WEBVTT - #294 Packers Unscripted: Bigger picture

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, sitting alongside the one and only

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>wes Hodkowits were coming to you here from our studios

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>at lambeau Field and West. A little bit of Packers

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>news to touch on. Since we last spoke, Green Bay's

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>top two draft picks, cornerbacks Jaire Alexander from Louisville and

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jackson from Iowa now under contract. They have signed

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>their rookie deals. That leaves at this point only third

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>round pick or In Burke's unsigned, and by the time

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>some people watch this or listen to this, he might

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be signed as well. Because these things are happening rather quickly,

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's because of the current Collective Arty Agreement post

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven. This issue with rookie contracts and training

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>camp holdouts and all this kind of stuff really things

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of the past. The thing that's so funny, Mike is

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I started on the Packers beat full time in two

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve, and I think the greatest gift that

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>was given to me was that c B A and

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the roughie wage scale. I mean, I have heard so

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>many horror stories from Beat writers about what those days

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>were like when not only are you chasing the contract,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>but then you'd get to training camp and then eve

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of training camp and you're not sure if guys are

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be holding out or just sitting out. Because throughout

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the offseason program you can sign a waiver to participate

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in things. Once you get to training camp, you have

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to have an actual contract to be out there. Um Now, now,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in this current environment, it's not as much of a

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>big deal because of the rookie wage scale really basically

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>slots players where they are in terms of what they're

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna make. But back in the day, man, it was

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the Wild West in terms of what

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys were going to get in every all these agents,

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>all these players were kind of just sitting around waiting

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to see how things unfolded, so to make sure that

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>their guy got as much as they could potentially command. Yeah,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there were agents and players, uh, you know, waiting to

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>see what guys drafted near them would get to. You know,

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to short change themselves. They you know,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't want to jump into early. Everything ends

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>up getting delayed and then you end up with players

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>these rookies who you know, end up as contract holdouts

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or training camp holdouts. They get that label when really

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to sign their deal and they want to

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>play it, and it's it's just, you know, the economics

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of things were always difficult. I remember Nick Barnett, I

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>think it was the first round draft pick for the

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Packers in two thousand three, was sitting in his car

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>watching the first training camp practice out his car window

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because he couldn't be there, He couldn't actually even be

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline to watch it without a contract. But

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he was just waiting really to get that phone call

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from his agent. Okay, it's all set. Go sign it,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and put your uniform out there and go

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>play so good that that you know those days are

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are behind us, because it definitely I think anytime rookies

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>missed time and training camp, it hurts them. You don't

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>want them to miss those first couple three four practice

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>even if they're back before the first preseason game, anytime

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they miss in camp is valuable. Well, you and I

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>were talking in our pre production meeting about since they

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>did the new CB, if they've had any issues whatsoever

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with rookie contracts. I can't think of one. I can't

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>think of one either, not not since two thousand eleven,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the new C B A, and you go back to

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands, I mean Ted Thompson, Andrew Brandt and

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Russ Ball. I mean some guys are the best in

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the business and what they do. They still had Aaron

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers sitting out, and I believe also b J Roji

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>guys because their high picks and they want to get

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>what they believe they're worth. But there wasn't really any

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>guiding force whatsoever. So I think that this is one

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most positive things that came out of the

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>most recent collective bart In agreement because it protects veterans.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It makes sure that veterans are still not getting short change.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>You're getting cut to make room for guys that have

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>never done anything, never played a snap in the NFL before,

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>while also being respectful to what these rookies should be

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>making for really the attention that they're getting and even

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>when you look a guy like Baker Mayfield, the expectations

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that get put on him right away. Yeah, And it

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>made sense for the players Union back in eleven to

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>agree to this because they were seeing veteran players as

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, getting cut, their careers not extend perhaps as

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>long as they should because you had number one overall

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>draft picks, for instance, like Sam Bradford and Matthew Stafford

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in in two thousand in that range, who were getting

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars of guaranteed money before they even took

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a snap in the NFL. Things got out of whack

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and then C b A, you know, kind of put

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>things back in line a little bit to where the

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>veterans are getting what they should and the rookies are

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have the opportunity down the road. One of

