WEBVTT - I Don't Have Socks For Tomorrow! Ah Crap!

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty I'm Strong and Jettie and

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 2>he Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 3>The opening act, grabbing headlines for all the wrong reasons.

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>A comedian who offered unfunny, racist, cringe worthy.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Jokes basically calling Puerto Rican's trash the most repulsive racial

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 4>jokes about Latino's disgusting and hateful.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 3>So incredibly crude, frankly just.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Too x rated to play here, extremely wild so called jokes.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Now obviously in retrospect, having a roast comedian come to

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.639
<v Speaker 4>a political rally a week before election day and roasting

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 4>a key voting demographic probably not the best decision.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>By the campaign politically.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 4>But to be fair, the guy's really just doing what.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>He does, right.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, old uh Tony Hinchcliffe. He sold out two nights

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at Madison Square Garden just a little while back. I

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>guess he's really popular among young men doing very very

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>edgy humor.

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he he refuses to apologize. I wouldn't apologize either. Hey,

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you hired me.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>This is what I am. I'm really popular for what

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I do. Sorry you didn't like it, but I don't

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>know what you want from me. Right, You're gonna have

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Skinner to apologize for going Doweta Le tweet leed tweet.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Lead tweeted Lee. I mean, it just doesn't make any sense.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 2>You hired them.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's so it is simultaneously, because I've read

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>through the jokes simultaneously an orchestrated frantic overreaction by the

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>left who are desperate for a narrative.

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>And also those jokes.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Were terrible, I mean, like incredibly unwise in that setting,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 1>because it's more than the Puerto Rico joke, the Porto

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Rico joke. You got to work to make that quote

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>quote racist. We have so dumbed down what is considered

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>racist in this country. It's laughable. On the other hand,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>there was some other stuff that was just objectionable. Well,

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you're terrible. To your point, here's jd Vance yesterday.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen the joke.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, maybe it's a stupid racist shoke, as you said,

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 5>maybe it's not.

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to comment on the specifics of the joke,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 5>but I think that we have to stop getting so

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 5>offended at every little thing in the United States of America.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I'm so over it. So anyway, there's that

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>view of it.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>John Stewart did play some of the guys act not

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>from Sunday Night, but like his regular act and we're

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>really edgy jokes and came back to John Stuart's laughing

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and say, I'm sorry, I find the guy funny.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I just knew.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, but again, like you're your point was, that's

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not the kind of person you put in your rally

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a week out from an election mass appeal. It just

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's I don't know.

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 6>To me.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>The only thing you could possibly make it, like an honest.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Real point about is it shows Trump's doesn't really care

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>about detailed sort of way of running things.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>That's the only conclusion you could draw.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, if you want to make that point, that's fine.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I have several different pieces of journalism slash thinking that

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do with the acute discomfort a lot of

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>working class America's feeling because of inflation. Housing costs, in

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>particular devastating the rates of evictions are going up in

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of significant markets, including some swing states, and

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's real gut level. Oh childcare. Folks can't afford childcare.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is in your gut, can't sleep at night,

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>economic fear that's going on. And we're talking about this

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>roast comedian's unfortunate jokes seriously America.

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I'm just looking up the TVs.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I got a bank of televisions in here, and CNN, CBS,

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and ABC all led with it this hour.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 2>That's a joke, the Puerto Rican joke.

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So, anyway, at the risk of beating that point to death,

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll we'll move on. But I thought it was

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>really interesting that Gerard Baker, who's a Trump hesitant conservative

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Wall Street Journal, wrote a great piece about

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>how Democrats made a Trump comeback thinkable, and he talks

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>about how the overcharged rhetoric about Trump that takes his

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>flaws and inflaces them to just almost hilarious levels. People

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>see through that sort of thing, And he said, though

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump is a highly flawed guy, we're conflicted because of

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the simple engaging thought about the Democrats themselves. Are we

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>really going to let them get away with exploiting our

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>unease with Trump, using our doubts and manipulating our angs

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to validate retrospectively the damage they've wrought in the past

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>four years, and to approve proactively what they might do

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in the next four. He goes on their deceitfully vacuous campaign.

