from artist and director Boots Riley, whose latest film,

2:04:04.930 --> 2:04:08.150
<v Speaker 14>I Love Boosters, Dukong cited as a direct influence on

2:04:08.170 --> 2:04:11.380
<v Speaker 14>his decision to try to organize, which is so cute

2:04:11.600 --> 2:04:14.680
<v Speaker 14>and so timely. Like, damn, that John just came out.

2:04:15.480 --> 2:04:17.400
<v Speaker 14>It's a great movie. You should go see it. And,

2:04:17.540 --> 2:04:20.860
<v Speaker 14>you know, maybe you'll get some ideas. On the organizing side,

2:04:20.900 --> 2:04:23.460
<v Speaker 14>he also got an early boost from the Emergency Workplace

2:04:23.560 --> 2:04:27.080
<v Speaker 14>Organizing Committee. Great project that you should look up if

2:04:27.140 --> 2:04:30.680
<v Speaker 14>you are union curious. He connected with them through his

2:04:30.740 --> 2:04:34.860
<v Speaker 14>work as a volunteer field lead for now Mayor Zoran

2:04:34.880 --> 2:04:39.280
<v Speaker 14>Mamdani's successful campaign. It just goes to show there are

2:04:39.300 --> 2:04:42.590
<v Speaker 14>a million ways to get started in organizing. And a

2:04:42.610 --> 2:04:45.020
<v Speaker 14>Boots Riley movie marathon might not be a bad way

2:04:45.060 --> 2:04:48.640
<v Speaker 14>to start. As for DeKong and the UAW, they're not

2:04:48.680 --> 2:04:52.280
<v Speaker 14>backing down. As he told the chief, anybody who's interested

2:04:52.300 --> 2:04:55.770
<v Speaker 14>in forming union at their AutoZone, we want anybody interested

2:04:55.810 --> 2:04:58.970
<v Speaker 14>in that to reach out to us. Their union busting

2:04:59.010 --> 2:05:01.730
<v Speaker 14>certainly works, but not well enough.

2:05:02.890 --> 2:05:03.270
<v Speaker 6>Boom.

2:05:04.150 --> 2:05:07.440
<v Speaker 14>How could you not want to support that dude? That's

2:05:07.520 --> 2:05:10.030
<v Speaker 14>it for me. Thank you so much for tuning in.

2:05:10.570 --> 2:05:12.300
<v Speaker 14>And if any of this has caught your interest, you

2:05:12.320 --> 2:05:14.080
<v Speaker 14>want to do some more reading, you want to dig

2:05:14.120 --> 2:05:15.770
<v Speaker 14>into it, you want to talk to your coworkers a

2:05:15.770 --> 2:05:20.550
<v Speaker 14>little bit, then my job here is done. Until next time.

2:05:33.550 --> 2:05:37.010
<v Speaker 5>This is It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly

2:05:37.030 --> 2:05:40.110
<v Speaker 5>newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world,

2:05:40.170 --> 2:05:43.110
<v Speaker 5>and what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis. Today

2:05:43.130 --> 2:05:48.210
<v Speaker 5>I'm joined by Robert Evans and special correspondent Bridget Todd. Welcome.

2:05:48.910 --> 2:05:51.270
<v Speaker 18>Thanks so much for having me. Excited to talk through

2:05:51.310 --> 2:05:54.080
<v Speaker 18>some of the worst stuff imaginable with you fine folks.

2:05:54.580 --> 2:05:58.660
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it is a hard week. This week that we

2:05:58.700 --> 2:06:03.000
<v Speaker 5>are covering is September 23rd to September 30th. I'll start

2:06:03.020 --> 2:06:05.470
<v Speaker 5>with a few shorter news stories that I think our

2:06:05.650 --> 2:06:10.550
<v Speaker 5>little panel here might find interesting. On Tuesday, Donald Trump,

2:06:10.810 --> 2:06:15.930
<v Speaker 5>the president, launched America.gov, a website to host an AI

2:06:15.970 --> 2:06:19.830
<v Speaker 5>chatbot that pulls information from across the multitude of federal

2:06:19.870 --> 2:06:23.940
<v Speaker 5>government websites. America.gov and this little chatbot probably deserves its

2:06:24.000 --> 2:06:27.740
<v Speaker 5>own focus in a future episode. But also on Tuesday,

2:06:28.100 --> 2:06:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Trump signed an executive order to rename artificial intelligence to superintelligence,

2:06:33.980 --> 2:06:36.640
<v Speaker 5>after running polls on social media for the past week.

2:06:37.480 --> 2:06:40.180
<v Speaker 5>And he also met with the heads of six tech

2:06:40.200 --> 2:06:45.480
<v Speaker 5>companies to sign the, quote, White House Accord on Superintelligence,

2:06:46.510 --> 2:06:53.570
<v Speaker 5>which essentially promotes self-regulation in the AI industry. Speaking of superintelligence,

2:06:53.790 --> 2:06:57.550
<v Speaker 5>under Trump's signature on this document, the United States is

2:06:57.590 --> 2:07:04.380
<v Speaker 5>written as the Unites States. Excellent work there. This document

2:07:04.420 --> 2:07:08.640
<v Speaker 5>was also signed by Sundar Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk,

2:07:08.660 --> 2:07:13.350
<v Speaker 5>Kijensen Huang of NVIDIA, Greg Brockman of OpenAI, and Anthropix

2:07:13.530 --> 2:07:16.970
<v Speaker 5>Dario Amadei. Does anyone have any notes on this little

2:07:17.090 --> 2:07:21.170
<v Speaker 5>chatbot or super intelligence they'd like to add?

2:07:23.050 --> 2:07:26.560
<v Speaker 7>Not really. I mean, what is there to say?

2:07:26.880 --> 2:07:27.650
<v Speaker 5>We can just move on.

2:07:27.650 --> 2:07:28.140
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:07:28.160 --> 2:07:28.420
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

2:07:29.180 --> 2:07:32.740
<v Speaker 5>Now, Dario's inclusion in the White House Accords is a

2:07:32.760 --> 2:07:36.770
<v Speaker 5>little funny because earlier this week, a memo circulating the

2:07:36.810 --> 2:07:40.610
<v Speaker 5>White House named Dario as a leading figure in the

2:07:40.690 --> 2:07:45.450
<v Speaker 5>cultish effective altruism movement, which, according to the memo, is

2:07:45.490 --> 2:07:49.780
<v Speaker 5>responsible for the AI doom panic threatening technological innovation and

2:07:49.840 --> 2:07:53.800
<v Speaker 5>national security. Robert, if you've not seen this memo, that

2:07:53.820 --> 2:07:57.200
<v Speaker 5>document CloudLink has it there. You should take a look.

2:07:57.260 --> 2:07:58.180
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty funny.

2:07:59.070 --> 2:08:01.070
<v Speaker 7>Oh yes, no, yes. I, I have seen this. Yes.

2:08:01.480 --> 2:08:04.920
<v Speaker 5>The memo covers anthropics ties to effective altruism and identified

2:08:04.940 --> 2:08:09.320
<v Speaker 5>effective altruism as a, quote, heavily male, white, non-religious, politically

2:08:09.360 --> 2:08:12.880
<v Speaker 5>left or center left, and usually vegan or vegetarian.

2:08:14.060 --> 2:08:16.060
<v Speaker 11>I love that they throw in their diet, like a

2:08:16.080 --> 2:08:16.780
<v Speaker 11>little detail.

2:08:16.800 --> 2:08:21.140
<v Speaker 7>And I don't even fully agree with that statement, but okay.

2:08:21.200 --> 2:08:24.950
<v Speaker 5>This memo tracks the, quote, AI doom pipeline back to

2:08:24.990 --> 2:08:31.030
<v Speaker 5>effective altruism, consequentialism, and long-termism based on effective altruism's, quote,

2:08:31.610 --> 2:08:37.380
<v Speaker 5>impartial maximization. Do the most good wherever and whenever it occurs.

2:08:38.020 --> 2:08:41.740
<v Speaker 5>Extend the calculation into the far future through long-termism. enter

2:08:41.800 --> 2:08:45.930
<v Speaker 5>human extinction as the loss of potentially enormous future value, unquote.

2:08:46.910 --> 2:08:49.820
<v Speaker 5>The memo also talks about, you know, shrimp consciousness, bestiality,

2:08:49.840 --> 2:08:53.530
<v Speaker 5>and killing babies, pulling from a variety of effective altruism,

2:08:53.630 --> 2:08:55.370
<v Speaker 5>like thought experiments and writing.

2:08:55.450 --> 2:08:57.990
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, yeah. This is why I don't really agree

2:08:58.010 --> 2:09:00.150
<v Speaker 7>with calling them even a left or a center left,

2:09:00.190 --> 2:09:02.810
<v Speaker 7>or at least there's elements of that, but there's elements

2:09:02.880 --> 2:09:07.240
<v Speaker 7>of like classic far right, like eugenic thought, right? And

2:09:07.260 --> 2:09:09.040
<v Speaker 7>this document even notes that, you know, it's talking about

2:09:09.060 --> 2:09:11.240
<v Speaker 7>some of the stuff Singer said about disabled kids and

2:09:11.280 --> 2:09:14.060
<v Speaker 7>the like, but they're leaving out, like it's interesting to

2:09:14.080 --> 2:09:16.160
<v Speaker 7>me that this seems to, I haven't done like a

2:09:16.320 --> 2:09:18.520
<v Speaker 7>deep dive, but at least from What I remember and

2:09:18.540 --> 2:09:20.320
<v Speaker 7>from what I'm looking over now, it does not seem

2:09:20.380 --> 2:09:23.490
<v Speaker 7>to be mentioning Nick Bostrom. He's like the guy who

2:09:23.730 --> 2:09:26.770
<v Speaker 7>is generally considered the father of long-termism within the EA

2:09:26.990 --> 2:09:30.680
<v Speaker 7>subculture and is also like the biggest eugenicist within like

2:09:30.700 --> 2:09:32.100
<v Speaker 7>the prominent chunk of that movement.

2:09:33.300 --> 2:09:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, it makes sense that the Trump allies

2:09:35.800 --> 2:09:38.140
<v Speaker 5>might not be talking about those aspects of EA.

2:09:38.360 --> 2:09:38.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:09:39.140 --> 2:09:43.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

2:09:44.230 --> 2:09:47.510
<v Speaker 5>But a lot of this memo does focus on Anthropic

2:09:47.750 --> 2:09:48.390
<v Speaker 5>and Amadei.

2:09:48.630 --> 2:09:48.930
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:09:49.070 --> 2:09:53.350
<v Speaker 5>Because the government's been beefing with Anthropic for months, especially

2:09:53.390 --> 2:09:56.260
<v Speaker 5>following the Iran war and statements that Anthropic has made

2:09:56.300 --> 2:09:58.840
<v Speaker 5>about military use of their technology.

2:09:58.860 --> 2:09:58.940
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:09:59.330 --> 2:10:03.130
<v Speaker 5>Which has led to the War Department publicly attacking Anthropic and,

2:10:03.390 --> 2:10:06.390
<v Speaker 5>as of last week, effective altruism itself in a series

2:10:06.450 --> 2:10:06.970
<v Speaker 5>of posts.

2:10:06.990 --> 2:10:07.910
<v Speaker 7>What a time to be alive.

2:10:08.430 --> 2:10:11.770
<v Speaker 5>Quote, Americanism, not effective altruism.

2:10:11.790 --> 2:10:11.950
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:10:12.310 --> 2:10:14.750
<v Speaker 5>The United States will continue to be AI dominant.

2:10:15.190 --> 2:10:19.130
<v Speaker 7>We're this close to Pete Hegseth talking about Ayala's birthday

2:10:19.170 --> 2:10:21.890
<v Speaker 7>gangbang as a matter of national security. And I, for one,

2:10:21.970 --> 2:10:24.230
<v Speaker 7>am ready for this glorious day to come.

2:10:24.260 --> 2:10:30.330
<v Speaker 5>LAUGHTER Oh man. Dark timeline.

2:10:30.690 --> 2:10:32.950
<v Speaker 7>I want the younger listeners or anyone who's like, you

2:10:32.970 --> 2:10:35.130
<v Speaker 7>remember like hanging out at parties in your early twenties

2:10:35.190 --> 2:10:38.670
<v Speaker 7>with some like absolute dipshits. Now imagine the president is

2:10:38.730 --> 2:10:41.790
<v Speaker 7>like getting really angry at those dipshits and like you

2:10:41.870 --> 2:10:43.850
<v Speaker 7>hate them, but he's not angry at them for a

2:10:43.930 --> 2:10:46.470
<v Speaker 7>good reason. This is like for those of us who've

2:10:46.490 --> 2:10:48.650
<v Speaker 7>been following the EA movement for years.

2:10:48.670 --> 2:10:49.270
<v Speaker 11>Such a good analogy.

2:10:49.290 --> 2:10:51.750
<v Speaker 7>It's like, well, these guys suck, but not for these reasons.

2:10:55.520 --> 2:10:59.100
<v Speaker 11>The post that they put out, it's clearly AI-generated.

2:10:59.360 --> 2:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, got it, yeah.

2:11:00.020 --> 2:11:00.740
<v Speaker 11>People should see it.

2:11:01.200 --> 2:11:04.530
<v Speaker 18>One of them, it almost looks like a really bad,

2:11:04.690 --> 2:11:08.770
<v Speaker 18>over-the-top AI-generated flyer for like a theme night at a nightclub.

2:11:09.520 --> 2:11:10.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:11:10.120 --> 2:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:11:10.640 --> 2:11:10.940
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

2:11:11.300 --> 2:11:13.360
<v Speaker 5>It's pulling from a bunch. I mean, the whole War

2:11:13.380 --> 2:11:15.470
<v Speaker 5>Department feed right now pulls from a whole bunch of

2:11:15.510 --> 2:11:18.470
<v Speaker 5>like what I'll call downstream from telegram aesthetics.

2:11:18.670 --> 2:11:19.010
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:11:19.150 --> 2:11:22.030
<v Speaker 7>And I think these follow that also. These are all

2:11:22.070 --> 2:11:25.050
<v Speaker 7>descended from like the white boy summer aesthetics we were

2:11:25.070 --> 2:11:27.650
<v Speaker 7>seeing four or five years ago. Which, of course, is

2:11:27.690 --> 2:11:31.430
<v Speaker 7>pulling from kind of like nightlife aesthetics as well. Yeah.

2:11:31.630 --> 2:11:33.170
<v Speaker 5>It's a really horrible mix of things.

2:11:33.230 --> 2:11:34.050
<v Speaker 7>It's an Eruberos.

2:11:35.690 --> 2:11:39.430
<v Speaker 5>Another post from the Department of War. The United States

2:11:39.490 --> 2:11:41.990
<v Speaker 5>will never be an effective altruist country.

2:11:42.010 --> 2:11:42.510
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

2:11:42.530 --> 2:11:44.110
<v Speaker 7>Pretty cool.

2:11:44.750 --> 2:11:45.020
<v Speaker 3>Fair.

2:11:45.150 --> 2:11:45.879
<v Speaker 11>He's right, he's right.

2:11:49.580 --> 2:11:54.140
<v Speaker 5>Pretty cool. Moving on. About a week after Pennsylvania Senator

2:11:54.320 --> 2:11:57.430
<v Speaker 5>John Fetterman sent a little video to the Republican Midterm Convention,

2:11:58.030 --> 2:12:01.910
<v Speaker 5>The Intercept reported that Fetterman has been fundraising using GOP

2:12:02.010 --> 2:12:06.370
<v Speaker 5>email lists, with campaign fundraising emails coming from the address, quote,

2:12:06.840 --> 2:12:13.020
<v Speaker 5>info at gopsquad.com. Now, one of these GOP-linked fundraising emails

2:12:13.220 --> 2:12:16.540
<v Speaker 5>said it was from friend of the pod, James's favorite senator,

2:12:17.060 --> 2:12:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Mike Lee, who wrote in this email, quote, friend, I

2:12:21.340 --> 2:12:24.760
<v Speaker 5>just got an email from John. He's basically a Republican now.

2:12:25.240 --> 2:12:28.260
<v Speaker 5>I need your help to draft him. Sign here, unquote.

2:12:28.680 --> 2:12:32.560
<v Speaker 5>And then there's John Fetterman campaign insignias below this little

2:12:32.620 --> 2:12:36.180
<v Speaker 5>email chain. So cool stuff there. Two great tastes that

2:12:36.200 --> 2:12:39.360
<v Speaker 5>go great together, Fetterman and Mike Lee. And while speaking

2:12:39.500 --> 2:12:44.089
<v Speaker 5>at the Texas Tribune Festival this past Sunday, Fetterman did

2:12:44.100 --> 2:12:46.250
<v Speaker 5>a little Freudian slip. Let's take a listen.

2:12:46.270 --> 2:12:48.850
<v Speaker 7>A Hindi from Dallas and they ask, why not become

2:12:48.870 --> 2:12:49.490
<v Speaker 7>an independent?

2:12:54.210 --> 2:12:57.110
<v Speaker 8>Because I'm a lifelong Republican.

2:12:57.780 --> 2:13:03.820
<v Speaker 7>Democrat every time every time it's funny that's.

2:13:03.660 --> 2:13:06.700
<v Speaker 13>A moment right there that's clippable ladies and gentlemen circulate

2:13:06.900 --> 2:13:12.080
<v Speaker 13>go go go internet spin wildly wildly spin internet.

2:13:12.480 --> 2:13:14.830
<v Speaker 4>Yeah i i guarantee you that's gonna break through that'll

2:13:14.850 --> 2:13:18.850
<v Speaker 4>get that'll get clipped yeah i'm a lifelong democrat though.

2:13:19.470 --> 2:13:21.850
<v Speaker 7>You're not spinning he just said he was a republican

2:13:21.890 --> 2:13:23.130
<v Speaker 7>there's no spin to do.

2:13:22.990 --> 2:13:25.690
<v Speaker 5>Yeah that'll get clipped uh doing my.

2:13:25.610 --> 2:13:29.210
<v Speaker 7>Part i guess Yeah, man, that's that. I just love

2:13:29.230 --> 2:13:31.250
<v Speaker 7>the like, they're going to take this out of context. No,

2:13:31.290 --> 2:13:34.190
<v Speaker 7>the context was you called yourself a Republican, man. Like, yeah,

2:13:34.210 --> 2:13:36.190
<v Speaker 7>it was a slip up, but it's like no one's

2:13:36.250 --> 2:13:37.410
<v Speaker 7>taking it out of context.

2:13:37.720 --> 2:13:38.340
<v Speaker 11>You said it.

2:13:38.660 --> 2:13:39.620
<v Speaker 7>You just said that.

2:13:41.360 --> 2:13:47.020
<v Speaker 5>Speaking of our totally cool Congress, Palantir was named as

2:13:47.100 --> 2:13:50.570
<v Speaker 5>a quote, top supporter of the Congressional Black Caucus at

2:13:50.630 --> 2:13:55.180
<v Speaker 5>their annual charitable gala this month. with Palantir's name plastered

2:13:55.220 --> 2:13:57.540
<v Speaker 5>on tables at the event and a big thank you

2:13:57.760 --> 2:13:59.460
<v Speaker 5>banner in the convention center.

