Speaker 1: All right, News roundup and information overload hour. Here's our
Speaker 1: toll free number. It's eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Our friend Eric Schmidt, Senator Missouri, was ag for a
Speaker 1: long time before he became a senator. And before I
Speaker 1: get to some other issues that I want to talk
Speaker 1: to him about, the Save Act among them, I'm dying
Speaker 1: to get your take. I honestly cannot believe the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court decision on birthright citizenship today, the idea that people
Speaker 1: that don't respect our laws, our sovereignty, our borders get rewarded,
Speaker 1: and now it's codified by the US Supreme Court. How
Speaker 1: could this do anything other than encourage people from around
Speaker 1: the globe to just, you know, just make it across
Speaker 1: the border and your home free. I mean, I can't
Speaker 1: believe what a bad decision it is. And if you
Speaker 1: look at the history of the fourteenth Amendment and its text,
Speaker 1: I mean, and it's limit to it, you know, all
Speaker 1: persons born on or naturalized in the US and subject
Speaker 1: to the jurisdiction thereof don't those words matter.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it is a shockingly bad decision, Sean. And also
Speaker 2: if you take it into the context of the Civil
Speaker 2: Rights Act that took place in eighteen sixty six. The
Speaker 2: authors of that knew exactly what they were doing if
Speaker 2: you read the text. You know, Senator Howard, who was
Speaker 2: the author, explicitly said this wasn't for foreigners, this wasn't
Speaker 2: for aliens, this was for the freed children of slaves,
Speaker 2: to make sure that they were included in citizenship. They
Speaker 2: got the franchise. And it also said in other writings,
Speaker 2: including the Civil Rights Act of eighteen sixty six, talks
Speaker 2: about and not subject to a foreign power, the jurisdiction
Speaker 2: of a foreign power. That's what they meant it to be,
Speaker 2: which meant if you were from somewhere else and you
Speaker 2: weren't an American citizen, your children didn't become citizens, right.
Speaker 2: I mean, it is a ridiculous interpretation that's not based
Speaker 2: in the text. It's a miss reading, and it has,
Speaker 2: you know, drastic consequences. I think, you know, we've got
Speaker 2: a couple of options moving forward. I think we have
Speaker 2: a constitutional amendment. The President's already indicated in his post Congress.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but we all know to get a constitutional amendment passed, well,
Speaker 1: I know, is like the heaviest lift you can never
Speaker 1: have in Washington, and with a divided Congress, there's no
Speaker 1: way that's going to happen in the next fifty years
Speaker 1: them as far as I can see.
Speaker 2: No, it's a terrible result. I'm not trying to sugarcoat it.
Speaker 2: It's a terrible result. And they went further than they
Speaker 2: could have. What they could have said was the President
Speaker 2: couldn't do this by way of executive order. But they
Speaker 2: didn't stop there. They basically went on to say, no,
Speaker 2: this is what the fourteenth Amendment means, and so it
Speaker 2: has real consequences. It's been a mixed bag. I mean,
Speaker 2: getting rid of the temporary protected status for Haitians, I mean,
Speaker 2: that was a good result. There's a couple of other
Speaker 2: good results on administrative state, but this one's a big miss,
Speaker 2: no doubt about it.
Speaker 1: So ostensibly this codifies into law, it would grant citizenship
Speaker 1: to hundreds of thousands of children that are born annually
Speaker 1: to parents that are not citizens of this country. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if the term anchor baby is used anymore.
Speaker 1: I really don't know, but that was a term that
Speaker 1: was used for many, many years and people and I
Speaker 1: frankly don't blame them. If I come from a poor
Speaker 1: country and I want a better life for my kids,
Speaker 1: the grandkids, I don't blame them for looking at America
Speaker 1: as the land of milk and honey and wanting to
Speaker 1: make a perilous journey to come here for a better
Speaker 1: life for my kids. However, I think we have to
Speaker 1: be a nation governed by a constitution.
