WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - December 7th, 2019

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Hi, I'm

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly, I'm Carol Masser. Welcome to the weekend edition

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week. Over the next couple of hours,

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll bring you news of the week, insights from the magazine,

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. And so much of course, is

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Bloomberg fifty that time of year again, from

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>finance to politics, tech and entertainment. These are the folks, Carol,

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>who really shaped twenty nineteen, maybe in some unexpected ways.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And because we're Bloomberg, you've got to be able to

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>measure it. Where else can you talk about Rihanna and

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the black hole I'm just saying, and a chicken sandwich

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and a chicken sandwich. It's all here. Plus we've got

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a growing pushback on stock by backs and a different

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of housing crisis that asked the question, is homelessness

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a crime? It's an important story. That one really caught

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>my attention. I loved our conversation with Noah bu Higher

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>in part because you know, this is the story of

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>our time in many ways, because it touches on so

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>many things that are going on in America right now, political, economic, social,

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and more. But first up, let's talk about our top

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>story this week. NATO. It turned seventy and they were

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>meant to celebrate in London, but turned out to be

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>less of a birthday party, more like a Thanksgiving dinner

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Carol for a large dysfunctional family. I have to say

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting just to watch all the photo ops

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and watch the body language between all of the

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>world leaders. Definitely something worth covering this week. Not all

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of them got along. There was a few snide remarks made,

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but in the end everyone well, they seem to accept

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're kind of stuck with each other. At least

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's according to Mark Champion, who covered the summit outside London.

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>He joins US now, So Mark, what's the latest on NATO?

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot happened this week? It was I mean, the

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>build up was pretty extraordinary. Um, this was supposed to

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be just a celebration. It wasn't a real summit. It

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a full summit. They do that every two, you know,

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>two to three years, but this one they felt they

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>had to do because it was the seventie uh, and

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they kept it really short because they specifically didn't want

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to create a big you know, target for unscripted problems

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump, which they've had before, um so, and

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden in the weeks before, you

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had the French President mcclan coming out and talking about

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>how he wasn't so sure whether you know the rest

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the NATO allies would go to the defense of

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Turkey under the Article five Collective Defense clause, which is

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely at the core of NATO. It caused a huge

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>blow up. And then of course you had Turkey itself,

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>which had begun a military operation in Syria against the

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>will of most of the other allies. So you know,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>people were very apprehensive going in about you know this,

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this thing could just blow up, and instead of being

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a celebration and demonstration of the union of this uh

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the unity really of of this alliance, it would be

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. Hey, I do want to ask you about

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson. He was at the summit. He's also the

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>subject of remarks in the magazine this week and more

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>spec typically his character and his temperament, his anger. Who

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>knew um tell us a little bit about that and

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>how that might impact his campaign and possibly his election.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>So this has been a really extraordinary campaign. They're very

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>short in the UK. One has to remember that, especially

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>if you're familiar with American ones will go on for

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>more than a year. They're basically a month long, a

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>month or six weeks, you know, in effect, so they're

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>extremely short. Stuff is really packed in in all the

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>debates and everything. It happens very very fast. We're already

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>towards the last week. But this particular campaign is is

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>really quite extraordinary because you have both parties you know,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>making big plays in terms of you know, changes in

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>public spending and budgeting and fiscal policy, all these sorts

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of things. Um And in the end though, it really

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>comes down to trust in the two main candidates, one

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of them is Boris Johnson UM and he has always

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>had a big issue with trust and the anger, uh

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know a piece of that um And we

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>had this article to that, you know, in this this

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>issue in Business Week, which is really runs through it

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>very carefully, reminds you of the times when he's really

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of flown off the handle and people already don't

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>quite trust him because he has a record. You know,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>he was fired once for not telling the truth, you know,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>while he was a cabinet minister. He was fired as

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a journalist for not telling the truth. And then if

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you add on top of that the possibility of a

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>blow up because you know he doesn't keep his temper,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which has happened before, then you know that that is

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that the people who are running campaign,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>his campaign, are very concerned about, and they've kept they

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>kept campaign on a very tight leash and kept him

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on a very tight leash, and they've kept his exposure, um,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, quite limited. All right, Mark Champion, we're gonna

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Thank you so much, joining us from London.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>A very busy time between posting NATO and then obviously

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this a election. Well for more on this week's magazine.

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Here he is Business Week's editor Joel Weber. The Bloomberg fifty.

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the most wonderful time of the year. Yeah, exactly.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>This is like one of our favorite issues of the

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>year where we recognized the fifty people who really defined

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen and we and we look specifically for things

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that are measurable because you know, this is Boomberg all industries,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, entertainment, finance, fashion, entertainment, sports. We we

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really try to look across everything and that's what makes

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this one special. You know, like you could have a

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>list of people that are you know, expected names like

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett could basically be on that list every year.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But we're looking for measurable contributions in the year of

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. So we go back to January and all

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the way up through now to find out who really sparkled.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>And even a chicken sandwich, even a chicken sandwich the

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the Popeye' chicken sandwich. It broke

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the interest data. Three month supplies sell out in a

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>matter of days. People even got stabbed over it, which

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know the downside of this story, but

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>really it speaks to like the ability for brands to

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like these things, and a chicken sandwich of all things,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, with some extra pickles can really break the internet. So,

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we reach out, you know, around the Bloomberg organization.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody pitches ideas and so on and so forth. Is

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>their name that surprised you or that you found was

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>really this is a big team sport. We pulled from

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>all the bureaus around the world and we're looking for

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>leaders and business people and CEOs. One of my favorite

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.559
<v Speaker 1>ones was remember the black hole. It's easy to forget

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>all the things that have happened this year, but in science,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge deal. The team that discovered a

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>black hole, so that was one of my favorite ones

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>because you know that's it's a photo of nothingness, is

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>effectively what we all looked at for the first time,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and it really just marked incredible scientific achievements. So I'm

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>honored to have them on the list. And that's editor

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Joel Weber. I love the enthusiasm that Joel has about

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this issue. It's a labor of love, for sure, but

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what a fun exercise to be able to tap into

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire global newsroom of Bloomberg. And a lot of

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that falls to Brett Began. We're going to hear from

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit later on. And a lot of

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>social momentum around this issue as well. You're listening to

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week coming up. Older Women Are the Beauty

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Industry's Next gold Mine is a fascinating story. This is work.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's a few stories in the Business section that

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we did want to highlight this week, and the editor

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of the section, Jamalysis here, well, any excuse to talk

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to gem LSC. It's always on the leading edge. And

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is I want to start with Chanelle because

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously an incredibly well known brand, and you actually start

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this story with sort of this portrait of Paris. Uh.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And they're going after a market where Marty has failed, right,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean basically, um, And we start out the story

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at Chanelle's boutique on the Plasta van Dam and Paris,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's facing all these other sort of well known

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>names and watches like Rolex and Pouget and um. And

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we're and and there's Chanelle, which is normally thought of

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>as a female centered brand that's big in real fashion

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and also in fragrance and um. You think of the

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>blazers and the purses, but you don't really think about

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>watches as much, even though they've been in the watch business.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Well now they've decided to make a really big push

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>into it. Now that's tricky simply because the brand is

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>really associated with a very feminine, um sort of fashion orientation,

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's not where the biggest watch companies are. The

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest watch companies are things that you know, men buy,

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's a male focused in the business and um,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a tough way for these Uh.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, people to sort of we shoulder

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>their way in. So is it all about going after

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>men specifically or men and women? Are they all in

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on watching? It's it's all in. I mean they short

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it out with a watch it's been successful called the

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>J twelve and it's a unisex watch and means so

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's sized and styled in a way that it looks

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>good on both men and women, and um, well it

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>has done well. However, you know, it's just the beginning,

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>because the thing is that other companies have had, you know,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years or a couple of hundred years and watches,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is definitely a hundred year, hundred year old brand,

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's one that's been associated with fashion, and among

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>true watch aficionados, the notion of a fashion watch is

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a that's not a compliment. Yeah, I mean,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>watches are such a funny little corner of the market.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've talked a lot about the watch trade,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as it were, with Chris Rouser, who runs the Pursuit section,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>who I imagine was somehow consulted in all of this.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I do wonder why, you know, not

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to be too Centcalo about Chanelle, but like what makes

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>them so special? You know that they can figure scial Okay,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they have been um. You know, that's something that they've

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>had to, you know, sort of contend with among the

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the inside watch crowd, and they've been um, not just

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people who wanted to sell watches, but they wanted to

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>make better watches, and so they have invested in UM

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>making their own movements, which is the real hard part

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of watchmaking, not just putting a quartz movement on something,

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but instead saying, you know, they're going to have a

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanical you know, sort of specialists in Switzerland who are

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>actually making their watches. They also own uh you know,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>minority ownership and very expensive Swiss watch companies, and so

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they actually know how to make watches. And it's been um,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it has been shown. They won the UM

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>uh what sort of the oscars of watches UM in

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Geneva the last two years for best Women's Watch and

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and so one of them was extremely technical. So there,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have the product. The issue is can

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you break into something where people have typically thought of

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as being sort of controlled by a few other companies,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly at a price point that a luxury company needs

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to charge. Well. I do think there's a lot of

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on, like LVMH buying Tiffany and they were

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that to really get into the jewelry space and

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so on. So for though, I do think that there's

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a re emphasis whether it's on jewelry or watches, and

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a market that can be continued to

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>be tapped. I think upscale brands and upscale burns are

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>continually looking a new ways to get growth. And if

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not in some segment that you know, sort of

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ties into the high priced world, you try to get

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>into it. So Chanel okay, so going after watches big time.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They already have a cosmetics line. I don't know if

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they have been looking into tapping the elderly consumer market,

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but if you go to Japan, apparently cosmetics for the

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>elderly that's a that's a thing. This was a weight

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>what story for me? I have to say, I did

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>not see this one coming. Tell us what's going on? Well,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's um, you know, we all know that Japan is

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the oldest, you know, has the oldest populist of any

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>country right now, and so it wasn't a big stretch

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for consumer product companies to say, oh, the elderly, there

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>may be a good market. But normally when you think

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>about cosmetics, it's aimed at the young, sort of use

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>young people as in all your advertising, and you sort

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of target everything about looking like your twenty with skin

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of twenty year olds. And instead, in Japan, we're almost

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>half the women now are over fifty, and by elderly,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm just but okay, in another fifteen twenty years, more

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>than half of the over sixty. I mean, this is

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a really really aging population. And so all of a

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>sudden people have said they shouldn't be ignored that we

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there's money here. There's an affluent population too, and so

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>therefore if we pump products aimed at that market, we

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can sell a lot more. And so companies are sort

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of coming out with lines that look at that. So

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>shadoh um, polar orbis ks um, you know, they're doing that,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>and they're also using older influencers as well. Well. That

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was one of the things that really jumped out at

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>me is, you know, in the same issue where we

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are celebrating rightly in the Bloomberg fifty, Kylie Jenner at

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the right buled age of twenty two with her line

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that she now does a deal with Cody. Here we

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have throwback to you know, my era, Kate Moss Kate

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>five years old years old as the spokesperson for cose

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and um you know, and that is, you know, forty five,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>while it seems young to me, is not young in

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that world. And so therefore what they're saying is that,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are talking about your skin more mature skin.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And one of the really interesting things in the story

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is that UM polar Orbits, which is one of the

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest cussing companies in Japan, is using one of its

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>UM influencers is a woman who is the world's oldest

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>beauty consultant. She's years old. She works for polar Orbits,

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and she's been sort of helping women with their skin

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for well forever, and UM, it was really interesting to

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>see that. Um, you know, there are all sorts of tricks.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That tricks are strategies that people use when they're dealing

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>with older customers. It means that the bottles have to

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have larger text so that they can um you know

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of it doesn't strain your eyes as much. It

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>also means that use wax on some of the eye

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>products because it then doesn't hurt the thinning skin. And

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>um Soseto is even selling comb special combs that have

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>little dots of black dye on the end of the teeth.

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Go for your for the roots of the hair that's

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>turning gray. I mean, there's all sorts of things that

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>people are using now to say, Okay, I understand that

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you're aging, but you can still be your best person.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You look your best way, and we're going to help

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you with that and thank you, spend money with my company.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That's Jamli is the editor of the business section. Two

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>great stories about companies and industries looking to really kind of,

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, create more revenue lines. For Chanelle, of course

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's about high end watches, but for cosmetics. Uh, that

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>industry going after an older population, right, and the demographics

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>underneath this whole trend fascinating. Obviously, Japan is something of

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a test case, giving how they have that aging population,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but you have to thank Europe is next, and then

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we're getting older here in the United States as well.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg business Week coming up an experiment

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee to offer free tuition while it boosted enrollment,

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but dropout rates still remain high. Yeah, no one size

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>fits all going on here when it comes to solving

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that conundrum of higher education. This is bloomberg. Several presidential

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>candidates have proposals to defray the cost of higher education.

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>But Jason, I think it's safe to say one size

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is not fit all. Well, I think it's also fair

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to say you and I both have teenagers. This is

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>front of mind for so many parents across the country

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and for so many would be students. The affordability of

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>higher education. Uh, it is. I think the technical term

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is bananas the cost of higher education. Read pickartt joins

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>us from Washington, d C. With the story take us

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to Tennessee. The thing about Tennessee, so they were the

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>first state to implement a statewide free tuition program for

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>every high school graduating senior, and they could go to

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>community college or technical college completely for free. That started

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in but it started as an economic program. So the

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>idea was that Tennessee took a look around its workforce

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and realized within an increasingly skilled economy and an advancing economy,

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't going to have enough skilled workers. So

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>as a result, they came up with Tennessee Promise and

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a complementary program for adults called Tennessee Reconnect that works

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>towards getting Tennessee AND's to have a post secondary education,

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>so whether that's a technical certificate or a community college degree,

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it may be. And the results have been

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>really promising. You've seen college going rates increase, You've seen

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>enrollment and community colleges increase. You've seen graduation rates at

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>community colleges improve. But at the same time, the dropout rates,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>while improving, still could use a little bit of improvement.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's almost of students are dropping out after three years

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>using the program. We talked to us because you actually

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>introduced us to one student in particular, and I do

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like, based on your reporting that if you're a

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>low income students, this is a tougher truck for you.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a tougher track, and being a low income student

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and Tennessee or any other state in America is is

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a tougher track. But the thing about this program is

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's a last dollar scholarship, so it means that

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>it covers the cost of tuition that federal pell grants

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>don't cover, or other state aid doesn't cover. So for

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>students who are low income and perhaps would already have

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the majority of their college paid for UM from through

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>federal pell grants, you know, they're getting a smaller proportion

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of their tuition paid for by this program versus UM

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>students who earn our come from families with a bit

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of a higher income. So the idea is that, you know,

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at these dropout rates and tuition is not

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a factor, but the other cost of college that this

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that a financial aid program doesn't address, like transportation or

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>housing or the cost of books, are really weighing on

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>these low income students. What has been learned in Tennessee

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that can and cannot be applicable to other states. So

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so for Tennessee, it has its own program. It was

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the first to offer to all students of that we're

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>graduating from high school. But other states have their own

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>versions of programs. Some have residency requirements, like New York

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>requires you to live in the state after you receive

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the aid UM. Other states offer it for for your education,

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>while some offer it for two or for specific areas

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>or income brackets. But I guess what the lesson that

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I have heard from UM experts in this area, is

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that one size fits all approach is really challenging, especially

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in something like higher education, where each state is different

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and each state has come up with their own program

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to serve to serve them. UM. So looking at it

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from a one size fits all approaches is really challenging. UM.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>But that that is different than having a federal framework

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and then giving states a little more wiggle room to

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>decide what's best for themselves. Well and read, as Carol pointed, doubt,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it becomes sort of complicated and difficult economically

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of the students, especially in the lower

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>income brackets, because they may need to work to support themselves,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to support their family for all hosts of reasons. And

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it is the money, but part of it

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is the way that even the classes are structured and

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the and the educational offerings are structured. Is there any

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of creativity being applied to that part of the equation. Oh,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so. Community colleges are going out of their way

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>to make themselves available to students. They're holding office hours

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of with professors, outside of normal hours. They're offering

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>night classes, they're offering weekend classes, They're doing everything that

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they can. The problem is that the Promise program requires

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>students to go to school full time. It requires them

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to take a full class load. And in the case

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of a student who's working forty hours a week, that

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>can seem like a lot, but but it makes sense

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways because you know, in general, dropout

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>rates tend to be better when students are going to

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>school full time than when they're going part time. Well,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and what's interesting, and I think states are dealing with

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this a lot, and employers within states is that they

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>need workers, and they need workers with the right skills. So, um,

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's at play here as well. Correct, correct, And you're

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. You're seeing it work. I mean, since the

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>programs was announcing and then implemented for the first group

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in and looking at the unemployment rate, since it's half

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of what it was, the media and household income has

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>reached nearly thirty percent of what it was. And that's

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>read Picker, such a smart story, a look inside what's

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going on in Tennessee. And you know, it reminds me

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of something we talked about with people like Peter Coy

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time, that the data can tell you one thing,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>but real life tends to intervene when you're trying to

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>solve what seemed to be intractable problems. You're listening to

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week coming up the people who defined that's right,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Bloomberg fifty. We're going to take

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you inside that list. This is Bloomberg. So the magazine

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>this week is about the Bloomberg fifty. The people in business, entertainment, finance, politics,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and science and technology. Who's accomplishments, merit, recognition, applause, so

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>much more. Jason, this is a cool list. We love

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>this every year we get to be a part of it.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>The big event that's happening in New York City next week.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But the man who's behind it all, who's really at

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the crux of it, are partnering crime and the impresario,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>as it were. Brett began here with us in New

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>York City. This is such a cool list, But remind

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>us how it gets put together? Well, it's actually it's amazing. Basically,

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I send an email to the entire company and I say, Hey,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>who's on your radar or who might be on your

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>radar later this year? So we're looking sometimes for this

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>starts months ago. Yeah, yes, we start this in like April.

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Here we are and I don't remember one month December,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's all day. Um. Yeah, we started a long time ago.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know what we say is basically, in your

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>areas of expertise, who are the people that are doing

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of provably well this year that the general lay

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>reader person out there might not know about. So we

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>try to mix that with people that are a little

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>bit more famous, right, because we want them on the

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>list to um And yeah, So it starts months and

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>months and months ago, and what I do is basically

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>feel the submissions and then make a determination about who

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are the most interesting of these people? Well, and I'm

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>glad you said provable, because that's a very bloomberg thing, right.

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not totally subjected like this is applying data and

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody essentially with their nominations has to come armed with

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a metric, right, some sort that's exactly right, so to

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get on the list. It's not really a lifetime achievement award.

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And there's many, many, many people that I want to

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>put on this list every year, but they don't really

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have a data, any data or a metric to sort

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of prove um why we should include them. So a

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is sort of looking at the numbers,

0:22:57.920 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at the figures and saying, Okay, they did have

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a great year, and we can actually show this through

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a stock price growing up, or an acquisition or a

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>million other ways we try to measure it. But I'm

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>always curious about the kind of debates that you guys

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have as you're discussing all of these names, because I'm

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>sure people are like, his name has to be on

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this list, and you're like, no, it doesn't have to

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>be on this list. There is a lot of that.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of people you look at and say, hey,

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this person, of course is going to be on the

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Listen every year, I think, oh, this person is definitely

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the list, and then we get to

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the end and they wind up not on it um

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And that sort of happens because we decide either that

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the metric isn't strong enough, that it wasn't basically important enough.

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the other thing that happens. A lot of people

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>have metrics, but you sort of look at the how

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>business shapes up and you say, actually, you know, if

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, this doesn't really marrit inclusions. So

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is there anybody this year of the Bloomberg fifty that

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were like, Okay, this person, no

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it, has to be on the list. You know,

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one person that we said that about um that actually

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>did wind up on the list this year is like

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Kylie Jenner, right, so the world's youngest gen z's first

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>billion air And that was someone who pretty early on

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we said, you know, like there's a really good chance

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>she'll be on the list, and she is in fact

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on the list. And Rihanna is the other person that

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 1>we thought earlier well have to go back to yeah,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like she probably had a very strong

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>case earlier in the year, and then just a few

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago she capstones it, as it were, with this

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>huge deal, six hundred million dollar deal with Cody, which

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>actually increased the valuation of the company from about one

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>point one to about one one point two. And the

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>way we measure is that she owns you know, basically

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>makes her a billionaire because of that, because of the

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>original deal. So and I love like the more we

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>find out about that store of Christie owns the bulk

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the company, right, but then mom mom owns the

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>moms the rest she's a piece of everything. Yeah, and

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an amazing I mean, she's twenty two to be

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire at twenty two. Granted, how to you know,

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>how to little help a little bit of a jog

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>jogging platform, absolutely, but still pretty amazing. Um, she knows

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that essentially, if she puts something on her Instagram account,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>which has a hundred and fifty millions most followers, that

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that people are gonna do it. They're gonna buy that product.

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go to the old Dough or Cody and

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>go buy that product. So she has an amazing power.

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>She's an incredible influencer. She's probably one of the most

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>important people in terms of determining fashion and style in

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this country. All right, so talk to us about Rihanna,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>because we can't get too far away from that. I mean,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a name that really does stand out from a

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of her peers in a lot of ways. And

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>also because of a tie up that she has in

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the broader business. Well, and you know, fenty is her brand.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>It started, you know, basically they did five hundred and

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty million dollars worth of makeup sales. And LVAM said this,

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this seems to be working caught our attention here, and

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>her big thing with that was the shelf. He had

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>forty shades, which had never really been done before, and

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>now everybody offers forty ship's really every major company. So

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>she's now doing clothing, which makes total sense, and in

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>doing so she became a number of first usually the

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the first woman to create an original fashion brand and

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>v image, among many many other accolades this year. So

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>she was she was also pretty much a shoeing So

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is there name on the list that might surprise people

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily a household name like Kylie Jenner Orianna. Yeah,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of them actually, and that's kind

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of what makes the list fun is that for every

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Kylie or or Orihanna, there's actually a lot of people

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 1>in here that you've probably never heard of. Um, you know,

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>someone like retash Auger Wolf to me is a really

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting story. So he's a nineteen year old He

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>decides to travel around India as a budget traveler and says,

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this is terrible. You know, all these hotels have roaches

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and its foam blocks from mattresses. What if I were

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>to take hotels that our hundred and fifty rooms are

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>smaller and so standardized, so have hot water in the showers,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have actual mattresses, right, eliminate the bugs in the room.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>So said, oh, I'll give this shot. He's twenty six

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>now is worth more than a billion dollars. His Odio

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hotel chain is adding seventy two eighty hotels a day,

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely insane. And they are by room now

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the number two hotel in the world and are poised

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to overtake Marriott pretty much early next year. So that

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>story found amazing. The most amazing little tidbit in there

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the way they use data and analytics to

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out what works, and they found that

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if they put portraits of Maryland Monroe in the rooms,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>that people consider those hotels now boutique and that actually

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>increases increases revenue per available room ten to eleven per hotel. Wow,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know when it's not always just single people. And

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit because it's one

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>of our favorite storylines the year US when its national

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>team a shoe into some extent on the list, in

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>part because this was much more than just winning the

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>World Cup. So there their magic actually is that the

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>number of people that watched set records for any game,

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>not just you know, for for women playing for men

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for women. Um, but they're also on the list because

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of their pay equity battle and um, you know they

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have uh they're now basically this is going to come

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to trial next year and they are they are one

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the groups on there that is fighting very hard

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for pay equity. And their argument is a pretty you

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>know good one, which is that, um, they actually playing

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>more and more games. They won four World Cups. Um,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>don't we deserve a little bit more here? And we

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing actually elsewhere in the world that is happening.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Australia actually just granted their women's team in the same

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of money as their men's team. I also always

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder on this list when you guys think about something

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that Business Week covers so well, and that is big business,

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>corporate stories or business trend Who among the business community

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was worth being on this list this year. Hum, that's

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Um. You know somebody that I love

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is Ethan Brown. Right, if you look at business this year,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>really hard to overlook the world of fake meat. Right

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond meat is his company You've got you know, impossible

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and now you've got pretty much every other company doing

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this well, but their stock price up about two hundred

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>percent UM since it launched this year. It was a successful, huge,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>huge I p o UM, and it's just a space

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be worth so like hundreds of

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in the coming years. So he was

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a shoe in for that. Um. That's just

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>also an area that we've covered, you know, at length.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Mayer um over at Disney with the launch of

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus, I mean, signing up nearly ten million people,

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost right away. And one of the themes

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>throughout this list is you see we have Kevin Mayer

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>on the list. Um. Yeah. Also on the list is

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Faiy of Marvel. Um obviously Marvel Avengers and Game

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this year again the most successful movie of all time

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>two point eight billion dollars in ticket sales. Yeah, a

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of Kevin's really running the show over Disney exactly.

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you have people, you know, like a Starnoff

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>at Warner Brothers, right who's charged with basically making HBO

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Max works. So you're seeing a ton in the streaming

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>world this year. A lot of people on the list

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>basically really responsible for reshaping how we watch TV. That's

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Brett began. He's the editor of The Bloomberg fifties, so

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>he's responsible for talking to everyone around the Bloomberg organization

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to help come up with this lest the Bloomberg fifty. Well,

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and it starts months and months and months in advance.

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It becomes this massive project with people pitching and him

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>asking for more information. Because what's at the heart of

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>all this is you got to prove it. So you

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>can't just say, yeah, it's a really great guy. You've

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got to be able to say this person grew market

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>share or made a massive acquisition measurable to some extent, right,

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Or in the case of Kylie Jenner, you know, sort

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of had it two ways in the sense of becoming

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire and then doing this massive deal with Cody

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think sealed her place on the Bloomberg right

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>or in the case of a chicken sandwich running out

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of buns and lines, you know, for people standing in

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>lines to get a sandwich. Well, and one of the

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>most fun things about the Bloomberg fifty every year is

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that we get to co host the Big d It's

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>coming up early next week. Here in New York City.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be literally on the Red Carpet or

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>just adjacent to it. Will be on the Red Carpet

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at some point where we'll be nearby it. We'll be

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>interviewing a number of the folks who made the list,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>some other notable folks who will be stopping by. It's

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a great event. It's very funny in a lot of ways,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and we get to honor all these folks. Bottom line,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>what it is, it's fifty people that you need to

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.959
<v Speaker 1>know about because they're doing things already and they're going

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to continue doing things in the coming year, so it's

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really important to know who they are well. And one

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite parts of it is the ones to watch.

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>We get to honor them as well. And you think

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about our buddy Paul Rabel. He was one to watch

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>last week and lo and behold he went and created

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a massive new professional league. Well, that wraps up the

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>first hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Jason Kelly and I'm Carol Mass

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are plenty in our next hour, including a pushback on

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the c suite pumping up their pay with buy backs,

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a league good story. Plus Soros. Yeah, we're

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about George Soros and his fund. Sort of a

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>different take these days. He used to be one of

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest risk takers out there. Now his fun more conservative.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The times they certainly are changing. This is Bloomberg. Hello,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Massar and I'm Jason Kelly. Plenty ahead for

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you in this hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. We're gonna talk a little bit more about

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg fifty. That's right, folks. You need to know

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about an entertainment, business, politics, finance, science and technology. That's

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>all to come. Plus we take a look at a

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>different kind of housing crisis. We asked the question, is

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>homelessness a crime? That is an issue, Carol, that may

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>actually come before the Supreme Court before too long and

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>may help define or dictate how America deals with this

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>huge public crisis. Plus Vota phone, it's looking at a

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>greener take on the smartphone. But first, Carol. Story in

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the finance section of the magazine this week about Soros

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fund management, and yes we mean that of or some

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>long time investor George So that George Sorrows arguably one

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world's best known investors, but his namesake fund

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not the same without him or his family directly involved.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Don Fitzpatrick, she's the c i O. Cathy Burton has

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the story of her tenure so far hasn't been awesome.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>To use a technical term, everything is not awesome everything

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>now it has not. They've struggled pretty mightily with performance

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>over the past three years since Dawn started in and

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>remind us who she is, where she came from, and

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>how she got to this job. She came from UBS.

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>She ran the hedge fund business there as well as

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the equities businesses and some other businesses at the asset

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>management part of UH. You of UBS, and she was

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>chosen to run this new Sourros Fund Management, which is

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>UH managing the money for the foundation, not for George

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and his family. Well, that's to take us to back,

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like there was a long period where

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>George Soros could only do really smart things in terms

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of investments, right, and if you could work there, it

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was a really cool thing. So remind us of his

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of past. Sure, So, as you said, it used

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the major best performing hedge fund in the world,

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and George sat on top of it, he had great traders.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>They made tons of money, and then in sen he

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>transferred most of his wealth to his foundation, and that

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>meant the foundation was no longer managing money for George

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>whipping it around. They had to be much more conservative

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't want to lose money. They just have

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that they can fund all their their projects

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>every year. And that's such a key point because if

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the culture and the ethos of

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the original Soros, it was big, big bets. I mean

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>huge bets that paid off in many cases unbelievably, but

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>swinging for the fences a lot of ways. Right, Yes,

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 1>absolutely absolutely. They made so many big bets. The biggest,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>most famous one was George betting against the pound. George

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and Stan drecon Miller betting against the pound in They

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>made a billion dollars on that bet. And they bet

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars ten millions, ten billion dollars on that bet,

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to bet fifteen. They just couldn't get

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it done, all right. So that's where George strows is

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so fast forward. And let's be fair, like the hedge

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>fund world has changed dramatically and we've seen a lot

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds either shut down or folks take the money,

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of give it back to investors and

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just kind of have their own family offices, right, I

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mean the world has changed dramatically. Yes, it's much harder

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to make money. And now this isn't a hedge fund.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's been in a family office for several years now. Um.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But now it even has to be more conservative because

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of the foundation, because it's the foundation's money. And that's

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>where Don Fitzpatrick comes in. And that's exactly what you've

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>been doing, because your story really reads well. I mean,

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>she's gotten rid of a lot of managers. She's done

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of big things already. Yes, she got rid

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of external managers because, um, for one,

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>they weren't making a lot of money. And for two,

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to have more control of the capital. She

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be able to if there is a market dislocation,

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>she says, she wants to be able to pounce on that.

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>What does this tell us about almost like this generation

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of managers. Yes, we have seen that that that change

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>going on in other parts of the industry. We have

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.479
<v Speaker 1>people who have left hedge funds because the clients have said, hey,

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>your man, you have so much of your own money

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in here, and you're managing it like it's your money

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're too conservative. So we see that a lot.

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>There is this transition of people who are getting ready

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to retire and as you say, have different needs and

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is changing the industry a lot well. And

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of changes, I love how this story kind

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of kicks off that if you kind of want a

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>job to go work with Don Right, you can maybe

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>get it through a podcast, or at least they promoted

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a good job on a podcast. It was kind

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of unheard of, right, it was the past. It was

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>very surprising. People said to me that they were very

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>surprised when they heard about that or so, so that's

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Um that, Uh, Dawn came in and had

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 1>this interview with Ted. Sid's a old hedge fund hand

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and and she wanted the message out there that that

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for talent. And it seemed very unusual

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>that Soros Fund Management would ever need to advertise. This

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been a place that years ago people would

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have murdered other people to like get a job or

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>even just get an interview. Um at Soros. So it's

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>amazing how times has changed. So what happens next, Like,

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is this something where Dawn Fitzpatrick just sort of kind

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of weathers this storm and goes on. What was the

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>sense you got from talking to her? Uh? The sense

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>from her is that the board wants to look at

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>her performance over five or seven in years. So and

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 1>also I think that now that George is not involved

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 1>in the money management, as long as she can more

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or less make the billion dollars that they need to

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>spend every year, Um, she'll have the backing of the board.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Has she done it so far? How long has she

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>been there? She has been there since April, so almost

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>three years. And she didn't do it last year. She's

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not She's maybe going to do it this year. And

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the first year was there they had a little surplus,

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so not net. They're probably just in line over those

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>three years. And that's Kathy Burton. She knows all about

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds. Literally wrote the book on it, hedge Hunters

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>back in the day where she profiled people like George

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Soros and really took stock of the industry. Then looked

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead and man, the industry has changed. Now you're listening

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up, the Supreme Court is

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>considering hearing a case that could make homelessness a crime.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg homelessness. You see it in a lot

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of major cities, especially where the cost of housing has

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 1>become unaffordable for so many Jason, a current court case

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that could create a different kind of housing crisis. It

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>feels like the government, businesses people just human beings. Residents

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 1>of major cities especially are starting to look at this

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>problem as much more complex than we did for a

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>long time. No Abu Hier joins us from Seattle with

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the latest on this case and what it may mean

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for what certainly has become a crisis. So tell us

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about this case to start. Yeah, it's a It's a

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>case that started about a decade ago in in Boise, Idaho,

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and UM six uh homeless people brought a case against

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the city basically saying that the UM the local ban

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on on camping in public places was on constitutional that

0:39:55.000 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>represented cruel and unusual punishment because um basically there was

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>no place for them to go. There weren't enough spaces

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and shelters UM and effectively they were being uh penalized

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.439
<v Speaker 1>for being homeless, which is something you can't do under

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the loft. This is so, this is this is wild

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think it could change dramatically based on your

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>reporting in this court case of how we think about housing,

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>because it really gets to righte Noah, the idea that

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 1>housing is a basic rate. Yeah, I mean that's that's

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a larger question that looms over this case. It's the

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>legal issue is much narrower. But just to complete the story, huh,

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Boisey one in the in the at the district

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>court level, but then it was appealed to the Ninth

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Circuit UM, which covers, you know, a giant swath of

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the US West from Alaska to Arizona, and the appellate

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>court found UM in the favor of the homeless folks.

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 1>So as a result, you have a ruling out there

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>right now that UM says that these sorts of bands

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.839
<v Speaker 1>on public camping are unconstitutional. And it's it's a big

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>deal because it's a ruling that goes far beyond boys now.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's something that matters to cities like Los Angeles and Seattle,

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's created a lot of discussion in UM cities

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>throughout the West about how uh they can tackle this

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>giant problem of homelessness well. And in your story, no uh,

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>you do talk about some of what various cities have done,

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those cities you mentioned have done to try

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and combat this, especially at a time where if you

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:41.479
<v Speaker 1>talk to people in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, they

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about, even anecdotally, just this massive rise in homelessness,

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which obviously has something to do a large part to

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 1>do with the affordability of housing. What have we seen

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>those individual cities due to try and combat this so far?

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>What you've seen, broadly on a national level is an

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>uptick in these laws that that criminalize you know, camping

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>or sleeping and in public. Now, this the the Ninth

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Circuit decision really really calls some of those into question,

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's made a lot of cities um back

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:18.439
<v Speaker 1>away from from those bands. Um. The question, though, long term,

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like the bigger question that looms over this case, is

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to solve homelessness. I think a

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in the in the West and across

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the country recognize that it's a problem, but there's a

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 1>very robust and active debate about what you do about it.

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, on the one side, the folks who

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are arguing on behalf of the homeless folks from Boise.

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>They say that criminalizing people for sleeping on the streets

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>when they have no other alternative is really counterproductive. There

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are tons of studies out there that show that if

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>you take the cost of policing, emergency room visits and

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>other UM costs on society into account, it's a lot

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>less cost effective to basically approach chronic homelessness that way.

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It's much better to get people a house and then

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>start working on mental health issues or substance abuse issues.

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, no, there's this Ninth Circuit Court decision.

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>The thing at issue here is whether or not this

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go all the way to the Supreme Court, correct, right,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So that could be decided as soon as this month. UM.

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a request for review that UM A legal

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>team representing Boise, including UM ted Olson of Bush v.

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Gore Fame UM, filed in UH in August or September,

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and the Supreme Court UM could decide as

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>soon as this month whether they're gonna hear that review

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and what ultimately are people doing or in the interim.

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned that some cities and municipalities and

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>states are trying to to sort of figure this out

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the context of this decision. What could potentially happen.

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Are we talked more shelters. Are we talking about more

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.240
<v Speaker 1>affordable housing the cities or states or the federal government

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>would force to be built. What are the potential solutions here?

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the reality on the ground right now there's

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty, and cities are approaching it in

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>different ways because they don't want to run a foul

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>of the Ninth Circuit's decision. They don't want to be

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sued and told, you know, and have a court find

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that their their ban is unconstitutional and they need to

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pay damages to to UM people who bring those suits.

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So UM on on a very basic level, you're you're

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing UM a questioning and a rethinking of how they

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>approach these particular bands. Apart from that, I mean, it's

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not like places that have these bands weren't working on

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:45.399
<v Speaker 1>homelessness to begin with. There's a lot of work underway UM.

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>But the proponents of UM the Ninth Circuit's decision basically

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>say that it's an opportunity for cities to think about

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>other ways of solving their crisis, which, as you said,

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a complex issue. It goes directly to housing of

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>portability in a lot of these places, and there are

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>other tools in the toolkit. UM. These advocates say, for

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for sities to deal with this, they can relax zoning

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>rules so you can build more and cheaper apartments through

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>UM cities where there's a lot of demand for housing. UH.

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You can increase subsidies so that people can you know,

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 1>afford to live in places that have where the rents

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>have gone up. And it's interesting too when you think

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>about what it will mean nationally, you know, all of

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a sudden or not all of a sudden, but we're

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where these cities that are at the

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>core of the economy in many ways, especially when you

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>think about the importance of Los Angeles, Seattle, UH, San

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Francisco out there in the west, Las Vegas being another.

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, so much innovation, so much business and growth

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>in economic growth has happened there, but it obviously has

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>come at a cost. I think you see it right

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there in your backyard right now, right. I mean, I

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>think there's a pretty wide acceptance now that booming economies

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>are um. Part of the problem here. You don't have

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of runaway growth and homeless populations without uh.

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, in Seattle, a thriving texting where you've seen

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the population grow by in a in a short number

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of years. Uh. Same for l A, where rents have

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>gone up just a dramatic amount because um, the city

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:28.959
<v Speaker 1>has chronically underbuilt for its population growth. That's no buu hire.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course, Jason joining us from Seattle, where we

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 1>know homelessness is a really big problem. We see this

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in these major cities where there's been a lot of development.

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten so expensive to live there, and as a result,

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 1>homelessness is on the rise. And especially when you think

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>about the western part of the United States, this is

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a defining issue of our time, and you do wonder

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:51.399
<v Speaker 1>whether this will be a defining case for that issue. Yeah,

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>asking a very important question if housing is a basic

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>human right. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week coming up

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>after for and flight sham a phone shaming Carol. Maybe

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>next it's all about a greener environment. This is Bloomberg,

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a green smartphone that you can repair yourself, not science

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>fiction apparently, Jason Kelly, I love this idea because I

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>am completely perplexed by my mobile phone and never opened

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it up and check it out inside, even more upset

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about how much I have to pay to get it

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>fixed when it breaks. Stephan Nicola joins us from Berlin.

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.879
<v Speaker 1>He's got the answer to some extent. It's called the

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>fair phone. What's going on? Well, the fair phone is

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:37.879
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, the sustainable answer to all the other smartphones

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>out there. Um, smartphones in general are pretty pretty bad

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sustainability. They are, um, you know,

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:53.280
<v Speaker 1>built in questionable environments. They're using metals and minerals, mind

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in war zones, and it's basically impossible to recycle them

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:02.400
<v Speaker 1>or repair them, um meaning you know, they'll they'll they'll

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>often get tossed and and that's not a good thing

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as we all know. Alright. So Stephen, I'm thinking that

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in this moment and movement, if you will, where I

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like folks are looking for greener solutions to everything.

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious why this hasn't happened sooner or taken off more.

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about kind of put it in perspective, because

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we sell what more than a billion smartphones kind of

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Yet this is just a small part

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of the market. Yes, the fairphone is still a niche product.

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Last year alone, one point four five billion smartphones were

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sold around the world, and the fair Phone has a

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>modest target of selling one and fifty thousand models next year. Um. However, um,

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know these products are catching on. The fairphone is

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>special because its sources um sustainable minerals, from fair fair

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.760
<v Speaker 1>trade sources and from places where they ensure that there's

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>no child labor or arm conflicts involved. It's using recycled plastics,

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and you can very easily take this phone out and

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and open it up and repair it yourself for a

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fraction of the cost you know getting your iPhone or

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Samsung Galaxy repaired. That alone blows my mind. So let's

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about that specific element to it, because that was

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the thing really jumped out of me exactly. I mean, so,

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:31.479
<v Speaker 1>how did they make something that one can actually fix oneself? Yeah?

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So basically, um, they have the problem which is, you know,

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when you have your iPhone broken, When your iPhone is

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>broken and you want to repair it yourself, that's basically impossible.

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Not only will you not be able to open it,

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>but also you'll avoid the warranty If you do it.

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So they try to come up with an entirely new

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 1>modular design that makes that possible. You know, the phone

0:49:56.360 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 1>chips with a tiny screwdriver that you can used to

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>open the device and and very simply, very easily replace

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>seven key components from the screen that we all know

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>breaks easily, to the camera, to the battery, to all

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>kinds of key components that usually you won't see or

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:21.760
<v Speaker 1>touch in other smartphones. So, Stephan, I think everybody who's

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 1>listening and watching this interview wants to know, Okay, Jason's

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 1>got two smartphones here, I've got one. We've got pretty

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 1>probably close to the latest and greatest models that are

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out there. Um, So how does this compare, this green

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>smartphone compared to kind of the smartphones we've all gotten

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>used to. Of course, it doesn't compare when it comes

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, text backs with the latest iPhone

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:49.880
<v Speaker 1>all the flagship Samson Galaxy. It's a it's a step behind.

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a decent mid level phone, um at a

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>price that slightly higher than mid level. It's said it

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>will cost you four hundred and fifty euros um, but

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that you know, is a bit higher than comparable phones. Um.

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The screen is a decent screen that you know you

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>would have seen maybe a year ago and in other models. UM.

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But the battery gets you through the day, UM. And

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the processor is UM. Yeah, also maybe from a phone

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that you would have brent you last year. But all

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in all, it's it can get you anywhere, it can

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>do all the things you need. UM. And you have

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a sustainable alternative if that's what you're looking for. Well.

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And what I find so interesting about this story, Stephen,

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is this notion that while this phone has been hanging

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:43.240
<v Speaker 1>around for a while and people have essentially been ignoring

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it from a broad perspective, we are in this moment

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>right now where people seem to be willing to pay up.

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>People seem much more concerned about where their stuff comes from.

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 1>How much will they be able to take advantage of

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this moment? Yeah, exactly. That that's the the whole, the

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>big difference right now. UM. The fair Phone three, that's

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's how the phone is called. Uh. And that that

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>already suggests that there was a fair Phone one and

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a fair Phone to UM that that was introduced years ago,

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't sell that much of those, but they

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>did sell them to a very committed community. And now

0:52:22.680 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 1>things are changing as you As you said, consumers are

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>becoming more aware of the sustainability in their products. And

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>now voter Phone, Europe's biggest wireless carrier, has agreed to

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sell the smartphone in five of its key European markets

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>where it has eighty million subscribers in total. So that's

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a big sales push for the fair Phone, and it

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.439
<v Speaker 1>gets the phone out in front of the consumer much

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>more than it used to be. I mean that's another

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>big difference, right that they finally have one of the

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest wireless carriers out there. I think they're the fourth

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>biggest actually supporting them, right, that could be a game

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>changer for them. Yeah, yeah, I mean, motor Phone is

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a key player in Europe. Uh, there's so many millions

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>of wireless subscribers across the continent. And of course it

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>has physical shops and stores where you can see the

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fair phone and touch it and and really you know,

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>see that there and feel that there is a sustainable

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>alternative out there and one that may get you through

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the day as well. Right well, And what's so interesting

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately this is going to be about I do

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of at least having the option to

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fix it myself. But what's interesting, Stefan, is this notion

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately you have to get the big phone makers

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:45.879
<v Speaker 1>behind it because a for availability and distribution, but also

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because their business model to date has really been built

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:52.479
<v Speaker 1>on cellphone. It wears out, we'll sell you another phone.

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this has been a volume game for to

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a large extent. Yes, it has, and of course the

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>industry is still playing that game. Now there's pressure rising pressure,

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, on the industry to change that game somewhat,

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to change the rules a bit and and give me,

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, leave that buy and toss model every year

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a new smartphone or every two years at the latest,

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and that you know that model is seriously coming under pressure.

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:22.919
<v Speaker 1>So you know that's also a move by Voter Phone

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to have an alternative in its portfolio and show that

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.759
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, beginning to tackle some of those issues. Yeah,

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea of buying TASS right is just I

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 1>think we've got to change it or what they call

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>commercial electronic sustainability and be a little bit more official. Um, Stefan,

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:43.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, great story, Thank you, good job,

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>great job, really well. Thank you, thanks for being patient

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>with us that the concept. Oh thank you so much

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for having me take care of We'll see you next time.

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 1>So stocks often move higher on news of a buy back,

0:54:55.000 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and there are immediate benefits to shareholders, especially those on

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the inside. Jason, Well, that is the key point to this.

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.239
<v Speaker 1>They've always been seen to be good for shareholders, at

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>least academically. But this is more complicated maybe than folks

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 1>have thought about, and the SEC is thinking about it

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>now more. At least one commissioner, Peter coy is here

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with us with the inside scoop. This is really fascinating

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 1>because buy backs, they've been all the rage. They sure have.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Buy Backs are more important than dividends. There's a way

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for companies to use their operating earnings to benefit shareholders,

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and they have been very quarter since something like fifty

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 1>percent of operating earnings in the last short while have

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>gone towards buy backs. And again, what we're talking about

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>here is companies going into the open market buying their

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>own shares well. And I feel like when a company

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>announces it, think about it so many times after the

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 1>closing bell, we're reporting it in our daily show and

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 1>immediately see you see the stock kick up in the

0:55:51.080 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>after hours and remind us of the mechanics of it

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>again and sort of what what the effect of a

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.800
<v Speaker 1>buy back is? Well, what it does is we moves

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 1>shares from the market so that the there's fear outstanding shares,

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>operating earners haven't changed, so the earnings per share go up.

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:10.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's can be attractive to investors, and it's right,

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's why investors like it. There's a lot of debate

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:15.760
<v Speaker 1>though about is that the best use of a company's

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>money versus maybe investing in R and D, you're investing

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in their workers and so new plant or whatever. So

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there are two general criticisms of buy backs. The one

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you hear about a lot is exactly what you're saying

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:32.680
<v Speaker 1>here that companies should be doing other things with their money,

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is like, don't you have anything better to do with

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.399
<v Speaker 1>your money than just buy back your own shares? Don't

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a plant you ought to be building, some

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:41.440
<v Speaker 1>invention you ought to be making, and or don't you

0:56:41.440 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just pay you employees more? And so the liberal Democrats

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are very much on this theme, including two of our

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>leading presidential candidates, Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 1>signed on to legislation that would actually prohibit companies from

0:56:56.640 --> 0:57:00.399
<v Speaker 1>buying back their own shares. So that's out there, kind

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of a known criticism. I'm not focusing on that there.

0:57:04.480 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say one thing though, is that there is

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a response to that. Um, the people will say, uh,

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, companies can really do bad things with their money.

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's better to take it away from the management,

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>give it back to the shareholders, and let them deploy

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that money as I see fit, perhaps into fast growing

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>startups that need money more than some old cash count

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because as you say, one of the benefits of this

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>is that earnings per share go up, and that is

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:37.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what people are investing in, is that company's future earnings.

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So but but again that's not the focus of the story.

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Of the focus is on this other thing which has

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>gotten less attention, which is what executives do when there's

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a buy back. And Robert Jackson is one of the commissioners,

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the sec not the chairman. He has commissioned his own

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>staff to look into this, and what he found is that,

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.440
<v Speaker 1>as Carol said before Stockston to go put a buy

0:58:00.440 --> 0:58:04.080
<v Speaker 1>back is announced, it's an expression of confidence by management

0:58:04.080 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in the future of a company. Right, So it's no

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:09.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder the stock goes up a bit. But what do

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 1>executives do. They are more likely to sell their shares

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>an immediate aftermath of this buy back announcement, taking advantage

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of that pop in the stock. So if you're a

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>real cynic, you would say this is sort of a

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:29.760
<v Speaker 1>legal version of serving illegal pump and dump stock manipulation, right, right,

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is insiders, usually senior corporate executives, right, and

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:35.960
<v Speaker 1>directors that are taking advantage. So we're so there's been

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>research out there that's showing that the insiders are selling

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>right after the inction of a biback. There's always a

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:45.600
<v Speaker 1>steady dribble of selling by executives. You know, they're catching

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in the stock options on. What you see is a

0:58:47.760 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>big jump, like fivefold increase in the dollar value of

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the stock sales right after eight days after a buyback

0:58:57.120 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>announcement versus before, and the number of executives doing so

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is also up. So what does Jackson want to do

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>about this? He has a very narrow tailored solution which

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>seems kind of unobjectionable, which is no bar executives and

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 1>directors other insiders from selling in the immediate aftermath of

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a buyback. He doesn't say exactly how very many days

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that should be, but as he says, you know who

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's a good idea for executives been doing this

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>right after buybacks announced? Who who benefits from that? Except

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for those people? Because they are already restrictions right on

0:59:30.400 --> 0:59:34.200
<v Speaker 1>when insiders can buy and sell chairs. Yeah, and so

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this would be knew then that they would not be

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:41.480
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do. How likely is Mr Jackson's change to

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be implemented? Well, I mean, I think what he's betting

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>on is that articles and oppressed like this one Washington

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Post had a story on this recently, will start to

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>generate some uh interest in this in the general public.

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So far, the Chairman of the SEC, Jake Clayton, has

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not gone along with this. He was asked about it

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>by Senator Chris van Holland last year and kind of demurred,

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm still willing to talk about this. I

1:00:08.880 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have a big roundtable about it. But

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's uh susceptible to political pressures like anybody else,

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and if the pressure amounts, you know, change and it

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>comes at an interesting moment right where people are asking

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger and kndidly more complicated questions about who's got what

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at stake? Are executives really doing things in a holistic

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>way that benefit everyone or is there just enrichment going

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on their own benefits precisely So, I mean it seems

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to me like a worthy topic that Robert Jackson has

1:00:43.840 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>brought up. Yeah, I agree with you. I was thinking

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. Just this greater emphasis on either governance issues

1:00:50.720 --> 1:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>all of the stakeholders involved, and I think, you know,

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be something that people

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>will be looking at more closely. Hey, I do want

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to ask you since we've got you the issue about

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg fifty and you nominated somebody and interviewed somebody

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for the GETA GETA. Gopinath is the chief economist of

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the International Monetary Fund in Washington. She's raised in India,

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>um first woman to have the job as research director

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>chief Economists of the i m F. She's a Harvard professor,

1:01:22.360 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>has been since two thousand five. Got her PhD at Princeton.

1:01:26.600 --> 1:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>One of her advisers was Ben Bernanky. So she's got tree. Oh,

1:01:31.480 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>she's super smart and she's been doing stuff too. She's

1:01:35.760 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>just finishing her first year in the job and she's

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>she's not slowing down. I mean she she dove right

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>into some pretty serious issues. Well, and one of her

1:01:45.080 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>main areas of interest is around the dollar, and it's

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of rolling the world. Tell us about that. Yeah,

1:01:50.640 --> 1:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this is probably one of her key research, probably going

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>back to before she joined the IMF. So the quick

1:01:56.320 --> 1:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>quick version is that lots of transactions in international commerce

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are denominated in dollars, even when neither the buying nor

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the selling nation uses the dollars. Some other country um

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so oil for examples, price in dollars. So there's a

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>downside to that. If you're a fragile um say, emerging

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>market country, and you your products of priced in dollars,

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>are you're buying stuff in dollars, then your currency goes

1:02:22.960 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>down Suddenly imports become more expensive, right, that's what happens.

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But your exports, because they're price in dollars, don't change

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in price there. You know, they're just dollars you're getting.

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:39.439
<v Speaker 1>So you you get hit on one end without any

1:02:39.440 --> 1:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>benefit on the other. And uh, it's it can be

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a real squeeze on some of these vulnerable countries, and

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like Peru and Brazil among other countries have gotten hit

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>by this. So she's not out there advocating for any

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>particular policy, because that's not her job. She's a research person.

1:02:57.000 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting that she's pinpoint a real vulnerability

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that the dominance of the dollar creates well. And I

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's also interesting, especially in a year where we've

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>been so focused on the U S. China trade wars,

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the research she did about who really bears

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the cost of higher tariffs, if you will, on Chinese

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>imports and that that cost is being borne by US

1:03:22.480 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>consumers and importers. Now that's almost become a commonplace in

1:03:26.800 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>recent months. Other people have duplicated that research and found

1:03:30.880 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. But I m F was fairly early

1:03:32.960 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and making that point well. And she is an appointee

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>or she was putting this job by Christine Legard, who, well,

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Christine Lagarde, you know, recommend her for the job, and

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>she got approved and Christine Legard of Courses moved on.

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>She's uh, but Legard obviously had faith in her as

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>being the kind of person who could handle a job

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. I love to that part of her job

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>she sees is kind of increasing the number of women

1:03:57.240 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>who are economists and high profile positions. I mean, sound

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>profession is one where women have not gotten their fair share.

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's pretty clear that Janet yell And and and

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>others have taken this on as a cause. And so

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>she's she's one of the people you hope I become

1:04:13.640 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a role model for young women who might consider enter

1:04:15.800 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the profession. That's our economics editor, Peter Koy. I'm so

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>glad we were able to talk to him about a

1:04:19.680 --> 1:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. Of course, that very important story about

1:04:22.520 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>stock by backs. We talked about it all the time

1:04:24.800 --> 1:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg. There's definitely arguments to be made for

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>doing them and for not necessarily doing them, So I

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's important that we talked about. And then, of course, well,

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, looking at one of the most influential

1:04:38.000 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>economists out there, you know, someone who's really setting a

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>different sort of tone, a designate in some ways of

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Christine Legarde. So you do wonder whether not just the

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>tone of economics, but the look of economics may be

1:04:54.120 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>changing long overdo Jason. She was the I m f

1:04:56.800 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>s first female chief economist, and of course she's part

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Bloomberg fifty, a great list of people. We

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on Monday are going to be at the Bloomberg fifty event.

1:05:05.640 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be at the red carpet doing a live

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>radio broadcast speaking to many of the folks that are

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on that list. That's right. We'll be live six pm

1:05:12.960 --> 1:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street time here in New York City. And if

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't catch us live, check out next weekend show.

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have the best of those interviews. Well,

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna wrap up the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so much for joining us.

1:05:27.280 --> 1:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jason Kelly and I'm Carol Masser. Be sure to

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>tune into Bloomberg Business Week Radio live Monday through Friday

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>starting at two pm Wall Street Time. And I can't

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>catch us lide check out our daily podcast and get

1:05:37.480 --> 1:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that at Bloomberg dot com or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:05:40.760 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course you can get this week's edition of

1:05:42.280 --> 1:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the magazine. It is on newsstands now. We'll be back

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>right here next week at the same time. This is

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg