WEBVTT - Bracket Busters

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hell that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm for I've heard so many players say,

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>well I want to be happy. You want to be

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>happy for Dake Edo Steak? Is that woo woom? And

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>then and Tye, welcome back to the solid verbal Poison Girls.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hildebrand, joining me as always over

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there in the Chicago Burbs, the one the only Dan Rubinstein, Sir,

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>how are you? I'm good?

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And full disclosure because this is a show about honesty.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>You got through four words before you had to restart

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>this episode because you fumbled over something, and that's okay.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>We all may I probably make a lot more mistakes

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>than you do. But have you ever listened to a

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>podcast in which somebody accidentally left in an edit where

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they're like, uh oh and he played for the conference championship? Help, shoot,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>that's wrong?

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Three? Two? Have you ever listened to a podcast where

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they forgot an edit? I've listened to our own podcast

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>where I've forgotten to do an edit. Is that true?

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god? Yeah, it's the worst feeling in the world.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You feel helpless because most of the time it's like,

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>oh great. Twenty thousand people heard this already. Yeah, there's

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>really not much I can do at this point. But no,

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it on our show. I've heard it on

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>other shows in full disclosure, because this is a show

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>about honesty. Yes it is. The words that I stumbled

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on were my own name, Dan. It's been a day

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>here as we record this long I'm ron brokenby a

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>long Monday afternoon. But yes, I've heard the edits okay, good.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure that everybody is as

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>silly and dumb as we are.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 2>It's snowing here. I played tennis this morning and I

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>woke up to a message or I received a message

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>from you at some point saying that you received a

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>message at seven am from your mom about the lyrics

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to Wop to Wap.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the It was the annual text slash call after

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Grammys from mom age. Yeah, we had a spirited

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation I'll say about the wh is she not big

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on kids these days? No, not the kids music. Not

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>big on WOP. I know that's a huge surprise. Had

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>some choice commentary about the dresses that she saw on

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>display at the ceremony. Standard ish stuff. It's like once

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>a year after the Grammys. That's the call you get.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, today also happens to be a day in

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 2>which people are filling out brackets, and we'd be nothing

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 2>if not going against the grain if we didn't do

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 2>some sort of bracket related show. So I'm excited for that.

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you have any news you want

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to get to. I don't know if you want me

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to explain our bracket game. I don't know if you

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 2>wanted me to explain what's happening in that song wap wop,

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>like I know you have offline mentioned that, like I

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>don't understand this reference or that reference, and can you

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>break it down for me in an exacting way on

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the solid verbal. I'm happy to tye. I had to

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>look up a lot of things, a lot of physiology.

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>But I'm here to explain whatever you need now.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. I'm I think I'm good, Okay, Okay,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I I think I'm okay, But I will I will

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>keep you in the loop if anything changes. I did

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>want to mention that we did have some Patriot League games.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>We did have Patriot League games, speaking of sliding, slithering, slathering, Yeah,

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>we had some.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriot game Patriot League games. We had Holy Cross twenty

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to three over your Lehigh Mountain Hawks, Dan, I believe

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I had that right. I believe you had the Crossaders.

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We also had the Lafayette Leopards over Colgate. Hello, old friend,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to ten in uh Fisher Stadium. Is so

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ty starts the year zho and two Dan two and

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>oh interesting? I think I picked Lafayette, didn't I did you?

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going against the hated Leopards. The

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Fordham Bucknell game was postponed. For what it's worth, We've

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>got a handful more this weekend at Fordham, holy Cross, Lehigh, Colgate, Lafayette, Bucknell.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about those on the Thursday show. Don't forget

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe slash follow the show if you don't already,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to get all of our latest content delivered to your

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>podcasting app of choice. You can also follow along on

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>social media. We've got a Twitch, we've got a YouTube.

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>All that fun stuff is out there two times a

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>week all throughout the off season. Verballers dot com is

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>where you can find the Patreon. Dan, No, I don't

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have news outside the Patriot League outside of.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>We had well did we not have I don't know

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 2>if we actually discussed Les Miles being actually fired.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>He said he was going to be in our opinion.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think that did. Jeff Long was let go.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>They agreed to part ways whatever it is now. Emmett

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Jones is the interim coach.

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>EMMITTT.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 2>Jones was there receiving receivers and passing game coordinator for

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Kansas these past couple of years. Was at Texas Tech

0:04:57.839 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>before that, and.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Then a high school coach with some success in high

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>school going back what eight ten years. So he is

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the new interim head coach at Kansas, EMMITTT. Jones, And

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if the tag gets taken off, if he's

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:15.559
<v Speaker 1>able to start something anew in Lawrence. There was also

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the news that you told me about this. Drew Brees

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be taking over for Tony Dungeee always.

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Felt like Tony Dungee wasn't super pumped about calling Notre

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Dame football games.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think I think I'm okay with this. I

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything about Drew Brees, which I played at Perdue.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>No no, no, no, no time as an announcer. Oh oh, gotcha,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>gotcha as an announcer I know nothing about Drew Brees,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that I'm with it probably indicates a

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lot about how I felt about the Tony Dungee commentary.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He's probably going to be pretty bad, right, Drew Brees.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>He can't be any worse than Doug Flutie's first year.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just going to be pretty bad because

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>announcing football games when you have no experience announcing football games.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>And everybody points to Tony Romo, But my guess is

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and Tony Romo has a much bigger stage than Drew

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Brees will calling Notre Dame games, even though it's both

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>network TV. I assume it's going to be hopefully a

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>good transition throughout the year that he improves throughout the year,

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's going to be quite difficult for

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 2>him on that stage at first.

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope it works out. I stand by the fact

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that Doug Flutie's first.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Years he was super into NBC show promos.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, this is even before he was into

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the NBC show promos. That was the worst first year

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that I can remember. Is this like an annual change

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like the it feels like next to Turrico since he

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it was Turrico after what was it Tom Hicks, Tomnri,

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hicks, Stan Hicks for a year or two right,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and then before that was Tom hat Like, I don't

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>know why Notre Dame can't keep our NBC can't keep

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>guys calling Notre Dame games and being sent to South

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ben Indiana. Well, it seems like an easy gig. We'll see,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how Drew Brees does, but that'll be interesting.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is going to take over in the booth

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for Tony Dungee. I don't have much else in the

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>way of news, Daniel, No, neither do. I am ready

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:27.679
<v Speaker 1>to bracketologize, bracketologize. So the tournament, the actual basketball tournament starts,

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess on Tuesday with the initial play in games,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the first two days, which arguably are the

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>most fun, are Thursday and Friday, where you've got the

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>first round games. Have you watched any college basketball this year?

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think have I actually watched college basketball?

