WEBVTT - March 4th, Hour 1: Mid-Tier starting pitching on a Modica Monday

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever, m to to do Do Do

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Do do do do too. Yeah, this is the Fantasy

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever. Here are the Fantasy Sports Your Network,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>alongside Frankie Stample. I am Greg Susan Fran. What's going on, Greggae,

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back, Happy Monday. Greg. If you didn't know who

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>DK metcalf is, you certainly know. Now what are you doing, buddy?

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it right, man, I'm doing it right. Weird

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.639
<v Speaker 1>dreams lately, though, weird dreams, So that means you've been sleeping.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>How have you been sleeping? I was up like several

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>times last night, but like weird dreams, like I don't

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>remember them now, but like I'm just thinking about Matt

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Modica not dreaming that problem. That would be a good dream.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. What's on man? Jump guys, how's you

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going with today? You upgraded from a metsat to a

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>twins hat this week? Well, I just saw the poll

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stample put out where you put out about which one?

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>So I figured it was there you go, jas, there

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you go, there it is, there it is. Where's your

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati reds hat? Matt? That I do that own one?

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>That was not an option, not yet, not yet, not yet.

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Being the biggest fan of Luis cast you, I think

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you need one, Maddiemo. Uh, you know what, I guess

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd become the biggest fan or his PR spokesman on Twitter.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>At least. It's because I think some of the statements

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that are made about him aren't factually correct or if

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you do an overview, you know there's a lot more

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>than that meets the eye. And that's been banging this

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>drum for Louis Castio for a while. True story, Matt.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Last night I was texting Greggy and I said, I'm

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to you and Matt going head to head

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on Louise Castillo because Greg's has been owned Louise Castio.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Last year he was thoroughly disappointed. And I know again, yeah,

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you're you're banging that drum, so it gonna be fun. Well,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. You know what we last last week we

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, Frankie, we kind of jumped around a lot, right,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>We started going in order with with Nick and then

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 1>when Vetger came up here, we just you know, we

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just jumped all over the place. So I thought, today

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we do the same thing and just jumped all over

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the place. And that's why I want to start. I

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want to start with Louise Castio because when he talked

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about out some of the hot names that are going

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>off the board, some of the sexier names, and you

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>hear about, um, the Paventas and the shame beavers of

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the world and so wanted, so forth. But those guys

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are going after Louis Castio, who over the last ten

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>days or so in the NFBC, Louis Castier is up

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to the pitcher off the board at about pick one twelve. Again,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that's in the last you know, ten days or so.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Um in the NFBC, Matt Louis. It's amazing because if

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you didn't own Louise Castio last year. You obviously we

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>can say it's for a lot of players. They didn't

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>own a guy last year. You have a totally different

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>mindset of this player. And when the the end of

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the text message that I said to Frank was Mattery

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>knows my arguments, like, I owned this guy through July

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, and it was miserable. It was a miserable,

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>miserable mirrorretle experience. And I dropped him and I felt

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>good about dropping him, and I never looked back. And

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>by never looking back, I obviously missed what he did,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of course in August September when he turned it around.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>But my question for you is what makes you so sure?

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how so sure you are? What

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>makes you so short that Louise Castio we saw in

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>August and September of last year. He's the guy that

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get from April on this year. I'm

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>anxiously awaiting this opportunity. And I did a tweet the

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>other day showing, you know, three months of sub three

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>e r A by Louis Severino and Louis Castillo and

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the raised north of five for both uh Louis Severino

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and Louis Castillo. One was drafted as an ACE, the

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>other was drafted as your second or third starting pitcher.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>One went off the board as they pick last year.

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>One was pick. Uh, just real quick. When you look

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>at your end of season valuations, Sevno didn't lose that

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>much money compared to you know, he lost money, but

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty much in line of what you would

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have figured him to be. Castillo gets crushed in the

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>end of season uh. Value relations. My point is if

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you had your ace that you basically couldn't use for

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season because he had a

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>five E r A and a one forty one whip,

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the same whip that still had in his first three

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>months that were terrible. That's like you know, having your

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>study starting running back who you had a bench for

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season, or he gave you

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>negative points each week. So I don't think people really

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>look at it that way. Uh. Too often they just

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see the end of the season. Well, I had some

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>arena for twenty eight. He made twenty three, so it

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that bad. It was really bad because that guy

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was your ACE. Why I'm confident in Louis Castile this

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>year is no one argues about his stuff. That's not

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>an argument anybody ever makes. The first half, the first

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>three months, where he puts to like a five eight five,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you're already one whip. Uh, the fastball velocity was down

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like a mile and a half almost two miles. Uh.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>In the second half he got the increased of view

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on the fastball. He used the slider and change ten

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>percent more while decreasing the fastball. Now he has a

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>fastball that you know, we as we sat in the

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>second half was almost about ninety seven. Uh. You know,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to have control of your command of the fastball.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Is you know something that really helps a picture. His

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>fastball needs to improve. Even though you throw it hard,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you gotta know where it's going and where it's place it.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So he's got two pitches that he whips on last year.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of pictures can say that in Major

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>League baseball. Is he a guarantee? No, But neither is Barrios,

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>neither is Wheeler, and neither is Herman Marquez. I mean

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Marquez out of the foursome, has probably the best skill

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>set and he pitched to a sub three e r

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>A excuse me, a sub three x FIP at home

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. But when you look at the Certifice acts,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it just shows you how difficult and what a monster

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>courses no matter how good you are, of course, can

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>still the feed you. I look at what Louise Castio

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>did in that second half where you and you make

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good points throughout that. Speaking of Luisi

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>sa Marino and Louis CASTI like, I get it. I

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>can hear what you're saying. But in July where he

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>really went off or he was great, Phip was great,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a brutal August like that, inconsistency was still there. And Frankie,

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could answer this question like Castile, as Matt said,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>was coming off the board in like as your third

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>or show starting pitcher last year? Prostially what pick was

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that last year? Eighty? Last year? So you're getting them okay, perfect,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that was all a thirty picks later. You're getting it,

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>get later than Sa Mareno, Well you know what I'm

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>saying this this year, Luise, Yes, year later than you

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>were last year. Most people are still getting him as

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>their SP three. That's true, that's true. Are you basically

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>are you comfortable with that meant, are you comfortable with

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy as your sp three? Are you taking him

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>again seventh round? Yeah? No, I think you're probably gonna

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have to want to pay in a sixth round, probably

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>early seventh, you know, depending on format and stuff. But

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>my case is the talent is there is. I'll continue

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to saying none of these four are a lot to

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.119
<v Speaker 1>deliver it. Look, Zack, Zach Wheeler was awesome for the past,

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, like over over three months last year. But

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just can't, you know, say Zach Wheeler

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is definitely going to do it. There's a lot of indicators.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Zach Wheeler in in that stretch where he

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was amazing. He had a home run the fly wall

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>percentage of five nine percent, he had a babbit of

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to fifty. He had a left on base percentage of

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like eighty something. So if you you know, just pull

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>those numbers back a little to the norm, you know,

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>he's really got to ramp it up again. And I

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like Zach Wheeler. I'm not talking bad about him. I'm

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>just trying to make the case that after the first

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirteen pictures, that's why you know, I want

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to live in a certain area when I'm drafting, when

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm selling my kds, you know, it gets risky or

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and risky, whether it's injuries, inexperience, or track recording. Yeah,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's definitely right about that. Like I have my

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 1>top thirteen. The tier ends with Synderguard. And we we

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about that tier a lot last year last week, Greg,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>where it's you know, at the middle tier. You know,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>once you get into like the early third round, it's

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>like your Severino Carrasco, Walker Bueller, Synderguard. That's that's my

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that cuts off my thirteen. That's the end of it.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this that I mean, how have I

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>know that I know the answer to this, but for

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the listening audience and people watching at home and Greg,

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how have you how have you been constructing your pitching?

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I know you're big on you know, you have

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to have a plan heading into your draft. Are you

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to get two of the top thirteen pitchers and

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>then you know maybe in that six seventh round range

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get a Louise Castillo or maybe even

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on a Shane Bieber as your

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>SP three or or Zach Wheeler, one of these guys.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to have one of these top thirteen

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>pitchers or is that how you wanted most of your

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>draft to come out with one of these top two

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of these top guys to to lead your staff for

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this season. I don't have to have one. I prefer

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>to have one. Uh. Look, if somebody fell on the

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>hitting side that was too good to pass up. He

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>overweighted that that age value, and I figured, I'm just gonna,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, load up and starting pitching. I'm I'm always

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna make audibles at the draft table, but as you said,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna walk in there with with a plan, and

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I do want to grant I'm totally fine with Syndegard

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Syndeguard as my ace. I mean, he has the skills

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>set and even in a down year, look what he

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was able to do. So he's come out and said

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he's getta better on himself and all that. He's not

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>taking one of these team friendly deals and stuff like that.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>So I want to have at least one of those aces. Uh.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why picking in the top say five, really, in

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, gives you an advantage in that second and

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>third round because the end of the second early third.

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to take a picture at the end

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the second. But if you if that's the how

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you're scud on your board and you want to do that,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you can either fortify your hitting to take your first ace,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and it gives you that option in the third early

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>third round we have even a second ace. I mean,

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if if you started off with a Garrett pol under

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the second and Carlos Karashka was sitting there in the

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the third, that's tough to pass up. Which

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>if you take those two you can really just start

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>pounding hitters. I understand you're passing up on elite hitting

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as well there, but you already got a first round

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and hitter and there's plenty of good guys in a

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>round four and five. Yeah, So I think that's well put.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think what Matt said about you know

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the obviously, I mean you can say this about any position,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but obviously with pitching, it I mean it's even uh,

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more under a microscope. Is once you get

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>past those first thirteen, it's like the lower you go

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is like there's gonna be more and more questions, Like

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be question marks with all of these guys

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>in this range. So you know, I can't dispute that

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 1>I currently have Louise Castio ranked as my twin the

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>third starting pitcher. I have him right behind Jose Burrios.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I know some people might prefer to Castio to Burrios. Um.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're skipping over a whole tier, which we'll

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>get to like as as we go. We'll get to them.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Luis Castillo is one of these guys.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>He's very polarizing, you know, like a lot of people

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>want to hear about him. What is there to like

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to me? I saw him ranked as my SP twenty three.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's a lot of moving parts. Again,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you could say this for a lot of these pictures

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in this range. It seems like no matter what you

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>say about Castillo, like there needs to be things that

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>go right for him to pay off this value. Again,

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing for a lot of the guys in this range.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But just like the e r A by month modica,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just all over the place, like last

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>year April seven point eight, five May three point four, eight,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>June six point seven, five, July two point two, five,

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 1>August five point five seven September one point zero nine

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and how over the place, man, how about this he

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>has one of the same problems that has as well.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Those home roads splits are start. Castillo was like dominant

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at home. He had uh striking a percentage maybe a

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>five percent walk percentage, and his extrip was like three.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>That's a great American, you know they like to joke around,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>great American, small park, whatever you want to call it.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>He was really good at home. His problem is even

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at home on the road. He gave him fourteen homers

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>at home, fourteen homers on the road. That's something that

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to, you know, get closer to the average as

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>opposed to be in touch an outlier. You know, you

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can't just keep giving up the long ball constantly. And

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that could correct a bit. I'm not saying

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna totally solve it, but this is the same

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thing with Burrios. I mean he is night and day

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>home in the road, He's true, Yeah, Burrios three point

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>zero three, three point zero three e r A at

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>home last year, four point eight five on the road.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Sto three point five one at home, five point zero

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>three on the road. Which is weird again because he

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>pitches in Cincinnati. Like that was one of the first

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>things that stood out to me. Why does he pitch

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so well at home? Is it just like a comfort

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>factor kind of thing. It doesn't make sense because it's

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's known as a smaller ballpark, hitters ballpark. Well, it's

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>weird it is, And that makes me a little bit

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>nervous draft teams that a number that could go up.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I I know the fIF and the x FI. We're

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>not that far away from the three five number at

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>home in general, which is a good thing. I just

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>want to jump one thing. That one thing that does

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>confuse me. If we look at like catch Still last

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>year was going off the board at He's dropped some picks.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's pulled back in in a DP, but

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Tanaka, who went one pick after him

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, is going even further back. And I really

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tanaka. He's got some of the same problems. You know,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the home run ball really hurts him. But he's a

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that I I just think that has a skill

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>set and Okay, maybe you're not getting off out of him,

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think he's one of the most undervalued pictures

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>out there. And I think that's probably one of the

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger takeaways here, Greg is basically with Burios, if you're

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>playing the fifteen team league, you're taking him in the

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>fifth round. Castillo in a fifteen team league, you're getting

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>him in the sixth round. Wheeler you're getting him in

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the sixth round. And with her Man Marques, he's more

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of a fifth round pick. With Burials, so you have

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Burials and Marquees in the fifth round, and you have

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Castillo and Wheeler in the sixth round. If you ask me,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and where I've kind of been living, is you're getting

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Tanaka or even a Chris Archer, who I find interesting.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You're getting those guys around or two later at times.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with Shane Bieber. Right, So like, if you

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like this here and you want one of these guys

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to be your SP three, you can kind of just

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>wait instead of taking Marquez or Burrios in the in

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the fifth or even Castillo in the sixth, you can

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>wait like two rounds later and you get Tanaka or

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer or Shane Bieber and the eight as your

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>SP three. It's just if you really buy that those

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are about to break out, because there's definitely signs

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like with those four specifically that I put in the

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>poll today, Wheeler, Marques Castillo, and Burrios, there are signs

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're like on the cusp of the breakout again,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as we've been talking about specifically with Castillo here, there's

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>also risk, there is and I want to get into

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Burrios a little bit deeper because well, Burrios has even

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to a larger extent than Luis Castillo had. This is

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a former top prospect, right and we cannot quit former

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>top prospects and believing what they can become. And that

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>leads that all leads you to Buyron Bucks and the

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>teammate of Ze Barrios, who's hit all these home runs

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in the sprain as all these r b ey's whatnot,

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and people continue to jump in on him probably earlier

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>than they should. Joze Barrios, we have waited and waited

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for him to become a legitimate ace. We have seen

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>signs in certain months over the last several years that hey,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>he can become that ace. That's why you get in

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on him at his current a d P. That's why

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't potentially wait on a Shane Bieber Pavetta that

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>tear rather than taking Burrios now right like that is

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the quadr you find yourself in. So when we come back, man,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you you've answered that question. Can

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Jose Barrios become and ace a guy that you're taking

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>much earlier next year? That's why you're taking where he is,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because you believe you can become that guy. Is this

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the year it all comes to fruition for Jose Barrios

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>That Modica answers that next, Daily Rodo dot Com learned

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stop. Industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Rodos dot Com optimize

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>her in minutes, build an optimized for cat games and

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>attorneys learn from the game's best DFS players joined Daily

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com. The following ad contains shocking material. Listener

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>discretion is advised. Is someone in your family playing a

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>die a year from drug overdose, A hundred and twenty

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>people a day, five people every hour, one person every

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse.

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Over two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes, somebody you know. Maybe next

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it. Call now and learn

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>how we can help you. Eight six six four eight

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one eight six six four eight

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>four nine six to one. That's eight six six four

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>eight four ninety six one scout Fantasy sports with Harper.

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of unfilled potential. So far. He's only

0:18:56.320 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>really had one huge fantasy season. His average is all

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>over the map. That's the biggest problem. He was to

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>forty nine last year. Just look at these last five

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>years to seventy three, three thirty to forty three, forty nine.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So where is the real Bryce Harper? Week days to

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>four bm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Network and on

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers Sickness going around the office right now, Frank,

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>good thing you're you're at home in Jersey. Everyone everybody's

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>calling out. Everybody's a little bit of snow on the ground.

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to come toward. I gotta get your opinion

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>here because we're talking about this during the break. And

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I've long been a fan of facial hair, and I've

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>been trying to get Greggy out here growing some facial

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>hair for a while now. And I gotta say, Greggy,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I am loving the scruff man. So I am loving

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the scrus So I'm so have you brought this up

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to Frank because I planning them bringing it off obviously,

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So I have not shaved it over a week at

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this point. And then the neck it is clear, you know,

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>making it cleaner. It looked no, so I recorded. So

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was recording the videos this morning, I looked

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at myself in the monitor. It's very good time and

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I can go to my eyes. So um, So I

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was looking at myself in the monitor, monitor, moner, it

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is okay. Finally, So I was looking at myself in

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the monitor and I was like, you know what, I

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really see much. It doesn't really look anything's going

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on here. There's really a munch of a difference. I

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>noticed it. I noticed it in person. Do you we

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>got a little five o'clock shadow a little bit, Maddie,

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think Should he keep it? Should he

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>grow it out? I planned on shaving it, like if

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like how it look, I was gonna shave

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it tomorrow morning. No stop, Greg, It's it's time for

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>something for a little while. It's gonna be called this week.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I like a little scruffy it. I'm just lazy, but

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not down with all these you know, beards and

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Be honest with you, Well, what do

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you think of Mark in Madiemo? Is it all right?

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? You're just very clean right now? Clean? Yeah?

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He usually isn't that bad. I mean, you don't have

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 1>one of these ones that are growing out and like,

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like stuff. And look how look how that

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>worked out for Dallas doesn't even have a job, doesn't

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>even have a job. It's probably because of the beard.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, Yeah, I got this, So there really questions.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna sake tomorrow and I'm seeing Judy's parents tomorrow night.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that. So we told me, I don't know

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>what they do. I'm kind of interested to sure they do.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I'm not sure what I'm gonna do yet.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like I might give it a little

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>while longer, just to see how I like it. I

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>liked and then and then at some point we'n shave

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it all off. Obviously I'm not. It's not gonna be

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>like deep I can't handle that. How about keep it

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>through auction night. We're doing auction next year. That's a

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>long time. So we're doing We're doing the g d

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>D auction next Thursday night. We actually still have to

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have our mandate where we do we plan out our oction.

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But we kind of talked about it, but we talked.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>We talked more this series. Yeah, we talked. I want

0:21:59.920 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to give the regulations to uh Frank Stamfel here. He's

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be participating in the NFBC main event. What time

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is What time is that? That is Saturday the six

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>at one pm, Stewart I will be there. We're gonna

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>be broadcasting. I'm covering the event. Oh, there you go,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can rip my team on the air. I mean,

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>great fun to play with the big boys. What I

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>have to talk to you? I want to make you

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>go on Friday, probably so you're not gonna go Friday.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm let me both of us go. Is that

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing? Like? Definitely we're officially broadcasting Friday thirty and

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Saturday at one. Okay, I mean, yeah, you guys have

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the super auction and I probably can't. I'll talk to

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you and Mike off the air and figure out how

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to do this actually all right anyway, because I think

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>because on Saturday, might want you to go Friday and

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the VANDUL stuff from here, you know what

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Just figure out how to balance that? Would

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I have a co host? Yeah? You do? You do,

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Brad Ziegler for readably picture will be covering the covering it,

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>covering it with us. Just piss appel over there as well,

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>covering with us. Oh nice. Yeah, we're not going on.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We got a little party going on stuff, all right.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So before we hit the break, I brought up Jose

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>burrias a guy that we're still waiting on to to

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>really be an east And we thought a lot of

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>people thought we could see that jump last year, and

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>after a month or so we thought he did came

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>back down to earth and he gave the splits a

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>little while ago. Matt, Josie Burrios Frankie has ranked one

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>spot higher. You said the Louise cast is this the

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>year of Burrios puts it all together, and even a

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Burrios guy in the past, is this the year he

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>puts it all together? Or is what we see what

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we get with this guy? No, I think he makes

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the step. I think he takes that next step. I

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think I have right there with Frankie and I just

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I think everything is coming. Everything is the stars or

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>a larning like to say, he went from a D

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the previous year that he put up a hundred nine

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>last year. The strikeout rate increased. You look at the

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike percent, which all so increased and confirms the

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 1>growth in that area. So that's that's a really good thing.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>The walk rate stayed the same, but it was really

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>key is the first pitch strike went from just below

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>two I think just under that's a that's a nice

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>jump upward. Uh. The X fit and the E r

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a aligned. So that's another sign looking, you know, everything

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>starting to can you know culminate? I guess is the

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>word of I was. There's actually a different word I

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was looking for, but it's not my mind front section.

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But even the sierra is right there. So you have

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all these things coming together. Then, like we stated that

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the road starts have been a big bugaboo. Uh. You know,

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully now another year of maturity, I think you can

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>tire some in that second half he made that jump.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he was that sharp, and I think

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the UH, I think the stats paid for that. So

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, I really like the four uh. There's a

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>lot to like with them. Nothing's a guarantee here, but

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna place a bet on Burrios. I like Burrios

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>too as well. I don't really like the price right now.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>You know in these fifteen team drafts, he's going in

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the fifth round. But look, you have to pay for talent,

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think last year we saw some of that

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>talent come to fruition. The skills getting better, as Maddie

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Moo mentioned, career high in swinging strike rate with eleven

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>point two percent, the first pitch strike rate, as Matt mentioned,

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>jump by five percent career high sixty four and a

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>half percent. I mean that was kind of something that

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was that hurt burials before is you know he's falling

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>behind in counts. Now he's getting ahead a little bit

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>more throwing those first pitch strikes. And he also had

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a career high Chase rate right around our thirty three percent.

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like everything's there right like a hundred

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and ninety two innings pitch last year. It looks like

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he's taking that step into like workload. He can handle

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>an ace type workload for a starting pitcher. Now, Uh,

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike rate eleven percent career high is good.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not Luis Castio level good like Luis Castillo is.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, thirteen and a half percent is up there

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>with like Noah cinder Guards of the world, like the

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen starting pitchers in the league. But I do

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like that Burials is trending in the right direction obviously.

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I think really what he needs to work on here, Matt,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you can speak to this as well, is

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Burrios throws a four team and a sinker with that

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>curve slurve. I mean you've seen gifts of Jose Burials pitch.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that breaking pitch is nasty. He needs to

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to develop this changeup. I think that is the

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the pitch that he needs. It's similar to

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Severino right right when we talked about this last week

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with Severio needed to develop that changeup and he worked

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was two off seasons ago with Pedro

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Martinez to help develop that pitch and it's turned into

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a serviceable third pitch. That's what Jose Burrios needs. He

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>needs because if you do just fastball and you know

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that slurve curveball pitch that he has you come from,

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you become a little bit too predictable. As nasty as

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the pitch can be, if you're just a two pitch picture,

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to hurt you. As he starting pitture, he

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to continue to develop that changeup. So that's something

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that I want to watch about the spring here to

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>see if he's working on it, if it's working out well,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>because if that's something that he can carry over into

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, a developed changeup, then I think we

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>can see him take that next step into turning into

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like a Luis Severino type picture. But he needs that

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>third pitch. What do you think? Man? Yeah? No, I

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in my starting picture preview for the Athletic on the

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Jji Barrios, right up, I did hit advocate continue? Okay, uh,

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>well done? Something he did? I did right? He needs

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to concentrate on that curve, slur whatever you want to

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>call it and he needs to correct the change. I

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>totally agree with Frank here, but this is the big

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>step is if he gets over pitch this year, the

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts will be there just in volume alone, and as

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the swinging strike improved last year, you know you could

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>be looking at some really good things from this guy

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>when he's on. You've seen the talent, so you know

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's there. It's being able to do it over the

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>course of the season. We're talking about Modica from the

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>athletic and give up with both of you guys have

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>said here to me, out of the crew that you

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>just named, Franking the pole of Marquez, Burrios, um Castillo,

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Zach Zach Wheeler, I feel like, and I don't think

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he has a disagree like, he's the one that you

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>jump into that next here has the best chance I'd

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>say jumping into that next here and the other guy.

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that reasonable? It's a little bit of a different

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>question than you asked. You're talking about based on a VP,

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think he has the best chance to go

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to the next here? Actually, I have Zach Wheeler ranked

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the highest of all these. Really, yeah, I have Zach

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler inside of my top twenty, which might be aggressive,

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but and I heard some of the things that Matt

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned um when we when he mentioned Wheeler earlier on.

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the bad bit at the home run, the

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>fly ball ratio during that stretch last year it was low.

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.239
<v Speaker 1>But I think the x fit is kind of something

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that you could pay attention to there and maybe expect

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Because his final eleven starts he pitched

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to a one point six eight e r A, but

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he had a three point four seven x tips, so

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe he could be a sub three point five

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>zero uh pitcher in terms of e r A with

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the whip be good. I mean,

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the walks came all the way down last year. I

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>mean the walks were I believe, you know, like two

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>point seven walks per nine last year, whereas you know

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that was consistently over three. This was someone who had

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>had actually struggled with with command in his career, so

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>like he was getting people to chase more during that

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven star stretch the final eleven games he was nine

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and one then, uh he was getting ground ball all rate,

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>limited hard hit rate to cent so he's inducing a

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of sold contact here. Uh. He he introduced a

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>new pitch, Greg it was he was throwing this, uh

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the splitter, which he only threw it about like six

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of the time last year, but it had

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a nine percent with rates. So this is something that

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I talked about where if you see someone at a

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>new pitch, and especially you know over the second half

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the season, he upped that usage up to around

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. I mean, even if that comes up a

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more this year, he throws that splitter ten

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>percent at the time to year, and he's getting a

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>whip rate around. This is a tangible change that Zach

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler made to his arsenal last year that made him

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a better picture. Um the swinging strike rade. It's not

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.479
<v Speaker 1>really adelite levels, you know. I just think I think

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he can be a Jamison ty One type picture. Jamison

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>ty One is going two rounds earlier, Jameson Taylan is

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>going in the fourth round. Like, I think a lot

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of people are drafting tie On this year because they

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>feel he's safe. I don't know that anyone believes that

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna give be like a ten k per nine

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy. I think he's gonna be between like

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half and nine case per nine. I

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>think Zach Wheeler could do something similar. I think Zach

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler could be a sub three five e r A.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of what we're respecting out of

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Tyoon as well. So I don't know that he

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>has like this huge, immense upside, but I do think

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that he can jump into this tier with like these

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>sp two type guys who are being drafted in the

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, fourth round, because like tyn Flaherty and Clevinger

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>are all going in the fourth round right now of

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team drafts. Zach Wheeler, you're getting two rounds with

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>later quite consistently in these drafts. I think he can

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be on the same level of those pictures. So that's

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>why I haven't ranked that same toyear. He's top twenty

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for me. Now, you give a lot of good stats

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>before about Zach Wheeler and when he did a comparative

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>leader Louise Castillo. What do you think about him this year?

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have him right behind Bars and Castillo,

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and like Frank said, the control. Look, the key thing

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is not giving back any of those games in in

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that area. He lad qualified uh hitters in MLB starters.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, on a hard hit percentage, and it was like,

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>which is which is pretty amazing? Right there? There is

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like with him. I agree with Frank,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you should always look at X TRIP. I don't even

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>look at FHIP. I'll be honest with you. PHIP is

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>something I don't pay a time I look at X FHIP.

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>If I want to look at Sierra, I'll look at that,

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and there is tons of like the splitter, as you mentioned,

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I put it's almost at that ten percent range. It's

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not quite there yet, but if you can get it

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>there or just above that's that's gonna be key. Because

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>if he can get you know, if he continue to

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>get the swing and mrs with that pitch, adding on

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to the arsenal the fastball slider, you know, you could

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>really have something nice. I would not be surprised if

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he finishes as inside the top twenty uh that they

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>would tie on to me. I think certain people I

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's supremely safe. I think he's safe as well,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but to a point, I'm looking more. I mean, I'm

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more conservative with with my ear A S and stuff.

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>If he pitched two A three six e r A

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and pitched say two hundred something in is with a

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred ni drac acts. I would sign up for that

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>right now today, as I think that's a hell of

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a picture. You know, you're really getting something good there. Uh.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Some people see the three r A last year from

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>town and they're thinking it's gonna get even better. Not

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that it can't, but I think that's like the nile

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of his projection that you're looking at. So, yeah, there's

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a really nice range. My point here is I want

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a pair of these guys with an eight or someone

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I consider an eight. Is now I have that floor,

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I have that base, and if they have a month

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or two where they're like Louis Castillo last year, you know,

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it makes it a lot easier to be able to

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>sustain it having an ace where if if you don't

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have that, you're you know, you gotta get volume here.

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You need two or three of these guys, and you

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>know you also got to consider when you're before you're

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sit in that draft room, especially like Frank, it's gonna

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be his first time in the NFBC main event where

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>am I taking my closure? So now in the sixth round,

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>am I gonna go with or the end of the

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>fifth sixth round. If Barrios, Castillo, Wheeler are all options

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to him, does he take a brad hand there? Does

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he take the starting picture? These are gonna be things

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be confronted with. And I know everybody's saying,

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just avoid closures this year. You can't just utterly avoid

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>closures in an overall competition like the main event. I'm sorry.

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You can fade them and then spend your whole time

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on fab And that's a really tough and I've done

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it before. It's really tough. It's very time consuming, and

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna miss out on like Lawan Soto's of the World,

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>which all your money is getting spent on speculating on closes. Yeah.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Mat made actually a great point on Twitter late last

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>week where he said, listen, you're gonna spend on closer.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It just depends if you want to spend your draft dollars,

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to spend your fab dollars, You're going to

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>ultimately spend. So don't think that like you're not taking

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>him in the draft, you're not gonna waste or spend

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>money on them. Later You'll be chasing closes potentially all year.

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>And I thought it was a really interesting point um

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>by Modica. There you nervous for the main event. My

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>nervous nore. This is I mean, I've always this is

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>what I love to do. I love to I love

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to draft. I mean, this is the best time of

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy baseball season is it's draft seasons. So I

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe once I get inside the room, I'll get

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>some butterflies there. I don't feel anything, but I'll be

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>there so I'll make you smile. Yeah, I mean, you

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta bring the pom pomps. And I don't want to

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>make a sign. I probably you probably aren't gonna want

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>me to do. I was sending text message during you

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna want to see that. No, I will not

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 1>be paying attention. I'll shut my phone off during the draft.

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think I'm the text you have to answer.

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Greg Biden, who is my co owner for this draft,

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>will be there with me. We'll be side by. You

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can't get that. I confused? No, sorry, Greg. If we

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have an intermission, I'll talk to you then. Is there

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is there like an intermission for this moody? Uh? After

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>chen rounds, believe we'll stop. There should be some food

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>provided They better be some food provided do the people

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>covering get people covering the draft get that food. Yeah,

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you beautiful. I'm just gonna stop. I love it. I

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 1>love it. That's fantastic. Uh. Maddie move is right about

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this though, Like when it comes to closer, especially if

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you're competing for an overall, if you're playing in a

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>rodal league, like, you can't completely fade closing, right, So

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to make decisions. And you know, if you

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>wanna if you want to get one of these starting pitchers,

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to get a Castillo or Zach Wheeler, you

0:35:58.120 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>want to take one of those guys in the sixth

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>round on, then you're probably forfeiting your chance to take

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a Brad Hand or a Roberto Osuna or you know

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one of these top level elite closers that Matt mentioned. Uh,

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And then you're probably looking a little bit later on,

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're taking to do little round seven or you know,

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I know in the Great Fantasy based plementation, will I

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>end up with? Wade Davis is my first closer in

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>round nine? It's not ideal. I don't love it, but

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think his job security is pretty good there in Colorado,

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he's one of those top fourteen fifteen

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 1>closures where I actually feel all right about his job security.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the numbers might not be great, but he's

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>still gonna give me, you know, thirty five plus saves.

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what I expect. So you have to decide when

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do you want to take that first closure. You want

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to take it in around six or around seven, and

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not gonna get one of these starting pitchers.

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>If you want to take it in around nine, then

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you can wait a little bit. Maybe you get like

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a Kirby Yates, or you get a of Way Davis.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You get one of those guys that's your first closer,

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>but you're not gonna feel as safe as that, Or

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>take that closed early on around six and then you

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>end up getting one of these and we'll talk about them.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Archer to knock. You get one of those guys in

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>around eight around nights. So you gotta have to wait,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Like which combination I like better? Don't want to get

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this closer in the starter? What do I want to

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>get you know, Wheeler and k STO and then take

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>a closure later on? Like these are all decisions that

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to think of before the draft.

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I have a bit of a

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>keeper deliver you know it. I want to ask Matt

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the excessive back after. The Fantasy Sports Network is hitting

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>you from all angles with the best fantasy sports and

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>betting analysis. You can catch the latest programming on so

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 1>many platforms. There's no way you'll miss out on any

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of the award winning programming we pump out every single day.

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You can listen through the F and T s Y

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, iHeart Radio, tune in Radio, Stitcher, download our

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Audio Boom, and you

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can watch select programming on the F and T s

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Y YouTube channel or the Fantasy Sports Network, your only

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 1>source for fantasy sports and wagering anytime and anywhere more.

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Salad two thousand and fifteen, two thousands and sixteen, European

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen, World number one.

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Me personally, I keep my game face on me all

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, especially coming out with the bucker, leaving the

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>range or you're leaving the ports. What's your story? Can

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>go to game face Grooming dot Com from all your

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>athletic facial wipes and body cleansing, kneed rains, Make it

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Rain Texas cornerback Chris Boyd was asked if he had

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>both his testicles. His answer was, UM, yeah, I don't. Why, Like,

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>why do you did you hear I only had one? Like?

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? And I don't even know if

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I could, honestly with a straight face ask anybody you know, dude,

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you got both your Like, honestly, you got both those

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>things hanging Lord? What what's going on here? Week day

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>on your popular podcast providers Can't get enough Fantasy Football,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo Experts is launched there ATFL Fantasy Football package, which

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 1>anywhere here on the Internet, and Davis Madig and the

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Rugo Experts are providing honesty, season long betting, best ball

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and NFL Draft content every day of the year to

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>give you an edge regardless of what type of fantasy

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 1>football you play. Save temper sent at roto experts dot

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>com with the promo code evan T s Y. It's

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL three Fantasy football package only at Roto Experts

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Joined the Experts live on the air every

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>day by calling in at April four, seven nine to

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>join the Fantasy Sports Network. Cash to Go Over the

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Green podcast each week on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is a daily ronod crew goes and breaks down the

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>upcoming PGA tournament from a fantasy perspective, going through the green, teks,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>course history, pg A, betting one done, fantasy picks, and

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>much more. Separate yourself from the field and go over

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Green with Daily Rhodo this fantasy golf season. It's

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on AudioBoom, iTunes, Google Play. That you're and your favorite

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast provider. All right, we're back with you here Fantasy

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>best friends forever. And then I have a bit of

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a personal dilemma here of what I need to do

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.479
<v Speaker 1>as a keeper. So in my league, I'm keeping four guys,

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one of them being non Arnado. Fine, that's not part

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of the story. Head right is head to head categories.

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. Keeping No. One hour Nas that's one of

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>my keepers. I have Blake Snell in the I'm going

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep Blake Snell. Now I have two more spots

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for three guys, to which are starting pitchers. Obviously Franks

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>will pine on this a bunch of ready. I could

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>keep Wheeler in the ninth, I could keep Corvin in

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the eleven, I can keep Justin Turner. In which two

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>of those threes will you keep? I'm gonna be honest,

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Rhodo guy, but hed to head an know

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 1>how important pitching is. Yep, I'm definitely keeping Corbin. Okay,

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the move to Washington and I like that ball.

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So it comes down to Wheeler or Turner correct and

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's a keeper. Yes, I mean j T.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I love that bad. I really do. Mm hmmm.

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>For the keeper aspect, I'll probably go Wheeler and the

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>head to head pitching thing. I think in this format

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you can you can keep Wheeler, throwback Turner, and maybe

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>get Turner. I'm gonna take that gamble, and that's that's

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>completely fair. And I've been leaning towards keeping just Justin

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Turner as the guy because he's so good in the

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>head to head four and basically what amounts to a

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>points leave with some of our categories, and he's he's amazing,

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he's absolutely fantastic in it. But Frank's like, I think

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you should just keep all three pictures. You grab one

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:57.839
<v Speaker 1>more picture early and then you know the worry about

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>pitching for a very long time. So Franks saying, keep Wheelers, Snell,

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and Corvin, draft an ace, and you get your first

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>four starting pitchers and don't look back. That's what Frank

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like that. I definitely like that that theory.

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, I knew matt Emo was gonna

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>agree with me. But it also helps to know that

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you have the first pick and have to keeper league.

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>But Mookie Bets is being thrown, so you're taking Mookie first.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>At your two or three turn, you'll probably grab another

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher there. But given the fact that it's a

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>keeper league and every twelve teams to keep up to

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>four players, there's already forty eight pictures, not just pictures.

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>There's so you know, I do that you're not gonna

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna get a great I don't know who

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you're what's starting picture you're gonna get there the two

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>three turns, I don't know, you might get like actually

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>one of these like tie Own, like maybe Clevinger. You

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>know what, I have a so I have an idea

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of who I will get. You give me a second.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It's all right, Greig, take your time live radio live.

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you do what bets. I think you know,

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>having those three pictures and they head form. Lets you

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>already have the third basement in arrea not so you don't.

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of makes it easier to throw

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>justin turner back, like do you play with a corner infielder? Nope?

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Utility though, so he would be all right, well you

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know we have we have we have two utilities to

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be fair, not as big of a need because you

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>already have the third base. Alright, So I think this

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is the right document that i'm opening. Yes, okay, So

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the picture that I'm looking to on the board, I'm

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>expecting to be if Walker Vieweller. If it's not Walker

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Bueller in the top picture on the board, give or take,

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is James Paxton, Steven Strassburg, Zactdrinky Jamison Tyan like that

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>tier Okay that maybe look if well, how is Walker Bueller?

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>How many people can keep four? Keep four? The guy

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that has Walker Vieweler's a lot of people to keep

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's very impressive, not gone, he might not, might not.

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But my point is Buller the keeper league Bueller is

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna let how many twelve? I don't know, it's very

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 1>close it's very close. Definitely take him if if you

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>were obviously you want to take a starting pitture, like

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>if I'm just like ranking those guys with James Paxson

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>is the highest rank wealth of bombs, and you're gonna

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have back to back pitch here at the two three tone.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe I'm gonna said the head points thing

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is not my game, but j because I just know

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 1>how good that Pat hasn't roto let alone, you know,

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in real life, So then maybe I would go with

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>turn it if you really have a possibility of a

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Bueller at a Paxton right there, and then you've got

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>three hitters and four pictures, so I don't know, alright,

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so tough, okay, fair enough? Um I mentioned Patrick Corbyn

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's I believe the fifteen pitcher off the border,

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so um, yeah, he's happen up now with Yeah, yes,

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right, he's the fourteen now right after Bueller

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and Sindergarten. He's not right after, he's eleven picks later,

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's the next pitcher up an NFBC ADP. And

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where we left off yesterday. I realdn't

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 1>really get into Patrick or Friday. Rather, we don't really

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get into Patrick Corbyn. Um like the top right, So

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Orbyn is good, good ones to kind of jump

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>off to. Now, Matt and Corbyn, you said you're you know,

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>on him this year with the move to Washington. Now

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at all some of the advanced numbers, they're

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>all pretty good With Cordy. I think we all kind

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of waited for it to fall off with him. Didn't

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>happen last year. How come you're jumping back, you know,

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbyn this year? I mean I think maybe you know, realistically,

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if he did just three r A, I'm

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>totally fine with that. Uh. If he can you know,

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>withstand and repeat with the innings, you're gonna get a

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of strikeouts as well. Look, you only have to

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have him for one year. The Nationals are on the

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>hook for six years, so you know it's a totally different,

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>uh mindset. There is just slide is one of the

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>best pitches in all of baseball. We were waiting for

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.320
<v Speaker 1>him to really make stat the injuries and stuff. It

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>finally came through fruition and I, like I said, I'm

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not pray, but he pitches two D strike apps something

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>like that should win a bunch of games too in Washington.

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Something just doesn't feel right about. I liked him last

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>year too, but now you're paying the premium for him

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>because he's going in the fourth round. So now you

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>have to pay up for what he gave you last year.

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And it was a contract year. I'm not saying, you know, oh,

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it's contract year. There's no way he can come close

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to what he was doing last year. But you know,

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the velocity kind of like dipped, and I know it

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>came back towards the end of the season in terms

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of the fastball velocity. But you know, a lot of

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:38.720
<v Speaker 1>some things that I've read about him was that his slider,

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>according to FanGraph pitch values, was the best slider in

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>baseball last year. And you know he threw at forty

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the time, so I mean he throws

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this pitch a massive amount of time. He's his swinging

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.840
<v Speaker 1>strike rate was fifteen point six percent last year overall

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>amongst all his pitches, his pitches, that was the second

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>best in baseball behind Max Scherzer. So that he actually

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>gets to go to the Nationals and learned from a

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>guy like Max Scherzer and Pitchel inside him. I understand

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>those things, but I just don't know what made the

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>slider so good last year, Like in terms of a

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that I've read is that the pitch

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately didn't change all that much except he just threw

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it like fourteen percent more time, like it was what's up.

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>But what happens to is, you know, the more he's

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 1>throwing that fourteen percent at the time, and it's auditioned

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>by subtraction, one of his lesser pitches, he's eliminating fourteen

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:29.839
<v Speaker 1>percent at a time to say, So that really does

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>play like I think you know when piget your starts

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>to harness and you should say a lot of these

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>slide bulk slider curve guys, you know, really focusing on that.

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I thin think it's auditioned by subtraction. The more where

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you use a better weapon, and unless you use something inferior,

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the better you're gonna bab I hear you. It kind

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense. I hear you on it. But the

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.439
<v Speaker 1>herd the hard hit rate was also really high last

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.399
<v Speaker 1>year to like forty seven was second in baseball behind

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>my guy Cole Hamile's. So I don't know. Something just

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>seems off about him, like maybe it's just like like

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>an intuition thing kind of. I don't hate him. I

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>still have him ranked like inside my topic. Yeah, but

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like whenever he's the top, you don't go

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in his direction. I have him as SP eight teen,

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so I have him just Clevinger, tay On Flaherty. I

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I feel like you're paying up. I like

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Corn better than those guys. Yeah, I know a lot

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of people do. I don't think he's gonna be on

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>my team at that price. It's fine, that's fine. Um

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in this tier though, Matt, you heard some names just

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>now from Frankie. But the name I don't want to

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 1>bring up before we get into a Paxner time. Even

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>more is his teammate Steven Shotsburg, who I think it

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense in this area. Shotsburg is

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy that, as we said last week, frank he

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that the gram synderguard bum Garners here last year

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and then he got hurt kind of as he always

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>tends to do. You're getting Shotsburg now around pick sixty one.

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He's the eighteen pitcher off the board directly by I'm

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Paxson in town. But I think you can probably make

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>an argument that it's Strasburg below is a little bit

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier than them. Meanie, are you you know Steven Strasburger,

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this you met at its price? I am, yeah, I

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 1>understand it's pretty much every year you gotta deal with this, uh,

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, injury and stuff like that. The fastball velocity

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was concerning that a dipped when he came back. He

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>did focus more on the changeup, which is his money pitch.

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But remember one thing, Strasburg and I've been chasing this

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>dragon for years, the peripherals, the area indicas just two

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>good year in a year out. But remember one thing.

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 1>He's one year removed from what a fantastic season, the

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 1>reason we were all drafting him earlier. It's a major headache.

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I get some people don't want to deal with it,

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but I mean the talent is there. You're not paying

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a premium price anymore. Look, you're still paying you know,

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:54.479
<v Speaker 1>early fifth round price, which is expensive. I'm not saying

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not, but you're not paying that second or third round.

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So if he's my number two, I'm gonna take that

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.879
<v Speaker 1>gamble because even if he gives you one fifty one

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 1>six strikes out a hundred eight batters and three r A.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what, that's a hell of the picture. I

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.839
<v Speaker 1>mean after you're hoping you can get from a lot

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of the other guys that are going to go after Yeah,

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna be on my team yet. Like the

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Nats in general, clearly I like Max first round there.

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Look with Strassburg, it's it just it comes down to

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the injuries as well. I can't deny the talent that's there.

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, over ten cas per nine the

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:36.800
<v Speaker 1>whip should be solid as well. But he's averaged a

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty one endings pissed for season throughout his career,

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he's only gone gone over two d pitch once. I

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think what Matt said about, you know, kind of projecting

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty innings, that makes sense for Steven Strossberg. Like

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>something that we did with Will Myers, right is I

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>looked up his his inside injuries page and kind of

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>listed all his injuries. So this was what I had

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>last year from Steven Strotsberg when I looked at his

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>inside injuries page to rotator cuff sprain, great, two ligament sprain, great,

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to muscle sprain, a C joint sprain, bone contusion, discarniation

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in his neck. Now I'm not dr a no, but

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that does not sound good. That doesn't sound good. If

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you're a starting pitcher and talked DR about Steven this week, Yeah,

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we should probably talk to him about Steven Strotsburg and

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Steve Now Steve. Another thing thing that Matt mentioned was

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is it this like, is this his his oft injured

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>altar personality? You know? Um? But you know, something else

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that Maddiemo mentioned here about him is that the velocity

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>decline when he returned to So another thing that's hard

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to judge Steven Strotsburg is you can't really judge the

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>skills from when he returns from injury because you don't

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>know if he's pitching through injury. Like it's like you

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>can't even you don't even know when he's pitching whether

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.239
<v Speaker 1>he's helped right, right, So it's just kind of hard

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>to trust. You know what, I thought that you would

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>coming into this draf Secene. I thought you would have

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:57.880
<v Speaker 1>got more of a discount of Strotsburg. I thought Strostsburg

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>would have been been going closer to like this Louise

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Castile range. I'm being perfectly. Honest, I thought it would

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have been more of like a sixth round pick. But

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he is going in that fifth round range. He's going

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>right after like pax Stone and all these other guys,

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, right around the Barrios range in the

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>fifth round where you know you can get him as

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:14.280
<v Speaker 1>your sp two. I thought you would have been getting

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a discount, to be honest, Well, what I'm

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting in is like as a player, Frank, Yeah, so

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna but what do you when he's out there,

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he's usually pretty like the rich Hill effect on steroids precisely.

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like when you know he's gonna only give you

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty and sixty endings. But when he's out there,

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when he pitches on a perse start peranning, basically he's

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very good. So look, if you want to

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>take him, that's fine, Like you know what you're gonna

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 1>get out of Strasburg, and if he ends up going

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 1>one eighty, then you profit a lot on this picture.

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>But you also you also need to know, like when

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you're taking him, the pictures that you take after what

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't take a lot of other injury risks after

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 1>him like you kind of have to build in like

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and you take Tanaka. Then after that, like maybe you

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have to leave a few of these guys. Were like,

0:52:57.640 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you're gonna get any out of them like

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>an arch or or like a Jose Acontana or something

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, where like you're gonna have to get anyings

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere, you know what I'm saying. So like it's

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a roster construction thing. What were gonna say, Man, No,

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you said that perfect roster construction. But I

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>mean the case when him is the case with James Paxson.

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, James Paxson has top five stuff in the league.

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:19.840
<v Speaker 1>If the Yankees get a hundred and eighty innings or

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>more out of James Paxton, that is a winfull of

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>riches for any fantasy owner that gets him in whatever

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the fourth round or something like that.

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you had, if you drafted an Ache, then

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you have two aces on your team. As I said,

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:37.720
<v Speaker 1>once again, does not come without risk. But that talent

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is you know. That's but the point you made, I

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think is imperative when you take guys like this. Later

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on you argue to you guys a Jose A. Kontana

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes a more valuable asset to you because you know

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a hundred eighty innings out of him.

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually write an article on the Athletic matt that where

0:53:57.600 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>where Nando was kind of like pulling all these writers

0:54:00.520 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and stuff and they they talked about when Jose Cantana

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 1>came back last year, or like he did something. He

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 1>moved himself on the rubber, like this is what I'm

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about, where he made a tangible change and his

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 1>final twelve starts he pitched like a three six e

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>r a with like awe strikeout. Now, that's closer to

0:54:15.880 --> 0:54:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the Jose Kanana that we've seen throughout his career. So

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he made a change and he got better because of

0:54:21.400 --> 0:54:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that change. So these are things that like I pay

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>attention to that where Okay, I am a little bit

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>more apt by Jose Kantana now, whereas earlier on in

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the draft season he was kind of just an afterthought.

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I got him in the Great Fantasy Baseball

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Invitation as my fifth starting pitcher. You get Jose Cantana

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as your fifth starting pitcher. I feel pretty good about that.

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 1>So those are type of things where I'm looking at,

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 1>where if someone made a change to where they were

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>pretending on the rubber or to adding a new pitch.

0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that was something big that Mike Florio,

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>our guy, looked into a Blake Snell heading into last season,

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>was that he changed where he was pitching on the

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:54.439
<v Speaker 1>rubber or you know, it was something along those lines

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>where like a mechanical change, he did something differently and

0:54:57.360 --> 0:54:59.799
<v Speaker 1>he got better in a second half two years ago

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that carried over into the next season. These are kind

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of like the little things that when you're splitting hairs

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you need to find these kind of things that make

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a picture stand out differently than other pictures going in

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:16.399
<v Speaker 1>their range. Was going to chime in there. I figured

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd step back for the second. No, He's French, right, Yes,

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>change things that you can look to, whether it's on

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the rubber, whether it's mixing up the pitch, mix throwing

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one pitch more, uh, discarding another picture that has not

0:55:30.680 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>been effective. So I mean, these are things you really

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 1>do need to focus on. And look at what Blake

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Snow did when he came back in August. He changed

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>up his repertoire. I mean, you look at look at

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the the percentage of pitches he threw and how he

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>threw them. So I mean, even when you're good, there

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are things you can get better at. And but even

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>if can Tana pitched to a three NB year, right,

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>if he gave me those innings, if you're taking risk

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 1>of your guys earlier, to Frank's point, you do need

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to fill them in with these guys that will give

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you anings and could be under four R Mattimo, we

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>only have like a minute left here with you with James.

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>With James Paxson, the home runs went from nine seventeen

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to twenty three last year. Now he moves over to

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Yankee Stadium, Is that something that you worry about? Yeah,

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the long will is worried some. The fact that he's

0:56:22.320 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>left handed and I think helps him out in that park.

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But I'm always getting bet on the talent here. For me,

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the main concern with Paxton is the health. It's not

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark I'd prefer him to be pitching in Safego,

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I don't like the Yankees number one

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>head number two, but he should get a bunch of

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:44.240
<v Speaker 1>four wins with that team. So over the past three seasons,

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Greg James Packson three five two year grade one point

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one six with that's that's the top five team. Start

0:56:49.719 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>me Moodiga, follow him at CTM Baseball and webody has

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to say at the Athletic Manics appreciate time. We'll do

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:59.359
<v Speaker 1>it again next week. Thanks gentlemen. Absolutely with data break

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever series dext