WEBVTT - Mail Time: Part 1

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid Verbo. I'll that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for a day at the State. Is that woo woom?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And and Tye, welcome back to the solid Purba boys

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>and girls. My name is ty Hildebrandt. Joining me is

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>always over there and beautiful and sunny in almost springing,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Dan Rubinstein, sir, how are you?

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty good, ty, I'm pretty good. I considered stopping

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 2>at any number of places on my walk home from

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>the office for a little snack, but I was just

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>in LA for a very short time for a podcast conference, okay,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and I ate a lot of food, So my discipline

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to stay the course was actually pretty admirable. Unlike Melt Talk, Mel.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Tucker, We're going to get into the El Tucker news

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>here momentarily Today's Q and A Show, or at least

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>part one of a Q and A show, so it

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>works in typical fashion here on the Soliverbal. We like

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to do more of the Q and A Style show

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason because there isn't as much news to

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Mel Tucker ain't walking out that door every week,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>after all, So we got to fill the time with

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>useful college football intel and knowledge and questions from the

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>verballerhood at large. So what you did is went out

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. You went out on all of our social channels.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>We got other email questions that came in to Soliverbal

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com, compiled those in a big old

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Google doc, and we're going to read through a bunch

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>of football questions here in just a little bit. The

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>other tidbit that I'll throw out there, and I started

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>advertising this a little bit on Twitter earlier today at

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Soliverbal if you don't already follow us. But as we said,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Dan and I are in the very early stages now

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of planning out what our live show menu is going

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to look like for the month of August, when we

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>typically do fantasy things and maybe we'll throw other things

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in there, who knows. But we put together a survey

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>which I linked up on our Twitter sphere. I'm gonna

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>link it up on our website. If you go to

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>solid verbal dot com slash live, you can get to

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>our survey and just let us know if you're gonna

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>be around in August if any of these cities or

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>locations appeal to you, you might want to come out

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and see us. That'll help us put together what our

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>game plan is going to become August. But it is

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>something we're starting to think about, even though it's February.

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's better to do that earlier and get people

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the know than later. Kind of at the last second.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if it were up to me, we would just

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>be doing a tour of small towns just north of

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco and have a nice little summer wine tour.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Little wine. You don't even like wine.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't even like wine, but I like that area. Ty, Yeah,

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I like trees, I like grapes, I like sunshine. There's

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a million places that I think we would have a

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 2>terrific time doing a live show and could not be

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 2>happier about doing that. All we really know is that somehow,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 2>someway we are going to include the Navarro cheer team.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Oh my gosh, my people, All right, absolute people, Okay, sorry, yeah, boom.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Boom boom boom. You mentioned mel Tucker at the top.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Melt Tucker has reversed course, So Meltucker head football coach,

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>formerly head football coach at Colorado. He initially turned down

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State, he reversed course. He has now accepted the

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>job at Sparta. Do you like this move?

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it'd be hard to form an opinion about

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 2>mel Tucker after one season going five and seven, inheriting

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a not amazing roster, but still your guys Stevie Montes

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and Leaves Chanalt are quality players that you know. Chanalt

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 2>was hurt but didn't have the talent to really turn

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 2>the defense around. Excuse me, y'ar one his specialty. So

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how any Michigan State fan, how anybody

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>can think like yes, home run when they're just Jerry's out, Like,

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we just have no idea because we have to have

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>a bigger sample size from him. The headline here, as

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, we talk about it like six days after

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>it happened because that's our recording schedule, is that he

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>was only at Colorado for a year and he got

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>basically his salary doubled, His assistant pool was significantly increased,

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>which is very very important by a Michigan State program

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 2>which makes a lot more money from the Big ten

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and their TV deals plural than the PAC twelve does.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>And Colorado is not a program that has been in

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the money these this past decade fifteen years, things have improved.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they've built new facilities, but certainly from a

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 2>monetary standpoint, Colorado is not as big a program and

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have as big a wallet as Michigan State does

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 2>by you know, their circumstance. So I think the higher

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>is fine. I think his background, his experience, both you know,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 2>in the SEC and the NFL. I think people respond

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 2>well to him as a coach. It appears he's been

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 2>able to recruit and his short time in Boulder pretty well,

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>so I imagine he will do a pretty good job

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>given his background both in the Midwest and South, attracting

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 2>talent to Michigan State. It's a tough job to me,

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>so I think it's fine slash tbd.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Here is my overarching question about this though. How good

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of a job is that Michigan State job. I know

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's something we've discussed here on the show, right, and

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we like Boulder, Colorado as a college football

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>or just college destination. I just get a human destination

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to make human destination. Sure, it's a good place. It's

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in a conference that is certainly at a little bit

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>more wide open than the Big ten East. I think

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that much is assumed, right, So how much of a

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>better job? Obviously the money's better, But outside of the money,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is it truly a better college football spot than in Boulder?

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So what defines that to you?

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>How if you are going to list items bullet points

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>say this is what makes a good job to me,

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>it's administrative support, money, proximity to recruits, maybe, path to

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 2>maximizing success based on division, based on conference, How strong

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>is the school's quote brand regionally, nationally, internationally, whatever. And

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>for Michigan State, it's tricky. I think if it starts

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 2>with administrative support, there's a lot of the word interim

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 2>right now at Michigan State. It's not a strong time

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 2>for the Michigan State brand. Not the fault of regional

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>recruits in the Midwest or coaches that Mel Tucker, not

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a fault of a lot of people who were in

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>that Michigan State program during some up and down years

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>under Mark d Antonio.

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's rough.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's a lot of confidence on the

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>board of trustees and the athletic director in the athletic

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 2>department right now. So that to me is in flux,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>which is never great because if you look at schools

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that generally succeed consistently, there seems to be a good

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>backbone of continuity there. Right, No, you've had what Notre

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Dame is at the same AD forever, Oregon has had,

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean the same AD forever. These are the schools

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>we're most familiar with. Penn State had to deal with

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of flux, but things have calmed down some, right, Yeah,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So looking at schools, especially in the Big Ten, Wisconsin

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>has a lot of continuity. Michigan has had some changes.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State has had some changes, but Jean Smith has

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>been at Ohio State for a long time and so

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>there's experience there running things. Michigan State's different, and Michigan

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>State has had a lot of success in the last decade.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>One could point out that Michigan State's absolute height twenty

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>thirteen to twenty fifteen, like we've talked about before, came

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 2>at a time that perhaps Michigan and Ohio State, they're

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>chief rivals in the division, we're not operating at full capacity.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>But one could also point out that Penn State and

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Michigan today are not unbeatable, So it can be a

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>very good job. This is a Rose Bowl job if

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the circumstances are correct, But a lot of good jobs

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>are the same way that you just need things to

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>break correctly. So I think it's tough, but I think

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Michigan State has a much higher ability, a higher ceiling

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 2>than a lot of teams in this country.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>The downside from Michigan State, whenever somebody steps aside in

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>February or just at a really weird juncture in the season,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get a decent name, you sort

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of got to pay the piper, yeah, premium, And that

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>meant good news from mel Tucker on that side of things. Otherwise,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm ambivalent on this. It's good news for them that

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 1>they're able to go out and get a guy in

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>mel Tucker who's been highly thought of for a while

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and someone who you would think could continue building that

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>winning tradition, certainly on the defensive side of the ball,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>where he's always been very good. That's all very good news,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but like five and seven first year, you're paying that

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>guy five and a half million dollars, it seems like

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe they overbid on a guy that you know they

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to overbid for well, they had the cash.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>They have the cash to pay that much money to

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>a coach. I mean, Scott Frost is making a ton

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of money, and at least I guess he accomplished more

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>as a head coach than Mel Tucker did. Going in

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Brohm, I don't know how. I mean, he had

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>a huge win for Purdue over Ohio State, and I

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 2>had to have the leverage with Louisville coming after him.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But there are what.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Looked to be not crazy impressive coaches in the Big

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Ten making at least right now to me, impressive money.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 2>The other interesting thing is this people treated this as

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>more dirt on the PAC twelve casket, and I'm sort

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 2>of confused by that.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Somewhat.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I know the PAC twelve is lagged behind another TV

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 2>deal isn't good, But I've just never understood why people

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>look like people look at the PAC twelve as like, yeah,

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>they're a Power five conference. They should be right in

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the neighborhood is of how much money the Big Ten

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and SEC are making when PAC twelve football as a whole,

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 2>as a full product has never been as popular as

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>conferences that have these enormous enormous properties when the PAC

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>twelve has like one point eight of them.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So does a move like this and I promise we'll

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>move on after this? Yeah, maybe two point six. Does

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a move like this worry you then about, like, let's say,

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the overall health of Power five football or college football

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, Given that there is this gulf between

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>different revenue models from conference to conference.