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I watched a YouTube highlight of I think Oregon beating

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State to win the Pac twelve regular season championship,

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think I've sat down and watched Oregon,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 2>let alone, anyone.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to remember, no Jody with and I has

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>not been watching Michigan. I haven't watched any you know,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the local teams USC UCLA or the local teams where

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I live here. I really don't think I have no.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched a single solitary minute. I was super

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>into the women last season. It was crazy bummed when

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Sabrina Yenesco couldn't Enescu couldn't play for a national championship,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>when the tournament got called off. I was actually super

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>into that team. Well, look, we're going to play our

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>own bracket challenge here in a much much different way.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put a college football spin on it. Dan,

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>how does the skin Yeah we are? How does the

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>skame we are?

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to I have sixteen items in my sixteen

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>item bracket, and it's a likelihood bracket.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you a number of items.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they have to do with wins, Maybe they have

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to do with specific situations. They're tied to the seeds.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So I have one versus sixteen, I have six verses eleven,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 2>five verses twelve involving teams and scenarios, and you and

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>or I have to pick the likelier scenario, okay. And

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>it could be twenty twenty one, it could be over

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the course of the next few years, it could be

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of combinations of things. That's what I have

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>down here. All right, So it's eight items. I don't

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>know if you have an associated sound that you want

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 2>to throw into it on the fly right now.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't have to work on this. I I don't even

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have the soundboard plugged in. You hear that? Oh wow,

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that sound. Yeah, we could play this, Okay,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems obvious. Why don't we go with that? Okay?

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So do you want to do this in terms of

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>like going through the seedings or do you want to

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>actually fill out a bracket in terms of likelihood?

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll fill out a bracket. I'm gonna okay, I'm gonna

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>work on that on my end. Go ahead, Okay, So

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be writing this bracket. You need to keep

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>track of this because I didn't put it in bracket form.

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. Sixteen team, Yeah, sixteen item. Here we go.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to start with the one versus sixteens?

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Get it out of the way.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it has nothing to do once again with like,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>the sixteenth seed is not the least likely in my mind.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just happens to have an item involving the number

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>sixteen one seed BAMA National championship in the next year.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Will there'd be one BAMA National championship in the next year? Okay,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>so that is somewhat likely.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>New quarterback.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>All sorts of changes, though among the coaching staff. It's

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 2>especially sixteen plus Clemson long scrimmage plays allowed. They allowed

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 2>seventeen in a shortened twenty twenty Darien Kendrick, starting defensive back,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>starting corner just left the team, and I believe it

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>was just arrested. I saw so more shorthanded than they

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 2>thought they'd be. They're young, but very promising up front.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Returned some linebackers Trent and Simpson, a big name James

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Kalski back Miles Murphy looks like a star in the

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 2>making up front for Clemson, and they do start the

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 2>season with Georgia. They do start the season with Georgia,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>but the rest of their non conference schedule doesn't look crazy.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina and a for sure rebuilding year Clemson. Will

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 2>their defense continue the slope they fell down we saw

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Filder Covid light them up a little bit. We saw

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you in book a little bit during that game and

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>key moments. So when I say long scrimmage plays allowed,

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that's forty plus yards.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Forty plus yards. Ooh, so they gave a shortened season

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen last year. Yes, wow, wow, So it's that. It'mfying

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's forty and not thirty. But yes, it's that against

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Alabama winning a national championship next year.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep, what is the likelier outcome the Yeah, that's forty

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>plus Clemson in I believe it was what twelve games,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 2>so usually Clemsons playing thirteen, fourteen, fifteen games, so it's

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>shortened for them. As Clemson ended up playing in the

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 2>playoff twelve games seventeen, so over one per game. And

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that was a slippery falldown for Clemson, who had been

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 2>very good at limiting those bigger plays. Now here's the

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>thing that you have to leave in mind when you

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 2>think about that. So difficult, it's tricky. So here's what

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>you have to keep in mind. Obviously, there is going

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to be garbage time. Big playing garbage time means nothing.

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>You're going against the Clemson threes. But that's always been

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 2>the case. Is Clemson has been kind of on a

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 2>rampage these last few years. The other thing to keep

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>in mind maybe is if you're a big believer in

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the Clemson offense, they're going to score quickly dj uyungal La.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 2>If you're not a big believer and you think the

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Clemson offense is going to struggle, you know, the offensive

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 2>line is back, but they lose pieces at receiver obviously,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Travis Etn Trevor Lawrence the big highlight. So if they

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 2>do struggle, they'll be on the field less as well.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>And so this is a counting stat, so more opportunities

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>of a team is so generally Clemson is allowing about

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>sixty five to sixty eight plays a game, but if

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>they get seventy seventy two plays in there, you're the

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 2>opportunities could be there for bigger plays.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, I'm going to say the sixteen

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or more long scrimmage plays is my selection.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go with that as well. I anticipate

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Clemson playing more games than twelve as well, so I

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>don't think it gets fixed overnight. And the secondary still

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean, there are some young guys

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>that are interesting. But the guys who are playing, I

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I think they're going to.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Allow you need. You need so much to go right

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to win a national championship, even for Alabama.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So you're banking on things going wrong. More likely, it's

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>much easier for things to go wrong, for there to

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>be blown coverage. Clemson's got tackling yeap some games against

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>good offenses. So yeah, let's go. Let's let's ride with

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sixteen or more long scrimmage plays. I think I'm with you.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>The problem is Alabama's always excellent. I know, I know

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they're always excellent. I'm with you there. So we agree

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>part put down Clemson sixty plus. I got it. What's next? Okay?

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>So then we go to the eight nine games, eight nine,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>eight win Florida State eight win Florida State A lot.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>They went six and seven and twenty nineteen, but seemed

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to take a step back last year.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Or nine win Duke a QUS Tech, Duke q Tech,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Duke Acuse Tech. All right, so this is Duke Syracuse

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and Virginia Tech combined, Georgia Georgia Tech, Georgia Tech. Yes,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>nine wins QS Tech nine plus yeah, ooh, ooh, I'm

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty high on Florida State. You are too, We both

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we both may Yeah, it might be a stretch to

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>say we're high on Florida State, but we feel fairly

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>bullish about them, don't we. Yeah.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I am feeling for the most part in terms of

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 2>year two coaches who are dealta pretty rotten hand and

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>just that twenty twenty was such a mess that that

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>had to be their year to get to know their

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 2>team and personnel and higher coaches everything like that.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I am leaning.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Nine win Duke Acuse Tech just because you can stumble

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>into five wins in the ACC and with other non

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 2>conference schedules that those teams have. I know, Georgia Tech

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>plays Georgia, but I think you can stumble into five,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>which lowers the bar considerably. So I'm going to go

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>with nine win.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Duke Acuse Tech. I feel like that's probably the answer, because, like,

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as I'm going through and looking at schedules.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Here, you might just look at non confer It's because

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>that's what I'm doing. See plays four non conference games,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 2>so you can load.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Up That's what I'm That's what I'm looking at. So

