WEBVTT - Not Just No, But Hell No!

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Katty arm Strong

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>and Jetty and he Armstrong and Yetty. But before that,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do Magda Magda make America great depression together.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what, It'll be great. It'll be better than great.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>It'll be a fantastic, unbelievable depression like so which.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen before. We like to say, what's so

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>which we've never seen before?

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, this depression is gonna be so great.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll be the ones eating the cats and the dogs.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be far Low and Srow. You gotta brazen,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Wow, Wow. The liberal Saturday Night Lived whatever

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are they?

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>I would say, God, what percentage of mainstream news coverage

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>thinks this is a bad idea. It's somewhere like ninety percent.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's heavy, yes.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Including lots and lots and lots of Conservatives and Republicans.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The hardcore Magacrawt would answer you, well, they're the

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people who have been perpetrating the sucking out of the

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>American manufacturing economy, loss of jobs, exporting, blah blah blah.

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That's fine.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not making the argument of whether it's right or not.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying it's not only lefty journalism that is

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>making fun of this. Let's get one more short clip

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 3>on that eight there, Michael.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the stock.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Market has crashed temporarily, but that is all part of

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 3>the plan.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>It's simple economics. Okay. If the stock market goes down.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>And down and down and down and down, that means

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>there's nowhere to go but up or perhaps further down.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think that's what we're all looking at today, right,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>there's no place to go but up or ups further

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>down for a while.

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see what happens next hour. And I am

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to this a great deal. Compare and contrast

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of terrific historians who most of us know

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and love, Neil Ferguson and Victor Davis Hansen, with differing

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>opinions about the tariff thing. Really interesting. We'll give you

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>as many facts and as much perspective as we can

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and help you decide what you think about it, as

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>opposed to simply preaching to the choir, which is not

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 1>what we do. If you're a new listener, welcome. First

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of all, glad you're listening. Give it a little bit.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a little different than what you know you generally

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>encounter on the dial. So well, Joe understaying Getty Show.

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Joe and I have worked for big companies

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>that make short term plays because of the stock market that.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Are bad long term.

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>And every employee knows, everybody like in the office knows

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>this is a bad idea long term, but it's good

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>for the stock short term. A lot of the Wall

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Street stuff you see and commentators, they are people that

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>live quarter to quarter and not making a quarter to

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 3>quarter move right rightly or wrongly?

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Right, So here we go. Yeah, in principle, the idea

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about the long term health of the American

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people as opposed to just winning the next election is

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly gratifying. Doesn't make everything right? Well, that's the deal. Yes,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if President AOC were to make a long

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>term decision to alter the trajectory of the United States,

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>even if we lose the midterms, that again would be

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>admirable in a way, but I'm certain I would be horrified.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So here's an interesting question for you. What are the

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>courts going to say about the tariff thing? And when

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>might they say it? Probably not too long from now,

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is the answer to the second question. There are already

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>some lawsuits being being filed, although interestingly enough, there are

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>some big corporations that are extremely comfortable with this. They

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are have stripped naked to the waist, have knives in

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>their teeth, and painted their faces, and are now running

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the halls like maniacs in their corporate headquarters. But they

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be the lead name in a lawsuit

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>against the Trump administration, so they're lying in law, which

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting dynamic. But I'm relying here on a

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>professor of political science, a reasonable guy, Paul Sratchik, legal analyst.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's tariffs are a major legal question. The Supreme Court

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>has set clear boundaries on unilateral executive action of this magnitude,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>he believes, and he thinks the Court is going to

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>strike a lot of this down. But here are the questions.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Never mind the conclusion President Trump relied on the International

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose the tariffs. It's an

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>expansion of his executive authority. I believe he writes oversteps

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries set by the Supreme Court's major questions doctrine

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>prominent in recent judicial rulings, the doctrine holds that federal

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>agencies and the executive branch cannot make decisions of vast

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>economic and political significance without clear congressional authorization. Now, the

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>IEEPA AJEPA was enacted in nineteen seventy seven was intended

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>to rein in what Congress considered overuse of the Trading

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Enemies Act, And since twenty twenty two, the

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court has been clear, the fabulous, wonderful Donald Trump

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>appointed majority, they've been clear. When an agency or the

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>executive claims the authority to resolve a major question, that's

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>en quote quotes a policy issue with quote vast economic

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and political significance quote, it must point to clear congressional intent.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs which reshade global trade, potentially cost American consumers billions trillions,

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and disrupt entire industries certainly qualify as major questions. Yeah.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 3>I hate the idea of just if something's major, because man,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 3>that's open to I the boulder. But regardless of that,

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 3>this certainly qualifies as major. No, but nobody's wondering if

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 3>this is a close.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Call, right, right, And the argument you're going to hear

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is that Trump claimed a unilateral power to tax and

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>regulate commerce powers Constitution vests in Congress, although Congress doesn't

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>do a damn thing these days, but it is vested

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to Congress and Article one, Section eight, and the Supreme

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Court of signal skepticism towards such executive improvisation. In West Virginia, VEPA,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Court struck down the Obama EPA's Claim Power Plan,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ruling that the agency could not overhaul the energy sector

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>without explicit congressional approval. The court and this precedent has

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>been used over and over again to rein in out

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of control lefty presidents, especially in recent years. And I'll

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you what one thing about this show that you're

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>either going to love or hate is we are consistent.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>If we call executive overreach executive overreach when there's a

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>d in the White House, we're gonna call it on

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ours too, because by God, somehow or other, there will

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>be a Democrat in the White House again and we

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want him over reaching.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>We'll see Elon Broke with the tariff thing over the

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 3>weekend saying he's not not into it.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He likes more of a free trade guy.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>And Ted Cruz, as I mentioned a little bit earlier,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>who's been pretty solid supporter of Trump, said there's gonna

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>be a bloodbath for his party in the midterm elections

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>if Donald Trump's tariff sent the US economy into recession, which.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>It's about a fifty to fifty chance.

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 3>According to most of your geniuses right now, with the

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>caveat that Trump could back off all of this at

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 3>any moment.

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, there are a number of forces at work.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>There are seven Republican Senators who are signed onto a

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>law saying this is executive overach and it has to stop.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It won't become law because it won't pass the House,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and even if it did, Trump would veto it with

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a hearty laugh. But you have that going on, and

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>then the court stuff. The court, I promise you hates

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea of stepping in and squashing this right now,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>because part of the Roberts Court's identity is, Look, we're

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a court, we're serious, we're sober, we're not politicians, even

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>though Barack Obama tried to turn us into them and

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden like berated us from the lectern which was terrible.

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>We're only going to step in on huge stuff like

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>this if we have to but they may have to.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Dang it.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Oil's way down too, which the Trump people are pointing

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>to is a good thing that came out of this

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 3>somehow or whatever.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I heard one super pro Trump host saying, well, the

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world stock markets are down way more

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>than ours, so that proves that this is a good idea.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, wait, what.

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Trump tweeted out today? Oil prices are down, interest rates

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 3>or down, food prices are down, there's no inflation.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>This is all good.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 3>David Boonson, who's one of your think tank conservative economists, said,

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I can show you many charts of oil prices and

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 3>interest rates from every recession we've ever had that will

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>show that this.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>They often go hand in hand. So there you go. Yeah,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the messaging seems a little suspect to me. Anyway,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>more to come after a word from our friends at

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>simply Save Home Security. I'll tell you what, speaking of policies,

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>we don't like decriminalizing crime. Scumbags and junkies and burglars

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on the streets, and you know, it's a shame you

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>have to have a security system. But simply safe is

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the one to choose.

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, with the active guard outdoor protection can prevent break

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 3>ins before they happen. I mean AI powered cameras. Why

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>monitoring agents all working together to try to catch people

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 3>before they get into your house. You'd think that'd be

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 3>super expensive because it's so good, But nope, about a

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>dollar a day. No long term contracts or cancelation fees either.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Why if, like my sweet bride and I, you had

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>an old timey security system with a subscription and all,

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're getting paid multiples of this for worse technology.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking, is this for real?

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It is, It absolutely is. Visit simply safe dot com

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>slash armstrong. Claim fifty percent off a new system with

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a professional monitoring plan, cats first month free. That's simplysafe

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash armstrong, and again, monitoring plans start affordably

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>at around a buck a day. Simply safe dot com

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>slash armstrong. There's no safe like simply safe. It's interesting.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So a number of people were predicting a black Monday,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>like a historic drop in the stock market today, which

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 3>it's down, but it's not like make the history books down.

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Charles CW. Cook of the National Review. His take of

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 3>that is this suggests to me that the markets think

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump is going to back off the fact that it's

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 3>not the just complete. I hate to use the term bloodbath.

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing that bloodbath became an acceptable term for financial downtterms.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, because a bloodbath is pretty disgusting. It is gruesome, Yes, yes, gruesome,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>but you know, a big historic drop so the market.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>So the Wall Street crowd thinks hee, he's not gonna

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>stick with this like long term.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Yeah, as I was saying earlier, I wish I

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>had a little more cash on hand, I'd be investing,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's still no better place on earth to have

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>your money than the United States unless this keeps going,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna have to get hip to investing

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>in foreign markets again if the trade structure changes.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 3>You know I'm wearing I didn't notice until I put

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>it on today. I'm wearing a sock, one sock with

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.599
<v Speaker 3>a big hole in the heel, And I thought, you

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>know what, I'm just gonna go ahead, where as low

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 3>rent as it is, prepare myself for the financial downturn

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 3>if it sticks around, because this might be my new lifestyle,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>wearing socks with holes in them. And my question is,

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>when you took the sock off the last time and

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 3>elected to keep it and launder it.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We must not have noticed the hole.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Surely I didn't keep around a sock with a hole

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 3>in the hill, because I mean, that's just at this

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 3>point in my life.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>What have I worked every day for to wear holy socks?

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I know? Is it like a Saint Francis of a

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>CC thing if you put a rock in your shoe

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>or remind you of the suffering of others. I'd be

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>horrified if I sent my kids off to school with

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>holes in their socks. Here I am at work.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, has AI ruined sports betting? Like maybe it's over?

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Stay tuned for that, among other things.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Stay with it.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 4>The Men's Final four in San Antonio, after the Houston

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Cougars completed a stunning comeback against Dude, they'll be in

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 4>a fierce fight with the Florida Gators.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. You got that your and versus

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Gator caa final. Do it what you gotta like the

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Gators in that battle because they've got like scales and

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the cougar could jump on him and bite him as

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>much as he wanted. But unless you flip it and

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>can get at the soft underbelly. So if they gotta

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like a gator, especially drags that cougar in the water,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's over.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>If the actual animals fought as opposed to the college

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 3>basketball team.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how I make sports predictions. Gotcha coming up? If

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite brothel asked you to fill out a ten

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>page application with all of your personal information, would you

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>do it? That's right, we're talking about a house of hoary.

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>That very thing happened in Boston. Crazy story, we'll tell

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you about it. So a couple of AI stories for you.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>First one that centers around the NCAA Championship game tonight.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 3>March Madness bet AI versus pro gamblers one million dollar

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>March Madness bet. So a professional gambler took on AI,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 3>and this article was from Saturday. I don't know where

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 3>they are after the two games that happened on Saturday,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 3>but the one million dollar March Madness wager between a

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 3>pro gambler and an artificial intelligence site came down to

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the AI platform four C predictions. The guy had missed

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>thirteen games out of the first sixty, AI only missed ten.

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>The point of this article and the discussion was and

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 3>that became a thing online over the weekend. Is if

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 3>AI is as good as or better than your top

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 3>five percent of sports gamblers, which it seems it is, well,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>then where where does that leave sports gambling at all?

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>And will it continue to exist in the form that

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it has?

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Wow. One of the big betting houses said that they

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 3>have been concerned about this and knew it might be coming,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 3>that didn't would be here yet, and they feel that

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>perhaps the decision is here earlier than they had expected.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 3>It's gone beyond even what we had expected at the

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 3>start of AI.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, the house always wins on average, That's why casinos

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>exist and supports betting sites exist too. Individuals will win

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>against the house semi regularly. That's why you keep going

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>back If AI, well, the question is will AI win enough? Well?

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Sad profit turns into a loss because if it's a

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>thinner margin, they'll just restructure what they do a little bit.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would think that, and I don't know a

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>lot about this, but I would think that your big

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 3>betting houses, they get a lot of people betting that

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, most of them aren't professionals, and most of

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 3>them aren't that good.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>They lose a lot.

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 3>So if AI's better than the top five percent and

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>every other dufus now can just use AI. Then all

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>of the betters are like the top five percent. That's

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>got to be a different profit margin. Oh yeah, for

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the bedding houses than what they've had in the past. Yeah,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I know, their profit margins are very, very large. Yeah,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 3>that's that's a great question.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I could easily believe that it would cut the profit

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>down to this is not worth it. It's going to

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be even turned it into a loss.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's going to be a complete restructure of what

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 3>they've had in the past because they are counting on

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 3>dufuses like me that get all excited for their you know,

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 3>their home team when they make a run and that

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing. Not the professional gamblers. They might even

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 3>expect to lose on the professional gamblers. But if everybody

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>is professional gambler level, that's something AnyWho. One of the

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>many repercussions of AI. Here's a guy who used an

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 3>AI avatar in a legal appeal. The judge didn't dig it.

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's listen to this audio and then I'll fill in

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>any of the blanks.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Twelve.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Michael, the appellant has submitted a video.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>We will hear that video. Now, may it please the court?

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I come here today a humble proceeds were a panel

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 3>of five distinguished justices?

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this hold on? Is that counsel for the case.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I generated that that is not a real person.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>You did not tell me that, sir, And you have

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 2>appeared before this court and been able to testify verbally.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 2>You are not going to use this courtroom as a

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>launch for your business.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you are.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Able to shut that off, hold you have five minutes.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that judge was not happy with that. So the

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 3>guy tried to use an AI lawyer. Yeah, she clearly

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 3>thinks there. I say, I'm reading this New York Times article,

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>but I didn't read the whole thing. She clearly thinks

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 3>it's some attempt to like advertise his AI lawyer business.

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 3>But at least in the first couple of pages of

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 3>this article that I read, it is just a guy

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>who didn't have any representation and felt like he was

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 3>in a bad position and so used AI, which you've

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 3>heard about, you know, around the country, various people using

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 3>AI lawyers.

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Huh, where is that going to go?

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You just got to hire a flesh and blood human

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to read what the AI told him to say, right, yes, fine,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make any sense obviously. Hmm. We got a

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>lot on the way.

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I hope you can stay here if you missed a second,

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 3>and get the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>And Getty Pain in the Market.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 4>At some point, you're unwilling to tolerate this idea of

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 4>a Trump put they're a threshold.

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think your question is so stupid.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's a I don't want anything

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to go down, but sometimes you have to take beticon

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 3>to fix something. As questions are stupid. I suppose they

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 3>got to ask him. It's just what the what?

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>What?

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 3>So the whole point is to scare a bunch of

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 3>these country Yeah, these countries into thinking, wow, we better,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>we better adjust here because he's serious long term, and

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and he's gonna tell a reporter asked not I'm not

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 3>serious long term. This is just to scare them, and

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>so I'm going to back off of them just as

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 3>soon as I mean, what is that?

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but what conclusion? Is he looking for a rebalancing

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of tariffs to a truly reciprocal relationship, or is he

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to permanently restructure trade around the world by putting

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>up high tariffs against imports for the US for good

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>good question. That's why nobody knows quite what to think,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and the explanations out of the White House are a

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>little difficult to follow at times. More on that next hour,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>including two great conservative historians taking different views of the

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>tariffs and where they might be going. Also, this is

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an unnecessarily snarky headline, but it made me giggle. Great

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>news for humanity. Depressed liberals are increasingly suicidal due to

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>climate anxiety, according to a new study, and those that

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>remain to stick around aren't having children. So might progressives

0:19:53.280 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>be self depopulating? Be fine with me, Yeah.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 3>The suicide part is troubling, but not having children's that's

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 3>that's absolutely happening.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Although I've got to admit it, and I believe it

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or not a fairly compassionate fellow. But if you're committing

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>suicide over climate anxiety, you have profound mental problems. Anyway,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>More on that to come. Here's a question for you.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We've all, you know, applied for colleges or jobs or

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>loans or whatever, and you sit down, you fill out

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a long detailed application with your financial information, your employment information,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>your past addresses that sort of thing. Would you do

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>that for a horror house? No, not just no, but

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>hell no. Story out of the Boston area, there's this

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>high end brothel operating out of a luxury apartment complex,

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>charged up to six hundred dollars an hour for sexual encounters,

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>an elite club near Harvard University. And you had biotech execs, doctors, lawyers, politicians,

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>filled out applications and handed over IDs, work badges, personal references.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>This cant what kind of a reference. Joe was a

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fine and upstanding young man. He coached my son in baseball.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, I don't think that was part of the reference,

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>although you make an excellent point. So this this Cambridge

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>brothel they're calling it. The gal who ran it was

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a former sex worker in Vietnam, an immigrant to the

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>country forty two years old. They wanted to attract rich

0:21:53.840 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and powerful men and with very good security, high standards,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>no danger to anybody involved in the process, so to

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>being arrested, I issome well, well, right, yeah, until it happened,

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>so that there were no you know, junkies or scumbags

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>or violent people or whatever. And so the young women

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>involved and it's all women as far as I can tell,

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>had much less risk on their end, and the guys

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>had the Johns had much less risk on their end.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>And as an amateur economist, the dismal science, indeed, I'm

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>interested that though they mentioned the up to six hundred

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars an hour, it was frequently less expensive than that,

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's because they had figured out a

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>way to mitigate risk. I mean, you hear about your

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>your Las Vegas call girls or whatever or whatever. It's

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>more than three hundred and fifty bucks an hour, way more.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 3>And all the normal caveats on all different sides in that,

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 3>I don't think this is a good lifestyle from the

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 3>john standpoint of making yourself happy. I think you're seeking

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 3>some happiness that you're not going to find. And I'm

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 3>going to make assumptions that none of these women are, like,

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, drug slave, being trafficked by violent pimps at

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>this level, although they might be. But if that's but

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 3>if you don't have that, I can't imagine why I,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 3>as a taxpayer, care if some attractive twenty five year

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>old woman is willing to have sex with some rich

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>businessman for money. I just can't imagine why I care

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>about of all the things going on in my community

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 3>that I'm worried about on a daily basis, Right, how

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 3>about you attack those first?

0:23:55.240 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? To what extent should the government criminal eye immorality?

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Especially if it's I mean, there was no streetwalking hose here.

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>This is you know, you'd never know it existed, right, can't?

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is an interesting question.

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 3>This is not that it's bringing in a criminal element

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 3>and driving down home prices and all that sort of stuff.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 3>With the streetwalking, hourly hotel situation.

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, and this woman paid the workers far more than

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>generally is the tradition in this sort of work. And

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not arguing in favor of it. But one interesting,

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>really interesting aspect to this, and I'm glad I almost forgot,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>was that the bust took place in two places, the

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Boston area. And also it just says Virginia, Oh, just

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>out there. It is just outside Washington, d City. I

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 1>was just about to say, you're gonna tell me. I know,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I've read enough history to know this sort of thing

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>has existed near the capital forever and always will probably sure.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But so the Boston authorities have pursued charges against the Johns,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and in a recent court ruling, the names have emerged.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>The various attorneys asked to keep them quiet because the

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>damage that would be done would be disproportionate to the

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>nature of the crime. Blah blah blah, But the judge said, no,

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you can turn them loose. Interestingly, just outside the capital

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, the local authorities there said no, we're not

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>going to go after any of the Johns. Well, uh,

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll just prosecute the madam and the sex workers. Yeah,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so that's a problem. It's either a law or it's not.

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 3>And if you're going to enforce it on you know,

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>an hourly wage dude who goes to a crappy massage

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 3>parlor in a bad street, and you're going to ruin

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>his life sometime over catching me, you got to treat

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the rich dude the same way.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I will I will never ever know for sure,

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but I would bet heavily on the opposition that the

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>non going after the Johns in Washington, d C. Is

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>entirely because they're powerful people of the government and or

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lobbyists and the authorities, and you know Fairfax and Falls

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Church and the various incredibly rich suburbs of DC and

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's funny. How does everybody get so rich in DC

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>They don't manufacture anything, huh. Anyway, I don't think it's

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>any accident that the local authorities said, no, let's keep

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>these names out of the paper. Unbelievable.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, again, it seems like such a sad, not going

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 3>good place as a lifestyle. But remember what was the

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>thing with Heidi Flies way back in the day. He

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 3>got to be old to remember Heidi flies in Los

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Angeles in Hollywood.

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But that that sort of thing.

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 3>It was like a high end hooker thing that eventually

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 3>got busted.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Great deal of discretion, and everybody was on the up

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and up. She had changing sex for money.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 3>She had her black book, her list, and then I

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 3>was coming out in drips and drabs that include various

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:58.479
<v Speaker 3>movie stars.

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Sheen shot. You know, I everybody has their own

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>opinion on this based on their own morality and religious beliefs.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>If it's an occasional seeking of pleasure as opposed to

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a lifestyle, as you put it, you know, teach their own.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure the government needs to be involved

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 1>in it. Frankly, new listeners to the show. I've been

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>faithfully married to my wife forever and don't indulge.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>But well, I'm serial no interest in that. But you know,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 3>like I said, I'm not concerned about somebody else who

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 3>is interested in that. With all the caveats I threw

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 3>out there of you know, it's not some doesn't speak

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 3>English woman from El Salvador who's basically.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's not. Oh, that's abhorrent, absolutely abhorrent. Yeah,

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of prostitution is that, especially in urban areas,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely terrible. A brutal a pimp who who who

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>well brutalizes the women under his thumb.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I don't know. We did a sex workers panel

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 3>many years ago. It was very interesting sex workers of

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 3>various levels. What percentage is what I described? You're a

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>good looking twenty five year old completely doing this of

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 3>your own volition, nobody's forcing you to do it whatsoever,

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>with guys you trust, and it's what percentage is that?

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Is that such a minor percentage? I wonder that it's

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 3>not even worth having the discussion around that.

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that might be true.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe such a tiny percentage of all prostitution is that

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 3>To throw that out there is just ridiculous.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, It's like the percentage of golf courses that are

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>ritzy private clubs. For instance, there are fifty golf courses

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that aren't for each one that is, right, So crafting

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>any laws or having attitudes about the whole prostitution business

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with that in mind is really distract might be I

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>wish I knew that. Yeah, Yeah, And there are some cases,

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>just again to get back to the philosophy of governance,

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>where terrain in the truly horrific, sometimes the just mildly

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ikey gets caught up in It's it's well, like you know,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>these wealthy guys going to these apartments in Cambridge. I mean,

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. Is it mildly icky from a moral

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>point of view, yes, But that is what has to

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>exist to prevent sixteen year old girls from l Salvador

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>being trafficked by the cartels and becoming rape slaves in

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the United States under the thumb of some brutal pimp, Right,

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's the reality. I think it's important to know.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 3>If that's the case, then I am all for having

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 3>a standard and making it clear every now and then

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>we ain't.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Cool with this. Yeah, I would love to know that.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I know there are folks in law enforcement listening, drop

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>us a note mail bag at armstrong and Getty dot com.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>What have you seen the actual reality? So this is

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible and I am going to pretend to be troubled

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>by it. Depressed liberals are increasingly at risk of suicide

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>due to so called climate change. According to a group

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of European and French Canadian scientists. The alleged findings, while morbid,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>could signal a bright future for the human race. Rights

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Styles, who apparently is not upset by this. A

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>world with fewer annoying people would make life more tolerable

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of us, The species would grow more resilient,

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and the planet might also somewhat ironically benefit from the

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>decline in population, assuming it isn't all a hoax.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 3>That is a cold eyed look that will jump into

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the whole terriff discussion. See where we are on that

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 3>on a Monday, on day three of Liberation Day, so

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 3>stick around for that.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us.

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Mental health experts are saying that adults can help deal

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 4>with trauma by sleeping with a stuffed animal, which is

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the same thing goofy whispered to your wife. Subway has

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 4>partnered with Doritos to offer new foot long nachos. But

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't love the slogan, eat out of this trough,

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>you pig.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this. It's not a good slogan.

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I watched a musical act a young lesbian and an

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 3>older lesbian. The musical act Brandy Carlyle and Elton John.

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 3>If you just glanced to the screen, it looked like

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 3>a young lesbian and an old lesbian singing the duel,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>which was very good.

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Musically, it was very good. Sure, not that there's anything

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong with it. Coming on.

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to read some stuff from a Shell Obama

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 3>that came out over the weekend. I thought it was

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 3>really interesting about it kind of clears up where things

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 3>are with the Obama's marriage. You know, there been a

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of rumors flying around, and it really that sort

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>of level of partisanship really bothers me. The like, if

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.959
<v Speaker 3>you would take joy in the Obama's marriage breaking up,

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I think you're deranged in the same way that people

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 3>who anybody with the last name Trump has personal problems

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 3>that makes you happy.

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I that's just weird. That's weird, man.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Michelle Obama said some things about their marriage. I

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 3>thought everybody should hear that I thought were really really good.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 3>They did have some really tough spots and anyway, I'll

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 3>read them later and we can discuss.

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So you want Michelle Obama to be the next president,

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a good lord. Some texts on things we talked about.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We got this text.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I used to frequent prostitutes often after my divorce. Here's

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 3>what I learned. You don't have to pay a hooker alimony.

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 3>That's not a good text, that's not helpful to the conversation.

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, please, aren't the.

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence agencies from China, Russia in the US. They must

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 3>love these madams, these high dollar madams in these hotels,

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 3>especially around DC. I guarantee you they have cameras set

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 3>up so that every one of these brothels following these girls,

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 3>so they.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Know who came and went. I don't know, maybe maybe not,

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, if they knew it was happening, But yeah,

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be an enormous trove of blackmail material for

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign intelligence agencies. Yeah.

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 3>On sports gambling and whether AI has ruined it, Gents,

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I've been using AI for the past six weeks, probably

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of March Madness stuff. For gambling, and

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 3>it's not that great. At best, it's fifty to fifty,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 3>so it's like a coin flip. But I can do

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 3>that for you. I would think you would have to be.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if there's such thing as professional sports gamblers,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 3>because they dedicate so much time to taking in through

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>so many statistics, that they're better than a coin flip,

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 3>AI's got to be able to do that, doesn't it.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well if yeah, yeah, I don't know. That's an interesting question.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see a statistical study of how many

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>gamblers are better than fifty to fifty and how many worse.

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think for the average schmo, they're definitely worse

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>than fifty to fifty. Oh, I know, I would be Yeah,

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>so use AI.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Somebody said they're just watching Jim Kramer, and he said

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street made twenty percent each of the last two years.

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 3>A correction needed to happen. It should be resetting around

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty five thousand. Anyway, that's an interesting take.

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was crazy overheated the price to earnings ratios.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I won't get technical on you, but they were like

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>twice as high as the historic highs in a lot

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of sectors.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just insane and everybody knew that, So I

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 3>guess the question would be, is did this tariff thing

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>just kick in the correction that was bound to happen.

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>At some point anyway, I don't know that either. That's possible.

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It couldn't continue the way it had been. That's true

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>where the tariff thing comes to rest. That's not an

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>argument in favor of what Trump's doing, but it's a

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>point worth observing.

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm somewhat amused by the stories Fox is doing so

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 3>that they have something to.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Talk about other than the stock market and the tariff thing.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Looking up there. This is a big story this morning.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Disc golfer refuses to play against trans athlete out into

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 3>the worlds disc golfing.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>You know something.

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Viewers can get around well, but they head over in

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the corner. Dow down seven hundred points. It was down

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 3>as many as almost two thousand earlier in the day

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 3>and is now back to being down between low hundreds,

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 3>two hundred.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>To five hundred.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 3>So it's possible that we reached some sort of correction bottom.

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 3>It's possible, like I mentioned earlier from one pundit, that

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street believes Trump's not gonna stick with this and

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 3>have some reason to think that I have some inside

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 3>knowledge on that.

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Yeah, he's made a couple of noises

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that hinted at that, but it's you cannot possibly overestimate

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the importance of speculation in the US stock market at

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this point. Speculation being i'll bet it's gonna go up

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>sw I'm going to buy regardless of I would like

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a share of this company for I believe it will

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>be profitable in future days. That's what investing is supposed

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>to be. And so people sell when they think it's

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down, by when they think it's gonna go up,

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and the the you know, the underlying principles of what's

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a good investment what's not tend to get lost. So

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with a lot of speculation change right now.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>More of that coming up.

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Biggest movie debut of the year happened over the weekend too,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 3>and a bunch of other stuff. I hope you can

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 3>stay with us, Armstrong and Getty