WEBVTT - Largest NY Hospital System Sees Return of Patients, Surgeries

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Alright, very excited for this

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>next interview. Michael Dowling as President and CEO of north

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Well Health, New York State's largest healthcare provider, twenty three hospitals,

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>more than thirteen and a half thousand affiliated physicians. And

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of course you will have seen Michael Dowling next to

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Governor Cuomo during the beginning part of this pandemic. He's

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>been his advisor and is advising him specifically on reopening

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>plans and so on. Michael, the gratitude of the state

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and country is with you. But as much as you've done,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>we're only part way through this whole story. Are you

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>preparing for more cases now that New York has started

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to reopen, and of course as we see protests continue, Yes,

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of cases have dramatically dropped, and we're only

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now very very few new cases. Two days

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ago across our whole health system, we only had nine

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>new cases. But given the reopening and giving all of

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the protests that recently occurred, um we are watching it

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>very very closely to see whether or not there will

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 1>be an uptick in cases over the next couple of weeks.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We have not seen anything yet, but we are we

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>are observing it very very closely, as I said, just

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in case that might happen. And of course we're also

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>making plans, um uh for the potential that you could

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have an up surge sometime in the fall during the

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>flu season. So we are we are prepared. I mean,

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we've handled the situation up to this point, I think

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>quite well. We've learned a lot, and we definitely are

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>prepared for anything that might hit us in the future.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>We hope it doesn't occur, and we hope that people

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, comply with the social distancing and wearing masks

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and do it do the right thing for the good

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the community. And if they do that, then I

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>think we will be in a pretty good in a

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good situation. But we are prepared. Going back to

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>your question, Michael North, while health Hospitals have treated more

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen patients than any others in the United States.

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>What I want to ask you is how are your

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>people doing? How And maybe kind of get to look

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit now and some of those crazy

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>days and crazy weeks where your hospitals and others in

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the city, in the state were overwhelmed with patients. As

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you look back, how is your staff doing. The staff

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is doing very very well, empeed And I I do

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>spend myself. I spent a lot of my time out

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>on the floors of the hospital. So I am in

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the direct contact with staff and all of our facilities

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>on an ongoing basis. Them allow is very very high. Um.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It is extraordinary how people came together, work together, supported

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one another and stuck with it during the whole period

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the severe cases we had. UM. Now, we we

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>do have a lot of support programs for staff, of course,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and while doing a crisis, everybody's a drillin is going

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're working very hard. But it is possible that

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as it slows down now that we're going to see

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the residual results of the circumstance that they

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>were in. And so we're holding you know, meetings on

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>mental health issues, behavioral health issues, stress reduction issues, etcetera.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Just to make sure that we can accommodate any needs

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of the start have. But overall, among the physicians, the nurses,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the social workers, etcetera, extraordinary resilience and unbelievable positivity even

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of a situation like this, especially since

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>many of them themselves, you know, had six family members

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>family members who died. I've come across a number of employees,

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>including yesterday, were a nurse she actually took care of

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>her brother who actually died on the floor of the

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>same hospital that she was practicing. Again, um, but overall

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>quite positive given the circumstances. And it says something it's

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>shot them about healthcare workers. Yeah, it leaves you dumbfounded

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>when you listen to some of those stories, Michael. But

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the other part of your problem is that with twenty

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>three hospitals under your umbrella, seven fifty outpatient facilities, you've

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>lost a lot of revenue during this time as well.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And of course no one likes to talk about, you know,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>profit and making money during as tough a time as

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we've had. But you're going to have to look after

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>conservations and patients who need you know, surgery immediately and

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>so on. How do you do that when you've lost

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>one and a half billion dollars in revenue, Well, you

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>focus on if you focus on your stay positive and

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you stay up beat. I mean we we we had

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a circumstance to deal with. We dealt with it when

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>not only lost revenue, but we had to spend an

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of new money is to just accommodate all

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the new cases, and we retrofit many of our hospitals.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's an the lens by which you look at it.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>During a crisis, you do what you do because it's

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do, and you take care of

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the community. And now that we are coming out of it,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>at least for this stage of it, hopefully, and it

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>will be the end stage, we are rebuilding back and

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we're transitioning, we're bringing back business. We're focusing a lot

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>on the cases that were deferred that can't be deferred

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>any longer, otherwise you can have some other serious negative effects.

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So give you an example. Two days ago, I mentioned

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>that we had nine COVID patients into our facilities, but

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we had seven hundred and twenty intatient admissions on that

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>very same day across our health system. So patients are

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>coming back, surgery is being done, and we're going to

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>build back up. And I think we're going to build

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>back up in a stronger and will be in a

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>stronger position in the future that we were in the

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>past because we learn some lessons. We have to rethink

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>our organization right now, become more product productive, become more

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>consumers focused, become leaner and uh and use technology and

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>awful lot more about our normable lessons that we learned here.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course we did get some support from the

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>federal government. So when I look forward a year from now,

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we will come out of this. Okay, Um, you know, circumstances, yeah,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>show you you know, put your into a negative circumstances

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for a while, but you look forward and you're going

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to come out of it healthy, strong, and better. I

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>believe sometimes, you know, going through a bad experience weakens

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you up and gives you a new perspective, gets you

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about what's important and how to build your

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>organization for the future. So I'm optimistic, um, And you

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be optimistic because it also is in a

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>leadership in any organization should be optimistic at a time

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like this, because that's the message that you sent to

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>your staff as well. So I thought, absolutely, Michael, just

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds left. How about some smaller market hospitals.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some news reporting that, boy, a lot of

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the those types of facilities are really gonna have a

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>hard time staying afloat what is what? What's your understanding there? Yes,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>smaller hospitals that are stand alone hospitals that are not

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the larger system, that don't have some of

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, capabilities that places like us have. But

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a most more difficult circumstance. You will have

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>some places across the country, my guests, that will close.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You will have some places that will will will allie,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we create alliances with other large entities. But there's going

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a shift and a change in healthcare now,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of that is for the good.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of the things we were always doing one way

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we would now do a different way. Especially do you

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>telemedicine and telehealth, etcetera. So yes, um, you'll see some

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>positives coming out of this, But like everything else that

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>happens in circumstances like this, you're going to see some

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>negatives as well. Michael Dowling, thank you so much for

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the time to speak with us. We really appreciate

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hearing your perspective from really ground zero on the very

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>front lines of dealing with this COVID nineteen and you know,

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>our our thanks to you into all the staff of

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>your hospitals. Michael Dawling, President, chief executive officer of north

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Well Health joining us. Just some extraordinary commentary, Vanni. You know,

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think about the no hospital system in the country handed

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>more COVID nineteen cases than north Well. Yeah, and saved

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the state and the rest of the country from you know,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tragedy as well. But I'm sure that

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>one anecdote he told he probably has hundreds more. And

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you wonder what it's like to lead an organization like

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that at a time like this. It is time to

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>check in with Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined now by opinion

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>columnist Sarah Holzack. Sarah, thank you for joining a great

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>opinion piece today. On retail. We've known for some time

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that retail will be challenged, but there are more challenges

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>facing retail. As the protests got underway and each of

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the brands were called out to have a response to

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what was going on in the environment. So where do

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we stand now with retail? What are CEO is telling you? Yeah,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the key thing that I've been thinking about

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the clothing category in particular is in dire

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>straits right now. Um, it's just a corner of retail

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that was more overstored than any other and already so

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>many of the brands in that space were in a

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>beleaguered position before the onset of the pandemic and the recession.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>The likes of Victoria's Secret, Banana Republic Gap Chico's expressed

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>these are brands that for years have been struggling to

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>connect with customers based on their fashion alone, and now

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>when you add these other problems on top of it,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a very very dark time in

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this segment of retail for months and perhaps years to come. So, Sarah,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as we think about the clothing aspect of retail again,

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, there's a lot of the fashion aspect

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to it. How has kind of the pandemic and changing

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer behaviors about how they actually purchase clothing, How has

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that changed our people more comfortable spending on fairly moderate

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the big ticket items strictly online. Yes, so I think

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that what this has done has basically meant years worth

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>of online adoption was compressed into a matter of months um,

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and so people are getting more comfortable with purchasing clothing online.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen UH surveys that show people plan to keep

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>buying clothing online at the rate that they've begun to

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>now during this time of lockdowns, and that creates a

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>unique challenge for the clothing segment that's not faced elsewhere.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's because re terms of online purchases and this

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>segment tends to be extremely high. We all probably know

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>this from personal experience. You buy multiple sizes of a

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>given pair of pants or multiple colors um, and having

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to foot the bill for return, shipping and restocking um

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is a really tricky profitability problem for these clothing retailers

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that just simply is not faced by retailers of electronics, toys, groceries,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. So one of the reasons that

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>people still do go into break and mortar stories is

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to avoid having to do that Sarah, to try on

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>different sizes and to just try on something so they

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>won't have to send it back. How will stores change

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>their fitting room policies post pandemic. Yeah, so we're seeing

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of different approaches on this front. Coals and

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>t J Max, for example, have their fitting rooms closed

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>all together right now. Nords from its taking an approach

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>where it has only a limited number of them open

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're cleaning each fitting room in between each patron um,

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and again you can see how this just compounds the

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>problem of fitting rooms are a key reason that you

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>go to do brick and mortar shopping in the first

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>place for clothing stores, and when that option is not

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>available to you, or when it's suddenly become a lot

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>flunk here, you can see how that might keep people

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>away or keep people from purchasing as many things as

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they might have if they were able to try them on. So, Sara,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we've heard about within retail

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, is this omni channel approach to retailing. You know,

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the bricks and mortar plus the online being able to

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe pick up something that you ordered online.

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that still seen as the best strategy for a

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of these retail segments. So I think curbs I'd

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>pick up the getting a huge boost in the grocery

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>category right now, and I think a lot of people

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are trying that for the first time and reach other's

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like Walmart and Target have long said that these services

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>have extraordinarily high net promoter scores that once people, once

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they can get people to try them, uh, they really

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>do stick with them and recommend them to other shoppers.

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So this moment of trial for curbside pickup in the

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>grocery space in particular, I think it's going to be

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sticky and powerful. Um, these experiments that say a Bloomingdale'

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is doing with curbside pickup, I'm not sure how enduring

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be after the pandemic, because again, this

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like a situation where either you'd want to go

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to the store, try the clothes on, have that sort

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of social experiential moment, or you'd want to shop online.

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think curbside will be have lasting impacts there. Sarah, Obviously,

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you know a big story is rent and Gap is

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>suing it doesn't want to pay rent and so on.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>What are people like MPG group and so on saying

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about who will up on the hook for rents? Yeah,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a tricky question and I think it would me

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone's watching that particular lawsuit you mentioned very closely to

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>see how it shapes out. Um. I think it's interesting

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to note that different retailers will have different advantages that

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they can bring to these lease negotiations. If you're someone

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>who's a key traffic driver to a shopping center, so Apple,

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, uh tends to drive a lot of foot

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>traffic to a mall. Or if you're a grocery store

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>which has been opened this whole time and is a

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>basics retailer, you have a lot of leverage in these

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>negotiations with the mall operators. If you're one of these

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>leaguer clothing stores we were talking about earlier, a Victoria's

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Secret and express Uh, you know, Victoria's secret is closing

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of its North American fleet. That does not

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>really put you on good footing to be able to

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>renegotiate that our terms for your leases. And so I

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think that is definitely going to play a role and

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>who the ultimate survivors are after all of this tumult.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Hals like, thank you so much for joining us.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We're always glad to get your perspective and all things

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>retail Cheach retail colms for Bloomberg Opinion. You can read

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>more of Sarah's work and other stories from Bloomberg Opinion

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, slash Opinion, and on the Terminal

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>by typing o p I n go So, Fannie, I

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's just more tough times for the retail retailers

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>out there. It's gonna be really tough coming back from

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic, right, I mean, there were so many of

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>them on the brink of bankruptcy. Anyway, if you listen

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to somebody like Howard Divito, Wits or whatever, he will

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you that, you know, they should have been bankrupt

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago, some of them. And obviously, this

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>pivot online, as you said, Paul, is just going to

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>accelerate and has been accelerating in the pandemic. So obviously,

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>as we saw online shopping boosted massively, it doesn't mean

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that the brick and mortar stores will be able to

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>stick around. And we are back looking forward to our

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>chat with the illustrious David Kotag. Next. David joins us

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>from Cumberland Advisors, where he's the chief investment Officer, chairman

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course just a friend of the show for decades.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have to say, at this point, David, you've

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>seen money markets sell off. David, is this a sell

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>off based on panic, based on fundamentals, based on what

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>FED chair Paul said yesterday, or all of the above? Oh, Vanni,

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much and nice to be with you

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and Paul, all of the above. In an extraordinary environment

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with a VIX, which is an indicator of volatility and

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>risk that's contemporaneous with the markets, that has been at

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>such a high level reflecting that volatility. You think about

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what we've done in three months. We went from thirty

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three hundred on the SMP back to thirty two hundred,

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and now we're somewhere around thirty one and in what

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like a very free fault. Temporarily, it's a wild time.

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're it's explainable by what you're just outlined, and

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>there will be more, but I'm afraid to say so today,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>but we got another very difficult drobbles claims number today.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We had FED chairman Pal yesterday calling out that a

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>rebound in this economy will take longer than perhaps people anticipated.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>As you look across the credit spectrum, are you starting

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to see significant credit quality problems that are going to

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be an issue for investors going forward. Well, we worry

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about the credit problems, Paul. We have seen. We saw

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the credit spreads blowout at the end of March, and

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>then the FED activities started to narrow them, and they

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>narrowed wherever the market believed the FED would provide market

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>function support and not only functioning, but liquidity to continuously functioned.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So there is confidence restored in those credit spread and

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>other credit spreads much less so. So there's a sort

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of a division. And I think in the market, I

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>would draw the line at what was previously investment grade

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of any type. The FED is intent on trying to

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>keep that a functioning market. If it was below if

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a junk credit, and the junk credit last fall,

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED is not going to go bail it out,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but they do want market functionality. And I believe that's

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>how you divide the credit analysis in a general thematic way.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>David Square off for me, the idea that this will

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be the shortest recession of all time with the data

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing and what the FED chair said yesterday

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>about unemployments still being just below time present by the

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>end of the year and F one C member is

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not being able to forecast an interest rate increase until

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>at least well. I can understand what j Pal tried

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to convey because he's feeling this so many unknowns, like

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>how long the virus, how much damage does it do,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>When do we have curated treatment, super people have safety

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if they get sick, and when do we get a

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine in mass distribution. We don't know that everything is

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>being worked on. Everybody's hopeful, but we have no idea

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>as to time. So he has to give himself a

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>time cushion, and that would probably be a safe two years.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>The second thing he has to do is say, we

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how deep and how much the damage will be.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to buffer the damage. We're trying to bridge

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>across the valley, and we cannot know how why the

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>valley is and that was the nature of his message.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED in the pal are doing a

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>terrific job confronting something that is a once in a

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred year type of an event. So I believe they

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>were candidate. They said what they did, They said, take

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>this very seriously. Where markets were on this euphoric rise

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>based upon opening up is an access market swing to

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>access in both directions, and they did it over the

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>last period of time, and now they're correcting the excess.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>If the sell off gets to the point where we

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>think it is, it will present an entry opportunity again,

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because in the end of this there is recovery, and

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>after the recovery there's a reconfiguration of economics. People forget,

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>if I have another minute, Bunny and Paul. People forget

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a survivor bias under way here. Look at the

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>SMP five index, for example, Macy's used to be in it.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not in it anymore. It's still a five hundred index,

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's reconfigured by definition to capture and adjust for

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the changes. So, David, given that time frame that Chairman

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Pal suggested yesterday, perhaps a two year kind of time

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>frame here for trying to get to the other side here,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>how how are you positioning your portfolio right now, given

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that again this may be a little bit longer to recover. Well,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the first is today in the stock or FOLI we

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>have a cash reserve, we have had it for a while.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>We will deploy it and reduce it on entries that

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>appear inviting and we will raise it if markets go

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to access. Our biggest overweight in the United States and

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the US portfolio is the health care sector. We think

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>when this is over, Paul, the healthcare sector in the

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>United States will amount to the GDP of the country.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>That will be an all time record high American healthcare country.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Companies in partnership with others around the world, are doing

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a stellar job in cooperatively developing what the tools will

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be to deal with the pandemic. It's this is how

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>our biggest overweights there. We're worried about the geopolitics of

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the world, so we have an overweight the defense sector.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I wish it weren't so. And we have a position

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>which I really like because I think some changes are

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, and that's in water, wind and solar.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We are overweight that package. We think there's going to

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be some reaction around the world. I wish there would

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>be more to the change that's necessary to address climate change.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a hopeful estimate, but we've got some money on

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>it is happening. David Kotalk, thank you so much for

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us. As always, we appreciate your thoughts and commentary

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and your experience, the benefit of your experience. David Coo Talk,

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief investment officer, a couple of advisors joining

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>us at once again with his Sage Advice and Ronnie

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at the markets here. Uh, you know, continued weakness here.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's continuing the third day we've seen the

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sell off here, we're now uh four off on the Dow.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh So again the market reacting to a confluence of

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>events from the last several days. Yeah, and I mean,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>let's not overplay it right now because we had actually

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>been out records before this, which was really sort of

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the stunning thing. But still for the year now the

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Dow was down about ten percent based on today's numbers included. Well,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we certainly have equity markets trading off substance substantially today.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>The question is simply, is this something that is to

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>be expected given the huge rebound we've had off the

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>bottom source, it's suggesting something more. To get some color,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we welcome Barry Ridholt's, founder of rit Holt's Wealth Management,

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is also Bloomberg Opinion calumnists and host of Masters in Business.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So Barry, what say you about this market today? Yeah,

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of fascinating when you look at um

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the after the fact explanation, and we love to do that,

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>We love to create a narrative about that. You had

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fed chair and Pal's comments about keeping rates low until

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>two and I think he threw a little bit of

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>cold water on the u V shape recovery expectations in

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy. This is going to be a long slow recovery,

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 1>especially in the labor market. But also given all the

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>reopenings of various states that we've seen over the past

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, the spike in new infections is definitely um

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>startling people. It probably shouldn't, but uh, if you back

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>out New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, in Massachusetts and look

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>at the rest of the country that seems to have

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ramped up infection rates later than the Northeast, we are

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>not doing a great job here. We're not doing a

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>great job on flattening the curve elsewhere or testing and

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>contact racing, and so we may see a reopening that

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>stumbles and we go right back down to lockdown. If

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that's this gets much worse, and I think the markets

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>are looking at that as well. Sorry, markets haven't really

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>cared though about what good or about of a job

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we're doing on the pandemic. They only care if businesses

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>are open, and they haven't seemed to be even worried

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>about demand if businesses do open until literally today, Are

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you saying that suddenly markets change their mind about that, Um,

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. I don't think it's that the markets did

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>not care about the lockdown or or or about how

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>well we're doing. I think they were looking over the

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>valley of the shutdown towards a treatment of vaccine contact tracing.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they were very optimistic about our ability to

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>manage this competently and allow if you look at Singapore

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or South Korea, you look at some of the other

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>countries that have handled the shutdown and reopening well, the

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>expectations where hey, hopefully we can do at least as

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>well as that, and the early data that we're really

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just seeing. Remember you're always on a week to two

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>week delay, and today is the eleven, so a lot

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of states that opened on the first we're just starting

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to see infection rates and hospitalization rates increase now and

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>over the next few days, we're really going to find

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>out what the opening did. I think this is new

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>data that the market is incorporating and saying, hey, we

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are far less competent than other countries are in managing this,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and there will be an economic price to pay if

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't do this right. Well, we have Secretary Mnution

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>coming out suggesting that are saying that there will not

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>be another I guess nationwide lockdown if the virus makes

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a return. So there's kind of a dulling narrative there, Barry.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, you know, fiscal stimulus has kind of gone

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>into the back burner a little bit. There seems to

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be a lack of agreement between the Democrats and Republicans

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>about the next round of stimulus. Is that something you

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think the market should be paying attention to, perhaps a

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more so, So let me address both of

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>those issues, Minution and the stimulus in one answer. Um,

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>whether or not there's a national lockdown or not has

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>become completely irrelevant because of the total um lack of

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>leadership on a on a national basis in this it

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>has fallen to the individual states, and we are now

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>running fifty experiments. What what happens in Wyoming is different

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>than California and Florida and Massachusetts and New York, etcetera.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So if if the Treasury Secretary is focused on a

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>national lockdown question, he's missing what's actually taking place where

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>boots are on the ground, what's actually happening state by state.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And the answer to your question about UM another round

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus depends on how bad the sell off gets.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean today, I mean over the next couple

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of months. Think back to September and October two thousand

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and eight, when we first introduced some form of of

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>UM national rescue plan for the Great Financial Crisis. Congress

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>said no, and then the Dow had its worst week

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in decades, and by that Monday, no, by Friday became yes.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Let this market sell off another ten that's good for

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars. Let it sell down another thirty from here,

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see another two and a half three trillion dollars.

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Congress and the President react to a variety of signals.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Nothing scares the but Jesus set of people like seeing

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the market lose a third of its value in a

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>month or two. That motivates them. Barry, we have to

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>leave there already. I did want to ask you about

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve chairman and concerns about some kind of

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.239
<v Speaker 1>frosthiness here, but we're going to have to wait for

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the next time. And anyway, we're seeing us frothiness today.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That is very riddles of riddles wealth management, of course

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion columns. Of his latest columns include talking about

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>market panic, selling, and other behavioral aspects to this market performance,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking of which we are down three point seven five

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>percent on the Dow Johnes Industrial Average, the SMP down three,

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and the NAZAC is the winner today pole but it

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 1>is still down two. Yeah. Yeah, significant layoff sell off here,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's barried with suggesting some combination of the Fed

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>chairman's comments yesterday about the longer term trends for the economy,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>plus some you know, growing news and growing awareness of

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a second wave in certain regions of the country.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>So the market's kind of digesting that new news and

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>will certainly followed up throughout the remainder of the day. Yeah.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we're looking at an unappointment rate of

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just blow time percent at the end of the year,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that is not a pretty picture. Thanks for listening to

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever. Podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at Bonny Quinn and

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio. Well. Eh,