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you look at Georgia Tech. I know

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you said they played Georgia and that's true, but they

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>also played Northern Illinois and Kennesaw State YEP, So I

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's probably more upside. Gess I's been pretty

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>good though I know I know they have. Yeah, I

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's probably more upside there. You know, Duke's

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>got North Carolina A and T got a game against

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte which they should hopefully win. All the Charlotte's been okay,

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So I Duke accuse Tech is the answer here. But

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good question. And I don't feel any

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>worse about Florida State, even though I'm going to go

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Duke acuse Tech. I just feel like it's yeah.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, if McKenzie milton is healthy and he's

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 2>accurate and he's relatively mistake free, that's not the biggest ask.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>No, not at all, State to win it a game,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not at all. But it's just it's the same deal

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>as the first question. You just get more bites at

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the apple with three teams.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Correct and UMass is awful, and on Florida State's non

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>conference schedule, Notre Dame fills out one of those four.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I believe, right, Jacksonville State, who's playing right now. Jacksonville

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>State's playing right now, and certainly Florida. So having Notre

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Dame and Florida count to those four, that's a tough

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 2>break schedule wise for Florida State right now. So I'm

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>going Dukeacus Tech myself all right. Next up will be

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 2>four and thirteen four thirteen four Rutgers Scarlet Knights wins

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 2>shortened season, they go three and six three this year.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>And because I liked making those combos, tie thirteen for

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the fighting corn Boilers.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Fighting corn boilers don't free to use that name in

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>your actual practice. So that's Nebraska, Purdue and Illinoisla and

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I yeah thirteen, yep, wow, Nebraska, Illinois Perdue.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 2>So I would need four four five across those three teams.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 2>First year Brett Bilima, Scott Frost Reeling and Lincoln and

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 2>certainly Jeff Brom low Key Reeling.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>In West Lafia. Wow.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I you know, man, if we could get that on

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 2>some sort of chiron this fall, Jeff Bram instead of

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>head coach Purdue low Key Reeling, I'd be very happy,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 2>be thrilled.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm fighting corn boilers. I'm looking at Rutgers schedule right now. Okay,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>four winds feels like a stretch to me. But it's

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like there's really no margin for air, because sure, I

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like in a regular season, let's put this way,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in a regular season where we don't have all sorts

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>of weird COVID protocols and injuries and whatnot, it's just

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>probably not the same setup as it was a year

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>ago for Rutgers. You're saying Rutgers was advantaged by a

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>deadly pandemic in a weird way. Yes, I think I'm

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that I gid nobody was advantaged. Yeah, but there's

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>just no margin for air here. They've got to beat Temple,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they've got to beat Syracuse, they've got to beat the

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Delaware Blue Hens of obviously, obviously, and they've got to

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>beat Illinois. That's the clearest path to get to four.

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>They're on a Michigan State winds dreak. They are on

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a Michigan State win streak. But that just feels and

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel better about Rutgers. I think Chiano did a

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>good job. Got Maryland at the end there. I think

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of dots on there. There's just not

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>much room for error. And then on the Nebraska Illinois

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Perdue side of things, I feel like we looked at

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska schedule. I'm pulling it up now, and it's not

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly an easy setup. Okay, they've got a game against Yeah,

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They've got a game of road tilt against Oklahoma. They've

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>got Ohio STATEUM.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Which almost got canceled. I don't know if you saw

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 2>that news item I did.

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Oklahoma was adamant that they wanted to play the

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>game in Nebraska said, ah, I don't know if that's

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 2>for us specifically, and then it got out in Nebraska's like, oh,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 2>we intend to play. Oh yeah, we're gonna play Yeah.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 2>So tough schedule. I feel like the answer is fighting

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>corn Boilers.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Corn Boilers is the answer. It's got to be the answer,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>because now I'm looking at the schedule. I mean, even

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>though it's tough for Nebraska, they can get the seven

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wins here. They can get the seven wins. Dan, walk

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>me through your favorite Scott Frost Bowl season. Just lay

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it out. They can get the seven wins here, and

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>then you're asking for three apiece from Purdue in Illinois,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which is doable.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska's they kind of had a single offensive threat last year,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 2>and he decided Nebraska's.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Not for me.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Right to Kentucky. Kentucky's high flying offense went home. I

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>know those family stuff as well, but.

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fighting corn boilers. Have fun with that, corn boilers,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going rockers, I am. So we have to I mean,

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody has to win these games. I guess we have

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to agree on one.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let's I suppose if we're gonna go bite

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 2>at the apple theory, we'll go fighting corn boilers.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Here, corn boilers. Okay, five versus twelve is up next,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>four wins, It's not terrible.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Five versus twelve tie. This is always where there's an upset.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Although this is not really a scene.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We just had a thirteen over a four.

0:21:54.840 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of Kentucky's high flying offense. Five SEC games in

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>which Kentucky scores over thirty points. Oh no, they had

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>one in twenty nineteen that was Vanderbilt. But twelve Georgia

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>wins including you can include the SEC championship game. So

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>thirteen games, twelve Georgia wins out of thirteen twelve plus.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, this is extremely difficult. There is no chance

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky is going to score more than thirty points in

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>five SEC games. There's no chance. There's always a chance,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but given where they came from, that offense was real bad.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Dan new quarterback, thirty, we won't be Will Levis, new quarterback,

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>new coordinator. Yeah, this is what their SEC schedule looks

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>like this year. Versus MISSOO at South Carolina, versus Florida,

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>versus LSU. First of all, not a crazy killer of

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a defense in that group. Right, should have had their

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>own issues. Sure, miss.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Thirty plus points, doesn't matter how you score them. Georgia,

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Mississippi State, two pretty good defenses, Tennessee, Vanderbilt.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>There is no chance that's going over thirty points in

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>five SEC games now.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>So you are likely are twelve and one or thirteen

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and oh Georgia which includes Week one Clemson.

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'm on twelve here. There's just no way Kentucky's

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that. There's no way thirty points. Wandelle Robinson. I

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>don't care. There's no chance, Okay, Mayah, I would love

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to see it, though, I would love to see it.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I think I agree. Yeah, I was trying to find it.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 2>What about three? Could you find three thirty point games?

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Missoo South Carolina fandy.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I could find oh god, I could find three. Sure,

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I could find three. Three I would take even if

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I was in Bridge too far. You take three over

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve Georgia wins? Yeah, I think so okay, because twelve

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgia winds is still very difficult. Everything has to go right.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Next matchup three versus six, three versus six, So we have.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>No Oh you're doing this in quadrants? How are you

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 2>doing this because we still have seven verses ten?

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>We still have seven verses ten, three verses fourteen? Is

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that what you meant to say? Three versus fourteen? I'm sorry? Continue, Okay,

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Yep, yep, yep yep. Three straight pac

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve titles for Oregon. They've already won two.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>They would add that crown, the triple crown, or fourteen

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>plus total wins for two of the three other Pacific Northwest.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the Cascade Cup. I forget what they

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>call it. Washington Schools fourteen plus total wins for the

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Washington Schools, or a pack twelve crown this year for Oregon,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 2>making it three straight.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, by the way, there's a decided twelve Days of

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Christmas feel to this game. Now that I'm great. It

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>took me four matchups for five matchups now to catch

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on that this is what you were doing. But okay,

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're going pack twelve title for Oregon versus fourteen

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or more total wins for the Washington schools. I think

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I go Oregon here.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Really, you don't like the trending directions of Wazoo and

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 2>you so Wazoo had a completely abysmal defense this past year,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 2>and that one in three shortened season, completely abysmal. That's okay,

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that can be improved upon. Defense is about effort. Washington

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 2>had an efficient offense, but no huge playmakers, and defensively

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 2>probably not where they should have been. They got pushed

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>around a little bit upfront. So well, Washington and Wazoo,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about an average of seven wins apiece, you know,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>nine for U DUB five for Wazoo. That's fourteen eight and.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Six ten four. Feel great about Washington. I'm not crazy

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>about Wazoo. That's the thing. That's the thing that I

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>have trouble without. I know, That's why I'm not crazy.

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not crazy about Wazoo, and I'm I'm mixed on Washington.

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>You seem to be higher on Jimmy Lake, but I'm

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of mixed on Washington myself. But yeah, yeah, well

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>even still, I think you're higher on the Huskies than

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I am. Like the I like the hire of Jimmy Lake.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not opposed at all to Jimmy Lake. Everything we've

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>heard has been really positive. I like it they promoted

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>from within, that they established continuity. But last season quote

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>unquote last season four games whatever they played, like, that's shit.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Not you can't take anything from last season seriously, in

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>my view, it kind of all goes out the windows.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like we still don't know a whole

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>lot about what Washington's going to look like under Jimmy Lake.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>We know they've got a quarterback coming in that everyone's

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>very excited about, but I just there's too many variables there,

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and I really just know they have a quarterback that

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>exists already there. I know, yeah, I know, But Washington

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>is clearly the better of the two schools in that equation. Wazoo.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 2>You kind of need to find five or six Wazoo wins,

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 2>which is becoming difficult. So if you want to say

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Utah State and was it Prairie State. That's who they're

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 2>playing Week two. Oh, excuse me, not Prairie Portland. Excuse me,

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 2>I didn't recognize the Vikings logo. Portland State and Utah State.

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Good shot, Uta State first year coach, and Blake Anderson.

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. I like Milake Anderson.

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Portland State's a likely win. An Arizona at home November nineteen,

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>likely win. Outside of that, we've got BYU that's sandwiched

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 2>in there between Stanford and Arizona State on the road

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 2>in October, and then it's at Cal at Utah USC

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State at home. So if you want to say

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State and what Cal in terms of close calls,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 2>enough that gets you to five maximizing five, which means

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 2>you need nine from U.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Doub right.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Oregon has a pretty big question market quarterback, new defensive coordinator,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>a good amount of experience on offense overall, and a

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty high talent level on defense. I'm going to go

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>for schedule. I'm going with Oregon. I'm going to go

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>with your ducks, Dan, I'm going to go with your ducks.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I'm not sure. Against the bites of the apple theory,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm crazy about Oregon either, right, Like,

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>how do we feel about Anthony Brown leading the Orgon Ducks.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>You think that's a good situation.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're a top twelve team in the

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>country with Anthony Brown, but I think they can win

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 2>games and position themselves somehow if they win the correct

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>games to win the North and give themselves a shot

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>at winning the conference. But my understanding is Anthony Brown

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 2>will start, and depending on the development of ty Thompson

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 2>or I mean it's probably ty Thompson his development early

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and roly big time quarterback freshmen, depending on his development

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 2>and readiness, They'll make a decision at some point. But

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Brown's obviously the guy with Tyler Schuck transferring, So

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I think they are overall in a B minus quarterback situation,

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 2>which can be good enough to win a bunch of

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>games in the Pac twe twelve, but nothing important nationally

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>seven ten seven or higher final regular season rank of

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame.

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Or lower going the other one.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I got a toffee though Michigan, Penn State, or Wisconsin

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>finish with ten plus wins one of them any of

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>those three. It's seven ten seven is the regular season

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>rank or higher for Notre Dame. Ten is the number

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>of wins for either Michigan, Penn State, or Wisconsin.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's it's one hundred percent. The ten plus wins.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>There's no chance Notre Dame is going to be finished.

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Kade McNamara, Sean Clifford, Grammertz, Oh God, why do you

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have to do that to me? Yeah? First off, Sean

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Clifford is not going to be the quarterback? Can get

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Can we get get that out there? I think quarterback

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>James Franklin made a comment that I saw floating around

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter earlier today, so friends were sending it around

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that James Franklin wants to see what to Kwan Roberson

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and Christian Vio can can do out there. Quote. We

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.239
<v Speaker 1>want to feel like we can put those guys in

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a game and win with them. So I interpret that

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>as they're gonna they're gonna give them a serious look.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Can we just agree that Penn State's going to be

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>done with Sean Clifford and it's going to be one

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 1>of these other guys. I don't know if that necessarily

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>makes them better, but it's not going to make them

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>any more disorganized on offense, especially now with your series.

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So they're gonna win ten games Penn State with a

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>brand new quarterback. I don't feel great about that, But

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>so is that the team of those three that you

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>feel best about. I feel pretty good about Penn State. Yeah,

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do, And if I'm ranking them in order,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I probably go Penn State, Wisconsin, Michigan.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 2>You're not a Kade McNamara. I know it's but I

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>like cawde and or JJ McCarthy and becoming five star freshmen.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Not yet, Okay, that could change by week one.

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 2>But and you don't think Jack Cone can lead Notre Dame.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what their schedule looks like to a

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 2>high ranking, a playoff ish ranking.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me pull this up. Rose bull Cone,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Rose king Cone, King Cone. King Cone is the official Moniker. Sorry,

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pulling this up. My gut reaction was, there's no

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>way but road tilt against Florida State, Toledo, Perdue, Wisconsin. Okay,

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some crossover Cincinnati and Virginia Tech, USC North Carolina, Navy,

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Georg. Oh my god, they could go. They could

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>go twelve to zero. With this man, you are going

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to make a fool out of me here. You're going

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame. I might have to. I didn't realize the

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>schedule looked like this.

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who are the likeliest losses for Notre Dame on

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that schedule?

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Cincy? That's market Freeman. He knows that team. USC. Yeah.

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Can I answer USC twice? I don't. North Carolina lost

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody with the exception of Seam Howell. Yeah, so they're

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of in rebuilding mode. The defense actually has interesting

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>pieces though it does. But this this feels like easily

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a ten and two season for note rightwause they do

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>bring a lot back. Yeah. Man, fine, I'll go Notre Dame.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Damn it. Why do you seven? Yeah? Yeah?

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So do we only have one left for round matchup?

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got a two verses fifteen here. Oh and then

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we also have six eleven and we have six eleven,

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So let's do six? Will go? Next six to eleven?

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Next six total years of Lane kiff and in Oxford, Mississippi.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 2>So he needs five more twenty one, twenty two, twenty three,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, or twenty five. You'll give him six total

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 2>years or eleven combined wins in the next two years

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 2>in Knoxville.

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>In Knoxville, not.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 2>For Lane Kiffen for Tennessee and overall, not just home games.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 2>A six winner and a five winner on average, Tennessee

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 2>can win seven this year. It's likely that they're going

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 2>to hit or eclipse that number.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Lane Kiffin's going to stay at Old

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Miss for six years? What's the job though? I don't know.

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>You think he's getting fired for some sort of No,

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think acties. I think he step up for Lane?

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 2>What school hires him? What school wants all the good,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 2>bad and weird of Lane Kiffin? What's that jump up

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>from Ole Miss Florida?

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Damn, Allen's going to be around at Florida. He'sami Florida State.

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, maybe it might be the NFL, could be

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I just don't see him staying for six

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>years at Old Miss. And I like the Old Miss job.

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>He obviously does. He m he had his pick of

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the proverbial litter there, but probably not Saban retirement Bama.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't see them going to Do you think they

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>would give Lene a look? No? I don't think so,

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not the way things ended, I don't think. I don't

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>think he would do that, So.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I think they're probably I think they might go as

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 2>far as letting Nick Saban have that voice in that

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 2>conversation if he wants it.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I think I gotta go. I think I gotta go

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>with Tennessee being Tennessee wins.

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we need like a if things are rough

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 2>because of how thin the roster is, we need to

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 2>hit five or four or five this year, which is

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:02.959
<v Speaker 2>a tough ask.

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a thin roster right now. Yeah, but you could,

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you could cobble together. You could go very easily four

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>wins this year in seven next year. Are you do?

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>You have the schedule in front of you and yours

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee football schedule. They could win four games this year, though,

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>couldn't they Bowling Green who just lost Brian van Gorder

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>like the.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Night before spring right right, So that's additioned by a

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 2>subtraction to me, pitt uh TNTC.

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that Tennessee Tech? Is that Tennessee Tech the Golden Eagles? Yeah,

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they call it. They have Southma, they have Vandy on here.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>They could win easily three four, So I think I

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think five is likely. They're at least going to win

0:36:55.560 --> 0:37:00.919
<v Speaker 1>one more. Five is likely. Yeah, and they and if

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.799
<v Speaker 1>we're assuming the best, they would improve upon that mark

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two. I'm looking at the schedule now, yeah,

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean Ball State, Pit, Army, U T. Martin. But

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just penciling in Pitt as a loss to Tennessee. No,

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm penciling in as a win. No, I'm saying you're

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>saying Pitt. You're penciling as a loss. Pitt is losing

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to Tennessee in this game. I am yeah, Oh my god,

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I go Tennessee here. There's just

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>there's no chancelling staying there for six years. Give me

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the next matchup in the second round. Well, we have

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>do the two and fifteen yet, don't we oh two fifteen?

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me? Here we go? Two regular season wins over

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma schools by Texas. Texas plays both Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Actually I think it's in consecutive weeks. The Oklahoma State

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>game is in Austin, and as we all know, Oklahoma, Texas, Texas, Oklahoma,

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever your preference, as it is every year in Dallas.

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>You're saying they beat both Oklahoma schools.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, regular season, So any potential rematch in a conference

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 2>championship game does not count. Regular season?

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay or or fifteen total games played by Oklahoma,

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So they could lose to Texas hypothetically in this scenario

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and still play fifteen games to go, you know, eleven

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to one when the conference championship game end up in

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>the playoff, win a game, go to the national championship game.

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>So this means it's just games played. It's essentially saying

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma National Championship game birth or Texas beating Oklahoma and

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State in consecutive weeks. Wow, I don't think, man,

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that's tough. I don't think Texas is going to and

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>zero Okay and beating both the Oklahoma schools during the

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>regular season, and I feel Oklahoma. I feel more strongly

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about that then I do Oklahoma's prospects of making the

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>national Championship game because still Spencer Rattler back start a

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of younger guys last year.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Sure lost their best defensive player in Ronnie Perkins, though

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 2>terror on the edge.

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they didn't play defense anyway. What differences is Oh,

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not true at all. What difference does it make?

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not true at all. This is an improved defense, sure,

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sure it is. I'll go Oklahoma.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Here for the record, I think you're wrong about the

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma defense. So this what you're saying, though, is also

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma can max lose one game in the Big Twelve,

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 2>and Oklahoma will beat some combination, not some combination, but

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 2>one of these schools. They'll beat Ohio State, they'll beat Clemson,

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 2>they'll beat Alabama, they'll beat whoever may come out of

0:39:57.000 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the Pac twelve unscathed throughout eleven and one twelve one.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 2>They'll beat Georgia, they'll beat I don't Notre Dame. There'll

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 2>be one of those types of schools in late December,

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>early January, Texas, A and M.

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I still think that's more likely than Texas going to

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and oh LSU because they got the offense. You know

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna two games, it's all it takes. Yeah, but

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Texas hasn't beaten both them.

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 2>No chance they were an overtime or however many overtimes

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 2>against Oklahoma last year, and I believe that didn they

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 2>bleat Oklahoma State. Yeah, not crazy overtime game, sure, I

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 2>just I don't see any chance. Okay, no chance, no chance,

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 2>two games, No chance they'll be in a rhythm by then.

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>It's October, October, October, thank you, Yes, Texas did indeed

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 2>beat Oklahoma State in overtime last year.

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.439
<v Speaker 1>It was a a crazy game, all right. So let's

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>go back through then and let's do it. Round two.

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You got we've got the sixteen or sixteen or more

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>long scrimmage plays allowed by Clemson. Yep versus nine plus

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>win Duke Accus Tech, give it to me. I think

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I go Duke Acuse Tech.

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So now you think this is less likely you're you're

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 2>taking the bites off the apple.

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think Duke Accuse Tech. Three three teams combined,

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>giving me a chance to get to nine or more wins. Okay, next, next,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got the fighting corn boilers thirteen combined wins makes

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>me giggle. Yep versus Georgia twelve wins, fighting corn boilers

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>thirteen combined wins. I think I go george corn Boilers.

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Which of those those boiler of boilers of corn that fights?

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Which Which of those do you feel is going to

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 1>be pulling their own weight the most? Pulling their own

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>weight the most? Yeah?

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Like, is Illinois really carrying perdue in Nebraska?

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Tosa? Probably the unforeseen thirteen.

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>And going to come up with something Nebraska's shoulder in

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:27.439
<v Speaker 2>the load.

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I do. Okay, because look, Nebraska and Purdue they

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>could each get five wins. Illinois got to get three.

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, and they still hit that. So yeah, corn

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Boilers right here.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Corn Boilers over Georgia and high success level. Okay, next item.

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got three straight pack twelve titles for Oregon versus

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 1>eleven combined wins in next two years in Knoxville.

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So this it's requiring what is what is the

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 2>easier path searching out and finding those eleven wins in

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>two years? You can go five and seven, six and six,

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you hit it. You can be unexceptional and win this matchup,

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 2>or you have to be at least good if you're

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Oregon to hit this one. So basically, what I'm saying is,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:23.399
<v Speaker 2>are you betting on the shine of mediocrity or.

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Positivity? The attraction of positivity? Hm? Wow, I'm going eleven

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>combined wins? Eleven combined wins? Okay, you're going with the

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>high floor rather than the low bar. That's correct. Okay.

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Next matchup? Oh god, this one Oklahoma with fifteen games

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>played versus Notre Dame rest Championship, Notre Dame playoff or

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>playoff A J oh god, I hate this one. It's

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>got to be Notre Dame. It's it has to be

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame.

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 2>It has to be Notre Dame. So Oklahoma one of,

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 2>if not the only. I'm trying to think, like, depending

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:18.879
<v Speaker 2>on how you classify Georgia, but certainly JD. Daniels didn't

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 2>start the season, Oklahoma is either the only or if

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm forgetting somebody to bring back their starting quarterback.

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, that's right, that's right. So that sort of

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>continuity is really attractive. See. No, you don't break through

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>until you do. This is why this is bull You're

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>arguing both sides of the coin here. You're doing this

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to me on purpose. Yeah, of course, continue. I'm just

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to give you my viewpoint trying to give you.

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to arm you with all of the possible

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>context and information. Knowledge is power, Okay, yep, yeah, I'll

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 1>go Notre Dame. I don't know what do you think.

0:44:55.600 --> 0:45:00.479
<v Speaker 2>If I'm deciding between Jack Cone Notre Dame winning likely

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 2>eleven plus or Oklahoma realistically going thirteen and one to

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.919
<v Speaker 2>reach game number fifteen, that a blemish won't affect their

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>title run. But to say that they're going to be

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and h is probably a lot considering that they're

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 2>not a complete team right now.

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So you go Notre Dame too. I think I'm going

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame.

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really hard to do what I'm asking

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma to do now. They're a playoff team and Notre

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Dame has been a top seven team, what two of

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the last three years, to last four years, whatever it is,

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 2>so Notre Dame's barrier to entry. I'm looking up their

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 2>schedule right now because I didn't have it when you

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 2>said Cincinnati and USC were the toughest two.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati USC there's a game against Virginia Tech, I think

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 1>on the road. That doesn't bother me that much. Where

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin game. There's a Wisconsin game, the USC games at

0:45:58.520 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame.

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we've got a Wisconsin game against a legitimately

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.839
<v Speaker 2>very very good defensive coordinator who knows in some form

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Jack Cone.

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 2>We like Jim Leonard. We think he's a promising there.

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>He's a young defense wearing but really good. So we

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 2>have Jim Leonard Wisconsin defense. We have non Marcus Freeman

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati defense. We've got pretty good but definitely talented USC

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 2>defense with a really good quarterback, and that game is

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 2>in South Bend. We've got Sam Howell, who struggled with

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 2>more talent last year, to consistently move the ball and

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 2>score touchdowns against Notre Dame. We have a Notre Dame

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 2>team with their own new defensive coordinator. Mind you, but

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how much Stanford scares you. Virginia at

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 2>this point, Navy. Navy's an interesting maybe let down look

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 2>ahead sandwich, I guess. But yeah, the back half of

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>their schedule seems fine, but you know that's not an

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 2>amazing middle season stretch of Wisconsin, Cincinnati, Virginia Tech on

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the road USC North Carolina. Now four of the five

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of those are at home, unless there are some neutral

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 2>site that I'm not seeing. So I don't love tough

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 2>five game stretches. But even still, there's no that the

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 2>loss isn't obvious unless you're a big believer in Wisconsin.

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's not obvious. I hate that. I hate

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that you put me in this situation, but the answer

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 1>is probably Notre Dame. It's got to be Notre Dame,

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The down still down. Florida State, Cincinnati replacing key guys.

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So we're down to the semifinals here. Okay, what's

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the matchup? Nine plus win Duke Accuse Tech versus thirteen

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>combined wins for the fighting corn boilers.

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 2>That came together nicely. It's almost used the apple biting.

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>No, no, we've got three bites of the apple in

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>both cases. I think I go nine win, nine plus

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>win Duke Accuse Tech. It's a low bar, lower bar

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to clear. Yeah, I think that's the answer here.

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think the the competence quotion is probably higher

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.800
<v Speaker 2>with Nebraska and Purdue. I don't think Duke is trending

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 2>in the right way. The Syracuse offense is such a

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.759
<v Speaker 2>mess still, and Georgia Tech is just a propensity to

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>let the bottom fall out, even with their you know,

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 2>you know how I feel about Jamior Gibbs. But okay,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 2>you're going with that nine win.

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Ducuse Tech lower bar three wins apiece. Okay. And if

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you get a school like a Georgia Tech that you

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>know plays hard, has played hard, really hard the last

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>two years, m hm, they get bull eligible, it's a

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:49.280
<v Speaker 1>near certainty that you're going to hit. Okay, Duke Accuse

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech through to the finals, Dan through to the finals.

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Duke Acuse Tech second matchup here, yep, eleven combide wins.

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Next two years in Knoxville or Notre Dame ranks seventh

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>or higher.

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 2>So once again, it's excellence versus mediocrity. Eleven combined wins.

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>You get to pick this one. Don't make me do this.

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Because does Tennessee's non conference twenty twenty two schedule exist online?

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm looking at it right now. Who is it?

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Ball State, Pit Army, UT Martin. So even if you

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>want to play it super conservatively, that's three wins. What

0:49:38.960 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>it's three wins? Is not a Tennessee team that just

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Panthers of Georgia State. I'm assuming the

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>best here. Okay, forgive me. They shouldn't lose I just

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>whistled they shouldn't lose the Ball State Army or UT Martin.

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 1>They shouldn't lose the Pit either, but they could.

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean, shouldn't lose to Pitt. Pitt's been fine.

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 2>They've been a five hundred program.

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, if not better worst case scenario, it's a

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>three win non conference slate for them. Okay, Army Army

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty decent. They're not. Okay, can you please

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>answer the question, Dan, so, am I taking the Notre

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Dame or I'm going Tennessee? I think I think Tennessee's

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the answer here. I'm going Tennessee.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's tough for teams without the upper upper

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 2>upper level of talent and depth thereof to go to

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:38.800
<v Speaker 2>the playoff and back to back seasons.

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think Notre Dame will go ten and two

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with that schedule and missed the playoff. So that brings

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:46.920
<v Speaker 1>us to our final. Although they could go they could

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>finish number seven in the country at tenant too, which

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 1>is all I'm asking here. This brings us to our final. Then, yeah,

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got nine plus wins, excessive mediocrity. Yeah, Duke accues

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Tech with nine plus wins or eleven or more wins

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in Knoxville over the next two years. Dan, Oh, this

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is tough. I still extreme difficult Tech.

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Duke accuse Tech because of the four non conference games

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 2>they play. What if I were to say, it's only

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know if you have all three schedules

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 2>in front of you, only FBS games count, so you

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 2>have to take away.

0:51:20.400 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>All you can't change the rules. Now, Well, I'm just

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>asking it's just a wrinkle, that's that's no. I would

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 1>probably go no. I would probably say no if you

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have to take off FCS matchups. No, I'm not feeling

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as good about that. But you know, Duke did not

0:51:38.640 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>have a good year last year. He did not have

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a RIP year last year. But they play North Carolina

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:48.919
<v Speaker 1>A and T in Kansas this season. Those should both

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be w's. Then we move over, hold on, let me

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>finish this. Then we move over to Syracuse, who also

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>did not have a great year last year. But again

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at the schedule, they've got a game against Ohio

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Albany Great Danes. So we're not counting that though. No,

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we still are counting that. You can't change the rules

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 1>on me. Yeah, that's two more wins. And then we

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>go over to Georgia Tech. And I like Georgia Tech.

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech is building under Jeff Collins or I think

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>playing hard week in and week out. They've got games

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:30.359
<v Speaker 1>here against Northern Illinois, Kanesaus State, they play Duke, who

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to beat. I mean, it's not obvious, Okay.

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So here's what you do need. This is added context.

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 2>If I may it's not obvious. Oh no, twenty twenty

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, these three teams added up to five wins.

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Twenty nineteen, the added up to seven wins.

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You scoundrel. This is tough. This is I think I

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:57.959
<v Speaker 1>assume too much. But I'm still going Duke a QS

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Tech in I am still going Duke que Tech.

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:04.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that was I was using ACC Conference

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:06.720
<v Speaker 2>games to get those numbers. If you want the full

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 2>I should have been obviously my question. I wasn't, so

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving it to you. So it's three, five and five.

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 2>So it was thirteen two years ago. Okay, okay, If

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 2>that makes you feel any better, okay, okay.

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel better. No, okay, I still go Duke Accuse

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Tech here.

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 2>If I made it ACC games only, would that change anything? Yes,

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 2>So you would go Tennessee to hit eleven overall the

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 2>next two years before you would take ACC wins between Duke,

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Syracuse and Georgia Tech.

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:39.720
<v Speaker 1>To equal nine.

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was six overall last year between those three.

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I think Syracuse won and ten Duke to a nine

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech three.

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I go Tennessee in that case, I think I'd.

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Have to Tennessee's eleven over Duke Accuse Tech's nine ACC wins.

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think that's right. Okay, so Tennessee eleven

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>wins is overall your champion. No, Duke acus Tech is

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:03.720
<v Speaker 1>still much Duke acus Tech is your overall champion unless

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>ACC games are used. Yeah, Duke Accus Tech, what an

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.280
<v Speaker 1>unexpected What are they a nine seed? Yeah? Because it's nine.

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't see it anything.

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 2>But okay, so the nine win Duke acus Tech is

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 2>your We have no name for this game our item bracket.

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I did not expect that from making this bracket.

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I definitely didn't. Yeah, I actually expected.

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the most love of Duke acus Tech is

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get all year. Oh man, we need to

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 1>keep track of this somewhat. I'll keep this document. I'll

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>create a Google doc so we can track it over

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the course of the year. All right, I have it.

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I have see what I nailed thing, and maybe somebody

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>out on the Patreon can help us out as well.

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>First dot com.

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 2>But uh also I want to know what anybody Patreon

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 2>non Patreon, who they have winning and where we really

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:55.280
<v Speaker 2>messed up our bracket.

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where they have who they have winning? This bracket

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>and who they have winning the actual bracket too. Oh,

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>are we doing that? I don't know if we're doing it,

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'd like to know what I'm missing and like

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>who the sleepers are, because generally what I'll do I

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.319
<v Speaker 1>don't usually watch a lot of college basketball because it's

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:16.759
<v Speaker 1>not that I have anything against it, but by the

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>time basketball season rolls around, I'm just looking for like

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>sports detox for a couple months after what we do

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>throughout the fall and into January. It's not really what

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you've been watching just watching Netflix. Man, tell me what

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you've been watching and watching this marriage or mortgage show?

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you yet?

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 2>I watched twenty minutes of it, Jody, and I was

0:55:37.280 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 2>watching it while feeding the little guy. Yeah, it's incredible, frustrating.

0:55:42.840 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I have an opinion about it.

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:47.719
<v Speaker 2>It's so the concept marriage or mortgage is you have

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 2>a certain amount of money to either spend on a

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 2>down payment for a house or the house itself I

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 2>don't even know, yeah, or for the for like a

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 2>super nice wedding.

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. Yeah, And then what they do is they

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>try to sweeten the post a little bit. So is

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it a full house or is it a mortgage or

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>or is it a down payment? It's well they're saying,

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we have X amount of money to use on a

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:14.839
<v Speaker 1>down payment, got on a wedding, and then it's it's

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>very much a love it or leave it type show

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if you've loved or listed excuse me if you've seen

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the old shows. And I forget what network

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that was, but HGTV something like that. Yeah, yeah, And

0:56:27.480 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>instead the spin off is you can either devote that

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 1>money to your wedding where they're going to jump in,

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get you a great deal with all

0:56:35.600 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 1>sorts of perks a wedding or your dreams, or they're

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:41.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get you a nice deal on a house

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 1>where you know the owners or the builders provide some

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 1>concessions too. What's frustrating about it?

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a really good I mean, I think

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:50.880
<v Speaker 2>it's always obvious to me that you should spend money

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 2>on something you're going to be using for decades rather

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:56.720
<v Speaker 2>than a single day. But I understand having a nice wedding,

0:56:57.000 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 2>So what is frustrating to about it?

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:02.839
<v Speaker 1>What's frustrating to me is that, and keep in mind,

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I come from like both sides of our family are

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 1>very traditional, right, so the prospect of like buying a

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>house before marriage is not really something that was much considered.

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's just so obvious when you're looking at these

0:57:16.120 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>two like maybe in hindsight, well they're engaged, right, they're engaged. Yeah,

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, out of bounds to say we should look

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:27.919
<v Speaker 1>for a house. In hindsight, I'm looking at these selections

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm screaming at the television at eleven thirty at night.

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Take the house, Take the house, Take the They take

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the wedding, they take the What is the rationale of

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the people who take the wedding? They just they're just wowed.

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They're just wowed. Yeah, oh they got us the troths seduced.

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh I did see that was when I saw I

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think in Nashville. Yeah, who cares about the trolley, it's

0:57:53.760 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>probably cold. Just take the damn house.

0:57:56.920 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 2>What and be careful what you say? What percentage would

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 2>you now in retrospect, cut your wedding by financially if

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:09.120
<v Speaker 2>you could put it to your mortgage?

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I mean we've talked about this, okay, and I

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about this while watching the show. What was your total?

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>What was your total attendee list numbers. I don't like

0:58:21.280 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred. It wasn't that many. Now I forget the four.

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>What would your new number be? Knowing that you could,

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, book a smaller venue and order less food

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and rent fewer chairs, all that kind of stuff. We've

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we've had the conversation before, where you a sixty person wedding.

0:58:38.160 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 1>If we'd do it all over again, we'd get it

0:58:40.800 --> 0:58:42.400
<v Speaker 1>done at the courthouse and then throw a party in

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the backyard. It's so obvious. It is obvious, but it's

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>less frustration. How many people could you invite to your backyard?

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Though every lister of this show could probably No, you

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have a big yard, we get it, no idea, okay,

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but at least the number of people who came to

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the wedding. Okay. Wow.

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I have noticed, and I don't know

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 2>if there's a specific reason for this, Maybe it's just

0:59:11.960 --> 0:59:14.960
<v Speaker 2>because there's fewer episodes. Have you noticed that Netflix reality

0:59:15.000 --> 0:59:20.040
<v Speaker 2>shows have way better production value than your typical cable No, it's.

0:59:19.960 --> 0:59:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Not a reality show, it's not even all They all

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>include My favorite, my favorite tell for all Netflix shows

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is duct and value wise, Yeah, they've got the production

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>value it's it's way higher. But they've all got the

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>dramatic drone shot at some point, all featured the dramatic

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>drone shot. Yep, every sun seton over Hollywood, every Netflix

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 1>show has that interesting.

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, I'm watching Dog Day Afternoon. I'm just going through,

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 2>like I don't have time to sit down and watch

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:54.800
<v Speaker 2>an actual long movie because I am, you know, two

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 2>little guys, and now I'm also tired all the time,

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:00.400
<v Speaker 2>so I don't have to like two and a half

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 2>hours to sit down and watch a nineteen seventy six

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 2>al Pacino movie. But I am almost done with Dog

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Day Afternoon and it is great.

1:00:07.120 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen it?

1:00:07.920 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>No, who's in that's it's al Pacino. There's not that

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>many other famous people in. I'm trying to think of

1:00:16.320 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the people in it. I know the guy who plays Sam,

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>his accomplished, his accomplice. Excuse me, it's Sonny and Sam.

1:00:22.920 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 2>He's fan because he played Fredo I believe in The Godfather.

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm forgetting his name. But I'm trying to go

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>through like classic, amazing movies that I haven't seen that

1:00:35.040 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I can just sort of pick up and watch thirty

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:42.840
<v Speaker 2>eight minutes of at a time, so it's fantastic. It's

1:00:42.920 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 2>really really John Kazzali. Kazali plays the side and he

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>was also Fredo and The Godfather Charles Derning. Believe it's

1:00:53.160 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I know it's Sidney Lumette is the director, all time director,

1:00:57.280 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>but al Pacino and al Pacino's hair it's a sensations.

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>He has like sweaty summer in Brooklyn hair but a

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>giant mop at the same time. And it's an all

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>time hair performance from al Pachiaz.

1:01:12.560 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Hair hero, okay, an absolute hair hero. So I'm watching

1:01:16.440 --> 1:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that right now. I haven't been watching any other I

1:01:18.680 --> 1:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>watched loopin, Loopin, Okay, that was pretty decent on Netflix.

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Something consistent in my life, by the way, is anytime

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to know what's good to watch, ask your

1:01:32.200 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 2>single or friends without children, and they'll be like, what

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>are you looking for? Yeah, I have forty seven recommendations

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and I have no time to watch anything.

1:01:40.280 --> 1:01:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, look on that note, so savor it. On that note.

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about the Patreon for Ballers dot com.

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>This is that week where we do it off topic

1:01:48.600 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>show and oh though we haven't I guess come to

1:01:52.720 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>agreement on what the topic's going to be. I do

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>know that one we had in the in the clip

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't use last time, Whoever was like childhood movies,

1:02:02.760 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So right, the Mighty Ducks the Sandlot doesn't just have

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to be sports, but the influence that some of those

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>movies had in our lives growing up. I think that

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a fun show to do.

1:02:16.640 --> 1:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>So do you want to limit it? Do you want

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to sort of narrow the scope to nineties kids sports movies?

1:02:23.720 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I could do that.

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Or do you want it to just be nineties kids movies?

1:02:28.280 --> 1:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Or do you want it to be like Puberty Awakening nineties.

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But not anything pornographic? Right?

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Just Tie being sleazy adjacent? No, I mean it could be.

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan being sleezy jacent for what it's worthing.

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:48.919
<v Speaker 2>I have all the texts from you that I could

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>just read out. Sure, I think we do nineties kids

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>sports movie, nineties kids sports movie, and I think we

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>bring on I'll see if Bill's around, Okay, we'll find

1:02:57.560 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>somebody to come on with us.

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Bill or somebody. I love Bill so much. Though,

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the deal with the deal with the off topic show again,

1:03:04.960 --> 1:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's only available to Patreon subscribers going out to Verballers

1:03:08.040 --> 1:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Dot com for more information. The last one we did

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is also available still for Patreon subscribers, and that was

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>youth sports. We talked through this sort of a continuation

1:03:20.120 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>then kinda yeah, it feels like a natural offshoot. So

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about ninety sports movies for kids on

1:03:28.960 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the show that's going to drop on Friday. For our

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Patreon subscribers, verballers.

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Dot com, done, lock it in, give us suggestions and

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>give us your takes.

1:03:38.800 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Soliverbletgmail dot com. You can also hit us up on

1:03:42.160 --> 1:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the soliverrable discord if you are part of that Patreon

1:03:45.000 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>community and let us know your thoughts on social media.

1:03:48.560 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>As always, for that guy over there, my good friend

1:03:51.160 --> 1:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein, for myself, Tie hilden Brand, we will talk

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to you all on Thursday. In the meantime, stay soler, peace,