2:13:59.480 --> 2:14:00.300
<v Speaker 14>Oof.

2:14:00.800 --> 2:14:04.870
<v Speaker 5>The Congressional Hispanic Caucus has very publicly returned donations from Palantir.

2:14:05.530 --> 2:14:08.450
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I was at the CBC here where I live

2:14:08.470 --> 2:14:09.310
<v Speaker 18>in Washington, D.C.

2:14:09.340 --> 2:14:12.750
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that was... I wasn't my fave.

2:14:12.770 --> 2:14:15.640
<v Speaker 18>You know, when you went into the building, there was

2:14:15.700 --> 2:14:19.980
<v Speaker 18>this image that was like a orange image of the

2:14:20.020 --> 2:14:21.720
<v Speaker 18>late Shirley Chisholm, who is.

2:14:21.680 --> 2:14:22.340
<v Speaker 11>One of my idols.

2:14:22.480 --> 2:14:23.780
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Shirley Chisholm's awesome.

2:14:23.800 --> 2:14:27.240
<v Speaker 11>She's awesome. She was the first black woman elected to Congress.

2:14:27.690 --> 2:14:32.570
<v Speaker 18>It's her picture with Palantir's branding on her image.

2:14:33.590 --> 2:14:34.340
<v Speaker 7>That's fucked up.

2:14:34.630 --> 2:14:36.510
<v Speaker 11>That was like getting kicked in the nuts right when

2:14:36.530 --> 2:14:36.870
<v Speaker 11>I went in.

2:14:36.990 --> 2:14:40.880
<v Speaker 18>And, you know, I just, I can't imagine that anything

2:14:40.920 --> 2:14:44.640
<v Speaker 18>about what Palantir is doing Chisholm would have been down for.

2:14:44.660 --> 2:14:45.400
<v Speaker 7>No, no.

2:14:45.760 --> 2:14:49.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it was not my fave.

2:14:49.940 --> 2:14:50.580
<v Speaker 5>That sucks.

2:14:50.720 --> 2:14:53.720
<v Speaker 7>For some positive Shirley Chisholm representation, though, if you watch

2:14:53.760 --> 2:14:56.640
<v Speaker 7>the relatively new History of the World by Mel Brooks

2:14:56.720 --> 2:14:59.190
<v Speaker 7>TV show that was on, I think, Hulu? I forget

2:14:59.270 --> 2:15:02.660
<v Speaker 7>which streaming platform. Shirley Chisholm plays a major role in it.

2:15:03.950 --> 2:15:04.890
<v Speaker 7>It's a loving tribute.

2:15:05.170 --> 2:15:06.710
<v Speaker 11>I need a palate cleanser. I might have to watch

2:15:06.750 --> 2:15:07.370
<v Speaker 11>that tonight.

2:15:07.630 --> 2:15:08.850
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's not bad, actually.

2:15:09.630 --> 2:15:13.010
<v Speaker 5>In a statement to HuffPost, Palantir said there, quote, Proud

2:15:13.050 --> 2:15:16.250
<v Speaker 5>and honored to support the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's mission

2:15:16.290 --> 2:15:18.810
<v Speaker 5>of creating pathways for promising young people to enter public service.

2:15:19.150 --> 2:15:20.990
<v Speaker 5>who may not have the networks or financial means to

2:15:21.030 --> 2:15:22.810
<v Speaker 5>do so without support, unquote.

2:15:22.930 --> 2:15:24.010
<v Speaker 7>Basically, we want to own them.

2:15:24.250 --> 2:15:24.490
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:15:24.950 --> 2:15:27.890
<v Speaker 11>Surveil them, track them, get them into our databases.

2:15:27.910 --> 2:15:30.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, and you can't fault some of these guys

2:15:30.840 --> 2:15:34.020
<v Speaker 5>who are in their 80s and 90s who don't really

2:15:34.180 --> 2:15:37.610
<v Speaker 5>know what Palantir is necessarily. By you can't fault them, I,

2:15:37.620 --> 2:15:39.500
<v Speaker 5>of course, mean you should be faulting them. They shouldn't

2:15:39.540 --> 2:15:40.080
<v Speaker 5>be in office.

2:15:40.360 --> 2:15:41.430
<v Speaker 7>They should. They're too old.

2:15:41.740 --> 2:15:44.500
<v Speaker 5>The former chair and current influential member of the Congressional

2:15:44.520 --> 2:15:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Black Caucus, 86-year-old Jim Clyburn, recently told Vox that he

2:15:47.820 --> 2:15:50.590
<v Speaker 5>only learned what chat GPT was earlier this summer.

2:15:51.310 --> 2:15:53.670
<v Speaker 7>Like, I think I'm too old to be an elected

2:15:53.710 --> 2:15:57.070
<v Speaker 7>leader now because when people bring up, like, TikTok or influencers,

2:15:57.130 --> 2:15:59.190
<v Speaker 7>I just black out and find myself holding a gun

2:15:59.250 --> 2:16:02.610
<v Speaker 7>these days. So, like, I can't imagine being 80 and

2:16:02.650 --> 2:16:03.790
<v Speaker 7>trying to keep up with this shit.

2:16:04.510 --> 2:16:06.720
<v Speaker 11>You don't think of yourself as an influencer at all, Robert?

2:16:07.530 --> 2:16:10.750
<v Speaker 7>Oh, gosh. I make media.

2:16:10.770 --> 2:16:14.040
<v Speaker 18>That was a rage bait question and you fell for it,

2:16:14.070 --> 2:16:14.440
<v Speaker 18>my friend.

2:16:14.450 --> 2:16:18.700
<v Speaker 5>I want Robert doing makeup tutorials on Blue Sky.

2:16:18.720 --> 2:16:23.380
<v Speaker 7>I could do that, yeah. Paint dazzle camouflage on your face. Anyway, sorry, Gary.

2:16:25.700 --> 2:16:28.020
<v Speaker 5>Well, with just a little over a month left until

2:16:28.050 --> 2:16:32.629
<v Speaker 5>the midterms, the federal government has begun airing pro-Trump television

2:16:32.790 --> 2:16:37.610
<v Speaker 5>ads paid for by U.S. taxpayers. These are, for all

2:16:37.670 --> 2:16:41.429
<v Speaker 5>intents and purposes, Republican campaign ads paid for by you.

2:16:42.250 --> 2:16:45.740
<v Speaker 5>There's at least three different ads in circulation. One of them,

2:16:45.840 --> 2:16:48.020
<v Speaker 5>a single black and white shot of Trump walking down

2:16:48.040 --> 2:16:51.680
<v Speaker 5>a hallway with a voiceover talking about, quote, a final

2:16:51.740 --> 2:16:54.880
<v Speaker 5>battle with you by my side to demolish the deep

2:16:54.940 --> 2:16:59.699
<v Speaker 5>state globalists and warmongers. And if that little last part

2:16:59.730 --> 2:17:03.170
<v Speaker 5>sounds a bit outdated, that's because this was literally a

2:17:03.270 --> 2:17:03.959
<v Speaker 5>Trump 2024 campaign ad.

2:17:03.970 --> 2:17:04.070
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

2:17:05.879 --> 2:17:09.600
<v Speaker 5>But with one important change, the on-screen text at the

2:17:09.760 --> 2:17:14.250
<v Speaker 5>end of the ad reads, paid for by the US government, unquote.

2:17:15.270 --> 2:17:18.209
<v Speaker 5>This ad is played during sports games and on Fox News.

2:17:19.170 --> 2:17:21.810
<v Speaker 5>Another one of these Trump ads airing on TV is

2:17:21.970 --> 2:17:25.530
<v Speaker 5>edited in the form of like a hype video with

2:17:25.570 --> 2:17:30.670
<v Speaker 5>like quick flashing images on screen with text reading, largest

2:17:30.750 --> 2:17:36.020
<v Speaker 5>tax cuts in history, reigniting American manufacturing and Defend law

2:17:36.140 --> 2:17:40.539
<v Speaker 5>and order and police. Too many ands. So as images

2:17:40.620 --> 2:17:43.840
<v Speaker 5>of Trump and these little phrases flash on screen, the

2:17:43.890 --> 2:17:48.310
<v Speaker 5>song Love Me by JMSM plays in the background. Let's

2:17:48.650 --> 2:17:49.190
<v Speaker 5>take a listen.

2:17:49.209 --> 2:17:49.830
<v Speaker 14>Together.

2:17:50.060 --> 2:17:54.040
<v Speaker 17>We will defeat communism, socialism, and Marxism in America.

2:17:54.100 --> 2:17:56.939
<v Speaker 13>America will never be a communist country.

2:18:03.629 --> 2:18:04.350
<v Speaker 6>Oh, God.

2:18:13.740 --> 2:18:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Paid for by the U.S. government.

2:18:15.160 --> 2:18:18.180
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that should be illegal. Probably is illegal.

2:18:18.600 --> 2:18:22.020
<v Speaker 5>Adding this to the ever-expanding bucket of, um, is that legal?

2:18:22.600 --> 2:18:25.520
<v Speaker 5>How are they allowed to do that? Now, the White

2:18:25.540 --> 2:18:29.480
<v Speaker 5>House has defended these federally funded, but clearly partisan ads

2:18:29.520 --> 2:18:33.980
<v Speaker 5>to influence the midterms by calling them Public service announcements

2:18:35.020 --> 2:18:38.990
<v Speaker 5>akin to Biden's PSAs about the COVID-19 vaccines.

2:18:39.350 --> 2:18:40.530
<v Speaker 11>Are you fucking kidding me?

2:18:40.550 --> 2:18:42.590
<v Speaker 3>Sure, man.

2:18:43.050 --> 2:18:46.490
<v Speaker 7>Public service announcements about how our great leader is perfect

2:18:46.970 --> 2:18:48.010
<v Speaker 7>and can do no wrong.

2:18:48.190 --> 2:18:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Love me. Love me. To quote the White House, the

2:18:51.780 --> 2:18:55.700
<v Speaker 5>announcements are very clearly not campaign ads. President Trump is

2:18:55.840 --> 2:19:00.089
<v Speaker 5>not on the ballot and there is no call to action. Instead,

2:19:00.129 --> 2:19:03.310
<v Speaker 5>the announcements are a reminder for Americans to love their

2:19:03.370 --> 2:19:06.570
<v Speaker 5>country and know why it's worth defending at home, at

2:19:06.610 --> 2:19:08.529
<v Speaker 5>the border, and abroad, unquote.

2:19:08.550 --> 2:19:11.570
<v Speaker 7>Their country? That's not what they were singing Love Me To.

2:19:11.690 --> 2:19:14.459
<v Speaker 7>They were singing Love Me To images of Donald Trump

2:19:14.480 --> 2:19:18.180
<v Speaker 7>with his arms wide open. Like the fucking Jesus at Rio.

2:19:18.379 --> 2:19:25.539
<v Speaker 7>It's wild. It's bad. I don't like this, yeah.

2:19:25.560 --> 2:19:28.810
<v Speaker 5>A few other kind of election-related points I want to hit.

2:19:29.470 --> 2:19:33.730
<v Speaker 5>Last Thursday, the California Supreme Court ruled that Sheriff Chad

2:19:33.770 --> 2:19:40.250
<v Speaker 5>Bianco violated state election law by seizing 650,000 ballots for

2:19:40.270 --> 2:19:43.609
<v Speaker 5>the Prop 50 special election on redistricting as a part

2:19:43.629 --> 2:19:48.250
<v Speaker 5>of his, quote unquote, election fraud investigation. Now, I think

2:19:48.290 --> 2:19:52.090
<v Speaker 5>it's worth noting that emails leaked in 2021 revealed that

2:19:52.190 --> 2:19:56.750
<v Speaker 5>Sheriff Chad Bianco was a dues-paying member of the Oath

2:19:56.790 --> 2:20:01.839
<v Speaker 5>Keepers since at least 2014. And in a debate earlier

2:20:01.879 --> 2:20:04.410
<v Speaker 5>this year during the sheriff's unsuccessful bid to be the

2:20:04.440 --> 2:20:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Republican nominee for governor... Bianco said he was proud of

2:20:08.280 --> 2:20:10.140
<v Speaker 5>his affiliation with the Oath Keepers.

2:20:10.360 --> 2:20:11.339
<v Speaker 11>You're an Oath Keeper.

2:20:11.680 --> 2:20:12.490
<v Speaker 12>We all know that.

2:20:12.890 --> 2:20:13.930
<v Speaker 5>And I'm very proud of it.

2:20:14.370 --> 2:20:15.670
<v Speaker 11>I'm very proud of it.

2:20:15.730 --> 2:20:18.870
<v Speaker 3>And everybody that wants to, like, again, lie and emotionally

2:20:19.190 --> 2:20:23.260
<v Speaker 3>get all spun up about the Oath Keeper organization, I

2:20:23.340 --> 2:20:25.519
<v Speaker 3>just would, before you do that, and I know none

2:20:25.540 --> 2:20:27.449
<v Speaker 3>of you have, I want you to go read the

2:20:27.490 --> 2:20:30.090
<v Speaker 3>mission statement of the Oathkeeper mission statement and the ACLU.

2:20:30.110 --> 2:20:32.460
<v Speaker 7>I saw them on CNN attacking the Capitol.

2:20:32.540 --> 2:20:35.320
<v Speaker 3>And the ACLU. I saw a politician molesting kids. Does

2:20:35.340 --> 2:20:37.440
<v Speaker 3>that mean you molest kids? What?

2:20:37.940 --> 2:20:43.599
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. Really compelling stuff from Sheriff Oathkeeper. But this whole

2:20:43.720 --> 2:20:48.340
<v Speaker 5>story gives us an interesting look into possible election interference

2:20:48.920 --> 2:20:52.980
<v Speaker 5>done on like a county level with HUD sheriffs just

2:20:53.080 --> 2:20:56.240
<v Speaker 5>seizing huge swaths of ballots to try to invalidate as

2:20:56.340 --> 2:21:00.560
<v Speaker 5>many as they can after an election, based on vague

2:21:00.700 --> 2:21:06.080
<v Speaker 5>allegations of, quote, discrepancies in the count. But now going forward,

2:21:06.100 --> 2:21:10.240
<v Speaker 5>at least in California, there will be protections against this tactic.

2:21:10.879 --> 2:21:12.940
<v Speaker 18>You know, you said that it was found that he

2:21:12.980 --> 2:21:14.880
<v Speaker 18>did this and that he violated state election law.

2:21:15.320 --> 2:21:17.259
<v Speaker 11>Will he be facing any consequences?

2:21:18.180 --> 2:21:20.720
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't look like he'll be facing consequences, no. The

2:21:20.740 --> 2:21:23.980
<v Speaker 5>ballots will be returned and destroyed. But no, this is

2:21:24.420 --> 2:21:27.180
<v Speaker 5>not going to result in anything. for him personally. He

2:21:27.220 --> 2:21:31.959
<v Speaker 5>just can't continue his investigation. Speaking of allegations of election fraud,

2:21:32.680 --> 2:21:35.990
<v Speaker 5>earlier this summer, Trump and DHS Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen

2:21:36.050 --> 2:21:39.650
<v Speaker 5>claimed they had uncovered hundreds of thousands of non-citizens who

2:21:39.690 --> 2:21:43.510
<v Speaker 5>were registered to vote. And we didn't report on these

2:21:43.610 --> 2:21:46.890
<v Speaker 5>claims in depth because the White House provided no evidence

2:21:46.990 --> 2:21:51.860
<v Speaker 5>for these extraordinary claims. But in communications to state election

2:21:51.900 --> 2:21:55.390
<v Speaker 5>officials following this big public announcement, the Trump admin already

2:21:55.490 --> 2:22:01.150
<v Speaker 5>began to de-emphasize the certainty of these large figures. Nevada

2:22:01.230 --> 2:22:03.769
<v Speaker 5>was first told by DHS that they had as many

2:22:03.930 --> 2:22:11.480
<v Speaker 5>as 15,903 non-citizens on their voter rolls. But in a

2:22:11.580 --> 2:22:16.200
<v Speaker 5>meeting between state officials and DHS last month, DHS said

2:22:16.280 --> 2:22:20.990
<v Speaker 5>that that number might not be totally accurate because each

2:22:21.090 --> 2:22:24.980
<v Speaker 5>voter had not yet been manually reviewed, And the true

2:22:25.040 --> 2:22:30.370
<v Speaker 5>number may be closer to 185 voters. After this meeting,

2:22:30.410 --> 2:22:34.170
<v Speaker 5>DHS emailed Nevada officials clarifying, quote, we did not reduce

2:22:34.270 --> 2:22:36.130
<v Speaker 5>the 15,903 to 185. We've manually reviewed some of the

2:22:36.129 --> 2:22:37.090
<v Speaker 5>15,903 and confirmed 185 are not U.S.

2:22:37.110 --> 2:22:38.330
<v Speaker 7>Citizens, unquote.

2:22:38.410 --> 2:22:41.310
<v Speaker 5>So still keeping open the possibility that there could be

2:22:41.370 --> 2:22:53.550
<v Speaker 5>upwards of 16,000 non-citizens on the voter rolls, which have

2:22:53.570 --> 2:22:57.490
<v Speaker 5>been flagged, but then DHS themselves narrowed that down to

2:22:57.530 --> 2:23:03.300
<v Speaker 5>at least 185 confirmed cases. So, after this, state officials

2:23:03.379 --> 2:23:08.939
<v Speaker 5>then checked those 185 alleged non-citizen voters and found that

2:23:09.180 --> 2:23:11.800
<v Speaker 5>every single one was actually a U.S.

2:23:11.920 --> 2:23:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Citizen.

2:23:13.240 --> 2:23:14.939
<v Speaker 5>In a letter obtained by the New York Times through

2:23:14.959 --> 2:23:18.140
<v Speaker 5>an open records request, the Deputy Attorney General in Nevada,

2:23:18.280 --> 2:23:23.330
<v Speaker 5>Gray Goat, wrote to DHS, As for the 185 individuals,

2:23:23.629 --> 2:23:27.490
<v Speaker 5>our records indicate that they were citizens. You have provided

2:23:27.590 --> 2:23:32.850
<v Speaker 5>nothing of substance to suggest otherwise. Nevada's Secretary of State

2:23:33.030 --> 2:23:36.360
<v Speaker 5>said in a statement, quote, Our records do not support

2:23:36.420 --> 2:23:39.000
<v Speaker 5>DHS's claims and DHS has still not provided evidence to

2:23:39.120 --> 2:23:43.140
<v Speaker 5>change that. Instead, DHS officials continue their attempts to intimidate

2:23:43.200 --> 2:23:47.540
<v Speaker 5>election officials into compliance and deter voters with huge claims

2:23:47.580 --> 2:23:52.220
<v Speaker 5>of fraud with no evidence. repeating unsupported claims does not

2:23:52.300 --> 2:23:56.960
<v Speaker 5>make them true, unquote. All of this relates to our

2:23:57.140 --> 2:24:01.290
<v Speaker 5>first main story this episode. On September 25th, the Supreme

2:24:01.350 --> 2:24:05.070
<v Speaker 5>Court ruled 6-3 on ideological lines to allow the Trump

2:24:05.110 --> 2:24:09.530
<v Speaker 5>administration to use a janky citizenship database from DHS to

2:24:09.590 --> 2:24:13.800
<v Speaker 5>purge voter rolls. Though the worst potential effects of this

2:24:13.840 --> 2:24:18.070
<v Speaker 5>will be delayed until after the midterms. Now, we've talked

2:24:18.110 --> 2:24:20.730
<v Speaker 5>before about the ongoing legal battles over Trump's attempts to

2:24:20.790 --> 2:24:24.369
<v Speaker 5>restrict mail-in voting. This new shadow docket ruling centers on

2:24:24.390 --> 2:24:27.390
<v Speaker 5>the implementation of the other half of Trump's March 2025

2:24:27.390 --> 2:24:31.210
<v Speaker 5>executive order to, quote, protect the integrity of American elections.