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess I think you need smarter people at athletic

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>departments making better decision as to who you hire. I mean,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 2>it can be weathered in the Big ten and SEC.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>If you know, Mississippi State hires Joe Morhead and it

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work out after a couple of years, they don't

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>hesitate to pay his buyout, to move on to pay

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 2>Mike Leach whatever it is, five million dollars, And that's

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>certainly a very nice luxury to have. But in the

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Big twelve, which has you know, come under some some

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 2>troubling times having to go back to ten teams, the

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>TV deal isn't where the Big ten and the SEC

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 2>are and the PAC twelve, and to I guess a

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 2>lesser extent.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The ACC.

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>You got to make better decisions. It's not Larry Scott's

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 2>fault that you know, Oregon State and Gary Anderson didn't

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>work out.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted that out.

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 2>It's not, you know, Larry Scott's fault that you know,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Sublan has been pretty bad in terms of a

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>hire for Arizona thus far, and it hasn't been wasn't

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>as you know, whatever is John Embry, Mike McIntyre and

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>ever the up and down of his career there. That's

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>not on the conference. It's just these schools needs to

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 2>do a better job of finding perhaps up and comers,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 2>perhaps better deals at head coach, and figure out how

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to get creative in terms of raising money. And that's

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 2>it's certainly tougher. But I'm not sure I ever understood

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>why they everybody needs to just automatically be on an

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 2>equal playing field.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand that that I don't. I don't reckon

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that that's what college football has happened.

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't reckon. I don't reckon. All Right, the other

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>tidbit here that I think we should probably mention. Yeah,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so the Big Ten pitched it, the ACC agreed a

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>one time transfer.

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the NCAA is now looking into it as well.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, without penalty. It's under consideration for the twenty twenty

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>slash twenty twenty one school year. To provide some important

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>context here, the only sports for which you must sit

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out a year if you transfer or college football, both

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>men's and women's basketball, also baseball, also hockey. Right, if

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>you add this rule one time transfer without penalty. My

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>guess is we're going to see a lot of interesting

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>takes out there as whether or not this is good,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it's bad. They are winners, there are losers.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>They're already out there. The takes are out there. Oh,

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the takes trips alongside his weird hot dog sandwich thing

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 2>is out there.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think? I'll tell you where I

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>stand here. Please. I think this is a really good thing, okay,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And I understand the counter argument here is that it

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps devalues a commitment, and why commit if you can

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just leave. I'm sure we're gonna see plenty of you know,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the kids these days style arguments against this. But the

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>truth of the matter is, and we've been beating this

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>drune for years on this show. Programs coaches have so

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>much leverage over these kids. Yeah, you know, I don't

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>mean to demean the value of a scholarship. Certainly, that's

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>something that holds a lot of value. Sure, but programs

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>have so much damn leverage over these kids. And we

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>saw with mel Tucker. Look, I mean mel Tucker, I'm

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>sure didn't do it with any malice in his heart,

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but mel Tucker got a godfather offer to go to

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a different school, He got five and a half million dollars.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And now the kids that's signed to play under Meltucker

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that he's not going to be there.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is not this is not the first

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 2>time we saw Todd Graham, we saw Willie Tagger.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Happens, all happens every single year. So I don't know

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if this balances truly balances out that situation, but I

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do think it gives kids a little bit more leeway here.

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I like the move, I really do. Yeah.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I think offering freedom is a good thing. And I

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 2>know people are going to say, well, like, this is

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>free agency for college football. It's my opinion that kids

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>don't want to transfer. Kids want to be happy with

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 2>where they end up. Kids want to be somewhere where

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 2>they're perhaps dating somebody, perhaps they like their classes. If that,

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>if academics are a part of their life in a

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>major way. They like their coaches. They're committing to a

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>school because, you know, potentially their coaches there and stays there.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 2>They're committing to a school because maybe they like the

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>college town, maybe they like the campus, maybe they like

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the food, maybe they like the facility. They want to

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>succeed in the place they commit to, And I can't

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>imagine like people are freaking out because they think it's

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 2>free agency and like, wow, it doesn't work out here,

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>They're just going to go over there, Okay. You want

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 2>people to want to be where you are. I think

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that's an understanding. Whether it's in an office setting, whether

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>it's in a family setting, you want people to want

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to be there. And if you have all sorts of

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 2>people who are not happy with their role, who've been

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>sitting for two three years, or who get somewhere and

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 2>be like, yeah, this was definitely a wrong decision. I'm

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to see this through, but I am unhappy. You

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>want your locker room to be filled with happy people.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>That's why a team like Clemson has succeeded to the

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 2>degree that they've succeeded because people, coaches, players, support staff

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>want to work for Dabo Sweeney at Clemson, and so

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 2>it actually puts a lot more pressure on people running

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>programs and running athletic departments to build a culture that

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 2>people want to be a part of. And you cannot

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>hire d holes. Tie you can't hire d holes as much,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's a big win.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. I mean, so much of the problem with

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>college football is the fact that it's college football, that

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not club football. That we've tied in the academics

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with the sport. I think that's the root of much

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of the evil that we see in college football. And

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody once told me that, without exception, any player who

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>plays at the D one level, certainly the D one

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Power five level, without exception, all of those kids think

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to the NFL. Of course, perhaps that's the

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>cynical way to look at college football, but that I

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>believe is the reality that we are living in. Academics

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>can still be important to many kids, it still is

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and will always be, but football, if you're playing at

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this level, definitely takes on a greater significance to I

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>think deny an option for kids who are very clearly

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>heavily invested in their football future, maybe to go elsewhere

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and play to pursue that dream I just think is wrong.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>It also takes power away from the NC double A

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 2>who's been having to decide on waiver appeals. Well, let's

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>see there it is, and that's power away, which is nice.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>You're speaking to my stick it to the man's side. Yeah,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you take power away from a governing body that if

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 2>you listen to Kirk Farence, the sport has probably grown

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 2>too large for the NC double A to sort of

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>figure out which rules too and to kind of enforce.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>And that that all rings true to me. You're also

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 2>strengthening It probably strengthens G five teams because a lot

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 2>of times the power five player will want to transfer

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>to a G five school but may want to play immediately,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 2>or may only have a year of eligibility left and

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>hasn't graduated and goes to the FCS level to avoid

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 2>sitting out for a year. So you're strengthening G five

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>And I understand you could have situations like Derek King.

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 2>You know it's not working out for him at Houston,

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's obviously proven himself to be a level quarterback.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Why not go up a slight level? All the Houston's

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 2>had a ton of success playing the ACC play at Miami.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Generally speaking, teams that are very, very successful are not

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 2>doing so because G five quarterbacks have gone to a

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Power five team. Generally, it's because Power five teams build

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>cultures that really strong quarterbacks want to be a part of,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and they develop and become a really strong quarterback or

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 2>player there.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So maybe the.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 2>FCS level is hurt a little bit by not getting

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a G five or a Power five transfer, be it

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 2>at quarterback or any other position. But I don't think

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be as pronounced as the the alarmists

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>may think.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, enough on the news front, Okay, we got

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of really smart, really fun questions here from

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>our college football loving for ballers. Congratulations, Skippy, you've got mail,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got mail. On the solid verbal let's start here

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>at the very top. From Brian, he wants to know

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how does Baylor's improved defense adapt to the Dave Aranda system.

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So Dave Randa, highly paid defensive coordinator for the LSU Tigers,

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they win a national championship. Matt Rule Leeves Goes gets

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a godfather offer from the Carolina Panthers. Well, and behold,

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Dave Randa's your new head football coach in Waco, Dan Now,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Dave Randa comes from really good defensive stock. He's run

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a great defense. Is defensive stock. He is defensive stock.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>He kind of sounds like Batman when he talks right,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got that prodelly deep voice. But defensively, defensively, what

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are you feeling here? So Phil Snow ran like an

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>adaptable three three five. He rotated in a number of players,

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>which is good news for the Bears because I think

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>they lose nine starters those most of if not all,

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>of their linebackers. Their secondary is going to look pretty different.

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of the guys who are stepping in

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 1>should be familiar or with playing high level college football

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>on a high level defense. David Randa's defense succeeded. I

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>saw this from our Daily Bears, a really cool community

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that David Randa's defenses have succeeded in year one. Every

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, Utah State, Wisconsin, LSU, They've made jumps. So

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I imagine Baylor is going to be in a pretty

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>good position. I don't know if it's where they were

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. A lot of upperclassmen, a lot of guys

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of experience. The Baylor offense to me

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>under Larry Fedora is probably the bigger question. The line

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is okay, but pretty new, and they should not be

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>as explosive as they were at times. This was not

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a crazy explosive offense last year, but it's going to

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be new look on both sides, and I think there's

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an adjustment period. The good news for the

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>defense is, I mean, are there a lot of scary

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>experienced quarterbacks in the Big Twelve? My sources say no, no,

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not really. Yeah.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's Sam Ellinger, and we assume Spencer Ratler,

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>whoever starts at Oklahoma should succeed. But otherwise across the conference,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, Spencer Sanders had moments, but he's not where

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma State quarterbacks have been, Kansas State, TCU, West Virginias.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>A lot of questions on offense. So it's a good

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>year I think to work in a new defensive scheme

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 2>for Baylor.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>On the topic of Baylor, we have a question here

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from Adam and it might not even be David Randas

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>three four, by the way, correct on Roberts is the

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>new coordinator. It might be his defense. We'll say correct,

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's where I'm going next year? So Adam writes

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in and he says he graduated from Baylor More Baylor

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and one. He was before Matt Rule.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>He had never seen a Baylor coach leave under good circumstances.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>And he knows what the talking points are when a

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>coach gets fired for losing or for some crazy other reason.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But his question is what are the talking points when

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't end on bad terms? What are the preseason

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>talking points now? For Baylor, given the fact that they

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>had a great season a year ago. Matt Rule leaves

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>what they bring in an excited guy in a Dave Aranda.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a really good question. I had never really

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>considered this. I would lean on the fact that I

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>think the talking points will center around the fact that,

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>first off, Dave Randa's first time head coach. But Dave

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>randa brings in a I believe proven commodity at least

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side of the ball. And Larry Fedora,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>who knows that a coach offense should hopefully improve their

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>output on the offensive side. Excuse me, and you mentioned

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Ron Roberts. Ron Roberts was a mentor for Dave Oranda.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>He taught him a lot of what he knows. So

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that if you like the Dave Randa

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>defense that you've seen over the years, what you're going

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>to see now out of Ron Roberts, Even if there

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is a new cast on the defensive side of the

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ball for Baylor, you should expect more of the same

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. I think you know what you are getting,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>or at least we have a really good sense of

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>what we are getting for Baylor the foreseeable future, just

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>given the coaching staff that Randa has assembled here.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I expect year one reduce sodium Baylor. That's all

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 2>reduce sodium Baylor. I like reduce sodium Baylor. Nathan wants

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>to know, Yes, will Wisconsin win a national tighter title

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 2>or tighter under Paul christ.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Next question shares Wisconsin's really good and fun at football.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 2>They need a game changing quarterback and I don't think

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>they've had one since Russell Wilson. And that was not

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 2>an accident, but that was a happy occurrence to receive

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>somebody as talented did Russell Wilson. I just the talent

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily there. There's certainly a tier below recruiting wise,

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and bringing in blue chips to absolutely compete and win

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 2>a Big Ten championship over presumably Ohio State and then

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>win two games against teams like Clemson, Georgia, Alabama, Oklahoma,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that kind of thing. So no, I think probably not,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>but I'll never say never. I'll say there's a one

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>point six percent chance.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I am not rooting against their chances. But no, I

0:23:59.280 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>tend to agree with you.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>No, nicelys that just came into Madison as well. Jack

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>wants to know who should Colorado hire and by the time,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 2>do you want to just react to every potential hire

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 2>we see happening?

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, we joked around on the mysterious g Chat earlier

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>today that they were going to announce Brett Bielma at

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>six oh eight pm Eastern time, shortly after we hit

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the stop button, because like all big announcements in college football,

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it always happens immediately after we hit the stop button

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on a podcast, doesn't it.

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're not a college football podcast unless you complain

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 2>about the timing of coaching news.

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So who are who are the likely candidates here? Brett

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Beielma's one.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, Troy Calhoun and Brett Bielima. There was a

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 2>report from football Scoop. I saw today as we record

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>this Wednesday, the what's the nineteenth? Yeah, that an announcement

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 2>could come as early as tomorrow, so shift time with us.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 2>But I think both of those hires. What's the opposite

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of hot and bothered? Cold and comfortable?

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I don't both. I don't know those either of

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>those options, do you?

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I like the literal option that Troy Calhoun and what

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 2>that offense looks like at its best. But I would

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>just go get Ken Neo modalolo engage his interest. Maybe

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't interested in Colorado, but I would. I would

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>go for the dude doing this option thing. Man, I

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 2>can't what I can't get into it. Colorado is a

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 2>job that if you take Colorado to nine wins, you're

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna leave unless you went there or are a

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>West Coast guy, and that's where you want to coach

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 2>in the Pac twelve. If Brett Bilma goes to Boulder

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and goes nine to three, he's just gonna leave and

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>we're back here.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Who wants to Bilma? Though?

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean he had a he had a nice year

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>at Arkansas singular singular, and a really nice run at Wisconsin. Now,

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>he's been in the NFL. Arkansas is a tough place

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 2>to win, and he had a singular good year. Troy

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Calhoun doesn't really do it for me. It's hard to

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>know exactly what he'll run. Ken Neo Moodalolo talked about

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>adjusting his offense when he was under consideration for the

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Arizona job, and you know, perhaps it's it's a different

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 2>style offense than what he's done in previous years, but

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the air Force defense is these past like it. Basically

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>his entire era have not been good. And I understand

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it's tough to build a good defense when that's what

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 2>your offense runs. But that's that's tough. I would trust

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>ken Ney Madololo more. That's all that's that to me,

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>is is better. I know Eric Bienemy's name came around.

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>He was the offensive coordinator there like a twenty eleven,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty twelve all time bad Colorado offenses. I don't think

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 2>that's on him. Has succeeded with the Chiefs. I think

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>he can do better than Colorado.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Again, we love Boulder and we like Colorado football being good.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm mixed on the Brett bielm The thing I don't

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>think that culturally he is a good fit. But I

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>am interested stylistically in what a version of his old

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>offense could do in the Pact. Now, if he could

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>rebuild essentially, uh, what he had at Wisconsin with a

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>beast offensive line, in a really solid running game, and

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>just like a really good game manager at quarterback, you

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>could go places in the You could win nine games

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Pac twelve with that pretty easily.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's because he was at Colorado State, but Jim

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 2>mckaway just looks like a Colorado coach. He just looks

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 2>as like, Yeah, that dude runs out with a buffalo.

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Did I see that they were considering

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Jim Mora?

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Of course, anyway's post job, Jim Mora's name comes up,

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 2>great age retreads. Good lord, Okay, I don't. I mean

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Darren Shiverini. Shiverini, who's been there for a few years assistant, right,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I know he's been under consideration.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a. It's a. It's another tough job. Next question,

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Next question, Dan, let's go to let's go to left coast. Kane. Oh,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready. Did the Miami Hurricanes win the off season? Okay,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a loaded question. Headed into spring ball, they

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>went six and seven. They landed a new offensive coordinator

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and Rhet Lashley, the top two players in the transfer portal.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They hired Ed Reid. They finished with the number thirteen

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>recruiting class and six under armour all Americans. Wow. So

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I was under the impression that they sort of won

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the off season last year when they got Manny Diaz.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>We did a whole thing on how you know, Yeah,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he's bringing the swagger back to Miami. That did not

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>work out according to the plane here. But now we're back.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>We're another bite at the apple. Dan, Did they win

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this offseason?

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean I've always I've long said, Miami and USC

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>our sister schools in USC man those recruiting classes, the

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>assistant hires, the transfers.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>All every is htt Lashley good. Yeah, that's a question.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Is he is he? Actually?

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>So his offense is whether or not he's called the plays.

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's been like the architect because

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>it's been with Gus Melzan and most recently Sunny Dykes

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 2>at SMU. His offenses have succeeded with other people building

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 2>those offenses, and so Auburn's offense seemed to get worse

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the more he was empowered.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't in the room.

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea, but that's what it seems that,

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Nick Marshall offenses were really fun, and

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 2>then when they went into the post Nick Marshall world

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 2>where at Lashley seemed to have more responsibility and what

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 2>they weren't as good.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I honestly don't know about that. And the transfer portal thing.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 2>The Eric King certainly promising Quincy Roche. I think his

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 2>name is from Temple the edge rusher really strong for

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Temple ed Reid. If he can play safety, he's able

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>to play. I don't know exactly. I think he's what

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the head of personnel, chief of staff, something like that.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So hopefully that's a good influence on people caring at Miami.

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just what does the offense look like?

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That's all it is.

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 2>And so winning the off season, I don't know. I

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>like what Oregon's done personally, hiring Joe Morehead, recruiting well,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 2>keeping Mariho crist of all, all of those things have

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>been positive for me. There's a number of teams who've

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 2>had decent enough off seasons. Tennessee finishing with a really

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 2>nice recruiting class and finishing their year. I think the

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 2>momentum is nice for Tennessee. Sure, I think winning the

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 2>off season is an important thing if you're Miami. So yes,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I will say yes, sure.

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I like the fact that Manny Diaz is

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>pulling out the stops here and seemingly trying to build

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a better program, trying to make an immediate impact. But

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I would hope so, yeah, you know, I mean there's

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>reason for optimism. But I was very optimistic going into

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this last season and that did not work out at all.

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Derek King behind that same offensive line won't be amazing.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Coda writes in when will be the next time?

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So get out your crystal ball here, Dan, Yeah, the

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>next time a team west of the Mississippi wins a

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>national title? And who will it be? Wow, I'm gonna

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>try to translate this.

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>When will a team west of the Mississippi win a

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>national title?

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>How we would edit that? And who is going to

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>be that team? I think the easiest answers would be

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And I had to look up exactly the border of

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the Mississi too, actually, So if you are back and

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 2>forth about Minnesota, they count Minneapolis is West believe if

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>my research is correct, so Iowa, if that's a team

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 2>that you're considering Nebraska, who will it be? I think

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 2>the earliest is probably twenty twenty one would be the earliest.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>And I would have it as probably Oregon, Washington, Oklahoma.

0:31:58.000 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And I would say Oregon or Washington because I think

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the aths are easier for them if the PAC twelve

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 2>remains somewhat down at the top, Okay, see what happens

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 2>with Washington quarterback. But I'm pretty confident Washington can build

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a borderline championship defense.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Se I'm not feeling you on the Washington vibe. Oh,

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I love hyping up Washington. I know, I know you

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>do it every year. I look, Jimmy Lake could work out.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of reason to believe that Jimmy Lake

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>will work out. I'm always skeptical on new coaches. You

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>don't care if I watched John Donovan offenses. I have

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>watched Joses thank you. Oh, I'm sorry. Implosive implosive implosive. Yeah, yeah, sorry,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So forgive me if I'm a little bit skeptical. I

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>share your optimism on Oregon. I've got Oregon in my

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>contenders list as well, because recruiting has been strong. Yeah,

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Mario Chris Ball has played a much more physical brand

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I think of football, especially on the defensive side of

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the football. Bring that sec mentality, bringing that sec mentality

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Pacific Northwest. So more to come on that front.

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Say the least, I like Oregon, I like Oklahoma or

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma kind of goes without saying they've been not I

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>almost want to disqualify Oklahoma. Well, they're in here. This

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is the question. I've seen them in the playoff.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I have not seen the current iteration of Oregon against

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll see them against Ohio State early next year. I've

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>not seen them on that stage. So I cannot say

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>with certainty that there is a good chance they're going

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>to get blown out with Oklahoma.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You can, you can, you can't. I let me throw

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and m out there. A coach that's been

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there before. That's just such a tough path though, it's

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a very tough path, but it's a coach that's been

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>there before in Jimbo Fisher. It's a recruiting situation that's

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>been very strong in the last two years, especially this year,

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>very very good. He's building depth. He's also got a

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>lot coming back from season. So it's a good situation

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in college station. I don't know how soon it is,

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and I know Alabama is still recruiting and still playing

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>at a very very high level. But what the post

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to Alabama looks like remains somewhat to be seen.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I have a guest, I think they're gonna look like Alabama.

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna look incredible, I'm sure, but there is some

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>turnover there that maybe they can take advantage of. The

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>SEC West is baller. Obviously, LSU just won a national championship.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty good situation as well. LC is going

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to take a minute to get back to where they were,

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>though I believe that's accurate. So A and M is

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me. The two programs that aren't on either

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of our lists are Texas and USC.

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I would put Texas ahead of Texas A and M.

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I would put Texas A and M ahead of Texas

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 2>if they were still in the Big twelve. It's a

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 2>path thing to me, and as open as the SEC

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 2>West appears to be. With a new full time starting

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 2>quarterback for Alabama and some consistency issues in retaining assistance,

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Alabama is still crazy talented. LSU should field still really

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>good sides the ball, offense and defense should still be

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting enough. The Mississippi schools are not national title contenders.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Auburn is a perennial, dangerous at times team. The path

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>is just more difficult and I cannot right now. I mean,

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>this year will have Kellen Mond and I just moving forward.

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing that tells me texts A and M can

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 2>come over like two humps right now, whereas with Texas

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 2>it looks like it's only one hump.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>What if right now? What if Nick Saban retires in

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two years. Sure, we've been saying that since twenty fifteen

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he may be indestructible, but if and when he retires,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>that could upset the balance of things.

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's gonna be a long time for USC.

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 2>It was a long time before they were really good

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's been a long time since. So all right,

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 2>they had the Sam Donald dear and.

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>That was that. Jeremy says, I know you guys love

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to do restaurant recommendations, but what about stadium recommendations? What's

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>on your bucket list for college football stadiums to attend

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and which ones have you been to that verballers should

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>go to. So for those listeners who do not know

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the full story of how this show came to fruition,

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan used to do a digital series for SI dot

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 1>com called The College Football Tour Guy. The SI Tour

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Guy as he was later known. You visited a lot

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of college football stadiums, so your resume, at least in

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>this sense, is far deeper than mine. What are your

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>recommendations here.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin in terms of putting it all together? Game environment,

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Tailgating town is really strong in the Big Ten. I've

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed going to some of the like the cocktail party.

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not a college town. I would if you're looking

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 2>at bucket list stuff, maybe don't go to a neutral

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>site game. In terms of places I haven't been that

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 2>i'd like to go, I still haven't been to the Plane,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 2>so I haven't been to an Auburn game. I haven't

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 2>been to Stillwater or Norman. I'd like to go to

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 2>both of those places I haven't been to. I'm not

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 2>dying to go to a Florida State or Miami game,

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 2>but I would. That's just not top of my list

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 2>where some of other you know, the smaller college towns are.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Clemson's a really good time if it's a big game.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 2>They just don't play that many big games with what

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 2>the ACC is like right now. Sure, unless I guess

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame comes to town or if you know, North

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.279
<v Speaker 2>Carolina or Louisville continue to improve. What else is on

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 2>my Tennessee is wild. I love my time at Tennessee.

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>That is a just enormous undertaking. Oregon and Washington are

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 2>both fun out west in the Pacific Northwest, it's you know,

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 2>even though Seattle's not a college town that stadiums run

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 2>on the lake as well, it's a good time. I'm

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to think other bucket lists. I Wisconsin to me

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 2>is in the Midwest, Notre Dame is a good time,

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 2>but South Bend didn't really move the needle for me.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 2>But the actual Notre Dame campus and stadium was pretty incredible.

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I would say in the Midwest, go to

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Madison would be my verdict. And in the South, lsu

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>or Ole Miss l it's.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Your ole, miss Okay. I'm gonna go with your recommendations.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Go with bands recommendation. George is also a great time.

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Georgia was a good time. I enjoyed my enjoyed my game,

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and I saw at Georgia. Yeah, which new higher This

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is from MSU jargon great, which New Hire will win

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the most games next year? And which coaches will be

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>on the hot seat in twenty twenty. So we're just

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>skipping over twenty twenty here and going right to the end.

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So here's a quick listing of new coaches. We've got

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam Pittman at Arkansas, Eli Drinkwoit's at Missou, Mike Leech

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at Mississippi State, Jeff Haffley Boston College, Mike Norvelle Florida State,

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Lake at Washington we mentioned him earlier, Mel Tucker

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>at Michigan State. We've got Lane Kiffin at Ole Miss.

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>We've got Greg Ciano at Rutgers, Ryan Silverfield Memphis, Jeff

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott USF Dave Randa Baylor, Kaylin de Boor at Fresno State.

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got Brady Hokee at San Diego State, And did

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I mention Todd Graham Graham at Old There.

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 2>Are more than this, but these are the ones I

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 2>guess we'll consider.

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, so of these here, Yeah, who who strikes

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you as being in the best situation too, let's say

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>win the most games and or potentially make a make

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a big Bowl game.

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 2>So there's only a couple of them where the coaches

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 2>left because the situation was good and they decided to

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 2>retire or move on to a bigger job. And so

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it's Ryan Silverfield at Memphis, Jimmy Lake and Washington Nick Rolovich.

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I forgot to mention Nick Rolovich at Rolovich Washington State. Yes,

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 2>obviously Jeff Tedford retired for health reasons from Fresno State.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 2>San Diego State is in a good situation, especially on defense,

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and Baylor in bringing in David Randon to replace your

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 2>guy Matt Ruhle heading to the Carolina Panthers. So a

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of like continuity schools, I'm probably gonna say Ryan

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Silverfield at Members I've got him highlighted returning quarterback, non

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.359
<v Speaker 2>major conference but semi major conference, depending on where your

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 2>brain's at. I think he's in a good situation continuity wise,

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>whereas a lot of these guys are either in very

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 2>tough divisions, tough conferences, or are inheriting a talent level

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 2>that's probably year two, three years away. So I'm gonna

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 2>go with Ryan Silverfield here I agree.

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Moving on, all right, Taylor says, tell me something good

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>about Texas Tech football. Oh, Alan Bowman's good. Alan Bowman's good.

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>They've also got a terrific home schedule. They have a

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>good scat next year. They've got Baylor, Texas.

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>And Oklahoma all at home. Their defense was probably their

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.479
<v Speaker 2>best defense and now the Big twelve is very different

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nine, but probably the best defense since like

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen. Yeah, something like that. To set up points

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 2>per drive was like seventy seventh, which is a revelation

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to just being kind of below average. So it's going

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to be an interesting year. Alan Bowman seems to always

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 2>get hurt, so sometimes quarterbacks get hurt a lot and

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 2>then they just don't and hopefully that's what happens to

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 2>Texas Tech.

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>He also says actual questions, so apparently that wasn't his

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>real question. Oh okay, how does the Pac twelves continued

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>dissent impact the overall landscape of college football if it

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't improve in the next few years? How does realignment

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>look for West Coast football? So does he mean realignment

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in a figurative or a literal sense? Because I am

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>here for the literal sense if we mean like that

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like Pangaea.

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh, let's do that thing again, land masses rejiggering.

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh let's get Chip Brown online one, Let's do this

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 1>thing over again.

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the West Coast literally breaking off the rest of

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the country and floated to the Pacific, right right, it

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 2>makes it worse. I mean, the Pac twelve playing interesting

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 2>games on a channel that everybody gets is a net

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 2>positive for everybody involved. I don't know if and when

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 2>that happens, So I think he's probably asking, like, does

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the PAC twelve and Big twelve do they merge? That

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>seems to be the underlying part of his question. I

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 2>don't think so, but I can't swear that it won't happen. Yeah,

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 2>it is important for every single major conference to have

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>impressive teams at the top and good enough teams in

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 2>the middle that any given week something weird can happen,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 2>sort of like where the Big twelve I think more

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 2>often than not has been Maybe what the SEC looked

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 2>like in twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen when Ole Miss became

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 2>a player, what the ACC was like with you know,

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the annual Clemson Florida State but also you know, Louisville's

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 2>hanging around Teddy Bridgewater, all these teams. That's what you want,

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's where the PAC twelve isn't. The PAC twelve

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 2>has chunks of impressive teams at different places. You know,

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 2>ASU here and there, USC's offense Utah until they have

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:20.959
<v Speaker 2>to play talented teams Oregon when they're not let down

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 2>against a team like ASU or finishing the Auburn game

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 2>in that way. They need that quality of the top.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 2>They need two really strong teams at the top and

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 2>then four teams after that that it had their act together.

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, get that three out of three on the

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 2>competence test that we did on the twos cruise midway

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 2>through the year. And I'm not confident in it.

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I really am not.

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think college football is just going to continue

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 2>to suffer without a decent PAC twelve.

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So we just move Arizona and Arizona State, along with

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Colorado and Utah over into the Big twelve. I guess

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they'd have fourteen teams at that point, so I have

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the back to the pack eight I think, so, yeah,

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that will be eight.

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's really a solution is to take out teams

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and fan bases oh, I am, I am here for this.

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 2>You take out maybe the best one of the best

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>two college basketball teams in the conference in Arizona or programs. Yeah,

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 2>that's a very strange okay, maybe the only consistently good

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 2>team football wise in Utah.

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Jake says, what traditionally bad program would you want to

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>suddenly become a national power? Yeah? The example he uses

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>here is Ucla. He says, UCLA is now the best

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>team in the Pac twelve and a consistent top ten teams.

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:46.839
<v Speaker 1>So he says, traditionally bad program. I guess, yeah, which

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of misleading, Like, yeah, is Ucla traditionally bad?

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they go that far.

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 2>So if we were to shift this to like underperforming underperforming, yeah,

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>given what we consider to be a higher ceiling than

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:02.760
<v Speaker 2>what they've shown.

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I actually did take this in a more literal sense,

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>traditionally bad. So I went through each Power five conference

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and identified the schools that I would want to root

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for to suddenly become that national power in the ACC

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>For me at Syracuse, Syracuse has been traditionally pretty bad. Yeah, okay,

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And I've always been a fan of Otto the Orangeman. Yeah.

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Out of the Orange, So for me, it's Syracuse. Also,

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the Carrier Dome just a weird place to play. I

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>do enjoy that element more notoriety for the Carrier Dome

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:38.959
<v Speaker 1>in Syracuse, and the Orange is pretty exciting. Iowa State

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Twelve now, maybe not so much recently,

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but Iowa State's been a doormat for a long time

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Big Twelve and I've enjoyed what's going on

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>there under Matt Campbell, and I'd love to see more

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of it. So Iowa State the national power.

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Iowa State is an easy, easy answer, just because those games,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 2>when the big Games and ames are always fun.

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 1>In the Big Ten, Minnesota is really interesting to me.

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota had a renaissance this past year and PJ Fleck

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is trying to build them up accordingly. But they play

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in an outdoor stadium in the middle of winter. It's

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the easiest place to recruit to, but it

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:26.799
<v Speaker 1>definitely poses an interesting challenge if you're a team having

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to go to Minneapolis in mid to late November.

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather have Nebraska as a super strong team in Minnesota.

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But they're not traditionally bad.

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe underwhelming, modern underwhelming.

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Modern underwhelming. Okay, I could get behind that too.

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But Minnesota is currently peaking, and he used the example

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 2>of top ten Ucla and you are pointing out Minnesota,

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 2>who literally.

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Just finished the season.

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 2>I know, but traditionally they've been very bad. I don't

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 2>think no, Minnesota has not been traditionally very bad. They

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 2>have been an average program. Oh, come on, they've been

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 2>They're a perennial bowl.

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Program, are they. Yeah, look that one up. Okay, I'll

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it. If I'm wrong, yell at me, I'll

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>take Okay, Okay, Pac twelve, Pack twelve, I've got cal.

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 2>I think i'd rather have Ucla. They're playing the Rose Bowl.

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 2>They've had big names come through their Chip Kelly's there now,

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 2>so that means Chip Kelly's reigniting the program, which I

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 2>think is.

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>A positive thing. What about Arizona?

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Arizona's fine, They're fine. I think Ucla is just a

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:34.760
<v Speaker 2>better answer.

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you know the one? Okay, it might be a

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>better answer. But the one thing that I find interesting about.

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 2>You, since nineteen ninety nine, Minnesota has four seasons where

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 2>they haven't been to a bowl game. Really, so since

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety nine, if I'm going to add on the fly, seven, nine, fourteen, sixteen.

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Out of.

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Twenty one seasons, they've been to a Bowl game.

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Wow, Okay, I didn't know that. I'm going to leave

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this in the show.

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 2>That was after a long gap. We thank you that

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the Jim Whacker era, yeah, was not super kind.

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, So there's a little something for everybody. If

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to yell at me, at Suliver, well you

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>can yell at me. It's fine. Shout out Joe Salem,

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>shout out Murray Warmath. That's right, Stole. What I was

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>going to say, though, is the one thing that I

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it comes through on any of our shows, is,

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of course you're mister Pac twelve, mister Oregon. Yeah, people

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:34.279
<v Speaker 1>know that, but I don't think it ever truly comes through.

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Just how angry you are that Arizona isn't better.

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I do want Arizona. Arizona is a great time. What

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 2>were we just discussing this with someone disappointing we were

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 2>we were just talking about this very point and Arizona

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 2>not being a boll team is the dumbest thing in

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>It comes through like fire on the Mysterious g Chat

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.360
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about Arizona and you are genuinely, like

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>viscerally angry. Yeah, over the fact that this is not

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a better football program.

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm a legacy. My mom went to Arizona.

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, proud graduate.

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think UCLA is the better answer there. Uh.

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Colorado, I think is they're not print. They've won a

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.439
<v Speaker 2>national championship, but it'd be better if Colorado were better.

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd want probably, and they appear maybe to be on

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:25.680
<v Speaker 2>an upswing. I'd love for Tennessee to be a power again, yeah,

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 2>and add some depth to the East there. I'd love

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 2>for Arkansas to be mixing it up once again. I

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 2>mean those like the run DMC teams. Yeah, amazing, amazingly

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 2>fun to have Arkansas on the mix.

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>At the top of the sport. I'm okay with both those. Yeah, yeah,

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, where do you want to go next year?

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to let's go to Mike any tips for

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 2>being a new dad and watching college football? Now, this

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 2>is sort of we're doing a non college football and

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:56.800
<v Speaker 2>not like a non college football part two to this

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Q and A yes, but this is a college football

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 2>specific watch question, so I'm gonna do my best to

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 2>tie it specific to watch in college football uh. He

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:07.320
<v Speaker 2>and his wife are expecting their first in August. So

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to strategize the fall and the college football

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 2>intake now.

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna sit this one out. No, Ty, I

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>think you should jump in. I could.

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm you have so many good answers when

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you talk about things that you're not personally experienced with,

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and so do I.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I have a puppy, which isn't quite the same thing.

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>What so if you want, if you want feedback on

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that side of things, Mike, I'd be happy to oblige.

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 2>But no, have you ever have you ever in person

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 2>when somebody is talking about their kids, say, listen, I

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 2>don't have a.

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Killing that puppy. I listen, I have a puppy. So

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.280
<v Speaker 1>if I can jump in right here, no, I haven't.

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 2>And I drop your kid off at obedience school while

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 2>you're at work, that's right, and you'll they'll give you

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 2>a certificate.

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, so's what's what's the strategy here?

0:50:56.239 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 2>The strategy is to get your kid probably sleep training.

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I have a couple recommendations as early as they'll let you,

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 2>so you get on a good schedule.

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to get me to buy this from my

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:08.239
<v Speaker 1>cousin who just reads.

0:51:09.120 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 2>I've got a really good recommendation, but I think I'm

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna try to get them on board as a sponsor.

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta get him as a sponsor first.

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 2>You gotta get him as a sponsor first, because I

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it will be the best reads I've done since I

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 2>told the world how much you love Manscape. That's right, great,

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 2>you gotta get them. You gotta get them on a

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 2>regular sleeping schedule. And then what you have to do

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.880
<v Speaker 2>is to your spouse, say what do you want to

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 2>get done? Do you have errand's? Do you want to

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:35.359
<v Speaker 2>take a nap? Do you want to go for a run,

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 2>do you want to visit, you know, hang out with

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 2>your friends? You let me know what you want to do,

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:41.800
<v Speaker 2>because I want to go to the gym, and I

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 2>want to schedule that around the sleep schedule. And then

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you go to the gym for the last hour of

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 2>a game you really want to watch. If you're in

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 2>make sure you go to a gym that has TVs

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 2>because I would also recommend your instinct is going to

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 2>be I need to sleep when the baby sleeps, and

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 2>that's right. But also sometimes instead of taking a nap,

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.400
<v Speaker 2>you should go work out, because that's very good for

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 2>your brain and your body. So I would time up

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 2>gym visits with a TV or just like bring a

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 2>tablet that you can stream games on and just go

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 2>real slow on the treadmill, real slow on an ex

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 2>exercise bike and find that window of football watching you

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 2>want to watch, or just DVR games and do the

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 2>best job you can without finding out the results. And

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna be up in the middle of the night anyway,

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 2>probably either with your wife or solo if that's how

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 2>you're feeding, and you know, zoom through games that you

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:34.760
<v Speaker 2>know two.

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Forty four window, window of opportunity, window of opportunity, window

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity, I think is I'm what I'm hearing here?

0:52:40.480 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but do some do some time management negotiation and

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 2>be the one to say, when what do you want

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 2>to get done? I will watch the kid and then

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 2>time it up so your gym visit coincides with the

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 2>last hour at you.

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Well, good luck to you, Mike, Congratulations, be giving.

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's do like two or three more here, yes, and

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>call it a night. Austin Taos says, what do y'all think? Yeah?

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Did I do the y'all right, I mean you've long done, y'all,

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 2>so yes, that was an improvement.

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>What do y'all think the ideal conference size slash structure

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>should be.

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bill Connelly's pods obviously obviously get pods going, so

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 2>teams play each other more often than not, because what

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 2>do we have this We had Texas A and M

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and Georgia playing for the first time since joining the

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 2>same conference.

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yeah, So.

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 2>I avoid situations like that with pods to schedule regularly

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:39.920
<v Speaker 2>occurring matchups.

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I like twelve. I like twelve. I like nine conference games,

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and the I guess the extra flavor that I would

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>add to this, And I don't know how you could

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:55.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly enforce this, but I got twelve teams, nine conference games,

0:53:56.000 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and one, honest to goodness, try at a premium non

0:54:01.680 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>con opponent.

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't even need nine. I'm okay with eight if

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody's if everybody across the board is playing ten Power

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:12.600
<v Speaker 2>five games or something like that in the way that

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 2>we have these you know, Clemson, South Carolina, Florida, Florida State,

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 2>we have these inter conference annual matchups. If we get those,

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:23.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm fine with an eight game pod.

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:26.919
<v Speaker 1>System. Okay, I like the pod system, I just don't

0:54:26.960 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's realistic.

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Look up, look up Bill Connolly's pod system, and I

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 2>think you will all be converts.

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Converts because we can't do a Q and A show

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>without a Jim Harbaugh question. This one for Abbot, says

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>dear friend, Abbot, Dear friend, Abbot. He says, not that

0:54:40.600 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a better option, but how many straight

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>losses to Ohio State will hire ups at Michigan take

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 1>before showing Harball the door? Abbit abbit, habit habit listen quote,

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Not that I think there's a better option end quote.

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Is doing a lot of work in this question, Dan, Yeah,

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work here. I think it's far more

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 1>likely that Jim Harbaugh finds a different gig, most likely

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, than Michigan ever firing him. Agree, disagree.

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't care that much about Jim Harbaugh's job security,

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 2>but I think the way he framed this question is right.

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 2>That not that I think there's a better option. I

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 2>think if I were to frame this question would be

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 2>how many times can he lose to Penn State and

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 2>or Wisconsin and or Iowa say before his seat warms up?

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Michigan has to consistently beat all of

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 2>those teams every year before we can And we've talked

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 2>about this before before. Ohio State is the measuring stick

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:58.399
<v Speaker 2>for Michigan. I know their arrival, but they're ahead. They're

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 2>just ahead or as a program, and they're ahead by

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a considerable margin if you look at the recent scores.

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I know there was the JT.

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Barrett game, but it doesn't look like Ohio State is

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 2>going to have a quarterback who is similar to J. T.

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Barrett or has j T. Barrett's consistency limitations anytime soon.

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 2>So beat those three teams in Michigan State. I mean,

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll see. I mean Michigan State is not in the

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.399
<v Speaker 2>position right now. I think of Iowa, Wisconsin and Penn State.

0:56:30.080 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 2>But Michigan has to jump out of that group before

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 2>we can say we only lost in another one of

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State. I think it's just I think it's framed improperly,

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 2>even if that's the reality. So I think if he

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 2>loses the next three by three plus touchdowns, right, and

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 2>it's the game that seals Michigan as a cements Michigan

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 2>as a non double digit, that's cementsa nine and three season.

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it warms up, but there has to be

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:06.279
<v Speaker 2>an obvious person to ascend to that position, and the

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 2>odds of that happening are not zero. But it seems

0:57:10.800 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of like a stretch, sort of like a stretch

0:57:13.760 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 2>like Jim Harbaugh and having acrimony at San Francisco and

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 2>having acrimony and ann arbor with Brady Hoke. That was obvious.

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know who that obvious name is. I'll bet

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you it's not Less Miles. All right, Well we'll see, Yeah,

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll see. We did see offensive improvement towards the latter

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 2>half of the year, so I think, at least on

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the coaching side of the offense, the move to go

0:57:42.240 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 2>out and change the system up did yield some results

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 2>later down the stretch. I don't know if that translates

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 2>to beating Ohio State. I don't know if that translates

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 2>into getting Michigan too a more stable spot. But I

0:57:55.320 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 2>was encouraged by that at the minimum. So Grizzly Grizzly

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Web asks a fascin grizzly web, Okay, what can a

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 2>school do to change the national perception that their school

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 2>has a very toxic fan base, He adds here he's

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 2>a diehard Colgate fan.

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 1>No. Wow, I don't know if you thought about this

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. I thought about it a little bit, and

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what a school can do. I didn't

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:23.880
<v Speaker 1>even see this question. Yeah, it came.

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 2>It came in earlier today, or it was came in

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty late on the subreddit soliverble do reddit dot com Join.

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Now what I think a lot of this is dependent

0:58:33.360 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on is maybe the fan communities.

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Are there funny people, funny fans that are tweeting out

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 2>funny things or starting blogs or podcasts or video series

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:51.880
<v Speaker 2>that they themselves come off as being somebody with a

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 2>sense of humor, somebody who doesn't take things too too seriously,

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and somebody creating a sort of fan universe that you

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 2>want to be a part of because it doesn't seem

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 2>full of hate and toxics. So what you're saying is

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 2>that we have reopened our recruitment. Yeah, as a college

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 2>football entity, the soliverbal is open to changing its fan affiliation.

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you to that point? Can you hire someone like

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a Matthew McConaughey, Like a Matthew McConaughey. Of course you can't.

0:59:27.240 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Texas was ever thought of as being toxic.

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>No, But like you, if you put Matthew McConaughey in

0:59:34.240 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or on top of a really toxic situation, do you

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think that would immediately revive the image of that fan base.

0:59:41.160 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So I was going to actually go to Texas A

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 2>and M. Okay, not that I thought Texas A and

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 2>M was toxic, but it definitely appears to be a

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 2>fan base that can get too serious.

0:59:52.240 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you took McConaughey, yeah, and transplanted him, forgot

0:59:56.880 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about his Texas affiliation, right, and moved them over to

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the A and M side of things, do you think

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that was flaming this up? Well, I'm trying. It's one

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of our last question. That's what it was he was saying.

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>So, for instance, like textags doesn't an incredible job covering

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the Aggies, right, they are just one stop solution. They

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 2>produce a ton of content. I know they're affiliated or

1:00:20.440 --> 1:00:23.400
<v Speaker 2>war affiliated with the Athletic whatever it is. And it's

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>just like this, this grouping of diehards. I remember, like

1:00:26.240 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Robert Gates was on textags, right, Secretary of Defense, like

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you just have and so like I would always just

1:00:31.600 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 2>think about text saying M like, Okay, there's this this

1:00:34.360 --> 1:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>ag and like military type school and they don't have

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the history of top level success, but they expect it.

1:00:40.160 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>They're so serious. They're they're on message boards all year long.

1:00:43.000 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 2>They have these like crazy important people on there. And

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>then the good bull hunting people popped up and they

1:00:50.520 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>do an incredible job and they have like a sense

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>of humor and I always am excited to see what

1:00:55.960 --> 1:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>they have to say about the Aggies and they do

1:00:59.160 --> 1:01:01.400
<v Speaker 2>really fun graphic and stuff like that. And that totally

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>altered my overly serious perception of Texas A and M

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and their fan base because those guys are good at

1:01:07.800 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 2>what they do in terms of not going berserk and

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>having a little fun with it. Felt the same way

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 2>about some Iowa fans that are funny, like Spencer Hall

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and Florida. Like when you have those prominent fans or

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 2>communities that do a good job of putting things in

1:01:24.040 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>perspective and getting a little wacky, that changes things for.

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Me, Hmmm, fair or not? Okay, I don't know what

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you do.

1:01:33.040 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Because these are they're the most public facing fans if

1:01:37.000 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>you're asking about toxic because every every school has a

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>section of fans that are yelling at recruits online and

1:01:46.720 --> 1:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>are poisoning trees and yelling terrible things to children wearing

1:01:52.080 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>the wrong colors at games. That exists everywhere. That's this

1:01:55.960 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>dumb sport that we love. But yeah, I think you

1:01:58.840 --> 1:02:00.280
<v Speaker 2>just got to get lucky with some of your public

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>facing fans.

1:02:00.920 --> 1:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say Russian disinformation, Dan, but

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that's all. You have a much better thought out answer,

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so we can go with that.

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you this, Mike Golick Junior has done a

1:02:10.440 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>nice job of young and up Notre Dame. Oh yeah,

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's a very old angry Fanase not that angry

1:02:19.440 --> 1:02:19.800
<v Speaker 2>you've done.

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay too, I'm not as well. I didn't play for

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame. No, but all right, final question here from Peter.

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, who has been your favorite player that you

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>discovered by accident? Example, you turn on Team X because

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you've heard about their star tight end, but discover their

1:02:41.160 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>running back that no one else is talking about. He's

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>really the one who melts your butter. I love that

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>term melts your butter. So I have a very easy

1:02:50.240 --> 1:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>one for me, and it probably doesn't quite fit the

1:02:54.200 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>example that he laid out. But for me, it's Clyde

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire. Oh, good answer.

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>For Ellis answer, good answer, thank you.

1:03:01.920 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank That's what they tell you at game shows to do. Yeah. No,

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's Clyde Edwards Hilaire. I had tuned in

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Burrow all last season, and I feel like

1:03:13.240 --> 1:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>every time I saw Clyde Edwards Lair, I came away impressed,

1:03:18.000 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like I was seeing him with virgin eyes dan for

1:03:20.080 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the first time. So Clyde Edwards Lair for me, it's

1:03:23.040 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>an easy answer.

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:26.560
<v Speaker 2>This year he was He started the season as a backup,

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>but obviously Michael Cunningham to me, Michael Puma pass got

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Saderfield's first year, they start running all over Notre Dame

1:03:34.120 --> 1:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and then things kind of go south. But then he's

1:03:36.760 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a revelation for Louisville. Didn't originally tune in for him,

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>but there he was. I remember specifically, and maybe I'm misremembering,

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 2>but when Kansas State was really peaking seven, eight, nine

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>years ago with Colin Klein, it was like he's the

1:03:51.560 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>new t Bow and he would always he would always

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>do that sort of stutter, like it's going to be

1:03:57.040 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>a draw. And pop back or do little pop passes

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. And Kansas State was winning a

1:04:02.200 --> 1:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of games. People were going into Manhattan thinking they

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>could come out with a win. What is it, Bruce

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Snyder family whatever, and they didn't know. And I would

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>watch some of those games for Colin Kline, and I

1:04:15.440 --> 1:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>guess the good people Samsung did too, because he's all

1:04:17.680 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>over their commercials. But then I saw who when he

1:04:21.280 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 2>would throw it, every time he threw it to this

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:28.160
<v Speaker 2>one dude, he would catch it, and then they just

1:04:28.240 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>kept throwing it to him and nobody could cover him.

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And I love that element more than I love Colin Kline.

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 2>And that was Tyler Lockett, Okay, And he just sort

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of came out of nowhere for me that like, just

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>consistently he was dependable, he was unguardable. Those are the guys,

1:04:45.400 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the receivers that just continue, like I mean this year

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>with Minnesota, that did it a little bit for me

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:52.520
<v Speaker 2>that I was watching. Okay, let's see if Tanner Morgan

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:55.600
<v Speaker 2>gets better than like they have. Arguably the maybe it's

1:04:55.640 --> 1:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>not Ohio States level, but maybe the best receiving duo

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>in the conference. Tyler Johnson and or Sean Bateman. Those

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>types of surprises happen every year for me, it's happened

1:05:05.960 --> 1:05:07.720
<v Speaker 2>for teams I root for it, it happens for teams

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I root against. I remember feeling that way about Buddha

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Baker for Washington.

1:05:12.520 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, we're just like damnd. It's everywhere, man, Tyler

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Locket's such a good answer. I've had him stashed away

1:05:20.360 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on my fantasy football bench for like five years, waiting

1:05:23.120 --> 1:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for him to pop, and it finally happens like the

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>last two years. Get it. Oh that's good. Yeah, okay, well,

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you one, thank you all for the questions. Yeah,

1:05:31.120 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to go on out to that link I

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, soliverble dot com slash live. We want you

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to take our survey. Let us know if you want

1:05:39.000 --> 1:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to come see us in person. We're still trying to

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out where exactly we're going to go in the

1:05:43.280 --> 1:05:46.439
<v Speaker 1>month of August, but your feedback will most certainly help,

1:05:47.160 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you can fill that out, that be helpful.

1:05:48.920 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to follow us on all of our social

1:05:51.480 --> 1:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>media channels and by all means, if you got something

1:05:54.080 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, if you want to talk to us, take

1:05:56.320 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a knee, talk a little bit more individually, more personally.

1:06:00.240 --> 1:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Cliverrable at gmail dot com is always the email addressed.

1:06:02.880 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>In Yeah that's all I got. I think that's all

1:06:07.040 --> 1:06:09.360
<v Speaker 2>I have. I was listening to a podcast I really

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>enjoy that. I'm sure is much too big for me

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>shouting them out to do anything. But there's a show

1:06:15.240 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 2>called Two Bears, One Cave Tie. Oh nice couple, comedians

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Thompsoner and Burt Kreischer, And on this week's episode they

1:06:22.280 --> 1:06:29.200
<v Speaker 2>made a point of over emphasizing love and it brought

1:06:29.240 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>me great joy. If you decide to listen to that show,

1:06:32.400 --> 1:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>it's it's for mature audiences. It is not safe to

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>listen to at work out loud. But if you like

1:06:38.600 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>comedians and like podcasts, they do a great NSFW is

1:06:42.360 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the NSFW. Lou make me very happy. I laughed on

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>a subway.

1:06:46.320 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Platform for that guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein,

1:06:49.080 --> 1:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for myself, Ty Hilde Brian, thank you so much for

1:06:51.160 --> 1:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>tuning into the show. We will catch you all in

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a week. In the meantime, enjoy the rest of your week,

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>all of your weekend, and hey, stay so peace.