WEBVTT - Reddit IPO, Intel Chips, Boeing's Cash Drain, Gucci Sales Fall

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.159
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Playing and

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Broun Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Busy twenty four hours or so. Here in the ipo market,

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>we've got Esteri Labs that price last lane at thirty six,

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 2>indicating to open at fifty six, so that would be

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>good for the ipo market. And then we've also got

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Reddit looking to price tonight. And we saw some Bloomberg

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>reporting earlier today. It says they are considering the high

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>end or perhaps even above it abobove the range. So

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>let's break it all down with Bailly Lipschaltz. She covers

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the equity markets, including the new issue markets. So Billy,

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>let's sell with Astera Labs. Boy, if this would open

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>we had fifty six dollars again after pricing at thirty six,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that would be huge news for the ico market.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.959
<v Speaker 3>The even more interesting thing this is an ipo that

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>bumped up its rage, increased the allocation and number of shares,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and then priced above. So we're already talking about it

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 3>pricing almost twenty six.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Percent of government for this kind of bump necessarily.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>No, and this is the deal that everyone had circled.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>We're all talking about Reddit. But when I talk to

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>bankers and investors, they say a stair Labs, they're backed

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>by Intel, they make AI chips, they fit into every

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>tailwind that you want in this market. That's the deal

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 3>that you want to keep an eye on.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>And they're profitable, but they don't do the weight lossing.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 5>As far as I know, they're profitable, which begs the

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 5>question is Reddit profitable?

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>They are not.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 3>They've been on the path to profitability, if you will.

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>They talked up kind of the fact that they tightened spending.

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 3>They have AI licensing, data licensing partnerships that really kind

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of bolstered numbers in three Q really four Q of

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>last year. But when you talk to investors in some

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 3>of the skeptical analysts, the big question is it's almost

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>two decades old, it's not profitable. It operates in social media,

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>which has its own flurry of issues. You look at

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Snapchat and Pinterest, who are the two best comps publicly traded?

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Those docks aren't doing too well. But if it does,

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>price at the top of the range. That'd be a

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>six point four billion dollar valuation haircut from the ten

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 3>billion it raised at in twenty twenty one, but still

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe a bit of a green shoot. It does remind

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>me quite a bit of the instacart ipo in the

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 3>fall of last year, which took a quote unquote down round,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>but right now is trading up about twenty three percent

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 3>from that IPO price, despite some choppy aftermarket performance.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 2>So when Reddit, I also understand in addition to the

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>advertising component, which again we've seen before as you mentioned

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>with Pinterest and others Snapchat, there's also a data component

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>to it, and they're trying to tie it into a

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 2>little bit of an AI situation. You can explain what

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 2>that pitch is.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I talked to one of the pitch book

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>analysts who laid it out, I think pretty easily.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>He said.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Basically, they're trying to license data for AI makers, so

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>they have exactly what some of these AI companies want,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>which is engagement and human beings posting and talking to

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 3>each other. He basically said, though the question is it's

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>still in the early stages.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, exactly the human.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Beings, and that's one of the things I talked to

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 3>a number of Wall Street Bets moderators about whether or

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>not they're buying into the IPO.

0:02:58.240 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>They were very much divided.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>But the big quest question for them, the boal case

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 3>for these believers of Reddit, these redditors, is that as

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 3>of now where we are in kind of the AI

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>technology landscape, you need data, you need input, you need

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>humans to create something. So that's one of the big

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of pitches from Reddit is that if you open

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 3>up a partnership with Google or whoever and say, hey,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 3>here's the thousands and millions of people actively engaging with

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>each other, do with it what you want. Though, that

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 3>does kind of raise questions for users and whether or

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>not they would maybe taper.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Off their usage.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Well also yes, and also I was going to say,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 5>like I've never been on Reddit. Do we want language

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 5>models to know Reddit? Really like, do we like that relationship?

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the big question.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I lurk, So I don't, Alex, I don't

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>have a Reddit account, but I do.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I lurk.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>You know you're planning a trip, you kind of want

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 3>to see what people recommend or if you're looking to

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>make a purchase, see what what.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>The forums are talking about.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>But I think even if you talk to Reddit users,

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of their content is not safe for work.

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>A lot of it is shall we say, not family friendly,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>and they call each other a lot of names and taking.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Actually I did go on Reddit. I went down the

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Kate Middleton reddit rabbit hole.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, did you find good content?

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know what to trust. I didn't know what

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 4>was real.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 5>I got really confused, and then I got scared and

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 5>I left. But that's a great example of like what

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 5>what reddit is?

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>It sounds about right, Yeah, And Reddit is built on

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>so called karma points. So you get karma points when

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>people upvote your comments or upvote your posts vote, which

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 3>is just basically liking. It's liking, but you can also

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 3>dislike it. I actually trying to get people to talk

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to me and said I was a Bloomberg reporter and

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 3>wanted to talk about the IPO. Immediately had negative karma like.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 5>That hurts.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then you can't comment. So then I couldn't

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 3>comment anything. I couldn't respond to people because I know exactly.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 3>And then yeah, I got hit with some of the

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Steve Belushia giffs and memes of like hey, cool, fellow

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 3>fellow friends like what's going on?

0:04:59.120 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Which?

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 2>All right, how important are these two IPOs to the

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>new issue market here? I mean, do we have a

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch backed up and we're just looking for some

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 2>good karma in the IPO market? How important these two

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>names here? They're critical? And it's really because they both

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 2>are in the tech space. They are what we would

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>call kind of down the middle of the fairway IPOs

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 2>in that five hundred to a billion dollar raise in

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 2>terms of cash being funded.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 3>You look at arm and armor sports, Yeah, big deals,

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 3>they're their own thing. The big thing though, when I

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 3>talked to bankers is that at this point in time,

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 3>the new issue market is going to be idiosyncratics. So

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the reason for Asteria Labs going public is very different

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>than the reason that Rerdeup's going public. And they're they're

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of trying to take or at least trying to

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 3>read the signals from investors on who's willing to pay

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>what multiple. But if these deals price as they are

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 3>indicated and trade strongly, I definitely think, at least from

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>my channel checks and conversations, that people will be drawn

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 3>from the sidelines.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 5>Is it do you think that these companies and I

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 5>appreciate their all different companies. Do they need the money

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 5>to go stuff? Is it a commentary on while this

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 5>market's awesome when we get a piece of it, or

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 5>is it we need investors need to cash out or

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 5>employees have shares and they need a vehicle?

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Like what is the reasoning?

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 3>A little bit of both, so you have in both

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 3>cases insider selling is part of the IPO, so trying

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>to get some form of a return. But when you

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 3>look at a Steri Labs taking those proceeds and being

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>able to kind of bolster on their operations. Again to

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>your point, they're writing the AI wave. So if you

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>can have Jensen wang As filming a video for your roadshow,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 3>that's going to get people excited.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>So why not go public now?

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Whereas write it again, you look at the business, the

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>evolution of the business on that path to profitability. It's

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 3>been private, it's about nineteen years old, so it's kind

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 3>of due time for it to go public again, similar

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>to instacart. So they all kind of have their own reasons.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 3>But the big thing when you talk to investors and

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 3>bankers either profitability, path to profitability or some form of

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>unit economics and that's been the big thing, and that's

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 3>why we can see some of the more interesting names

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I think potentially going public in the next few weeks

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 3>and months, those names that have been in the pipeline,

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 3>but also some that just have good, strong, fundamental businesses.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I would think there'd be a lot of private equity

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>sponsored deals that would like to come.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 3>So we haven't seen a lot that was Homer Sports

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 3>was essentially private equity, not necessarily bright Spring is just

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>KKR back that was a disaster of a deal and

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 3>traded terribly. That was at least when I talked to

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 3>some investors and strategists, was kind of.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>They just needed to get it out the door.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 3>But to your point, when you're a private equity company,

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 3>a private equity firm, you're kind of looking to recycle

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and get that fund of flows. We've had the IPO

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>market really frozen for a few years at this point,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>so it's really a question of will they kind of

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 3>cave on valuation and meet investors where they are Because

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those assets are big, they aren't necessarily growing,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>and you need to get someone to at least buy

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>the IPO.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 4>Will they do you think they will?

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I think again, it goes back to the whole case

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>by case argument.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 4>That company a company.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>The big thing is when you look at your comps.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 3>So if you're again an Asteri Labs, Semiconductors AI perfect,

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>If you're Reddit, a little bit tougher again because Snapchat Pinterest,

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>but you're pitching that AI kind of part of the

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 3>business and also trying to get more tied to meta platforms.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 5>All right, Bailey, great stuff, really really great stuff. I'm

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 5>amazed that you can be that excited about so many

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 5>different companies going ipo and Billy Lipschaltz, a Bloomberg News

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 5>IPO reporter, joining us there.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>The other news item out there, in addition to the

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>FED one of the key ones. It's just kind of

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in the chip business. Got a couple data points for

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 2>you here. Today, Intel wins almost twenty billion dollars in

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>chips incentives for US plants. That's good for Intel in

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the US chip business. On the flip side, the US

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>ways sanctioning Huawei's secretive Chinese chip network. Let's get the

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>latest on kind of what's happening there. We're joined by

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Mackenzie Hawkins. She is a Bloomberg News US industrial reporter. Mackenzie,

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us here. Let's start with

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Intel here here. I guess this is part of on shoring.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, a lot of stuff on the US soil,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>particularly on the chip side, talks about this Intel story, right.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 7>So today we saw the first preliminary term sheet for

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 7>an advanced chip maker to come out of this broader

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 7>US effort to bring semi conductor manufacturing back to American soil.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 7>So Biden signed the chips back into law in August

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty two. Companies have been waiting for you know,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 7>well over a year to see those funds start flowing

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 7>out the door. They haven't actually flowed out the door yet.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 7>Intel's award today is just a preliminary agreement, and it

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 7>will be likely until the end of this year that

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 7>they start to actually see money doled out in tranches.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 7>But this is a huge investment in you know, the

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 7>real leading American chip maker, and I mean these chips

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 7>will power you know, the AI friends. There are the

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 7>types of tips that go into nuclear missiles and hypersonics,

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 7>and this is a really significant investment for the company

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 7>and for the states for they're building, including Arizona, Ohio, Oregon,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 7>and New Mexico.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 5>So Mackenzie pair of this. So okay, I love covering energy.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 5>So I'm really into the IRA And like what you've

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 5>seen a lot in the IRA is everyone got super excited,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 5>but then actually sort of putting shovels in the ground

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 5>was a lot more difficult. So there's like, yeah, yeah,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 5>we're gonna get the money, It's gonna happen, but it's

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 5>not happening quite yet. How do we think this plays

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 5>out from the chips act? Like when does Intel put

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 5>a shovel in the ground. What other companies are trying

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 5>to put their shovels in the ground and get the

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 5>funding and will it actually you know, happen.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 7>So Intel's already building these facilities. They've had a twenty

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar Arizona expansion underway for some time. They're building

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 7>multiple fabrication facilities, there. They're making some progress in Ohio,

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 7>although there's been reporting that that's slightly delayed. We expect

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 7>that construction to finish in twenty twenty six. Intel's rival

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Taiwan Semi Conductor Manufacturing Company and Samsung out of South

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 7>Korea are also building plants in the US. Both of

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 7>their sites have seen some delays that the companies and

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 7>the Biden administration insist are in line with typical projections,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 7>but time will tell on this one. It will be

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 7>years before these facilities are stood up. The Commerce Department

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 7>has set a goal that the US will produce twenty

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 7>percent of the world's advanced logic shows by the end

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 7>of the decade. Currently we're at about zero, so that's

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 7>a lot of progress to catch up on. Most of

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 7>that productions happening in East Asia. The companies announced their

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 7>projects before they got the funding from the federal government,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 7>but it is certainly their expectation that they will receive

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 7>that funding, and they would like it to happen, probably

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 7>a little bit faster than it did.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Hey McKinnie, how secure is this funding over time? Thinking

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 2>about we may have a new administration in twenty twenty five,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>how secure is this funding particularly you know in the

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:51.479
<v Speaker 2>out years.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 7>It's a great question. So today's announcement is a preliminary agreement.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 7>Then there's a due diligence stage, and then a final

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 7>term sheet between Intel and the Commerce Department that will

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 7>likely come closer to the time of the presidential election.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 7>And the Commerce Department is setting all types of benchmarks

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 7>that Intel must need for the money to be doled

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 7>out over time. So it's not that they get the

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 7>final agreement and then they get eight and a half

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars in grants and eleven billion dollars worth of

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 7>love loan guarantees. They have to meet benchmarks related to production,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 7>related to workforce development, and there are all types of

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 7>requirements that Biden's Commerce Department might set that a potential

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 7>from Commerce Department might not be as interested in. You've

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 7>seen saying like child care facilities, which Intel and other

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 7>companies have committed to community development agreements, all those types

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 7>of things. It's entirely possible that that could shift over time.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 7>But the reality is, once they've got the equipment in

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 7>the building, these are machines that cost hundreds of millions

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 7>of dollars, they're committed to these facilities but Intel's CEO

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 7>Podcassingers said just yesterday, we might need to shift back

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 7>to two point zero companies buying for a lot more

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 7>money than they currently have. The advance chipmakers together asked

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 7>for more than double what the Commerce Department has available.

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 7>So this is really something to watch over the next

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 7>couple of years and decades.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, is President Trump really going to go to

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Ohio and Arizona and Oregon in New Mexico and be like,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 5>just kidding, I'm gonna take this development back. I mean,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 5>I think that's going to be a tricky proposition since

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 5>hearing it.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Is so much money.

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 5>So I just came back mackenzie from energy conference basically,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 5>and I was just telling Paul that all the talk

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 5>there was that tech companies are finally getting wise to

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 5>the fact that they're going to build all this stuff

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 5>they need power, and that power isn't as easy to

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 5>come by as they might have thought. Do you hear

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 5>that at all on your industrial side, Like, hey, this

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 5>is great, build all these data centers Intel, but like,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 5>who's going to how are you going to get that power?

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 4>What do you plug it in?

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, the infrastructure is a top concern for these companies.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, a big part of their ability to apply

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 7>for chap X funding is to demonstrate commercial viability and

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 7>that they have buy in from state and localists to

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 7>marshal the resources necessary to stand up factories that cost

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 7>tens of billions of dollars to build, sometimes require entire

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:13.239
<v Speaker 7>new water pipelines or energy resources. You know, take Arizona,

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 7>which has not just this massive Intel expansion but also

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 7>a huge factory to factories under construction from PSMC. Arizona

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 7>does one hundred year water planning. This is a desert

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 7>and so they've had to very carefully plan their water

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 7>development ensure residents that their water supply is not going

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 7>to be impacted, and I mean down to the land

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 7>parcels in Arizona, they've planned these industrial park. You see

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 7>similar things happening in Indiana, which is expected to get

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 7>a roughly fifteen billion dollar investment from Skhinex, which is

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 7>one of the main advanced packaging companies out of South Korea.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 7>That announcement hasn't been formally announced yet on Boo Bloomberg

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 7>has reported on it. So I mean, this is a

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 7>massive infrastructural effort which, as you note, is coming alongside

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 7>a lot of other investments in other sectors coming from

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 7>the Inflation Reduction Act, things like UV's batteries, hydrogen, wind, solar,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 7>and sort of more traditional heart infrastructure from the Byparts

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 7>and Infrastructure Law.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 2>All Right, more news mackenzie on the chip front, which

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>you're reporting as well. Well, you're all over this stuff.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>The US ways sanctioning Huawei's secretive Chinese chip network. This

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 2>sounds like another round of what may be a technological

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>cold war between China and the West. What's the latest

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>year with Whuahwei?

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 7>Certainly so this is I would say the strongest potential

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 7>US reactions so far. So a pretty significant breakthrough that

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 7>Huawei had last August. So Huawei has been the target

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 7>of US efforts to curtail China's text development for years now.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 7>Is originally sanctioned in twenty nineteen the Biden administration that

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 7>was under Trump. The Biden administration followed up with sweeping

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 7>export controls on the ability of US companies and foreign

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 7>companies that use US technology to ship advance shifts and

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 7>ship making equipment to China, and the goal was to

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 7>cap Huawei and other Chinese companies chip development. At what

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 7>we consider an older generation or mature node. And then

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 7>while the Commerce Secretary Junior Raimondo was visiting China in August,

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 7>Huawei unveiled a smartphone that was powered by an advanced

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 7>seven nanimeter chips produced by their chip making partner, Smick,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 7>also a Chinese company, and a lot of people who've

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 7>been watching the industry for a while saying this isn't

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 7>actually hugely surprising. Of course, China's doubling down on efforts

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 7>to build a full domestic semi conductor supply chain. They

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 7>figured out how to retool some older generation machines from

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 7>the main Dutch equipment maker to produce these chips. But

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 7>a lot of folks in Washington were caught a little

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 7>bit by surprise and has been working on a response.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 7>And so this is what the response could look like.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 7>There's a network that Bloomberg reported on last year. The

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 7>Semi Conductor Industry Association of Washington based trade group identified

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 7>several companies that could potentially produce chips for Huawei in

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 7>the future. And so this list affirms that BIDEN is

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 7>considered sanctioning, meaning that any shipments to those companies would

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 7>require a formal license from the Commerce department includes four

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 7>companies that might make chips for Huawei and two companies

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 7>that they're worried. These are not actual shipmakers themselves, but

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 7>they could import advanced equipment and then send that to

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 7>Huaweis or to Huawei's other infomating partners to continue producing

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 7>these chips.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Really great stuff. You were coming out all the time

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 5>at Kensie Hawkins. Thank you so much, Bloomberg News US

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 5>Industrial Reporter. It's just the whole decoupling thing. Yeah, exactly,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 5>really hard. It's take out a lot of time.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Appo, Cardplay and Android

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of Boeing, I'm looking at the stock here. It's

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>up about one point eight percent, as Abigail suggested, so

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 2>still down twenty nine percent year to date and off

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>about ten percent over tilling twelve months. There really some

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>concerns there from investors. So let's check in with George

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Fergus and he's an aerospace and airlines analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 2>He joins us a via a zoom from Princeton. God

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>for Biddy gets on the train and comes to New York.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, he's the best on the street, so we

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>appreciate getting a few minutes at his time. George, you know,

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>I love Boeing. It's just a great American company. I

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 2>love aerospace. But boy, these guys have just seems like

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.239
<v Speaker 2>every day something's happening here.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's partly you know, the press is just

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 2>picking up on any little thing. But what's going on

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>there with Boeing? Really, do you think?

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think we heard it from Brian West

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 8>this morning. He was in London at the Bank of

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 8>America conference. And you know, besides, I think the cash

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 8>flow guidance he provided, he provided few details about anything else.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 9>And so.

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 8>He describes a lot of processes, you know, processes at

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 8>the FAA to get airplanes certified, processes and refining, the

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 8>manufacturing process, curing, you know, the excess outsourcing they've probably

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 8>done over the last couple of dedys aids.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 9>So I think what you really get.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 8>Is a sense of a company that's in a state

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 8>of a lot of flux, and you know, I think

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 8>that the markets have shown us, you know, the stock

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 8>prices sort of reflects that.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 5>So George, does that mean so if the stock is

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 5>up two percent, does that mean that it could have

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 5>been worse? Like?

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Is that my takeaway?

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 5>Like that cash burn and the cash outflow could have

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 5>been worse than foreign a half billion.

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's my biggest takeaway from this was that, you know,

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 8>the market likes the fact that he talked about cashual

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 8>being positive by the end of the year. So it

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 8>sounds like they've got a pretty nice ramp up in

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, sort of resuming build rates of their factories

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 8>across the year.

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 9>That was better than what I expected.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 8>But again, the storyline inside the company is still one

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 8>that's all about flux and not about details. So I

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 8>just wonder. I think I got a sense there's some

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 8>risk in that cashlow projection.

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 2>So, George, you've covered Boeing for decades here, can you

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 2>recall a time when maybe they're they've had these quality

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 2>issues before? Is this how unprecedented disease? You know, last

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>couple of years?

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:11.959
<v Speaker 8>Really, I think thoroughly unprecedented. Right, So, even as I

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 8>was leaving Blackrock, you know, on the during the global

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 8>financial crisis. I remember Boeing stock was down at thirty

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 8>three dollars a share, pretty cheap than what it is today.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 8>But the discussion then was just about like a defense portfolio,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 8>who products really weren't that modern, you know, and and

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 8>angst about the company's future, but not these kind of

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 8>problems inside their manufacturing business, which is the core business

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 8>of this company, right, it's an engineering and manufacturing company.

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 8>If you can't manufacture things well in aerospace, that's a

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 8>bad science. So I don't think it's ever been this

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 8>bad ever.

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 5>So just to recap today, at a Bank of America

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 5>conference in London, the CFO, so the cash outflow is

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 5>going to reach four to four and a half billion

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 5>in the first quarter. Analysts we're looking for maybe five

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 5>billion plus, and like you said that maybe we'll get

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 5>cash flow positive by the end of the year.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 4>That was the indication from Boeing. Do we believe.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 5>Okay, that's not the right question. How did they come

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 5>up with this estimate? Like what are the factors that

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 5>go into this kind of estimate?

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 8>That's exactly we don't know, right, And so some of

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 8>it's all about deliveries, it's all about deliveries of commercial airplanes.

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 8>And so what I heard, you know, listening to it

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 8>this morning was I heard what I thought was, we're

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 8>going to be at rate thirty eight by the end

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 8>of the year, which is the rate they should have

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 8>probably built out.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 2>All year long.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 8>And then we'll move to the next higher rate, that's

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 8>thirty eight a month, sorry on the seven thirty seven,

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 8>and we'll move to the next higher rate when.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 9>The FAA lets us.

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 8>So we'll publish tomorrow on the Bloomberg Terminal our view

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 8>at Bloomberg Intelligence of what we think build rates were.

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 8>I can tell you we have factored in a fourth

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 8>quarter at rate thirty eight, but it sounds like quarter

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 8>one is going to be a really rough quarter. So

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 8>they'll have to pull a lot of things back together

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 8>to get rate back to thirty eight by the end

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 8>of the year.