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the things I think Martin Mayhew and I know he

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>did end up getting let go as the GM of

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, but people got to understand how terrible that

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>situation was because they had that O n sixteen seasons,

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so they had all these early draft picks coming up.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Matthew Stafford and Dominican sue that put

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>them not only in a hole where they were signing

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>these guys, but then when you're looking at second contract,

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because nobody's gonna want to play out that first contract

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can take less. They want to get more they want

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and you push that cat number four. It was causing

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems. Now you look at the way

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it is now. The fact that these deals get done,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these rookies get into camps, they could start preparing, they

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>can start preparing for their next face of life outside

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of football. Um, I think from all every avenue outside

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of maybe the running back position, where you can make

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a case that this has been something that's really benefited

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole Yeah, it doesn't put teams in salary cap

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>jail to go a couple of years with a top

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ten draft pick, and that's what used to happen. And

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you go to three years picking in the top ten

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or top twelve, all of a sudden your cap is

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>blown on all these rookies. Imagine where would be right now,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know if that was how it worked out? Right? Yeah, exactly.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>With that, we'll go to a break back with more

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and Packers Unscripted right after this. Welcome back to Packers Unscripted.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Spofford in this chair, West Hodko, it's in that one. West.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a whole lot of other Packers news

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to disc us, so I want to spend the rest

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of this show broadening our horizons a little bit. Let's

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more league wide in general. Here.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>There was an interesting question I got in our Insider

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Inbox column recently, and it was someone asking within the

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>context of the fact that the Los Angeles Rams went

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>from kind of an afterthought to a division champion in

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a playoff team, and the Jacksonville Jaguars went from three

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen to the a f C Championship Game in

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>one year. Is there one of these turnaround teams on

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the brink, so to speak, of a big turnaround in

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you got one in mind, it's Houston Texans, without a doubt,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and again I'll add the caveat that if Deshaun Watson

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>is back makes the recovery they need from that a

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>c L surgery. Here's what's funny, Mike. That could have

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>been a disastrous trade for the Texans last year, trading

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>their first rounder for this next year so they could

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>get up trade up to get to Shaun Watson. I

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't hear one single person anywhere in the country mentioning

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that narrative, though, because how well Watson played before that

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a c L. You're willing to give up that number

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>four overall pick to the Cleveland Browns if you saw

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>what you saw the last year from Deshaun Watson. If

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got your franchise guy, you've got no complaints. Yeah,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not complaining about it. And I think they're excited

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>about what his future holds, assuming everything turns out okay

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>coming back from the knee injury. The fact that j J.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Watt could potential to be back. I think Jadeveon Clowney

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>has made some strides. There's a lot of talent there,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're better than what their record indicated

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last year after they lost Watson. So for me, especially

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at that division, considering if you go back, it's

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of been anybody's division, and then get any given

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>year in the fact that two teams actually made it

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs last year because of you know, some

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the death concerns from the NFC I have. I

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>see no reason why the Texans couldn't be back in

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this thing, all right. I I definitely agree with that pick.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw another one at you though, that maybe

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people aren't thinking about, and that's the

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants. I say that for a few reasons. One,

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that was just in the playoffs.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Two years ago. You've got at a quarterback. I know

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's on the downside of his career, but you've got

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback who's been there, done that one a couple

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of Super bowls. You've added Sae Kwon Barkley to that offense.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And if there is one issue, I guess I would

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>say two issues with the Giants offensively over the last

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. One has been receivers staying healthy. So

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>if those if those receivers stay healthy, Eli Manning is

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a different quarterback and number two and put him in

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever order you want, maybe this should be number one

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is pass protection? Well, there might be no better help

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for pass protection than a running back like Sae Kwon

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Barkley who's going to make defenses have to stop the run.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That may be the best protection that Eli Manning is

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get. I know they have a new head

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>coach and Pat Shermer. You know the Giants are not

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>defensively certainly what they were in uh in those Super

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Bowl years. But I'm telling you I'm not blown away

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>by anybody else in the NFC East, aside from obviously

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles, which is going to

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>make it difficult for uh, the Giants to jump back

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>wherever they were last year into the playoffs or something

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I don't sleep on the Giants. Yeah,

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's a good pick too, Mike, because the Cowboys

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>came back down to Earth last year. They're going through

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh, I don't want to call it rebuilding,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but definitely trying to retool what they have their Washington

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>now going to see what they can do with Alex Smith.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>My biggest issue with the Giants um se Kwon Barkley

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>might be a once in generation player. They drafted Will

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Hernandez to block for him out of Utah, the former

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>guard for for Aaron Jones that we talked so much

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>about in the pre draft process. I really really really

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see them take Sam Donald and instead he

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>goes to the across the you know city team with

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the New York Jets. Only time will tell us which

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one of those moves was correct. Maybe Barkeley becomes the

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>next Adrian Peterson or Barry Sanders and you know, it

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was a moot point, but I really did think they

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>needed to improve their holdings at quarterback. Now. They also

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>got the kid from Richmond. I forget his name, but

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>they're really high on him. The fourth round pick. Yeah,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm d a blank for Kyle Lenetta Leonetta. Remember seeing

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>him at the combine. He had a table full of

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>press there because people thought he was gonna be the

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>next Patriots quarterback. So it's not like didn't find another one.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>But they've gone the fourth round pick route before and

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't pushed Eli Manning at that spot. So yes,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you're right, they have a veteran quarterback that's one two

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>super Bowls. I just would have liked to have seen

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>them gotten Donald and start building for the next chapter.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll see which one ends up being right. Yeah, all right, Well,

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got some more bigger issues league wide. I want

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to throw your way, but we'll do that after the

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>breakback with Moron Packers Unscripted. Right after this, Welcome back

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to Packers Unscripted. Mike Spofford Here, West Hodko, it's over there, okay, West.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We spent some time earlier this offseason talking about the

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>coaching changes in the NFC North. The Bears and the

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Lions both getting new head coaches, but they're a handful

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of other new head coaches around the league. I mentioned

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, in the last segment, Cardinals, the Colts, the Titans,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Raiders also have new head coaches. Is there

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those new coaching hires that intrigues you the most?

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Screwed in of course? And and the Raiders. I always

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tell this story. Um, it's now three and a half

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago. My old colleague at the green Bay Prescausette

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and Night, Scott Vincy Uh, we shadowed John Gruden around

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay before Monday night football game. He was given

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>away a donation through his charity, the in the Fired

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Football Coaches Association to green Bay East and green Bay West.

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>We followed him to this presentation and the entire time

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we were grilling him about whether or not he was

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>going to come back, and in so many words, he said, no,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I like what I'm doing too much. But you always

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>knew it didn't matter what he said or how many

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>times he declined it. You always knew that there was

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that outside chance. And seeing how much money, my goodness,

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, has was thrown at him by Mark Davis there,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you had to do it. But the reason it's not

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>even just Gruden coming back that intrigues me, it's the

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>moves that they've made since then in some of the

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>changes that they made in in in how they're constructing

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>their roster and the players that they have. I want

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to see how all that eventually settles out right, And

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in some ways I would I would issue a word

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of caution in a sense to the folks in Oakland

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>because Reggie mackenzie, and I'm I'll admit I'm biased. I

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really liked Reggie and he was here. I was sad

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to see him go, but happy for him in a

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>personal sense that he got a chance to become a GM.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But he pulled that franchise out of a salary cap

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>mess of gargantuan proportions. And then you know, with the

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>drafting of the quarterback Derek Carr and some other really

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>good moves, he's gotten them back to contending status in

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>fairly short order. When you look at it in the

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture, things that we're hearing out of Oakland, and

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you and I aren't there every day, but it sounds

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like John Grew is starting to have a little bit

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>more say over personnel and things and treading into that

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>GM territory a little bit nicely. Just watch it, watch

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit, because Reggie Mackenzie knows what he's doing.

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He does. And it's funny too because I think if

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>John Gruden had that power when he was in Tampa Bay,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the situation is completely different. Aaron Rodgers is probably down

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Brett Farve is probably down there playing football, former Aaron

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers or somebody. But by the times he's talked about that.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, personnel guys are personal guys for

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a reason. And I think, you know, one of the

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>reasons the Raiders were so patient with Reggie when he

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>went down there is just because how muddled that situation

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>was terrible, with how short the lifespan is um you know,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for for you know, contracts only five years in terms

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of the pro ration of bonuses. Guys aren't signing twelve

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>year contracts like Major League Baseball. But even then, it

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>still took so long for the Raiders to pull themselves

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>out of that because the year after year they were

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>making bad deal after bad deal. Mackenzie cleared the slate,

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they got a twelve and fourth season out of it,

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>looked to be going in the right direction. Took a

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>step back now are trying to reset. I think it's

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>still very important to stay with those principles. Uh that

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that got them there in the first place, and also

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>got them Derek Carr, you know in Khalil Mack, the

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>prospects that Mackenzie found. Yeah, Mari Cooper, I mean the

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that he projected Khalil Mack to go from doing

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what he did at Buffalo and the third or overall

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>pick or whatever it was and making him a star

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in this league. It says a lot about his scouting acumen. Yeah,

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. Another of the coaching changes that

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>intrigues me, it's another one in the a f C.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's what the Tennessee Titans. And I say that

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for again a couple of reasons. One, this is a

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>team that not only made the playoffs last year, but

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>one a road playoff game in Kansas City, not an

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>easy place to go and win in the postseason on

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the road. But yet they decided to part ways with

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mularkey and they've hired Mike rabel Um. I'm always

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how the guys, I guess you would

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>call them from the Bill Belichick the Patriots tree, how

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to fair because you know, Josh McDaniels had

0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, didn't work out when he got his first

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>head coaching job in Denver, and then now he passed

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on another head coaching opportunity obviously this past off season,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but then also with the Titans, you mentioned the a

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>f C South, how that division can kind of be

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up for grabs the way things go. And then their

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Marcus Mariota, very high draft pick, a guy who

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>has definitely improved. You know, is his arrows still pointing up?

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Have we still not seen the best of Marcus Mariota

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL? Or have we? And then maybe getting

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs and winning one game is is they're seiling?

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>How they're currently constructed, I don't know. I just think

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they're an intriguing team to keep it up. If if

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you're the Titans, you better hope that you haven't seen

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the best out of Marcus Marriott's because last year, honestly,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be quite honest, wasn't very good until the playoffs.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Until the playoffs, you played well, But you look at

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that regular season, uh it is It is impressive that

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they made the playoffs, but they had a lot of

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>things working against them. The reason I bring that up

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is because I think they put a lot of this

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at Malarkey's feet. They put a lot of it at

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Dick Lebo's feet. Um. But at the end of the day,

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a quarterback driven league and they have put talent

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>around him. Now, how does that talent further develop and grow?

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>They made some acquisitions this offseason. Me personally, and this

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is just me, I would have dedicated myself to Derrick Henry,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, they made some other changes there. They

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want him to be the soul back, but there

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of talent there. Um. They're looking for

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>consistency now and that starts at Mariotta. Yeah. All right,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with that, we're gonna go to another break back with

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>more on Packers Unscripted right after this. Welcome back to

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Packers Unscripted Mike Spofford alongside Wes Hodku. It's okay, West.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>One more topic I want to throw at you here

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as we wrap up the show for today. I found

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>something interesting the other day. Was just doing a little

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>quick research something I was working on for Insider Inbox,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and I noticed, you look at the last four years

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL fell the m v pen Tom Brady,

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, Cam Newton, Aaron Rodgers, turns out those are

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the only four active quarterbacks in the NFL who have

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>won an m VP award. Obviously, Brady has won multiple,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Rogers has one multiple. So it leads me to this question,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>who do you think is the next quarterback currently active

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>who is going to win an m v P. You

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>can go a couple of different directions with this, because

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you have the old guard, Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger, those

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>guys who have not won an m v P yet,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and you have a slew of young up and coming

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks that nobody knows just yet how good they're going

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to be. Who do you think. I'm want to just say,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible to me when you pointed this out that

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees hasn't won an m v P. When you

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think about it, it makes sense. Yeah, But considering the

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>way that that offense is structured, him throwing for five

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand yards as many times as he has, it actually

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>is surprising. But I get it. There were seven and

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>for like three or four straight seasons there was some

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding that had to be done there. Fine for me, though,

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I still think Ben Roethlisberger has one in him, even

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>though there's been sort of this hovering, floating theory that

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know he might be getting near the end, we

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>might want to retire soon. Roethlisberger has the capability. I

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>still think. I know that Aaron Rodgers is more athletically

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>gifted than Roethlisberger, but Roethlisberger is the closest thing I've

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>seen in this league to encompassing what Aaron Rodgers does UM,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and probably is even more untacklable if you want to

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>use that. He might be one of the hardest quarterbacks

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to sack, and just in terms of physically getting him

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, But it just seems like he has

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that ability to to extend plays one way or another.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Not maybe with his feet as much as Rogers, but

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>he just he has that X factor that he always

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>keeps you in ahead on things. I've I've been a

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of his ability on the football field since

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>he came out and replaced Tommy Maddox. I believe in

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five whenever that was UM. But I think

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Roethlisberger, one way or another, UM, I think

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he still has a Yeah. I've had a hard time

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.959
<v Speaker 1>with this question because I still can't decide which direction

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to go there's a part of me that

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>says Drew Brees has got an m v P and

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>him the way they have retooled some things on that

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense, we saw how close they were. They were

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a fluke play essentially away from playing for the NFC

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Championship in Philadelphia last year. When with what happened in

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis on the last play of the game, I think

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Breeze potentially has an m v P in him. But

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>then the other guy that I think is definitely headed

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for an m v P sooner rather than later might

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>be Carson Wentz in Philadelphia because before he got hurt

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>last year, when I did get a chance to watch

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles, I was really impressed with how difficult he

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was to sack his escapability and not only just to

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>keep plays alive, but then also to run and rush

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>for yardage. His a c L was not because of

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>getting sacked in the pocket. He was diving for the

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>goal line for a touchdown on on a scramble. And

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he's still awfully young. I don't know if the a

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>c L surgery is going to change the way he plays.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>My guess is that it won't, and I think that's

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's got an m v P in his future.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I've always looked at this as stages like the Quarterback Club,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>right with Farv and Young and Aikman and and then

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you always have these generations where these guys are the

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>top quarterbacks in the league. I thought, for a while, Okay,

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>after Roethlisberger and Rodgers, who's the next guy? Um? And

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there's guys that are very good Pro Bowl All Pro

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>type players, but who's going to be the guy that

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>really drives the league? I think Wentz has that ability.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the best quarterback prospect that's been taken

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>arguably since Cam Newton in two thousand eleven. Different types

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of players, but in terms of what they offered and

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>bring to the table. Uh, he was exceptional. He was

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>exceptional as rookie season to step in there, going from

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>FCS football, improving everybody wrong that he his skills could

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>translate a guy like Josh Allen getting picked out of

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a smaller school like Wyoming. I think that's a product

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of what Carson Wentz did a few years ago. UM.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I also think, to be honest with you, Mike, I

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think Nick Foles is going to be a starting quarterback

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in this league too. I think he's finally at that point.

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he's matured enough that after this season, if

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Wentz can come back from the knee, that Fools is

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>going to find a home. But that one to punch together.

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>What Whence did to set them up last year and

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>how Fulls finished it. That's that's a big driving force

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>for why the Eagles were able to win that Super

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowl last season. Yeah, just to go one other quick thing.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Out of those five quarterbacks taken in the first round

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, including Lamar Jackson taken at the end of

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the first round, who do you think big picture is

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have the best career out of those five.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I still love Lamar Jackson. I've loved him since the beginning.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the guy can play quarterback. I think he's

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be dynamic. I think the safe money in

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>my opinions on Sam Donald just because of his makeup

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and and exactly what he offers as in terms of

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the physical prototypical quarterback that you look for in terms

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>of size. I'll throw my lot in with John Dorsey,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Elliott Wolf, and Alonso high Smith and go with Baker Mayfield.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 1>But who knows. I guess that's something to watch for

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>years to come. With that, we will sign off on

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of the team on Packers dot com

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. You can still find him at west hot

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Mike Spofford at Packers for the team account.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuning, and everybody, We'll see you next time. Hmm.