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's invitation to sign up to a blank slate, on

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>their plans for another term, and collective amnesia about their

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>work in the current one. Their empty pantsuit of a candidate,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>incessantly blurting inanities into the media, void incapable of articulating

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a single substantive idea for governing. What they amount to

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is nothing less than an abuse of voter scruples, an

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>exploitation of the yearning many have for a hint of normalcy.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So yes, without the Democrats, Trump couldn't exist, or couldn't

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>exist with any strength whatsoever. So I think is a

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>good point for those of us who are Trump hesitant

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but agast at the progressives. As watching kamlo Is interviewed

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>by Nora O'Donnell on CBS News, I think we have

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>clips of it we'll play later. But man, she will

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not answer a question, will not or cannot Nora o'

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>donald really tried to nail her down on the whole

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>abortion thing. But what restrictions are you in favor of

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>because that's something she hasn't outlined in the past. Anything

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>she's ever said about it leads you to believe she's

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>okay with abortion, you know, up tilly whatever you always

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>say up to kindergarten, which is horrific. But she would not,

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>she would just would not answer the question. Nor A

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald asks several times, and Kamala Harris says, I already

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>told you, and just stares at her, and there's like

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a silence between them for a while as nor A

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Donald looks at her and Jay look at each other,

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and nor A Donald moves.

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 2>On, Actually you did if you told me? This is weird?

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>He got a nice note from Doug from Boston with

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of analysis the election, that sort of thing.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>One point in particular leaves out.

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He says, I think the reason Kamalin never gives any

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>direct policy answers is because the party is such a

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>loose coalition of strange bedfellows that and she's barely holding

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>onto a tie. She can't or to alienate anyone faction

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>by giving any concrete answers. That's the same reason jd Vance,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, is so soft on the anti Ukraine. Putin's

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a hero wackad do wing of right wing America. He

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to hold on to them. Yeah, to be fair, Yeah,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that'd be a perfect mirror image of the same sort

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of thing.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 2>When JD.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Vance was asked over the weekend, Jady Vance goes on

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>every show because he is very comfortable answering tough questions.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But ask his enemy, is Russia an enemy or ally

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the United States? He would not say enemy. That's

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not the right way to look at it. We have

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>many countries in the world we do business with and

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>different guys, and I thought, really, you can't just say

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Russia an enemy the United States.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>But for the reasons you just.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Said, yeah, and his point of view is, hey, look

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna pursue a new relationship. I actually a pretty

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous to not say Russia's an enemy of the United States.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I would agree it's there's no reason not to, although

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of Joe Biden being tempted into calling Saudi

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Arabia pariah state. It's just a dumb move. Don't play

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>your cards until you have to play them, is my opinion.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>In foreign policy. Anyway, I wanted to move on to this.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a Rich Lowry, who's absolutely terrific editor in chief

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the National Review. He's positing that we've and this

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is a question we've asked several times, that we've passed

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the peak of woke politics.

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>In the US.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And he makes this point through pointing out that Kamala

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>has like disavowed all of her ideas that she touted.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I could do the list. Do we

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have to defund the police? Oh no, no, no, abolish ice?

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh I don't believe in that, Dee, I never heard

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. Medicare for all that was three years ago,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Green New Deal. Let's not get carried away. Allow the

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ad that they're running around the country. I don't see

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>ads because I'm in California. There's no point in run ends.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>But the ad that's getting the most attraction, according to

0:08:55.440 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff I read, the Trump ad is the tax sex

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>changes for criminals, the criminal illegals.

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's just. And she says, I will follow

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the law. I will follow. But do you think that's

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a good idea. I will follow the law. All right? Yeah.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That is the number one Trump ad right now in

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of a number of times shrun and the positive

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>response focus groups, blah blah blah.

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>And I've seen it a couple of times.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And what makes it so good is that it has

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Kamala in her own words, and then Charlemagne the God

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and his sidekick saying taxpayer dollars for sex changes for inmates.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not down with that. Kamala Harris is for they them,

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump is for you.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And again, whoever made the point that it's not that

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>specific issue, because it's not gonna happen a lot, and

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>it would be a drop in a bucket of money.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 2>It just shows how crazy you are. It shows you

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 2>to be insane. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah ah.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And then Rich Lowry goes on and this is the

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>point I really wanted to get to, and I he's right,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But well, I'll just read it that Harris now feels

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>compelled to disavow so many of the ideas that she

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>once embraced. This powerful testament to their political toxicity. An

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>idea has won or lost in American politics when both

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>parties favor or oppose it, or simply don't want to

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>fight over it anymore. Ronald Reagan's economics truly prevailed when

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party, via Bill Clinton in the early nineties

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>accepted his basic approach.

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>The era of big government is over gay.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Marriage one politically, when Republicans decided to stop talking about

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the issue. By this standard, woke attitudes and policies are

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in marked decline. And Kamala Harris's exhibit A. That's a

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>good point and a win for us. I don't think

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he's somewhere between right and wrong. And the reason I

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>say that is they still have full capture of so

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>many of the centers of communication in our society, specifically

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the media and academia, which is different than those other

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>things in a lot of ways. And also, don't forget friends,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:08.239
<v Speaker 1>from the time of Lenin and Marx to today, Marxism

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>is one hundred percent comfortable with deception. They will absolutely

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you, oh, we're not in favor of defunding the

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>police because they know it's not popular enough. Then the

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>moment they get powered, they will defund the police. So

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure Rich is right, but it's an encouraging sign.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And then, as usual, I've rambled on long enough that

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get to the main thing I really wanted

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to get to, and that is an obgyn in Texas

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who's been practicing for over thirty years, delivered to over

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>five thousand babies. And she says these stories about after

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Texas enacted pro life laws, women are dying because they're

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>being or dying because they're being denied emergency medical care

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and for miscarriages, or they took the abortion drug. She said,

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not true. It's not true at all. I care

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for these women all the time, and nobody's been denied care.

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>For three minutes. It's a fantasy, she said.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>The only women who are getting hurt are women who

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have become so convinced by the Harris campaigns.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Rhetoric that they can't get care. Wow.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>The doctors are two of them to a man and woman, saying,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>come will take care of you, one hundred percent. There's

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>no problem here, Come will take care of you. And

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the campaign's saying, don't even go because they will let

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you die. Well, and then that poor woman in Georgia

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who died who they regularly mention and Liz Cheney mentioned

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on stage the other day.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 2>I thought, Liz Cheney, you gotta be kidding me.

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So that woman who died in Georgia of sepsis unrelated

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to this as well.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Documented according to.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Her own lawyer, who's suing to try to get money,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. So to me, that says, if that's the

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>best example, you've got one that's not a good example,

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>then it must not happen very often, because if you

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>had a clear cut good example, I assume you'd be

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>using it.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 2>So which side really cares about women? That's a good one.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Hezbollah has a new leader. I think they're oh boy,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I think they're all.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>State Agent just called and said, we need to talk

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to you about your life insurance premiums.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 2>They're going up. We've got a bunch more news on

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the way. Stay with us.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 6>Swinging in a ball driven right field, way back, and

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 6>forget it, it's gone. Freddie Freeman has homer for the

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 6>third straight game in this World Series and now five

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 6>consecutive World Series games. Freeman does the job at two

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 6>run homer and the Dodgers strike first with what else

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 6>the long ball?

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers win. They're up three to zero in the World Series.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Freeman has hit a home run in five straight

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>World Series games, which ties the record held by a

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who played for the Astros who was probably getting signals.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So right there, you go.

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Freeman's been a monster. Hey, we add an email

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>asking did you do what you threaten to do, which

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is by and where a Dodger's hat?

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, I did not.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I never go on the winning I did not get

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>around to it. That's just science, folks, that's cause and effect.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I could go out and buy one and you'd have

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the very first ever World Series three oh collapse, yep,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want that.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>So, uh, didn't Boston come back from three to zero?

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>That was in the Division Series. It's never happened in

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a World Series, League championship, League championship. Yeah, they came

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>back on the Yankees, Boston a right of course. Yeah,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>both American League teams. Yeah, Uh, that was I gonna say.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, So, I was kind of excited about the AI

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that Apple Phone was going to have, just because I

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>want to start messing around with AI and it's got to.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Be super easy for me to use and I do

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>everything on my phone. But it's getting pretty tepid reviews

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately so far. I assume it will improve, but you

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>never know.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But here's a little AI chat gb he sort of

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>story here from CNN yesterday.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing the rise of empathetic AI. This is artificial intelligence.

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>It's different from just chat GPT where you're trying to

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 3>get it to help you with creative writing or tasks.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 3>This is artificial intelligence that is actually created to feel

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 3>human and personable and character AI is an interesting platform

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>because it's actually a two way immersive experience where you

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>build these characters, or you can have a character that

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, and you begin to actually feel like you're

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 3>living within a story. And they build this AI fan

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 3>fiction platform. So this isn't just normal AI that we're

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>hearing about. This is the rise of empathetic intelligence, and

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>this company has been at the forefront of it.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So empathetic AI.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And then there's an example of well that's pretty long,

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's a fourteen year old boy who's driven to

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>suicide by this. I got to believe the kid was

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>struggling before this came along, but yeah, but if you've

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>followed the story, it's extremely troubling. Yeah, so the role

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that this platform played you what do you what do

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you think you think this is going to become a thing,

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like a common thing where people feel like they're friends

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>with and lovers one hundred percent it's already happening. Yeah,

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and it'll spread like crazy, and the birth rate will

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to decline between this and pornography.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Man, sorry to be the bear of bad news,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>but I mean, that's that's as clear as it can

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>be to me.

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty easy for me to be quite judgmental about this. Like,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you got to be a certain sort

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of sad person for this to happen.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. I haven't, I haven't done it.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that first time you come home and you realize

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to your chat bot because they make you

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>feel better, you realize, holy crap.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's sad and it's pathetic if it's an adult.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But like I always say about indoctrination, the reason they

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>go after the kids is because it works. It's fairly

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. And if you're a child or an

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>adolescent who's not known the normal way to deal with

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, having a online porn enhanced quote unquote relationship

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem that odd, do you.

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I gotta look, it's sick.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I gotta keep an eye on my kids having some

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of chat bought friend that's made them feel.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Good, Armstrong and getty.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 7>The new reports found that Americans are changing their vacation

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 7>plans due to election anxiety. Yep, people are waiting till

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 7>after the election so they know whether by a round

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 7>trip or one way. Wow, okay, smiley, amusing, but some

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 7>people mean it.

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw a thing yesterday was uh, and this person

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>was completely serious. They're making a list of things that

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they're grateful for should Trump win, to remind them that

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>life is still you know, good.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 2>God, dang it. I can't imagine being that wrapped up

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 2>and who gets elected president? I I care a lot.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes a big difference, but I'm not gonna.

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't need like therapy to survive it. Yeah, I

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>wish the most and wise among us. Could you know,

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>issue forth some book or editorial or something or other

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>explaining how I guess they already have.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>But how is it.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody like equates their own soul their reason for being

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with a political candidate. But the hell is that, I

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know other than unhealthy as can be. I was

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this the other day. We've talked many times

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>about how human beings clearly have a tendency toward wanting

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a king, like putting all their faith in a human

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's got to be an evolutionary thing that the

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>tribes that survived were the ones that all rallied around

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a leader, as opposed to I'm not with him, I'm

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>not with them. Some of us are with them, some

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of us are not. Got defeated by the next door

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>village where they all believe they'd stuck with the guy

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. Yeah, it's helpful to look at human

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>history as a long timeline because democracy has been around

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>for as long as golf shoes.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's like it's a completely new thing.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, our tendency is toward the strong leader who

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>will defeat our enemy. So you pick somebody, you go

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with him, and then in your mind you justify being

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>behind this person no matter what. So your village, everybody

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>fights and fights hard because it matters for our guy,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>even with his claws. Or even then, if I'm skinning

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a deer, I'm thinking about skinning a deer.

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Non who's going to be the new tribal chief.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Then if I'm tending my crops or cleaning out my hut,

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not obsessed with it round the clock anyway. How

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>A book from nineteen seventy explains the current election. I

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thought this was very interesting. After this, I vowed to

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>reset this and hadn't gotten to it because everything's so

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy busy right now. But that story The New York Times,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>which has been pretty brave on the whole abusing and

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>torturing children in the name of transgender ideology, they've been

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty brave about reporting some stuff, and I I think

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it was last week I brought up that a big

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>transgender scientist lady had gotten ten million dollars to do

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a study through the NIH on whether the hormone treatments

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and puberty blockers were actually helping the adolescent kids. Well,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the study came out with a resounding no, absolutely not.

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But then the doctor has declined to publish it out

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of fear that opponents of this garbage will use it

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>for their own ends. And I quote, I do not

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>want our work to be weaponized. It has to be

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly on point, clear and concise, and that takes time,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. But if it had found the puberty blockers

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>do help the kids, would the study still be unpublished?

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I think not.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, this is a setup to the fabulous JK. Rowling

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking of moral courage. She's got more money than God,

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>but still she is really risked a lot all the

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>anti Christian wizard books.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow Wow. Putting that aside for a moment, here's what

0:20:58.960 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>she said.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Or if you don't know that, we must not publish

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a study that says we're harming children because people who

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>say we're harming children will use the study as evidence

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>that we're harming children, which might make it difficult for

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>us to continue harming children.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I think this well summarized. JK has quite away with words.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I just heard this story the other day. I can't

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>believe I forgot it yesterday. I have to be very

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>vague because I don't want to get anybody trouble. But

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's somebody in the world of therapy who talks to

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>younger people, and it was the topic of in California.

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>How in the schools and in the world of therapy,

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>if a young person says they think they're the other sex,

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to tell the parents.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 5>Then.

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>And this person in the world of therapy said, I

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>want one, I thought that was ridiculous, And two said,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they've had a couple of people, a couple of young

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people come to them with and they were both girls.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 2>If I remember right, of course, who thought they were boys?

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>And she said or he said, could be either. You

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's a she or a he be transgender.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to be either.

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>The therapist said, I talked them out of it in

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like two minutes. But I have other people in my

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>world who would have immediately put them, you know, pushed

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>them toward the person that's gonna start them on the

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>drugs right away. Right, I talked them out of it

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in two minutes. I know people who would have fast

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>tracked them down the road. How horrifying is that your

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen year old girl, for whatever reason, you know, being

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a teenager freaking hard, your teenage girl thinks maybe I'm

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a boy. There are some people who said, I'll bet

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you are here start this drug. And once you start

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the drug under affirming care, that's the only thing you

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>can do.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 2>Affirm it.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't affirm it, they're gonna kill themselves,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so you have to or they're death's on your hands.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And once you get one drug into them affecting their hormones,

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>well then who knows what they're gonna think. I mean,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>everything's up in the air at that point.

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 2>So few to confused.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Adolescents always know what's best for themselves and ought to

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be empowered to make permanent changes. That nobody has ever

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>believed that in all of human history, and yet it's

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>getting jammed down our throats. But how scary is that

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that those two kids happened to land with a therapist

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>who talked them out of it in two minutes, as

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a therapist who fast tracked them on the drugs.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that's horrifying. That changed the course of

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that child's life. Oh my god, that that therapist is

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a hero and or heroine d or neither, by the way,

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>are also worth saying.

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 5>What was it?

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 2>It just flitted out of my head.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh hey, it's just undeniable that adolescent females have a

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>tendency toward.

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>What is the proper term masses.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Theory is overstating it, but they are very impressionable. It's

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the same principle though, it's psychological impressionability. Do you remember

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>when anarexio was such a huge problem all the time.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, because I think it explains BTS girls. What

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now the popularity of the K pop band I don't

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>kid mass hysteria, Oh mass hysteria, not anarexia.

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, because I just said anirextion.

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>They get they can also get together and believe all

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>kinds of weird stuff like BTS is.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>A good band.

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, But then anorexia is stopped being a thing because

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they weren't looking at each other and trying to be

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>out skinnied and blah blah blah. It's It's still a

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>problem in some places, but none nearly as big adolescent

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>females are prone to, you know, impressionability anyway, and this

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is the current one. And to affirm it is obscene anyway.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Enough set on that topic, There'll be more for another day.

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was so interesting. If you want to

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>understand this year's election, look at this book from nineteen seventy.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 2>It's called The Real Majority.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>It was during Nixon's first term, and it was written

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of Democrats who are trying to save

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>their party from future defeats, Richard Scammon and Ben Wattenberg,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>who'd been a speech writer for Lynnon Johnson.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 2>Fairly well known.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, that's Jonah Goldberg's first boss. He always talks about.

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, I knew that name was familiar, Okay, anyway.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So Scamon and Waterberg believed that their fellow Democrats misunderstood

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the country's electorate.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 2>See if this sounds familiar to you.

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>The energy of the nineteen sixties had led the party

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that the typical voter was young and highly educated.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>As a hypothetical example, the book described a twenty four

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>year old political science instructor at Yale, But in reality,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the authors wrote, the typical voter resembled a forty eight

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>year old woman living in the suburbs of Dayton, Ohio,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>who didn't have a college degree and whose husband was

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a machinist. This Dayton voter wasn't poor, but she struggled

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with rising inflation. She worried about crime, student protests, and

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>drug use polls showed. I mean, this is like, this

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is almost crazy that this was written fifty four years ago.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>She felt ambivalent about the Vietnam War. She was one

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of the plain people. With Scammon and Waterberg put it,

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we had long voted Democratic but was uncomfortable with the

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>party's leftward shift towards the views of the twenty four

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>year old Yale instrument Peace unless Democrats changed courses, the

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>authors wrote, quote, we may see, well see Republican presidents

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in the White House for a generation. And sure enough,

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were won four of the next five presidential elections.

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Might have been five of five if you hadn't had Watergate.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh yeah, absolutely true. But I just thought that

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was that's so so prescient.

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Today, you know, it's the last decade when many Democrats

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>were shoving like less border security, less policing, long COVID lockdowns,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the end of private health insurance, decriminalization, decriminalization of pronouns, drugs, pronouns, transgender,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>this the anti jew Jewish, you know, chants and everything

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>on campuses.

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 2>The real voter is that lady in Dayton, not the

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 2>the social.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Degree, the women's studies degree spouting Wellesley grad who is

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>screaming in the face of a little girl on that

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>recent video. If you've seen that, that's that's not the voter.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is not America anyway, what's what's old is new?

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was interesting.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is very interesting, and uh, we'll see if

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 2>it's right again. And and one final thought.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>They they describe that gal that you know, archetypal gal

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>as the plain people, and that's fine.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I get it.

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But I would describe it as the practical people you're

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking back to my younger days. Mean, Judy

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and I I mean plane is kind of like average

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or live on the planes when you said Dayton, Ohio

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>average average, Yeah, suburbs, date and yeah. And I think

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think practical people is not prejudicial. And I'll tell

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you why because it sounds like I'm trying to win

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>an argument. But when when Judy and I had our kids,

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and when Delanny came along, our third kid, we were

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>doing okay.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 2>But Judy was a.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Stay at home mom and we watched every single penny

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and we lived in a very small rental house and

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>flights of ideological fancy were not a big part of

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>our world, if you know what I mean. We were

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>busting our ass to try to keep the kids fed

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and keep the roof over our heads, try to grow

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the career, you know, get the repairs done on the

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>car that we could barely afford. We were just we

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>were very much a working American family, even though I

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was in media at the time. We were in media

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time. You have to be a twenty seven

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>year old women's studies major from Princeton. I think to

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>spend all your time and energy on this wild progressive crap.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 2>People who the plain people, they don't have time and

0:28:59.320 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>they don't.

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Have interest in all this garbage, time being a big

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>part of it, and they're not on Twitter much either.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking to what you were saying. Laundry

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and laundry and meals. That's what I spend so much

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of my time on laundry and meals. Yeah, you clean

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>up from the last meal, it's time to get the

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>next one ready. And I don't have any socks for tomorrow. Crap,

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing that all the time. You don't have a

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of time to sit around and think about some

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of this weird crap they come up with and go

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>pontific hat online or screech on a college campus about

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>how the Jews are settler colonialists. So it's the plain people,

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the practical people. Pick the term you like.

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Ah.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I just saw an article about how the NFL is

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to deter political expressions after a forty nine or

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>throwing a Trump hat and ran into an interval.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, now politics is a problem. Are you a fie?

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Are you tagging the NFL?

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>That's how it bounds Okay, we have we have more

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all the way to stay with us, Getty. So, speaking

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of parenting, as Joe was, parenting is especially as the

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>kids get older. As every parent knows, it's never ending

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>judgment calls, never ending judgment calls.

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Everything's a gray area, too strict, too lenient, to.

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, too much this, too little of that, whatever,

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>varies from kid to kid. It's just NonStop judgment calls. Yeah.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, I'm not sure if I got this one

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 2>right or not. But we're well.

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>My son and I are walking back from the gym,

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>which we're going to regularly, which is cool. He's he's

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be thirteen here in a month, and we're walking

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>past yard signs in the neighborhood and one of them

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was a Harris Wall sign that said something like keep

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>your hands off my body or something like that. And

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>my son wanted to know what that was. And he

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>had asked the other day what abortion was, and I

0:30:58.480 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>think I ignored.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Him, but always a good strategy, and for whatever reason,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I decided yesterday to get into it and I said

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>it's about abortion. He said, what's abortion?

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And then I explained it and he was horrified and

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely horrified, and he's got particular things as longtime listeners

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>know that.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it wasn't a good idea to bring it up.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, But anyway, I was thinking how he

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>was horrified by the suggestion of what it was and

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what their particular view of it was. And I was thinking,

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>how much of his horror is the way I portrayed it,

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the way that family would have portrayed it.

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking that family probably would have said the family

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it has the Harris Walls sign in the yard. If

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>their kid asked what abortion was, would have said or

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just explaining the sign might have just gone with.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Some people believe males should be able to tell women

0:31:58.240 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>what kind of healthcare to get.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow, if you have to euphemize something that you know extensively,

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>take a look at yourself. Well, that's a pretty common

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thing in the abortion argument, isn't it. I mean, one

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>side wants to be very clear what we're talking about,

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and one side wants to use all kinds of euphemisms

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that make it seem like you're not allowed to get

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, your tetnis shot right, a bunch of white

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>men telling women they can't get tennis shots is what

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it is that would be an odd believe calcium supplements

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever other healthcare you might want.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I was trying to think what.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not unhappy with the opinion that with the conclusion

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he drew from what I explained at all, But I

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was just thinking about how somebody else would have explained

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that maybe you'd come to a

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>different conclusion. Well, yeah, if you were, if you cloaked

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it all in euphemism and dishonesty. And I'm, like most Americans,

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty moderate on the topic. I have a oddly and

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>esque view. I think abortions ought to be safe and

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>rare and for a limited time legal. I don't think

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there's any way around that in a society like ours. Yeah,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I did explain to him where America is where the

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of people are, which is, in case you don't know,

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and you probably do, that a majority of Republicans, Democrats,

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>men and women are okay with it first trimester.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>It's just true, whether you like it or not.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But after that, a majority men, women, Republicans, Democrats are

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not okay with it. And it's been steady for years.

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Why we can't just get that into law more or less.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know demagoguery and dishonesty. Honestly, I think well,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair as an analyst, the pro life

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>maximalist position, meaning life is sacred from the moment of conception,

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is very very powerful in politics. Sure, very very generous

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of political support and enthusiastic about getting out

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to the polls.

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>You have to consider it as a Republican.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, and apparently the given inch, they'll take a mile

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>crowd is so convinced that that's true in this case

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that you don't want to have any restrictions at all for.

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people. I don't get that.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, right well, ginning up fear is such a huge

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the democratic playbook at this point. I mean,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like all of it. I don't have to

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>gin up fear of a legal immigration. Ten million people

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have come in in the last few years, maybe more

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve thirteen, Who knows. I don't have to gin up

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>fear of crime. Look at the National Crime Victim's survey

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>that just came out. It's astounding. I don't have to

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>gin up the idea that there are junkies in your

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>parks and on your streets. But Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>refused to answer the question with Nora O'Donnell last night

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on the CBS News about restrictions. Jes just wouldn't answer it, Yeah,

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>because you'd turn off the people who want abortion. Up

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to the ninth month, I guess coming up some powerful

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>voices in favor of just women in women's sports, of

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>development on that front, Armstrong and Getty