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 5>I think it's everything has to go right, yeah, for

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 5>that to happen, Paul, And as we know, that never happened.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Never happens. But George, you've told us in the past,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 2>in the airspace business, there is no hey, we did

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good job on this plane. It has to

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 2>be perfect every single time, otherwise it's disastrous. And from

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>their customers perspective.

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 9>Georgia.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>If I'm a big buyer, like a Southwest or United,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 2>what am I saying to these guys? I mean, I

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 2>fly thousands of these planes every single day in my fleet.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 2>What am I telling Boeing these days?

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so you're watching very very closely. Of course, you're

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 8>telling Boeing the quality is job one. Safety quality is

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 8>job one. But if you're especially if you're like a

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 8>Southwest or a Ryanair where you're a pure fleet, right,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 8>you really can't afford your most important supplier to have

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 8>problems like this. So I think you're quietly coaching them

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 8>to improve things, hoping for better, but you're probably biting

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 8>your nails a little bit, right because if they it

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 8>continues to be serious problems, You're not switching to Airbus,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, overnight.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 9>And I don't know that those people are considering it.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm not saying that they are, but you got to

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 8>be concerned. You've got to be watching very closely.

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 5>Does the cash burn that they're looking at for the

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 5>first quarter would that I guess the answer is no.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 5>But I'm just wondering if they wind up buying Spirit

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 5>what that does to their cash burn, Like, they look

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 5>optimistic about getting back to their ramp rate of thirty

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 5>eight per month by the end of the year, But

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 5>what if they buy Spirit. Doesn't that get worse? Isn't

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 5>there cash burn get worse?

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 8>I mean so, I guess to some degree, there's some

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 8>things that end up getting hidden when you start buying Spirit, right,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 8>because there's no If Spirit's showing a loss because they're

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 8>selling a fuselage to Boeing at a loss, you know

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 8>Boeing is getting some excess out of that, that whole

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 8>thing washes out. So you can't always say just because

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 8>they're pulling Spirit in it's going to be a loss.

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 8>It depends how they structure that whole thing too, Right,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 8>if they hive off the airbus businesses, we think some

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 8>of those are loss making that can make things better.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 8>I think it's I think it's really really hard to tell.

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 8>But for sure there'll be a lot of work down

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 8>at Spirit to make sure they stabilize the production at Spirit,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 8>and that's not going to help cash burn either. But

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 8>I'd assume Brian had that built into his assumptions.

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 2>George, Let's talk about the other half of your research coverage,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 2>which is the airlines themselves. I just flew Newark to

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Salt Lake City seven thirty seven Max eight fully packed

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to the gills both ways. How are the airlines doing

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>these days?

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so in one queue, I think a bunch of

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 8>them are going to show losses. So they're filling airplanes

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 8>because I think the revenue managers never let airplanes go

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 8>down the runway with almost you know, being entirely full.

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 8>But everything what counts, as you know, the most is

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 8>going to be the ticket prices. And you know, when

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 8>we looked at four Q as we closed out of

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 8>four Q, the biggest challenge to the higher revenue that

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 8>they were bringing in was all about out these higher

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 8>pilot salaries.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 9>Right. They gave a bunch away to the pilots, and

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 9>so while.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 8>We're all paying more for the ticket, the pilot's getting

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 8>more in the front seat.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 9>They probably deserve it. They work pretty hard.

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And it's so happy you do.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 9>Actually, So profitability is still challenged.

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 8>Compared to what we saw last decade, I think fares

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 8>would have to go even higher, and we've seen them

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 8>softening a bit. This summer could be a little bit

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 8>better for the airlines. You know, if we have a

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 8>bunch of Airbus A three twenties out of the market

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 8>because of the gear turbo fan problems. If Boeing deliveries

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 8>are slowing down capacity gains in the.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 9>Marketplace, it could be a little bit better.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 8>But we're not looking at an environment where we think

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 8>they're going to see twenty nineteen levels of profitability, not

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 8>twenty nineteen, you know, even last decade levels of profitability

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 8>this summer.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 9>So I'd say profits still a little bit weak. As

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 9>the airlines recover, I think there might.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 8>Be just too much capacity in the marketplace to get

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 8>at the cutting right.

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 5>Like getn't just blu anounced they're going to cut capacity.