Speaker 3: And by the rule of law.
Speaker 1: We've got to protect our borders, our sovereignty, and none
Speaker 1: of that happened here. And it seems like the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court just put it, just codified this and put their
Speaker 1: seal of approval.
Speaker 3: On all of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you don't want perverse incentives that actually encourage people
Speaker 2: to come here illegally. And now this is one that
Speaker 2: is more set and stone. It's not a question where
Speaker 2: the other thing it does sean is and a Justice
Speaker 2: Department needs to be very, very active on this to
Speaker 2: take on this birth tourism industry. They're literally companies in
Speaker 2: China in other places that will fly women who are
Speaker 2: eight months pregnant, including by the way, members of the CCP,
Speaker 2: members of the military have their wives flown here at
Speaker 2: eight or nine months pregnant. They give birth, they get
Speaker 2: the medical care, and then a month later they fly
Speaker 2: back to China. What is the result of that? And
Speaker 2: this was actually mentioned in one of the opinions from
Speaker 2: Alito's opinion that what happens then is you could have
Speaker 2: then what is now for sure, a US citizen spend
Speaker 2: his entire formation in China and communist China being doctrinated
Speaker 2: to hate America, and then when they're eighteen, come back
Speaker 2: to America as a US citizen and vote in our elections,
Speaker 2: contribute to campaigns. This is the practical and this is
Speaker 2: not some like theory. This is happening. We don't know
Speaker 2: the exact numbers, but there's a lot. There's a lot
Speaker 2: of instances here, so that the DOJ needs to be
Speaker 2: really vigilant about this now. And we have to stamp
Speaker 2: it out because this is big business. And now they know,
Speaker 2: you know, the Supreme Court's laid in on it. So
Speaker 2: this birth toruism thing's real.
Speaker 1: I'm getting more and more disappointed with a lot of
Speaker 1: Justices Amy Cony Barrett and John Roberts in particular, for example,
Speaker 1: why would they side with liberal justices on this key
Speaker 1: election integrity case and the Supreme Court given that five
Speaker 1: to four ruling stating that mail in ballots can be
Speaker 1: counted several days after they arrive. Now, it might make
Speaker 1: sense if we have military ballots coming in from abroad.
Speaker 1: I could see that being an exception. But generally speaking,
Speaker 1: is it really too much to ask the citizens of
Speaker 1: this country to vote on time or to have one
Speaker 1: day that's election day? You know, the idea that we have,
Speaker 1: you know, some states that allow voting for you know,
Speaker 1: thirty sixty plus days, and the issues that may ultimately,
Speaker 1: you know, decide the outcome of an election haven't even
Speaker 1: happened yet in some cases.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it does a couple of things. I mean, that's
Speaker 2: a bad decision too, for a couple of reasons. One
Speaker 2: is sort of the election integrity front. This used to
Speaker 2: not be a part is an issue at all. There
Speaker 2: was a Baker Carter commission twenty years ago that was
Speaker 2: bipartisan and said, hey, here are the ten things you
Speaker 2: can do to make sure that you don't you know,
Speaker 2: to protect against fraud, very limited mail in balloting. If
Speaker 2: people are truly homebound or disabled, our caregiver, that's one thing,
Speaker 2: But this just mass mail in balloting, and then you
Speaker 2: can still keep counting the election day doesn't even matter
Speaker 2: for a week later. Not only is it right for fraud,
Speaker 2: it actually creates mistrust in our system, right like if
Speaker 2: you're still waiting in California a month later, or the
Speaker 2: votes are coming in to decide who's the president of
Speaker 2: the United States and you don't have some finality, people
Speaker 2: are going to lose confidence in our elections. And you've
Speaker 2: seen this across the board. And so the Democrats know
Speaker 2: exactly what they're doing now. They're creating conditions where like
Speaker 2: they had in twenty twenty and I was attorney general
Speaker 2: in Missouri and we were one of the states that
Speaker 2: brought suit against Georgia because what they did was they
Speaker 2: created a system where they mailed it out to everybody,
Speaker 2: They had dropboxes, you didn't know when things were going
Speaker 2: to be counted. It just creates these conditions that are
Speaker 2: right for fraud. It's the wrong way to go. And
Speaker 2: and you know, and that's why the presidents, you know,
Speaker 2: we talk a lot about this. I know we're going
Speaker 2: to talk about the same America Act, the provision, and
Speaker 2: I've sponsored the five pillar one that President likes, which
Speaker 2: includes the mail and balloting piece too. He knows that
Speaker 2: this is the one that the Democrats manipulate I think
Speaker 2: the most, and it's important for us to do something
Speaker 2: about it. But yeah, this opens the door for ballots
Speaker 2: to be counted after election day and I think that's wrong.
Speaker 3: I think it's way wrong. Why is it?
Speaker 1: And you know, we've been now talking at nauseum about
Speaker 1: the Save Act. It's an eighty five fifteen issue in
Speaker 1: terms of conservatives Republicans in the country, but we can't
Speaker 1: get enough senators to jump on board and support this.
Speaker 1: Leader Thoon has no appetite to take that issue on
Speaker 1: in a way that would be effective. It doesn't seem
Speaker 1: like there is the appetite among enough Republicans to go
Speaker 1: with an eighty five percent issue.
Speaker 3: And I'm trying to understand why.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I wish I had a good answer for we
Speaker 2: Sho had a good answer for Sean. I'm committed, and
Speaker 2: I think the way that we should go about doing
Speaker 2: it is a talking filibuster. This is exactly what the
Speaker 2: philibuster was meant to do. And in fact, most states
Speaker 2: around the country, if you have someone trying to block legislation,
Speaker 2: they have to earn it. They got to be on
Speaker 2: the floor they get tired, people get sleepy, they get cranky.
Speaker 2: You got to earn it. And the way it works
Speaker 2: right now is you just come in and you just
Speaker 2: say yeah, your nag and you don't have sixty that's
Speaker 2: the end of it. You don't test anybody. And it
Speaker 2: also gives you an opportunity to continue to build support
Speaker 2: among the public, Like you said, for an eighty five
Speaker 2: percent issue. So that's where I'm at on it. I
Speaker 2: think there's a lot of people, but maybe not enough,
Speaker 2: so we have to keep winning that argument. The other
Speaker 2: thing I would say is it's no coincidence Sean, that
Speaker 2: these two issues we're talking about at the same time,
Speaker 2: which is this mass migration we saw from the Democrats
Speaker 2: and election integrity, they know even though their voters support this,
Speaker 2: their own voters now you've got the hammer and sickle
Speaker 2: wave in New York. They want to have the legals vote.
Speaker 2: But I think that even some old school Democrats don't
Speaker 2: want to do it. That's why you're at eighty five percent.
Speaker 2: But the elected Democrats at this point know they have
Speaker 2: lost the argument with the American people, and so they're
Speaker 2: so power obsessed they're willing to import fifteen million people
Speaker 2: here and they don't care if they're citizens to vote.
Speaker 2: That's the truth. So it affects our electoral maps. It
Speaker 2: elects how money goes to certain states. If you had
Speaker 2: a real deal where only citizens were kunded in the census,
Speaker 2: California will lose a massive numbers seats. And you see
Speaker 2: people walking with their feet to states like Florida, Missouri,
Speaker 2: from Illinois, Texas. In the next census, we're going to
Speaker 2: pick up seats that way. And that's why I think
Speaker 2: on this whole you know, argument about Jerrymander districts, the
Speaker 2: Democrats have been doing this for a long time. There's
Speaker 2: no Republican elected in the northeast Shawn, No, but no
Speaker 2: Republican elected in Congress. And so if that's the game
Speaker 2: that they're going to play, that's the game that we
Speaker 2: should play. When we've got it tough enough, I think
Speaker 2: and understand what time it is.
Speaker 1: It looks like the Mom Donnie wing of the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is now the dominant wing. And the more fascinating
Speaker 1: to me aspect of this is no Democrat but for
Speaker 1: John Fetterman will dare stand up to any of them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they've created a monster and they actually don't know
Speaker 2: how to deal with it. Chuck Schumer is going to
Speaker 2: lose if he runs again. He will lose his Senate
Speaker 2: seat in York to AOC, which is why I think
Speaker 2: he'll be the co chair of her presidential committee so
Speaker 2: she doesn't run. But if it's not her, it's somebody else.
Speaker 2: They're coming for them. And they've created this monster because
Speaker 2: they've bought into this idea that we should teach our
Speaker 2: kids that hate America, that the cops are bad, that
Speaker 2: federal law enforcement is bad, that Western civilization is irredeemable,
Speaker 2: and the sins of our founders should be the highlight
Speaker 2: of America to fifty, not this glorious republic that was
Speaker 2: created outside of human history that's allowed freedom to flourish,
Speaker 2: and you have a government that's meant to protect individual liberty.
Speaker 2: They hate all that, and now they have candidates who,
Speaker 2: by the way, if they did, if Chuck Schumer didn't
Speaker 2: actually believe it, these people really do and they're now
Speaker 2: getting elected. These people are now running major cities and
Speaker 2: they're going to be running for the United States Senate.
Speaker 2: And so I think that when we get closer to November,
Speaker 2: when you have a binary choice and the maps are
Speaker 2: up for grabs Congress and the Senate. I know that
Speaker 2: not everybody is thrilled with exactly how are going. I
Speaker 2: have my own gripes about certain things too. But the
Speaker 2: truth of the matter is that's a binary choice. If
Speaker 2: you think Joe Biden was bad, Joe Biden was a
Speaker 2: puppet puppet for these people who wrote white papers about
Speaker 2: open borders and mass migration. What happens if you get
Speaker 2: somebody in there who actually believes all that stuff and
Speaker 2: has a whole army of people who believe it, and
Speaker 2: so our republics on the line. The founders knew this,
Speaker 2: were celebrating America, tufty, They knew how hard it was.
Speaker 2: You know, the way of the world is to aggregate
Speaker 2: power and exercise it ruthlessly. This country stands outside of
Speaker 2: history for that to say, no, we're going to respect
Speaker 2: the will the people. We have these rights to speak
Speaker 2: your mind and protect yourself at the Second Amendment. All
Speaker 2: that's on the line, and it's not an exaggeration. And
Speaker 2: now they're electing people like Montdomie or these other people
Speaker 2: in New York who literally are railing against Western civilization.
Speaker 2: They want to tear it all up. And so I
Speaker 2: just think the chickens have come to roosts now, and
Speaker 2: privately some of them will tell you that that this
Speaker 2: is a different proposition than when Bill Clinton was talking
Speaker 2: about secure borders thirty years ago. They're in a whole
Speaker 2: new world now, and we got it. That's why I
Speaker 2: think our efforts have to be to double down.
Speaker 1: I think the bigger phenomenon is that there's there's no Democrat.
Speaker 3: Either.
Speaker 1: You are part of that radicalized group, the Mam Donnie,
Speaker 1: the AOC, the Grandpa Bernie, the Pocahontas, the Elsaiah tel Rico,
Speaker 1: Graham Platner, or you're just too afraid to dare to
Speaker 1: speak out against any of them because you know the
Speaker 1: consequences will be severe. Chuck Schumer, he doesn't even he
Speaker 1: thinks that this will save his job as Minority leader.
Speaker 3: It won't. I don't think Keem Jeffrey survives either.
Speaker 2: Right, they get Tiger by the tale and that's the truth.
Speaker 2: And then you've got a guy like tell Rico who
Speaker 2: comes out of like a woke lab I mean the
Speaker 2: way that he talked, it's like woke. One point, Oh,
Speaker 2: this isn't twenty twenty anymore. And that was the language. Remember,
Speaker 2: everyone was supposed to accept. And it's why when I
Speaker 2: was a trade journal we fought back so hard because
Speaker 2: I could just see the landscape what was happening, and
Speaker 2: people were being intimidated and censored and being told that
Speaker 2: you can't question this, and you got to say that.
Speaker 2: The American people, I think, responded in a fever broke
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty four. And so now they have a
Speaker 2: candidate who's all everything that they said in twenty twenty
Speaker 2: and twenty twenty one is coming back. But that's what
Speaker 2: they really believe. I mean, this whole like eight different genders.
Speaker 2: And I am a Christian, but I hate Christianity. This
Speaker 2: stuff is crazy. It's crazy. Now. I don't know. Maybe
Speaker 2: it would work in Oregon, but this is Texas. I
Speaker 2: know that dog wouldn't hunt in Zuri. I can't believe
Speaker 2: it worked in Texas.
Speaker 1: That dog ain't gonna hut and hunt in Texas. God
Speaker 1: b us Texas, no way. The fact that they think
Speaker 1: they can spend tens of millions and is insane to
Speaker 1: me that they have so misjudged the people of Texas.
Speaker 1: It's actually laughable anyway. Eric Schmidt, Missouri Senator, appreciate you,
Speaker 1: thanks for being with us. Eight hundred and nine four one.
Speaker 1: Shawn is on number you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. You know, Lindo's thinking about this today.
Speaker 1: And then you came up with a genius idea, which
Speaker 1: I don't say that often.
Speaker 3: You're laughing. You're not laughing.
Speaker 4: If you're about to say what I think you're going
Speaker 4: to say.
Speaker 5: I'm gonna hat tip Ethan because Ethan texted me and
Speaker 5: built this. So do credit of genius goes to Ethan.
Speaker 1: Okay, So between yesterday and today and all of last
Speaker 1: week and the week before, we have been spending a
Speaker 1: lot of time on how the Democratic Party gets more
Speaker 1: and more radicalized. The Graham Platner's, the James Telerrico's, the
Speaker 1: El Sayeds, the Mom Donnie's, the Grandpa Bernie's, the Pocahontas's,
Speaker 1: you know, Mom Donnie's pretty much the head of the party,
Speaker 1: and AOC and the squad and the anti Semitisms and
Speaker 1: on and on and on. And the bigger issue to
Speaker 1: me is that there used to be a wing within
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party that would stand against this radicalism. And
Speaker 1: that's why I keep saying these are uncharted waters for
Speaker 1: a midterm election.
Speaker 3: Let me just play.
Speaker 1: This has been an evolution into what is now culminating
Speaker 1: into a party that is so extreme, so radicalized, so
Speaker 1: out of touch that if you would have asked me
Speaker 1: ten years ago if I thought this could happen, I
Speaker 1: probably would have said no.
Speaker 3: Shows you how wrong I can be. Listen, We're not
Speaker 3: going to.
Speaker 2: Make America great again.
Speaker 3: It was never that great.
Speaker 6: I've seen for myself how the original sin of slavery
Speaker 6: weaved white supremacy into our founding documents and principles.
Speaker 2: But the American flag is such a complicated symbol for
Speaker 2: most of us, ways like Jesus, like the cross. It's
Speaker 2: been co opted and and and in some ways its
Speaker 2: true meeting has been betrayed.
Speaker 3: Do you think America has ever been truly great?
Speaker 6: I don't believe America has been great for all folks ever,
Speaker 6: even today.
Speaker 2: No, no, no, not God bless America, God America.
Speaker 3: I can't celebrate.
Speaker 2: Yah.
Speaker 7: Fourth, I was on Long Island this weekend visiting a
Speaker 7: really dear friend, and I was really disturbed. I saw,
Speaker 7: you know, a dozens and dozens of pickup trucks with
Speaker 7: American flags, which you know is also just disturbing because
Speaker 7: essentially the message was clear, it was this is my country.
Speaker 2: Making America great again. When that passed was never as
Speaker 2: great as advertised.
Speaker 7: Is part of the foundation of America.
Speaker 6: My white brothers and sisters do level. Fourth of July.
Speaker 6: It is Independence Day. Everybody is barbecue and it's a
Speaker 6: thing I could promise you black folks, we will take
Speaker 6: that day off. We will barber you because we all
Speaker 6: with black people that nobody black I know is really
Speaker 6: excited about the Fourth of July.
Speaker 1: I mean to hear that back to back and then
Speaker 1: put it together with you know, everything that we've been
Speaker 1: pointing out about these these lunatics. You know, I got
Speaker 1: elected in New York and Platner and elsaiaed and tell
Speaker 1: Rico it's it's Linda.
Speaker 3: Is it not amazing or what I think?
Speaker 4: It's heartbreaking.
Speaker 5: I really feel like and I've felt this way for
Speaker 5: some time, and I'm not saying it to be you know,
Speaker 5: it's not hyperbole. I'm serious. I would like every single
Speaker 5: person on this list to go live in a nation
Speaker 5: that currently is under communist socialist dictatorship, like leadership. I
Speaker 5: want them to go there, and I want them to
Speaker 5: have to live there for one year, and after one year,
Speaker 5: if they think that is a better way of life
Speaker 5: than what we have going on here, we can talk.
Speaker 5: But right now, this is all BS ideology from a
Speaker 5: bunch of woke with a joke. People who have no
Speaker 5: real world experience do not understand capitalism. Let's has to
Speaker 5: do with their own pocketbook. I think they really need
Speaker 5: to have a little bit of applied life experience. So
Speaker 5: go ahead, go and come back and tell me how
Speaker 5: much better than America it is.
Speaker 1: How many times have we offered celebrities or actors a
Speaker 1: one way we had a big country?
Speaker 4: Yeah, Scott Shannon did it for us. The jet is ready.
Speaker 1: Good, jet is ready. I will pay the way. I'll
Speaker 1: even include champagne and caviar.
Speaker 5: Still waiting to fly out all those Libs who promised
Speaker 5: to leave that Trump were elected.
Speaker 8: The jet is ready?
Speaker 3: Is the Sean Hannity show.
Speaker 5: Gods?
Speaker 3: Jeez? Yeah, well, you know, give an example.
Speaker 1: The left doesn't like that President Trump has taken on Iran,
Speaker 1: and yet we're told by the people that know that
Speaker 1: they were literally twelve weeks away from potentially having nuclear
Speaker 1: you know, weapons by enriching their sixty percent of uranium
Speaker 1: to ninety percent, which is weapons great.
Speaker 3: Nobody wants to hear that part.
Speaker 1: You know, all these people that make up lies that
Speaker 1: either have a microphone in front of them or a
Speaker 1: camera in front of them, they are spectacular lies. Because
Speaker 1: every single source that I have, and I have a
Speaker 1: lot more sources than they do, is that a true statement?
Speaker 3: You know what my life is like? Is that true?
Speaker 4: Sure? That's true.
Speaker 1: Okay, every single person, without exception has said to me quote,
Speaker 1: the president had no choice that we're talking about epic fury.
Speaker 3: This is after midnight hammer. You know.
Speaker 1: Then this insanity of how they define the Trump doctrine
Speaker 1: drives me up a wall.
Speaker 3: Anyway, let's get the go ahead now.
Speaker 5: I'm just My final thought on that is I agree
Speaker 5: that you have insider information, and that is because of
Speaker 5: a position that you've earned over forty years in the
Speaker 5: political circuit. Where I disagree with the administration's handling of
Speaker 5: this entire situation, and it is a very sad situation,
Speaker 5: and my heart breaks for the people of Iran that
Speaker 5: are under this terrible you know Iranian Ayatola IRGC rule.
Speaker 5: They need to be quiet. I don't need to hear
Speaker 5: from scentcom. I don't need to wish I had military clearance.
Speaker 5: I don't need to hear from the President one hundred
Speaker 5: and forty two times on the flip flop of where
Speaker 5: we're at. Just be quiet and go take care of it.
Speaker 4: That's it. That's why we elected you. We don't need
Speaker 4: these daily updates. That, to me is the biggest problem
Speaker 4: of the mixed messaging, the lack of consistency. We're dealing
Speaker 4: with lunatics. It's going to change quite a bit, So
Speaker 4: just be quiet until it's over.
Speaker 3: In my humble opinion, I don't disagree.
Speaker 1: You know, I actually asked the President about this privately,
Speaker 1: and I don't think he'd mind me sharing the answer.
Speaker 1: He says, Sean, everything is a negotiation. Every word he
Speaker 1: utters is a negotiation. It's all part of the process
Speaker 1: to him, and that kind of defines him. So it
Speaker 1: makes sense in his case. Let's go to let's see
Speaker 1: here Glenn and Washington.
Speaker 3: Glenn, how are you.
Speaker 8: Hy, Sean?
Speaker 3: What's going on?
Speaker 8: Must be celebrating the Supreme Court's decision on worthright citizenship.
Speaker 8: I know that they'll continue sending their women here to
Speaker 8: the United States to have babies, which will be US
Speaker 8: citizens and then go to China to be raised, and
Speaker 8: then we get old enough then come back and vote,
Speaker 8: maybe be our congressman. Yeah, maybe even be the president
Speaker 8: of the United States.
Speaker 1: You know what's really sad to me. Do you think
Speaker 1: if I went to China. Now I did go to
Speaker 1: China with President Trump on his recent trip. I didn't
Speaker 1: love China my own personal view. I didn't do much
Speaker 1: in China. I was told that I would be watched
Speaker 1: the whole time I was there, so I didn't have
Speaker 1: a lot of free time to just hang out in
Speaker 1: a restaurant.
Speaker 3: I think I went to one little restaurant in.
Speaker 1: The hotel with guys that I work with, and that
Speaker 1: was the extent of me going out, and otherwise it
Speaker 1: was just a work trip. But do you think if
Speaker 1: I went to China and I wanted to buy up farmland,
Speaker 1: ranch land, or land near military installations, do you think
Speaker 1: President Chi or anybody in China would allow Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: to buy up land like we're allowing them to do here.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, he wouldn't, of course, not on us.
Speaker 8: Just like sinning women to the United States to be
Speaker 8: citizens and then going back to China and be raised
Speaker 8: by communist leadership.
Speaker 2: It's just a scam.
Speaker 3: It just it makes no sense.
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court decision, it makes no sense, and it
Speaker 1: is frustrating because you know, elections are supposed to have consequences.
Speaker 1: I do believe the President thought he was making good
Speaker 1: decisions when he appointed certain people to the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: that have been huge disappointments, not the least of which
Speaker 1: is Amy Cony Barrett, not the least of which is
Speaker 1: Chief Justas Roberts. They're two of my biggest disappointments. Kavanaugh,
Speaker 1: I don't I have no idea where he's going to
Speaker 1: come down on anything.
Speaker 3: It's frustrating.
Speaker 1: Appreciate the call, Glenn Michelle Alaska, Michelle, how are you
Speaker 1: glad you called?
Speaker 3: Hey?
Speaker 9: Sean, You had a guest on there yesterday that said
Speaker 9: he wasn't worried about the Senate seat flipping in Alaska
Speaker 9: Fitt flipping blue. I am an Alaskan. I am very
Speaker 9: worried about it. We have two senators rhino leftist Trader Murkowski,
Speaker 9: and then also Daniel S. Sullivan, who seat is up
Speaker 9: for reelection. Mary Popola, who went one term in the
Speaker 9: US House, is going against him. She went and visited
Speaker 9: a little town in Alaska named Petersburg, and out of
Speaker 9: that town a guy named Daniel J. Sullivan. After she left,
Speaker 9: came out and refiled as a Republican, tried to file
Speaker 9: as Daniel S. Sullivan for the same Senate seat. It
Speaker 9: was denied by the state of Alaska Department of Elections.
Speaker 9: He went and hired a lawyer, and there was just
Speaker 9: an emergency decision for the Alaska Supreme Court that said, yes,
Speaker 9: now he can be on the ballot. Well, Alaska is
Speaker 9: ranked choice voting, So this was all concocted by the
Speaker 9: Democratic Party to take enough votes away from the real
Speaker 9: Daniel S. Sullivan to put Mary Pultola into that Senate seat.
Speaker 9: So I am very concerned and very worried, and we
Speaker 9: need this, We need the entire United States help to
Speaker 9: overcome this.
Speaker 3: You know, I've never liked rank choice voting at all.
Speaker 1: The only reason that Lisa Murkowski is still in the
Speaker 1: Senate is because of rank choice voting.
Speaker 3: She would have lost many elections ago.
Speaker 1: And I'm not sure what it is that there seems
Speaker 1: when I when I watch her listen to her, and
Speaker 1: you know, when you think of all the President Trump
Speaker 1: has done, for Alaska, especially with energy, you know, opening
Speaker 1: up energy dominance and anwar and and all the all
Speaker 1: the benefits that the people of Alaska will receive themselves.
Speaker 1: Because you don't pay income taxes state income taxes.
Speaker 3: You got to check from the government.
Speaker 1: And the more money the government makes from energy, the
Speaker 1: more money you're going to get paid from the state
Speaker 1: of Alaska.
Speaker 9: Right well, side note, Sean, our legislator, our state legislator
Speaker 9: is taking our PFD and using it to fund the budget,
Speaker 9: the leftist budget, and they're also blocking all efforts to
Speaker 9: get that liquid natural gas pipeline go. So Alaska, which
Speaker 9: used to be a solid red state, is now turning blue.
Speaker 9: And people, you know, just like people are saying Texas
Speaker 9: is red and other places are red. Well, Alaska used
Speaker 9: to be red. It is turning blue. And people need
Speaker 9: to wake up to what's happening. We are losing our country.
Speaker 9: People need to wake up. Every single Conservative out there,
Speaker 9: every single Christian out there. You need to do whatever
Speaker 9: it takes to get out to vote, to bring your neighbors.
Speaker 9: I don't care. We need to Sean. At this point,
Speaker 9: we need to fight fire with fire because.
Speaker 1: The demis is a Michelle I hope all of our
Speaker 1: friends in Alaska are listening to you. I am fascinated
Speaker 1: with your state. I'm fascinated with people that live off
Speaker 1: the grid. I'm fascinated with light below zero. I'm fascinating,
Speaker 1: fascinated with deadly as catch. I'm fascinated. You know, it's
Speaker 1: it's a life. I kind of dream that one day
Speaker 1: I'll live that. I know I'm never going to live,
Speaker 1: so I live vicariously through people that do live that life.
Speaker 1: But this is a big election, this is important, it matters,
Speaker 1: And you're right, that's a dirty trick, typical, not shocking
Speaker 1: to me. All right, that's gonna wrap things up for today.
Speaker 1: All Right, we are watching elections. This lunatic leftist radical
Speaker 1: Democrat in Colorado.
Speaker 3: We'll watch that closely.
Speaker 1: We'll get an analysis of how far left the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party has gone, what impact it will have in the midterm.
Speaker 1: Also the great one, Mark Levin, Riley gains on the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court decision about men and women's sports, and Erin
Speaker 1: McGuire and much more. Nine Eastern Hannity on Fox. See
Speaker 1: you then back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the
Speaker 1: show possible.