2:24:32.129 --> 2:24:35.769
<v Speaker 5>The creation of a new list of verified U.S. citizen voters.

2:24:36.690 --> 2:24:41.459
<v Speaker 5>After Trump signed the election integrity order last year, DHS

2:24:41.500 --> 2:24:45.000
<v Speaker 5>began to expand something called the SAVE database so that

2:24:45.020 --> 2:24:49.670
<v Speaker 5>it could be used to verify whether large batches of voters. Quickly,

2:24:49.790 --> 2:24:53.270
<v Speaker 5>voting rights organizations sued and a district court blocked the order,

2:24:53.910 --> 2:24:56.949
<v Speaker 5>finding that the overhauled SAFE program, quote, trampled on the

2:24:56.990 --> 2:24:59.910
<v Speaker 5>privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens

2:25:00.250 --> 2:25:03.670
<v Speaker 5>the sacred right to vote. But the Trump administration asked

2:25:03.730 --> 2:25:07.330
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court to stay the district court's ruling. And

2:25:07.400 --> 2:25:11.340
<v Speaker 5>last week, without a full briefing or oral argument, the

2:25:11.379 --> 2:25:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court granted that stay. clearing the way for Trump

2:25:15.100 --> 2:25:19.020
<v Speaker 5>to implement the new SAVE database. The SAVE database was

2:25:19.060 --> 2:25:22.320
<v Speaker 5>created decades ago to verify the citizenship and immigration status

2:25:22.360 --> 2:25:25.400
<v Speaker 5>of people applying for public benefits like Medicaid and food stamps.

2:25:26.180 --> 2:25:29.859
<v Speaker 5>But the newly modified SAVE system incorporates confidential data from

2:25:29.900 --> 2:25:32.720
<v Speaker 5>the Social Security Administration and allows authorities to conduct bulk

2:25:32.800 --> 2:25:37.750
<v Speaker 5>searches of multiple individuals at once. Currently, 27 U.S. states

2:25:37.840 --> 2:25:40.750
<v Speaker 5>use the SAVE system to verify voters. And last year,

2:25:40.910 --> 2:25:44.570
<v Speaker 5>some states began testing the newly modified database. More on

2:25:44.650 --> 2:25:48.010
<v Speaker 5>that later. In the lawsuit that first prevented the government

2:25:48.050 --> 2:25:51.810
<v Speaker 5>from using this newly overhauled database, the plaintiffs alleged that

2:25:51.850 --> 2:25:57.050
<v Speaker 5>the integration of Social Security Administration data violates multiple privacy protections,

2:25:57.590 --> 2:25:59.949
<v Speaker 5>and that the use of the data to purge voter

2:25:59.990 --> 2:26:03.850
<v Speaker 5>rolls risks irreparable harm to voters who are mistakenly removed

2:26:03.930 --> 2:26:07.980
<v Speaker 5>from the rolls due to inaccurate or out-of-date information in

2:26:08.010 --> 2:26:11.410
<v Speaker 5>the database. And this part is really crucial because Social

2:26:11.450 --> 2:26:17.050
<v Speaker 5>Security Administration data does not necessarily reflect someone's current immigration

2:26:17.190 --> 2:26:21.220
<v Speaker 5>or citizenship status. And SSS data is not just your

2:26:21.300 --> 2:26:25.220
<v Speaker 5>Social Security number, but also names, dates and places of birth,

2:26:25.379 --> 2:26:30.580
<v Speaker 5>citizenship indicators, death records, and any information obtained while processing

2:26:30.670 --> 2:26:34.369
<v Speaker 5>requests for Social Security numbers. So there's a bunch of very,

2:26:34.850 --> 2:26:38.370
<v Speaker 5>very personal, very private data that gets stored here. It's

2:26:38.390 --> 2:26:42.500
<v Speaker 5>not just your, you know, however many digit number. So

2:26:42.600 --> 2:26:45.860
<v Speaker 5>if this new database flags someone or a search comes

2:26:45.920 --> 2:26:49.560
<v Speaker 5>up inconclusive, voters could be required to take additional affirmative

2:26:49.600 --> 2:26:53.840
<v Speaker 5>steps to prove their citizenship or naturalization, possibly within a

2:26:53.920 --> 2:26:57.670
<v Speaker 5>very short time window, or they risk being removed from

2:26:57.709 --> 2:27:01.090
<v Speaker 5>the voter rolls and unable to exercise their right to vote.

2:27:01.930 --> 2:27:06.230
<v Speaker 5>In the dissent penned by Justice Jackson... She echoed the

2:27:06.250 --> 2:27:10.190
<v Speaker 5>concern of the plaintiffs that, quote, the staleness of Social

2:27:10.209 --> 2:27:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Security Administration's citizenship records risked disenfranchising recently naturalized U.S. citizens, unquote.

2:27:18.430 --> 2:27:21.140
<v Speaker 5>And absolutely, if someone's afraid that they might get into

2:27:21.200 --> 2:27:24.880
<v Speaker 5>trouble or ICE might go after them for registering to vote,

2:27:25.100 --> 2:27:27.699
<v Speaker 5>even if they are legally allowed to, or if that

2:27:27.879 --> 2:27:31.420
<v Speaker 5>fear prevents them from taking certain actions, that is real

2:27:31.480 --> 2:27:33.750
<v Speaker 5>and active harm. And this type of stuff isn't just

2:27:33.930 --> 2:27:38.390
<v Speaker 5>future speculation. According to a ProPublica report from last February, quote,

2:27:38.850 --> 2:27:42.160
<v Speaker 5>DHS has had to correct information provided to at least

2:27:42.330 --> 2:27:48.660
<v Speaker 5>five states after Save misidentified some voters as non-citizens. In particular,

2:27:48.840 --> 2:27:52.280
<v Speaker 5>in Texas, one woman had her voter registration revoked without

2:27:52.340 --> 2:27:54.850
<v Speaker 5>her knowledge. And two more people had to provide proof

2:27:54.890 --> 2:27:58.720
<v Speaker 5>of citizenship to maintain registered voter status per Jackson's dissent.

2:27:59.160 --> 2:28:01.560
<v Speaker 5>So this can also happen to you and you not

2:28:01.660 --> 2:28:04.060
<v Speaker 5>know about it. So you can be removed from your

2:28:04.080 --> 2:28:07.619
<v Speaker 5>voter roll, not actually know necessarily. Maybe they tried to

2:28:07.660 --> 2:28:10.700
<v Speaker 5>contact you and that just didn't work. That just didn't happen.

2:28:11.520 --> 2:28:14.150
<v Speaker 5>So then you think that you're registered to vote, but

2:28:14.170 --> 2:28:17.230
<v Speaker 5>you actually aren't, which of course then makes you unable

2:28:17.350 --> 2:28:21.879
<v Speaker 5>to vote. These are all real, actual harms. But the

2:28:21.920 --> 2:28:24.740
<v Speaker 5>majority opinion of the Supreme Court didn't actually consider any

2:28:24.780 --> 2:28:28.500
<v Speaker 5>of these harms posed to lawful voters, but just focused

2:28:28.640 --> 2:28:32.220
<v Speaker 5>on the harm that the government could suffer if they

2:28:32.240 --> 2:28:35.980
<v Speaker 5>weren't allowed to use this new SAVE database. And weighing

2:28:36.060 --> 2:28:40.910
<v Speaker 5>the legality of DHS using what's otherwise protected confidential data

2:28:41.270 --> 2:28:45.589
<v Speaker 5>from the Social Security Administration, which the majority ruled DHS

2:28:45.650 --> 2:28:49.710
<v Speaker 5>was allowed to do based on the Illegal Immigration Reform

2:28:49.950 --> 2:28:55.670
<v Speaker 5>and Immigrant Responsibility Act, Section 1373. And this is the

2:28:55.690 --> 2:29:00.270
<v Speaker 5>big kind of legal debate regarding, is this database actually legal?

2:29:00.390 --> 2:29:03.710
<v Speaker 5>Are they allowed to use this protected data? The district

2:29:03.730 --> 2:29:07.590
<v Speaker 5>court said no. The dissent says no. The plaintiffs say no.

2:29:08.150 --> 2:29:11.630
<v Speaker 5>But the federal government and now Supreme Court majority says yes.

2:29:12.480 --> 2:29:14.980
<v Speaker 5>And I want to get more into kind of the

2:29:15.100 --> 2:29:19.500
<v Speaker 5>weeds of this legal argument in a future episode. Because

2:29:19.620 --> 2:29:23.660
<v Speaker 5>to quote Jackson, the argument being made by the majority

2:29:23.920 --> 2:29:30.270
<v Speaker 5>is implausible. And they are very clearly misreading a federal law.

2:29:30.490 --> 2:29:34.150
<v Speaker 5>It's a very plain misreading and interpreting a specific law

2:29:34.490 --> 2:29:36.770
<v Speaker 5>in a way that no one else has interpreted it

2:29:36.810 --> 2:29:40.470
<v Speaker 5>before and would fundamentally alter privacy protections in this country.

2:29:41.170 --> 2:29:44.270
<v Speaker 5>and goes directly against the Clinton administration's interpretation of this

2:29:44.320 --> 2:29:46.459
<v Speaker 5>law as well. But I'll get more into that kind

2:29:46.480 --> 2:29:50.080
<v Speaker 5>of in a future episode about the various efforts to

2:29:50.160 --> 2:29:54.420
<v Speaker 5>undermine elections going into the midterms. So as bad and

2:29:54.620 --> 2:29:58.110
<v Speaker 5>bullshit as all of this is, this ruling will, quote,

2:29:58.490 --> 2:30:02.550
<v Speaker 5>likely have a minimal short-term impact, according to Jackson. And

2:30:02.610 --> 2:30:06.289
<v Speaker 5>that's because the National Voter Registration Act prohibits states from, quote,

2:30:06.870 --> 2:30:11.060
<v Speaker 5>systematically removing the names of ineligible voters from from their

2:30:11.100 --> 2:30:14.230
<v Speaker 5>rules in the 90 days prior to any primary or

2:30:14.310 --> 2:30:18.670
<v Speaker 5>general election. So they cannot do these massive bulk searches

2:30:18.690 --> 2:30:21.030
<v Speaker 5>that this database is designed to do. They can't just

2:30:21.050 --> 2:30:23.610
<v Speaker 5>like remove tons of people all at once from the rules.

2:30:24.350 --> 2:30:26.580
<v Speaker 5>But that doesn't mean that this will have no impact

2:30:26.640 --> 2:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>on the midterms because the government is still allowed to

2:30:29.820 --> 2:30:35.259
<v Speaker 5>use this new safe program to conduct quote, individualized inquiries

2:30:36.160 --> 2:30:40.050
<v Speaker 5>per the majority. so they can still go after individual people,

2:30:40.129 --> 2:30:44.209
<v Speaker 5>just not bulk searches. Jackson writes that states will, quote,

2:30:44.790 --> 2:30:49.950
<v Speaker 5>at most conduct individualized voter roll maintenance using the modified

2:30:50.030 --> 2:30:53.869
<v Speaker 5>save system. And she concludes her dissent by saying, quote,

2:30:54.410 --> 2:30:58.349
<v Speaker 5>the harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few

2:30:58.490 --> 2:31:02.650
<v Speaker 5>lawful voters outweighs the non-existent harm that the government experiences

2:31:03.070 --> 2:31:05.640
<v Speaker 5>when it is prevented from taking an action that it

2:31:05.770 --> 2:31:08.800
<v Speaker 5>likely lacks the authority to take, unquote.

2:31:10.040 --> 2:31:14.379
<v Speaker 18>I'm glad she named that in her dissent because I

2:31:14.440 --> 2:31:17.560
<v Speaker 18>can't get over that bit of, what about the harm

2:31:17.600 --> 2:31:18.620
<v Speaker 18>to the government?

2:31:18.900 --> 2:31:19.760
<v Speaker 11>That's wild to me.

2:31:20.740 --> 2:31:23.700
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, there's another line I have saved in my

2:31:23.780 --> 2:31:28.170
<v Speaker 5>full report of this, which is so funny. She writes,

2:31:28.550 --> 2:31:31.650
<v Speaker 5>it cannot be that the government is injured whenever it

2:31:31.709 --> 2:31:33.830
<v Speaker 5>is prevented from violating the law.

2:31:33.850 --> 2:31:34.930
<v Speaker 14>Exactly.

2:31:36.129 --> 2:31:38.150
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of a really good sum up of like

2:31:38.250 --> 2:31:44.090
<v Speaker 5>most Supreme Court kind of debates during Trump's second administration

2:31:44.850 --> 2:31:47.220
<v Speaker 5>is that the government is constantly claiming that they're going

2:31:47.240 --> 2:31:49.119
<v Speaker 5>to suffer harm if they're not allowed to break the law.

2:31:49.879 --> 2:31:52.339
<v Speaker 5>Considering all of this, I think it's important to reiterate

2:31:52.379 --> 2:31:59.700
<v Speaker 5>that non-citizen voting is relatively rare and statistically insignificant. It's

2:31:59.820 --> 2:32:03.320
<v Speaker 5>not something that is altering election results or causing harm.

2:32:03.720 --> 2:32:07.410
<v Speaker 5>But what could cause harm or potentially alter results is

2:32:07.450 --> 2:32:12.550
<v Speaker 5>the mass disenfranchisement of voters, scaring naturalized citizens into not voting,

2:32:13.209 --> 2:32:18.570
<v Speaker 5>and DHS forcibly deregistering lawful U.S. citizen voters because of

2:32:18.709 --> 2:32:25.410
<v Speaker 5>their wildly inaccurate voter verification system. Now, regarding the massive

2:32:25.490 --> 2:32:28.910
<v Speaker 5>numbers thrown around by the Trump admin, like 300,000 non-citizen voters,

2:32:28.910 --> 2:32:34.990
<v Speaker 5>16,000 flagged in Nevada, It's not yet clear if the

2:32:35.030 --> 2:32:38.670
<v Speaker 5>new SAVE system is where DHS is getting those numbers,

2:32:39.490 --> 2:32:44.360
<v Speaker 5>but considering the fact that the 185 quote manually confirmed

2:32:44.400 --> 2:32:48.260
<v Speaker 5>cases in Nevada turned out to be all U.S. citizens,

2:32:48.900 --> 2:32:52.959
<v Speaker 5>you cannot take anything DHS is saying at face value. Basically,

2:32:52.980 --> 2:32:58.810
<v Speaker 5>this whole illegal voting panic is functionally a psyop to

2:32:58.890 --> 2:33:03.550
<v Speaker 5>purge U.S. citizen voters. It's to convince as many states

2:33:03.610 --> 2:33:08.470
<v Speaker 5>as possible to use this new save system, using threats

2:33:08.550 --> 2:33:13.190
<v Speaker 5>and intimidation, with the ultimate goal of purging voter rolls,

2:33:14.290 --> 2:33:15.980
<v Speaker 5>which they're not allowed to do in the three months

2:33:16.010 --> 2:33:20.379
<v Speaker 5>before the midterms. But going forward after the midterms, DHS

2:33:20.440 --> 2:33:24.760
<v Speaker 5>now has the ability to do bulk searches and removals

2:33:25.320 --> 2:33:29.800
<v Speaker 5>ahead of future elections. So this is definitely something we

2:33:29.820 --> 2:33:35.350
<v Speaker 5>will keep an eye on. going into 2028. Anyway, let's

2:33:35.390 --> 2:33:38.230
<v Speaker 5>go on an ad break and then return for some

2:33:38.650 --> 2:33:54.400
<v Speaker 5>bad news. And we are back. Let's turn to Bridget

2:33:54.459 --> 2:33:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Todd for our next main story.

2:33:57.200 --> 2:33:58.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, thanks, Gare.

2:33:58.300 --> 2:34:00.330
<v Speaker 18>And I have to give a quick heads up in

2:34:00.340 --> 2:34:02.870
<v Speaker 18>the form of a trigger warning that this segment deals

2:34:02.890 --> 2:34:06.830
<v Speaker 18>with some pretty rough stuff. Sexual assaults, drugging. So just

2:34:07.110 --> 2:34:08.940
<v Speaker 18>know that before we talk about it.

2:34:09.750 --> 2:34:12.050
<v Speaker 5>Cutting in here just to say, if you would like

2:34:12.070 --> 2:34:16.240
<v Speaker 5>to skip this section on Cornell and Title IX, you

2:34:16.280 --> 2:34:19.140
<v Speaker 5>can skip to the next ad break, which should be

2:34:19.260 --> 2:34:23.360
<v Speaker 5>around the 55-minute mark. I can't know the exact timestamp

2:34:23.400 --> 2:34:26.450
<v Speaker 5>because that depends on the ads that are loaded into

2:34:26.490 --> 2:34:30.789
<v Speaker 5>your individual podcast feed. But the next section by Robert

2:34:30.850 --> 2:34:35.689
<v Speaker 5>Evans should be around the 55-minute mark after the next

2:34:35.940 --> 2:34:36.300
<v Speaker 5>ad break.

2:34:37.200 --> 2:34:39.860
<v Speaker 18>So y'all have probably been hearing about what's happening at

2:34:39.920 --> 2:34:42.740
<v Speaker 18>Cornell right now. And I want to start by walking

2:34:42.820 --> 2:34:46.019
<v Speaker 18>through the timeline because this case did not just suddenly

2:34:46.100 --> 2:34:49.060
<v Speaker 18>emerge this month. The New York Times actually had a

2:34:49.160 --> 2:34:51.820
<v Speaker 18>really detailed breakdown of the timeline that was super helpful

2:34:51.860 --> 2:34:54.220
<v Speaker 18>in me kind of just understanding what's going on.

2:34:55.140 --> 2:34:56.619
<v Speaker 11>All of this happened.

2:34:56.280 --> 2:34:58.500
<v Speaker 18>Almost two years ago, but there is a reason why

2:34:58.570 --> 2:35:01.370
<v Speaker 18>folks are talking about it right now. So back in

2:35:01.430 --> 2:35:05.750
<v Speaker 18>October of 2024, according to Jane Doe's lawsuit, earlier that night,

2:35:05.850 --> 2:35:08.640
<v Speaker 18>she had been out at bars and Greek life events.

2:35:09.240 --> 2:35:13.019
<v Speaker 18>Around 11 o'clock, she goes to the Chi Phi fraternity

2:35:13.050 --> 2:35:16.390
<v Speaker 18>house to meet a male Cornell student. She's also a

2:35:16.410 --> 2:35:18.650
<v Speaker 18>student at Cornell at this point. She said that she

2:35:18.750 --> 2:35:21.430
<v Speaker 18>thought of this student as a friend to her. Now,

2:35:21.450 --> 2:35:24.730
<v Speaker 18>according to this lawsuit, she was then pressured into consuming

2:35:24.810 --> 2:35:29.310
<v Speaker 18>drugs and alcohol, including ketamine, and that seven men sexually

2:35:29.350 --> 2:35:32.789
<v Speaker 18>assaulted her while she was incapacitated from the drugs and

2:35:32.830 --> 2:35:37.390
<v Speaker 18>alcohol and weaving in and out of consciousness. I looked

2:35:37.590 --> 2:35:40.510
<v Speaker 18>at the lawsuit that she filed. The details that are

2:35:40.570 --> 2:35:44.200
<v Speaker 18>laid out in this lawsuit are truly horrific, to the

2:35:44.220 --> 2:35:47.539
<v Speaker 18>point where I don't even necessarily feel comfortable getting into

2:35:47.580 --> 2:35:50.260
<v Speaker 18>all of them here. Stuff like her being forced to

2:35:50.300 --> 2:35:51.560
<v Speaker 18>snort ketamine off.

2:35:51.440 --> 2:35:52.339
<v Speaker 11>Of an erect penis.

2:35:52.740 --> 2:35:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Oh, God.

2:35:53.720 --> 2:35:57.940
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, it's pretty bad. And her suit says all of

2:35:57.980 --> 2:36:02.060
<v Speaker 18>this went on for hours. According to her complaint, one

2:36:02.080 --> 2:36:05.180
<v Speaker 18>of the men posted a message to the fraternity's Snapchat

2:36:05.200 --> 2:36:09.780
<v Speaker 18>group during the night that said, quote, free pussy. Obviously,

2:36:09.920 --> 2:36:13.510
<v Speaker 18>her suit interprets this as an invitation for other fraternity

2:36:13.530 --> 2:36:16.050
<v Speaker 18>members to join in the room and join in the assault.

2:36:16.370 --> 2:36:19.670
<v Speaker 18>This is not even, like, super in dispute. You can

2:36:19.730 --> 2:36:22.640
<v Speaker 18>find pictures of that Snapchat message and, like, see the

2:36:22.660 --> 2:36:23.260
<v Speaker 18>replies to it.

2:36:23.750 --> 2:36:26.250
<v Speaker 11>And even the do-nothing district.

2:36:25.970 --> 2:36:27.970
<v Speaker 18>Attorney, who I'll be talking about more in a moment,

2:36:28.330 --> 2:36:33.480
<v Speaker 18>has since described those Snapchat messages as, quote, morally disgusting.

2:36:33.940 --> 2:36:35.859
<v Speaker 18>And he said that his office was examining whether or

2:36:35.900 --> 2:36:40.720
<v Speaker 18>not those Snapchat messages could have criminal significance. So three

2:36:40.820 --> 2:36:43.750
<v Speaker 18>weeks later, on November 8th, Jane Doe goes to the

2:36:43.790 --> 2:36:47.650
<v Speaker 18>Cornell University police. And, you know, I don't think anybody

2:36:47.670 --> 2:36:49.869
<v Speaker 18>is surprised to hear that in situations like this, there's

2:36:49.990 --> 2:36:55.510
<v Speaker 18>always some victim-blaming fuckery. So here is some victim-blaming fuckery.

2:36:56.090 --> 2:37:00.459
<v Speaker 18>So that do-nothing DA, the Tompkins County District Attorney Matt

2:37:00.500 --> 2:37:03.940
<v Speaker 18>Van Houten, said that Jane Doe's original statement to the

2:37:04.000 --> 2:37:07.200
<v Speaker 18>police described at least some of her drug use and

2:37:07.260 --> 2:37:10.920
<v Speaker 18>sexual activity that night as voluntary and consensual.

2:37:10.959 --> 2:37:12.020
<v Speaker 11>That's his words, not mine.

2:37:12.820 --> 2:37:15.240
<v Speaker 18>He says that that was a major reason that his

2:37:15.340 --> 2:37:18.179
<v Speaker 18>office determined at the time that there was insufficient evidence

2:37:18.200 --> 2:37:22.570
<v Speaker 18>to pursue criminal charges. So when I heard that, I

2:37:22.590 --> 2:37:25.840
<v Speaker 18>kind of did that Scooby-Doo, like.

2:37:25.920 --> 2:37:28.110
<v Speaker 11>What the fuck do you mean? That seemed absurd to me.

2:37:28.490 --> 2:37:29.810
<v Speaker 11>So I looked into this.

2:37:30.370 --> 2:37:33.189
<v Speaker 18>And I only learned this from researching the situation, but

2:37:33.270 --> 2:37:36.289
<v Speaker 18>there is a wrinkle in New York state law that

2:37:36.350 --> 2:37:40.670
<v Speaker 18>critics have called the voluntary intoxication loophole, which is basically

2:37:40.690 --> 2:37:45.280
<v Speaker 18>that under New York law, if you voluntarily get even

2:37:45.379 --> 2:37:49.400
<v Speaker 18>extremely drunk, the fact that you were too intoxicated to

2:37:49.520 --> 2:37:54.340
<v Speaker 18>meaningfully consent does not by itself legally establish that you

2:37:54.379 --> 2:37:56.959
<v Speaker 18>were incapable of consenting to sex.

2:37:57.540 --> 2:37:58.860
<v Speaker 11>Which to me is.

2:37:59.000 --> 2:38:02.480
<v Speaker 18>I mean, I, maybe I'm a Pollyanna, but I did

2:38:02.520 --> 2:38:04.120
<v Speaker 18>not know that. I was learning that for the first

2:38:04.140 --> 2:38:06.560
<v Speaker 18>time from researching what happened at Cornell.

2:38:07.240 --> 2:38:10.660
<v Speaker 7>I get legally, especially in a situation like a party

2:38:10.760 --> 2:38:14.620
<v Speaker 7>where multiple people are drinking, how do you adjudicate after

2:38:14.640 --> 2:38:17.140
<v Speaker 7>the fact without blood tests and stuff, the level of

2:38:17.180 --> 2:38:21.580
<v Speaker 7>intoxication of everybody? I understand how there's complications there, but

2:38:21.600 --> 2:38:25.350
<v Speaker 7>it seems like something other than just not addressing it

2:38:25.410 --> 2:38:26.890
<v Speaker 7>would be the right thing to do legally.

2:38:26.930 --> 2:38:27.330
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:38:27.490 --> 2:38:32.440
<v Speaker 18>And basically, this law posits that you essentially have to be,

2:38:32.480 --> 2:38:36.160
<v Speaker 18>if you're talking about consensual drinking, you basically have to

2:38:36.200 --> 2:38:39.300
<v Speaker 18>be incapacitated to the point where you cannot move or

2:38:39.440 --> 2:38:42.800
<v Speaker 18>speak on your own in order for that and that

2:38:42.920 --> 2:38:45.780
<v Speaker 18>alone to establish that you were incapable of consenting to sex.

2:38:45.800 --> 2:38:49.840
<v Speaker 18>So if you're, you know, drinking but still talking, even

2:38:49.879 --> 2:38:52.840
<v Speaker 18>if you're like extremely, extremely drunk, that by itself does

2:38:52.890 --> 2:38:55.430
<v Speaker 18>not legally establish that you were not capable of consenting.

2:38:55.709 --> 2:38:58.629
<v Speaker 18>So I really take your point, but it seems to

2:38:58.650 --> 2:38:59.050
<v Speaker 18>me that.

2:38:58.950 --> 2:39:02.240
<v Speaker 11>Like, okay, well, we'll just... codify that into law seems

2:39:02.280 --> 2:39:03.780
<v Speaker 11>wonky to me. And there are lawmakers.

2:39:03.800 --> 2:39:07.940
<v Speaker 7>It just seems like they've abrogated their, like making an

2:39:08.080 --> 2:39:11.860
<v Speaker 7>actual like decision on any of this and just sort

2:39:11.900 --> 2:39:15.260
<v Speaker 7>of picked, I don't know, like it doesn't seem like

2:39:15.740 --> 2:39:18.320
<v Speaker 7>where you should draw the line, right? Like just, okay,

2:39:18.340 --> 2:39:22.240
<v Speaker 7>when somebody's passed out, like in nothing before, that's just really,

2:39:22.480 --> 2:39:24.310
<v Speaker 7>it just seems very irresponsible and incomplete.

2:39:24.910 --> 2:39:25.700
<v Speaker 11>Totally agree.

2:39:25.750 --> 2:39:30.039
<v Speaker 18>And there are lawmakers who are actively working on changing

2:39:30.100 --> 2:39:34.379
<v Speaker 18>this intoxication loophole. And I'm glad that you said that, Robert,

2:39:34.420 --> 2:39:37.310
<v Speaker 18>because to me, this is just me editorializing, I think

2:39:37.360 --> 2:39:40.209
<v Speaker 18>it raises a fundamental question about how consent works, because

2:39:40.230 --> 2:39:44.849
<v Speaker 18>a person can voluntarily use drugs or drink and be

2:39:44.870 --> 2:39:47.680
<v Speaker 18>sexually assaulted. A person can consent to one sex act

2:39:48.000 --> 2:39:50.760
<v Speaker 18>And then not consent to another consent is.

2:39:50.900 --> 2:39:51.359
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely.

2:39:51.420 --> 2:39:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:39:51.660 --> 2:39:53.140
<v Speaker 11>And I think that we just have.

2:39:53.020 --> 2:39:55.820
<v Speaker 18>To I want for us a society where we have

2:39:55.940 --> 2:39:59.080
<v Speaker 18>more conversations about what consent actually looks like and how

2:39:59.150 --> 2:40:02.289
<v Speaker 18>it works so that more people kind of fully understand that.

2:40:02.310 --> 2:40:05.150
<v Speaker 18>I don't feel like we're having those conversations now, unfortunately,

2:40:05.350 --> 2:40:07.630
<v Speaker 18>like in wider society, particularly with young people.

2:40:07.650 --> 2:40:08.150
<v Speaker 17>Yeah.

2:40:09.010 --> 2:40:10.910
<v Speaker 11>So that do-nothing.

2:40:10.450 --> 2:40:12.970
<v Speaker 18>DA that I told you about, Van Houten, he also

2:40:13.010 --> 2:40:15.709
<v Speaker 18>has pushed back on this sort of emerging claim that

2:40:15.890 --> 2:40:20.480
<v Speaker 18>Jane Doe's original statement was fragmentary or incomplete, or this

2:40:20.530 --> 2:40:23.000
<v Speaker 18>idea that the investigators just did not do a good

2:40:23.040 --> 2:40:24.080
<v Speaker 18>enough job of getting.

2:40:23.900 --> 2:40:25.320
<v Speaker 11>A detailed account from her.

2:40:25.700 --> 2:40:28.959
<v Speaker 18>He says that Jane Doe gave police a comprehensive statement

2:40:29.240 --> 2:40:31.960
<v Speaker 18>and made more than 20 handwritten corrections to that statement

2:40:32.080 --> 2:40:34.700
<v Speaker 18>before signing it. So that's what he says is, like, why...

2:40:35.120 --> 2:40:38.629
<v Speaker 18>His office declined to pursue charges. But Jane Doe's attorney

2:40:38.670 --> 2:40:41.230
<v Speaker 18>disputes all of this, including the idea that her original

2:40:41.250 --> 2:40:44.849
<v Speaker 18>statement means that her current allegations are inconsistent with what

2:40:44.890 --> 2:40:48.280
<v Speaker 18>she originally reported. Her attorneys argued that she was traumatized

2:40:48.300 --> 2:40:51.740
<v Speaker 18>and incapacitated and that authorities failed to adequately investigate what

2:40:51.920 --> 2:40:55.459
<v Speaker 18>actually happened to her. So I should say that Cornell

2:40:55.640 --> 2:40:59.240
<v Speaker 18>did take some actions following this report. According to both

2:40:59.360 --> 2:41:03.990
<v Speaker 18>Cornell and third-party reporting, the university did temporarily suspend the

2:41:04.030 --> 2:41:08.730
<v Speaker 18>Chi Phi fraternity and impose some temporary suspensions or restrictions

2:41:08.910 --> 2:41:12.890
<v Speaker 18>on students accused in connection with this incident while they investigated.

2:41:13.510 --> 2:41:17.599
<v Speaker 18>Cornell University's police did contact that DA, which like, okay,

2:41:17.620 --> 2:41:20.160
<v Speaker 18>a lot of good that did. And prosecutors, again, reviewed

2:41:20.180 --> 2:41:24.099
<v Speaker 18>the allegations and ultimately decided not to you know, pursue

2:41:24.140 --> 2:41:28.000
<v Speaker 18>criminal charges under New York state law. Then in January

2:41:28.020 --> 2:41:32.090
<v Speaker 18>of 2025, Jane Doe filed a formal Title IX complaint

2:41:32.190 --> 2:41:36.310
<v Speaker 18>with Cornell, triggering a totally separate university review process. So

2:41:36.670 --> 2:41:38.930
<v Speaker 18>in case you don't know, Title IX is the federal

2:41:38.990 --> 2:41:41.880
<v Speaker 18>civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in schools that

2:41:41.920 --> 2:41:46.420
<v Speaker 18>receive federal funding and dictates rules around how colleges are

2:41:46.500 --> 2:41:49.540
<v Speaker 18>required to respond when a student reports something like sexual

2:41:49.580 --> 2:41:53.029
<v Speaker 18>assault or sexual harassment. According to the New York Times,

2:41:53.230 --> 2:41:56.920
<v Speaker 18>by May, Cornell's Title IX committee had held at least

2:41:56.920 --> 2:42:01.620
<v Speaker 18>12 hearings involving these allegations and this situation. So Cornell

2:42:01.820 --> 2:42:04.920
<v Speaker 18>now says that this investigation eventually resulted in what they

2:42:04.959 --> 2:42:09.650
<v Speaker 18>describe as serious disciplinary sanctions, what they describe as things

2:42:09.670 --> 2:42:13.620
<v Speaker 18>like suspensions and expulsions. and that the Chi Phi chapter

2:42:13.640 --> 2:42:18.740
<v Speaker 18>that was involved in this is still barred from campus. However,

2:42:19.280 --> 2:42:23.020
<v Speaker 18>we don't actually know exactly what happened to each individual

2:42:23.060 --> 2:42:26.300
<v Speaker 18>student because Cornell has declined to publicly disclose any of

2:42:26.340 --> 2:42:30.300
<v Speaker 18>those details, citing federal student privacy laws. Jane Doe's attorney

2:42:30.340 --> 2:42:33.560
<v Speaker 18>told CBS News that two of the seven students were expelled,

2:42:33.580 --> 2:42:36.200
<v Speaker 18>and at least some of the men who were named

2:42:36.360 --> 2:42:40.360
<v Speaker 18>in the lawsuit have denied allegations through their attorneys. So

2:42:40.740 --> 2:42:43.680
<v Speaker 18>if you've heard about this situation, you've probably heard about

2:42:43.920 --> 2:42:48.300
<v Speaker 18>one particularly grim detail, and that is the essays. So

2:42:48.720 --> 2:42:52.080
<v Speaker 18>Jane Doe's civil complaint alleges that several of the accused

2:42:52.100 --> 2:42:56.570
<v Speaker 18>students were, quote, afforded the opportunity to mitigate their conduct

2:42:56.830 --> 2:43:01.310
<v Speaker 18>by submitting essays to Cornell, like written papers that you

2:43:01.330 --> 2:43:02.170
<v Speaker 18>would write in a class.

2:43:02.810 --> 2:43:04.530
<v Speaker 11>Cornell has since pushed back on that.

2:43:04.450 --> 2:43:08.970
<v Speaker 18>Claim, but in a way that I find interesting, because

2:43:09.450 --> 2:43:12.580
<v Speaker 18>They did not say that none of the students involved

2:43:12.740 --> 2:43:15.080
<v Speaker 18>were made to write an essay to mitigate, you know,

2:43:15.760 --> 2:43:19.680
<v Speaker 18>their conduct. What Cornell said was, quote, none of the

2:43:19.720 --> 2:43:23.500
<v Speaker 18>individuals charged were offered the opportunity to write essays as

2:43:23.560 --> 2:43:27.200
<v Speaker 18>a sole consequence of their involvement. So, like, it kind

2:43:27.220 --> 2:43:30.310
<v Speaker 18>of does sound like maybe they were made to write essays. Like,

2:43:30.620 --> 2:43:35.360
<v Speaker 18>I'm not sure what that exactly means. So Cornell says

2:43:35.400 --> 2:43:38.240
<v Speaker 18>the disciplinary process resulted in a range of sanctions, including

2:43:38.280 --> 2:43:41.340
<v Speaker 18>suspensions and expulsions. But again, we don't really know what

2:43:41.360 --> 2:43:45.350
<v Speaker 18>all went down there. So after that, the story kind

2:43:45.430 --> 2:43:49.670
<v Speaker 18>of fell from public view until very recently this month.

2:43:50.170 --> 2:43:53.530
<v Speaker 18>This month, Jane Doe filed a civil lawsuit against the defendants,

2:43:53.590 --> 2:43:57.800
<v Speaker 18>including Cornell University, Chi Phi, her sorority Delta Delta Delta,

2:43:58.140 --> 2:44:01.760
<v Speaker 18>university officials, and seven men that she says participated in

2:44:01.800 --> 2:44:05.320
<v Speaker 18>this assault. And that lawsuit has really pushed this whole

2:44:05.360 --> 2:44:09.640
<v Speaker 18>situation more into public view, like how did the university

2:44:09.660 --> 2:44:12.350
<v Speaker 18>handle it? How did the authorities handle it? And I

2:44:12.930 --> 2:44:16.710
<v Speaker 18>have to really champion the student journalists at the Cornell

2:44:16.750 --> 2:44:20.490
<v Speaker 18>Daily Sun here, which is Cornell's independent student newspaper. The

2:44:20.530 --> 2:44:24.090
<v Speaker 18>Daily Sun's journalists have been reporting on these allegations going

2:44:24.129 --> 2:44:27.650
<v Speaker 18>back to 2024, and they have been aggressively pursuing and

2:44:27.709 --> 2:44:31.150
<v Speaker 18>covering the lawsuit and the university's response. There is a

2:44:31.660 --> 2:44:34.170
<v Speaker 18>really good Q &amp; A with one of the student editors,

2:44:34.610 --> 2:44:37.260
<v Speaker 18>Cerise Kuzba, in the cut about what it was like

2:44:37.300 --> 2:44:39.720
<v Speaker 18>to break and cover this story. And one of the

2:44:39.760 --> 2:44:44.340
<v Speaker 18>things that she said was that weirdness around whether or

2:44:44.379 --> 2:44:47.700
<v Speaker 18>not these students were asked to write essays to mitigate

2:44:47.740 --> 2:44:51.500
<v Speaker 18>this like really, really awful behavior. Like it clarified that

2:44:51.540 --> 2:44:55.160
<v Speaker 18>for me because she basically says that Cornell treats sexual

2:44:55.230 --> 2:44:58.869
<v Speaker 18>assault on campus as a more of an education issue,

2:44:59.270 --> 2:45:02.610
<v Speaker 18>not a public safety issue. And she really describes the

2:45:02.650 --> 2:45:04.550
<v Speaker 18>kind of environment where like it would make sense that

2:45:04.570 --> 2:45:07.670
<v Speaker 18>the university would think that Having students do workshops or

2:45:07.730 --> 2:45:10.290
<v Speaker 18>write essays would be an appropriate way to mitigate harm.

2:45:10.629 --> 2:45:13.770
<v Speaker 18>She told The Cut, When you search the task force website,

2:45:14.030 --> 2:45:16.959
<v Speaker 18>you see what they're doing is classes, workshops, and website links.

2:45:17.360 --> 2:45:19.620
<v Speaker 18>It's pretty easy to assume that those who would often

2:45:19.680 --> 2:45:22.459
<v Speaker 18>commit the sexual assault will most likely not be the

2:45:22.540 --> 2:45:26.359
<v Speaker 18>ones attending the voluntary and optional sexual assault workshops. Within

2:45:26.379 --> 2:45:29.700
<v Speaker 18>the editorial committee, we feel that sexual misconduct cannot be

2:45:29.760 --> 2:45:31.600
<v Speaker 18>solved in the same way we try to attempt to

2:45:31.640 --> 2:45:32.410
<v Speaker 18>solve plagiarism.

2:45:32.870 --> 2:45:37.570
<v Speaker 11>These are very fundamentally different issues, she told The Cut. So,

2:45:38.150 --> 2:45:38.670
<v Speaker 11>if you have.

2:45:38.650 --> 2:45:42.730
<v Speaker 18>Seen the names of these men circulating publicly, that is

2:45:42.770 --> 2:45:45.680
<v Speaker 18>because of the Cornell Daily Sun. On September 21st, the

2:45:45.720 --> 2:45:49.279
<v Speaker 18>Cornell Daily Sun's editorial board published the names of all

2:45:49.300 --> 2:45:51.860
<v Speaker 18>of the men who were named as defendants in this lawsuit.

2:45:52.260 --> 2:45:54.440
<v Speaker 18>They said that they believed Cornell had failed in its

2:45:54.560 --> 2:45:58.260
<v Speaker 18>obligation to protect the students and to adequately account for

2:45:58.320 --> 2:46:00.180
<v Speaker 18>its handling of the allegations.

2:46:00.830 --> 2:46:03.650
<v Speaker 11>So, I do have a couple of updates.

2:46:04.070 --> 2:46:08.550
<v Speaker 18>On September 28th, that Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten,

2:46:08.910 --> 2:46:12.410
<v Speaker 18>you know, that do-nothing DA I was describing earlier, well,

2:46:12.570 --> 2:46:15.129
<v Speaker 18>he announced that his office was actually going to do something,

2:46:15.230 --> 2:46:19.090
<v Speaker 18>and that is to reopen this criminal investigation. Van Houten

2:46:19.110 --> 2:46:21.690
<v Speaker 18>says that his office has assigned a senior prosecutor with

2:46:21.730 --> 2:46:24.990
<v Speaker 18>experience prosecuting sex crimes and is preparing to present the

2:46:25.010 --> 2:46:28.520
<v Speaker 18>case to a grand jury. Also, New York Governor Kathy

2:46:28.560 --> 2:46:31.670
<v Speaker 18>Hochul called for an outside council to conduct a transparent,

2:46:31.700 --> 2:46:36.570
<v Speaker 18>independent review of how the university handled Jane Doe's situation. Specifically,

2:46:36.650 --> 2:46:39.169
<v Speaker 18>she wants this review to determine whether or not Cornell

2:46:39.370 --> 2:46:43.200
<v Speaker 18>met its obligations to protect students and pursue justice. So

2:46:43.240 --> 2:46:47.560
<v Speaker 18>that's kind of where the Cornell situation sits right now.

2:46:47.580 --> 2:46:52.020
<v Speaker 18>I have a couple of other sort of pieces there.

2:46:52.280 --> 2:46:54.910
<v Speaker 18>I'm I don't know if you would call this person

2:46:54.950 --> 2:46:57.990
<v Speaker 18>a journalist. I'm going to refer to him as a

2:46:58.610 --> 2:47:00.390
<v Speaker 18>sub stack troll.

2:47:00.629 --> 2:47:00.930
<v Speaker 3>Oh, no.

2:47:00.970 --> 2:47:02.670
<v Speaker 5>Are you going to talk about who I think you're

2:47:02.690 --> 2:47:03.310
<v Speaker 5>going to talk about?

2:47:03.709 --> 2:47:04.910
<v Speaker 11>It's Michael Tracy.

2:47:05.030 --> 2:47:05.529
<v Speaker 13>Oh, yes.

2:47:05.750 --> 2:47:06.090
<v Speaker 15>Yes.

2:47:06.270 --> 2:47:08.250
<v Speaker 7>It's time for Michael Tracy.

2:47:08.400 --> 2:47:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Damn it.

2:47:09.060 --> 2:47:11.379
<v Speaker 11>Is this not his first appearance on the pod?

2:47:11.400 --> 2:47:14.920
<v Speaker 7>No, we've talked about Michael and him being sure the

2:47:14.959 --> 2:47:18.220
<v Speaker 7>Americans were about to invade to help Ukraine because he

2:47:18.500 --> 2:47:21.959
<v Speaker 7>wound up accidentally at a U.S. embassy in Poland. We've

2:47:22.000 --> 2:47:24.500
<v Speaker 7>talked about Michael a few times because he's always wrong

2:47:24.520 --> 2:47:25.459
<v Speaker 7>about everything he says.

2:47:25.920 --> 2:47:28.540
<v Speaker 18>Well, you might not be surprised then to find out

2:47:28.600 --> 2:47:32.070
<v Speaker 18>that he is trying to reveal Jane Doe's identity.

2:47:32.430 --> 2:47:35.330
<v Speaker 7>This is not the first time he's gone after a survivor. Yeah.

2:47:35.980 --> 2:47:36.320
<v Speaker 15>Yes.

2:47:36.560 --> 2:47:39.279
<v Speaker 18>He tweeted, if you happen to know who this Cornell

2:47:39.560 --> 2:47:41.760
<v Speaker 18>Jane Doe is, get in touch and I would be

2:47:41.800 --> 2:47:44.440
<v Speaker 18>happy to publish her name and identifying information. And yes,

2:47:44.459 --> 2:47:47.740
<v Speaker 18>this is 100% permitted under the First Amendment. Whatever threats

2:47:47.800 --> 2:47:50.610
<v Speaker 18>or emotional blackmail people might want to deploy.

2:47:50.629 --> 2:47:53.270
<v Speaker 11>So just a real.

2:47:53.010 --> 2:47:58.269
<v Speaker 18>Lovely guy, real lovely addition to this whole shit show.

2:47:58.690 --> 2:48:00.970
<v Speaker 5>There's been a few other kind of far right content

2:48:01.010 --> 2:48:05.170
<v Speaker 5>creators who've tried to dox this woman, have put out

2:48:05.250 --> 2:48:08.710
<v Speaker 5>identifications that who knows if they are real or not.

2:48:09.209 --> 2:48:11.830
<v Speaker 5>But this is definitely not just Michael. This is not

2:48:11.850 --> 2:48:14.330
<v Speaker 5>just a Michael problem. This is across the whole kind

2:48:14.379 --> 2:48:19.539
<v Speaker 5>of Twitter America first, Groyper sphere as well.

2:48:20.260 --> 2:48:20.740
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:48:20.760 --> 2:48:20.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah.

2:48:21.640 --> 2:48:23.630
<v Speaker 11>And I'm glad that you mentioned that.

2:48:23.670 --> 2:48:26.110
<v Speaker 18>You know, when I was researching for this, I actually

2:48:26.150 --> 2:48:29.450
<v Speaker 18>found myself in the Behind the Bastards or Cool Zone subreddit.

2:48:29.490 --> 2:48:31.130
<v Speaker 18>And one of the posts on there caught my eye,

2:48:31.170 --> 2:48:34.360
<v Speaker 18>which was, I think this person is right, but basically asking,

2:48:34.840 --> 2:48:38.800
<v Speaker 18>does it seem like there's an uptick in kind of, quote,

2:48:38.980 --> 2:48:43.330
<v Speaker 18>gender wars stuff being used in incendiary ways?

2:48:43.470 --> 2:48:43.650
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

2:48:44.390 --> 2:48:46.310
<v Speaker 18>And he was talking about some of the conversation around

2:48:46.330 --> 2:48:49.150
<v Speaker 18>the Lindsay Clancy trial. And I do, I mean, I'm

2:48:49.450 --> 2:48:52.490
<v Speaker 18>lucky that I've, on my side of pocket of the internet,

2:48:52.670 --> 2:48:57.150
<v Speaker 18>everybody is, you know, supportive of Jane Doe and they

2:48:57.209 --> 2:49:00.890
<v Speaker 18>want a more transparent, clear process for when this kind

2:49:00.930 --> 2:49:02.750
<v Speaker 18>of thing happens. But I do think we're seeing an

2:49:02.790 --> 2:49:05.010
<v Speaker 18>uptick in this kind of thing being used to divide

2:49:05.230 --> 2:49:06.129
<v Speaker 18>and incite.

2:49:06.390 --> 2:49:06.590
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:49:07.140 --> 2:49:07.349
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

2:49:07.400 --> 2:49:10.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. The Lindsay Clancy or whatever her name is case,

2:49:10.220 --> 2:49:12.420
<v Speaker 7>I'm also seeing used a lot that way in the

2:49:12.459 --> 2:49:14.790
<v Speaker 7>right of like, women want to be able to murder

2:49:14.830 --> 2:49:17.869
<v Speaker 7>their babies and stuff. Like, there's definitely a concerted effort

2:49:18.129 --> 2:49:20.129
<v Speaker 7>to push gender conflict shit.

2:49:21.110 --> 2:49:24.689
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, and I hate that it is effective.

2:49:25.270 --> 2:49:26.840
<v Speaker 18>I hate that it's the kind of cultural issue that

2:49:26.879 --> 2:49:31.220
<v Speaker 18>really can move people along these lines. And, you know,

2:49:31.240 --> 2:49:34.160
<v Speaker 18>I think it's important that we know that this situation

2:49:34.220 --> 2:49:38.160
<v Speaker 18>at Cornell is, like, not isolated. Campus rape is not

2:49:38.180 --> 2:49:41.050
<v Speaker 18>an isolated thing. And there's actually another story that you

2:49:41.120 --> 2:49:45.160
<v Speaker 18>might be hearing less about A student at Louisiana State

2:49:45.180 --> 2:49:49.430
<v Speaker 18>University named Kendall Francis Basically, Kendall Francis is a student

2:49:49.470 --> 2:49:51.250
<v Speaker 18>at LSU, a young Black woman.

2:49:51.629 --> 2:49:52.750
<v Speaker 11>This is from law commentary.

2:49:52.770 --> 2:49:57.440
<v Speaker 18>LSU found a football player responsible for sexual assault and

2:49:57.500 --> 2:50:01.340
<v Speaker 18>forcible rape through its Title IX process, then reduced his

2:50:01.580 --> 2:50:06.080
<v Speaker 18>one-year suspension on appeal to two years of probation without restrictions,

2:50:06.459 --> 2:50:10.890
<v Speaker 18>subsequently allowing him back on the LSU football team. So

2:50:11.110 --> 2:50:13.830
<v Speaker 18>this finding remained in place. And that case is now

2:50:13.990 --> 2:50:18.830
<v Speaker 18>under criminal investigation. So you're probably thinking, What the fuck? Basically,

2:50:19.410 --> 2:50:22.850
<v Speaker 18>law commentary reports that Francis, the student at LSU, filed

2:50:22.870 --> 2:50:26.580
<v Speaker 18>a formal Title IX complaint in January of 2026. After

2:50:26.720 --> 2:50:30.780
<v Speaker 18>investigating these allegations and the player's account, the university did

2:50:30.920 --> 2:50:35.260
<v Speaker 18>find him responsible for sexual assault and forcible rape. LSU

2:50:35.320 --> 2:50:40.400
<v Speaker 18>initially imposed a one-year suspension. That player appealed. The university

2:50:40.540 --> 2:50:44.379
<v Speaker 18>upheld the sexual misconduct finding, but then reversed the suspension,

2:50:44.440 --> 2:50:48.340
<v Speaker 18>replacing it with that two years of, quote, disciplinary probation

2:50:48.570 --> 2:50:49.690
<v Speaker 18>without restrictions.

2:50:50.129 --> 2:50:52.530
<v Speaker 11>This, of course, allowed him to return to school.

2:50:52.820 --> 2:50:57.360
<v Speaker 18>To campus, campus life, campus activities, including returning to the

2:50:57.560 --> 2:51:00.590
<v Speaker 18>LSU football team. So the student has been saying, you know,

2:51:01.290 --> 2:51:04.930
<v Speaker 18>I've been made incredibly anxious by this. Like, I wanted

2:51:04.950 --> 2:51:07.390
<v Speaker 18>to be on campus and live my life. But the

2:51:07.450 --> 2:51:10.609
<v Speaker 18>idea that the person at the university agrees assaulted me

2:51:11.000 --> 2:51:15.180
<v Speaker 18>is just allowed back on campus is unacceptable. So in response,

2:51:15.240 --> 2:51:18.090
<v Speaker 18>she filed a criminal complaint And that complaint was brought

2:51:18.150 --> 2:51:21.390
<v Speaker 18>to the East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney's Office for

2:51:21.430 --> 2:51:25.310
<v Speaker 18>review on September 22, 2026, where they are now investigating.

2:51:25.370 --> 2:51:28.060
<v Speaker 18>And that's kind of where we're at right now. But

2:51:28.260 --> 2:51:30.860
<v Speaker 18>LSU says that they're standing by what they did. They

2:51:30.879 --> 2:51:34.480
<v Speaker 18>said that they followed the policies and the process correctly

2:51:34.520 --> 2:51:38.040
<v Speaker 18>and that they're, you know, working with law enforcement to

2:51:38.080 --> 2:51:38.800
<v Speaker 18>solve the matter.

2:51:39.240 --> 2:51:40.199
<v Speaker 11>She's been speaking up.

2:51:40.600 --> 2:51:44.199
<v Speaker 18>On social media, you know, using her real identity, which

2:51:44.240 --> 2:51:47.570
<v Speaker 18>is an incredibly fraught thing to be doing. I wanted

2:51:47.590 --> 2:51:49.390
<v Speaker 18>to play just a little bit of a video that

2:51:49.490 --> 2:51:51.330
<v Speaker 18>she posted to social media.

2:51:52.490 --> 2:51:56.070
<v Speaker 1>We had a pretty rough hearing. The hearing was not

2:51:56.150 --> 2:52:01.030
<v Speaker 1>the best. And then LSU said that he was accountable

2:52:01.070 --> 2:52:04.109
<v Speaker 1>for rape and then proceeded to suspend him for a year,

2:52:04.350 --> 2:52:07.750
<v Speaker 1>even though for rape, the suspension is two to three years.

2:52:09.410 --> 2:52:12.369
<v Speaker 1>Even with him admitting on the record that he did

2:52:12.430 --> 2:52:15.170
<v Speaker 1>rape me, they still just gave him a lesser sentence

2:52:15.330 --> 2:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in which he then appealed. During this appeal process, it

2:52:19.670 --> 2:52:22.800
<v Speaker 1>took so long and they took a long, long time

2:52:22.959 --> 2:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to give it back to me. And I ended up

2:52:25.200 --> 2:52:27.539
<v Speaker 1>coming back to LSU because at first he was suspended

2:52:27.600 --> 2:52:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and I did not think that they would suspend him

2:52:29.740 --> 2:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>because they had already found or unsuspend him because they

2:52:32.720 --> 2:52:37.050
<v Speaker 1>had already found him responsible for rape. After the appeal process,

2:52:37.640 --> 2:52:39.990
<v Speaker 1>LSU decided to send me the email of the appeal

2:52:40.020 --> 2:52:42.709
<v Speaker 1>process during my class, so I ended up reading the

2:52:42.750 --> 2:52:44.929
<v Speaker 1>appeal in my class, and during the letter it said

2:52:45.310 --> 2:52:47.770
<v Speaker 1>that he was still responsible for rape, but he's able

2:52:47.790 --> 2:52:50.830
<v Speaker 1>to play football, join orgs, and everything like that, and

2:52:50.870 --> 2:52:53.210
<v Speaker 1>so that made my anxiety really, really bad because I

2:52:53.250 --> 2:52:53.690
<v Speaker 1>don't want.

2:52:53.610 --> 2:52:56.650
<v Speaker 6>To face this person. So this caused me.

2:52:56.629 --> 2:53:00.720
<v Speaker 1>To go online full-time, and now I'm just trying to

2:53:00.780 --> 2:53:04.000
<v Speaker 1>speak on my story because LSU does really protect their athletes,

2:53:04.140 --> 2:53:06.490
<v Speaker 1>especially their football players, and I'm sorry for anyone else

2:53:06.780 --> 2:53:09.390
<v Speaker 1>who has gone through something similar to this. My DMs

2:53:09.430 --> 2:53:11.230
<v Speaker 1>are open, and you guys are more than welcome to

2:53:11.470 --> 2:53:15.550
<v Speaker 1>message me. I really just wanted to bring awareness upon

2:53:15.590 --> 2:53:19.610
<v Speaker 1>this situation because I'm just dealing with a lot right now,

2:53:20.030 --> 2:53:21.990
<v Speaker 1>and I think that this story needs to be heard.

2:53:22.870 --> 2:53:24.570
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys for listening to my story, and I

2:53:24.610 --> 2:53:26.030
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys all have an amazing day.

2:53:28.600 --> 2:53:31.690
<v Speaker 11>So she's been really speaking out on social media.

2:53:31.870 --> 2:53:36.190
<v Speaker 18>And, you know, I'm really happy that we are galvanizing

2:53:36.250 --> 2:53:39.770
<v Speaker 18>around Jane Doe at Cornell. And I think that all

2:53:39.830 --> 2:53:44.529
<v Speaker 18>survivors and victims deserve to have their stories shared, deserve

2:53:44.550 --> 2:53:46.850
<v Speaker 18>to have support, deserve to be believed. And so I

2:53:46.890 --> 2:53:49.890
<v Speaker 18>just wanted to also highlight what's happening at LSU with

2:53:49.910 --> 2:53:54.050
<v Speaker 18>this Title IX complaint as well. And Coincidentally, I do

2:53:54.150 --> 2:53:57.790
<v Speaker 18>have some Title IX news because on September 28th, the

2:53:57.890 --> 2:54:01.210
<v Speaker 18>very same day that that DA announced that they were

2:54:01.250 --> 2:54:06.000
<v Speaker 18>reopening the Cornell investigation, the Trump administration formally reinstated the

2:54:06.030 --> 2:54:09.640
<v Speaker 18>Title IX regulations that were created during Trump's first term.

2:54:10.080 --> 2:54:12.220
<v Speaker 18>This has been a little bit of a political and

2:54:12.280 --> 2:54:15.879
<v Speaker 18>legal tug of war back and forth for years. During

2:54:15.940 --> 2:54:20.259
<v Speaker 18>Trump's first term, his administration rewrote the Title IX rules

2:54:20.320 --> 2:54:24.420
<v Speaker 18>back in 2020. Among other things, the regulations that he

2:54:24.520 --> 2:54:28.930
<v Speaker 18>changed narrowed what kinds of sexual harassment schools were required

2:54:28.970 --> 2:54:33.330
<v Speaker 18>to address under Title IX and also strengthened procedural protections

2:54:33.370 --> 2:54:37.950
<v Speaker 18>for students who were accused of misconduct. The Biden administration

2:54:38.050 --> 2:54:42.270
<v Speaker 18>rewrote those rules again in 2024. Those Biden rules broadened

2:54:42.330 --> 2:54:47.110
<v Speaker 18>protections against sex discrimination to include explicitly extending those protections

2:54:47.190 --> 2:54:51.990
<v Speaker 18>to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. and

2:54:52.129 --> 2:54:55.670
<v Speaker 18>changed how schools could handle sexual harassment complaints. But those

2:54:55.730 --> 2:54:58.180
<v Speaker 18>rules then got tied up in lawsuits, and in January

2:54:58.200 --> 2:55:02.320
<v Speaker 18>of 2025, a federal judge struck them down nationwide. So

2:55:02.379 --> 2:55:06.039
<v Speaker 18>the 2020 Trump rules were effectively kind of back in place.

2:55:06.400 --> 2:55:08.800
<v Speaker 18>But what happened this week is that the Trump administration

2:55:09.160 --> 2:55:13.320
<v Speaker 18>made that official. The Education Department formally removed those Biden-era

2:55:13.360 --> 2:55:18.080
<v Speaker 18>regulations from the books and restored those Trump 2020 regulations.

2:55:18.520 --> 2:55:20.800
<v Speaker 18>So if you ask me, those rules make it more

2:55:20.840 --> 2:55:24.990
<v Speaker 18>difficult for some students who experience sexual harassment or misconduct

2:55:25.070 --> 2:55:28.030
<v Speaker 18>or assault to come forward and get real help from

2:55:28.070 --> 2:55:31.830
<v Speaker 18>their schools. Now, to be clear, the Cornell case and

2:55:31.870 --> 2:55:34.350
<v Speaker 18>this Trump change are different developments.

2:55:34.370 --> 2:55:37.910
<v Speaker 11>They're not related. But it is hard for me not

2:55:37.930 --> 2:55:38.270
<v Speaker 11>to sort.

2:55:38.190 --> 2:55:41.539
<v Speaker 18>Of read them concurrently because it feels like we're watching

2:55:41.620 --> 2:55:44.840
<v Speaker 18>this Cornell case raise all these questions about what happens

2:55:44.879 --> 2:55:48.550
<v Speaker 18>when a student reports you know, sexual assault or sexual misconduct,

2:55:48.910 --> 2:55:52.970
<v Speaker 18>who believes them, who investigates what the university does, what

2:55:53.170 --> 2:55:55.570
<v Speaker 18>they have to do if they're getting federal funding, what

2:55:55.629 --> 2:55:58.609
<v Speaker 18>law enforcement does, you know, while the federal government is

2:55:58.650 --> 2:56:03.060
<v Speaker 18>simultaneously deciding what obligations schools have when students come forward

2:56:03.100 --> 2:56:03.840
<v Speaker 18>with stuff like this.

2:56:05.000 --> 2:56:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:56:05.459 --> 2:56:07.920
<v Speaker 5>And I mean, to the degree to which the Title

2:56:08.080 --> 2:56:12.689
<v Speaker 5>IX issue was motivated by transphobia as well, just shows

2:56:12.730 --> 2:56:16.910
<v Speaker 5>how much transphobia ends up hurting everyone. You're going to

2:56:17.590 --> 2:56:21.140
<v Speaker 5>talk about keeping women safe in locker rooms, and that's

2:56:21.190 --> 2:56:24.240
<v Speaker 5>why you're going to attack trans people. But then you're

2:56:24.260 --> 2:56:26.660
<v Speaker 5>actually going to be reinstating a version of Title IX

2:56:26.740 --> 2:56:29.619
<v Speaker 5>with less sexual assault protections.

2:56:30.060 --> 2:56:30.500
<v Speaker 6>Oh, yes.

2:56:30.720 --> 2:56:33.160
<v Speaker 18>I have said this many times. It's like that Beyonce quote,

2:56:33.180 --> 2:56:35.920
<v Speaker 18>when you play me, you play yourself. When you dabble

2:56:36.080 --> 2:56:40.540
<v Speaker 18>in transphobia, ultimately, you are hurting everyone. You're making everyone

2:56:40.560 --> 2:56:41.020
<v Speaker 18>less safe.

2:56:41.940 --> 2:56:44.770
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for that report, Bridgette. We'll have one more ad

2:56:44.820 --> 2:56:48.700
<v Speaker 5>break and then Robert will have a special report.

2:56:48.800 --> 2:57:04.710
<v Speaker 7>Darn tootin'. And we're back. So in April earlier this

2:57:04.790 --> 2:57:07.830
<v Speaker 7>year on this very show, I celebrated the massive upset

2:57:07.890 --> 2:57:11.250
<v Speaker 7>parliamentary elections in Hungary, which saw right wing authoritarian Prime

2:57:11.260 --> 2:57:14.810
<v Speaker 7>Minister Viktor Orban forced out of office. Over the past

2:57:14.890 --> 2:57:18.150
<v Speaker 7>decade and change, Orban had disintegrated what checks and balances

2:57:18.190 --> 2:57:21.910
<v Speaker 7>existed in Hungarian democracy as he cracked down on political opponents,

2:57:21.970 --> 2:57:25.450
<v Speaker 7>destroyed academic independence and censored the media so effectively that

2:57:25.470 --> 2:57:27.740
<v Speaker 7>his regime was used as a model by the U.S.

2:57:27.830 --> 2:57:31.100
<v Speaker 7>right wing ever since. Hungary started hosting its own CPAC,

2:57:31.120 --> 2:57:33.580
<v Speaker 7>and people like Tucker Carlson produced fawning coverage of Orban's

2:57:33.620 --> 2:57:36.310
<v Speaker 7>regime in an effort to copy it here. Then came

2:57:36.390 --> 2:57:39.250
<v Speaker 7>Peter Magyar, whose name is the Hungarian equivalent of a

2:57:39.290 --> 2:57:43.250
<v Speaker 7>guy in the U.S. being called Pete America. A centrist conservative,

2:57:43.330 --> 2:57:46.610
<v Speaker 7>Magyar rose to power promising to take back Hungarian democracy

2:57:46.670 --> 2:57:49.170
<v Speaker 7>and punish Orban and his cronies for their years of

2:57:49.209 --> 2:57:52.630
<v Speaker 7>outrageous corruption. On the campaign trail, he called Orban's government

2:57:52.709 --> 2:57:56.990
<v Speaker 7>a mafia state. Magyar laid out a road-to-jail program in

2:57:57.010 --> 2:58:00.270
<v Speaker 7>which he promised consequences for right-wing politicians and appointees who

2:58:00.310 --> 2:58:03.410
<v Speaker 7>abused their power, and this was a massively popular part

2:58:03.550 --> 2:58:06.550
<v Speaker 7>of his campaign, and it's something that Democrats in the

2:58:06.590 --> 2:58:10.109
<v Speaker 7>United States should be paying attention to. After Magyar's Tiza

2:58:10.170 --> 2:58:13.119
<v Speaker 7>Party won, among the celebrations was a tinge of very

2:58:13.200 --> 2:58:16.000
<v Speaker 7>real worry. What if Peter turned out to simply be

2:58:16.040 --> 2:58:18.340
<v Speaker 7>a different kind of authoritarian? Or what if he was

2:58:18.400 --> 2:58:20.480
<v Speaker 7>just feckless and did the same kind of thing our

2:58:20.520 --> 2:58:23.220
<v Speaker 7>own political leaders did in the U.S. when Trump lost

2:58:23.260 --> 2:58:26.080
<v Speaker 7>in 2020? In other words, what if he completely failed

2:58:26.150 --> 2:58:28.950
<v Speaker 7>to hold Orban and his people to account out of fear?

2:58:29.370 --> 2:58:31.610
<v Speaker 7>There was good reason to worry that the road to

2:58:31.670 --> 2:58:35.510
<v Speaker 7>jail program would get dropped entirely now that Magyar and

2:58:35.550 --> 2:58:38.710
<v Speaker 7>his Tiza party were in power. As Kino Vrsek noted

2:58:38.770 --> 2:58:41.450
<v Speaker 7>in an article for Deutsche Welle, quote, Orban had laid

2:58:41.510 --> 2:58:43.990
<v Speaker 7>out plans that stretched decades into the future. In the

2:58:44.030 --> 2:58:46.410
<v Speaker 7>event of his party losing the election, civil servants who

2:58:46.430 --> 2:58:48.629
<v Speaker 7>would be difficult to replace would sabotage the work of

2:58:48.690 --> 2:58:51.709
<v Speaker 7>new governments. In addition, billions were squirreled away to continue

2:58:51.810 --> 2:58:55.010
<v Speaker 7>financing Orban's network. They were left in Hungary with kind

2:58:55.030 --> 2:58:56.609
<v Speaker 7>of the same problem we are going to have in

2:58:56.629 --> 2:58:58.550
<v Speaker 7>the U.S. if we ever do get Trump and his

2:58:58.590 --> 2:59:00.770
<v Speaker 7>people out of office, which is that you can't just

2:59:00.950 --> 2:59:03.150
<v Speaker 7>beat them in an election. You have to undo the

2:59:03.170 --> 2:59:05.310
<v Speaker 7>stuff they did and punish them in order to cripple

2:59:05.350 --> 2:59:08.510
<v Speaker 7>their networks and stop them from rising again. And that

2:59:08.590 --> 2:59:11.590
<v Speaker 7>was an open question after Magyar won in Hungary, and

2:59:11.670 --> 2:59:14.410
<v Speaker 7>it's now looking, after a few months, like he is

2:59:14.490 --> 2:59:18.000
<v Speaker 7>committing to going after Orban and his network. With a

2:59:18.060 --> 2:59:21.280
<v Speaker 7>two-thirds majority in parliament, Tiza has launched what I've seen

2:59:21.340 --> 2:59:26.279
<v Speaker 7>translated as Operation Purge or Operation Purgatory on different news sites.

2:59:26.680 --> 2:59:29.780
<v Speaker 7>I'm not really sure what's a more accurate description of

2:59:30.320 --> 2:59:34.430
<v Speaker 7>what Magyar actually meant. I think Operation Purgatory, because as

2:59:34.470 --> 2:59:37.629
<v Speaker 7>Deutsche Welle notes, Peter has a known penchant for religious

2:59:37.670 --> 2:59:42.070
<v Speaker 7>and historical symbols. On Monday, Hungarian prosecutors detained two of

2:59:42.129 --> 2:59:46.490
<v Speaker 7>Orban's former ministers over corruption allegations. These guys are still incarcerated.

2:59:46.910 --> 2:59:49.910
<v Speaker 7>Parliament had previously voted to lift their immunity. Per a

2:59:50.050 --> 2:59:54.050
<v Speaker 7>Euronews article by Sandor Zeros, Zestak, who served as development

2:59:54.090 --> 2:59:57.050
<v Speaker 7>minister from 2014 to 2018, is suspected of taking around

2:59:57.050 --> 3:00:00.120
<v Speaker 7>30 million euros in bribes linked to bus tenders. Hanco

3:00:00.160 --> 3:00:03.150
<v Speaker 7>is being investigated over the disbursement of 46 million euros

3:00:03.180 --> 3:00:06.109
<v Speaker 7>in cultural funds to public figures, which the authorities largely

3:00:06.150 --> 3:00:10.470
<v Speaker 7>regard as campaign financing. Now, both men deny any wrongdoing,

3:00:10.530 --> 3:00:13.810
<v Speaker 7>and I don't know how this is going to shake out,

3:00:13.870 --> 3:00:16.350
<v Speaker 7>but I suspect it looks like the government is going

3:00:16.410 --> 3:00:18.690
<v Speaker 7>after them pretty hard. And I think this story is important.

3:00:19.180 --> 3:00:23.420
<v Speaker 7>to watch, both because obviously Hungarian democracy matters, but also

3:00:23.459 --> 3:00:26.279
<v Speaker 7>because this should be taken as a model by Democrats

3:00:26.340 --> 3:00:28.560
<v Speaker 7>if they ever do manage to unseat the Republicans and

3:00:28.720 --> 3:00:31.360
<v Speaker 7>take back some form of control. Magyar isn't just going

3:00:31.440 --> 3:00:33.830
<v Speaker 7>after Orban and his people because they broke the law.

3:00:33.890 --> 3:00:38.250
<v Speaker 7>He's doing it because it's excellent politics. Political analyst Sabolx

3:00:38.350 --> 3:00:41.369
<v Speaker 7>Dole told Euronews that fighting corruption has been a major

3:00:41.410 --> 3:00:45.050
<v Speaker 7>source of Magyar's continuing popularity. In other words, voters continue

3:00:45.090 --> 3:00:48.410
<v Speaker 7>to support him going after Orban. Quote, Now, the elephant

3:00:48.450 --> 3:00:50.530
<v Speaker 7>in the room here remains Orban, just as Trump would

3:00:50.580 --> 3:01:11.440
<v Speaker 7>be if things were reversed here. Victor Orban has not

3:01:11.520 --> 3:01:14.170
<v Speaker 7>yet been charged with any crimes, but Magyar's party has

3:01:14.209 --> 3:01:16.769
<v Speaker 7>been hard at work building the judicial infrastructure to make

3:01:16.810 --> 3:01:19.990
<v Speaker 7>that possible, and I also consider this very relevant for Americans.

3:01:20.390 --> 3:01:23.240
<v Speaker 7>The heart of Operation Purge is a new government office,

3:01:23.320 --> 3:01:27.300
<v Speaker 7>the National Asset Recovery and Protection Office, which is dedicated

3:01:27.400 --> 3:01:30.400
<v Speaker 7>to going after people who robbed the government during the

3:01:30.470 --> 3:01:33.830
<v Speaker 7>time that Orban's very corrupt party was in power. This

3:01:33.890 --> 3:01:37.170
<v Speaker 7>new body has been empowered to take over corruption investigations

3:01:37.209 --> 3:01:40.310
<v Speaker 7>from traditional prosecutors, as well as to start new investigations

3:01:40.390 --> 3:01:43.390
<v Speaker 7>and to issue warrants. They have several other Orban cronies

3:01:43.430 --> 3:01:45.170
<v Speaker 7>in their sights at present, and it looks likely that

3:01:45.230 --> 3:01:48.570
<v Speaker 7>Viktor himself will soon face charges over his criminal liability

3:01:48.870 --> 3:01:51.420
<v Speaker 7>in a case involving two Ukrainian cash couriers who were

3:01:51.430 --> 3:01:55.039
<v Speaker 7>illegally stopped and had their money confiscated. As you'd expect,

3:01:55.160 --> 3:01:58.300
<v Speaker 7>Orban's Fidesz party has issued complaints about their treatment, calling

3:01:58.340 --> 3:02:01.680
<v Speaker 7>it arbitrary and complaining that tis a tyrants want to

3:02:01.760 --> 3:02:06.170
<v Speaker 7>imprison half the country. Within parliament, Magyar has also faced resistance.

3:02:06.330 --> 3:02:08.350
<v Speaker 7>His own immunity was lifted at the request of the

3:02:08.370 --> 3:02:11.150
<v Speaker 7>prosecutor's office over a minor theft claim that just makes

3:02:11.190 --> 3:02:14.270
<v Speaker 7>him seem cooler. In May of 2024, he stole the

3:02:14.330 --> 3:02:16.289
<v Speaker 7>phone of a man who was filming him dancing at

3:02:16.330 --> 3:02:19.390
<v Speaker 7>a nightclub and threw it in the Danube, which honestly

3:02:19.629 --> 3:02:19.910
<v Speaker 7>is pretty sick.

3:02:19.930 --> 3:02:23.130
<v Speaker 5>That's just proper etiquette. Yeah, that's... That's just awesome.

3:02:25.030 --> 3:02:28.070
<v Speaker 7>That's just rad as hell, bro. It's also worth me

3:02:28.129 --> 3:02:30.990
<v Speaker 7>noting that Magyar and Tisza have been busier than just this.

3:02:31.230 --> 3:02:33.530
<v Speaker 7>During his first month or so in office, he had

3:02:33.570 --> 3:02:37.029
<v Speaker 7>parliament approve cuts to the salaries of lawmakers and ministers

3:02:37.330 --> 3:02:39.790
<v Speaker 7>and introduced a new maximum limit to the time that

3:02:39.830 --> 3:02:42.730
<v Speaker 7>a prime minister can hold office, two terms, which is

3:02:42.790 --> 3:02:45.530
<v Speaker 7>really noteworthy, both that like his party's in power and

3:02:45.550 --> 3:02:48.880
<v Speaker 7>they're voting to give politicians, including themselves, less money and

3:02:49.000 --> 3:02:51.800
<v Speaker 7>limit their own power in office. That's a really good sign.

3:02:51.840 --> 3:02:52.020
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:02:52.240 --> 3:02:54.880
<v Speaker 7>In terms of like him actually giving a shit about

3:02:54.920 --> 3:02:58.330
<v Speaker 7>restoring Hungarian democracy. Also on Tuesday of this week, the

3:02:58.370 --> 3:03:01.260
<v Speaker 7>Hungarian parliament passed a raft of anti-corruption measures. I'm going

3:03:01.280 --> 3:03:04.460
<v Speaker 7>to keep covering this as Magyar continues going after Orban.

3:03:04.480 --> 3:03:06.860
<v Speaker 7>I think this is really worth watching. And so far,

3:03:06.900 --> 3:03:09.260
<v Speaker 7>I'm pretty optimistic about what's going on there.

3:03:09.620 --> 3:03:12.650
<v Speaker 5>No, especially in terms of how much Orban's regime was

3:03:12.670 --> 3:03:16.570
<v Speaker 5>like the blueprint for Trump's second term. This gives us

3:03:16.990 --> 3:03:21.550
<v Speaker 5>this look into a what-if potential. We've talked about the

3:03:21.770 --> 3:03:25.560
<v Speaker 5>outrageous levels of corruption in the second Trump administration. And-

3:03:26.020 --> 3:03:28.320
<v Speaker 5>I don't think many people are very confident that the Democrats,

3:03:28.540 --> 3:03:31.200
<v Speaker 5>upon taking power, will actually hold the Trump admin accountable.

3:03:31.300 --> 3:03:31.920
<v Speaker 12>I sure am not.

3:03:32.520 --> 3:03:34.900
<v Speaker 5>But I think looking at stuff like this, it gives

3:03:34.940 --> 3:03:37.860
<v Speaker 5>us a good barometer to kind of hold the Democrats

3:03:37.920 --> 3:03:38.650
<v Speaker 5>to a certain extent.

3:03:38.670 --> 3:03:38.890
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

3:03:39.430 --> 3:03:41.910
<v Speaker 7>This can work. And this can work electorally, right?

3:03:41.930 --> 3:03:42.390
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

3:03:42.490 --> 3:03:45.150
<v Speaker 11>When you said it was excellent politics, Robert, I agreed

3:03:45.170 --> 3:03:45.529
<v Speaker 11>with that.

3:03:45.670 --> 3:03:48.450
<v Speaker 18>And that's how I know the Democrats probably aren't going

3:03:48.470 --> 3:03:48.820
<v Speaker 18>to do it.

3:03:48.950 --> 3:03:50.450
<v Speaker 7>The Democrats probably aren't going to do it.

3:03:50.470 --> 3:03:50.570
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

3:03:50.590 --> 3:03:51.410
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, unfortunately.

3:03:52.450 --> 3:03:55.410
<v Speaker 7>Unfortunately. I do, before we leave, also want to turn

3:03:55.450 --> 3:03:58.770
<v Speaker 7>our attention briefly to another nation that recently ousted a

3:03:58.810 --> 3:04:01.730
<v Speaker 7>right-wing wannabe tyrant, Brazil. And this is a somewhat less

3:04:01.830 --> 3:04:06.270
<v Speaker 7>optimistic story. Several years now after Jair Bolsonaro's ouster, which

3:04:06.560 --> 3:04:09.300
<v Speaker 7>he's in prison now for the coup that was launched

3:04:09.400 --> 3:04:12.240
<v Speaker 7>after he lost his election in 2022, Brazil is in

3:04:12.260 --> 3:04:15.000
<v Speaker 7>the thick of another election that many fear might return

3:04:15.040 --> 3:04:17.900
<v Speaker 7>the right and the Bolsonaros to power. The most recent

3:04:17.980 --> 3:04:22.699
<v Speaker 7>polling from 30th of September by Mio slash Idea showed Lula,

3:04:22.750 --> 3:04:25.850
<v Speaker 7>the current president, with thirty nine point four percent of

3:04:25.910 --> 3:04:28.570
<v Speaker 7>the vote and Flavio Bolsonaro with thirty eight point four

3:04:28.610 --> 3:04:30.970
<v Speaker 7>percent of the vote. They go through like multiple. This

3:04:30.990 --> 3:04:32.290
<v Speaker 7>is the second round of voting.

3:04:32.470 --> 3:04:32.629
<v Speaker 5>Right.

3:04:32.930 --> 3:04:33.030
<v Speaker 3>Right.

3:04:33.050 --> 3:04:33.390
<v Speaker 13>Right. Right.

3:04:55.629 --> 3:04:58.030
<v Speaker 7>It is very hard to tell what's going to happen here.

3:04:58.270 --> 3:05:02.379
<v Speaker 7>And Bolsonaro's son could, and Flavio is Bolsonaro's kid, could

3:05:02.420 --> 3:05:05.740
<v Speaker 7>very well win this election. It's entirely possible. Writing for

3:05:05.800 --> 3:05:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Chatham House, Dr. Christopher Sabatini said of this election, quote,

3:05:09.420 --> 3:05:13.720
<v Speaker 7>a Bolsonaro victory would mean Trump-aligned governments dominate South America. Now,

3:05:13.760 --> 3:05:15.700
<v Speaker 7>I won't have time to cover this election in detail,

3:05:15.730 --> 3:05:18.190
<v Speaker 7>but it's worth noting that the incumbent, Lula da Silva,

3:05:18.330 --> 3:05:22.180
<v Speaker 7>is 80, whereas Flavio Bolsonaro is 45. That said, it's

3:05:22.220 --> 3:05:25.039
<v Speaker 7>unclear to me if age is a major factor in this.

3:05:25.120 --> 3:05:28.640
<v Speaker 7>I doubt it's a non-factor, but these numbers are not

3:05:28.760 --> 3:05:32.459
<v Speaker 7>far from the 2022 numbers, right? Lula won his way

3:05:32.500 --> 3:05:36.020
<v Speaker 7>back into power with 50.9% of the vote to 49.1%

3:05:36.020 --> 3:05:41.650
<v Speaker 7>for Jair Bolsonaro after polls consistently undercounted Bolsonaro's support, right?

3:05:42.170 --> 3:05:43.310
<v Speaker 7>One thing I'll say is this doesn't look like a

3:05:43.410 --> 3:05:46.810
<v Speaker 7>massive shift. They were pretty close to tied when Lula won,

3:05:46.890 --> 3:05:50.349
<v Speaker 7>and they're pretty close to tied now, right? Per Dr.

3:05:50.370 --> 3:05:53.460
<v Speaker 7>Sabatini's analysis, quote, this year's contest is more than a

3:05:53.480 --> 3:05:55.900
<v Speaker 7>familial grudge match. For one, it looks a lot like

3:05:55.980 --> 3:05:59.039
<v Speaker 7>recent presidential elections in the region. In June, elections in

3:05:59.080 --> 3:06:01.260
<v Speaker 7>both Peru and Colombia went to a second round. Each

3:06:01.280 --> 3:06:04.040
<v Speaker 7>resulted in a narrow victory for conservative candidates who, like

3:06:04.060 --> 3:06:07.340
<v Speaker 7>the Bolsonaros, are aligned with the regional diplomatic agenda of U.S.

3:06:07.390 --> 3:06:10.510
<v Speaker 7>President Donald Trump. Both Lula and the younger Bolsonaro face

3:06:10.590 --> 3:06:14.320
<v Speaker 7>high levels of voter rejection. More than 54% of Brazilian

3:06:14.340 --> 3:06:17.580
<v Speaker 7>voters disapprove of Flavio, according to one poll. Lula does

3:06:17.680 --> 3:06:20.600
<v Speaker 7>little better in the same survey, with 52% against the

3:06:20.640 --> 3:06:24.019
<v Speaker 7>president running for a fourth term. Brazil also suffers from

3:06:24.060 --> 3:06:27.440
<v Speaker 7>much of the same electoral malaise that we do. Only 37%

3:06:27.440 --> 3:06:29.940
<v Speaker 7>of Brazilian voters say they are satisfied with their democracy,

3:06:30.360 --> 3:06:34.230
<v Speaker 7>a drop of nearly 50% since 2013. The highest levels

3:06:34.260 --> 3:06:37.529
<v Speaker 7>of dissatisfaction are, of course, seen among Bolsonaro voters. And,

3:06:37.670 --> 3:06:41.090
<v Speaker 7>as a recent Guardian editorial noted, most voters disapprove of

3:06:41.190 --> 3:06:44.800
<v Speaker 7>most men. In tracing the significant developments of this campaign,

3:06:44.820 --> 3:06:48.240
<v Speaker 7>The Guardian summarizes, quote, Lula's social programs are extensive, but

3:06:48.280 --> 3:06:51.370
<v Speaker 7>frustration at Brazil's enduring failure to match its economic record

3:06:51.390 --> 3:06:54.010
<v Speaker 7>to its potential may hobble him, especially with growth slowing.

3:06:54.330 --> 3:06:57.270
<v Speaker 7>Violent crime remains a top issue. Then came the Banco

3:06:57.350 --> 3:07:00.360
<v Speaker 7>Master financial scandal, which has snowballed into a corruption case

3:07:00.379 --> 3:07:03.880
<v Speaker 7>spanning Brazilian politics in the judiciary. First, Flavio Bolsonaro was

3:07:03.940 --> 3:07:07.379
<v Speaker 7>caught on tape asking the failed bank's Playboy owner, Daniel Vorcaro,

3:07:07.600 --> 3:07:10.590
<v Speaker 7>for almost $ 27 million to make a film about his father.

3:07:10.850 --> 3:07:14.750
<v Speaker 7>He denies wrongdoing. Then, compromising messages between Mr. Vorcaro and

3:07:14.770 --> 3:07:17.050
<v Speaker 7>the Supreme Court judge who led the prosecution of the

3:07:17.129 --> 3:07:20.860
<v Speaker 7>ex-president Bolsonaro were revealed. The allegations fed the perception that

3:07:20.900 --> 3:07:24.020
<v Speaker 7>politicians are all dirty and bolstered the unfounded far-right claim

3:07:24.040 --> 3:07:27.619
<v Speaker 7>that Mr. Bolsonaro Sr. was stitched up. So this is

3:07:27.680 --> 3:07:32.890
<v Speaker 7>incredibly close. Bolsonaro could wind up leading Brazil again very soon.

3:07:33.370 --> 3:07:34.670
<v Speaker 7>And if it does, a big part of the reason

3:07:34.709 --> 3:07:38.770
<v Speaker 7>is that nobody presented Brazilian voters with a candidate they liked.

3:07:39.740 --> 3:07:40.020
<v Speaker 13>Right.

3:07:40.379 --> 3:07:43.220
<v Speaker 7>Like Lula is very popular among like the Western left,

3:07:43.320 --> 3:07:45.160
<v Speaker 7>but he's not popular in Brazil right now.

3:07:45.420 --> 3:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Right.

3:07:46.040 --> 3:07:50.010
<v Speaker 7>He's more popular than Flavio Bolsonaro, but they're both disliked

3:07:50.070 --> 3:07:52.730
<v Speaker 7>by a majority of the country. So if there's a

3:07:52.810 --> 3:07:55.190
<v Speaker 7>warning that every other country should take out of it

3:07:55.250 --> 3:07:57.990
<v Speaker 7>than that, it's make sure whoever you run against the

3:07:58.010 --> 3:08:00.150
<v Speaker 7>far right is someone people like.

3:08:01.420 --> 3:08:01.660
<v Speaker 5>Right.

3:08:02.120 --> 3:08:03.439
<v Speaker 11>Again, excellent politics.

3:08:03.560 --> 3:08:04.220
<v Speaker 5>Hope we do it.

3:08:04.660 --> 3:08:05.060
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:08:05.620 --> 3:08:05.920
<v Speaker 16>Anyway.

3:08:06.310 --> 3:08:08.289
<v Speaker 7>That's Brazil. We'll see how that goes. I hope Lula

3:08:08.310 --> 3:08:11.480
<v Speaker 7>wins because I don't want to see a Bolsonaro running

3:08:11.520 --> 3:08:15.100
<v Speaker 7>Brazil again. But whoever wins, I have one prediction for Brazil,

3:08:15.260 --> 3:08:17.500
<v Speaker 7>which is that Jair Bolsonaro will wind up in a

3:08:17.560 --> 3:08:19.080
<v Speaker 7>hospital again within the next three months.

3:08:21.800 --> 3:08:28.890
<v Speaker 5>That's barely a prediction. That's just a statistical certainty, I think.

3:08:28.910 --> 3:08:30.810
<v Speaker 5>But no, this is a really good wake-up call and

3:08:30.830 --> 3:08:33.330
<v Speaker 5>a reminder that as fun as it is to have

3:08:33.350 --> 3:08:35.570
<v Speaker 5>these kind of grandpas on the left... You have to

3:08:35.610 --> 3:08:37.910
<v Speaker 5>pass off leadership to new people. Like you have to

3:08:37.950 --> 3:08:38.590
<v Speaker 5>pass the torch.

3:08:38.629 --> 3:08:40.390
<v Speaker 7>Even if they're guys who've done some really good stuff

3:08:40.410 --> 3:08:43.030
<v Speaker 7>in the past. And he's too fucking old. It just is.

3:08:43.050 --> 3:08:46.429
<v Speaker 5>I think I saw like Ryan Grimm musing about running

3:08:46.610 --> 3:08:49.950
<v Speaker 5>Sanders again for 2028. Like recently. I'm like, dude, what

3:08:49.990 --> 3:08:51.490
<v Speaker 5>the fuck are you talking about?

3:08:51.510 --> 3:08:53.590
<v Speaker 7>I still, I have fond feelings for Bernie.

3:08:53.610 --> 3:08:54.450
<v Speaker 5>He's too old.

3:08:55.870 --> 3:08:56.730
<v Speaker 12>He's too old.

3:08:57.470 --> 3:08:59.290
<v Speaker 5>He'd be like 90 years old, dude.

3:08:59.370 --> 3:09:01.470
<v Speaker 7>We gotta, we gotta move on people.

3:09:01.750 --> 3:09:03.470
<v Speaker 5>Get real. Get real.

3:09:03.530 --> 3:09:04.130
<v Speaker 7>I'm sorry.

3:09:05.280 --> 3:09:09.160
<v Speaker 5>Before we close this episode, let's pivot to Mia Wong

3:09:09.200 --> 3:09:11.119
<v Speaker 5>for a special Tariff Talk segment.

3:09:11.300 --> 3:09:14.070
<v Speaker 17>So let's talk tariffs.

3:09:30.090 --> 3:09:33.750
<v Speaker 12>As Trump's trade war with Canada continues with no sign

3:09:34.000 --> 3:09:38.619
<v Speaker 12>of any agreement in sight, Trump's tariffs are finally getting

3:09:38.660 --> 3:09:43.730
<v Speaker 12>their day in court. But not the 50% tariffs. that

3:09:43.770 --> 3:09:48.530
<v Speaker 12>Trump levied against Canada using what can at best be

3:09:48.580 --> 3:09:52.520
<v Speaker 12>described as the extremely dubious powers, quote unquote, of the

3:09:53.020 --> 3:09:57.080
<v Speaker 12>1930s Smoot-Hawley tariff act. Oh no, the tariffs that have

3:09:57.120 --> 3:10:02.060
<v Speaker 12>finally reached the U.S. Court of International Trade are the

3:10:02.140 --> 3:10:07.440
<v Speaker 12>Section 301 tariffs that Trump levied back in July. Now,

3:10:07.560 --> 3:10:10.379
<v Speaker 12>by the time you are listening to this, a couple

3:10:10.420 --> 3:10:14.720
<v Speaker 12>of days in the future, it is going to be October. Now,

3:10:14.940 --> 3:10:19.220
<v Speaker 12>the first lawsuit against these tariffs was filed again in

3:10:19.540 --> 3:10:25.230
<v Speaker 12>late July, and it's now October. And we're getting, you know,

3:10:25.250 --> 3:10:31.690
<v Speaker 12>we're getting the initial arguments on September 30th. Meanwhile, the

3:10:31.690 --> 3:10:34.830
<v Speaker 12>10 to 12 percent tariffs on almost all U.S. imports

3:10:34.890 --> 3:10:38.300
<v Speaker 12>remain in effect. and probably will continue to remain in

3:10:38.360 --> 3:10:41.500
<v Speaker 12>effect while this case winds its way through this court,

3:10:41.920 --> 3:10:45.370
<v Speaker 12>probably an appeals court, and then probably also the Supreme Court,

3:10:45.410 --> 3:10:48.230
<v Speaker 12>despite the fact that these tariffs are a just obviously

3:10:48.310 --> 3:10:52.550
<v Speaker 12>absurd usage of Section 301. So, for those who've forgotten,

3:10:52.610 --> 3:10:55.750
<v Speaker 12>Section 301 are supposed to be the tariffs for unfair

3:10:55.810 --> 3:10:59.530
<v Speaker 12>trade practices. The July tariffs are, once again, on 99.4%

3:10:59.530 --> 3:11:05.020
<v Speaker 12>of all imported goods. And these ones are nominally supposed

3:11:05.080 --> 3:11:08.830
<v Speaker 12>to be about forced labor. The thing about Section 301

3:11:08.830 --> 3:11:11.650
<v Speaker 12>tariffs is that you can't just impose them immediately. You

3:11:11.690 --> 3:11:14.690
<v Speaker 12>have to do a whole investigatory process, at least nominally,

3:11:14.709 --> 3:11:20.720
<v Speaker 12>about the specific unfair trade practices that the country is doing. But,

3:11:21.270 --> 3:11:23.620
<v Speaker 12>you know, so these are supposed to nominally be about

3:11:23.680 --> 3:11:26.900
<v Speaker 12>forced labor, but they're on an unbelievable number of countries

3:11:26.920 --> 3:11:30.060
<v Speaker 12>that just happen to, again, constitute 99% of all imported

3:11:30.100 --> 3:11:33.360
<v Speaker 12>goods in the U.S., And as the litigants in this

3:11:33.600 --> 3:11:38.380
<v Speaker 12>case have begun to argue in front of the U.S.

3:11:38.400 --> 3:11:42.610
<v Speaker 12>Court of International Trade, it doesn't actually make sense to

3:11:42.650 --> 3:11:46.289
<v Speaker 12>just have two categories of tariff levels and then just

3:11:46.510 --> 3:11:48.720
<v Speaker 12>be like, oh, yeah, all these countries did forced labor

3:11:48.740 --> 3:11:52.740
<v Speaker 12>or weren't. harsh enough about cracking down on other countries

3:11:52.780 --> 3:11:55.000
<v Speaker 12>doing forced labor, so we're just going to set this

3:11:55.040 --> 3:11:58.720
<v Speaker 12>tariff rate for all of them. That's not what Section

3:11:58.720 --> 3:12:00.820
<v Speaker 12>301 tariffs are supposed to be for. They're supposed to

3:12:00.860 --> 3:12:04.760
<v Speaker 12>be for, you know, like deliberate, very specific targeted tariffs

3:12:05.020 --> 3:12:08.280
<v Speaker 12>on a country for a specific thing, not we want

3:12:08.300 --> 3:12:11.620
<v Speaker 12>to impose a 10% tariff again and our last thing

3:12:11.680 --> 3:12:14.880
<v Speaker 12>that was letting us impose a 10% tariff is failing.

3:12:14.900 --> 3:12:17.920
<v Speaker 12>So we're going to do this one now. And as

3:12:18.500 --> 3:12:23.510
<v Speaker 12>you sort of might expect, the initial arguments do not

3:12:23.610 --> 3:12:28.350
<v Speaker 12>seem to be going well for the administration, who showed

3:12:28.430 --> 3:12:31.130
<v Speaker 12>up in front of the court with the bumbling ineptitude

3:12:31.150 --> 3:12:34.170
<v Speaker 12>that they have become known for when they're forced to

3:12:34.190 --> 3:12:37.820
<v Speaker 12>defend administration decisions in recent times. There's a bunch of

3:12:37.840 --> 3:12:42.620
<v Speaker 12>reports of You know, one of the representatives of the

3:12:42.700 --> 3:12:45.150
<v Speaker 12>administration is like giving this starting to try to give

3:12:45.180 --> 3:12:47.690
<v Speaker 12>this like giant speech about the evils of forced labor.

3:12:47.750 --> 3:12:49.070
<v Speaker 5>And one of the judges just like.

3:12:48.970 --> 3:12:52.450
<v Speaker 12>Immediately interrupts him. And they're doing, again, another thing that's

3:12:52.490 --> 3:12:54.490
<v Speaker 12>a staple of if you've if you listen to or

3:12:55.190 --> 3:12:58.660
<v Speaker 12>seen clips of like any administrative proceeding for like anything

3:12:58.670 --> 3:13:02.960
<v Speaker 12>this administration does in court, you will see administration representatives

3:13:03.000 --> 3:13:05.699
<v Speaker 12>be asked basic questions about a case and just not

3:13:05.740 --> 3:13:06.539
<v Speaker 12>know the answers to them.

3:13:07.040 --> 3:13:07.160
<v Speaker 13>So.

3:13:07.580 --> 3:13:12.170
<v Speaker 12>This is already going poorly on day one. However, again,

3:13:12.190 --> 3:13:14.629
<v Speaker 12>this is the first of three courts they have to

3:13:14.670 --> 3:13:17.150
<v Speaker 12>go through, and probably these are going to be in

3:13:17.190 --> 3:13:20.250
<v Speaker 12>effect until, I don't know, probably the Supreme Court gets

3:13:20.290 --> 3:13:24.190
<v Speaker 12>to it. So incredible, incredible stuff happening in the US

3:13:24.250 --> 3:13:28.289
<v Speaker 12>legal system where the president can just impose whatever tariffs

3:13:28.330 --> 3:13:30.490
<v Speaker 12>he wants by making up legal authority, and then they

3:13:30.530 --> 3:13:34.410
<v Speaker 12>just stay in effect until bunch of months later when

3:13:34.510 --> 3:13:36.230
<v Speaker 12>they're found to be illegal, at which point he's moved

3:13:36.290 --> 3:13:38.750
<v Speaker 12>on to the next tariff. Again, we're one tariff cycle

3:13:38.800 --> 3:13:42.540
<v Speaker 12>behind with the Section 301 tariffs, right? He's already using

3:13:42.580 --> 3:13:46.400
<v Speaker 12>Holly Smoot for the Canada tariffs. Now, it is worth noting,

3:13:46.420 --> 3:13:47.900
<v Speaker 12>and this is part of the reason I'm talking about

3:13:47.920 --> 3:13:51.950
<v Speaker 12>the Section 301 tariffs, is that Trump is also threatening

3:13:52.010 --> 3:13:55.650
<v Speaker 12>to do a different set of Section 301 tariffs to

3:13:55.850 --> 3:14:00.240
<v Speaker 12>do these They're called quote-unquote excess capacity tariffs that he's

3:14:00.280 --> 3:14:04.660
<v Speaker 12>had these investigations going for a while now. So excess

3:14:04.680 --> 3:14:05.700
<v Speaker 12>capacity is.

3:14:05.720 --> 3:14:05.800
<v Speaker 14>It.

3:14:07.420 --> 3:14:09.670
<v Speaker 12>Is a thing that exists in the world. It refers

3:14:09.790 --> 3:14:12.570
<v Speaker 12>to steel as the context in which it comes up

3:14:12.610 --> 3:14:15.830
<v Speaker 12>the most. It refers to, oh yeah, there's actually a

3:14:15.870 --> 3:14:17.869
<v Speaker 12>lot more steel production than there's supposed to be in

3:14:17.910 --> 3:14:19.910
<v Speaker 12>these countries that are producing more steel than they need

3:14:19.950 --> 3:14:22.830
<v Speaker 12>and pumping it all on the market to depreciate steel prices.

3:14:23.629 --> 3:14:27.400
<v Speaker 12>They're nominally doing investigations about a range of goods. With

3:14:27.440 --> 3:14:30.960
<v Speaker 12>excess capacity. I did an entire episode about this last year,

3:14:30.980 --> 3:14:33.840
<v Speaker 12>about the sort of core economic causes of this and

3:14:33.860 --> 3:14:37.750
<v Speaker 12>the way that this sort of like chronic overproduction and underconsumption,

3:14:38.610 --> 3:14:40.550
<v Speaker 12>where you have a bunch of stuff being produced that's

3:14:40.570 --> 3:14:44.650
<v Speaker 12>going to waste because people can't use it because they

3:14:44.670 --> 3:14:48.800
<v Speaker 12>don't have any money. This is a structural feature of capitalism. Yeah,

3:14:48.820 --> 3:14:51.420
<v Speaker 12>I did an episode last year when there was another

3:14:51.480 --> 3:14:54.800
<v Speaker 12>big fight over steel tariffs. That was about overcapacity. It's

3:14:54.820 --> 3:14:57.540
<v Speaker 12>called the economics of the tariff regime. if you want

3:14:57.560 --> 3:15:00.580
<v Speaker 12>to go more into this deal over capacity stuff. But

3:15:01.459 --> 3:15:05.250
<v Speaker 12>these tariffs mostly seem to be another attempt to do

3:15:06.570 --> 3:15:10.110
<v Speaker 12>basically the same thing as the other Section 301 tariffs

3:15:10.150 --> 3:15:13.789
<v Speaker 12>that he just levied. So it's to have some kind

3:15:13.830 --> 3:15:18.240
<v Speaker 12>of another way to impose a broad percentage tariff on

3:15:18.260 --> 3:15:22.060
<v Speaker 12>a whole bunch of different countries. And these are the

3:15:22.080 --> 3:15:24.260
<v Speaker 12>kind of tariffs that Trump has been salivating over ever

3:15:24.300 --> 3:15:26.180
<v Speaker 12>since he took office, and he's been trying to find

3:15:26.220 --> 3:15:29.640
<v Speaker 12>increasingly obscure ways to do them since the Supreme Court

3:15:29.980 --> 3:15:35.900
<v Speaker 12>overruled his initial extremely bizarre claiming of powers that he

3:15:35.980 --> 3:15:39.349
<v Speaker 12>used to do it last time. Now, to close out

3:15:39.450 --> 3:15:44.230
<v Speaker 12>my section here, let's wrap up the story of, I

3:15:44.250 --> 3:15:48.400
<v Speaker 12>guess now ex-chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell. who,

3:15:48.600 --> 3:15:51.340
<v Speaker 12>if you will remember, Trump attempted to have investigated by

3:15:51.400 --> 3:15:57.010
<v Speaker 12>federal prosecutors nominally for corruption around the remodeling of the

3:15:57.050 --> 3:15:59.970
<v Speaker 12>Federal Reserve Building. This was a whole thing that Trump

3:16:00.010 --> 3:16:01.870
<v Speaker 12>and all those people were pushing at the time in

3:16:01.910 --> 3:16:04.410
<v Speaker 12>the middle of this conflict he was having where Trump

3:16:04.430 --> 3:16:06.500
<v Speaker 12>was trying to get Jerome Powell to cut interest rates.

3:16:07.220 --> 3:16:09.420
<v Speaker 12>But that's not a thing that the president is supposed

3:16:09.459 --> 3:16:12.680
<v Speaker 12>to be pressuring the Fed to do that defeats the

3:16:12.720 --> 3:16:15.580
<v Speaker 12>entire purpose of the independence of the Fed. And, you know,

3:16:15.600 --> 3:16:18.340
<v Speaker 12>Trump was going on TV all the time and talking about, like, ah, they're, like,

3:16:18.360 --> 3:16:20.940
<v Speaker 12>turning the Fed into, like, a palace. They're, like, using

3:16:20.959 --> 3:16:25.150
<v Speaker 12>all your government money to, like, make giant, like, glowing

3:16:25.250 --> 3:16:27.750
<v Speaker 12>bathrooms and stuff. Which is really funny when you, like,

3:16:27.830 --> 3:16:31.629
<v Speaker 12>look at all of the shit that Trump was doing. Like,

3:16:31.990 --> 3:16:36.390
<v Speaker 12>just all of the unhinged, weird, golden, like, renovation, quote-unquote,

3:16:36.430 --> 3:16:38.199
<v Speaker 12>stuff that was happening in the White House and the

3:16:38.240 --> 3:16:41.160
<v Speaker 12>whole sort of ballroom bullshit. Real sort of classic case

3:16:41.200 --> 3:16:41.820
<v Speaker 12>of projection.

3:16:41.980 --> 3:16:42.140
<v Speaker 6>But.

3:16:42.910 --> 3:16:46.379
<v Speaker 12>These like very absurd charges led to a fairly serious

3:16:46.400 --> 3:16:50.109
<v Speaker 12>situation where you have Jerome Powell getting subpoenaed by the

3:16:50.150 --> 3:16:54.690
<v Speaker 12>Justice Department. And this is unprecedented, right? And then he

3:16:54.830 --> 3:16:56.929
<v Speaker 12>ends up as a response releasing what I can like

3:16:57.030 --> 3:17:01.060
<v Speaker 12>really only describe as like a preemptive hostage video where

3:17:01.140 --> 3:17:03.480
<v Speaker 12>he's just talking about like, hey, yeah, I am like

3:17:03.520 --> 3:17:06.890
<v Speaker 12>the chairman of the Federal Reserve Committee. And I am

3:17:06.990 --> 3:17:11.689
<v Speaker 12>being persecuted for my political beliefs by the president of

3:17:11.709 --> 3:17:15.580
<v Speaker 12>the United States. And this, you know, caused kind of

3:17:15.640 --> 3:17:19.480
<v Speaker 12>enough of a firestorm, even among Republicans in Congress, that

3:17:19.860 --> 3:17:24.460
<v Speaker 12>eventually this federal investigation is dropped in exchange for Trump's

3:17:24.520 --> 3:17:27.420
<v Speaker 12>nominee for Fed chairman, Kevin Warsh, getting a hearing in

3:17:27.440 --> 3:17:30.100
<v Speaker 12>the Senate. And the end result of that was that

3:17:30.120 --> 3:17:33.660
<v Speaker 12>this investigation was sort of moved to the Fed's independent watchdog.

3:17:34.440 --> 3:17:39.420
<v Speaker 12>And this week, the Fed finally released a really, like,

3:17:39.440 --> 3:17:44.000
<v Speaker 12>126-page-long report that clears Jerome Powell of any criminal wrongdoing, which, like,

3:17:44.900 --> 3:17:48.180
<v Speaker 12>I mean, yes, obviously, he, like, didn't commit a bunch

3:17:48.200 --> 3:17:50.680
<v Speaker 12>of crimes in this remodeling. There is a bunch of

3:17:50.700 --> 3:17:52.859
<v Speaker 12>stuff there about, like, ah, there were cost overruns, and

3:17:52.890 --> 3:17:57.070
<v Speaker 12>they should have had, like, a cap on costs, but.

3:17:58.490 --> 3:17:58.869
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

3:17:58.990 --> 3:18:02.170
<v Speaker 12>Like, A, the Fed funds itself. Like, it's not even

3:18:02.350 --> 3:18:07.360
<v Speaker 12>tax dollars. It's, like, they fund itself from fees, and B, like, look,

3:18:07.440 --> 3:18:11.240
<v Speaker 12>I'm not a Federal Reserve fan, but, like, oh my god,

3:18:11.280 --> 3:18:14.840
<v Speaker 12>there were cost overruns from subcontractors doing bullshit in a

3:18:14.860 --> 3:18:20.330
<v Speaker 12>construction project is, like, like, come on, like, what are

3:18:20.350 --> 3:18:22.590
<v Speaker 12>we doing here? Yeah, no shit, of course there were

3:18:22.629 --> 3:18:27.370
<v Speaker 12>cost overruns on, like, a pseudo-government construction project from, like,

3:18:27.990 --> 3:18:33.970
<v Speaker 12>costs increasing, like, okay, so this whole, sort of, chapter

3:18:34.070 --> 3:18:37.529
<v Speaker 12>appears to largely be over, although it still remains to

3:18:37.550 --> 3:18:39.810
<v Speaker 12>be seen whether we're going to get a confrontation between

3:18:39.870 --> 3:18:43.110
<v Speaker 12>Kevin Warsh and Trump over interest rate cuts. Warsh has

3:18:43.140 --> 3:18:46.740
<v Speaker 12>been kind of bailed out, like at least this quarter

3:18:46.860 --> 3:18:51.320
<v Speaker 12>by inflation data was like slightly better than people was expecting. But,

3:18:51.480 --> 3:18:53.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, there is also still just a chance that,

3:18:54.820 --> 3:18:57.340
<v Speaker 12>you know, next quarter inflation goes up and we see

3:18:57.680 --> 3:19:01.340
<v Speaker 12>like a direct conflict between Warsh and Trump over what's

3:19:01.360 --> 3:19:03.959
<v Speaker 12>going to happen with the interest rates. Once again, as

3:19:04.340 --> 3:19:08.140
<v Speaker 12>happened with Jerome Powell. And if that happens, we will

3:19:08.280 --> 3:19:09.920
<v Speaker 12>keep you informed.

3:19:11.480 --> 3:19:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Finally, here is a quick message from James Stout, who

3:19:14.959 --> 3:19:15.890
<v Speaker 5>is out in the field.

3:19:15.910 --> 3:19:20.070
<v Speaker 17>Hey everyone, it's James. I wasn't able to join the

3:19:20.129 --> 3:19:22.750
<v Speaker 17>rest of the gang for ED today because I was

3:19:22.810 --> 3:19:27.230
<v Speaker 17>in Lochiel, Arizona, where a group of people have been

3:19:27.350 --> 3:19:32.890
<v Speaker 17>defending a cottonwood tree in against destruction for the building

3:19:33.030 --> 3:19:36.210
<v Speaker 17>of the border wall. They have so far been able

3:19:36.250 --> 3:19:40.269
<v Speaker 17>to stop construction. I believe it'll be 66 or 67 days,

3:19:40.670 --> 3:19:42.189
<v Speaker 17>if you hear this on the day it comes out.

3:19:42.850 --> 3:19:46.310
<v Speaker 17>And they have done so by occupying this giant cottonwood

3:19:46.350 --> 3:19:49.190
<v Speaker 17>tree 24-7. If you're not familiar with cottonwoods, they're very

3:19:49.230 --> 3:19:53.320
<v Speaker 17>important trees in this ecosystem. They often grow near water.

3:19:53.879 --> 3:19:56.459
<v Speaker 17>In this case, these cottonwoods are several hundred years old,

3:19:56.540 --> 3:19:59.260
<v Speaker 17>and there used to be a contiguous canopy between them.

3:19:59.620 --> 3:20:01.680
<v Speaker 17>what is now Mexico and what is now the United States.

3:20:02.280 --> 3:20:05.140
<v Speaker 17>At one point, there was a tree sitter in Mexico

3:20:05.300 --> 3:20:09.500
<v Speaker 17>also occupying one of those cottonwood trees. They were asked

3:20:09.540 --> 3:20:11.940
<v Speaker 17>by landowners to come down after those landowners were threatened

3:20:11.980 --> 3:20:14.019
<v Speaker 17>by border patrol, according to people I spoke to on

3:20:14.040 --> 3:20:17.599
<v Speaker 17>the ground. But the tree sit in the United States

3:20:17.640 --> 3:20:20.360
<v Speaker 17>side is still ongoing. In between those two trees, there

3:20:20.400 --> 3:20:24.880
<v Speaker 17>were other old cottonwoods that were They weren't cut down.

3:20:24.980 --> 3:20:27.599
<v Speaker 17>They were pushed or pulled down by excavators. You can

3:20:27.680 --> 3:20:29.310
<v Speaker 17>see where their root balls have been torn out of

3:20:29.330 --> 3:20:33.110
<v Speaker 17>the ground. It's really, really, really horrible to look at.

3:20:33.770 --> 3:20:36.830
<v Speaker 17>If people are interested, there is a day of action

3:20:37.610 --> 3:20:41.890
<v Speaker 17>on the 4th of October, and they are also able

3:20:42.050 --> 3:20:45.610
<v Speaker 17>to look at the camp website. If you want to

3:20:45.629 --> 3:20:47.510
<v Speaker 17>look at the camp website, it's very new, but it

3:20:47.530 --> 3:20:51.520
<v Speaker 17>should be ready by the time you hear this, and

3:20:51.540 --> 3:20:59.939
<v Speaker 17>it is camp. c-a-m-p hyphen o-s-h-a-d dot o-r-g. I will

3:20:59.980 --> 3:21:03.879
<v Speaker 17>also include that in the show notes. You can find

3:21:04.300 --> 3:21:07.760
<v Speaker 17>updates from the camp there. And if you want to

3:21:07.780 --> 3:21:11.930
<v Speaker 17>know more about the planned day of action, you can

3:21:12.010 --> 3:21:15.550
<v Speaker 17>click on the Get Involved tab at the top of

3:21:15.590 --> 3:21:18.630
<v Speaker 17>that website. I noticed that they also have a list

3:21:18.920 --> 3:21:21.040
<v Speaker 17>of things that they need, which people can drop off

3:21:21.120 --> 3:21:22.700
<v Speaker 17>if they are in Tucson, Arizona.

3:21:24.150 --> 3:21:26.629
<v Speaker 5>All right, that does it for us here at It

3:21:26.670 --> 3:21:30.150
<v Speaker 5>Could Happen Here. Bridget, where can people find you and

3:21:30.209 --> 3:21:31.090
<v Speaker 5>your work online?

3:21:31.410 --> 3:21:34.070
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, you can check out my audio book about how

3:21:34.370 --> 3:21:38.110
<v Speaker 18>tech companies and AI companies are using our deepest, darkest

3:21:38.150 --> 3:21:40.830
<v Speaker 18>thoughts to exploit us called Love at First Prompt, AI

3:21:40.850 --> 3:21:43.260
<v Speaker 18>and the Future of Intimacy. You can check out my podcast,

3:21:43.280 --> 3:21:44.880
<v Speaker 18>There Are No Girls on the Internet. You can follow

3:21:44.900 --> 3:21:46.680
<v Speaker 18>me on Instagram at Bridget Marie NDC.

3:21:47.220 --> 3:21:48.440
<v Speaker 7>Awesome. Thank you, Bridget.

3:21:48.980 --> 3:21:51.780
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much for joining us this episode. We

3:21:51.820 --> 3:21:52.540
<v Speaker 5>reported the news.

3:21:54.060 --> 3:21:54.860
<v Speaker 3>We reported the news.

3:22:00.240 --> 3:22:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

3:22:03.440 --> 3:22:05.279
<v Speaker 7>from now until the heat death of the universe.

3:22:06.140 --> 3:22:08.590
<v Speaker 19>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

3:22:08.790 --> 3:22:13.150
<v Speaker 19>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com.

3:22:13.610 --> 3:22:16.410
<v Speaker 19>Or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

3:22:16.770 --> 3:22:19.570
<v Speaker 19>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find

3:22:19.629 --> 3:22:22.560
<v Speaker 19>sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

3:22:23.080 --> 3:22:23.740
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening.