WEBVTT - NASA and AI: Decoding Our Universe

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>If I were to go back, I don't know thirty

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>years in Kenya, what's the difference between then and now

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of tree cover. I'm talking to Philip, Theigo

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Special Technology envoid to the Kenyan President.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's speak as if you think about we are now

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 2>elevent trol percent. Previously we were more than twenty percent.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>So we are cutting trees more than we're planting them.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>In thirty years, Kenya lost half its tree cover half

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And here's why that matters. Kenya is a mountainous country.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Dotted throughout the highlands are dozens of what canyons call

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>water towers natural reservoirs, densely forested areas capable of absorbing

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the enormous amount of water that falls on the country

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>during the rainy seasons. The tree roots and undergrowth secure

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and capture moisture, then slowly release it into the rivers

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that flow down into the country's low lying coastal areas.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But in recent years, the water towers have depleted, settlements

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have encroached on them, trees have been chopped down, thousands

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of acres cleared. The natural reservoirs cease to hold nearly

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as much water. So now Kenya is prone to extremes.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Too much water flowing down from the highlands in the

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>rainy season and too little water left during the dry season.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>So you have a couple of hours of water, then

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 2>you have a couple of hours with no water that

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>it tops off to be dry by the city authority.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's the significance of the water towers we have

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>when they cannot hold water.

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Kenya desperately needed to restore its water towers by planting

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as many trees as humanly possible. So in the fall

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty three, the Kenyan government took action. It

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>started a national holiday, National Tree Growing Day, a day

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to allow the citizens of Kenya to go out into

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the forest to dominate the Kenyan countryside and plant as

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>many trees as they can. Government decided on a number.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>The President's really focus right around how to ensure that

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>we do not lose more forests was in this very

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 2>ambitious campaign around fifteen billion trees.

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right, fifteen billion with a bee.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 2>So imagine that number will tell you the ambition. But

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>as he tells you the deficit, it has to be

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>fifteen billion in the next eight years.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen billion trees over eight years averages out to more

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>than five million trees per day. That's a lot of trees.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But with such a massive goal, how can you track

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>your progress? How do you know where to plant those

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>trees so they'll have the most impact. How do you

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>monitor where older trees are still being cut down? Well,

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer to those questions came from IBM and a

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>little space agency called NASA. That's right, folks, Smart Talks

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to space. My name is Malcolm Glabo listening

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to the latest episode of Smart Talks with IBM, where

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we offer our listeners a glimpse behind the curtain of

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the world of technology. In this season, IBM has gone

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>inside elementary school classrooms, toured formulation labs at Loreel, and

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>spoken with the fan development team at Scuderia Ferrari HP.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, how IBM is partnering with NASA to

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>build geospatial models using data from satellites to better understand

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>our Earth and Solar system.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Five four three two one zero all engine running liptoff.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>We have a liptof thirty two minutes past the hour

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>liftoff on Apollo eleven.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>IBM has worked on space related projects since before I

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was even born.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm all for man.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>A team of four thousand IBM engineers help create the

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Saturn five rocket that took Neil Armstrong to the Moon

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>up and when I think of NASA, I tend to

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>picture the Moon landing, or the team of people back

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in Houston guiding the Apollo mission, or the Hubble telescope,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or astronauts aboard the International Space Station. What I didn't

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>think about until now are NASA's geographers.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 5>In order to go places, you need a map things.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Kevin Murphy, chief Science Data Officer at NASA's

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Science Mission Directorate.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 5>But I think that there's an assumption that NASAs all

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 5>about rockets and astronauts, and certainly that's a really large

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 5>part and important part of NASA.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>NASA sends people to space and looks out of the stars,

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but NASA also looks down at the Earth. The agency

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>has about one hundred and fifty satellites that use radar, lightar, landset, Aquaterra, cloudset, AURA,

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>low Earth orbit, Medium Earth orbit, geostationary orbit, on and on.

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>In one sense, NASA makes hardware to build rockets and

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft and all those satellites that circle the Earth. But

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally NASA also collects data. It's scientists and engineers people

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like Kevin want to make the best use possible of

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>all the information gathered by all those many dozens of instruments.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 5>Right now, we gather around twenty five petabytes of new

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 5>observational data per year. In the next couple of months,

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 5>we're about to launch a high resolution global radar. When

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 5>that launches, will double how much we collect every year

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 5>to about fifty petabytes of information.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually, since we recorded this conversation, NASA launched that global radar,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>what they call NYSAR. So NASA is already generating new

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>data at the rate of fifty petabytes each year. To

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>put that in perspective, a single petabyte could hold about

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>five hundred billion pages of standard printed text. Now can

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone sort of apply to use this data is.

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 5>They don't even have to apply. It's free and open data.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 5>It advances how we understand what we do on Earth

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 5>and how we see ourselves within the universe. People can

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 5>take it for so many different downstream applications. So you

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 5>can go to our websites today, you can search through

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 5>our tools, and you can download information from the Mars rovers.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 5>You can download information from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter or

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 5>any of the science data satellites, and.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Give me an example of a really cool application, a

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really cool use that someone I don't know in academic

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever has used your data for. It is there?

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 5>It okay. So one of the really kind of cool

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 5>but unexpected observations that we had is that we launched

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 5>a pair of satellites in their early two thousands called Grace,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 5>and these satellites orbit the Earth and they can measure

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 5>very precisely the distance that they're away from each other

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 5>as they orbit the Earth, and as you go into

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 5>gravity wells, you can actually see a satellite accelerate and

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 5>the other one accelerate after it. Right, And using that information,

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 5>we were trying to map kind of the gravity fields

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 5>of Earth. What they found is that they can actually

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 5>map below kind of the mass of Earth to where

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 5>water storage is. For instance, so aquifers, right, so you

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 5>can monitor through gravity how much water is being depleted

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 5>or added to an aquifer or the density of glaciers.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So, just to back up for a moment, the presence

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and density of water deposits below the Earth's surface have

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>an effect on gravitational fields that are being measured in

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>space correct. Yeah, And so does that tell you presume

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you learn things like where there's an aquifer where you

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't think there was an aquifer.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 5>Or if it's being depleted faster. Yeah. Yeah.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So who's using that kind of data?

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 5>All sorts of different organizations, whether they're you know, NGOs

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 5>or government agencies or people that are planning a large

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 5>agricultural product.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>How did you Was that an intentional decision?

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't. It was accidental.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It was accidental. NASA has assembled a historically unprecedented mountain

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of data about the physical world, free and open to anyone,

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and the possibilities for how that information can be used

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are so vast that even NASA is still uncovering them.

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, I loved legos. I had

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge bin full of them. At the time, legos

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>were really just colored bricks of various sizes. They weren't

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>as complicated as they are today. And what I realized

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>even then was that there were more possibilities in a

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>box of legos than I could ever imagine on my own.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I played with my brother and he would show me

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>something that hadn't occurred to me, and I go to

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>my friend Bruce's and see that he was off on

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>some legos. Tan engined that I'd never even thought of,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like a cool bridge, or a castle or a truck.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I use legos one way. Bruce used his legos in

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a completely different way. NASA's data treasure trove is like

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a very very big box of legos. And here's the question.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>With so much data, containing so many possible connections, could IBM,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and specifically IBM's artificial intelligence help NASA scientists uncover patterns

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and connect systems in a way they've never done before.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Everything started with a question, right.

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to one Bernabe Moreno, director of IBM Research

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in Europe.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 4>As we advance AI, we have new tools to understand

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 4>the surroundings, understand the world, understand the language, and understand

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 4>our planets. And the question that we were asking ourselves

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 4>was all these new advances that we see in language.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>It was a post GPT moment. Could we apply the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 4>same idea on the same architecture and technology to add

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 4>a double do our planets?

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The advent of AI created a new opportunity. What if

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>all of NASA's mountain of data could be organized, analyzed,

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>understood by artificial intelligence. The original idea was to create

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a geospatial foundation model for the Earth and from there

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>create additional specialized models for other scientific priorities of NASA,

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and finally create an AI system that can understand all

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the data across those specialized models in order to uncover

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>hidden insights and relationships. Together, these models could unlock an

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>infinite number of potential applications. I asked Kevin Murphy at

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>NASA about the beginning of these Earth models.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Has some colleagues, and we were investigating a number of

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 5>different avenues of using AI with our data, but also

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 5>kind of the management and stewardship of the data, so

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 5>not only like the observations, but how we make it

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 5>available to people, make it discoverable. And they said, hey,

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 5>we see these transform architectures. We think that they can

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 5>be applicable to some of the sequential observations that we make.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 5>We'd really like to work with IBM on that. And

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 5>I was like, I'm really skeptical. But while because I

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 5>hadn't seen those types of tools really produce results that

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 5>were commensurate with the amount of effort you put into them, right,

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 5>So we were getting some really good results and deep

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 5>learning approaches, but they took a lot of effort.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But Kevin came around quickly.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 5>When we typically develop a new data product or an algorithm,

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 5>it takes anywhere from you know, twelve months, eighteen months,

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty four months to go from data and hypothesis to

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 5>results which is validated. We were able to get approximately

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 5>the same precision for some well known types of benchmarks

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 5>with and I think it was about four months, oh,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 5>instead of starting the work.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so it happened faster than you thought, much faster.

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty three, IBM and NASA launched a foundation

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>model trained on NASA's harmonized landset sentinel to satellite data

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>across the continental United States. They named the model Prithvi,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Sanskrit word for Earth. The first version of Prithvy

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>used only Earth observation images and just that was enough

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to totally change Kevin's idea of what foundation models could do.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But they didn't stop there. IBM and NASA were encouraged

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at how well Prithvy worked for Earth observation tasks, so

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>they decided to create a more complex version of Prithvy

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>that could understand whether and climate data. They hope this

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>new version of PRITHV would allow researchers to answer new

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>questions about the Earth, from short term weather forecasting to

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>longer term climate effects. Imagine you have a map of

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>all the different temperatures, pressures, clouds, rainfall, and more from

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>around the globe. With this map, IBM and NASA could

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>implement advanced tasks. They could track the formation of El

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Nino or predict how the path of a hurricane would

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>change if the ocean temperature went up by half a degree.

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 4>I will always remember this moment was when we created

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 4>the Weather and Climate Foundational Molive. The senior methodologist of NASA,

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 4>it was like, I cannot believe that it has changed

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 4>the way I think about the AI and ever since

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 4>he's been kind of preaching with this A sample.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>One and his team then took the model and decided

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>to test it, really tested it. Took away ninety nine

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>percent of the data points and ran the experiment again.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>What they were trying to figure out is if the

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>model had learned enough about the basic principles of the Earth,

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the underlying physics of the way the planet works, to

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>fill in the blanks on its own with just one

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of the original data, would it still be accurate

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in its predictions. What happened the model crushed it, so

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it was able to extrapolate on the basis of one

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of the data what the entire picture looked like. Yes,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>because pre learned everything right, Yeah, it learned the kind

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of principles of exactly. Yeah. Oh wow, that's very very impressive.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So at that moment when when you realize you could

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>do that, and just curious about your emotional I mean,

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>did you jump up and down? What did you do?

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 4>That's I was like, wow, it was a very emotional

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>meeting because you know, having this person say now I'm

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 4>convinced right, Yeah, it was kind of a quite a

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 4>special moment. These moments make your life as a researcher.

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>IBM and that's a launch prithe for Weather and Climate

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. And while IBM and as a

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>scientist could use Prithvy to run interesting experiments, they were

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>even more excited about how prithy could help people in

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the real world. So let's go back to Kenya Ambassador

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Philip Digo and the country's Great tree planting project.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So on those initial months, there was a massive effort,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>including a couple of national holidays.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>For tree planting.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, where the entire cabinet was sent.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Ah, did you plant trees as I did?

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I said, the entire cabinet plus someone

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 2>we have to be seen.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you good at that plantet two weeks ago?

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Well it's very easy to go hole put a tree

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>in the ground.

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 5>The show Well wow, what.

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Planting a tree is easy? But remember it has to

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>happen fifteen billion times. IBM Research has been operating in

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Nairobi since twenty thirteen, and what Kenya wanted, at least

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning was straightforward. The prith Fee model that

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>IBM and NASA built could be used to essentially make

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the world's greatest map, and Kenya, with IBM's help, could

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>use that model to make the world's greatest map of Kenya.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>The first step was to lay a grid across the

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>topography of the country, break the forest into manageable bite

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sized pieces, each of which could be analyzed separately.

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>So, because our forest is massive when you look at

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>it in terms of green rite, but only lay it,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you're able to break it into pieces like into boxes.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And for us that was important because then it's easy

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>to tackle it. When it's in a greed system than

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>just as a massive forest. So that was also what

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the model was able to do.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Then the model painstakingly sorted through each of those boxes

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and look for what Philip calls hotspots.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So you can see, for example, very quickly, which other

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 2>areas are being eroded very fast, and that you need.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>To quickly protect.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you sometimes and that's where you want to target, right,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not possible to do everything at the

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>same time.

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a definition of a hotspot and how

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>many hotspots are there according to that definition.

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Oh, there are a lot.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 2>So we have more than forty water towers, and I'll

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 2>tell you all of them have hot spots. And the

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 2>hot spots in my definition areas that are being degraded

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>fast and in a very unusual way. Right, you can

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 2>literally see how human activity is seriously degrading that particular

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>area that if you do not have a direct intervention,

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 2>we'll lose the entire forest. So that's the hot spot

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>for us, because you think about cutting a hundred trees

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>a day and cutting a million trees a day, So

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a hot spot. You want to look at places

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 2>where there's just unusually high activity of deforestation.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>In a hot spot. The size of each box in

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the grid was ten by ten meters, about half a

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>tennis court. That's how closely they were examining the forest

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so very crudely. The model ingests all of this satellite

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>data and it helps you answer some very specific questions

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like where should we prioritize our tree planning efforts, which

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>areas down to an extraordinary levels of specificity are eroding

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>most quickly. You know, all those kinds of practical questions

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>about how to direct your strategy.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about a smart forest, right, and

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>that's really for us according with smart fencing, smart forests,

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 2>everything that's smart because of AI. If you think about

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>your usual what you can see with your eyes and

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 2>then the satellite layer which just zooms in and you

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 2>see green. So what the model has been able to

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 2>do is to create a smart layer, right, and then

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that smart layer you can actually see many things from

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 2>analytics to the greeds to a dashboard on a lot.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>So able to layer to those blocks, you can quantify

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 2>degradation by blocks. You can match intevations, you can match reforestation.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I asked Philip to imagine what would have been liked

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>to attempt the tree planting project in an era before AI.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>His answer was plant fifteen billion trees, restore the water towers. Impossible.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>With Prithvi on Kenya's side, though it's really happening. What

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>should be clear by now is how versatile Prithvy can be.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Want to know how to combat deforestation, Prithvy can model that.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Want to know when the best time in the year

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to plant your crops is, Prithvy can help predict that too.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Last year, six months after IBM started helping Kenya with reforestation,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Kenya needed Prithvy's help on something else and it was

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>an emergency.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 2>So something was happening in the world that we sort

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of had these floods that we didn't expect.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>In the spring of twenty twenty four, Kenya was hit

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with thunderstorms and torrential rain, days and days of.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 2>It, and so I got a call from the Red Cross,

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 2>the one of my friends, and they're like, Ambassador, we

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 2>need a little bit of help on how we deal

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>with response because what we're seeing is unusual, right, because

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 2>normally you would only have one area, all of a sudden,

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 2>we had an entire country flooding. In April we had

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>about three thousand, eight hundred kilometers square kind of total

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>land flooded, which is unusual for Kenyon. And so when

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I got this call, we were like, okay, there's someone

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>could do with IBM. We only did one function for

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the trees. It was actually a climate model, and we said,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 2>can we use this to help us better respond to floods?

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 2>And so that was how we started having this discussion

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 2>with IBM in terms of repurposing the model to help

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 2>us deal with this new challenge around floods.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Again, prithvy is versatile. Prithvie could use everything it new

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>about the land, the forests and infrastructure to analyze how

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and where and when floods would occur. The Kenyan government

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>could then use the model to help the Red Cross

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>organize its response, show areas that needed to be evacuated

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or safe places where the Red Cross could set up camps.

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>That information was invaluable.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Historically, what has happened is that they would set up

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 2>camp based on population congregation right where people assembly is

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 2>where they set up a camp, not based on any data,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>right simply because people are there, they will come there

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to provide services and emergency response. What we realize is

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 2>that that model doesn't work. So what we've been able

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>to do with IBM is be able to sort of

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 2>give red cause very specific locations or options where to

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 2>set up camps. So if people come here, just tell

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 2>them no, move here, that's the safe place you really

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>want to go. So I think for me that was

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>really amazing. So we are calling them a very funny

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>word for it, flood assembly points. We always have fire

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 2>for assembly points, but now we can say we have

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>literally flat assembly points that are safe or citizens.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. So the model has ingested this incredibly granular

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>picture later of the topography and weather patterns of Kenya.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>It's just giving you a set of useful predictions about

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>how you should shape your response.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and what we did remember is that, as I said,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 2>it was a full multistate called capability. What IBM gave

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 2>us was a base map. We didn't have that before,

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and a base model. So you cannot have these layers

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 2>up on layers up on layers to be able to

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>make intelligent decisions.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Throughout my reporting on this episode, I've been really impressed

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>by what Prithvie can do. But it doesn't stop at

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>floods and reforestation. Prithvie has also been used to look

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>at wildfires and floods in the UK, and Kevin told

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>me that researchers in Africa have even used prithvy to

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>identify locust breeding grounds, which could help them prevent swarms

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that destroy crops. But all these are issues on land.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I always say to people, seventy percent of

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 6>our land mass is ocean.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Kate Rice is the director of the heart Tree Center,

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>which focuses on adopting AI into UK's public and private sectors,

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and one of those sectors is the blue economy. Oceans, fish, shellfish.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But oceans are huge, and getting data from motions is difficult.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 6>So you're dealing with something where there's not a lot

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 6>of people walking around collecting data. So the real difficulty

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.719
<v Speaker 6>is understanding that collecting enough data to make anything makes sense.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 6>And oceans are very complex in terms of their interaction

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 6>with our climate and how they interact with the climate,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 6>so understanding the physics space models is pretty challenging too.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Once again, enter IBM. IBM created a new geospatial model

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to help us better understand our oceans. Heart Tree and IBM,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>along with the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, the UK Science and

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Technology Facilities Council and the University of Exeter have all

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>partnered to focus the model's power on the waters around

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom, which ultimately will help the UK's blue economy.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 6>You get these major blooms in algae, so the ocean

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 6>goes green and you might see it in lakes as well. Now,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 6>if you are shell fishing and that's what you're harvesting,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 6>you can't harvest cockles muscles to be very colloquial, when

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.479
<v Speaker 6>you have algae blooms because they're poisonous. So there are

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 6>certain times of the year where you can harvest. In

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 6>a certain times of year you can't if you keep

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 6>having the algal blooms. Just to put it on an

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 6>economic terms, that's a problem. So if we look at

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 6>it that way, that's an issue. So we really do

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 6>need to try and understand where these algal blooms will happen,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 6>when they will happen, and how to limit them because obviously,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 6>if you're shell fishing as your livelihood, that's going to

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 6>really impact you.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Kate told me that understanding these algal blooms, how they form,

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>why they form, and how they move would allow people

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to better manage them.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 6>What is it you're putting in the water. Are you

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 6>putting fertilizers in the water in the near shore environment

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 6>that is causing those algal blooms? Is it because we

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 6>are heating up the oceans and particularly our near shore

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 6>environments that is causing that.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 6>I'm not a specialist, but that's what you're trying to

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 6>figure out. Is there something we are doing that is

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 6>creating those environments that is causing those algal blooms or

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 6>is it natural? And natural was always a difficult one

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 6>because I would say we live in a very managed environment,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 6>particularly in the UK. Very few landscapes are natural. Most

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 6>of it is managed in some way. Are we managing

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 6>it in an appropriate way? Is there changes in how

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 6>we behave that could make things better?

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Not that I needed more examples to sell me on

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 1>how useful the Perythvia models are, but Kate gave me

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a few more use cases that reinforced just how exciting

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>foundation models are for our oceans.

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 6>These big brown seaweeds can really help with carbon sequestration.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Imagine if we could improve the environment enough so that

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 6>we could have more of that so that we could

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 6>sequentch more carbon. The other thing is wind power. In

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 6>the UK, we have a lot of offshore wind farms

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 6>and we're doing really well with our renewable energy resources.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 6>So where do we put that and how does that

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 6>impact sand movements? So these sandbars things aren't static, they move,

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 6>so understanding that is really important for where you're going

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 6>to put your suboceanic infrastructure. So you've got cables going

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 6>across the oceans. If we're going to use our oceans more,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 6>we need to understand what that environmental impact is going

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 6>to be long term.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>The Ocean Model launched at the end of September twenty

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. The research is only beginning. When I sat

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>down with Kevin Murphy at NASA, I wanted to understand

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>where all of this impressive work was going. And one

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the signature aspects of this work is that it's

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not just for IBM and NASA researchers. Anyone can use

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>these models.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 5>So before, if you were a researcher, or let's say

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 5>you were a farmer or maybe a technology informed person

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 5>that was interested in something like this, you would have

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 5>to learn about how to do remote sensing, how to

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 5>calibrate the imagery, how to stitch it together, because you

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 5>know they come in kind of postage stamps that you

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 5>have to squash together. And then you'd have to learn

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 5>about the algorithms necessary to do all the processing right,

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of work, and then you could actually

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 5>do the mapping that you were interested in. Today. What

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 5>you can do is you can go to hugging face,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 5>which is where this model exists in the open using

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 5>kind of our open science principles, and you can apply

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 5>it to future or historical observations. With how having all

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 5>of that background information.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And with the partnership between NASA and IBM, these foundation

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>models are multiplying. The new version of prithviy I mentioned

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>launched in September twenty twenty four. Then in August twenty

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, NASA and IBM launched another foundation model called Syria,

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>based on data from the Sun. Soria can help predict

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>solar flares which can disrupt communications and increase radiation for

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>high altitude flights. And then there's the Ocean model I

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about with Kate Royce. So what does the future

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>look like for all these foundation models built from NASA data?

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>If I wanted to look five or ten years out

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand erosion patterns in a coastal town.

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you could give me Eventually, I think we'll get there. Yeah,

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, we've really only been doing this for the

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 5>past few years. There is a lot of I think

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 5>capabilities to still discover and uncover with how we use

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 5>these models for like especially long term predictions. Like you're talking.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>About what do you think you can't do and that

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you really love to do. What's the kind of like

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>great white whale problem.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 5>We can't do this today, but I'd like to be

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 5>able to do it in the future, which is really

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 5>the linking of the models together. Right. So right now

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 5>we have these isolated areas where you know, we have

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 5>the harmonized lansat Sentinel or GSPA. We have the weather model,

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 5>which can look at short term predictions. We're building out

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 5>the heliophysics model to look at the Sun dynamics. But

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 5>they're probably going to have to be additional models built

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 5>so that we can understand how they interact with one another, right,

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 5>And that is you know, kind of towards a digital

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 5>twin of kind of the Solar system or Earth systems,

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>which I think is a big Harry problem. But if

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 5>we understand it, we might be able to address some

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 5>of the questions that you just asked about prediction.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you linked all of those models together, Basically

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is, can I you say a digital

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>twin you're essentially replicating holistically how our world works.

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And do you think that is achievable?

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it's immediately achievable, yeah, but based on

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of the progress that we've seen in the last

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 5>three or four years, I think it's more achievable today

0:30:59.400 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 5>than it was.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you'll see it in your Yeah?

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 5>Sure, I'm hopeful, and I've got a couple of years last.

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Ramano, Amy Gains, McQuaid,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Trina Menino, and Jay Harper. Were edited by Lacy Roberts.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Engineering by Nina Bird Lawrence, mastering by Sarah Bruguer, music

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>by Gramoscope, Strategy by Tatiana Lieberman, Cassidy Meyer and Sophia Derlin.

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to the team at NASA's Science Mission Directorate.

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and Ruby Studio at iHeartMedia to find more Pushkin podcasts.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Glawell. This is a paid

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>advertisement from IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>represent IBM's positions, strategies, or opinions. Since we recorded this episode,

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>IBM and NASA released Syria their solar weather model. In

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>early testing, it showed us sixteen percent improvement in solar

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>flare prediction accuracy. This is the kind of improvement that

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>helps protect our satellites, our power grids, and our GPS

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>systems from the Sun's unpredictable nature. And the next step

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in this partnership another model coming in twenty twenty six.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Looking beyond the Earth and the Sun, the universe of

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>possibilities just keeps expanding.