Speaker 1: Ahead on American Sunrise, Tucker Carlson unveiling a ten point
Speaker 1: vision for America's future.
Speaker 2: Could it signal a twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: Eight White House bid or even a brand new political party.
Speaker 2: We're going to give our takes. Plus.
Speaker 1: The fallout from doctor Anthony Fauci's hearing continues. After pleading
Speaker 1: the fifth more than one hundred times last week, A
Speaker 1: Senate committee set to vote this morning on whether to hold.
Speaker 2: Him in contempt. Will it move forward?
Speaker 1: The result happening live in our show and later. The
Speaker 1: Trump administration has refunded roughly one hundred billion.
Speaker 2: Dollars in tariff payments.
Speaker 1: So what's the White House's next move and what could
Speaker 1: it mean for American businesses, consumers, and the economy. That
Speaker 1: story so much more, as American Sunrise starts right now.
Speaker 2: Good morning, America.
Speaker 3: Welcome to American Sunrise.
Speaker 4: Whether it's culture, we have breaking he was to share
Speaker 4: with you politics.
Speaker 1: President Trump is joining us live now from Florida.
Speaker 5: You've got your couple.
Speaker 2: This is what it looks like to be a patriot.
Speaker 6: We have to protect the American family.
Speaker 3: The American dream is still alive.
Speaker 2: I'm David Brody, I'm Terrence and.
Speaker 3: I'm doctor Gina.
Speaker 4: Good morning everybody. I'm doctor Gina. We are live with
Speaker 4: you from the Palm Beacheres. Let's bring in David Brodie.
Speaker 4: He's in Washington, DC. Terence Bates in our Denver newsroom.
Speaker 4: Good morning, gentlemen.
Speaker 1: Helloa, sounds very business like this morning, good morning, good morning.
Speaker 4: Well, I'll tell you to be honest. So this morning
Speaker 4: I didn't think I had time to I didn't have
Speaker 4: a lot of breakfast that I usually bring a bunch
Speaker 4: of snacks with me. But I found my little Sam
Speaker 4: had stuck a bag of chocolate chip cookies he made
Speaker 4: in my bag and I didn't know it. So I
Speaker 4: found him, and I had this beautiful hot cup of
Speaker 4: coffee that Matthew had just made me and my sammy cookies,
Speaker 4: and I had I'm like, I have to do this.
Speaker 3: So I dipped it intok, a little bite, and then
Speaker 3: I'm like, uh oh, I have to go on air.
Speaker 3: That's what happened. That's the reality.
Speaker 4: So if there's chocolate chips in my teeth, you can
Speaker 4: blame Sammy, Okay, it's always.
Speaker 6: About the chocolate chip cookies in coffee.
Speaker 4: I wish I could I know, Champion, I know like,
Speaker 4: was I really once I once I saw this sitting
Speaker 4: together right here in front of me, like God just
Speaker 4: said it in my life? Was I really not going
Speaker 4: to dip that cookie and take one little bite even
Speaker 4: though I had like three seconds to air?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 2: No, that was God's will for your life this morning.
Speaker 5: There's no doubt about absolutely.
Speaker 6: Sorry, Hey guys, So let's talk about this Tucker Carlson
Speaker 6: ten point manifestos. It's been called Axios has this headline
Speaker 6: which reads Tucker Carlson unveil's ten point manifesto amid third
Speaker 6: party speculation. I'm going to call it similar to what
Speaker 6: David called it. It's ten point vision for America.
Speaker 5: Here's the points here.
Speaker 6: I'm just gonna read these real quickly, fair, sovereign, productive, beauty, full, healthy, honest, optimistic, wise, decent, united.
Speaker 6: Those are the ten points that he lays out in
Speaker 6: this vision, as I'm.
Speaker 5: Going to call it.
Speaker 6: Others are calling it a manifesto, but David and doctor
Speaker 6: Gina obviously there's a speculation about this new party launch,
Speaker 6: but it's not a platform, it's just these ideals. I
Speaker 6: would quite honestly see these ten points, David, as a
Speaker 6: code of conduct.
Speaker 5: If you will Yeah, that's.
Speaker 2: Probably a better way to say it.
Speaker 1: I mean, why doesn't he just continue on and say
Speaker 1: like awesome and cool and nice. I mean, come on,
Speaker 1: I mean, this isn't a manifesto, this isn't even a vision.
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, I'm a big fan of honesty.
Speaker 1: I'm a big fair fan of fairness and a lot
Speaker 1: of the things that he's talking about. So I mean,
Speaker 1: this idea that you know he has any sort of
Speaker 1: concrete plan that's coming, it's not here now. So do
Speaker 1: me a favor, Tucker, give me a call. Not that
Speaker 1: he has myself, but give me a call when you
Speaker 1: actually have a concrete plan. At this point, it's just
Speaker 1: a bunch of here comes the word of the day.
Speaker 1: As you know, we say it a lot. It's a
Speaker 1: bunch of generic gobbligook. That's what it really is to me.
Speaker 1: Once again, I'm not disparaging it. Well, I guess I
Speaker 1: just did by saying gobligook. But what I'm saying is
Speaker 1: that there's no concrete plan yet, and that would be
Speaker 1: what I'm waiting for.
Speaker 2: The rest of this is like, yeah, who doesn't believe
Speaker 2: in honesty? I mean, unless you're a liberal obviously, or fairness.
Speaker 4: But Gina, your take, well, we definitely need more of
Speaker 4: all of that in our body politic, There's no question
Speaker 4: about it. I'm glad the conversation is happening. I am
Speaker 4: not one of those who thinks that we shouldn't have
Speaker 4: this conversation. I'm very open to the conversation. I just
Speaker 4: am really hoping that we can somehow you sweep all
Speaker 4: this broken glass back together and put it in a
Speaker 4: mighty refined dustpan in time for emptying it on the
Speaker 4: Democrats in the midterms. Because I'm very concerned about this.
Speaker 4: I'm really concerned. I'm really concerned, and I tried to
Speaker 4: listen to this. I maybe was listening to the wrong thing.
Speaker 4: I was trying to listen to a podcast last night,
Speaker 4: and it was very fatalistic. Right at first, was that
Speaker 4: it was that the right one.
Speaker 3: No, okay, so I the wrong thing. But I do think, doctor.
Speaker 6: Gena, we do have a clip from last night. Let's
Speaker 6: play that real quickly, because I did skip over the guys.
Speaker 6: Let's play this clip real quick and then you can
Speaker 6: kind of finish your thought.
Speaker 5: If that's okay, Doctor.
Speaker 7: G Somebody needs to begin work immediately on one question,
Speaker 7: which is what unites all of us.
Speaker 8: It's probably not going to be that.
Speaker 7: Hard because most of the divisions that we think are irreparable,
Speaker 7: they're chasms. There's no way I have anything in common
Speaker 7: with that person, and my daughter married him, I'd freak out.
Speaker 7: Most of those divisions are artificial. They were actually foist
Speaker 7: out on us by our leaders, who's in competence and
Speaker 7: graf a cover. There are smart people who have been
Speaker 7: saying this for a long time. It's not to say
Speaker 7: there weren't natural differences between people. Of course there are,
Speaker 7: including between races. Of course there are. But are they
Speaker 7: bigger than the things we have in common? No, they're not.
Speaker 7: But they've been exacerbated and inflamed and intentionally highlighted as
Speaker 7: part of a long term project to divert attention from
Speaker 7: what is now very obviously true, which is that both
Speaker 7: parties have colluded against the population to make their lives
Speaker 7: better and our lives worse. There's kind of no arguing
Speaker 7: that that's a fact at this point.
Speaker 4: Is that what you were thinking about, doctor g No,
Speaker 4: I think I listened to the wrong thing last night.
Speaker 4: I'm not really good at operating YouTube videos, unfortunately, and
Speaker 4: I was trying to find it last night on YouTube,
Speaker 4: and I think I listened to the wrong thing. But no,
Speaker 4: you know what, listen, Constructive criticism is a good thing.
Speaker 4: Competition is actually a good thing. It makes us stronger,
Speaker 4: and being questioned is a good thing. So for those
Speaker 4: of us who I mean, at least for me, I'm
Speaker 4: a person who has been wrong so many times in
Speaker 4: my life. I'm always glad when someone is saying, hey,
Speaker 4: are you doing this right? Are you really thinking about
Speaker 4: this clearly? What about if you thought about this instead?
Speaker 4: A lot of times that's my children these days. But
Speaker 4: I'm ready to have the conversation. I hope Tucker calls,
Speaker 4: let's have him on the show, let's talk about it.
Speaker 4: I think I think there's a lot of conversations we had.
Speaker 4: What I don't want is for us to continue alienating
Speaker 4: people in our own party because we don't listen. I
Speaker 4: think that's really important, not saying that we have to
Speaker 4: agree with them.
Speaker 3: Nobody said that.
Speaker 4: I don't agree with Tucker on any of the on
Speaker 4: any of the terror stuff that he goes into. I
Speaker 4: don't even understand it. I've tried to understand. I don't
Speaker 4: understand it. I don't know, I could go on all
Speaker 4: day about that, because I pray about this and think
Speaker 4: about this probably about fifteen hours a day. Honestly, I'm
Speaker 4: very concerned for the future of our country because I
Speaker 4: have five amazing children and a grand baby on the way,
Speaker 4: you know, and I want things to go well, and
Speaker 4: because I love the Lord and.
Speaker 3: I want him to be glorified and all of it.
Speaker 4: All right, let's check out today's Bible verse that was
Speaker 4: sent to us by Susan Schipe, North Carolina from the
Speaker 4: YouTube chat. If you're not in our YouTube chat, please
Speaker 4: get in there. Send us your favorite Bible verse. Colassians
Speaker 4: one ten is the verse today that you may walk
Speaker 4: worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing him, being fruitful in
Speaker 4: every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God.
Speaker 4: All right, let's bring in former Trump spokesworsu person.
Speaker 3: Liz Harrington.
Speaker 4: Liz, it's always great to see you, Liz. I don't
Speaker 4: think there's any doubt that someone from that table, that
Speaker 4: infamous table shot we saw the other day, is going
Speaker 4: to be very involved at the grassroots level and probably
Speaker 4: a third party unless there's some major reconciliation that happens
Speaker 4: in the meantime. Is there a way we continue to
Speaker 4: win midterms for a conservative Christians. I guess that's really
Speaker 4: my question.
Speaker 9: Well, good morning, and doesn't it kind of seem the
Speaker 9: point to contrary to what Tucker was saying there, to divide,
Speaker 9: divide the party, try to make it harder for us
Speaker 9: to win, for Republicans to whin. I didn't even say,
Speaker 9: you know, for us, because honestly a lot of points
Speaker 9: that he's making, some of them are true, but you
Speaker 9: have to go back and look at the broader picture.
Speaker 3: You know, why is that true?
Speaker 10: Yes, the two parties have worked together.
Speaker 9: And pitted people against each other and gotten rich and
Speaker 9: rigged the system. And well, who exposed all that?
Speaker 3: President Donald J.
Speaker 2: Trump?
Speaker 9: And why are you then turning against him when that's
Speaker 9: the battle he's fighting.
Speaker 2: That's the battle he's waging.
Speaker 9: Get the fights with the Senate. You can't even get
Speaker 9: the basic agenda through, we can't get recess appointments through
Speaker 9: all these different things that the Republican Senate.
Speaker 2: Has slow walks.
Speaker 9: So why are you then turning your fire against the
Speaker 9: one man who.
Speaker 3: Has really made all of this possible for us to see.
Speaker 9: Clearly what was happening in Washington with the corruption who
Speaker 9: put everything on the line to stand against it, whose
Speaker 9: one goal is to try to fix this country and
Speaker 9: make it great again. It just doesn't make sense, and
Speaker 9: so then you have to look what is the real
Speaker 9: motivation behind this. It sounds like you're trying to divide us,
Speaker 9: trying to make it harder for President Trump to be successful,
Speaker 9: which should be all of our goals. If you want
Speaker 9: to have constructive criticism, tell him, try to help him
Speaker 9: get past these battles, because that's how we can fix things,
Speaker 9: not by taking votes away, which honestly, I don't think
Speaker 9: is going to be very successful. This is not going
Speaker 9: to be a very successful third party, if that's what
Speaker 9: it is.
Speaker 1: Liz, not that you're a Polster, but what's your sense
Speaker 1: of this wing of MAGA. They call themselves America First.
Speaker 1: There's clearly a difference now between America First and MAGA.
Speaker 2: Though obviously MAGA is America First.
Speaker 1: But they're positioning themselves different than the overall MAGA.
Speaker 2: I'm curious what percentage do.
Speaker 1: You think roughly this wing of MAGA has call it
Speaker 1: the isolationist wing, called the non interventionist wing. They always
Speaker 1: talk about how President Trump said no more foreign wars,
Speaker 1: that's actually not what he said. What he said is
Speaker 1: no more endless foreign wars, and there's a big difference.
Speaker 1: And he also said Aron is never going to have
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapon on a campaign trills did they miss
Speaker 1: that part as well.
Speaker 2: So they're being disingenuous exactly, and.
Speaker 3: That's my problem with it.
Speaker 9: They're misconstruing what President Trump's believes, who actually has been
Speaker 9: very consistent. I mean, you can go back to the
Speaker 9: eighties and nineties. He's saying the exact same thing about China,
Speaker 9: he's saying the exact same thing about Iran, and his
Speaker 9: actions follow through. So it is disingenuous, and honestly, they've
Speaker 9: all been it seems personal. They've all been, you know,
Speaker 9: personally their jobs taken away or they you know, got
Speaker 9: into this mess themselves and President Trump didn't bail them out,
Speaker 9: like when it comes to Marjorie Taylor Green and now
Speaker 9: they're on this vendetta.
Speaker 10: I saw Jeffrey Clark alluded to a couple of weeks
Speaker 10: ago Rick Wilson formerly being as part of intelligence and
Speaker 10: kind of suggesting that the whole Lincoln project was an
Speaker 10: intelligence op.
Speaker 9: And it made me laugh because I'm like, is this
Speaker 9: the same type of thing. Is this the best they
Speaker 9: can come up with?
Speaker 3: You know? MTG.
Speaker 9: Massey Tucker, the Lincoln Project types.
Speaker 3: The Lincoln Project didn't work it certainly.
Speaker 9: I mean, it maybe gave some fodder for the fake news,
Speaker 9: which nobody trusts anyway, nobody cares.
Speaker 2: Nobody listens to.
Speaker 9: But is this the best they've got? I don't think
Speaker 9: it's very high. If you're asking a percentage, maybe five percent.
Speaker 9: It seems they're all aligned on one thing. They have
Speaker 9: a problem with Israel, which is very telling, and I
Speaker 9: think it honestly misconstrues the rest of their thinking on
Speaker 9: these issues. And look, President Trump has always said peace
Speaker 9: through strength. We have to project strength to be safe.
Speaker 3: On the homeland, but he's not.
Speaker 9: Again, this is longer than I think a lot of
Speaker 9: us hoped or wanted or was the plan at the
Speaker 9: beginning this entanglement with Iran. But it's not an endless war.
Speaker 9: It is not going to be a twenty year boots
Speaker 9: on the ground awful situation like we saw in the past.
Speaker 9: That's not what he does. So again, you're absolutely right, David,
Speaker 9: they miscontrue what he's doing, and again to divide and
Speaker 9: to hurt a movement, which has been the most successful
Speaker 9: placeolitical movement that we've seen, and a real opportunity to
Speaker 9: fix Washington, to help our country and root out corruption.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Liss Harrington, I still remember hopping on the Trump
Speaker 4: bus the very first time I met you. I believe
Speaker 4: we were somewhere here in Florida was his announcement. Remember
Speaker 4: that extremely hot Florida day, and we were on the
Speaker 4: trunk bus and we were cleaning really fast because the
Speaker 4: Trump family was coming and we wanted it to look nice.
Speaker 3: Remember that. I was like, who's taking the toilet? Girl?
Speaker 4: All right, Liz Harrington, thank you so much. It's a
Speaker 4: it's been a long hike for President Trump, hasn't it
Speaker 4: it HAPs.
Speaker 9: There's more to go and people should stay united and
Speaker 9: stay the course.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, thank you for being with us. All right, Coming up,
Speaker 4: we're going to check out the hottest headlines from the
Speaker 4: RAVS newsroom with Terrence Bates. So you're not gonna want
Speaker 4: to go anywhere, because we're going to be with you
Speaker 4: for the next two hours, almost right here in Real
Speaker 4: America's Voice.
Speaker 11: Newsbreak is brought to you by amac Association of Mature
Speaker 11: American Citizens.
Speaker 1: Or New York If you look closely. You got to
Speaker 1: look closely, you'll see it. There's on MANDAMI literally ruining
Speaker 1: the city.
Speaker 2: It's in there. It's in that picture somewhere. Actually it's
Speaker 2: in the entire five borough area. Welcome back to everybody,
Speaker 2: to American Sunrise. I'm David Brody. All right, let's get
Speaker 2: to teammates.
Speaker 1: He's got the role, America's voice, snooze headlines, and it's
Speaker 1: all sponsored by AMAC.
Speaker 12: Our country is under attack.
Speaker 5: The America we know is at risk of not being
Speaker 5: that way.
Speaker 12: The radical left wants to destroy America.
Speaker 2: We're not going to let that happen.
Speaker 12: The younger generation needs you to stand up and lead.
Speaker 13: It's an inside out strategy.
Speaker 12: This is more than an organization, this is a movement.
Speaker 5: We're here to say the country.
Speaker 12: AMAC is a family, over two million patriots strong.
Speaker 8: I am an AMAC member.
Speaker 12: By the way, AMAC gives you the training, resources and
Speaker 12: tools to be a citizen soldier.
Speaker 5: Each one of us can make a difference, and that's
Speaker 5: what AMAC shows every day.
Speaker 12: Plus real benefits like travel discounts, insurance and medicare guidance.
Speaker 12: We are stronger together.
Speaker 9: Our rights don't come from government, Our rights come from God.
Speaker 12: Rav family Let's stand with AMAC.
Speaker 14: To extinguish all the evil that we see around us.
Speaker 12: Scan the QR code right now or go to AMAC
Speaker 12: dot us slash RAB and let's take our country back together.
Speaker 6: On the heels of self proclaimed progressive Abdul Lsayed Senate
Speaker 6: primary win in Michigan, President Trump taking aim at the
Speaker 6: Democrat candidate and the socialist movement and the Democrat Party
Speaker 6: in general while in Las Vegas on Wednesday forty seven,
Speaker 6: saying if the country rolls the Democratic Socialist of America's dice,
Speaker 6: well it's going to crap out.
Speaker 15: Mianism is the greatest threat to our country in its history,
Speaker 15: including even World War One, World War two, Pearl Harbor
Speaker 15: nine to eleven. I think it's the greatest threat.
Speaker 6: As for Lsi ed, while he claims that he's a
Speaker 6: progressive and not a socialist, he is widely considered to
Speaker 6: be a socialist slash communist. He'll face Republican and former
Speaker 6: Michigan Congressman Mike Rodgers in November's general election. The Centers
Speaker 6: for Disease Control and Prevention has a new director this
Speaker 6: morning after the Senate confirmed doctor Erica Schwartz to lead
Speaker 6: the public health agency. The fifty four year old one
Speaker 6: confirmation in a fifty one to forty.
Speaker 5: Four vote on Wednesday.
Speaker 6: Schwartz brings both medical and law degrees to the position,
Speaker 6: along with having served as Deputy Surgeon General. She's taking
Speaker 6: over an embattled agency that has lost more than a
Speaker 6: quarter of a time workforce Since President Trump returned to office.
Speaker 6: The CDC has reportedly seen more than three thousand layoffs
Speaker 6: and resignations. Schwartz is President Trump's third nominee to lead
Speaker 6: the nation's leading public health agency. The previous director, Susan
Speaker 6: Monterez one confirmation, but was then fired less than a
Speaker 6: month in as the administration said she just wasn't aligned
Speaker 6: with the President's agenda. That's a quick check of your headlines. Now,
Speaker 6: let's get a quick check of your forecast. Weather Nation
Speaker 6: meteorologists Tracy Anthony standing by it with what you can expect. Tracy,
Speaker 6: it is a crazy time. On one coast, you're dealing
Speaker 6: with way too much rain and flooding. On the other coast,
Speaker 6: not enough rain and wildfires.
Speaker 5: What's going on?
Speaker 16: Yeah, definitely, we've been kind of stuck in this same
Speaker 16: stalled out weather pattern and we will continue to have
Speaker 16: moisture working on shore across parts of the East Coast.
Speaker 16: So yesterday we saw the gentleman wading through the waters
Speaker 16: in Norfolk, Virginia, and now we've got a jet ski
Speaker 16: that's you know, hey, that's probably the best way to
Speaker 16: cruise because that truck that's driving in the water not
Speaker 16: going to be a good idea. So I've never been
Speaker 16: to Norfolk, but it looks pretty interesting. These areas will
Speaker 16: have a chance for severe storms today and tomorrow. The
Speaker 16: big threat is going to be damaging winds. So we
Speaker 16: do have an onshore flow that's bringing in some warm,
Speaker 16: humid air and that's what's going to help fuel the
Speaker 16: thunderstorm activity. So could have some significant downpours into the
Speaker 16: weekend and some localized flooding. But it's keeping areas like
Speaker 16: Boston up in the nineties and that feel like temperature
Speaker 16: will be close to triple digits now out west, areas
Speaker 16: like Vegas one twelve today. You were at one thirteen yesterday,
Speaker 16: that tied your previous record. And overnight lows are trending
Speaker 16: on the warm side as well, so overnight temperatures staying
Speaker 16: in the nineties for areas like Vegas, so they're not
Speaker 16: getting any relief from the heat. And Terrence, you mentioned
Speaker 16: the fire situation. The Spokene Complex fire is three different
Speaker 16: that are kind of just north of the city of Spokane,
Speaker 16: have burned over eight hundred buildings and evacuated hundreds of people. Terrence,
Speaker 16: it's a really serious situation. And this is a video
Speaker 16: from the National Guard and it just shows the terrain
Speaker 16: that these crews are battling. You know, they have got
Speaker 16: the steep, hilly terrain along with record potential high temperatures
Speaker 16: all weekend.
Speaker 5: Wow.
Speaker 6: Yeah, just to look at that fire, it's out of
Speaker 6: control still. Unfortunately they haven't gotten it fully under control
Speaker 6: just yet. All right, Tracy, we appreciate it once again, folks.
Speaker 6: As Tracy always tells you, you can scan that QR
Speaker 6: code there at the bottom of your screen and you
Speaker 6: have direct access to our friends over at weather Nation.
Speaker 5: Good to see you. Will check in with you next hour.
Speaker 8: All right.
Speaker 6: Up Next, Victor Choken is telling a side of the story.
Speaker 6: The former Ukrainian prosecutor at the center of the Biden
Speaker 6: Bereisma controversy is laying out his version of what happened,
Speaker 6: what he alleges and who he blamed. Find out why
Speaker 6: the story is back in the spotlight. That's next here
Speaker 6: on American Sunrise.
Speaker 2: That's Wildwood, New Jersey. Remember Trump had that big rally there.
Speaker 1: What was it like thirty forty fifty thousand to seven million?
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 2: There was a lot of people there with Snooky.
Speaker 1: There is the real question there down on the Jersey shore.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back everybody to American Sunrise.
Speaker 1: So there's a book by former Ukrainian prosecutor General Victor
Speaker 1: choke in and who was presenting his allegations about Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and Breize mine his removal from office. So the
Speaker 1: books called Biden's Corruption and War, and Choken lays out
Speaker 1: his version of what happened. Chokin claims he was dismissed
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen because of pressure from then Vice President Biden.
Speaker 2: Pressure, he says.
Speaker 1: Was connected to an investigation involving the Ukrainian energy company Barisma,
Speaker 1: where of course Biden's son Hunter enters the picture because
Speaker 1: he served on the board. Chokin also alleges interference by
Speaker 1: both Ukrainian and US officials. Biden later publicly described pressuring
Speaker 1: Ukraine to remove Choken by threatening to withhold one billion
Speaker 1: dollar loan guarantee.
Speaker 17: Remember this, I remember going over convincing our team or
Speaker 17: brothers to convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees.
Speaker 17: And I went over, I guess the twelve thirteenth time
Speaker 17: to Kiev and I was supposed to announce that there's
Speaker 17: another billion dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a
Speaker 17: commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsunyak that they would take
Speaker 17: action against the state prosecutor.
Speaker 8: And they didn't.
Speaker 17: So they said they were walking out to press compt
Speaker 17: I said no. I said, I'm not going to or
Speaker 17: we're not going to give you the billion dollars. They said,
Speaker 17: you have no authority, you're not the president. The president said,
Speaker 17: I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you're not
Speaker 17: getting a billion dollars. I said, you're not getting the
Speaker 17: billion and I'm going to be leaving here. And I
Speaker 17: think it was what six hours. I look at Sai,
Speaker 17: I'm leaving the six hours. If the prosecutor's not fired,
Speaker 17: you're not getting the money.
Speaker 8: Oh, son of them.
Speaker 17: I got fired and they put in place someone who
Speaker 17: was solid.
Speaker 1: Joe, use your inside voice, don't let it ever come out.
Speaker 1: Story Time with Joe Biden. Everybody, let's bring an investigative columnist,
Speaker 1: Bill Robinson. Bill, Oh my goodness, what more can you
Speaker 1: tell us about this book? It sounds fascinating.
Speaker 18: Good morning to you, Good morning, Good morning, patriots.
Speaker 19: This book is so important because it allows us to
Speaker 19: finally go back and potentially hold some of the atrocity
Speaker 19: he's accountable in the Biden administration, the Obiden criminal clan.
Speaker 18: And uh, you know, it's just it's just.
Speaker 19: So we let him get away with escape free on
Speaker 19: Afghanistan and the treason of that little escapade which resulted
Speaker 19: in the deaths of Americans. And uh, and we really
Speaker 19: have to go back and and and get him. On
Speaker 19: this Ukraine thing, this was an intentional war set up
Speaker 19: by originally by Obama, Barack insane Obama.
Speaker 18: Uh and uh, you know, so.
Speaker 19: It's they're both green lit putin to go into the
Speaker 19: Ukraine in order to create a Ukrainian money laundering machine
Speaker 19: for the Democrat Party. They used U S I A
Speaker 19: I D to siphon funds all over the world.
Speaker 18: Uh.
Speaker 19: They used it to arrange arm shipments to Lebanon, and uh,
Speaker 19: Libya and Gaza. Of course the Democrats love Gaza.
Speaker 18: And uh you know.
Speaker 19: I mean, it's just they wanted to They wanted to
Speaker 19: support uh A, destabilizing freedom fighters all over the world.
Speaker 18: They also, you.
Speaker 19: Know, wanted to funnel money back to Act Blue into
Speaker 19: Democrats and to fund their assorted atrocities that were committing
Speaker 19: in its country. And lastly, one of my you know, real, real,
Speaker 19: real mainlanes on this is that they used Ukraine in
Speaker 19: the war there to feed the global sex trafficking of
Speaker 19: women and children. And that's the really despicable, demonic, deranged
Speaker 19: Democrats for you.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's hard bill to pick from the the plethora
Speaker 4: in the garden of Democrat corruption, but it really does
Speaker 4: seem like the Bidens were a special flower in that garden.
Speaker 4: Let's just put it that way. Will we see any accountability?
Speaker 4: I mean, old Joe, I don't think he knows where
Speaker 4: he is anymore.
Speaker 3: Jill's still there, Hunter's still around. Will we see accountability ever?
Speaker 18: I sure hope.
Speaker 8: So.
Speaker 19: I don't think Americans are really that familiar with Victor shit,
Speaker 19: but he was one of the few good men in
Speaker 19: the Ukrainian government, and he was really pursuing truth justice
Speaker 19: in the Ukrainian way, very similarly to President Trump. They
Speaker 19: treated him the same way they treated President Trump. They
Speaker 19: tried to kill him a couple of times with mercury
Speaker 19: poisoning and shooting him in his office, trying shooting at
Speaker 19: him through his window in his offices.
Speaker 18: So this is the same kind of treatment that President
Speaker 18: Trump has been getting.
Speaker 19: Charlie Kirk obviously was murdered by people who hated him Democrats,
Speaker 19: and you know what they're doing to Sophie Cunningham is
Speaker 19: also another example of the way Democrats.
Speaker 18: Treat us Republicans. It's time for us to fight back
Speaker 18: and put the armor of God on.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and tell people, Bill, if you would, where they
Speaker 4: can get the book from this patriot who took the
Speaker 4: time to keep this alive and tell the truth that
Speaker 4: he knows personally from this whole incident, so Americans can
Speaker 4: find it.
Speaker 19: Well, I think most people go to Amazon, but you
Speaker 19: can also go to the book publishers, and I believe
Speaker 19: that's it any Benny Productions dot Com. I'm not sure
Speaker 19: exactly sure of the r L, but I mean this
Speaker 19: this Biden. Biden is probably not gonna be held accountable
Speaker 19: because he's already playing the sick role. But people like
Speaker 19: Joe Biden Joe Biden, Frank Jim Biden, Frank Biden, Valerie Biden,
Speaker 19: all of his family, and certainly people like Tony Blincoln
Speaker 19: and uh and and uh Jake Sullivan. Those people are
Speaker 19: young enough to be prosecuted, to spend a lot of
Speaker 19: time in jail.
Speaker 4: Yeah, get your copy of Biden's Corruption and War. Thank
Speaker 4: you so much for being with us, Bill.
Speaker 18: Thanks, thank you for having me.
Speaker 2: All right, we are back in a minute.
Speaker 1: First though, razone Don Newan releasing his new song Stortion
Speaker 1: one seven through Real America's Music. It's a song honoring
Speaker 1: America's heroes. Here's a quick review.
Speaker 20: Some stories deserve more than headlines. They deserve to be remembered.
Speaker 20: Extortion seventeen honors the thirty American service members and eight
Speaker 20: Afghan partners who made the ultimate sacrifice when their helicopter
Speaker 20: was shot down during a mission in Afghanistan on August sixth,
Speaker 20: twenty eleven. Through powerful orchestration and heartfelt emotion, composer Don
Speaker 20: Newan pays tribute to their courage, their service, and the
Speaker 20: families who continue to carry their legacy. From Real America's Music.
Speaker 20: This is Extortion one seven by Don Newan. Download it now.
Speaker 11: Breaking news from Real America's boys.
Speaker 6: We're back with breaking news as a Senate Homeland Security
Speaker 6: committees meeting right now to potentially vote on holding Anthony
Speaker 6: fouching contempt. This is Senator Ran Paul speaking. This is
Speaker 6: going to be a good one. Let's listen.
Speaker 14: In compel compliance with its lawful demands, that is Congress's
Speaker 14: compulsory instrument. A subpoena is not an invitation. A subpoena
Speaker 14: with no consequence is not a subpoena. It's a suggestion.
Speaker 14: Seeking the truth is not a witch hunt. Accountability is
Speaker 14: not vengeance. Accountability is what stands between the American people
Speaker 14: and a repeat of the mistakes and the very real
Speaker 14: consequences of the past. The Senator Peters, you're recognized.
Speaker 8: Thank you, mis Suir Chairman.
Speaker 21: The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee has a
Speaker 21: long and very proud history of conducting serious bipartisan oversight
Speaker 21: on behalf of the American people. Democrats and Republicans have
Speaker 21: worked together to follow the facts, compel information, and hold
Speaker 21: both Democratic and Republican administrations alike accountable. That work depends
Speaker 21: on the credibility of this committee. It depends on the
Speaker 21: legitimacy of our investigations and a recognition by witnesses, courts,
Speaker 21: and the public that Congress is exercising its powers dutifully.
Speaker 21: The contempt resolution before us today puts all of that
Speaker 21: at risk, following a one sided investigation and a rushed
Speaker 21: process that has repeatedly excluded them.
Speaker 6: Again, this is a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Speaker 6: They're going to be voting here in short order on
Speaker 6: holding Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress for pleating the
Speaker 6: fifth repeatedly during his hearing last week. We'll continue to
Speaker 6: monitors for you and keep you updated. We'll definitely let
Speaker 6: you know how that vote ultimately turns out. In the meantime,
Speaker 6: the Trump administration is now refunded about one hundred billion
Speaker 6: dollars in tariffs that were collected under President Trump's use
Speaker 6: of emergency economic powers, including his so called Liberation Day duties.
Speaker 6: That represents roughly sixty percent of the one hundred and
Speaker 6: sixty five billion dollars that was collected before the US
Speaker 6: Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act
Speaker 6: did not authorize the president to impose tariffs. The refunds
Speaker 6: are being sent to importers who paid those duties, with
Speaker 6: more than one hundred and twenty eight billion dollars reportedly
Speaker 6: accepted for processing. However, consumers who paid higher prices may
Speaker 6: not see that money directly, and small businesses that weren't
Speaker 6: listed as the official importer could face difficulties recovering their costs. Meanwhile,
Speaker 6: the administration has imposed new teriffs under different federal trade laws,
Speaker 6: prompting another round of legal challenges. Let's bring in the
Speaker 6: managing partner of Chapwood Investments.
Speaker 5: That would be ed Botowski. Ed good to see you.
Speaker 22: Good to see you as well.
Speaker 5: Terrence, So look so much to unpacked.
Speaker 6: I'd like to know where you want to go first,
Speaker 6: because the first thing that comes to my mind is
Speaker 6: as a consumer, I probably paid more for these items
Speaker 6: because of the tariffs. Yet I'm not getting the money back.
Speaker 6: That seems unfair to me on its face. But what
Speaker 6: do you see being the biggest pitfall here?
Speaker 22: Well, I see it amazing that the Supreme Court would
Speaker 22: rule against this.
Speaker 8: I mean, here we are in the United States.
Speaker 22: We should be able to go at things as we
Speaker 22: see fit, and we have one point seven trillion dollar deficit.
Speaker 22: That means that's how much more we've spent this year
Speaker 22: than what we've brought in, So any additional funds, if you're.
Speaker 8: An American, you should be rooting.
Speaker 22: For it if you possibly, you know, have any kind
Speaker 22: of influence on it. So that's the first thing that
Speaker 22: comes to my mind, is how dare the Supreme Court
Speaker 22: rule against this.
Speaker 6: Let's talk then bigger picture. We are in a major deficit.
Speaker 6: We've got, you know, major major spending that's gone out
Speaker 6: of con and now we're having to refund these hundreds
Speaker 6: of billions of dollars that we took in they could
Speaker 6: have helped our coffer. Big picture, how detrimental is that?
Speaker 22: Yeah, well it's money that we didn't plan on having
Speaker 22: at the beginning of the year until Liberation Day. But then,
Speaker 22: you know, when it comes to individuals, like when I
Speaker 22: go out and I buy a bag of chips, I
Speaker 22: have no idea how much more those bag of chips
Speaker 22: cost me because of the tariffs. So there's just no
Speaker 22: way of going in and microanalyzing this. So having it
Speaker 22: go back to the company, Now, if the company was
Speaker 22: doing things right, they'd give a discount in the future
Speaker 22: to their customers.
Speaker 13: But it would be impossible to go through that.
Speaker 22: I think there's like twenty five million different products that
Speaker 22: had tariffs slapped on them, So that would be a
Speaker 22: very very difficult task for anybody to go through. But again,
Speaker 22: you know, having this money would be helpful. But you know,
Speaker 22: if you really stop and take a look at our
Speaker 22: fine actual picture, it is such a disaster having forty
Speaker 22: trillion dollars in debt and then we're spending one point
Speaker 22: seven trillion more than what we bring in, and then
Speaker 22: people sit there and say.
Speaker 11: Well we should tax more.
Speaker 18: Well, that's not good for the economy.
Speaker 22: So anyway that Trump can go ahead and get more
Speaker 22: money to slow down that deficit, I applaud him for
Speaker 22: his effort, and again, just shot the Supreme Court voted
Speaker 22: against it.
Speaker 5: I got you.
Speaker 6: You know, hey, that's actually an interesting point there because
Speaker 6: doesn't set precedent. Do you think for future challenges to
Speaker 6: President Trump's policies on tariffs. Obviously he's using different laws
Speaker 6: now to justify tariffs, but people are going to challenge it.
Speaker 6: And does the Supreme Court's ruling ultimately give those challenges
Speaker 6: a little bit more fuel?
Speaker 11: Yeah, well, it really depends.
Speaker 22: There's a different section that he went out and started
Speaker 22: the tariffs. Now, this was a nineteen thirty's b I
Speaker 22: didn't realize there were this many different laws that you
Speaker 22: could go back, reach back and start to use and
Speaker 22: apply him to today. But he's applying something from the
Speaker 22: nineteen thirties I think it's called Section three oh eight
Speaker 22: and trying to apply those for ten to twelve and
Speaker 22: a half percent tariffs on imports today. So again he
Speaker 22: continues to try and people should applaud this. They should
Speaker 22: absolutely applaud Trump's effort to make our economy better. Anybody
Speaker 22: who poo poos it just doesn't understand what dire straits
Speaker 22: were in at this country.
Speaker 6: Ed Botowski, you have used the word of the day,
Speaker 6: pooh pooh.
Speaker 5: I love it.
Speaker 6: Good to see you, my friend, you too, all right? There,
Speaker 6: of course is more American sunrise coming your way here
Speaker 6: in just a little bit. Also there at the bottom
Speaker 6: of your screen, you see the contempt hearing that is
Speaker 6: going on for Anthony. Fauci will continue to monitor that
Speaker 6: for you. In the meantime, I want to remind you
Speaker 6: that our friend Eric Boling is back with another Main
Speaker 6: Street America event. Be sure to tune in tomorrow at
Speaker 6: four pm for the special broadcast of Bowling.
Speaker 5: Here's a preview.
Speaker 23: From packed crowds to unforgettable conversations. Eric Bowling's Main Street
Speaker 23: America tour has been an incredible journey across the country.
Speaker 8: Make sure you subscribe to Real America's Voice.
Speaker 24: Pro Trump, pro conservative, patriotic network more so than anyone
Speaker 24: I've ever worked at.
Speaker 23: And now it's time for the next stop, Las Vegas.
Speaker 23: Join Eric Friday, August seventh, does he broadcast live from
Speaker 23: Joel's chop House inside the Ahern Hotel, bringing you the stories,
Speaker 23: the voices, and the energy that have made this tour
Speaker 23: such a success.
Speaker 8: I think you are the new America's Cheff. Your numbers
Speaker 8: are incredible.
Speaker 23: Tune in for this special live broadcast be getting at
Speaker 23: one pm local time, or join us in person, but
Speaker 23: tickets won't last long. Scan the QR code right now
Speaker 23: to secure your spot. Beautiful place downstairs.
Speaker 2: You got some live music, John, We got this here
Speaker 2: you want.
Speaker 12: We have a big crowd a little bit later.
Speaker 23: Don't miss it. Friday, August seventh, only on Real America's Voice.
Speaker 11: Breaking news from Real America's Voice.
Speaker 5: Welcome back to American Sunrise. Everyone.
Speaker 6: We appreciate you being here with us. We're discussing Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 6: There is an ongoing hearing right now the Senate Committee
Speaker 6: voting this morning on whether to hold doctor Fauci in
Speaker 6: contempt of Congress. Here's some of the conversation in advance
Speaker 6: of the upcoming vote.
Speaker 24: Is that really worth destroying people's lives, shutting down businesses,
Speaker 24: destroying an economy? I argued back then that it wouldn't be.
Speaker 24: It's been six years since the pandemic began. We have
Speaker 24: not had a reckoning of What happened last Wednesday's hearing
Speaker 24: was an excellent hearing from a standpoint of legitimate questions
Speaker 24: being raised, legitimate questions the American people want answers to
Speaker 24: legitimate questions that some of them only Anthony Fauci, Saint Fauci,
Speaker 24: mister science could answer. And even though we have quotes
Speaker 24: of him saying, I'm not afraid of any oversyched me.
Speaker 24: I'm happy to talk to any over psyched me. I
Speaker 24: have nothing to hide, that's not the position he took
Speaker 24: last Wednesday. What he displayed last Wednesday was contempt for Congress,
Speaker 24: contempt for this committee, contempt for investigation, the same contempt
Speaker 24: that our ranking member, our ranking members have shown for
Speaker 24: the diligent oversight and the exposing of the truth that
Speaker 24: I've been undertaking for six years. There's nothing rushed. It's
Speaker 24: been one sided, but not because we haven't reached out,
Speaker 24: not because we haven't involved the other side, the other side,
Speaker 24: like way too many Americans have just closed their eyes,
Speaker 24: covered up their ears.
Speaker 8: And refused, refused to look at the truth.
Speaker 24: I am definitely going to vote yes on contempt of Congress,
Speaker 24: and my investigation has just begun. We've invited doctor Fauci
Speaker 24: for a transcribed interview. Okay, he doesn't want to do
Speaker 24: it in front of the American public, Come in front
Speaker 24: of our front of our committee. We'll go through detail
Speaker 24: and detail. You say you have nothing to hide. Good,
Speaker 24: we'll do it behind closed doors. We'll transcribed it. That's
Speaker 24: only one of the interviews will be conducting. So again, no,
Speaker 24: this this the last week's hearing just began.
Speaker 5: The accountability.
Speaker 24: There's a lot more accountability that's required, beg you, miss Chairman.
Speaker 14: The Committee will now proceed to consideration of an Original Revolution.
Speaker 5: We're going to.
Speaker 8: Continue to debate.
Speaker 14: Once we get on it, there's going to be time
Speaker 14: for everyone to speak. The committee will now proceed to
Speaker 14: consideration of an original resolution authorizing the President of the
Speaker 14: Senate to certify to the United States Attorney for the
Speaker 14: District of Columbia, Columbia, the Committee's report concerning doctor Anthony
Speaker 14: Fauci's refusal to answer questions required by Committee subpoena.
Speaker 21: Mister Chairman, I'm going to move the motion is to
Speaker 21: be tabled.
Speaker 14: This motion to table is intended to avoid accountability. We
Speaker 14: only have one question, whether to hold a witness responsible
Speaker 14: for his contempt towards Congress. The witness had many chances
Speaker 14: to answer the questions pertinent to our investigation, and he
Speaker 14: made his decision one hundred and eleven times. I will
Speaker 14: oppose this motion and urge my colleagues to do the same.
Speaker 8: The Clerk will call.
Speaker 21: It mister comment on the motion, Mister Chairman. Chairman, I
Speaker 21: moved a table this residence until the Chairman commits to
Speaker 21: abiding by the Senate Rules, practice, and laws that address
Speaker 21: attempt of Congress under the Senate Rules long Standing Practice,
Speaker 21: as well as the US Code. Following a committee vote,
Speaker 21: the full Senate must vote to determine whether to refer
Speaker 21: a resolution of contempt of Congress to the Department of Justice.
Speaker 21: The Senate as a body, not an individual member, must
Speaker 21: make that decision. Given the Chairman Paul is indicated he
Speaker 21: may attempt to bypass this process, which is required by
Speaker 21: Senate rules and precedent. Members of this committee should move
Speaker 21: to table this resolution until we can be assured by
Speaker 21: the Chairman that he will not take action that weaken
Speaker 21: the Senates and this Committee's ability to conduct oversight in
Speaker 21: the future.
Speaker 5: The Clerk will call the Rome.
Speaker 25: Second the motion.
Speaker 26: Senator Johnson No, Center, Langford Center, Scott Center, Holly Center, Marino, Sener,
Speaker 26: Ernst Center, Moody, Sener, Peters Yes, Center, Hassen Yes, Center,
Speaker 26: Bloy Center, Fetterman Yes. Senor Kim Yes, Center, Gego.
Speaker 21: Yes by proxy, Center, slock In Yes by proxy, Paul.
Speaker 26: H zero, Mister Chairman, on the vote of those present,
Speaker 26: the yays or five, the Naser eight, on the vote
Speaker 26: by proxy, the yas or two, the Naser zero. On
Speaker 26: this vote the yays or seven, the Naser eight, and
Speaker 26: the motion is not agreed to.
Speaker 2: Mister Chairman, I moved.
Speaker 25: I moved to table consideration of this resolution until the
Speaker 25: Chairman invites the views of legal experts who can speak
Speaker 25: to the constitutional questions and legal authorities Chairman Paul has
Speaker 25: raised in his Contempt of Congress resolution. This resolution should
Speaker 25: be tabled until our committee can hear from independent experts
Speaker 25: about the applicability of the Fifth Amendment and other constitutional
Speaker 25: considerations raised by the Chairman's actions.
Speaker 14: This motion is intended to avoid accountability. I will oppose
Speaker 14: this motion and urge my colleagues to do the same.
Speaker 26: Senator Johnson Center, Langford Center, Scott Center, Holly Center, Marino Center,
Speaker 26: Ernst Center, Moody Cener, Peters Yes Center, Hassen Yes, Center,
Speaker 26: Bluementhal Yes, Sor Fetterman Center, Kim Yes Center, Geago.
Speaker 8: Yes by proxy, Er slock Kin Yes by proxy, Paul no,
Speaker 8: Miss Chairman.
Speaker 5: That's the vote.
Speaker 26: First, on the vote of those present, the Yaser five,
Speaker 26: the Naser eight, on the vote by proxy, the years
Speaker 26: er to the Nezer zero. On this vote, the Yezer seven,
Speaker 26: the Neezer eight, and the motion does not agreed to.
Speaker 8: Thank you, Miss cher.
Speaker 27: I moved to postpone consideration of this resolution until the
Speaker 27: Committee has an opportunity to hear from doctor Fauci's attorney,
Speaker 27: who was forcibly removed from the hearing last week. I
Speaker 27: should point out that doctor Fouchi had a well founded
Speaker 27: fear based on facts, that he was in jeopardy of
Speaker 27: prosecution for perjury. In fact, the Chairman and others on
Speaker 27: the committee have said the quiet part out loud. They've
Speaker 27: shouted it repeatedly that their objective in that proceeding was
Speaker 27: in fact to put doctor Fauci behind bars. He was
Speaker 27: represented by counsel who attempted to speak at this proceeding
Speaker 27: even during the darkest days of the McCarthy hearings. Council
Speaker 27: were allowed to speak. We denied that opportunity to doctor Fauci,
Speaker 27: and we should hear from his council before we move
Speaker 27: on this motion, so that we can hear his side
Speaker 27: of the legal argument here. And I would simply predict,
Speaker 27: mister Chairment, based on the long history of assertion of
Speaker 27: self incrimination rights, that there is virtually no chance the
Speaker 27: court would actually approve any contempt because he had a
Speaker 27: well founded fear of self incrimination which entitled him to
Speaker 27: invoke the Fifth Amendment, and we should hear from his council.
Speaker 27: I asked for a roll call vote.
Speaker 14: Even when the Fifth Amendment is appropriately taken where no
Speaker 14: pardon exists, the Fifth Amendment doesn't allow you to testify
Speaker 14: on the other side of the question. Basically, you are
Speaker 14: you are allowed not to self incriminate, but you're not
Speaker 14: allowed to say, oh, I'm not going to self and creminate,
Speaker 14: but that I'm going to condemn the committee and the investigation.
Speaker 14: So he attempted to do that in his opening statement,
Speaker 14: which of course have looked poorly upon. Trying to have
Speaker 14: it both ways and allowing the attorney to take the
Speaker 14: positive role of saying this is what he would have
Speaker 14: said had he spoken, but he's not going to speak.
Speaker 14: Also doesn't fit in with the history of the Fifth Amendment.
Speaker 14: So I will move to table.
Speaker 5: Mister Sherman.
Speaker 8: Miss German, I will.
Speaker 14: Oppose tabling the tabling motion.
Speaker 8: Mister Sherman.
Speaker 28: Just to clarify, what's the name of the attorney?
Speaker 27: The attorney could be of doctor Fauci's choices.
Speaker 8: I know the attorney that you're.
Speaker 28: Saying, but you said you want to hear from the attorney.
Speaker 28: What's the name of the attorney you want to hear from.
Speaker 8: I think it was David Scherdler.
Speaker 28: Mister Shella, Okay, could we put in a record that
Speaker 28: he is also the attorney for Senator Menendez in a
Speaker 28: bribery scandal. And also are you asking that you think
Speaker 28: it was something he'd be prosecuted for for answering Senator
Speaker 28: Holly's questions about the color of that equment.
Speaker 27: We could hear by the way from mister Honrado, who
Speaker 27: also represented, But you think there was.
Speaker 28: Jeopardy in the answering questions what's the color of your tie,
Speaker 28: what's the color of the floor, what's the color?
Speaker 27: The format of the hearing and the responses and who
Speaker 27: would be there could be determined by the committee. All
Speaker 27: I'm asking is that we postpone this motion until we
Speaker 27: hear from an attorney of doctor Fauci's choice representing his
Speaker 27: Fifth Amendment rights, and to respond to Senator Paul. There
Speaker 27: is well established precedent that witnesses have their attorneys here
Speaker 27: make statements before the committee, even during the McCarthy hearings.
Speaker 27: There is also well established president for a witness providing
Speaker 27: a statement at the outset and then declining to answer
Speaker 27: questions afterward. Most of the prosecutors here know that if
Speaker 27: one of us, as a prosecutor, had said I'm putting
Speaker 27: this witness behind bars and then call him to a
Speaker 27: grand jury or any other proceeding. There's simply no way
Speaker 27: that a court would say you can hold him in
Speaker 27: contempt because he's invoked his Fifth Amendment rights. I mean,
Speaker 27: this is sort of black letter basic constitutional rights, Senator Marino,
Speaker 27: and I think all of us in this committee really
Speaker 27: have a stake in making sure those rights are respected,
Speaker 27: because if we tear down the precedents and the principles
Speaker 27: of the Fifth Amendment, now there is no telling where
Speaker 27: the decline will wind us up, and we will all
Speaker 27: reap the windfall.
Speaker 8: Mister Chairman, Yes.
Speaker 29: Not to disagree with my fellow, a former Attorney General,
Speaker 29: Senator billmensaal the reason, but since Senator Marino mentioned it,
Speaker 29: the reason that I asked doctor Fauci what color his
Speaker 29: tie was, and what day of the week it was,
Speaker 29: and what color the carpet is. He looked by the
Speaker 29: way I thought he was going to answer that one.
Speaker 29: He looked very carefully at the carpet. Then he decided
Speaker 29: not to answer. The reason I asked those questions was
Speaker 29: precisely to test the good faith nature of his invocation
Speaker 29: at the Fifth Amendment, because, as the lawyers in the
Speaker 29: room will know, the invocation of the Fifth Amendment, particularly
Speaker 29: in a context where immunity has already been obtained. Doctor
Speaker 29: Fauci has full immunity. He has a full and unconditional
Speaker 29: pardon for a period of some eleven years. In that context,
Speaker 29: the assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege only adheres.
Speaker 8: To those instances where the witness.
Speaker 29: Has a reasonable fear of future prosecution, and it must
Speaker 29: be tailored to any such fear. And the fact that
Speaker 29: he wouldn't answer questions about the tie he was wearing,
Speaker 29: or the color of the carpet, or the day of
Speaker 29: the week Senator Paul asked him about did he have
Speaker 29: a folder in front him?
Speaker 8: He wouldn't answer.
Speaker 29: That betrays the fact that his invocation of the Fifth
Speaker 29: Amendment wasn't tailored to anything. It was a predetermined, pre
Speaker 29: meda meditated design to evade this committee's questions on any subject,
Speaker 29: including emphatically those for which he has a pardon. And
Speaker 29: the United States Supreme Court has been clear for over
Speaker 29: a century, dating back to eighteen ninety six, that when
Speaker 29: a witness has received immunity, he may not stand upon
Speaker 29: his privilege, and multiple courts of appeals from including the
Speaker 29: United States Supreme Court, in the cast of guard case.
Speaker 29: It says that I'm going to quote now, a witness
Speaker 29: must reasonably believe that his statements could be used in
Speaker 29: criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might
Speaker 29: be so used. The Court has also said that the
Speaker 29: danger must be real and appreciable. It must not be
Speaker 29: one of imaginary and unsubstantial character.
Speaker 8: All that to say that.
Speaker 29: I think it's pretty clear given doctor Fausti's one hundred
Speaker 29: and eleven invocations of the Fifth Amendment, including the questions
Speaker 29: that he could have no fear of prosecution on it's
Speaker 29: not going to get prosecuted for the color of his tie,
Speaker 29: shows that he had no interests and no intention of
Speaker 29: answering any of our questions, and that is an abuse.
Speaker 29: There's no privilege for any of that. And I think
Speaker 29: there was no good faith attempt to.
Speaker 27: Mister Chairman, I really need to answer with your permission
Speaker 27: that point. Whether he had a reasonable fear, I think
Speaker 27: is beyond question. Not only the chairman of the committee,
Speaker 27: but three state attorneys general have said that they are
Speaker 27: conducting investigations of doctor Fauci. The color of his high
Speaker 27: the color of the carpet. Maybe you were testing his
Speaker 27: good faith, but the standard is not the response to
Speaker 27: your questions. It is whether he had a reasonable fear,
Speaker 27: and it is to be liberally construed, as you know,
Speaker 27: under the Supreme Court cases that you cited in favor
Speaker 27: of the potential defendant. President Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment
Speaker 27: four hundred and forty times in his deposition with the
Speaker 27: New York Attorney General. Nobody held him in contempt for
Speaker 27: doing so. This right is so fundamental that we ought
Speaker 27: to seriously consider before we take this immensely historic step
Speaker 27: and hear from his counsel as to what he feared,
Speaker 27: why and how. And my motion would simply postpone consideration
Speaker 27: this contempt motion until we hear from him.
Speaker 14: The primary question of the hearing last week was to
Speaker 14: understand why doctor Fauchi made the decision to do this
Speaker 14: funding of this research in Wuhan. I can't understand how
Speaker 14: there could be any liability attached to a question of why.
Speaker 14: That's his opinion of why he funded it. There's not
Speaker 14: a crime in funding it. There's a judgement, and mister Chairman,
Speaker 14: there is.
Speaker 2: We got the Fifth Amendment.
Speaker 5: All he had to do was tell the truth.
Speaker 14: Clerk will call the role on the bluemintal motion.
Speaker 5: I will vote know Er.
Speaker 26: Johnson no, Center, Langford Center, Scott Center, Holly, Santa Marino Center,
Speaker 26: Ernst Center, Moody yes, Senator Peters Yes, Center, Hassen Yes, Center,
Speaker 26: Blumenthal Yes, Center, Fetterman Yes, Senter, Kim Center, Geago yes
Speaker 26: by proxy, Center, slock In Yes by proxy, Center, Paul No.
Speaker 26: Mister Chairman, on the vote those President, the yeas or five,
Speaker 26: the Nazer eight in the vote by proxy of the
Speaker 26: years or two, the Naser zero. On this vote the
Speaker 26: yas or seven, the NASER eight in the motion does
Speaker 26: not agreed to.
Speaker 21: Mis Chairman, I moved to UH table this resolution. I
Speaker 21: move to table consideration of this resolution until the Chairman
Speaker 21: commits to abiding by the UH oops.
Speaker 8: That was my last one.
Speaker 21: I moved to considered until the Chairman provides all members
Speaker 21: of this Cante with access to all documents, transcripts, and
Speaker 21: materials related to this investigation, which I have repeatedly requested
Speaker 21: since the beginning of this Congress. Senate and Committee rules
Speaker 21: are clear that all members of this committee have a
Speaker 21: right to access committee documents. The Chairman has publicly stated
Speaker 21: he has received over one million documents as part of
Speaker 21: this investigation and has only shared a small fraction with
Speaker 21: a minority despite repeated requests over the past year and
Speaker 21: a half. That's why I urge my colleagues to vote
Speaker 21: for this, and I just want to reply to some
Speaker 21: of the comments made by the chair that we just
Speaker 21: didn't want to look at this information. We have been
Speaker 21: asking for information for quite some period of time over
Speaker 21: the past eighteen months, and at every turn, whether it's
Speaker 21: the documents or trying to have the ability to question
Speaker 21: witnesses as we have been denied. Just in April of
Speaker 21: this year, your staff conducted a transcribed interview of Ralph
Speaker 21: Barrick without even notifying my staff about the interview. After
Speaker 21: you posted the transcript publicly, we asked for the unredacted
Speaker 21: version and the classified portion received absolutely no response. Refused
Speaker 21: to let the minority participate in the transcribed interview that
Speaker 21: doctor Fauci agreed to do voluntarily. To comment on, one
Speaker 21: of my colleagues made we could just do it and
Speaker 21: have a transcript in private.
Speaker 8: We were open to that.
Speaker 21: Doctor Fauci was open to it, but we were declined
Speaker 21: ability to do that. It was going to be one sided,
Speaker 21: and when he knew it was going to be one sided.
Speaker 21: He didn't want to come in. This committee normally always
Speaker 21: deals in a bipartisan way. We should have been there
Speaker 21: asking those questions as well.
Speaker 8: I know that.
Speaker 21: The Chairman says that there were these documents were on
Speaker 21: some sort of website. We did not know at that website.
Speaker 21: We were told that there was a letter talking about
Speaker 21: the website. We were understand it was hard copy, only
Speaker 21: we have no record of receiving it. Almost everybody on
Speaker 21: the DASA has no record.
Speaker 8: Of receiving it.
Speaker 21: And yet, as we continually asked for documents, if there
Speaker 21: was this website, which is different than what we have
Speaker 21: done as a committee, we always have a shared site
Speaker 21: where all of us can take a look at documents.
Speaker 21: We all have a writer as members of the committee
Speaker 21: to look at those documents. If this other website existed
Speaker 21: and we were supposedly told about it in a letter
Speaker 21: and we didn't get it, we don't have any record
Speaker 21: of receiving it.
Speaker 8: We didn't see it.
Speaker 21: But there were numerous times where the Chairman staff, when
Speaker 21: we were asking for documents, could have said, hey, go
Speaker 21: to that website we have, Oh, okay, we'll take a
Speaker 21: look at it. We didn't we made I don't know
Speaker 21: we have records of all these emails. We have records.
Speaker 21: I can go through them. I don't need to maybe
Speaker 21: go through them all we got them to have. You know,
Speaker 21: where are these records? We'd like to see records? Crickets, nothing, no, no.
Speaker 8: Mention of it.
Speaker 21: Could have been a mention like, oh, well, by the
Speaker 21: way we have this, this is over eighteen months, like
Speaker 21: stonewalling for eighteen months. That's not the way this committee
Speaker 21: should ever work. It didn't work when I was chair
Speaker 21: now Chairman Paul. We went through investigation. We had a
Speaker 21: detailed investigation of COVID nineteen. All those documents were provided.
Speaker 21: We worked with then ranking member Paul, under Chairman Paul.
Speaker 21: We don't get those records. That's just not the way
Speaker 21: this place should work. And I would hope my colleagues
Speaker 21: on the other side of the aisle would realize that too.
Speaker 8: Because things change.
Speaker 21: If we make this the new precedent, there will be
Speaker 21: a Democrat as a chair.
Speaker 8: Would you want them.
Speaker 19: To do that?
Speaker 8: Would you want to be treated that way?
Speaker 21: I don't think you're going to want to be treated
Speaker 21: that way as well, and you'll scream and holler about it.
Speaker 8: It should We should stop it right now.
Speaker 21: Let's continue to have the kind of bipartisan investigations that
Speaker 21: has made this committee a powerful committee over the years.
Speaker 21: Right now, we're seating all that. We're just making it
Speaker 21: highly partisan. And when you make a highly partisan, people
Speaker 21: just ignore what you do, and that's really tragic.
Speaker 8: I think it's sad. So I would urge my colleagues
Speaker 8: to table this resolution.
Speaker 21: Let us take a look at these documents.
Speaker 8: They're on his private web or whatever he has set
Speaker 8: up for it. We'll take a look at it.
Speaker 21: But we should get back to the practice where we
Speaker 21: actually have shared information. I know when Senator Johnson was chair,
Speaker 21: we had shared information. I know he wanted shared information
Speaker 21: under Chairman Paul's get to the motion.
Speaker 8: So but I'm well, let me finish is that.
Speaker 14: I've let you go on and on and we're gonna
Speaker 14: we're gonna get to the votes.
Speaker 21: Well, I understand that, but I don't remember ever cutting
Speaker 21: you off when you were ranking member, and I've always
Speaker 21: respected your rights and I continue to respect your rights.
Speaker 21: I would just hope that you would offer that same
Speaker 21: courtesy to us, because the things do change, and precedent
Speaker 21: is important, and I would urge my colleagues to table
Speaker 21: this resolution til we have a chance to look at
Speaker 21: the rect the information, as has been the practice of
Speaker 21: this committee for as long as this committee has been
Speaker 21: in existence.
Speaker 14: For the record, Anthony Fauci refused a voluntary private deposition,
Speaker 14: and that's why he was brought in under subpoena.
Speaker 2: Don't interrupt the chair. Don't interrupt the chair.
Speaker 14: With regard to access to records, there has been an
Speaker 14: unprecedented access to records. They have all been uploaded on
Speaker 14: a website that you were invited to join.
Speaker 5: You refuse to join.
Speaker 14: You had utter disdain. You'd never even asked for the
Speaker 14: past where not one of you ever signed up. It's
Speaker 14: been up for over a year. The information is there
Speaker 14: for the taking. I've repeated it publicly over and over.
Speaker 14: Don't come to this hearing saying you weren't given the records.
Speaker 14: The records were given.
Speaker 8: The clerk will call the role.
Speaker 2: You've been talking.
Speaker 30: I had nauseum center, Marino center, Center, Moody Center, Peters Yes, Center,
Speaker 30: Hassen Yes, Center.
Speaker 26: Center, Fetterman Senter, Kim Center, Guyago.
Speaker 2: Yes by proxy, Center, slot Kin yes by proxy.
Speaker 26: No, Mister Chairman, on the vote, was present the Yeas
Speaker 26: or five, the Naser eight on the vote by proxy
Speaker 26: the Ya's or two the Nazers. You're on this vote
Speaker 26: the Yeas or seven, the Naser eight and the motion
Speaker 26: does not agreed to.
Speaker 14: Seeing no other motions, the question is on reporting of
Speaker 14: an original resolution.
Speaker 8: Chairman, I have I have emotion.
Speaker 14: Mister, we will entertain more emotions, but the discussion has
Speaker 14: become dilatory, and so the discussion I have. I have
Speaker 14: one more listen to my ruling. The discussion will be
Speaker 14: for two minutes. You will have two minutes to prevent
Speaker 14: to present your motion. Senator Blumenthal, thank you, Miss Chairman.
Speaker 27: I moved to postpone consideration of this resolution until this
Speaker 27: Committee has an opportunity to seek leave from the Department
Speaker 27: of Justice to obtain in a cord order providing doctor
Speaker 27: Fauci with immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony
Speaker 27: on matters raised during the committee's hearing. The immunity from
Speaker 27: prosecution could be limited to perjury. It is standard procedure,
Speaker 27: and again we need to hear from his council. So
Speaker 27: whether it would be satisfactory to provide immunity if this
Speaker 27: committee is really interested in serious answers to the serious
Speaker 27: questions it will seek to provide him with this very
Speaker 27: limited immunity to appear before this committee. There is a
Speaker 27: need for a serious inquiry to answer questions arising from
Speaker 27: the pandemic. We need to know where COVID originated, how
Speaker 27: it spread, what could have been done better. We need
Speaker 27: to hear not only from doctor Fauci, but from others
Speaker 27: in the course of a bipartisan, non partisan inquiry, perhaps
Speaker 27: through a commission, where again doctor Fauci could testify a
Speaker 27: nine to eleven type commission. But this kind of show
Speaker 27: trial is no way to elicit the important information that
Speaker 27: the country needs to know. So I asked that we
Speaker 27: postponed consideration this resolution until we can give doctor Fouci
Speaker 27: the kind of legal protection against self incrimination that he needs.
Speaker 26: The Clerk Will Color Role, Senator Johnson Center, Langford Center,
Speaker 26: Scott Sa, Holly Center, Marino Senter, Ernst Centa, Moody Sener,
Speaker 26: Peters Yes Center, Hassen Center, Blumenthal Center, Fetterman Center, Kim Center,
Speaker 26: Geyago Yes, Proxy, ser Slackin Yes, Proxyer Paul No, Mister
Speaker 26: Chairman on the vote those President the years or five
Speaker 26: the Nayser eight on the vote by proxy the or
Speaker 26: to the naser'szer on this about the Yezer seven the
Speaker 26: Naser eight, and the motion is not agreed to.
Speaker 8: Mister Chairman.
Speaker 21: I'd like to, mister Chairman, without objection, I'd like to
Speaker 21: enter into the record all of the copies of emails
Speaker 21: so that we sent to your staff asking to have
Speaker 21: access to information. And you will see in these emails
Speaker 21: there's either absolutely no response or are no way to
Speaker 21: understand that there's a separate email or a separate play
Speaker 21: somewhere where we can get an email. Certainly, I'll put
Speaker 21: these in the records without objection. Certainly would be opening
Speaker 21: open to see any emails that actually told us about this.
Speaker 21: We can't find any in any of our electronic records,
Speaker 21: and we'd be open to seeing that. But I would
Speaker 21: like to do this without objection.
Speaker 14: Without objection, seeing no other emotions. The question is on
Speaker 14: reporting original by me, mister Chairman, go ahead, seeing no
Speaker 14: other motions. The question is on reporting of an original
Speaker 14: resolution regarding contempt of Congress.
Speaker 5: The cleric will call the role.
Speaker 26: Sentator Johnson, Yes, Centerlank Senor Scotty Senor Holly Center, Marino on.
Speaker 28: Behalf of the millions of people harmed by Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 8: Resoundingly Yes.
Speaker 26: Center, Ern's Center, Moody, Sener, Peters Center, Hassen, Sarah Blumenthal, Center, Fetterman, Senter,
Speaker 26: Kim Center, Geago.
Speaker 8: No by proxy, Center Slock No, Biproxy, Paul Yes, Scott.
Speaker 26: Mister Chairman, on the vote of those present, the YASER eight,
Speaker 26: THEASER five, on the vote by proxy, and for the
Speaker 26: record only, the YASER zero, the NASER two on this vote,
Speaker 26: the YASER eight, the NASER five, and the motion is
Speaker 26: agreed to.
Speaker 8: Mister chairman.
Speaker 21: Uh uhcognized you, mister Chairman.
Speaker 14: We've had ample remarks on this. The chair will limit
Speaker 14: remarks to two minutes. I will give you another chance
Speaker 14: to state your opinion, which has been amply stated.
Speaker 8: You have two minutes, well, mister Chairman.
Speaker 21: Pursuant to Committee Rule six B and Senate Rule twenty six,
Speaker 21: Section ten C, I'm notifying you that I intend to
Speaker 21: file minority views regarding this resolution.
Speaker 8: The Clerk will report the conclusion of the vote.
Speaker 14: Just and that is reported favorably commit The Committee will
Speaker 14: out proceed to consideration of S four or five five,
Speaker 14: a bill to require the US Post Service to designate
Speaker 14: zip codes for certain communities.
Speaker 2: Center Ernest.
Speaker 31: Yes, thank you mister Chairman for holding today's markup, and
Speaker 31: I do have an amendment at the desk in the
Speaker 31: nature of substitute for S four five five designating single
Speaker 31: zip codes. Americans deserve timely and efficient mail service, and unfortunately,
Speaker 31: far too many of our communities aren't having their needs
Speaker 31: met by the United States Postal Service. We have delayed
Speaker 31: tax refunds, we have voter registration confusion, there are misdirected
Speaker 31: prescription deliveries. And it's time we change this because our
Speaker 31: families are facing real word world consequences by having an
Speaker 31: outdated USPS ZIP code. So these folks aren't minor inconveniences,
Speaker 31: they are affecting our families. Now, cities can appeal to
Speaker 31: the US Postal System for changing their zip codes, and
Speaker 31: most often the answer is no to those communities, and
Speaker 31: unfortunately the process is not transparent and they can only
Speaker 31: appeal these no's every ten years. And so we have
Speaker 31: communities like Urbandale, Iowa, where families are medical centers and
Speaker 31: our schools are not receiving their mail or have to
Speaker 31: send someone to a post office. A community over to
Speaker 31: collect their misdirected mail. This is not acceptable and it
Speaker 31: is time for Congress to act. A lot of folks
Speaker 31: will say that Congress shouldn't be involved in this, but
Speaker 31: we should be because this is one place where the
Speaker 31: Constitution couldn't be clearer. Article one, Section eight.
Speaker 5: Club. All right, welcome back everyone.
Speaker 6: The big headline Anthony Fauci being held in contempt of Congress.
Speaker 6: His case will now go to the Justice Department, which
Speaker 6: will ultimately decide what charges to bring, if any charges
Speaker 6: would be brought, and then the investigation will continue.
Speaker 5: Doctor Geena David here with us. Doctor Gene, I know
Speaker 5: you've been hot on this.
Speaker 6: You've said that you want Anthony Fauci held in contempt
Speaker 6: or more importantly, held accountable for his alleged crimes. Do
Speaker 6: you feel a little vindicated at this point.
Speaker 3: We'll see, We'll see what happens.
Speaker 4: All I can think this whole entire time, while these
Speaker 4: senators or being you know, moronic, is this is your
Speaker 4: one chance to redeem yourselves to the American people.
Speaker 3: This is your one chance.
Speaker 4: You are so vastly unpopular, so thought of as a
Speaker 4: group of do nothings, and here's your one chance. But
Speaker 4: you know, David, I'm honestly not surprised. I have to
Speaker 4: tell you, you know, I do this. I watch all
Speaker 4: of the other side of news. I listened to all
Speaker 4: of their voices. I make a habit of this to
Speaker 4: hold myself accountable for what I think I believe, and
Speaker 4: I could not believe the way they.
Speaker 3: Were depicting Fauci.
Speaker 4: Did you guys watch any of this If you watched
Speaker 4: MS NOW, or you watched CNN, or you watched BBC
Speaker 4: or any of these If you watch them, the way
Speaker 4: they depicted this entire scenario was like, it's a parallel universe,
Speaker 4: is all I can say. They are not in the
Speaker 4: same reality the rest of us are. In days they
Speaker 4: were seeing things like the entrapment of Republican senators on Fauci.
Speaker 4: You know what they're doing to poor doctor Fauci after
Speaker 4: everything he sacrificed for America, making him into some sort
Speaker 4: of hero, and their side really believes this.
Speaker 3: That's the scary part.
Speaker 2: Such a great point, Gina.
Speaker 1: All that was missing in front of Democrats this morning
Speaker 1: was a idol of Anthony Fauci in.
Speaker 2: Front of their desks and burning incense.
Speaker 1: And that's really what it boiled down to and you
Speaker 1: make such a great point that this was their chance.
Speaker 1: They now have the data they I mean, once again,
Speaker 1: they were wrong in twenty twenty. But if you want
Speaker 1: to just get take them off the hook for a moment,
Speaker 1: I don't. But if you do, this was their chance
Speaker 1: to correct it.
Speaker 9: All.
Speaker 1: They now have all of the data. They see what
Speaker 1: this has done to our kids. They see that what
Speaker 1: is done to the skepticism and this.
Speaker 2: Whole idea of trust the science.
Speaker 1: They had an opportunity to correct it, and they didn't
Speaker 1: do it. Shame on all of them in a pox
Speaker 1: and all their houses. Let me just say one thing.
Speaker 1: During the break in the chat, I have mentioned something,
Speaker 1: and so I know a lot of folks obviously following
Speaker 1: us in the chat, I had said something about that
Speaker 1: this committee vote would then be referred to.
Speaker 2: The full Senate.
Speaker 1: No, that won't happen, as Terence, as you pointed out,
Speaker 1: this is one of those unusual situations where it's in
Speaker 1: essence it's a criminal referral. If you will over to
Speaker 1: the DOJ, and the DOJ will now take it from there.
Speaker 1: There will be no Senate vote, And quite frankly, there's
Speaker 1: a reason there won't be a full Senate vote because they.
Speaker 2: Can't get it past the US Senate. That's the truth
Speaker 2: of the matter.
Speaker 1: So because of that, they are able to refer to
Speaker 1: the DOJ. And now it's up to Blanche. If it's
Speaker 1: going to be Todd Blanche and the DOJ, what are
Speaker 1: they going to do with it? Are they going to
Speaker 1: bring criminal charges against Anthony Fauci I suspect they will?
Speaker 1: And then at that point there becomes a legal fight
Speaker 1: and we'll be talking about the Supreme Court for the
Speaker 1: next two, three, four, six months whatever it is, because
Speaker 1: this is going to the Supreme Court. Whether or not
Speaker 1: he actually was in contempt of is based on the
Speaker 1: pardon that Faulcy received.
Speaker 2: So this is a a.
Speaker 1: DOJ fight, te Bates, and then it became not a
Speaker 1: fight but a DOJ decision and then then a legal fight.
Speaker 1: That those are the two subcess.
Speaker 6: And David, just to expound on that, I'm not a lawyer,
Speaker 6: but i did stay in a holiday in last night,
Speaker 6: and so I've.
Speaker 5: Got on my lawyer cap right now.
Speaker 6: The ultimate issue here is uh, the ultimate issue here
Speaker 6: is that it's not about what happened before the pardon.
Speaker 6: It's about what happened after the fact that Anthony Fauti,
Speaker 6: Anthony Fauci, excuse me, pleaded the fifth and whether in
Speaker 6: fact he was covered on pleading the Fifth from any
Speaker 6: criminal prosecution. The argument, of course from Republicans is well,
Speaker 6: you've already got immunity, so you should have answered our questions,
Speaker 6: and you showed contempt for Congress by not answering those questions.
Speaker 6: And so that is ultimately a question that the Department
Speaker 6: of Justice is going to have to assess whether in
Speaker 6: fact he did show contempt, not because he because he
Speaker 6: asserted his his Fifth Amendment right, but whether in fact
Speaker 6: he's skirted Congress by not answering questions even though he
Speaker 6: had legal protections. So that's really going to be at
Speaker 6: the heart of all of this.
Speaker 5: And if I could just.
Speaker 2: Add one more thing, David Nim please take this.
Speaker 5: I found it interesting.
Speaker 6: I was thinking the entire time, Okay, so this is
Speaker 6: like a political delay of game, like in football from Democrats.
Speaker 6: They kept kind of coming up with these arguments trying
Speaker 6: to skirt this particular vote which we knew was going
Speaker 6: to come. And one of the senators said, oh, well,
Speaker 6: we want to go to the Department of Justice. And
Speaker 6: get them to assure us that they are not going
Speaker 6: to hold Anthony founching contempts or that they won't prosecute him,
Speaker 6: that they'll.
Speaker 5: Give him immunity for perjury.
Speaker 6: And then we want to hear from Anthony Fauci again,
Speaker 6: why would you give someone immuni from perjury? Like, why
Speaker 6: would you excuse the perjury in the first place? And
Speaker 6: then beyond that, how are you going to trust someone
Speaker 6: that you just admitted perjured himself. Just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 6: And I'm glad this played out in front of the
Speaker 6: American people. All Right, I'm done, I'm off my soulbox. Please,
Speaker 6: lady and gentlemen take it.
Speaker 3: Good news.
Speaker 4: James Uthmeyer, who is the Assistant ag in Florida, has
Speaker 4: obviously announced that he is going to go in hard
Speaker 4: against Fauci because he does not have immunity in the states.
Speaker 4: So we'll hope that other states follow suit. Missouri, I'm
Speaker 4: looking at you, and perhaps Alabama and some other good
Speaker 4: red states.
Speaker 3: I'm hoping we'll follow suit.
Speaker 1: David, let me just say real quick on the immunity
Speaker 1: in the states. Each state has a different you know,
Speaker 1: how long immunity lasts for in.
Speaker 2: Terms of the statue of limitations.
Speaker 1: Okay, so for example Louisiana, which is thinking about bringing
Speaker 1: charges instauci, it's six years there. Well, when did the crime,
Speaker 1: If there was a crime in Louisiana, when did that
Speaker 1: specifically happen? And then you go six years back from there,
Speaker 1: so it can get murky, It can get very murky.
Speaker 6: Got you, absolutely, This was interesting to know to watch
Speaker 6: play out, and I'm glad it played out publicly so
Speaker 6: the American people can see who stands where for sure.
Speaker 6: Good discussion, guys, Glad we were able to share that together.
Speaker 6: More American sunrise coming your way after this quick break.
Speaker 12: Our country is under attack. The radical left, woke agenda
Speaker 12: is infiltrating our schools, our houses of worship, our government,
Speaker 12: and our media. The younger generation needs you, the older,
Speaker 12: wiser generation, to stand up and lead us back to
Speaker 12: the right path. Think you're too old to fight back,
Speaker 12: Think again. Stand up right now and join AMAC, the
Speaker 12: Association of Mature American Citizens. AMAC will give you the
Speaker 12: training and resources to become a citizen soldier so you
Speaker 12: can fight for the country you love before it's too late.
Speaker 12: AMAC is more than two million patriots strong. You need
Speaker 12: to be the next to raise your hand and join.
Speaker 12: Will you defend democracy? Will you fight for the nation
Speaker 12: you love? Scan the QR code right now or go
Speaker 12: to amac dot us slash rav. Time is running out,
Speaker 12: Stand up, up and fight today.
Speaker 2: Meg America great again.
Speaker 5: Welcome back everyone.
Speaker 6: We're getting you ready for the opening bell at the
Speaker 6: New York Slock Exchange. It's set to ring here in
Speaker 6: about five minutes. Here's a look at pre market trading.
Speaker 6: Not looking so good. The Dow looks like it's one
Speaker 6: of the few bright spots. The S and P five
Speaker 6: hundred also back in the green that's been going up
Speaker 6: and down. The NAZAC, that of course, is the tech
Speaker 6: heavy index is in the red. We'll continue to monitor
Speaker 6: all of this for you and again take it to
Speaker 6: New York for the opening bell here in short order.
Speaker 6: First though, let's get you over to David Brodie.
Speaker 2: David, good morning, Good morning, t Bates. All right.
Speaker 1: A million dollar battle erupting in Tennessee, where a left
Speaker 1: leaning billionaire is pouring cash into an effort to unseat
Speaker 1: Republican congressman and the Ogles.
Speaker 2: The invest In Tomorrow Coalition has already.
Speaker 1: Spent about two million bucks attacking Ogles and boosting his
Speaker 1: Republican primary challenger, a former Tennessee Agricultural Commissioner, Charlie hatcher Or.
Speaker 2: Ogle says the spending is about more than energy policy.
Speaker 1: He believes his close alliance with President Trump and has
Speaker 1: pushed to roll back green energy subsidies and made him
Speaker 1: a target Tennessee voters, by the way, sets ahead to
Speaker 1: the polls today on a Thursday for that primary. I
Speaker 1: believe Tennessee is the only state in the country that
Speaker 1: has primaries on a Thursday.
Speaker 2: I may be wrong. I'm just an anchor. A congressman.
Speaker 1: Andy Ogles joins us now a congressman, good morning to you,
Speaker 1: and good luck. What can you tell us about this?
Speaker 1: They're targeting you, obviously.
Speaker 5: Yeah, absolutely.
Speaker 32: You know, as the Trump endorsed candidate, as someone who's
Speaker 32: very close to the President, I carry most or a
Speaker 32: lot of his legislation. In the words of the super
Speaker 32: pac you know, I'm public enemy number one, and they're
Speaker 32: going to try to make an example out of me
Speaker 32: because I am so conservative, and to strike fear into
Speaker 32: other Republicans to not vote as conservative as I do.
Speaker 5: But look, we're leading.
Speaker 33: At the end of the day.
Speaker 5: This is up to the voters.
Speaker 32: And so, you know, I ask and encourage everybody to
Speaker 32: go vote, because you literally have a billionaire from California,
Speaker 32: someone who's given Kamala Harris ten to fifteen million dollars.
Speaker 32: So this guy's a lefty and he's now pouring two
Speaker 32: million dollars against me. And the reason is is he's
Speaker 32: making so much money off of these green energy subsidies
Speaker 32: that when I help take it away and made him
Speaker 32: Matt and so. But that's the problem, is that it's
Speaker 32: not the role of government to send millions of dollars
Speaker 32: to a billionaire in California when we have veterans killing
Speaker 32: themselves at of rate of twenty to twenty two a day.
Speaker 32: The veterans need our support. We have third graders who
Speaker 32: can't rewrite or do arithmetic. In fact, I have Secretary Kennedy.
Speaker 32: I'm hosting him here in Nashville this morning as we're
Speaker 32: going to go to some of the head start programs
Speaker 32: and we, you know, look to reduce regulation and create
Speaker 32: greater access because when you exit third grade, if you
Speaker 32: can't read or write, and you go into the fourth grade,
Speaker 32: you're more likely to go to prison when you're an adult.
Speaker 32: So it's important that we investor in our children, not
Speaker 32: billionaires in California.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Congress, not to get wonky or anything, but kind
Speaker 1: of give us a lay of the land in terms
Speaker 1: of what the polling has been like there and what
Speaker 1: the turnout needs to be and all all of that.
Speaker 32: Well, you know, Tennessee redistricted, so about ninety percent of my.
Speaker 5: District is new so my old or I.
Speaker 32: Guess technically my current district is a very small, compact
Speaker 32: district just south of Nashville. Now, I have the suburbs
Speaker 32: of Nashville. I go up to the Kentucky border, so
Speaker 32: around Nashville to Fort Campbell.
Speaker 2: I go across the border.
Speaker 32: Of Kentucky to the far corner to Real Food Lake.
Speaker 32: Then I go down the Mississippi River and I have
Speaker 32: West Memphis. So I have this giant kind of arch
Speaker 32: from middle to the far west Tennessee. But it's beautiful
Speaker 32: country and I'm honored to serve it. But to that
Speaker 32: being said, I've been leading in the polls from the beginning.
Speaker 32: I'm currently leading in the polls. But you take nothing
Speaker 32: for granted. Our kids play sports and we always tell
Speaker 32: them to finish strong. You never quit until the bell
Speaker 32: has rung until you've run through the day, and that's
Speaker 32: what I'm doing here in Tennessee today.
Speaker 2: Well, Congressmanbles, we've been a front of the show.
Speaker 1: We appreciate you coming on and we wish you the
Speaker 1: best of luck today down there in Tenner.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much and appreciate all that y'all do you.
Speaker 1: Bet all right, let's head back to Ta Bates now
Speaker 1: in Denver for the opening bell of New York Stock Exchange,
Speaker 1: sponsored by AMAC.
Speaker 33: The Association of Mature American Citizens is the conservative voice
Speaker 33: for Americans fifty and older. AMAC is fighting for the
Speaker 33: values that you hold, dear. Joined today, together we can
Speaker 33: right the course of America.
Speaker 6: We're about a minute away from an opening bellow to
Speaker 6: New York Stock Exchange. Yeah, I'm checking my clock now
Speaker 6: at seven twenty nine, my time, seven twenty nine, Mountain time.
Speaker 6: At thirty is when the bell is going to ring.
Speaker 6: Here's a look at pre market trading. As you can
Speaker 6: see the down the S and P five hundred looking
Speaker 6: pretty positive right now. Unfortunately, the NASDAC is in the
Speaker 6: red and the rest of the board, uh, someone in
Speaker 6: the red as well.
Speaker 5: A mixed bag. You hear the applause.
Speaker 6: There behind you there it is America two fifty at
Speaker 6: the podium. This means the opening bell is going to
Speaker 6: ring here in short order, and then we'll get an
Speaker 6: idea of how the markets are looking on.
Speaker 5: This Thursday of trading.
Speaker 6: All right, here we go, ladies and gentlemen, the opening
Speaker 6: bells set to rings here momentarily right on queue.
Speaker 32: There you have what.
Speaker 6: The markets are now officially open. Those first sales are
Speaker 6: being entered. And here's how things are looking to start
Speaker 6: this Thursday of trading. The Dow remaining in the green,
Speaker 6: and as you just saw, the S and P five
Speaker 6: hundred just went back to the green. The NASDAC, however,
Speaker 6: the Tech Heavy index still in the red. There the
Speaker 6: other indices and precious metals and those sorts of things,
Speaker 6: you can see those on your board as well. Well, folks,
Speaker 6: you typically don't wait until your house is on fire
Speaker 6: in order to install a smoke detective. You also don't
Speaker 6: wait until the wind and rain hammer your windows and
Speaker 6: the power goes out to prepare for a hurricane. Plus,
Speaker 6: you don't reach for your seat belt after the impact,
Speaker 6: because after the crash, the hurricane, or the house fire,
Speaker 6: well it's too late right. Similarly, you don't want to
Speaker 6: wait until the dollar goes to zero before you buy gold.
Speaker 5: It's too late by then.
Speaker 6: That's why you may want to consider diversifying with precious
Speaker 6: metals right now, because you just never know what's going
Speaker 6: to threaten your savings next. Persistent inflation, a weakening dollar,
Speaker 6: unexpected financial disruptions, it can all be a major mess.
Speaker 6: You don't know what's coming. But you can take a
Speaker 6: preventative step. Do that right now by requesting a free
Speaker 6: information kit on gold from the folks over at the
Speaker 6: Birch Gold Group. Simply text the word America to the
Speaker 6: number ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. There's no cost,
Speaker 6: there's no obligation here to straightforward information on how you
Speaker 6: can diversify your savings even with an IRA or four
Speaker 6: one K, simply by.
Speaker 5: Focusing on gold.
Speaker 6: We trust the folks over at the Birch Gold Group
Speaker 6: here at Real America's Voice, and you can trust them
Speaker 6: as well. Simply text the word America to the number
Speaker 6: ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. All right, Tom, to
Speaker 6: take another quick break when we come back here on
Speaker 6: America in Sunrise. Multiple polls are showing that Democrat James
Speaker 6: Tallarico is inching ahead of Republican Ken Paxton in a
Speaker 6: highly watched Senate race in Texas. So could Democrats actually
Speaker 6: stage a historic upset in the deep red state. We'll
Speaker 6: discuss right after the break first, though, just a reminder,
Speaker 6: Rasberry own Eric Bowling back with another Main Street America event.
Speaker 5: Be sure to tune in.
Speaker 6: Tomorrow at four o'clock for the special broadcast of Bowling.
Speaker 5: Here's a preview.
Speaker 23: From packed crowds to unforgettable conversations. Eric Bolan's Main Street
Speaker 23: America tour has been an incredible journey across the country.
Speaker 24: Make sure you subscribe to Real America's Voice, pro Trump,
Speaker 24: pro conservative, patriotic network more so than anyone I've.
Speaker 23: Ever worked at. And now it's time for the next stop,
Speaker 23: Las Vegas. Join Eric Friday, August seventh, does he broadcast
Speaker 23: live from Joel's Chophouse inside the Ahearn Hotel, bringing you
Speaker 23: the stories, the voices, and the energy that have made
Speaker 23: this tour such a success.
Speaker 8: I think you are at the New america'sriff. Your numbers
Speaker 8: are incredible.
Speaker 23: Tune in for this special live broadcast. We get it
Speaker 23: at one VM local time or join us in person.
Speaker 23: The tickets won't last long. Scan the QR code right
Speaker 23: now to secure your spot.
Speaker 8: Beautiful place downstairs.
Speaker 12: We got some live music, John, We got this here.
Speaker 23: John.
Speaker 12: We have a big crowd a little bit later.
Speaker 23: Don't miss it. Friday, August seventh, only on Real America's Voice.
Speaker 4: All right, welcome back to American Sunrise. I'm doctor Gee.
Speaker 4: We're so happy you joined us this morning. We invite
Speaker 4: you to hop in our conversation on YouTube. Getter and Rumble.
Speaker 4: We are in the chat there. It is lots of fun.
Speaker 4: We spent a lot of time talking about food, especially
Speaker 4: Cole Slot. We want to know your opinions on that
Speaker 4: from yesterday. All right, it is time now to take
Speaker 4: the political polls of America. Here's the beat today. A
Speaker 4: new poland Texas showing just how competitive the state's US
Speaker 4: Senate race could be, with Democratic James Tollerico holding a
Speaker 4: narrow lead over Republican Ken Paxton. The Texas Southern University
Speaker 4: poll Tallerico has is ahead forty seven to forty five percent,
Speaker 4: now the third straight poll this is showing the Democrat
Speaker 4: edging ahead of Paxton.
Speaker 3: The poll shows.
Speaker 4: Talerrico with a major edge among independents, though, sixty three
Speaker 4: to twenty three percent, while Paxston leads among men and
Speaker 4: also white voters. Let's talk more about this with Terrence
Speaker 4: bas and David Birdie. I mean, I know this is
Speaker 4: probably not cool to say, but like his deceptive, boyish
Speaker 4: looking face annoys the daylight, I'm sure that's not appropriate.
Speaker 4: So I'm I'm just yeah venting, David, go ahead, wolf.
Speaker 2: In sheep's clothing.
Speaker 1: Now times have I said I've said this, You guys
Speaker 1: know I've said it. I said it right from the beginning,
Speaker 1: not just about that, but I said, do not sleep
Speaker 1: on tallar Rico. I've been very clear about this. We're
Speaker 1: seeing in poll after Paul after Paul. I've interviewed him
Speaker 1: three times. I know the deal with tallar Rico. Okay,
Speaker 1: I've seen this before. He's very slick. And remember, he's
Speaker 1: not going to fool mag of diehards. He's not going
Speaker 1: to fool people that are up on the news. But
Speaker 1: it'll fool a lot of other people. And guess what,
Speaker 1: that's the majority of voters. That's the truth, and because
Speaker 1: of that you get polls like this. But can I
Speaker 1: just let me just finish the full point t base,
Speaker 1: which is that this is like you said, there, you know,
Speaker 1: the third straight poll that we're seeing. This isn't an
Speaker 1: outlier poll. Here's the other problem, and this is the
Speaker 1: biggest problem at all.
Speaker 2: You see that number among independents.
Speaker 1: Paxton is losing independent voters in Texas to tall Rico
Speaker 1: by forty four zero forty points. Listen, y'all in Texas,
Speaker 1: y'all need to get busy. Y'all need to get busy
Speaker 1: because this is this is critical mass, and it doesn't We're.
Speaker 2: Not you can't.
Speaker 1: I wait till September October. It starts now.
Speaker 6: I was talking to a buddy who lives up in Denton, Texas,
Speaker 6: that's just north of Dallas, and he was bringing up
Speaker 6: the fact that there are some concerns among people, some
Speaker 6: rally concerns. There's, of course the infidelity allegations about Paxton
Speaker 6: and his wife, and then of course the fact that
Speaker 6: he was brought up on charges while attorney general in Texas,
Speaker 6: and that's giving people some voters there in Texas pause.
Speaker 6: It's not about policy, it's about character, and there are
Speaker 6: questions for some voters there in Texas about that, and
Speaker 6: so that might ultimately be an achilles heel for Ken Paxton.
Speaker 6: Whether justifiable or not, it is an issue for some
Speaker 6: voters there in Texas.
Speaker 4: I'm concerned, though, about an enthusiasm gap. I'm concerned about
Speaker 4: what this looks like. We're looking at Texas right now. Texas,
Speaker 4: Like I just have to keep telling myself that over
Speaker 4: and over again that they would vote for someone like
Speaker 4: Tallarico over Paxton, who, regardless of whatever personal issues, is
Speaker 4: known as a solid like bread and butter kind of
Speaker 4: conservative right in terms of policy.
Speaker 3: Versus Tall Rico. I mean, I'm just I can't even
Speaker 3: let that sink into memory.
Speaker 1: Grafts are changing, demographic excuse me, demographics are changing in Texas, and.
Speaker 4: That is my concern and what this is telling us
Speaker 4: going forward, what this is telling us just about the
Speaker 4: enthusiasm gap I was talking about in terms of our
Speaker 4: conservative is going to turn out at the polls our
Speaker 4: Democrats were motivated for whatever reason.
Speaker 3: It's weird. I feel like the divide on the right, and.
Speaker 4: You guys correct me if I'm wrong, But this is
Speaker 4: how I'm just a lot of times, my gut instinct,
Speaker 4: I hate how right it is. Sometimes I feel like
Speaker 4: the division on the right is causing conservatives to just
Speaker 4: kind of want to sit back and not really do
Speaker 4: anything and not really say anything, I feel like, and
Speaker 4: cancel each other by the way, I feel like the
Speaker 4: divide on the left is making the moderate left want
Speaker 4: to get out there and take their party back, and
Speaker 4: the radical left want to get out there and take
Speaker 4: control of the Democrat Party, so that means they have
Speaker 4: a major motivator to get to the polls, while Conservatives
Speaker 4: are all going, gosh, I wish we weren't fighting, and gosh,
Speaker 4: I really hate and I just want to cancel these
Speaker 4: people on our side.
Speaker 3: They're saying what I don't believe and all the rest
Speaker 3: of it.
Speaker 4: I just think we really have to look in the
Speaker 4: mirror right now, Conservatives, if we want to win in
Speaker 4: the midterms.
Speaker 3: Changing gears.
Speaker 4: Aj Rice is back with a new book taking aim
Speaker 4: at what he sees as the absurdities of American modern
Speaker 4: American culture, and this time he's going after gender politics,
Speaker 4: the media, Hollywood, sports, and the Democrat Party.
Speaker 3: In The Bearded.
Speaker 4: Lady, which I know I can't unsee, Send me eye Bleach,
Speaker 4: Rice uses political satire and shock humor to argue that
Speaker 4: what he calls the trans mafia has helped drive a
Speaker 4: cultural shift he believes is detached from objective reality.
Speaker 3: Imagine that.
Speaker 4: The book is the latest in Rice's Mental Illness trilogy,
Speaker 4: following The Woking Dead and the White Privilege album. He
Speaker 4: joins us, now, Aja, glad to have you with us.
Speaker 4: I got this copy in the book and of your book,
Speaker 4: and I think you're great that cover. Though I can't
Speaker 4: unsee it, I need, I believe, and I want to
Speaker 4: know if you're going to send it to me.
Speaker 13: Absolutely absolutely, it's set you like a case of them. Look,
Speaker 13: you know that our job usually you know, and you
Speaker 13: guys do a little bit here, is to transform horror
Speaker 13: into humor, sometimes using satire, using comedy. It kind of
Speaker 13: acts as a cultural autopsy. So there's been a lot
Speaker 13: of books about trans doctors have written them, although I
Speaker 13: got to do you know, Gina, you've talked about it,
Speaker 13: You've written columns about it. I wanted to do a
Speaker 13: cultural autopsy, not a medical one, just just to get
Speaker 13: into this sort of nuts and bolts of why the
Speaker 13: Democrat Party, liberalism, the DSA and others are are wedded
Speaker 13: to dying on the Bearded Lady Hill. For this one
Speaker 13: small segment of basically nothing. They are willing and that's
Speaker 13: the curse. The curse is the fact that they can't
Speaker 13: shake it. And it does appear they've learned nothing from
Speaker 13: the twenty twenty four election.
Speaker 1: Well, aj, you know you're arguing that gender ideology has
Speaker 1: moved beyond individual beliefs and into institutions.
Speaker 2: Talk about where you see that plane out so clearly,
Speaker 2: And I got to tell you, you know, to me.
Speaker 1: This is all about the liberal left, the anarchists left,
Speaker 1: the socialist left, breaking down the paradigms of the family.
Speaker 2: Confusion and chaos are their friend absolutely.
Speaker 13: And look I wrote about that in the White Privileged album.
Speaker 13: The three things under assault is Western civ so Greco
Speaker 13: Roman Jeneo Christian civilization, the nuclear family. Black Lives Matter
Speaker 13: told us that on their website, and of course the
Speaker 13: middle class if they can shake these things, and they
Speaker 13: do it with different flavor of totalitarian ice cream. Right.
Speaker 13: So Antifa does this, the Me Too movement does that.
Speaker 13: The trans mafia does an attack on, like you said,
Speaker 13: the traditional family. But it also is about capturing. It's
Speaker 13: about capturing children, in some cases mentally ill adults, and
Speaker 13: it spreads like a peer contagion, right, that's what this is.
Speaker 13: So it you know, there's something in science and in
Speaker 13: literature called the Worther effect, which is copycat suicide. So
Speaker 13: what you kind of see with the way they try
Speaker 13: to groom children or try to remove one parent that
Speaker 13: believes one thing and another parent that believes another is
Speaker 13: this spreads like peer pressure mixed with a social contagion,
Speaker 13: and the media gives them power. The Democrat Party scared
Speaker 13: the death of challenging these people. Very few people, you know,
Speaker 13: Bill Maher, Fetterman, maybe Stephen A. Smith, very few others.
Speaker 13: Seth Malten was one, but then heeped back down on
Speaker 13: it this week. Yah, I'm sorry, bearded lady. I'm sorry.
Speaker 13: I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I would love for you to
Speaker 13: run my daughter over at lacrosse practice. So they are
Speaker 13: wedded to this. They can't untether themselves from it. And look, guys,
Speaker 13: there's plenty of people that get serious with it. This
Speaker 13: is a serious topic. But you know, comedy is moral
Speaker 13: warfare by other means, and that's what I try to
Speaker 13: do with the book.
Speaker 6: I appreciate your use of satire to kind of push
Speaker 6: back and try to fight back about on this issue,
Speaker 6: but at some point in time, give us some practical
Speaker 6: steps that we all need to do. Satire is great,
Speaker 6: makes us laugh, hopefully makes us think a bit more
Speaker 6: probingly about some of these issues. But the pendulum has
Speaker 6: got to swing back the other way. I think you
Speaker 6: would agree.
Speaker 13: I think we are winning. You saw Major League Baseball.
Speaker 13: You know, look, major League Baseball made all their players
Speaker 13: put you know, rainbow on their hat. And look, I
Speaker 13: run a PR firm, so I know in these day,
Speaker 13: in these offices, how these marketing departments are concocting this stuff.
Speaker 13: And you know, technology helps us push back. Parents being
Speaker 13: mobilized absolutely helps us push back. It was amazing to
Speaker 13: see that happened, because you know, they started to basically
Speaker 13: threaten players that were writing Bible verses on their hat,
Speaker 13: you know, as a form of protest for sure that
Speaker 13: you know that they were gonna be fined if they
Speaker 13: didn't play along.
Speaker 2: JD.
Speaker 13: Vance weighed in, other people weighed in, and they kind
Speaker 13: of backed down. So I mean they're gonna keep coming
Speaker 13: on this though, guys, I mean they fighting against the
Speaker 13: woking dead. They might not use these terms anymore because
Speaker 13: we've kind of made them radioactive. Woke or dei. But
Speaker 13: until look, the Trump era has been about one thing,
Speaker 13: and that is shaming and mocking your enemies. He has
Speaker 13: prevented wars by doing this, by going after the leader
Speaker 13: of North Korea. Next thing you know, he's having lunch
Speaker 13: with it. And I think conservatives have gotten really good
Speaker 13: at this, and the left is still trying to scramble
Speaker 13: on how to respond.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, God told us this would happened. It's
Speaker 4: definitely right there in the Bible, and it's happened in history,
Speaker 4: and we've forgotten it and therefore are doomed to repeat
Speaker 4: it if we don't take this seriously. But it's a
Speaker 4: good chance to have a laugh and look at the
Speaker 4: satire of it all in your new book. We're excited
Speaker 4: about it, aj Rice, thanks for being here with us today.
Speaker 13: Doctor Jett, I appreciate it. Thank you.
Speaker 4: The book is sold, of course, where you find any
Speaker 4: good books, you can find it there.
Speaker 3: All right, coming up, Comedian.
Speaker 4: John Stewart challenges Senator John Fetterman over his position on Israel.
Speaker 4: We're gonna roll that clip right after the break, but first,
Speaker 4: Rav's own Don Newan releasing his new song Extortion seventeen
Speaker 4: It's an amazing historic ballot. This is all happening through
Speaker 4: the amazing Real America's Music ram. It's a new song
Speaker 4: honoring American heroes and telling the story of history that
Speaker 4: many might otherwise forget.
Speaker 3: Here's a preview.
Speaker 20: Some stories deserve more than headlines. They deserve to be remembered.
Speaker 20: Extortion seventeen honors the thirty American service members and eight
Speaker 20: Afghan partners who made the ultimate sacrifice when their helicopter
Speaker 20: was shot down during a mission in Afghanistan on August sixth,
Speaker 20: twenty eleven. Through powerful orchestration and heartfelt emotion, composer Don
Speaker 20: Newan pays tribute to their courage, their service, and the
Speaker 20: families who continue to carry their legacy. From Real America's Music.
Speaker 20: This is Extortion one seven by Don Newan. Download it now.
Speaker 5: Rackets a job.
Speaker 11: Let's spill some tea.
Speaker 6: This segment is sponsored by Artillery Tea Company. It's veteran
Speaker 6: owned and it is built for those who serve. Scan
Speaker 6: the QR code right there at the bottom of your
Speaker 6: screen right now for special rav offer on their new
Speaker 6: iced Tea starter kit.
Speaker 5: The kit includes thirty total.
Speaker 6: Servings of their top five iced tea blends that are
Speaker 6: designed for maximum bold flavor. Plus you can score yourself
Speaker 6: a custom sticker and cold brewing instructions for making the
Speaker 6: perfect iced tea like you have never tasted before, and
Speaker 6: you can get it.
Speaker 5: Done simple and fast.
Speaker 6: Normally this is a fifty five dollars value, but right
Speaker 6: now you can get it for just twenty nine to
Speaker 6: ninety five plus free shipping. Scan the QR code right
Speaker 6: now before this deal ends. It's stare at the bottom
Speaker 6: of your screen. I'll take a quick breath and allow
Speaker 6: you to scan the code. All right, let's get right
Speaker 6: into what's in the cup today, folks. Senator John Fetterman
Speaker 6: says that support for Israel is a red line for him,
Speaker 6: so much so that he previously said that he would
Speaker 6: leave the Democratic Party if it ever became officially anti Israel.
Speaker 6: Fetterman was challenged on this idea during an interview with
Speaker 6: comedian John Stewart, who of course questioned whether Israel should
Speaker 6: really be the issue that determines who belongs in the
Speaker 6: Democratic Party or not.
Speaker 34: So for you, you could agree with them ninety percent, but
Speaker 34: Israel is the red line. Absolutely Israel for me, like
Speaker 34: I can't ever turn my back to Israel after where
Speaker 34: it's at.
Speaker 12: And I mean no disrespect on this, but that is
Speaker 12: not our country.
Speaker 34: And what I'm saying is like, if you are a
Speaker 34: DSA member, if you are a member of a specific
Speaker 34: political party, run under your own banner.
Speaker 5: All right, let's bring in David doctor Gina to discuss. David.
Speaker 6: Of course, I'm going to defer to you first. I
Speaker 6: suspect you have some ideas here.
Speaker 1: Well, First of all, I disagree with the disclaimers. I
Speaker 1: disagree with John Fetterman on about ninety seven percent of issues. Now,
Speaker 1: having said that, God bless John Fetterman for saying that.
Speaker 1: Absolutely absolutely, I'm glad it's his red line in the sand. Look,
Speaker 1: here's the bottom line. This is a moral imperative. Okay,
Speaker 1: these are modern day Nazis we're talking about. You have
Speaker 1: to understand it from that termament, With that terminology in mind,
Speaker 1: if you believe that Hamas and Iran and all of
Speaker 1: those folks over there are modern day Nazis, because they
Speaker 1: are and they're trying to exterminate the Jewish people, that
Speaker 1: is their stated doctrine. If you believe that, then why
Speaker 1: the heck wouldn't you stand with Israel so someone explain
Speaker 1: why you wouldn't.
Speaker 2: Now America, this is.
Speaker 1: Not about Israel as much as it about is America's interest.
Speaker 1: Israel is an America's interest, There's no doubt about it.
Speaker 1: A strong democracy, a strong country over there that's fighting
Speaker 1: the bad guys on the front lines is an America's interest.
Speaker 1: A world without Israel is a is.
Speaker 2: An America that is not as safe, no doubt about it.
Speaker 2: You can make the direct line. But good for John Fetterman.
Speaker 1: And once again, if these are modern day Nazis, and
Speaker 1: they are that have killed a thousand or so Americans
Speaker 1: since nineteen seventy nine, they have American blood on their hands,
Speaker 1: why in the world wouldn't we be standing with Israel,
Speaker 1: who are fighting these horrible modern day Nazis every single day.
Speaker 2: Good for him?
Speaker 4: Well, first of all, I don't know if I've ever
Speaker 4: seen John Fetterman in a suit, So I'm still in shock.
Speaker 4: I've got the bearded lady and I've got John Fetterman
Speaker 4: in a suit, and i just don't know what else
Speaker 4: I'm going to see today. But you know, David, this
Speaker 4: is a much longer to ussion that you and I've
Speaker 4: been having, like all day, every day. We talk about this,
Speaker 4: We text back and forth about this, and it's a
Speaker 4: very interesting one and it's a very scriptural one.
Speaker 3: And I would just say, because.
Speaker 4: There's not time to really go into everything, it's just
Speaker 4: a time for Christians to really be on our knees,
Speaker 4: be in the word and uh and and to be
Speaker 4: deeply in prayer because we have to understand God's God's
Speaker 4: true word here on all of this, because it's final.
Speaker 4: And if we are out there, you know, thumping on
Speaker 4: this and we're not saying what God actually says, I
Speaker 4: think there's a great danger in that. So I think
Speaker 4: we need to all guard our hearts and our tongues
Speaker 4: very closely.
Speaker 3: Right now.
Speaker 1: Well, I think I'm okay, I think I'm thumping on this,
Speaker 1: but I also think I'm correct biblically.
Speaker 2: But I hear what you're saying.
Speaker 3: I wasn't speaking specifically about.
Speaker 35: You, okay, Well, because I was just thumbing David, I'll
Speaker 35: say even more powers you touched on something that I
Speaker 35: think is critical America's interest.
Speaker 6: We always have to America's interests at the forefront. And
Speaker 6: I think, as you said, that Israel is an America's interest.
Speaker 5: That's just a policy thing.
Speaker 6: Forget that, and I guess I shouldn't take the Bible
Speaker 6: out of it, but just from a very grassroots standpoint,
Speaker 6: if it's an America's interest, then we should support.
Speaker 5: What does that mean?
Speaker 3: What does that mean? How big is this?
Speaker 18: Does that mean?
Speaker 4: Our security has even said I believe on this show
Speaker 4: that you are not not comfortable with the amount of
Speaker 4: money that the United States gives Israel?
Speaker 3: Am I misquoting you on that?
Speaker 2: I don't know if you're misquoting me. I think it's
Speaker 2: a longer discussion.
Speaker 3: It's a longer way.
Speaker 5: All right, guys, we'll have that. We have to go.
Speaker 6: We will have that discussion that at some point in time.
Speaker 6: I'll text you guys more American Sunrise coming your way
Speaker 6: in a couple of minutes.
Speaker 4: All right, welcome back to American Sunrise. I'm doctor Gina.
Speaker 4: Thank you so much for being with us this morning.
Speaker 4: It is time now for our this and that. Today
Speaker 4: I'm asking my co hosts about chicken wings, David Birdie
Speaker 4: and Terrence drummis or flats. David, I'm going to go
Speaker 4: to you first.
Speaker 1: I am not a chicken expert. Clearly we've established that
Speaker 1: on the show. I will say flats flats, Terrence.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 5: Why I'm a drummy guy. Go ahead. I'm sorry, go ahead,
Speaker 5: I asked you.
Speaker 2: I just want to extra fried. I need a little
Speaker 2: not for excuse me, I shouldn't say fried. I'm the show.
Speaker 2: I need a little extra crispy, little extra crispy.
Speaker 5: Okay, okay, all right.
Speaker 6: It's all drums for me all day. They have more
Speaker 6: meat than the flats, and they're easier to eat. You
Speaker 6: just eat around the bone. It's drummies for me all day.
Speaker 6: Go ahead, I think that's common.
Speaker 16: No.
Speaker 4: Actually, so here's the thing from I mean, I don't
Speaker 4: mean to like condescend you guys, because I love you
Speaker 4: and respect.
Speaker 3: You, and you're both smarter than me.
Speaker 4: But we're talking about food here, and I am the
Speaker 4: expert on food.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, I am. It's just I'm accepting you are.
Speaker 4: You should accept it too. Here's the reality on chicken wings.
Speaker 4: The drummis have more meat, yes here, and so I
Speaker 4: knew you would like them better. The flats have more flavor,
Speaker 4: David Brody. So if you're an epicurean like me, you
Speaker 4: want that flavor in those flats.
Speaker 3: But here's the thing. When we ordered chicken wings.
Speaker 4: My husband gets the flats because he loves them, and
Speaker 4: I am kind of stuck with the drummis So, yeah.
Speaker 3: That's the real thing.
Speaker 2: I did not know that.
Speaker 3: By the way, that was quite controversial.
Speaker 4: I feel like this could be as explosive as Coleslaw
Speaker 4: was yesterday. In our chats, Join us in our chats.
Speaker 4: Please on YouTube, get her and Rumble war Room is
Speaker 4: coming up next time you're