1 00:00:09,119 --> 00:00:13,440 Speaker 1: Y'all know him as the lead public defender for Jody Arias. 2 00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:18,560 Speaker 1: That case catapulted him into the national spotlight, but that 3 00:00:18,640 --> 00:00:23,000 Speaker 1: ain't his whole story by a long shot. After Arius, 4 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 1: he fought cancer, he won, and he also made some 5 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:31,479 Speaker 1: big changes in his life and decided he was going 6 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:35,320 Speaker 1: to focus on happiness. That was going to be his goal, 7 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:40,040 Speaker 1: not work, not getting to the top of anything. Just 8 00:00:40,520 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: what makes me happy. That's what I'm going to focus on. 9 00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:47,560 Speaker 1: And his wife and his dog are his priority. And 10 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:50,320 Speaker 1: let me tell you something. In this new life of 11 00:00:50,360 --> 00:00:54,959 Speaker 1: his He's authored eight books, he speaks around the country, 12 00:00:55,520 --> 00:00:59,279 Speaker 1: He's on crime stories with Nancy Grace Court TV, been 13 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 1: on the Today Show. We know him, we love him, 14 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:07,000 Speaker 1: we rely on him because I'm going to tell y'all something, 15 00:01:07,400 --> 00:01:12,520 Speaker 1: in the world of death penalty cases, nobody knows that 16 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:16,680 Speaker 1: system and that process better than a public defender. So 17 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:23,039 Speaker 1: tonight we have the legendary Kirk Nurmi. Sir, Welcome to 18 00:01:23,160 --> 00:01:23,800 Speaker 1: Zone seven. 19 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 2: Well, thank you, And as my biography indicates, I wouldn't 20 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 2: be here if I wasn't happy to be talking to you. 21 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 2: And it's just a delight to talk to you. Get 22 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:35,199 Speaker 2: some of that verbal butter you churn out every day 23 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 2: and have a great conversation about the death Centain. 24 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:41,039 Speaker 1: Well, I appreciate it so much. And I also just 25 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 1: want to tell you on a personal note, a lot 26 00:01:43,880 --> 00:01:45,679 Speaker 1: of people do not know, but I do have a 27 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:48,880 Speaker 1: sister that's fighting cancer right now, and you were so 28 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:51,640 Speaker 1: lovely to reach out and just say, hey, she ever 29 00:01:51,720 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 1: needs to talk. I've been there. I would love to 30 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 1: just give her what I've got to try to help 31 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,800 Speaker 1: her out, And just personally wanted you to know what 32 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 1: that meant to me. So I appreciate you. 33 00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:05,760 Speaker 2: Well, I appreciate that, and I appreciate a lot of 34 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:08,520 Speaker 2: what I do, some of the things I do with 35 00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 2: my health changes and everything else, because I remember Cheryl 36 00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:14,799 Speaker 2: being in that chemo chair and getting that first chemo 37 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:18,520 Speaker 2: and not only not wondering whether I was going to survive, 38 00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:21,120 Speaker 2: but what life was going to be like afterwards, because 39 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:26,040 Speaker 2: chemotherapy isn't exactly a kind to kind of the human body, right, 40 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:30,079 Speaker 2: It's poison meant to kill, a more significant poison. And 41 00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 2: so when I came out of that, one of the 42 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 2: things that I wanted to do with my health, my transformation, 43 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:39,919 Speaker 2: using happiness as my beacon as you talked about earlier, 44 00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:43,720 Speaker 2: is to set an example, be out there and try 45 00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 2: to show people what life can be like after chemo. 46 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:49,519 Speaker 2: And and I'm rooting for your sister, and I'm hoping 47 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:51,600 Speaker 2: that she can look at me and say, listen, there's 48 00:02:51,639 --> 00:02:55,400 Speaker 2: somebody who's really made some changes in life, and I 49 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 2: can live that kind of life too, beyond cancer. 50 00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 1: Amen. And she does. Let me tell you, she knows it, 51 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 1: She sees it, she feels it. Any well, wish, any prayer, 52 00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:08,880 Speaker 1: any good thought, and especially when somebody that has been 53 00:03:08,919 --> 00:03:13,480 Speaker 1: through it she's watching, she knows. And you know, Ashley 54 00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 1: Wilcox has been real supportive and Nancy Grace has been 55 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:20,680 Speaker 1: real supportive, and I mean like from TV and she 56 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 1: gets it. I mean she is just transformed by it 57 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: every time. So I do appreciate it. But you know, 58 00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:29,400 Speaker 1: one thing I want people to know is you tried 59 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:31,400 Speaker 1: to get away from Arias and the judge said you 60 00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:33,600 Speaker 1: couldn't do it. And I think that's another thing. When 61 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 1: you're looking at things that make you literally sick, there's 62 00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 1: no question I think that case puts you in the 63 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:42,040 Speaker 1: position you got in. 64 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:44,560 Speaker 2: Well, you know, I don't want to go too far 65 00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 2: into areas. You know, we've talked about that before. But 66 00:03:46,920 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 2: I tell you what though, you're right, Mack, because I knew, 67 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 2: you know, it happened about four months after she was sentenced, 68 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 2: and I knew right away in my heart that it 69 00:03:56,040 --> 00:03:59,200 Speaker 2: was the stress of having to deal with everything involved 70 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 2: in areas they brought cancer into my life. 71 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 1: Yep. And that's the last thing I wanted to say 72 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:06,360 Speaker 1: about it. But I just when people are listening and 73 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:09,320 Speaker 1: you're talking about making changes and only want to be 74 00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:13,200 Speaker 1: surrounded by things that make you happy, I again want 75 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 1: people to hear if you are in a situation that 76 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:19,720 Speaker 1: is just complete crap and it's just stressing you out 77 00:04:19,760 --> 00:04:21,760 Speaker 1: every day, you have got to get away from it, 78 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:22,640 Speaker 1: whatever it is. 79 00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:24,080 Speaker 2: That's exactly right. 80 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,280 Speaker 1: So let's go on to a lighter topic, the death penalty. 81 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:33,080 Speaker 2: All right, So from one to the next. 82 00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:36,200 Speaker 1: That's right, one killer to the next. But you know, 83 00:04:36,320 --> 00:04:39,719 Speaker 1: I am often told by people and they believe this. 84 00:04:39,920 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 1: They'll say, oh, man, that guy's in trouble. He only 85 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 1: has a public defender, and I tell him. I said, 86 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:48,520 Speaker 1: let me tell you something, right now, public defenders know 87 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: more about trying cases, high profile cases, death penalty cases 88 00:04:53,200 --> 00:04:56,560 Speaker 1: than any other attorney because that's all they do. 89 00:04:57,040 --> 00:04:59,719 Speaker 2: Well, you're right about that, especially when you talk about 90 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:03,360 Speaker 2: the death penalty, because the death penalty is an extensive 91 00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 2: and expensive process, right, and that's why some of the 92 00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,359 Speaker 2: states have done away with it for various reasons. But 93 00:05:09,960 --> 00:05:13,160 Speaker 2: it's very expensive. So if you're the average person and 94 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,720 Speaker 2: you've been charge of the death penalty offense, I can 95 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 2: almost guarantee you, unless you're a multi millionaire, you are 96 00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:22,920 Speaker 2: not going to be able to afford counsel. And ultimately, 97 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:27,560 Speaker 2: in terms of death penalty trained and qualified attorneys, there 98 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:31,200 Speaker 2: is probably few out there in whatever state has the 99 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:34,279 Speaker 2: death penalty that aren't public defenders or didn't gain that 100 00:05:34,360 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 2: experience during the public during their work as a public defender, 101 00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 2: because that's ultimately who has to take those cases. 102 00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 1: Absolutely, So tonight we're going to talk about the process, 103 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:49,000 Speaker 1: and we're going to use Lori Valo and Chad Daybail 104 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: to do that. I think that's the case everybody's pretty 105 00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:56,920 Speaker 1: familiar with. But just a thumbnail review. Chad day Bail 106 00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:00,599 Speaker 1: and Lori Valo, we're married to other people. When they met, 107 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:05,600 Speaker 1: when they got together and their worlds collided. People started 108 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:09,680 Speaker 1: dying and first it was a spouse, then it was 109 00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:12,159 Speaker 1: a brother, then it was another spouse, then it was 110 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: two children. If you're familiar at all with the case, 111 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:20,680 Speaker 1: Laurie's children, JJ and Tylie were murdered in such a 112 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 1: horrific way that if you had a chance to listen 113 00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 1: to the lead detective testify, he was asked, what did 114 00:06:29,880 --> 00:06:33,960 Speaker 1: you see in states Exhibit B, What did you see 115 00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 1: in states Exhibit eleven C, eleven D eleven E. Y'all, 116 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:45,680 Speaker 1: it was just horrible. Laurie and Chad, separately, were members 117 00:06:45,720 --> 00:06:48,080 Speaker 1: of a cult. They thought the world was going to end. 118 00:06:48,680 --> 00:06:51,279 Speaker 1: They thought sometimes people went really dark, and when they 119 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:54,440 Speaker 1: went dark, they had to do something about it. But again, 120 00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:57,440 Speaker 1: when the detectives started to testify, but what happened to 121 00:06:57,520 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 1: the two children at the end. It's going to be 122 00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: a little graphic, but I think it's necessary because when 123 00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 1: people talk about, well, there's only certain cases that I 124 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 1: would really even want the death penalty to be talked about. 125 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:13,400 Speaker 1: If you are ever going to use it, this is 126 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:15,720 Speaker 1: the kind of case you would use it for. Period. 127 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:21,680 Speaker 1: So jj His remains were found near the pond on 128 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 1: the property that Chad owned. Tiley's remains were found near 129 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: the pet cemetery and the fire pit on the land 130 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 1: that Chad day Bell owned, and these officers and detectives 131 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:38,000 Speaker 1: and crime scene investigators had to dig with their bare 132 00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 1: hands to recover evidence such as charred and rotted flesh, 133 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 1: broken pieces of bone, some that were eventually sticking up 134 00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:53,800 Speaker 1: from the dirt as they removed one layer after the other. 135 00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:59,000 Speaker 1: There were fragments of bones. There was part of a 136 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 1: melted bucket where organs and a skull were put in 137 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 1: this bucket and then placed in the fire pit, and 138 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:13,920 Speaker 1: that was highly JJ was wrapped in plastic and duct 139 00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 1: take layers of it, layers of bond layers. He was 140 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:22,000 Speaker 1: found in pajamas. I mean, the case is just horrible. 141 00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:25,680 Speaker 1: So again, one thing that I want Kirk and Nermi 142 00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:28,760 Speaker 1: to do for us is walk through when you have 143 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:32,640 Speaker 1: facts of a case that are just terrific and graphic 144 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 1: and horrible, and then what you do with that when 145 00:08:35,920 --> 00:08:38,560 Speaker 1: you're looking at the process of Okay, the death penalty 146 00:08:38,600 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 1: is on the table now. Just as a reminder, Lori 147 00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 1: Valo's death penalty was taken off the table, but Chad 148 00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:50,679 Speaker 1: Davell's is still in full swing. So I'm going to 149 00:08:50,760 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: turn it over to you, Kirk, and you just walk 150 00:08:53,240 --> 00:08:56,000 Speaker 1: us through how you would start it, what you're looking for, 151 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:58,319 Speaker 1: what is the process for you. 152 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:01,320 Speaker 2: Let's back up a little bit, because I want to 153 00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:04,320 Speaker 2: get some context when people hear all those facts and 154 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 2: they are blatantly horrific. You're absolutely right. I'm not contradicting 155 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:11,240 Speaker 2: any any of that. But let's walk it back to 156 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:14,440 Speaker 2: where a death penalty case really begins. In a couple 157 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:18,040 Speaker 2: places it begins, but starting off in the courtroom is 158 00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:22,120 Speaker 2: one of the places, obviously that it begins. And for 159 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:26,480 Speaker 2: most people listening to this podcast, fans of Zone seven, 160 00:09:26,559 --> 00:09:30,840 Speaker 2: they are maybe follow criminal law, criminal defense, all that stuff. 161 00:09:30,880 --> 00:09:33,720 Speaker 2: They watch court TV, and they might talk about the 162 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:36,600 Speaker 2: death penalty. But when they walk in that courtroom at 163 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 2: the jury summons, hoping that they're going to have a 164 00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 2: dui or a one day kind of trial, maybe a 165 00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:45,720 Speaker 2: theft something like that, and they find themselves sitting in 166 00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:49,640 Speaker 2: using the day Bell example, sitting in a courtroom, looking 167 00:09:49,679 --> 00:09:53,480 Speaker 2: at the prosecutors, looking at mister Pryor, and looking at Daybel, 168 00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:58,720 Speaker 2: the death penalty takes on a whole new light and 169 00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 2: every and the number one job of a criminal defense 170 00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 2: attorney is a capital defense attorney is that they are 171 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:11,480 Speaker 2: there to save their client's life. So what each and 172 00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 2: every capital defense attorney should be doing is thinking about 173 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:22,080 Speaker 2: how that person who gets stunned into a death penalty case, right, 174 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,439 Speaker 2: who has met the legal qualifications And we can talk 175 00:10:25,480 --> 00:10:28,439 Speaker 2: about those down the road, But who has met those 176 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:34,240 Speaker 2: legal qualifications? How are they not talking about acquittal, but 177 00:10:34,559 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 2: how are they what would arm them with the evidence 178 00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:42,679 Speaker 2: they need to grant life under the most horrific conditions 179 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:46,319 Speaker 2: that you are talking about, Because it's not about guilt 180 00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 2: or innocence, right. Nobody of a right mind he's innocent 181 00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:54,679 Speaker 2: until proven guilty is going to think that Chad dabil 182 00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:57,760 Speaker 2: is innocent, right in terms of the evidence, in terms 183 00:10:57,800 --> 00:10:59,640 Speaker 2: of the trial structure. 184 00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:00,000 Speaker 1: What have you. 185 00:11:00,280 --> 00:11:05,600 Speaker 2: So you keep that mitigation, that sentencing phase in mind 186 00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:09,880 Speaker 2: when you look at a case. So you are looking 187 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:15,480 Speaker 2: at trying to get a psychological profile of your client 188 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:19,800 Speaker 2: as quickly as you can after his or her arrest, 189 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 2: because that is going to be the most accurate assessment, 190 00:11:24,679 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 2: and you start digging into your client's life. Because one 191 00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 2: of the things that is true of a death penalty 192 00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:36,199 Speaker 2: case when we talk about that sentencing phase, is that 193 00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:42,160 Speaker 2: everything about that client's life from conception, and I do 194 00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 2: mean conception to the day of sentencing is relevant and 195 00:11:46,600 --> 00:11:50,319 Speaker 2: possibly mitigation and could possibly be a reason for one 196 00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:53,600 Speaker 2: of those jurors who comes into that box and the 197 00:11:53,640 --> 00:11:56,480 Speaker 2: death penalty suddenly takes a whole new meaning to them. 198 00:11:56,880 --> 00:12:03,160 Speaker 2: What about that person's life might motivate that juror to 199 00:12:03,240 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 2: grant life. And you only need, at least in Arizona, 200 00:12:06,559 --> 00:12:10,000 Speaker 2: probably in every state, you only need one such person 201 00:12:10,040 --> 00:12:15,000 Speaker 2: to do that. 202 00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:18,480 Speaker 1: That is a ton of information already, So I think 203 00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:22,600 Speaker 1: that's important that all right, look at it differently. We're 204 00:12:22,600 --> 00:12:25,840 Speaker 1: not even talking about guilt or innocence. We won't to 205 00:12:25,880 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: save this person's life. So now the goal is life 206 00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 1: without parole. 207 00:12:30,040 --> 00:12:35,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, ultimately, because if a state is charging the death penalty, 208 00:12:35,679 --> 00:12:40,120 Speaker 2: realistically guilt is presumed. There might be the rare case 209 00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:44,760 Speaker 2: where theirs issues and obviously you do as you try 210 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:47,200 Speaker 2: the death penalty case. You are certainly one way to 211 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:51,319 Speaker 2: save a client is to perhaps have a b second 212 00:12:51,360 --> 00:12:54,560 Speaker 2: degree murder or manslaughter or something like that. If there's 213 00:12:54,760 --> 00:12:58,480 Speaker 2: reasons that somebody might have paused for thought in terms 214 00:12:58,559 --> 00:13:02,360 Speaker 2: of first degree murder, that kind of carries over residual 215 00:13:02,400 --> 00:13:05,960 Speaker 2: doubt wise to the sentence there, because there's one thing 216 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:10,120 Speaker 2: to say, you know, I think this person's guilty, and 217 00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:13,480 Speaker 2: there's another thing to say, I'm sure of it enough 218 00:13:13,840 --> 00:13:17,680 Speaker 2: that I would kill them. Because that's the difference. Right. 219 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:20,280 Speaker 2: We can talk about the death penalty, people can listen 220 00:13:20,320 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 2: to it, but you think about that when if you're 221 00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:26,000 Speaker 2: in that jury box and you're looking at that person 222 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:29,520 Speaker 2: and you've kind of seen them for months, and you 223 00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:33,400 Speaker 2: see their family, their family might be behind them, their kids, 224 00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:37,760 Speaker 2: their spouse, et cetera, and you as a juror have 225 00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:41,560 Speaker 2: to look at that person and say I think you 226 00:13:41,679 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 2: should die. You have to look at that person's wife 227 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:48,280 Speaker 2: or family member and say I think your family member 228 00:13:48,600 --> 00:13:52,599 Speaker 2: should die. And conceptually a lot of people listening to 229 00:13:52,600 --> 00:13:55,200 Speaker 2: this might say, well, I could do that, but trust me, 230 00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 2: it's the number one thing I hear of jurors is 231 00:13:58,280 --> 00:14:00,960 Speaker 2: that it takes on a whole new mea when they're 232 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:05,079 Speaker 2: sitting in that courtroom and they have to make that decision. 233 00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:07,680 Speaker 1: A ton of your background is going to come into 234 00:14:07,679 --> 00:14:12,080 Speaker 1: play in that courtroom. And maybe your grandparents took you 235 00:14:12,120 --> 00:14:16,440 Speaker 1: to church from zero to twelve, but you haven't really 236 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:19,080 Speaker 1: practiced since then. I promise you it's going to come 237 00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:20,200 Speaker 1: back to you in that courtroom. 238 00:14:20,560 --> 00:14:23,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right. I mean there's a lot of moral 239 00:14:23,200 --> 00:14:26,240 Speaker 2: quandaries that come up. I mean, one of the religion 240 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 2: can be an impediment a lot of people. Some people 241 00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:32,360 Speaker 2: just think shoot them right in the courtroom. You know, 242 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:35,400 Speaker 2: why even have the trial kind of things. So there's 243 00:14:35,480 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 2: those kind of people obviously that get weeded out. But ultimately, 244 00:14:41,400 --> 00:14:46,120 Speaker 2: a legally permissible juror has to be able to look 245 00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:49,840 Speaker 2: at the worst killing that they can imagine, for example, 246 00:14:50,480 --> 00:14:53,680 Speaker 2: and sentence that person to either life or death. 247 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:58,240 Speaker 1: When you heard the facts of this case. As a 248 00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:02,640 Speaker 1: public defender, what's going through your mind as far as 249 00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 1: in the future, what would I want to say to a. 250 00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:08,680 Speaker 2: Jury, I'm glad I'm out of this game. Like we 251 00:15:08,800 --> 00:15:12,720 Speaker 2: talked about, doing death penalty work was not something that 252 00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:17,080 Speaker 2: brought me joy. But you know, like I say, it 253 00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:20,960 Speaker 2: goes back to if I was on mister Dave Bell's team, 254 00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:23,720 Speaker 2: or if I was you know, somehow appointed or what 255 00:15:23,880 --> 00:15:28,600 Speaker 2: have you, I would want to look at his psychological 256 00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:31,760 Speaker 2: profile big time, and I would be digging into his 257 00:15:31,840 --> 00:15:34,920 Speaker 2: background big time. And I remember, you know, when I 258 00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:38,840 Speaker 2: first accepted the capital unit position. I went and I 259 00:15:38,920 --> 00:15:44,480 Speaker 2: watched a capital trial and there was a defendant's second 260 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:48,120 Speaker 2: grade teacher up on the stand. That's how far you 261 00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:50,160 Speaker 2: go back. And when I say going back to conception 262 00:15:50,280 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 2: as their fetal alcohol center, did mom smoke? Did mom 263 00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:56,880 Speaker 2: use drugs? What is the brain show us? Do they 264 00:15:56,920 --> 00:15:59,680 Speaker 2: have brain damage? All those sorts of things. So I'm 265 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:03,960 Speaker 2: really my priority if I'm on that defense team is 266 00:16:04,040 --> 00:16:07,840 Speaker 2: all those mitigating factors. It's not the case. Obviously the 267 00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:12,040 Speaker 2: case plays a role, but that's not where my focus 268 00:16:12,120 --> 00:16:15,440 Speaker 2: is going to be because my charge as a criminal 269 00:16:15,720 --> 00:16:19,240 Speaker 2: capital attorney is to save the client's life. And it 270 00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 2: just saved. It's a sentencing face. It's not going to 271 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:23,840 Speaker 2: be saved at the guilt face, especially in a case 272 00:16:24,200 --> 00:16:28,920 Speaker 2: like Chad Daviels, where you have two dead children, burned bodies, 273 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:31,160 Speaker 2: and you have some of the other factors that are 274 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:32,400 Speaker 2: a part of the case. 275 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:35,680 Speaker 1: You know, I tell people all the time, third grade 276 00:16:35,720 --> 00:16:40,200 Speaker 1: teachers know they have seen so many children that if 277 00:16:40,240 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 1: there is a child that is almost destined to be 278 00:16:44,520 --> 00:16:47,560 Speaker 1: in trouble with the law, they can usually pick it 279 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:51,840 Speaker 1: out and there are reasons in their background. Typically and 280 00:16:51,880 --> 00:16:56,040 Speaker 1: So do you find it difficult when you're trying to 281 00:16:56,080 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 1: talk about the psychological profile and you go as far 282 00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:03,560 Speaker 1: back as somebody's third grade teacher, or you know, was 283 00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:07,240 Speaker 1: mama drinking while she was pregnant? Do you find the 284 00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:10,879 Speaker 1: jury is open to that or do you think they're like, oh, 285 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 1: come on, you can't blame mama. He's fifty years old now. 286 00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:20,320 Speaker 2: Well, the jurors that are seated in that jury box 287 00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:25,399 Speaker 2: to make that decision have promised the court that they 288 00:17:25,480 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 2: will consider everything about the defendant's background before rendering the verdict. 289 00:17:30,720 --> 00:17:33,520 Speaker 2: Whether they make good on that promise, whether that promise 290 00:17:33,560 --> 00:17:39,200 Speaker 2: gets wiped out by pictures of charred remains, we don't really. 291 00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:41,960 Speaker 2: You're never really going to know. But that is the 292 00:17:42,080 --> 00:17:44,359 Speaker 2: vow they take to the court when they say that 293 00:17:44,440 --> 00:17:48,320 Speaker 2: they are going to be open to considering everything about 294 00:17:48,359 --> 00:17:49,359 Speaker 2: a person's life. 295 00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:53,680 Speaker 1: Do you remind them gently about that? 296 00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:59,920 Speaker 2: That becomes part of the sentencing phase opening statement, that 297 00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:03,439 Speaker 2: becomes part of the closing statement in that phase. I 298 00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:06,440 Speaker 2: mean that sentencing phases like a trial in and of itself, 299 00:18:06,920 --> 00:18:10,560 Speaker 2: And yes, you remind them, and you give them that 300 00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:14,800 Speaker 2: they are supposed to digest the reality of who the 301 00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:18,439 Speaker 2: client is so they can make an individualized sentencing determination. 302 00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 2: And I think when you get to that point, you 303 00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:25,680 Speaker 2: know a lot studies have shown that jurors and death 304 00:18:25,680 --> 00:18:31,040 Speaker 2: penalty cases get PTSD. Some of that emanates from what 305 00:18:31,080 --> 00:18:34,359 Speaker 2: they see, right the crime scene, photographs, everything else, because 306 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:39,199 Speaker 2: no matter what murder a death penalty juror is seeing, 307 00:18:39,560 --> 00:18:42,240 Speaker 2: it's more than likely going to be the worst thing 308 00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:44,960 Speaker 2: that they've ever seen in their life. But at the 309 00:18:45,040 --> 00:18:49,840 Speaker 2: same time, the decision is so heavy when it shifts 310 00:18:49,840 --> 00:18:53,280 Speaker 2: from the coffee shop or the telephone to the courtroom 311 00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 2: and having to ultimately walk into a courtroom and render 312 00:18:57,680 --> 00:19:02,520 Speaker 2: that verdict. I think tend to take that very seriously 313 00:19:02,600 --> 00:19:06,120 Speaker 2: because you know, there have been people exonerated from death row, 314 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:09,920 Speaker 2: there have been people wrongly executed, and I don't think 315 00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:13,919 Speaker 2: jurors in the end want to live with that possibility 316 00:19:13,960 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 2: that they could be wrong. 317 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:21,520 Speaker 1: Absolutely, And I think in this particular case, we had 318 00:19:21,560 --> 00:19:25,080 Speaker 1: things like Laurie and Chad went on a podcast, We 319 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:28,160 Speaker 1: had text messages between the two of them. We had 320 00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:33,879 Speaker 1: a lot of in real time their exact wording of 321 00:19:33,960 --> 00:19:37,640 Speaker 1: things like when Chad sent his wife a text message 322 00:19:37,640 --> 00:19:40,960 Speaker 1: about shooting the raccoon near the fire pit, and then 323 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:44,399 Speaker 1: it turns out that's where Tyley was at, you know, 324 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:46,840 Speaker 1: and he even talks about the pet cemetery, you know, 325 00:19:46,920 --> 00:19:48,879 Speaker 1: being all over you know, that's where he put the 326 00:19:48,960 --> 00:19:53,960 Speaker 1: raccoon and stuff. I would think any jury that is 327 00:19:54,000 --> 00:19:56,760 Speaker 1: going to hear all of this and start putting the 328 00:19:56,760 --> 00:20:00,080 Speaker 1: pieces of the puzzle together is going to understand what 329 00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:03,399 Speaker 1: you're doing. When you talk about the psychological profile. You 330 00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:06,200 Speaker 1: have somebody that is saying the world is going to end, 331 00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:11,520 Speaker 1: so clearly they are not okay mentally. You have somebody 332 00:20:11,560 --> 00:20:14,160 Speaker 1: that is saying their children have gone dark and they've 333 00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:17,080 Speaker 1: got to take care of it. They are not okay. 334 00:20:17,560 --> 00:20:20,320 Speaker 1: I don't think that would be a stretch. Then again, 335 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:24,600 Speaker 1: how do you reconcile? Yes, I believe this person is 336 00:20:24,680 --> 00:20:30,360 Speaker 1: mentally not well, they are not okay. But again, if 337 00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:33,280 Speaker 1: we are ever going to use it, it would be 338 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:39,760 Speaker 1: here after you heard Detective ray Hermicillo break down what 339 00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:41,680 Speaker 1: he found on his hands and knees. 340 00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:44,399 Speaker 2: You're not wrong, and I and I am not in 341 00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:48,120 Speaker 2: any way. Again, say I think mister Dave Bell will 342 00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:50,960 Speaker 2: ultimately be sentenced to death by this jure. I don't 343 00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:54,840 Speaker 2: think that penalty will ever be imposed, and we can 344 00:20:54,880 --> 00:20:57,800 Speaker 2: talk about the reasons for that later, but I will 345 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:01,000 Speaker 2: say this. You think when you get to that point 346 00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 2: of mentally unwell, the question becomes in what the unanswered 347 00:21:05,400 --> 00:21:08,199 Speaker 2: questions are, and what would be put forward in a 348 00:21:08,280 --> 00:21:13,119 Speaker 2: sentencing phase. Is what motivated Chad day Bell, at the 349 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:18,920 Speaker 2: time a grave digger to write these books? What motivated 350 00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 2: him to start this cult? What about his background? What 351 00:21:23,960 --> 00:21:28,240 Speaker 2: about his psychological profile, what about his history? How was 352 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:32,560 Speaker 2: he raised? Those questions will be put in front of 353 00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:32,960 Speaker 2: the jury. 354 00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:33,160 Speaker 1: Now. 355 00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:35,120 Speaker 2: They may very well be dismissed, and I don't think 356 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:39,560 Speaker 2: they're going to overcome what he did. But those are 357 00:21:39,560 --> 00:21:42,359 Speaker 2: the kind of unanswered questions that the jury will have 358 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:44,679 Speaker 2: to grapple with when they decide whether or not to 359 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:45,639 Speaker 2: give life or death. 360 00:21:46,160 --> 00:21:49,040 Speaker 1: I agree with you, and I also believe that he 361 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:51,560 Speaker 1: will receive the death penalty, but I don't think we'll 362 00:21:51,600 --> 00:21:53,359 Speaker 1: ever see it carried out. I agree with you one 363 00:21:53,440 --> 00:21:54,000 Speaker 1: hundred percent. 364 00:21:54,320 --> 00:21:57,840 Speaker 2: There's so many reasons for that that start with his 365 00:21:58,400 --> 00:22:01,800 Speaker 2: counsel and what have you. We go into those if 366 00:22:01,840 --> 00:22:04,360 Speaker 2: you like, right now. But sure, I. 367 00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:07,479 Speaker 1: Mean, I know there's tons of appeals, but let's just start. 368 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:11,160 Speaker 1: I mean, just devil's advocate. He sentenced to death, what's 369 00:22:11,160 --> 00:22:12,920 Speaker 1: going to happen that same day? 370 00:22:13,359 --> 00:22:16,280 Speaker 2: I can tell you the process in Arizona. But in Arizona, 371 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:19,440 Speaker 2: if someone is sentenced to death by a jury, they 372 00:22:19,440 --> 00:22:22,160 Speaker 2: are sentenced to death and hauled off to death row 373 00:22:22,760 --> 00:22:25,960 Speaker 2: right away. That's it, and then you know, the appeal 374 00:22:26,080 --> 00:22:29,480 Speaker 2: process can begin. But let me back up a little 375 00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:31,080 Speaker 2: bit and tell you why I don't think the sentence 376 00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:36,160 Speaker 2: will ever be imposed. A capital defense team. The American 377 00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:39,080 Speaker 2: Bar Association has guidelines that most states that have the 378 00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:44,640 Speaker 2: death penalty have adopted. They require that a capital defendant 379 00:22:44,720 --> 00:22:50,040 Speaker 2: have two attorneys, a lead council and co council. That 380 00:22:50,119 --> 00:22:53,600 Speaker 2: they have a mitigation specialist, someone who is versed in 381 00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:58,840 Speaker 2: the social sciences that can help collect information those grade 382 00:22:58,880 --> 00:23:04,800 Speaker 2: school records, conception, you know, the investigation into what mom 383 00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:08,359 Speaker 2: was doing, any issues there, any issues at the hospital, 384 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:12,240 Speaker 2: all that kind of stuff, and an investigator to investigate 385 00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:15,439 Speaker 2: the case anew they're supposed to take a look at 386 00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:18,440 Speaker 2: it from top to bottom, make sure the police did 387 00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:23,320 Speaker 2: everything correctly. He doesn't have that. I don't know what 388 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:26,080 Speaker 2: he has behind the scenes, but I know he doesn't 389 00:23:26,119 --> 00:23:29,880 Speaker 2: have co counsel and I also know that mister Pryor, 390 00:23:30,000 --> 00:23:34,000 Speaker 2: while some have suggested he has everything he needs to 391 00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:37,159 Speaker 2: be deathbound and qualified, just hasn't taken the step. I 392 00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:41,200 Speaker 2: would argue against that because in order to be lead 393 00:23:41,320 --> 00:23:46,560 Speaker 2: counsel in a in a capital case under the ABA guidelines, 394 00:23:47,040 --> 00:23:51,720 Speaker 2: you have to have second chaired a death penalty case. 395 00:23:51,800 --> 00:23:54,840 Speaker 2: You have to have experience trying a death penalty case. 396 00:23:56,040 --> 00:24:00,159 Speaker 2: This cannot be your first go round. And what this 397 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:04,439 Speaker 2: seems to be is mister Pryor's first go round at 398 00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:08,280 Speaker 2: a case of this nature. So I think what we 399 00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 2: have and I don't know why Judge Boyce is, you know, 400 00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:16,159 Speaker 2: pushing this. What we have is a man who is 401 00:24:16,200 --> 00:24:19,840 Speaker 2: going to be perceived, at least undercurrent statute in law, 402 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:25,840 Speaker 2: as per se ineffective. Additionally, the one thing, but mister 403 00:24:25,880 --> 00:24:29,800 Speaker 2: Pryor has done something that I think is very well taken, 404 00:24:29,880 --> 00:24:33,320 Speaker 2: at least from saving mister Dabell's life. If you remember, 405 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 2: the State of Idaho did not turn over some discovery, 406 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:43,639 Speaker 2: et cetera, and ultimately Judge Boyce denied their ability to 407 00:24:43,680 --> 00:24:48,439 Speaker 2: impose the Definkelly on miss Fallow, his co defendant. And 408 00:24:48,520 --> 00:24:51,600 Speaker 2: there's some US Supreme Court case law that says that 409 00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:56,800 Speaker 2: it is fundamentally unfair under the due process provisions and 410 00:24:57,160 --> 00:25:02,000 Speaker 2: the Eighth Amendment to impose death on one co defendant 411 00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:07,600 Speaker 2: and not the other. And what we have in this situation, obviously, 412 00:25:07,760 --> 00:25:12,040 Speaker 2: is one co defendant in mister da Bell, who is 413 00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:14,960 Speaker 2: probably going to be sentenced to death, and another co 414 00:25:15,080 --> 00:25:18,760 Speaker 2: defendant in Miss Valo da Bell, who is not going 415 00:25:18,840 --> 00:25:22,080 Speaker 2: to be sentenced to death. So right then and there 416 00:25:22,160 --> 00:25:28,520 Speaker 2: you have another layer built into the legal shortcomings of 417 00:25:29,080 --> 00:25:31,879 Speaker 2: his defense and of the ability of the state to 418 00:25:32,000 --> 00:25:34,359 Speaker 2: impose the death penalty. And that is why I think 419 00:25:35,119 --> 00:25:39,600 Speaker 2: if mister Pryor is wise rather than go after Miss 420 00:25:39,720 --> 00:25:46,000 Speaker 2: Valo's brother, Alex Cox, he will present a defense at 421 00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:50,440 Speaker 2: trial and to some extent at the mitigation phase. That 422 00:25:50,720 --> 00:25:56,080 Speaker 2: really Miss Valo bears equal, if not more responsibility, because 423 00:25:56,400 --> 00:25:58,480 Speaker 2: there's two ways to save a life in a death 424 00:25:58,520 --> 00:26:01,639 Speaker 2: penalty case. The first is a trial level and the 425 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:04,800 Speaker 2: second is at the appellate level, and that's about fifteen 426 00:26:04,880 --> 00:26:09,040 Speaker 2: years worth of appeals. Everything a capital defense attorney does 427 00:26:09,359 --> 00:26:11,639 Speaker 2: goes all the way up to the US Supreme Court 428 00:26:12,119 --> 00:26:14,960 Speaker 2: and has looked at for ineffective assistance the Council. What 429 00:26:15,040 --> 00:26:17,800 Speaker 2: have you. We've already talked about why that might be overturned. 430 00:26:18,280 --> 00:26:23,120 Speaker 2: But the appellate record, it's not what he suggests. It's 431 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,719 Speaker 2: not Miss Vallo's trial record. It's the trial record that 432 00:26:26,800 --> 00:26:32,000 Speaker 2: mister Pryor makes, and mister Pryor's record should, if he's smart, 433 00:26:32,000 --> 00:26:35,720 Speaker 2: be replete with references to Miss Vallo, the co defendant 434 00:26:35,760 --> 00:26:37,000 Speaker 2: who did not get death. 435 00:26:41,960 --> 00:26:44,400 Speaker 1: Let me ask your thoughts on this, because when you're 436 00:26:44,440 --> 00:26:49,000 Speaker 1: talking about law enforcement and the prosecutor's office and then 437 00:26:49,119 --> 00:26:52,920 Speaker 1: ultimately the judge, all of those folks at some point 438 00:26:53,840 --> 00:26:58,840 Speaker 1: become politicians. So the sheriff runs, the DA runs, the 439 00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:02,320 Speaker 1: judge runs. Do you think that factors in? Do you 440 00:27:02,359 --> 00:27:05,200 Speaker 1: think it should factor in? You know where I'm going. 441 00:27:05,080 --> 00:27:09,359 Speaker 2: Right, Well, the court of public You're ultimately asking if 442 00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:13,560 Speaker 2: the court of public opinion should should sway the decision 443 00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:15,320 Speaker 2: to seek the death penalty. 444 00:27:15,080 --> 00:27:18,200 Speaker 1: Because you know it does. If you're in a pro 445 00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:21,080 Speaker 1: death penalty state and you're the prosecutor, you got to 446 00:27:21,119 --> 00:27:23,399 Speaker 1: ask for the death penalty, whether that's what you believe 447 00:27:23,480 --> 00:27:23,719 Speaker 1: or not. 448 00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:26,359 Speaker 2: To some extent, yes, I mean, I think there's a 449 00:27:26,400 --> 00:27:30,320 Speaker 2: lot of factors that go into it. You know, when 450 00:27:30,840 --> 00:27:32,760 Speaker 2: you know I obviously have not been on that side 451 00:27:32,760 --> 00:27:35,879 Speaker 2: of the coin. But when you have a situation where 452 00:27:35,920 --> 00:27:40,320 Speaker 2: you say you're in a smaller county, budget comes into play, right, 453 00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:42,640 Speaker 2: because it costs a lot more to bring all those 454 00:27:42,720 --> 00:27:45,879 Speaker 2: jurors in to have a trial that lasts that long. 455 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:50,600 Speaker 2: All those sort of things factor into it that decision, right, 456 00:27:50,640 --> 00:27:53,440 Speaker 2: because you could say, okay, well we want the death penalty, 457 00:27:53,480 --> 00:27:56,720 Speaker 2: Well we don't have the reason this. A small county 458 00:27:56,800 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 2: might not have the resources, or it may blow up 459 00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:05,280 Speaker 2: high percentage of the county attorney's budget just trying that 460 00:28:05,400 --> 00:28:08,800 Speaker 2: case because they take so long. I mean, the shortest 461 00:28:08,840 --> 00:28:12,560 Speaker 2: death penalty case I ever had was between three and 462 00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:17,800 Speaker 2: four months, and that was a cold case with no family, nothing, 463 00:28:18,080 --> 00:28:21,200 Speaker 2: and you know, not a single person in the gallery, 464 00:28:21,760 --> 00:28:24,560 Speaker 2: and it still took that long. So some of these 465 00:28:24,560 --> 00:28:27,280 Speaker 2: smaller counties they have to think about budget. They also 466 00:28:28,160 --> 00:28:32,320 Speaker 2: rightly should consider the wishes of the family as well. 467 00:28:32,680 --> 00:28:36,119 Speaker 2: You can go reference the Idaho four that I understand 468 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:39,760 Speaker 2: some parents want the death penalty, some don't, and so 469 00:28:40,080 --> 00:28:44,760 Speaker 2: all those factors can play into it. I hope it's 470 00:28:44,960 --> 00:28:48,760 Speaker 2: not just satiating the court of public opinion, because a 471 00:28:48,840 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 2: prosecutor needs to be more reasonable than that needs to 472 00:28:54,120 --> 00:28:58,280 Speaker 2: look at the you know, totality of everything, whether in 473 00:28:58,320 --> 00:29:00,200 Speaker 2: death penalty should be sought, because there's a lot of 474 00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 2: people that would would say, let's impose the death penny 475 00:29:03,640 --> 00:29:06,760 Speaker 2: on every single first degree murder and that's not supposed 476 00:29:06,760 --> 00:29:07,400 Speaker 2: to be the way it. 477 00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:12,920 Speaker 1: Happens, right, excellent point. So the judge when he ruled 478 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:15,760 Speaker 1: that he wasn't going to take the death penalty off 479 00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:19,320 Speaker 1: the table for Chad daybil what they were trying to say, 480 00:29:19,400 --> 00:29:25,280 Speaker 1: his attorneys that it was arbitrary, capricious, and disproportionate. So 481 00:29:25,360 --> 00:29:28,400 Speaker 1: they were trying to say that, hey, if Laurie Valo 482 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:30,520 Speaker 1: is not going to get it, he shouldn't get it. 483 00:29:31,000 --> 00:29:33,959 Speaker 1: But the reality is he's also charged with the murder 484 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:38,320 Speaker 1: of Tammy day Bill and Lourie Valo was never charged 485 00:29:38,320 --> 00:29:41,560 Speaker 1: with her murder. So therefore the death penalty can stay 486 00:29:41,880 --> 00:29:42,320 Speaker 1: for him. 487 00:29:42,680 --> 00:29:48,000 Speaker 2: It could but in theory yes, but the issue would 488 00:29:48,040 --> 00:29:53,200 Speaker 2: be are they conspirators in that regard because they were 489 00:29:53,720 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 2: talking about Tammy's passing what have you? Right? So, uh, yeah, 490 00:29:58,360 --> 00:30:02,200 Speaker 2: there's a law what a complication there? That just isn't 491 00:30:02,360 --> 00:30:05,560 Speaker 2: so cut and dry to say, okay, we've got a 492 00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:09,840 Speaker 2: different person who is dead. Therefore he can receive the 493 00:30:09,840 --> 00:30:13,520 Speaker 2: death penalty. Could a court rule in that manner, you bet. 494 00:30:14,040 --> 00:30:16,800 Speaker 2: But if it was part of this overall conspiracy to 495 00:30:16,880 --> 00:30:23,040 Speaker 2: eliminate their spouses and their children based on their darkness, 496 00:30:24,400 --> 00:30:26,720 Speaker 2: you know, that's a different matter. 497 00:30:27,120 --> 00:30:29,080 Speaker 1: Now, Kruger, are you trying to say the death penalty 498 00:30:29,120 --> 00:30:29,920 Speaker 1: is not cut and dry? 499 00:30:32,760 --> 00:30:35,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just not as it's just not cut and 500 00:30:35,720 --> 00:30:38,600 Speaker 2: dry as those people, those people who want to shoot 501 00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:42,040 Speaker 2: him in the courtroom think it is, you know, right right. 502 00:30:42,680 --> 00:30:45,240 Speaker 1: Right, well, you know, I mean I hear people say, 503 00:30:45,880 --> 00:30:48,760 Speaker 1: because of my religious belief, I cannot put somebody to death, 504 00:30:48,920 --> 00:30:51,520 Speaker 1: and then I hear people say, hey, eye for an eye, 505 00:30:51,560 --> 00:30:55,080 Speaker 1: like there's no question that should happen, you know, string 506 00:30:55,120 --> 00:30:57,440 Speaker 1: them up, get rid of them, you know, fire up 507 00:30:57,480 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 1: os Barkie. It is a very polarizing topic. I can 508 00:31:02,240 --> 00:31:02,960 Speaker 1: tell you that. 509 00:31:03,160 --> 00:31:06,160 Speaker 2: It certainly is. And I've heard all those things. You know, 510 00:31:06,280 --> 00:31:08,640 Speaker 2: you hear a lot of religious objections, and you do 511 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:10,880 Speaker 2: hear the you know, basically kill them in the courtroom 512 00:31:10,960 --> 00:31:15,360 Speaker 2: kind of thing, and it is polarizing. But and that's 513 00:31:15,360 --> 00:31:17,360 Speaker 2: what I wanted to say when we talk about that 514 00:31:17,440 --> 00:31:21,640 Speaker 2: polarization is you know, when we talk about that jury 515 00:31:21,640 --> 00:31:24,080 Speaker 2: summons and that juror coming in thinking maybe they're getting 516 00:31:24,080 --> 00:31:26,640 Speaker 2: a driving under the influence case, and all of a 517 00:31:26,640 --> 00:31:30,240 Speaker 2: sudden they're sitting at a death penalty case. It takes 518 00:31:30,360 --> 00:31:34,680 Speaker 2: on a different scope. So while you're while people listening 519 00:31:34,680 --> 00:31:37,880 Speaker 2: to this may have strong opinions either way, the one 520 00:31:37,960 --> 00:31:41,000 Speaker 2: thing I can guarantee them if they're ever unfortunate enough 521 00:31:41,040 --> 00:31:44,320 Speaker 2: to be selected on a capital jury or at least 522 00:31:44,520 --> 00:31:47,800 Speaker 2: sit through the Vordayer process, things are going to take 523 00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:51,160 Speaker 2: on a completely different light. When you're sitting in the courtroom, 524 00:31:51,160 --> 00:31:55,320 Speaker 2: you're filling out a thirty page questionnaire and you're maybe 525 00:31:55,480 --> 00:31:57,400 Speaker 2: going to be a juror on a death penalty case. 526 00:31:58,360 --> 00:32:03,880 Speaker 1: How many hours do you think the average public defender 527 00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:06,719 Speaker 1: is going to put into a death penalty case, not 528 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:10,600 Speaker 1: even high profile one that maybe is not on the 529 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:11,800 Speaker 1: front page of every paper. 530 00:32:12,600 --> 00:32:15,160 Speaker 2: I don't know how to answer that in terms of hours, 531 00:32:15,160 --> 00:32:17,880 Speaker 2: but let me tell you what it could involve, and 532 00:32:17,920 --> 00:32:19,560 Speaker 2: then you get that and you can kind of get 533 00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:23,720 Speaker 2: a sense of the magnitude of it. Probably once you 534 00:32:23,880 --> 00:32:27,920 Speaker 2: get a case like that in Arizona, unlikely to go 535 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:32,280 Speaker 2: to trial for let's say two years, and part of 536 00:32:32,320 --> 00:32:35,080 Speaker 2: what you're going to do in those two years, if 537 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:38,560 Speaker 2: your capital defense attorney is go back. You're going to 538 00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:42,080 Speaker 2: start getting school records. You're going to start traveling to 539 00:32:42,160 --> 00:32:46,800 Speaker 2: their hometown. You are going to talk to their teachers, 540 00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:50,920 Speaker 2: talk to their parents, talk to all their relatives, go 541 00:32:51,000 --> 00:32:54,560 Speaker 2: into their house, probably see the room they lived in, 542 00:32:55,680 --> 00:32:58,640 Speaker 2: you know, take a look at every single thing, but 543 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 2: maybe their high school year, whatever it might be. You're 544 00:33:02,640 --> 00:33:07,880 Speaker 2: going to consult with experts on the psychological background. You're 545 00:33:07,920 --> 00:33:10,400 Speaker 2: going to construct that. You're going to have to have 546 00:33:10,520 --> 00:33:15,240 Speaker 2: an understanding enough to ask questions about that psychological background. 547 00:33:15,760 --> 00:33:18,960 Speaker 2: You're going to have to build a relationship with the 548 00:33:19,040 --> 00:33:22,360 Speaker 2: client that allows them to trust you enough to share 549 00:33:22,720 --> 00:33:26,440 Speaker 2: some information about their life. Maybe they'd been a victim 550 00:33:26,440 --> 00:33:31,480 Speaker 2: of molestation, they've never told anybody different things of that nature. 551 00:33:31,560 --> 00:33:34,880 Speaker 2: So while I couldn't put an hour figure on it, 552 00:33:34,960 --> 00:33:38,200 Speaker 2: I can tell you that it's extensive even getting to trial, 553 00:33:38,920 --> 00:33:41,520 Speaker 2: and three to four months would be a short death 554 00:33:41,560 --> 00:33:45,280 Speaker 2: penalty trial. And in those three to four months, I 555 00:33:45,320 --> 00:33:51,160 Speaker 2: can guarantee you you're probably working twelve to sixteen hours 556 00:33:51,240 --> 00:33:54,120 Speaker 2: a day. And it's not the kind of thing that 557 00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:57,240 Speaker 2: your brain can shut off because one of the most 558 00:33:57,280 --> 00:34:01,200 Speaker 2: stressful elements of being a death penalty turny is that 559 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:04,280 Speaker 2: you know, and I personally don't believe in the death penalty, 560 00:34:04,880 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 2: but ultimately, and some to believe it or not, some 561 00:34:07,880 --> 00:34:13,760 Speaker 2: capital defense attorneys do. But ultimately the the ultimate reality 562 00:34:13,800 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 2: for that attorney is that you're looking at somebody's somebody's kid, right, 563 00:34:19,760 --> 00:34:23,719 Speaker 2: and you're looking at their parents, and their parents are 564 00:34:23,760 --> 00:34:28,080 Speaker 2: looking at you to save their kid's life. You're looking 565 00:34:28,120 --> 00:34:33,560 Speaker 2: at somebody you know, sister, spouse, friend, what have you, 566 00:34:34,280 --> 00:34:37,760 Speaker 2: and they are looking at you to save that person's life. 567 00:34:37,800 --> 00:34:41,440 Speaker 2: And there's no greater burden in the field of law 568 00:34:41,640 --> 00:34:45,160 Speaker 2: or true crime or anything else than looking at someone 569 00:34:46,560 --> 00:34:49,840 Speaker 2: having them look at you and know that you're the 570 00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:54,359 Speaker 2: barrier between their life and their death. 571 00:34:55,239 --> 00:35:01,560 Speaker 1: What a powerful responsibility. Sir, Well, you appreciate your career 572 00:35:01,760 --> 00:35:04,680 Speaker 1: and your life and the way that you have devoted 573 00:35:04,719 --> 00:35:07,040 Speaker 1: yourself to saving other people. 574 00:35:07,440 --> 00:35:11,600 Speaker 2: Well, I appreciate you saying that it was an interesting journey, 575 00:35:11,640 --> 00:35:14,640 Speaker 2: and like I say, now, I've gone from hopefully saving 576 00:35:14,920 --> 00:35:19,040 Speaker 2: people to hopefully inspiring people. And you know, as we 577 00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:21,280 Speaker 2: sign off, I want you to know I've been thinking 578 00:35:21,320 --> 00:35:23,759 Speaker 2: about your sister, and you and your whole family as 579 00:35:24,200 --> 00:35:25,000 Speaker 2: you all endure this. 580 00:35:25,840 --> 00:35:29,600 Speaker 1: Battle, I appreciate you more than you know. And I'm 581 00:35:29,600 --> 00:35:31,960 Speaker 1: going to end Zone seven the way that I always 582 00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:35,440 Speaker 1: do with a quote. I was personally opposed to the 583 00:35:35,480 --> 00:35:39,920 Speaker 1: death enerty, and yet I think I've probably asked for 584 00:35:40,000 --> 00:35:43,320 Speaker 1: the death enerty more than most people in the United States. 585 00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:48,440 Speaker 1: Janet Reno. I'm Cheryl McCollum and this is Zone seven, 586 00:36:00,040 --> 00:36:00,640 Speaker 1: W Down