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 5>They're getting out of certain markets and stuff like. I mean,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 5>it feels like the capacity cuts are underway.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of discussion at the airlines about how

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 8>to optimize schedules to try to improve fares. Like you said,

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 8>airlines like Jet Blue Spirit pushing back some of their

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 8>new deliveries as they manage balance sheets a little better

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 8>and think about, you know, their their financial health. I

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't say that all signals are rosy inside that market.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 8>I think they're especially on the low cost budget side.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 8>I think there's probably too much seat capacity in the

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 8>in the budget world, and folks have to think about

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 8>how they could fix that in order to get better

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 8>fares and improve profitability.

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 5>I have a question, why do some of my business

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 5>class tickets I have Sometimes I have a TV on

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 5>the back, and sometimes I don't, And it gets really confusing.

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Why is this? George?

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's all about how you know the airplane

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 8>they're using, how it's been outfitted. Sometimes it's on length

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 8>of haul and how important the market is.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 8>I've had overnight flights that come out of San Diego

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 8>where I can't even get a live flat seat on it,

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 8>and I'm a business class. You come out of LA

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 8>you get a live flat seat. Because competition is a

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 8>lot more intense than it. It depends about competition in

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 8>those marketplaces. It's about airlines using older equipment. But there

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 8>is even a school out there that says, why bother

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 8>putting a screen behind any seat anymore? Because everybody gets

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 8>on the airplane with an iPad or an iPhone will

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 8>stream them their content. Save all those electronics behind the

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 8>see save all that weight. Maybe it's a better world.

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 8>Sounds like you vote no exactly.

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point.

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well it's just not consistent. So it makes me

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 5>scratch my head. So going to Houston. I've been back

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 5>and forth and called last couple weeks TV super nice plane,

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 5>all good.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Coming back.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 5>Both times I'm like, oh, okay, this is an old plane,

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 5>isn't it, And like you don't have a TV.

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson, what's happening? I mean, right, George Ferguson, Thank

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 2>you very much. You can go back to work here

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 2>George Ferguson Aerospace Airlines and.

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomer Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with a Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Looking at the shares of Caring. That's the owner of

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of luxury good manufacturers, most notably Gucci. And

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 2>if you're looking for a good book in a good movie,

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the House of Gucci is awesome and it really gives

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a good sense what's happening there in that world. But boy,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 2>the stocks down thirteen percent here today. I need to

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>figure out why. So I go to one person, one

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>person only. That's Debacon. She's a senior in retail annalys

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg Intelligence covering the luxury space, amongst others. But

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I think your real forte is the luxury space. Got

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a really good sense of what's going on out there

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence in London. So deb carrying this is a

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>big company, it's got a forty five billion dollar market

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>cap stock, but it's really taking it on the chin today.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>What did the company announce? And what's going on with

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 2>friends of Gucci.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 6>Right high? So it was a prelimb on the Q

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 6>one in the knowledge that Gucci was by far weaker

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 6>than the market had expected, particularly out of Asia. So

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 6>the idea here a guided ten percent for coring overall

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 6>in the one queue. This whole group will start reporting

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 6>mid April, and then for Gucci in particular, they expected

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 6>to be down around twenty percent. Now what that does

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 6>Gucci into these numbers was fifty percent of cells and

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:43.479
<v Speaker 6>a much higher contributor to profitability and cash flow. We

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 6>already know that the whole sector is up against very

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 6>high comps, including but not actually Gucci, because we know

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 6>that it's been going through almost two years of transition,

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 6>but the brand did. The underlying product that's behind the

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 6>brand while it transitions to a new creative director, is

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 6>just not resonating out in Asia or is not being

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 6>backed perhaps in the way that it should with investment

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 6>and direct advertising.

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 5>How much of it is also that Gucci in some

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 5>ways I appreciate it's not cheap, but it became like

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 5>an aspirational thing for young people. And if that's the

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 5>area of consumer that's also getting hit, like it's not

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 5>our mes right, Like it's not like insane high end.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 5>They're trying to be sort of cooler. They're trying to

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 5>get that aspirational buyer.

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Is that a mistake?

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 6>So the idea actually with Gucci's that that's where they

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 6>ended up after three years of thirty to forty percent

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 6>of sales and into so many categories and their brand.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 6>It reminds me of something that happened a few years

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 6>ago also with Birbury. So their brand became more of

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 6>a fashion focus brand, a lot of a listers in

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 6>the younger generation, a lot of products that were kind

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 6>of niche in their product portfolio, and it lost what

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 6>I would classes the exclusivity, the high end, the level

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 6>of production that is expected for one of the names

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 6>you've given at the very high end, and what has

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 6>actually tried to do over the last two years is

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 6>to elevate luxury and identity and it's failed on that.

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 6>So it has a new creative director in place. Products

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 6>adjus in from mid February are only and ready to wear,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 6>which is fifteen percent of the business there, and it

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 6>needs the rest of the year to roll that out.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 6>And in the meantime, particularly in Asia, it's very much

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 6>a wholesale backed market where those wholesale accounts aren't willing

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 6>to take the risk on inventry which could become very

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 6>quickly obsolete from the prior creative director, and separately where

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 6>the new creative director is not yet tested.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So I know from talking to you in a pass

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and reading your research the Asian consumer is so key.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>The Asian market is so key, particularly China. What do

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>we hear because I don't see the Chinese shoppers on

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Fifth Avenue. I'm not sure if you've seen them on

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the high streets in London.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 4>But nothing. There's French people now in for that avenue.

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 2>There's all the Europeans are everywhere here, which is great.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 2>They're always welcome in New York. But I don't see

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the Asian shoppers. So talk to us about China. What

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>that means for luxury?

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 6>Oh, what's happening at the moment. There's a lot of

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 6>domestic spend. Now there is certainly what's propping up in

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 6>positive comments. After these results, we went through searching as

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 6>a reminder what was said by Mmes, by Kushin Ali,

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 6>Bipradra and others, and will certainly pop some of that

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 6>information out there. But overall, when you think about the

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 6>Chinese consumer, the numbers for the Chinese consumer or Asia

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 6>overall is still only about eighty percent recovered where it was.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:00.959
<v Speaker 6>Chinese consumer is shopping on the mainland. Excuse me, shopping

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 6>on the mainland. But also I was hearing from one

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 6>of our colleagues, Thailand is very very popular right now

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 6>because of price sensitivity. They can get a very good

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 6>break over there. Hong Kong, you only have a seven

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 6>day permit to stay from the Chinese mainland and so

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 6>therefore others are becoming more popular, like traveling to Singapore

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 6>where you have thirty day visa free. So there is

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 6>movement around, but it's just not really long haul yet,

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 6>and we weren't expecting that until the second half the year.

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 6>With what's happening with real estate another we're kind of

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 6>pushing that into end of the year twenty twenty five.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 5>So clearly this news is driving down most luxury stocks today,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 5>all lugsury stocks today, which one shouldn't be beaten.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 6>Up if I look at the end of twenty twenty three.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 6>First of all, I should highlight half one twenty four.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 6>We came into this year saying it was very much

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 6>going to be a tale of two halves. That's not

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 6>on a big pickup in the market per se, but

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 6>it's on the fact that the first half comps are

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 6>particularly heavy versus the second half. Even for emes, you're

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 6>looking at almost thirty percent growth in the first half

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 6>and half of that in the second half, so they're

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 6>up against big comps. But what doesn't get beaten up

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 6>it's the very high end of the hierarchy. So generally

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 6>it's MS. It's also prot should do very well. It's Kushnelly,

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 6>it's within the alviumhor portfolio. There are some brands which

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 6>they really pick out. Louis Vitandi or and others which

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 6>should still hold well.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 5>But even with your stand I know they're really nice,

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 5>it's really expensive and they're pretty, but it's like it's

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 5>like suits and stuff, it's like regular clothes, Like it's

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 5>not I don't get it right.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 6>I think with the Kushinelli side, it's about the quality

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 6>and what it offers, the fact that the product is

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 6>there with longevity, very well made, so it's a piece

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 6>that you can but in your wardrobe. A lot of

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 6>it is not seasonal, so you're buying a piece for

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 6>an event or the office or so, and it's something

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 6>that you can regularly use.

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 2>How is the luxury shopping? I know, as part of

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>your duligiens you'll go around to some of the luxury

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 2>stores in London. How are things in London and maybe

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 2>even Paris and the other places you go?

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I would say quite mixed. Actually you see

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 6>more of the high end where they're in there and

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 6>really being highly serviced and not so many not so

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 6>many bags on the high street. We are still seeing

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 6>decent numbers in terms of e commerce growth, but there

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 6>are there are very high end product. There's very high

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 6>end product out there in bags if you're in particular stores,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 6>but then you're only in selective stores where the brand

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:55.479
<v Speaker 6>is stocked, and so it is quite mixed out there

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 6>in any major cities.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Dev, thanks so much for joining us. As always,

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 2>debiecon she covers all the retailers, including the luxury names.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>For Bloomberg Intelligence based in London again Carringstock, owner of

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>several luxury brands including Gucci. Down about thirteen percent here today.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal